reclamation issues and estimated cost of ......reclamation at modern mines. others also have...

RECLAMATION ISSUES AND

ESTIMATED COST OF RECLAMATION MARLIN MINE

San Miguel Ixtahuacán and Sipacapa Municipalities

San Marcos Department Guatemala

2011

Comisión Pastoral Paz y Ecología Unitarian Universalist ServiceCommittee Diócesis de San Marcos 689 Massachusetts Ave. Casa Diocesana, Oficina 21 Cambridge, MA 02139-3302 10 Avenida, 6-28 Zone 4, San Marcos United States of America San Marcos, Guatemala www.uusc.org www.copaeguatemala.org/

AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS

Keith Campbell, B.S., P.E.

Chemical process engineer with 25 years experience in treatment of contaminated groundwater, process water, and industrial wastewater for the mining, oil and gas, chemical process, pharmaceutical, and alternative energy industries.

Ana Lidia González, Lic. Biologist responsible for water quality monitoring around the Marlin mine.Experience in environmental impact studies and biological research.

Steve Laudeman, B.S., M.S., P.E.

Geological and civil engineer with 21 years experiencein hazardous materials, waste management, road construction, mines and quarries, and infrastructure for nature reserves.

James Montgomery, E.M.

Mining engineer with 40 years experience in minerals exploration, mine design, safety engineering, production and project management for underground mines and nuclear waste disposal.

Nic Remington, B.S., P.E. Civil engineer with 8 years experience investigating soil and structural failures, assessing earthquake damage, designing commercial and educational facilities, and cost estimating.

Robert Robinson, E.M., M.S., M.E.M.P., P.E. Mining and environmental engineer with 40 years experience in mine production and engineering, and the remediation of abandoned and historic mines.

Additional Research: Molly Butler Translation: Molly Butler Maria J. Van Der Maaten, M.A. H. Alejandro Alfaro Santiz, M.A. Resumes available on request. Location map on cover page by Richard Harris.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page Introduction 01 Environmental Risks of Mining 03 Reclamation Cost Estimate 09

Reclamation Tasks 12 Costing Methodology 23

Reclamation Plan Requirements 25 Conclusions 29 Works Cited 31 Appendix

Reclamation Cost Estimate (not including water treatment) 35

Figures 5 - 8 1. Millsap Tailings near Victor, Colorado 2. Eureka Tailings near Silverton, Colorado 3. American Tunnel Tailings near Gladstone, Colorado 4. Gilt Edge Open Pit near Lead, South Dakota 5. Grand Mogul Mine Discharge near Gladstone, Colorado 6. Kerber Creek Fish Kill near Villa Grove, Colorado 7. Urad Water Treatment Plant and Tailings near Empire, Colorado

Tables

1. Total Estimated Reclamation Cost in Quetzals, Labor Adjusted 09 2. Total Estimated Reclamation Cost, USA Cost Basis 11

Note: This report uses both dollars and quetzals, and metric and English units. The cost estimating software is based on dollars and English units as well as many of the data sources. Information is quoted herein in their original units so the information can be conveniently traced back to its source.

1

INTRODUCTION The Marlin mine is owned and operated by Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S.A. a wholly-owned subsidiary oftransnational Goldcorp Inc. The mine is located in the north of San Marcos Department, and straddles the municipalities of San Miguel Ixtahuacán and Sipacapa. Montana has provided a $1 million surety bond (Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S. A., 2010, p. 50) that the government can use to reclaim the mine in the event of a company default. This amount is trivial compared to reclamation bonds required for mining operations elsewhere. For example, reclamation bonds for four mines in Colorado, U.S.A. are:

· Cresson: gold, open pit, heap leach, processing plant - $99 million; · Climax: molybdenum, underground mine and open pit , processing plant -

$52 million; · Henderson: molybdenum, underground mine, processing plant- $41

million; and · San Luis: gold and silver, open pit, processing plant - $7.4 million

(Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining & Safety, 2010). Although the reclamation requirements at these four mines are not fully comparable with the Marlin mine, many of the reclamation tasks are similar and the preceding reclamation amounts indicate the magnitude of surety bonds for reclamation at modern mines. Others also have observed that the Marlin bond amount is low(On Common Ground, 2010, p. 16; E-Tech, 2010, p. 8) The low Marlin surety bond amount exposes the government, local residents, and the environment to significant risks from default by Montana in properly reclaiming the mine. The risks include ongoing pollution from acidic toxic metal effluents, erosion and sedimentation, and disturbed lands that cannot be returned to their prior use. These risks are discussed further in the next section. The amount estimated in this study for an appropriate surety bond on Marlin is Q389 million or $49 million, obviously a significant increase over the existing bond. This amount provides for indefinite operation of the existing water treatment plant;covering mine waste rock dumped on the surface and tailings from ore processing; contouring disturbed lands to natural and less erosive landforms; control of erosion;removal of buildings, equipment, and waste; and revegetation. If it proves that water retreatment becomes unnecessary, approximately half of the bond amount could be returned to Montana. Similarly, if it can be certified that Montana is properly performing concurrent reclamation, applicable portions of the bond could be returned. The reclamation cost was estimated with computer software that is widely acceptedand used within the U.S.A.Nevada State regulators and the mining

2

industry in that State jointly prepared the software and unit costs. Where available, input data for the computer software was taken from publicly available Montana and Goldcorp documents. Unfortunately, these documents are lacking in regard to reclamation information, and some input data had to be assumed from the authors’ experience and judgment. If additional data becomes available,input for the computer program can be updated. For example, a Guatemalan professional cost estimator could adjust the unit cost rates used herein to the local rates. The third section of this report describes the reclamation cost estimate and the estimating software. The attached Appendix contains the costing spreadsheets. The second section of this report summarizes the reclamation risks posed by Marlin. For those readers unfamiliar with reclamation plans, the fourth section describes the content and level of detail generally required.

3

ENVIRONMENTAL RISKSOF MINING Even though mostmining companies arefairly responsible environmentally, monumental disasters continue to occur. A few examples of recent gold mining disasters include the following:

· Baia Mare, Romania: In January 2000, a tailings dam breach released some 100,000 cubic meters of cyanide-rich tailings into the river system. This spill released an estimated 50-100 tons of cyanide, as well as toxic metals, particularly copper, into the Somes and Tisza Rivers, and finally into the Danube River before reaching the Black Sea.

· Omai, Guyana: The breach of a tailings damin August 1995 released 3.5 million cubic meters of toxic effluent containing cyanide and toxic metals into the Omai and Essequibo rivers.

· Gilt Edge Mine, USA: After mine closure in 1992, acidic toxic metal effluents seeped into a river from mine waste rock dumps and contaminated water filling three open pits. The owner became insolvent in 1999before cleanup was completed. Subsequently the U.S. Environmental Protection agency financed cleanup.

· Yanacocha, Peru: The mine has been discharging acidic toxic metal effluents to local rivers, and these rivers have diminished flow from consumption by the mine. The toxic effluents and diminished water flow impact drinking water and agriculture. There also has been a spill of mercury in transit to the mine.

This is a short list of the many recent environmental disasters from gold mining.The US Environmental Protection Agency (1997, p. 1)summarized 62 cases in just eight states from 1990 to 1997 of toxic releases and damages to the environment from mining and ore processing. Forty-nine of these cases involved tailings, ponds, mine wasterock, process solution (e.g., cyanide), wastewater, acid mine drainage, and storm water. The above examples and document present some of the risks of gold mining, including cyanide spills, breaches and leakage in tailings dams, and acidic toxic metal effluents.These and some other risks are illustrated in Figures 1 – 7.

· Figure 1 shows a gulley in tailings that eroded downstream after a breach in the tailings dam. These tailings flooded and sterilized the fields of downstream farmers.

· The barren valley floor in Figure 2 should be covered with willow bushes and beaver ponds; however, the area is contaminated with toxic tailings that also leach into the adjacent stream killing aquatic life. This contamination occurred more than 100 years ago, and the area has not reclaimed itself.

· The tailings in Figure 3 are 20 to 80 years old. The tailings never completely dried out, and acidic toxic metal effluents seeped into an

4

adjacent stream during the entire period. At the time the photo was taken, the tailings were being removed to anengineeredlandfill.

· The open pit in Figure 4 filled with surface and groundwater that became contaminated from leaching sulfides and metals in the mineralized rock remaining in the pit walls. This water contaminated groundwater, which surfaced in nearby streams. Such water also builds up in underground mines and become similarly contaminated.

· A spring from underground mine water is shown in Figure 5 where the orange water is acidic toxic metal discharge mixing with clean water.

· Figure 6 shows some of the more than 150,000 fish killed from a sudden release into the stream of tailings similar to those shown in Figure 3.

· A mine water treatment plant with sludge ponds atop old tailings is shown in Figure 7. Sludge output from the treatment plant is removed to a landfill periodically. The water treatment plant has been operating since the mine closed in the early 1970s, and probably will be required to operate in perpetuity.

The risks of all the preceding environmental calamities exist at the Marlin mine. In addition, there are others not shown in the examples, document, and photos. The soils on the site are easily eroded when stripped of vegetation and disturbed. If surface waters are not carefully controlled and the area not properly re-vegetated, there could be considerable erosion making the lands unfit for use. Downstream, the eroded soils settle out of the water, and become sediments that clog streams and cover adjacent landswhen mobilized by high water. If Montana suddenly abandons the mine, there also will be hazardous chemicals and petroleum products on-site that become vulnerable to release to the environment. When disasters occur such as those above, it is the government, area residents and the environment that suffer the consequences. The nations’ taxpayers must finance the cost of cleanup or the local land and people will suffer severe and long-lasting injuries to public health and the environment. Given the poor record of some mining companies in leaving such disasters, authorities should be aggressive in making mining companies meet their responsibilities. This includes requiring the mining company to set aside the full cost of reclamation. The following section provides an estimate of the funds that Montana should provide, in a surety bond, in the event of its default in properly completing reclamation and protecting public health and the environment.

5

Figure 1Millsap Tailings, near Victor, Colorado (U.S.A.)

Figure 2 Eureka Tailings, near Silverton, Colorado (U.S.A.)

6

Figure 3 American Tunnel Tailings, near Gladstone, Colorado (U.S.A.)

Figure 4 Gilt Edge Open Pit, near Lead, South Dakota (U.S.A.)

7

Figure 5 Grand Mogul Discharge, near Gladstone, Colorado (U.S.A.)

Figure 6 Dead Fish Kerber Creek, near Villa Grove, Colorado (U.S.A.)

8

Figure 7 Urad Water Treatment Plant and Tailings, near Empire, Colorado (U.S.A.)

9

RECLAMATION COST ESTIMATE The estimated total reclamation cost is Q389 million ($49 million, exchange rate Q8.097 = $1.00), which assumes Montana departs fromthe Marlin mine without performing adequate reclamation. This mightoccurif the company abandons the mine, the company goes bankrupt, or the government suddenly ordersthe mine closed. It is the amount the Guatemala government should require from Montana in a surety bond for minereclamation in the event of any of those defaults. If Montana defaults on proper reclamation, the reclamation bond could be used to reclaim the mined lands, protect the local people and environment from long-term injuries, and return the mined lands to their prior use. The existing Marlin reclamation bond is $1 million (Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S. A., 2010, p. 50). A breakdown of the estimated total reclamation cost is given in Table 1.

Table 1Total Estimated Reclamation Cost, Labor Adjusted

Reclamation Tasks Labor Equipment Material Total

(Q) (Q) (Q) (Q)

Water Treatment 2,883,410 20,242,500 73,650,312 96,776,222

Exploration 366,260 5,930,972 774,948 7,072,179

Roads 326,069 5,592,501 243,388 6,161,957

Pit Berms 4,603 36,752 126,977 168,332

Pit Lime 1,236 26,315 749,985 777,536

Pit Dewater 62,766 242,910 1,093,095 1,398,771

Underground Openings 10,514 33,797 37,270 81,582

Underground Lime 1,902 40,485 578,936 621,322

Underground Dewater 34,236 202,425 526,305 762,966

Process Ponds 138,934 1,487,613 42,712 1,669,259

Mine Waste Rock & Open Pits

2,428,867 45,687,954 347,588 48,464,409

Landfill 20,094 309,872 13,473 343,439

Tailings 3,147,584 51,135,373 1,374,328 55,657,285

Foundations & Buildings

1,218,871 7,427,038 105,520 8,751,429

Equipment Removal 163,540 3,396,044 3,559,584

Yards 391,756 5,706,417 460,655 6,558,828

Sediment & Drainage 208,606 622,894 1,551,029 2,382,529

Waste Disposal 53,821 2,763,061 2,816,882

Fences 140,810 249,792 6,153,720 6,544,323

Pipe Removal 329,804 852,614 1,182,418

10


(Q) (Q) (Q) (Q)

Power Lines & Substation

879,351 879,351

Riprap 6,358,693 18,831,986 596,117 25,786,797

Monitoring 1,092,399 963,090 4,363,919 6,419,407

Construction Management

2,535,133 10,361,958 60,728 12,957,818

Indirect Costs 91,308,590 91,308,590

TOTAL 22,799,259 179,381,302 186,922,654 389,103,215

Note that the largest cost items include:

· Surface Water Treatment for indefinite operation of the water treatment plant –Q96,776,222/$11,952,108.

· Mine Waste Rock & Open Pits, and Tailings are earthmoving costs for regrading the highwalls of the open pits; and contouring, covering, and re-vegetatingall these areas–total Q104,121,694/$12,859,293.

· Sediment &Drainage, and Riprap for controlling erosion–Q28,169,326/$3,478,983.

· Demolition and removal of buildings, equipment, power lines, and substation –total Q13,190,364/$1,629,043.

The high cost of water treatment and the earthmoving reflect the highest risk from mining, which is the discharge of toxic effluents. The remaining costs are required to return the lands disturbed by the mine to their prior use, which in this case is agriculture and forestry. The reclamation cost estimate could be reduced by concurrent reclamation and equipment salvage. Although Montana is performing some concurrent reclamation, the annual monitoring reports do not provide any details.(Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S. A., 2005 - 2009) Some of the areas Montana may be reclaiming concurrently include exploration disturbances, open pits, and minewaste rock. It is difficult to give a precise cost saving from any concurrent reclamation, as Montana has nopublic reclamation plan, and the annual monitoring reports are vague in regard to reclamation completed to date. Most importantly, an independent or government authority has not certified the reclamation accomplished thus far or the quality of the work. There may be some salvage value of the mining and processing equipment that could be credited to the reclamation cost. However, no equipment salvage values are included in the cost estimate as it is not possible to anticipate the condition of the equipment when the mine closes.

11

Another possible cost saving is in the water treatment operating cost, if acidic toxic metaleffluents do not develop in the two open pits, underground mine, and mine waste rock. Portions of the reclamation bond could be returned to Montana as reclamation is completed and certified or shown to be unnecessary. Because Montana does not have a public reclamation plan or any plans showing the final limits of mining and land disturbance, the above estimated total reclamation cost was in large part based on professional judgment and experience with similar mines. A cost estimate based on detailed plans and maps, actual data, and engineering analyses may result in a much higher cost estimate. All the cost items are vulnerable to an increase, if the costing parameters are underestimated. Some of the reclamation items that could be significantly underestimated in this cost estimate are the adequacy of the existing water treatment plant for future uses, the amount of toxic effluents that develop from the mine workings, mine waste rock, and tailings, the amount of time required to stabilize the tailings, and the work required to control erosion and re-vegetate the disturbed lands. Montana also plans to process ore from other nearbyprojectsat the Marlin facilities. The impact on reclamation costs of this activity is not included here. Table 2 summarizes the estimated reclamation costs on a U.S. cost basis. These are the costs that were adjusted for Guatemalan labor rates and currency to arrive at the costs given in Table 1. In Table 1, labor is adjusted to 15.66 percent of U.S.A. labor. This percentage is based on the ratio of Guatemala to U.S. average monthly wages for mining and quarrying obtained from the International Labor Organization at http://laborsta.ilo.org/. The currency conversion rate used is Q8.097 for $1. Guatemala costs for imported equipment and supplies could be higher than estimated. On the other hand, supplies obtained locally could be less than estimated. The Table 1 cost estimate assumes these differences compensate. A skilled local costing engineer could update the estimate with local unit cost rates. Table 2 is provided here for reference and tracking to the detail spreadsheets in the Appendix. The Appendix has another cost summary that breaks down the costs differently.

Table 2 Total Estimated Reclamation Cost, USA Cost Basis


($) ($) ($) ($)

Water Treatment 2,274,000 2,500,000 9,096,000 13,870,000

Exploration 288,851 732,490 95,708 1,117,049

Roads 257,154 690,688 30,059 977,901

Pit Berms 3,630 4,539 15,682 23,851

12


($) ($) ($) ($)

Pit Lime 975 3,250 92,625 96,850

Pit Dewater 49,500 30,000 135,000 214,500

Underground Openings 8,292 4,174 4,603 17,069

Underground Lime 1,500 5,000 71,500 78,000

Underground Dewater 27,000 25,000 65,000 117,000

Process Ponds 109,570 183,724 5,275 298,569

Mine Waste Rock & Open Pits

1,915,525 5,642,578 42,928 7,601,031

Landfill 15,847 38,270 1,664 55,781

Tailings 2,482,341 6,315,348 169,733 8,967,422

Foundations & Buildings

961,262 917,258 13,032 1,891,552

Equipment Removal 128,976 419,420 548,396

Yards 308,958 704,757 56,892 1,070,607

Sediment & Drainage 164,517 76,929 191,556 433,002

Waste Disposal 42,446 341,245 383,691

Fences 111,050 30,850 760,000 901,900

Pipe Removal 260,100 105,300 365,400

Power Lines & Substation

693,500 693,500

Riprap 5,014,781 2,325,798 73,622 7,414,201

Monitoring 861,520 118,944 538,955 1,519,419


1,999,332 1,279,728 7,500 3,286,560

Indirect Costs 11,276,842 11,276,842

TOTAL 17,980,627 22,154,045 23,085,421 63,220,093

RECLAMATION TASKS The reclamation proposed in this cost estimate has the objective of minimizing the mining impacts on the local people and environment, and returning the disturbed lands to their prior use to the extent possible, given the current state of reclamation technology. Prior use means returning as much of the land as possible to farming, grazing, and forestry. Insuring that the lands return to these uses may be a lengthy process, perhaps as long as fifteen or more years.To return the disturbed lands to their prior use, all the surface facilities and equipment must be removed. The disturbed lands must be contoured to natural landforms, covered with growth media, and re-vegetated. In addition, surface water must be controlled to prevent erosion and the subsequent down-slope or down-stream damaging effects of sedimentation.

