probability review water resource risk analysis davis, ca 2009

38
Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Upload: kristina-heath

Post on 13-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Probability Review

Water Resource Risk AnalysisDavis, CA

2009

Page 2: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Learning Objectives

• At the end of this session participants will understand:• The definition of probability.

• Where probabilities come from.

• There are basic laws of probability.

• The difference between discrete and continuous random variables.

• The significance of learning about populations.

Page 3: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Probability Is Not Intuitive

Pick a door.What is the probability you picked the winning door?What is the probability you did not?

Page 4: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Suppose you picked door #2

Should you switch doors or stay with your original choice if your goal is to win the game?

Page 5: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

It’s True

Your original choice had a 1/3 chance of winning.It still does. Switching now has the 2/3 chance of winning. Information changes probabilities.

http://math.ucsd.edu/~crypto/Monty/monty.html

Page 6: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Definition

Probability => Chance something will or will not happen.

A state of beliefA historical frequencyThe math is more settled than the perspective

Page 7: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

What’s the probability of….

• A damaging flood this year?

• A 100% increase in steel prices?

• A valve failure at lock in your District?

• A collision between two vessels?

• A lock stall?• More than 30% rock

in the channel bottom?

• Levee overtopping?• Gas > $5/gal?

Page 8: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Probability

• Human construct to understand chance events and uncertainty

• A number between 0 and 1

• 0 is impossible

• 1 is certain

• 0.5 is the most uncertain of all

Page 9: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Probability

• One of our identified possibilities has to occur or we have not identified all the possibilities

• Something has to happen

• The sum of the probability of all our possibilities equals one

• Probability of all branches from a node =1

Page 10: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

80.0% 24.0%

30.0% Cracking

20.0% 6.0%

Liquifiable Soil

60.0% 42.0%

70.0% Cracking

0

40.0% 28.0%

Earthquake Model

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

One of these four endpoints must occur.Endpoints define the sample space.

Page 11: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Expressing Probability

• Decimal = 0.6

• Percentage = 60%

• Fraction = 6/10 = 3/5

• Odds = 3:2 (x:y based on x/(x + y))

Page 12: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Where Do We Get Probabilities

• Classical/analytical probabilities

• Empirical/frequentist probabilities

• Subjective probabilities

Page 13: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Analytical Probabilities

• Equally likely events (1/n)

– Chance of a 1 on a die = 1/6

– Chance of head on coin toss = ½

• Combinatorics

– Factorial rule of counting

– Permutations (n!/(n - r)!)

– Combinations (n!/(r!(n - r)!)

• Probability of a 7

Page 14: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Empirical Probabilities• Observation-how many times the event of interest

happens out of the number of times it could have happened

• P(light red)

• Useful when process of

interest is repeated many

times under same

circumstances

• Relative frequency is

approximation of true probability

Page 15: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Subjective Probability

• Evidence/experience based

• Expert opinion• Useful when we deal

with uncertainty of events that will occur once or that have not yet occurred

Page 16: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Repeatable and Unique

• Frequency of flooding

• House has basement

• Pump motor lasts two years

• Grounding

• County manager won’t reassign personnel

• >30% rock in channel bottom

• Structure damage in earthquake <6.2

Page 17: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Working With Probabilities

• If it was that simple anyone could do it

• It ain’t that simple

• There are rules and theories that govern our use of probabilities

• Estimating probabilities of real situations requires us to think about complex events

• Most of us do not naturally assess probabilities well

Page 18: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Levee ConditionContingency Table

Inadequate Maintenance

Adequate Maintenance Total

Private 80 20 100Locally Constructed 50 50 100Federal Construction 10 90 100Total 140 160 300

Page 19: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Marginal Probabilities

• Marginal Probability => Probability of a single event P(A)

• P(private) = 100/300 = 0.333

Inadequate Maintenance

Adequate Maintenance Total

Private 80 20 100Locally Constructed 50 50 100Federal Construction 10 90 100Total 140 160 300

Page 20: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Complementarity

• P(Private) = 0.333• P(Private’) = 1 –

0.333 = .667Inadequate Maintenance

Adequate Maintenance Total

Private 80 20 100Locally Constructed 50 50 100Federal Construction 10 90 100Total 140 160 300

Page 21: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

General Rule of Addition

• For two events A & B• P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) -

P(A and B)

• P(Private or Inadequate)=P(P)+P(I)-P(P and I)

• 100/300 + 140/300 -80/300 = 160/300 = 0.533

Inadequate Maintenance

Adequate Maintenance Total

Private 80 20 100Locally Constructed 50 50 100Federal Construction 10 90 100Total 140 160 300

Page 22: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Addition Rules

• For mutually exclusive events P(A and B) is zero

• P(A and B) is a joint probability

• P(Private and Local) = 0

• For events not mutually exclusive P(A and B) can be non-zero and positive

Page 23: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Multiplication Rules of Probability

• Independent Events

• P(A and B) = P(A) x P(B)

• Dependent Events

• P(A and B) depends on nature of the dependency

• General rule of multiplication• P(A and B) = P(A) * P(B|A)

• Engineering involves a lot of dependence

Page 24: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Dependence & IndependenceHere is a “picture” of our table.

Notice how inadequate and adequate probabilities vary. They depend on the ownership. Thus, ownership changes the probability.

If maintenance condition was independent of ownership all probabilities would be the same.

