quarterly fixed income and currency … · quarterly fixed income and currency review and outlook...
TRANSCRIPT
FOR PROFESSIONAL CLIENTS ONLY. NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL.PLEASE REFER TO ALL RISK DISCLOSURES AT THE BACK OF THIS DOCUMENT.
QUARTERLY FIXED INCOME AND CURRENCY REVIEW AND OUTLOOKJULY 2018
UK GOVERNMENT BONDS // 5Harvey Bradley, Portfolio Manager, Fixed Income• Markets pricing in an August rate hike
• Inflation reaches one-year low
• Bank of England forecasts 0.4% GDP growth in Q2
EUROPEAN GOVERNMENT BONDS // 6Gareth Colesmith, Senior Portfolio Manager, European Fixed Income• Italy’s sovereign bonds still at risk from new government’s spending plans
• European Central Bank in little rush to raise deposit rate from negative territory
• Central bank asset purchases to wind down this year
US GOVERNMENT BONDS // 7Isobel Lee, Head of Global Fixed Income Bonds• Tax cuts and increased federal spending are underpinning the growth outlook
• We continue to expect gradual rate hikes through 2018 and beyond
• Longer-maturity bond yields have moved to fair value for now
GLOBAL INVESTMENT GRADE CREDIT // 8Peter Bentley, Head of UK and Global Credit• Credit spreads continue their choppy run
• Political risk remains a concern, but markets will benefit from low supply over summer
• Given valuations, adding risk at these levels does not look attractive
US INVESTMENT GRADE CREDIT // 10Jesse Fogarty, Senior Portfolio Manager• Credit spreads widen for second quarter running
• Trade tensions deepen, raising risk of trade war
• Valuations still look tight overall, tactically market should be supported over summer
SUMMARY
EMERGING MARKET DEBT // 11Colm McDonagh, Head of Emerging Market Fixed Income• Technical factors have driven the recent sell-off
• Emerging market fundamentals remain sound
• Indiscriminate selling has created opportunities for less constrained investors
SECURED LOANS // 13Ranbir Singh Lakhpuri, Senior Portfolio Manager, Secured Finance• Technical backdrop remains strong, even with elevated issuance levels
• Strong demand for asset class likely to remain
• Investors’ ability to push back on documentation growing
HIGH YIELD // 14Uli Gerhard, Senior Portfolio Manager, High Yield• High yield debt markets remained volatile due to political uncertainty and outflows
• Default rates expected to remain low given broadly positive economic growth outlook
• Emerging market corporates face a range of risks
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES // 15Shaheer Guirguis, Head of Secured Finance• Asset-backed securities (ABS) markets remained steady through volatile period for risk assets
• Recent weakness driven by increased supply rather than fundamentals
• ABS markets still offer compelling strategic value given fundamental credit quality and security
CURRENCIES // 16Paul Lambert, Head of Currency• Economic growth outperforming relative to other countries, and rising trade tensions, boosted
the US dollar (USD)
• Emerging market currencies weakened across the board
• USD strength likely to persist for now
The key risk continues to be the evolution of Brexit
negotiations, as well as the profile of UK inflation
HARVEY BRADLEY
Figure 1: UK gilt yields fell in Q2
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.030-year yield
10-year yield
Jun 18Dec 17Jun 17Dec 16Jun 16Dec 15Jun 15Dec 14Jun 14Dec 13Jun 13
10 year 30 year
Yiel
d (%
)
Source: Bloomberg, as at 29 June 2018.
5
UK GOVERNMENT BONDS
RATE HIKE EXPECTED LATER AMID SOFTER DATA
Harvey Bradley Portfolio Manager, Fixed Income
• Markets pricing in an August rate hike
• Inflation reaches one-year low
• Bank of England (BoE) forecasts 0.4% GDP growth in Q2
At the start of the second quarter, UK economic and inflation data
continued with the softening theme seen in Q1, clouding
expectations of a rate hike from the BoE in May. Q1 GDP growth
slumped to 0.1%, which is down from the 0.4% growth recorded
in Q4 2017 and is the worst quarterly growth rate in five years.