13

The primary environmental risk is the release of acidic toxic metal effluentsfrom the open pits (Marlin and Cochise), underground mine, mine waste rock dumped on the surface, and tailings.Surface and groundwater pass through sulfide mineralization in the mine rock. The water dissolves the metal sulfides and becomes acidic. This process is generally referred to acidic rock drainage (ARD). There are two lines of defense against ARD. The first defense includes various source control measures designed to prevent the formation of ARD. The second line of defense is to collect anyARD,remove toxic constituents in a water treatment plant, and release the clean water to nearby waterways. The toxic sludge removed by the water treatment plant must be sequestered in an engineered landfill on-site. This treatment may be required indefinitely as historically some mines discharge ARD for many decades and centuries after mining ends. Source control involves blocking ingredients in the chemical reactions that form ARD. In the case of the Marlin mine, this means blocking water and oxygen from contacting the sulfide minerals in the rock left exposed by the mining. These are two of the ingredients necessary to form ARD. The source control measures used in this cost estimate include liming sulfide soils and sulfide rock exposures, compacting soils to minimize water infiltration, and diverting surface water away from those areas. ARD is very difficult to stop once the chemical reactions begin, and so it is likely that any source control measures will be only partially successful. Tailings are a slurry of finely ground rock, processing chemicals, and process water that are left over after the processing plant has removed the valuable mineralsfrom the ore. The water has the same toxic metals as ARD, plus some processing chemicals. The tailings are contained behind a dam, and fill a small valley. Toxicwater from the tailingscan both overflow the dam during storm events, and continuallyinfiltrate groundwater immediately down gradient from the dam. Below the dam, there are groundwater wells intended to intercept the toxic effluents,and pump the toxic water into a pond. (This pond is referred to as the‘infiltration pond’ by Montana.) From this pond, the captured toxic water is pumped back into the tailings. The second line of defense in preventing release of toxic discharges is to collect anyARDthat gets past the source control measures, collecttoxic water in the tailings and in the groundwater below the tailings dam, and process these discharges in a water treatment plant. Sludge removed from the water must be sequestered in a leak-proof landfill. Montana constructed a water treatment plant for the purpose of processing the tailings to remove toxic constituents. This cost estimate assumes that theexisting water treatment plant is adequate for future needs. The treatment plant may be required to operate indefinitely. The following subparagraphs describe all of the reclamation tasks that are the basis for the total estimated reclamation costs.The titles of most

14

subparagraphsare the same as in their costing spreadsheets in the Appendix. Some of the cost items are found on multiple spreadsheets or are just one item of several on a particular spreadsheet. For these cost items, the following subparagraphs name the spreadsheet where the cost item(s) are found. One exception is Water Treatment, which is estimated from different sources. The Appendix spreadsheets are given in the following order:

1. Title page with cost basis information. 2. Table of contents. 3. Cost summary. 4. -26. Detail cost spreadsheets.

Input data for each spreadsheetare color-coded green and blue. Citations for each line of input follow the input tablein numbered notes. Where the references had incomplete information, the authors assumed input from their judgment and experience with mine reclamation. Key assumptions are given in the following subparagraphs. Water Treatment Q96,776,222/$11,952,108 Marlin has one existing source of toxic discharge and three other possible sources that could develop with time. The existing source is the tailings, which contain toxic waters. This water is infiltrating the groundwater below the tailings dam(E-Tech, 2010; MEG 2009, p. 61; MARN 2008-2010, D6 samples; Robertson 2009, p. 6,11). Currently, Montana has groundwater wells that are pumping the contaminated water into a pond and then back into the tailings. This groundwater pumpingprobably must be continued indefinitely or until there is no more contamination of the groundwater.The water must be treated to remove the toxic constituents prior to releasing treated water downstream. Otherwise, the contaminated groundwater plume will expand and eventually surface in springs or in downstream waters.Further, toxic water in the tailings requires treatment in order to complete final reclamation of the tailings area. Solids in the tailings are not settling out of the toxic water as expected (Robertson, 2009,p. 6 & 11). In order to dewater the tailings,the tailings must be treated to separate solids from the water. The water is treated to remove toxic constituents and released. The separated solids must be removed to an engineered landfill on-site.Treatment of the groundwater plume and water in the tailings may require many years or decades. The other three possible sources of toxic dischargesare the Marlin and Cochise open pits, the underground mine, and mine waste rock dumped on the surface. All these facilities contain exposed rock with sulfide minerals that can leach out acidic toxic metaleffluents (also known as acidic rock drainage or ARD). Montana reportsundertakingsource control steps to avoid ARD such as regrading the highwalls of the open pits, placing cemented backfill in the underground mine

15

where ore has been removed, encapsulating any sulfide waste rock deep within neutral waste rock, and placing a soil cover over the mine waste rock. However, these steps are notorious for having limited success. In the cost items below, additional source control steps are provided to further minimize the risk of ARD.If these measures are unsuccessful, the ARD will require treatment,perhaps indefinitely. This cost item provides for operating the existing water treatment plant indefinitely to treat tailings dam effluents and toxic water contained within the tailings, and possibly ARD.The cost estimating software does not provide for estimating water treatment. In addition, Montana has not made public details of the water treatment plant from which costs could be estimated. Water treatment operating costs generally range from $1 to $4 per 1000 gallons treated. If a reasonable rate of $1.50 per 1000 gallons is assumed for the Marlin water treatment, the operating costs are:

1. Total Cost to Treat Water in Tailings $4,800,000 given the 20 million cubic meters of tailings (Howell & Christopherson, 2009) and 0.6 water content of tailings.

2. Annual Cost to Treat Groundwater and ARD $394,200 per year assuming the need to treat 500 gallons per minute of contaminated groundwater and ARD. An escrow account earing six percent interest per year would require $6,570,000 to pay this annual operating cost.

If the plant must be operated indefinitely, additional funds must be provided to replace aging equipment. A typical cost for a water treatment plant such as the one at Marlin is around $5 million not including engineering and design costs. Providing half of that amount to replace aging equipment over time would require $2.5 million.The total initial construction cost of $5 million does not need to be provided as much of the original cost includes funds for items that do no need replacement such as site preparation and foundations. The total amount required for the reclamation bond is $13,870,000, the three preceding amounts in bold text. Exploration Spreadsheets: Exploration and Exploration Roads & Pads

Q7,072,179/$873,432 Montana drilled and continues to drill exploration holes into various mineral deposits to sample for possible ore. This drilling has occurred at Marlin, La Hamaca, and West Vero. Any casing in the holes must be removed. The holes must be plugged for their entire length to prevent cross-linking of any aquifers penetrated by the drill holes, and to prevent injuries to people or livestock from tripping in open holes. The cost estimate provides for plugging the holes with

16

grout.There also are a number of water supply wells and monitoring wells that similarly must be plugged during the final phase of reclamation. The number of drill holes and their depth were found in various sources; however, there is little information on the length of hole casing and depth to water. This information had to be assumed. Exploration access roads, drill pads, and sumps must be regraded to natural landforms, covered with growth media, and re-vegetated. No information was found on access roads and drill pads for La Hamaca and West Vero, and this information had to be assumed. The length and width of the access road to the water supply wells was obtained from a map of Marlin(Comision Gubernamental Para Analizar El Fenomeno De Agrietamiento De Paredes En Algunas Casas Adyacentes Al Proyecto Minero Marlin I, 2010). The reclamation cost for access roads within the Marlin project area is included under Roads. It is possible that Montana has completed some of this reclamation work. However, until the work is certified as properly completed, any reclamation bond should provide for performing the work. Roads Q6,161,957/$761,017 Roads requiring reclamation include the very wide haul roads from the Marlin and Cochise open pits to the ore crusher and the mine waste rock dump, the airstrip, and other on-site roads. These roads must be regraded to natural landforms, covered with growth media, and re-vegetated.The airstrip is paved with asphalt, and the cost of removing and treating this asphalt is included under Waste Disposal. Pit Berms Q168,332/$20,789 Berms must be placed around the Marlin and Cochise open pits to discourage vehicle traffic from disturbing the open pit reclamation. Pit Lime Treatment Q777,536/$96,028 Spreadsheet: Miscellaneous Costs Apply lime to sulfide soilsin the open pits to neutralize any acidic toxic metal leachates that might form. The cost estimate assumes that 10 tons per acre (Skousen & McDonald, 2005)are applied over 65 acres (263,045 square meters). The preceding acreage assumes that much of the pit surface is sulfide rock. This may not be the case, and a careful inventory by an independent professional may result in a lower acreage. In addition, there may be present carbonate rock that will help to neutralize the sulfides.

17

Pit Dewater Q1,398,771/$172,752 Spreadsheets: Miscellaneous Costs Pit slope regrading may leave a depression in the Marlin pit bottom where water can collect, and become contaminated with acidic toxic metal effluents. When this water rises to the lowest point along the depression rim, the water will begin to overflow onto the southern hillside above the Tzalá River. The cost estimate provides for cutting a trench from the pit bottom to the outlying hillside toward the south, installing a culvert with perforated riser pipe on the pit bottom end, and backfilling the trench. This culvert drains any water accumulating in the pit bottom to a lined pond where it is pumped to the water treatment plant. The cost estimate is based on a pond (included under Sediment and Drainage Control) with a capacity and a pump with a pumping rate adequate to handle a 24-hour 100-year stormevent of 219 millimeters (Robertson, 2009, p. 9) over 65 acres (263,045 square meters). The cost estimate provides for a500 gallons per minute pump, and a pipeline 6,600 feet long with 200 feet of head. This pit dewatering may be required indefinitely. Similar pit dewatering is not includedin the cost estimate for the Cochise open pit as it is open toward a drainage that flows into the tailings. Underground Openings Q81,582/$10,076

The underground mine has two openings to the surface including a decline ramp and a ventilation shaft. The cost estimate provides for a concrete and rock plug in the decline portal and a concrete cover for the shaft opening. Underground Mine Water When the mine closes, there is a risk that the underground workings will fill with water that could accumulate acidic toxic metal effluents from the surrounding sulfide rock. Subsequently this toxic water could migrate out into the groundwater and then into surface springs and rivers. Because Montana is backfilling some areas in the mine with cemented mine waste rock, the cement is buffering any acid currently being formed. This buffering may not last in the long term, and the following two cost items are included to minimize the risk of acidic toxic metal discharge.

Underground Lime Treatment Q621,322/$76,735 Spreadsheet: Miscellaneous Costs Lime must be placed in the underground workings to neutralize any formation of acidic toxic metal leachates. The volume of the mine water is estimated at 1.1 million cubic meters, which is the estimated volume of the underground development workings at the planned closure of the mine. This volume does not include the areas where ore will be or has been removed,as Montana is backfilling theseareas with cemented mine waste rock. The amount of lime is estimated based on the mine water having 500 milligrams of sulfate per liter (Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S.

18

A., 2007, pp. Ann. C, D1)and a lime neutralization efficiency of 0.82 (Skousen, Hilton, & Faulkner, 2010). Underground Mine Dewater Q762,966/$94,228 Spreadsheet: Miscellaneous Costs In the event that the preceding lime application is inadequate, the cost estimate provides for a drill hole (water well) from the surface to a sump at the lowest pointin the workings to dewater the mine. The drill holemust be equipped with pipe and submersible in-wellpump both acid resistant to remove acidic toxic metal effluents from the mine to the water treatment plant. The assumedrate is 150 gallons per minute with a head of 475 meters. This dewatering and water treatment may be required indefinitely.

Process Ponds Q1,669,259/$206,158 There are three process ponds. The first is for storage of water pumped from the water supply wells, the second is a sediment pond on the south side of the Marlin open pit, and the third is an infiltrationbelow the tailings dam. Montana is planning a second tailings storage facility(Robertson, 2009, p. 4), and the cost estimate provides for reclaiming an additional infiltration pond for the second facility. This spreadsheet does not include any ponds constructed for sediment control and final reclamation, which are included under Sediment& Drainage Control. Mine Waste Rock &Open Pits Spreadsheet: Waste RockDumps Q48,464,409/$5,985,477 Montana states that the mine waste rock dump now in use is being reclaimed concurrently. However, the annual monitoring reports provide no specific information on this reclamation, and there is no independent certification that the reclamation has been accomplished properly. The cost estimate provides for regrading the mine waste rock dump to a 2.5:1 horizontal to vertical slope, and compacting to minimize the risk of erosion and surface water infiltration. Surface water infiltration could react with sulfide rockin the dump, and produce acidic toxic metal effluents. There is another mine waste rock dump called area 5. This dump is no longer in use and has been covered. One water sample from this area shows little contamination in effluents from the mine waste rock (Ministero de Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, 2007) The steep highwalls around the open pits must be regraded to a slope of 2.5:1 horizontal to verticalto minimize erosion of the final pit surfaces, and return the final pit surfaces to their prior use. The regraded areas must be compacted, covered with growth media, and re-vegetated. Slope reduction will reduce the risk of erosion. Compaction will reduce the risk of surface water percolating through the fill to react with sulfide rock. The earthmoving calculations performed in the Waste Rock Dumps spreadsheet are applicable to dozing the pit highwalls

19

from the existing steep slope to the required flatter slope. This estimate assumes that the earthmoving does not require blasting. Landfill Q343,439/$42,416 Marlin has a solid waste landfill for non-hazardous waste that will require closure and reclamation when the mine closes.Any building materials not salvaged in the demolition of the buildings also must be disposed of in this landfill. Tailings Q55,657,285/$6,873,815 The existing tailings storage facility is expected to reach full capacity within a year (Robertson, 2009, p. 4), and a second will be required for future tailings. The cost estimate provides for reclaiming the existing tailings and a second storage facility with similar dimensions. This assumption may underestimate the estimated reclamation cost as the new tailings storage facility may have a greater capacity than the existing facility. The cost estimate is based on covering the tailings first with a compacted 24-inch thick low permeability soil layer. The second layer is a 12-inch thick drainage layer. The third or top layer of the tailings cover is growth media 24 inches thick, which is thicker than the growth media layers used elsewhere on the site. (United States Enviornmental Protection Agency, 1989, p. 9) It may be many years or decades before the existing tailings storage facility can be finally reclaimed. Solid particles in the tailings are not settling from the water at the rate expected(Robertson, 2009, p. 6 & 11), and the surface may not become solid enough for any work for a long time. Operation of the water treatment plant will facilitate dewatering of the tailings. In addition, a plan is understudy to dewater future tailings by filtration, and alternatively a water cover for the tailings has been suggested. (Robertson, 2009, p. 3) The existing tailings dam is settling more than expected, approximately three percentto date (Robertson, 2009, p. 13). The cost estimate provides for adding two100-inch lifts(three percent of dam height) on top of the dam to maintain its designed height. Foundations and Buildings Demolition Q8,751,429/$1,083,232

The cost estimate provides for dismantling all the buildings, slab demolition, and burying the foundations in place. The disturbed areas must be covered and re-vegetated. Although the municipality or other organizations may want to retain some of the buildings after mining ends, the cost estimate provides for removing all buildings as there is no certainty that any will be retained. There may be some salvage value in the buildings when the mine closes; however, there is no certainty that the buildings will have any value, and some may be unusable if contaminated with process chemicals.

20

Equipment Removal Q3,559,584/$439,618 The processing equipment and storage tanks must be dismantled and removed. Two of the tank volumes had to be assumed for the cost estimate, as the volumes were not found in the Montana documents. The mining equipment and various vehicles must be removed. The cost estimate provides for removing the equipment for sale in Guatemala City. Any proceeds from the sale could be credited to the surety bond. Yards Q6,558,828/$810,031 Storage areas, building sites, parking lots, and other yards require ripping (scarifying), growth media cover, and re-vegetation. This cost estimate is adequate to include chemical characterization of any soils contaminated with petroleum products and other contaminates. Petroleum-contaminated soils must be removed to the bioremediation cell. Sediment and Drainage Control Spreadsheets: Sediment &Drainage Control and Miscellaneous Costs Q2,382,529/$294,248

To minimize erosion and the risk of acidic toxic metal effluents, the cost estimate provides for perimeter ditchesto divert surface water from flowing onto the regraded open pits,mine waste rock dump, and tailings. All these ditches will drain into sediment ponds that settle out sediment carried by the water. The Marlin pit perimeter ditch is in two sections, one around the east end and a second around the west end with a pond at the end of both sections. Although the existing tailings havetwo sediment ponds below the dam, this cost estimate provides for reconstructing both ponds. The existing ponds may not be functional when the mine closes. The sediment ponds periodically will require removal of trapped sediments. The mine waste rock dump must have parallel contour ditches evenly spacedacross the top and sides to minimize erosion and water infiltration into the waste rock from direct precipitation. In addition, this dump has a very long slope, and surface water must be diverted to the sides to eliminate formation of rills and gullies from erosion. To further minimize water infiltration, these ditches must be concrete lined (see the spreadsheet Miscellaneous Costs for the concrete lining) as recommended by Robertson (2009, p. 15). The spacing between parallel contour ditches is 50 meters horizontal. These ditches will flow into the perimeter ditches described above. Unit costs for the concrete lining were obtained from RSMeans Building Construction Cost Guide (1999, p. Sec. 033 130 4840). The Marlin pit east sediment pond must be lined. This pond performs double duty in receiving water from the eastern perimeter ditch and water drained through the pit bottom trench (see Pit Dewater). The pond must be lined in the event that waters from the pit bottom develop acidic toxic metal effluents.

21

Waste Disposal Spreadsheets: Waste Disposal and User 1 Q2,816,882/$347,892

Marlin has an asphalt-paved airstrip. The cost estimate provides for removing the asphalt and treating it in a bioremediation cell. This cost item probably is adequate to remove other small areas of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil in the project area.

Marlin has an incinerator for disposal of hazardous chemicals. The cost estimate assumes operating this incinerator for 10 days to incinerate any open containers and bins containing hazardous chemicals. The incinerator has a capacity of 400 pounds per hour (Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S. A., 2006). The unit costs were obtained from the RSMeans Building ConstructionCost Guide(1999, p. Sec. 111 701 4480). The cost estimate assumes that unopened containers of both hazardous and non-hazardous chemicals can be returned to suppliers at a cost less than their return value. Fences Spreadsheet: Miscellaneous Costs Q6,544,323/$808,240

The existing fence around the project boundaries must be removed and a new fence installed. The new fence will have a smaller perimeter only enclosing the tailings, water treatment plant, and Marlin pit east sediment pond. The new fence protects these areas from public intrusion until their final closure and reclamation. Final remediation of these facilities is expected to be completed long after the other reclamation work. Pipe Removal Spreadsheet: Miscellaneous Costs Q1,182,418/$146,031

Overland pipelines that must be removed are the water supply pipeline from the supply wells to the crude water pond, pipelines between the process plant and both the tailings storage facility and water treatment plant, a pipeline from the tailings infiltration pond to the water treatment plant, and a new pipeline provided in this cost estimate from the Marlin pit east sediment pond to the water treatment plant. The lengths of the pipelines to the existing tailings storage facilityare doubled in the cost estimate to remove pipelines to the new tailings storage facility.

The cost of building demolition should be adequate to include any pipe removal in and around the various buildings.

Power Lines and Substation Spreadsheet: Miscellaneous Costs Q879,351/$108,602 The cost estimate includes removal of two power lines and a substation. One power line is high voltage incoming power from the power plant at Tejutla. The second is a lower voltage line to the water supply wells.

22

The estimated cost of building demolition is assumed adequate to include removal of on-site power distribution. Riprap Spreadsheet: Miscellaneous Costs Q25,786,797/$3,184,735 The cost estimate provides for lining all perimeter diversion ditches and sediment pond spillways with riprap. The riprap will protect the integrity of the ditches and spillways for the long term. Rock on the tailings dam face and spillway is weathering and degrading(Robertson, 2009, p. 5 & 10). The cost estimate also provides for placing riprap on these surfaces. The source of the riprap is assumed offsite. These cost items are not included for the new tailings storage facility as it is assumed thisfacility will be built properly.

Monitoring Q6,419,407/$792,813 The cost estimate provides for monitoring mine waste rock (including area 5), landfills, tailings and tailings dams, re-vegetation, ground and surface water, and any toxic effluents for a period of fifteen years. This task requires the following:

· Sampling and analysis of mine waste rock and tailings, and ground and surface water for contaminants.

· Measuring integrity and stability of mine waste rock dumps, landfills, tailings, and tailings dams with inclinometers and survey monuments.

· Sampling tailings for density and moisture content. · Sampling re-vegetation for density and species richness. · Inspection for erosion and sedimentation.

The task includes interpreting and reporting monitoring results to the authorities and interested parties. The cost estimate for this task does not include monitoring for the above water treatment plant as those operating costs include monitoring. Construction Management Q12,957,818/$1,600,323 The post-mining reclamation period is expected to require a year. After this reclamation, the site supervision required is for monitoring and site maintenance. Indirect Costs Q91,308,590/$11,276,842 Spreadsheet: Cost Summary The cost estimate automatically adds indirect costs based on the size of the reclamation project. These costs include an item ‘BLM Indirect Cost”. This item is the cost for government agency compliance monitoring of the reclamation, which in this case would go to MEM and MARN.

23

COSTING METHODOLOGY The estimated reclamation cost was prepared with Excel software developed jointly by the State of Nevada (U.S.A.), other U.S.A. government agencies, and the mining industry(Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, 2010). The software name is Standardized Reclamation Cost Estimator (SRCE), and information regarding the software is available at the web site: http://www.nvbond.org/index.htm SRCE has the following advantages:

· Specific to the mining industry, · Acceptable to both government and industry, · Up-to-date cost rates, and · Readily available at the above web site.

