power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

29
Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in-orbit data of two commercial LEO satellites Alan Kharsansky Systems Engineer @AlanKharsa

Upload: others

Post on 02-Jun-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in-orbit data of two commercial LEO satellites

Alan KharsanskySystems Engineer

@AlanKharsa

Page 2: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Last five years…

CubeBug-1Capitan Beto

Apr 2013

CubeBug-2ManolitoNov 2013

BugSat-1Tita

Jun 2014

NewSat 1,2 & 3Fresco, Batata,

Milanesat2016-2017

…NewSat 4/5

Q3 2017

They all neededpower!

Page 3: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

NewSat SatellitesCommercial earth observation satellites

• 39 Kg satellite• 3 Axis stabilized with precise pointing• Payloads:

• 1m multi-spectral camera• 30m hyperspectral camera• 80m Thermal Infrared • 75m RGB camera multipurpose

• 2 launched in May 2016• 1 launched in June 2017• 2 confirmed launches for 2017

Page 4: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Satellite architecture

Satellite

Payloads BUS

Structure Power Thermal OBC AOCS COMMS PROP

Payload 1 Payload 2 Payload 3

Page 5: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Subsystem goals• Deliver Power to the rest of the satellite• Be autonomous of the rest of the satellite • Be robust (free of “single points of failure”)• Protect the loads from Latch-Ups and others SEE• Manage the energy available

Page 6: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

The “normal” process

HardRequirements

Detailed eng.

Implementation

Validation

Integration and testing

Page 7: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

The “real” process

Softrequirements

Detailed eng.

Implementation

Validation

Integration and testing

Other subsystems reqs. Next generation

Page 8: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Initial soft-Requirements1. Deliver power to all the satellite loads during the different mission modes

even if the satellite was at the eclipsed phase of the orbit.

2. Degrade not more than 10% for the first 3 years in orbit.

3. Be able to work on any LEO ranging from equatorial to polar and SSO (from 10:30 to 14:30 LTAN) below 700 Km.

Page 9: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Architecture

Solar Panels

Battery

Rest of the Satellite

Page 10: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

LoadsThe stakeholders of the power subsystem

Solar Panels

Battery

Rest of the Satellite

Page 11: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Power budget – Orbital Average Power

Duty cycle per mode [%]

Component Nom. Power [w] Detumbling Earth pointing Lunar Injection

BUS

Power modules 2.74 100% 2.74 100% 2.74 100% 2.74

On board computers 5.38 13% 1.19 13% 1.19 26% 8.98

Comms low bitrate 5.85 100% 5.85 100% 5.85 100% 5.85

Comms high bitrate 25.11 8% 2.28 8% 2.28

AOCS 9.63 13% 1.27 80% 7.65 80% 7.65

Payload

EM Drive propulsión module 27.4 100% 27.4

Rainbow detector 13.0 100% 13.0

Unicorn tracker 3.01 100% 3.01

Results 11.05 35.72 54,9

Page 12: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Real numbers

Mode Orbital average powerSafe Mode 9.50 WNominal Mode 24.53WMission Mode ~40 W

With peaks of up to 80W

Page 13: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Solar PanelsPrimary energy source

Solar Panels

Battery

Rest of the Satellite

Page 14: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Generated power

𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 𝑊𝑊 = 𝑃𝑃𝑖𝑖𝑊𝑊𝑚𝑚2 ∗ 𝑎𝑎𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑎𝑎 𝑚𝑚2 ∗ η ∗ cos 𝛼𝛼

α

Solar cell

NormalSun

Page 15: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Geometric generation model

Page 16: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Solar cell degradationTemperature [C]

30 40 50 60 70 80 901M

eV F

luen

ce[e

/cm

^2]BOL = 0 100.0% 98.0% 96.0

%93.9%

91.8%

89.7%

87.6%

2.50E+14 94.5% 92.3% 90.2%

88.0%

85.8%

83.5%

81.2%

5.00E+14 92.4% 90.2% 87.9%

85.6%

83.2%

80.9%

78.5%

1.00E+15 90.9% 88.7% 86.5%

84.3%

82.0%

79.8%

77.4%

Page 17: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Solar cell Model

Satellite geometric model

Solar cell parameters

Degradation model

Temperature and radiation fluence

Generated power

Cells arrangement

Orbital and attitude parameters

Orbit and attitude model

Sun vector in body axes

Powerper cell

Total power

Input parameters

The complete generation model

Page 18: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Model output

Page 19: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

BatteriesSecondary energy source

Solar Panels

Battery

Rest of the Satellite

Page 20: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Main driver: Battery capacity

Objective: Define the configuration (series and parallel)

Basic cell unit

Type Li-Po 3.7V

Capacity 4.26 WhMax charge/discharge 0.575 A

Page 21: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Main drivers• Solar panels outputs limits• Bus voltage requirements• As high as possible for thinner cables

Conclusion3 cells in series -> 9.3v to 12.4v battery voltage

Voltage/Series selection

Page 22: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Main drivers:• Capacity of the total battery required (from loads in eclipse) 24 Wh• Maximum charge/discharge current (from loads and solar panels) 80W

Constraints:• Multiples of 3 in series -> 12.78 Wh x N

Conclusion:• Parallel configuration -> 2 Packs

Parallel selection

Page 23: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

The tyranny of the depth of discharge (DoD)

Cyc

les

3 Years = 17,520 cycles

(inspired by “The tyranny of the rocket equation”, by Don Petit)

Page 24: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Battery configuration

The 2 packs are now just the 20% of the requiered battery in order to never gobeyond 20% DoD.

Final configuration:

3S-10P

Page 25: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Final power module

Yes, it’s a CubeSat!

Page 26: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Systems validationIn orbit data

Page 27: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Power generation – 4 orbits

Page 28: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in

Batteries SoC – 18th Nov to 18th Dec

Page 29: Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in