The BoE stressed that this weakness was temporary however,
while economists pointed to the spell of harsh winter weather
during the period as the driver. The UK manufacturing purchasing
managers’ index (PMI) also fell to 53.9 in April, down from 54.9 in
March and below expectations of 54.8. Towards the end of the
quarter some positive data releases came through – Q1 GDP
growth was revised up to 0.2% and retail sales were upbeat, rising
to 2.8% year-on-year in May. Inflation meanwhile slipped over the
quarter and reached a one-year low of 2.4% year-on-year in May.
Lower inflation took some pressure off the BoE to tighten
monetary policy. At the start of the quarter BoE Governor Mark
Carney also suggested that it was not certain the central bank
would raise rates in May, stating “I am sure there will be some
differences of view but it is a view we will take in early May,
conscious that there are other meetings over the course of this
year.” The central bank kept rates unchanged throughout the
period. However, market expectations for a rate hike in August
rose, as the BoE’s chief economist, Andrew Haldane, joined two
other Monetary Policy Committee members in voting to raise
rates to 0.75% at the central bank’s June meeting.
Towards the end of the period the UK government won a critical
series of votes on leaving the European Union (EU), following a
compromise with rebel MPs which will allow the Speaker of the
House of Commons to decide on whether a future government bill
on the final terms of exit can be amended by Parliament.
UK government bond yields fell over the quarter. The 10-year yield
dropped by 14bp while the 30-year yield fell by 9bp. Looking
ahead, the BoE has forecast Q2 GDP to rise to 0.4%, and expects
inflation to remain at 2.4% year-on-year in Q2. Markets are pricing
in a 25bp rate hike from the BoE in August, but this remains
data-dependent. The key risk continues to be the evolution of
Brexit negotiations, as well as the profile of UK inflation. We expect
the unwind of quantitative easing to begin when official rates
reach 1.5%.
6
EUROPEAN GOVERNMENT BONDS
POLITICS DOMINATES
Gareth Colesmith Senior Portfolio Manager, European Fixed Income
• Italy’s sovereign bonds still at risk from new government’s
spending plans
• European Central Bank (ECB) in little rush to raise deposit rate
from negative territory
• Central bank asset purchases to wind down this year
The growing political discord between centrist and anti-
establishment political movements continued to be a major theme
in Europe over the second quarter.
Following weeks of negotiation after Italy’s general election, the
Five Star Movement and Lega Nord agreed a coalition to govern.
The coalition’s policy proposals included plans for an €80bn fiscal
expansion worth around 5% of GDP, including cuts in income and
corporate taxes and a minimum citizens’ income. No clues were
offered on how the programme would be funded, however. Earlier
leaked proposals – including a request for up to €250bn of Italian
debt held by the ECB to be written off and to explore mechanisms
for leaving the euro (EUR) – were rescinded from the final
proposals. From the markets’ perspective, a less significant change
of government occurred in Spain, where Prime Minister Mariano
Rajoy suffered a no-confidence vote and was replaced by the
Socialist opposition (and pro-EU) leader Pedro Sánchez.
Italian sovereign spreads widened by up to 150bp, in contrast
to Spanish spreads which widened a maximum of 53bp across
the curve.
During the period, the ECB confirmed that it intends to conclude its
asset purchase programme at year-end. Following September, its
monthly purchases will be halved from €30bn to €15bn per month
for the final three months of the year. This played out largely as
markets anticipated, but the ECB’s forward guidance on policy
rates was significantly more dovish than expected. The central
bank stated that rates will remain on hold until at least “through the
summer” of 2019. With Mario Draghi’s tenure as ECB president due
to end in October, it raises the possibility that he will become the
only ECB leader to never hike rates during their term. Against this
backdrop, German bund yields fell by up to 20bp across the curve
over the quarter.
Looking ahead, with the deposit rate looking likely to remain
in negative territory for some time and European economic
growth coming off record-highs, a short duration position
appears less justified. We believe bund yields are likely to be
range-bound for a while and think investors should consider more
tactical positioning, as yields are likely to oscillate within the range.
However, in the periphery, Italian political developments remain a
risk. The publication of the new budget will be a key event – it may
well be in violation of EU limits and sovereign ratings downgrades
could be likely, meaning Italian government spreads may have the
potential to gap wider. We expect any weakness to remain
idiosyncratic to Italian bonds and therefore a short position in Italy,
offset against a long in Spain (to exclude the effects of trends in
peripheral debt), could be worth considering.
