re imagine play - denver · 7/29/2014 3 prescribed response –everyone already knows exactly what...

17
7/29/2014 1 ReImagine Play New Site Selection Community Meeting, July 29 th , 2014 1. Introductions 2. Overview: How we got here 3. Why ReImagine Play? 4. ReImagine Play at City Park: City Loop 5. Why Paco Sanchez? (New Park Selection Process) 6. Thoughts + Questions 7. Next Steps Agenda

Upload: ngodan

Post on 26-Jul-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

7/29/2014

1

Re‐Imagine PlayNew Site Selection

Community Meeting, July 29th, 2014

1. Introductions

2. Overview:  How we got here

3. Why Re‐Imagine Play? 

4. Re‐Imagine Play at City Park:  City Loop

5. Why Paco Sanchez?  (New Park Selection Process)

6. Thoughts + Questions

7. Next Steps

Agenda

7/29/2014

2

2008: Play Area Master Plan‐

Re‐Imagine Play

March 2012: Idea Competition ‐ 26 entries

May 2012: 8 entries shortlisted and displayed

July 2012: 3 Finalists present to the public

October 2012: ‘City Loop’  is competition winner

How we got here

2013: Design Development

Playground Master Plan

• 2008 Citywide Study

• Goals for the Future of Play in Denver:

• Increase Access to Play for all Neighborhoods

• Improve Health and Wellness

• Enhance Community Identity

• Strengthen Neighborhoods

• Reduce Childhood Obesity

Why Re‐Imagine Play?

7/29/2014

3

Prescribed Response – Everyone already knows exactly what to do here

Why Re‐Imagine Play?

Open Ended – A place to explore, discover and create

Why Re‐Imagine Play?

7/29/2014

4

Childhood Obesity Rates

Why Re‐Imagine Play?

What is Re‐Imagine Play? Multi‐Generational

7/29/2014

5

What is Re‐Imagine Play? Playable Art

What is Re‐Imagine Play? Programmed Play Events

7/29/2014

6

What is Re‐Imagine Play? Neighborhood Connections

What is Re‐Imagine Play? Promote Health + Fitness

7/29/2014

7

What is Re‐Imagine Play? Dynamic + Changeable

What is Re‐Imagine Play? Innovative, Creative, Unique

7/29/2014

8

What is Re‐Imagine Play? Placemaking

M lti G ti l Multi Generational

Playable Art

Programmed Play Events

Neighborhood Connections

Promote Health and Fitness

Placemaking

Dynamic + Changeable Innovative + Creative Unique + Sustainable

Imagine the Possibilities

Placemaking

7/29/2014

9

Re‐Imagine Play at City Park:  City Loop

City Loop

7/29/2014

10

City Loop

7/29/2014

11

City Loop

7/29/2014

12

City Loop

7/29/2014

13

Why Paco Sanchez Park?

7/29/2014

14

City‐wide Evaluation

New Site Selection Process

Park Size and Scale Playground Condition Location Accessibility Near Rec

Center

10 Acres Available

SpacePark Name Classification Acres Year Condition Central Bus Train Bike Parking

Rosamond Park Community 35.6 1999 Excellent No

Bear Valley Park Community 72.1 1998 Good No

Bible (James A) Park Community 66.2 1995 Good No

Garfield Lake Park Community 29.0 1993 Poor No

Washington Park Regional 157.5 1991 Fair No

Cook (Judge Joseph E) Park Community 37.9 1993 Fair No( g p ) y

Garland (David T) Park Community 50.3 1992 Fair No

Montbello Central Park Community 36.9 1992 Fair NoEisenhower Park Community 20.2 1992 Fair No

Garland (David T) Park Community 50.3 1992 Poor No

Thomas (Fred N) Park Community 29.4 1988 Fair No

Harvey Park Community 24.5 1998 Fair No

Southmoor Park Community 17.3 1992 Fair No

Wallace (George M) Park Community 24.8 1999 Fair No

Washington Park Regional 157.5 1989 Fair No

Congress Park Community 19.2 1991 Fair Yes Yes No No Yes Pool No

Weir Gulch Park Community 20.6 1993 Fair Yes Yes No Yes Street Only No No

Weir Gulch Park Community 20.6 1993 Fair Yes Yes No Yes Street Only No No

New Site Selection Process

y y

Weir Gulch Park Community 20.6 1998 Fair Yes Yes No Yes Street Only No No

Sloans Lake Park Regional 284.2 1992 Poor Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes

