pov - aligning aps functionality to plan demand and manage inventory
DESCRIPTION
Whether selecting a package, implementing the software, or tuning-up the process, organizations must recognize both the importance and challenge in determining which planning models and parameters to use. Several methods are usually available within any leading APS package. This overview covers many of the more common methods and offers a perspective on how they may be applied. Appropriate application, in concert with other critical success factors, will aid greatly in helping organizations achieve and sustain desired benefits from their APS investment.TRANSCRIPT
Aligning APS Functionality to Plan Demand & Manage Inventory
A Point of View
By Tom Tiede
Aligning APS Functionality to Plan Demand & Manage Inventory
A Point of View 1 By Tom Tiede
Introduction
Many large corporations are considering or have implemented Advanced Supply Chain Planning (APS)
software. In doing so, the goal is to improve cash flow and minimize inventory investment. Successfully
achieving these goals is dependent on a number of factors such as executive sponsorship, resource
commitment, data integrity, and process discipline. Another critical success factor is the alignment of
software functionality with the needs of the business and the unique characteristics of each item to be
planned and managed by the system. Aligned appropriately, an APS will aid significantly in:
• Improving demand plans;
• Driving out unnecessary and excessive inventory levels; and
• Meeting or exceeding service level agreements.
Overview of Demand Planning, Inventory Planning & Replenishment Planning
Leading APS providers offer a suite of solutions for Demand Planning, Inventory Planning, and
Replenishment Planning. Usually, these are highly integrated modules that allow for the seamless flow of
data from forecast through replenishment order for each item and inventory location.
Exhibit 1: Demand to Replenishment Planning
In summary form, the process begins by periodically creating a forecast (or demand plan) for each item.
Pre-defined inventory rules are attached to each item to determine the system calculations to be used for
Order Quantity, Reorder Point, and Safety Stock. Replenishment Planning monitors on hand and projected
inventory levels to determine when and how much inventory should be ordered for each item and location to
meet anticipated demand.
It is relatively simple and straight-forward process. The challenge is determining which parameters or rules
to use for each product in attempt to find the optimal balance between service performance and inventory
investment.
Demand Planning
As stated, the process begins by creating a demand plan. A demand plan is the organization’s best view of
unconstrained future demand. It is derived by creating a statistical forecast from historical data then
factoring this with forward looking information from sales, marketing, and finance to create a consensus
demand plan. This plan, in turn, is fed as key input into the Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP) process
which results in a constrained operations plan.
Historical
Demand &
Current Orders
Inventory Rules
• Service Levels
• Order Quantity
• Reorder Points
• Safety Stock
• On Hand Inventory
• Planned Receipts
• Planned Orders
DemandPlanning
InventoryPlanning
ReplenishmentPlanning
Forecasts
By Item
& Location
Inventory Plan
By Item
& Location
Recommended PO
By Item
& Location
Historical
Demand &
Current Orders
Inventory Rules
• Service Levels
• Order Quantity
• Reorder Points
• Safety Stock
• On Hand Inventory
• Planned Receipts
• Planned Orders
DemandPlanning
InventoryPlanning
ReplenishmentPlanning
Forecasts
By Item
& Location
Inventory Plan
By Item
& Location
Recommended PO
By Item
& Location
Aligning APS Functionality to Plan Demand & Manage Inventory
A Point of View 2 By Tom Tiede
Exhibit 2: Demand Planning Process
Demand Planning serves several purposes and therefore often requires a different level of detail and time
horizon for each step in the process.
Exhibit 3: Demand Planning Time Horizons (Illustrative)
Time horizon terms to consider in the Demand Planning process include:
• Historical Horizon: defines the time period for which the historical data will be used and displayed for
forecast modeling. This is often comprised of demand history at the item-location level.
• Forecast Planning Horizon: defines the time period over which statistical forecasts are created and
adjustments may be made.
• Frozen Forecast Horizon: defines the time period for which demand planning processes will not
update/change the statistical forecast or adjusted demand plans.
• Telescopic Planning: defines the level of detail managed and communicated per time period. Near term
time periods will be managed at a more granular level of detail.
Historical data is stored in its most granular detail. In the statistical forecasting process, this data is rolled up
in a hierarchal structure so that forecasts can be created at multiple levels. Lower level forecasts (e.g. by
item and location) are used for near term inventory management and replenishment planning. Adjustments
can be applied at any level or horizon of the forecast. Creating consensus in the demand plan may require
alignment with Sales, Marketing, Finance, or other stakeholder groups. Each group may require a different
view and time horizon of an aggregated plan. Sales and Operation Planning (S&OP) generally uses a
monthly or quarterly view of anticipated demand summarized for purposes of planning long term operational
and resource requirements.
