possible non-prompt photons in pp collisions and their ...€¦ · possible non-prompt photons in...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Possible non-prompt photons in pp collisions and their effects in AA collisions
Akihiko Monnai (KEK, Japan)
Hard Probes 2018
3rd October 2018, Aix-les-Bains, France
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear colliders: a gateway to quark-gluon plasma
Transverse momentum spectraRelativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)@BNL, √sNN = 5.5-200 GeV (2000-)
2 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear colliders: a gateway to quark-gluon plasma
Transverse momentum spectraRelativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)@BNL, √sNN = 5.5-200 GeV (2000-)
Large Hadron Collider (LHC)@CERN, √sNN = 2.76-5.44 TeV (2010-)
2 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear colliders: a gateway to quark-gluon plasma
Transverse momentum spectraRelativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)@BNL, √sNN = 5.5-200 GeV (2000-)
Large Hadron Collider (LHC)@CERN, √sNN = 2.76-5.44 TeV (2010-)
FAIR@GSI, NICA@JINR, SPS@CERN, J-PARC@JAEA/KEK … ?
2 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: QCD point of view
Transverse momentum spectra
Hydrodynamic stage (~1-10 fm/c)
Glasma (~0-1 fm/c)
Hadronic transport (> 10 fm/c)
QGP fluid
Hadronic fluid
Hadrons
Freeze-out
Graphics by AM
z
t
Colliding nuclei
Freeze-out
Equilibration
Color glass condensate (< 0 fm/c)
Little bang
3 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: QCD point of view
Transverse momentum spectra
Hydrodynamic stage (~1-10 fm/c)
Glasma (~0-1 fm/c)
Hadronic transport (> 10 fm/c)
QGP fluid
Hadronic fluid
Hadrons
Freeze-out
Graphics by AM
z
t
Colliding nuclei
Freeze-out
Equilibration
Color glass condensate (< 0 fm/c)
Little bang
Color opaque
Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”
3 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view
Transverse momentum spectra
QGP fluid
Hadronic fluid
Hadrons
Freeze-out
Graphics by AM
z
t
Colliding nuclei
Hydrodynamic stage (~1-10 fm/c)
Glasma (~0-1 fm/c)
Hadronic transport (> 10 fm/c)
Freeze-out
Equilibration
Color glass condensate (< 0 fm/c)
Little bang
Color opaque
Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”
Electroweak transparent
Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system
4 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view
Transverse momentum spectra
QGP fluid
Hadronic fluid
Hadrons
Freeze-out
Graphics by AM
zColliding nuclei
Color opaque
Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”
Electroweak transparent
t
Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system
4 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view
Transverse momentum spectra
Prompt photonsQGP fluid
Hadronic fluid
Hadrons
Freeze-out
- from hard processesGraphics by AM
zColliding nuclei
Color opaque
Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”
Electroweak transparent
Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system
t
4 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view
Transverse momentum spectra
Prompt photonsQGP fluid
Hadronic fluid
Hadrons
Freeze-out
Pre-equilibrium photons
- from hard processesGraphics by AM
zColliding nuclei
Color opaque
Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”
Electroweak transparent
Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system
t
4 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view
Transverse momentum spectra
Thermal photons
Prompt photonsQGP fluid
Hadronic fluid
Hadrons
Freeze-out
Pre-equilibrium photons
- from soft radiation
- from hard processesGraphics by AM
zColliding nuclei
Color opaque
Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”
Electroweak transparent
Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system
t
4 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view
Transverse momentum spectra
Thermal photons
Prompt photonsQGP fluid
Hadronic fluid
Hadrons
Freeze-out
Decay photons
Pre-equilibrium photons
- from hadronic decay
- from soft radiation
- from hard processesGraphics by AM
zColliding nuclei
Color opaque
Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”
Electroweak transparent
Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system
t
4 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view
Transverse momentum spectra
Thermal photons
Prompt photonsQGP fluid
Hadronic fluid
Hadrons
Freeze-out
Decay photons
Pre-equilibrium photons
- from hadronic decay
- from soft radiation
- from hard processes
Direct p
ho
ton
s
Graphics by AM
zColliding nuclei
Color opaque
Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”
Electroweak transparent
Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system
t
4 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view
Transverse momentum spectra
Thermal photons
Prompt photonsQGP fluid
Hadronic fluid
Hadrons
Freeze-out
Decay photons
Pre-equilibrium photons
- from hadronic decay
- from soft radiation
- from hard processes
Direct p
ho
ton
s
Graphics by AM
zColliding nuclei
Color opaque
Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”
Electroweak transparent
Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system
t
(Jet photons, etc)
4 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ “Collectivity” in small systems
Weller and Romatschke, PLB 774,351 (2017)
Hydrodynamic and non-hydrodynamic models both work
?
