professor wang chien ming
TRANSCRIPT
Mega Floating Structures
Professor Wang Chien Ming
Engineering Science Programme and
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
National University of Singapore
E-mail: [email protected]
Singapore Maritime Technology Conference 23rd & 24th April 2015
Marina Bay Sands Expo & Convention Centre, Singapore
Main Types of Mega Floating Structures
Semi-Submersible Type
Pontoon Type
Okinawa Marine Exposition
Aquapolis
Size: 104 x 100 x 26 m
Mega-Float
Size: 1000 x 60-120 x 3 m
Brazilian Petrobras P-51
Semi-submersible oil
platform
operating depth: 1700m
Constructed: 2006
Components of Mega Floating Structure System
Breakwater Access
Bridge
Mooring
System
Sea Bed
Land
Superstructure Mega-Float
Fabrication and Towing of Floating Units
Joining of Floating Units
▲Floating Hotel, King Pacific Lodge
Princess Royal Island British
Columbia
▲ Floating Heliport in Vancouver Canada
▲Floating Platform in Singapore
◄ Floating Hotel in Busan, Korea (70m x 50m x 7m)
Station Keeping Systems
c) Caisson Dolphins and Fenders
b) Tension Legs
d) Jackets, Piles and Fenders
a) Chains, Ropes and Anchors, Sinkers
Mooring Dolphin-Rubber Fender System
Pavement
Rubber
Fender
Steel Jacket
Steel Pipe Pile
Jacket Type Dolphin and Fender System
Applicable to Deep Water and Soft Seabed
Little Effect to Environment such as Sea Current and Water Quality
Short Construction Time
Expandable and Removable
Base Isolated to Earthquakes
Utilizing Buoyancy Force in Supporting Load
Possess Mobility
Easy Access to Water
Interior Space may be Utilized
Their Presence at Coastline Serve as Breakwaters
Not affected by Global Warming (Scientists predict a rise in sea levels
of up to 1 m by the year 2100)
ADVANTAGES OF MEGA FLOATING STRUCTURES
OVER LAND RECLAMATION
Applications of
Mega Floating Structures
Floating Airfield (1943)
Mega-Float: Floating Runway Test Model
Proposed Floating Runway at
Tokyo Airport (Haneda)
142 ha x 20 m
Estimated Cost 450 Billion Yen
845-m long Bergsoysund Bridge, built
in 1992 near Kristiansund over a fjord
depth of 320 m ▶
1246-m long Nordhordland Bridge, built in 1994 at Salhus over a fjord
depth of 500 m▶
Floating Bridges and Roads
King Xerxes’ Floating Boat Bridge
across the Hellespont
300 m long floating
bridge in Dubai ▶
▲ Mulberry Harbors, 6 miles of flexible steel roadways on concrete and steel pontoons
Lacey V. Murrow Memorial Bridge,
Washington Lake, Seattle-Mercer
2018m long highway bridge
2nd longest floating bridge
Completed: 1993
Yumemai Bridge, Japan
World’s Largest Floating Steel Arch
Bridge
Length: 410 m
On 2 megafloat pontoons
Completed: 2000
Floating Road, Hedel, the Netherlands
Length: 70 m
Pontoons: Aluminium, filled with EPS
Dimensions pontoons: 5,25x3,5x1,0m3
Companies: Bayards Aluminium Construction, DHV,
TNO, XX Architects
Completed: 2003
Length: 1400 m 25 metres below water; not in sight, potential cheaper than normal tunnel Tube diameter: 9.5m Completed: Study NTNU www.ntnu.no
HogSWjord Tunnel, Norway
◄ Floating Prestressed Concrete
Pier (150m x 30m x 4m) at Ujina
Port, Hiroshima, Japan
Floating Piers and Container Quay
▲ Mobile Floating Container Quay
by Marine Research Institute
(480m x 160m x 8m Composite
of steel and concrete)
▲Floating Terminal Dock, Valdez, Alaska
Floating Rescue Emergency Bases
◄ At Tokyo Bay 80 x 25 x 4 m Steel structure
At Osaka Bay
80 x 40 x 4 m Reinforced Concrete Structure ►
◄ Floating Heliport Vancouver, Canada
Floating Fish Farms
Floating Wind Turbines
pontoon semisub spar
coastal type offshore type
Russia and China to Collaborate
on Developing Floating Nuclear
Power Plants BY Rob Almeida ON AUGUST 3, 2014
Rosatom, Russia’s State Atomic Energy Corporation announced last week that its subsidiary Rusatom Overseas signed a Memorandum of Understanding with CNNC New Energy Company (China) to cooperate in the development of floating nuclear power plants. This MOU followed a visit last month by a Chinese delegation to United Shipbuilding Corporation’s Baltic Shipyard in St. Petersburg where the world’s first floating nuclear power plant (NPP) is currently under construction. Delivery of that first unit is planned for Q3 2016.
