programme evaluation and impact programme...
TRANSCRIPT
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
1
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme by
the Tech Mahindra Foundation
Prepared by KPMG Advisory Services Private Limited
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
2
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
3
Table of Contents
Disclaimer and notice to the readers 03
List of tables 04
List of figures 04
Abbreviations used 04
Executive Summary 1. Context and Overview of SMART programme
2. Study Design
2.1. Objectives of the assignment
2.2. Stakeholder identification, sampling and data collection tools
2.3. Analysis framework
3. Observations and Findings
3.1. IRECS
3.2. Impact Assessment using Social Return on Investment (SROI)
3.2.1. Impact mapping
3.2.2. Evidencing outcome and giving them a value
3.2.3. Establishing impact
3.2.4. Calculating SROI
4. Conclusion and Recommendations
05 07
10
10
11
13
13
22
22
24
24
26
27
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
4
Disclaimer and notice to the readers The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances
of any particular individual or entity. No one should act on such information without appropriate
professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.
We have prepared this report solely for the purpose of providing select information on a confidential
basis to the management of Tech Mahindra Foundation in accordance with the letter of engagement
dated 30th April 2015 executed between Tech Mahindra Foundation and KPMG (“Engagement Letter”).
This report is confidential and for the use of management only. Any distribution beyond the
management (including any copying, circulation, reference or quoting) in correspondence or discussion
with any other party, in whole or in part, shall only be with our prior written consent, as per the terms
agreed between KPMG and Tech Mahindra Foundation.
This report sets forth our views based on the completeness and accuracy of the facts stated to KPMG
and any assumptions that were included. If any of the facts and assumptions is not complete or accurate,
it is imperative that we be informed accordingly, as the inaccuracy or incompleteness thereof could have
a material effect on our conclusions.
While performing the work, we assumed the genuineness of all signatures and the authenticity of all
original documents. We have not independently verified the correctness or authenticity of the same.
We have not performed an audit and do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance. Further,
comments in our report are not intended, nor should they be interpreted to be legal advice or opinion.
While information obtained from the public domain or external sources has not been verified for
authenticity, accuracy or completeness, we have obtained information, as far as possible, from sources
generally considered to be reliable. We assume no responsibility for such information.
Our views are not binding on any person, entity, authority or Court, and hence, no assurance is given
that a position contrary to the opinions expressed herein will not be asserted by any person, entity,
authority and/or sustained by an appellate authority or a court of law.
Performance of our work was based on information and explanations given to us by the staff of the Tech
Mahindra Foundation. Neither KPMG nor any of its partners, directors or employees undertake
responsibility in any way whatsoever to any person in respect of errors in this report, arising from
incorrect information provided by the Tech Mahindra Foundation staff.
Our report may make reference to ‘KPMG Analysis’; this indicates only that we have (where specified)
undertaken certain analytical activities on the underlying data to arrive at the information presented; we
do not accept responsibility for the veracity of the underlying data.
In accordance with its policy, KPMG advises that neither it nor any partner, director or employee
undertakes any responsibility arising in any way whatsoever, to any person other than Tech Mahindra
Foundation (TMF) in respect of the matters dealt with in this report, including any errors or omissions
therein, arising through negligence or otherwise, howsoever caused.
In connection with our report or any part thereof, KPMG does not owe duty of care (whether in contract
or in tort or under statute or otherwise) to any person or party to whom the report is circulated to and
KPMG shall not be liable to any party who uses or relies on this report. KPMG thus disclaims all
responsibility or liability for any costs, damages, losses, liabilities, expenses incurred by such third party
arising out of or in connection with the report or any part thereof.
By reading our report the reader of the report shall be deemed to have accepted the terms mentioned
hereinabove.
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
5
List of tables
Table 1: Expected shortfall in manpower by 2022 ................................................................. 8
Table 2: SMART models of implementation and courses offered........................................10
Table 3: Stakeholders, sampling and data collection tools ..................................................12
List of figures
Figure 1: Cities with SMART centers ................................................................................................................ 9
Figure 2: Key stakeholders ................................................................................................................................ 11
Figure 3: Number of respondents from each city ....................................................................................... 12
Figure 4: Education qualification of students ............................................................................................... 14
Figure 5: Age profile and marital status of students .................................................................................. 15
Figure 6: Number of months after which placement was received and current nature of
employment of the students ............................................................................................................................ 17
Figure 7: Mobile public address system mounted on bike ....................................................................... 20
Figure 8: Pamphlets distributed in communities ........................................................................................ 20
Figure 9: SMART+ center at Hyderabad ........................................................................................................ 21
Figure 10: TMF SMART board on the entrance and inside the center ................................................... 22
Figure 11: Charts on Microsoft Word, Excel and Power point at the SMART center ......................... 22
Figure 12: Information pamphlets used by SMART centers .................................................................... 22
Figure 13: Attribution to various stakeholders as per inputs from the students ................................ 26
Abbreviations used
CRS Customer Relationship and Sales
CSR Corporate Social Responsibility
HO Head Office
IGIT Indo-German Institute of Technology
IRECS Inclusiveness, Relevance, Expectations, Convergence, Service Delivery
IT Information Technology
ITES Information Technology Enable Services
ITI Industrial Training Institute
MIS Management Information System
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
M&E Monitoring and Evaluation
NGO Non-Governmental Organizations
NSDC National Skills Development Centre
SMART Skills-For-Market Training
SOP Standard Operating Procedures
SROI Social Return on Investment
TMF Tech Mahindra Foundation
TOT Training of Trainers
WPR Work Place Readiness
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
6
Executive Summary
Established in 2007, Tech Mahindra Foundation is driven by the vision of ‘‘Empowering through
Education“. The Foundation is working in ten cities across India with over 110 partners in
education and skills development sector.
