project and production management module 2 project planning prof arun kanda & prof s.g....

102
Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

Upload: justus-jefferys

Post on 14-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

Project and Production Management

Module 2

Project Planning

Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering,Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

Page 2: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

Module 2 Project Planning

1. Developing the Project Network

1. Work Break Down Structure

2. AOA & AON networks2. Basic Scheduling for AOA

networks1. Critical Path2. Floats

3. Basic Scheduling for AON networks

1. Critical path2. Floats

4. Scheduling Probabilistic Activities

1. PERT assumptions2. Probability Statements

5. Illustrative Examples6. Self Evaluation Quiz7. Problems for Practice8. Further exploration

Page 3: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FORMATION OF PROJECT TEAM

• Appointment of Project Manager

• Selection of Project team members

• Briefing meetings amongst team members

• Broad consensus about scope of work and time frame

• Development of work breakdown structure and allocation of responsibilities

Page 4: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

A breakdown of the total project task into components to establish

• How work will be done?

• How people will be organized?

• How resources would be allocated?

• How progress would be monitored?

Page 5: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

ALTERNATIVE WAYS TO BREAKDOWN WORK

Page 6: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

Task Task

System I System II System N

Subsystem Subsystem Subsystem

Project

Subtask Subtask Subtask

Work package Work package

WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

Page 7: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

• Hardware orientation (Identification of basic work packages)

• Agency orientation (Based on assignment of responsibility to different agencies)

• Function oriented (e.g Design, Procurement, Construction and Commissioning)

Page 8: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE (Continued)

• Generally a WBS includes 6-7 levels. More or less may be needed for a situation.

• All paths on a WBS do not go down to the same level.

• WBS does not show sequencing of work.• A WBS should be developed before

scheduling and resource allocation are done.

Page 9: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE (Continued)

• A WBS should be developed by individuals knowledgeable about the work. This means that levels will be developed by various groups and the the separate parts combined.

• Break down a project only to a level sufficient to produce an estimate of the required accuracy.

Page 10: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

ILLUSTRATIVE WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

Missile

Guidance Rocket Launching Warhead

control sys platform

Ballistic Propulsion Re entry

shell engine vehicle

I Stage Solid fuel II Stage

Page 11: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

MEANS OF PROJECT REPESENTATION

• Project name and description.

• List of jobs that constitute the project.

• Gantt or bar chart showing when activities take place.

• Project network showing activities, their dependencies and their relation to the whole. (A-O-A and A-O-N representations)

Page 12: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

WHY USE PROJECT NETWORKS ?

• A convenient way to show activities and precedence in relation to the whole project.

• Basis of project planning: – Responsibility allocation– Definition of subcontracting units– Role of different players

• Basic scheduling and establishment of work time tables

Page 13: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

WHY USE PROJECT NETWORKS -II ?

• Critical path determination and selective management control– Deterministic vs probabilistic activity times

• Resource planning for projects– Project crashing with time cost tradeoffs– Resource aggregation– Resource levelling– Limited resource allocation

Page 14: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

WHY USE PROJECT NETWORKS - III ?

• Project implementation:– Time table for implementation– Monitoring and reporting progress– Updation of schedules and resources– Coordination of work with different agencies

The project network is thus a common vehicle for planning, communicating and implementing the project right from inception.

Page 15: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EXAMPLE 1Organizing a one day Seminar

Generate the list of jobs to be done:

1) Decide date ,budget, venue for seminar.

2) Identify speakers, participants.

3) Contact and finalize speakers.

4) Print seminar brochure.

5) Mail brochures to tentative participants

6) Estimate number of participants.

Page 16: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

Organizing a one day seminar

7) Decide menu for lunch, tea & coffee

8) Arrange for catering

9) Arrange projection facilities at venue.

10) Receive guests at registration.

11) Conduct seminar as per brochure

12) See off guests.

