power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in
TRANSCRIPT
Power modeling and budgeting design and validation with in-orbit data of two commercial LEO satellites
Alan KharsanskySystems Engineer
@AlanKharsa
Last five years…
CubeBug-1Capitan Beto
Apr 2013
CubeBug-2ManolitoNov 2013
BugSat-1Tita
Jun 2014
NewSat 1,2 & 3Fresco, Batata,
Milanesat2016-2017
…NewSat 4/5
Q3 2017
They all neededpower!
NewSat SatellitesCommercial earth observation satellites
• 39 Kg satellite• 3 Axis stabilized with precise pointing• Payloads:
• 1m multi-spectral camera• 30m hyperspectral camera• 80m Thermal Infrared • 75m RGB camera multipurpose
• 2 launched in May 2016• 1 launched in June 2017• 2 confirmed launches for 2017
Satellite architecture
Satellite
Payloads BUS
Structure Power Thermal OBC AOCS COMMS PROP
Payload 1 Payload 2 Payload 3
Subsystem goals• Deliver Power to the rest of the satellite• Be autonomous of the rest of the satellite • Be robust (free of “single points of failure”)• Protect the loads from Latch-Ups and others SEE• Manage the energy available
The “normal” process
HardRequirements
Detailed eng.
Implementation
Validation
Integration and testing
The “real” process
Softrequirements
Detailed eng.
Implementation
Validation
Integration and testing
Other subsystems reqs. Next generation
Initial soft-Requirements1. Deliver power to all the satellite loads during the different mission modes
even if the satellite was at the eclipsed phase of the orbit.
2. Degrade not more than 10% for the first 3 years in orbit.
3. Be able to work on any LEO ranging from equatorial to polar and SSO (from 10:30 to 14:30 LTAN) below 700 Km.
Architecture
Solar Panels
Battery
Rest of the Satellite
LoadsThe stakeholders of the power subsystem
Solar Panels
Battery
Rest of the Satellite
Power budget – Orbital Average Power
Duty cycle per mode [%]
Component Nom. Power [w] Detumbling Earth pointing Lunar Injection
BUS
Power modules 2.74 100% 2.74 100% 2.74 100% 2.74
On board computers 5.38 13% 1.19 13% 1.19 26% 8.98
Comms low bitrate 5.85 100% 5.85 100% 5.85 100% 5.85
Comms high bitrate 25.11 8% 2.28 8% 2.28
AOCS 9.63 13% 1.27 80% 7.65 80% 7.65
Payload
EM Drive propulsión module 27.4 100% 27.4
Rainbow detector 13.0 100% 13.0
Unicorn tracker 3.01 100% 3.01
Results 11.05 35.72 54,9
Real numbers
Mode Orbital average powerSafe Mode 9.50 WNominal Mode 24.53WMission Mode ~40 W
With peaks of up to 80W
Solar PanelsPrimary energy source
Solar Panels
Battery
Rest of the Satellite
Generated power
𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 𝑊𝑊 = 𝑃𝑃𝑖𝑖𝑊𝑊𝑚𝑚2 ∗ 𝑎𝑎𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑎𝑎 𝑚𝑚2 ∗ η ∗ cos 𝛼𝛼
α
Solar cell
NormalSun
Geometric generation model
Solar cell degradationTemperature [C]
30 40 50 60 70 80 901M
eV F
luen
ce[e
/cm
^2]BOL = 0 100.0% 98.0% 96.0
%93.9%
91.8%
89.7%
87.6%
2.50E+14 94.5% 92.3% 90.2%
88.0%
85.8%
83.5%
81.2%
5.00E+14 92.4% 90.2% 87.9%
85.6%
83.2%
80.9%
78.5%
1.00E+15 90.9% 88.7% 86.5%
84.3%
82.0%
79.8%
77.4%
Solar cell Model
Satellite geometric model
Solar cell parameters
Degradation model
Temperature and radiation fluence
Generated power
Cells arrangement
Orbital and attitude parameters
Orbit and attitude model
Sun vector in body axes
Powerper cell
Total power
Input parameters
The complete generation model
Model output
BatteriesSecondary energy source
Solar Panels
Battery
Rest of the Satellite
Main driver: Battery capacity
Objective: Define the configuration (series and parallel)
Basic cell unit
Type Li-Po 3.7V
Capacity 4.26 WhMax charge/discharge 0.575 A
Main drivers• Solar panels outputs limits• Bus voltage requirements• As high as possible for thinner cables
Conclusion3 cells in series -> 9.3v to 12.4v battery voltage
Voltage/Series selection
Main drivers:• Capacity of the total battery required (from loads in eclipse) 24 Wh• Maximum charge/discharge current (from loads and solar panels) 80W
Constraints:• Multiples of 3 in series -> 12.78 Wh x N
Conclusion:• Parallel configuration -> 2 Packs
Parallel selection
The tyranny of the depth of discharge (DoD)
Cyc
les
3 Years = 17,520 cycles
(inspired by “The tyranny of the rocket equation”, by Don Petit)
Battery configuration
The 2 packs are now just the 20% of the requiered battery in order to never gobeyond 20% DoD.
Final configuration:
3S-10P
Final power module
Yes, it’s a CubeSat!
Systems validationIn orbit data
Power generation – 4 orbits
Batteries SoC – 18th Nov to 18th Dec