There are other reclamation cost estimating software available including RACER(US Air Force & US Environmental Protection Agency, 2008) and Sherpa(Aventurine Engineering, Inc., 2010). The US Environmental Protection Agency and US Air Force developed RACER for estimating reclamation costs for all types of hazardous materials sites. The software requires detailed input data that is not publicly available for Marlin. Sherpa has an excellent reputation and its author also provides a mine costing data service used widely by the mining industry. In the early 1990s, the US Bureau of Mines published a mine cost estimating guide that includes reclamationand water treatment costs(United States Bureau of Mines). The specific version of the SRCE software and cost rates used herein is given on the title page of the cost estimate (see Appendix).Dimensional input data for SRCE was extracted from various Montana sources, which are listed in the Works Cited section of this report. Notes following input in the SRCE spreadsheetsindicate the specific reference for the data. Where the Montana information is incomplete, the authors assumed input from their experience and professional judgment.

The cost estimate selects small to medium sized earthmoving equipment instead of the large-scale mining equipment used by Montana. This selection assumes that a local contractor with road-building sized equipment will perform the reclamation, as Montana’s equipment may not be available or operable at the time reclamation is required. The cost estimate uses US unit cost rates. The total costs are adjusted for local labor rates and converted to Guatemalan quetzals with the conversion factor current at the time of the cost estimate was prepared. For a more accurate cost

24

estimate, a Guatemalan professional cost estimator could adjust the unit cost rates used herein to the local rates. SRCE does not specifically provide for costing all the reclamation tasks required at Marlin. In particular, there are no spreadsheets for regrading the open pits, treating toxic waters, and operation of the hazardous waste incinerator. For regrading the open pits, it was possible toadapt the Waste Rock Dumpsspreadsheet. For the water treatment and incineration, SRCE was supplemented with professional estimating sources and publications. There are possible shortcomings in the cost estimate. Much of the input data came from the Marlin Evaluacion de ImpactoAmbiental y Social de Marlin (Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S. A., 2003). This document is now seven years out of date, and some of the data is incomplete for costing purposes. Similarly, some data was taken from the annual monitoring reports (Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S. A., 2005 - 2009), which are not as suitable for cost estimating as actual field measurements and detailed engineering plans.The biggest uncertainty is in the cost of future treatment of toxic water in the tailings and possibly acidic toxic metal effluents from the mine workings and mine waste rock dumped on the surface. Another cost estimate for Marlin reclamation is reported at $13.06 million (On Common Ground, 2010, p. 13). MWH Consulting prepared this cost estimate on behalf of Goldcorp in May 2009. An independent professional review concludes thatthe cost estimate is low, the post closure period short, and there is no surety bond to guarantee the reclamation(On Common Ground, 2010, pp. 12-14). Other experienced professionals in mining risks have observed that the existing $1 million reclamation bond is minimal (E-Tech, 2010). Apart from the preceding review, the MWH cost estimate is not publicly available, and has not stood the test of public scrutiny. Nor has a qualified independent authority analyzed and evaluated the estimate. It would be very useful to review the MWH cost estimate with specific attention to the methods and assumptions used.

25

RECLAMATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS It has been reported that there is a reclamation plan for the Marlin mine(On Common Ground, 2010, p. 13); however, it is not public. If it is made public, the reclamation tasks and costs can be compared with this estimate to check whether that plan is complete and its cost estimates are acceptable. The authors of that plan presumably had better access to Marlin information. Or, the input data for this cost estimate can be adjusted as appropriate. In doing so, care must be taken to accept only obviously better information, and information that has been independently certified by a recognized authority. In engineering plans there are several levels of detail including 1) order of magnitude, 2) conceptual, 3) design, and 4) construction. A mine reclamation plan should beat the construction level of detail. This means providing the performance criteria, specifications, constraints, quantities, and engineering drawings in sufficient detail for construction.The currentdisturbances and the planned final disturbancesto the land at Marlin should be shown to a scale larger than 1:200, and these plans should be updated whenever there are changes. The reclamation earthmoving drawings should be on the same scale, and details on those drawings such as ditches, ponds, fences, etc. should be on a scale adequate for construction. For the various buildings and processing facilities, the original construction drawings updated with any subsequent modifications are adequate. It is vital that the reclamation plan have detailed reports on the various natural resources including surface and groundwater, geology and mineralogy, soils, wildlife, and vegetation. These reports must describe the pre-mining state of the resources, how the mine will impact the resources, and mitigation measures required to prevent their degradation. For any possible project effluents, the reports must describe their sources, pathways of release, and all possible environmental and human receptors. The reports must include maps of the resources; sampling and analytical data; population density, and distribution statistics. Most importantly, the mine reclamation plan must include management plans for protecting the resources and mitigatingimpacts of the project. For an example of the requirements for a mine reclamation plan, see the rules and regulations for Colorado,USA at http://mining.state.co.us/Rules%20and%20Regs.htm This web site also has the reclamation plans for mines in Colorado. For example, the San Luis gold mine was similar in size to Marlin with daily ore production of 5,000 tons and a life of 10 years. The reclamation plan is about 700 pages long in 17 exhibits and 3 appendices. The file includes another 170 documents on public hearings, reviews, and correspondence on the reclamation plan. Subsequent to filing the original plan, approximately 1790 revisions were filed through the life of the mine. Administration of the reclamation plan by the

26

state is reported in 55 documents on the reclamation bond, 120 inspections, and 471 documents on enforcement.(Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining & Safety, 2010) There are a number of international references or starting points from which Guatemala’s regulators could begin to develop a comprehensive mine reclamation program. The World Bank Group has information on mining guidelines, mine closure, and surety bonds. (International Finance Corporation, 2007) (Sasson, 2009) (Sheldon et al, 2002)One of Montana’s engineering contractors, SRK Consulting, published an “Overview of International Mine Closure Guidelines.”(Garcia, 2008)At Marlin, the tailings are one of the primary reclamation issues. The following web sitehas technical information and guidelines on tailings. www.tailings.info/guidelines.htm A highly respected technical resource is the Canadian program Mine Environment Neutral Drainage, which can be accessed at http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/mms-smm/tect-tech/sat-set/med-ndd-eng.htm. Guatemala’s regulators should be diligent in insisting on a comprehensive Marlin reclamation plan and should be diligent in enforcing the plan. Goldcorp does not have a very good record of environmental protection at many of its mines as follows:

· Alumbrera, Argentina: slurry pipeline spill; transportation release of ammonium nitrate; releases of arsenic, cadmium, copper, mercury, and strontium.

· Red Lake, Canada: release of tailings into the Bruce Channel of Red Lake that required two-day shutdown of nearby municipal water treatment plant; among highest 12 emitters of arsenic in Canada.

· Musselwhite, Canada: cyanide release. · Equity Silver, Canada: acid rock drainage. · La Coipa, Chile: releases of mercury and cyanide. · Pueblo Viejo, DominicanRepublic: acidic rock drainage. · San Martin, Honduras: reduced water resources; releases of arsenic,

cyanide, copper, iron, and lead. · Nukay, Mexico: tailings release. · Marigold, USA: arsenic contamination of groundwater; releases of

mercury. · Wharf, USA: releases of cyanide, nitrate, and selenium.(MiningWatch

Canada, 2007) Without vigilance on the part of the government of Guatemala, the San Miguel Ixtahuacán and Sipacapa Municipalities, and the local people, Marlin has the

27

potential to leave a costly legacy, and a source of ongoing environmental impacts for many years to come.

29

CONCLUSIONS From multiple viewpoints, the existing Marlin reclamation bond of $1 million is a trivial amount. The cost estimate given in this report indicates that the reclamation cost in the event of a Montana default could be as much as Q389 million or $49 million. There is a high risk that contaminated effluents from the site will require water treatment indefinitely (E-Tech, 2010), and the preceding total includes sufficient funds for an escrow account of Q97 million or $12 million to fund the treatment. Reclamation bonds held on other modern mines elsewhere are in the same order of magnitude. An unpublished report prepared for Montana estimates reclamation at $13.06 million. Even so, another mining expert who has reviewed the $13.06 million estimate concludes that it is inadequate(On Common Ground, 2010). By not requiring an adequate reclamation bond, Guatemala is exposed to high risks of injury to public health and the environment should Montana default on its responsibility to properly reclaim the Marlin mine. Such aMontana default could result from bankruptcy, forced or unplanned shutdown of the mine, and extreme weather or seismic events. A non-public reclamation plan is equally serious. It raises doubts about the sincerity of the mining company and regulators. Worldwide these documents are required to be public. The public can be a valuable resource in assuring that industrial projects are conducted in an appropriate manner. The world’s landscape is littered with mines that adversely impact public health and the environment. Many of these are historic mines, but irresponsible modern mining companies continue to leave environmental disasters such as the short list given in the section Environmental Risks of Mining. Many of these disasters are monumental as modern mining takes place on a massive scale. Some of these disasters require hundreds of millions or more than a billion dollars of government funds to cleanup, and in spite of these costly cleanups many of the injuries are perpetual.As noted earlier, Goldcorp has a history of environmental problems at many of its mines. Unless comprehensive reclamation requirements are diligently applied, the Marlin Mine also could become a significant environmental disaster. It would serve Goldcorp well to improve its environmental reputation among governments and citizens by carrying out exemplary reclamation at the Marlin mine.

31

WORKS CITED

Aventurine Engineering, Inc. (2010). Accessed 28-Sept. 2010at Sherpa: www.aventurineengineering.com/index.html Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining & Safety. (2010). Retrieved 3-Oct. 2010 from http://mining.state.co.us/operatordb/criteria.asp?search=minename Comision Gubernamental Para Analizar El Fenomeno De Agrietamiento De Paredes En Algunas Casas Adyacentes Al Proyecto Minero Marlin I. (2010). Informe final No. GI-001-2010 An. D 100115 CONJUNTO MARLIN(1), Guatemala City. E-Tech International (2010). Evaluation of predicted and actual water quality coditions at the Marlin Mine, Guatemala. Garcia, D. H. (2008).Overview of International Mine Closure Guidelines.2008 Meeting of American Institute of Professional Geologists, Flagstaff, Arizona, 20-24 Sept.2008. Goldcorp Inc. (2010). Marlin Drill Hole Data. Vacouver: Accessed 16-July 2010 at www.goldcorp.com/operations/marlin/reports. Howell, C., & Christopherson, D. (2009). Three-phase mining effluent treatment plant to meet stringent standards. Enginering and Mining Journal, April 2009, p. 48. International Finance Corporation. (2007). Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines MINING. World Bank Group, Washington, D. C., 10-Dec. 2007. Kuyucak, N. Lime neutralization treatment plant cost estimate. Golder Associates Ltd., Ontario. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection. (2010). Standardized reclamation cost estimator. Bureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation. Reno: Retrieved 1-July 2010 from http:www.nvbond.org/index.htm. MiningWatch Canada. (2007). Goldcorp Analysis. Retrieved 1-Oct. 2010 from www.miningwatch.ca Ministero de Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. (2007-2010). Informe de inspeccion Minera Marlin 1. Guatemala City.

32

Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S. A. (2003). Estudio de evaluacion de impacto ambiental y social projecto minero Marlin. Guatemala City. Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S. A. (2006). Estudio de evaluacion de impacto ambiental del proyecto La Hamaca. Guatemala City. Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S. A. (2007). Annual Monitoring Report 2006. Guatemala City. Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S. A. (2008). Annual Monitoring Report 2007. Guatemala City. Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S. A. (2010). Annual Monitoring Report 2009. Guatemala City. On Common Ground. (2010). Human Rights Assessement Appendix H External Environmental Review. Vancouver: Goldcorp, Inc. Robertson, A. M. (2009). Dam inspection - November 2009.2009 Annual Monitoring Report, Appendix E,Guatemala City: Montana Exploradora de Guatemala, S. A. RSMeans Company, Inc. (1999). Building Construction Cost Data. Kingston, MA: RSMeans Company, Inc. Sasson, M. (2009). Guidelines forthe Implementation of Financial Surety for Mine Closure.World Bank, Oil, Gas, and Mining Policy Division, Extractive Industries for Development Series #7, Washington, D. C., June 2009. Sheldon, C. G., J. E. Strongman, M. Weber-Fahr, N. Mekharat, M. Tall. (2002). Global Mining It’s Not Over When It’s Over: Mine Closure Around the World. World Bank Group’s Mining Department, Washington, D. C., 2002. Skousen, J., & McDonald, L. (2005). Land Feclamation.Accessed 5-Sept. 2010athttp://anr.est.wvu.edu/land_reclamation/revegetation Skousen, J., Hilton, H., & Faulkner, B. (2010). Overview of acid mine drainage treatment with chemicals. Accessed 1-Sept. 2010 at http://anr.ext.wvu.edu/land_reclamation/chemical_treatment. Morgantown, WV, USA. United States Air Force & US Environmental Protection Agency. (2008). Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. Retrieved 28-Sept. 2010 from www.frtr.gov/ec2/ecracersystm.htm

33

United States Bureau of Mines. Bureau of Mines Cost Estimating System Handbook. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of the Interior, Information Circular 9142-9143. United States Enviornmental Protection Agency. (1989). Technical Guidance Document: Final Covers on Hazardous Waste Landfills and Surface Impoundments. Washington, D.C.: EPA/530-SW-89-047. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1997). Damage cases and environmental releases from mines and mineral processing sites. Washington, D.C.

35

RECLAMATION ISSUES

At the

Marlin Mine

APPENDIX

RECLAMATION COST ESTIM

Version 1.1.2 (updated 03 February, 2008)

NOT APPROVED FOR USE IN NEVADACOST DATA FILE INFORMATION

File Name: Marlin Rec Cst 2010 12 01.xls

Cost Data File: cost_data-std-nv2009-1.xls

Cost Data Date: August 1, 2009

Cost Data Basis: Standardized Data

Author/Source: Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) & NV BLM

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project Name:

Date of Submittal: 1 July 2010

Select One:

Select One:

Cost Basis Category:

Cost Basis Description:

STANDARDIZED RECLAMATION COST ESTIMATOR

Churchill, Douglas, Elko, Eureka, Humboldt, Lander, Lyon, Mineral, Pershing, Storey, Washoe,

and White Pine Counties

Marlin

Notice or Sm Exploration Plan Notice or Sm Exploration Plan Lg Exploration Plan Lg Exploration Plan

Private Land Private Land Public or Public/Private Public or Public/Private

Mine Plan of Operations Mine Plan of Operations

Northern NevadaNorthern Nevada

This version has been validated and verified by the NDEP and BLM for use in Nevada as

of 04 February 2008.

Copyright © 2004-2008 - SRCE Software. All Rights Reserved. Page 1 of 1

Project Name: Marlin

Project Date: 1 July 2010

Marlin Rec Cst 2010 12 01.xls

Reclamation Plan

Table of Contents

Cost Summary

Exploration

Exploration Roads & Pads

Waste Rock Dumps

Heap Leach Pads

Tailings

Roads

Pits

Underground Openings

Foundations and Buildings

Other Demo & Equipment Removal

Sediment & Drainage Control

Process Ponds

Landfills

Yards, Etc.

Waste Disposal

Misc. Costs

Monitoring


Labor Costs

Equipment Costs

Material Costs

Misc. Unit Costs

Fleets (Crews)

Productivity

Seed Mixture #

Page 1 of 1

Project Name: MarlinProject Date: 1 July 2010

Model Version: Version 1.1.2 (updated 03 February, 2008)File Name: Marlin Rec Cst 2010 12 01.xls

NEVADA STANDARDIZED RECLAMATION BOND CALCULATION - SUMMARY

A. Earthwork/Recontouring Labor(1)

Equipment(2) Materials Total

Exploration $270,101 $689,665 $92,558 $1,052,324

Exploration Roads & Drill Pads $18,307 $42,445 $0 $60,752

Roads $252,926 $687,057 $0 $939,983

Well Abandonment* $0 $0 $0 $0

Pits $1,424 $2,645 N/A $4,069

Underground Openings $8,292 $4,174 $4,603 $17,068

Process Ponds $108,790 $183,054 $0 $291,844

Heaps $0 $0 $0 $0

Waste Rock Dumps $1,909,488 $5,637,391 $0 $7,546,879

Landfills $15,613 $38,069 $0 $53,682

Tailings $2,458,465 $6,294,839 $0 $8,753,304

Foundation & Buildings Areas $85,419 $204,651 $0 $290,070

Yards, Etc. $300,955 $697,883 $0 $998,838

Drainage & Sediment Control $63,255 $73,484 $15,246 $151,985

Other** $0

Subtotal $5,493,035 $14,555,357 $112,407 $20,160,798

Mob/Demob* $0

Subtotal "A" $5,493,035 $14,555,357 $112,407 $20,160,798

B. Revegetation/Stabilization Labor(1)


Exploration $0 $0 $0 $0

Exploration Roads & Drill Pads $443 $380 $3,150 $3,973

Roads $4,228 $3,631 $30,059 $37,918

Well Abandonment N/A

Pits $2,206 $1,894 $15,682 $19,782

Underground Openings N/A

Process Ponds $780 $670 $5,275 $6,725

Heaps $0

Waste Rock Dumps $6,037 $5,187 $42,928 $54,152

Landfills $234 $201 $1,664 $2,099

Tailings $23,876 $20,509 $169,733 $214,118

Foundation & Buildings Areas $2,870 $2,466 $13,032 $18,368

Yards, Etc. $8,003 $6,874 $56,892 $71,769

Drainage & Sediment Control $2,862 $2,461 $19,854 $25,177

Other** $0

Subtotal "B" $51,539 $44,273 $358,269 $454,081

Labor(1)


Process Ponds/Sludge* $0

Heaps* $0

Dumps (Waste & Landfill)* $0

Tailings* $0

Surplus Water Disposal* $0

Monitoring* $0

Miscellaneous* $0

Solid Waste - On Site $0 $0 N/A $0

Solid Waste - Off Site $0

Hazardous Materials $0

Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils $9,196 $0 $91,245 $100,441

Other** $33,250 $0 $250,000 $283,250

Subtotal "C" $42,446 $0 $341,245 $383,691

Labor(1)


Foundation & Buildings Areas $872,973 $710,141 $0 $1,583,114

Other Demolition $4,500 $4,500 $0 $9,000

Equipment Removal $124,476 $414,920 $0 $539,396

Fence Removal $20,850 $8,450 $29,300

Fence Installation $90,200 $22,400 $760,000 $872,600

Pipe & Culvert Removal $260,100 $105,300 $365,400

Powerline Removal $635,000 $635,000

Transformer Removal $58,500 $58,500

Rip-rap, rock lining, gabions $5,014,781 $2,325,798 $73,622 $7,414,201

Other Misc. Costs $177,375 $64,234 $520,581 $762,190

Other** $0

Subtotal "D" $7,258,755 $3,655,743 $1,354,203 $12,268,701

Labor(1)


Reclamation Monitoring and Maintenance $594,234 $50,218 $172,355 $816,807

Ground and Surface Water Monitoring $267,286 $68,726 $366,600 $702,612

Subtotal "E" $861,520 $118,944 $538,955 $1,519,419

F. Construction Management & Support Labor Equipment(2) Materials Total

Construction Management $1,775,232 $499,392 N/A $2,274,624

Construction Support $0 $356,609 $0 $356,609

Road Maintenance $224,100 $423,727 $7,500 $655,327

Other** $0

Subtotal "F" $1,999,332 $1,279,728 $7,500 $3,286,560

G. Operational & Maintenance Costs Labor(1)

Equipment(2)

Materials(3) Total

Subtotal A through F $15,706,627 $19,654,045 $2,712,579 $38,073,250

* Costs estimated outside of standardized model - additional documentation required.

