project management plan...project management plan 42 rank stakeholder entity contact name interest...

10

Upload: others

Post on 10-Jul-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Project Management Plan...Project Management Plan 42 Rank Stakeholder entity Contact Name Interest level (H,M,L) Influence level (H,M,L) Score Proposed mechanism and actions Engagement
Page 2: Project Management Plan...Project Management Plan 42 Rank Stakeholder entity Contact Name Interest level (H,M,L) Influence level (H,M,L) Score Proposed mechanism and actions Engagement

Project Management Plan

40

The scoring matrix used in this process in outlined below.

Table 8.2 : Scoring matrix used in stakeholder consultation

Interest Level

InfluenceLevel

Low Medium High

Low 2 4 6

Medium 3 6 9

High 4 8 12

The scoring matrix uses a standard multiplier to develop a total score which combines the overall in influenceand interest the stakeholder has in regards to the project. For example, a stakeholder with a low influence andinterest level would receive a score of 2.

The higher the score the more importance and rank that was associated with the particular stakeholder for theproject.

Page 3: Project Management Plan...Project Management Plan 42 Rank Stakeholder entity Contact Name Interest level (H,M,L) Influence level (H,M,L) Score Proposed mechanism and actions Engagement

Project Management Plan

41

8.3 Stakeholder Engagement Plan

The following Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) table has been developed. Table 3: Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP)

Rank Stakeholderentity

Contact Name Interestlevel(H,M,L)

Influencelevel(H,M,L)

Score Proposedmechanism andactions

EngagementPlan(frequency andtiming)

Risk of notconsulting (or riskof consulting)

Risk management strategies

=1 Department ofInfrastructure,RegionalDevelopmentand Cities

TBC H H 12 · Formal updatesandpresentationsat monthlymeetingRegular directcommunication

· Invites to publicmeetings andother keydiscussions

· FormalmonthlyupdatesAd hocdiscussionson keymatters

· Disruption toproject delivery

· Rework anddelays tomilestones

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Misalignment ofprojectexpectations

· Ongoing constructive communication

· Share initial findings and seek feedback

=1 Project SteeringCommittee(TBC)

TBC H H 12 · Weeklytelephoneupdate

· Provision ofdraft chapters

· Invited to one-on-onestakeholdermeetings &workshops

· Weeklyupdates

· Draftchapters asper projectplan

· Disruption toproject delivery

· Rework anddelays tomilestones

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Misalignment ofprojectexpectations

· Ongoing constructive communicationShare initial findings and seek feedback on draft DBCby chapter

=1 StakeholderReferenceGroup

TBC H H 12 · Formal updatesandpresentations

· Semi-Regularmeetings to

· Disruption toproject delivery

·

Page 4: Project Management Plan...Project Management Plan 42 Rank Stakeholder entity Contact Name Interest level (H,M,L) Influence level (H,M,L) Score Proposed mechanism and actions Engagement

Project Management Plan

42

Rank Stakeholderentity

Contact Name Interestlevel(H,M,L)

Influencelevel(H,M,L)

Score Proposedmechanism andactions

EngagementPlan(frequency andtiming)

Risk of notconsulting (or riskof consulting)

Risk management strategies

· Invites to publicmeetings andother keydiscussions

brief thegroup and toreceivefeedback

· Unable toreceive supportfor project

· Misinformationabout theproject

=1 Councils Townsville CityCouncil

H H 12 · Regularcommunicationand meetingswith seniorexecutives andCouncillors withSteeringCommitteeChair andProjectManager

· Offer of projectbriefings

· Monthly ormorefrequent ifrequired onparticularmatters

· Disruption toproject delivery

· Unable toreceive Councilsupport forproject

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Regular contact with senior executives andCouncillors

· Promote the community benefits and positive impactto the region of the project

=1 Landholders Directly affectedlandholders

H H 12 ·

· Regular contactwith updates ofthe project andpotentialimpacts toproperty

· Regular bi-monthlycontact ormorefrequentwhenrequired

· Disruption toproject delivery

· Potential to beobstructivetowards theproject,including refusalof site access

· Regular and honest engagement on the process andpotential property impacts

· Recognising the significant impact on landowners

Page 5: Project Management Plan...Project Management Plan 42 Rank Stakeholder entity Contact Name Interest level (H,M,L) Influence level (H,M,L) Score Proposed mechanism and actions Engagement

Project Management Plan

43

Rank Stakeholderentity

Contact Name Interestlevel(H,M,L)

Influencelevel(H,M,L)

Score Proposedmechanism andactions

EngagementPlan(frequency andtiming)

Risk of notconsulting (or riskof consulting)