The Foundation’s flagship programme for skills development, SMART (Skills-for-Market Training)
was conceptualised to enhance employability of youth from underprivileged background and
linking them with employment opportunities. The programme has scaled up from one center in
September 2012 to 65 centers by March 2015. In this span of three years, the programme has
benefited more than 15,923 youth.
The evaluation study presented in this document assesses the SMART programme on IRECS
(Inclusiveness – Relevance – Expectations – Convergence – Service Delivery) parameters and
measure SROI (Social Return on Investment). Key stakeholders consulted during the study include
over 3500 SMART students using online questionnaire, 200 students through focus group
discussion and 5 location mangers, 10 center managers, 20 trainers, 10 community mobilisers and
20 employers through in-depth interviews.
The performance of SMART programme on IRECS parameters is provided below:
Inclusiveness: The programme charges zero fee for trainings, which ensures that every
youth, from economically marginalized communities serviced by the SMART centers, can
access training. Specialized SMART+ centers are established to provide training to people
with disabilities. Furthermore, the programme has achieved gender equity in access to
trainings, as equal number of male and female students have been trained at the SMART
centers.
Relevance: There is a clear linkage between skills training provided at the SMART centre
and jobs available in the local market. The SMART centers are able to place an average of
72.19 percent of students after completing the training. It is also important to note that,
more than 66.33 percentage of students are still serving in the same job where they were
placed by SMART center. Employers also recognised that the SMART students are more
punctual, disciplined and prepared for workplace.
Expectations: The SMART programme has largely met the expectations of the students by
ensuring that students get desired job after the training. Students reported increase in self-
confidence, aspirations and respect from the community. One of the key observation made
by girl students was the change in attitude by their parents towards their career. Girls
informed that their parents are more supportive of their career now and they experience
lesser pressure for marriage.
Convergence: The SMART programme leverage the skills and experience of the
implementation partners. It has tie-ups with experienced knowledge partners and
corporates who are supporting the programme with technical support or infrastructure.
The TMF has also planned to align the SMART programme with government policies on
skilling.
Service Delivery: The SMART programme is being implemented across ten cities through
registered non-profit implementation partners. TMF supports the implementation partner
with required infrastructure and provide curriculum and programme implementation
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
7
guidelines. The Center Managers play key role in selecting partners and monitoring
programme implementation. The synergy between the implementation partners and TMF
is identified as key to the efficient delivery of the programme.
It was found that, over the last three years, the SMART programme has created social value worth
INR 13.29 for each rupee invested by the Tech Mahindra Foundation (SROI of 13.29). The outcomes
of the training programme experienced by the students are provided below:
Increased skills, employability and access to employment opportunities
Increased self-confidence, self-esteem and aspirations
Improved personality in terms of ability to have a conversation with people, manage facial
expressions and dressing style
Increased respect from the parents, friends, relatives, neighbours and community
Financial independence and financial support for siblings and parents
Increased support for career development for girls and reduction in pressure for marriage
after completing the education
Increased understanding of the course and improved teaching methods for trainers
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
8
1. Context and Overview of SMART programme
Established in 2007, Tech Mahindra Foundation is driven with the vision of ‘‘Empowering through
Education“. The Foundation is working in ten cities across India with over 110 partners in
education and skills development sector. In order to address issues concerning the teaching-
learning process, the Foundation has adopted a holistic approach entailing core objectives like
improving learning outcomes; enhancing teaching-learning environment; providing teacher
training; facilitating effective pedagogy; enhancing employability and employment opportunities
for youth; recognition for teachers and formulating coherent policies for the issues mentioned.
1.1. Context
India is facing a two-pronged challenge of unemployment and un-employability, implying the
scarcity of jobs as well as the lack of manpower with appropriate skill sets. In this light, the country
not only requires to generate sufficient employment opportunities, but also needs to focus on
harnessing and developing potential manpower.
While an estimated unemployment rate of 4.9 percent at all India level1 is disconcerting, the
unemployment figure of approximately 50 percent2 for the people with graduation and above
degree is a cause for huge concern. Additionally, as per the study conducted by Ministry of Skill
Development and Entrepreneurship, the expected shortfall in manpower by 2022 is estimated as
below3:
Key Sectors Expected shortfall by 2022 (in million)
Building, Construction & Real Estate 31.13
Organized retail 17.13
Transport & logistics 11.66
Tourism, Hospitality & Travel 6.48
Textile & clothing 6.31
Education & skill development services 4.29
Auto & auto components 3.90
Healthcare 3.80
IT & ITES 2.35
Table 1: Expected shortfall in manpower by 2022
Recognizing this as a challenge as well an opportunity, the Twelfth Five Year Plan focuses on
improving the employability of youth through skill development and fostering high value
employment in primary and secondary sectors. To boost the efforts, a Ministry of Skill
Development and Entrepreneurship (MoSDE) was established and a flagship programme named
1 Fourth Annual Employment-Unemployment Survey 2013-14 conducted by Labour Bureau; www.labourbureau.gov.in 2 Report on Youth Employment-Unemployment Scenario 2012-13 3 “Minister of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship Shri Rajiv Pratap Rudy Launches Human Resource and Skill Requirement
Reports for 24 Priority Sectors”, 9 April 2015, Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship,
Government of India
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
9
‘Skill India Programme’ (National Skill Development Mission) on July 15, 2015. This programme
seeks to provide an institutional capacity to train a minimum 400 million people by 2022.
1.2. Overview of SMART programme
The SMART (Skills-for-Market
Training) programme was
conceptualised and designed to
address the need for employability
skills among underprivileged youth.
