practical benefit of risk assessment - automate show definition sources: 1) iso 12100-1:2010 2) ansi...
TRANSCRIPT
Mark NehrkornDirector RCC Safety
SICK Inc.
Practical Benefit of Risk Assessment:Zone Determination by Layout Analysis
Practical Benefit of Risk Assessment:Zone Determination by Layout Analysis
What is a Zone?
• A zone may include space within or around the system:
• which is used by personnel to access a specific location, an operating position or a servicing point;
• in which personnel perform standard production operations or other tasks.
• zone: a segmented space within a machine
• control zone: An identified portion of a production system under coordinated control
• hazard zone: Any space within or around a machine in which a person can be exposed to a hazard in which an immediate or impending hazard exists
• task zone: Any predetermined space within or around a machine in which a person can perform work
Definition Sources: ISO11161:2007, ANSI B11.19-DRAFT #8, ANSI B11.20 – DRAFT #7
Types of Zones
• Automation systems should be designed to facilitate safe manual interventions
• For some manual interventions, it may be impractical to stop the whole system
• … in which case the system should be segregated into zone(s) where personnel can perform their tasks safely
Why Create Zones?
Operation MaintenanceSet-Up Troubleshooting
Where is Guidance Available?
• ANSI/RIA R15.06-2012, Part 2 (ISO 10218-2:2011)• 5.9 Integrated manufacturing system (IMS) interface
• 5.9.1 General
• 5.9.2 Emergency stop
• 5.9.3 Safety-related parts of the IMS
• 5.9.4 Local control
• 5.9.5 Enabling device
• 5.9.6 Mode selection
• 5.9.7 Task zone implementation
Where is Guidance Available?
• ISO 11161:2007 + Amd 1:2010• Safety of machinery — Integrated manufacturing
systems — Basic requirements
• ANSI B11.20-2004 (R2015)• Safety Requirements for Integrated Manufacturing
Systems
RISK ASSESSMENT
Interrelationship of Standards
ISO 10218-1 ANSI/RIA R15.06 (Part 1)
Integrated Manufacturing System(IMS)
Robotsystem/cell
Robot
Other machine(C-type) standard
ISO 12100
ISO 11161
ISO 10218-2 ANSI/RIA R15.06 (Part 2)
ANSI B11.20
RIA R15.306 & ANSI B11.0
• This figure describes the relationship of the scope of machinery standards used in a robot system
• The robot alone is covered by Part 1, the system and cell is covered by Part 2
• A robot cell may include other machines subject to their own C level standards, and the robot system can be part of an
integrated manufacturing system covered by ISO 11161 which in turn can also make reference to other relevant B and C
level standards
• Part 2 adds additional information in line with ISO 12100 and ISO 11161
Source: ANSI/RIA R15.06, Part 2, Figure 1
Interrelationship of Standards
Image Source: ANSI/RIA R15.06, Part 2, Annex B
Integrated Manufacturing Systems
• An integrated manufacturing system (IMS):a) incorporates two or more industrial machines which:
1) can operate independent of each other, and
2) are intended for the purpose of manufacturing, treatment, movement or packaging of discrete parts or assemblies;
b) is linked by a material handling system; and
c) is interconnected by a control system(s) for coordinated operation
(saw)
Die carrier
Platen
Butt shear
Gate lock cylinder
Span of Control
• span of control: Predetermined portion of the production system under control of a specific device
• The control of one or more control zones of the machine by various safety-related control devices is defined by the span of control of each device
Definition Source: ISO11161:2007, ANSI B11.19-DRAFT #8, ANSI B11.20 – DRAFT #7
Devices with Span of Control
• Typical safety-related control devices which may have span of control include:
• INPUT:
• OUTPUT:
• Safeguarding devices:
o Interlock devices
o Presence sensing devices
• Complimentary control devices:
o Emergency stops
o Enabling devices
o Hold-to-run controls
o Resets
• End switching devices:
o Contactors
o Valves
o Drives
Span of Control & Layout Analysis
• Additional guidance in future machine-specific (Type-C) ANSI standards:
• The span of control of safety-related control devices shall be determined by a layout analysis, which includes:
• Specification of the limits
• Task/hazard pairs as identified from a risk assessment
• Task zone identification
• Selecting risk reduction measures
• Control zone identification
Risk Assessment Process
Image Source: ANSI B11.0-2015, Figure 6 (Used with permission)
Referenced by RIA TR R15.306-2016, Clause 6
Layout Analysis Process
Image Source: ANSI B11.20-DRAFT #7
Comparison of Processes
Risk Assessment Process Layout Analysis Process
Combination of Processes
Applying Layout Analysis to an Example Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment Example
• Palletizing Cell
Risk Assessment Example
• Identification of Tasks
A
B A
B
CD
A: Load/Unload Pallets
B: Cleaning
C: Teaching Robot
D: Jam Clearing
E: Conveyor Maintenance
ED
F2
F1
F1
F2
F1
Definition Sources: 1) ISO 12100-1:2010 2) ANSI B11.0-2015
2) task: Any specific activity
that is done with, on or around
the machine during its lifecycle.
