power quality assessment - iaea · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 dynamic voltage restorer (dvr) 76 5.4...

163
POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT BY HUSSEIN MOHAMED EL-EISSAWI FATHI A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Engineering at Al-Azhar University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy IN ELECTRICAL POWER AND MACHINES Under the Supervision of Prof. M. Zaher Prof. N. Ayad Dr. G. Abdel Salam Al-Azhar University Atomic Energy Authority Ministry of Electricity FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AL-AZHAR UNIVERSITY CAIRO, EGYPT 2012

Upload: others

Post on 30-Mar-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

BY

HUSSEIN MOHAMED EL-EISSAWI FATHI

A Thesis Submitted to the

Faculty of Engineering at Al-Azhar University

In Partial Fulfillment of the

Requirements for the Degree of

Doctor of Philosophy

IN

ELECTRICAL POWER AND MACHINES

Under the Supervision of

Prof. M. Zaher Prof. N. Ayad Dr. G. Abdel Salam

Al-Azhar University Atomic Energy Authority Ministry of Electricity

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING

AL-AZHAR UNIVERSITY

CAIRO, EGYPT

2012

Page 2: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87
Page 3: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

I

POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT

BY

HUSSEIN MOHAMED ELEISSAWI FATHI

A Thesis Submitted to the

Faculty of Engineering at Al-Azhar University

In Partial Fulfillment of the

Requirements for the Degree of

Doctor of Philosophy

IN

ELECTRICAL POWER AND MACHINES

Approved by the

Examining committee

Prof. Dr. Fahmy Metwally Ahmed Bendary (Member) ----------------------

Benha University

Prof. Dr. Mohamed Mohamed Ibrahim Al-Gazar (Member) ---------------------

Al-Azhar University

Prof. Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Moety Ragheb Zaher (Advisor) ----------------------

Al-Azhar University

Prof. Dr. Nabil Mohamed Abdel-Fatah Ayad (Advisor) ----------------------

Atomic Energy Authority

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING

AL-AZHAR UNIVERSITY

CAIRO, EGYPT

2012

Page 4: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

II

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

CONTENTS II

LIST OF FIGURES V

LIST OF TABLES VII

LIST OF SYMBLOS VIII

ACKNOWLEDGMENT IX

ABSTRACT X

LIST OF PUBLICATIONS XII

CHAPTER (1)

INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Background 1

1.2 Objectives – Scope of the thesis 2

1.3 Overview of the thesis 3

CHAPTER (2)

LITERATURE REVIEW 4

2.1 Power quality definition 4

2.2 Power disturbances 4

2.3 Types of electrical power disturbances 4

2.4 Power quality monitoring 14

2.5 Power quality standards 15

2.6 Power quality solutions 19

2.7 Power quality assessment procedure (PQAP) 22

2.8 Related studies done by other researchers 27

CHAPTER (3)

DESCRIPTION OF CASE STUDY AND MEASURING PROCESS 37

3.1 Description of the case study (ETRR-2) 37

3.2 Electrical system of ETRR-2 38

Page 5: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

III

3.3 Electrical defects of ETRR-2 40

3.4 Measuring process 40

CHAPTER (4)

MONITORING IN ETRR-2 44

4.1 Introduction 44

4.2 Measurement results 44

4.3 Measurement results of the first feeder (source1) 44

4.4 Site appraisal of incoming feeder from substation1 (source 1) 53

4.5 Measurement results of the second feeder (source2) 54

4.6 Site appraisal of incoming feeder 2 (Source 2) 66

4.7 Invesigation results and mitigation techniques 67

CHAPTER (5)

MITIGATION APPLICATIONS 68

5.1 Introduction 68

5.2 Harmonic Filters 68

5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76

5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84

CHAPTER (6)

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

6.1 Conclusions and recommendations 87

6.2 The most important points that have been reached 87

6.3 Future work 88

REFERENCES

89

APPENDIX A 95

Power quality standards

Page 6: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

IV

APPENDIX B

Trend graphs

98

b.1 The trend graphs of incoming feeder 1 (Source 1) 99

b.2 The trend graphs of incoming feeder 2 (Source 2) 123

Page 7: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

V

LIST OF FIGURES

Page

Figure (2-1) : The voltage sag scenario 5

Figure (2-2) : The voltage swell scenario 6

Figure (2-3) : The under voltage scenario 6

Figure (2-4) : The over voltage scenario 7

Figure (2-5) : Typical instantaneous flicker signal recorded Close

to an electric arc furnace

9

Figure (2-6) : Waveforms with harmonic and interharmonic

components

11

Figure (2-7) : Voltage notching due to power electronic devices 11

Figure (2-8) : Voltage noises 12

Figure (2-9) : power system with nonlinear load 13

Figure (2-10) : power quality assessment procedure (PQAP) 26

Figure (3-1) : ETRR-2 general view 37

Figure (3-2) : Single line diagram of the electrical system of ETRR-2 39

Figure (3-3) : The Unipower 900F front panel 42

Figure (3-4): Single line diagram of PCC and measuring points

43

Figure (4-1):

Figure (4-2):

VTHD of incoming feeder of Source 1

ITHD of incoming feeder of Source 1

45

45

Figure (4-3) : ITHD variations of source 1 at 2nd day 46

Figure (4-4) : power variations of source 1 at 2nd day 46

Figure (4-5) : Voltage swell on phase 3 49

Figure (4-6) : Overvoltage on phase 1 50

Figure (4-7) :

Figure (4-8):

Overvoltage on phase 2

Overvoltage on phase 3

50

51

Figure (4-9): Short time voltage flicker of Source 1 52

Figure (4-10) : Long time voltage flicker of source 1 52

Figure (4-11) : VTHD of incoming feeder of source 2 54

Page 8: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

VI

Figure (4-12) :

Figure (4-13):

Figure (4-14):

Figure (4-15):

Figure (4-16):

Figure (4-17):

Figure (4-18):

VTHD variations of source 2 at 2nd day

Power variations of source 2 at 2nd day

ITHD of incoming feeder of source 2

ITHD variations of source 2 at 2nd day

Power variations of source 2 at 2nd day

ITHD variations of source 2 at 3rd day

Power variations of source 2 at 3rd day

55

55

56

57

57

58

58

Figure (4-19) : Voltage sag on phase 1 61

Figure (4-20) : Voltage sag on phase3 61

Figure (4-21) : Voltage swell on phase 3 62

Figure (4-22) : Voltage transient on the three phases 63

Figure (4-23) : Voltage transient on the three phases 63

Figure (4-24) : Voltage Outage 64

Figure (4-25) : Short time voltage flicker of source 2 65

Figure (4-26) : Long time voltage flicker of source 2 65

Figure (5-1) : Single tuned filter 70

Figure (5-2) : Typical schematic of a power system compensated by the

DVR.

77

Figure (5-3) :

Figure (5-4):

Basic Configuration of DVR

Effective transformer connection in stand-by and boost

modes

79

79

Figure (5-5) : General control system block diagram 81

Figure (5-6 ) : Schematic of double conversion on-line UPS 85

Page 9: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

VII

LIST OF TABLES

Page

Table (2-1) : Summary of IEEE standard 1100-1992 21

Table (4-1) : VTHD and ITHD at max. and min.loads of source1 47

Table (4-2) : Voltage deviation at max. and min. loads of source1 47

Table (4-3) : Voltage unbalance at max. and min. loads of source1 48

Table (4-4) : VTHD and ITHD at max. and min. loads of source2 59

Table (4-5) : Voltage deviation at max. and min. loads of source2 59

Table (4-6) : Voltage unbalance at max.and min. loads of source2

60

Table (5-1):

Table (5-2):

calculations for 5th harmonic filter

IEEE Std 18-2002

75

75

Table (5-3) : The situation of developing and researching for DVR 77

Page 10: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

VIII

LIST OF SYMBOLES

Pst Short time flicker severity

Plt Long time flicker severity

THD

V

I

D

Total harmonic distortion

Voltage

Current

Distortion power

Pfdisp Displacement power factor

Pfdistortion Distortion power factor

Wth Thermal power

Pav Average power

Pf total Total power factor

.hr. Harmonic order of resonant frequency

XC Capacitor reactance

XR Reactor reactance

STF Single tuned filter

DVR Dynamic voltage restorer

PCC

VPCC

Point of common coupling

Voltage at point of common coupling

S Apparent power

CDVR Cost of dynamic voltage restorer

CVS Cost of voltage sag

NVS Number of voltage sag per year

Tpayback Payback time

XF Filter reactance

IFF Filter fundamental current

QF Filter reactive power

XT Transformer reactance

IP Peak harmonic current

Page 11: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

IX

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The author wishes to express his sincere gratitude and appreciation first of all for his

parents, Prof. Dr. Mohamed Zaher; Al-Azhar University, Prof. Dr. Nabil Ayad;

Atomic Energy Authority and Dr. Gamal Abdel-Salam; Ministry of Electricity. For

their supervision and active guidance during the preparation of this thesis.

Thanks are also extended to Prof. Dr. Mohamed Al-Gazar; Al-Azhar University and

Prof. Dr. El-Metwally EL-Sherbiny; Atomic Energy Authority. For their great

assistance to complete this work.

And greeting to the spirit of the late Prof. Dr. Mohamed Askora; Al-Azhar University.

For his help and guidance during the work of this thesis.

Page 12: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

X

ABSTRACT

The electrical power systems are exposed to different types of power quality

disturbances problems. Assessment of power quality is necessary for maintaining

accurate operation of sensitive equipments especially for nuclear installations, it also

ensures that unnecessary energy losses in a power system are kept at a minimum

which lead to more profits. With advanced in technology growing of industrial /

commercial facilities in many region. Power quality problems have been a major

concern among engineers; particularly in an industrial environment, where there are

many large-scale type of equipment. Thus, it would be useful to investigate and

mitigate the power quality problems. Assessment of Power quality requires the

identification of any anomalous behavior on a power system, which adversely affects

the normal operation of electrical or electronic equipment. The choice of monitoring

equipment in a survey is also important to ascertain a solution to these power quality

problems. A power quality assessment involves gathering data resources; analyzing

the data (with reference to power quality standards); then, if problems exist,

recommendation of mitigation techniques must be considered.

The main objective of the present work is to investigate and mitigate of power

quality problems in nuclear installations. Normally electrical power is supplied to the

installations via two sources to keep good reliability. Each source is designed to carry

the full load. The Assessment of power quality was performed at the nuclear

installations for both sources at different operation conditions.

The thesis begins with a discussion of power quality definitions and the results of

previous studies in power quality monitoring. The assessment determines that one

source of electricity was deemed to have relatively good power quality; there were

several disturbances, which exceeded the thresholds. Among of them are fifth

harmonic, voltage swell, overvoltage and flicker. While the second source has bad

power quality. There are several and regular disturbances, which exceeded the

thresholds. They were voltage sag, voltage swell, under-voltage, temporary outage,

voltage transient and flicker. Mitigation techniques were suggested to install passive

harmonic filter to mitigate harmonic distortion, install a dynamic voltage restorer

Page 13: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

XI

(DVR) to mitigate voltage disturbances and isolate all the sensitive and critical loads

of nuclear installations and feed them via uninterruptible power supplies (UPS).

The thesis ends with the conclusion and recommendation of the effective/economic

mitigation techniques and the need for further studies in the discipline.

Page 14: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

XII

LIST OF PUBLICATIONS

This thesis is based on the work reported in the following papers:

Paper 1: M. Zaher, M. Askora, N. Ayad, G. Abdel Salam, H. Eleissawi, "Power

Quality and Voltage Interruptions in Nuclear Research Reactors", Journal

of Al-Azhar University Engineering Sector, JAUES, 2012.

Paper 2: M. Zaher, N. Ayad, E. Elsherbiny , G. Abdel Salam, H. Eleissawi, "

Investigation and Mitigation Techniques of Power Quality Problems in

Nuclear Installations", Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications,

2012.

Page 15: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١

CHAPTER (1)

INTRODUCTION

1.1- Background

The concept of power quality has often been misunderstood and oversimplified. But

in this day and age of sophisticated electronics, assessment of power quality has

become too important. The widespread use of high-tech devices has complicated all

aspect of electrical power. Not only are these devices more sensitive to the effects of

power quality, but they can also impact it negatively. Poor power quality can result in

less productivity, lost and corrupt data, damaged equipment and poor power

efficiency. “Power Quality” is a broad term used to describe the electrical power

performance.

The causes and solutions of power quality problems is site dependent, so the power

quality assessment is important for sensitive projects. Under normal (ideal sinusoidal,

balanced, and symmetric) conditions power quality is basically a loading problem.

But with the growth in the power electronics and control systems industry, the once

majority linear customer loads, are now being dominated by a majority of non-linear

customer loads. Such loads like: switch mode power supplies used in both industrial

and commercial computers / microprocessors; variable speed drives used in process

control; arcing device like welders and arc furnaces; silicon controlled rectifiers used

in air-conditioners; and basically any electronic device which draws current in pulses

are termed to be non-linear. So the power quality of a system is equally the

customers’ concern as much it is the supply authorities’ concern.

Power quality assessment has become a critical concern for virtually all electric

utilities through the world. It is primarily due to the fact that customer equipment has

become more sensitive and is now interconnected in extensive networks and

processes. The result is that variations in the power quality that were never a concern

can now be very expensive in terms of process shut-downs and equipments

malfunctions. The objectives of distribution system power quality assessment work

were to:

Page 16: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٢

1- Design a statistically valid power quality measurement program that would

enable assessment of power quality levels.

2- Perform measurements of power quality delivered to customers sufficient to

describe the transient, harmonics, short-and long- duration voltage variation, and

momentary interruption characteristics of present distribution supply system.

3- Perform analytical, modeling and simulation studies to verify and /or improve

analytical models by using the measured data.

4- Assess the limitations of a typical electric utility distribution system to supply

loads that degrade power quality.

5- Perform studies to identify measures to improve power quality from the supply

system perspective.

6- Determine the cumulative effect as the number of small (sensitive and /or

polluting) loads is increased.

7- Provide a rational basis for the development of a recommended practice for

providing solutions to power quality problems and improving system power quality

levels.

1.2- Objectives – Scope of the thesis:

The purpose of power quality investigation is to generate a data resource about a

power system where, following the analysis of that data resource, an appropriate

solution to the problem will be found. Due to the infancy of this technology and the

diversity of power systems, there is no set method for power quality surveys and

analysis. However there is one common goal of power quality assessment - to find a

solution. This analysis of the power system data was in accordance with the standards.

However, before proceeding directly to perform a site survey, some background

knowledge of the power quality area is essential. An understanding of the

characteristics of various faults, along with typical causes and prevention techniques

are suggested.

The aim of this thesis therefore is to firstly introduce the reader to common power

quality problems, their causes, and techniques or devices used to reduce their impact

on systems. An analysis of the results from the two incoming sources of nuclear

installation power quality studies is then presented. The investigation of the site

generated a data resource. If the data gathered from the site indicate deviations, which

Page 17: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٣

exceeds the limitation of the power quality standards, then logical explanations for

the disturbances should be suggested. Once this explanation is proposed, the next

stage of solving the problem can be initiated.

1.3- Overview of the thesis

This thesis discusses power quality assessment conducted with in a nuclear

installation. These surveys present a modular format for the analysis and

classification of power quality and power system problems.

This thesis consists of six chapters:

Chapter one presents the introduction, the objective and the overview of the thesis.

Chapter two contains all the terms and definitions of power quality, it describes the

different types of power disturbances, power quality monitoring, power quality

standards, solutions of power quality problems and power quality assessment

procedure. It contains also a review of studies conducted by other researchers.

Chapter three presents a general description of electrical system of nuclear

installation, electrical defects and measuring process.

Chapter four discusses the results, analysis and discussion of the power quality

investigation conducted at the case study.

Chapter five contains the mitigation techniques. The thesis document concludes with

chapter six, which presents conclusions, recommendations and future work in this

area.

Page 18: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٤

CHAPTER (2)

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 - power quality definition [1]

Power quality problem is any power problems manifested in voltage, current, or

frequency deviations that result in failure or missed operation of utility or end user

equipment.

2.2 -Power disturbances [2], [3] and [4]

The electrical power system is exposed to different types of disturbances leading to

power quality problems. These problems such as; voltage, current or frequency

deviation may result in failure or misoperation of customer equipment.

2.2.1 - Sources of disturbances

Electrical power quality is mainly affected by disturbances in feeding systems.

The sources of these disturbances are: -

1- Disturbances originating from utility feeding system due to faults which disturb the

source voltage waves and can be isolated within two seconds to one minute by

protection systems, or supply interruption will occur.