Japan has built a 70 MW floating solar plant in the Kagoshima Prefecture of Southern Japan. Called the Kagoshima Nanatsujima Mega Solar Power Plant, it is the largest solar power plant in Japan and it can generate enough electricity to power approximately 22,000 average households. The plant started operation in November 2013.
Floating Oil Storage Bases
◄ Shirashima, Japan Capacity of 5.6 million kilolitres
Each module: 397m x 82m x 25.1m
Built in 1996
Kamigoto, Japan Capacity of 4.4 million kilolitres
Each module: 390m x 97m x 27.6m
Built in 1988 ►
◄ Pulau Sebarok, Singapore Capacity of 300,000 m3
Each module: 190m x 82m x 19m
Floating Islands of Han River, Seoul
Manmade Floating Islands, Maldives (by Dutch Docklands)
A Star Shaped
Floating Convention Hotel
Floating 18-hole Golf Course
Interconnected by Underwater Tunnel
KOH PANYEE, Thailand (AFP) - With its stunning limestone cliffs towering over stilt houses surrounded by azure waters, the island of Panyee is a typical Thai paradise. But it's not mother nature drawing tourists here - it's a floating football pitch. - See more at: http://www.straitstimes.com/news/asia/south-east-asia/story/floating-football-pitch-keeps-thailands-tourist-blues-bay-20141128#sthash.kEBuPs6s.dpuf
World’s Largest Floating
Performance Stage at
Marina Bay, Singapore
Floating Dwellings
Floating village on the Tonle Sap,
Cambodia
Floating village Halong Bay,
Vietnam Dwellings on rafts of totora reeds,
Lake Titicaca, Peru
Canoe Pass Village in Vancouver, Canada Floating Houses in Maasbommel,
The Netherlands
Luxurious Floating Homes by GAM
Floating Restaurants and Hotels
Jumbo restaurant in Hong Kong Floating restaurant in Yokohoma
Four Seasons Hotel King Pacific Lodge Princess Royal
Island, British Columbia
Proposed floating dormitory
by Joseph Lim and CM Wang, NUS
Vincent Callebaut’s
Floating Lily Pad Cities
Floating Cities by Finnish GAM
300m x 60m x 2m 75m x 60m x 2m
Rigid body
motion
Hydroelastic
response
VLFS response under wave action
When do we need to perform hydroelastic
analysis on floating structures?
based on characteristic length (by Suzuki, 1996)
1
4
2c
c
EI
k
: bending stiffness
(= g): spring constant of hydrostatic restoring forcec
EI
k
ISSC 2006; Suzuki, Fujikubo, et al.
x
y
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
0
20
40
60
80
100
v.m.s.
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
Frame 001 13 Jan 2008 moment
x
y
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
0
20
40
60
80
100
v.m.s.
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
Frame 001 13 Jan 2008 momentx
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
y
0
20
40
60
80
w
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
Frame 001 13 Jan 2008 Displacement
x
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
y
0
20
40
60
80
w
0
0.05
0.1
Frame 001 13 Jan 2008 Displacement
Hydroelastic Response
Hydroelasticity Codes that Capture Seabed Profile
Utsunomiya and Watanabe (2006)
Length of VLFS = 1500m
Width of VLFS = 150m
Height of VLFS = 1m
Sea Condition
Wave direction = π/4, Wavelength = 156.8m
Water depths: constant water depth = 8m
Or variable water depth as shown by contour plot = /4
Reducing hydroelastic response using
flexible connector and gill cells
Summary of Findings
The hydroelastic response of the VLFS is
significantly reduced when combining the use of
hinge connector and gill cells, but at the expense
of sacrificing a small front end portion of VLFS
(b) = 60m , = 0.06
VLFS with hybrid system Continuous VLFS
z
x
L
x
y
h
Flexible connector
kr = ζD/L
xc=L
Gill cells
Hybrid system
(a) plan view
(b) side view
(a) = 30m, = 0.06
Gill cells
Reducing hydroelastic response
by changing the VLFS shape
Elliptical shaped VLFS
(b) = 60m
(a) = 30m
Rectangular shaped VLFS
Triangular shape
Elliptical shape
Circular shape
Rectangular shape
Summary of Findings
The hydroelastic response of VLFS can
be reduced by changing its edge shape.