1) task: specific activity
performed by one or more
persons on, or in the vicinity of,
the machine during its life cycle
Risk Assessment Example
• Identification of Hazard SourcesF2
F1
F1
F2
F1
Definition Sources: ISO 12100-1:2015, ANSI B11.0-2015
12
1: Robot / End Effector
2: Conveyor Lifts
3: Conveyors
32
hazard: A potential source
of harm
Risk Assessment Example
• Identification of Hazard Types
Definition Sources: ISO 12100-1:2015, ANSI B11.0-2015
1: Robot / End Effector
2: Conveyor Lifts
3: Conveyors
12
1a: Crushing
1b: Dropped parts
2a: Shearing
2b: Pinching
2c: Entanglement
3a: In-running nip points
32
S3
S1
S4
S2
S3
S2
1: Robot / End Effector
2: Conveyor Lifts
3: Conveyors
Risk Assessment Example
• Identification of Task Zones
Definition Sources: ISO11161:2007, ANSI B11.19-DRAFT #8, ANSI B11.20 – DRAFT #6
task zone: Any predetermined
space within or around a machine
in which a person can perform work
IIIIII
I: Load/Unload & Cleaning
II: Teaching Robot
III: Jam Clearing
IV: Maintenance
IVIII
I
Risk Assessment Example
• Risk Assessment: Identify Task / Hazard Pairs
HA
ZAR
DS ROBOT CONVEYOR LIFTS CONV.
1a 1b 2a 2b 2c 3a
TASKS Crushing Dropped Parts Shearing Pinching Entang. In-Running Nips
A L/UL 1 2 - - - - F2
B Cleaning 3 4 - - - - F1
C Teaching 5 6 - - - - F1
D Clearing 7 8 9 10 11 12 F2
E Maint. 13 14 15 16 17 18 F1
S3 S1 S4 S2 S3 S2
Risk Assessment Example
• Risk Assessment: Risk Estimation
ID Task Haz-ard Sever-ityExp-
osureAvoid-ance
Occur-rence
Risk Level
PLr
1 A 1a S3 F2 A1 O2 4 d
2 A 1b S2 F2 A2 O2 1 b
3 B 1a S3 F1 A1 O1 1 b
4 B 1b S2 F1 A2 O1 0 a
5 C 1a S3 F1 A1 O3 3 c
6 C 1b S2 F1 A2 O1 0 a
7 D 1a S3 F2 A1 O1 3 c
8 D 1b S2 F2 A2 O1 0 a
9 D 2a S3 F2 A2 O2 6 d
10 D 2b S1 F2 A2 O2 0 a
11 D 2c S2 F2 A2 O2 1 b
12 D 3a S1 F2 A2 O2 0 a
13 E 1a S3 F1 A1 O1 1 b
14 E 1b S2 F1 A2 O1 0 a
15 E 2a S3 F1 A2 O2 3 c
16 E 2b S1 F1 A2 O2 0 a
17 E 2c S2 F1 A2 O1 0 a
18 E 3a S1 F1 A1 O2 0 a
Risk Assessment Example
• Control Zones for Coexistence
Co
ntr
ol Z
on
e ACo
ntr
ol Z
on
e B
Control Zone C
Risk Assessment Example
• Apply Protective Measures (Gap in the Fence)
Safe!
