prof. m. thaller (universität köln) - toward a reference curriculum in digital humanities

33
Towards a reference curriculum for the Digital Humanities Moderator: Manfred Thaller, Universität zu Köln Digital Humanities 2012, July 15 th 2012

Upload: infoclioch

Post on 16-Jan-2015

2.551 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1. Towards a reference curriculumfor the Digital HumanitiesModerator: Manfred Thaller, Universitt zu Kln Digital Humanities 2012, July 15th 2012

2. Setting the agenda09:00 10:30 Setting the agendaTypes of degree courses 3. Setting the agendaEmpirical base15 universitiese) 10 BA /BSc programsf) 12 MA / MSc programsg) 2 certificatesh) 1 embedded degree within Humanities courseEstimate: 5 6 universities missing 4. Setting the agendaAttempt at a typology MAs in Digital Humanities BAs in Digital Humanities MAs in information science or as a specialization of a Comp. Sci. course with a Digital Humanities focus BAs in information science or as a specialization of a Comp. Sci. course with a Digital Humanities focus BAs / MAs with Comp. Sci. as minor MScs / MAs with a Humanities focus at Comp. Sci. schools BScs / BAs with a Humanities focus at Comp. Sci. schools Certificates of Digital Humanities [ "Joint Degrees" (taught by more than one university together) ] 5. Setting the agendaObservations towards a typology of scope degrees adding DH knowledge to classical Humanitiescontent degrees targeting DH and classical Humanities content tomemory institution training degrees adding Comp. Sci. knowledge to classicalHumanities content degrees adding Humanities knowledge to classical Comp.Sci. content 6. Setting the agendaObservations on consensus between courses and proponents Modeling and formalizing should be a core component ofcurriculum Theoretical understanding of modeling issues should beunderpinned by skills to support their application by tools Standards have to be known 7. Setting the agendaObservations on disagreements between courses andproponents Modeling and formalizing: UML or X-technologies orapplication of a specific standard? Skills: XSLT or PHP or Java? Administrate your ownserver? Standards 8. Setting the agendaStandards important for the Digital Humanities 1 Encoding: ASCII, Unicode Meta languages: SGML, XML (incl. Namespaces) Schema languages: DTD, xml schema, rng, ANSI-SPARCArchitecture, Unified Modeling Language (UML), Entity-Relationship-Models Meta data languages: RDF Metadata: TEI-Header, Dublin Core, OAI-PMH Text encoding: TEI, MEI 9. Setting the agendaStandards important for the Digital Humanities 2 Data formats and Codecs and Codecs Text: pdf, particularly pdf/a, TeX/LaTeX, rtf Image: jpg, png, tiff, SVG Audio: wav, mp3, flac A/V: quicktime, MPEG-4, H.264, AVI, FLV Geographical Information Systems: OpenGis Standards 10. Setting the agendaStandards important for the Digital Humanities 3 Ontology languages: OWL, RDF, Topic Maps, SKOS Cultural heritage standards (libraries, museums, archives): AACR, RAK (Germany), METS, MODS, EAD, CIDOCCRM, LIDO, RSWK (Germany), DDC, RVK,ICONCLASS, MARC21 / MARCxml, PND, SWD,GKDMETS, Z.39.50 Internet / Web: HTTP, URI (incl. URN,URL), HTML, CSS,OSI model, TCP/IP, doi, purl Retrieval: xpath, xquery, SQL 11. Setting the agendaStandards important for the Digital Humanities 4 Linking: URI (incl. URN,URL), xpointer, xlink Text formatting: HTML, CSS (->Web), xsl:fo, TeX / Latex Programming languages: javaScript, perl, python, java, c++ XML processing: xslt, xproc 12. Setting the agendaStandards important for the Digital Humanities on levels(3)Know that it exists, ist principal field of application,ist function. In some cases know software for handling.Example: pdf(5)Also: Understand its basic specification.Example: CIDOC-CRM.(7)Also: Good knowledge of the standard, experience in its application.Example: TEI. 13. Setting the agendaStandards important for the Digital Humanities on levels(3)Know that it exists, ist principal field of application,ist function. In some cases know software for handling.Example: pdf(5)Also: Understand its basic specification.Example: CIDOC-CRM.