project - mydocsmydocs.dot.ga.gov/info/designbuild/shared documents/0010925...project as it relates...

Project #:

Pavement Design Package Submittal Checklist

PI #:

County:

Project Manager Office:

Project Manager:

Designer's Office/Company:

Design Phase Leader:Date Package Submitted:

MGMT Let Date: Expected Construction Length (months):

Brief Project Description (examples: widen and reconstruct 2 to 4-lane, interchange reconstruction):

Note: A more detailed pavement project description will be attached. This description will be focused on the project as it relates to the pavement designs being proposed.

Please check all items below that are attached before submitting your package to your Project Manager. (Note 1) Include this checklist in your pavement design package submittal. NOTE 1: GDOT Design Phase Leaders (DPL) submit their packages to the State Roadway Design Engineer (SRDE) or designee instead of their Project Manager. 1) Construction Plan Sheets (11” x 17” is acceptable if legible)

CoverTypical Sections Staging Typical Sections (Note 2)

Traffic Diagrams (Note 3)

Note 2: Staging typicals are required when temporary pavement sections are proposed.

Note 3: Include GDOT Office of Planning review and approval correspondence for traffic diagrams prepared by consultants.

2) Reports and Summaries (Note 4)

Soil Survey Summary (Note 5)Pavement Evaluation SummaryPavement Type Selection ReportGDOT's VE Study Implementation Correspondence

Note 4: Include GDOT Office of Materials and Research review and approval correspondence for reports and summaries prepared by consultants. Note 5: One package will include a copy of the complete Soil Survey including sample test data. The remaining copies only require the Soil Survey Summary.

3) Quality Assurance (QA) - (required for Consultant DPL submittals)

SRDE QA Review SheetsConsultant DPL QA Review Responses

4) Design Analysis

Full Depth Rigid PavementOverlay Rigid PavementFull Depth Flexible PavementOverlay Flexible Pavement

Number of Designs -Number of Designs -Number of Designs -Number of Designs -

Mgmt Let Date:

PI No: Project No: Submitted by:

County: SR: Date Received:

OPD PM: WFTK: CST Funding:

1

2015/2035

N/A

Traffic Diagrams1. Only include the "Build" ADT and DHV traffic diagrams. The "No Build" and the existing year traffic diagrams are notneeded in the pavement design package.2. Based on the Management Let Date and an assumed construction length of two years; the initial and final design yearshould be 2017/2037, respectively.

Pavement Design Package Submittal Checklist1. A Pavement Design Package Submittal Checklist that is available on the GDOT ROADS website needs to be included in thepackages sent to the Committee.2. As stated on the checklist; include all plan sheets as half size sheets.

Pavement Design1. The Consultant Design Phase Leader needs to sign the "Recommended By" line on all of the pavement designs.2. On the Riverside Dr. full depth pavement design, the lanes in each direction needs to be changed to one.3. Even though 5 inches of 25mm SP is allowed by Sec. 400 Shelf Special Provision, the Office of Materials has requested thatthe Pavement Design Committee not approve designs using this due to possible construction issues.4. The underdesign percentage for the Riverside Dr. full depth pavement design is not within the required underdesign valueof 0 - 5% for roadways with curb and gutter. Also, the roundabout traffic data and LDF should be used; if it is higher.5. The overlay pavement design for Riverside Dr. is incorrect. There is no Pavement Evaluation Summary that details theexisting pavement structure. As noted on the design remarks; the plans that the existing pavement information was gatheredfrom need to be included in the pavement package.6. The existing pavement structure shown for the overlay pavement design seems to be unrealistic. There is only 2 inchesof existing asphalt. Also, clarify if the Pavement Evaluation Summary is pending.7. On the Riverside Dr. overlay pavement design the form should show 2 lanes in one direction and the LDF should be modified.8. Since there is no Soil Survey Report available yet; typical county values should be used for the soil support value and regionalfactors. Also, clarify if a Soil Survey Report will be done for this project.9. On the Riverside Dr. overlay pavement design; according to the typical sections, there is no reason why a thicker pavement structure cannot be provided that will ensure the underdesign value is within or close to the 0 - 5% required range.10. The ramps should not be constructed with CRCP as the design analysis reflects. Use JPCP to construct the ramps; whichthe typical sections and the project description show.11. Separate ramp designs can be proposed if desired to possibly save on the construction material costs; since each ramp hasdifferent traffic data.

Typical Sections1. Use the full pay item description for all of the pavement layers.2. Include the Class B Base and Pavement Widening Detail.3. Extend the 19mm Superpave interlayer 2 ft. beyond the vertical edge of the concrete paving.4. Milling is shown on the overlay design but is not shown on the overlay typical sections; E.g. Riverside Dr. typical Section.5. The Riverside Dr. mainline and roundabout typical sections show different thicknesses for the 25mm layer (Label C).

Cover Sheet1. Show the begin/end location for the Ramp A - D construction.

GDOT Office of Roadway Design QA Review By:

Pavement Design Package Quality Assurance Review Sheet 11/15/2015

0010925 0010925 IPD

Fulton N/A 5/5/2014

Marlo Clowers $2,080,800.00

Full Depth Concrete: 1 Overlay Asphalt: Full Depth Asphalt: 1

Overlay Concrete: N/A Traffic Data: Pavement Eval Summary: Not Included

VE Study Immplementation:

N/A Soil Survey: Pavement Type Selection: 3/11/2010

g:\tra\gdot i-285\riverside\rdy\pavement design\riverside supporting docs\04_consultant_qa_responses.docx Page:

1/3

Subject:

Riverside Drive Roundabouts Pavement Design Package Quality Assurance Review Consultant Responses PI No. 0010925

From:

Ryan Graves

Date: ARCADIS Project No.:

May 16, 2014 GADT0201.0141

Traffic Diagrams 1. Only include the "Build" ADT and DHV traffic diagrams. The "No Build" and the existing year traffic diagrams are

not needed in the pavement design package. ARCADIS Response: Only “Build” ADT and DHV traffic diagrams will be included with the

pavement design submittal. 2. Based on the Management Let Date and an assumed construction length of two years; the initial and final design

year should be 2017/2037, respectively. ARCADIS Response: The Riverside Drive Roundabout project is being advanced as a

design-build project and the project schedule has been accelerated. The interchange is expected to open to traffic in 2015.

Pavement Design Package Submittal Checklist 1. A Pavement Design Package Submittal Checklist that is available on the GDOT ROADS website needs to be

included in the packages sent to the Committee. ARCADIS Response: The current Pavement Design Package Submittal Checklist, from the

GDOT R.O.A.D.S. website, will be included with the pavement design submitted to the Pavement Design Committee.

