possible non-prompt photons in pp collisions and their ...€¦ · possible non-prompt photons in...

36
Possible non-prompt photons in pp collisions and their effects in AA collisions Akihiko Monnai (KEK, Japan) Hard Probes 2018 3 rd October 2018, Aix-les-Bains, France

Upload: others

Post on 19-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Possible non-prompt photons in pp collisions and their effects in AA collisions

    Akihiko Monnai (KEK, Japan)

    Hard Probes 2018

    3rd October 2018, Aix-les-Bains, France

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear colliders: a gateway to quark-gluon plasma

    Transverse momentum spectraRelativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)@BNL, √sNN = 5.5-200 GeV (2000-)

    2 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear colliders: a gateway to quark-gluon plasma

    Transverse momentum spectraRelativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)@BNL, √sNN = 5.5-200 GeV (2000-)

    Large Hadron Collider (LHC)@CERN, √sNN = 2.76-5.44 TeV (2010-)

    2 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear colliders: a gateway to quark-gluon plasma

    Transverse momentum spectraRelativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC)@BNL, √sNN = 5.5-200 GeV (2000-)

    Large Hadron Collider (LHC)@CERN, √sNN = 2.76-5.44 TeV (2010-)

    FAIR@GSI, NICA@JINR, SPS@CERN, J-PARC@JAEA/KEK … ?

    2 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: QCD point of view

    Transverse momentum spectra

    Hydrodynamic stage (~1-10 fm/c)

    Glasma (~0-1 fm/c)

    Hadronic transport (> 10 fm/c)

    QGP fluid

    Hadronic fluid

    Hadrons

    Freeze-out

    Graphics by AM

    z

    t

    Colliding nuclei

    Freeze-out

    Equilibration

    Color glass condensate (< 0 fm/c)

    Little bang

    3 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: QCD point of view

    Transverse momentum spectra

    Hydrodynamic stage (~1-10 fm/c)

    Glasma (~0-1 fm/c)

    Hadronic transport (> 10 fm/c)

    QGP fluid

    Hadronic fluid

    Hadrons

    Freeze-out

    Graphics by AM

    z

    t

    Colliding nuclei

    Freeze-out

    Equilibration

    Color glass condensate (< 0 fm/c)

    Little bang

    Color opaque

    Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”

    3 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view

    Transverse momentum spectra

    QGP fluid

    Hadronic fluid

    Hadrons

    Freeze-out

    Graphics by AM

    z

    t

    Colliding nuclei

    Hydrodynamic stage (~1-10 fm/c)

    Glasma (~0-1 fm/c)

    Hadronic transport (> 10 fm/c)

    Freeze-out

    Equilibration

    Color glass condensate (< 0 fm/c)

    Little bang

    Color opaque

    Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”

    Electroweak transparent

    Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system

    4 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view

    Transverse momentum spectra

    QGP fluid

    Hadronic fluid

    Hadrons

    Freeze-out

    Graphics by AM

    zColliding nuclei

    Color opaque

    Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”

    Electroweak transparent

    t

    Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system

    4 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view

    Transverse momentum spectra

    Prompt photonsQGP fluid

    Hadronic fluid

    Hadrons

    Freeze-out

    - from hard processesGraphics by AM

    zColliding nuclei

    Color opaque

    Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”

    Electroweak transparent

    Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system

    t

    4 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view

    Transverse momentum spectra

    Prompt photonsQGP fluid

    Hadronic fluid

    Hadrons

    Freeze-out

    Pre-equilibrium photons

    - from hard processesGraphics by AM

    zColliding nuclei

    Color opaque

    Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”

    Electroweak transparent

    Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system

    t

    4 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view

    Transverse momentum spectra

    Thermal photons

    Prompt photonsQGP fluid

    Hadronic fluid

    Hadrons

    Freeze-out

    Pre-equilibrium photons

    - from soft radiation

    - from hard processesGraphics by AM

    zColliding nuclei

    Color opaque

    Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”