(7)Also: Good knowledge of the standard, experience in its application.Example: TEI. 14. Setting the agendaStandards important for the Digital Humanities 1 Encoding: ASCII, Unicode Meta languages: SGML, XML (incl. Namespaces) Schema languages: DTD, xml schema, rng, ANSI-SPARCArchitecture, UML, Entity-Relationship-Models Meta data languages: RDF Metadata: TEI-Header, Dublin Core, OAI-PMH Text encoding: TEI, MEI 15. Setting the agendaStandards important for the Digital Humanities 2 Data formats and Codecs and Codecs Text: pdf, particularly pdf/a, TeX/LaTeX, rtf Image: jpg, png, tiff, SVG Audio: wav, mp3, flac A/V: quicktime, MPEG-4, H.264, AVI, FLV Geographical Information Systems: OpenGis Standards 16. Setting the agendaStandards important for the Digital Humanities 3 Ontology languages: OWL, RDF, Topic Maps, SKOS Cultural heritage standards (libraries, museums, archives): AACR, RAK (Germany), METS, MODS, EAD, CIDOCCRM, LIDO, RSWK (Germany), DDC, RVK, ICONCLASS,MARC21 / MARCxml, PND, SWD, GKDMETS, Z.39.50 Internet / Web: HTTP, URI (incl. URN,URL), HTML, CSS,OSI model, TCP/IP, doi, purl Retrieval: xpath, xquery, SQL 17. Setting the agendaStandards important for the Digital Humanities 4 Linking: URI (incl. URN,URL), xpointer, xlink Text formatting: HTML, CSS, xsl:fo, TeX / Latex Programming languages: javaScript, perl, python, java, c++ XML processing: xslt, xproc 18. Setting the agendaStandards important for the Digital Humanities on levels(3)Know that it exists, its principal field of application, its function. In some cases know software for handling.Example: pdf(5)Also: Understand its basic specification.Example: CIDOC-CRM.(7)Also: Good knowledge of the standard, experience in its application.Example: TEI. 19. Setting the agendaA Digital Humanities degree with an emphasis on textualtechnologies and applied to editorial studies 20. Setting the agendaA Digital Humanities degree with an emphasis on textualtechnologies and applied to linguistic studies 21. Setting the agendaA Digital Humanities degree with an emphasis on quantitativemethods and applied to linguistic studies 22. Setting the agendaA Digital Humanities degree with an emphasis on quantitativemethods and applied to historical studies 23. Setting the agendaNo Digital Humanities degree 24. Setting the agendaWhy?(3)Probability of political pressure to make degree courses more compatible.(4)Make conditions for admission more compatible.(5)Make it easier to establish new degree courses.(6)Give graduates a easily understable profile on the job markets.(7)Make exchange between European academic landscapes easier (8) and establish ERASMUS MUNDUS degree courses? 25. Setting the agendaAn example (M. Thaller): Modeling / Formalization in the corecurriculum.Modeling: To model a Humanities problem allows its representation in such a way, that based on the model an algorithmic treatment becomes possible.Formalization: To formalize a Humanities problem allows itsrepresentation in such a way, that based on the model analgorithmic treatment becomes possible. It includes theability to implement the solution. 26. Setting the agendaModeling 1 / basic conceptsMandatory:(4)Understanding information v. meta information / data v. meta data(5)Ladder of knowledge: data / information / knowledge / wisdom(6)Handling of language: syntax / semantics / pragmatics 27. Setting the agendaModeling 2Recommendation:Extend analytical categories to at least one non-linguistic field.This may lead to fields as:(7)Basics of model based simulation of processes-(8)Basics of cartography / GIS(9) 28. Setting the agendaModeling 3Implementation:At least one, usually two of the following:(6)Design of a markup system and describing it in XML schema.(7)Mapping a conceptual system into an ontology.(8)Conceptual modleof a data base schema.(9)Definition of a use case: 29. Setting the agendaFormalizationLevel definitions:(4)Procedural tools: PHP, Python, Pearl(5)Non procedural tools: XSLT, XQuery / Lisp, Prolog(6)Object oriented programming: Java, C++Core requirement:Fluency in at least one tool from two of the three levels. 30. Commonalities I11:00 12:30 What do we have in common? 1Add skills for finding data, curating and preserving them.Relationship between curatorial skills and content diciplines.Proposal:Level one: How to enable all Humanities disciplines digitally and creating general digital content? Augmentation of other curiculaLevel two: How to train a Digital Humanist in his / her own right and the creation of discipline specific digital content? ProfessionLevel three: How to train curators curating Humanities digital content? Profession 31. Commonalities I14:00 15:30 What do we have in common? IIParallels and differences in the concept of DigitalHumanities underlying the individual courses 32. Synergies16:00 17:30 Are there synergies?Creating a work program to facilitate discussionsof exchange facilities and curricularcoordination across national boundaries 33. [email protected]