• Evidence-based

• Outcomes-focused

• Learner-centered

• Strengths-based

PresenterPresentation NotesToday PIO is impacting incarcerated parents and their children across the country and in other countries.

•Parents• “Silo” approach• Limited or no follow-up

•Children• Visitation• Mentoring• Parenting education (inmates)• Limited or no follow-up

•Pre-post•Four small randomized studies (N = 222)•Mixed findings

• Parent attitudes• Parenting knowledge• Stress

• Created by multifaceted and multidisciplinary team

• Reflects multiple experiencesand voicesIncarcerated mothers and fathersPractitioners working with incarcerated

mothers and fathers in Oregon and around the U.S.Researchers studying parenting under a

variety of risk conditionsClinical and developmental psychologistsInstructional designersCorrections professionals and

administratorsAdvocates

•Trained and supervised coaches•Parent Management Training (PMT)Group-based, 36 sessions across 12 weeksBrief lecture, small and large group exercisesInteractive activities throughout weeks (e.g., bear

adoption – monitoring and supervision)Homework with feedbackExercises

• Individual meetings•Graduation

The Parent Child Study

Funded by the National Institute of Mental Health

68% of men (transfers)92% of women

50% women; 40% minority35% with children full timePerson crime: 60% men, 40% women

Due to parental incarceration: 1/3 men, 1/2 women

Gender, total time in prison, baseline score

00.20.40.60.8

11.21.41.61.8

2

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Baseline Depression

Wav

e 3

De

pre

ssio

n

Class

Control

Chart1

00

0.50.5

11

1.51.5

22

2.52.5

Class

Control

Baseline Depression

Wave 3 Depression

0.2976

0.1879

0.4628

0.50795

0.628

0.828

0.7932

1.14805

0.9584

1.4681

1.1236

1.78815

future Inv

Coefficientsa

ModelUnstandardized CoefficientsStandardized CoefficientstSig.Coefficientsa

BStd. ErrorBetaModelUnstandardized CoefficientsStandardized CoefficientstSig.

1(Constant)4.511.09647.117.000BStd. ErrorBeta

corgroupam.076.105.040.724.4701(Constant)1.538.6132.508.013

femaleAM.013.104.007.122.903corgroupam2.296.8411.2092.731.007

Zp851k4M Zscore: ‘mi likely play active role raise kids 6’.364.075.3954.883.000femaleAM.013.104.007.122.903

groupXZactiverole-.272.102-.216-2.666.008p851k4M ‘mi likely play active role raise kids 6’.624.128.3954.883.000

groupXactiverole-.466.175-1.195-2.666.008

range 1 -5.5

y=(4.511 + (.364*BL) + (.076*I) + (-.272*I*BL) + (.013+F)y=1.538 + (2.296*I) + (.624*BL) + (-.466*1*BL)

-2-10112345

Class4.4034.4954.5874.679Class3.9924.154.3084.4664.624

Control3.7834.1474.5114.875Control2.1622.7863.414.0344.658

future Inv

Class

Control

Baseline Active Role

Active Role

Dep cesd interation

regress p57dep3 p57dep1AM corgroupam femaleAM groupXp57dep1

Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 261

0

Model | 15.2218274 4 3.80545684 Prob > F = 0.0000

Residual | 35.0062761 256 .136743266 R-squared = 0.3031

-------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0.2922

Total | 50.2281034 260 .193185013 Root MSE = .36979

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

p57dep3 | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

p57dep1AM | .6401005 .0782574 8.18 0.000 .4859902 .7942108

corgroupam | .1096947 .0872714 1.26 0.210 -.0621665 .2815559

femaleAM | .1349243 .0472927 2.85 0.005 .0417921 .2280565

groupXp57d~1 | -.3097132 .1037046 -2.99 0.003 -.5139361 -.1054904

_cons | .1878771 .0682374 2.75 0.006 .0534989 .3222552

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

range 0 - 2.5

y=.1879 + (.6401*BL) + (-.3097*1*BL) + (.1097*1*I)