City Park Regional 314.4 1996 Poor Yes Yes No Yes Yes Soon Yes

Cheesman Park Regional 80.8 1992 Fair Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes

Lakewood and Dry Gulch Park Community 56.0 1992 Poor Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No

Sanchez (Paco) Park Community 29.9 1997 Fair Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

7/29/2014

15

New Site Selection Process

Park Size and Scale Playground Condition Location Accessibility Near Rec

Center

10 Acres Available

SpacePark Name Classification Acres Year Condition Central Bus Train Bike Parking

Rosamond Park Community 35.6 1999 Excellent No

Bear Valley Park Community 72.1 1998 Good No

Bible (James A) Park Community 66.2 1995 Good No

Garfield Lake Park Community 29.0 1993 Poor No

Washington Park Regional 157.5 1991 Fair No

Cook (Judge Joseph E) Park Community 37.9 1993 Fair No( g p ) y

Garland (David T) Park Community 50.3 1992 Fair No

Montbello Central Park Community 36.9 1992 Fair NoEisenhower Park Community 20.2 1992 Fair No

Garland (David T) Park Community 50.3 1992 Poor No

Thomas (Fred N) Park Community 29.4 1988 Fair No

Harvey Park Community 24.5 1998 Fair No

Southmoor Park Community 17.3 1992 Fair No

Wallace (George M) Park Community 24.8 1999 Fair No

Washington Park Regional 157.5 1989 Fair No

Congress Park Community 19.2 1991 Fair Yes Yes No No Yes Pool No

Weir Gulch Park Community 20.6 1993 Fair Yes Yes No Yes Street Only No No

Weir Gulch Park Community 20.6 1993 Fair Yes Yes No Yes Street Only No No

New Site Selection Process

y y

Weir Gulch Park Community 20.6 1998 Fair Yes Yes No Yes Street Only No No

Sloans Lake Park Regional 284.2 1992 Poor Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes

City Park Regional 314.4 1996 Poor Yes Yes No Yes Yes Soon Yes

Cheesman Park Regional 80.8 1992 Fair Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes

Lakewood and Dry Gulch Park Community 56.0 1992 Poor Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No

Sanchez (Paco) Park Community 29.9 1997 Fair Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

7/29/2014

16

Park Size and Scale Playground Condition Location Accessibility Near Rec

Center

10 Acres Available

SpacePark Name Classification Acres Year Condition Central Bus Train Bike Parking

Rosamond Park Community 35.6 1999 Excellent No

Bear Valley Park Community 72.1 1998 Good No

Bible (James A) Park Community 66.2 1995 Good No

Garfield Lake Park Community 29.0 1993 Poor No

Washington Park Regional 157.5 1991 Fair No

Cook (Judge Joseph E) Park Community 37.9 1993 Fair No( g p ) y

Garland (David T) Park Community 50.3 1992 Fair No

Montbello Central Park Community 36.9 1992 Fair NoEisenhower Park Community 20.2 1992 Fair No

Garland (David T) Park Community 50.3 1992 Poor No

Thomas (Fred N) Park Community 29.4 1988 Fair No

Harvey Park Community 24.5 1998 Fair No

Southmoor Park Community 17.3 1992 Fair No

Wallace (George M) Park Community 24.8 1999 Fair No

Washington Park Regional 157.5 1989 Fair No

Congress Park Community 19.2 1991 Fair Yes Yes No No Yes Pool No

Weir Gulch Park Community 20.6 1993 Fair Yes Yes No Yes Street Only No No

Weir Gulch Park Community 20.6 1993 Fair Yes Yes No Yes Street Only No No

New Site Selection Process

y y

Weir Gulch Park Community 20.6 1998 Fair Yes Yes No Yes Street Only No No

Sloans Lake Park Regional 284.2 1992 Poor Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes

City Park Regional 314.4 1996 Poor Yes Yes No Yes Yes Soon Yes

Cheesman Park Regional 80.8 1992 Fair Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes

Lakewood and Dry Gulch Park Community 56.0 1992 Poor Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No

Sanchez (Paco) Park Community 29.9 1997 Fair Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Why Paco Sanchez Park?

7/29/2014

17

Thoughts and Questions?