2- Disturbances originating from consumers’ networks and devices is mainly due to

three-phase loads, connection unbalance, absence of appropriate neutral wire,

absence of earthing system or low circuit breaker rating.

3- Non-linear characteristics of loads and devices or unsuitable line sites are other

sources of disturbances.

2.3- Types of electrical power disturbances:-

2.3.1- Voltage spikes and surges

It is a short duration from microsecond to millisecond voltage increase; it occurs due

to lightning, switching of heavy loads and power system faults. It leads to equipment

failure, system lock-up, data corruption and data loss. Solutions to voltage spikes and

Page 19: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٥

surges problems include equipment such as surge arresters, filters and isolation

transformer.

2.3.2-Voltage sag (dip)

It is a reduction in voltage outside the normal tolerance for a short time less than few

seconds. The magnitude of the reduction is between 10 percent and 90 percent of the

normal (rms) voltage. It occurs due to starting of heavy loads and power system

faults. It reduces the energy being delivered to the end user and causes computers to

fail, adjustable-speed drive to shut down and motors to stall and over heat.

Figure (2-1) shows the voltage sag scenario. Solutions to voltage sag problems

include equipment such as ferroresonant transformer, energy storage technologies,

uninterruptible power supply (UPS) and dynamic voltage restorer (DVR).

Figure (2- 1) the voltage sag scenario

Page 20: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٦

2.3.3-Voltage swell

It is a momentary increase in voltage outside the normal tolerance. The (rms.) voltage

variations that exceed 110 percent. Faults and turning off heavy electrical equipment

cause voltage swell. The increased energy from a voltage swell often overheats

equipment and reduces its life. Figure (2-2) shows the voltage swell scenario. Voltage

regulator, motor-generator set and uninterruptible power supply can mitigate the

voltage swell effects.

Figure (2-2) the voltage swell scenario.

2.3.4-Under voltage

As shown in figure (2-3) it is a decrease in the rms ac voltage to less than 90% at the

power frequency. A load switching on or a capacitor bank switching off can cause an

under voltage until the voltage regulation equipment in the system can bring the

voltage back within tolerances. Overloaded circuits and the loss of major

transmission support can also result in under voltages. It can cause sensitive computer

equipment to read data incorrectly and motor to stall and operate inefficiently. Utility

can prevent under voltage by building more generation and transmission lines.

Figure (2-3) the under voltage scenario.

Page 21: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٧

2.3.5- Over voltage

As shown in figure (2-4) it is an increase in the rms ac voltage greater than 110% at

the power frequency. Over-voltage is usually the result of the switching-off of a large

load, or the energizing of a capacitor bank. Over-voltages occur either because the

system is too weak for the desired voltage regulation or the voltage controls are

inadequate. An incorrect tap setting in transformers is one example.

Figure (2-4) the over voltage scenario

2.3.6- Voltage modulation

It is a periodic increase and decrease of amplitude. Periodic loads cause it. It leads to

poor power quality.

2.3.7- Voltage imbalance (IEEE Std. 1159) or unbalance

It can be defined as the maximum deviation from the average of the three-phase

voltages, divided by the average of the three-phase voltages and expressed in

percentage points. Imbalance can also be defined using symmetrical components. The

ratio of either the negative or zero sequence components to the positive sequence

component can be used to specify the percent imbalance. The primary source of

voltage imbalance (typically less than 2%) is the unequal distribution of single-phase

loads in a three-phase circuit. Voltage imbalance can also be the result of blown fuses

in one phase of a three-phase capacitor bank. Severe voltage imbalance (greater than

5%) can result from single-phasing conditions. Voltage imbalance causes motors and

transformers to overheat. This is because the current imbalance in an induction

device.

Page 22: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٨

2.3.8- Phase angle imbalance

It is the deviation from the normal 120 or 240 degree between three-phase voltages.

Phase angle imbalance can be caused by the uneven distribution of loads among the

phases.

2.3.9-Voltage fluctuations (flicker)

As shown in figure (2-5) they are cyclical variations in the voltage rms values or a

series of random voltage changes, whose magnitude does not normally exceed

voltage ranges of 0.9 p.u. to 1.1 p.u. A common phenomenon of voltage fluctuations

is the voltage flicker. Loads, which can exhibit continuous, rapid variations in the

load current magnitude, can cause voltage fluctuations or flickers. The present

industry practice is to characterize the severity of a voltage flicker with respect to the

sensitivity of the human visual perception. Typically, magnitudes as low as 0.5% can

result in a perceptible lamp flicker. Arc furnace and welders are the most common

causes of voltage fluctuations in utility transmission and distribution systems. Other

sources of voltage fluctuation include lumber mills, draglines, and rock crushing

machines. Voltage fluctuations can be considered as repetitive random voltage sags

and swells. Therefore, voltage fluctuations have propagation characteristics similar to

those of sags. They can be assessed using steady-state power system models. A strong

supply system can greatly reduce severity of voltage fluctuation. Voltage fluctuations

can cause incandescent and fluorescent lights to blink rapidly. It can also cause

sensitive equipment to malfunction. Static VAR system can mitigate the flicker

effects [2]. As the annoyance created by flicker is a function of both the intensity of

perception and the duration of exposure, according to IEC the severity of the

disturbance is described by two parameters: the short term severity (Pst) measured

over a period of ten minutes. And the long term severity (Plt) calculated from a

sequence of 12 Pst - values over a two hours interval, according to the following

expression:

312

1

3

12∑ =

=i

sti

lt

pp (2-1)

Page 23: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٩

Figure (2-5) typical instantaneous flicker signal recorded

Close to an electric arc furnace.

2.3.10- Outage

It is a complete loss of power, it is caused by faults and accidents. Solutions to outage

problems including equipment such as standby engine generator.

2.3.11- Power frequency variations

They are the deviations in the power system fundamental frequency from its normal

value. The power system frequency is directly related to the rotational speed of the

generators supplying the system. Slight variations in frequency occur as the dynamic

balance between load and generation changes. The size of the frequency shift and its

duration depend on the load characteristics and the response of the generation control

system to load changes. In modern interconnected power systems, significant

frequency variations are rare. Frequency variations of consequence are much more

likely to occur for loads that are supplied by generators isolated from the utility

system. In such cases, the generator response to abrupt loads changes may not be

adequate to regulate the frequency within the narrow bandwidth required by

frequency sensitive equipment. [1]

Page 24: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٠

2.3.12- Waveform distortion [1], [5] and [6]

It is defined as a steady-state deviation from an ideal sinusoidal wave of power

frequency. It is characterized by the spectral content of the deviation. Primary types of

waveform distortion are harmonics, notching, interharmonics, DC offset and noise.

Figure (2 –6) indicates waveforms with harmonic and interharmonic components.

- Harmonics are sinusoidal voltages or currents having frequencies that are integer

multiples of the fundamental frequency. Distorted waveforms can be decomposed into

the sum of the fundamental frequency and the harmonic components. Harmonic

distortion levels are described by the complete harmonic spectrum with magnitudes

and phase angles for each individual harmonic component. It is also common to use a

single quantity, the Total Harmonic Distortion (THD), as a measure of the effective

value of harmonic distortion. Harmonic distortion originates in the nonlinear

characteristics of devices and loads in the power system. Typical harmonic sources

are variable speed drives and other power electronics based equipment. One of the

major problems related to harmonic disturbances is harmonic resonance. The

resonance can magnify harmonic distortions to a level that can damage the equipment

or cause equipment malfunction. Power factor correction capacitors in distribution

system are the main cause of harmonic resonance. Other effects of harmonics are

equipment overloading, increased losses and sometimes equipment malfunction.

The most commonly used harmonics index is:-

THDV = 1

2

2

V

Vh

h∑∞

= * 100 % and THDI = 1

2

2

I

Ih

h∑∞

= * 100 % (2-2)

This is defined as the ratio of the rms value of the harmonic components to the rms

value of the fundamental component and usually expressed in percent. This index is

used to measure the deviation of a periodic waveform containing harmonics from a

perfect sine wave. For a perfect sine wave at fundamental frequency, the THD is zero.

Similarly, the measures of individual harmonic distortion for voltage and current at h-

th order are defined as Vh/V1 and Ih/I1, respectively.

Page 25: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١١

-Interharmonics are voltages or currents having frequency components that are not

integer multiples of the fundamental frequency. They can appear as discrete

frequencies or as a wide-band spectrum. Cyclo-converters are one of the sources of

interharmonics. It must be noted that due to the limitations of power quality

instruments time-varying harmonics can be recorded as interharmonics. Technically

sound methods for the accurate recording of the interharmonics have yet to be

developed. The effects of interharmonics are not known well. They have been shown

to affect power line carrier signaling.

Figure (2 –6) waveforms with Harmonic and Interharmonic Components

-Notching, as shown in figure (2-7). It is a periodic voltage disturbance caused by the

normal operation of power electronics devices when current is commutated from one

phase to another. Notching can be characterized through the harmonic spectrum of the

affected voltage. Although notching is a special case of voltage harmonics, it is

generally treated as an independent disturbance. The frequency components

associated with notching can be quite high and may not be readily measured with

equipment normally used for harmonic analysis.

Figure (2 –7) voltage notching due to power electronic devices.

Page 26: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٢

-Noise, as shown in figure (2-8). It is defined as unwanted electrical signals with

broadband spectral content lower than 200 kHz, superimposed upon the power system

voltage or current in phase conductors, or found in neutral conductors or signal lines.

Power electronic devices can cause noise in power systems, control circuits, and

arcing equipment. Improper grounding that fails to conduct noise away from the

power system often exacerbates noise problems. Basically, noise consists of any

unwanted distortion of the power signal that cannot be classified as harmonic

distortion or a transient. Noise disturbs electronic devices such as microcomputers and

programmable controllers.

Figure (2 –8) voltage noises

-DC Offset refers to the presence of a dc voltage or current in an ac power system.

This phenomenon can occur as the result of a geomagnetic disturbance or due to the

effect of half-wave rectification. Direct current in alternating-current networks can

have a detrimental effect by biasing transformer core fluxes. Transformers can

become saturated even in normal operation. This causes additional heating, loss of

transformer life, and the production of harmonics. DC offset may also cause the

electrolytic erosion of grounding electrodes and other connectors.

2.3.13- Distortion power factor [7]

Example for the non-sinusoidal situations is shown in figure (2-9). An expression for

distortion power factor can be arrived from current and voltage harmonic distortion

factors. From [7] and the definition of these factors, rms harmonic voltages and

currents can be written as

Page 27: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٣

Figure (2-9): power system with nonlinear load

2

)( )100(1 Vrmshrms THDVV += (2-3)

2

)( )100(1 Irmshrms THDII += (2-4)

Therefore, the total power factor is

22)()( )100(1)100(1 IVrmsrmshrmshrmstotal

total

THDTHDIV

P

IV

P

S

Ppf

++=== (2-5)

Where, 222 DQPS total ++= , D is the distortion power , (2-6)

Neglecting the power contributed by harmonics and also voltage distortion, as it is

generally small

distortiontdisplacmen

I

total pfpfTHD

pf •=+

−=2

11

)100(1

1)cos( θδ (2-7)

Because displacement power factor (pfdisp) can never be greater than unity, then the

true power factor in non-sinusoidal situations has the upper bound

distortiontotal pfpf ≤ . (2-8)

It is important to point out that it cannot be, in general, compensate for poor distortion

power factor by adding shunt capacitors. Only the displacement power factor can be

improved with capacitors. This fact is especially important in load areas that are

dominated by single-phase power electronic loads, which tend to have high

displacement power factors but low distortion power factors. In these instances, the

Page 28: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٤

addition of shunt capacitors will likely worsen the power factor by inducing resonance

and higher harmonic levels. A better solution is to add passive or active filters to

remove the harmonics produced by the nonlinear loads, or to utilize low distortion

power electronic loads.

2.4- Power quality monitoring: [8] and [9]

Power quality monitoring is needed to determine what type of power quality

disturbance is present, as disturbances are not always obvious. Many types of power

quality monitors are available. It measures and records all energy data such as

voltage, current, average power factor, instantaneous power factor, active power,

reactive power, frequency and all the disturbances.

Monitoring power quality instruments are connected to the network through

transducers and transducers should be selected according to the system. This will

require current transformers for current measurement on low voltage. Higher voltages

require correctly installed current and voltage transformers for connection of

monitoring equipment. Transducers should be selected based on the frequency

response required.

There are some basic instruments specifications such as the following: -

- Appropriate variable threshold for all required power quality disturbances.

- Range of disturbance types recorded.

- High crest value needed to avoid clipping and modifying over voltage in the

monitored waveform.

- Can ride through disturbances.

- Type and amount of data stored – raw data or parameters, sufficient for the desired

logging period.

- Number of channels, sampling rate and accuracy: 7 channels are necessary for the

recording of three phase voltage, current and neutral current as is desirable for

investigation of plant problems. Another channel for measuring neutral-earth voltage

can also be useful.

- Good reporting software.

- Associated large database capabilities.

- Easy to use.

Page 29: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٥

2.5- Power quality standards: [10], [11] and [12]

The purpose of power quality standards is to protect utility and end-user equipment

from failing or misoperation when the voltage, current or frequency deviates from

normal values. Power quality standards provide this protection by setting measurable

limits as to how for the voltage, current or frequency can deviate from normal values,

by setting these limits.

Power quality standards help utilities and customers to gain agreement to what are

acceptable and unacceptable levels of service. The customer should have level of

service corresponding to their devices, it is impossible to obtain a pure voltage wave

with fixed amplitude at each customer terminals. So, acceptable and allowed

disturbance levels should be specified in networks at different levels. There are many

standard organizations provide the acceptable levels. Such as Institute of Electrical

and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), European Union Standards organization

(CENELEC), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), American National

Standard Institute (ANSI), National Electrical Manufactures Association (NEMA),

Underwriters Laboratories (UL), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and

Semiconductor Equipment and Material International (SEMI).

2.5.1- Standard levels in power quality: [13] and [14]

- IEEE Standard 141-1993, Recommended Practice for Electric Power Distribution

for Industrial Plants. A thorough analysis of the basic electrical-system

considerations are presented. Guidance is provided in design, construction, and

continuity of an overall system to achieve safety of life and preservation of property;

reliability; simplicity of operation; voltage regulation in the utilization of equipment

within the tolerance limits under all load conditions; care and maintenance; and

flexibility to permit development and expansion.

- IEEE Standard 142-1991, Recommended Practice for Grounding of Industrial and

Commercial Power Systems. Presents a thorough investigation of the problems of

grounding and the methods for solving these problems .

- IEEE Standard 242-2001, Recommended Practice for Protection and Coordination

of Industrial and Commercial Power Systems. Deals with the proper election

Page 30: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٦

application and coordination of the components which constitute system protection

for industrial plants and commercial buildings.

- IEEE Standard 446-1995, Recommended Practice for Emergency and Standby

Power Systems for Industrial and Commercial Applications. Recommended

engineering practices for the selection and application of emergency and standby

power systems. It provides facility designers, operators and owners with guidelines

for assuring uninterrupted power, virtually free of frequency excursions and voltage

dips, surges, and transients.

- IEEE Standard 493-1995, Recommended Practice for Design of Reliable Industrial

and Commercial Power Systems, the fundamentals of reliability analysis as it applies

to the planning and design of industrial and commercial electric power distribution

systems are presented. Included are basic concepts of reliability analysis by

probability methods, fundamentals of power system reliability evaluation, economic

evaluation of reliability, cost of power outage data, equipment reliability data, and

examples of reliability analysis. Emergency and standby power, electrical preventive

maintenance, and evaluating and improving reliability of the existing plant are also

addressed.

- IEEE Standard 519-1992, Recommended Practices and Requirements for

Harmonic Control in Electrical Power Systems .This guide applies to all types of

static power converters used in industrial and commercial power systems. The

problems involved in the harmonic control and reactive compensation of such

converters are addressed, and an application guide is provided. Limits of disturbances

to the AC power distribution system that affect other equipment and communications

are recommended. This guide is not intended to cover the effect of radio frequency

interference.

- IEEE Standard 929-2000, Recommended Practice for Utility Interface of

Photovoltaic (PV) Systems.

- IEEE Standard 1100-2005, Recommended Practice for Powering and Grounding

Sensitive Electronic Equipment. Recommended design, installation, and maintenance

practices for electrical power and grounding (including both power-related and signal-

Page 31: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٧

related noise control) of sensitive electronic processing equipment used in commercial

and industrial applications.

- IEEE Standard 1159.3-2003, Recommended practice for the transfer of power

quality data.