At the core of the Demand Planning process is the generation of a statistical forecast. Most Demand
Planning modules allow users to consider base (or average) demand, trend, seasonality, cycles, and
randomness in developing a forecast. Typically, a number forecast models will be available to use within the
application. The following are a few examples from a leading APS provider along with general guidelines on
how they are used.
• Derived: use when past demand data is non-existent or unreliable
• Inhibited: use to create a zero forecast
• Life Cycle Planning: use for new or end of life items
• Moving Average: use for items with very random demand histories or items with relatively flat demand
(i.e. no trend or seasonality)
S&OP
Plan(Constrained)
Consensus
Plan(Aligned)
Adjusted
Forecast(Unconstrained)
Statistical
Base LineForecast
Demand & Causal
Factor
Intelligence
Core Product Management
New Product
Introduction
Scope of “Leading Practice” Demand Planning Process
S&OP
Plan(Constrained)
Consensus
Plan(Aligned)
Adjusted
Forecast(Unconstrained)
Statistical
Base LineForecast
Demand & Causal
Factor
Intelligence
Core Product Management
New Product
Introduction
Scope of “Leading Practice” Demand Planning ProcessScope of “Leading Practice” Demand Planning Process
Frozen Period
(1 – 2 weeks)
Telescopic Granularity – Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly
Historical Horizon(12 - 36 months)
Forecast Planning Horizon
(12 – 36 months)
Frozen Period
(1 – 2 weeks)
Telescopic Granularity – Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly
Historical Horizon(12 - 36 months)
Forecast Planning Horizon
(12 – 36 months)
Aligning APS Functionality to Plan Demand & Manage Inventory
A Point of View 3 By Tom Tiede
• Non-seasonal: use this model when demand is trending but does not vary seasonally
• Irregular: use these models for items which are seldom used or if there are zero demand months
• Seasonal: use this model when demand is often higher or lower during particular times of the year
In addition, smoothing factors can be applied to the base, trend, and seasonal components of a forecast.
Smoothing factors allow each of these components and/or more recent data history to be weighed more or
less heavily in the creation of the forecast. Products in volatile markets, for example, may need to weigh
recent demand history more heavily than products with similar year over year trends.
Another important feature to consider is the demand planning hierarchy and the application of factoring
logic. As an example, leading forecasting systems will plan and forecast at multiple, user-defined levels
within a hierarchal pyramid structure.
Each level is independently forecasted within
the hierarchy, and the initial totals across levels
are usually unequal. Since each level must
eventually equal, top-down factoring logic is
then applied. Generally, forecasts are more
accurate when performed at a higher level of
detail. Forecasting demand for an entire product
group is usually more accurate than the sum of
the forecasts for each individual item within that
product group. The same is generally true when
forecasting across multiple inventory locations
for the same item. Therefore, factoring the
lower level detail by the higher level totals is
considered as a leading business practice which
ultimately results in higher overall forecast
accuracy and service level performance.
Inventory Planning
Inventory Planning is the link between Demand Planning and Replenishment Planning. It dynamically
computes time-phased inventory levels by item and location based on anticipated demand, replenishment
lead times, and required service levels. Inventory Planning is where the business rules and parameters are
established for:
• Reorder Point = Expected demand during replenishment lead time plus safety stock
• Safety Stock = Quantity held in stock to accommodate variability in customer demand and supplier
reliability (where the service level target establishes the amount of variability to cover)
• Order Quantity = Quantity ordered from supply point when reorder point is hit (may be a fixed or
variable quantity)
Key inputs include:
• Demand forecast by item and location: as the forecast changes so does the reorder point (if so
configured)
• Replenishment lead time (and lead time variation): used in determining the reorder point
• Forecast error: used as input to safety stock calculation
• Service level target: also used as input to the safety stock calculation
Exhibit 4: Demand Planning Hierarchy
(Illustrative)
Super
Group
Product Group
Item
Item & Location
Item, Location & Other Attributes
5
4
3
2
1
Super
Group
Product Group
Item
Item & Location
Item, Location & Other Attributes
5
4
3
2
1
Aligning APS Functionality to Plan Demand & Manage Inventory
A Point of View 4 By Tom Tiede
Exhibit 5: Inventory Reorder Point Logic (Illustrative)
The primary output is a time-phased inventory plan used as input to Replenishment Planning.
Safety stock is required to meet service levels when variability exists for demand and supply. The higher the
variability (or forecast error) and the higher the service target, the higher the safety stock needed to meet
demand. This is illustrated by the following normal distribution chart.
Exhibit 6: Normal Distribution Chart (Illustrative)
As demand becomes more variable, the curve widens and more safety stock is needed to meet an
established service level target. Slower moving items tend to have more variable demand, resulting in more
safety stock required on a relative basis.
Reorder Point
Safety Stock
Order
Qty.Order
Qty.
Order
Qty.