The programme, started with its first
center in September 2012 and scaled
up to 65 centers by March 2015 i.e.
within a span of just three years. In
this short span, the SMART
programme has benefited more than
15,9234 youth across ten cities -
Bangalore, Bhubaneshwar,
Chandigarh, Chennai, Delhi- NCR,
Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai, Pune
and Vishakhapatnam.
The distinctiveness of SMART
programme lies in the three models,
namely; SMART (for women and men
from socio-economically deprived
communities), SMART+ (for
differently abled youth) and SMART-
T (technical skills for youth). This design is in alignment with the mission of the Mahindra Group
which says, ‘Educated, skilled and able women and men are a country's true strength. We aspire
to see children who are purposefully engaged, youth that is constructively employed, and a society
that provides equal opportunities to people with different abilities. Through its corporate social
responsibility initiatives, the Mahindra Group commits itself to this’.
The SMART programme is a 3 month course imparting a combination of different skillsets-
foundation skills, technical skills and field exposure.
Foundation courses: This course ranges up to a total of 210 hours and consists of the
subjects on functional English (Yuva English - 120 hours), soft skills (workplace readiness -
40 hours) and basic IT skills (50 hours). Foundation courses are common to all students at
SMART.
Technical course: This course ranges up to a total of 90 hours and consists of specific
subjects under Customer Relationship and Sales, Tally accounting, Hospitality and IT
enabled services. For SMART-T students the subjects include Automobile Technician, Civil
4 Data provided by Tech Mahindra Foundation
Bhubaneswar
Delhi-NCR
Chandigarh
Bengaluru
Kolkata
Chennai
Mumbai
Pune
Hyderabad Visakhapatnam
Figure 1: Cities with SMART centers
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
10
Works, CNC Machine Technician, AC and Refrigeration mechanic, Electrician, Fitter and
Maintenance Technician and Welding.
Field exposure: Students are given field exposure in the Technical skills for minimum of 4
hours. For example, under Customer Relationship and Sales course students, students
would observe representatives pitching the client and also interact with prospective clients.
SMART Models
Following table provides details of SMART programme implementation models.
Table 2: SMART models of implementation and courses offered
SMART Model Target Group Courses / Trades Covered
SMART Youth over 18 years of age
Urban-socio-economically
disadvantaged individuals
Able to read and comprehend
simple English
Job seeker
Foundation course: Spoken English,
Workplace readiness and Basic IT and
computer.
Specialized courses: Customer Relationships
and Sales, Hospitality, ITES/ BPO, Nurse
Aides, Office Administration, Pharmacy
Assistant, Quick Service Restaurants, Tally
SMART+ Young women and men with visual and
physical disabilities - people with
hearing/speech impairment
visual-impairment
locomotive disabilities
Specialized courses: Hospitality, ITES/ BPO,
Customer Relationships and Sales,
Multimedia, Tally
SMART-T Youth over 18 years of age
Urban-socio-economically
disadvantaged individuals
Job seeker
Specialized courses: CNC machine operator
– Milling and Turning, Automobile
Mechanics, AC and refrigeration
Technicians, Electrical Maintenance and
Technicians, Basic and Advanced welders,
Fitter Maintenance Technicians
The programme has outlined a robust set of processes for each of the programme components
including identification of implementation partner, selection and training of students, placements
of students in appropriate jobs and tracking students post placements.
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
11
2. Study Design
2.1. Objective of the assignment
The SMART program is operational for last three years with 65 SMART centres established as on
March 2015. Tech Mahindra Foundation hired KPMG Advisory Services Private Limited’s Social
Sector Practice team to undertake an evaluation of the programme and conduct an impact
assessment study. Broader objectives of the study were to:
assess the programme design and implementation model
assess programme management processes and organisation capacity
measure impact of the programme on students
provide inputs to further strengthen the programme and enhance the impact
The study was designed to evaluate the programme using IRECS (Inclusiveness – Relevance –
Expectations – Convergence – Service Delivery) parameters and assess the impact using SROI
(Social Return on Investment) methodology. Key highlights of the study design are provided
below:
2.2. Stakeholder identification, sampling and data collection tools
Stakeholders: Key stakeholders involved
in the programme are represented in the
figure. KPMG team engaged in
consultation with each of the
stakeholders to meet the objectives of
the assignment.
While the students provided vital inputs
to measure impact, other stakeholders
provided information on the programme
design, implementation model,
management processes and
organisation capacity.
Sampling: highlights of the sampling are
provided below:
Number of respondents to the online
questionnaire is proportionate to the
total number of students passed out
from respective city
Five cities – Delhi-NCR, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Mumbai, and Kolkata were covered to
conduct face to face consultations
Two centers per city based on the number of students passed out were selected
A mix of SMART (5 centers), SMART+ (3 centers) and SMART-T (2 centers) were
selected
Telephonic interview with Technical Advisor for SMART-T was conducted
Students
TMF HO Team
Location Manager
Center Manager
Trainer
Community Mobiliser
Employer
Figure 2: Key stakeholders
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
12
Following table summarises the sample selected for data collection and the tools used.
Table 3: Stakeholders, sampling and data collection tools
Stakeholder Data collection tools used Number of respondents
Students Questionnaire (closed ended)
Focus Group Discussion checklist
Case study format
3500 (online responses collected from
all the cities)
TMF HO team In-depth interview checklist 2
Location Manager In-depth interview checklist 5
Center Manager In-depth interview checklist 10
Trainer In-depth interview checklist 20
Community Mobilisers In-depth interview checklist 10
Employers In-depth interview checklist 20
Number of respondents across the SMART centers as captured in the online responses to the
questionnaire are represented in the figure below:
Figure 3: Number of respondents from each city
2.3. Analysis framework
The performance of SMART programme was assessed using the IRECS framework and the impact
of the programme was measured using the SROI methodology.