Figure 2: Italian and Spanish sovereign spreads widened markedly in Q2
Spre
ad (b
p)
Spain 10-year sovereign spreadItaly 10-year sovereign spread
50
100
150
200
250
300
Spain 10-year spreadItaly 10-year sovereign spread
Jul 18May 18Mar 18Jan 18Nov 17Sep 17Jul 17
Source: Bloomberg, as at 17 July 2018.
US GOVERNMENT BONDS
TAX REFORMS AND FEDERAL SPENDING UNDERPIN A SOLID GROWTH OUTLOOK
Isobel Lee Head of Global Fixed Income Bonds
• Tax cuts and increased federal spending are underpinning the
growth outlook
• We continue to expect gradual rate hikes through 2018
and beyond
• Longer-maturity bond yields have moved to fair value for now
The US Treasury curve shifted upwards and flattened, with shorter
maturities impacted to the largest degree, following a 25bp hike in
the federal funds rate in June. Federal Reserve (Fed) Chairman
Jerome Powell stated that the economy had strengthened
“significantly” since the global financial crisis and was now
approaching a “normal” level that no longer requires the Fed to
encourage economic activity. The Federal Open Market Committee
also changed its forecasts to reflect two further interest rate hikes
in 2018 (to take the total to four).
Economic growth slowed in the first quarter, but reaccelerated in
the second quarter with all segments of domestic demand showing
robust growth. Tensions around international trade escalated as
President Trump pressed ahead with plans to impose a 25% tariff on
$50bn of Chinese imports and allowed the exemption on key allies
for steel and aluminium tariffs to expire on 1 June. The G7 summit,
held in Quebec on 12 June, appeared to deepen divisions. Although
creating some volatility in markets, there appears to be little impact
on growth as yet, with business sentiment still at elevated levels.
The tax-reform policies implemented at the end of 2017, combined
with an agreement to increase federal spending, continues to
underpin a solid economic outlook. Inflationary pressures were
depressed through 2017, but more recent data suggests a modest
acceleration. We believe headline inflation is likely to remain above
2% in 2018 and could reach a peak of 3% if oil prices remain
elevated. The combination of strong growth and loose fiscal policy
means that we expect the Fed to continue to gradually tighten
policy until signs of economic slowdown become apparent or
financial conditions tighten significantly.
Yields on 10-year US Treasuries have been unable to move above
3% on a sustained basis, partially a result of strong demand from
US pension funds who are buying bonds to match long-term
liabilities. One consequence of the tax-reform plan is that
corporates are rushing to make pension fund contributions before
a drop in corporate tax rates later in the year reduces the tax
benefit. A surprise acceleration in inflation, possibly buoyed by
higher trade tariffs, could be a risk for bond markets, especially
if it were to come at a point when pension fund demand was
dissipating and Treasury supply increasing. In the short term,
however, the upward move in yields over the year has reduced the
overvaluation in bond markets, moving them closer to fair value –
meaning that we believe a significant duration underweight is no
longer appropriate.
Figure 3: US yield curve has flattened
Yiel
d (%
)
30 June 2018 31 March 2018 30 June 2017
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0June 30, 2017
March 31, 2018
June 30, 2018
30Y10Y7Y5Y3Y2Y1Y6M3M1M
Maturity
Source: Bloomberg, as at 30 June 2018.
7
8
GLOBAL INVESTMENT GRADE CREDIT
NOT YET TIMETO ADD RISK
Peter Bentley Head of UK and Global Credit
• Credit spreads continue their choppy run
• Political risk remains a concern, but markets will benefit from
low supply over summer
• Given valuations, adding risk at these levels does not look
attractive
Following the volatility shock in the first quarter of 2018, global
credit spreads continued their choppy performance in Q2,
widening to their widest levels since December 2016.
Political uncertainty continued to be a major market concern,
particularly as international trade tensions showed no signs of
cooling, leaving open the possibility of a trade war. The US pushed
through with its tariffs on steel, threatened 20% tariffs on EU
carmakers and implemented its first round of tariffs against China
(while securing no deal to avoid further escalation).
From a sector perspective, volatility was felt in the European auto
sector. Elsewhere in Europe, the formation of the new anti-
establishment Italian coalition prompted weakness in Italian
financials in line with the sovereign, reflecting the government’s
unfunded fiscal expansion plans and further political risk.