Risk management strategies

· Misinformationabout theproject

=1 Potentialcustomers

Parties that couldreceive water from theproject

H H 12 · Regularcommunicationthroughinformationsessions, face-to-facemeetings andphoneconversations

· Supported withwrittencommunicationthrough e-mailsand overviewdocuments

· Bi-monthlyinformationsessions

· Continuedengagementthrough thedemand anddesignassessment

· Lack of projectsupport

· Not delivering aproject meetingcustomerrequirements

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Regular engagement on the opportunity of the project

· Recognising the significant impact on landowners

=1 Traditionalowners /Aboriginalcultural heritage

2. TBC H H 12 · A face-to-facemeeting withtraditionalownerrepresentativesand projectstaff

· Specificcommunicationand site visit forspecific projectevents (e.g.

· Regularupdates

· Specificengagementduringspecificproject tasks

·

· Disruption toproject delivery

· Potential to beobstructivetowards theproject

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Regular and meaningful engagement

· Engaging during potential sensitive stages of theproject

Page 6: Project Management Plan...Project Management Plan 42 Rank Stakeholder entity Contact Name Interest level (H,M,L) Influence level (H,M,L) Score Proposed mechanism and actions Engagement

Project Management Plan

44

Rank Stakeholderentity

Contact Name Interestlevel(H,M,L)

Influencelevel(H,M,L)

Score Proposedmechanism andactions

EngagementPlan(frequency andtiming)

Risk of notconsulting (or riskof consulting)

Risk management strategies

below groundinvestigations)

=7 Federaldepartments andauthorities

· Department of theEnvironment andEnergy

· InfrastructureAustralia

·

H/M H 10 · Regularupdates onproject statusvia Queenslanddepartments

· Specific anddirectengagement onmatters ofinterest and/orareas requiringfeedback andguidance

· Regularprojectupdates

· On an as-needs basisfor specificmatters

· Disruption toproject delivery

· Rework anddelays tomilestones

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Misalignment ofprojectexpectations

· Providing regular updates and presenting anunderstanding of the opportunities and challenges ofthe project

=7 Statedepartments,authorities andcorporations

· QueenslandTreasury

· Department ofNaturalResources, Minesand Energy

· Department ofStateDevelopment,Manufacturing,Infrastructure andPlanning(including theOffice of the

H/M H 10 · Regularupdates onproject status

· Specific anddirectengagement onmatters ofinterest and/orareas requiringfeedback andguidance

· Regularprojectupdates

· On an as-needs basisfor specificmatters

· Disruption toproject delivery

· Rework anddelays tomilestones

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Misalignment ofprojectexpectations

· Providing regular updates and presenting anunderstanding of the opportunities and challenges ofthe project

Page 7: Project Management Plan...Project Management Plan 42 Rank Stakeholder entity Contact Name Interest level (H,M,L) Influence level (H,M,L) Score Proposed mechanism and actions Engagement

Project Management Plan

45

Rank Stakeholderentity

Contact Name Interestlevel(H,M,L)

Influencelevel(H,M,L)

Score Proposedmechanism andactions

EngagementPlan(frequency andtiming)

Risk of notconsulting (or riskof consulting)

Risk management strategies

Coordinator-General)

· Department ofAgriculture andFisheries

· Department ofEnvironment andScience

· SunWater

=9 FederalDepartmentalMinisters

· Minister forAgriculture andWater Resources

· Minister for theEnvironment andEnergy

· Minister forInfrastructure andTransport

M H 8 · Specific anddirectengagement onmatters ofinterest and/orareas requiringfeedback andguidance

· Regularprojectupdates

· On an as-needs basisfor specificmatters

· Disruption toproject delivery

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Misalignment ofprojectexpectations

· Providing regular updates and presenting anunderstanding of the opportunities and challenges ofthe project

=9 Federal electedrepresentatives

· Federal Membersfor Townsville area

M H 8 · Specific anddirectengagement onmatters ofinterest and/orareas requiringfeedback andguidance

· Regularprojectupdates

· On an as-needs basisfor specificmatters

· Disruption toproject delivery

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Misalignment ofprojectexpectations

· Providing regular updates and presenting anunderstanding of the opportunities and challenges ofthe project

=9 State Premierand

· Premier andMinister for Trade

M H 8 · Specific anddirectengagement onmatters of

· Regularprojectupdates

· Disruption toproject delivery

· Providing regular updates and presenting anunderstanding of the opportunities and challenges ofthe project

Page 8: Project Management Plan...Project Management Plan 42 Rank Stakeholder entity Contact Name Interest level (H,M,L) Influence level (H,M,L) Score Proposed mechanism and actions Engagement

Project Management Plan

46

Rank Stakeholderentity

Contact Name Interestlevel(H,M,L)

