quality reporting within the eurostat and the ess metadata systems

16
1 Quality reporting within the Eurostat and the ESS metadata systems August Götzfried and Håkan Linden Eurostat Unit B6: Reference databases and metadata

Upload: gaia

Post on 15-Jan-2016

47 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Quality reporting within the Eurostat and the ESS metadata systems August Götzfried and Håkan Linden Eurostat Unit B6: Reference databases and metadata. Current situation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

1

Quality reporting within the Eurostat and the ESS metadata systems

August Götzfried and Håkan Linden

Eurostat Unit B6: Reference databases and metadata

Page 2: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

2

Current situation

Within the European Statistical System (ESS) reporting on statistical data quality exists in many statistical domains….

Page 3: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

3

… BUT :

– Quality reports do not exist for all statistical processes within the ESS;

– No homogeneity between the different report structures used for data quality reporting;

– Not all the quality related information is made publicly available;

– No common and standard IT infrastructure is used within the ESS;

The new Eurostat vision: “Improving the production method of EU statistics” requires an improvement action.

Problem statement

Page 4: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

4

Progress made since 2008

2008: introduction of the Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS) at Eurostat and the ESS for the production and dissemination of reference metadata (Commission Recommendation 498/2009)

01/2009: release of the new version of the ESS quality reporting documents:

• ESS Standard for Quality Reports (ESQR)• ESS Handbook for Quality Reports (EHQR)

Detailed requirements following the European Statistics Code of Practice ESS Quality and Performance Indicators (QPI’s) defined

03/09: EP/Council Regulation 223/2009 Article 12 defining the quality criteria to be reported

2009/2010: Development and deployment of the Eurostat Metadata Handler with:

• EMIS: production and dissemination of ESMS files at Eurostat • National Reference Metadata Editor (NRME): production, transmission and

dissemination of national ESMS files

Page 5: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

5

ESMS and ESQR

ESMS is more oriented to the USERS of statistics

to understand the statistical data released there is no need for too detailed information on data quality 21 SDMX cross domain concepts used

ESQR is more oriented to the PRODUCERS of statistics

to monitor the quality of the statistics produced in detail concentrating on the main quality concepts (being also part of the ESS Statistics Regulation No 223/2009)

However, there is information on quality criteria which is common to both ESMS and ESQR.

Page 6: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

6

ESMS and ESQR: the starting point

XI. Conclusions

X. Confidentiality,

IXI. Performance, Cost and Respondent

Burden

VIII. Assessment of User needs and

Perceptions

VII. Trade-offs between Output Quality Components

I. Introduction to the Statistical Process and

Its Outputs

XI. Conclusions

X. Confidentiality,

IXI. Performance, Cost and Respondent

Burden

VIII. Assessment of User needs and

Perceptions

VII. Trade-offs between Output Quality Components

I. Introduction to the Statistical Process and

Its Outputs

VI. COMPARABILITYand COHERENCE

V. ACCESSIBILITYand CLARITY

and PUNCTUALITY

IV. TIMELINESS

III ACCURACY

II. RELEVANCE

14. Accuracy and reliability

7. Confidentiality

20. Statistical processing

13. Relevance6. Institutional mandate

19. Data revision12. Quality management

5. Reference period

18. Cost and burden11. Accessibility of documentation

4. Unit of measure

17. Coherence10. Dissemination format

3. Statistical presentation

16. Comparability9. Frequency of dissemination

15. Timeliness and punctuality

8. Release policy

14. Accuracy and reliability

7. Confidentiality

20. Statistical processing

13. Relevance6. Institutional mandate

19. Data revision12. Quality management

5. Reference period

18. Cost and burden11. Accessibility of documentation

4. Unit of measure

17. Coherence10. Dissemination format

3. Statistical presentation

16. Comparability9. Frequency of dissemination

15. Timeliness and punctuality

8. Release policy

ESQR ESMS

TIMELINESS

COMPARABILITY

2. Metadata update

1. Contact

ACCESSIBILITYCOHERENCE

CLARITY

ACCURACY

RELEVANCE

ACCURACY

21. CommentTransparency, Security

Page 7: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

7

The new ESQRS Based on the ESQR, a new report structure - the ESS

Standard for Quality Reports Structure: ESQRS - was created for harmonising the reporting on statistical data quality within the ESS.

The ESQRS is using the main statistical data quality criteria as listed in EP/Council Regulation 223/2009 and as being part of the ESMS and details them further :

• Relevance• Accuracy• Timeliness and Punctuality• Accessibility and Clarity• Comparability• Coherence

A subset of the Quality Performance Indicators (QPI’s) is also covered in the new ESQRS.