2. As stated on the checklist; include all plan sheets as half size sheets. ARCADIS Response: Construction Plan sheets will be included with the Pavement Design

Submittal.

ARCADIS U.S., Inc.

2410 Paces Ferry Road

Suite 400

Atlanta

Georgia 30339

Tel 770.431.8666

Fax 770.435.2666

www.arcadis-us.com

TRANSPORTATION

Contact:

Ryan Graves

Phone:

770.431.8666

Email:

[email protected]


2/3

Pavement Design 1. The Consultant Design Phase Leader needs to sign the "Recommended By" line on all of the pavement designs.

ARCADIS Response: The Consultant Design Phase Leader will sign “Recommended By” line on all pavement designs.

2. On the Riverside Dr. full depth pavement design, the lanes in each direction needs to be changed to one. ARCADIS Response: The number of lanes in each direction will be changed to one for the

Riverside Drive Full depth pavement design. 3. Even though 5 inches of 25mm SP is allowed by Sec. 400 Shelf Special Provision, the Office of Materials has

requested that the Pavement Design Committee not approve designs using this due to possible construction issues.

ARCADIS Response: A depth of 7 inches for 25mm superpave will be used instead of 5 inches on all flexible pavement designs.

4. The underdesign percentage for the Riverside Dr. full depth pavement design is not within the required underdesign value of 0 - 5% for roadways with curb and gutter. Also, the roundabout traffic data and LDF should be used; if it is higher.

ARCADIS Response: The Riverside Drive pavement design will be adjusted to be within the required underdesign percentage range of 0-5%. Due to the addition of right turn lanes to all the roundabout approaches traffic in a single lane will not be greater than the traffic volume shown for Riverside Drive, which will be used for the full depth pavement design on Riverside Drive.

5. The overlay pavement design for Riverside Dr. is incorrect. There is no Pavement Evaluation Summary that details the existing pavement structure. As noted on the design remarks; the plans that the existing pavement information was gathered from need to be included in the pavement package.

ARCADIS Response: In response to comments by the State Pavement Engineer, a pavement evaluation was not completed and as-built plans were used to determine existing pavement sections. The existing plans will be included in the Pavement Design Package.

6. The existing pavement structure shown for the overlay pavement design seems to be unrealistic. There is only 2 inches of existing asphalt. Also, clarify if the Pavement Evaluation Summary is pending.

ARCADIS Response: A pavement evaluation is not proposed for the project. As-built plans were used to determine the existing pavement section of Riverside Drive. These plans indicate that Riverside Drive was constructed with only 2 inches of asphalt. The pertinent existing plan sheets will be included with the Pavement Design Package.

7. On the Riverside Dr. overlay pavement design the form should show 2 lanes in one direction and the LDF should be modified.

ARCADIS Response: Riverside Drive will only have two lanes in one direction on the approaches to the interchange, where right turn lanes will be added. The travel lanes leaving the interchange will remain just a single lane. For this reason the LDF for the overlay section was kept as 1 lane. Proposed construction plan sheets will be included in the Pavement Design Package so that the lane configurations of the proposed construction are clearer.

8. Since there is no Soil Survey Report available yet; typical county values should be used for the soil support value and regional factors. Also, clarify if a Soil Survey Report will be done for this project.

ARCADIS Response: Typical county values for soil support values and regional factors were used when preparing the pavement evaluations.


3/3

9. On the Riverside Dr. overlay pavement design; according to the typical sections, there is no reason why a thicker pavement structure cannot be provided that will ensure the underdesign value is within or close to the 0 - 5% required range.

ARCADIS Response: A pavement design on Riverside Drive that would provide and underdesign value within the 0-5%required range would require 5.5 inches of 19mm leveling. While the project does propose replacing curb & gutter along the entire length of the project it is crucial to minimize grade changes along much of the project corridor as this would increase impacts to adjacent parcel. This is especially critical in the area adjacent to the historically eligible resource in the southwestern quadrant of the interchange.

10. The ramps should not be constructed with CRCP as the design analysis reflects. Use JPCP to construct the ramps; which the typical sections and the project description show.

ARCADIS Response: The ramp pavement design will be updated to show JPCP 11. Separate ramp designs can be proposed if desired to possibly save on the construction material costs; since

each ramp has different traffic data. ARCADIS Response: For simplicity, only one pavement design will be proposed for the ramps

at this time. The design-build team may propose alternate pavement sections for the ramps.

Typical Sections 1. Use the full pay item description for all of the pavement layers.

ARCADIS Response: Full pay item descriptions will be used on the typical sections. 2. Include the Class B Base and Pavement Widening Detail.

ARCADIS Response: The Class B Base and Pavement Widening Detail will be included with the project typical sections.

3. Extend the 19mm Superpave interlayer 2 ft. beyond the vertical edge of the concrete paving. ARCADIS Response: The 19mm Superpave interlayer will be extended 2 feet beyond the

vertical edge of the concrete paving. 4. Milling is shown on the overlay design but is not shown on the overlay typical sections; E.g. Riverside Dr.

typical Section. ARCADIS Response: Milling will be shown on the Riverside Drive overlay typical section

5. The Riverside Dr. mainline and roundabout typical sections show different thicknesses for the 25mm layer (Label C). ARCADIS Response: The thickness of the 25mm pavement layer will be revised to be

consistent between the Riverside Drive typical section and the roundabout typical section. Cover Sheet

1. Show the begin/end location for the Ramp A - D construction. ARCADIS Response: Limit of construction labels will be added to the cover sheet for all

ramps.

P.I. 0010925, Fulton County, Riverside Drive at I-285 Interchange Improvements

Detailed Project Description: The proposed Design-Build project is located on Riverside Drive at the

interchange with I-285 in Fulton County Georgia and is within the city limits of Sandy Springs. The

project consists of safety improvements to the existing interchange which will convert the two existing

signalized intersections at each ramp terminal with roundabouts.

The current roadway configuration of Riverside Drive consists of one, twelve foot lane in both directions

and traffic signals at the ramp termini. There are no turn lanes at the intersections with the I-285

entrance ramps, resulting in turning vehicles blocking the through movements. The existing bridge only

provides for two lanes of traffic, one northbound and one southbound. The eastbound and westbound I-

285 off ramps each consists of a single, sixteen foot lane. There are no existing sidewalks approaching

the bridge, however there are existing sidewalks on the bridge itself. The existing right-of-way along

Riverside Drive varies from 50 to 100 feet.