Continued anxiety over what many have begun to dub
“quantitative tightening” also likely contributed to risk market
weakness. The Fed pushed ahead with both its hiking cycle and
reduction of its balance sheet. Early in the quarter the ECB
significantly slowed its corporate bond purchases, raising
concerns of a ‘stealth taper’. However, it later attributed this to
“seasonal” factors, reassuring the market, and its subsequent
announcement that its asset purchases will conclude at year-end
was broadly in line with market expectations.
Looking ahead, credit markets are in something of a tricky spot.
On the one hand, the global economy looks robust, though
growth now looks less globally synchronised. Corporate earnings
growth still looks strong. On the other hand, valuations do not
look particularly compelling and most sectors are increasingly
showing ‘late cycle’ signs. Political risk is far from receding, at a
time in which central bank support is fading.
Tactically though, as the summer lull causes issuance to dry up,
absent political surprises, we believe credit markets will have little
reason to sell off over the coming few weeks. A short position
would sacrifice carry and could be costly. A modest, and very
cautious, long position (with tactical hedges where necessary),
could be the optimal path. It is unlikely to be the time to materially
add risk.
Figure 4: Global investment grade credit spreads continued to widen
50
100
150
200
250 Global credit spreads (RHS, bp)
Jul 18Jan 18Jul 17Jan 17Jul 16Jan 16Jul 15Jan 15Jul 14Jan 14Jul 13
Global credit spreads
Spre
ad (b
p)
Source: Bloomberg, as at July 2018. Global credit spreads represented by the ICE Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Corporate Index.
We believe credit markets will have
little reason to sell off over the coming
few weeksPETER BENTLEY
Figure 5: US dollar investment grade credit spreads
50
100
150
200
250
Jun 18Mar 18Dec 17Sep 17Jun 17Mar 17Dec 16Sep 16Jun 16Mar 16Dec 15
USD credit
Spre
ad (b
p)
Source: Bloomberg, as at 29 June 2018. Spreads as measured by the ICE BofAML US Corporate Index.
US INVESTMENT GRADE CREDIT
AFTER SUMMER BEWARE THE FALL
Jesse Fogarty Senior Portfolio Manager
• Credit spreads widen for second quarter running
• Trade tensions deepen, raising risk of trade war
• Valuations still look tight overall, tactically market should be
supported over summer
The second quarter was another tricky one in the credit markets.
US dollar investment grade credit indices widened by around
15bp. Investment grade credit continued to underperform other
risk markets including the high yield and equity markets as
negative technicals outweighed the fundamentals. This is only the
second quarter that credit spreads have risen since September
2015. That being said, the move was not dramatic, and credit
spreads are still not far off their post-crisis lows, having
only reverted to early-2017 levels.
Political developments continued to contribute to the softer
market. Trade tensions rose between the US and China. In addition
to steel tariffs, the US readied its first round of tariffs against
$34bn of Chinese goods, with the Chinese government
responding in kind with tariffs on products such as soybeans and
other farming products. President Trump also threatened the EU
with 20% tariffs on imported autos unless “tariffs and barriers are
not broken down soon and removed”. Although the measures
announced were relatively modest, concerns increased that the
situation could worsen.
Other concerns over monetary policy normalisation also appeared
to impact risk assets. Investors seemed to increasingly accept the
Fed’s intention to hike policy rates once per quarter, and its
intention to accelerate the reduction of its balance sheet.
Looking ahead, on a tactical basis, we believe credit spreads are
likely to grind tighter into the summer, partly as technical factors
take effect such as the annual lull in supply. However, from
September onwards, the market could come under pressure again.
While we expect Q2 earnings to put in a solid showing, and
economic growth looks both strong and sustainable at this stage,
valuations look stretched. Despite the back-up in yields, at this
stage it is probably not attractive enough a time to materially
increase risks. Instead, we think maintaining a modest tactical
long for now is likely to be attractive.
10
EMERGING MARKET DEBT
A TECHNICALLY DRIVEN SELL-OFF
Colm McDonagh Head of Emerging Market Fixed Income
• Technical factors have driven the recent sell-off
• Emerging market fundamentals remain sound
• Indiscriminate selling has created opportunities for less
constrained investors
It was another difficult quarter for emerging market debt (EMD).