5 / 24
Thermalized QGP in pp is still controversial; but there is a possibility in most central collisions
Mace et. al., PRL 121, 052301 (2018)
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Direct photon ingredients
AA collisions vs. pp collisions
pp×Ncoll
ThermalPrompt
AA
pp ~ pQCD
6 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Direct photon ingredients
AA collisions vs. pp collisions
pp×Ncoll ?
ThermalPrompt
AA
pp ~ pQCD?
There can be thermal photons in pp Cf. C. Shen, J.-F. Paquet, G. S. Denicol, S. Jeon and C. Gale, PRC 95, 014906 (2017)
7 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Direct photon ingredients
AA collisions vs. pp collisions
ThermalPrompt
AA
pp
Pre-equilibrium
Pre-equilibrium photons can be importantCf. Early hydro vs. glasma: J. Berges et. Al., PRC 95, 054904 (2017),
mBU-Glasma: V. Khachatryan et. al., NPA 978, 123 (2018)
pp×Ncoll ?
~ pQCD
8 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Direct photon ingredients
AA collisions vs. pp collisions
ThermalPrompt
AA
pp
Pre-equilibrium
pp×Ncoll -(thermal + pre-eq.)?
- It may pose limit to the amount of QGP in pp collisions
- Pre-eq. photons may affect the analyses of AA collisions
Aim of this study: Non-prompt photons in both AA and pp (glasma production more likely at LHC)
~ pQCD?
9 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Photon puzzle
Observed azimuthal momentum anisotropy (v2) is large
Systematic tension not removed yet; clarification from experiments is essential
10 / 24
PHENIX, PRL 109, 122302 (2012)
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Introduction
◼ Photon puzzle
Observed azimuthal momentum anisotropy (v2) is large
Systematic tension not removed yet; clarification from experiments is essential
10 / 24
PHENIX, PRL 109, 122302 (2012)
Non-prompt photons in pp may improve the situation; pre-equilibrium photons in AA collisions may do the opposite
Momentum anisotropy in AA system
Prompt Pre-eq. Thermal
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Timeline
◼ Photons from different stages of HIC
Prompt Pre-equilibrium Thermal
τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c
11 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Timeline
◼ Thermal photons
Prompt Thermal
τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c
Pre-equilibrium
Estimated using a (2+1)-D hydrodynamic model
τth: tuned to 1 fm/c
Equation of state: lattice QCD
Initial condition: Glauber model (event-averaged)
Collision energy: 2.76 TeV
12 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Timeline
◼ Thermal photons
Prompt Thermal
τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c
Pre-equilibrium
Thermal photon emission rate
Arnold, Moore and Yaffe, JHEP 0112, 009Turbide, Rapp and Gale, PRC 69, 014903
where and
13 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Timeline
◼ Pre-equilibrium photons
Bottom-up / turbulent thermalization approach to glasma
Prompt Thermal
τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c
Pre-equilibrium
R. Baier, A. H. Mueller, D. Schiff, and D. T. Son, PLB 502, 51 (2001)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
are introduced to “squeeze” the processes into the pre-hydro phase
J. Berges et. al., PRC 95, 054904 (2017)
14 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Timeline
◼ Pre-equilibrium photons
Emission rate: Berges-Reygers-Tanji-Venugopalan model
Prompt Thermal
τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c
Pre-equilibrium
J. Berges et. al., PRC 95, 054904 (2017); N. Tanji and R. Venugopalan PRD 95, 094009 (2017)
Stages (i), (ii)
15 / 24
: Self-similar scaling distribution
(Exponentially cut off for pT > Qs; normalized as nq = nq
th at τth)
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Timeline
◼ Pre-equilibrium photons
Emission rate: Berges-Reygers-Tanji-Venugopalan model
Prompt Thermal
τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c
Pre-equilibrium
J. Berges et. al., PRC 95, 054904 (2017); N. Tanji and R. Venugopalan PRD 95, 094009 (2017)
Stage (iii)
with effective
Note: The model is parametrically extended to fit into the pre-hydro time; quantitative discussion should be made carefully
16 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Timeline
◼ Prompt photons
pp direct photons - (other photons) scaled by Ncoll
Thermal
τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c
Pre-equilibriumPrompt
Alternatively one may perform pQCD analyses; it should be noted that yet other sources of photons can be hidden
Turbide, Rapp and Gale, PRC 69, 014903
17 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Photons in AA collisions
