polytechnic of bari department of electrical and...
TRANSCRIPT
Prof. Engr. Mariagrazia Dotoli, PhD
DECISION & CONTROL LABORATORY
Engr. Raffaele Carli, PhD Engr. Graziana Cavone, PhD
Engr. Nicola Epicoco, PhD Engr. Seyed Mohsen Hosseini
Engr. Gioacchino Manfredi Engr. Roberta Pellegrino, PhD
http://dei.poliba.it/DEI-it/ricerca/decision-and-control.html [email protected]
Polytechnic of Bari
Department of Electrical and Information Engineering
Decision and Control Laboratory❑ Mission: fostering the education of undergraduate/graduate students, supporting
courses lab activities, performing theoretical/applied research in a broad spectrum of
topics in systems, control, optimization, and decision-making areas.
❑ Collaborations:
✓ Universities: University of Cagliari (Italy), Ecole Centrale de Lille (France), Aix-
Marseille Université (France),Hamburg Helmut Schmidt University (Germany),
Crakow University of Science and Technology (Poland), University of Manchester
(UK), Chalmers University (Sweden), Universidad Zaragoza (Spain), New Jersey
Institute of Technology of Newark (USA), Delft University of Technology (Holland).
✓ Public companies: Banque Central du Luxembourg, Ferrovie del Sud Est,
Municipality of Bari, ReteGas Bari SpA, AMTAB SpA.
✓ Private companies: Centro Ricerche Fiat, IBM, Enel Distribuzione, Masmec SpA,
Mermec SpA, General Transport Service SpA, Planetek Italia Srl, Divella SpA, Le
Gemme, Tera Srl, Cannillo Srl, SimNT Srl, Primadonna SpA, Veronico Srl, Dream
Project SpA, Gigant Italia Srl.
❑ Recent research areas:
- transport optimization (goods, waste, passengers)
- decision-making techniques (supplier selection, re-engineering, …)
- energy management and energy efficiency (public and private sectors)
- smart city, smart governance, smart mobility
Transport Optimization
Freight transport
- Logistics (internal/external)
- Multimodal terminals
- Intermodal rail-road terminals
- detection of criticalities
- road paths optimization
- yard positioning of containers
- train load planning
- Waste collection and transportation (special and hazardous waste)
Freight Transport: External logistics
Advantages: flexible and
efficient SCN + cooperation and
competitiveness among
stakeholders + time and cost
reduction + what-if analysis
QdwS1=0 S1
Qups1=0
IS1=0
M1 QdwD1=22
QdwS2=2 Qup
D1=25
QupS2=1 S2 QD1,M1=5 SLD1=8
IS2=182 € CD1=5548 €
QdwM1=7 ID1=7842 € ĎR1=(3005;3200;3250) pcs
QM3,S2=2 QM1,S3=4 Qup M1=4 PrD1=2294 € QupR1=31 batches=3100 pcs
SLM1=2 SLR1=20 pcs
QdwS3=9 CM1=484 € QD2,M1=2 QR1,D1=20 CR1=11930 €
QupS3=5 S3 IM1=1790 € SPR1≥3.73 €/pc
IS3=1047€ PrM1=1306 € D1
QR2,D1=2
R1 Qcl,R1=3200 pcs
QM3,S3=1 QM2,S3=4 QD1,M2=8
M2
QdwS4=2 S4
QupS4=2 QD2,M2=25 QR1,D2=11
IS4=160 € QM2,S4=2
QdwM2=33 D2
QupM2=16 Qcl,R2=2102 pcs
QdwS5=0 S5 SLM2=0 R2
QupS5=0 CM2=2300 € QR2,D2=19
IS5=0 QM2,S6=3 IM2=9748 € QdwD2=30
PrM2=7448 € QupD2=27 ĎR2=(1950;2102;2200) pcs
SLD2=5 QupR2=21 batches=2100 pcs
QdwS6=3 S6 CD2=8030 € SLR2=139 pcs
QupS6=1 QD1,M3=12 ID2=12216 € CR2=8128 €
IS6=489 € M3 PrD2=4186 € SPR2≥3.87 €/pc
QM2,S8=7
QdwS7=0 S7
QupS7=0 Qdw
M3=12
IS7=0 QupM3=4
SLM3=6
QM3,S8=1 CM3=446 €
QdwS8=8 S8 IM3=2040 €
QupS8=2 PrM3=1594 €
IS8=1352 €
S5
clients
S1 S2 S3 S4
Aim: strategic design of an agile Supply Chain Network (SCN) multi-buyer multi-seller
under multi-objective and uncertain parameters, performance evaluation, resource
management.