2.3.1. IRECS framework
IRECS framework measured the performance of programme on five parameters – Inclusiveness,
Relevance, Expectation, Convergence and Service Delivery. Overview of areas assessed under
each of these five parameters is provided below:
Inclusiveness: Assesses the extent to which communities equitably access the benefits of
assets created and services delivered. It also assesses the role of different stakeholders in the
design and implementation of the project.
Relevance: Assesses if the project is geared to respond to the felt needs of the communities.
Expectations: Examines the extent to which the process of project implementation meets the
expectations of the communities.
352
108
119
475
1049
1051
258
75
199
113
Bengaluru
Bhubaneshwar
Chandigarh
Chennai
Delhi
Hyderabad
Kolkata
Mumbai
Pune
Vishakhapatnam
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
13
Convergence: Judges the degree of convergence with government/other partners; the degree
of stakeholder buy-in achieved; and the linkages with concurrent government programmes in
the field.
Service Delivery: Assessing the state of operations of the programme outputs in terms of
delivering the intended services to the beneficiaries.
2.3.2. Social Return on Investment (SROI)
Social Return on Investment (SROI) is a methodology to monetize the social and environmental
impact of the project and measures how much value has been created for each rupee invested/
spent on the project. This method is an analytic tool and an accepted form of stakeholder centered
evaluation. The evaluative aspect of SROI quantifies the value of the social impact of the projects.
It endeavors to measure the social, environmental and economic value created as a result of
investment.5
Through SROI, organizations are able to evidence the social impact, gain deeper insight into what
impact they are having for their stakeholders and can thus use this as an input for their
programme strategy.
5 The SROI Guide: http://www.thesroinetwork.org/publications/doc_download/241-a-guide-to-social-return-on-investment-2012 as on 5th March 2015
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
14
3. Observations and Findings
This section provides a snapshot of the performance and impact of the SMART programme. The
information presented in this section is based on the observations made during the field visits to
the 10 SMART centres and interaction with the stakeholders including executive team of TMF,
implementation partners, knowledge partners, trainers, employers and students. The field
observations are substantiated with the data collected from more than 3500 students through an
online questionnaire. The SMART programme was evaluated using the IRECS parameters and an
impact assessment was conducted using the SROI methodology. Details of our observations are
provided below:
3.1. IRECS6
The IRECS framework was used to assess the programme on five parameters: Inclusiveness,
Relevance, Effectiveness, Convergence and Service Delivery.
3.1.1. Inclusiveness
The SMART programme was observed to be inclusive as is evidenced below: Profile of Students: SMART imparts training to
students from the socio-economically
marginalised youth. The age group of students
is primarily 20 – 25 years whereas the education
qualification varies from 8th and 12th pass to
graduates (mostly B.Com. and B.Tech.)
depending on the nature of centre (SMART or
SMART –T). Distribution of education profile of
the students is presented in the adjacent graph.
Ratio of female to male is 1:1 which is in line
with the guidelines by SMART programme. Few
SMART centers are also exclusively for female
operated by specialised organisations.
It is important to note that, the SMART
programme caters to youth with disabilities
through specialised SMART+ centres.
Age profile and marital status of the students is
showcased in the figures below.
6 Primary data collected from interviews with TMF HO team, location managers, center managers, trainers and employers, and FGDs with the students
0 200 400 600 800
10th
12th
Below 10th
Graduation
Incomplete Graduation
ITI
Others
Male
Female
Figure 4: Education qualification of students
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
15
Figure 5: Age profile and marital status of students
Cost of training: SMART training centres do not charge any fees from the students to ensure
that students from very poor economic background can access the training.
Selection Process: The selection process does not ask for any pre-requisite skill apart for the
minimum level of education required for the course. Center manager assess the seriousness
of the candidate towards training and taking up job after the course completion.
Assessment of student performance: Students undergo regular performance assessments
during the course and one post-training assessment. As per current format, same questions
are used for pre-training and post-training assessment.
The training certificates are provided to students who perform up to a defined standard in
these tests. However, students who do not perform well and hence do not complete the
training, can continue to visit the centres and learn till they are able to reach the required level
of skill to complete the training. Almost 97% of the students have shown satisfaction with the
assessment process.
3.1.2. Relevance
The SMART programme addresses the specific problem of employability of the youth and
unmet demand for skilled labour in the market. The relevance of SMART programme in selected
communities was observed as is showcased below:
Skills for job: There is a clear linkage between skills training provided at the SMART centre
and available jobs in the local market. The training courses being imparted at the center
are chosen based on the baseline data and skills gap assessment done by the
implementation partner.
Communication skills and personality development: It was specifically noted during the
interaction with the students that more than employment or new skills learned, students
were motivated due to improvement in their communication skills and personality.
Students attributed their success and ability to secure job to their improved communication
skills and personality.
953
2178
364
104
19 and below
20-25
26-31
31 and above
Age profile
1440
356
3
1658
105
3
Unmarried
Married
Divorced
Marital Status
Male Female
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
16
Curriculum design: The courses offered at the SMART centres has a adequate mix of technical
skills, soft skills and field exposure needed for the job. Students appreciated the component of
exposure visits and practice sessions for interviews. They further stated that course on
Workplace Readiness enable them to stand-out in the early days of employment. Almost 98%
students observed that the course content is good.
Placements: The SMART programme is able to place about 72.19 percent students enrolled for
training, which is equivalent to the placement figures mandated by NSDC for an effective
training programme.
Almost 63.00 percent students received placement within one month of completion of
training. Some students also informed that they received placement even before
completing the training.
It is also important to note that 66.33 percent students who were placed through SMART
center are still continuing in the same job.
