race, place, and opportunity: the role of structures in (re)producing inequality
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
john a. powell
Executive Director, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity
Williams Chair in Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, Moritz College of Law
The Thomas Jefferson District of the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations 2010 Anti-racism Conference-Building the World We Want: Race, Place and Community
October 9, 2010 Richmond, VA
Race, place, and the distribution of opportunityOpportunity isolation How structures create, maintain, and perpetuate racial
disparities
How race operates in U.S. society Social construction of race Implicit bias Framing
Ensuring equitable access to opportunities for all
2
“We are a vibrant, diverse faith community of healthy congregations that is a prophetic
model of anti-racism and anti-oppression. We are called to collaborate with other faith and community groups to transform our society.”
3
District Vision Statement:
Inequality has a geographic footprint.
4
5
6
Outcomes
&
Behaviors
Social
Physical
Cultural
Opportunity includes access to:
Healthcare
Education
Employment
Services
Healthy food
7
Individual/family costs
Living in “concentrated disadvantage” reduces student IQ by 4 points, roughly the equivalent to missing one year of school (Sampson 2007)
Societal cost
Neighborhoods of concentrated poverty suppress property values by nearly 400 billion nationwide (Galster et al. 2007))
8
People of color are far more likely to live in opportunity-deprived neighborhoods and
communities.
It’s more than just a matter of choice.
9Photo: Sxc.hu; roniebow
10
Racialized…
• In 1960, African-American families in poverty were 3.8 times more likely to be concentrated in high-poverty neighborhoods than poor whites.
• In 2000, they were 7.3times morelikely.
Spatialized…
• Marginalized people of color and the very poor have been spatially isolated from opportunity:• Jim Crow, • ghettos, • barrios, etc.
Globalized…• Economic
globalization
• Climate change
• the Credit and Foreclosure crisis
Different communities are situated differently with respect to institutions and opportunity.
Community A has no insurance and
no hospitals in the area.
Community B has no insurance, but there’s a hospital down the street.
Community C has access to both insurance an a
hospital.
11
Problem: 3 people are out to sea and a big storm is coming
Goal: To reach the people within 6 hours
Assumption: If we can reach them within 6 hours, we will save them all.
12
But the 3 are not all in the stormy water in the same way…
Which person would be most likely to survive the 6 hours it would take to reach them??
If water is a “structure,”(housing, education, etc.) some groups are able to navigate the structure more successfully than other groups.
13
Example: Controlling for risk factors, African Americans were 15-30% more likely than whites to get subprime loans for purchase and for refinance
Likely refinance targets: elderly, often widowed, African American women in urban areas
For Latinos, similar numbers for purchase, not for refinance
Many Latino homebuyers were recent, first generation homebuyers who could not be automatically underwritten (multiple income earners, cash, local credit, etc.)
Sources: Graciela Aponte (National Council of La Raza) and Debbie Bocian (Center for Responsible Lending) presentations at The Economic Policy Institute panel “Race, Ethnicity and the Subprime Mortgage Crisis” on June 12, 2008 in WDC; and “Baltimore Finds Subprime Crisis Snags Women” in The New York Times online, Jan. 15, 2008 14
• “If they wanted to, they could pull themselves up by their bootstraps.”Is it culture?
• “If only people would stop stereotyping and discriminating….”
Is it interpersonal racism?
• “Institutions can interact in ways that are discriminatory.”Is it structural?
Is it some or all of the above?
15
A series of mutually reinforcing federal policies across multiple domains have contributed to the disparities we see today.
School Desegregation
Suburbanization/ Homeownership
Urban Renewal
Public Housing
Transportation
16
17
Lower EducationalOutcomes
Increased Flight
of Affluent Families
Racial and Economic
Neighborhood Segregation
SchoolSegregation &Concentrated
Poverty
Structures and policies are not neutral. They
unevenly distribute benefits and burdens.
Institutions can operate jointly to produce
racialized outcomes.
Example: A bird in a cage
Examining one wire cannot explain why a bird cannot fly.
But multiple wires, arranged in specific ways, reinforce each other and trap the bird.
18
19
Some people ride the “Up” escalator to reach
opportunity.
Others have to run up the “Down” escalator to get there.
Structural Barriers
One Dimensional:
One variable explains differential outcomes
Multidimensional:
The individual bars working together to cage the bird
… to an understanding of processes and relationships
20
We need to think about the ways in which the institutions that mediate opportunity are arranged – systems thinking.
21
Our relationship to these systems and the responsiveness of systems is both uneven and racialized.
While understanding the relationships that exist within a system is important, we need to look for nodes of influence and power.
Where are the levers that can enact change?
22
Our perceptions of race are shaped by our subconscious attitudes and by how messages are framed.
23
24
The racial categories into which we group people are not as problematic as the social meaning and racial hierarchy we assign to those groups.
People talk about race as though it is essential. This provokes some important questions:
How is race constructed?
By whom?
For what purpose?
What work does it do?
25
The fact that race is constructed implies that it has a history and that it is constantly changing.