The proposed Design-Build project will convert the signalized intersections at the ramp termini to single

lane roundabouts, one at each intersection. Each approach to the roundabout will be widened to two

lanes with one lane entering the roundabout and the other serving as a right turn lane. Sidewalks will

be added to both sides of the roadway along Riverside Driveway within the limits of the project. The

project is approximately 0.5 mile length.

The project will also include routine rehabilitation of the existing bridge. This work includes

replacement of the joints at bent 2 and abutments 1 and 5. All construction joints will be resealed and

the bridge deck will be sealed with a two-part polymer overlay. Concrete spalling will be repaired on

bents 3 & 4 and abutment 5.

Proposed Pavement DescriptionThe full depth flexible pavement section for Riverside Drive will consist of 12” GAB base layer, 5” 25mmsuperpave intermediate layer, and top layer of 2” 19mm superpave, 1.5” 12mm superpave. This willproduce a SN of 5.10, and the required SN is 5.70 resulting in a 10.52% underdesign.

The existing overlay flexible pavement section for Riverside Drive will consist of existing 6” GAB baselayer, an existing 5” cement stabilized graded aggregate, an existing 1.5” asphalt concrete intermediatelayer, and a proposed top layer of 2” 19mm superpave, 1.5” 12mm superpave. This will produce a SN of3.39, and the required SN is 5.70 resulting in a 40.52% underdesign.

The full depth rigid pavement section for the interstate ramps will consist of 10” GAB base layer, 3” of19mm superpave intermediate layer, and top layer of 9” plain concrete pavement. This will result in apavement that is 14.24% understressed and 16.60% overdesigned.

01-

PROJECT LOCATION

MILES

DATE

FEDERAL AID PROJECT

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONSTATE OF GEORGIA

PLANS COMPLETED - -

REVISIONS

FEDERAL ROUTE # N/A

STATE ROUTE # N/A

P.I. NO. 0010925 FULTON COUNTY

COSTING PLANS OF PROPOSED

NET LENGTH OF EXCEPTIONS

GROSS LENGTH OF PROJECT

NET LENGTH OF ROADWAY

NET LENGTH OF BRIDGES

NET LENGTH OF PROJECT

LENGTH OF PROJECT

SUBMITTED BY:

RECOMMENDED FOR

SUBMISSION BY:

TRAFFIC A.D.T.:

TRAFFIC A.D.T.:

TRAFFIC D.H.V.:

DIRECTIONAL DIST:

SPEED DESIGN:

24 HR.TRUCKS %:

% TRUCKS:

DESIGN DATA:

INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTSRIVERSIDE DRIVE AT I-285

LOCATION SKETCH

DESIGNED IN ENGLISH UNITS.

PROJECT DESIGNATION: EXEMPT

CHIEF ENGINEER

STATE DESIGN ENGINEER

DESIGN

19,350 (2015)

21,580 (2035)

1745 (2035)

8.5%

8%

35 MPH

01-001SUBSECTIONS 102.04, 102.05, AND 104.03 OF THE SPECIFICATIONS.

OF TRANSPORTATION IN ANY WAY. THE ATTENTION OF BIDDER IS SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED TO

SAME ARE SHOWN AS INFORMATION ONLY, ARE NOT GUARANTEED, AND DO NOT BIND THE DEPARTMENT

FIELD INVESTIGATIONS AND ARE BELIEVED TO BE INDICATIVE OF ACTUAL CONDITIONS. HOWEVER, THE

INDICATED THEREBY, WHETHER BY DRAWINGS OR NOTES, OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER, ARE BASED UPON

THE DATA, TOGETHER WITH ALL OTHER INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS OR IN ANYWAY

THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT OF GEORGIA, AND SHALL BE DEEMED TO MEAN

DEPARTMENT ", OR " DEPARTMENT " WHEN THE CONTEXT THEREOF MEANS THE

HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ", GEORGIA STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ", " HIGHWAY

WITH THIS DOCUMENT, TO " STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT OF GEORGIA ", "STATE

DOCUMENTS, DRAWINGS, OR PHOTOGRAPHS USED, OR TO BE USED IN CONNECTION

ALL REFERENCES IN THIS DOCUMENT, WHICH INCLUDES ALL PAPERS, WRITINGS,

NOTE :

APPROVAL DATE:

LOCATION & DESIGN

URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL

FUNCTIONAL CLASS:

56% IN CONG. DIST. 6

44% IN CONG. DIST. NO. 11 &

FULTON COUNTY AND IS

THIS PROJECT IS 100% IN

OF 1988.

AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD)

1983)/94 WEST ZONE, AND THE NORTH

COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1984 (NAD

USING THE HORIZONTAL GEORGIA

THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN PREPARED

COUNTY No. 121

0010925

Project No.

FULTON COUNTY, GA

LAND DISTRICT 17

LAND LOTS 133, 166

PROJECT IS LOCATED IN

0.239

0.000

0.239

0.190

0.049

PLANS PREPARED BY:

UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:

SHAMIR POUDEL, P.E.

0.50/0.50 (N.B./S.B.)

400 800

SCALE IN FEET

0 200

TS AT

E

OG

FE

O

RGIA

17

76

CONSTIT

UTI

ON

JU

STI

CE

OM

DER

ATIO

NDO

M

WIS

5/16/2014

USER:rgraves

GPLOT-V8

gplotborder-V8i-PO.tbl

G:\TRA\GDOT I-285\Riverside\RDY\DGN\0010925_01-001.dgn

GRWCOV

SHEET NO.PROJECT NUMBER

TOTAL SHEETSSTATE

GA

CONCOV

DRAWING No.

I-285

TO ATLANTA

E 2223772.7112

N 1423985.9348

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

STA 104+32.67

BEGIN PROJECT

E 2223782.9738

N 1425245.9152

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

STA 116+92.69

END PROJECT

SANDY SPRINGS

TO

LL 166

LL 133

100+00

105+00

110+00

115+00

120+00

RIVERSIDE DR.

