public awareness nato & defence issues. not about… process procedures technical elements...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PUBLIC AWARENESS
NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES
![Page 2: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
NOT ABOUT…
• Process
• Procedures
• Technical elements
• Communication and campaign „tricks”
![Page 3: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ABOUT CHALLENGES!
• Substantive issues!• Definition issues
– What is NATO?– What is security?– What is a national interest?– What is the role and function of the military?
• „Philosophical” issues– Public nature of security and defence policy– Populism– Subjective vs. objective
![Page 4: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
WHAT IS NATO?
• Image vs. Reality– Transforming identity– Cold War identity vs. Stability provider– Collective defence vs. Protection of interests
• Interests? Values?– Framework for US interests?– Values! – return to values– Whose values? - perceived values of Hungary
• Elite club– How do we define elite? – Everything we always wanted to
be but couldn’t…
![Page 5: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
WHAT IS NATO?
• NATO image vs. EU image– CEE approach to integration institutions –
boxes• Council of Europe – democracy• OECD – market economy• NATO security (defence, military)• EU – well being – positive image!!
– Everybody wants to be European, nobody wants to be a hawk
![Page 6: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
WHAT IS SECURITY?
• Outdated concepts– WW2 – WW3– Territorial defence– National framework
• Reality– No direct military threat (YU crisis!)– Multidimensional security challenges– Not territorial– Security & challenges – international framework
• How to change notion of security?
![Page 7: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
NATIONAL INTEREST?
• Integration vs. Sovereignty– Are we less or more sovereign through integration?
• Involvement in other nations’ conflicts– Is any conflict too distant?– Are there any geographical limits of interests?– Are we becoming a global player?
• If yes, how do we sell it?
• International framework vs. „none of our business…”– How to make the notion of national interests
multidimensional?
![Page 8: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ROLE & FUNCTION OF MILITARY?
• Protection of…– Independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity
• No one intends to hurt…
– National interests• Whose national interests?• What national interests?• No direct link between military involvement & foreign
investment, tourism, well being, etc.
• Costs of military membership• Effectiveness vs. Price• Can we afford? Do we wish to afford?• Do you support Hungary’s NATO membership if…?
![Page 9: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PUBLIC NATURE OF SECURITY POLICY
• Public policy vs. Elite policy– Becoming more and more public– Security threats directly concern public safety
• Terrorism, illegal migration, illegal trade, organised crime, etc.
• Post-modern society – information society– The public will have information
• What kind? How to influence? Is any information „objective”? Is manipulation allowed? Does it ever backfire?
– CNN-effect• Uncontrollable effects on any public campaign
• Gov’t funding for different opinion groups?
![Page 10: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
POPULISM
• Communication strategy without populism?– Tools?
• „Defence is an issue for the whole nation!”– What does this mean?
• No populism, extremism, party interests, short term gov’t interests are allowed!
• BUT!!– It is just a natural field for such intrusions.
• Not in Hungary, but almost everywhere else…
• DANGER!! PITFALL!!
![Page 11: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
SUBJECTIVE vs. OBJECTIVE
• Transatlantic integration– PRO – rational (objective) arguments– CON – subjectiove (emotional) arguments
• Neutrality – AT, YU, 1956• Foreign troops, great powers – USSR, USA
• How to make rational arguments „catchy”?– Do we need to?– Use subjective arguments in the PRO campaign
• Values, elite club, security• Even if these arguments are sometimes debatable• Do not overcomplicate!
![Page 12: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
REFERENDUM?
• Last resort– Legitimacy– Political, legal, moral– Headache
• Long term investment– Catalyst of transformation – Notion of security– Double edged!
![Page 13: PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082710/56649e245503460f94b1368d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS?
• Any at all?• NATO should not be a single issue
• What is the nature of our security?• What are the best long term measures to protect national interests?• Transformation of the notion of security – society, political elite
• Old NATO? New NATO?• Mixed and competing images
• Find the right media• Teachers, journalists, local governments• Must be a positive story