There was considerable divergence between local currency debt,
the key underperformer with a -10.4% return (as measured by the
JPMorgan GBI-EM Global Diversified Index), followed by sovereign
debt at -3.5% (JPMorgan EMBI Global Diversified Index) and
corporate debt at -1.8% (JPMorgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Index).
High yield assets were disproportionately impacted as sentiment
soured. Chief among investor concerns are monetary policy
normalisation and trade protectionism. The great unwind of
accommodative monetary policy continues apace, and with this
comes a reversal of the ‘search for yield’ flows that such policy
attracted into EMD, and increased volatility. Although global
growth is robust, this policy normalisation comes as concerns
grow over trade protectionism. Investors have largely disbelieved
President Trump’s protectionist threats, but this has started to
change as the dispute between the US and China escalates, with
the US administration seemingly determined to ratchet up tariffs
on Chinese imports.
This backdrop of global macro uncertainty has intensified the
focus on emerging markets’ vulnerabilities. While investors have
singled out countries (such as Argentina and Turkey) which are
perceived as being most vulnerable to a shift in global financial
conditions, the selling pressure has become increasingly
indiscriminate. Much of this can be attributed to an unwind of
‘cross-over’ or non-dedicated EMD investor positioning. What
began as nervousness caused by an unstable macro environment
has morphed into a focus on emerging markets’ perceived
vulnerabilities. These investors, many of whom entered the asset
class during the 2016/17 rally, now appear to be looking to exit
their positions at the same time. The end result has been
significant market dislocation and higher EMD risk premia.
While specific countries’ vulnerabilities undoubtedly exist, our
view is that emerging market fundamentals are on a solid
trajectory. The growth backdrop for emerging markets continues
to improve relative to developed markets, and this should
continue to support longer-term flows into EMD. There has been a
focus on countries with current account concerns, but deficits
across emerging markets have reduced on aggregate since 2013
and are now within 3% of GDP. And while government borrowing
has increased since 2008, similar to developed markets, the
composition of this debt has undergone a considerable
transformation, rendering emerging markets more resilient (local
currency rather than hard currency debt accounts for most of the
increase). Ultimately, unless investors believe cross-over outflows
will continue, it may pay to consider adding some EMD risk. If 2013
serves as a good reference point, much of the sell-off has already
likely materialised. We believe the premia on offer across EMD
more than compensate for the risks associated with the uncertain
external backdrop. We believe valuations look increasingly
compelling given our fundamental outlook.
Figure 6: EMD valuations
200
300
400
500
600 M corporate spread
M sovereign spread
Jul 18Jan 18Jul 17Jan 17Jul 16Jan 16Jul 15Jan 15Jul 14Jan 14Jul 13
EM corporate spread (LHS) EM sovereign spread (LHS) Local yield (RHS)
Spre
ad (b
p)
5
6
7
8
Local yield
Yield (%)
Source: Bloomberg, as at 20 July 2018. Index definitions are JPMorgan EMBI Global Diversified (EM Sovereign), JPMorgan CEMBI Broad Diversified (EM corporate), JPMorgan GBI-EM Global Diversified (EM Local yield).
11
We expect returns to be primarily driven by income through the remainder of 2018
RANBIR SINGH LAKHPURI
13
SECURED LOANS
INVESTORS PUSH BACK AS SUPPLY RISES
Ranbir Singh Lakhpuri Senior Portfolio Manager, Secured Finance
• Technical backdrop remains strong, even with elevated
issuance levels
• Strong demand for asset class likely to remain
• Investors’ ability to push back on documentation growing
The first half of 2018 has been dominated by a surge in supply.
In Europe there was €13.3bn of new issuance, significantly higher
than the €8.8bn issued over the same period in 2017. In the US,
loan issuance accelerated into the end of Q2. In June there was
$60bn of new issuance added to the S&P Leveraged Loan Index,
a 50% increase from an already-busy May.
With issuance at such high levels, investors were able to be more
selective and pushed back against weak documentation through
the quarter. The ratio of issuer-friendly price flexes to investor-
friendly price flexes in the US fell from 6.8 in Q1 to just 1.1 in Q2.
A similar trend was clear in Europe, but demand was apparent
once documentation was tightened.
Excess supply, combined with concerns around a potential global
trade war, weighed on secondary markets, which softened over
the quarter. Only 21.6% of US loans were bid at par or higher at the
end of June, while the average bid for European institutional term
loans ended June at 98.22.
