r. lacey, suny stony brook phenix measurements of anisotropic flow in heavy-ion collisions at rhic...
TRANSCRIPT
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
PHENIX Measurements of Anisotropic Flow in Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC
Energies
PHENIX Measurements of Anisotropic Flow in Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC
Energies
1
Nuclear Chemistry Group , SUNY
Stony Brook, NY
for the PHENIX Collaboration
Arkadiy Taranenko
The 2nd International Conference on the Initial Stages in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions,
Napa Valley, California, 3-7/12/2014
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
PHENIX VPHENIX Vn n Measurements at RHIC Measurements at RHICPHENIX VPHENIX Vn n Measurements at RHIC Measurements at RHIC
2
1) Introduction
2) Methods / flow and non-flow
3) System size dependence of anisotropy?
4) Azimuthal anisotropy in small systems: d+Au and 3He+Au at 200GeV
5) PID Vn results and hadronization at RHIC
6) PID V2 results: comparison with LHC
7) Conclusions and Outlookε2
ε3
ε4
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
PHENIX Flow Measurements : MethodsPHENIX Flow Measurements : MethodsPHENIX Flow Measurements : MethodsPHENIX Flow Measurements : Methods
3
1
1 2 cos ( )n nn
dNv n
d
n , 1, 2,3..,{ } co sn nv n n
Correlate hadrons in central Arms
with event plane (RXN, etc)
(I) pairs
1
1 2 cos( )a bn n
n
dNv v n
d
(II)
∆φ correlation function for EPN - EPS
∆φ correlation function for EP - CA
Central Arms (CA) |η’| < 0.35
(particle detection)
ψn RXN (||=1.0~2.8)
MPC (||=3.1~3.7)
BBC (||=3.1~3.9)From 2012:
- FVTX (1.5<||<3)
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
PHENIX Flow Measurements : MethodsPHENIX Flow Measurements : MethodsPHENIX Flow Measurements : MethodsPHENIX Flow Measurements : Methods
4
ψn RXN (||=1.0~2.8)
MPC (||=3.1~3.7)
BBC (||=3.1~3.9)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 062301 (2010) Vn (EP): Phys.Rev.Lett. 107 (2011) 252301
Good agreement between VGood agreement between Vn n results results
obtained by event plane (EP) and two-obtained by event plane (EP) and two-particle correlation method (2PC)particle correlation method (2PC)
No evidence for significant No evidence for significant ηη-dependent -dependent non-flow contributions from di-jets for non-flow contributions from di-jets for pT=0.3-3.5 GeV/c. pT=0.3-3.5 GeV/c. Systematic uncertainty : event plane: 2-5% for v2 and 5-12% for v3.
arXiv:1412.1038 , arXiv:1412.1043
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
5
Recent PHENIX publications on flow at RHIC:Recent PHENIX publications on flow at RHIC:1) 1) Systematic Study of Azimuthal Anisotropy in Cu+Cuand
Au+Au Collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV: arXiv:1412.1043
2) 2) Measurement of the higher-order anisotropic flow coefficients for identified hadrons in Au+Au collisions at
200 GeV : arXiv:1412.1038
Recent PHENIX publications on flow at RHIC:Recent PHENIX publications on flow at RHIC:1) 1) Systematic Study of Azimuthal Anisotropy in Cu+Cuand
Au+Au Collisions at 62.4 and 200 GeV: arXiv:1412.1043
2) 2) Measurement of the higher-order anisotropic flow coefficients for identified hadrons in Au+Au collisions at
200 GeV : arXiv:1412.1038
5
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
• Eccentricity scaling is broken and v2/ɛ depends on the Knudsen number K=λ/Ṝ, where λ is the mean free path and Ṝ is the transverse size of the system. How viscous damping depends on the size of the colliding system / beam energy?
6
Centrality dependence of v2 in CuCu/AuAu collisions at 62.4-200 GeVCentrality dependence of v2 in CuCu/AuAu collisions at 62.4-200 GeVCentrality dependence of v2 in CuCu/AuAu collisions at 62.4-200 GeVCentrality dependence of v2 in CuCu/AuAu collisions at 62.4-200 GeV
5
σx & σy RMS widths of density distributionGeometric fluctuations included
Geometric quantities constrained by multiplicity density.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
7
ln n
n
v
R
ε
- Viscous Hydrodynamics
Slope parameter β″ is nearly the same for Au+Au at 62.4-200 GeV, but shows change from Au+Au to Cu+Cu at 200 GeV . Bigger viscous damping in smaller systems / different beam energy dependence?