Page 17: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EXAMPLE 1Organizing a one day Seminar

Activity Predecessors

1) Decide date ,budget, venue for seminar. --

2) Identify speakers, participants. --

3) Contact and finalize speakers. A2

4) Print seminar brochure. A1, A3

5) Mail brochures to tentative participants A4

6) Estimate number of participants. A5

Page 18: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

Organizing a one day seminar

Activity Predecessors

7) Decide menu for lunch, tea & coffee A6

8) Arrange for catering A1,A7

9) Arrange projection facilities at venue. A6

10) Receive guests at registration. A8, A9

11) Conduct seminar as per brochure A8, A9, A10

12) See off guests. A11

Page 19: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

DRAWING THE PROJECT NETWORK (A-O-A)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A11 A12

A1

A10

A9

Page 20: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

DEVELOPING THE PROJECT NETWORK (A-O-N)

A1 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8

A2 A3 A10

A9 A11 A12

Page 21: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

5

3

21

EXAMPLE 2

Job Predecessorsa --b --c --d a,be b,c

4

a

b

c

d

e

Page 22: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EXAMPLE 3

Job Predecessorsa --b --c --d a,be a,cf a,b,c

1 2 5 6

3

4

a

b

c e

f

d

Page 23: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EXAMPLE 4

Job Predecessorsa --b ac ad ae b, c, d

1 2 5 6

3

4

ab

d

c e

DUMMIES FOR UNIQUENESS OF ACTIVITY REPRESENTATION

Page 24: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EXAMPLE 5

S T

DUMMIES FOR CREATION OF A SINGLE SOURCE AND SINK

Page 25: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

THE ROLE OF DUMMIES IN PROJECT NETWORKS

Role of Dummy I II III

Network type

A-O-A yes yes yes

A-O-N no no yes

I Correct representation of precedence logic

II Uniqueness of activity representation

III Creation of single source/ sink

Page 26: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EXAMPLE 6Inconsistent Network

2 3 4

5 6 7

1 8

A closed loop in a project network is a logical inconsistency.

Page 27: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EXAMPLE 7REDUNDANCY (A-O-N)

Job Predecessorsa --b ac --d a, b, ce df d

b e

***********

c f

a d

Redundancy a in the predecessor set for activity d could be removed thereby deleting arc a-d above

Page 28: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PREREQUISITES FOR A VALID PROJECT NETWORK

• NECESSARY REQUIREMENT– The project network must not have any cycles

or loops, since these represent logical inconsistencies in representation.

• DESIRABLE FEATURES– The project network should have the minimum

number of dummies and no redundancies since these unnecessarily clutter the network.

Page 29: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Basic Scheduling with

A-O-A Networks

Page 30: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT REPRESENTATIONS

• Activity on Arc

(A-O-A)• Arrow diagrams• Event oriented

networks

• Activity on Node

(A-O-N)• Precedence networks• Activity oriented

networks

i j aactivity, a

Page 31: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

ACTIVITY DURATIONS

• Deterministic (as in CPM)– when previous experience yields fairly

accurate estimates of activity duration, eg construction activity, market surveys.

• Probabilistic (as in PERT)– when there is uncertainty in times, as for

instance in R&D activities, new activities being carried out for the first time.

Page 32: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

TIME ESTIMATES

• Deterministic times– A single time estimate is used for each

activity. This is taken from experts who have prior knowledge and experience of the activity.

• Probabilistic times– Three time estimates (optimistic, most likely

and pessimistic) are commonly used for each activity based on the consensus of the group.

Page 33: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EXAMPLE 1

Job Predecessors Duration (days)

a -- 2

b -- 3

c a 1

d a, b 4

e d 5

f d 8

g c, e 6

h c, e 4

i f, g, h 3

Page 34: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PROJECT NETWORK FOR EXAMPLE 1 (A-O-A)

a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i2

3

1

4

5

8

6

4

3

Page 35: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

CRITICAL PATH

• The longest path in the network

• Lower bound on the project duration

• Selective control for management of project

• Can be determined by– Enumeration of all paths in the network– Event based computations (A-O-A networks)– Activity based computations (A-O-N networks)

Page 36: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

NODE NUMBERING FOR EXAMPLE 1 (A-O-A)

a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i2

3

1

4

5

8

6

4

3

Page 37: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PATH ENUMERATION

Level 0

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4 Level 5

Level 6

Level 7

Page 38: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FORWARD PASS

• Initialization:E1 = 0 (or the project start time S)