But not very efficient…
Risk Assessment Example
R
R
R R
R R
Risk Assessment Example
• Safety-Related Span of Control
Control Zone C
Co
ntr
ol Z
on
e ACo
ntr
ol Z
on
e B
R
R
R
R
RR
RR
Risk Assessment Example
• Risk Assessment: Risk Reduction MeasuresID Task Hazard Severity Exposure Avoidance OccurrenceRisk
LevelPLr
Risk Reduction Measures:Technical Protective Measures & Administrative Measures
1 A 1a S3 F2 A1 O2 4 d Interlocked sliding door, Light curtain, Awareness light, Reduced robot speed controlled by Area scanner
2 A 1b S2 F2 A2 O2 1 b Interlocked sliding door, Light curtain
3 B 1a S3 F1 A1 O1 1 b Interlocked sliding door, Light curtain, Awareness light, Reduced robot speed controlled by Area scanner
4 B 1b S2 F1 A2 O1 0 a Interlocked sliding door, Light curtain
5 C 1a S3 F1 A1 O3 3 c Teach pendant (with enabling device and emergency stop), Manual reduced speed (T1)
6 C 1b S2 F1 A2 O1 0 a Teach pendant (with enabling device and emergency stop), Manual reduced speed (T1)
7 D 1a S3 F2 A1 O1 3 cInterlocked hinged door, Infeed light curtain, Interlocked sliding door, Emergency stop cable pull, Safe distance, Awareness signs
8 D 1b S2 F2 A2 O1 0 a Interlocked hinged door, Infeed light curtain, Interlocked sliding door, Safe distance, Awareness signs
9 D 2a S3 F2 A2 O2 6 dInterlocked hinged door, Infeed light curtain, Interlocked sliding door, Emergency stop cable pull, Safe distance, Awareness signs
10 D 2b S1 F2 A2 O2 0 aInterlocked hinged door, Infeed light curtain, Interlocked sliding door, Emergency stop cable pull, Safe distance, Awareness signs
11 D 2c S2 F2 A2 O2 1 bInterlocked hinged door, Infeed light curtain, Interlocked sliding door, Emergency stop cable pull, Safe distance, Awareness signs
12 D 3a S1 F2 A2 O2 0 aInterlocked hinged door, Infeed light curtain, Interlocked sliding door, Emergency stop cable pull, Safe distance, Awareness signs
13 E 1a S3 F1 A1 O1 1 b Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), Safe work procedures
14 E 1b S2 F1 A2 O1 0 a Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), Safe work procedures
15 E 2a S3 F1 A2 O2 3 c Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), Safe work procedures
16 E 2b S1 F1 A2 O2 0 a Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), Safe work procedures
17 E 2c S2 F1 A2 O1 0 a Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), Safe work procedures
18 E 3a S1 F1 A1 O2 0 a Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), Safe work procedures
Risk Assessment Example
Risk Assessment Example
• Interaction Matrix (Performance Levels and Span of Control)SAFETY-RELATED COMPONENTS HIGHEST LEVEL OF SAFETY PERFORMANCE
FUNCTION DEVICE LOCATION ROBOT CONVEYOR LIFTS CONVEYORS
PR
OT
ECTI
VE
STO
P
Light Curtain Conveyor Entrance d d b
Door Interlocks Lift Doors d d b
Door Interlocks L/UL Doors d d b
Door Interlock Maintenance Door d d b
Light Curtains L/UL Stations d - -
Area Scanners L/UL Stations d - -
Position Switches Robot Primary Axes d - -
EMER
GEN
CY
STO
P
E-stop Pushbutton Conveyor Entrance b b b
E-stop Pushbuttons Lift Doors b b b
E-stop Pushbuttons L/UL Doors b b b
E-stop Pushbutton Maintenance Door b b b
E-stop Cable Pull Cell Interior b b b
RES
ET
Reset Pushbutton Conveyor Entrance d d a
Reset Pushbuttons Lift Doors d d a