** Other Operator supplied costs - additional documentation required.

C. Detoxification/Water Treatment/Disposal of Wastes**

D. Structure, Equipment and Facility Removal

Hazmat Incinerator

E. Monitoring

Marlin Rec Cst 2010 12 01.xls Page 1 of 2 1/17/2011

Project Name: MarlinProject Date: 1 July 2010

Model Version: Version 1.1.2 (updated 03 February, 2008)File Name: Marlin Rec Cst 2010 12 01.xls

NEVADA STANDARDIZED RECLAMATION BOND CALCULATION - SUMMARY

Indirect Costs Include? Total1. Engineering, Design and Construction (ED&C) Plan (7) $1,522,930

2. Contingency (8) $2,284,395

3. Insurance (9) $235,599 $235,599

4. Performance Bond (10) $1,142,198

5. Contractor Profit (11) $3,807,325

6. Contract Administration (12) $2,284,395

7. BLM Indirect Cost (13) N/A

Subtotal Add-On Costs $11,276,842

Grand Total $49,350,092

Administrative Cost Rates (%)

<= <= <= >

1. Engineering, Design and Construction (ED&C) Plan (7) $1,000,000 $25,000,000 $25,000,000 Notice Level

Variable Rate 8% 6% 4% 0%

<= <= <= >

2. Contingency (8) $500,000 $5,000,000 $50,000,000 $50,000,000 Notice Level

Variable Rate 10% 8% 6% 4% 0%

3. Insurance (9) 1.5% of labor costs

4. Bond (10) 3.0% of the O&M costs if O&M costs are >$100,000

5. Contractor Profit (11) 10% of the O&M costs

<= <= <= >

6. Contract Administration (12) $1,000,000 $25,000,000 $25,000,000

Variable Rate 10% 8% 6%

7. BLM Indirect Cost (13) 21% of Contract Administration

13. BLM’s indirect cost rate is 21% of BLM’s contract administration costs.

Cost Ranges for Indirect Cost Percentages

4. Fluid management should be calculated only when mineral processing activities are involved. Fluid management represents the costs of maintaining proper fluid

management to prevent overflow of solution ponds through premature cessation or abandonment of operations. Calculate a minimum six month direct cost

estimate which includes power, supplies, equipment, labor and maintenance.

5. Handling of hazardous materials includes the cost of decontaminating, neutralizing, disposing, treating and/or isolating all hazardous materials used, produced,

or stored on the site.

6. Any mitigation measures required in the Plan of Operations must be included in the reclamation cost estimate. Mitigation may include measures to avoid,

minimize, rectify and reduce or eliminate the impact, or compensate for the impact.

7. Engineering, design and construction (ED&C) plans are often necessary to provide details on the reclamation needed to contract for the required work. To

estimate the cost to develop an ED&C plan use 4-8% of the O&M cost. Calculate the ED&C cost as a percentage of the O&M cost as follows: up to and including

$1 million, use 8%; over $1 million to $25 million, use 6%; and over $25 million, use 4%. Inclusion of a line item for the development of an ED&C plan may not be

necessary for small operations, such as notice-level exploration. With small, uncomplicated reclamation efforts contracting may be able to proceed without

developing an ED&C plan. [ED&C is automatically eliminated if "Notice" is selected on the Property Information Sheet]

8. A contingency cost is included in the reclamation cost estimation to cover unforeseen cost elements. Calculate the contingency cost as a percentage of the

O&M cost as follows: up to and including $500,000, use 10%; over $500,000 to $5 million, use 8%; over $5 million to $50 million, use 6%; and greater than $50

million, use 4%. As with the ED&C cost, inclusion of a contingency cost may not be necessary for small operations, such as notice-level exploration.

9. Insurance premiums are calculated at 1.5% of the total labor costs. Enter the premium amount if liability insurance is not included in the itemized unit costs.

10. Federal construction contracts exceeding $100,000 require both a performance and a payment bond (Miller Act, 40 USC 270et seq.). Each bond premium is

figured at 1.5% of the O&M cost. Enter the sum of both premium costs on this line.

11. For Federal construction contracts, use 10% of estimated O&M cost for the contractor’s profit.

12. To estimate the contract administration cost, use 6 to 10% of the operational and maintenance (O&M) cost. Calculate the contract administration cost as a

percentage of the O&M cost as follows: up to and including $1 million, use 10%; over $1 million to $25 million, use 8%; and greater than $25 million use 6%.

RECLAMATION COST ESTIMATION SUMMARY SHEET FOOTNOTES1. Federal construction contracts require Davis-Bacon wage rates for contracts over $2,000. Wage rate estimates may include base pay, payroll loading, overhead

and profit. To avoid double counting of any of the identified administrative costs the operator must itemize the components of their labor cost estimates or provide

BLM with a signed statement, under penalty of USC 1001, that identifies what specific administrative costs are included in the quoted hourly rate.

2. The reclamation cost estimate must include the estimated plugging cost of at least one drill hole for each active drill rig in the project area. Where the submitted

Notice or approved Plan of Operations calls for drill holes to be plugged, but doesn’t specifically require the drill holes be plugged before the drill rig has been moved

from the drill pad, the reclamation cost estimate must include the plugging cost for those drill holes. For all drill holes and wells scheduled to be left open, the

estimated plugging cost must be included in the reclamation cost estimate. Where the approved Plan of Operations proposes immediate mining through an area

where the drilling is to occur, and the cost of the post-mining reclamation is included in the reclamation cost estimate, the cost estimate does not need to include the

plugging costs for those drill holes.

3. Miscellaneous items should be itemized on accompanying worksheets.

Marlin Rec Cst 2010 12 01.xls Page 2 of 2 1/17/2011

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Ex

plo

rati

on

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Ex

plo

rati

on

- C

os

t S

um

ma

ry

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Ho

le A

ba

nd

on

me

nt

Co

sts

$2

70

,10

1$

68

9,6

65

$9

2,5

58

$1

,05

2,3

24

Tre

nc

h B

ac

kfi

llin

g C

os

ts$

0

Su

bto

tal

Ea

rth

wo

rks

$2

70

,10

1$

68

9,6

65

$9

2,5

58

$1

,05

2,3

24

Tre

nc

h R

ev

eg

eta

tio

n C

os

ts$

0

Su

bto

tal

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

$0

$0

$0

$0

TO

TA

LS

$2

70

,10

1$

68

9,6

65

$9

2,5

58

$1

,05

2,3

24

Co

lor

Co

de

Ke

y

Use

r In

pu

t -

Dire

ct

Inp

ut

Dir

ec

t In

pu

tE

xp

lora

tio

n h

ole

su

rfa

ce

se

al

thic

kn

es

s:

20

.0ft

< I

n N

ev

ad

a u

se

10

'

Use

r In

pu

t -

Pu

ll D

ow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Min

imu

m s

ea

l a

bo

ve

gro

un

dw

ate

r ta

ble

:5

0.0

ft<

In

Ne

va

da

us

e 5

0'

Pro

gra

m C

on

sta

nt

(ca

n o

ve

rrid

e)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rog

ram

Ca

lcu

late

d V

alu

eL

oc

ke

d C

ell

- F

orm

ula

or

Re

fere

nc

e

Ex

plo

rati

on

Dri

llh

ole

Ab

an

do

nm

en

t -

Us

er

Inp

ut

Ho

le P

lug

gin

g

Ho

le T

yp

eD

iam

ete

r

To

tal

Nu

mb

er

of

Ho

les

Ma

x H

ole

s

Op

en

at

On

e

Tim

e

Ca

sin

g t

o

Re

mo

ve

Av

era

ge

De

pth

of

Ho

le(1

)

De

pth

to

Wa

ter

Ho

le

Plu

g

Me

tho

d-1

(se

lect)

inft

ft b

gs

ft b

gs

(se

lect)

1M

arl

in E

xp

lora

tio

n D

rill

Ho

les

, 2

Co

re2

.98

61

06

10

30

69

02

0G

rou

t +

Ba

ck

fill

2L

a H

am

ac

a E

xp

lora

tio

n D

rill

Ho

les

, 3

Co

re2

.98

31

31

30

85

02

0G

rou

t +

Ba

ck

fill

3W

es

t V

ero

Ex

plo

rati

on

Dri

ll H

ole

s,

2C

ore

3.9

83

83

83

01

,31

72

0G

rou

t +

Ba

ck

fill

4W

ate

r S

up

ply

We

ll P

SA

-1,

4R

ota

ry1

2.2

51

11

11

01

,11

57

50

Gro

ut

+ B

ac

kfi

ll

5W

ate

r S

up

ply

We

ll P

SA

-2,

4R

ota

ry1

2.2

51

19

50

96

02

46

Gro

ut

+ B

ac

kfi

ll

6P

W M

on

ito

rin

g W

ell

s,

5R

ota

ry9

55

30

03

10

28

0G

rou

t +

Ba

ck

fill

7M

W M

on

ito

rin

g W

ell

s, 5

Ro

tary

97

74

60

82

04

80

Gro

ut

+ B

ac

kfi

ll

No

tes:

1.

If c

ore

ho

les a

re p

re-d

rille

d,

use

le

ng

th o

f h

ole

be

low

pre

-drille

d le

ng

th2

. G

old

co

rp 2

01

03

. M

EG

20

06

4.

ME

G 2

01

0 p

. 59

5.

ME

G 2

01

0 A

tt.

D a

nd

ME

G 2

00

8 F

ig. 8

Ex

plo

rati

on

Tre

nc

he

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Tre

nc

h

Le

ng

th

Tre

nc

h

De

pth

Tre

nc

h

Bo

tto

m

Wid

th

Tre

nc

h

Sid

es

lop

e

An

gle

Ad

dit

ion

al

Hrs

for

Wa

lk-i

n(1

)B

ac

kfi

ll

Ma

teri

al

Cu

t

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Ba

ck

fill

ing

Fle

et

Se

ed

Mix

Mu

lch

Fe

rtil

ize

r-1

ftft

ftd

eg

ree

s(s

ele

ct)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

1

1.

Inclu

de

on

e-w

ay h

ou

rs n

ece

ssa

ry t

o w

alk

eq

uip

me

nt

in f

rom

dro

p-o

ff p

oin

t to

wo

rk a

rea

Ex

plo

rati

on

Dri

llh

ole

Ab

an

do

nm

en

t

Vo

l/fo

ot

of

de

pth

Ho

le

Plu

gg

ing

Ma

teri

al

(1)

To

tal

Gro

ut

Vo

lum

e(2

)

To

tal

Cu

ttin

gs

Vo

lum

e

To

tal

To

p S

ea

l

Vo

lum

e(3

,4)

To

tal

Dri

llh

ole

Ab

an

do

n.

Ho

urs

(6

,7)

Ca

sin

g

Re

mo

va

l

La

bo

r

Co

st

(5)

Ca

sin

g

Re

mo

va

l

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Plu

gg

ing

La

bo

r

Co

st

Plu

gg

ing

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Plu

gg

ing

Ma

teri

al

Co

st

To

p S

ea

l

Ma

teri

al

Co

st

(2,3

)

To

tal

Co

st

(6,7

)

ft3

cy

cy

cy

hrs

$$

$$

$$

$

1M

arlin

Exp

lora

tio

n D

rill

Ho

les,

20

.05

Gro

ut

1.5

70

.02

2.9

$3

0,9

98

$7

9,1

49

$1

93

,73

6$

49

4,6

80

$6

2,8

25

$3

,56

3$

86

4,9

51

2L

a H

am

aca

Exp

lora

tio

n D

rill

Ho

les,

30

.05

Gro

ut

1.9

40

.02

2.9

$1

,57

5$

4,0

22

$9

,84

6$

25

,13

9$

3,9

45

$1

81

$4

4,7

08

3W

est

Ve

ro E

xp

lora

tio

n D

rill

Ho

les,

20

.09

Gro

ut

5.4

40

.04

2.9

$1

,93

1$

4,9

31

$1

2,0

69

$3

0,8

16

$1

3,5

61

$4

44

$6

3,7

52

De

sc

rip

tio

n

Tre

nch

Para

mete

rsB

ackfi

ll

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 1

of

3E

xp

lora

tio

n

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Ex

plo

rati

on

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

4W

ate

r S

up

ply

We

ll P

SA

-1,

40

.82

Gro

ut

+ C

utt

ing

s1

5.7

52

0.9

60

.38

25

.9$

1,7

66

$4

,50

9$

1,3

34

$3

,40

6$

1,0

33

$1

11

$1

2,1

59

5W

ate

r S

up

ply

We

ll P

SA

-2,

40

.82

Gro

ut

+ C

utt

ing

s2

9.0

05

.65

0.3

82

2.0

$1

,51

2$

3,8

60

$1

,09

2$

2,7

90

$1

,90

2$

11

1$

11

,26

7

6P

W M

on

ito

rin

g W

ells

, 5

0.4

4G

rou

t +

Cu

ttin

gs

1.6

33

.59

0.2

08

.8$

2,4

14

$6

,16

3$

2,2

23

$5

,67

7$

53

5$

29

2$

17

,30

47

MW

Mo

nito

rin

g W

ells

, 5

0.4

4G

rou

t +

Cu

ttin

gs

7.9

46

.84

0.2

01

2.3

$5

,15

8$

13

,17

0$

4,4

47

$1

1,3

53

$3

,64

6$

40

9$

38

,18

3

63

.27

37

.04

1.2

47

7.7

$4

5,3

54

$1

15

,80

4$

22

4,7

47

$5

73

,86

1$

87

,44

7$

5,1

11

$1

,05

2,3

24

No

tes:

1.

Assu

me

s g

rou

t b

ackfill

fro

m b

ott

om

of

ho

le t

o 5

0' (

15

.24

m)

ab

ove

sta

tic w

ate

r le

ve

l, u

p t

o d

ista

nce

fro

m t

op

of

ho

le a

s s

et

ab

ove

.

2

. A

ssu

me

s 2

5%

lo

ss t

o f

orm

atio

n f

or

gro

ut

ba

ckfill

3.

If "

To

p P

lug

" h

ole

plu

g m

eth

od

is u

se

d,

assu

me

s p

hysic

al p

lug

in

sta

lled

with

ou

t b

ackfill,

gro

ut

or

ce

me

nt.

No

t a

va

ilab

le o

ptio

n f

or

Ne

va

da

pro

jects

4.

Assu

me

s t

op

10

' (3

m)

of

ho

le is p

lug

ge

d w

ith

ce

me

nt

if "

Gro

ut

On

ly",

"B

ackfill

+ G

rou

t",

or

"Ce

me

nt

Plu

g"

ho

le p

lug

me

tho

d a

re c

ho

se

n.

5.

Assu

me

s t

ha

t a

) ca

sin

g is n

ot

ce

me

nte

d e

ntire

le

ng

th,

b)

do

es n

ot

inclu

de

te

mp

ora

ry s

urf

ace

ca

sin

g

6

. A

ssu

me

s m

inim

um

1 h

r p

er

ho

le f

or

ab

an

do

nm

en

t (e

xclu

din

g m

ove

-to

an

d c

asin

g r

em

ova

l)

7

. A

ssu

me

s f

ixe

d h

ou

rs p

er

ho

le f

or

se

tup

& t

ea

r-d

ow

n a

nd

mo

vin

g b

etw

ee

n h

ole

s (

se

e P

rod

uctivty

Sh

ee

t) p

er

drill

ho

le (

inclu

de

s r

ig t

ime

if

gro

utin

g r

eq

uire

d,

lab

or

cre

w o

nly

if

cu

ttin

gs b

ackfill

on

ly)

Ex

plo

rati

on

Tre

nc

he

s -

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Exp

lora

tio

n T

ren

ch

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

nD

ozin

g &

Rip

pin

g/S

cari

fyin

g C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Do

zin

g:

Do

zin

g d

ista

nce

= 1

/2 t

ren

ch

le

ng

th o

r 4

00

ft

(ma

x p

ush

) w

hic

he

ve

r is

le

ss

Assu

me

s f

lat

pu

sh

(g

rad

e c

orr

ectio

n f

acto

r =

1)

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

:1

0 f

t (3

m)

ad

de

d t

o t

ren

ch

wid

th t

o a

cco

un

t fo

r re

ve

ge

tatio

n u

nd

er

sp

oil

pile

Ex

plo

rati

on

Tre

nc

he

s -

Ba

ck

fill

/Re

gra

din

g C

os

ts

Pro

du

cti

vit

y =

Do

zer

Pro

du

cti

vit

y x

Gra

de C

orr

ecti

on

x D

en

sit

y C

orr

ecti

on

x O

pera

tor

(0.7

5)

x M

ate

rial x V

isib

ilit

y x

Jo

b E

ffic

ien

cy (

0.8

3)

Tre

nc

h

Ba

ck

fill

Vo

lum

e

Do

ze

r

Pu

sh

Dis

tan

ce

Eq

uip

me

nt

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Do

zin

g

Ma

teri

al

De

ns

ity

Co

rre

cti

on

Ba

ck

fill

ing

Fle

et

Co

rre

cte

d

Ho

url

y

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

To

tal

Do

ze

r

Ho

urs

Tre

nc

h B

ac

kfi

ll

La

bo

r

Co

st

Tre

nc

h B

ac

kfi

ll

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Tre

nc

h B

ac

kfi

ll

Co

st

LC

Y (

BC

Y+

30

%)

ftyd

3/h

ryd

3/h

rh

r$

$$

1

Ex

plo

rati

on

Tre

nc

he

s -

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

sts

Su

rfa

ce

Are

a

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

La

bo

r

Co

st

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Re

vg

eta

tio

n

Ma

teri

al

Co

st

To

tal

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

st

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

!

db

a"

# 2

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 2

of

3E

xp

lora

tio

n

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Ex

plo

rati

on

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

acre

s$

$$

$

1

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 3

of

3E

xp

lora

tio

n

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Ex

pl.

Ro

ad

s &

Pa

ds

Pro

jec

t N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

- R

ec

lam

ati

on

Pla

n

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Ex

plo

rati

on

Ro

ad

s &

Pa

ds

- C

os

t S

um

ma

ry

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Gra

din

g C

osts

$2

,02

0$

2,0

66

N/A

$4

,08

6

Co

ve

r P

lace

me

nt

Co

st

$1

5,6

64

$4

0,0

43

N/A

$5

5,7

07

Rip

pin

g C

ost

$6

23

$3

36

N/A

$9

59

Su

bto

tal

Ea

rth

wo

rks

$1

8,3

07

$4

2,4

45

$6

0,7

52

Re

ve

ge

tatio

n C

ost

$4

43

$3

80

$3

,15

0$

3,9

73

TO

TA

LS

$1

8,7

50

$4

2,8

25

$3

,15

0$

64

,72

5

Co

lor

Co

de

Key

Use

r In

pu

t -

Dire

ct

Inp

ut

Dir

ec

t In

pu

tM

ax

imu

m g

rad

e a

llo

we

d f

or

do

ze

r:1

0.0

%<

In

Ne

va

da

us

e 1

0'

Use

r In

pu

t -

Pu

ll D

ow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Ma

xim

um

gra

de

all

ow

ed

fo

r g

rad

er:

10

.0%

< I

n N

ev

ad

a u

se

30

'

Pro

gra

m C

on

sta

nt

(ca

n o

ve

rrid

e)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tO

rig

ina

l s

lop

e c

uto

ff t

o i

nc

lud

e e

xtr

a s

um

p v

olu

me

:3

0.0

%P

rog

ram

Ca

lcu

late

d V

alu

eL

oc

ke

d C

ell

- F

orm

ula

or

Re

fere

nce

Ex

plo

rati

on

Ro

ad

s &

Pa

ds

- U

se

r In

pu

tY

ou

mu

st

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

ro

ad

Ph

ys

ica

l(1

)G

row

th M

ed

ia

ID C

od

e

Un

de

rly

ing

Gro

un

d

Slo

pe

Un

gra

de

d

Slo

pe

Cu

t

Slo

pe

Ro

ad

+

Dri

ll P

ad

Le

ng

th

Ro

ad

Wid

th

Nu

mb

er

of

Dri

ll

Pa

ds

Ind

ivid

ua

l

Su

mp

Vo

lum

e

Dri

ll

Pa

d

Wid

th

Dri

ll

Pa

d

Le

ng

th

Slo

pe

Re

pla

ce

me

nt

Pe

rce

nt

Re

gra

de

Vo

lum

e

(if

ca

lcu

late

d

els

ew

he

re)

Dis

turb

ed

Are

a

(if

ca

lcu

late

d

els

ew

he

re)

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Th

ick

ne

ss

Dis

tan

ce

to

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Sto

ck

pil

e

Slo

pe

fro

m

Ro

ad

to

Sto

ck

pil

e

-1%

gra

de

_H

:1V

de

gre

es

ftft

cy

ftft

%cy

acre

sin

ft%

gra

de

1L

a H

am

ac

a2

0.0

1.3

45

10

,00

01

23

12

03

33

01

23

0,0

00

-6

2W

ate

r S

up

ply

We

ll A

cc

es

s &

Pa

d,

32

0.0

1.3

45

4,0

00

12

22

01

03

01

23

4,0

00

-63

1

. A

ll P

hysic

al p

ara

me

ters

mu

st

be

in

pu

t e

ve

n if

ma

nu

al o

ve

rrid

es f

or

vo

lum

e o

r a

rea

are

use

d.