Going into the second half of the year, the near-term forecast is for
better-balanced market conditions, barring any unexpected
shocks to the system or a material increase in interest rates that
draws even more cash into the asset class. We expect returns to
be primarily driven by income through the remainder of 2018,
with minimal default activity and stable loan prices supported by
strong demand from US collateralised loan obligation (CLO)
issuance, along with institutional and retail fund flows looking for
floating rate debt.
Figure 7: US loan market principal amount
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,0002nd Lien Loans
Inst'l 1st Lien Loans
201820142010200620021998
Prin
cipa
l am
ount
($m
)
n Institutional 1st Lien Loans n 2nd Lien Loans
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, S&P/LCD, ICE Data Indices LLC, as at 30 June 2018.
14
HIGH YIELD
HIGH YIELD MARKET VOLATILE BUT GROWTH REMAINS SUPPORTIVE
Uli Gerhard Senior Portfolio Manager, High Yield
• High yield debt markets remained volatile due to political
uncertainty and outflows
• Default rates expected to remain low given broadly positive
economic growth outlook
• Emerging market corporates face a range of risks
High yield debt experienced increased volatility over the quarter,
with six deals pulled in the European market. Sentiment was
affected by concerns over the Italian political situation, as well as
weakness in emerging markets, though economic data continued
to be broadly positive. Over the three months, the US high yield
market generated a small positive return, while European high
yield recorded a loss.
The economic environment, translating into positive earnings
momentum, continues to be positive for the asset class. While
investment grade funds have recently pulled back from investing
in high yield, they have done so in a relatively orderly fashion.
There are heightened credit concerns in some sectors (particularly
in the US), but defaults continue to run at low levels, supported by
the stable macroeconomic backdrop and solid capital markets.
We expect growth in the US and Europe to be enough to support
earnings momentum through the rest of this year and 2019,
keeping defaults low. However, the rate of growth in Europe has
moderately slowed and the direction of the Italian economy is of
concern. Moreover, some of the tariffs announced by the Trump
administration are set to come into effect soon, and we await the
effect on credit and clarity on what happens next.
With regard to technical factors, US and European investors
continued to sell shorter-dated paper, given rising redemptions
and higher interest rates. Year-to-date fund flows have been
negative, but we do not foresee a significant increase in supply
over the next few months. We do not expect European interest
rates to move significantly higher this year – this expectation was
reinforced by the comments from ECB President Draghi, who
stated rates were unlikely to increase before late 2019. This
benign backdrop should help to underpin demand from
investment grade accounts. However, given the risk of short-term
volatility, we continue to remain vigilant.
Risks we are alert to include heightened volatility and the
evaporation of liquidity in some emerging market corporates. We
expect comments from the Trump administration regarding
companies and sectors outside the US to result in periods of
extreme volatility. There are a variety of country-specific risks that
we are alert to: in Mexico the ongoing threat of NAFTA dissolution,
in Brazil, we will stay cautious into the October election; and we
are also keeping an eye on the Chinese yuan, and the Chinese
government’s decision to push liquidity into the domestic system
to support growth.
Figure 8: European high yield spreads widened by more than US high yield in Q2 2018
US high yield
European high yield
200
400
600
800
1000HE00
H0A0
Jun 18Dec 17Jun 17Dec 16Jun 16
Spre
ad (b
p)
Source: Bloomberg, as at 30 June 2018. US high yield spreads as measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Master II Index. European high yield spreads as measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch Euro High Yield Index.
15
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES
FUNDAMENTALS REMAIN STRONG AS SUPPLY INCREASES
Shaheer Guirguis Head of Secured Finance
• Asset-backed securities (ABS) markets remained steady
through a volatile period for risk assets
• Recent weakness driven by increased supply rather than
fundamentals
• ABS markets still offer compelling strategic value given
fundamental credit quality and security
ABS markets remained relatively steady through a volatile quarter
for risk assets, with European ABS and US structured credit
markets moving largely in line with each other, though there were
pockets of volatility and some weakness late in the period. Early in
the quarter, investor sentiment broadly improved as trade-war
rhetoric appeared to fade and economic data showed signs of
stabilising, and risk assets performed well. However, in May,
sentiment turned as tariff disputes began to escalate and
uncertainty grew over the US-North Korean relationship. The
Italian election result had a sharp impact on risk assets. Markets
settled somewhat later in the quarter, but concerns continued to
rise over the impact of tariffs. Through this uncertainty and
volatility, ABS markets were relatively stable, though some areas
were affected by wider news.
