power8 - develop.apsu.comdevelop.apsu.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/presentation-ibm-power8.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
IBM Power8
David Spurway IBM Power Systems Product Manager
IBM Power8
David Spurway IBM Power Systems Product Manager
Power Systems
Power Systems
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
LEGO Bricks
Have you seen one look like this?
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
They even managed to do this…
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
The science behind LEGO
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
LEGO provides the building blocks
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
Why are Power and LEGO similar?
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
Why are LEGO and Power Systems Similar?
Heritage 50+ years 50+ years
R&D Constant focus to remain current $1 billion
Market Leadership ~$1.57B revenue Number 1 (62% Unix)
Reliability ~18 per million elements rejected 130x more checkers in POWER processors
Security 0.002 mm Tolerance Minimal Advisories & Compliance Reporting
Manafacturing 19 Billion elements per year Common Platform
Cost Competition from Lego Clones Competition from Intel
Why are LEGO and Power Systems Similar?
Heritage 50+ years 50+ years
R&D Constant focus to remain current $1 billion
Market Leadership ~$1.57B revenue Number 1 (62% Unix)
Reliability ~18 per million elements rejected 130x more checkers in POWER processors
Security 0.002 mm Tolerance Minimal Advisories & Compliance Reporting
Manafacturing 19 Billion elements per year Common Platform
Cost Competition from Lego Clones Competition from Intel
LEGO underprins the Toy Market, Power the Enterprise Server Market
LEGO®is a trademark of the LEGO Group of companies which does not sponsor, authorize or endorse this presentation
‘Due to the architecture and design of the cloud-based LEGO Matrix, IT is not a bottleneck on growth.’ !Esben Viskum, Senior Director, LEGO Service Center
IBM AIX, IBM PowerHA, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager, IBM Tivoli Netcool/Webtop, IBM Tivoli Netcool/OMNIbus Probe, IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager, IBM Tivoli Monitoring,
IBM Tivoli Enterprise Console, IBM Tivoli Network Manager, IBM Tivoli Performance Analyzer, IBM System Storage SAN Volume Controller, IBM TotalStorage Productivity Center
IBM Power 570, IBM BladeCenter HS22 blade servers, IBM System x3650 servers, IBM System Storage DS4800, IBM System Storage DS8700, IBM Tape Library
and added 2 x 9117-MMBs to their datacentres in 2011
http://www-‐01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-‐bin/ssialias?infotype=PM&subtype=AB&htmlfid=SPC03262DKEN
‘Due to the architecture and design of the cloud-based LEGO Matrix, IT is not a bottleneck on growth.’ !Esben Viskum, Senior Director, LEGO Service Center
IBM AIX, IBM PowerHA, IBM Tivoli Storage Manager, IBM Tivoli Netcool/Webtop, IBM Tivoli Netcool/OMNIbus Probe, IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager, IBM Tivoli Monitoring,
IBM Tivoli Enterprise Console, IBM Tivoli Network Manager, IBM Tivoli Performance Analyzer, IBM System Storage SAN Volume Controller, IBM TotalStorage Productivity Center
IBM Power 570, IBM BladeCenter HS22 blade servers, IBM System x3650 servers, IBM System Storage DS4800, IBM System Storage DS8700, IBM Tape Library
and added 2 x 9117-MMBs to their datacentres in 2011
http://www-‐01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-‐bin/ssialias?infotype=PM&subtype=AB&htmlfid=SPC03262DKEN
What “Bricks” do LEGO use?
Power8 Processor
Caches • 512KB SRAM L2 / core • 96 MB eDRAM shared L3 • Up to 128 MB eRAM L4 (off-
chip)
Memory • Up to 230 GB/s sustained bandwidth
Cores • 12 cores (SMT8) • 8 dispatch, 10 issue, 16 exec pipe • 2X internal data flows/queues • Enhanced prefetching • 64K data cache • 32K instruction cache
Accelerators • Crypto & memory expansion • Transactional Memory • VMM assist • Data Move/ VM Mobility
Energy Management • On-chip Power Management Micro-controller • Integrated Per-core VRM • Critical Path Monitors
Technology • 22nm SOI, eDRAM, 15 ML 650mm2
Bus Interfaces • Durable open memory attached
interface • Integrated PCIe Gen3 • SMP Interconnect • CAPI (Coherent Accelerator Processor
Interface)
More Cores !12 processor cores per socket (50% more than before) that deliver better per core performance !What this means Enjoy better scale up performance, and more throughput per scale out server node.