(This applies to all source nodes)

• Ej= Max (Ei+ tij) for all i before node j

j

iB(j) tijEi

Ej( Set B(j))

Page 39: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FORWARD PASSEXAMPLE 1 (A-O-A)

1

2 5 6

3 4 7

8a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i2

3

1

4

5

8

6

4

3

Page 40: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

BACKWARD PASS• Initialization:

Ln (or the latest occurrence of all ending nodes)

= Project duration, T as determined in the forward pass

• Li = Min (Lj-tij) over all successor nodes j of the node i being investigated, (set A(i))

i jLj

Li

tij A(i)

Page 41: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

BACKWARD PASS EXAMPLE 1 (A-O-A)

1

2 5 6

3 4 7

8a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i2

3

1

4

5

8

6

4

3

0

2

3

12

7

16

18

21

Page 42: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

ACTIVITY SCHEDULE FROM EVENT TIMES

i jtijEi

Li

Ej

Lj

Early start of activity ij = ES(ij) = EiEarly finish of activity ij= EFij = ES(ij)+ tij

Late finish of activity ij = LF(ij) = LjLate start of activity ij = LS(ij) = LF(ij) -tij

FORWARDPASS

BACKWARDPASS

Page 43: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EARLY & LATE SCHEDULE FOR EXAMPLE 1

Job duration ES EF LS LF TF

a 2 0 2 1 3 1

b 3 0 3 0 3 0

c 1 2 3 11 12 9

d 4 3 7 3 7 0

e 5 7 12 7 12 0

f 8 7 15 10 18 3

g 6 12 18 12 18 0

h 4 12 16 14 18 2

i 3 18 21 18 21 0

Page 44: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

GANTT CHART SHOWING ACTIVITY SCHEDULE

A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

a

b ^^^^^^

c

d ^^^^^^^^^

e ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

f

g ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

h

i ^^^^^^^^

Page 45: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

CRITICAL PATH EXAMPLE 1 (A-O-A)

1

2 5 6

3 4 7

8a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i2

3

1

4

5

8

6

4

3

0

2

3

12

7

16

18

21

0

3

3 7 18

21

1812

Page 46: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EVENT SLACKS

i j

Ei

Li

Ej

Lj

Ei Li Ej Lj

tij

Slack on node i = Li - EiSlack on node j = Lj - Ej

Page 47: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

ACTIVITY FLOATS

i j

Ei

Li

Ej

Lj

Ei Li Ej Lj

tij

Total float = F1(ij) = Lj-Ei -tijSafety float = F2(ij) = Lj- Li-tij Free float = F3(ij) = Ej -Ei -tij Independent float = F4(ij) = Max (0, Ej -Li- tij)

Page 48: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FLOAT COMPUTATIONS

Ei

Li

Ej

Lj

tij

Total float = LS - ES = LF-EF of activitySafety float = Total float - Slack on preceding node Free float = Total float - Slack on succeeding node Independent float = Max (0, Total float - Slack on preceding and succeeding nodes)

Page 49: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FLOATS FOR EXAMPLE 1

Job Total Safety Free Independent

a 1 1 0 0b 0 0 0 0c 9 8 9 8d 0 0 0 0e 0 0 0 0f 3 3 3 3g 0 0 0 0 h 2 2 0 0i 0 0 0 0

Page 50: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

INTERPRETATION OF FLOATS

• An activity , in general, has both predecessors and successors. Each of the four kinds of float depends on how these accommodate the activity.

activity

Predecessors Successors

Page 51: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FLOAT INTERPRETATION

Free Total

Independent Safety

Early Late

Early

Late

SUCCESSORS

PREDECESSORS

Page 52: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

ANOMALIES

ACTIVITY h FLOATSTotal Safety Free

Ind.• 2 2 2 2

• 2 0 2 0

• 2 2 0 0

• 2 0 0 0

5 7

5 7

5 7

5 7

h

h

h

h

4

4

4

4

12 18

12 18

12 18

12 18

12 18

Page 53: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Basic Scheduling with

A-O-N Networks

Page 54: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT REPRESENTATIONS

• Activity on Arc

(A-O-A)• Arrow diagrams• Event oriented

networks

• Activity on Node

(A-O-N)• Precedence networks• Activity oriented

networks

i j aactivity, a

Page 55: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

SCHEDULING WITH A-O-N NETWORKS

• Basic scheduling computations can be done on both A-O-A or A-O-N networks.

