primary energy division coal haulage: road to · pdf fileprimary energy division coal haulage:...
TRANSCRIPT
Primary Energy Division
COAL HAULAGE: ROAD COAL HAULAGE: ROAD TO RAIL MIGRATION
14 October 2010
Transport Forum
COAL LOGISTICS STRATEGY DEVELOPED TO ENSURE SECURITY OF SUPPLY & TO IMPROVE THE COST & SAFETY OF PED’S COAL LOGISTICS
Security of supply
• Put the appropriate and relevant logistics solutions into place to ensure that power stations are supplied with coal from the targeted sources
• Where possible, build in the ability to switch modes of transport/or sources of supply in the event of supply problems
• Ensure that the transport of coal is done in the most cost optimal manner i.e., conveyor or rail
Objectives of the PED logistics’ strategy
+
2
Safety and social
responsibility
Cost optimisation manner i.e., conveyor or rail
• Limit road transport due to high cost, and unacceptable safety / social impact and risk.
• Minimise additional cost of road repairs
• Ensure that all coal logistics are done in a safe and socially responsible manner
• Minimise adverse environmental impact of coal transport
• Involve BEE participants, where possible
• Where possible, accelerate reduction in trucking
+
LONG TERM COAL SUPPLY STRATEGY WAS APPROVED BY BOARD IN DECEMBER 2008
Pursue long term contracts with mines
• Enter into long term contracts with mines in close proximity to the power stations, in order to ensure
the mines actually develop the projects in a timely fashion, and will help avoid the higher costs
associated with short-term contracts
Minimize long term transportation costs and increase flexibility
• For all logistics routes, Eskom should pursue the financially optimal solution for the long term, which will be either a conveyor or a rail based solution
• Establish an effective rail backbone in Mpumalanga to increase flexibility and improve supply security
• Maintain some trucking capability (<5%) to provide sufficient transport flexibility
Improve coal consistency and
• Assess and implement opportunities to improve coal consistency and quality (potentially including
changes to existing contracts), or affect operational changes in the plant, based on plant by plant
analyses
1
2
3
4
qualityanalyses
Develop the Waterberg Rail-link
• Upgrade the existing Waterberg Rail-link connecting the Waterberg coal fields to the Mpumalanga power stations in order to – Improve security of supply through increasing the available supply sources for Mpumalanga
stations
Develop risk based stock-days
• Formalise stockpile levels per station based on a full assessment of the specific risks per station
• Conduct a regular risk review and adjustment to re-assess appropriate stock days per station
5
4
Engage Transnet to develop short and long-term rail solutions
Establish a logistics department in PED
reporting to the MD
• Transnet to be engaged in the development of the proposed short and long-term rail solutions primarily in the Mpumalanga area - other than the Waterberg Rail Link - and to negotiate the required outcomes for PED
• Pursue Waterberg feasibility study with Transnet
• Pursue alternative ownership models, including Eskom participation
• A logistics department will be structured within PED and staffed with skilled personnel to manage road (with assistance from the lead logistics provider, ROTRAN) and rail transportation.
• This department will also drive the PED relationship with all stakeholders such as Transnet and will be responsible to ensure the implementation of short- to long-term logistics solutions and optimisation initiatives
LONG TERM LOGISTICS STRATEGY APPROVED BY BOARD IN APRIL 2009 ON FOUR KEY PRINCIPLES
5
Appoint a Lead Logistics Provider to manage road deliveries
• Pursue alternative ownership models, including Eskom participation
• To pursue a Lead Logistics Provider model, and to investigate the possibility of ROTRAN developing an in-house competency to be able to fulfil this function, failing which, to pursue alternative recognised service providers.
• Funding for long term logistics solutions, incorporating rail and conveyor options, is estimated at Rxbn over the next 5 years, including the Majuba Heavy Haul Line.
• Eskom will invest in PS infrastructure and certain loading sites .