Page 8: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

8

ESQR and ESQRS

XI. Conclusions

X. Confidentiality,

IXI. Performance, Cost and Respondent

Burden

VIII. Assessment of User needs and

Perceptions

VII. Trade-offs between Output Quality Components

XI. Conclusions

X. Confidentiality,

IXI. Performance, Cost and Respondent

Burden

VIII. Assessment of User needs and

Perceptions

VII. Trade-offs between Output Quality Components

ESQR ESQRS

Transparency, Security

III ACCURACY

IV. TIMELINESSand PUNCTUALITY

V. ACCESSIBILITYand CLARITY

VI. COMPARABILITYand COHERENCE

II. RELEVANCE

I. Introduction to the Statistical Process

and Its Outputs

IntroductionII IntroductionII

Relevance (user needs and perceptions)

III Relevance (user needs and perceptions)

III

AccuracyIV AccuracyIV

Timeliness and punctualityV Timeliness and punctualityV

Accessibility and clarityVI Accessibility and clarityVI

ComparabilityVII ComparabilityVII

CoherenceVIII CoherenceVIII

ContactI ContactI

CommentIX CommentIX

Page 9: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

9

The ESQRS

Concept nameESQRS Concept nameESQRS

Average size of revisions (A8)III.3.7.3

Data revision – policyIII.3.7.1

Data revision - practiceIII.3.7.2

Imputation rate (A6)III.3.4.1

Item response rate (A5)III.3.3.3

Unit response rate (A4)III.3.3.1

Edit failure rate (A3)III.3.2.1

Rate of overcoverage (A2)III.3.1.1

Seasonal adjustment III.3.8

Data revisionIII.3.7

Mistakes (A7)III.3.6

Model assumptionsIII.3.5

Processing errorsIII.3.4

Non response errorsIII.3.3

Measurement errorsIII.3.2

Coverage and other frame errorsIII.3.1

Non-sampling errorIII.3

Coefficient of variation (A1)III.2.1

Sampling errorIII.2

Overall accuracyIII.1

AccuracyIII

Average size of revisions (A8)III.3.7.3

Data revision – policyIII.3.7.1

Data revision - practiceIII.3.7.2

Imputation rate (A6)III.3.4.1

Item response rate (A5)III.3.3.3

Unit response rate (A4)III.3.3.1

Edit failure rate (A3)III.3.2.1

Rate of overcoverage (A2)III.3.1.1

Seasonal adjustment III.3.8

Data revisionIII.3.7

Mistakes (A7)III.3.6

Model assumptionsIII.3.5

Processing errorsIII.3.4

Non response errorsIII.3.3

Measurement errorsIII.3.2

Coverage and other frame errorsIII.3.1

Non-sampling errorIII.3

Coefficient of variation (A1)III.2.1

Sampling errorIII.2

Overall accuracyIII.1

AccuracyIII

IntroductionI IntroductionI

Rate of available statistics (R1)II.3.1

CompletenessII.3

User satisfaction survey – dateII.2.2

User satisfaction index (US1)II.2.1

User satisfactionII.2

User needsII.1

Relevance (user needs and perceptions)

II

Rate of available statistics (R1)II.3.1

CompletenessII.3

User satisfaction survey – dateII.2.2

User satisfaction index (US1)II.2.1

User satisfactionII.2

User needsII.1

Relevance (user needs and perceptions)

II

Quality documentationV.7

Metadata –completeness (AC3)V.6.1

On-line database – accesses (AC2)

V.3.1

Publications – number (AC1)V.2.1

PublicationsV.2

On-line databaseV.3

Micro-data accessV.4

OtherV.5

News releaseV.1

Documentation on methodologyV.6

Accessibility and ClarityV

Quality documentationV.7

Metadata –completeness (AC3)V.6.1

On-line database – accesses (AC2)

V.3.1

Publications – number (AC1)V.2.1

PublicationsV.2

On-line databaseV.3

Micro-data accessV.4

OtherV.5

News releaseV.1

Documentation on methodologyV.6

Accessibility and ClarityV

Concept nameESQRS Concept nameESQRS

Punctuality – publication (T3)IV.2.1

PunctualityIV.2

Timelag – final results (T2)IV.1.2

Timelag – first results (T1)IV.1.1

TimelinessIV.1

Timeliness and PunctualityIV

Punctuality – publication (T3)IV.2.1

PunctualityIV.2

Timelag – final results (T2)IV.1.2

Timelag – first results (T1)IV.1.1

TimelinessIV.1

Timeliness and PunctualityIV

Coherence – cross domainVII.1

Length of comparable time series (CC1)