LeadTime
LeadTime
LeadTime
Inventory
Time
Reorder Point
Safety Stock
Order
Qty.Order
Qty.
Order
Qty.
LeadTime
LeadTime
LeadTime
Inventory
Time
K=2
Safety Stock = function(K*σF,S,LT)
Service Level = 97.7%
Shortages
Mean
All Demand Satisfied
Lead Time Demand =LT*DK=2
Safety Stock = function(K*σF,S,LT)
Service Level = 97.7%
Shortages
Mean
All Demand Satisfied
Lead Time Demand =LT*D
Aligning APS Functionality to Plan Demand & Manage Inventory
A Point of View 5 By Tom Tiede
Organizations must also consider the diminishing rate of return on investment in safety stock, as depicted in
the following illustrative chart of the service vs. inventory trade-off curve.
High service level targets require substantially
more inventory. That is why a leading
business practice is to segment service level
targets by inventory class. For example, 98%
service level target for “A” items, 95% for “B”
items, and 90% for “C” items. This
concentrates inventory investment in those
products with the most importance to the
organization.
Most leading Inventory Planning solutions
offer several methods for calculating safety
stock, including the use of a defined service
level target for each item. Here are a few
examples and a perspective on their
recommended application.
• Fixed Quantity
— Use this method to limit investment in high cost items, new items, items with highly variable supply,
or items where forecast error exceeds the standard deviation of demand
— May also be used to maintain an agreed minimal balance for a customer
• Lead Time (sum of forecast during replenishment lead time): use for dependent demand transfer items
(e.g. from RDC to service center) to cover replenishment lead time from WH to WH
• Periods of Supply (# of days of forecast to cover)
— Use for items with less predictable demand (high error rate but less than std. deviation in demand),
less predictable service level performance (due to erratic demand or supply reliability), but desired
minimal balances
— Potentially good method for slowest moving items
— May also best used for internal transfer of dependent demand items where forecast days equal
replenishment days
• Service Level (the expected unit demand fill rate)
— Use to provide a consistent service level (e.g. 95%) for items with predictable demand patterns (i.e.
forecast error < std. deviation of demand)
— For many organizations, this will be the most prevalently used safety stock method
• Minimize Backorders (the expected order demand fill rate): use if order fill rate is deemed more
important than unit fill rate and demand is relatively predictable
A reorder point is the point at which a new order is triggered. Generally, it is derived based on expected
demand during a specified time period plus safety stock. Five common methods for deriving reorder points
and perspective on their recommend application are as follows.
• Fixed quantity
— Use for items with unpredictable demand (forecast error > std. dev. of demand), low service
requirements, and no minimal balances (or embed safety stock by increasing the fixed quantity)
— May also be used when tied to a storage unit of measure such as pallet (e.g. reorder when only one
pallet is on hand in the warehouse)
• Fixed quantity + safety stock
— Use for items with unpredictable demand but required minimal balances (e.g. new items)
Exhibit 7: Service vs. Inventory Tradeoff Curve
(Illustrative)
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0S
erv
ice
Level %
Inventory Investment
90%95% 98%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0S
erv
ice
Level %
Inventory Investment
90%95% 98%
Aligning APS Functionality to Plan Demand & Manage Inventory
A Point of View 6 By Tom Tiede
— Similar to above method but allows safety stock to be calculated using a different method
• Forecast for X periods (Periods of Supply)
— Use for items with predictable demand, ordered on a periodic basis, but with low service
requirements, and no minimal balances (or embed safety stock by increasing the number of periods
of supply)
• Forecast for X periods (Period of Supply) + safety stock
— Use for items with predictable demand and high service levels but ordered on a predetermined,
periodic basis (e.g. weekly orders for high volume items when more than one order may be
generated during the replenishment lead time)
— Allows safety stock to be calculated using a different method
• Forecast during lead time + safety stock
— Use for items with predictable demand, high service level requirements, an orders generated on non-
periodic basis
— For many organizations, this will be the most prevalently used reorder point method.
Inventory Planning logic assumes an order will be generated when inventory hits a reorder point. It does not
create the supply order, but it does assume an order quantity method will be used when creating an
inventory plan. There are several methods for determining an order quantity. Here are a few of the more
common methods and perspective on their recommended application.
• Fixed Quantity: use when the same size order is required every time (e.g. agreed allocations from
suppliers); or when demand is highly stable (minimal trending, seasonality or randomness)
• Fixed Minimal Quantity: use to take advantage of a known price break (however the minimum will be
fixed regardless of actual need, so the use of this method may be limited)
• Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)
— A fixed quantity determined by [(2*annual forecast*order cost)/(inventory carrying cost per
unit)}^0.5
— Not recommended unless these costs are known, fixed quantities are desired, and demand is stable
• Periods of Supply (# of days of forecast to cover)
— Use when ordering for a period of time rather than a fixed quantity (e.g. weekly or monthly order
quantities rather than a fixed quantity), or use when EOQ is not known with confidence
— For many organizations, this will be the most prevalently used order quantity method.
