rak single denture
TRANSCRIPT
SINGLE DENTURE
Dr Rakesh kumar yadav
Complications
Materials used
Methods to obtain balanced
occlusion
Tooth modification techniques
Disadvantages
Advantages
Contraindications
Indications
Classifications
Single denture
Introduction
Single complete denture is a prosthesis which replaces the lost natural teeth and its associated structures functionally and esthetically as a single unit which opposes all or some of the natural teeth.
single denture construction : The making of a maxillary or mandibular denture as distinguished from a set of complete dentures (GPT-1)
Mostly edentulous maxilla is seen.
Why they are difficult conditions?
Why single denture in maxilla are better then
single denture construction in mandible? Cases where a single denture in mandible are
relatively acceptable.Class III
Cleft palate patients
Types
SCD opposing natural teeth
SCD opposing a preexisting complete denture
SCD opposing a removable partial denture
SCD opposing an overdenture
SCD opposing an implant supported denture
Problems seen
• Heavy occlusal forces• Esthetics • Supraeruption• Mesial drifting• A mandibular single complete denture
opposing upper natural teeth is extremely complicated
• Combination syndrome• Occlusal wear
Indications
Inoperable tori cleft or perforated palates
Natural teeth that is sufficient in number
A partially edentulous arch replaced by a fixed
or removable partial denture.
Retrognathic mandible
Contraindications
Excessive loss of supporting bone
Reduced vertical dimension
Deranged occlusal plane
Flared out opposing teeth
Advantages
Maintains the vertical dimension
Maintains the occlusal plane
Maintains the residual ridge height
Maintain the esthetic appearance and function
for mastication, speech etc.
Disadvantages
Supraerupted teeth can reduce the space available, making setting of artificial teeth a laborious process.
A mandibular single complete denture opposing upper natural teeth is extremely complicated.
Combination syndrome. Occlusal wear Fixed position of lower anterior
Classification
Class l: Patients for whom minor, or no, tooth reduction is needed to obtain balance
Class 2: Patients for whom minor additions to the height of the
teeth are needed to obtain balance.
Class 3: Patients for whom both reductions and additions to teeth are required to obtain balance. The treatment of these patients usually involves a change in vertical dimension of occlusion.
Class 4: Patients who present with occlusal discrepancies that require addition to the width of the occluding surface.
Class 5: Patients who present with combination syndrome.
Tooth modification techniques
Swenson’s technique Yurkstas Method: Bruce’s Method: Boucher’s method :
Swenson’s technique
Maxillary base is made and denture teeth are set
Any interference adjusted on cast which acts as guide
Natural teeth are modified Teeth with modified occlusal surface is
mounted again Final try in
Yurkstas Method:1968
Metal U – shaped occlusal template, slightly convex on lower
surface
Bruce’s Method: Modifications on stone cast occlusal surfaces Clear acrylic resin template pressure indicating paste used
Boucher’s method : Cast mounted Maxillary porcelain teeth arranged Placed opposing mandibular stone cast Denture processed Comparison of natural teeth and altered
stone casts Natural teeth ground Base plate wax
Common occlusal problems?
Antreiors and premolars Severely tilted molars in centric and excursive
movements Ideal treatment for tilted molars?
onlays Cast gold crowns Bridge Rpd with crowning the teeth
Over bite and over jet
Natural teeth ?
Complete denture?
In single denture
Perfecting the Occlusal Plane
A. Orthodontic Means – Intrusion, Extrusion, Etc.
B. Placing Restorations – Crowns, Onlay Prosthesis
C. Occlusal Grinding – To Reshape The Teeth And to
Create a Suitable Occlusal Surface with low cusp
height.
Methods used to obtain a balanced occlusion
Teeth modified, final impression made, cast mounted
Two techniques Functional chew in techniques Articulator equilibration techniques
Functional chew-in techniques
Stansbury 1928 Intraorally Record base stability Good neuromuscular control Mental competence
Stansbury’s technique : Compound maxillary rim trimmed buccally
and lingually Carding wax used Perform eccentric movements till VD is
reached Occlusal rim removed stone is vibrated into
the generated pathways – positive stone cast of generated occlusion
Denture teeth set Try-in Lower cast removed replaced by lower chew-
in cast record Interfering spots ground.
Vig’s technique : Fin of resin placed contacting the central
fossae Helps to diagnostically locate the interfering
lower cusps In eccentric movements the lower cusp tips
are ground until equal contact occurs between teeth and resin
Fin then built up using a soft wax, and a functional path is recorded
Sharry’s technique:
Maxillary rim of softened wax is used
Lateral and protrusive chewing movements
are made –generating the functional paths of
the lower cusps
Continued until correct vertical dimension
Rudd’s technique :
Compound maxillary rim
Thickness of recording wax made up of three
sheets of medium hard pink base plate wax and
two sheets of red counter wax, is added to the
buccal and lingual surfaces of the compound rim.