VI.2.1

Assymetries for statistics mirror flows (CC2)

VI.1.1

CoherenceVII

Coherence – internalVII.2

Coherence with other statisticsVII.1.3

Coherence – National AccountsVII.1.2

Coherence –subannual and annual statistics

VII.1.1

Comparability – domainsVI.3

Comparability - over timeVI.2

Comparability – geographicalVI.1

ComparabilityVI

Coherence – cross domainVII.1

Length of comparable time series (CC1)

VI.2.1

Assymetries for statistics mirror flows (CC2)

VI.1.1

CoherenceVII

Coherence – internalVII.2

Coherence with other statisticsVII.1.3

Coherence – National AccountsVII.1.2

Coherence –subannual and annual statistics

VII.1.1

Comparability – domainsVI.3

Comparability - over timeVI.2

Comparability – geographicalVI.1

ComparabilityVI

= Concepts in common with ESMS

Page 10: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

10

The ESMS and the ESQRS

The metadata produced in the ESMS and ESQRS need to be kept consistent. The ESQRS is based on the ESQR, but not taking up all the chapters contained in the latter one.

The information in the ESQRS is more detailed compared to the information on statistical data quality contained in the ESMS.

ESQRS reports deeper in terms of data quality compared to the ESMS

Page 11: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

11

The ESMS and the ESQRS

Accuracy and reliability Non- sampling error

Description:Accuracy:closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values that the statistics were intended to measure.Reliability: closeness of the initial estimated value to the subsequent estimated value.

ESMS

Description:Error in survey estimates which cannot be attributed to sampling fluctuations.

Non- response errorNon- response error Unit response rateUnit response rate Formulae unit resp. rateFormulae unit resp. rate

Description:The difference between the statistics computed from the collected data and those that would be computed if there were no missing values.

Description:The ratio of the number of units for which data for at least some variables have been collected to the total number of units designated for data collection.

Description:

Ex. calculation formluae for un-weighted unit response rate.

Accuracy Non- sampling error

Description:Accuracy:closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values that the statistics were intended to measure.

Description:Error in survey estimates which cannot be attributed to sampling fluctuations.

ESQRS

Page 12: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

12

ESS Guidelines

The guidelines for quality reporting from ESS Handbook for Quality Reports (EHQR) are already used in the “ESS Guidelines” for ESMS.

These guidelines will be further used in the ESQRS in order to provide detailed guidelines for 6 different statistical processes:

• Sample survey• Census• Statistical Process using Administrative Sources• Statistical Process involving Multiple Data Sources• Price or other Economic Index Process• Statistical Compilation

Page 13: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

13

The underlying IT infrastructure

The Eurostat Metadata Handler as IT tool for the production, transmission and dissemination of the ESQRS metadata.

National Metadata Editor

National Metadata Editor

EMISEMIS

RAMONRAMON CODEDCODED

Eurostat Metadata Handler

Common user interface

Eu

ro S

DM

X

Reg

istr

y

Page 14: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

14

The ESQRS Statistical Business Process

NationalMetadata

Editor

NRME Database Eurostat Website

NationalESQRS

NationalESQRS

National and

Eurostat ESQRS

eDamis

PRODUCTION TREATMENT AND ANALYSIS

DISSEMINATION

NATIONAL STATISTICAL AUTHORITY

EUROSTAT

Page 15: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

15

Production and dissemination of metadataat national and European level

EU Member States Eurostat

ESQRS - Production of national ESQRS - Transmission of national ESQRS to

Eurostat- Dissemination of national ESQRS

(if decided so)

- Production of the Eurostat ESQRS based on the national ESQRS

- Dissemination of the Eurostat ESQRS if decided so

- Checking and dissemination of the national ESQRS (dissemination only if decided so)

ESMS - Production of national ESMS files- Transmission of national ESMS

files to Eurostat- Dissemination of national ESMS

files (if decided so)

- Production of the Eurostat ESMS files

- Dissemination of the Eurostat ESMS files

- Checking and dissemination of the national ESMS files (dissemination only if decided so)

Page 16: Quality reporting within the Eurostat  and the ESS metadata systems

16

Summary

New reporting structure for quality related metadata has been created: the ESQRS.

The ESQRS is based on the existing EU legislation and documentation for data quality in the ESS.

The quality indicators contained in the ESQRS allow the harmonised measurement/ monitoring of the statistical data quality within and across statistical processes.

The ESS quality reporting will successively be converted into the ESQRS by the use of the National Reference Metadata Editor

The ESQRS needs to be further promoted and communicated

within and beyond the ESS.