property and appliance fires - jensen hughes · 2015/10/13 · senior electrical engineer •b.s....
TRANSCRIPT
Property and Appliance FiresKenneth G. Rice
CFI, CFEI, CVFI, TIFIREE, PI, CFM, CBO, Senior Fire Investigator Sebastian Scheiff
PE, CFEI, Electrical Engineer
A very special thanks to
• Craig Harris• Dan Purcell
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 2
Agenda• 12:45pm – 1:40pm
– Classroom• Introductions• Appliance Fires Overview• Investigation, Site Evidence and Analysis
• 1:40pm – 2:40 pm – Flammable Pad / Outside
• Property Fire/Flashover Demonstration• Scene Inspection / Diagramming
• 2:40pm‐3:30pm– Classroom
• CASE Studies• Property Fires and Structural Safety• Q&A
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 3
Ken RiceCFI, CFEI, CVFI, TIFIREE, PI, CFM, CBOSenior Fire Investigator • Glendale Law Enforcement Training Academy – National
Emergency Training Center• New Castle School of Trades – Advanced Automotive
Technology• Graduate, National Fire Academy, Emittsburg, MD• Certified Fire and Explosion Investigator, NAFI• Certified Fire Investigator, IAAI• Certified Vehicle Fire Investigator, NAFI• Licensed Unarmed Private Investigator, AZ• Licensed Unarmed Private Investigator, MT• Licensed Unarmed Private Investigator, OR• Licensed Unarmed Private Investigator, WA
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 4
Ken RiceCFI, CFEI, CVFI, TIFIREE, PI, CFM, CBOSenior Fire Investigator • Certified Fire Marshal, ICC• Certified Building Official, ICC• Certified Commercial Building Inspector, ICC• Certified Residential Building Inspector, ICC• Certified Fire Inspector I & II, ICC• Certified Fire Plans Examiner, ICC• Certified Fire Code Official, ICC• Certified Housing Code Official, ICC• Certified Property Maintenance & Housing Inspector, ICC• Certified Zoning Inspector, ICC• Code Enforcement Administrator, AACE• Code Enforcement Officer, AACE• Property Maintenance & Housing Inspector, AACE• Zoning Enforcement Officer, AACE• General Instructor, AZPOST• Maricopa County Arson Task Force• Technician, Institution of Fire Engineers11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 5
Sebastian ScheiffPE, CFEISenior Electrical Engineer
• B.S. in Electronics Engineering Technology, Western WA Univ.
• A.A. in Technical Arts, Skagit Valley College• Registered Professional Engineer, state of WA• Certified Fire and Explosion Investigator, NAFI• Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Certification, CSOTI
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 6
APPLIANCE FIRESOverview
Appliance Fires
• Almost any appliance plugged into 120 VAC has the ability to fail and start a fire in some manner
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 8
Receptacles
• Contact resistance can deteriorate over time• “Back Fed” (push‐in) type receptacles have a higher incidence of failure
• Must have arcing
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 9
GFCI Failures
• Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters (GFCI) can fail
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 10
Common Residential Appliances• Toaster• Range/Oven• Coffee Maker• Electric Can Opener• Refrigerator• Dishwasher• Microwave Oven• Portable Space Heater• Electric Blanket• Window Air Conditioning Unit• Hair Dryer/Curler• Clothes Iron• Clothes dryer• Consumer Electronics• Lighting
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 11
Appliance Fires: Toaster Example
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 12
Appliance Fires: Toaster
• Are there any visible differences between the two bread slots?
Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 1311/9/2015
Appliance Fires: Toaster
• Are there any visible differences between the two bread slots?