◼ Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV, Glauber, 0-5%, Qs = 3 GeV
Semi-hard reflecting the saturation momentum scale Qs
Absolute value is dependent on parametrization; they could be comparable to thermal photons
Pre-equilibrium photons
(GeV)T
p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
)-2
dy (
Ge
VT
dp
T)
dN
/pp
(1/2
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
Pb-Pb 2.76 GeV
pre-eq
thermal
thermal+pre-eq
Preliminary
18 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Photons in AA collisions
◼ Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV, Glauber, 0-5%, Qs = 3 GeV
Semi-hard reflecting the saturation momentum scale Qs
Absolute value is dependent on parametrization; they could be comparable to thermal photons
Pre-equilibrium photons
(GeV)T
p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
)-2
dy (
Ge
VT
dp
T)
dN
/pp
(1/2
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
Pb-Pb 2.76 GeV
pre-eq
thermal
thermal+pre-eq
Preliminary
(GeV)T
p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
)-2
dy (
Ge
VT
dp
T)
dN
/pp
(1/2
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
Pb-Pb 2.76 GeV
scaled pppre-eq
thermal
direct
Preliminary
Prompt photons if pp is not modified by thermal or pre-eq. photons
Ncoll scaled pp
19 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Photons in AA collisions
◼ Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV, Glauber, 0-5%, Qs = 3 GeV
Semi-hard reflecting the saturation momentum scale Qs
Absolute value is dependent on parametrization; they could be comparable to thermal photons
Pre-equilibrium photons
(GeV)T
p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
)-2
dy (
Ge
VT
dp
T)
dN
/pp
(1/2
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
Pb-Pb 2.76 GeV
pre-eq
thermal
thermal+pre-eq
Preliminary
(GeV)T
p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
)-2
dy (
Ge
VT
dp
T)
dN
/pp
(1/2
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
Pb-Pb 2.76 GeV
scaled pppre-eq
thermal
direct
Preliminary
Prompt photons if pp is not modified by thermal or pre-eq. photons
Ncoll scaled pp
Typical momentum scale
19 / 24
thermal pre-eq prompt
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Photons in pp collisions
◼ p-p 2.76 TeV, Glauber, Qs = 0.9 GeV
They can be com-parable to direct photons in most central events
Thermal photonsCf: C. Shen, Hard Probes ‘16
They can be comparable to direct photon near Qs
Pre-equilibrium photons
Modified prompt background?
(GeV)T
p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
)-2
dy (
Ge
VT
dp
T)
dN
/pp
(1/2
-910
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
-310
-210
-110
1
10
p-p 2.76 GeV
direct
pre-eq
prompt
Preliminary
20 / 24
No thermal QGP is assumed for the moment to be “conservative”
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Photons in AA collisions
◼ Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV, Glauber, 0-5%, Qs = 3 GeV
Reduced at pT ~ Qs(p) and enhanced at pT ~ Qs(Pb)
Prompt & pre-eq photons
(GeV)T
p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
)-2
dy (
Ge
VT
dp
T)
dN
/pp
(1/2
-810
-710
-610
-510
-410
-310
-210
-110
1
10
210
310
410
Pb-Pb 2.76 GeV
promptpre-eq
thermal
direct
Preliminary
Modified prompt photons do not have much effect on spectra as thermal photons are dominant at pT ~ 1 GeV
Results are dependent on the value of Qs; v2 may be affected more
21 / 24
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Summary and outlook
◼ We have studied non-prompt photons in PbPb and pp collisions
22 / 24
Pre-equilibrium photons can provide visible semi-hard contribution to pT spectra
pp direct photons may not be pure prompt photons; the baseline for AA analyses may well be modified by glasma creation
One may probe and constrain the pre-equilibrium physics (Qs etc.) through direct photon analyses
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Summary and outlook
◼ We have studied non-prompt photons in PbPb and pp collisions
◼ Future prospects include:
Pre-equilibrium photons can provide visible semi-hard contribution to pT spectra
pp direct photons may not be pure prompt photons; the baseline for AA analyses may well be modified by glasma creation
22 / 24
One may probe and constrain the pre-equilibrium physics (Qs etc.) through direct photon analyses
Analyses of the effects on elliptic flow v2Full pp thermal photon analyses can be used to test if the QGP is produced in pp collisions
Implementation of chemically equilibrating QGP in hydrodynamic models Cf: AM, PRC 90, 021901(R) (2014)
-
Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018
Fin
◼ Merci de votre attention!