Aligning APS Functionality to Plan Demand & Manage Inventory
A Point of View 7 By Tom Tiede
The following exhibit summarizes the recommended application of inventory planning parameters. Since
every organization’s requirements and product characteristics are unique, it should be viewed simply as
general guideline.
Exhibit 8: Recommended Application of Inventory Planning Parameters
(Illustrative)
Replenishment Planning
Replenishment Planning links planning and purchase order execution by creating recommend order
quantities based on forecasted demand, future inventory positions, and replenishment lead times.
Replenishment planning is also often referred to as Distribution Requirements Planning (DRP). Basic features
offered within the DRP modules:
• Automatically reconciles forecasts and customer orders
• Calculates a time phased (day-by-day) planned inventory (by adding in expected receipts and subtracting
the net requirements)
• Projects when inventory will drop into the safety stock
• Determines when an order must be released to prevent using safety stock
• Creates a recommended purchase quantity for authorization.
• Identifies exception situations where supply and demand are out of balance and expedited orders are
needed
Exhibit 9: DRP Example and Graphical Depiction (Illustrative)
Type of Product Order Pattern Restriction Demand Behavior Service Level
Inventory Parameters High Cost New End of Life
Dependent
Demand Item
Periodic Order
Frequency
Non-Periodic
Frequency
Handling,
Storage,
Purchasing
Restriction
Stable
Demand
Limited Trend
or Seasonality
Predictable by
Variable
Demand
σerror < σdemand
Erratic
Demand but
σerror < σdemand
Highly
Variable
σerror > σdemand
High Service
Level
Minimal
Balance
Requirements
Order Quantity
EOQ Use if lieu of fixed quantity when the order cost and carrying costs are known
Fixed Quantity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Minimum Use if lieu of fixed quantity when the minimim quantity is always purchased Yes
Periods of Supply (Variable Quantity) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Reorder Point
Fixed Quantity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Fixed + Safety Stock Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Periods of Supply + Safety Stock Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Periods of Supply Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Forecast over Lead Time + Safety Stock Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Safety Stock
Fixed safety stock quantity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sum of forecast over lead time Yes Yes Yes Yes
Periods of Supply Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Service level Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Minimize backorders Use in lieu of service level if order fill rate is preferred metric to unit fill rate
Periods 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Beginning Inventory 180 280 180 100 210 100 160 270 190 280
Projected Demand 100 100 80 90 110 140 90 80 110 100
Inventory (if no receipt) 80 180 100 10 100 -40 70 190 80 180
Planned Order 0 0 200 0 200 200 0 200 0 200 0
Planned Order Receipt 200 0 0 200 0 200 200 0 200 0
New Ending Inventory 280 180 100 210 100 160 270 190 280 180
Standard Order Quantity 200
Safety Stock 80
Lead Time Periods 2
Average Demand per Period 100
Periods 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Beginning Inventory 180 280 180 100 210 100 160 270 190 280
Projected Demand 100 100 80 90 110 140 90 80 110 100
Inventory (if no receipt) 80 180 100 10 100 -40 70 190 80 180
Planned Order 0 0 200 0 200 200 0 200 0 200 0
Planned Order Receipt 200 0 0 200 0 200 200 0 200 0
New Ending Inventory 280 180 100 210 100 160 270 190 280 180
Standard Order Quantity 200
Safety Stock 80
Lead Time Periods 2
Average Demand per Period 100
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Receipts
Demand
Inventory on Hand
Inventory (if no receipt)
Safety Stock
Aligning APS Functionality to Plan Demand & Manage Inventory
A Point of View 8 By Tom Tiede
This capability is often referred to as time-phased planning. Essentially, it takes a proactive approach to
planning orders based on projected future inventory levels. Much like a material requirements planning
(MRP) system, it also allows users to define dependent demand relationships, such as in a hub and spoke
distribution network. In doing so, it lowers the overall investment in inventory.
Summary
APS capabilities in Demand Planning, Inventory Planning, and Replenishment Planning enable organizations
to reduce inventories and lower operating costs while also raising service level performance. To maximize
benefit, it requires careful thought on how best to apply the capabilities of the software to business needs
and the unique characteristics of each planned item. Whether selecting a package, implementing the
software, or tuning-up the process, organizations must recognize both the importance and challenge in
determining which planning models and parameters to use. Several methods are usually available within any
leading APS package. This overview has covered many of the more common methods and a perspective on
how they may be applied. Appropriate application, in concert with other critical success factors, will aid
greatly in helping organizations achieve and sustain desired benefits from their APS investment.