• A-O-N networks are simpler to draw, though they lack intuitive work flow interpretation of A-O-A networks.

• There are no float anomalies in A-O-N networks.• A-O-N networks are becoming more popular, in

computer packages,• Lead easily to PDM with expanded precedence

relations FS , FF, SS, SF.

Page 56: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EXAMPLE Job Predecessors Duration (days)a -- 2b -- 3c a 1d a, b 4e d 5 f d 8 g c, e 6h c, e 4i f, g, h 3

Page 57: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PROJECT NETWORKEXAMPLE (A-O-N)

a c g

bd e h i

f

2 1 6

34

8

345

Page 58: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FORWARD PASS(A-O-N Networks)

• Initialization: Early start(ES) for all beginning activities = 0 (or the start date, S for the project)• Early finish (EF) for activity = ES+ duration• ES(j)= Max (EF all predecessors)

i1

i2j

ip

ES/ EFES/EFES/EF

ES/EF

Page 59: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FORWARD PASS FOR EXAMPLE

a c g

bd e h i

f

2 1 6

34

8

345

Page 60: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

BACKWARD PASS (A-O-N Networks)

• Initialization Project duration,T = Max (EF of ending jobs).

LF(all ending jobs) =T

• LS = LF- Duration

• LF = Min (LS of successors)

LS/LF

LS/LF

LS/LF

LS/LF

Page 61: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

BACKWARD PASSFOR EXAMPLE

a c g

bd e h i

f

2 1 6

34

8

345

0 / 2

0 / 3

2 / 3

3 / 7 7 / 12

12 / 18

12 / 16

7 / 15

18 / 21

Page 62: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EARLY & LATE SCHEDULE FOR EXAMPLE

Job duration ES EF LS LF TF

a 2 0 2 1 3 1

b 3 0 3 0 3 0

c 1 2 3 11 12 9

d 4 3 7 3 7 0

e 5 7 12 7 12 0

f 8 7 15 10 18 3

g 6 12 18 12 18 0

h 4 12 16 14 18 2

i 3 18 21 18 21 0

Page 63: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

CRITICAL PATHFOR EXAMPLE

a c g

bd e h i

f

2 1 6

34

8

345

0 / 2

0 / 3

2 / 3

3 / 7 7 / 12

12 / 18

12 / 16

7 / 15

18 / 21

18 /21

10 / 18

14 / 18

12 /1811 / 12

7 / 12 3 / 7

1 / 3

0 / 3

Page 64: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

CRITICAL PATH FOR EXAMPLE

a c g

bd e h i

f

2 1 6

34

8

345

Page 65: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

GANTT CHART SHOWING ACTIVITY SCHEDULE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

a *** ]

b ^^^^^^

c ** ]

d ^^^^^^^^^

e ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

f ****************** ]

g ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

h ********** ]

i ^^^^^^^^^

Page 66: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

INTERPRETATION OF FLOATS

• An activity , in general, has both predecessors and successors. Each of the four kinds of float depends on how these accommodate the activity.

activity

Predecessors Successors

Page 67: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FLOAT INTERPRETATION

SUCCESSORS

Early Late

Early Free Total

PREDECESSORS

Late Independent Safety

Page 68: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

COMPUTATION OF FLOATS

j

k1

k2

i1

i2 ES/EF

LS/LF

LS/LF

LS/LF

ES/EF

ES/EF

ES/EF

Slack on preceding node= Max (LF of predecessors) -ESSlack on succeeding node = LF- Min (ES of successors) (in the corresponding A-O-A representation)

imLS/LF kn

Page 69: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FLOATS FOR EXAMPLE

Job Total Safety Free Independent

a 1 1 0 0b 0 0 0 0c 9 8 9 8d 0 0 0 0e 0 0 0 0f 3 3 3 3g 0 0 0 0 h 2 2 0 0i 0 0 0 0