2

. S

um

p v

olu

me

will

be

ap

plie

d t

o a

ll ro

ad

s o

n s

lop

es le

ss t

ha

n s

ho

w a

bo

ve

. O

n s

lop

es g

rea

t th

an

sh

ow

n a

bo

ve

pa

d w

idth

(i.e

. cu

t vo

lum

e)

sh

ou

ld b

e a

de

qu

ate

to

acco

un

t fo

r su

mp

vo

lum

e.

3.

Co

mis

ion

20

10

Ex

plo

rati

on

Ro

ad

s &

Pa

ds

- U

se

r In

pu

t (c

on

t.)

Yo

u m

ust

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

ro

ad

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Re

gra

de

Ma

teri

al

Cu

t M

ate

ria

l

Ty

pe

Re

co

nto

uri

ng

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Ad

dit

ion

al

Hrs

for

Wa

lk-i

n (1

)C

ov

er

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Co

ve

r

Pla

ce

me

nt

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Ad

dit

ion

al

Hrs

for

Wa

lk-i

n (1

)S

ee

d M

ixM

ulc

hF

ert

iliz

er

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g?

Rip

pin

g F

lee

t

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

1L

a H

am

ac

a1

All

uv

ium

Sm

Ex

ca

va

tor

1A

llu

viu

mS

ma

ll T

ruc

k1

Mix

1S

tra

w M

ulc

hC

he

mic

al

Ye

sS

ma

ll D

oze

r

2W

ate

r S

up

ply

We

ll A

cc

es

s &

Pa

d,

31

All

uv

ium

Sm

Ex

ca

va

tor

0A

llu

viu

mS

ma

ll T

ruc

k0

Mix

1S

tra

w M

ulc

hC

he

mic

al

Ye

sS

ma

ll D

oze

r3

1.

Inclu

de

on

e-w

ay

ho

urs

ne

ce

ssa

ry t

o w

alk

eq

uip

me

nt

in f

rom

dro

p-o

ff p

oin

t to

wo

rk a

rea

Ex

plo

rati

on

Ro

ad

s &

Pa

ds

- C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Re

gra

din

g V

olu

me

an

d F

oo

tpri

nt

Vo

lum

e

Will

no

t a

llow

do

ze

r fo

r slo

pe

s g

rea

ter

tha

n 3

0%

Fo

r d

oze

r re

gra

din

g p

ush

dis

tan

ce

= r

oa

d w

idth

Fa

cil

ity

De

sc

rip

tio

nU

se

r O

ve

rrid

es

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

Gra

din

gC

ov

er

Fig

ure

1 -

Reg

rad

ing

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

n

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 1

of

3E

xp

l. R

oa

ds &

Pa

ds

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Ex

pl.

Ro

ad

s &

Pa

ds

Pro

jec

t N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

- R

ec

lam

ati

on

Pla

n

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

lsA

ssu

me

s d

oze

r p

ush

is u

ph

ill

Assu

me

s m

inim

um

pu

sh

dis

tan

ce

of

10

0 f

t

Rip

pin

g/S

ca

rify

ing

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Min

imu

m 1

hr

rip

pin

g/s

ca

rify

ing

tim

e p

er

are

a

Nu

mb

er

of

pa

sse

s =

Fin

al slo

pe

le

ng

th ÷

Gra

de

r w

idth

Tra

ve

l d

ista

nce

= N

um

be

r o

f p

asse

s x

R

oa

d le

ng

th

To

tal h

ou

rs =

(T

rave

l d

ista

nce

÷ G

rad

er

pro

du

ctivity)

+ (

Nu

mb

er

of

pa

sse

s x

Gra

de

r m

an

eu

ve

r tim

e)

Fo

r d

oze

r re

gra

din

g a

ssu

me

s p

ush

dis

tan

ce

= 3

x r

oa

d w

idth

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Min

imu

m o

f 1

acre

cre

w t

ime

pe

r a

rea

Inp

utt

ing

Ex

plo

rati

on

Ro

ad

s a

nd

Dri

ll P

ad

s

Ex

plo

rati

on

Ro

ad

s &

Pa

ds

- R

eg

rad

ing

Co

sts

To

tal

Ro

ad

Le

ng

th

To

tal

Dri

ll P

ad

Le

ng

th

Re

gra

din

g

Vo

lum

e

Re

co

nto

uri

ng

Fle

et

Eq

uip

me

nt

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Ho

urs

(1)

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Re

gra

din

g

Co

st

ftft

cy

cy/h

rh

r$

$$

1L

a H

am

ac

a9

,07

09

30

3,6

76

Sm

Exca

va

tor

13

92

8.4

$1

,68

2$

1,7

21

$3

,40

3

2W

ate

r S

up

ply

We

ll A

cc

es

s &

Pa

d,

33

,94

06

07

96

Sm

Exca

va

tor

13

95

.7$

33

8$

34

5$

68

33

13

,01

09

90

4,4

72

34

.1$

2,0

20

$2

,06

6$

4,0

86

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 2

of

3E

xp

l. R

oa

ds &

Pa

ds

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Ex

pl.

Ro

ad

s &

Pa

ds

Pro

jec

t N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

- R

ec

lam

ati

on

Pla

n

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls(1

) In

clu

de

s w

alk

-in

tim

e b

ase

d o

n d

ista

nce

an

d t

rave

l sp

ee

d (

se

e P

rod

uctivity s

he

et

for

sp

ee

ds)

Ex

plo

rati

on

Ro

ad

s &

Pa

ds

- G

row

th M

ed

ia C

os

ts

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Vo

lum

e

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Re

pla

ce

me

nt

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Co

st

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

0 1L

a H

am

ac

a6

,89

1S

ma

ll T

ruck

57

61

61

4.0

$1

1,8

34

$3

0,2

48

$4

2,0

82

2W

ate

r S

up

ply

We

ll A

cc

es

s &

Pa

d,

32

,36

4S

ma

ll T

ruck

54

41

74

.3$

3,8

30

$9

,79

5$

13

,62

5

3

9,2

55

18

.3$

15

,66

4$

40

,04

3$

55

,70

7

Ex

plo

rati

on

Ro

ad

s &

Pa

ds

- S

ca

rify

ing

/Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

sts

Su

rfa

ce

Are

a

Rip

pin

g

Ho

urs

Rip

pin

g

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Rip

pin

g

La

bo

r

Co

sts

To

tal

Rip

pin

g

Co

sts

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

La

bo

r

Co

st

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Re

vg

eta

tio

n

Ma

teri

al

Co

st

To

tal

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

st

acre

sh

rs$

$$

$$

$$

1L

a H

am

ac

a4

.23

4.3

$4

62

$2

49

$7

11

$3

30

$2

83

$2

,34

6$

2,9

59

2W

ate

r S

up

ply

We

ll A

cc

es

s &

Pa

d,

31

.45

1.5

$1

61

$8

7$

24

8$

11

3$

97

$8

04

$1

,01

43

5.6

85

.8$

62

3$

33

6$

95

9$

44

3$

38

0$

3,1

50

$3

,97

3

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 3

of

3E

xp

l. R

oa

ds &

Pa

ds

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Ro

ad

sP

roje

ct

Na

me

: M

arl

in -

Re

cla

ma

tio

n P

lan

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Ro

ad

s -

Co

st

Su

mm

ary

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Gra

din

g C

osts

$116,6

94

$354,0

32

N/A

$470,7

26

Cover

Pla

cem

ent C

ost

$129,4

16

$330,7

79

N/A

$460,1

95

Rip

pin

g C

ost

$6,8

16

$2,2

46

N/A

$9,0

62

Su

bto

tal E

art

hw

ork

s$252,9

26

$687,0

57

$939,9

83

Revegeta

tion C

ost

$4,2

28

$3,6

31

$30,0

59

$37,9

18

TO

TA

LS

$257,1

54

$690,6

88

$30,0

59

$977,9

01

Co

lor

Co

de K

ey

User

Input -

Direct In

put

Dir

ect

Inp

ut

Maxim

um

gra

de a

llo

wed

fo

r d

ozer:

30.0

%<

In

Nevad

a u

se 1

0'

User

Input -

Pull

Dow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Maxim

um

gra

de a

llo

wed

fo

r g

rad

er:

10.0

%<

In

Nevad

a u

se 3

0'

Pro

gra

m C

onsta

nt (c

an o

verr

ide)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rogra

m C

alc

ula

ted V

alu

eL

ocked

Cell -

Fo

rmu

la o

r R

efe

ren

ce

Ro

ad

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

Yo

u m

ust

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

ro

ad

Fa

cil

ity

De

sc

rip

tio

nP

hy

sic

al

(1)

Gro

wth

Me

dia

ID C

od

e

Un

derl

yin

g

Gro

un

d

Slo

pe

Un

gra

ded

Slo

pe

Cu

t S

lop

eR

oad

Wid

thR

oad

Len

gth

Slo

pe

Rep

lacem

en

t

Perc

en

t

Reg

rad

e V

olu

me

(if

calc

ula

ted

els

ew

here

)

Dis

turb

ed

Are

a

(if

calc

ula

ted

els

ew

here

)

Gro

wth

Med

ia

Th

ickn

ess

Dis

tan

ce t

o

Gro

wth

Med

ia

Sto

ckp

ile

Slo

pe f

rom

Ro

ad

to

Sto

ckp

ile

-1%

gra

de

_H

:1V

degre

es

ftft

%cy

acre

sin

ft%

gra

de

1M

ine A

ccess R

oad

s, 2

30.0

1.3

60.0

33

4,9

21

100%

12

30,0

00

-6

2A

ir S

trip

, 3

30.0

1.3

60.0

146

2,6

00

100%

12

30,0

00

-6

3O

verb

urd

en

Hau

l R

oad

, 3

30.0

1.3

60.0

80

7,2

00

100%

12

30,0

00

-6

4O

re H

au

l R

oad

, 3

20.0

1.3

60.0

80

4,4

80

100%

12

30,0

00

-65

Co

ch

es H

au

l R

oad

, 3

20.0

1.3

60.0

80

2,5

00

100%

12

30,0

00

-6

(1)

All

Physic

al para

mete

rs m

ust be input even if m

anual overr

ides for

volu

me o

r are

a a

re u

sed.

2. M

EG

2003 p

. 3-1

13. C

om

isio

n 2

010

Ro

ad

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

(co

nt.

)

Berm

Len

gth

Berm

Heig

ht

Berm

Base

Wid

th

Berm

Sid

eslo

pe

An

gle

Nu

mb

er

of

Berm

s(2

)

(1 o

r 2 s

ides)

ftft

ft_H

:1V

1M

ine A

ccess R

oad

s, 2

4,9

21

24

1.0

1

2A

ir S

trip

, 3

00

00.0

1

3O

verb

urd

en

Hau

l R

oad

, 3

7,2

00

38

1.3

1

4O

re H

au

l R

oad

, 3

4,4

80

38

1.3

15

Co

ch

es H

au

l R

oad

, 3

2,5

00

38

1.3

1

(2)

Ente

r 1 if berm

on o

nly

one s

ide o

f ro

ad, 2 if both

sid

es o

f ro

ad a

re b

erm

ed.

Ro

ad

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

(co

nt.

)Y

ou

mu

st

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

ro

ad

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Do

zin

g

Mate

rial

Co

nd

itio

nC

ut

Mate

rial T

yp

e

Reco

nto

uri

ng

Eq

uip

men

t F

leet(3

)N

o. o

f E

xcavato

rs

if g

rad

e >

30%

Gro

wth

Med

ia

Mate

rial T

yp

e

Co

ver

Pla

cem

en

t

Eq

uip

men

t F

leet

Seed

Mix

Mu

lch

Fert

iliz

er

Scari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g?

Rip

pin

g F

leet

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

1M

ine A

ccess R

oad

s, 2

1B

asalt

Med

Do

zer

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

2A

ir S

trip

, 3

1B

asalt

Med

Do

zer

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

3O

verb

urd

en

Hau

l R

oad

, 3

1B

asalt

Med

Do

zer

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

4O

re H

au

l R

oad

, 3

1B

asalt

Med

Do

zer

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

5C

och

es H

au

l R

oad

, 3

1B

asalt

Med

Do

ze

r1

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

(3)

If origin

al slo

pe >

30%

"optim

ize"

option w

ill o

nly

sele

ct am

ong the e

xcavato

r options.

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Gra

din

g

Us

er

Ov

err

ide

s

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Ha

ul

Ro

ad

Sa

fety

Be

rms

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8 -

SR

CE

So

ftw

are.

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pa

ge

1 o

f 3

Roads

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Ro

ad

sP

roje

ct

Na

me

: M

arl

in -

Re

cla

ma

tio

n P

lan

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Ro

ad

s -

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Re

gra

din

g V

olu

me

an

d F

oo

tpri

nt

Vo

lum

eS

afe

ty B

erm

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

n

Will

not allo

w d

ozer

for

slo

pes g

reate

r th

an 3

0%

For

dozer

regra

din

g p

ush d

ista

nce =

road w

idth

Tota

l berm

volu

me d

ouble

d if both

sid

es o

f ro

ad a

re b

erm

ed.

Assum

es d

ozer

push is u

phill

If length

of berm

on e

ach s

ide o

f ro

ad is d

iffe

rent, input to

tal le

ngth

of both

berm

s

Assum

es m

inim

um

push d

ista

nce o

f 100 ft

a

nd input 1 for

num

ber

of sid

es

Rip

pin

g/S

ca

rify

ing

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Min

imum

1 h

r rippin

g/s

carify

ing tim

e p

er

are

a

Num

ber

of passes =

Fin

al slo

pe length

÷ G

rader

wid

th

Tra

vel dis

tance =

Num

ber

of passes x

R

oad length

Tota

l hours

= (

Tra

vel dis

tance ÷

Gra

der

pro

ductivity)

+ (

Num

ber

of passes x

Gra

der

maneuver

tim

e)

For

dozer

regra

din

g a

ssum

es p

ush d

ista

nce =

3 x

road w

idth

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Min

imum

of 1 a

cre

cre

w tim

e p

er

are

a

Ro

ad

s -

Re

gra

din

g C

os

ts

Reg

rad

ing

Vo

lum

e

Reco

nto

uri

ng

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

yT

ota

l F

leet

Ho

urs

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal R

eg

rad

ing

Co

st

cy

cy/h

rhr

$$

$

1M

ine A

ccess R

oad

s, 2

12,1

99

Med D

ozer

157

77.7

$4,5

00

$13,6

51

$18,1

51

2A

ir S

trip

, 3

118,6

24

Med D

ozer

110

1078.4

$62,4

50

$189,4

64

$251,9

14

3O

verb

urd

en

Hau

l R

oad

, 3

101,9

09

Med D

ozer

157

649.1

$37,5

89

$114,0

40

$151,6

29

4O

re H

au

l R

oad

, 3

37,9

87

Med D

ozer

282

134.7

$7,8

00

$23,6

65

$31,4

65

5C

och

es H

au

l R

oad

, 3

21,1

98

Med D

oze

r282

75.2

$4,3

55

$13,2

12

$17,5

67

291,9

17

2015.1

$116,6

94

$354,0

32

$470,7

26

Ro

ad

s -

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Co

sts

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Fig

ure

1 -

Re

gra

din

g V

olu

me

Ca

lcu

lati

on

!

hb

a"

# 2

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8 -

SR

CE

So

ftw

are.

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pa

ge

2 o

f 3

Roads

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Ro

ad

sP

roje

ct

Na

me

: M

arl

in -

Re

cla

ma

tio

n P

lan

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Gro

wth

Med

ia

Vo

lum

e

Gro

wth

Med

ia

Rep

lacem

en

t

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

cks/ S

cra

pers

To

tal F

leet

Ho

urs

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal T

op

so

ilin

g

Co

st

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

1M

ine A

ccess R

oad

s, 2

8,9

03

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

15.6

$13,1

87

$33,7

04

$46,8

91

2A

ir S

trip

, 3

20,8

12

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

36.4

$30,7

69

$78,6

44

$109,4

13

3O

verb

urd

en

Hau

l R

oad

, 3

31,5

80

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

55.3

$46,7

45

$119,4

78

$166,2

23

4O

re H

au

l R

oad

, 3

16,8

00

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

29.4

$24,8

52

$63,5

20

$88,3

72

5C

och

es H

au

l R

oad

, 3

9,3

75

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

16.4

$13,8

63

$35,4

33

$49,2

96

87,4

70

153.1

$129,4

16

$330,7

79

$460,1

95

Ro

ad

s -

Sc

ari

fyin

g/R

ev

eg

eta

tio

n C

os

ts

Su

rface A

rea

Fin

al S

lop

e

Len

gth

Rip

pin

g H

ou

rs

Rip

pin

g

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

Rip

pin

g

Lab

or

Co

sts

To

tal

Rip

pin

g

Co

sts

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Lab

or

Co

st

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

Revg

eta

tio

n

Mate

rial

Co

st

To

tal

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Co

st

acre

sft

hrs

$$

$$

$$

$

1M

ine A

ccess R

oad

s, 2

5.5

249

3.7

$650

$214

$864

$431

$370

$3,0

61

$3,8

62

2A

ir S

trip

, 3

12.9

216

9.4

$1,6

51

$544

$2,1

95

$1,0

06

$864

$7,1

53

$9,0

23

3O

verb

urd

en

Hau

l R

oad

, 3

19.5

7118

13.7

$2,4

07

$793

$3,2

00

$1,5

26

$1,3

11

$10,8

51

$13,6

88

4O

re H

au

l R

oad

, 3

10.4

1101

7.7

$1,3

53

$446

$1,7

99

$812

$697

$5,7

72

$7,2

81

5C

och

es H

au

l R

oad

, 3

5.8

1101

4.3

$755

$249

$1,0

04

$453

$389

$3,2

22

$4,0

64

54.2

138.8

$6,8

16

$2,2

46

$9,0

62

$4,2

28

$3,6

31

$30,0

59

$37,9

18

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8 -

SR

CE

So

ftw

are.

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pa

ge

3 o

f 3

Roads

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nP

its

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Pit

s -

Co

st

Su

mm

ary

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Safe

ty B

erm

Co

nstr

ucti

on

Co

st

$1,4

24

$2,6

45

N/A

$4,0

69

Safe

ty B

erm

Reveg

eta

tio

n C

os

t$2,2

06

$1,8

94

$15,6

82

$19,7

82

TO

TA

LS

$3,6

30

$4,5

39

$15,6

82

$23,8

51

Co

lor

Co

de K

ey

User

Input -

Direct In

put

Dir

ect

Inp

ut

User

Input -

Pull

Dow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

onsta

nt (c

an o

verr

ide)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

t

Sta

ndard

ized D

ata

(cannot overr

ide)

Pro

gra

m C

alc

ula

ted V

alu

eL

ocked

Cell -

Fo

rmu

la o

r R

efe

ren

ce

Pit

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

ID C

od

e

Be

rm

(or

Hig

hw

all

)

Le

ng

th

Be

rm

He

igh

t

Be

rm

Ba

se

Wid

th

Be

rm

Sid

es

lop

e

An

gle

Be

rm M

ate

ria

l

Ty

pe

Be

rm

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Se

ed

Mix

Mu

lch

Fe

rtil

ize

r

-1ft

ftft

_H

:1V

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

1M

arl

in O

pen

Pit

(M

EG

2003, F

ig. 3.4

-4)

8,0

00

310

1.3

Allu

viu

mS

mall

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

2C

och

ise O

pen

Pit

(M

EG

2003, F

ig. 3.4

-4)

3,2

00

31

01.3

Allu

viu

mS

mall

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Pit

s -

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Safe

ty B

erm

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

n

Pro

ductivity a

ssum

es p

ush d

ista

nce o

f:

100

feet

Reveg

eta

tio

n C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Dozer:

L

ength

x (

Berm

Base W

idth

+ D

ozer

Push D

ista

nce)

- accounts

for

dis

turb

ance c

reate

d in b

orr

ow

are

a

Min

imum

1 a

cre

revegeta

tion c

rew

tim

e p

er

are

a

Pit

s -

Sa

fety

Be

rm C

on

str

uc

tio

n C

os

ts

Safe

ty B

erm

Sa

fety

Be

rm

Vo

lum

e

Se

lec

ted

Fle

et

Co

rre

cte

d

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

To

tal

Ho

urs

Sa

fety

Be

rm

La

bo

r

Co

st

Sa

fety

Be

rm

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Sa

fety

Be

rm

Co

st

cy

cy/h

r$

$$

1M

arl

in O

pen

Pit

(M

EG

2003, F

ig. 3. 4

5,4

22

Sm

all

(D7R

)308

17.6

$1,0

19

$1,8

92

$2,9

11

2C

och

ise O

pen

Pit

(M

EG

2003, F

ig.