“I did not understand English earlier; but after completing the training I can communicate fluently in English”
Rahul acknowledged that before undertaking training at the
SMART centre, he had difficulty in understanding the English
language and wasn't confident enough to talk to new people.
The 'Spoken English' course, delivered as part of the training,
has helped him to hone his English language skills and his
communication skills.
The most significant change, that he observed, is the change
in his confidence level and personality. He attributes this
change to his comfort with conversing in English language.
He further quoted that his current job at Optol Infocom Pvt.
Ltd. (placement from SMART centre) requires him to
communicate with client in English, and he is able to do his
job effectively because of the skills acquired at SMART.
The transformation in his personality is acknowledged by his friends and Rahul thinks that he
has gained respect in his friend circle. His inhibitions and fear of communicating due to lack
of the knowledge of the English language are things he was able to change through this
course.
Rahul’s father is a Tea stall owner. Rahul has now started supporting his family with
increased income which has doubled from INR 4000/- per month to INR 8000/- per month.
Increase in income has enabled him to purchase assets for the family like fridge, cycle and
contribute to the household rent. Moreover, Rahul is saving money to buy the house he is
currently renting.
Rahul enjoys music and reading books. He has passed 12th standard and has a younger
brother in 9th standard.
Rahul
SMART, Kolkata
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
17
Figure 6: Number of months after which placement was received and current nature of employment of the students
Employer satisfaction: The relevance of the training is further substantiated by the employers.
During the interaction with employers, KPMG team had following observations:
- The students trained at SMART centres are very punctual and disciplined. The students are
better prepared for the workplace environment.
- The students have basic/ foundation skills and understand the subject matter faster;
reducing the effort and time spent on on-job training.
63%
33%
1%
4%
0-1 month
1-5 months
Above 5 months
Not received
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Jobless
Permanent job
Others
Student
Contract/ Probationary job
“course modules are highly relevant to the employment offered” Sushma, currently employed as trainee at AP Mahesh Bank,
Hyderabad agrees that the modules she learned at SMART
center are relevant to her current job. She quips that she would
have never afforded the Tally course as the fees charged by
private coaching institutes are very high. She further stated that
Tech Mahindra Foundation has helped her realise her dream, as
she was able to learn Tally and got a job that she wanted.
Commenting on the relevance of course curriculum, she said
that, “the course on Tally was exceptionally good and provided
her with an excellent job offer at the completion of the course. The modules covered during
the training were relevant to the employment offered. The spoken English and Work place
readiness component of the course were helpful during job interviews. The course on spoken
English was very specific to the regional requirements of the location and the Telugu
speaking students in terms of comprehensiveness of the subject and teaching methods
used”.
Sushma enjoys dancing and has two elder sisters and a brother. A daughter of an electrician,
she is looking forward to a career in the Banking sector which she thinks would not have been
possible without SMART training programme.
P. Sushma,
SMART, Hyderabad
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
18
3.1.3. Expectations
The SMART programme has largely met the expectations of the students. The benefits from the
programme, as identified by the students, are listed below:
Desired Job: Almost everyone joining SMART center has an aspiration to get a better job
profile apart from the increased remuneration. Students specifically mentioned that the jobs
received after the training meet their expectations of better working environment, on-job
facilities provided by the employer, kind of client they interact with, working hours and
scheduled holidays. While approximately 31% students have a permanent job and 69% are on
contract / probationary job out of those who are employed; almost 89% students have shown
satisfaction with the placement they received. Around 7.5% of the passed out students have
not yet received desired job offers.
Increase in self-confidence: About 96.30% respondents have experienced increase in self-
confidence and self-esteem and 88% respondents reported increase in their decision-making
abilities due to SMART training. This increase in self-confidence has not only helped students
but their families as well.
Supporting Family Income: More than 57% students stated that they support their family with
their income. The average salary earned by SMART students is INR 7733/- per month which
enables them to support family with monthly grocery shopping, paying house rent, paying for
the education of siblings or their entertainment.
Purchase of Assets: Increase in income has enabled students to afford assets like mobile phone
and bicycle for themselves or refrigerator for the family.
Support for career development for girls: Most of the girl students reported that before
enrolling in the programme and the job placement, their families wanted to marry them; but
that is not the case now. After seeing the progress of their daughters, parents realize that their
“Gained respect in community with better job profile” Ayan was coaching students in his community after
completing his BA in 2012. But the people in his community
never respected him and threw taunts like “he is coaching
kids as he does not have any other job”. After securing job
with Aditya Birla Group, Ayan’s income has significantly
increased from INR 1,000 to INR 6,000. This has enabled him
to not only contribute to the household income but also be
financially independent.
There has been a substantial increase in the level of his
self-esteem and he has a got a sense of achievement and
pride. Ayan is confident that he will be able to grow
professionally and fulfil his dream of travelling and start-up
his own business.
Ayan Ganjan SMART, Kolkata
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
19
daughters can be successful if given an opportunity. There is clear change in attitude towards
marriage for the girls in families.
This change can further lead to increased respect for the girls in society and better health of
the girls. Right age for marriage will also ensure better family planning and better health for
the mother and child.
3.1.4. Convergence
SMART programme has achieved convergence, to an extent, with the agencies working in skills
development sector and with corporates with similar vision. Primarily, the SMART programme
leverage the skills and experience of the implementation partners at all training centers.
Tie-ups with knowledge partners: SMART programme, specifically SMART-T and SMART+, is
delivered with support from institutions with expertise in the respective fields. The technical
support on SMART-T is provided by Indo-German Institute of Technology (IGIAT),
Vishakhapatnam. IGIAT was formed through collaboration between the Government of Andhra
Pradesh and Government of Germany through the PPP model and has been operational for 9
years. Similarly, SMART+ programme is implemented by organisations with expertise and
proven track record in providing trainings to persons with disability.