People tend to misunderstand and underestimate the significance of this.
How does our perception of race change?
What forces are causing these changes?
26
Racial attitudes in the U.S. have improved significantly over time.
We have moved from segregation into a period of racial egalitarianism.
Interracial relationships are becoming more accepted.
We elected a biracial President.
The United States continues to be strongly divided by race.
Nationally, the black unemployment rate tends to be about twice as high as the white rate.
A black male born in 2001 has a 32% chance of spending time in prison at some point in his life, a Hispanic male has a 17% chance, and a white
male has a 6% chance.
http://www.sentencingproject.org/doc/publications/rd_reducingracialdisparity.pdf
27
Both these perspectives are true – how we frame issues of race matters.
Consider the false dichotomies we often use when we think and talk about race. These binaries are actually frames.
Black / White
Post-racialism / Civil Rights
Race is not important / Race matters
28
How messages are
framed affects how
they are perceived.
Implicit Bias
• People are meaning-making machines.
•Individual meaning•Collective meaning
•Only 2% of emotional cognition is available to us consciously
• Racial bias tends to reside in the unconscious network
We unconsciously think about race
even when we do not explicitly
discuss it.
29
30
31
Racialized outcomes do not require racist actors.
32
Distributions of Responses on Explicit (Self-reported) and Implicit Measures
GroupsCompared
Explicit Implicit
Nonwhite Neutral White Nonwhite Neutral White
Blacks/Whites 12% 56% 32% 12% 19% 69%
Asians/Whites 16% 57% 27% 11% 26% 63%
Note: Percentages represent the percent biased in favor of group.
Source: 94 California Law Review (2006), p. 957.
34
Are you right-brained or left-brained?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkJVqhEcHiY&feature=related
OR
http://www.moillusions.com/2007/06/spinning-sihouette-optical-illusion.html
35
36
Outside under a tree. The woman has an item balanced on
her head.
Indoors. There is a window
through which shrubbery
outside can be seen.
Your response is indicative of your cultural orientation.
37
38
Repeatedly exposing people to admired African Americans can may help counteract pro-white / anti-black IAT results…
BUT, a more productive strategy is to show both admired African Americans and infamous whites.
Joy-Gaba, J . A., & Nosek, B. A. (in press). The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations. Social Psychology. 39
40
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cH1S9DgLXQU&feature=channel_page
Be aware of implicit bias in your life. We are constantly being primed.
Debias by presenting positive alternatives.
Consider your conscious messaging & language. Affirmative action support varies based on whether it’s
presented as “assistance” or “preference.”
Engage in proactive affirmative efforts – not only on the cultural level but also the structural level.
41
Aligning our values and our structures
42
Maps can visually track the history and presence of discriminatory and exclusionary policies that spatially segregate people.
Identifying places with gaps in opportunity can help direct future investment.
43
44
45
Adopt strategies that open up access to levers of opportunity for marginalized individuals, families, and communities
Connect people to existing opportunities throughout the metropolitan region
Bring opportunities to opportunity-deprived areas
Invest in people, places, and linkages
46
Advocate for an opportunity-based approach to community development and housing advocacy
Support both in-place and mobility-based strategies to affirmatively provide access to opportunity
Adopt a multi-disciplinary, collaborative approach to advocacy
Design strategies that are sensitive to the unique challenges and strategic opportunities of each community
47Graphic: sxc.hu; shlomaster
48
49
We usually focus on how spirituality inspires social justice work, but not on how working for social justice informs spirituality.
Caring about other’s suffering is not just about relieving their suffering but about one’s own spiritual development.
Spirituality Social Justice
Our values and structures impact each other.
It’s not enough to have the right values. We need the right structures.
51
1. The inherent worth and dignity of every person;
2. Justice, equity and compassion in human relations;
3. Acceptance of one another and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations;
4. A free and responsible search for truth and meaning;
5. The right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large;
6. The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and justice for all;
7. Respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.
52http://www.uua.org/visitors/6798.shtml
“We started the journey, a spiritual one, to be truly ‘whole,’ to accept, respect, value each
person while responding to his/her behaviour on its own merits. Then we worked to change our own church institution, and finally started on all of those of American society. Sorry, we still have a long way to go. And this is where
you must carry on!”
53
~ Tomas Firle, member, First Unitarian Universalist Church of San Diego, CA
p. 586, The Arc of the Universe is Long
54
www.KirwanInstitute.org
KirwanInstituteon:
www.race-talk.org
The Self – Two paradigms
55
56
Current paradigm: Hobbesian, isolated Perceives individuals as autonomous-independent selvesEgoistic, possessive, separate, isolated, rational
This has led to increasing hyper-individualism and fear of the other This framework creates and marginalizes the racialized other Racial disparities are seen as a subjective, personal experience Creates false separations – negates shared humanity
57
What is the alternative vision?A model of connectedness Individuals as part of something bigger Inter-being, unified, not egoistically separate
Individualism and interconnectivity are not mutually excusive
When linked correctly, interconnectivity supports individuality