More Threads !SMT8 – 8 dynamic threads per core, supporting SMT1, 2, 4, & 8 modes dynamically across VMs !What this means You choose – Deploy VM’s in the optimal SMT mode based on application needs.
More Cache !At 100MB, 3X the on-chip cache as POWER7 – plus 128MB of new off-chip cache as well !What this means Memory-intensive applications (like database) will perform better as memory latency is reduced
More Bandwidth !2.3X our prior gen to memory, and 2.4X our prior gen to I/O. !What this means Data-hungry applications (like big data & analytics) will respond twice as fast and scale more efficiently.
Industry Leading
Power8 - Continued Leadership(what you expected)
Industry Leading
Industry LeadingIndustry Best Practice
CAPI !Open interface allows PCIe3 devices to participate in operations at memory speed without risk. !What this means Gain orders of magnitude application performance with PCI card technology w/o hiring specialized skills
Transactional Memory !Borrowed from the mainframe, this technology speeds up memory writes by reducing contention. !What this means A feature that improved OLTP database performance by 45% on System z is now available on Power.
Native PCIe !Integrating PCIe Gen 3 into the processor boosts performance by eliminating logic overhead. !What this means I/O intensive data applications will run faster due to high bandwidth, low latency communications.
PowerKVM !KVM, the open-source virtualization solution, can be used to manage Linux-only systems. !What this means Data centers can now standardize their clouds with a single open-source virtualization technology.
Industry on Power
Power8 - Innovating for Tomorrow
Industry on Power
Industry Extended
Industry Innovation
2013
Pow
er S
yste
ms
2014
IBM
Pow
er S
yste
ms
April 28 New Power Systems Naming Transition
Scale-out Systems (1&2 sockets)
Announce: April 28, 2014
Enterprise Systems (4+ sockets)
PowerLinux 7R1
Power 710
Power 720
Power 730
Power 740
PowerLinux 7R2
Power 750
Power 760 Power 770 Power 780 Power 795PowerLinux 7R4
Power S812L Power S822L
Power S822Power S814
Power S824
System Simple Query
Intermediate Query
Complex Query
Reports per Hour
POWER POWER8 43945 7758 212
X86 Ivy Bridge 2267 185 0.27
Speed up 19 42 784
DynamicQuery
CompatibleQuery
DynamicCubes
Based on IBM internal tests comparing IBM DB2 with BLU Acceleration system with a comparably tuned competitor configuration executing a materially identical 2.6TB operational analytics workload in a controlled laboratory environment. Test measured 60 concurrent user report throughput executing identical Cognos report workloads. Report per hour (RPH) metric calculated for each category of reports as total completed reports/hours to completion of all reports in the category. Competitor configuration: HP DL380p, 24 cores, 256GB RAM, Traditional Database, SuSE Linux 11SP3 (Database) and HP DL380p, 16 cores, 384GB RAM, Cognos 10.2.1.1, SuSE Linux 11SP3 (Cognos). IBM configuration: IBM S824, 24 cores, 256GB RAM, DB2 10.5, AIX 7.1 TL2 (Database) and IBM S824, 16 cores, 384GB RAM, Cognos 10.2.1.1, SuSE Linux 11SP3 (Cognos). Results may not be typical and will vary based on actual workload, configuration, applications, queries and other variables in a production environment.
POWER8 thrives on the complexRunning Cognos BI reports and analytics on POWER8 with DB2 with BLU Acceleration versus Ivy Bridge with a traditional database
Larger and more complex queries have more speedup
DB2 AESE v10.5 !• Power S824 with 24 cores • AIX 7.1, 64-bit !!!• FlasySystem 840
Exadata X3-2 Quarter Rack !• Intel-based Processors • 1/4 Rack • 32 database cores • 2 Server Nodes • 3 Storage Nodes !