Methodology: cross-efficiency fuzzy/stochastic DEA + fuzzy bargaining game.
- M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco (2018), “Integrated network design of agile resource-efficient Supply Chains under uncertainty”. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. In press.
- G. Cavone, M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, C. Seatzu (2018), “A game-theoretical approach for multi-stage Supply Chains Network Design under uncertainty”. 14th IEEE International Conference on
Automation Science and Engineering (CASE 2018), Aug. 20-24, 2018, Munich (Germany).
- M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, F. Sciancalepore (2016), “A stochastic cross-efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis approach for supplier selection under uncertainty”. International
Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 23 (4), pp. 725-748.
Freight Transport: Multimodal terminals
Aim: strategic management of combined freight transport terminals, performance
evaluation, and resource management. Also useful for process re-engineering.
Methodology: discrete event simulation (Petri Nets).
Advantages: standardized and modular modeling + dynamic analysis + simulation and
what-if analysis + application of control policies.
INTERMODAL TERMINAL
OPENING/CLOSING
(for Days/Hours)
ACCESS ROAD
(Entrance for Semitrailers)
ACCESS ROAD
(Exit for Semitrailers - Port)
ACCESS ROAD (Exit for Semitrailers - Customer)
RAILWAY ACCESS (Incoming/Outgoing ITUs
BARI-BOLOGNA Line)
RAILWAY ACCESS (Incoming/Outgoing ITUs
BARI-PIACENZA Line)
OPENING/CLOSING
(for Days)
YARD
STORAGE
Semitrailer trucks
Tractors and ITUs
ITUs
- G. Cavone, M. Dotoli, C. Seatzu, “Management of Intermodal Freight Terminals by First-Order Hybrid Petri Nets”. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 1(1), pp. 2-9, 2016.
- G. Cavone, M. Dotoli, C. Seatzu, “A Survey on Petri Net Models for Freight Logistics and Transportation Systems”. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 19(6), pp. 1795-
1813., 2018
- G. Cavone, M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, C. Seatzu, “Efficient resource planning of intermodal terminals under uncertainty”. 15th IFAC Symposium on Control in Transportation Systems (CTS 2018), June
6-8, 2018, Savona (Italy).
- M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, G. Cavone, “A Timed Petri Nets Model for Performance Evaluation of Intermodal Freight Transport Terminals“, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and
Engineering, vol. 13 (2), pp. 842-857, 2016.
- G. Cavone, M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, C. Seatzu (2017), “Intermodal terminal planning by Petri Nets and Data Envelopment Analysis”. Control Engineering Practice, vol. 69, pp. 9-22.
Freight Transport: criticalities
Aim: removing criticalities (Pareto principle), also useful for internal logistics and
process re-engineering.
Methodology: integrated approach (UML + VSM + math formulation of Lean Philosophy).
Advantages: materials and information flows analysis, identification of responsabilities,
time, bottlenecks and how they impact on performance.
N observed problemserror
%
profit
abilityquality PV CV AIV
1 lack of immediate information about any extra costs 1 1 0 2 3 5
2 lack of summary information from historical accounts 1 0 0 1 5 6
3 lack of basic information in the process of receiving the order 2 1 1 4 6 10
4 lack of schedules load planning 0 1 1 2 4 6
5 manual management of the security seals on containers 1 0 0 1 2 3
6 manual management of the association between ITU and wagon 1 0 0 1 3 4
7 manual management of creating the load list 1 2 0 3 4 7
8 lack of standardization in the container stocking in the yard 0 2 0 2 7 9
9 lack of optimization criteria in the train composition 0 2 1 3 6 9
10 lack of customer feedback tools 0 1 2 3 2 5
11 lack of clarity on the responsibilities 1 1 1 3 2 5
12 lack of standardized criteria for the management of overbooking 1 1 1 3 5 8
13 lack of standardized criteria for the management of matching 0 2 0 2 6 8
14 lack of schedules unload planning 0 1 1 2 3 5
- G. Cavone, M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Franceschelli, C. Seatzu, «Hybrid Petri Nets to Re-design Low-Automated Production Processes: the Case Study of a Sardinian Bakery». IFAC-
PapersOnLine, vol. 51(7), pp. 265-270, 2018.