    Electroweak transparent

    Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system

    t

    4 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view

    Transverse momentum spectra

    Thermal photons

    Prompt photonsQGP fluid

    Hadronic fluid

    Hadrons

    Freeze-out

    Decay photons

    Pre-equilibrium photons

    - from hadronic decay

    - from soft radiation

    - from hard processesGraphics by AM

    zColliding nuclei

    Color opaque

    Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”

    Electroweak transparent

    Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system

    t

    4 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view

    Transverse momentum spectra

    Thermal photons

    Prompt photonsQGP fluid

    Hadronic fluid

    Hadrons

    Freeze-out

    Decay photons

    Pre-equilibrium photons

    - from hadronic decay

    - from soft radiation

    - from hard processes

    Direct p

    ho

    ton

    s

    Graphics by AM

    zColliding nuclei

    Color opaque

    Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”

    Electroweak transparent

    Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system

    t

    4 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Relativistic nuclear collisions: Electroweak point of view

    Transverse momentum spectra

    Thermal photons

    Prompt photonsQGP fluid

    Hadronic fluid

    Hadrons

    Freeze-out

    Decay photons

    Pre-equilibrium photons

    - from hadronic decay

    - from soft radiation

    - from hard processes

    Direct p

    ho

    ton

    s

    Graphics by AM

    zColliding nuclei

    Color opaque

    Most information before freeze-out is lost in “thermal hadrons”

    Electroweak transparent

    Photons retain information of the space-time evolution of the system

    t

    (Jet photons, etc)

    4 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ “Collectivity” in small systems

    Weller and Romatschke, PLB 774,351 (2017)

    Hydrodynamic and non-hydrodynamic models both work

    ?

    5 / 24

    Thermalized QGP in pp is still controversial; but there is a possibility in most central collisions

    Mace et. al., PRL 121, 052301 (2018)

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Direct photon ingredients

    AA collisions vs. pp collisions

    pp×Ncoll

    ThermalPrompt

    AA

    pp ~ pQCD

    6 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Direct photon ingredients

    AA collisions vs. pp collisions

    pp×Ncoll ?

    ThermalPrompt

    AA

    pp ~ pQCD?

    There can be thermal photons in pp Cf. C. Shen, J.-F. Paquet, G. S. Denicol, S. Jeon and C. Gale, PRC 95, 014906 (2017)

    7 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Direct photon ingredients

    AA collisions vs. pp collisions

    ThermalPrompt

    AA

    pp

    Pre-equilibrium

    Pre-equilibrium photons can be importantCf. Early hydro vs. glasma: J. Berges et. Al., PRC 95, 054904 (2017),

    mBU-Glasma: V. Khachatryan et. al., NPA 978, 123 (2018)

    pp×Ncoll ?

    ~ pQCD

    8 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Direct photon ingredients

    AA collisions vs. pp collisions

    ThermalPrompt

    AA

    pp

    Pre-equilibrium

    pp×Ncoll -(thermal + pre-eq.)?

    - It may pose limit to the amount of QGP in pp collisions

    - Pre-eq. photons may affect the analyses of AA collisions

    Aim of this study: Non-prompt photons in both AA and pp (glasma production more likely at LHC)

    ~ pQCD?

    9 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Photon puzzle

    Observed azimuthal momentum anisotropy (v2) is large

    Systematic tension not removed yet; clarification from experiments is essential

    10 / 24

    PHENIX, PRL 109, 122302 (2012)

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Introduction

    ◼ Photon puzzle

    Observed azimuthal momentum anisotropy (v2) is large

    Systematic tension not removed yet; clarification from experiments is essential

    10 / 24

    PHENIX, PRL 109, 122302 (2012)

    Non-prompt photons in pp may improve the situation; pre-equilibrium photons in AA collisions may do the opposite

    Momentum anisotropy in AA system

    Prompt Pre-eq. Thermal

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Timeline

    ◼ Photons from different stages of HIC

    Prompt Pre-equilibrium Thermal

    τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c

    11 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Timeline

    ◼ Thermal photons

    Prompt Thermal

    τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c

    Pre-equilibrium

    Estimated using a (2+1)-D hydrodynamic model

    τth: tuned to 1 fm/c

    Equation of state: lattice QCD

    Initial condition: Glauber model (event-averaged)