- IEEE Standard 1250-1995, Guide for Service to Equipment Sensitive to

Momentary Voltage Disturbances. Computers, computer-like products, and

equipment using solid-state power conversion have created entirely new areas of

power quality considerations. There is an increasing awareness that much of this new

user equipment is not designed to withstand the surges, faults, and reclosing duty

present on typical distribution systems. Momentary voltage disturbances occurring in

AC power distribution and utilization systems, their potential effects on this new

sensitive, user equipment and guidance toward mitigation of these effects are

described. Harmonic distortion limits are also discussed.

- IEEE Standard 1346-1998, Recommended Practice for Evaluating Electric Power

System Compatibility with Electronic Process Equipment. A standard methodology

for the technical and financial analysis of voltage sag compatibility between process

equipment and electric power systems is recommended. The methodology presented

is intended to be used as a planning tool to quantify the voltage sag environment and

process sensitivity. It shows how technical and financial alternatives can be evaluated.

Performance limits for utility systems, power distribution systems, or electronic

process equipment is not included.

- IEEE Standard 18-2002, Standard for Shunt Power Capacitor.

- IEEE Standard 1453-2004, Recommended Practice for Measurement and Limits

of Voltage Fluctuations and Associated Light Flicker on AC Power System.

- IEEE Standard 1159-2009, Recommended Practice for Monitoring Electric Power

Quality. Monitoring of electric power quality of AC power systems, definitions of

power quality terminology, impact of poor power quality on utility and customer

equipment, and the measurements of electromagnetic phenomena are covered.

Page 32: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٨

- SEMI E-10-1999, Standard for Definition and Measurement of Equipment

Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability, it defines the sag ride through

capability.

- SEMI F-42-1999 ،Test Method for Semiconductor Processing Equipment Voltage

Sag Immunity, it defines the test methodology to confirm compliance to the standard.

- UL 1449 Second Edition, 1998. Standard 1449 is a Safety, Construction, and

Performance Standard for Transient Voltage Surge Suppressors. The second edition

revision includes withstand for loss of neutral condition without damage to the

suppressor.

- ANSI C84.1-1995, Electric Power Systems and Equipment - Voltage Ratings.

Published by NEMA, National Electrical Manufacturers Association, This voluntary

standard was first approved in 1954 as a joint effort by the Edison Electric Institute

and the NEMA to recommend voltage ratings for both electric systems and equipment

to promote compatibility. ANSI standard establishes the steady state voltage delivery

window of +/- 5% at the point of delivery. It also recommends a tolerance window of

+6% and -13% for end use equipment. The standard also establishes a tolerance

window for voltage unbalance of +/-3%.

- EMA MG 1- 1998, Motors and Generators National Electrical Manufacturers

Association. This standard gives technical specifications used by manufacturers.

Power quality concerns that can be referenced include voltage and current unbalance

tolerance, over and under voltage tolerance, electrical starting characteristics, and

insulation values.

- NEMA Standards Publication No. LS1-1992, Low Voltage Surge Protective

Devices. This is a good standard for quality construction of the device.

-EN50160 indicates Voltage Characteristics of Electricity Supplied by Public

Distribution Systems. [11]

- IEC61000-4-15, Flicker meter- Functional and Design Specifications. [12]

Page 33: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٩

2.6- Power quality solutions: [1]

There are four ways to solve power quality problems:

1- Design equipment and electrical systems to prevent electrical disturbances from

causing equipment or systems to malfunction. Where, manufactures of sensitive

equipment can reduce or eliminate the effect of power quality problems by designing

their equipment to be less sensitive to disturbances. They can add some devices to

their equipment according to situation, for instance a capacitor to provide temporary

energy storage when the voltage sags are too low. They can also alter their equipment

to desensitize it to power quality problem for example; they can design special K-

factor transformers that tolerate harmonics.

2- Analyze the symptoms of power quality problems to determine its cause and

solution. It is important to determine source and type of power quality problems, the

type of power quality problem and its cause often determine the solution.

3-Identify the medium that is transmitting the electrical disturbances and reduce or

eliminate the effect of that medium.

4- Treat the symptoms of the power quality problems by use of power conditioning

equipment. It provides essential protection against disturbances. Power conditioning

equipment include devices that reduce or eliminate the effect of a power quality

disturbance. It can be used to condition the source, the transmitter, or the receiver of

the power quality problems. The equipment can be divided into ten categories, surge

suppressors, noise filter, isolation transformer, low-voltage line reactors, various line-

voltage regulators, motor-generator sets, dual feeders with static transfer,

uninterruptible power supplies, harmonic filters and Dynamic voltage restorer (DVR).

2.6.1-Selection of appropriate power conditioning equipment:

End user should implement the following steps before selecting the appropriate power

conditioning equipment to mitigate their problem:

· Determine the power quality problem.

· Correct wiring and grounding and faulty equipment problems before purchasing

power conditioning equipment.

Recent surveys by ERRI and others indicate that improper grounding and wiring

Page 34: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٢٠

cause 80 to 90 percent of the power quality problems. However, many end users

overlook improper grounding and wiring in their facilities. They should always

investigate the wiring and grounding in their facilities before purchasing and

installing expensive power conditioning equipment.

· Evaluate alternative power conditioning solutions.

· Develop a power-conditioning plane.

· Determine if the utility source is compatible with the load.

· Select and install power conditioning equipment.

· Operate and maintain power-conditioning equipment

Table (2-1) from IEEE standard 1100-1992. Indicates how to select the appropriate

power conditioning technology to match the power quality problem.

Page 35: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٢١

Table (2-1) Summary of IEEE std.1100-1992

The condition should be corrected by the indicated power-conditioning

technology.

There is a significant variation in product performance.

The condition may or may not be fully correctable by the technology.

Page 36: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٢٢

2.7- Power quality assessment procedure (PQAP): [6] and [15]

Power quality assessment procedure is based on a variety of different power quality

concerns that can exist and focuses on a combination of monitoring and analysis to

characterize these concerns. Once the power quality concerns are characterized, the

analysis procedures developed can be used to evaluate possible solutions to the power

quality problems. These solutions must then be evaluated from both a technical and an

economic perspective.

There are a number of important areas that must be addressed in the power quality

assessment procedure. These include:

- Data collection requirements.

- Important power quality concerns as a function of the type of customer.

- Equipment sensitivity.

- Important parameters of the power quality concerns.

- Roles of measurements and simulations in evaluating the concerns.

- Implementation of possible solutions to solve the problem.

Power quality assessment procedure provides a general framework that contains all

the possible elements that may be needed for power quality study. The following

sections summarize the general steps involved in the procedure.

2.7.1-Identify power quality concerns

The specific power quality concerns that need to be evaluated will be different from

customer to customer. A review of the types of equipment used by the customer,

process requirements and economic impacts of problems will lead to a list of concerns

that need to be studied. They can include possible problems with both the utility

distribution system and the customer facilities. Possible power quality problem

categories to be evaluated include the following:

- Voltage transients caused by circuit switching and load switching within the

customer facility.

Page 37: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٢٣

- Harmonic distortion from nonlinear loads.

-Transformer heating caused by harmonic current levels.

-Transient magnification at low voltage capacitor banks.

-Transients and notching associated with power electronics equipment operation.

-Neutral conductor overloading due to harmonic producing loads.

-Voltage flicker from arc furnace loads and arc welding loads.

-Voltage sags due to faults on parallel circuits on the same distribution system or faults

on the transmission system.

-Momentary interruptions at industrial and commercial installations due to recloser

operations on feeder circuit breakers.

-Coupled voltage at customer facilities due to lightning transients on the primary

distribution system.

Identification of particular concerns involved for an installation provides a focus

for the study. Development of a model for analysis of the problem is dependent on the

frequency range of the power quality variations that need to be studied. The model

can be for computer simulations, hand calculations, or application of simple rules.

2.7.2-Collect data

A representation of the customer system and important parts of the utility system

should be developed for preliminary analysis. In cooperation with the customer, the

data is collected and compiled into a database for convenient reference during the

analysis. Important information includes:

- load characteristics

motors

power electronics

process control

computers

Page 38: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٢٤

adjustable speed drives

lighting

- Transformer sizes/ ratings

- Conductor lengths, characteristics

- Customer capacitor sizes, location and switching procedures

- Customer equipment and circuit switching

- Power conditioning equipment

surge suppressors

isolation transformers

constant voltage transformers

U.P.S system

harmonic filters

- Distribution system characteristics

primary voltage

underground / overhead

protection practices and switching procedures

capacitor applications (locations, sizes and switching)

2.7.3-Develop measurement program and perform monitoring

The utility and customer systems being evaluated should be monitored to

characterize the power quality variations. The measurement program should be

designed based on the particular sensitive loads existing at the customer facilities.

Monitoring will typically be performed at the customer service entrance and close to

particular sensitive loads in order to characterize disturbances coming from the utility

system and disturbances which are localized at the sensitive loads. A measurement

program plan should be developed which specifies the following:

Page 39: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٢٥

- Quantities to monitor.

- Monitoring durations.

- Threshold levels which will trigger recording of disturbances.

- Waveform sampling and data storage requirements.

- Analysis procedure and data presentation formats.

The monitoring process requires close cooperation between the customer and utility

personnel. Monitoring sites and instrumentation should be selected based on the

particular concerns being characterized. The duration of monitoring will depend on

the parameters which can affect the power quality concerns.

2.7.4-Evaluate measurement results and develop solutions

The measurement results are analyzed. The initial measurements and the site survey

are used to identify the phenomena involved and the important parameters. This

information is used for possible solutions to the power quality problem.

Once the range of technical solutions is identified, economic analysis need to be

performed to evaluate the possible alternatives for solving customer power quality

problems. These alternatives will generally include the following options:

- Power conditioning and / or filtering at the sensitive loads.

- Central power conditioning and /or filtering at the customer service entrance.

- Changing operating procedures or system design on the utility distribution

system.

- Modification to the design of sensitive loads to make them less sensitive to power

quality variations.

The requirements for each of these options will be developed and the analysis of

measurements results will be performed.

Figure (2-10) indicates a summary of power quality assessment procedure (PQAP)

Page 40: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٢٦

Implement Solution

Identify Power Quality Concerns

Voltage Sags

Momentary Interruptions

Capacitor Switching Transients

Lightning

Harmonic Distortion

Neutral Conductor Overloading

Transformer Heating

Voltage Flicker

Voltage Notching

Circuit/Load Switching Transients

Collect Data

Utility System Data

Customer System Data

Equipment Characteristics

Develop Measurement Program/

Perform Monitoring

Location(s) to Monitor

Quantities to Monitor

Instrumentation Requirements

Thresholds

Analysis Requirementst

Customer Participation

Evaluate Measurement Results/Develop Solutions

Identification of Cause of Problem

Evaluate Solutions

Economic Analysis of Solutions

Power Conditioning

Utility System Modification

Equipment Design Modifications

Figure (2-10) power quality assessment procedure (PQAP)

Page 41: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٢٧

2.8- Related studies done by other researchers:

This part presents preliminary results from different researchers in the power quality

assessment on electric distribution system. These researches were done in various

locations around the world.

- Barker P. P [16], this work done in mid 1989, the Niagara Mohawk Power

Corporation’s Research and Development Department sponsored a major power

quality study of two distribution feeders in the Buffalo, New York region. The aims of

this two-year study were:

i) Assist Niagara Mohawk in identifying and correcting abnormal conditions resulting

from possible poor power quality in a residential area, served by the Shawnee

Substation, and referred to as Wurlitzer Park.

ii) Create a database of power quality measurements, which could be used for system-

wide comparison and analysis.

The results of the study proved that majority of the problems were actually caused by

the customer’s owned equipment.

– Dabbs W. et al [17], in 1990, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has

decided to corporate with Electrotek Concepts to conduct a study of the state of power

on the various power distribution systems in the United State. The purpose of this

survey is to develop a statistical representation of the power system, the disturbances

being measured, the protective relaying devices and other site characteristics. The

distribution power quality project was planned which involves the monitoring and

simulation of power quality phenomena on the distribution systems.

The project was starting in June 1992, over a period of two years, quite a large

number of PQ nodes were places on a total of about 300 monitoring points. The

results of these studies have shown that the most common type of faults found in the

power disturbances were voltage sag, transients, harmonic distortions and momentary

interruptions.

- Dorr D. S. et al. [18], in 1991, the Canadian Electrical Association (CEA) started a

three year long power quality survey. With twenty-two utilities involved on a total

550 site, the monitored activities went on for 25 days per site. The data collected were

Page 42: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٢٨

from different groups, such as industrial, commercial and residential. The main

objective was to obtain an indication of power quality on the utility’s distribution

system in Canada. In order to avoid getting readings influenced by individual loads or

wiring error in the utilities, the sites being monitored were at the customer's service

entrance panel. The gathered results were then served as a baseline for further

comparisons of newly founded results in the near future.

- M. McGranahan [15], in 1991, the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)

published procedure for assessment the power quality. This report presents the results

of an effort sponsored by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and Pacific Gas

and Electric Company (PG E) to develop a standardized approach for dealing with

power quality problems. The approach taken here is to develop an understanding for

the full range of possible power quality concerns. A set of definitions for different

power quality categories is presented. Under each category, important characteristics

of the concern are identified, possible causes of the power quality variations are

presented, and possible solutions are outlined. After developing an understanding for

the various phenomena, a standard procedure for evaluating power quality problems is

presented. This Power Quality Assessment Procedure (PQAP) involves a combination

of measurements and simulations and emphasizes on the required cooperation between

all the parties involved. A power quality survey was also performed to assist in

identifying the most important concerns reported by customers on the PG E system.

- D. D. Sabin et al[19], this work done in 1996, the Electric Power Research Institute

(EPRI) published a technical report "An assessment of distribution system power

quality”, this report provides a comprehensive statistical database of power quality

measurements collected during the EPRI distribution power quality projects as well as

guidelines for monitoring and modeling power quality phenomena on distribution

system. Presented are triggering methods, characterization algorithms, and statistical

analysis for voltage disturbances.

- Chan, V.K.K [20], this work presents power quality survey at University of

Queensland, St. Lucica campus was done during a thesis study. The monitoring was

carried out in three different locations within the University of Queensland. Two

transformers that were monitored one with a 1000kVA rating and the other one with

Page 43: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٢٩

750kVA rating. The result of this case study has concluded that, the most of the

transients occurred between 5:00 – 7:00AM. These disturbances were probably

caused by the switching of the controlled capacitor banks.

- Tapan Saha et al [21], this paper presents an investigation of power quality

problems in a remote gold mine site in Papua New Guinea and was done during thesis

work at the University of Queensland. The results has concluded that, the common

voltage sag phenomena was observed and a dynamic voltage restorer (DVR) was used

as a solution of this problem.

- Eloi Ngandui [22], this work discusses power quality monitoring and analysis of a

university distribution system. The analysis of the recorded data at the point of

common coupling of the University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres yield the following

results: - the voltage THD is below the 5 % limit set by the IEEE 519-1992 - the

current injected has a TDD below the 5 % limit set by the IEEE 519-1992. 99% of the

time the TDD is below 2.04 %. The information provided in this analysis gives a

reference level for future study and extension of the electrical installation of the

University of Quebec at Trois-Rivieres.

- M. Izhar et al [23], In 2003, an investigation on power quality at electrical and

electronic engineering department building in the University of science Malaysia for

three phase four-wire system was done. The survey was conducted through out a day

during peak and off peak hours. The harmonic level, total harmonic distortion, neutral

current and power associated such as power consumption, true power factor, etc. for

each line were measured and analyzed. The analysis of data from the measured

distribution system showed that the harmonic level was highest at odd harmonic

compared to even harmonic. The results also reveal that power consumption and

instantaneous power increased during peak hours. The power factor correction

mechanism too was functioning well and approaching unity. One very interesting

factor is that the neutral currents and total harmonic distortion were excessive in the

line neutral distribution system and would affect the distribution system performance.

Ideally, it should be zero.

Page 44: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٣٠

-Wes Sunderman et al [24], this paper presents the findings of a follow-on project,

referred to as DPQ 11, which was conducted in 2001 and 2002 in U.S. This project

resulted in characterizing power quality in terms of short-duration variations such as

voltage sags, voltage swells, and voltage interruptions. The characterization was

based on analysis of data from 480 power quality monitors at different locations in a

power system spanning a date range from August 30, 1993, through December 12,

2002. The results of the analysis that are presented in this paper provide a unique

opportunity to understand the electrical environment in terms of short-duration

variations and further validate the findings of DPQ 1.

- Jose C.C. Costa et al [25], this work presents an example of power quality

assessment study in an electrical panel that supplies investigation laboratories, office

rooms and an electronics workshop, using a developed power quality monitor. The

results of this study are analyzed using international standards as reference in order to

determine the quality of the supplied energy.