M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, N. Costantino, B. Turchiano, “An integrated approach for warehouse analysis and optimization: a case study”. Computers in Industry, vol. 70, pp. 56-69, 2015.
- M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, N. Costantino, “A lean warehousing integrated approach: a case study”. Proc. 18th IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA
2013), September 10-13, 2013, Cagliari (Italy).
- M. Dassisti, M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, “Internal logistics integration by Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems: A reengineering case study”. On the Move to Meaningful Internet
Systems: OTM 2012 Workshops. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7567, pp. 78-82, P. Herrero et al. (Eds), 2012.
Freight Transport: road paths
Aim: matching of delivery and pick-up requests (first/last miles).
Methodology: CVRP(TW) + FFM. (Constraints: max 2 clients per visit; discharge before
loading).
Advantages: combination of load/unload activities, savings (times, costs, resources).
Simple trip Double matching Single matching
Delivery nodeDepot Pickup node Simultaneous
pickup&delivery node
Empty run Loaded run
Path Match Delivery Pick Up Km tk [min]
Routes for customers' ITUs (run time 21.04 sec)
p1 double Putignano Brindisi 224 344
p2 double Gravina Massafra 179 299
p3 double Melfi M. Savoia 208 328
p4 double Foggia M. Savoia 229 349
p5 double Valenzano Monopoli 92 212
p6 simple trip Modugno / 12 72
p7 simple trip Valenzano / 18 78
p8 double Buccino Statte 359 479
Routes for owned 45' ITUs (run time 41.74 sec)
p9 double Trani Buccino 284 404
p10 double Fasano Cavallino 297 417
p11 no match / Statte 142 202
p12 single Andria Andria 92 212
Routes for owned 20' ITUs (run time 22.06 sec)
p13 double Fasano Cavallino 297 417
p14 no match / Putignano 82 142
p15 single Andria Andria 92 212
p16 double Policoro Buccino 356 476
Scheduling for with customers' ITUs (run time 0.053 sec)
path Tv [min]
Tover [min] p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 p6 p7 p8
veh
icle
s
v1 x x x 449 0
v2 x 349 0
v3 x 344 0
v4 x 328 0
v5 x 212 0
v6 x 479 0
Scheduling for owned ITUs (run time 0.0517 s)
path Tv
[min]
Tover
[min] p9 p10 p11 p12 p13 p14 p15 p16
veh
icle
s
v'1 x x 414 0
v'2 x x 354 0
v'3 x 417 0
v'4 x 417 0
v'5 x 404 0
v'6 x 476 0
- M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, “A model for the optimal management of containers’ drayage at intermodal freight terminals”. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and
Automation (ICRA 2016), May 16-21, 2016, Stockholm (Sweden).
- M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, B. Angelico, A. Vinciullo, “A two-step optimization model for the pre- and end-haulage of containers at intermodal freight terminals”. Proc. 14th IEEE
European Control Conference (ECC 2015), July 15-17, 2015, Linz (Austria), pp. 3477-3482.
Freight Transport: Yard positioning
Aim: maximize the yard fullfillment.
Methodology: Knapsack problem (Constraints: capacity, stackability, economic and
commercial value, stringency, customers importance).
Advantages: profit increase, reduction of removals, cost, and time, informatization,
better use of resources, departures/arrivals management.
M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, C. Seatzu, B. Turchiano, “A Decision Support System for optimizing operations at intermodal railroad terminals”. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and
Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 47 (3), pp. 487-501, 2017
Railway transport optimization
(freights and passengers)
- G. Cavone, M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, C. Seatzu (2017), “A decision making procedure for robust train rescheduling based on Mixed Integer Linear Programming and Data Envelopment Analysis”.
Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 52, pp. 255-273.
- M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, C. Seatzu, “An improved technique for train load planning at intermodal rail-road terminals”. Proc. 20th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and
Factory Automation (ETFA 2015), September 8-11, 2015, Luxembourg.
- M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, D. Palma, B. Turchiano, “A train load planning optimization model for intermodal freight transport terminals: a case study”. Proc. 2013 IEEE International
Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC 2013), October 13-16, 2013, Manchester (UK).
Aim: global optimization + offline scheduling of the timetable + real-time management
of disturbances.