RA

MP

A

RA

MP

B

RA

MP

C

RA

MP

D

E 2223777.7135N 1424600.0920

STA 110+73.23PROJECT MIDPOINT

RAMP ’A’

STA 26+39.33

LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION

RAMP ’B’

STA 63+55.47


RAMP ’C’

STA 2+81.03


RAMP ’D’

STA 45+33.68


RA

MP B

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

RA

MP C

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

RA

MP B

RAMP A

RA

MP

A

RA

MP C

RA

MP

D

RA

MP

D

COL

DSTRE

AM C

OURT

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

GDOT DETAIL RA-1LANDSCAPING AS PER

DO NOT DISTURB SIGN

STA 111+12.64

END EX. BRIDGE

STA 108+51.79

BEGIN EX. BRIDGE


DE

NTE

NTI

ON STR

UCT

URE

POTE

NTI

AL ST

OR

MW

ATER

GR

ADE T

O

DR

AI

NP

AVE

ME

NT

RE

MO

VE E

X.

TYP.CONC. ISLAND

6" RAISED

ISLAND TYP.6" RAISED CONC.

PA

VE

D

DIT

CH

PA

VE

D

DIT

CH

PA

VE

D

DIT

CH

PA

VE

D

DIT

CH

Smyrna

1

14

12

1

12

Brokhaven

22

7

N.R.A.RIV 4

421

CHAT

ATLUSNAS

AFB

120Lp

2

2

2

2

2

2

NAT’L. CEMMARIETTA

2

3

2

2

1

3

1

COBB

DOBBINS

10

17

1

6

11

3

Chamblee

2

SpringsSandy

Doraville

78,278

280

236

9

120

41

140

400

TEAD1 ST

TPBL5 ST

LL166

LL133

LL166

LL133

LL166

LL133

APPROX LOCATION L.L.L.



PL

PL

PL

PL

PL

PL

PL

PL

PL

PL

14

13

19

21

74

75

69

65

44

42

43

38

16

17

20

39

73

32

33

12725

13203

68

Profile Grade

2% 2%

12’-0"

Travel Lane Travel Lane

12’-0"

2:1

MAX

2:1 MAX

2% 2%2:

1 MAX

2:1 MAX

5’-0"2’-6"

Sidewalk

Shoulder

5’-0"

Sidewalk

2’-6"

CL

GADOTLOWNDES

0’-0" to 12’-0"

Turn Lane

Varies

2’-0"

10’-0"

Shoulder

10’-0"

2’-0"

0’-0" to 12’-0"

Turn Lane

Varies


& S.E. Pivot Point

Profile Grade

or S.E.

2%

12’-0" to 16’-0" 0’-0" to 12’-0"

Varies Varies

2’-6"

6.25%

10’-0"

3’-0"

9’-0"

NOT TO SCALE

REVISION DATES

DRAWING No.


5/15/2014

USER:rgraves

GPLOT-V8

gplotborder-V8i-PO-utilities-25.tbl

G:\TRA\GDOT I-285\Riverside\RDY\DGN\0010925_TYP.dgn SHEET NO.PROJECT NUMBER

TOTAL SHEETS

OFFICE:

TYPICAL SECTIONS

05-001

PI No. 0010925

8:44:00 PM

GPLN

STATE

GA

6/20/2011

LB

2:1 MAX

GADOTLOWNDES

Existing Shoulder

6’-0"

ShoulderPaved

Existing


& S.E. Pivot Point

Profile Grade

or S.E.

2%

0’-0" to 12’-0" 12’-0" to 16’-0"

Varies Varies

2’-6"

6.25%

10’-0"

LB

2:1 MAX

Varies

Widening

0’-0" to 8’-0"

Existing Pavement

16’-0"

GADOTLOWNDES

Exist. Concrete V-Gutter

Exist. Conc. Curb & Gutter

Exist. Type T Guardrail

Exist. Pavement Varies

20’-0" to 24’-0"

I-285 EASTBOUND EXIT RAMP

TYPICAL SECTION

I-285 WESTBOUND EXIT RAMP

TYPICAL SECTION

FOR DESIGN-BUILD

COSTING PLANS

G

D

C

B

A

6" 6"

OUTSIDE OF INTERCHANGE

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

TYPICAL SECTION

E

AF

D

C

B

AF

J

I

G

J

I

G

6"

2% 2%

Existing Pavement

16’-0"

Varies

Widening

0’-0" to 8’-0"

K K

Exist. Concrete Pavement


Exist. Asphalt Pavement

C

A

B

D

REQUIRED PAVEMENT

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

GP 2 ONLY, INCL BITUM MATL & H LIME

165 LB/SY RECYCLED ASPH CONC 12.5 MM SUPERPAVE,

GP 1 OR 2,INCL BITUM MATL & H LIME

220 LB/SY RECYCLED ASPH CONC 19 MM SUPERPAVE,

GP 1 OR 2, INCL BITUM MATL & H LIME

RECYCLED ASPH CONC 25 MM SUPERPAVE, 770 LB/SY

GR AGGR BASE CRS, INCL MATL12"

& H LIME, AS REQUIRED

RECYCLED ASPH CONC LEVELING, INCL BITUM MATL

CONC SIDEWALK, 4 IN

CONC CURB AND GUTTER, 8 IN X 30 IN, TYPE 2


PLAIN PC CONC PVMT, CL 3 CONC, 9 INCH THK



10" GR AGGR BASE CRS, INCL MATL

2’

6"

2’

L MILL ASPH CONC PVMT, VARIABLE DEPTH L

2%2%

LC

1’-0"5’-0" 14’-0" 14’-0" 5’-0"

1’-0"SidewalkSidewalk

Profile Grade

NOT TO SCALE

2’-6"

2%

5’-0"

Sidewalk

2’-0"

Shoulder

10’-0"

LC

Landscaping

Central Island

Central Island

4% to 6:1

4:1 MAX

Plain PC Concrete

Graded Aggregate Base

Concrete Header Curb,

4 inch, Type 9

Concrete Header Curb,

6 inch, Type 7

Center of Roundabout

1% to 2%

REVISION DATES

DRAWING No.


5/15/2014

USER:rgraves

GPLOT-V8

gplotborder-V8i-PO-utilities-25.tbl

G:\TRA\GDOT I-285\Riverside\RDY\DGN\0010925_TYP.dgn SHEET NO.PROJECT NUMBER

TOTAL SHEETS

OFFICE:

TYPICAL SECTIONS

05-002

PI No. 0010925

8:45:05 PM

GPLN

STATE

GA

6/20/2011

Circulatory Roadway

18’-0"Varies

Truck Apron

Exist. Travel LaneExist. Travel Lane

& S.E. Pivot Point

Profile Grade

or S.E.