PRL112, 082302(2014)
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
8
Flow in symmetric colliding systems : Cu+Cu vs Au+Au
8
Phys.Rev.Lett. 107 (2011) 252301
Strong centrality dependence of v2 in AuAu, CuCu
Weak centrality dependence of v3
2( )expn T
n
v pn
ε
Scaling
expectation:
Simultaneus measurements of
v2 and v3 Crucial constraint for η/s
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
9
Centrality/Pt dependence of v2, v3 in 200 GeV Cu+Au
9
- Clear centrality dependence of v2
- No Significant centrality dependence of v3
Same centrality dependence as seen in symmetric collisions: Au+Au and Cu+Cu
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
10
v2, in 200 GeV Cu+Au vs Cu+Cu/Au+Au
10Phys.Rev. C84 (2011) 067901
The observed system size dependence of v2: AuAu>Cu+Au>CuCu originate from the differences in initial ɛ2
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
11
v3 in 200 GeV Cu+Au vs Cu+Cu/Au+Au
11Phys.Rev. C84 (2011) 067901
The observed system size independence of v3 Is expected from the similar values of ɛ3
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
Long range correlation in d+Au/3He+Au
12Ridges are seen on both Au-going and 3He-going sides
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
The v2 and v3 in 3He+Au
The v2 of 3He+Au
is similar to that of d+Au
A clear v3 signal is observed in 0-5% 3He+Au collisions
13
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
The v2 of and p in d+Au
Mass ordering for identified hadron is observed in both d+Au and p+Pb ---- consistent with hydrodynamic flow
14
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
15
v2 of Identified charged hadrons Au+Au/Cu+Cu at 200 GeV arXiv:1412.1043
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
16
v2 , v3 , v4 of Identified charged hadrons Au+Au at 200 GeV arXiv:1412.1038
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
17
Scaling Properties of Vn Flow at 200 GeV arXiv:1412.1038
/2 n, 2, /2
vv ( ) ~ v or
( )n
n q T q nq
KEn
NCQ-scaling holds well for v2,v3,v4 below 1GeV in KET space, at 200GeV
2
2 2
( )exp ( 4)
( )n T n
T
v pn
v p
ε ε
vn is related to v2
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
18
arXiv:1412.1038 , arXiv:1412.1043
V2(pt) shape if very similar for charged pions between RHIC/LHC: 10-14% difference
The difference in eccentricities between : ɛ2(PbPb at 2.76TeV) and ɛ2(Au+Au at 200 GeV) will increase the difference by 5-7%.
PHENIX ALICE: CERN-PH-EP-2014-104 e-Print: arXiv:1405.4632
Comparison with LHC ALICE Pb+Pb at 2.76 TeV : charged pions
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
19
arXiv:1412.1038 , arXiv:1412.1043PHENIX ALICE:: arXiv:1405.4632
Comparison with LHC ALICE Pb+Pb at 2.76 TeV : (anti)protons
apply blueshift to RHIC data
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
20
arXiv:1412.1038 , arXiv:1412.1043
Difference in kaons between RHIC and LHC looks complicated, especially the difference between charged and neutral kaons at LHC.
PHENIX ALICE: CERN-PH-EP-2014-104 e-Print: arXiv:1405.4632
Comparison with LHC ALICE Pb+Pb at 2.76 TeV : kaons
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
Summary
• V2 and V3 studied in different colliding systems: Au+Au/Cu+Cu and Cu+Au:
– Similar magnitudes and trends observed both v2 and v3, independent of system
– Viscous damping effects appear to be larger for smaller systems
• The ridge is observed in d+Au and 3He+Au. – Similar magnitudes observed for v2– v3 signal observed for 3He+Au– Mass ordering observed; splitting less than observed at LHC
• The vn of identified charged hadrons presented as a function of pT and centrality
– Mass ordering for all harmonics at all centralities studied – Measurements can be scaled by generalized quark number
scaling
21
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
22
Backup Slides
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
23
A B
Geometric fluctuations included
Geometric quantities constrained by multiplicity density.
*cosn nnε
Phys. Rev. C 81, 061901(R) (2010)
arXiv:1203.3605
σx & σy RMS widths of density distribution
Geometric quantities for scaling
Geometry
Roy A. Lacey, Stony Brook University, QM2014
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
24
PHENIX Flow Measurements : Event Plane ResolutionPHENIX Flow Measurements : Event Plane ResolutionPHENIX Flow Measurements : Event Plane ResolutionPHENIX Flow Measurements : Event Plane Resolution
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
25
centrality (%)
n=2 RXNn=3 RXNn=4 RXNn=2 MPCn=3 MPC
n =
<co
s n
(n
(mea
s.) -
n(t
rue))>
200GeV Au+Au
PHENIX Preliminary
PHENIX Flow Measurements : Event Plane ResolutionPHENIX Flow Measurements : Event Plane ResolutionPHENIX Flow Measurements : Event Plane ResolutionPHENIX Flow Measurements : Event Plane Resolution
ψn RXN (||=1.0~2.8)
MPC (||=3.1~3.7)
BBC (||=3.1~3.9)
Overall good event plane resolution
for Vn measurements and study beam energy dependence of the flow.