Methodology: MILP + heuristics, PES, re-scheduling (Constraints: dimension; weight;
priorities; customers importance; empty ITUs + railway constraints + robustness +
reshuffle for the train’s head/tail positioning of prosecuting ITUs).
Advantages: max profit, handling overbooking + min delays + user-friendly GUI,
management of intermediate stops and contingencies (discarded ITU or new urgency).
.
MILP problem time
horizon
First level:
trains rescheduling
(Rescheduling
Mathematical Model)
Second level:
robustness evaluation
(Validation Model)
Third level:
heuristics
(Conflict Identification &
Resolution)
Number of instances
Time Window
Waste Management
Aim: scheduling and routing of the special and hazardous waste collection.
Methodology: CVRP(TW) + HWM (Constraints: vehicles capacity (mass and volume),
availability, drivers break, working hours limits, segregation of immiscible waste,
multiple time windows).
Advantages: route optimization and fleet/resource management, cost/time savings.
M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco (2017), “A vehicle routing technique for hazardous waste collection”. 20th World Congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC 2017), July 9-14, 2017,
Toulouse (France). IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 50 (1), pp. 9694-9699.
Process Re-engineering
Aim: re-engineering, automation, and optimization of processes.
Methodology: First-Order Hybrid Petri Nets.
Advantages: simulation of the As-Is behavior, bottlenecks and waste sources
detection, what-if analysis, improvement of the production process.
- G. Cavone, M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Franceschelli, C. Seatzu, «Hybrid Petri Nets to Re-design Low-Automated Production Processes: the Case Study of a Sardinian Bakery». IFAC-
PapersOnLine, vol. 51(7), pp. 265-270, 2018.
Smart City Management
Energy efficiency
- «Res Novae» Project
- «UCCSM» Project
Smart mobility
- «Semina» Project
RES NOVAE Project(Reti Edifici Strade Nuovi Obiettivi Virtuosi per l’Ambiente e l’Energia)Networks, buildings, roads: new virtuous objectives for the environment and energy
Work
context
Research
areas
Bari
Cosenza
• Scientific Management: ENEA• Project Management: Enel Distribuzione• Project duration: 36 months (from 01/11/12 to
31/10/2015)• Program: “Smart Cities and Communities and
Social Innovation” • Budget: about 24 M€
Aim: Develop an integrated urban planning solution to increase city performance in terms of
energy efficiency and environmental sustainability while meeting citizens’ expectations for quality
of life.
RES NOVAE Project(Reti Edifici Strade Nuovi Obiettivi Virtuosi per l’Ambiente e l’Energia)Networks, buildings, roads: new virtuous objectives for the environment and energy
Smart District
Urban Data Center
Smart Grids
Energy
Environment
MobilitySmart Street ControlPublic Light controlSmart urban objects
Building Diagnostics& ControlActive DemandManagement
Urban renewables and ecobuildings
Smart Grid
Distributed generation
Distributed storage
Aim: create a platform for monitoring andmanaging urban dynamics and city performance,to support the energy governance for PublicAdministrations and to enable communicationto citizens and participation of communities.
Advantages:
⚫ Indicators dashboard: report and analysis of urban performance (status, history, predicted state).
⚫ Business intelligence tools for strategic decision making and planning of urban sectors.
⚫ Collaboration tool for citizens’ awareness and active involvement.
UCCSM Project(Urban Control Center per le Smart city Metropolitane)Urban Control Center for the metropolitan smart cities
➢ Tools for developing smart cities
Two main functionalities are presented for smart cities monitoring and management:
⚫ the measure and monitoring of the smart city performance
⚫ the definition of strategic action programs as result of decision making and planning
.
2. decision making
support tools
1. Dashboard of KPIs
smart city
KPIs target values
Current KPI values
Decision
making
KPIs
Evaluation
City Urban dynamics
Action plans
Disturbance factors List of potential action plans
City
Policies
Objectives
Urban Control Center
Monitoring, management, and control of smart cities
Aim: Development of a multi-criteria technique to
support the Public Administration in the analysis
and benchmarking of the sustainability of
energy/water/environment systems in metropolitan
areas.
Methodology: AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)
– Case study:
35 SDEWES (Sustainable Development of
Energy, Water, and Environment Systems)
indicators
Metropolitan City of Bari (Bari, Bitonto, Mola,
Molfetta)
➢ Benchmarking of metropolitan areas
- R. Carli, M. Dotoli, R. Pellegrino (2018), “Multi-criteria Decision-Making for Sustainable Metropolitan Cities Assessment,” Journal of Environmental Management , vol. 226, pp. 46-61.