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 14
Appliance Fires: Toaster
• Fire Starter / Human Shocker
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 15
Appliances Fires: Component Failures • Common Component Failures in Appliances
– Relocatable Power Taps (Power Cords)– Batteries– Overcurrent Protection– Switches
• Levers, toggle, knobs– Temperature (expanding metal, bimetal, fluid pressure, melting)
• Thermal Cutouts (TCOs), Thermostats, Limit Switches– Solenoids/Relays– Transformers– Motors– Heating Elements– Lighting– High Intensity Discharge (HID) Lighting– Miscellaneous
• Timers, Thermocouples
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 16
Relocatable Power Taps (power strips, surge protectors, extension cords)
• Component Failures– Plastic Body–Metal Body–Metal Oxide Varistor (MOV)–Multiple Outlets
Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 1711/9/2015
Relocatable Power Tap Disassembled
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 18
Exemplar Circuit Board and MOV
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 19
MOV Disk
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 20
MOV Failure
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 21
Failed MOV
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 22
Capacitor Failures
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 23
Capacitor Internals
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 24
Capacitor Winding
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 25
Motor With Canopy
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 26
Failed Motor
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 27
Capacitor with Wax
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 28
Waxy Exudate
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 29
Capacitor with Wax
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 30
Capacitors Ignited and Sustained Flaming Combustion
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 31
High Resistance Connection
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 32
INVESTIGATION & SITE EVIDENCE ANALYSIS
Overview
Investigation: NFPA 921 Guide for Investigators Fire and Explosion (2011 Edition)• General Definitions
– 16.1* General. During the course of any fire investigation, the fire investigator is likely responsible for locating, collecting, identifying, storing, examining, and arranging for testing of physical evidence. The fire investigator should be thoroughly familiar with the recommended and accepted methods of processing such physical evidence.
– 11.5.1.1 Rules of evidence regulate the admissibility of proof at a trial. The purpose of rules of evidence is to ensure that the proof offered is reliable. The goal of every fire investigation is to produce reliable documents, samples, statements, information, data, and conclusions. It is not necessary that every fire investigator become an expert on rules of evidence, If the practices and procedures recommended within this guide are complied with, the results of the investigation should be admissible.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 34
Investigation: NFPA 921 Guide for Investigators Fire and Explosion (2011 Edition)• General Definitions
– 3.3.55 Failure Analysis. A logical, systematic examination of an item, component, assembly, or structure and its place and function within a system, conducted in order to identify and analyze the probability, causes, and consequences or potential and real failures.
– 3.3.62 Fire Investigation. The process of determining the origin, cause, and development of a fire or explosion.
– 3.3.144 Scientific Method. The systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formation and testing of a hypothesis.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 35
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 36
Investigation:Scientific Method
Investigation: NFPA 921 Guide for Investigators Fire and Explosion (2011 Edition)• General Definitions, con’t.
– 3.3.9 Area of Origin. A structure, part of a structure, or general geographic location within a fire scene, in which the “point of origin” of a fire or explosion is reasonably believed to be located.
– 3.3.127 Point of Origin. The exact physical location within the area of origin where a heat source and fuel interact, resulting in a fire or explosion.
– 3.3.22 Cause. The circumstances, conditions, or agencies that brought about or resulted in the fire or explosion incident, or bodily injury or loss of life resulting from the fire or explosion incident.
– 17.1.2 Determination of the origin of the fire involves the coordination of information derived from one or more of the following:• Witness information• Fire Patterns• Arc Mapping• Fire Dynamics
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 37
NFPA 921 – Guide for Investigators Fire and Explosion (2011 Edition)• Chapter 24.6 – Common Residential Appliances
– Range/Oven– Coffee Maker– Toaster– Electric Can Opener– Refrigerator– Dishwasher– Microwave Oven– Portable Space Heater– Electric Blanket– Window Air Conditioning Unit– Hair Dryer/Curler– Clothes Iron– Clothes dryer– Consumer Electronics– Lighting
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 38
Investigation: NFPA 921 Guide for Investigators Fire and Explosion (2011 Edition)
• Additional Common Residential Appliances– Cell phone batteries/chargers– Rechargeable batteries/chargers – power tools– Power strips/relocatable power taps– Anything that is energized with a 120V/240V AC or DC power source can be a potential source of ignition
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 39
What happened?
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 40
Investigative steps• Initial Scene Inspection
– Examine the loss scene from least damage to most damage
– Digital Photography – Begin burn pattern analysis and fire scene diagramming
– Collect & preserve evidence• Middle
– Scientific Method• End
– Scientific Opinion
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 41
Investigation: Evidence ev∙i∙dence /ˈevədəns/
– noun• That which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof.
• Something that makes plain or clear; an indication or sign:– His flushed look was visible evidence of his fever.
• Law. data presented to a court or jury in proof of the facts in issue and which may include the testimony of witnesses, records, documents, or objects.