2,1

69

Sm

all

(D7R

)308

7.0

$405

$753

$1,1

58

7,5

91

24.6

$1,4

24

$2,6

45

$4,0

69

Pit

s -

Sa

fety

Be

rms

- R

ev

eg

eta

tio

n C

os

ts

Reveg

eta

tio

nB

erm

Co

nstr

ucti

on

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

Sta

nd

ard

ized

Data

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

Pit

Berm

s

!

hb

a"

# 2

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8 -

SR

CE

So

ftw

are.

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pag

e 1

of

2P

its

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nP

its

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Fla

t A

rea

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

La

bo

r

Co

st

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Re

vg

eta

tio

n

Ma

teri

al

Co

st

To

tal

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

st

acre

s$

$$

$

1M

arl

in O

pen

Pit

(M

EG

2003, F

ig. 3.4

20.2

$1,5

76

$1,3

53

$11,2

01

$14,1

30

2C

och

ise O

pen

Pit

(M

EG

2003, F

ig.

8.1

$630

$541

$4,4

81

$5,6

52

28.3

$2,2

06

$1,8

94

$15,6

82

$19,7

82

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8 -

SR

CE

So

ftw

are.

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pag

e 2

of

2P

its

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Un

de

rgro

un

d O

pe

nin

gs

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Un

de

rgro

un

d O

pe

nin

gs

Co

st

Su

mm

ary L

ab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Ad

it a

nd

Declin

e P

lug

gin

g$5,1

18

$3,4

39

$2,2

75

$10,8

32

Sh

aft

Backfi

ll/C

over

$163

$401

N/A

$564

Sh

aft

Cap

pin

g$3,0

11

$334

$2,3

28

$5,6

72

TO

TA

LS

$8,2

92

$4,1

74

$4,6

03

$17,0

68

Co

lor

Co

de K

ey

User

Input -

Direct In

put

Dir

ect

Inp

ut

User

Input -

Pull

Dow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

onsta

nt (c

an o

verr

ide)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rogra

m C

alc

ula

ted V

alu

eL

ocked

Cell -

Fo

rmu

la o

r R

efe

ren

ce

Ad

its

, D

ec

lin

es

an

d P

ort

als

- U

se

r In

pu

t

Ph

ysic

al C

hara

cte

risti

cs

Backfi

ll M

ate

rial

ID C

od

eH

eig

ht

Wid

th

Backfi

ll/

Plu

g T

yp

e

Dis

tan

ce t

o

Bu

lkh

ead

Backfi

ll

Mate

rial

Backfi

ll

Mate

rial

Typ

e

Dis

tan

ce

to B

ackfi

ll

Bo

rro

w

Slo

pe f

rom

Ad

it t

o

Bo

rro

w A

rea

-1ft

ftft

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

ft%

gra

de

1D

eclin

e (

ME

G 2

003, p

. 3-2

8)

16

15

Co

ncre

te +

R15

01.2

Allu

viu

m50

00

Note

s: 1)

Foam

(adit)

option is for

sm

alle

r openin

gs that can b

e p

lugged w

ith s

imple

form

s a

nd a

5' t

hic

k p

lug.

2)

Foam

(pro

duction)

option is for

larg

er

pro

duction o

penin

gs (

declin

es, etc

.) a

nd r

equires larg

er

form

constr

uctio

n a

nd m

inim

um

10' t

hic

k p

lug.

3)

All

foam

plu

gs inclu

de m

inim

um

15' o

f backfill

from

openin

g to p

lug.

4)

Bat gate

option is for

sm

all

openin

gs a

nd the m

ate

rial cost is

the s

am

e for

any s

ize o

penin

g.

Sh

aft

Op

en

ing

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

Yo

u m

ust

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

sh

aft

Ph

ysic

al C

hara

cte

risti

cs

ID C

od

eD

iam

ete

r

Sh

aft

Dep

th

(fo

r b

ackfi

ll

meth

od

)

Backfi

ll/

Plu

g T

yp

e

Co

ver

Mate

rial

Typ

e

Co

ver/

Backfi

ll

Fle

et

Th

ickn

ess

(if

no

t

co

mp

lete

backfi

ll)

Dis

tan

ce

to B

ackfi

ll

Bo

rro

w

Slo

pe f

rom

Sh

aft

to

Bo

rro

w A

rea

-1ft

ft(s

ele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

ftft

% g

rade

1V

en

tila

tio

n S

haft

(M

EG

2003 p

. 3-2

9)

13

Co

ncre

te C

ap

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

250

00

Un

de

rgro

un

d O

pe

nin

gs

- C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Ad

its, D

eclin

es a

nd

Po

rtals

- V

olu

me C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Co

ncre

te C

over/

Bu

lkh

ead

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

n

Usin

g M

ean

s H

eavy C

on

str

ucti

on

Co

st

Data

(2004)

Estim

age c

over/

bulk

head thic

kness

Assum

es that all

concre

te w

ork

s a

re r

ein

forc

ed

Pro

ductivity for

cre

w fro

m M

eans H

eavy C

onstr

uction C

ost D

ata

(2004)

adju

ste

d for

superv

isio

n

(addre

ssed in M

isc. C

osts

) and D

avis

-Bacon W

age R

ate

s

Assum

es 1

8 in (

45 c

m)

thic

k s

lab

Backfi

ll C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Uses 1

larg

e a

nd

1 s

mall d

ozer

for

ad

it b

ackfi

ll

A

ssum

es m

ax 4

00 foot (1

22 m

) push

A

ssum

es a

vera

ge o

pera

tor

and 5

0 m

in/h

r availa

bili

ty

Uses t

ruck &

lo

ad

er

load

, h

au

l p

lace f

leets

fo

r sh

aft

s

Concre

te c

ap w

ill b

e 1

.5 feet (4

5 c

m)

thic

k, re

info

rced, str

uctu

ally

support

ed.

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Backfi

ll o

r F

ou

nd

ati

on

Co

ver

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 1

of

2U

nderg

round O

penin

gs

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Un

de

rgro

un

d O

pe

nin

gs

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

If c

oncre

te c

ap is u

sed, assum

e 1

0 feet (3

m)

of ro

ck b

ackfill

on top o

f cap.

Assum

es that all

concre

te w

ork

s a

re r

ein

forc

ed

If b

ackfill

is u

sed, assum

e o

verf

ill b

y 5

feet (1

.5 m

)

Carp

ente

r D

-B r

ate

incl F

ringe

$41.4

4per

hour

Sh

aft

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Ad

its

, D

ec

lin

es

an

d P

ort

als

Plu

gg

ing

Uses R

S M

ean

s H

eavy C

on

str

ucti

on

Co

st

Data

fo

r b

ulk

head

pro

du

cti

on

rate

, m

ate

rial co

sts

an

d c

rew

s

Backfi

ll o

r F

oam

(1

)B

at

Gate

or

Cu

lvert

(2,3

,4)

Bu

lkh

ead

Vo

lum

e

Backfi

ll

(ro

ck)

Vo

lum

e

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Mate

rial

Co

st

To

tal

Bu

lkh

ead

Co

st

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

Mate

rial

(Fo

am

)

Co

st

To

tal

Backfi

ll

Co

st

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Mate

rial

Co

st

To

tal B

at

Gate

Co

st

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Mate

rial

Co

st

To

tal

Plu

gg

ing

Co

sts

cy

cy

$$

$$

$$

$$

$$

$$

$$

$$

1D

eclin

e (

ME

G 2

003, p

. 3-2

8)

13

1,3

33

$4,0

87

$462

$2,2

75

$6,8

24

$1,0

31

$2,9

77

$4,0

08

$5,1

18

$3,4

39

$2,2

75

$10,8

32

13

$4,0

87

$462

$2,2

75

$6,8

24

$1,0

31

$2,9

77

$4,0

08

$5,1

18

$3,4

39

$2,2

75

$10,8

32

Note

s:

1)

Foam

costs

inclu

de 1

hour

move to a

nd s

etu

p +

1 h

r. m

inim

um

cre

w tim

e

2)

Assum

es 1

hr

walk

-in/w

alk

-out tim

e for

equip

ment

3)

Batg

ate

assum

es 8

hr

insta

ll tim

e e

ach

4)

Bat culv

ert

backfill

costs

based o

n o

ne 8

-hr

day (

i.e. backfilli

ng h

ours

= 8

hrs

).

Sh

aft

Plu

gg

ing

Co

ver/

Cap

Backfi

ll/C

over

Co

ver

Are

a

Backfi

ll

or

Co

ver

Vo

lum

e

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Mate

rial

Co

st

To

tal

Sh

aft

Cap

Co

st

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Backfi

ll

Co

st

ft2

cy

$$

$$

$$

$

1V

en

tila

tio

n S

haft

(M

EG

2003 p

. 3-2

9133

10

$3,0

11

$334

$2,3

28

$5,6

72

$163

$401

$564

133

10

$3,0

11

$334

$2,3

28

$5,6

72

$163

$401

$564

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Bu

lkh

ead

Co

nstr

ucti

on

To

tal C

osts

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 2

of

2U

nderg

round O

penin

gs

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nP

rocess P

on

ds

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Pro

ce

ss

Po

nd

s -

Co

st

Su

mm

ary

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Backfi

llin

g C

osts

$40,5

18

$100,9

40

N/A

$141,4

58

Gro

wth

Med

ia P

lacem

en

t C

osts

$22,3

16

$57,0

38

N/A

$79,3

54

Lin

er

Cu

ttin

g &

Fo

ldin

g C

osts

$45,9

56

$25,0

76

$71,0

32

Su

bto

tal E

art

hw

ork

s$108,7

90

$183,0

54

$0

$291,8

44

Reveg

eta

tio

n C

osts

$780

$670

$5,2

75

$6,7

25

TO

TA

LS

$109,5

70

$183,7

24

$5,2

75

$298,5

69

Co

lor

Co

de K

ey

User

Input -

Direct In

put

Dir

ect

Inp

ut

User

Input -

Pull

Dow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

onsta

nt (c

an o

verr

ide)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rogra

m C

alc

ula

ted V

alu

eL

ocked

Cell -

Fo

rmu

la o

r R

efe

ren

ce

Pro

ce

ss

Po

nd

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

Yo

u m

ust

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

po

nd

Po

nd

Dim

en

sio

ns

(1)

Backfi

ll (

1)

Gro

wth

Med

ia

ID C

od

eP

on

d

Le

ng

th

Po

nd

Wid

th

Po

nd

De

pth

Po

nd

Sid

es

lop

e

An

gle

Dis

turb

ed

Are

a

(if

ca

lcu

late

d

els

ew

he

re)

Pe

rce

nt

Ba

ck

fill

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Ba

ck

fill

Bo

rro

w

Slo

pe

fro

m

Fa

cil

ity

to

Bo

rro

w A

rea

Po

nd

Vo

lum

e

(if

ca

lcu

late

d

els

ew

he

re)

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Th

ick

ne

ss

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Sto

ck

pil

e

Slo

pe

fro

m

Fa

cil

ity

to

Sto

ck

pil

e

-1ft

ftft

_H

:1V

acre

s(1

00

% if

bla

nk)

ft%

gra

de

cy

inft

% g

rad

e

1C

rud

e W

ate

r P

on

d, 2

350

300

35

10.0

4.0

0100%

2,5

00

-617,0

00

12

30,0

00

-6

2T

SF

Filtr

ate

Po

nd

, 3

300

300

15

2.5

4.0

0100%

2,5

00

-612

30,0

00

-6

3O

pen

Pit

Sed

imen

t P

on

d, ?

300

100

15

2.5

100%

500

012

30,0

00

-6

4T

SF

II F

iltr

ate

Po

nd

300

100

15

2.5

200%

500

01

230,0

00

-6

(1)

All

Pond D

imensio

n a

nd B

ackfill

para

mete

rs m


anual overr

ides for

volu

me o

r are

a a

re u

sed.

2. M

EG

2003, F

ig. 3.4

-2 a

nd

p. 3-4

9

3. M

EG

2003, F

ig. 3.4

-10 a

nd

p. 3-1

4

Pro

ce

ss

Po

nd

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

(co

nt.

)

Lin

er

Backfi

llG

row

th M

ed

iaR

eveg

eta

tio

n

Cre

w

Cu

t &

Fo

ld

Tim

e

Ba

ck

fill

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Ba

ck

fill

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Pla

ce

me

nt

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Se

ed

Mix

Mu

lch

Fe

rtil

ize

r

hrs

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

1C

rud

e W

ate

r P

on

d, 2

120

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

2T

SF

Filtr

ate

Po

nd

, 3

121

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

3O

pen

Pit

Sed

imen

t P

on

d, ?

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

2S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

4T

SF

II F

iltr

ate

Po

nd

121

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

3S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Pro

ce

ss

Po

nd

s -

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Po

nd

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

n

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 1

of

3P

rocess P

onds

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nP

rocess P

on

ds

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Reveg

eta

tio

n C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Min

imum

1 a

cre

revegeta

tion c

rew

tim

e p

er

are

a

Pro

ce

ss

Po

nd

s -

Lin

er

Cu

ttin

g a

nd

Fo

ldin

g

Cre

w H

ou

rs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Lin

er

Re

mo

va

l

Co

st

hrs

$$

$

1C

rud

e W

ate

r P

on

d, 2

120.0

$15,2

34

$8,3

12

$23,5

46

2T

SF

Filtr

ate

Po

nd

, 3

121.0

$15,3

61

$8,3

82

$23,7

43

3O

pen

Pit

Sed

imen

t P

on

d, ?

4T

SF

II F

iltr

ate

Po

nd

121.0

$15,3

61

$8,3

82

$23,7

43

362.0

$45,9

56

$25,0

76

$71,0

32

Pro

ce

ss

Po

nd

s -

Ba

ck

fill

an

d G

row

th M

ed

ia C

os

ts

Po

nd

Backfi

llG

row

th M

ed

ia

Ba

ck

fill

Vo

lum

e

Ba

ck

fill

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Ba

ck

fill

Co

st

To

ps

oil

Vo

lum

e

To

ps

oil

Re

pa

ce

me

nt

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

To

ps

oil

ing

Co

st

cy

LC

Y/h

rh

rs$

$$

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

0 1C

rud

e W

ate

r P

on

d, 2

17,0

00

Sm

all

Tru

ck

560

330.4

$7,7

12

$19,3

27

$27,0

39

6,4

53

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

11.3

$9,5

52

$24,4

14

$33,9

66

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 2

of

3P

rocess P

onds

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nP

rocess P

on

ds

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

2T

SF

Filtr

ate

Po

nd

, 3

38,5

42

Sm

all

Tru

ck

560

368.8

$17,4

52

$43,7

41

$61,1

93

6,4

53

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

11.3

$9,5

52

$24,4

14

$33,9

66

3O

pen

Pit

Sed

imen

t P

on

d, ?

9,3

75

Sm

all

Tru

ck

298

131.5

$5,1

23

$12,6

37

$17,7

60

1,1

11

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.9

$1,6

06

$4,1

05

$5,7

11

4T

SF

II F

iltr

ate

Po

nd

18,7

50

Sm

all

Tru

ck

298

162.9

$10,2

31

$25,2

35

$35,4

66

1,1

11

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.9

$1,6

06

$4,1

05

$5,7

11

83,6

67

193.6

$40,5

18

$100,9

40

$141,4

58

15,1

29

26.4

$22,3

16

$57,0

38

$79,3

54

Pro

ce

ss

Po

nd

s -

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

sts

Fla

t A

rea

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

La

bo

r

Co

st

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Re

vg

eta

tio

n

Ma

teri

al

Co

st

To

tal

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

st

acre

s$

$$

$

1C

rud

e W

ate

r P

on

d, 2

4$312

$268

$2,2

18

$2,7

98

2T

SF

Filtr

ate

Po

nd

, 3

4$312

$268

$2,2

18

$2,7

98

3O

pen

Pit

Sed

imen

t P

on

d, ?

0.7

$78

$67

$409

$554

4T

SF

II F

iltr

ate

Po

nd

0.7

$78

$67

$430

$575

9.4

$780

$670

$5,2

75

$6,7

25

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 3

of

3P

rocess P

onds

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

He

ap

Le

ac

hP

roje

ct

Na

me

: M

arl

in -

Re

cla

ma

tio

n P

lan

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

He

ap

Le

ac

h P

ad

s -

Co

st

Su

mm

ary L

ab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Gra

din

g C

os

tsN

/A$

0

Co

ve

r P

lac

em

en

t C

os

tN

/A$

0

To

ps

oil

Pla

ce

me

nt

Co

st

N/A

$0

Rip

pin

g/S

ca

rify

ing

Co

st

N/A

$0

Su

bto

tal

Ea

rth

wo

rks

$0

$0

$0

$0

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

st

$0

TO

TA

LS

$0

$0

$0

$0

Co

lor

Co

de

Key

Use

r In

pu

t -

Dire

ct

Inp

ut

Dir

ec

t In

pu

t

Use

r In

pu

t -

Pu

ll D

ow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

on

sta

nt

(ca

n o

ve

rrid

e)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rog

ram

Ca

lcu

late

d V

alu

eL

oc

ke

d C

ell

- F

orm

ula

or

Re

fere

nce

He

ap

Le

ac

h P

ad

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

Yo

u m

us

t fi

ll i

n A

LL

gre

en

ce

lls

an

d r

ele

va

nt

blu

e c

ell

s i

n t

his

se

cti

on

fo

r e

ac

h h

ea

p,

lift

or

he

ap

ca

teg

ory

Ph

ys

ica

l(1

)C

ov

er(

low

er

lay

er)

Gro

wth

Me

dia

ID C

od

e

Un

de

rly

ing

Gro

un

d

Slo

pe

Un

gra

de

d S

lop

eF

ina

l S

lop

e

Fin

al

To

p

Slo

pe

Lif

t (h

ea

p)

He

igh

t

Mid

-Be

nc

h

Le

ng

th

Av

era

ge

Fla

t

Are

a L

on

g

Dim

en

sio

n

(rip

pin

g

dis

tan

ce

)

Fin

al

(Re

gra

de

d)

He

ap

Fo

otp

rin

t

Re

gra

de

Vo

lum

e

(if

ca

lcu

late

d

els

ew

he

re)

Co

ve

r

Th

ick

ne

ss

Slo

pe

s

Co

ve

r

Th

ick

ne

ss

Fla

t

Are

as

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Co

ve

r

Bo

rro

w

Slo

pe

fro

m

He

ap

to

Co

ve

r B

orr

ow

Slo

pe

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Th

ick

ne

ss

Fla

t A

rea

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Th

ick

ne

ss

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Gro

wth

Ma

teri

al

Sto

ck

pil

e

Slo

pe

fro

m

He

ap

to

Sto

ck

pil

e

-1%

gra

de

_H

:1V

_H

:1V

% g

rad

eft

ftft

acre

scy

inin

ft%

gra

de

inin

ft%

gra

de

1

No

tes:

(1)

All

Ph

ysic

al p

ara

me

ters

mu

st

be

in

pu

t e

ve

n if

ma

nu

al o

ve

rrid

es f

or

vo

lum

e o

r a

rea

are

use

d.

He

ap

Le

ac

h P

ad

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

(co

nt.

)Y

ou

mu

st

fill

in

AL

L g

ree

n c

ell

s a

nd

re

lev

an

t b

lue

ce

lls

in

th

is s

ec

tio

n f

or

ea

ch

he

ap

, li

ft o

r h

ea

p c

ate

go

ry

Gra

din

gR

ev

eg

eta

tio

n

Do

zin

g

Ma

teri

al

He

ap

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Gra

din

g

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Slo

t/

Sid

e-b

y-S

ide

Co

ve

r

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Co

ve

r

Pla

ce

me

nt

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Se

ed

Mix

Slo

pe

s

Se

ed

Mix

Fla

t

Are

as

Mu

lch

Slo

pe

s

Mu

lch

Fla

t A

rea

s

Fe

rtil

ize

r

Slo

pe

s

Fe

rtil

ize

r

Fla

t A

rea

s

Slo

pe

Sc

ari

fy/

Rip

?