Monitoring, management, and control of smart cities
Aim: Define strategic action plans in metropolitan areas (multi-criteria, with multiple
decision makers, under uncertain data).
Methodology: Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Group Decision Analysis
Case study:
35 SDEWES (Sustainable Development of Energy, Water, and Environment Systems)
indicators
Metropolitan City of Bari (11 strategic areas)
22 EU projects aggregated by budget in 4 action plans
➢ Planning
- R. Carli, M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, R. Pellegrino, “Defining sustainable action plans in metropolitan cities using the fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process group decision analysis”. 13th Conference on
Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems (SDEWES 2018), Sept. 30-Oct. 4, 2018, Palermo (Italy).
Monitoring, management, and control of smart cities
➢ Local decision-making panels
LDP #1 – Street Lighting Panel
Aim: Determine the optimal set of actions to beimplemented in the given existing street lightingsystem in order to reduce energy consumption,maintaining the required comfort and quality of life,protecting the environment, while not exceeding thegiven budget constraint.
Problema di Ottimizzazione LDP #1
Methodology: bi-level decentralized hierarchical constrained optimization.
⚫ Decision variables:
⚫ Luminaire replacement: ust = quantity of lamps of the t-th type to be replaced in the s-th zone lighting subsystem
⚫ Energy harvesting module installation: vs = quantity of energy harvesting devices to be installed in the s-th zone lighting subsystem
⚫ Zonal dimming device installation: ws = binary variable of unit value if dimming has to be integrated in the control station of s-th zone lighting subsystem (zero otherwise)
- R. Carli, M. Dotoli, R. Pellegrino (2018), “A decision-making tool for energy efficiency optimization of street lighting,” Computers and Operations Research , vol. 96, pp. 223-235.
Monitoring, management, and control of smart cities
- Carli, R.; Dotoli, M.; Pellegrino, R., «A decision making technique to optimize a building stock energy efficiency», IEEE Trans. Sys., Man Cyb.: Systems, 2015.
LDP #2 – Public Buildings Panel
Aim: Determine the optimal set of actions toimplement on buildings portfolio in order to makebuildings more energy efficient, moreenvironmentally sustainable, more comfortablefor occupants, while not exceeding the givenbudget constraint.
Methodology: two-level binary multi-objective optimization
Problema di Ottimizzazione LDP #2
➢ Local decision-making panels
s.t.
Decision variables
=else 0
applied isaction if 1jkx
Action cost
Criterion-dependent payoffBudget
Criteria
Criterion-dependent objective function
Monitoring, management, and control of smart cities
➢ Strategy for the multisectoral efficiency improvement
BLDP
PAYOFFS AND COSTS FOR PUBLIC BUILDINGS PORTFOLIO
PAYOFFS AND COSTS FOR STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM
TOTAL BUDGET OPTIMAL BUDGET ALLOCATION
OPTIMAL RETROFIT PLAN FOR PUBLIC BUILDINGS
Parameter
Subsystem 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Type 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 52 5 27
2 27 0 0 0 0 2 18 2 24 18
Parameter
Subsystem 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parameter
Subsystem 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
OPTIMAL RETROFIT PLAN FOR STREET LIGHT. SYS.
Action
Bu
ild
ing
0 0 0 1 1 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 0 1 1 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 1 1
- Replacing half the lamps, dimming of all lamps.
- Roof thermal insul. B2, new windows B2, B4, B5.
- All buildings: new boilers, thermostatic radiator valves, water tap aerators, high efficiency lamps.
Monitoring, management, and control of smart cities
- Carli, R., Dotoli, M., Pellegrino, R., “A Hierarchical Decision Making Strategy for the Energy Management of Smart Cities”, IEEE TASE (Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering),
vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 505-523, April 2017.
Aim: provide a smart energy scheduling for
public (or private) buildings under uncertain data.