– verb (used with object), evidenced, evidencing.• To make evident or clear; show clearly; manifest:
– He evidenced his approval by promising his full support.• To support by evidence:
– He evidenced his accusation with incriminating letters.– Idioms
• 6. in evidence, plainly visible; conspicuous:– The first signs of spring are in evidence.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 42
Investigation: Evidence
• How can it help or hurt your case?– Provides physical proof of your theory.– Can eliminate other causes/failures.– Analysis by unqualified expert.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 43
Investigation: Evidence
• What should you never, ever do with evidence?– Take it apart, or destructively examine, without consent from all parties.
– Touch or move if it is not your place to do so.– Fail to file proper chain of custody paperwork.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 44
Site Evidence
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 45
Properly Collecting Evidence
• When is it okay to collect the evidence?– If the evidence will be compromised by leaving it at the scene.
– After it has been documented (photos/sketches).
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 46
Properly Collecting Evidence
• Is there a such a thing as “too much evidence”?
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 47
Properly Collecting Evidence
• What is the proper way to preserve evidence?
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 48
Properly Collecting Evidence
• Minimum supplies needed– Disposable gloves– Camera– Lined cans– Plastic bags/shrink wrap– Evidence labels
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 49
Documentation
• What is documentation?– Chain of custody paperwork– Evidence labels/tags– Photographs
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 50
Documentation
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 51
Evidence Preservation
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 52
• Overhaul and fire suppression can be destructive
Evidence preservation begins immediately• Examining the loss scene
– The loss scene needs to be investigated by the local jurisdiction having authority, which may be conducted in conjunction with private fire investigators
– The loss scene can change quickly due to work of contractors, employees, etc.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 53
Avoiding potential issues
• An investigative firm should have the following– Procedures for handling evidence that minimize the risk that evidence is discarded or damaged
– Adequate storage facilities– Durable bags, boxes, and shrink wrap– Individual tracking numbers for each item of evidence
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 54
Easy To Lose Crucial Items
• Many parts can be camouflaged by their surroundings
• If small “crucial” parts are displaced, the entire case can be jeopardized
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 55
Easy to Lose Crucial Items
• Many small electrical components can easily blend in with fire debris
• Gypsum wall board forms “white mud”• Investigators need to have keen eye sight and an understanding of what to look for
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 56
Spoliation • The National Fire Protection Association’s 921 guidelines
are the standard for fire investigation.
• “Spoliation of evidence refers to the loss, destruction, or material alteration of an object or document that is evidence or potential evidence in a legal proceeding by one who has the responsibility for its preservation. Spoliation of evidence may occur when the movement, change or destruction of evidence or the alteration of the scene significantly impairs the opportunity of other interested parties to obtain the same evidentiary value from the evidence, as did any prior investigator.” – (Chapter 11.3.5.)
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 57
Spoliation
• How can you avoid a claim of spoliation?– Do not destructively examine.– Do not move evidence until all parties have opportunity to view scene.
– Store with care.– Don’t allow the restoration company, insured, etc. to rehab scene before exam.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 58
LIVE BURN DEMONSTRATION
Property Fire/FlashoverScene Diagramming
Transition to Property Fire Area
• Transition Break• Meet at Flam Pad, Outside
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 60
CASE STUDYCommercial Building Fire
CASE Study: Fish Tank Heater Fire
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 62
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 63
Background• Single Story Commercial Building Fire 2008, Building Destroyed
• Day of loss– Space Heater had not been used– Staff unaware of any electrical problems in the building. – Lights shut off – except for the incandescent “can” lights above the desk,
• History– 2001 Lobby Remodel
• Initial investigation focused on fluorescent fixtures abandoned in a previous false ceiling following remodel.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 64
Initial Suspected Area of Origin
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 65
Items in the Lobby• Lobby Furnishings
– Small beverage refrigerator,– Two large sofas– Two leather sofa chairs– Coffee table– Serving table– Aquarium– Reception desk
• Desk area– Computer on the floor – Three monitors – Printer– Remote telephone answering system,– Small space heater under the desk
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 66
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 67
Aerial view North wall of the building shows the approximate location of the fish tank (bluebox) and the location where the Fire Marshal selected the origin (red circle).
Char Patterns
• Visible char patterns were observed against the north concrete wall on the wood furring studs behind the aquarium.
• No char patterns were observed on the east wall wood studs.
• The west side wall between the lobby and the conference room was burned to the floor plate.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 68
Char Patterns
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 69
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 70
Aerial view Location of the fish tank and the conduit supplying power to the fish tank which ran over head in the attic space.
Area of Aquarium ‐ East View
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 71
Area of Aquarium ‐ North View
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 72
Electrical Examination
• The electrical distribution panels were examined. – Due to the extensive fire damage to the conduit, the branch circuits could not be traced.