00.511.522.5note at mean they are sig dif

Class0.29760.46280.6280.79320.95841.12360.7339

Control0.18790.507950.8281.148051.46811.78815

Dep cesd interation

Class

Control

Baseline Depression

Wave 3 Depression

dep cesd main effect

regress p57dep3 p57dep1AM corgroupam femaleAM

Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 261

0

Model | 14.0021945 3 4.66739818 Prob > F = 0.0000

Residual | 36.2259089 257 .140956844 R-squared = 0.2788

-------------+------------------------------ Adj R-squared = 0.2704

Total | 50.2281034 260 .193185013 Root MSE = .37544

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

p57dep3 | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

p57dep1AM | .464262 .0523403 8.87 0.000 .3611915 .5673326

corgroupam | -.1110407 .0471145 -2.36 0.019 -.2038203 -.0182611

femaleAM | .1165048 .0476057 2.45 0.015 .0227578 .2102518

_cons | .3202584 .0526728 6.08 0.000 .2165331 .4239836

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For every standard deviation increase in family contact, total arrests decreased by 11%

For every standard deviation increase in family contact, survival time increased by 42%

Total arrestsSelf-report of criminal behaviorSubstance abuse

No differences

Opportunities to connect with children and caregiversIntimate partner interaction and decision-making skillsTransitional housing and other early basic need supportsEmploymentMental and physical health careEstablishment of new pro-social support systems

During prisonIn community after releaseLong term follow-up – check-ins, boosters

OUR MISSION:

OUR VISION:

Purpose and Objectives:

Strengthen positive father-child engagement

Support healthy partner/co-parent relationships

Enhance education and employment opportunities to improve economic mobility

Starting 9+ months

Starting 6 months

Up to 6+ months

access to key resources (e.g. housing, healthcare, public assistance)

job search/retention assistance or access to education/training

adjust long-term plan for participant and family success

building an ongoing community support system

Content Understand how experiences/issues can fuel conflict Explore personality Recognize communication danger signs Handle anger and stress well Learn guidelines for making decisions regarding relationships Gain skills needed to navigate reentry into society successfully

Job Seeking Skills Supporting Workshops•

•

•

•

•

•

Native American/First Nations (4% EP vs 8% SIF) African American/Black (23% EP vs 18% SIF) Asian/Pacific Is (5% EP vs 3% SIF)White (67% EP vs 68% SIF) Hispanic (11% EP vs 9% SIF)

Eligible population:

SIF population:

PresenterPresentation Notes

InstructorsCase manager Navigator staff

Building Bonds,�Bridging WallsJoseph Tietz, Ph.DAnd How are the Children?Where it BeganThe Oregon DOC Accountability ModelParenting Inside OutWhat is Parenting Inside Out?Three ObjectivesWhere it is NowKeeping children connected to their parentsAndrew TignorFamily FirstJean Kjellstrand, Ph.DSlide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Challenges: Parents and ChildrenTypical ResponsesPast ResearchSlide Number 20Parenting Inside OutProcessContentSlide Number 24Randomized Controlled TrialEligibilityRecruitment (Statewide)BackgroundIntervention ConditionAnalysesPost-Intervention, Pre-ReleaseSlide Number 326 to 12 Months Post-ReleaseSlide Number 34Family Contact While in PrisonIntervention ParticipationImplicationsSlide Number 38Carolyn House-HigginsStrength in Families (SIF)Federal Grant Overview: ReFORMReFORM Grant Team StructureTargeted Outcomes SoughtEligible PopulationProgram EnrollmentProgram Structure: Pre-ReleaseSIF Program Structure: Post-ReleasePre-Release ClassesSIF Pre-Release ClassesSIF Pre-Release Classes�SIF Dads and FamiliesWho Are SIF Dads?Risk to RecidivateProgram Progress to DateQA and CQIWhat Have We Seen and Learned?Questions & Answers