Methodology: constrained fuzzy optimization
The system comprises:home appliances (uninterruptible passive loads
distinguished into non-shiftable and shiftable loads)
renewable energy sources (photovoltaic or wind
generators)
dispatchable energy sources (microturbines or fuel cells)
energy storage systems (batteries)
Advantages: full exploitation of the potential of
local energy generation and storage to reduce the
individual user energy consumption cost and PAR
(Peak to Average Ratio)
➢ Energy scheduling for smart buildings / smart homes
Energy Scheduling
- R. Carli, M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, “Cost-optimal energy scheduling of a smart home under uncertainty”. 2nd IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA 2018), Aug. 21-24,
2018, Copenhagen (Denmark)
- R. Carli and M. Dotoli, "A decentralized resource allocation approach for sharing renewable energy among interconnected smart homes," in Decision and Control (CDC), 2015 54th IEEE
Conference on, Osaka, 2015.
- R. Carli and M. Dotoli, “Energy scheduling of a smart home under nonlinear pricing,” in Decision and Control (CDC), 2014 IEEE 53rd Conference on, Los Angeles, CA, 15-17 Dec. 2014.
Aim: provide a day-ahead scheduling technique
for the optimal charging of a large-scale fleet
of Electric Vehicles (EVs)
.
Methodology: iterative distributed / decentralized
algorithm based on duality, proximity, and
consensus theory
Advantages: ensuring a cost-optimal profile of the
aggregated energy demand, complying with the EV
individual needs; satisfying the resource constraints
depending both on power grid components capacity and
EV locations in the distribution network; using a minimal
information structure, where EVs locally communicate
only with their neighbours, without relying on a central
decision maker.
➢ Energy scheduling for smart buildings / smart homes
Energy Scheduling
- R. Carli ; M. Dotoli, "A Distributed Control Algorithm for Waterfilling of Networked Control Systems via Consensus," in IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 334-339, Oct. 2017.
- Carli, R.; Dotoli, M.; “Distributed Control for Waterfilling of Networked Control Systems with Coupling Constraints”, Decision and Control (CDC), 2018 57th IEEE Conference on, Miami, 2018.
- Carli, R.; Dotoli, M., “A Distributed Control Algorithm for Optimal Charging of Electric Vehicle Fleets with Congestion Management,” 15th IFAC Symposium on Control in Transportation Systems
(CTS 2018), June 6-8, 2018, Savona, Italy.
- Carli, R.; Dotoli, M., “Decentralized Optimal Charging Control of Electric Vehicle Fleets with Congestion Management,” 2017 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and
Logistics, and Informatics, September 18-20, 2017, Bari, Italy, p. 63-67.
Bari
• Funding: Apulia Region Research and Innovation Bureau • Program: Apulian ICT Living Labs SMARTPUGLIA 2020• Contact person: prof. Mariagrazia Dotoli (Project Supervisor)• Budget: € 680.972,00; Poliba Budget: € 130.000,00• Number of partners: 4
Smart Mobility: SEMINA Project(Sistemi Evoluti per la Mobilità Intelligente in Network urbani Agili)Evolved systems for smart mobility in agile urban networks
Aim: Innovative design of an ICT system to provide the citizens and the Public
Administration of a smart city with useful information about urban mobility.
• The urban mobility Information System has been developed and prototyped by the
Polytechnic of Bari in collaboration with local SMEs for the Municipality of Bari
(Italy)
Smart Mobility: SEMINA Project(Sistemi Evoluti per la Mobilità Intelligente in Network urbani Agili)Evolved systems for smart mobility in agile urban networks
Aim: use of GPS data to evaluate bus transport
system conditions and to monitor the performance of
the urban roads network.
Data source: local bus fleet monitored by GPS signals
(100 tracked buses/die; 120.000 GPS traces/die)
Advantages: low cost of setup and implementation,
automatic data storage, scalability to other probe
vehicles.
Methodology: «bus-as-probe».
➢ Urban mobility Information System
Smart Mobility: SEMINA Project(Sistemi Evoluti per la Mobilità Intelligente in Network urbani Agili)Evolved systems for smart mobility in agile urban networks
Three levels of analysis:
1. Statistical analysis of the performances of
local public transport bus services
2. Statistical analysis of urban traffic
characteristics
3. Real Time monitoring of urban traffic
congestion
➢ Urban mobility Information System
Smart Mobility: SEMINA Project(Sistemi Evoluti per la Mobilità Intelligente in Network urbani Agili)Evolved systems for smart mobility in agile urban networks
Results:
⚫ Bus line 53, inbounding route, trip scheduled at 08:05 a.m.