-A.M. El-Zonkoly [26], the paper presents an intelligent system for power quality

assessment application. This system is used for power system model validation. A

genetic algorithm (GA) based system for validating the power system model in

capacitor switching studies has been developed. The problem formulation and the

proposed solution are illustrated. The feasibility of the developed system for practical

applications is demonstrated by evaluation studies.

- M.H.J. Bo1 ten et al [27], the work presents model has been incorporated in the

method for reliability/power quality analysis of industrial power systems, Simulations

are presented to show the influence of the post-fault voltage sag due to motor re-

acceleration on the reliability/power quality of the supply. The simulations result in a

table with the expected number of interruptions of plant operation for different load

sensitivities.

-Surya Santoso et al [28], the paper presents an approach to detect, localize, and

investigate the feasibility of classifying various types of power quality disturbances.

The approach is based on wavelet transform analysis, particddy the dyadic-

Page 45: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٣١

orthonormal wavelet transform. The key idea underlying the approach is to

decompose a given disturbance signal into other signals which represent a smoothed

version and a detailed version of the original signal. The decomposition is performed

using multiresolution signal decomposition techniques. They demonstrate and test

their proposed technique to detect and localize disturbances with actual power line

disturbances. In order to enhance the detection outcomes, they utilize the squared

wavelet trans-form coefficients of the analyzed power line signal. Based on the results

of the detection and localization, they carryout an initial investigation of the ability to

uniquely characterize various types of power quality disturbances. This investigation

is based on characterizing the uniqueness of the squared wavelet transform

coefficients for each power quality disturbance.

- G. T. Heydt et al [29], the paper discusses the application of the Windowed Fast

Fourier Transform to electric power quality assessment. The WFFT is a time

windowed version of the Discrete Time Fourier Transform. The window width may

be adjusted and shifted to scan through large volumes of power quality data. Narrow

window widths are used for detailed analyses, and wide window widths are used to

move rapidly across archived power quality data measurements. The mathematics of

the method is discussed and applications are illustrated.

- A. P. Salas Meliopoulos et al [30], the work represents a statistical method to

power quality assessment. The method is based on Monte Carlo simulation of the

integrated utility system/customer system. The proposed integrated model is based on

the physical design parameters of the system. This approach makes it possible to

relate the design parameters of a system to the statistical power quality level of the

system at the customer site. Thus the proposed model is very fusel for meaningful

improvements of the system to maximize power quality.

- E.F. EL-SaadanyY et al [31], the paper focuses on capacitor switching events,

capacitor switching transient depending on capacitor location, load type, load level,

voltage level and instant of switching. The effect of these factors on capacitor

transient was examined by using Wavelet and Fast Fourier Transforms.

Page 46: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٣٢

-T. K. Abdel-Galil et al [32], the paper discusses a new monitoring strategy for

power quality events. This new strategy will be implemented using a distributed

power quality monitoring nodes, which will be connected via Ethernet connection to a

central diagnosis unit.

-Mihaela Albu et al [33], the paper presents using the root mean square, a

mathematical operation in power quality assessment. The root mean square

mathematical operation is widely used in power engineering. The process has a

frequency response characteristic and an associated time constant which is important

especially for short term signals. Potential problem areas in using RMS values in

power quality assessment are identified and discussed.

- Abd-Elmoneim Moussa et al [34], the paper discusses a proposed work to

introduce a new concept of advanced power quality assessment. The introduced

system is implemented using applications of a set of powerful software algorithms

and a digital signal processor based hardware data acquisition system. The suggested

scheme is mainly to construct a system for real time detection and identification of

different types of power quality disturbances that produce a sudden change in the

power quality levels. A new mitigation technique through generating feedback

correction signals for disturbance compensation is addressed. The performance of the

suggested system is tested and verified through real test examples. The obtained

results reveal that, the introduced system detects fast and accurately most of the power

quality disturbance events and introduce new indicative factors estimating the

performance of any supply system subjected to a set number of disturbance events.

- Lucian Mandache et al [35], the paper discusses a new and accurate method of

harmonic analysis that permits to mitigate most of power quality related problems.

The principle is to estimate intermediate points between the initial samples given by

the available data acquisition system; therefore, the Fourier coefficients are estimated

more precisely using the Fast Fourier Transform. As interpolation technique they

chose the reconstruction of the analog signal using an ideal low pass filter. The

excellent results are validated on a pair of synthesized signals having known harmonic

spectrum.

Page 47: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٣٣

- Ivan J. Rivera et al [36], the paper represents a work to develop a time frequency

signal analysis system to detect and recognize different kinds of power quality events

or disturbances. To achieve their goal, design of computational signal processing

methods is addressed using developing time-frequency tools based on signal algebra

operators. The use of signal algebra operators permits the formulation of time-

frequency algorithms in a computational framework setting, allowing the search for

efficient hardware implementations. Time-frequency formulations are implemented

for embedded system applications using Digital Signal Processing (DSP) and Field

Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) units. Voltage disturbances are responsible for

many disruptions in industrial, commercial and residential power supply systems,

causing time and monetary losses. It is necessary to identify fast methods of

determining when these disturbances are occurring in order to make correct power

quality decisions. Automated information processing systems are needed to assess

existing problems. Although a lot of work has been done on power line disturbance

assessment, new techniques are desired to address new challenging power quality

issues, especially in the area of physical security. Time-frequency signal analysis is a

well known tool used in fields such as speech, sonar, and radar processing and is now

finding its being in power quality assessment. A time frequency representation is a

two-dimensional representation that shows how the spectral content of a given signal

changes with time. There is a genuine interest in this kind of representations for the

field of power quality signal analysis systems since they provide more information

than the typical one dimensional analysis. To achieve the goals of this work an

environment is created using MATLAB to simulate power line signal disturbances

such as swells, sags, harmonic distortions, and outages. This environment computes

desired time-frequency representations of selected signals to produce two-dimensional

time frequency characterizations of the disturbances. Time-frequency tools such as

the Discrete Short Time Fourier Transform (DSFT), the Discrete Ambiguity Function

(DAF), and the Discrete Wigner Distribution (DWD) are being used in the MATLAB

environment. These tools are characterizing the voltage disturbances, since the time-

frequency representations reveal patterns or properties that are not readily perceptible

in one dimension.

Page 48: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٣٤

-A. K. Al-Othman et al [37], the paper discusses a new digital approach for the

measurements of voltage flicker and its frequency using Particle Swarm Optimization

technique (PSO). The problem is formulated as a dynamic estimation problem. The

goal is to minimize the error of the estimated coefficients via a deigned fitness

function. The method is tested using simulated case study. The algorithm is tested

using simulated data. Effects of number of samples, sampling frequency and the

sample window size are studied. Results are reported and discussed.

- Cheng-Ting Hsu et al [38], the work presents the power quality assessment of

large synchronous motor starting and loading in the integrated steel-making

cogeneration facility. To execute the transient stability analysis, the proper

mathematical models, and the accurate parameters of the cogeneration units,

excitation systems, governor systems, load, and Static Var Compensators (SVCs) are

investigated in detail. Four case studies with or without considering the connection of

the power grid, the installation of autotransformer (AT) starter, and SVC are

performed to demonstrate the dynamic responses of the system frequency, voltage,

and cogeneration units due to motor starting and loading. Also, the voltage sag ride-

through curve of sensitivity load has been included, and a Power Quality Index (PQI)

due to voltage variation in the assessment period has been proposed to find the impact

of motor starting and loading on the power quality of the cogeneration system. It is

concluded that the system dynamic responses and PQI values have better performance

if the AT starter is applied with either the regulation of the SVC system or connection

to the bulk power grid.

- Surajit Chattopadhyay et al [39], the paper discusses an approach for assessment

of power quality parameters using analysis of fundamental and harmonic voltage and

current waveforms. Park transformation technique has been utilized for the analysis in

three-phase system, which has reduced the computational effort to a great extent.

Contributions of fundamental and harmonic components in power system voltage and

current signals have been assessed separately. An algorithm has been developed to

calculate the power quality parameters from online signals. This algorithm has been

simulated for a radial system, and the results have been compared with that obtained

Page 49: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٣٥

from a standard FFT-based system. The results are seen to be in good agreement with

that of the standard system.

- Sudipta Nath [40], this paper presents the application of continuous wavelet

transform to detect power quality disturbances. A power system network revealing

power quality disturbances has been simulated using Electromagnetic Transient

Program. Then continuous wavelet transform has been applied for feature extraction.

- Sutherland, P. E et al [41], the paper discusses a project to assess the specific

transformer grounding and connection methods that are used at the subject utility for

distributed generators (DGs) and provide a risk assessment in terms of potential

impact, ways to minimize the impact, and site specific screening criteria for additional

protection that may be required for DG interconnection. The utility has standardized

on a grounded wye-grounded wye transformer connection for customers connected to

their distribution system. When a backup generator exists in the customer's facility

that could be paralleled with the utility system, a contactor is installed on the neutral

to ground connection on the generator. This contactor is opened at any time the

generator is paralleled. The utility is considering remotely dispatching, these

distributed generation assets in times of peak load in the future. This will require the

generators to run paralleled for extended periods of time. Grounding practices for

auxiliary generators were evaluated, and simulations of both steady-state and fault

conditions were conducted. The most critical factors were found to be assuring that

the generator ground switch was closed during islanding and that the over-voltage

protection operates correctly to isolate the generator during fault conditions.

Recommendations for over-voltage protection and testing were developed based upon

the results.

- Legarreta, Andres E. et al [42], the work describes some of the constrictions and

requirements assumed for the design of the high performance power quality data

logger PQ1000, taking into account the international standards IEC 61000-4-30 Class

A and the IEC 61000-4-15 published in August 2010. Trough it, the most important

demands of the IEC 61000-4-30 class A instruments are exposed. Details of the

hardware components are also shown, and the most important points of the signal

Page 50: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٣٦

processing path are explained. The performance in the RMS values determination is

given, also the frequency response for harmonics measurement are shown, and a

detailed analysis of fulfillment of the tests given in the IEC 61000-4-15 are given in

the final section.

-Souza, L.F.W. et al [43], this paper discusses methods and criteria for the

assessment of the Low Voltage Ride-Through (LVRT) needs of the power grid.

Simulation techniques are used to investigate both how voltage dips caused by short-

circuits spread over the grid and what impact do they cause in the operation

performance of power systems with wind generation. The analysis is performed for

Wind Trbines (WT) with different LVRT characteristics. It is shown that, depending

on system's topology characteristics and the voltage level of WT's point of

connection; ride-through needs may be different throughout power systems, especially

those of continental countries as Brazil. As a conclusion, it is possible to have less

severe LVRT requirements without risking system operation security.

-Su, H.J. et al [44], This paper presents simulations for numerical models of two

wind turbine schemes, fixed and variable speed types, by using Matlab/Simulink,

where simplified analytical model of wind turbines for voltage spectral analysis are

illustrated for the power quality assessment.

Page 51: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٣٧

CHAPTER (3)

DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE STUDY

AND MEASURING PROCESS

3.1- Description of the case study [45]:

The case study is the Egypt 2nd Testing Research Reactor (ETRR-2), also known as

the Multipurpose Nuclear Reactor (MPR), it is an open pool type reactor, 22 MW

thermal power purchased from INVAP Argentina. The reactor is a powerful tool for

various researchs and applications. Several experimental and production facilities are

installed to meet the requirements of various utilization groups including universities,

research institutes, industry, and medical organizations. Figure (3-1) shows ETRR-2

general view.

Figure (3-1) ETRR-2 general view

The Egyptian 2nd Testing Research Reactor (ETRR-2) has the following benefits:-

- Economic Benefits:

• Production of radioisotopes to be used in different fields (such as, medicine,

agriculture, industry...etc.).

Page 52: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٣٨

• Production of radioactive cobalt-60 radiation sources with applications in food

preservation, oil logging and medicine.

• Production of silicon ingots, doped using Neutron Transmutation Doping

(NTD) techniques.

• Gem stones irradiation.

• Neutron radiography for industrial utilization.

Using Neutron activation analysis for environmental studies, geological mapping and

medical applications.

-Technical Benefits:

• Material testing research.

• Reactors physics research.

• Reactors and thermal engineering research.

• The reactor will serve as a training school to qualify staff on reactor operation

and maintenance.

-National Benefits:

• Development of highly qualified and skilled personnel in the field of research

reactor design and operation.

• Increasing the role of Egypt in the field of nuclear industries.

3.2- Electrical system of ETRR-2 [46]

The electrical loads of the reactors have been classified according to the following

categories:

- Class ‘A’ loads: are those loads essential from a safety point of view, they required

uninterruptible AC power. The capacity of UPS is 15 KVA. This capacity meets all

class ‘A’ required load demands and conditions ( including duty cycles , electrical

transients ) with autonomy of 30 minutes.

- Class ‘B’ loads: are loads whose reconnection to the system is convenient in order

to increase their availability after interruption of electrical supply from the external

lines. Class ‘B’ loads are fed by two sources, the normal power supply and the power

plant. The power plant has two diesel generators design to furnish AC power

Page 53: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٣٩

adequate for supplying class ‘B’ and the uninterruptible power system in case the

external lines are unavilable. The capacity of plant is two generators with 300 KVA

for each.

- Class ‘C’ loads: they admit interruption the supply for definite time. They fed from

the normal power supply. Power is brought to the ETRR-2 substation by two

independent sources at 11kV line. Source1 feeds transformer T1 , and Source 2

feeds transformer T2 . Transformer T1 feeds the left busbars and transformer T2

feeds the right busbars , both the busbars class ‘C’ loads left and right have

redundant full capacity. The load categories and the single line diagram are shown in

figure (3-2).

The normal power supply is capable of starting and operating all required loads and

the transformers are identical, each of them (primary voltage 11kV, 50Hz, secondary

voltage 0.4/0.231kV, connected group Dy 11) has 100 % of the total sum of

individual maximum demands. Each transformer has a capacity of 2000 kVA, which

is the power required for the ETRR-2.

Figure (3-2) single line diagram of the electrical system of ETRR-2

T2 Power Transformer

Source 1 ( 11 Kv)

T1 Power Transformer

2000 KVA

CB1 CB2

CB3

2000 KVA

Class " C" Loads Class " C" Loads

UPS

G G

CB 4 CB 5

CB 6 CB 7CB 8

CB 9

Class A LoadsClass B Loads Class B Loads

Source 2 ( 11 Kv)

Page 54: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٤٠

3.3- Electrical defects of ETRR-2

Because of a lot of electrical power disturbances, The ETRR-2 is affected by

electrical defects such as: -

- Failure of some component such as electronic cards, capacitors, etc.

- Phantom tripping of breakers, noisy bus ducts and distribution equipment.

- Overheating at low loads, noisy and failures of transformers.

- Overheating, excessive vibration, noise and winding burning out of motors.

- A lot of lamps and ballasts failing at abnormal rate.

- Erratic operation of sensitive equipment.

- Loss of power and hence shutdown the reactor.

- Malfunction and error signals lead to shut down the reactor.

- Bad performance of the electrical system.

All the problems described above, reflect poor power quality of electrical system of

ETRR-2. These problems lead to increase of operating costs and decrease the useful

life of the system component. Where, any disturbance leads to shut down the reactor

and then loss of money. The amount of money loss is depending on the cost and the

state of the reactor fuel. Normally the reactor needs about one hour to restart after

scram, but need about 50 hours to restart if it was at the end of fuel cycle due to the

reactivity. From experience the disturbance cost of ETRR-2 is approximately (5000 $)

at normal state.

3.4- Measuring process:

A general rule, it is necessary to test each location for at least one week, unless results

definity indicate power quality issues at location that could causing problems. In such

case the interval could be shorted [10]. The electrical power of the nuclear research

reactor is supplied to the installation via two incoming feeders from two different

substations to keep good reliability. Each feeder is designed to carry the full load. The

monitoring investigations were performed at the nuclear research reactor for both

feeders at different operation conditions. Measurements were carried out with power

analyzer instrument on the medium voltage side for each source separately.

Page 55: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٤١

3.4.1- power quality analyzer (UNIPOWER 900F) [47]

Network optimization and preventive measures increase in actuality when the

demands from power quality are increased. Long term measurements are required in

order to demonstrate that delivered electric energy maintains a promised quality.

The network analyzer Unipower 900F from Unipower is an excellent aid to this type

of weekly or monthly measurements. So, it is chosen as a power quality analyzer

instrument.

- Main functions of Unipower 900F:

-Automatic transducer identification

- General purpose transmitters 0-20 and 4-20mA

-Measures Quantities:

All units measured simultaneously and the Unipower 900F has the following

measurements: -

- Quantities and units like V, A, W, VA, VAr, kWh, kVArh, PF, CosΦ, Hz, °C,

IFL, PST, PLT

- Transients

-Voltage sag (dips) and swell.