Page 70: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FLOAT COMPUTATIONS FOR ACTIVITY a

Total Float = LS - ES = LF - EF =1Safety float = Total Float - [Max (LF of predecessors)-ES] = 1- (0 - 0) = 1Free float = Total Float -[LF -Min(ES of successors)] = 1 - (3-2) = 0Independent float = Total float - both the latter terms = 1 - (0+1) = 0

a c

d

0 / 2

1 / 3

2 / 3

3 / 7

Page 71: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FLOAT COMPUTATIONS FOR ACTIVITY c

Total Float = LS - ES = LF - EF =9Safety float = Total Float - [Max (LF of predecessors)-ES] = 9- (3 -2) = 8Free float = Total Float -[LF -Min(ES of successors)] = 9 - (12-12) = 9Independent float = Total float - both the latter terms = 9 - (1+0) = 8

a c g

h

2 / 3

11 / 12

12 / 18

12 / 161 / 3

Page 72: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FLOAT COMPUTATIONS FOR ACTIVITY f

Total Float = LS - ES = LF - EF =3Safety float = Total Float - [Max (LF of predecessors)-ES] = 3- (7 -7) = 3Free float = Total Float -[LF -Min(ES of successors)] = 3 - (18 - 18) = 3Independent float = Total float - both the latter terms = 3 - (0+0) = 3

d f i7 / 15

10 / 18

18 / 21

3 / 7

Page 73: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

Total Float = LS - ES = LF - EF =2Safety float = Total Float - [Max (LF of predecessors)-ES] = 2- (12 - 12) = 2Free float = Total Float -[LF -Min(ES of successors)] = 2 - (18 - 18) = 2Independent float = Total float - both the latter terms = 2 - (0+0) = 2

FLOAT COMPUTATIONS FOR ACTIVITY h

c

e h i12 / 16

14 / 18

18 / 2111 / 12

7 / 12

Page 74: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PRECEDENCE DIAGRAMMMING METHODS

• Generalized precedence relations– Start to Start (SS)– Finish to Finish (FF)– Start to Finish (SF)– Finish to Start (FS)

• Permit partial or complete overlap of activities

Page 75: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

START TO START LAG (SS)

u1

v1

u2

v2

Page 76: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FINISH TO FINISH LAG (FF)

u1

v1

u2

v2

Page 77: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

START TO FINISH LAG (SF)

u1

v1

u2

v2

Page 78: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FINISH TO START LAG (FS)

u v

Page 79: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PDM EXAMPLE COMPUTATIONS

A10

E12

F14

G2

C20

B 8

D6

SS 3

FF 2 SS 10

FS 0

SS 2FF 5

FS 0

SF 4

FF 5

FS 4

SS 3

Page 80: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Project Scheduling with Probabilistic Activity

Times

Page 81: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

UNCERTAIN ACTIVITY DURATIONS

• For each activity in the project three time estimates are obtained–Optimistic time, a

–Most likely time, m

–Pessimistic time, b

Page 82: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PERT TIME ESTIMATES

• Mean of activity duration =

(a + 4m + b) / 6

• Variance of activity duration =

{ (b - a) / 6}2

• Standard deviation of activity duration =

Sq. root of variance =

(b - a ) / 6

Page 83: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

BETA DISTRIBUTION

a m b

f(t) = K(t-a)c (b - t)d , a <= t <=b = 0, otherwise

[ a,b are the location parameters c,d are the shape parameters ]

Page 84: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

WHY CHOOSE BETA ?

• The beta distribution is bounded on both sides with non-negative intercepts.

• It is a uni-modal distribution.

• Permits flexibility of shapes by suitable choice of location and shape parameters.

• Intuitive appeal.

• Easy approximations to mean and variance.

Page 85: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

OTHER POSSIBLE DISTRIBUTIONS

• UNIFORM• TRIANGULAR• EXPONENTIAL• NORMAL• DISCRETE• OTHERS ...