Fla

t A

rea

Sc

ari

fy/

Rip

?

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Fle

et

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

1

He

ap

Le

ac

h P

ad

s -

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Re

gra

din

g V

olu

me

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Fin

al

Slo

pe

Are

a a

nd

Fo

otp

rin

t A

rea

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Dra

ina

ge

Ch

an

ne

l C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Re

gra

din

g P

us

h D

ista

nc

e C

alc

ula

tio

nU

se

wh

en

exis

tin

g h

ea

p m

ate

ria

l is

no

t su

ita

ble

dra

in r

ock

do

zin

g d

ista

nc

e:

ba

se

d o

n 2

/3 f

ina

l cu

t slo

pe

+ 2

/3 f

ina

l fill

slo

pe

(m

inim

um

= 5

0 f

t)A

ssu

me

to

be

co

nstr

ucte

d in

exis

tin

g s

olu

tio

n c

ha

nn

els

Assu

me

2H

:1V

ditch

sid

eslo

pe

s

Dra

in r

ock a

ssu

me

d t

o b

e G

rave

l -

Dry

at

2,5

50

lb

/cy (

1,5

10

kg

/m3

) fr

om

CA

T H

an

db

oo

k 3

5th

Ed

.

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

Co

ve

rG

row

th M

ed

ia

Fig

ure

2 -

Reg

rad

ing

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

n

Fig

ure

3 -

Fin

al S

lop

e A

rea a

nd

Fo

otp

rin

t A

rea C

alc

ula

tio

n

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 1

of

2H

ea

p L

ea

ch

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

He

ap

Le

ac

hP

roje

ct

Na

me

: M

arl

in -

Re

cla

ma

tio

n P

lan

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Rip

pin

g/S

ca

rify

ing

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Min

imu

m 1

hr

rip

pin

g/s

ca

rify

ing

pe

r a

rea

Slo

pe

s:

Nu

mb

er

of

pa

sse

s =

Fin

al slo

pe

le

ng

th ÷

Gra

de

r w

idth

Tra

ve

l d

ista

nce

= N

um

be

r o

f p

asse

s x

M

id-b

en

ch

le

ng

th

To

tal h

ou

rs =

(T

rave

l d

ista

nce

÷ G

rad

er

pro

du

ctivity)

+ (

Nu

mb

er

of

pa

sse

s x

Gra

de

r m

an

eu

ve

r tim

e)

Fla

t A

rea

s:

Fla

t a

rea

wid

th =

Fin

al fla

t a

rea

÷ A

ve

rag

e lo

ng

dim

en

sio

ns

Nu

mb

er

of

pa

sse

s =

Fla

t a

rea

wid

th ÷

Gra

de

r w

idth

Tra

ve

l d

ista

nce

= N

um

be

r o

f p

asse

s x

A

ve

rag

e lo

ng

dim

en

sio

ns

To

tal h

ou

rs =

(T

rave

l d

ista

nce

÷ G

rad

er

pro

du

ctivity)

+ (

Nu

mb

er

of

pa

sse

s x

Gra

de

r m

an

eu

ve

r tim

e)

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

:M

inim

um

1 a

cre

re

ve

ge

tatio

n c

rew

tim

e p

er

are

a

He

ap

Le

ac

h P

ad

- R

eg

rad

ing

Co

sts

Pro

du

cti

vit

y =

Do

zer

Pro

du

cti

vit

y x

Gra

de C

orr

ecti

on

x D

en

sit

y C

orr

ecti

on

x O

pera

tor

(0.7

5)

x M

ate

rial x V

isib

ilit

y x

Jo

b E

ffic

ien

cy (

0.8

3)

x (

Slo

t/S

ide-b

y-S

ide)

Re

gra

din

g

Vo

lum

e

Do

zin

g

Dis

tan

ce

(se

e a

bo

ve

)

Un

co

rre

cte

d

Do

ze

r

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Gra

de

Co

rre

cti

on

Do

zin

g

Ma

teri

al

De

ns

ity

Co

rre

cti

on

Sid

e-b

y-S

ide

or

Slo

t D

ozin

g

To

tal

Ho

url

y

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

To

tal

Do

ze

r

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Re

gra

din

g

Co

st

cy

ftcy/h

rcy/h

rh

r$

$$

1

He

ap

Le

ac

h P

ad

- C

ov

er

an

d G

row

th M

ed

ia C

os

ts

Co

ve

r (l

ow

er

lay

er)

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Pla

ce

me

nt

Co

ve

r

Vo

lum

e

Co

ve

r

Re

pla

ce

me

nt

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

Co

ve

r

La

bo

r

Co

st

Co

ve

r

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Co

ve

r

Co

st

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Vo

lum

e

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Re

pla

ce

me

nt

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

To

ps

oil

ing

Co

st

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

cy

BC

Y/h

r$

$$

1

He

ap

Le

ac

h P

ad

- S

ca

rify

ing

/Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

sts

Slo

pe

Are

a

Fla

t

Are

a

To

tal

Su

rfa

ce

Are

a

Fin

al

Slo

pe

Le

ng

th

Fla

t A

rea

Lo

ng

Dim

en

sio

n

Slo

pe

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Ho

urs

Fla

t A

rea

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Ho

urs

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

La

bo

r

Co

sts

To

tal

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Co

sts

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Lab

or

Co

st

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Re

vg

eta

tio

n

Ma

teri

al

Co

st

To

tal

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

st

acre

sa

cre

sa

cre

sft

fth

rsh

rs$

$$

$$

$$

1

1)

Min

imu

m t

ota

l rip

pin

g h

ou

rs =

1 (

i.e

. If

to

tal rip

pin

g h

rs (

slo

pe

+ f

lat)

< 1

, th

en

on

e h

ou

r o

f fle

et

tim

e is a

ssu

me

d,

reg

ard

less o

f a

cre

s s

ho

wn

in

in

sca

rify

ing

ta

ble

.)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

!

21

c32

"c

Fig

ure

2 -

Do

zin

g D

ista

nce C

alc

ula

tio

n

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 2

of

2H

ea

p L

ea

ch

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Wa

ste

Ro

ck

Du

mp

sP

roje

ct

Na

me

: M

arl

in -

Re

cla

ma

tio

n P

lan

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Wa

ste

Ro

ck

Du

mp

s -

Co

st

Su

mm

ary

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Gra

din

g C

os

ts$

1,6

23

,32

2$

4,9

24

,90

7N

/A$

6,5

48

,22

9

Co

ve

r P

lac

em

en

t C

os

t$

90

,42

5$

23

6,8

36

N/A

$3

27

,26

1

To

ps

oil

Pla

ce

me

nt

Co

st

$1

84

,86

7$

47

2,5

10

N/A

$6

57

,37

7S

ca

rify

ing

Co

st

$1

0,8

74

$3

,13

8N

/A$

14

,01

2

Su

bto

tal

Ea

rth

wo

rks

$1

,90

9,4

88

$5

,63

7,3

91

$0

$7

,54

6,8

79

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

st

$6

,03

7$

5,1

87

$4

2,9

28

$5

4,1

52

TO

TA

LS

$1

,91

5,5

25

$5

,64

2,5

78

$4

2,9

28

$7

,60

1,0

31

Co

lor

Co

de

Key

Use

r In

pu

t -

Dire

ct

Inp

ut

Dir

ec

t In

pu

t

Use

r In

pu

t -

Pu

ll D

ow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

on

sta

nt

(ca

n o

ve

rrid

e)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rog

ram

Ca

lcu

late

d V

alu

eL

oc

ke

d C

ell

- F

orm

ula

or

Re

fere

nce

Wa

ste

Ro

ck

Du

mp

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

Yo

u m

us

t fi

ll i

n A

LL

gre

en

ce

lls

in

th

is s

ec

tio

n f

or

ea

ch

du

mp

, li

ft o

r d

um

p c

ate

go

ry

Ph

ys

ica

lC

ov

er

(up

pe

r la

ye

r)G

row

th M

ed

ia

ID C

od

e

(op

tio

na

l)

Un

de

rly

ing

Gro

un

d

Slo

pe

Un

gra

de

d

Slo

pe

Fin

al

Slo

pe

Fin

al

To

p

Slo

pe

Lif

t (d

um

p)

He

igh

t

Mid

-Be

nc

h

Le

ng

th

Av

era

ge

Fla

t

Are

a L

on

g

Dim

en

sio

n

(rip

pin

g

dis

tan

ce

)

Fin

al

(Re

gra

de

d)

Du

mp

Fo

otp

rin

t

Re

gra

de

Vo

lum

e

(1)

(if

ca

lcu

late

d

els

ew

he

re)

Co

ve

r

Th

ick

ne

ss

Slo

pe

s

Co

ve

r

Th

ick

ne

ss

Fla

t

Are

as

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Co

ve

r

Bo

rro

w

Slo

pe

fro

m

Du

mp

to

Co

ve

r B

orr

ow

Slo

pe

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Th

ick

ne

ss

Fla

t A

rea

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Th

ickn

es

s

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Sto

ck

pil

e

Slo

pe

fro

m

Du

mp

to

Sto

ck

pil

e

-1%

Gra

de

_H

:1V

_H

:1V

% G

rad

eft

ftft

acre

scy

inin

ft%

gra

de

inin

ft%

gra

de

1W

as

te R

oc

k D

um

p,

22

0.0

1.3

2.5

16

90

.07

20

.07

20

.02

4.0

24

.05

00

01

2.0

12

.03

0,0

00

-6

2M

arl

in P

it,

We

st

Wa

ll,

20

.01

.02

.51

16

5.0

60

0.0

60

0.0

24

.02

4.0

30

06

12

.01

2.0

30

,00

0-6

3M

arl

in P

it,

No

rth

Wa

ll w

/ N

o R

oa

d,

20

.01

.02

.51

16

5.0

33

0.0

33

0.0

24

.02

4.0

30

06

12

.01

2.0

30

,00

0-6

4M

arl

in P

it,

No

rth

Wa

ll w

/ R

oa

d,

20

.01

.02

.51

23

0.0

11

80

.01

18

0.0

24

.02

4.0

30

06

12

.01

2.0

30

,00

0-6

5M

arl

in P

it,

Ea

st

Wa

ll,

20

.01

.02

.51

13

0.0

79

0.0

79

0.0

24

.02

4.0

30

06

12

.01

2.0

30

,00

0-6

6M

arl

in P

it,

So

uth

ea

st

Wa

ll,

20

.01

.02

.51

10

0.0

40

0.0

40

0.0

24

.02

4.0

30

06

12

.01

2.0

30

,00

0-6

7C

oc

his

e P

it, 2

0.0

1.0

2.5

11

00

.07

20

.07

20

.02

4.0

24

.03

00

61

2.0

12

.03

0,0

00

-6

(1)

All

Ph

ysic

al p

ara

me

ters

m

ust

be

in

pu

t e

ve

n if

ma

nu

al o

ve

rrid

es f

or

vo

lum

e is u

se

d.

2.

Co

mis

ion

20

10

Wa

ste

Ro

ck

Du

mp

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

(co

nt.

)Y

ou

mu

st

fill

in

AL

L g

ree

n c

ell

s a

nd

re

lev

an

t b

lue

ce

lls

in

th

is s

ec

tio

n f

or

ea

ch

du

mp

, li

ft o

r d

um

p c

ate

go

ry

Gra

din

gR

ev

eg

eta

tio

n

Do

zin

g M

ate

ria

l

Co

nd

itio

n

Du

mp

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Gra

din

g

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Slo

t/S

ide

-by

-

Sid

e

Co

ve

r

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Co

ve

r

Pla

ce

me

nt

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Se

ed

Mix

Slo

pe

s

Se

ed

Mix

Fla

t

Are

as

Mu

lch

Slo

pe

s

Mu

lch

Fla

t A

rea

s

Fe

rtil

ize

r

Slo

pe

s

Fe

rtil

ize

r

Fla

t A

rea

s

Slo

pe

Sc

ari

fy/

Rip

?

Fla

t A

rea

Sc

ari

fy/

Rip

?

Sc

ari

fy/

Rip

pin

g F

lee

t

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(sele

ct)

(se

lect)

1W

as

te R

oc

k D

um

p,

21

.0A

llu

viu

mM

ed

ium

No

All

uv

ium

Sm

all

Tru

ck

All

uv

ium

Sm

all

Tru

ck

Mix

1M

ix 1

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ica

lC

he

mic

al

Ye

sY

es

Me

d D

oze

r

2M

arl

in P

it,

We

st

Wa

ll,

20

.6A

llu

viu

mM

ed

ium

No

All

uv

ium

Sc

rap

er

Do

ze

All

uv

ium

Sm

all

Tru

ck

Mix

1M

ix 1

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ica

lC

he

mic

al

Ye

sY

es

La

rge

Do

ze

r

3M

arl

in P

it,

No

rth

Wa

ll w

/ N

o R

oa

d, 2

0.6

All

uv

ium

Me

diu

mN

oA

llu

viu

mS

cra

pe

r D

oze

All

uv

ium

Sm

all

Tru

ck

Mix

1M

ix 1

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ica

lC

he

mic

al

Ye

sY

es

La

rge

Do

ze

r

4M

arl

in P

it,

No

rth

Wa

ll w

/ R

oa

d,

20

.6A

llu

viu

mM

ed

ium

No

All

uv

ium

Sc

rap

er

Do

ze

All

uv

ium

Sm

all

Tru

ck

Mix

1M

ix 1

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ica

lC

he

mic

al

Ye

sY

es

La

rge

Do

ze

r

5M

arl

in P

it,

Ea

st

Wa

ll,

20

.6A

llu

viu

mM

ed

ium

No

All

uv

ium

Sc

rap

er

Do

ze

All

uv

ium

Sm

all

Tru

ck

Mix

1M

ix 1

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ica

lC

he

mic

al

Ye

sY

es

La

rge

Do

ze

r

6M

arl

in P

it,

So

uth

ea

st

Wa

ll,

20

.6A

llu

viu

mM

ed

ium

No

All

uv

ium

Sc

rap

er

Do

ze

All

uv

ium

Sm

all

Tru

ck

Mix

1M

ix 1

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ica

lC

he

mic

al

Ye

sY

es

La

rge

Do

ze

r7

Co

ch

ise

Pit

, 2

0.6

All

uv

ium

Me

diu

mN

oA

llu

viu

mS

cra

pe

r D

oze

All

uv

ium

Sm

all

Tru

ck

Mix

1M

ix 1

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Str

aw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ica

lC

he

mic

al

Ye

sY

es

La

rge

Do

ze

r

Wa

ste

Ro

ck

Du

mp

s -

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Re

gra

din

g V

olu

me

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Fin

al

Slo

pe

Are

a a

nd

Fo

otp

rin

t A

rea

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

Co

ve

rG

row

th M

ed

ia

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 1

of

3W

aste

Ro

ck D

um

ps

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Wa

ste

Ro

ck

Du

mp

sP

roje

ct

Na

me

: M

arl

in -

Re

cla

ma

tio

n P

lan

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Re

gra

din

g P

us

h D

ista

nc

e C

alc

ula

tio

nR

ipp

ing

/Sc

ari

fyin

g C

alc

ula

tio

ns

do

zin

g d

ista

nc

e:

ba

se

d o

n 2

/3 f

ina

l cu

t slo

pe

+ 2

/3 f

ina

l fill

slo

pe

(m

inim

um

= 5

0 f

t)M

inim

um

1 h

r rip

pin

g/s

ca

rify

ing

tim

e p

er

du

mp

Slo

pe

s:

Nu

mb

er

of

pa

sse

s =

Fin

al slo

pe

le

ng

th ÷

Gra

de

r w

idth

Tra

ve

l d

ista

nce

= N

um

be

r o

f p

asse

s x

M

id-b

en

ch

le

ng

th

To

tal h

ou

rs =

(T

rave

l d

ista

nce

÷ G

rad

er

pro

du

ctivity)

+ (

Nu

mb

er

of

pa

sse

s x

Gra

de

r m

an

eu

ve

r tim

e)

Min

imu

m 1

hr

Fla

t A

rea

s:

Fla

t a

rea

wid

th =

Fin

al fla

t a

rea

÷ A

ve

rag

e lo

ng

dim

en

sio

ns

Nu

mb

er

of

pa

sse

s =

Fla

t a

rea

wid

th ÷

Gra

de

r w

idth

Tra

ve

l d

ista

nce

= N

um

be

r o

f p

asse

s x

A

ve

rag

e lo

ng

dim

en

sio

ns

To

tal h

ou

rs =

(T

rave

l d

ista

nce

÷ G

rad

er

pro

du

ctivity)

+ (

Nu

mb

er

of

pa

sse

s x

Gra

de

r m

an

eu

ve

r tim

e)

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

:M

inim

um

1 a

cre

re

ve

ge

tatio

n c

rew

tim

e p

er

are

a

Wa

ste

Ro

ck

Du

mp

s -

Re

gra

din

g C

os

ts

Pro

du

cti

vit

y =

Do

zer

Pro

du

cti

vit

y x

Gra

de C

orr

ecti

on

x D

en

sit

y C

orr

ecti

on

x O

pera

tor

(0.7

5)

x M

ate

rial x V

isib

ilit

y x

Jo

b E

ffic

ien

cy (

0.8

3)

x (

Slo

t/S

ide-b

y-S

ide)

Re

gra

din

g

Vo

lum

e

Do

zin

g D

ista

nc

e

(se

e a

bo

ve

)

Un

co

rre

cte

d

Do

ze

r

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Gra

de

Co

rre

cti

on

Do

zin

g

Ma

teri

al

De

ns

ity

Co

rre

cti

on

Sid

e-b

y-S

ide

or

Slo

t D

ozin

g

To

tal

Ho

url

y

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

To

tal

Do

ze

r

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Re

gra

din

g

Co

st

cy

ftcy/h

rcy/h

rh

r$

$$

1W

as

te R

oc

k D

um

p,

22

,31

0,1

33

1,1

26

12

01

.60

1.0

00

.79

19

42

4,5

75

.9$

1,4

23

,19

0$

4,3

17

,74

0$

5,7

40

,93

0

2M

arl

in P

it,

We

st

Wa

ll,

21

14

,31

12

23

55

01

.60

0.6

00

.79

12

60

43

9.7

$2

5,4

63

$7

7,2

51

$1

02

,71

4

3M

arl

in P

it,

No

rth

Wa

ll w

/ N

o R

oa

d, 2

62

,87

12

23

55

01

.60

0.6

00

.79

12

60

24

1.8

$1

4,0

03

$4

2,4

82

$5

6,4

85

4M

arl

in P

it,

No

rth

Wa

ll w

/ R

oa

d,

24

36

,81

93

11

40

21

.60

0.6

00

.79

11

90

2,2

99

.0$

13

3,1

35

$4

03

,91

1$

53

7,0

46

5M

arl

in P

it,

Ea

st

Wa

ll,

29

3,4

25

17

66

88

1.6

00

.60

0.7

91

32

52

87

.5$

16

,64

9$

50

,51

1$

67

,16

0

6M

arl

in P

it,

So

uth

ea

st

Wa

ll,

22

7,9

85

13

58

83

1.6

00

.60

0.7

91

41

76

7.1

$3

,88

6$

11

,78

9$

15

,67

57

Co

ch

ise

Pit

, 2

50

,37

31

35

88

31

.60

0.6

00

.79

14

17

12

0.8

$6

,99

6$

21

,22

3$

28

,21

9

3,0

95

,91

72

8,0

31

.8$

1,6

23

,32

2$

4,9

24

,90

7$

6,5

48

,22

9

Wa

ste

Ro

ck

Du

mp

s -

Co

ve

r a

nd

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Co

sts

Co

ve

r (l

ow

er

lay

er)

Co

ve

r

Vo

lum

e

Co

ve

r

Re

pla

ce

me

nt

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

Co

ve

r

La

bo

r

Co

st

Co

ve

r

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Co

ve

r

Co

st

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Vo

lum

e

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Re

pla

ce

me

nt

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

To

ps

oil

ing

Co

st

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

cy

BC

Y/h

r$

$$

1W

as

te R

oc

k D

um

p,

21

21

,29

0S

ma

ll T

ruck

29

81

40

7.0

$6

6,1

99

$1

63

,28

4$

22

9,4

83

60

,64

5S

ma

ll T

ruck

57

11

61

06

.2$

89

,77

1$

22

9,4

49

$3

19

,22

0

2M

arl

in P

it,

We

st

Wa

ll,

21

9,9

09

Scra

pe

r D

oze

r9

26

12

1.5

$3

,75

3$

11

,39

3$

15

,14

69

,95

4S

ma

ll T

ruck

57

11

61

7.4

$1

4,7

08

$3

7,5

93

$5

2,3

01

3M

arl

in P

it,

No

rth

Wa

ll w

/ N

o R

oa

d, 2

10

,93

8S

cra

pe

r D

oze

r9

26

11

1.8

$2

,06

0$

6,2

53

$8

,31

35

,46

9S

ma

ll T

ruck

57

11

69

.6$

8,1

15

$2

0,7

41

$2

8,8

56

4M

arl

in P

it,

No

rth

Wa

ll w

/ R

oa

d,

25

4,5

31

Scra

pe

r D

oze

r9

26

15

8.9

$1

0,2

80

$3

1,2

12

$4

1,4

92

27

,26

5S

ma

ll T

ruck

57

11

64

7.7

$4

0,3

21

$1

03

,05

8$

14

3,3

79

5M

arl

in P

it,

Ea

st

Wa

ll,

22

0,6

51

Scra

pe

r D

oze

r9

26

12

2.3

$3

,89

2$

11

,81

7$

15

,70

91

0,3

25

Sm

all

Tru

ck

57

11

61

8.1

$1

5,3

00

$3

9,1

06

$5

4,4

06

6M

arl

in P

it,

So

uth

ea

st

Wa

ll,

28

,03

4S

cra

pe

r D

oze

r9

26

18

.7$

1,5

18

$4

,61

0$

6,1

28

4,0

17

Sm

all

Tru

ck

57

11

67

.0$

5,9

17

$1

5,1

24

$2

1,0

41

7C

oc

his

e P

it, 2

14

,45

5S

cra

pe

r D

oze

r9

26

11

5.6

$2

,72

3$

8,2

67

$1

0,9

90

7,2

28

Sm

all

Tru

ck

57

11

61

2.7

$1

0,7

35

$2

7,4

39

$3

8,1

74

24

9,8

09

54

5.8

$9

0,4

25

$2

36

,83

6$

32

7,2

61

12

4,9

03

21

8.7

$1

84

,86

7$

47

2,5

10

$6

57

,37

7

Wa

ste

Ro

ck

Du

mp

s -

Sc

ari

fyin

g/R

ev

eg

eta

tio

n C

os

ts

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Pla

ce

me

nt

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

Fig

ure

1 -

Reg

rad

ing

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

nF

igu

re 3

- F

inal S

lop

e A

rea a

nd

Fo

otp

rin

t A

rea C

alc

ula

tio

n

!