2%

2’-6"

6.25%

10’-0"

LB

2:1 MAX

GADOTLOWNDES

0’-0" to 16’-0"

Varies

Exist. Pavement

0’-0" to 18’-0"

Varies

Prop. Pavement

16’-0" to 18’-0"

Varies

Travel Lane 10’-0"

2%

2’-6"

7’-6" to 25’-3"16’-3" to 34’-0"

42’-0"

I-285 ENTRANCE RAMPS

TYPICAL SECTION

RIVERSIDE DRIVE BRIDGE OVER I-285

TYPICAL SECTION

RIVERSIDE DRIVE ROUNDABOUT

TYPICAL SECTION

FOR DESIGN-BUILD

COSTING PLANS

C

A

B

D

REQUIRED PAVEMENT

E

F

G

H

I

J

I

G

6"

K

D

C

B

A

6"

G

(SEE GDOT CONSTR. DETAIL RA-2)

J

K

K


GP 2 ONLY, INCL BITUM MATL & H LIME

165 LB/SY RECYCLED ASPH CONC 12.5 MM SUPERPAVE,

GP 1 OR 2,INCL BITUM MATL & H LIME



RECYCLED ASPH CONC 25 MM SUPERPAVE, 770 LB/SY

GR AGGR BASE CRS, INCL MATL12"

& H LIME, AS REQUIRED

RECYCLED ASPH CONC LEVELING, INCL BITUM MATL

CONC SIDEWALK, 4 IN



PLAIN PC CONC PVMT, CL 3 CONC, 9 INCH THK



10" GR AGGR BASE CRS, INCL MATL

CLASS "B" CONCRETE

SURFACE COURSE

WIDTH

EXCAV.

AREA

0.0 < WIDTHS < 5.0

6" MIN.

NO SCALE

Item Code 500-9999 - Cu. Yds.

CLASS "B" CONCRETE BASE OR PAVEMENT WIDENING

In excavated areas greater than 5’-0" in width, the Contractor shall

place base and paving as specified on the typical section.

In excavated areas between the existing paving and new curb and gutter

that are 5’-0" or less in width, Class "B" concrete shall be placed in lieu

of the base and paving specified by the typical section. Payment will be

made under "Class B Concrete Base and Pavement Widening".

CLASS "B" CONCRETE BASE OR WIDENING DETAIL

See plans for details of curb and gutter construction.2’

L MILL ASPH CONC PVMT, VARIABLE DEPTH

Department of Transportation State of Georgia

___________________________________________________________________

INTERDEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE

FILE Fulton County OFFICE Planning P.I. # 0010925

DATE November 14, 2013

FROM Cynthia L. VanDyke, State Transportation Planning Administrator TO Darryl D. VanMeter, State Innovative Program Delivery Engineer Attention: Marlo Clowers, P.E.

SUBJECT Design Traffic Review for I-285 RAMPS @ CR 209/RIVERSIDE DRIVE.

We have reviewed the consultant’s Design Traffic data for the above project. The Design Traffic is approved.

If you have any questions concerning this information, please contact Rhonda Niles at (404) 631-1924.

CLV/RFN

13-001

MAINLINE PLANEASEMENT FOR CONSTR

EASEMENT FOR CONSTR OF SLOPES

EASEMENT FOR CONSTR OF DRIVES

CONSTRUCTION LIMITS

& MAINTENANCE OF SLOPES

C F

REQUIRED R/W LINE

PROPERTY AND EXISTING R/W LINE PL

LIMIT OF ACCESS

BEGIN LIMIT OF ACCESS............BLA

END LIMIT OF ACCESS..............ELA

REQ’D R/W & LIMIT OF ACCESS

20

SCALE IN FEET

0 40 80

REVISION DATES

DRAWING No.


5/15/2014

USER:rgraves

GPLOT-V8

gplotborder-V8i-PO.tbl

G:\TRA\GDOT I-285\Riverside\RDY\DGN\0010925_13-001.dgn SHEET NO.PROJECT NUMBER

TOTAL SHEETS

OFFICE:

8:18:26 PM

GPLN

STATE

GA

12/14/2012

SEE

DR

AWI

NG

No. 13-002

MAT

CH LI

NE ST

A 109+50

SEE DRAWING No

. 14-002

MATCH LINE S

TA 61+50

SEE DRAWING No. 14-001

MATCH LINE STA 29+00

COUNTY: FULTON

PROJECT: PI 0010925FOR DESIGN-BUILD

COSTING PLANS INNOVATIVE DELIVERY

PI 0010925

ORANGE BARRIER FENCE

LINE AND INSTALL

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY

UP TO 5 FEET BEYOND

PRUNE AMERICAN HOLLY

104+00

105+00

106+00

107+00

108+00

109+00

29+00

30+00

WALL #1

WALL #2

CONSTRUCTION CL

CONSTRUCTION CL

P.C.

60+9

1.18

P.C. 29+37.70

P.T. 29+96.51

P.I. 29+68.15

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

STA 104+46.45

BEGIN CONSTRUCTION

10’+/-

14’+/-

27.35’

+60.91

TAPER 8:1

R=60’

R=800’

R=80’

R=100’

R=500’

R=270’

10.00’

+33.27

R=100’

18’

16’

16’

18.5’

11.54’ RT

STA 107+37.22

18’

8’

12’

12’

GRADE TO DRAINPAVEMENTREMOVE EX.

E= 4.91

R= 92.00

L= 58.81

T= 30.45

E= 2223695.02

N= 1424320.84

PI Sta= 29+68.15

Curve# 1

CUR

VE #1

17.7

1’+28.

67

6.36’

16.18’

16.36’

18.36’

15.65’

25.89’

111’R

486’R

518’R

289’R

218’R

98’R

200’R

ORANGE BARRIER FENCE

CURVE #2

E= 11.04

R= 800.00

L= 264.29

T= 133.36

E= 2223970.12

N= 1424348.05

PI Sta= 62+24.54

Curve# 2

108R

WALL

SOUND

REPLACE

100R

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

RA

MP B

RAMP A

200R

500R

STA 60+00.00 RAMP ’B’

RIVERSIDE DRIVE=

STA 106+84.11

INTERSECTION

STA 30+75.76 RAMP ’A’

STA 106+92.32 RIVERSIDE DRIVE=

INTERSECTION

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

STA 104+32.67

BEGIN PROJECT

STA 108+51.79

BEGIN EX. BRIDGE


TYP.CONC. ISLAND

6" RAISED

100R

501R

IN

V=1012.63’

TO

P=1015.63’

IN

LE

T

15"RCP

INV=1044.19’

TOP=1047.39’

CB

TOP OF SILT

INV=1045.90’

TOP=1047.40’

CB

IN

V=1040.94’

IN

V=100

5.20’

TO

P=100

8.50’

DI

IN

V=1004.98

RCP

15"

12"CMP

12"CMP

IN

V=101

4.06’

IN

V=1011.10’

FR

OM

PL

AN

S

BU

RI

ED

JB

DRIV

EW

AY

AS

PH

AL

T

PA

VE

D

DRIV

EW

AY

ASP

HA

LT P

AV

ED

ASPHALT PAVING

PARKING

ASPHALT PAVED

PARKING

ASPHALT PAVED

ASPHALT PAVING

DRIV

EW

AY

ASP

HALT P

AVE

D

CONC.