Using two maxillary bases
Articulator equilibration techniques :
First upper cast is mounted using a face-bow
Lower cast related to upper at acceptable VD
Buccal-lingual position of lower teeth and their
relation to upper arch
Tipped and inclined natural teeth ?
Other cusp other then holding cusp is reduced
Wax try in
Condylar inclinations set in articulator
Denture processed
Remounted , eccentric balance achieved
Two colors of articulating paper to
differentiate
Occlusal materials for the single complete denture Porcelain teeth Acrylic resin teeth Acrylic resin with amalgam stops IPN resin Gold occlusals
Potential adverse treatment outcomes Natural tooth wear
Maxillary porcelain denture teeth Cast restorations less resistant New generation acrylic/composite resin denture
teeth are ideal. Denture fracture
Heavy anterior occlusal contact Deep labial frenal notches High occlusal forces due to excessive action of the
masseter
Single complete maxillary denture to oppose natural mandibular teeth
Frequently seen Sufficient teeth in mandibular arch, acceptable
periodontal health, no missing teeth Number of mandibular teeth considered
sufficient should include first molars
Alter the clinical crowns of the teeth by grinding or with restorations
Single Complete Maxillary Denture to Opposing Natural Mandibular Teeth with fixed prosthesis
When the restorations are acceptable
The same principles of occlusion that apply to
complete dentures apply to the single complete
denture
Material considerations
Complete maxillary denture to oppose a partially edentulous arch and a removable
partial denture
The occlusal plane, tooth arrangement for
occlusion, esthetics, and the material
composition of the teeth must be such that an
accepted complete denture can be
constructed to oppose it
When both planned together
Mandibular denture to oppose natural teeth
1. Preservation of Residual Ridge
2. Necessity for Retaining Maxillary teeth
3. Mental Trauma
Single Complete Denture to Oppose an Existing Complete Denture
Systematic approach
1. How long has the existing denture been in
used?
2. Was the denture an immediate insertion at
the time of tooth removal?
Gives us idea -bone resorption.
Use of pressure disclosing paste
3. Does the denture meet the requirements of an acceptable denture?
Tooth position,condition of polished surface,occlusal plane
4. Has the denture opposed another denture?
5. Is the operator satisfied to institute complete denture procedures utilizing the existing denture?
Complications of single complete maxillary denture opposing a mandibular partial denture
Combination syndrome Wear of the natural teeth Fracture of the denture
Combination syndrome
Kelly E. Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial denture opposing a maxillary complete denture. J Prosthet Dent (1972) , 27:140-150..
By kelly E 1972
Sequence 2
Starts in mandible in distal extension area.
And continuous as in previous case
Five signs
anterior maxillary ridge resorption papillary hyperplasia in the hard palate maxillary tuberosity hypertrophy extrusion of the mandibular anterior teeth bone loss under the partial denture base
Saunders et al in 1979 added to the description of the combination syndrome by including destructive changes such as loss of occlusal vertical dimension, occlusal plane discrepancy, anterior spatial repositioning of the mandible, poor adaptation of the prostheses, epulis fissuratum and periodontal changes.
Saunders T et al ,The maxillary complete denture opposing the mandibular bilateral distal-extension partial denture: treatment considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41(2):124-8.
Preventive Measures
Extraction of remaining anterior mandibular teeth – CD/CD.
Implants placed in the posterior region. Or Over dentures Maximum coverage of the distal extension ridges in RPD.
References
Winkler S, Essentials of complete Denture prosthodontics, 2nd edition, India ,AITBS Publishers , 1996, pp 417-426.
Bolender, Zarb G, Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients, India, 12th edition, Elsevier publications, 2004, pp 427- 436
Rahn A O and Heartwell C M, Textbook of complete dentures, 5th edition, U.S.A, Lea and Febiger Publications, 1993, pp 481- 492.
References
Sharry J J , Complete denture Prosthodontics, 3rd edition, Mc Graw Hill company, pp 310-319.
Manappallil J.J, Complete denture prosthodontics, 1st edition, India, Arya publishers, 2006 , pp 323-328
References
Deepak Nallaswamy, Textbook of Prosthodontics ,1st edition, India, Jaypee Publications, 2003, pp 250-254
Kelly E. Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial denture opposing a maxillary complete denture, J Prosthet Dent (1972) , 27:140-150.
Saunders et al, The maxillary complete denture opposing the mandibular bilateral distal-extension partial denture: Treatment considerations. J Prosthet Dent (1979) ,41:124-128.
References
Driscoll et al ,Single maxillary complete denture,Dent Clin N Am 48 (2004) 567–583