The European ABS market began the quarter generating carry-
style returns, with relative performance within the market driven
by technical factors – the UK non-conforming market
outperformed as the available float shrank, while CLOs
underperformed in the wake of heavy issuance. The market
remained relatively steady in May, even as risk assets came under
heavy pressure due to escalating uncertainty. In response to
Italian political developments, lower-rated Italian commercial
mortgage backed-securities suffered, as did BB/BBB-rated CLOs,
but technical support – including continued ECB activity – helped
other segments of the market to remain steady. Late in the
quarter, the market weakened somewhat as lower-beta sectors,
like UK AAA-rated RMBS, suffered as supply surged; while spreads
in higher-beta sectors, such as CLOs, widened due to both supply
and weaker demand. Overall, we would note that issuance in
European ABS markets rose over the quarter. We believe this
reflects issuers seeking to wean themselves from the ECB asset
purchase programme.
The US structured credit market, as noted above, broadly moved
in line with the European ABS market. Early in the quarter, most
sectors recorded carry-style returns, and continued to remain
relatively steady through the wider market volatility in May.
However, there was some June weakness in higher-beta sectors
such as the credit risk transfer and CLO markets. Over the quarter,
supply picked up in sectors such as commercial real estate CLOs,
and from emerging sectors like mortgage insurance.
Recent weakness in the European ABS market, and US structured
credit market, has been driven by supply rather than any changes
in fundamentals. In Europe, markets have been re-pricing as ECB
asset purchases wind down, and it is not yet clear if the ECB will
reinvest maturing debt in the ABS market after the programme
ends. We have modestly reduced risk in our ABS portfolios, but
continue to believe ABS markets offer compelling strategic value
given the fundamental credit quality and security of the assets.
Figure 9: ABS spreads versus Libor were broadly stable – until late in Q2
Italian RMBS Snr UK RMBS AA GBP 5 Yr EURO CLO AA 7-8yCMBS Snr Euro
European EUR Autos Snr UK Non-Conforming RMBS Snr GBP
0
50
100
150
200
250CMBS Snr Euro
UK Non-Conforming RMBS Snr GBP
European EUR Autos Snr
EURO CLO AA 7-8y
UK RMBS AA GBP 5 Yr
Italian RMBS Snr
Jun 18Dec 17Jun 17Dec 16Jun 16
Spre
ad (b
p)
Source: JP Morgan as at 29 June 2018.
16
CURRENCIES
US ECONOMIC OUTPERFORMANCE DRIVES UP THE DOLLAR
Paul Lambert Head of Currency
• Economic growth outperforming relative to other countries,
and rising trade tensions, boosted the US dollar (USD)
• Emerging market currencies weakened across the board
• USD strength likely to persist for now
The USD reversed its weakening trend in the second quarter, rising
by 2.3% on a trade-weighted basis. The currency was supported by
the ongoing economic growth outlook in the US as well as the
growing divergence in policy between the Fed and other central
banks. In June, the Fed raised rates by 25bp, and raised its median
rate projections for 2018 and 2019. The USD also gained on the
back of rising trade tensions during the period, particularly versus
growth-sensitive commodity and emerging market currencies.
Emerging market currencies were weaker across the board. At the
beginning of the quarter, the Russian rouble (RUB) was among the
weakest performers, as the imposition of tough sanctions by the
US on Russia led investors to cut widely held long positions in the
currency. The Turkish lira also weakened notably, but recovered
somewhat in May as the combination of 300bp of emergency rate
hikes and a simplification of the Turkish central bank’s monetary
policy framework succeeded in stabilising the currency – it ended
the quarter down 13.9%. The Chinese renminbi meanwhile fell by
5.2%, as the US announced it would be imposing tariffs on a
growing range of Chinese imports.
A dovish ECB policy statement and weak data drove the EUR down
by 5.2% over Q2. Politics also weighed on the EUR in May, as
struggles to form a government in Italy led to a widening in
peripheral spreads.
