project management ilead u scenario 1 february 23, 2010

24
Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Upload: chloe-barker

Post on 01-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Project ManagementILEAD U Scenario 1February 23, 2010

Page 2: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

A collaborative text message reference project – first in the US

Over 60 libraries from the US and Canada Over 800 questions per month Using Altarama and gmail interface Started July 2009 Hours open: Mon-Fri 8-10 am; Saturday

9-5; Sunday 12-6 Project coordinated by Alliance Library

System All business and meetings conducted

online

Page 3: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Cell phone access higher than broadband internet use

Number of text messages sent has increased over 250 percent over the last two years

Typical mobile subscriber sends or receives 357 text messages a month compared to sending or receiving 204 phone calls

Although libraries were offering the service, they were not offering for many hours

We did not see any collaborative services

Page 4: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Patrons text a question to My Info Quest The question is forwarded from

Altarama to gmail The librarian receives the question in

gmail The answer is provided and goes

through gmail to Altarama and the patron’s phone

Page 5: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Every library has a representative to the group advisory board which meets online monthly

Other committees to participate in: Policies and procedures, training, public relations, evaluation

All groups meet online

Page 6: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Put out a call for participants on electronic mailing lists (March-April 2009)

Hosted online meetings for everyone interested (March-July 2009)

Talked to vendors to arrange for a trial (February-April 2009)

Began website development (May 2009) Committees meet to work on pr, procedures

etc) Training (May-June 2009) Soft launch of service (July 2009) Larger program launch (September 2009)

Page 7: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Offer more hours of service Expanded expertise available Shared coverage Shared cost Shared development time Shared promotion Shared risk

Page 8: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Staff the desk two hours per week Attend online advisory meetings Promote the service Attend training sessions Participate in google discussion group

Page 9: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Altarama Peoplewhere Both agree to free 6 month trial and

provide support for the group

Page 10: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Scheduling Best practices in answering reference

questions in this mode – i.e. should we use wikipedia? Should we use text speak?

Sustainability/Funding

Page 11: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Very important so libraries can decide if they want to continue, go out on their own, or discontinue

Lead by Lili Luo, San Jose State University SLIS with a team of volunteers to assist

Page 12: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

What types of individuals used the service?

What types of questions did users ask (e.g., consumer health, job search, or school-related)?

When did users ask questions? What are users. perceptions of the

service they received? Does offering this service reach out to

individuals who have not previously used library services?

What outreach methods are most effective in promoting the service?

What was the length of time for responding to users. questions (transaction turnaround time)?

Page 13: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

What are the core skill sets required in providing text message reference services?

What are the obstacles, if any, in providing text message reference services?

What aspect(s) of the training was most helpful?

What information was missing from the training that should have been included?

Is there any difference in librarian satisfaction (or product satisfaction) based on the type of library s/he works for?

To what extent does the service performance uphold the professional guidelines established by the Reference and User Services Association?

Page 14: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Administrative Perspective

What are the advantages and disadvantages to offering text message reference services through a collaboration of libraries?

What are the challenges when scheduling librarians to staff the service?

What service learning benefits did SLIS graduate students realize through their involvement?

How can successful service learning opportunities be created for graduate students in a collaborative reference service?

What is the level of cost-effectiveness of offering the service?

Page 15: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

282 transactions 189 – ready reference – questions that

request a single, uncomplicated and straightforward answer

49 – about local libraries – questions that inquire about patrons’ local libraries resources, services, policies, etc.

16 – specific search questions – request answers in the form of giving the user a document, list of citations, etc.

14 – questions about Infoquest 9 – unclear questions 5 – inappropriate questions

Page 16: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

868 questions – 74% from repeat users Response time – 5 minutes and less –

33.5% 6-10 minutes – 23.9% Remainder is over 11 minutes

Page 17: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

What’s In It for My Organization? “In the jungle, the mighty jungle, the lion

sleeps tonight!” When it comes to inter-organizational

collaboration, the sleeping lion is your own org

Each organization has its own mission and “weltanschauung”

Does inter-organizational collaboration work well when times are good, but suffer when times are tough?

Page 18: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Individuals who are volunteering their own time, not necessarily representing an organization

Individuals who are self-employed

Neither fish nor fowl

Are they orgs-of-one?

Harness their passion for the project

Page 19: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

What’s In It for My Users? What do we really know about the users

of a collaboratively conceived and delivered service?

What do we want or need to know? Protecting privacy and confidentiality Placing the onus on users ZIP codes or 3-letter code for the org

with which they are most affiliated

Page 20: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Getting to one voice for the collaborative project

Who speaks for the collaborative project? Traditional stance toward vendors:

Buyer/Renter and Seller Suspicion Hostility

Selecting vendors and third party service providers

Migrating to other vendors and service providers

Page 21: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

The way a project launches may be the single most important determining factor for the overall success of your project.

What type of launch do you want for your project?

Soft launch

Big, splashy launch

Can the launch be controlled by the project team?

Page 22: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

We don’t have the luxury of Goldilocks

Too hot, too cold, just right

Too hard, too soft, just right

Must be both effective and efficient

Strong Opinion Alert: Tom P. thinks most library projects involve too much pre-launch planning and too little post-launch planning.

Page 23: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

“Watch” how people are using the service

Read and listen to their comments and suggestions

Allow the service to evolve, if the user community wants it to evolve

Page 24: Project Management ILEAD U Scenario 1 February 23, 2010

Lori Bell

Director of Innovation

Alliance Library System

[email protected]

309.694.9200 (x2128)

Tom Peters

CEO

TAP Information Services

[email protected]

816.616.6746