Reset Pushbuttons L/UL Stations d d a
Reset Pushbutton Maintenance Door d d a
AU
XIL
IAR
Y Muting Sensors Conveyor Entrance d d b
Mute Override Conveyor Entrance d d b
Awareness Lights L/UL Stations d - -
Risk Assessment Example
• Risk Assessment: Risk Reduction MeasuresID TaskHaz-ard
RISKIN
PLrRisk Reduction Measures:
Technical Protective Measures & Administrative MeasuresSeverity
Exposure
Avoidance
Occurrence
RISK OUT
1 A 1a 4 d Interlocked sliding door, Light curtain, Awareness light, Reduced robot speed controlled by Area scanner S3 F1 A1 O1 1
2 A 1b 1 b Interlocked sliding door, Light curtain S2 F1 A2 O1 0
3 B 1a 1 b Interlocked sliding door, Light curtain, Awareness light, Reduced robot speed controlled by Area scanner S3 F1 A1 O1 1
4 B 1b 0 a Interlocked sliding door, Light curtain S2 F1 A1 O1 0
5 C 1a 3 c Teach pendant (with enabling device and emergency stop), Manual reduced speed (T1) S3 F1 A1 O1 1
6 C 1b 0 a Teach pendant (with enabling device and emergency stop), Manual reduced speed (T1) S2 F1 A1 O1 0
7 D 1a 3 cInterlocked hinged door, Infeed light curtain, Interlocked sliding door, Emergency stop cable pull, Safe distance, Awareness signs
S3 F1 A1 O1 1
8 D 1b 0 a Interlocked hinged door, Infeed light curtain, Interlocked sliding door, Safe distance, Awareness signs S2 F1 A1 O1 0
9 D 2a 6 dInterlocked hinged door, Infeed light curtain, Interlocked sliding door, Emergency stop cable pull, Safe distance, Awareness signs
S3 F1 A1 O1 1
10 D 2b 0 aInterlocked hinged door, Infeed light curtain, Interlocked sliding door, Emergency stop cable pull, Safe distance, Awareness signs
S1 F1 A1 O1 0
11 D 2c 1 bInterlocked hinged door, Infeed light curtain, Interlocked sliding door, Emergency stop cable pull, Safe distance, Awareness signs
S2 F1 A1 O1 0
12 D 3a 0 aInterlocked hinged door, Infeed light curtain, Interlocked sliding door, Emergency stop cable pull, Safe distance, Awareness signs
S1 F1 A1 O1 0
13 E 1a 1 b Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), Safe work procedures S1 F1 A1 O1 0
14 E 1b 0 a Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), Safe work procedures S1 F1 A1 O1 0
15 E 2a 3 c Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), Safe work procedures S1 F1 A1 O1 0
16 E 2b 0 a Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), Safe work procedures S1 F1 A1 O1 0
17 E 2c 0 a Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), Safe work procedures S1 F1 A1 O1 0
18 E 3a 0 a Control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout), Safe work procedures S1 F1 A1 O1 0
Review
1. The risk assessment process:
• is used to reduce risks
• is also used to more logically isolate / segregate various zones within complex automation systems
2. Involvement of design engineers (systems, controls, etc.) in the risk assessment process is important in order to achieve maximum safety and productivity
3. Other industrial safety standards can and should be used for additional guidance to maximize the results of a risk assessment
Risk Productivity
Process
Mark NehrkornDirector RCC Safety
SICK Inc.6900 West 110th St.
Minneapolis, MN
USA
Telephone: 952-941-6780
Email: [email protected]
www.sick.com/us/en/
Practical Benefit of Risk Assessment:Zone Determination by Layout Analysis