PA

VE

D

DIT

CH

15

DP

C

F/L 1004.98’

12 DPM

F/L ’1011.10’

12 DPM F/

L ’1

014.

06’

18

DP

C

F/L 1040.94’

Location

CD

#

Co

ntrol

Re-

Shot

#

Co

ntrol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

L

ocatio

n

CD

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Locati

on

CD

#

L

ocation

CD

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

C

ontrol

Re-

Shot

#

Locati

on

CD

#

Co

ntrol

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

C

ontrol

Re-

Shot

#

Location

CD

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Sh

ot

#

Co

ntrol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

Location

CD

#

Co

ntrol

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Sh

ot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Contr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

L

ocati

on

CD

#

Location

CD

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Locatio

n

CD

#

26.64

STA +32.67

38.41

STA +32.67

60.00

STA +50.00

-23.38

STA +35.00

-35.00

STA +35.00

-35.00

STA +59.92

40.33

STA +78.06

37.28

STA +59.75

26.71

STA +69.07

-55.00

STA +60.33

-70.00

STA +95.65

112.69

STA +95.77

-90.40

STA +96.08

-111.95

STA +38.29

-77.27

STA +55.99

-81.72

STA +64.72

-142.37

STA +10.83

-92.20

STA +85.25 -125.57

STA +10.61NEED FAIR OAKS MANOR S/D

NO DEED FOUND

N/F

E. FRANK TIMMERMAN

N/FJANE L.NATIONS

L. DEAN NATIONS &

N/F

UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, U.S.A.

THE PRESBYTERY OF ST. ANDREW

N/F

REQ’D

R/W

RE

Q’D

R/

W

1

3

4

2

REQ’D R/W

KC1001

KC1002

KC1003

KC2001

KC2002

KC3001

KC3002

KC3003

KC3004

KC4001

KC4002

KC4003

KC4004 KC4005

KC4006

KC4007

LL166

LL133APPROX LOCATION L.L.L.

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

STA 104+32.67

BEGIN R/W ACQUISITION

PL

PL

SEE SHEET

SEE SHEET

SEE SHEET$RW04$

$RW04$

$RW04$

$RW05$SEE SHEET

14

13

19

21

32

33

EXIST R/

W

& L/

A

EXIST

R/

W

& L/

A

GARRISON HOUSEESA - HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

MAINLINE PLAN

13-002

EASEMENT FOR CONSTR



CONSTRUCTION LIMITS


C F

REQUIRED R/W LINE


LIMIT OF ACCESS




20

SCALE IN FEET

0 40 80

REVISION DATES

DRAWING No.


5/15/2014

USER:rgraves

GPLOT-V8

gplotborder-v8i-PO.tbl


TOTAL SHEETS

OFFICE:

8:25:03 PM

GPLN

STATE

GA

12/14/2012

SEE

DR

AWI

NG

No. 13-001

MAT

CH LI

NE 109+50

SEE

DR

AWI

NG

No. 13-003

MAT

CH LI

NE 114+50

SEE DRAWING No. 14-004

MATCH LINE 41+50

SEE DRAWING No.

14-003

MATCH LINE 3+0

0

FOR DESIGN-BUILD

COSTING PLANS

COUNTY: FULTON

PROJECT: PI 0010925

INNOVATIVE DELIVERY

PI 0010925

110+00

111+00

112+00

113+00

114+00

WALL #3

WALL #4

41+00

3+00

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

RA

MP C

CO

NSTR

UCTI

ON CL

CO

NSTR

UCTI

ON CL

CONSTRUCTION CL

PT 3+9

6.81

PI 3+3

9.10

R=300’

R=800’

R=60’

R=100’

R=100’

R=150’

R=230’

R=75’

R=600’

R=100’

24.00’

+91.17

12’

12’

18’

18’

STA 112+25.00

18.5’

18’

18’

17’

E= 2.80

R= 600.00

L= 115.79

T= 58.07

E= 2223659.38

N= 1424775.36

PI Sta= 3+39.10

Curve# 3

CUR

VE #3

20.72’

18.94’

25.28’

16.77’

16.68’

14.23’

250’R

98’R

101’R

801’R

98’R

318’R

CUR

VE #3

WALL

SOUND

REPLACE

STA 40+00.00 RAMP ’D’


INTERSECTION

STA 4+67.17 RAMP ’C’


INTERSECTION

RA

MP

D


DO NOT DISTURB SIGN

STA 111+12.64

END EX. BRIDGE

ISLAND TYP.6" RAISED CONC.

24"RCP

15"RCP

24"RCP

15"

RC

P

15"RCP

INV=1021.57’

TOP=1024.77’

CB

INV=1020.52’

TOP=1024.92’

CB

IN

V=1016.71

TO

P=1020.41’

CB

15"CMP

INV=1003.07’

18"

RCP

INV=1001.88’

IN

V=

10

06.

79

TO

P=

101

6.

39’

DI

30"RCP

15"

RC

P

IN

V=1017.05’

BU

RI

ED

JB

METAL PLATE

NOT ACCESSABLE

TOP=991.45

DI

ASPHALT PAVING

DRIV

EW

AY

AS

PH

AL

T

PL

AN

S

TA

KE

N

FR

OM

DI

18

DP

C

F/L 1001.88’

15 DPMF/L

’1003

.07’

L

ocatio

n

CD

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

15

DPC

F/L 1017.05’

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

L

ocati

on

CD

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

L

ocati

on

CD

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Shot

#

L

ocation

CD

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Shot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

L

ocatio

n

CD

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

L

ocatio

n

CD

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Sh

ot

#

DCB

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Shot

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Shot

#

L

ocation

CD

#

C

ontr

ol

Re-

Shot

#

-105.00

STA +99.42

-76.35

STA +83.74

-76.35

STA +02.26

88.06

STA +22.74

-115.76

STA +94.18

-105.00

STA +07.64

-161.85

STA +75.37

46.04

STA +20.49

-105.00

STA +50.00

SANDRA K. CAMPBELL

N/F

RICHARD D. KLINE

N/F

REQ’D R/W

5

7

KC5001

KC7001

KC7002

KC7003

KC7004

LL166


EXIST R/W

SEE SHEET

SEE SHEET

$RW03$,$RW06$,$RW08$

$RW03$,$RW07$,$RW08$

KC5002

74

43

38

12725E

XIST R/

W

& L/

A

EXIST R/

W

& L/

A

MAINLINE PLAN

13-003

EASEMENT FOR CONSTR



CONSTRUCTION LIMITS


C F

REQUIRED R/W LINE


LIMIT OF ACCESS




20

SCALE IN FEET

0 40 80

REVISION DATES

DRAWING No.