20.0% 6.6667%

20

33.3333% Chance

100

80.0% 26.6667%

300 80

Chance

50.0% 16.6667%

50

33.3333% Chance

100

50.0% 16.6667%

50

90.0% 30.0%

90

33.3333% Chance

100

10.0% 3.3333%

10

Bayes Theorem Example1

Private

Adequate Maintenance

Inadequate Maintenance

Locally constructed

Adequate Maintenance

Inadequate Maintenance

Federal construction

Adequate Maintenance

Inadequate Maintenance

Page 25: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Conditional Probabilities

• Information can change probabilities

• P(A|B) is not same as P(A) if A and B are dependent

• P(A|B) = P(A and B)/P(B)• P(Inadequate|

Private)=80/100=0.8• P(Inadequate)=

140/300=0.4667

Inadequate Maintenance

Adequate Maintenance Total

Private 80 20 100Locally Constructed 50 50 100Federal Construction 10 90 100Total 140 160 300

Page 26: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Information Changes Probabilities

• John Tyler’s birth year• Which of the four statements

do you believe is most likely? • Which of the statements do

you believe is least likely? • Give probabilities to the four

events that are consistent with the answers you made above.

Year of Birth Probability

no later than 1750

between 1751 and 1775

between 1776 and 1800

after 1800

John Tyler was the tenth president of the United States. Use this information to reevaluate the probabilities you made above. Before you assign probabilities, answer the first two questions stated above

George Washington, the first President of the United States, was born in 1732. Again reevaluate your probabilities and answer all three questions. John Tyler was inaugurated as President in 1841. Answer the same three questions.

March 29, 1790

Page 27: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Important Point

• We often lack data and rely on subjective probabilities

• Subjectivists, maintain rational belief is governed by the laws of probability and lean heavily on conditional probabilities in their theories of evidence and their models of empirical learning. Bayes' Theorem is a simple mathematical formula used for calculating conditional probabilities

Page 28: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

A Question

• Suppose a levee is inspected and is found to be inadequately maintained

• What is the probability it is a private levee?– This flips the previous

example

Inadequate Maintenance

Adequate Maintenance Total

Private 80 20 100Locally Constructed 50 50 100Federal Construction 10 90 100Total 140 160 300

It is trivially easy with the table, 80/140

But what if there was no table?

Page 29: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Bayes Theorem for Calculating Conditional Probabilities

• P(A|B) = P(A)P(B|A)/P(B)

• Translated: P(P|I) = P(P)P(I|P)/P(I)

• In words, the probability a levee is private given it is inadequate equals the probability it is private times the probability it is inadequate given it is private all divided by the probability it is inadequate

Page 30: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Calculation

• P(P|I) = P(P)P(I|P)/P(I)

• (100/300 * 80/100)/ (140/300) =

• 80/140

Inadequate Maintenance

Adequate Maintenance Total

Private 80 20 100Locally Constructed 50 50 100Federal Construction 10 90 100Total 140 160 300

Page 31: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Bayes Helps Us Answer Useful Questions

20.0% 6.6667%

20

33.3333% Chance

100

80.0% 26.6667%

300 80

Chance

50.0% 16.6667%

50

33.3333% Chance

100

50.0% 16.6667%

50

90.0% 30.0%

90

33.3333% Chance

100

10.0% 3.3333%

10

Bayes Theorem Example1

Private

Adequate Maintenance

Inadequate Maintenance

Locally constructed

Adequate Maintenance

Inadequate Maintenance

Federal construction

Adequate Maintenance

Inadequate Maintenance

57.1429% 26.6667%

80

35.7143% 16.6667%

50

46.6667% Private

140

7.1429% 3.3333%

300 10

Inadequate Maintenance

12.5% 6.6667%

20

31.25% 16.6667%

50

53.3333% Private

160

56.25% 30.0%

90

Bayes Theorem Example2

Yes

Locally constructed

Federal construction

Private

No

Private

Locally constructed

Federal construction

1. We have an inadequate levee, what’s the probability it’s private? 2. We have a private levee, what’s the probability it is inadequate?

57.1429% 80%

P(P)=33.33% P(I)=46.67%But suppose we had more pointed Q’s?

Page 32: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

You Need to Know the Laws

• So you can construct rational models

Page 33: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Marginal=>P(contains oil)

Additive=>This times this times

this time this equals this

Page 34: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Conditional probability=>P(D>CD|Oil)

Conditional probability=>P(D>CD| No Oil)

Probabilities on branchesconditional on whathappened before

Page 35: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Conclusions

• Risk assessors must understand probability to do good assessments

• Risk managers must understand probability to make good decisions

• Risk communicators must understand probability to communicate effectively with those who do not

Page 36: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

It’s True

Your original choice had a 1/3 chance of winning and there was a 2/3 chance it was the doors you did not pick. I gave you some information I told you it wasnot door 3. That meant there is a 2/3 chance it is door 1 and if you want to maximizeyour chance of winning you should switch.

Page 37: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Take Away Points

• Probability is human construct, number [0,1]

• Estimates are analytical, frequency, subjective

• There are laws that govern probability calculations but philosophies differ

• It is language of variability and uncertainty

• You need to have people who know probability to do risk analysis

Page 38: Probability Review Water Resource Risk Analysis Davis, CA 2009

Charles Yoe, [email protected]

Questions?