radiation interaction with matter and energy dispersive x ...chateign/formation/course/... · 16...

Radiation interaction with matterand energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence

analysis (EDXRF)

Giancarlo PepponiFondazione Bruno KesslerMNF – Micro Nano Facility

[email protected]

MAUD school 2018Caen, France

1Radiation interaction with matter and XRF – MAUD school 2018 – Giancarlo Pepponi

2

Radiation – x-rays (photons) , neutrons, electrons

2

Wave – particle duality

De BrogliePlanck / Einstein

neutrons

electrons

charged particles

neutral particles

x-rays

photons

9.11E−31 kg511.0 keV/c2

939.6 MeV/c2

1.675E-27 kg

electromagnetic radiation

0 rest mass

protons

charged particles

1.673E−27 kg

938.27 MeV/c2

Radiation interaction with matter and XRF – MAUD school 2018 – Giancarlo Pepponi

3


3

neutrons

electrons

x-rays

photons

interactiontype

dipole

strong forcemagneticneutron capture

Coulomb force

interactionpartners

electronsatoms/electrons

nucleiunpaired electronsnuclei

electrons, nuclei

protons Coulomb force electrons, nuclei


4


4

neutrons

electrons

x-rays

photons

wavelength

1.54 A0.71 A

1.8 A3.5 A

energy

8.048 keV17.479 keV

25 meV6.6 meV

20 keV200 keV

CuKa1MoKa1

thermalcold

SEMTEM

speed

2200 m/s1127 m/s

temperature

293.6 K77 K

0.122 A0.025 A 2.0845e+08 m/s

8.15033e+07 m/s

protonsPIXEProton therapy

1 MeV100 MeV

28.62 fm0.28 fm

1.38301e+07 m/s1.2837e+08 m/s


5


5

40 eV

400 keV

1 keV

40 keV


6

Radiation – attenuation - Beer Lambert law

6

Au sheet

Calculated for X-Rays E = 17448eV

I0 I(x)


7

Radiation – attenuation - Beer Lambert law

7

?Scattering

(elastic, inelastic)Absorption


8

Attenuation X-Rays : microscopic view

8

Photoelectricabsorption

Inelastic (Compton)Scattering

Elastic Scattering


9

X-ray elastic scattering

9

Dipole emission

where

substituting

classical electron radius

Thomson cross section

In the X-Ray range: scattering from strongly bound electrons


is the angle subtended between the

direction of acceleration of the particle, and

the direction of the outgoing radiation

For unpolarized light calling now theta the angle between the direction of propagation of the incident light

and the direction of propagation of the scattered photon

10

X-ray inelastic scattering (Compton)

10

scattering from ‘free’ or loosely bound electrons

more important for light elements elements

inelastic scattering:

energy of scattered photon is less than

energy of incident photon

Relativistic quantum mechanical derivation

if


11

X-ray inelastic scattering (Compton)

11

Inelastic (Compton)Scattering

in a spectrum the Compton peak is broader due to the angle dependence (in the accepted solid angle there are different scattering angles) and due to Doppler broadening


12

Compton shift

12

angleenergy


13

Doppler broadening in Compton scattering

13

is the Compton profile and it is tabulated

Elastic

MoKα

Compton

peak


14

Photoelectric effect - macroscopic

14

e- e- e-

h h h

First observations:

1887 Heinrich Hertz

Ionisation of gases:

1900 Philipp Lenard

More detailed observations:

1899 Joseph John (J.J.) Thompson

- frequecy must be above a threshold- the higher the intensity the more

emitted photons


15

Photoelectric effect – macroscopic - microscopic

15

e- e- e-

h h h

- frequecy must be above a threshold- the higher the primary intensity on the material the more emitted photons

Photoelectricabsorption

e-

h


16

X-Rays cross section magnitude

16

data from:H. Ebel, R. Svagera, M. F. Ebel, A. Shaltout and J. H. Hubbell,Numerical description of photoelectric absorption coefficients for fundamental parameter programs,X-Ray Spectrometry, 32, 442–451 (2003)

Mg Au


17

X-Rays


18

Atomic binding energies, electron energy levels

18

Absorption edgesElectron energy levelsShells

www.txrf.org/xraydata


19

Photoelectric cross section – shell components


20

Photoelectric cross section – shell components

20

Between two absorption edges, τ decreases with the photon energy approximately following Bragg-Pierce law

r : jump ratio

J : jump factor


21

X-Ray Absorption near edge fine structure

21

The X-ray Absorption Fine

Structure (XAFS) of an iron foil

1000 10000

1E-4

1E-3

0.01

1

10

100

1000

10000

As

cro

ss s

ection

[cm

²/g]

energy [eV]

photoelectric

coherent

incoherent

sum

0.1

XAFS Spectroscopy

1000 10000

1E-4

1E-3

0.01

1

10

100

1000

10000

As

cro

ss s

ection

[cm

²/g]

energy [eV]

photoelectric

coherent

incoherent

sum

0.1

1000 10000

1E-4

1E-3

0.01

1

10

100

1000

10000

As

cro

ss s

ection

[cm

²/g]

energy [eV]

photoelectric

coherent

incoherent

sum

0.1

1000 10000

1E-4

1E-3

0.01

1

10

100

1000

10000

As

cro

ss s

ection

[cm

²/g]

energy [eV]

photoelectric

coherent

incoherent

sum

0.1

XAFS Spectroscopy

XAFS Spectroscopy

Different phenomena for:

- ‘free’ atoms- molecules- condensed systems


22

X-Ray Absorption near edge fine structure

22

Eph ~ Eb

Core electron

unoccupied levels

Edge fine structure

(XANES or NEXAFS)

Eph > Eb

Core electron

continuum

Extended fine structure

(EXAFS)

XANES

EXAFS

outgoing wavefunction

Backscattering

from

neighbouring atomsincoming wavefunction

INTERFERENCE


23

Transition energies

23


Can be obtained by difference from

Electron energy levels (electron binding

energies)Pb

As Kr

Pb L3-M5 13035.2-2484.0 = 10551.2

Pb L3-M4 13035.2-2585.6 = 10449.6

Pb L2-M4 15200.2-2484.0 = 12614.4

As K-L3 11866.7-1358.6 = 10508.1

Kr K-L3 14325.6-1674.9 = 12650.7


24

Energy level widths

24


An atom with a vacancy is in an excited state. If Δt is the average time of relaxation, the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle tells us:

If Γ is the relaxation constant proportional to 1/ Δt we may write the probability for the atom to remain

in the excited state versus time is given by and hence

Taking the Fourier

transform to move

to the energy domain:

The energy

distribution is

a Lorentzian


25

Energy level widths and transition energies

25


As

As K-L3 energy 11866.7-1358.6 = 10508.1

As K-L3 width 2.09+0.94 = 3.03

The line shape is a

Lorentz distrbution


26

Transition families – As K

26



27

Transition families – Pb L1

27



28


28



29


29



30

Transition families – PbL - all

30



31

Secondary effects – fluorescence vs Auger

31

Incident photon

Photoelectron

Fluorescence

photon

Incident photonIncident photon

PhotoelectronPhotoelectronPhotoelectron

Fluorescence

photon

Fluorescence

photon

Fluorescence

photon

Incident photon

Photoelectron

Auger

electronIncident photonIncident photon


Auger

electron

Auger

electron

data from:M. O. Krause, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 8 (1979) 307


32

X-Ray Fluorescence – characteristic lines

32

Germanium

IUPAC = International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry

Siegbahn = Manne Siegbahn (swedish physicist)Nobel Prize in Physics in 1924


33

The Auger effect

33

The Auger electron emission process may be viewed as a radiation-lessdecay of a singly ionized X-ray level into a level described by two vacanciesand one electron in the continuum.

An Auger process in which the vacancy is filled by an electron from a highersubshell of the same shell is called a Coster–Kronig transition. If, in addition,the electron emitted (the "Auger electron") also belongs to the same shell,one calls this a super Coster–Kronig transition.


34

Coster-Kronig transitions


35

Electrons interaction with matter

35

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_scatteringhttp://serc.carleton.edu/research_education/geochemsheets/electroninteractions.html


36

Inner shell ionization cross section: x-rays vs electrons


37

Inner shell ionization cross section: protons


38

Neutrons interaction with matter

38

http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/fys/FYS-KJM4710/h14/timeplan/neutron_chapter.pdf


39

Cross section : x-rays vs neutrons

39

https://www.psi.ch/niag/comparison-to-x-ray


40

Cross section : x-rays vs neutrons

40

https://www.psi.ch/niag/comparison-to-x-ray


41

Neutron cross section

41

Scattering (full line) and absorption (dotted) cross sections of light element commonly used as neutron moderators, reflectors and absorbers, the data was obtained from database NEA N ENDF/B-VII.1 using JANIS software

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_cross_section


42

Scattering - Differential cross section

42

units: barn or cm2; 1b = 10-24cm2


43

X-ray differential elastic cross section and the form factor

43

Thomson cross section

Variable relatedto the momentum transfer

Atomic form factor (atomic scattering factor)


44


44

… but actually there is a further dependence on energy …

photoelectric absorption

corrections for photoabsorption (Kramers-Kronig dispersion)relativistic effects, nuclear scattering

Diffraction (structure factor)


45


45

forward scattering factors (x = theta = q = 0)

f1 and f2 are directly related to the index of refraction(reflection, refraction, XRR)

photoabsorption


46

X-ray differential inelastic cross section (Compton)

46

form factor elastic scattering

Inelastic scattering function


47

X-Rays - Differential cross section – elastic scattering


48

X-Rays - Differential cross section – inelastic scattering


49

Electrons - Differential elastic cross section

49

Data from: http://www.ioffe.rssi.ru/ES/Elastic/


50

Cross section, mass/ linear absorption coefficient


51

X-ray polarization – scattering as dipole oscillation/emission

51

An oscillating charge emits dipole radiation.