Tie-ups with Corporates: SMART has tied up with Tally Solutions Pvt. Ltd. to design the
curriculum, undertake assessments and issue joint certificates (Tally and SMART in this case)
at the end of the training programme. Such a partnership will increase the market demand for
the trained student, which would result in better placements. SMART has also tied up with
Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd. and Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. who provided machinery
and skilled staff for the training.
Tie-up with NSDC: Tech Mahindra Foundation has planned to align the SMART programme
with government policies on skilling. The course curriculum for the SMART programme is
currently being reviewed and restructured to ensure adherence with curriculum recommended
by Sector Skills Councils.
3.1.5. Service Delivery
The SMART programme has grown from one center in Sep 2012 to 65 centers in June 2015. The
programme is now being implemented across ten cities of India through registered non-profit
implementation partners. Some of the salient features of the service delivery model are discussed
below:
Selection of Partner: The process of selecting implementation partner is very efficient, as the
implementation partners are generally recommended by the location managers or the
knowledge partners who understand the local community and strengths of various non-profits
operating in the proposed area.
Community Mobilization: This is one of the key activity to encourage youth to sign up for
SMART programme. Community mobilization is undertaken by a community mobilisers and
supported by Centre Managers. It was observed that both the centre managers and community
mobilisers have good understanding of the community they operate in and are able to mobilize
sufficient number of youth for trainings. However, few female community mobilisers
expressed concern over access to interiors in slum areas where they find it uncomfortable to
reach and at times they also need to work till late hours.
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
20
The list of community mobilization tool used
by implementation partners are:
Referral by SMART students: encourage
passed out students and current students
to refer probable candidates from their
community
Support from other non-profits:
Information on the SMART programme is
shared with other organisations to
motivate them for referral
Awareness camps: set up employment
awareness camps in the target community
and collect data of interested candidates
Door to door campaigns: community
mobilisers visit door to door in selected
communities
Mobile public address system:
Community mobilizers make
announcements about SMART
programme to create awareness
Social and print media: Social media
platforms, pamphlets and newspaper
advertisements are also used for outreach
Mass mailers: Implementation partners
collect database from local employment
exchange office and send mail to the
unemployed candidates
Special days: Events are organised on the
International Day for DEAF and Blind
Location of SMART Centres: Most of the
SMART centres are located close to the
communities they serve. Also, centres are
easily reachable by public transport in cases
where centres located away from the
community. More than 72% students
commented that they stay within 5 km distance from the center.
Infrastructure: All SMART centres are equipped with basic infrastructure. One of the student
observed that,” Facilities provided at the centre like lighting, clean toilets are good. Also, the
number of computers provided are sufficient for the number of students in a given batch”. A
picture of SMART+ center at Hyderabad is shown below.
Figure 7: Mobile public address system mounted on bike
Figure 8: Pamphlets distributed in communities
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
21
Figure 9: SMART+ center at Hyderabad
Relationship between teachers and students: At all the SMART centres, students appreciated
the support provided by trainers and center manager during the training, preparation for
placements and support after placements. In words of one of the respondent, “trainers were
exceptionally helpful and provided necessary guidance which enabled respondent to
comprehend the subject properly. The trainers are very patient and conduct multiple rounds
of exercises to make sure students understand the concept well”.
Placements: The placement process according to the student respondents is very well
organized where trainers arrange for mock interview rounds to make them comfortable with
the interview process. Additionally, a lot of effort is spent in grooming the students for jobs
through courses on English and Workplace Readiness. Regular sessions are conducted with
the students to appraise them of the prevailing conditions in the job market and set their
expectations in terms of the salary and job profile.
Monitoring of the programme: The concurrent monitoring of the SMART centres is undertaken
by the Location Managers. Additionally, team from TMF HO, including the Project Head,
undertake regular monitoring visits to different centers.
Relationship between Implementation Partners and TMF: All the implementation partners
visited during the field visit were highly appreciative of the support provided by the TMF team.
One of the centre managers noted that he has worked for many training institutes in his career
and SMART is one of the well managed programmes and there is never a delay in the
payments. He further appreciated the processes and documentation instituted for the SMART
programme describing it as a great learning experience in efficient delivery of a training
programme.
Branding: SMART programme is formulated and propagated by TMF through implementing
partners who deliver the programme at the ground level. Advertisements play a significant
role in the process of community mobilization, the first step in implementation. It is therefore,
important to ensure that set of guidelines devised for moderating the content and mode of
dissemination of programme information, are adhered to by all centres. However, it is also
equally important to provide some flexibility in context specific requirements. This would
prevent the programme from issues of rigidity and exclusiveness.
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
22
Figure 10: TMF SMART board on the entrance and inside the center
Figure 11: Charts on Microsoft Word, Excel and Power point at the SMART center
Figure 12: Information pamphlets used by SMART centers
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
23
3.2. Impact assessment using Social Return on Investment (SROI)
About SROI methodology
Social Return on Investment (SROI) is “a method, an analytic tool and an accepted form of
stakeholder centered evaluation.” The SROI quantifies the value of the social impact of projects,
programmes and policies. It endeavors to measure the value created as a result of investment –
namely social, environmental and economic value which is not fully reflected in conventional cost-
benefit analysis.7 Through SROI, organizations are able to evidence the social impact, gain deeper
insight into what impact they are having for their stakeholders and can thus use this as an input
for their programme strategy.
Type of SROI
KPMG has used Evaluative type of SROI conducted retrospectively and based on actual outcomes
that has already taken place.