US cyclical outperformance is supporting the USD, particularly
versus other major currencies. At the same time trade tensions are
leading to USD strength versus growth-sensitive currencies that
will suffer the most if global trade is disrupted. In our view this
combination can persist for now. Looking ahead, however, we are
mindful that the cyclical US outperformance is stretched relative to
history, and we are alert to any signs that relative growth rates are
starting to converge which would be negative for the USD. Any
improvement in relations between the US and its trading partners,
especially China, could also see a turnaround in USD sentiment.
Figure 10: USD strengthened in Q2
70
80
90
100
110
Jun 18Dec 17Jun 17Dec 16Jun 16Dec 15Jun 15Dec 14Jun 14Dec 13
Inde
x le
vel
USD trade-weighted index
Source: Bloomberg, as at 29 June 2018.
CREDIT
HIGHYIELD
BANK LOANS
SECUREDFINANCE
CREDITANALYSIS
RESPONSIBLEINVESTMENT
GLOBALCREDIT
GLOBALRATES
MONEYMARKETS
EUROPEANCREDIT
INFLATIONLINKED
US FIXEDINCOME
EMD
CURRENCY
TRADING
IMPLEMENTATIONAND OPERATIONS
PRODUCTSPECIALISTS
Adrian Grey
CIO ACTIVE MANAGEMENT Head of Fixed Income
This document is a financial promotion and is not investment advice. Unless otherwise attributed the views and opinions expressed are those of Insight Investment at the time of publication and are subject to change. This document may not be used for the purposes of an offer or solicitation to anyone in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorised or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. Insight does not provide tax or legal advice to its clients and all investors are strongly urged to seek professional advice regarding any potential strategy or investment. Issued by Insight Investment Management (Global) Limited. Registered office 160 Queen Victoria Street, London EC4V 4LA. Registered in England and Wales. Registered number 00827982. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Firm reference number 119308.© 2017 Insight Investment. All rights reserved.
FIND OUT MORE
Institutional Business Development [email protected] +44 20 7321 1552
European Business Development [email protected] +49 69 12014 2650 +44 20 7321 1928
Consultant Relationship Management [email protected] +44 20 7321 1023
Client Relationship Management [email protected] +44 20 7321 1499
@InsightInvestIM
company/insight-investment
www.insightinvestment.com
14094-06-18
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
RISK DISCLOSURESPast performance is not indicative of future results. Investment in any strategy involves a risk of loss which may partly be due to exchange rate fluctuations.
The performance results shown, whether net or gross of investment management fees, reflect the reinvestment of dividends and/or income and other earnings. Any gross of fees performance does not include fees and charges and these can have a material detrimental effect on the performance of an investment.
Any target performance aims are not a guarantee, may not be achieved and a capital loss may occur. Strategies which have a higher performance aim generally take more risk to achieve this and so have a greater potential for the returns to be significantly different than expected.
Portfolio holdings are subject to change, for information only and are not investment recommendations.
ASSOCIATED INVESTMENT RISKSFixed income
Where the portfolio holds over 35% of its net asset value in securities of one governmental issuer, the value of the portfolio may be profoundly affected if one or more of these issuers fails to meet its obligations or suffers a ratings downgrade.
A credit default swap (CDS) provides a measure of protection against defaults of debt issuers but there is no assurance their use will be effective or will have the desired result.
The issuer of a debt security may not pay income or repay capital to the bondholder when due.
Derivatives may be used to generate returns as well as to reduce costs and/or the overall risk of the portfolio. Using derivatives can involve a higher level of risk. A small movement in the price of an underlying investment may result in a disproportionately large movement in the price of the derivative investment.
Investments in emerging markets can be less liquid and riskier than more developed markets and difficulties in accounting, dealing, settlement and custody may arise.
Investments in bonds are affected by interest rates and inflation trends which may affect the value of the portfolio.
Where high yield instruments are held, their low credit rating indicates a greater risk of default, which would affect the value of the portfolio.
The investment manager may invest in instruments which can be difficult to sell when markets are stressed.
Where leverage is used as part of the management of the portfolio through the use of swaps and other derivative instruments, this can increase the overall volatility. While leverage presents opportunities for increasing total returns, it has the effect of potentially increasing losses as well. Any event that adversely affects the value of an investment would be magnified to the extent that leverage is employed by the portfolio. Any losses would therefore be greater than if leverage were not employed.