5/15/2014

USER:rgraves

GPLOT-V8



TOTAL SHEETS

OFFICE:

8:31:37 PM

GPLN

STATE

GA

12/14/2012

SEE

DR

AWI

NG

No. 13-002

MAT

CH LI

NE 104+50

FOR DESIGN-BUILD

COSTING PLANS

COUNTY: FULTON

PROJECT: PI 0010925

PI 0010925

INNOVATIVE DELIVERY

LAND LOT LINE

APPROX. LOCATION

36"RCP

INV=974.83’

TOP=978.16’

DI

36"RCP

18"

RC

P

18"

RCP

IN

V=965.42

IN

V=959.61

60"

RC

PINV=977.39’

ASPHALT PAVING

ASPHALT PAVING

ASPHALT PAVING

DRIVEWAY

ASPHALT

AS

PH

AL

T

PA

VIN

G

60

DP

C

F/L 959.61’

ATT

RN

AME

DP

M

F/L ’965.42’

60

DP

C

F/L 965.48’

36

DP

C

F/L 977.39’

Contr

ol

Re-

Shot

#

Location

CD

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Location

CD

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Location

CD

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Location

CD

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Locati

on

CD

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Co

ntrol

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Location

CD

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Control

Re-

Shot

#

Location

CD

#

-105.00

STA +50.00

-55.00

STA +00.00

-55.00

STA +23.70

-55.00

STA +00.00

-34.55

STA +20.00

115+00

116+00

117+00

118+00

119+00

120+00

DEMETRA ABDALLA

MICHAEL J ABDALLA &

N/F

RAJ BHOLE

N/F

PHILOMINA FASAE

KYODE FASAE &

N/F

CONNIE LYNN TAHAMTAN

AMIR A. TAHAMTAN &

N/F

6

1120

5 112

04

11

282

TE

AD1

ST

TE

AD1

TP

BL5

ST

10

14.34

1014.27

1016.57

7

KC5002

KC5003

KC5004

KC6001

KC6002

SANDRA K. CAMPBELL

N/F

LL166


RIVERSIDE DRIVE

STA 116+20.00

END R/W ACQUISITION

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

EXIST

R/

W

EXIST

R/

W

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

EXIST R/W

PL

PL

PL

SEE SHEET

SEE SHEET

5

RICHARD D. KLINE

N/F

SEE SHEET

$RW02$,$RW06$,$RW08$

$RW08$

$RW02$,$RW07$,$RW08$

75

69

65

44

42

13203

68

CONSTRUCTION CL

12.00’

+89.27 12’+/-

12’+/-

24.00’

+23.38

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

STA 116+13.13

END CONSTRUCTION

R=35’

81+00

12’+/-

+48.04

12’+/-

+48.04

HE

AR

DS CREE

K

HE

AR

DS CREE

K

ESA - 25’ STREAM BUFFER


HEARDS CREEKUNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO

CROSSROAD PLAN

14-001

EASEMENT FOR CONSTR



CONSTRUCTION LIMITS


C F

REQUIRED R/W LINE


LIMIT OF ACCESS




20

SCALE IN FEET

0 40 80

REVISION DATES

DRAWING No.


5/15/2014

USER:rgraves

GPLOT-V8



TOTAL SHEETS

Design File and Plot Substitution information

OFFICE:

8:35:57 PM

GPLN

STATE

GA

12/14/2012

SEE

DR

AWI

NG

No. 13-001

MAT

CH LI

NE 29+00

FOR DESIGN-BUILD

COSTING PLANS

COUNTY: FULTON

PROJECT: PI 0010925

PI 0010925

INNOVATIVE DELIVERY

INV=1015.21’TOP=1018.41’DI

18"RCP

INV=1005.37’

18"RCP

18"RCP

INV=1005.20’TOP=1008.50’DI

INV=1004.

98

RC

P15"

2’ WIDE PAVED DITCH

2’ WIDE PAVED DITCH

PAVED DITCH

PAVED DITCH

15 DPC

F/L 1004.98’

Location

CD

#

Control R

e-Shot

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

# Loca

tion CD

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

#

DDI

TOP 1018.41’

INV. IN 1015.21’

INV. IN 1018.41-IN2’INV. IN 1018.41-IN3’INV. IN 1018.41-IN4’INV. OUT 1018.41-OUT’

Control R

e-Shot

# Loca

tion CD

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

#

Control R

e-Shot

# Loca

tion CD

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

#

Location

CD

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

# Cont

rol Re-Sho

t

#

3

E. FRANK TIMMERMAN

N/FJANE L.NATIONS

L. DEAN NATIONS &

N/F

2

PL

PL

PL

SEE SHEET

$RW01$,$RW08$ SEE SHEET

$RW01$,$RW08$

1617 20

EXIST R/W & L/A

24+00

25+00

26+00

27+00

28+00

29+00

CONSTRUCTION CL

8.00’+04.72

16.00’

+59.81

V-GUTTER

TIE TO EXIST.

WALL

SOUND

REPLACE

RAMP ’A’

BEGIN C&G LT

STA 26+39.33


BUFFERESA - 25’ STREAM

HEARDS CREEKUNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO

CROSSROAD PLAN

14-002

EASEMENT FOR CONSTR



CONSTRUCTION LIMITS


C F

REQUIRED R/W LINE


LIMIT OF ACCESS




20

SCALE IN FEET

0 40 80

REVISION DATES

DRAWING No.