1,542
$1,357
Trade Completions per second (TPS)
per TPS
561
$6,837
Trade Completions per second (TPS)
per TPS
2.7x Faster
80% Lower cost per Trade
per second
DB2 10.5 on POWER8 is 2.7x Faster than Oracle DB on Exadata and 80% Lower Cost
System Cost 3 year TCA $2,094,115
System Cost 3 year TCA $3,835,481
Based on IBM internal tests comparing the IBM system with a comparably priced, comparably tuned competitor configuration (version available as of 01/01/2013) executing a materially identical online transaction processing workload in a controlled laboratory environment. Tests measured Trade Completion throughput rates to execute identical SQL query workloads. More Trade Completions is indicated by higher Trade Completions/second. Competitor configuration: ¼ Unit (usable uncompressed capacity = 9.5TB) including competitor recommended software options and features. Results may not be typical and will vary based on actual workload, configuration, applications, queries and other variables in a production environment. Users of this document should verify the applicable data for their specific environment.
Power S824 WebApplication !!!!!!!
HP - ProLiant DL380p Gen8 !!!!!
!!
183,800
WebSphere on platform Database off platform
$3.09
User Interactions per second
per UI per sec
AIX
!WAS
AIX
!WAS
AIX
!WAS
AIX
!WAS
PowerVM
RHEL
!WAS
RHEL
!WAS
RHEL
!WAS
RHEL
!WAS
VMware ESXi
2S/24 Core POWER8 (3.525 GHz)
2S/24 Core Ivy Bridge-EP (2.7 Ghz)
DB2
DB2
85,939
WebSphere on platform Database off platform
$5.84
User Interactions per second
per UI per sec
Online Banking Workload v3.6
Both Servers configured to achieve maximum throughput
2.1x Faster
47% Lower cost per
UI per sec
NO trade-offs: 2x Throughput at Half the Cost of x86POWER8 Delivers Over TWICE the Throughput Relative to Ivy Bridge-EP at 47% Lower Cost for an Online Banking Workload
This is an IBM internal study designed to replicate a typical IBM customer workload usage in the marketplace. The results were obtained under laboratory conditions, and not in an actual customer environment. IBM's internal workload studies are not benchmark applications, nor are they based on any benchmark standard. As such, customer applications, differences in the stack deployed, and other systems variations or testing conditions may produce different results and may vary based on actual configuration, applications, specific queries and other variables in a production environment. Prices, where applicable, are based on published US list prices for both IBM and competitor, and the cost calculation compares the cost per request for the 3yr life of the machine. 3 year total cost of acquisition comparisons are based on similar expected hardware, software, service & support offerings
© 2014 International Business Machines Corporation
Over 2 times better 24 core performance than nearest Intel competitive results
Up to 2 times greater performance than previous Power generation
SAP Sales & Distribution 2-Tier ERP 6 BenchmarksIBM Power System S824 using DB2 10.5 vs Competition
IBM Power System S824 Performance (2) (per core)
SAP
SD E
RP 6
.0 b
ench
mar
k us
ers
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
IBM Power S824 IBM p270 IBM p260
10,000
12,528
21,212
IBM Power System S824 Performance (1)
SAP
SD E
RP 6
.0 b
ench
mar
k us
ers
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
IBM Power S824 Fujitsu RX300 S8 Cisco UCS C240 M3 HP ProLiant BL460c
10,02510,04510,240
21,212
© 2014 International Business Machines Corporation
All results use Oracle eBS 12.1.3 Payroll Batch Extra Large Kit and are current as of 3/24/2014. For more information go to http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/benchmark/apps-benchmark/results-166922.html
IBM Power System S824 Performance (1)
Chec
ks p
er h
our
0
240,000
480,000
720,000
960,000
1,200,000
IBM Power S824 12-core Cisco UCS C240 M3 24-core Oracle BL460c 16-core
789,515
1,017,6391,090,909
IBM Power System S824 delivers Best of Breed eBS 12.1.3 Payroll performance
Over 2 times more performance per-core than Cisco result with higher overall through-put on few cores
IBM Power System S824 Performance (1) (per core)
Chec
ks p
er h
our
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
IBM Power S824 12-core Cisco UCS C240 M3 24-core Oracle BL460c 16-core
49,34542,402
90,909
© 2014 International Business Machines Corporation
IBM Power System S824 Performance (1)
Relea
se 8
.1.1
.4 D
B us
ers
0
12,000
24,000
36,000
48,000
60,000
IBM Power S824 6-core Oracle SPRACT T4-2 16-coreCisco UCS B200 M3 16-core
10,000
40,000
50,000
IBM Power System S824 delivers New High-water Siebel CRM Release 8.1.1.4 performance
Over 3 times the DB performance per-core than previous results Highest overall users supported on fever cores!