- Flicker (one and three phase)

-Harmonics. Odd, even, inter harmonics and power harmonics

- Three-phase voltage unbalance

- Frequency deviations

- In-Rush current

- Temperature

Page 56: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٤٢

-Performance of Unipower 900F:

Unipower 900F is an eight-channel network analyzer with its own hard disc and

battery operation for up to fifteen minutes of standby operation. The unit can store

multiple files in sequences without previous dumping. Useful if it is necessary to

measure on several points in the same facility and collect an amount of measuring

files. Figure (3-3) shows the front panel of the Analyzer (Unipower 900F).

Figure (3-3) the Unipower 900F front panel

- Real-time measurements:

The network analyzer Unipower 900F allows measurements to take place in real-time

for all units simultaneously. The oscilloscope waveforms for currents and voltages

can be studied as well as the vector diagram phase positions. The real-time window

allows studying of waveforms, diagram for harmonics, flicker, etc. With the

disturbance analyzer it is easy to capture transients, sags and swells, and also voltage

and current levels. Simply adjust nominal voltage level with permitted discrepancy

and instruct Unipower 900F to monitor the waveforms for all the phases. If and when

a disturbance appears it will be captured by the analyzer. The waveforms are stored

on the hard disc and the disturbances can then be shown on a viewing screen.

-Evaluation of Unipower 900F

- Power Profile shows data and waveforms in a graphic mode, easy to print and to

copy.

- Unipower Report for power quality assurance in relation to engineering standard

and standard specifications e.g. EN 50160 including automatic report generation.

Page 57: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٤٣

- Possibility to export data and measured files to other software, for instance spread

sheets. The Unipower 900F complies with the international standard specifications.

3.4.2-Measuring Points:

Measurments were carried out on the medium voltage side of the following:-

1- Incoming feeder from substation1 (source1) for one week.

2- Incoming feeder from substation2 (source2) for one week .

As shown in figure (3-4) When the measurments are carried out of source1 from

substation1 , the distribution center (PCC) feeds through panel (Pn2) and panels no.

(1,3,4) were switched off. And when the measurments are carried out of source2

from substation2 , the distribution center feeds through panel (Pn3) and panels no.

(4,1,2) were switched off.

Measurments were carried out under different operation conditions of Egypt 2nd

Testing Research Reactor (ETRR-2) as indicated in the following chapter.

Source 1 Source 2

Pn1 Pn2 Pn3 Pn4

Pn5,6

Pn7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Senstive Senstive

load1 load2

2 MVA2 MVAOther Loads

Other Loads

11 KV 11 KV

Points of Measurment

PCC 11 KV

Figure (3-4) Single line diagram of distribution center and measuring points

Page 58: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٤٤

CHAPTER (4)

MONITORING IN ETRR-2

4.1- Introduction :

This chapter illustrates the analysis and discussion of the results collected by power

analyzer and evaluating the power quality in accordance with the international

standard specifications. The monitoring process was carried out in the Egypt 2nd

Testing Research Reactor (ETRR-2) at two ponits as the following:

- Incoming feeder from substation1 (source1) for a period of one week.

- Incoming feeder from substation2 (source2) for a period of one week.

4.2- Measurement results:

The block diagram in figure (3-4) shows the single line diagram of distribution center

and measuring points.

After gathering data, an analysis using MS Excel was done. And all the daily trend

graphs are shown in appendex B. The discussion of the results and analysis are

shown at the following:-

4.3-Measurement results of the first feeder (source1):

4.3.1- Harmonics:

During the measurements period, it is observed that all the three phases are combined

into one single plot for comparisons. As shown in figure (4-1) the Voltage Total

Harmonics Distortion (VTHD) levels do not exceed the acceptable tolerance of 5 % set

by the IEEE standard, but from the recorded measurements data the 5th harmonic

exceeds the acceptable tolerance of 3 %. And as shown in figure (4-2) the Current Total

Harmonics Distortion (ITHD) levels are not exceeding the acceptable tolerance of 15 %

set by the IEEE standard. However there is an immense increase in the ITHD levels at

one point and referring to figures (4-3) and (4-4). This point is light load, wherever the

power at this point is approximately 180 kVA.

Page 59: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٤٥

Figure (4-1) VTHD of incoming feeder of Source 1

Figure (4-2) ITHD of incoming feeder of Source 1

Page 60: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٤٦

Figure (4-3) ITHD variations of source 1 at 2nd day

Figure (4-4) power variations of source 1 at 2nd day

Page 61: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٤٧

From the analysis of measured data, the values of VTHD and ITHD at maximum and

minimum loads are indicated in table (4-1). It is obvious that the THD at minimum

load is greater than at maximum load.

Table(4-1) VTHD and ITHD at max. and min.loads of source1

VTHD(%) ITHD(%)

R

S

T

IEEE

limit

R

S

T

IEEE

limit

Max

. lo

ad

1.45

1.63

1.64

5

1.7

2.1

1.91

15

Min

. lo

ad

2.6

2.95

2.8

5

6.44

5.45

7.64

15

4.3.2- Voltage Deviation

As shown in table (4-2) the percentage of voltage deviation does not exceed the IEEE

limit which is 5%.

Table (4-2) Voltage deviation at max. and min. loads of source1

Percentage of Voltage deviation

At max.load At min.load Accepted limit

1.65 - 1.72 4.1 - 4.45 5

Page 62: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٤٨

4.3.3- Voltage Unbalance

The percentage of voltage unbalance does not exceed the accepted IEEE limit of 2 %,

which most equipment can tolerate. The percentage of voltage unbalances values at

maximum and minimum loads are indicated in table (4-3).

Table(4-3) Voltage unbalance at max. and min. loads of source1

Percentage of voltage unbalance

At max.load At min.load Accepted limit

0.062 0.06 2

4.3.4- Voltage swell:

Occurrence of voltage swell on phase3 is being observed; it was occurred on fourth

day at (10:00:22 AM). As shown in figure (4-5). Percentage voltage increasing is 25%

and lasted for 150 ms. Referring to the trend graphs, the system is stable and the

power is about 200 kW and there was no capacitor switched on. The disturbance is

occurred at phase 3 only due to network transient. This indicated that this disturbance

is imported from the substation.

Page 63: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٤٩

Time

Vo

lta

ge

Figure (4-5) Voltage swell on phase 3

4.3.5- Overvoltage:

During the monitoring priod, an over-voltage of about 10% of the nominal value was

occurred on 6th day at (06:09:03 AM); and it was lasted for 1 minute. This disturbance

was occurred on three phases as shown in figures (4-6), (4-7) and (4-8) respectively.

Reffering to the measured data and the trend graphs, the power is constant at 400 kW

and there is no capacitor bank switching on. This disturbance was probably caused by

the switching of large loads.

Page 64: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٥٠

Time

Vo

lta

ge

Figure (4-6) Overvoltage on phase 1

Time

Voltage

Figure (4-7) Overvoltage that occur on phase 2

Page 65: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٥١

Time

Vo

lta

ge

Figure (4-8) Overvoltage that occur on phase 3

4.3.6- Short Time Flicker

During the measurements period, and as shown in figure (4-9) it is observed that, the

short time flicker (Pst) exceeds the acceptable limits. The short term severity (Pst) is

measured over a period of ten minutes. Short time flicker (Pst) is indicated daily. It is

imported from the substation because it is feeding industrial loads and these loads are

considered sources of voltage flicker.

4.3.7- Long time flicker

The long time flicker (Plt) exceeds the limit as shown in figure (4-10). It is indicated

daily. The long term severity (Plt) is calculated from a sequence of 12 Pst - values over

a two hours interval, according to the following expression:

3

12

1

3

12∑ =

=i

sti

lt

pp

Page 66: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٥٢

Fig. (4-9) Short time voltage flicker of Source 1

Fig (4-10) Long time voltage flicker of source 1

Page 67: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٥٣

4.3.8- Power frequency variations

Throughout the whole survey, the power frequency variations do not exceed the IEEE

limit, which is ±1%.

4.4- Site appraisal of incoming feeder from substation1 (source 1):

Generally, the analysis of all the data attained during the survey compared with the

power system disturbance suggests that the power quality is relatively good at source

1, with the exception of a few irregular occurrences. The results of monitoring are:-

- THD does not exceed the IEEE limits, but the fifth harmonic exceeds 3%.

- Voltage deviation does not exceed the IEEE limits.

- Voltage imbalance does not exceed the IEEE limits.

- Power frequency variations don not exceed the IEEE limits.

- Flicker exceeds the IEEE limits.

- Occurrence of few irregular disturbances (voltage swell, over-voltage and flicker).

The power disturbance encountered during the period of the investigation were due to

the natural causes of the disturbances.

Page 68: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٥٤

4.5- Measurement results of the second feeder (source2):

4.5.1- Harmonics:

During the monitoring period, it is observed that all three phases are combined into

one single plot for comparisons. As shown in figure (4-11) generally the Voltage

Total Harmonics Distortion (VTHD) levels do not exceed the acceptable tolerance of

5% set by the IEEE standard. However, there is an immense increase in the VTHD

levels at one point. And referring to figures (4-12) and (4-13) the power is

approximately 150 kVA, so, this point is considered light load.

Voltage Total Harmonic Distortion variation

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

14:05 21:17 04:29 11:41 18:53 02:05 09:17 16:29 23:41 06:53 14:05 21:17 04:29 11:41

Time

VTHD

VTHD1 VTHD2 VTHD3

Figure (4-11) VTHD of incoming feeder of source 2

Page 69: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٥٥

Figure (4-12) VTHD variations of source 2 at 2nd day

Figure (4-13) power variations of source 2 at 2nd day

Page 70: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٥٦

And as shown in figure (4-14) the Current Total Harmonics Distortion (ITHD) levels

are close to the acceptable tolerance of 15% set by the IEEE standard. But there are

increasing in the ITHD levels at three points. Referring to figures (4-15), (4-16), (4-

17) and (4-18), the power is very low at these points, hence these points are

considered light load.

Current Total Harmonic Distortion Variation

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

14:05 21:17 04:29 11:41 18:53 02:05 09:17 16:29 23:41 06:53 14:05 21:17 04:29 11:41

Time

ITHD

ITHD1 ITHD2 ITHD3

IEEE Limit

Figure (4-14) ITHD of incoming feeder of source 2

Page 71: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٥٧

Figure (4-15) ITHD variations of source 2 at 2nd day

Figure (4-16) power variations of source 2 at 2nd day

Page 72: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٥٨

Figure (4-17) ITHD variations of source 2 at 3rd day

Figure (4-18) power variations of source 2 at 3rd day

Page 73: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٥٩

And the values of VTHD and ITHD at maximum and minimum loads are indicated in

table (4-4). It is obvious that the THD at minimum load is greater than at maximum

load.

Table (4-4) VTHD and ITHD at max. and min. loads of source2

VTHD(%) ITHD(%)

R

S

T

IEEE

limit

R

S

T

IEEE

limit

Max

. lo

ad

1.18

1.26

1.22

5

1.92

1.93

2.02

15

Min

. lo

ad

1.43

1.45

1.41

5

9.91

10.44

9.98

15

4.5.2- Voltage deviation

As shown in table (4-5) that the percentage of voltage deviation does not exceed the

limit of IEEE standard which is 5%.

Table (4-5). Voltage deviation at max. and min. loads of source2

Percentage of Voltage deviation

At max.load At min.load Accepted limit

3.31 – 3.42 -.096 - -.099 5

Page 74: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٦٠

4.5.3- Voltage Unbalance

The percentage of voltage unbalance does not exceed the IEEE accepted limit of 2%,

which the most equipment can tolerate. The percentage of voltage unbalance values at

maximum and minimum loads are indicated in table (4-6).

Table(4-6) Voltage unbalance at max.and min. loads of source2

Percentage of voltage unbalance

At max.load At min.load Accepted limit

0.083 0.28 2

4.5.4- Undervoltage

An undervoltage of about 20% of the nominal value was occurred on 3rd day at (10:15

AM); and it was lasted for 1.1 min, and from the recorded measurments data the

power is 450 kW and there is no capacitor bank switching off. And the disturbance

has a long time. So this disturbance is imported from the utility.

4.5.5- voltage sag

It’s observed the occurrence of voltage sag on phase 1. As shown in figure (4-19),

percentage voltage reduction is 35%, for duration of 250 ms. And also, on phase 3 as

shown in figure (4-20) that percentage voltage reduction is 30%, for duration of 250

ms. This disturbance occurred on 4th day at (17:48:40 PM). Referring to the trend

graphs, the power is about 250 kW and there is no starting or short circuit at the

electrical system of ETRR-2. So, this disturbance is imported from the substation.

Page 75: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٦١

Time

Vo

lta

ge

Figure (4-19) Voltage sag on phase 1

Time

Vo

lta

ge

Figure (4-20) Voltage sag on phase3

Page 76: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٦٢

4.5.6- Voltage swell

It’s observed the occurrence of voltage swell on phase 3. As shown in figure (4-21),

the percentage voltage increasing is 25%, for duration of 200 ms. This disturbance

was occurred on 4th day at (17:49:10 PM). Referring to the trend graph, the system is

stable and the power is about 250 kW and there is no capacitor switched on. The

disturbance is occurred at phase 3 only due to transient network. This disturbance is

imported from the substation.

Time

Vo

lta

ge

Figure ( 4-21) Voltage swell on phase 3

4.5.7- Voltage Transient

There was a transient voltage observed during the period of monitoring, it’s observed

the occurrence of voltage transient on the three phases as shown in figures (4-22) and

(4-23). These disturbances were occurred on 4th day at (08:07:39 AM) and (16:25:03

PM) respectively. Referring to the power trend graphs and the recorded data the

ETRR-2 load is stable; there is no starting or any variation. So, this disturbance is

imported from the substation also. This disturbance was probably caused by

switching or short circuit.

Page 77: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٦٣

Time

Voltage

Figure (4-22) Voltage transient on the three phases

Time

Vo

lta

ge

Figure (4-23) Voltage transient on the three phases

Page 78: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٦٤

4.5.8- Outage

Throughout the whole survey, there was one outage occurred and lasted for 500 ms;

It was occurred on 4th day at (09:03:02 AM). As shown in fig. (4-24). There is no

faults or accidents in the electrical system of ETRR-2, so this outage occurred from

the substaion.

Time

Voltage

0

Figure (4-24) Voltage Outage.

4.5.9- Short Time Flicker

During the period of monitoring the short time flicker (Pst) exceeds the limit as

shown in figure (4-25). It is indicated daily. Because of the substation is feeding

industrial loads and these loads including arc furnace and welders. These loads are

considered sources of voltage flicker, so this disturbance is imported from the

substation.

4.5.10- Long Time Flicker

The long time flicker (Plt) exceeds the IEEE limit as shown in figure (4-26). It is

indicated daily. The long time flicker is calculated from a sequence 12 Pst – values

over a two hours interval.

Page 79: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٦٥

Figure ( 4-25) Short time voltage flicker of source 2

Figure ( 4-26) Long time voltage flicker

Page 80: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٦٦

4.5.11- Power frequency variations

Throughout the whole survey, the power frequency variations did not exceed the

IEEE limit, which is ±1%.

4.6 - Site appraisal of incoming feeder 2 (Source 2):

Generally, the analysis of all the data attained during the survey compared with the

power system disturbance suggests that the power quality is bad at the incoming

feedre of substation2 (Source 2), there are many irregular occurrences, like

(undrevoltage, voltage sag, voltage swell, voltage transients, temporary outage, and

flicker ). The results are:-

- THD does not exceed the IEEE limits.

- Voltage deviation does not exceed the IEEE limits.

- Voltage imbalance does not exceed the IEEE limits.

- Power frequency variations does not exceed the IEEE limits

- Flicker exceeds the IEEE limits.

- Occurrence of many irregular disturbances (under-voltage, voltage sag, voltage

swell, voltage transients and flicker).

From experience, most of the electrical defects of ETRR-2 occurred when ETRR-2

was fed through the incoming feeder of substation 2. This substation is pollutant

because it is feeding industrial and non-linear loads which are considered as source of

power disturbances.

Page 81: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٦٧

4.7- Invesigation results and mitigation techniques:

Generally, the analysis on all the information gathered during the investigation period

done in ETRR-2, there are many irregular disturbamces such as :-

- Fifth harmonic.

- Voltage flicker.

- Voltage sags/swells.

- Under/over voltage.

- Transients.

- Temporary outage (500 ms).

Referring to the results of power quality monitoring of the electrical system of

ETRR-2, and according to the power quality solutions, mitigation techniques are

suggested as the following: -

- Install Passive Filters at low voltage side.

- Install Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) at medium voltage side.

- All sensitive and critical loads should be isolated and fed through

Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS).