Principles used to assess SROI
Assessment of SROI was based on following seven principles:
Involve stakeholders
Understand what changes
Value the things that matter
Only include what is material
Do not over-claim
Be transparent
Verify the result
The following section covers impact mapping and SROI calculations based on the evidenced
outcomes during the primary data collection phase. Key recommendations based on the SROI
results are provided in the conclusion and recommendations chapter.
3.2.1. Impact mapping
The Impact Map provides link between resources contributed to the programme (inputs), the
results of the activity (outputs) and the outcomes of the programme that are a vital part of SROI
analysis. It is to be noted that we have focused on the impact on students and considered trainers
and implementation partner for specific inputs from Tech Mahindra Foundation.
The impact map for SMART programme is given below. The evidence outcomes and the SROI
calculations follow this impact map.
7 http://www.thesroinetwork.org/publications/doc_download/241-a-guide-to-social-return-on-investment-2012 as on 5th March 2015
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
24
Table 4: Impact map for the SMART programme
Stakeholder
Primary Objectives
Input Outputs Outcomes Impact
For each stakeholder
What is the type of
investment?
Summary of activity
Description of the change
Long term change
Youth beneficiaries / Students
Provide skills development trainings for youth empowerment
Time Students took admission at the SMART center
Improved skills level for employment
Reduced unemployment in the community
Training conducted for Basic IT skills, Spoken English, Workplace Readiness, CRS, ITES, Tally and other courses. Exposure visits conducted
Increased employability and access to desired employment opportunities for the students
Increased self-confidence, self-esteem and aspirations among students
Enhanced social and financial status of student’s family
Improved personality in terms of ability have conversation with people, facial expressions and dressing style
Students became financially independent
Improved wellbeing of family
Students provided financial support to their sibling’s education / extra-curricular activities
Improved education status of family
Increased respect from the parents, friends, community members, neighbours and relatives
SMART students being considered as a role model in the community
Increased support for career development for girls and reduced pressure for marriage
Improved physical and mental health of family
Trainers Provide training for increasing capacity of the trainers
Time Training of Trainers conducted at each location for trainers
Increased understanding of the course content and improved teaching methods
Improved teaching-learning environment in the SMART center
Implementation Partners
Develop infrastructure for implementing SMART programme
Time Develop infrastructure for SMART center
Assets created for the SMART center
Increased efficiency and outreach of the organisation
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
25
3.2.2. Evidencing outcome and giving them a value
Evidencing outcomes
The impact map was validated during primary data collection phase and the outcomes were
evidenced based on the indicators observed. These outcomes are quantified based on the data
collected from the online questionnaire and focus group discussions conducted at the selected
SMART centers. The quantification of outcome is based on the percentage of students who
experienced the change and total number of students passed out from the SMART training centers
i.e. 15,923 students till 31st March 2015.
Some outcomes can last throughout a person’s life and some outcomes maybe short lived i.e. the
outcomes lasts only as long as the activity lasts. For the purpose of this analysis, the visibility of
the outcomes have been considered to be a maximum of 5 years. This is based on the assumption
that, the students will need to build new skillsets according to their job profile and advancement
in technology and job market. It is further assumed that the students may learn or acquire new
skills while they are employed or under any other training programme, thereby diminishing the
relevance of the training provided through SMART.
Other impact assessment methodologies stop at identifying outcomes while SROI methodology
goes beyond to value them and calculate the social value of impact.
Giving Value to an Outcome - Identifying Financial Proxies
The distinguishing aspect of SROI methodology, compared to other impact assessment
methodologies, is the usage of financial proxies to value the outcome. This process of valuation
is often referred to as monetization because we assign a monetary value to things that do not
have market price. All the prices that we use in our day-to-day lives are approximations – ‘proxies’
– for the value that the buyer and the seller gain and lose in the transaction. Value is, in the end,
subjective. Identifying financial proxy for certain outcomes like monetary saving or increased
income is straight forward; while for outcomes like, increased confidence or becoming financially
independent involves certain assumption for assigning the monetary value. For example, if we
evidence that our intervention results in increase in confidence, the scenario can be equated with
individual attend a seminar or training session specifically focused on increasing confidence.
3.2.3. Establishing impact
After giving value to the outcome, we assessed how much of the outcome would have happened
anyway and what portion of the outcome can be isolated as being added to project activities. To
reduce the risk of over claiming the impact, following four aspects were used. These help gain the
credibility of impact calculation and identify measures to enhance the impact. All these aspects
are generally expressed as percentages.
These percentages are applied to the financial proxy of each outcome to arrive at the total impact
for the outcome.
Attribution is the process of considering impact in isolation; that is independent of other projects
operating in the same geographic area.
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
26
Following is the attribution to various stakeholders as per inputs from the primary beneficiary-
students. Attribution was commonly collected for all outcomes.
Outcome attribution for SMART programme = 37%
Figure 13: Attribution to various stakeholders as per inputs from the students
Displacement are the positive impacts on one stakeholder at the cost of a negative impact on other
stakeholder. KPMG team did not observe any negative impact on other stakeholder during the
primary or secondary data collection. Thus,
Displacement for the SMART programme = 0%
Deadweight is an estimation of the social benefits that would have accrued anyway, even without
the intervention.
It was noted that few students who enrolled for the course were either working part-time or full-
time. As per data collected from sample students few students were earning salary before joining
the SMART classes.
Deadweight for the outcome - increased employability and access to desired employment
opportunities = 16.49%
According to the students at sample locations, there was no other institute in their community
which provide similar combination of courses at free of cost. As the target beneficiaries are from
economically backward families they could not have afforded private coaching classes. With this
reasoning, we can assume that
Deadweight for other outcomes except the increased employability = 0%
Drop-off is the proportion of outcomes which are not sustained.