5/15/2014

USER:rgraves

GPLOT-V8



TOTAL SHEETS


OFFICE:

8:37:06 PM

GPLN

STATE

GA

12/14/2012

SEE

DR

AWI

NG

No. 13-001

MATC

H LI

NE 61+50

FOR DESIGN-BUILD

COSTING PLANS

COUNTY: FULTON

PROJECT: PI 0010925

INNOVATIVE DELIVERY

24"

RC

P

INV=1012.63’

TOP=1015.63’

INLET

15"

RC

P

INV=1024.41’

36"

RC

P

INV=1024.66’

15"RCP

IVNERT=1026.21’

INV=1024.74’

TOP=1028.49’

DI

FULL OF DIRT

TOP=1040.52’

DI

15"RCP

INV=1027.80’

TOP=1032.30’

DI

INV=1025.75’

FROM PLANS

BURIED

JB

PARKING

ASPHALT PAVED

CO

NC

RE

TE

FL

UM

E

PAVED DITCH

END NOT

FOUND

FROM PLANS

15"

CMP

36 DPCF/L 1024.41’

15 DPC

F/L 10

24.66’

15 DPC

F/L 1025.75’

Control Re-Shot

#

Control Re-Shot

#

Control Re-Shot

#

Control Re-Shot

#

Control Re-Shot

#

Control Re-Shot

#

Control Re-Shot

#

Control Re-Shot

#

Location CD #

Control Re-Shot

#

Control Re-Shot

#

Location CD #

Location CD #

Location CD #

Control Re-Shot

#

Control Re-Shot

#

Control Re-Shot

#

Control Re-Shot

#

Control Re-Shot

#

Location CD #

4

UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, U.S.A.

THE PRESBYTERY OF ST. ANDREW

N/F

SEE SHEET

$RW01$,$RW08$

EXIST R/W & L/A

EXIST R/W & L/A

CONSTRUCTION CL

P.I. 62+24.54

P.T. 63+55.47

62+00

63+00

64+00

64+29

16’+/-

RAMP ’D’

END C&G RT

STA 45+33.68


RAMP ’B’

END C&G

STA 63+55.47

LIMIT OF CONSTRCUTION

E= 11.04

R= 800.00

L= 264.29

T= 133.36

E= 2223970.12

N= 1424348.05

PI Sta= 62+24.54

Curve# 2

CURVE #2

CROSSROAD PLAN

14-003

EASEMENT FOR CONSTR



CONSTRUCTION LIMITS


C F

REQUIRED R/W LINE


LIMIT OF ACCESS




20

SCALE IN FEET

0 40 80

REVISION DATES

DRAWING No.


5/15/2014

USER:rgraves

GPLOT-V8



TOTAL SHEETS


OFFICE:

8:38:42 PM

GPLN

STATE

GA

12/14/2012

SEE

DR

AWI

NG

No. 13-002

MAT

CH LI

NE 3+00

FOR DESIGN-BUILD

COSTING PLANS

COUNTY: FULTON

PROJECT: PI 0010925

PI 0010925

INNOVATIVE DELIVERY

18"RCP

15"RCP

15"RCP15"RCP

INV=1001.70’TOP=1005.20’DI

INV=996.12’

TOP=999.68’

CB

FULL OF DIRT

IN END OF FLUME

DI

15"

RCP

FROM PLANS

BURIED JB

POSSIBLE JB

15"RCP

PAVED DITCH

PAVED DITCH

Control Re-Shot #

Control Re-Shot #

Control Re-Shot #

Control Re-Shot #

Control Re-Shot #

Control Re-Shot #

Location CD #

Control Re-Shot #

Location CD #

15 DPCF/L 1001.70’

Location CD #

Control Re-Shot #

Control Re-Shot #

Control Re-Shot #

DDITOP 1005.20’INV. IN 1001.70’INV. IN 1005.20-IN2’

INV. IN 1005.20-IN3’

INV. IN 1005.20-IN4’

INV. OUT 1005.20-OUT’

Control Re-Shot #

Control Re-Shot #

Location CD #

Control Re-Shot #

Location CD #

Control Re-Shot #

Control Re-Shot #

Control Re-Shot #

Location CD #

Control Re-Shot #

Control Re-Shot #

RICHARD D. KLINE

N/F

5

PL

SEE SHEET

$RW02$,$RW03$,$RW08$

39 EXIST R/W & L/A

0+00

1+00

2+00

3+00

CONSTRUCTION CL

0+00

PI 0+00.00

PC 2+81.03

16’+/-

CURVE #3

RAMP’C’

STA 2+81.03


14-004

CROSSROAD PLANEASEMENT FOR CONSTR



CONSTRUCTION LIMITS


C F

REQUIRED R/W LINE


LIMIT OF ACCESS




20

SCALE IN FEET

0 40 80

REVISION DATES

DRAWING No.


5/15/2014

USER:rgraves

GPLOT-V8



TOTAL SHEETS


OFFICE:

8:39:54 PM

GPLN

STATE

GA

12/14/2012

SEE

DR

AWI

NG

No. 13-002

MAT

CH LI

NE 41+50

FOR DESIGN-BUILD

COSTING PLANS

COUNTY: FULTON

PROJECT: PI 0010925

PI 0010925

INNOVATIVE DELIVERY

INV=1006.

79TOP=10

16.39’

DI

INV=1024.

74’TOP=1028.

49’DI

INV=1009.51

36"

RC

P

INV=1018.88’

TOP=1021.98’

DI

15"RCP

INV=1019.71

INV=1033.89’

TOP=1037.69’

DI

15"

CMP

15"

DP

M

F/L ’1019.71’

Locat

ion CD

#

Contr

ol Re-

Shot

#

Contr

ol Re-

Shot

#

Locat

ion CD

#

Locat

ion CD

#

Contr

ol Re-

Shot

#

Contr

ol Re-

Shot

#

Contr

ol Re-

Shot

#

Contr

ol Re-

Shot

#

Locat

ion CD

#

Contr

ol Re-

Shot

#

Locat

ion CD

#

Contr

ol Re-

Shot

#

Contr

ol Re-

Shot

#

SANDRA K. CAMPBELL

N/F

7 PL

SEE SHEET

$RW02$,$RW03$,$RW08$

73

EXIST R/W & L/A

42+00

43+00

44+00

45+00

46+00

45+00

42+00

43+00

44+00

45+00

46+00

PI 46+00.54

CONSTRUCTION CL

REPLACE SOUND WALL OARNGE BARRIER FENCE

8.00’

+33.69

16.00’

+65.53

RAMP ’D’

END C&G RT

STA 45+33.68


INTER

MITTE

NT STRE

AM #1


project - mydocsmydocs.dot.ga.gov/info/designbuild/shared documents/0010925...project as it relates...

Documents