    Collision energy: 2.76 TeV

    12 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Timeline

    ◼ Thermal photons

    Prompt Thermal

    τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c

    Pre-equilibrium

    Thermal photon emission rate

    Arnold, Moore and Yaffe, JHEP 0112, 009Turbide, Rapp and Gale, PRC 69, 014903

    where and

    13 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Timeline

    ◼ Pre-equilibrium photons

    Bottom-up / turbulent thermalization approach to glasma

    Prompt Thermal

    τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c

    Pre-equilibrium

    R. Baier, A. H. Mueller, D. Schiff, and D. T. Son, PLB 502, 51 (2001)

    (i)

    (ii)

    (iii)

    are introduced to “squeeze” the processes into the pre-hydro phase

    J. Berges et. al., PRC 95, 054904 (2017)

    14 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Timeline

    ◼ Pre-equilibrium photons

    Emission rate: Berges-Reygers-Tanji-Venugopalan model

    Prompt Thermal

    τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c

    Pre-equilibrium

    J. Berges et. al., PRC 95, 054904 (2017); N. Tanji and R. Venugopalan PRD 95, 094009 (2017)

    Stages (i), (ii)

    15 / 24

    : Self-similar scaling distribution

    (Exponentially cut off for pT > Qs; normalized as nq = nq

    th at τth)

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Timeline

    ◼ Pre-equilibrium photons

    Emission rate: Berges-Reygers-Tanji-Venugopalan model

    Prompt Thermal

    τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c

    Pre-equilibrium

    J. Berges et. al., PRC 95, 054904 (2017); N. Tanji and R. Venugopalan PRD 95, 094009 (2017)

    Stage (iii)

    with effective

    Note: The model is parametrically extended to fit into the pre-hydro time; quantitative discussion should be made carefully

    16 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Timeline

    ◼ Prompt photons

    pp direct photons - (other photons) scaled by Ncoll

    Thermal

    τ ~ 0.1 fm/c τ ~ 1 fm/c

    Pre-equilibriumPrompt

    Alternatively one may perform pQCD analyses; it should be noted that yet other sources of photons can be hidden

    Turbide, Rapp and Gale, PRC 69, 014903

    17 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Photons in AA collisions

    ◼ Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV, Glauber, 0-5%, Qs = 3 GeV

    Semi-hard reflecting the saturation momentum scale Qs

    Absolute value is dependent on parametrization; they could be comparable to thermal photons

    Pre-equilibrium photons

    (GeV)T

    p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    )-2

    dy (

    Ge

    VT

    dp

    T)

    dN

    /pp

    (1/2

    -810

    -710

    -610

    -510

    -410

    -310

    -210

    -110

    1

    10

    210

    310

    Pb-Pb 2.76 GeV

    pre-eq

    thermal

    thermal+pre-eq

    Preliminary

    18 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Photons in AA collisions

    ◼ Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV, Glauber, 0-5%, Qs = 3 GeV

    Semi-hard reflecting the saturation momentum scale Qs

    Absolute value is dependent on parametrization; they could be comparable to thermal photons

    Pre-equilibrium photons

    (GeV)T

    p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    )-2

    dy (

    Ge

    VT

    dp

    T)

    dN

    /pp

    (1/2

    -810

    -710

    -610

    -510

    -410

    -310

    -210

    -110

    1

    10

    210

    310

    Pb-Pb 2.76 GeV

    pre-eq

    thermal

    thermal+pre-eq

    Preliminary

    (GeV)T

    p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    )-2

    dy (

    Ge

    VT

    dp

    T)

    dN

    /pp

    (1/2

    -810

    -710

    -610

    -510

    -410

    -310

    -210

    -110

    1

    10

    210

    310

    410

    Pb-Pb 2.76 GeV

    scaled pppre-eq

    thermal

    direct

    Preliminary

    Prompt photons if pp is not modified by thermal or pre-eq. photons

    Ncoll scaled pp

    19 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Photons in AA collisions

    ◼ Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV, Glauber, 0-5%, Qs = 3 GeV