Page 86: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION

a b

1/ (b-a)

Mean = (a + b) / 2 Variance = (b - a)2 / 12

Page 87: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

TRIANGULAR DISTRIBUTION

a m b

Mean = (a + m + b) / 3Variance = {(b -a)2 + (b - m)2 + (m -a)2}/36 = (a2 + m2 + b2 - am - ab - mb)/18

2/ (b-a)

Page 88: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTION

f(t) = me -mt

m

Mean = 1/mVariance = 1/m2

Page 89: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

NORMAL DISTRIBUTION

Mean = muVariance = sigma 2

mu

N (mu, sigma 2)

Page 90: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

DISCRETE DISTRIBUTION

p1

p2

p3

pn

- - -

t1 t2 t3 tn

Mean = p1 t1 + p2 t2 + ... + pn tn

Variance = p1 t12 + p2 t2

2 + pn tn2

- (Mean) 2

Page 91: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

BASIC PERT PROCEDURE - I

• Compute mean and variance of all jobs.

• Conduct forward and backward pass on the project network with expected times of all activities.

• Identify the Critical Path.

• Obtain variance of critical path by adding variance of activities.

Page 92: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

BASIC PERT PROCEDURE - II

• Obtain the distribution of the Project Duration.

• Make probability statements about the project – Chances of meeting the target date.– Probability of exceeding a given ceiling date.– Probability that the project duration is

confined to an interval of time.

Page 93: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

AN EXAMPLE

Job Predecessors Time estimates Mean Variance

a m b ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A -- 2 4 8 4.33 1

B -- 4 6 10 6.33 1

C A 6 6 6 6.00 0

D A 2 8 14 8.00 4

E A 6 8 12 8.33 1

F B,C 3 6 9 6.00 1

G D,F 8 16 20 15.33 4

H D,F 4 4 4 4.00 0

I E,H 4 8 10 7.66 1

Page 94: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

SAMPLE NETWORK (A-O-A)

1

2 5

6

43

A

B C

D

E

F

H

I

G

4.33

6.33

6

6

8

8.33

47.66

15.33

Page 95: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

FORWARD & BACKWARD PASS

1

2 5

6

43

A

B C

D

E

F

H

I

G

4.33

6.33

6

6

8

8.33

47.66

15.33

Page 96: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

1

2 5

6

43

A

B C

D

E

F

H

I

G

4.33

6.33

6

6

8

8.33

47.66

15.33

CRITICAL PATH

0

4.33 20.33

31.66

16.3310.33

10.33 16.33

31.66

244.33

0

Page 97: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROJECT DURATION

• Project duration follows a Normal Distribution withMean = 31.66 Variance = 6 = (2.45)2

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

24.31 31.66 39.01

Page 98: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS

• Chances that the project is completed within

• mean +/- 1 sigma 68% (29.41 --34.11)

• mean +/- 2 sigma 95% (26.76 -- 36.56)

• mean +/_ 3 sigma 99% (24.31 -- 39.01)

Page 99: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PROBABILITY STATEMENTS - I

• Probability of meeting a Target Date,

say 36 days

• Z (Standard normal deviate) =

(36 - 31.66)/2.45 = 4.34/2.45 = 1.77

• Area from normal tables = 0.9616

Page 100: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PROBABILITYSTATEMENTS - II

• Probability of exceeding a ceiling, say

28 days

• Z (Standard normal deviate) =

(28 - 31.66)/2.45 = -3.66/2.45 = - 1.49

• Area from normal tables = 0.0681

Page 101: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

PROBABILITYSTATEMENTS - III

• Probability of duration lying in an interval, say 28 to 36 days

• Area from normal tables =0.9616 - 0.0681

= 0.8935

Page 102: Project and Production Management Module 2 Project Planning Prof Arun Kanda & Prof S.G. Deshmukh, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute

STANDARD PERT ASSUMPTIONS

1.The activities are independent

2 The critical path contains a large no. of activities so that we can invoke the Central Limit Theorem.

3 .All activities not on the critical path are ignored.

4. Activity times follow a Beta distribution.

5.The mean and variance of the activities are given by (a+4m+b)/6 and [(b-a)/6]2.