The following chapter will indicate the mitigation applications required for

elimination of the power disturbances of the electical system of ETRR-2.

Page 82: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٦٨

CHAPTER (5)

MITIGATION APPLICATIONS

5.1- Introduction

Disturbance mitigation can be done through changes in the power system

configuration, increasing equipment immunity or the use of mitigation devices. It is

well known that the delta connection of transformer prevents the flow of triplen

harmonics. Other changes in the system configuration that play a role in the

mitigation of power quality problems, especially voltage sags are in the reduction of

the number of faults, reducing fault-clearing time or designing parallel feeders. [21].

Referring to the results of monitoring of power quality of the electrical system of

ETRR-2 and according to the power quality solutions, mitigation techniques are

suggested as the following: -

- Install Passive Filters at low voltage side.

- Install Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) at medium voltage side.

- All sensitive and critical loads should be fed through Uninterruptible Power

Supply (UPS).

Passive filters are the most common method used to control the flow of harmonic

currents. The most common design is a single-tuned filter.

DVR is used to protect voltage sags on lines feeding sensitive / critical equipment, the

DVR is specifically designed for large loads served at distribution voltage. [48]

Normally, UPS are used to interface critical loads such as computers and

communication systems to the utility systems. The most common design of UPS is

The double conversion mode.

5.2- Harmonic filters:

Passive filters at suitable locations, preferably close to the source of harmonic

generation can be provided so that, the harmonic currents are trapped at the source

and the currents propagated in the system are reduced. The active filtering techniques,

generally incorporated with the harmonic producing equipment itself can reduce the

Page 83: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٦٩

harmonic generation at the source. Hybrid combinations of active and passive filters

are also a possibility.

5.2.1- Shunt filters [49] and [50]:

Shunt filters are the most common method used to control the flow of harmonic

currents. They are designed as a combination series of reactors and capacitors. They

are referred to as “tuned filters” or “traps” because they absorb the harmonic current

to which they are tuned. The most common design of shunt filter is a Single Tuned

Filter (STF). As shown in figure (5-1) it is connected as shunt element in parallel with

the source of a certain harmonic considered. This harmonic current is shorted to

ground with the filter and prevented from entering the system. The filter may have a

series resistance either added to it or found inherently in its inductance. The resonance

frequency is given by the following expression:

L

C

rX

Xf

LCf 0

2

1==

π (5-1)

Where:

fr : Resonance frequency.

L : The inductance of the filter.

C : the capacitance of the filter.

f0 : the fundamental frequency.

XL : Inductive reactance at fundamental frequency = 2Лf0L.

XC : Capacitive reactance at fundamental frequency =1/(2Лf0C).

Also the following parameters are defined to filter:

R : Series resistance.

Q : Quality factor of the filter , it is equal to the ratio of the inductive or capacitive

reactance at resonance, to the resistance. It ranges from 15 to 80 for the filters used in

Page 84: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٧٠

low voltages in industrial and commercial applications. It determines the sharpness of

tuning and, it determines the fundamental frequency losses.

Figure (5-1) single tuned filter

-Steps of filter design [51] and [52]:

1- Determine the capacitance needed to improve the power factor to eliminate any

penalty. This usually is about 0.95

2- Select the reactor to series tune the capacitor to the desired harmonic order. The

tuned frequency is taken slightly less than the filter harmonic order (3-10 %) to

reduce the stresses on the filter and to avoid parallel resonance at less harmonic order.

3- Calculate the voltage and current stresses on the capacitors and inductors of the

filter.

i- Capacitor duties

1. rms current.

2. Harmonic voltage.

3. Fundamental voltage.

4. Maximum peak voltage.

5. Maximum peak current.

6. Maximum reactive power.

ii- Inductor duties

1- Fundamental current.

2- Filter rms current.

Page 85: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٧١

3- Harmonic current.

4- Choose standard components to the duty that is placed upon them.

5-2-2- Design of fifth harmonic passive filter: [53]

Referring to the results of monitoring in ETRR-2, the Total Harmonic Distortion

(THD) does not exceed the IEEE limits, but the fifth harmonic level increases 3%. It

is considered a common feature in the ETRR-2 system, and must be mitigated.

According to the power quality solutions, mitigation techniques are suggested

installing passive filter at low voltage side. The most cost-effective filter is generally a

single- tuned passive filter and this will be applicable for the majority of the cases.

Filters must be carefully designed to avoid unexpected interactions with the system.

Referring to the electrical system of ETRR-2,

Harmonic order = 5

Three-phase capacitor bank rating = 500 kVAr

Capacity rating = 500 kVAr, 400 V

Nominal bus voltage = 400 V

Transformer rating = 2000 kVA, 6%

5th harmonic current = 40% of fundamental current (assumed)

Filter tuning harmonic = 4.7

Utility harmonic voltage source = 1%

The design steps as the following: -

Capacitor F.L current

IF.L = Q / ( 3 *V) = 500 / ( 3 *0.4) = 721.68 A (5-2)

Capacitor reactance

Q = V2 / XC, hence, XC = (0.4)2 / 0.5 = 0.32 Ω (5-3)

Page 86: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٧٢

Reactor reactance

XR = XC / h2 = 0.32 / (4.7)2 = 0.01448 Ω (5-4)

Filter reactance at fundamental frequency

XF = XC –XR = -0.32 + 0.01448 = -0.305 Ω (5-5)

Filter fundamental current

IFF = V / (XF* 3 ) = 400 / (0.305* 3 ) = 757.18 A (5-6)

Filter reactive power

QF = 3 * V* IF = 3 * 0.4*757.18 = 524.59 kVAr (5-7)

Transformer reactance at 5th harmonic

XT5 = 5*0.06*V2 / S = 5*0.06*(0.4)2 / 2 = 0.024 Ω (5-8)

Filter reactance at 5th harmonic

XF5 = (h*XR)-(XC/h) = (5*0.01448)-(0.32/5) = 0.0084 Ω (5-9)

Total harmonic reactance

XTOTAL = XT5+XF5 = 0.024+0.0084 = 0.0324 Ω (5-10)

Filter utility harmonic current

IF5 = (0.01*V) / ( 3 *XTOTAL) = (0.01*400) / ( 3 *0.0324) = 71.277 A (5-11)

Peak harmonic current

IP5 = (IFL*0.4) + IF5 = (721.68*0.4) + 71.277 = 359.9 A (5-12)

Page 87: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٧٣

Max r.m.s current

Irms = 2

5

2 )()( PFF II + = 22 )9.359()18.757( + = 838.38 A (5-13)

Fifth harmonic voltage (line voltage)

VC5 = IP5*(XC/5)* 3 = 359.9*(0.32/5)* 3 =39.89 V (5-14)

Fundamental capacitor voltage (line voltage)

VCF = ICF*XC* 3 = 757.18*0.32* 3 = 419.67 V (5-15)

Max capacitor voltage

Vcmax = VCF + VC5 = 419.67 + 39.89 = 459.56 V (5-16)

Max filter current

IFmax= IFL + IP5 = 757.18 + 359.9 = 1117.08 A (5-17)

Capacitor r.m.s voltage

VCrms = 2

5

2 )()( CCF VV + = 22 )89.39()67.419( + = 421.56 V (5-18)

Max capacitor reactive power

Qmax = 3 * Vcrms*Irms (5-19)

Qmax =0.001* 3 * 421.56 * 838.38 = 612.15 kVAr

-Capacitor limits ( IEEE Std 18-2002) [54]

Peak voltage: Vcmax / 400 = 459.56 / 400 = 114.8 % < 120 %

Maximum r.m.s current: Irms / Icfl = 838.38 / 757.18 = 110.72 % < 135 %

Capacitor r.m.s voltage: VCrms / 400 = 421.56 /400 = 105.39 % < 110 %

Page 88: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٧٤

Maximum reactive power: Qmax. / 500 = 612.15 /500= 122.43 % < 135%

Hence, all the values are accepted and the design is correct.

5.2.3- Cost of Filter:

The cost of fully automatic system is 60 $/ kVAr [55]

For 500 kVAr, this is required for the case study, then,

Cost = 500 * 60 = 30000 $.

And it is very low compared with its benefits; it can protect the electrical system

equipment from the harmonics effects.

5.2.4- Harmonic Filter Calculation Spreadsheet:

The harmonic filter calculations spreadsheet provides a convenient method for

determining low voltage filter component values and duties. A computer program

designs it for uses with Microsoft excel.

The design of this spreadsheet is depend on the previous equations, which used to

design the 5th harmonic passive filter.

This spreadsheet provides the user with a convenient method for entering the required

data. The entered specified data includes:

- filter tuning specification

- capacitor bank rating, voltage and frequency

- nominal bus rating

- transformer name plate rating and impedance

- total harmonic load

- utility background harmonic voltage distortion

Table (5-1) shows design example of the calculations for the 5th harmonic filter.

Calculations including capacitor derating, filter component values and capacitor duty

with respect to standard. And table (5-2) shows IEEE Std 18-2002.

Page 89: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٧٥

Table (5-1) calculations for 5th harmonic filter

Table (5-2) IEEE Std 18-2002

CAPACITOR LIMITS:(IEEE Std 18-2002)

Limits Actual value %

Peak Voltage 120% 458.8600254 114.7150064

RMS Current 135% 837.2054316 110.7550444

KVAR 135% 523.7079184 122.0567296

RMS Voltage 110% 420.8613741 105.2153435

Page 90: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٧٦

5.3- Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) [56]

The proliferation of voltage sensitive equipment in industrial sector has made

industrial processes more vulnerable to supply voltage deviations. Such voltage

deviations in the form of voltage sag, swell or temporary outage cause severe process

disruptions resulting in millions of dollars of loss of revenue.

Therefore, power supply authorities as well as customers have been desperately

looking for a cost-effective solution currently to ride through momentary power

supply disturbances. As such, the proposition of a novel custom power device called

Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) for compensating voltage disturbances in

distribution systems has generated a great deal of interest recently.

Apart from the DVR, some researchers have proposed several other devices to

mitigate momentary disturbances. Among those, static voltage booster and unified

voltage controller have been noteworthy.

The DVR is the most economic and effective means in improving the voltage relative

power quality problems. The DVR is power electronics based solution that employs

series voltage boost technology for compensating voltage sags / swells.

The DVR usually consists of an injection transformer, which is connected in series

with the distribution line, a voltage sourced PWM inverter bridge which is connected

to the secondary of the injection transformer and an energy storage device (batteries,

capacitors…etc.) connected at the dc-link of the inverter bridge.

A typical schematic of the DVR is shown in Fig. (5-2). The inverter bridge output is

filtered before being fed to the injection transformer in order to nullify switching

frequency harmonics. The series injected voltage with a variable amplitude, phase and

frequency of the DVR is synthesized by modulating pulse widths of the inverter

bridge switches. The injection of an appropriate series voltage component in the face

of a voltage disturbance requires a certain amount of real and reactive power supply

by the DVR. The real and reactive power supplied by the DVR however depend on

the type of voltage disturbance experienced, as well as the direction of the DVR

injected voltage component with reference to pre-sag voltage. The idea of advancing

the injected voltage in order to minimize the real power supplied by the DVR has

generated a great deal of research interest recently.

Page 91: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٧٧

Many companies have begun to customize the special monographic study of the

electric power technology, and have introduced commercialization DVR devices.

Table (5-3) shows the developing and demonstration projects situation of the ABB,

Siemens, and American Superconductor for the DVR installations. [57]

Fig. (5-2): Typical schematic of a power system compensated by the DVR

Table (5-3): The situation of developing and researching for DVR

Page 92: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٧٨

5.3.1-- Operating principle of DVR: [58] and [61]

When we talk about maintaining a certain voltage level on a bus, usually we think

first of capacitors and Static Var Compensators (SVC). However, they only control of

the voltage indirectly is through altering the system’s effective impedance. To cope

with voltage sags caused by faults in the transmission or distribution system, the

injection of voltage combined with the supply of active power is necessary, which is

the distinguishing feature of a DVR as outlined in the following. As shown in figure

(5-3) the basic idea of the DVR is to inject a dynamically control1ed voltage VG (t)

generated by a forced-commutated converter in series to the bus voltage by means of

a booster transformer. The momentary amplitudes of the three injected phase voltages

are controlled such as to eliminate any detrimental effects of a bus fault to the load

voltage VL(t). This means that, any differential voltages caused by transient

disturbances in the AC feeder will be compensated by an equivalent voltage generated

by the converter and injected on the medium voltage level through the booster

transformer T1. This principle works independently of the type of the AC fault

provided that the whole system remains connected to the supply grid, i.e.; the line

breaker does not trip. For most practical cases, a more economical design can be

achieved by only compensating the positive and negative sequence components of the

voltage disturbance seen at the input of the DVR. This option is reasonable because

for a typical distribution bus configuration, the zero sequence part of a disturbance

will not pass through the step down transformers because of infinite impedance for

this component. This zero sequence blocking function is achieved by the delta

winding of the load-side step down transformer TL. The DC capacitor between the

charger and the converter serves as the energy buffer to the DVR, generating and

absorbing power during voltage sags and voltage swells, respectively. For most of the

time, the DVR has virtually “nothing to do” except monitoring the bus voltage, that

means it does not inject any voltage ( VG = 0) independently of the load current.

Therefore, it is suggested to particularly focus on the losses of a DVR during regular

hot standby operation. Two specific features addressing this loss issue have been

implemented in this concept, which are the transformer design with low impedance,

and the semiconductor devices employed.

Page 93: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٧٩

Figure (5-3): Basic Configuration of DVR

The booster transformer's low voltage winding is shorted through the converter in the

DVR's standby mode (left side in Figure (5-4). No switching of semiconductors

occurs in this mode of operation, because the individual converter legs are triggered

such as to establish a short-circuit path for the transformer connection. Therefore,

only the comparatively low conduction losses of the semiconductors in this current

loop contribute to the losses.

Figure (5-4): Effective transformer connection in stand-by and boost modes

Page 94: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٨٠

As shown in Figure (5-4), the DVR transformer in short circuit mode (SCO)

resembles a shorted current transformer. In this mode the booster transformer works

like a secondary shorted current transformer - that means the injected voltage and the

magnetic flux are virtually zero. It should be noted that the converter does not switch

during SCO-mode. Only the semiconductors' conduction losses appear, which are

very low due to the advanced IGCT (Integrated Gate Commutated Thyristor)

technology. Since the DVR will be most of the time in this particular standby mode,

conduction losses will account for the bulk of converter losses during operation.

5.3.2- Control and Protection of DVR

The basic functions of a controller in a DVR are the following:

- Detection of voltage sag/swell events in the system.

- Computation of the correcting voltage.

- Generating of trigger pulses to the sinusoidal PWM based DC-AC inverter.

- Correction of any anomalous in the series voltage injection.

- Termination of the trigger pulses when the system has passed.

The controller may also be used to shift the DC-AC inverter into rectifier mode to

charge the capacitors in the DC energy link in the absence of voltage sag. Figure (5-5)

shows a general control block diagram of DVR.

To maximize dynamic performance, a direct feed-forward-type control architecture

should be applied in the control concept of the DVR. With this concept a fast response

time (approximately 1ms) can be achieved to compensate voltage sags.

All protective functions of the DVR should be implemented in the software.

Differential current protection of the transformer, or short circuit current on the

customer load side are only two examples of many protection functions possibility.

Depending on the particular fault condition, the fast control and protection may

switch the DVR into bypass if it becomes inoperable, thus secure an uninterrupted

energy flow to the customer’s plant. A modified industrial PC could serve as an event

recorder to log and display the various steps during operation of the DVR.

Page 95: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٨١

Figure (5-5) General control system block diagram

Pulse logic shall establish the interface between the electrical switching orders supplied

by the modulator, and the input / outputs of the Gate Units (GU) of the converters. In

particular they can have the following basic:

- Signal conversion electrical ↔ optical

- Maintaining of timing constraints (min. On-time ; min. Off-time ; Overcurrent

delay) required by the Voltage Source Converter ( VSC)

- Control of Short Circuit Operation (SCO)

- Supervision and signaling of correct operation of the IGCT’s.

5.3.3- Losses of DVR:

As the DVR most of the time is in standby operation, the standby losses must be very

small. Any switching of semiconductors or other operations of the DVR should be

avoided during the standby time. A concept that does not require the DVR converter

to maintain and control the DC-voltage is preferred, in order to avoid switching and

the thereto-related losses. The function of the DVR should be insensitive to minor

variations in the DC voltage. The evaluation and specification of the losses should be

related to the operation and during standby also, considering all auxiliaries, which are

in operation. This means the transformer losses, converter losses, DC-link losses and

auxiliaries' losses. Another loss cut results from the IGCT technology (Integrated

Page 96: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٨٢

Gate Commutated Thyristor) utilized in this converter. These novel semiconductor

devices combine the low conducting losses of a GTO (Gate Turn Off) thyristor with a

switching performance similar to a transistor. With turn-off times in the range of a

few microseconds, high-power IGCT type converters show approximately 30 percent

lower losses than conventional GTO-type systems. The efficiency should be related to

the definition of the DVR, which is the load to be protected (for example 2MVA) and

the standby losses. This definition will give a possibility to compare different DVR

solutions. Typically an efficiency of >98.5% can be achieved.