    Semi-hard reflecting the saturation momentum scale Qs

    Absolute value is dependent on parametrization; they could be comparable to thermal photons

    Pre-equilibrium photons

    (GeV)T

    p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    )-2

    dy (

    Ge

    VT

    dp

    T)

    dN

    /pp

    (1/2

    -810

    -710

    -610

    -510

    -410

    -310

    -210

    -110

    1

    10

    210

    310

    Pb-Pb 2.76 GeV

    pre-eq

    thermal

    thermal+pre-eq

    Preliminary

    (GeV)T

    p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    )-2

    dy (

    Ge

    VT

    dp

    T)

    dN

    /pp

    (1/2

    -810

    -710

    -610

    -510

    -410

    -310

    -210

    -110

    1

    10

    210

    310

    410

    Pb-Pb 2.76 GeV

    scaled pppre-eq

    thermal

    direct

    Preliminary

    Prompt photons if pp is not modified by thermal or pre-eq. photons

    Ncoll scaled pp

    Typical momentum scale

    19 / 24

    thermal pre-eq prompt

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Photons in pp collisions

    ◼ p-p 2.76 TeV, Glauber, Qs = 0.9 GeV

    They can be com-parable to direct photons in most central events

    Thermal photonsCf: C. Shen, Hard Probes ‘16

    They can be comparable to direct photon near Qs

    Pre-equilibrium photons

    Modified prompt background?

    (GeV)T

    p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    )-2

    dy (

    Ge

    VT

    dp

    T)

    dN

    /pp

    (1/2

    -910

    -810

    -710

    -610

    -510

    -410

    -310

    -210

    -110

    1

    10

    p-p 2.76 GeV

    direct

    pre-eq

    prompt

    Preliminary

    20 / 24

    No thermal QGP is assumed for the moment to be “conservative”

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Photons in AA collisions

    ◼ Pb-Pb 2.76 TeV, Glauber, 0-5%, Qs = 3 GeV

    Reduced at pT ~ Qs(p) and enhanced at pT ~ Qs(Pb)

    Prompt & pre-eq photons

    (GeV)T

    p0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

    )-2

    dy (

    Ge

    VT

    dp

    T)

    dN

    /pp

    (1/2

    -810

    -710

    -610

    -510

    -410

    -310

    -210

    -110

    1

    10

    210

    310

    410

    Pb-Pb 2.76 GeV

    promptpre-eq

    thermal

    direct

    Preliminary

    Modified prompt photons do not have much effect on spectra as thermal photons are dominant at pT ~ 1 GeV

    Results are dependent on the value of Qs; v2 may be affected more

    21 / 24

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Summary and outlook

    ◼ We have studied non-prompt photons in PbPb and pp collisions

    22 / 24

    Pre-equilibrium photons can provide visible semi-hard contribution to pT spectra

    pp direct photons may not be pure prompt photons; the baseline for AA analyses may well be modified by glasma creation

    One may probe and constrain the pre-equilibrium physics (Qs etc.) through direct photon analyses

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Summary and outlook

    ◼ We have studied non-prompt photons in PbPb and pp collisions

    ◼ Future prospects include:

    Pre-equilibrium photons can provide visible semi-hard contribution to pT spectra

    pp direct photons may not be pure prompt photons; the baseline for AA analyses may well be modified by glasma creation

    22 / 24

    One may probe and constrain the pre-equilibrium physics (Qs etc.) through direct photon analyses

    Analyses of the effects on elliptic flow v2Full pp thermal photon analyses can be used to test if the QGP is produced in pp collisions

    Implementation of chemically equilibrating QGP in hydrodynamic models Cf: AM, PRC 90, 021901(R) (2014)

  • Akihiko Monnai (KEK), Hard Probes 2018, October 3rd 2018

    Fin

    ◼ Merci de votre attention!