⚫ Weekdays statistical analysis in June 2014
Punctuality Index
Schedule Adherence
Stop ID
Time
[min]
+/- 3σ
Mean Level
advance
(Suburb Area)
delay
(City Centre)
dela
yad
av
nc
e
Planned
➢ Analysis of local public transport bus services
Smart Mobility: SEMINA Project(Sistemi Evoluti per la Mobilità Intelligente in Network urbani Agili)Evolved systems for smart mobility in agile urban networks
- R. Carli, M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco (2018), “Monitoring traffic congestion in urban areas through probe vehicles: A case study analysis”. Internet Technology Letters, vol. 1 (4), 1:e5, 7 pp.
- R. Carli, M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, B. Angelico, A. Vinciullo, "Automated evaluation of urban traffic congestion using bus as a probe" IEEE CASE 2015.
Results:⚫ Weekdays statistical analysis in June 2014
Piazza Garibaldi
Urban Coverage by GPS data
Travel Time index:-Time window: from 09:00 to 10:00 am
City centre
Worst Conditions
Ideal Conditions
Travel Time index
- weekdays
➢ Analysis of the urban traffic characteristics
Smart Mobility: SEMINA Project(Sistemi Evoluti per la Mobilità Intelligente in Network urbani Agili)Evolved systems for smart mobility in agile urban networks
Spin-off
Members: - Dr. Er. Mariagrazia Dotoli
- Dr. Er. Marco Falagario
- Dr. Er. Giuseppe Ardito
- Politecnico di Bari
Board: - Dr. Er. Nicola Epicoco (Chair)
- Prof. Er. Marco Bronzini
- Dr. Generosa Tagliente
Office: Via De Romita n. 22 - Bari
VAT number: 07392070723
Main activities:
Technological transfer of technical and scientific know-how to public and
private companies;
Consultancy, training, and assistance in:
▪ management and control engineering;
▪ energy savings and renewable sources;
▪ continuous improvement and quality control;
▪ management of private companies and optimization of resources in public bodies;
▪ re-engineering of business processes;
▪ organization, management, and control models (Italian Leg. Dec. 231/01).
Spin-off
Public Procurement
Application of MCDA multi-criteria decision analysis techniques under uncertainty
for the Public Procurement sector (with transparency, proportionality, equity, and non-
discrimination requirements).
Select the Best Bidder
Overall quality
Remun.
Price
Qualif. Organ. Quality
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 A11 A12 A13 A14 A15 A16 A17 A18 A19 A20
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7
…
M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario (2018), “Multi-Criteria Decision Making techniques for the management of public procurement tenders: A case study”. Applied Soft Computing. Under review.
Process analysis and re-engineering
- M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, N. Costantino, B. Turchiano (2015), “An integrated approach for warehouse analysis and optimization: A case study”. Computers in Industry, vol. 70 (1), pp. 56-
69.
- M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, F. Sciancalepore (2015), “A cross-efficiency fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis technique for performance evaluation of decision making units under uncertainty”.
Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 79, pp. 103-114.
- M. Dotoli, N. Epicoco, M. Falagario, F. Sciancalepore, N. Costantino (2014), “A Nash equilibrium simulation model for the competitiveness evaluation of the auction based day ahead electricity
market”. Computers in Industry, vol. 65 (4), pp. 774-785.
Analysis of the current state and criticalities, and of functional requirements and
obtainable improvements. Support in implementing corrective measures, monitoring
and control for a continuous improvement.
DSS
Decision Support Systems
Development of multi-objective optimization tools characterized by:
- ease of use and interpretation of results;
- interactive environment to perform simulations and what-if analysis;
- direct support to decision-making;
- effectiveness in the use of models and in data analysis.
Procedure protected by copyright at the OLAF section of the SIAE
Organization, management, and control models
Company reorganization and definition of appropriate procedures to prevent the
liability of entities pursuant to the Italian Legislative Decree 231/01, reducing the risk
of committing crimes and mitigating their possible impact on the company.
Partecipation in Supervisory Boards for public and private companies.
Prof. Engr. Mariagrazia Dotoli, PhD
DECISION & CONTROL LABORATORY
Engr. Raffaele Carli, PhD. Engr. Graziana Cavone, PhD
Engr. Nicola Epicoco, PhD Engr. Seyed Mohsen Hosseini
Engr. Gioacchino Manfredi Engr. Roberta Pellegrino, PhD
http://dei.poliba.it/DEI-it/ricerca/decision-and-control.html [email protected]
Polytechnic of Bari
Department of Electrical and Information Engineering