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
• Significant bias from near-side jet for |Δη|<0.5
• Consistent for larger Δη at pT<4 GeV
• Deviation again for pT>4 GeV due to swing of recoil jet
• EP method ( |Δη|< 2.5 with EP from full FCAL: 3.3<|Ƞ|<4.8 )
26
Effect of rapidity gap on VEffect of rapidity gap on Vn n measurements at LHC measurements at LHCEffect of rapidity gap on VEffect of rapidity gap on Vn n measurements at LHC measurements at LHC
J. Jia [ ATLAS Collaboration ]
QM 2011
ATLAS AN: http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/13524588
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
• Significant bias from near-side jet for |Δη|<0.5
• Consistent for larger Δη at pT<4 GeV
• Deviation again for pT>4 GeV due to swing of recoil jet
• EP method ( |Δη|< 2.5 with EP from full FCAL: 3.3<|Ƞ|<4.8 )
27
Effect of rapidity gap on VEffect of rapidity gap on Vn n measurements at LHC measurements at LHCEffect of rapidity gap on VEffect of rapidity gap on Vn n measurements at LHC measurements at LHC
J. Jia [ ATLAS Collaboration ]
QM 2011
ATLAS AN: http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/13524585
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
28
Differential v2(pT): Comparison with STAR Multi-particle methods
Ratio V2 {STAR} / V2{PHENIX EP} < 1.0 for 4p cumulant and LYZ method .
LYZ : Lee-Yang-Zeros Method
Lee-Yang-Zeros Method4p cumulant method
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
29
Elliptic Flow Measurements V2 (pT , centrality) in PHOBOS/STAR/PHENIX
TPC FTPCZDC/SMD
FTPCZDC/SMD
η
Central Arms BBC/MPCBBC/MPC ZDC/SMDZDC/SMD
|η| < 1.3
|η|<0.35η
2.5 <|η|< 4.0 |η| > 6.3
3.1<|η|<3.7
RXNRXN
|η| > 6.61.0<|η|<2.8
3.1<|η|<3.9
STAR
PHENIX
2.05<|η|<3.2η
EPEP
PHOBOSη = 0-1.6
29
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
30
Elliptic Flow of Charged Hadrons: Au+Au at 39-200 GeV
No significant change in v2(pT) for √s = 39 -200 GeV !
Precision DataPrecision DataPrecision DataPrecision Data
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
31
PHENIX: Extensive anisotropy DataPHENIX: Extensive anisotropy Data
Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 062301 (2010)
High precision double differential measurements
Phys.Rev.C81:034907,2010
31
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
32
• KET/nq< 1GeV – soft physics
Hydrodynamic flow
•Interplay soft-hard 3.0 < pT< 5 GeV/c ?
•Hard dominates: pT> 5 GeV/c
32
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
PHENIX Preliminary
PHENIX Preliminary
KET & nq scaling validated for v2 as a function of centrality
Flow scales across centralityFlow scales across centralityFlow scales across centralityFlow scales across centrality
PHENIX PreliminaryPHENIX Preliminary
PHENIX Preliminary PHENIX Preliminary
33
33
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
34
VV44 : A Small, But Sensitive Observable For Heavy Ion Collisions : A Small, But Sensitive Observable For Heavy Ion Collisions
Do we have qualitative agreement ? Answer is : YES!!!
J.Phys.G35:104105,2008,J.Phys.G36:064061,2009
PHENIX: QM 08, WWND 08, DNP 08, QM 09 STAR: WWND 09, QM 2009
STAR preliminary
STAR preliminary
V4 ~ k * (V22) – very small signal
34
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
35
Are Flow Measurements at RHIC Reliable?: PHENIX / PHOBOS
from PHOBOS QM06 proc. J. Phys. G34 S887 (2007)
EP{2}EP{1}η
PHOBOS EP: 2.05<|η|<3.2
Overall good agreement between differential flow measurements
EP: 1.0<|η|<2.8
EP: 3.1<|η|<3.7
35
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
36
Are Flow Measurements at RHIC Reliable?: PHENIX / STAR (2)
For 0-20% central collisions STAR V2 > PHENIX V2 :
Is rapidity gap in STAR TPC too small ? Need detailed comparison with STAR FTPC results (2.5 <|η|< 4.0 )
Do we have the same centrality definition between experiments?
R. Lacey, SUNY Stony Brook
V2{EP} – standard EP method
V2{EP2} – modified EP method
EP-StarEP-Star
37
Are Flow Measurements at RHIC Reliable?: PHENIX / STAR (1)
Overall good agreement for mid-central collisions with STAR results obtained using modified EP method ( exclude |Δη|<0.5 )