5.3.4-- Harmonics of DVR:

In standby mode, the DVR should not actively generate any harmonics, the valves

have to be in SCO mode, i.e., establishing only the short-circuit path for the booster

transformer's secondary winding. Under boost mode, the DVR will generate

harmonics, which are almost negligible with a 3-level 12-pulse converter

configuration.

5.3.5- Availability of DVR:

The reliability and the availability are very important items in the design of a DVR.

Usually, the DVR operates in a standby mode and is waiting for sag; therefore it is

very crucial that the equipment has a high reliability and availability.

A high availability can be achieved by reducing the number of components, which

are used in the DVR. The design of the parts itself should have enough safety so that,

for example a short over-current (e.g. motor start-up) does not bring the DVR in a

bypass mode.

Today, an availability of >98.5% can be achieved with the use of IGCT’s. As there is

the capability of operating in direct coupling to the energy storage, with only one

energy conversion, which does increase the availability of the equipment.

Page 97: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٨٣

5.3.6- DVR capacity and specification: [57] and [58]

Referring to the electrical system of ETRR-2:

- Vpcc = 11 kV

- S = 2000 kVA , PF = 0.9

- Response time = ¼ cycle

- Max three phase voltage sag = 60 %

- Duration of sag to protect = 500 ms

- Rated of DVR (kVA) =?

- Energy (kJ) =?

PCC (11 kV)

DVR Sensitive load (ETRR-2)

It is recommended to adopt DVR technology to compensate the bus voltage sag and

restore to 100 % of the rated value.

When the sag depth is lower than 60 %

Therefore, the compensating voltage of DVR = 0.7 p.u.

By taking into consideration of peak load (2000 kVA) with power factor 0.9

The compensating power = 0.7*2000 = 1400 kVA

Energy = power * time (5-20)

For duration time 0.5 sec.

The required energy = (kVA * PF) * time = (1400*0.9)*0.5 = 630 kJ. (5-21)

For more reliability and availability, DVR with (2 MVA, 900 kJ) is selected. And it

should be installed in the 11 kV side of the system.

Page 98: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٨٤

5.3.7- Cost and Payback Time: [55] and [59]

Assume, Cost of DVR: C DVR

Cost of sag: C VS

Number of sags: NVS, (number per year)

Payback time: T, (year)

Then, C DVR = C VS * NVS * T (5-22)

The Cost of DVR = 300$/KVA + 5% (maintenance and running)

The Cost of DVR= 2000*300*1.05 = 630000 $

According to disturbance cost of ETRR-2 at normal mode, the cost of voltage sag is

(5000 $), and assume the number of voltage sag occurrence is 52/ year (one sag every

week)

Then, T = 630000/ (5000*52) = 2.42

T payback= 2.5 year

Hint: this solution is economic because the life time of DVR is about 15 years.

5.4- Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS):

Uninterruptible power supplies in nuclear reactors are designed to provide a stable,

and uninterruptible vital AC power to the safety related, non-safety related

instrumentation, and control systems. Uninterruptible power supplies are used to

provide a reliable uninterruptible source of voltage and frequency regulated AC

power to the vital loads required to shutdown the reactor and maintain in a safe

condition after an anticipated operational occurrence or a postulated design basis

accident. There are many types of UPSs, but the on-line double conversion

technology offers highest security. Only this design offers absolutely uninterruptible

power supply and equalizes all power disturbances such as voltage fluctuations,

distorted voltage waveform, frequency fluctuations, voltage transients, short

Page 99: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٨٥

interruptions and long power outage. Critical loads will be supplied with a high

quality voltage waveform, even in the case of heavy non-linear loads drawing a non-

sinusoidal high crest factor current.

5.4.1- The Operational Principle of on-line double conversion UPS: [60]

This is the most common type of UPS above 10 kVA. The block diagram of the

Double Conversion On-Line UPS is shown in Figure (5-6), it is the same as the

Standby, except that the primary power path is the inverter instead of the AC main.

Figure (5-6): Schematic of Double Conversion On-Line UPS

It is the ultimate in UPS protection because the utility supply power does not flow

directly to the load like the off-line UPS. Instead, the power flows continuously

through a charger/rectifier that feeds both a storage battery and an inverter. The

inverter generates AC power to the load being protected. In the event of a power

failure, the battery feeds the inverter. Since the power flows through the rectifier and

inverter before reaching the load, most power disturbances are eliminated through

constant filtering. Therefore, an on-line UPS is a good idea for any system which is

sensitive to transients, noise, and/or cannot tolerate any power interruption.

5.4.2- UPS capacity and specification:

All the critical and sensitive loads of ETRR-2 = 45 kVA

The grand load of UPS = total loads * 1.2 (5-23)

Wherever: (The factor 1.2, may be dynamic load at the system)

Page 100: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٨٦

The grand load of UPS = 45 * 1.2 = 54 kVA

Hence, UPS with 60 kVA rated power was selected.

5.4.3- Cost of UPS:

According to [55] the cost of UPS is (500$ / kVA)

The cost of UPS = (rated kVA) * 500 + 5% (running and maintenance)

The cost of UPS = (60 * 500) * 1.05 = 31500 $.

And it is very low compared with its benefits; however, it is related to the safety of

nuclear research reactor.

Page 101: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٨٧

CHAPTER (6)

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMENDATIONS

6.1- Conclusion and recommendations

This work presents the assessment of power quality problems on the behavior of the

electrical system of nuclear installations. The analysis of the recorded data at the point

of common coupling yields that, fifth harmonics, flickers, voltage sags/swells,

under/over voltage, transients and temporary outage (500 ms) are the most severe

events and should be taken in consideration for any evaluation. It is recommended

that, mitigation techniques should be done to keep good performance of the electrical

system and then avoid operation problems of the nuclear installations. The Passive

Filters, Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) and Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)

are most economic and effective solutions to mitigate the power quality problems.

6-2- The most important points that have been reached

1-Power quality of supply has a direct impact on the electrical equipments and various

systems because the disturbances lead to damage of equipments and bad performance

of the system.

2-In any project – especially projects with high sensitivity equipments, power quality

assessment should be done regularly to keep good performance.

3-The thesis considers a guide of power quality assessment study by using data

recorded, analysis according to standards specifications and developing solutions to

improve the power quality.

4-In the projects that contain high level sources of harmonics, it is not preferred

adding capacitors to improve power factor, but the best solution is using filters to

eliminate harmonics and also improve the power factor.

5-Power quality assessment should be considered as one of the important steps in

determining the site for sensitive projects to avoid the bad impact of power

disturbances.

Page 102: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٨٨

6.3-Future work

Power quality assessment should be continued regularly at the sensitive projects. And

it is strongly recommended that for future work on this topic, the time allocated for

monitoring should be longer, it should be more than seven days, and this to ensure

that, more detailed and complete data could be obtained. Thus, the analysis of the data

would be more precise. It is also suggested that, more monitoring points to be

allocated in the site, so that more data could be gathered on the distribution system.

This would allow a more detailed analysis on the affected areas and other locations on

the same distribution system. It is strongly recommended that, for important and

sensitive projects, the assessment of power quality should be done as part of the site

selection procedure. It is strongly recommended that, for future work, solutions of

power quality problems can done by load reconfiguration. And also for future works,

power quality aspects of smart grids should be involved.

Page 103: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٨٩

REFERENCES

[1] Barry W. Kennedy , “Power Quality Primer”, McGraw- Hill, 2000.

[2] J. Schlabbach, D. Blume and T.Stephanblome, “Voltage Quality in Electrical

Power System”, Institution of Electrical Engineers, London , 2001.

[3] Surya Santoso, H. Wayne Beaty, Roger C. Dugan and Mark F. McGranaghan, "

Electrical Power Systems Quality ", 2nd edition, McGraw- Hill, 2004.

[4] H. Lee Willis, “Power Distribution Planning Reference Book”, MARCEL

DEKKER, INC, 1997.

[5] IEEE Standard 519-1992, “Recommendation Practice and Requirements for

Harmonic Control in Electrical Power System”, IEEE, New York, 1993.

[6] J. Arrillaga, N.R. Watson and S. Chen, “Power System Quality Assessment”,

John Wiley & Sons, 2000.

[7] W. Mack Grady, “Harmonics and how they related to Power Factor”, Proc. Of

EPRI power quality issues &opportunities conference, San Diego, CA, 1993.

[8] Tennessee Valley Public Power Association Research and Development , “Power

Quality Manual”, 2002.

[9] IEEE Std 1159 – 2009, IEEE Recommended Practice for Monitoring Electric

Power Quality, 2009.

[10] C. Sankaran, “Power Quality”, CRC press, Washington, USA, 2002.

[11] Guide to the application Standard EN50160, 1999.

[12] International Standard IEC 61000-4-15, 1st edition, 1997.

[13] Pacific Gas and Electric Company. “Power Quality Standard”, technical note,

2000. www.pge.com/docs/biz/power_quality/power_quality_notes

[14] Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers standards (IEEE),

http://www.ieee.org/web/standards/home/index/html

[15] M. McGranahan, ”Power Quality Assessment Procedure”, Electric Power

Research. Institute, Report CU 7529, 1991.

Page 104: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٩٠

[16] Barker P. P., Burke J. J., Mancao R. T., Short T. A., Warren C. A., Burns C. W.

and Siewierski J. J., “Power Quality Monitoring of a Distribution System”, IEEE

Transaction on power delivery, vol. 9, 1994.

[17] Dabbs W. W., Sabin D. D., Grebe T. E. And Mehat H. “Probing Power Quality

Data”, IEEE computer application in power, vol. 7, 1994.

[18] Dorr D. S., Hughes M.B., Gruzs T. M., Jurewicz R. E. and McClain J. L.,

“Interpreting Recent Power Quality Surveys to Define the Electrical Environment”,

IEEE transactions on industry applications, vol. 33, no. 6, November/December 1997.

[19] D. D. Sabin, et al “An Assessment of Distribution System Power Quality”.

Electric Power Research. Institute, EPRI Report. TR-106294-V1-3, May 1996

[20] V.K.K. Chan, “Power Quality Monitoring”, University of Queensland, Australia

1997.

[21] Franz Alois Hemetsberger and Tapan Saha, ”An Investigation of Power Quality

Problems in a Remote Mine Site in Papua New Guinea”, AUPEC 2004, Australia,

2004.

[22] Eloi Ngandui, Cedric Meignant, “Power Quality Monitoring and Analysis of a

University Distribution System”, Electrical and computer engineering, Canadian

conference, 2001.

[23] M. Izhar, C. Hadzer, S. Masri and S. Idris, “An Investigation on Harmonic level,

current & Voltage distortion and associated power for three phase four wire

distribution system in a USM electrical & electronic engineering department

building”, National power and energy conference (PECon) 2003 proceedings, Bangi,

Malaysia, 2003.

[24] Maitra A., Sunderman W., Waclawiak M. and Sundaram A, “Distribution

System Power Quality Assessment Phase II: Voltage Sag and Interruption Analysis”,

IEEE,2005

[25] JoseC. C. Costa, Ricardo L. Pregitzer, Tiago N. Sousa, Jose Batista and Joao L.

Afonso, “ A case of Power Quality Assessment Using a Developed Power Quality

Page 105: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٩١

Monitor”, IEEE , international conference on electrical engineering, Coimbra,

Portugal, 2005.

[26] A.M. El-Zonkoly, “Power System Model Validation for Power Quality

Assessment Applications Using Genetic Algorithm”, Elsevier, 2005.

[27 M. H. J. Bollen and P. M. E. Dirix, “Simple Model for Post-Fault Motor Behavior

for Reliability / Power Quality Assessment of Industrial Power Systems “,IEE Proc –

Gener Transm Distrib , Vol 143, No 1, January 1996.

[28] Surya Santoso, “Power Quality Assessment via Wavelet Transform Analysis”,

IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 11, No. 2, April 1996.

[29] G. T. Heydt, “Applications of the Windowed FFT to Electric Power Quality

Assessment”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 14, No. 4, October 1999.

[30] A.P.S. Meliopoulos, S. Jalali, S. Henneberry and G.J. Cokkinides, “Power

Quality Assessment via Physically Based Statistical Simulation Method”, IEEE, 2000.

[31] E.F. EL-SaadanyY, “Application of Wavelet Transform for Assessing Power

Quality in Medium Voltage Industrial Distribution System “, IEEE, 2001.

[32] T. K. Abdel-Galil, “Power Quality Assessment in Deregulated Power Systems”,

IEEE, 2002.

[33] Albu M. and Heydt G.T., “On the Use of RMS Values in Power Quality

Assessment”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, VOL. 18, NO. 4, October 2003.

[34] - Moussa A. E., EI-Gammal, M., Abdallah E.N., and EI-Seoud,

A.A., “Hardware – Software Structure On-Line Power Quality Assessment: Part I”,

ASME/lEEE Joint Rail Conference April 6-8, 2004, Baltimore, Maryland, USA,

2004.

[35] Mandache L. and Al-Haddad K. , “New High Precision Harmonic Analysis

Method for Power Quality Assessment", IEEE, CCECE/CCGEI, Saskatoon, May

2005.

[36] Rivera I.J., Ramirez A.B. and Rodriguez D., “A Time-Frequency Signal

Analysis System for Power Quality Assessment”, IEEE, 2005.

Page 106: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٩٢

[37] A. K. Al-Othman and El-Nagger K.M, "Voltage Flicker Measurement Using

Particle Swarm Optimization Technique for Power Quality Assessment", IEEE

MELECON, 2006.

[38] Cheng-Ting Hsu, Hui-Jen Chuang and Chao-Shun Chen, “Power Quality

Assessment of Large Motor Starting and Loading for the Integrated Steel-Making

Cogeneration Facility”, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, VOL. 43, NO.

2, March/April 2007

[39] Surajit Chattopadhyay, Samarjit Sengupta, and Madhuchhanda Mitra,” Area-

Based Approach in Power Quality Assessment”, International Journal of Power

Management Electronics Volume 2008, may 2008.

[40] Sudipta Nath, “Power Quality Assessment by Wavelet Transform Analysis, “TIG

Research Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, September 2008.

[41] Sutherland P.E. and Short T.A., “Power Quality Assessment of Distributed

Generator Grounding Method”, Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions ,2009

[42] Legarreta Andres E., Figueroa Javier H. and Bortolin, Julio A.," An IEC 61000-

4-30 class A — Power quality monitor: Development and performance analysis",

Electrical Power Quality and Utilization (EPQU), 2011 11th International Conference,

2011

[43] Souza, L.F.W., Assis, T.M.L. and Visconti I.F., "On the Assessment of Voltage

Ride-Through needs of the Power Transmission Grid", Bulk Power System Dynamics

and Control (iREP) – VIII (iREP), 2010

[44] Su H.J., Huang H.Y. and Chang, G.W., "Power Quality Assessment of Wind

Turbines by Matlab/Simulink", Power and Energy Engineering Conference

(APPEEC), 2010

[45] www.eaea.org.eg/etrr2.html.

[46] Safety Analysis Report of ETRR-2,”SAR”, 1998.

[47] Manual of Power Analyzer (Unipower 900F), English Version 2F,1999.

Page 107: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٩٣

[48] K.M.nor and Hasamaini M. , “Digital Simulation of Uninterruptible power

supply (UPS) and Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) for Voltage Sag Mitigation”,

AUPEC 2001, Australia, 2001.

[49] J. C. Das, “Power System Analysis”, CRC, 1st edition 2002.

[50] Abdel Moneim Mossa, “Experience with Harmonics in Power Systems”,

Tutorial article, MEPCON’2001, Egypt, 2001.

[51] IEEE Standard 141 “Recommended Practice for Electric Power Distribution for

Industrial Plants”, Red book 1993.

[52] Mark McGranaghan and David R. Mueller, “Designing Harmonic Filters for

Adjustable-Speed Drives to Comply with IEEE-519 Harmonic Limits”, IEEE

Transactions on Industry Applications, March/April 1999.

[53] Cornelia K. and Alexander E., “Passive Shunt Harmonic Filters for Low and

Medium Voltage: A Cost Comparison Study”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,

November 1996.