• Arc mapping for most of the scene was unsuccessful – Conductors were damaged or eliminated during the fire.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 73
Arc Mapping• However, arc mapping was instrumental in determining the cause of the fire. – The EMT conduit which supplied power to the fish tank receptacle ran overhead and passed through the fire department’s suspected area of origin.
– No arcing was found in the conductors within the EMT
– Arcing was found within the fish tank heater. • Therefore, the arcing in the fish tank heater must have preceded the fire damage in the attic space in the adjacent office.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 74
Fire Cause Determination
• The cause of the fire was determined to be the failure of the aquarium heater which resulted in electrical arcing and ignition of nearby plastic.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 75
How did the Aquarium Fail??• Evidence Examination
– During the first examination, evidentiary items were carefully inspected and eliminated as potential ignition sources.
– Among many other items, the filter tank for the aquarium was examined. • The filter tank was located on the left side under the main aquarium, inside a wooden cabinet that supported the tank.
• The filter tank was made of clear acrylic plastic.• The filter tank was separated into two compartments.
– The compartment on the right contained the filter media and heater.
– The left side contained the submersible filter pump.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 76
Bottom of the Filter Tank
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 77
Subject Heater Remains Position within the Filter Tank
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 78
First Evidence ExamX‐ray of the aquarium heater
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 79
Shows electrical arcing in the heater. Multiple arcs shown in the red circle.
First Evidence Exam
• Observations– A small section of the Plexiglas filter tank was broken out of the side wall of the tank.
– Examination confirmed that the piece had been broken by impact from inside the tank.
– The fracture occurred prior to the fire.
• First evidence exam was halted because the manufacturer of the aquarium heater had not been identified or notified.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 80
Broken Plexiglas
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 81
Broken Plexiglas
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 82
Second Examination• Exclusively focused on the aquarium heater. • The melted plastic bio‐balls and grating surrounding the heater was removed by heating the plastic with a heat gun. – This exposed the internal electrical components and conductors.
– Obvious evidence of electrical arcing was observed on the wiring and bus bars within the heater.
– Electrical arcing was also evident at the base of the heating elements.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 83
Electrical arcing inside the controls for the aquarium heater
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 84
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 85
Subject Heater With reconstructed glass tube placed in the filter tank in its original location.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 86
Subject Heater With reconstructed glass tube placed in the filter tank in its original location.
Testing and Analysis• CASE obtained several different manufacturers and wattages of submersible aquarium heaters.
• The heaters were injected with a salt water solution meant to simulate water from a salt water aquarium.
• The heaters were then laid horizontally on the bottom of a tank, plugged into a 120 VAC power source, and turned ON.
• The current, voltage and temperature were monitored using a data‐acquisition system.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 87
Testing and Analysis• Shortly after the heaters were energized, over‐pressurization occurred inside the heater which caused the glass test tube to “shoot” off the heater.
• The ejection of the glass test tube was violent, causing the tube to be swiftly ejected from the heater.
• The force of the test tube ejection appeared sufficient enough to cause the Plexiglas to break.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 88
Exemplar Heater “Shoot Off” Due to electrical arcing as a result of water infiltration
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 89
Burn Testing
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 90
Burn Testing Fire Progression
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 91
Burn Testing Fire Progression
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 92
Burn Testing Fire Progression
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 93
Burn Testing Fire Progression
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 94
Burn Testing Fire Progression
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 95
Conclusion• The origin of the fire was determined to be the north wall of the
lobby area. • V‐pattern behind the aquarium indicated potential area of origin. • Presence of electrical arcing within the aquarium indicated
potential cause.• The broken hole in the acrylic filter tank was found to directly
correlate with the location of the aquarium heater.• The glass tube of the heater was found to have separated from
the electrical control body resulting in a final length equal to the available distance within the filter tank.
• Electrical arcing within the heater confirmed that the cause of the fire was the heater, and the arcing also eliminated other potential areas of origin.
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 96
PROPERTY FIRE, STRUCTURAL SAFETY, REPAIR AND REMEDIATION
Property Fire
• Assessing Structural Safety• Repair and Remediation
Damage
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 99
Repair
Repair
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 101
Repair
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 102
Repair
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 103
Repair
11/9/2015 Copyright CASE Forensics 2015. All Rights Reserved 104
Q&A