IBM Power System S824 Performance (1) (per core)
Relea
se 8
.1.1
.4 D
B us
ers
/ cor
e
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
IBM Power S824 6-core Oracle SPRAC T4-2 16-core Cisco UCS B200 M3 16-core
625
2,500
8,333
(1) All results use Siebel 8.1.1.4 PSPP Kit and are current as of 3/24/2014. For more information go to http://www.oracle.com/us/solutions/benchmark/white-papers/siebel-167484.html
Leverage leadership IT efficiency • Systems designed to run at 80-90% utilization •Minimize excess capacity for peak demand, HA and contingency • Deploy new workloads at lower cost & enterprise service levels
!Implement a high availability architecture • Shift resources to support planned maintenance • Implement Active – Active for efficient HA / DR • Seamless transition to new technology
!Increase flexibility and business agility • Virtualization and Cloud management built on OpenStack • Elastic COD for instant, seamless response to business changes • Unrivaled flexibility with Mobile COD enables rapid response to
business changes while minimizing risk
Power Enterprise Pools help transform Enterprise IT for the Cloud
Power Enterprise Pools help transform Enterprise IT for the Cloud
Announce – 4/8 GA – 4/25
• Enterprise Pools with Mobile COD for Power 770 and Power 780 (Power 795 previously announced in 4Q13)
!Statements of Direction • Enterprise Systems with POWER8 technology will deliver more
performance, capacity & efficiency than any prior Power system • POWER8 & POWER7 servers will be able to interoperate & share
resources (processors / memory) in a single Power Enterprise Pool • Clients will be able to transfer Mobile CoD resources from POWER7
to POWER8 servers at no additional charge
Enterprise-class systems deliver leadership performance, resilience & resource sharing
PowerVM virtualization and cloud software simplify management & increase utilization
Elastic COD and Power IFLs enable cost efficient deployment of new workloads
Enterprise Pools with Mobile Capacity provide unprecedented flexibility and efficiency
POWER7POWER6/6+
AIX 7.1AIX 6.1AIX 5.3
AIX 7.1
AIX 6.1
AIX 5.3
Leverage POWER6 / POWER7 Compatibility ModesLPAR Migrate between POWER6 / POWER7 / POWER8 Servers
Can not move POWER8 Mode partitions to POWER6 or POWER7 systems.
AIX 7.1
AIX 6.1
POWER8
AIX 7.1
AIX 6.1
AIX 7.1
AIX 6.1
POWER6 / POWER7/ POWER8 Partition Mobility
2011 2012 2013 2014
SP
SP
AIX 7
TL1
TL7
TL9
TL8
TL2
SP10
SP5
SP10
SP6 SP7 SP8
SP2 SP3
SP6 SP7 SP8
SP2 SP3
SP2
SP5
TL3 SP2
SP9
SP4
SP9
SP4
SP
SP
SP
SP
SPx - Full I/O support on POWER8
SPx - Not supported on POWER8
SPx - Can live relocate to POWER8 with Virtual I/O
AIX 7
AIX 7
AIX 6AIX 6
AIX 6
SPx - Full I/O & POWER8 mode
Planned POWER8 support built into current AIX TLs