[54] IEEE Std 18-2002 “IEEE Standard for Shunt Power Capacitors”, New York,

October 2002.

[55] Mark McGranaghan and Bill Roettger, “Economic Evaluation of Power Quality”,

IEEE power engineering review, Feb. 2002

[56] Gerald T. Heydt and Siddharth Suryanarayanan., “Control Strategies for

Electronic Power Quality Enhancement Equipment”, AUPEC 2004, Australia, 2004.

[57] Zhongdong Yin, Minxiao Han, Lixia Zhou and Kunshan Yu, “Project Study of

Dynamic Voltage Restorer”, IEEE/PES transmission and distribution conf., China,

2005

[58] P. Daehler and R. Affolter, “Requirements and Solutions for Dynamic Voltage

Restorer, A Case Study”, power engineering society winter meeting, , IEEE, 2000.

[59] M.M. Abdel Aziz, G. A. Abdel salam and S. M. Kozman, “Cost and Mitigation

of Voltage sag for Industrial Plants”, electrical, electronic and computer engineering

international conference. ICEEC 2004. IEEE, 2004.

Page 108: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٩٤

[60] Linz .S, Heggebacher .O and Wolf .M, “A System-Design for UPS-Equipment

for Long –Term Backup Times”, TELESCON, MAY 2000.

[61] P. Usha Rani and S. Rama Reddy, "Dynamic Voltage Restorer using Space

Vector PWM Control Algorithm", European Journal of Scientific Research, 2011.

Page 109: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٩٥

APPENDIX (A)

POWER QUALITY STANDARDS

Power quality standards set voltage and current limits that sensitive electronic

equipment can tolerate from electrical disturbances. Utilities need standards that set

limits on the amount of voltage distortion their power systems can tolerate from

disturbances produced by their customers with nonlinear loads. End users need

standards that set limits not only for electrical disturbances produced by utilities but

also for disturbances generated by other end users. Several national and international

organizations have developed power quality standards. There is a confusing number

of different organizations that set power quality standards. The following tables show

some international standards.

Table (A-1) IEEE1159-1995 standards.

Page 110: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٩٦

Table (A-2) Voltage distorsion limites

Note – High voltage systems can have up to 2.0 % THD where the cause is an HVDC

terminal that will attenuate by the time it is tapped for user.

Table (A-3) Current distortion limits for general distribution systems

(120 V through 69000 V)

All power generation equipment is limited to these values of current distortion, regardless

of actual ISC/IL.

Note: - Even harmonics are limited to 25 % of the odd harmonic limits above. Current

distortions that result in a direct current offset, e.g., half-wave converters are not

allowed.

Where ISC is the maximum short-circuit current at PCC, IL is the maximum demand

load current (fundamental frequency component) at PCC .

Page 111: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٩٧

It is recommended that the load current IL be calculated as the average current flow

during the maximum demand for the preceding twelve months.

Table (A-4) Power system disturbance classification to EN 50160

Page 112: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٩٨

APPENDIX (B)

TREND GRAPHS

This appendex illustrates the the trend graphs of the analysis. The monitoring was

carried out in the case study at two ponits as the following:

- Incoming feeder 1 (source1) for a period of one week.

- Incoming feeder 2 (source 2) for a period of one week.

The trend graphs show the analysis of voltage variations, current variations, power

factor variations, power variations , voltage total harmonics distortion, current total

harmonics distortions, short time flicker and long time flicker.

All the daily trend graphs of the monitoring are illustrated as the following: -

- Part (B-1) shows the Trend graphs of incoming feeder1 (source1)

- Part (B-2) shows the trend graphs of incoming feeder 2 (source 2)

Page 113: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

٩٩

B.1- The Trend graphs of incoming feeder1 (source1)

B.1.1- The Trend graph of 1st day

Figure (b-1) voltage variations of source 1 at 1st day

Figure (b-2) current variations of source 1 at 1st day

Page 114: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٠٠

Figure (b-3) power factor variations of source 1 at 1st day

Figure (b-4) power variations of source 1 at 1st day

Page 115: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٠١

Figure (b-5) VTHD variations of source 1 at 1st day

Figure (b-6) ITHD variations of source 1 at 1st day

Page 116: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٠٢

Figure (b-7) short time voltage flicker of source 1 at 1st day

Figure (b-8) long time voltage flicker of source 1 at 1st day

Page 117: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٠٣

B.1.2- The trend graphs of 2nd

day

Figure (b-9) voltage variations of source 1 at 2nd day

Figure (b-10) current variations of source 1 at 2nd day

Page 118: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٠٤

Figure (b-11) power factor variations of source 1 at 2nd day

Figure (b-12) power variations of source 1 at 2nd day

Page 119: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٠٥

Figure (b-13) VTHD variations of source 1 at 2nd day

Figure (b-14) ITHD variations of source 1 at 2nd day

Page 120: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٠٦

Figure (b-15) short time voltage flicker of source 1 at 2nd day

Figure (b-16) long time voltage flicker of source 1 at 2nd day

Page 121: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٠٧

B.1.3- The trend graphs of 3rd

day

Figure (b-17) voltage variations of source 1 at 3rd day

Figure (b-18) current variations of source 1 at 3rd day

Page 122: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٠٨

Figure (b-19) power factor variations of source 1 at 3rd day

Figure (b-20) power variations of source 1 at 3rd day

Page 123: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٠٩

Figure (b-21) VTHD variations of source 1 at 3rd day

Figure (b-22) ITHD variations of source 1 at 3rd day

Page 124: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١١٠

Figure (b-23) short time voltage flicker of source 1 at 3rd day

Figure (b-24) long time voltage flicker of source 1 at 3rd day

Page 125: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١١١

B.1.4- The trend graphs of 4th day

Figure (b-25) voltage variations of source 1 at 4th day

Figure (b-26) current variations of source 1 at 4th day

Page 126: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١١٢

Figure (b-27) power factor variations of source 1 at 4th day

Figure (b-28) power variations of source 1 at 4th day

Page 127: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١١٣

Figure (b-29) VTHD variations of source 1 at 4th day

Figure (b-30) ITHD variations of source 1 at 4th day

Page 128: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١١٤

Figure (b-31) short time voltage flicker of source 1 at 4th day

Figure (b-32) long time voltage flicker of source 1 at 4th day

Page 129: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١١٥

B.1.5- The trend graphs of 5th day

Figure (b-33) voltage variations of source 1 at 5th day

Figure (b-34) current variations of source 1 at 5th day

Page 130: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١١٦

Figure (b-35) power factor variations of source 1 at 5th day

Figure (b-36) power variations of source 1 at 5th day

Page 131: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١١٧

Figure (b-37) VTHD variations of source 1 at 5th day

Figure (b-38) ITHD variations of source 1 at 5th day

Page 132: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١١٨

Figure (b-39) short time voltage flicker of source 1 at 5th day

Figure (b-40) long time voltage flicker of source 1 at 5th day

Page 133: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١١٩

B.1.6- The trend graphs of 6th day

Figure (b-41) voltage variations of source 1 at 6th day

Figure (b-42) current variations of source 1 at 6th day

Page 134: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٢٠

Figure (b-43) power factor variations of source 1 at 6th day

Figure (b-44) power variations of source 1 at 6th day

Page 135: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٢١

Figure (b-45) VTHD variations of source 1 at 6th day

Figure (b-46) ITHD variations of source 1 at 6th day

Page 136: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٢٢

Figure (b-47) short time voltage flicker of source 1 at 6th day

Figure (b-48) long time voltage flicker of source 1 at 6th day

Page 137: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٢٣

B.2- The trend graphs of incoming feeder 2 (Source 2)

B.2.1- The trend graphs of 1st day

Figure (b-49) voltage variations of source 2 at 1st day

Figure (b-50) current variations of source 2 at 1st day

Page 138: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٢٤

Figure (b-51) power factor variations of source 2 at 1st day

Figure (b-52) power variations of source 2 at 1st day

Page 139: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٢٥

Figure (b-53) VTHD variations of source 2 at 1st day

Figure (b-54) ITHD variations of source 2 at 1st day

Page 140: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٢٦

Figure (b-55) short time voltage flicker of source 2 at 1st day

Figure (b-56) long time voltage flicker of source 2 at 1st day

Page 141: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٢٧

B.2.2- The trend graphs of 2nd

day

Figure (b-57) voltage variations of source 2 at 2nd day

Figure (b-58) current variations of source 2 at 2nd day

Page 142: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٢٨

Figure (b-59) power factor variations of source 2 at 2nd day

Figure (b-60) power variations of source 2 at 2nd day

Page 143: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٢٩

Figure (b-61) VTHD variations of source 2 at 2nd day

Figure (b-62) ITHD variations of source 2 at 2nd day

Page 144: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٣٠

Figure (b-63) short time voltage flicker of source 2 at 2nd day

Figure (b-64) long time voltage flicker of source 2 at 2nd day

Page 145: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٣١

B.2.3- The trend graphs of 3rd

day

Figure (b-65) voltage variations of source 2 at 3rd day

Figure (b-66) current variations of source 2 at 3rd day

Page 146: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٣٢

Figure (b-67) power factor variations of source 2 at 3rd day

Figure (b-68) power variations of source 2 at 3rd day

Page 147: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٣٣

Figure (b-69) VTHD variations of source 2 at 3rd day

Figure (b-70) ITHD variations of source 2 at 3rd day

Page 148: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٣٤

Figure (b-71) short time voltage flicker of source 2 at 3rd day

Figure (b-72) long time voltage flicker of source 2 at 3rd day

Page 149: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٣٥

B.2.4- The trend graphs of 4th day

Figure (b-73) voltage variations of source 2 at 4th day

Figure (b-74) current variations of source 2 at 4th day

Page 150: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٣٦

Figure (b-75) power factor variations of source 2 at 4th day

Figure (b-76) power variations of source 2 at 4th day

Page 151: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٣٧

Figure (b-77) VTHD variations of source 2 at 4th day

Figure (b-78) ITHD variations of source 2 at 4th day

Page 152: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٣٨

B.2.5- The trend graphs of 5th day

Figure (b-79) voltage variations of source 2 at 5th day

Figure (b-80) current variations of source 2 at 5th day

Page 153: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٣٩

Figure (b-81) power factor variations of source 2 at 5th day

Figure (b-82) power variations of source 2 at 5th day

Page 154: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٤٠

Figure (b-83) VTHD variations of source 2 at 5th day

Figure (b-84) ITHD variations of source 2 at 5th day

Page 155: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٤١

Figure (b-85) short time voltage flicker of source 2 at 5th day

Figure (b-86) long time voltage flicker of source 2 at 5th day

Page 156: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٤٢

B.2.6 – The trend graphs of 6th day

Figure (b-87) voltage variations of source 2 at 6th day

Figure (b-88) current variations of source 2 at 6th day

Page 157: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٤٣

Figure (b-89) power factor variations of source 2 at 6th day

Figure (b-90) power variations of source 2 at 6th day

Page 158: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

١٤٤

Figure (b-91) VTHD variations of source 2 at 6th day

Figure (b-92) ITHD variations of source 2 at 6th day

Page 159: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

دة ا ا

إاد

ا ى

ا#زه -ر إ آ ا

'(ا %ل در )دآراة

ه اى وا.-ت ا+ *

إ1 اف

ل 5ا 8م. د 456 د / د.ا زاه . د.ا

وزارة ا+ *ء وا>; ه= ا>; ا:ر9 ا#زه ه

ا#زه -آ ا

ر9 % ا *-اه ة

٢٠١٢

Page 160: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

دة ا ا

إاد

ا ى

ا#زه -ر إ آ ا

آBCء >5ت ا%ل در اآراة

ه اى وا.-ت ا+ *

9 C ا

ا *ارى / د .ا) D (----------------------

– ه 51 ا *

----------------------) D ( ا* اهF اBCار / د .ا

ا#زه – آ ا

----------------------) I ف ( زاه راGH 5ا>/ د .ا

ا#زه – اآ

----------------------) I ف ( 5ا'ح د456/ د . ا

ه= ا>; ا:ر9

ا#زه -آ ا

ر9 % ا *-اه ة

٢٠١٢

Page 161: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

ا

Fم ا+ *N و95 ا. M5 ا>; ا+ * أهK Fر ا>; ادة ى اO

NN أى NN9ا NNO6#ا FNNأه NN ةPNNI NNO6#ا NN* NN9:QM NN RورNN ا NNO6 NN'Sا NN;<*

QI و .ا8ز Q ا O6 NC6 +N رN9 و اCو ا N%ت اTNIل *N#ا N5U

وFNNO6 اNNC 5 اM NNNN NN ا <NNK-ء ا اNN:آNN+M امSNNو ا NN.ت ا5NN

4+NN1 RNNIM NNدى إVNNM NNا NN<W NNQل اNN#ا NN NNXآ NNإ NNYZا+ و* و NNر *

N* +ا N;و;N أدى ذN\ . ا ا+ * ووث آX اQ ات وا-NY> ا*ت N ا>

م ا+ * +X ا-Y> ا*ت V9_ دة ا>; ا+ * M ض إOا و*

N'Sا O6#ء ا-داء ات وا Nدى اVNM N; N4 إNا `N;M NN اNI وت ا

ول هR:N ا#U وN و. واM Nوه N* +ا FON N*<ا Nت اNارا N ةNوا

NNدرا" FNNM دةNN NN* +ا NN;NNK . "ا>W رةNN%* NNارا R:NNه NNداد أهBNNM ت وTNNI

أ ض Mو. اوO6 9 ا آ4 اSN' ا NC* N<5Mدة ا Iا N;ا>

آN 4 ض و4NM و;NI وآ:\ ا+ * NIا \NM Nت اN ا'NKا N5U . N;و

وMb ا D9آ4 أNIة ا:Nه N GNQ 5 NNدة ا; اح وF%M ال ا

NN* +ا NN; إن . ا>NNآM NN ا NNاء درا NNإ NN'+ ديNN14 إرNNم دNN FNNM دةNN NN;ا>

Nت ا'NKا 5U حC* * +ا N *eN . اN ا NDM Nآ N5<ط اNا

4Kا FM ا ت اKوا .إ

F ا ا وM ل% : و

:ا'%4 ا#ول

.h ا

6Xا'%4 ا:

ول NN وhNN اNNم NNYع NN9 NN* +ا NN;jNN NN ا NN9` و ا-NNY> ا*ت NNدة ا>

ت اN اNدة N\ ا-NY> ا*ت 'Kت واا 4C و;س ا-Y> ا*M ق Uا+ * و

Page 162: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87

آ4 دة ا>; ا+ * I ا ول وآ' إ N* +ا N; و9Nى ء درا FMNدة ا>

D9أ .دة ا>; ا+ * FM درا ا

jXا'%4 ا:

م `Kول و9 N9ة 6وPI N9:Qدر اN%و N* +م اNOا `NKوو N* +ا FN9 jN

ظ ا- ار9 9Q:ا' 'S 9ى . %رN9و N* +آ4 اNIا N ND9أ

م ا+ * و O 5ء إN اء هN:ة ا%N_م أSN ز 4N اNرة اN `Kى و9

YZ . دة ا>; ا+ * هFM اس ا اد 6ط nYM إارا *

:ا ا*oا'4%

*ا CM FM ا pqز 4 ارة +N% 4ر 9 NF ض و4M و;I ا <

ت %در اQ:9 ا+ * ' دا وآ:\ FM دR ا>; ا+ * :ا ا%ر 'Kا 5U

م ا+ * أهFو9M ا اOة ا _Vت ا+ * اآ4 وا-Y> ا9Iا .

rا'4%Sا :

آ4 وا-NY> ا*ت ا+ *N ا 5NN GNQ ا; اح وF%M ال و9ول NIا FNواه

ت ه:ة ال N وا Nه GNآ Mو FN%M تN و NM 5N nN1ا N GNQ اا

NNCت ا+ NN GNNQ اNNY> ا*NN9د NN NN GNNآ Mو FNN%M oNNCM NNا NNY-*

8Wل 9:QMو .%ر ;رة o< Hا-ل ا وا

دسا'4% :ا

ت اq ت9ى ا-Kوا N5<ط اNا F4 واهNKا FNM Nا Nإ N

8Wل ا4 ه:ة ارا YZ o ا>ر ا ا4 ا ح ا 45 إ *I

.'r اYع

ت ا t 9ى : اs ا#ول'Kا+ *اا ; . ا Cدة ا>

t6NXا sى : اN9 4NMض و N nNYM Nت اNوا N6ت ا5N ا oN N

.ا8W pqل إ اء ه:ة ارا

Page 163: POWER QUALITY ASSESSMENT - IAEA · 2014. 3. 3. · 5.3 Dynamic Voltage Restorer (DVR) 76 5.4 Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) 84 CHAPTER (6) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 87