• To form, and/or participate in, joint ESKOM task teams to develop funding structures and to investigate and select appropriate funding partners for the long-term logistics solutions, including Majuba HH
Develop funding options for long-term logistics solutions
Camden
2.1Mtpa/
5Mtpa
Hendrina
2.5Mtpa
5 OF THE 6 ESKOM PS WHERE RAIL IS PLANNED ARE LINKED TO MAIN RAIL NETWORK WITH ESKOM OWNED LINES
Duvha
~18Mtpa – a
challenge
6
Grootvlei *
2.5Mtpa
Majuba GFB
9Mtpa
Tutuka
7Mtpa
* Grootvlei is not linked directly by an Eskom rail line, but there is a TFR branch line between Balfour and Grootvlei
Majuba HH
14Mtpa
ESKOM, TFR AND THE MINES MUST MAKE NECESSARY INVESTMENTS* TO ENSURE RAIL SYSTEM MEETS VOLUME ASPIRATIONS
Capital Planning StrategyOrganisation
• Invest in world class off-loading infrastructure at all Power Stations
• Ensure private sidings are constructed between main-line and Power Station
• Invest in Inland Consolidation Terminals to allow for rail solutions where Mine/Power Station are not close to railhead
• Invest in Containers and handling equipment where required (or outsource)
• May require bi-modal / multi-modal solutions to link railhead with Power Station, if infrastructure is prohibitively expensive
7
• Invest in main-line upgrades to provide for growth in Eskom traffic volumes
• Invest (with Eskom) in Inland Consolidation Terminals to allow for rail solutions where Mine/Power Station are not close to railhead Includes track and overhead power
• Provide rolling stock (wagons and locomotives)
• Rolling stock could be ex-Coal Line fleet, or newly built
• All investments are recovered by way of rail tariff
• Invest in world class loading infrastructure at all Mines serving Eskom (rapid loaders)
• Ensure private sidings are constructed between main-line and Mines serving Eskom
• May require multi-modal solution (Containers) to link railhead with Mine, if infrastructure prohibitively expensive
* May require Supply Chain funding approach so as to achieve optimal funding structure
NATIONAL TREASURY REQUIRES THAT THE RAIL MIGRATION PLAN BE IMPLEMENTED
• National Treasury has agreed to provide funding to DPE/Eskom for the road repair program
• This is contingent on 3 objectives being achieved:
• Coal Haulage Network Roads (~1,400km) be transferred to SANRAL
• Rail Migration plan be contractually concluded between ESKOM and TFR
8
TFR
• Robust performance mechanism put in place to monitor and manage both:
• The progress on road repairs as well as
• rail migration.
3. Road repairs
• The road repair program is at maximum reconstruction capability per annum
• Delayed rail migration causes deteriorating road conditions to be accelerated
• Security of supply will be threatened
• SANRAL indicates that if
IMPACT OF RAIL DELAYS ARE BOTH QUANTITATIVE & QUALITATIVE - QUANTITATIVE
9
• SANRAL indicates that if
� a poor road is left for 3 – 5 years, cost of upgrade goes up 3.5 times; and
� if left for 5 – 8 years, the cost goes up 18 times
Rail Migration shared (high level) with all affected Communities
• Communities accept that roads are being repaired, but have now moved on to a campaign to rid their towns/streets from Coal Trucks
� Accidents
� Fatalities
� Noise/dust pollution
� Negative impact on economies of these towns
IMPACT OF RAIL DELAYS ARE BOTH QUANTITATIVE & QUALITATIVE - QUALITATIVE
10
� Negative impact on economies of these towns
• Communities agitated and threaten action; blockades (Ermelo/Bethal)
• Security of supply and lives of drivers threatened
Rail Migration shared with all Road Transporters delivering for Eskom
• Rail delays will affect the truck reduction strategy, and more specifically the phasing out of fleets of vehicles over a staggered period in 3 year tranches
• Transporters will not invest in vehicles for short periods of time to cover for any rail delays; impacting on security of supply
CURRENT RAIL INITIATIVES4
1. Majuba GFB – operating at 8.5Mtpa (annualised)
2. Camden Container Solution – first train due 5th October 2010
3. Tutuka – approved by Board
4. Grootvlei – ERA phase
11
5. Hendrina – concept design
6. Duvha – mode selection
7. Majuba Heavy Haul – project launched with World Bank funding
8. Waterberg – concept study completed
9. Kusile Sorbent – mode selection