It was assumed that the impact of training will last for 5 years. As students will learn new skills as
part of their employment or through training programmes. Also due to change in technology,
there will be changes in skills requirement from the students. Thus the impact will be reduced
gradually in 5 years.
SMART37%
Family Members /Relatives /Friends
22%Your Employer
11%
Government / Local Administration
9%
Self21%
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
27
Drop-off for all outcomes of the SMART programme = 20% each year
Impact for each outcome
Considering the above parameters, the impact for each outcome is calculated with following
formula:
Impact = Quantity of outcome * Proxy Value * Attribution – Deadweight – Displacement – Drop-
off for each year
3.2.4. Calculating SROI
We are assuming that the outcomes of SMART will last for 5 years. The duration is calculated from
the year of training. Thus the outcome for students who passed out in 2012-13 batch will last till
2016-17. We have used inputs till 2014-15, thus the projections are done till 2018-19.
SROI is a ratio of cumulative present value for each outcome against the total investment in the
project
Total NPV of social value
SROI = --------------------------------------------------
NPV of investment
The detailed calculation for each outcome are available in the detailed report submitted to the
Tech Mahindra Foundation. Based on the values from the calculation tables;
SROI = 13.29
For each 1 rupee invested by Tech Mahindra Foundation, total 13.29 rupees of social value is
generated.
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
28
4. Conclusion and Recommendations
KPMG team conducted an impact assessment and analysis of SMART programme vis-à-vis its
design and implementation. The achievements of the programme, given the brief duration since
the time of its inception, is noteworthy. This can be attributed to the fervent focus ensured by the
top level management team; coordination between the former and location managers across the
SMART centers and persistent efforts of implementation partners to ensure effective attainment
of set objectives.
While the programme is overall well designed, TMF team ensures that knowledge is transmitted
from the design level to implementation level and the void between theory and practice is bridged.
This is done through a series of discussions, query resolution and training of trainers. To further
enhance the impact, TMF has successfully partnered with agencies like Tally Solutions Private
Limited, Mahindra & Mahindra Limited and Schneider Electric India Private Limited. However, at
this crucial juncture where SMART can be perceived as a role model for other CSR skills
development programmes, we suggest following recommendations for TMF and the
implementation partners.
1. Guidelines for branding, communication material and infrastructure
It is recommended that the TMF should set guidelines for branding and IEC material design.
Also wherever possible, internal infrastructure design should be standardized to ensure
consistent experience across SMART centers.
2. Reporting and sharing of good practices and learnings
Monthly review meetings are being conducted with implementation partners but the
process is not yet formalized. It is suggested that minutes of meetings conducted at each
location are recorded and shared it with the HO. Also each partner should share their
learnings with other partners and with the TMF HO to replicate in other centers.
3. Partner due-diligence reporting
The partner selection process and monitoring is being managed by location managers
efficiently. However the due-diligence report for each partner should be documented
before on-boarding the partner.
4. Guidelines for community mobilization
Community mobiliser play crucial role in the programme success. However it was noted
that in certain instances there are challenges with regard to community outreach which can
cause discomfort for the staff, primarily for female mobilisers. It then become pertinent to
define guidelines entailing necessary precautions to be undertaken for community
mobilization so as to ensure safety, efficiency and effectiveness of the process.
5. Guidelines for trainer selection process
TMF should define trainer selection process to ensure that trainers have required aptitude
and skills for training in the SMART center.
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
29
6. Review student evaluation process
It is recommended that the student evaluation process can be further reviewed to make it
more stringent.
7. Formation of alumni groups
TMF can facilitate initiation of Facebook or Whatsapp group for each center and outgoing
batches so that the alumni stay connected and the network can be leveraged.
8. Establishing employer helpline and candidate web-portal
As there is high demand for the skilled candidates, TMF can establish a helpline which can
connect employers with the candidates. Also a web-platform showcasing the profile of
students and connect them to the employers can be developed for enhancing employment
opportunities for the students and facilitating smoother hiring process.
9. Increase in field work and hands-on component
As per request from the students, it is recommended that the field work component and
hands-on experience for the students can be increased for further enhancement in
exposure and confidence subsequently in students.
10. Student selection criteria
The SROI calculation indicates that, if only the jobless candidates are selected for SMART
training, the SROI value would increase from 13.29 to 15.01. Thus, it is recommended to
modify the student selection criteria from selecting ‘job seekers’ to ‘currently unemployed’
candidates.
11. Smart-Talk: Special sessions on confidence building and personality development
It was noted during the conversation with students that, increase in confidence level and
enhanced personality had significant impact on them. As per SROI calculations, this
outcome contributes over 12.43% of total social value created. Thus, it is recommended to
focus on the confidence building and personality development aspect of the students which
can enhance the impact further. ‘SMART-Talk’ can be organised at the centers where
alumni, employers or even the real life heroes can share their experiences with the
students.
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
30
average salary per month for SMART students
96.30%
INR 7,733
72.19%
students experienced increase in confidence level
students are placed from SMART centers
students are still continuing with the same job placed by SMART center 66.33%
43.60% students received information about SMART from friends/ family/ relatives
13.29 rupees of social value is generated for each rupee invested
Achievements of the programme8
15,923 youth with socio-economically deprived background were trained till March 2015
INR 17,614
INR 3.78 Cr of assets created for SMART centres till March 2015
spent per year by students on household goods & supporting education of siblings
students received job offer within one month of completing the training 63.00%
864 youth with visual and physical disabilities were trained till March 2015
Tech Mahindra Foundation
Loveleen Kacker
Chief Executive Officer [email protected]
KPMG Advisory Services Private Limited
Dr. Amit Chatterjee, MD
Technical Director – Social Sector Practice [email protected]
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
31
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
32
Programme Evaluation and Impact Assessment of SMART programme
33