Dipole radiation is not isotropic. Starting from

An harmonically oscillating electric dipole

and using Maxwell's equations you get the emitted

power calculating the time averaged Poynting vector

Scattering is based on a dipole interaction. The incident EM wave forces electrons to oscillate at the

same frequency and radiation is emitted at that frequency, but not in all directions.

There is no emission in the dipole oscillation direction.


52

X-ray polarization - scattering

52

http://pd.chem.ucl.ac.uk/pdnn/diff2/polar.htm


53

Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence analysis (EDXRF)

53

Incident photon

Photoelectron

Fluorescence

photon



Fluorescence

photon

Fluorescence

photon

Fluorescence

photon

ADC

Pulse heightdiscriminator


54

EDS detector

54

detector efficiency + response

Modelling the response function of energydispersive X-ray spectrometers with silicondetectorsF. Scholze, and M. Procop


55

Detector artefacts / ‘environmental’ artefacts

55

sum / pile up

peaksescape

peak

Ar


56

X-Ray Fluorescence analysis

56

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 180

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

counts

/ c

hannel

photon energy [keV]

Sr

Ga

Zn

CuNi

Co

FeMn

Cr

KCa

Moscatter

TlPb

Bi

Tl BiPb

Sr

BaBa

Tl, Pb, Bi

Zn

Al

SiSr

Pb Bi

K

K

L

L

L

M


57


57

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000counts

/channel

photon energy [keV]

Zn

Cu

Ni

Co

FeMn

Cr

K CaBa

Ba

Tl, Pb, Bi

Al SiSr

K

K

L

L

M

CuNiAg

Cd

W Lscatter


58


58

10 20 30 400

2000

4000

6000

8000 lines

LL

KKMultielement sample

10 ng Cd

W white spectrum

monochromatised at about 33 keV

load: 45 kV 20 mA; 500s

Tl

BiTl

Pb

Bi Pb

Cr

Mn

Fe

Co

Ni

Cu

Zn

Ga

Ca

K

Sr

In

Zr

ZrSr

Ag

Cd

Cd

In

Ag

W white spectrum

scattered radiation

counts

E (keV)


59

X-Ray line families

59

Sr-K lines


60

X-Ray line families

60

Pb L-lines


61

X-Ray line families

61

Sr-K lines


62

X-Ray Fluorescence – intensity - Sherman equation

62

1. attenuation to depth z

2. photoelectric absorption in

layer dz

3. fluorescence yield

4. transition probability

(relative intensity of lines in shell)

5. attenuation to the detector

6. detector efficiency

geometrical factors and

primary flux form the

element independent

proportionality constant


63


63

1. attenuation to depth z

2. photoelectric absorption in

layer dz

3. fluorescence yield

4. transition probability

(relative intensity of lines in shell)

5. attenuation to the detector

6. detector efficiency

geometrical factors and

primary flux form the

element independent

proportionality constant

Integration over thickness


64


64

Monochromatic


65

Fluorescence enhancement, secondary fluorescence

65

Incident photon

Photoelectron

Fluorescence

photon



Fluorescence

photon

Fluorescence

photon

Fluorescence

photon

Cascade photon

Secondary

fluorescence

photon


66


66

200 nm of ZnSe on GeZnK

GeKa1

SeKa1

GeK


67


67

GaAs


68


68

GaAs solution deposited on silicon – Cascade – No Secondary Fluo

GaAs Wafer – No Cascade – No Secondary Fluo

GaAs Wafer – Cascade – Secondary Fluo


69

Data analysis XRD vs XRF

69

XRD : Rietveld

XRF : Fundamental parameters method


70

Data analysis XRD vs XRF

70

In MAUD:

the XRD definitions are obviously followed, since they are contain more

information:

from the XRD definition you can derive the XRF one, not the other way around


71

Instrumental parameters

71

XRF: energy, intensity fractionXRD: wavelength, intensity fraction

In MAUD:One or multiple wavelengths can be indicated with intensity fraction

Integration over different energies/wavelengths done numerically


72

Primary radiation – x-ray tube

72

Tube spectrum and filtered spectrum automatically calculated in MAUD


73


73

Tube spectrum and filtered spectrum automatically calculated in MAUD


74


74

sample

graphite monochromator

proportionalcounter

x-ray tube

filter

XRF and XRD signals related to different part of the X-ray primary beam

In MAUD: defined separately, hence taken into account


75

X-Ray Fluorescence – intensity – filtered primary beam


7676

Thank you for your attention!

For any further question or doubt:[email protected]


radiation interaction with matter and energy dispersive x ...chateign/formation/course/... · 16...

Documents