Influencelevel(H,M,L)

Score Proposedmechanism andactions

EngagementPlan(frequency andtiming)

Risk of notconsulting (or riskof consulting)

Risk management strategies

DepartmentalMinisters

· QueenslandTreasurer

· Minister for StateDevelopment,Manufacturing,Infrastructure andPlanning

· Minister forNaturalResources, Minesand Energy

· Minister forAgriculturalIndustryDevelopment andFisheries

· Minister forEnvironment andthe Great BarrierReef

interest and/orareas requiringfeedback andguidance

· On an as-needs basisfor specificmatters

· Misinformationabout theproject• Misalignmentof projectexpectations

=9 State electedrepresentatives

· State Members forTownsville area

M H 8 · Specific anddirectengagement onmatters ofinterest and/orareas requiringfeedback andguidance

· Regularprojectupdates

· On an as-needs basisfor specificmatters

· Disruption toproject delivery

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Misalignment ofprojectexpectations

· Providing regular updates and presenting anunderstanding of the opportunities and challenges ofthe project

Page 9: Project Management Plan...Project Management Plan 42 Rank Stakeholder entity Contact Name Interest level (H,M,L) Influence level (H,M,L) Score Proposed mechanism and actions Engagement

Project Management Plan

47

Rank Stakeholderentity

Contact Name Interestlevel(H,M,L)

Influencelevel(H,M,L)

Score Proposedmechanism andactions

EngagementPlan(frequency andtiming)

Risk of notconsulting (or riskof consulting)

Risk management strategies

=9 Media · Townsville Bulletin

· Other local media

· The Courier Mail

· The Australian

· ABC Radio

M M 8 · • Regularupdates onproject status• Specificupdates onprojectmilestones andmatters ofinterest

· Bi-monthlyupdates

· On an as-needs basison specificmatters

· Misinformationabout theprojectMisalignment ofprojectexpectations

· Providing regular updates and presenting anunderstanding of the opportunities and challenges ofthe project

=15 Potentialcontractors

· Parties that couldtender for theproject if it isapproved andfunded

M M 6 · Specific anddirectengagement onmatters ofinterest and/orareas requiringfeedback andguidance

· On an as-needs basison specificmatters

· Lack of interestor readiness forproject• Disruption toproject delivery

· • Misinformationabout theproject

· Engagement at specific stages of the project

· Providing a clear understanding of the relevantexpectations and opportunities with the project

=15 Communitygroups

· Townsville WaterSecurity Taskforce

· Other CommunityGroups (TBC)

M M 6 · Specific anddirectengagement onmatters ofinterest and/orareas requiringfeedback andguidance

· On an as-needs basison specificmatters

· Misinformationabout theproject• Misalignmentof projectexpectations

· Engagement at specific stages of the project

=17 Environmentalgroups

· TBC M L 4 · Specific anddirectengagement onmatters ofinterest and/or

· On an as-needs basison specificmatters

· Misinformationabout theprojectMisalignment of

· Engagement at specific stages of the project

Page 10: Project Management Plan...Project Management Plan 42 Rank Stakeholder entity Contact Name Interest level (H,M,L) Influence level (H,M,L) Score Proposed mechanism and actions Engagement

Project Management Plan

48

Rank Stakeholderentity

Contact Name Interestlevel(H,M,L)

Influencelevel(H,M,L)

Score Proposedmechanism andactions

EngagementPlan(frequency andtiming)

Risk of notconsulting (or riskof consulting)

Risk management strategies

areas requiringfeedback andguidance

projectexpectations

=17 Business · TownsvilleChamber ofCommerce

· Others TBC

M L 4 · Specific anddirectengagement onmatters ofinterest and/orareas requiringfeedback andguidance

· On an as-needs basison specificmatters

· Disruption toproject delivery

· Lack of interestor readiness forproject

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Engagement at specific stages of the project

· Providing a clear understanding of the relevantexpectations and opportunities with the project

=17 Industry peakbodies

· TBC M L 4 · Specific anddirectengagement onmatters ofinterest and/orareas requiringfeedback andguidance

· On an as-needs basison specificmatters

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Misalignment ofprojectexpectations

· Engagement at specific stages of the project

· Providing a clear understanding of the relevantexpectations and opportunities with the project

20 Utility serviceproviders

· Vodaphone

· Ergon Energy

· Telstra

· Optus

· Others TBC

L M 3 · Specific anddirectengagement onmatters ofinterest and/orareas requiringfeedback andguidance

· On an as-needs basison specificmatters

· Lack of interestor readiness forproject

· Misinformationabout theproject

· Engagement at specific stages of the project

· Providing a clear understanding of the relevantexpectations and opportunities with the project