21

c32

"c

Fig

ure

2 -

Do

zin

g D

ista

nce C

alc

ula

tio

n

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 2

of

3W

aste

Ro

ck D

um

ps

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Wa

ste

Ro

ck

Du

mp

sP

roje

ct

Na

me

: M

arl

in -

Re

cla

ma

tio

n P

lan

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Slo

pe

Are

a

Fla

t

Are

a

To

tal

Su

rfa

ce

Are

a

Fin

al

Slo

pe

Le

ng

th

Fla

t A

rea

Lo

ng

Dim

en

sio

n

Slo

pe

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g H

ou

rs

Fla

t A

rea

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g H

ou

rs

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g L

ab

or

Co

sts

To

tal

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g C

os

ts

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

La

bo

r

Co

st

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Re

vg

eta

tio

n

Ma

teri

al

Co

st

To

tal

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

st

acre

sa

cre

sa

cre

sft

fth

rsh

rs$

$$

$$

$$

1W

as

te R

oc

k D

um

p,

23

7.5

92

,27

47

20

27

.70

.1$

4,8

84

$1

,61

0$

6,4

94

$2

,93

2$

2,5

19

$2

0,8

44

$2

6,2

95

2M

arl

in P

it,

We

st

Wa

ll,

26

.17

44

86

00

4.0

0.1

$9

30

$2

37

$1

,16

7$

48

1$

41

3$

3,4

20

$4

,31

4

3M

arl

in P

it,

No

rth

Wa

ll w

/ N

o R

oa

d, 2

3.3

94

48

33

02

.30

.1$

54

5$

13

9$

68

4$

26

4$

22

7$

1,8

79

$2

,37

0

4M

arl

in P

it,

No

rth

Wa

ll w

/ R

oa

d,

21

6.9

06

24

1,1

80

10

.90

.0$

2,4

73

$6

31

$3

,10

4$

1,3

18

$1

,13

2$

9,3

71

$1

1,8

21

5M

arl

in P

it,

Ea

st

Wa

ll,

26

.40

35

37

90

4.2

0.0

$9

53

$2

43

$1

,19

6$

49

9$

42

9$

3,5

49

$4

,47

7

6M

arl

in P

it,

So

uth

ea

st

Wa

ll,

22

.49

27

14

00

1.7

0.1

$4

08

$1

04

$5

12

$1

94

$1

67

$1

,38

1$

1,7

42

7C

oc

his

e P

it, 2

4.4

82

71

72

03

.00

.0$

68

1$

17

4$

85

5$

34

9$

30

0$

2,4

84

$3

,13

3

77

.42

53

.80

.4$

10

,87

4$

3,1

38

$1

4,0

12

$6

,03

7$

5,1

87

$4

2,9

28

$5

4,1

52

No

tes:

1)

Min

imu

m t

ota

l rip

pin

g h

ou

rs =

1 (

i.e

. If

to

tal rip

pin

g h

rs (

slo

pe

+ f

lat)

< 1

, th

en

on

e h

ou

r o

f fle

et

tim

e is a

ssu

me

d,

reg

ard

less o

f a

cre

s s

ho

wn

in

in

sca

rify

ing

ta

ble

.)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 3

of

3W

aste

Ro

ck D

um

ps

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nL

an

dfi

lls

Pro

jec

t N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

- R

ec

lam

ati

on

Pla

n

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

La

nd

fill

s -

Co

st

Su

mm

ary

La

bo

rE

qu

ipm

en

tM

ate

ria

lsT

ota

lsG

rad

ing

Co

sts

$596

$1,1

07

$1,7

03

Co

ver

Pla

cem

en

t C

ost

$7,4

10

$18,4

58

N/A

$25,8

68

To

pso

il P

lacem

en

t C

ost

$7,1

85

$18,3

65

N/A

$25,5

50

Rip

pin

g C

ost

$422

$139

N/A

$561

Su

bto

tal E

art

hw

ork

s$15,6

13

$38,0

69

$0

$53,6

82

Reveg

eta

tio

n C

ost

$234

$201

$1,6

64

$2,0

99

TO

TA

LS

$15,8

47

$38,2

70

$1,6

64

$55,7

81

Co

lor

Co

de K

ey

User

Input -

Direct In

put

Dir

ect

Inp

ut

User

Input -

Pull

Dow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

onsta

nt (c

an o

verr

ide)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rogra

m C

alc

ula

ted V

alu

eL

ocked

Cell -

Fo

rmu

la o

r R

efe

ren

ce

La

nd

fill

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

Yo

u m

ust

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

lan

dfi

ll

Ph

ys

ica

l(1

)C

ov

er

(lo

we

r la

ye

r)G

row

th M

ed

ia (

up

pe

r la

ye

r)

ID C

od

e

Fin

al

La

nd

fill

Fo

otp

rin

t

Av

era

ge

Lo

ng

Dim

en

sio

n

(rip

pin

g

dis

tan

ce

)

Re

gra

de

Vo

lum

e

(ca

lcu

late

d

els

ew

he

re)

Co

ve

r

Th

ick

ne

ss

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Co

ve

r

Bo

rro

w

Slo

pe

fro

m

La

nd

fill

to

Co

ve

r B

orr

ow

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Th

ick

ne

ss

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m G

row

th

Me

dia

Sto

ck

pil

e

Slo

pe

fro

m

La

nd

fill

to

Sto

ck

pil

e

-1a

cre

sft

cy

inft

% g

rad

ein

ft%

gra

de

1S

olid

Waste

, 2

1165

525

40

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-62

Bio

rem

ed

iati

on

Cell

2150

700

40

2,5

00

01

230,0

00

-6

(1)

All

Physic

al para

mete

rs m


anual overr

ides for

volu

me o

r are

a a

re u

sed.

2. M

EG

2003, p

. 3-2

0

La

nd

fill

s -

Us

er

Inp

ut

(co

nt.

)Y

ou

mu

st

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

lan

dfi

ll

Gra

din

gC

ov

er

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Do

zin

g

Ma

teri

al

La

nd

fill

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Gra

din

g

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Slo

t/

Sid

e-b

y-S

ide

Co

ve

r

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Co

ve

r

Pla

ce

me

nt

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Se

ed

Mix

Mu

lch

Ty

pe

Fe

rtil

ize

rS

ca

rify

/ R

ip?

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Fle

et

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

1S

olid

Waste

, 2

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall

No

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

2B

iore

med

iati

on

Cell

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall

No

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

La

nd

fill

s -

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Do

zin

g,

Rip

pin

g/S

ca

rify

ing

& R

ev

eg

eta

tio

n C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Do

zin

g:

Dozin

g d

ista

nce =

2/3

the a

rea w

idth

up to 2

/3 o

f th

e 6

00 feet m

axim

um

fro

m C

ate

pill

ar

Handbook o

r 400 feet

Assum

es fla

t push (

gra

de c

orr

ection facto

r =

1)

Min

imum

1 h

r per

are

a

Rip

pin

g:

Fla

t are

a w

idth

= F

inal flat are

a ÷

Avera

ge long d

imensio

ns

Num

ber

of passes =

Fla

t are

a w

idth

÷ G

rader

wid

th

Tra

vel dis

tance =

Num

ber

of passes x

A

vera

ge long d

imensio

ns

Tota

l hours

= (

Tra

vel dis

tance ÷

Gra

der

pro

ductivity)

+ (

Num

ber

of passes x

Gra

der

maneuver

tim

e)

Min

imum

1 h

r per

are

a

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

Gro

wth

Me

dia

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4 -

20

08

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e .

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pa

ge

1 o

f 2

Landfills

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nL

an

dfi

lls

Pro

jec

t N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

- R

ec

lam

ati

on

Pla

n

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Reveg

eta

tio

n:

Min

imum

1 a

cre

revegeta

tion c

rew

tim

e p

er

are

a

La

nd

fill

s -

Re

gra

din

g C

os

ts

Pro

du

cti

vit

y =

Do

ze

r P

rod

uc

tiv

ity

x D

en

sit

y C

orr

ec

tio

n x

Op

era

tor

(0.7

5)

x M

ate

ria

l x

Vis

ibil

ity

x J

ob

Eff

icie

nc

y (

0.8

3)

x (

Slo

t/S

ide

-by

-Sid

e)

Re

gra

din

g

Vo

lum

e

Do

zin

g

Dis

tan

ce

(s

ee

ab

ov

e)

Un

co

rre

cte

d

Do

ze

r

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Do

zin

g

Ma

teri

al

De

ns

ity

Co

rre

cti

on

Sid

e-b

y-S

ide

or

Slo

t D

ozin

g

To

tal

Ho

url

y

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

To

tal

Do

ze

r

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Re

gra

din

g

Co

st

cy

ftcy/h

rL

CY

/hr

hr

$$

$

1S

olid

Waste

, 2

525

264

294

1.0

00.7

91

145

3.6

$208

$387

$595

2B

iore

med

iati

on

Cell

700

400

213

1.0

00.7

91

105

6.7

$388

$720

$1,1

08

1,2

25

10.3

$596

$1,1

07

$1,7

03

La

nd

fill

s -

Co

ve

r a

nd

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Co

sts

Co

ve

r P

lac

em

en

t

Co

ve

r V

olu

me

Co

ve

r

Re

pla

ce

me

nt

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

Co

ve

r

La

bo

r

Co

st

Co

ve

r

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Co

ve

r

Co

st

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Vo

lum

e

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Re

pla

ce

me

nt

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

To

ps

oil

ing

Co

st

ftL

CY

/hr

$$

$ft

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

1S

olid

Waste

, 2

5,3

78

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

211.9

$2,4

77

$6,1

70

$8,6

47

1,6

13

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

2.8

$2,3

67

$6,0

50

$8,4

17

2B

iore

med

iati

on

Cell

10,7

56

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

223.7

$4,9

33

$12,2

88

$17,2

21

3,2

27

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

5.7

$4,8

18

$12,3

15

$17,1

33

16,1

34

35.6

$7,4

10

$18,4

58

$25,8

68

4,8

40

8.5

$7,1

85

$18,3

65

$25,5

50

La

nd

fill

s -

Sc

ari

fyin

g/R

ev

eg

eta

tio

n C

os

ts

Fin

al

Are

a

Lo

ng

Dim

en

sio

n

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g H

ou

rs

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g L

ab

or

Co

sts

To

tal

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g C

os

ts

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

La

bo

r

Co

st

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Re

vg

eta

tio

n

Ma

teri

al

Co

st

To

tal

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

st

acre

sft

hrs

$$

$$

$$

$

1S

olid

Waste

, 2

1.0

0165

0.8

$141

$46

$187

$78

$67

$555

$700

2B

iore

med

iati

on

Cell

2.0

0150

1.6

$281

$93

$374

$156

$134

$1,1

09

$1,3

99

3.0

02.4

$422

$139

$561

$234

$201

$1,6

64

$2,0

99

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Pla

ce

me

nt

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4 -

20

08

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e .

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pa

ge

2 o

f 2

Landfills

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nT

ailin

gs

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Ta

ilin

gs

- C

os

t S

um

ma

ry

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Tailin

gs S

urf

ace G

rad

ing

Co

st

$204,0

91

$619,1

83

N/A

$823,2

74

Co

ver

Pla

cem

en

t C

os

t$779,0

80

$1,9

40,5

15

N/A

$2,7

19,5

95

To

pso

il P

lacem

en

t C

ost

$1,4

52,3

93

$3,7

12,2

40

N/A

$5,1

64,6

33

Rip

pin

g C

osts

$22,9

01

$22,9

01

N/A

$45,8

02

Su

bto

tal E

art

hw

ork

s$2,4

58,4

65

$6,2

94,8

39

$0

$8,7

53,3

04

Reveg

eta

tio

n C

ost

$23,8

76

$20,5

09

$169,7

33

$214,1

18

TO

TA

LS

$2,4

82,3

41

$6,3

15,3

48

$169,7

33

$8,9

67,4

22

Co

lor

Co

de K

ey

User

Input -

Direct In

put

Dir

ect

Inp

ut

User

Input -

Pull

Dow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

onsta

nt (c

an o

verr

ide)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rogra

m C

alc

ula

ted V

alu

eL

ocked

Cell -

Fo

rmu

la o

r R

efe

ren

ce

Ta

ilin

gs

- U

se

r In

pu

tY

ou

mu

st

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

tailin

gs im

po

un

dm

en

t

Ph

ysic

al

Co

ver

(lo

wer

layer)

Gro

wth

Med

ia (

up

per

layer)

ID C

od

e

Fin

al

(Re

gra

de

d)

Em

ba

nk

me

nt

Slo

pe

Fin

al

Em

ba

nk

me

nt

He

igh

t

Fin

al

Ta

ilin

gs

Su

rfa

ce

Are

a

Mid

-

Em

ba

nk

me

nt

or

Rip

pin

g

Le

ng

th

Su

rfa

ce

Re

gra

de

Vo

lum

e

(ca

lcu

late

d

els

ew

he

re)

Em

ba

nk

me

nt

Co

ve

r

Th

ick

ne

ss

Ta

ilin

gs

Su

rfa

ce

Co

ve

r

Th

ick

ne

ss

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Co

ve

r

Bo

rro

w

Slo

pe

fro

m

Ta

ilin

gs

to

Bo

rro

w

Em

ba

nk

me

nt

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Th

ick

ne

ss

Ta

ilin

gs

Su

rfa

ce

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Th

ick

ne

ss

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Gro

wth

Ma

teri

al

Sto

ck

pil

e

Slo

pe

fro

m

Ta

ilin

gs

to

Sto

ck

pil

e

-1_

H:1

Vft

acre

sft

cy

inin

ft%

gra

de

inin

ft%

gra

de

1T

SF

Su

rface, 1

151

1,2

00

350,0

00

36

2,5

00

624

30,0

00

-6

2T

SF

Dam

Lif

t, 2

4.1

1,8

00

100,0

00

200

2,5

00

612

30,0

00

-6

3T

SF

II

151

1,2

00

350,0

00

36

2,5

00

62

430,0

00

-6

Note

s:

1. M

EG

2003, p

. 3-1

42. R

ob

ert

so

n 2

009

Ta

ilin

gs

- U

se

r In

pu

t (c

on

t.)

Yo

u m

ust

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

tailin

gs im

po

un

dm

en

t

Reveg

eta

tio

nR

eveg

eta

tio

n

Gra

din

g

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Slo

t/S

ide

-by

-

Sid

e

Co

ve

r

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Co

ve

r

Pla

ce

me

nt

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Se

ed

Mix

Em

ba

nk

me

nt

Slo

pe

Se

ed

Mix

Ta

ilin

gs

Su

rfa

ce

Mu

lch

Em

ba

nk

me

nt

Slo

pe

s

Mu

lch

Ta

ilin

gs

Su

rfa

ce

Fe

rtil

ize

r

Em

ba

nk

me

nt

Slo

pe

s

Fe

rtil

ize

r

Ta

ilin

g

Su

rfa

ce

Em

ba

nk

me

nt

Slo

pe

Sc

ari

fy/

Rip

?

Ta

ilin

gs

Su

rfa

ce

Sc

ari

fy/

Rip

?

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g F

lee

t

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

1T

SF

Su

rface, 1

Med

ium

No

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

No

ne

Mix

1N

on

eS

traw

Mu

lch

No

ne

Ch

em

ical

No

Yes

Sm

all D

ozer

2T

SF

Dam

Lif

t, 2

Med

ium

No

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

No

ne

Mix

1N

on

eS

traw

Mu

lch

No

ne

Ch

em

ical

No

Yes

Sm

all D

ozer

3T

SF

II

Med

ium

No

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

No

ne

Mix

1N

on

eS

traw

Mu

lch

No

ne

Ch

em

ical

No

Yes

Sm

all D

oze

r

Ta

ilin

gs

- C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Su

rface A

rea C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Gra

din

g C

alc

ula

tio

ns

To

p S

urf

ace A

rea

pro

vid

ed b

y u

ser

Gra

din

g a

ssum

ed o

n im

poundm

ent surf

ace o

nly

, not em

bankm

ent

Avera

ge p

ush d

ista

nce a

ssum

ed to b

e 2

/3 o

f th

e 6

00 feet m

axim

um

fro

m C

ate

pill

ar

Handbook o

r 400 feet

Mate

rial assum

ed to b

e loose s

tockile

(1.2

pro

ductivity facto

r)

Dozin

g d

ensity c

orr

ection b

ased o

n d

ry s

and =

2300/2

400 =

0.9

6

Slo

pe a

ssum

ed to b

e 0

to 5

% (

1.0

pro

ductivity facto

r)

Rip

pin

g/S

cari

fyin

g/R

eveg

eta

tio

n C

alc

ula

tio

n

Min

imum

1 h

r rippin

g/s

carify

ing p

er

are

a

Min

imum

1 a

cre

revegeta

tion c

rew

tim

e p

er

are

a

Reg

rad

ing

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

n

Gro

wth

Med

ia

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

Gra

din

gC

over

Fig

ure

1 -

Su

rface A

reas

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 1

of

3T

aili

ngs

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nT

ailin

gs

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Fin

al S

lop

e A

rea a

nd

Fo

otp

rin

t A

rea C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Reg

rad

ing

Pu

sh

Dis

tan

ce C

alc

ula

tio

n

Ta

ilin

gs

- S

urf

ac

e R

eg

rad

ing

Co

sts

Pro

du

cti

vit

y =

Do

zer

Pro

du

cti

vit

y x

Gra

de C

orr

ecti

on

x D

en

sit

y C

orr

ecti

on

x O

pera

tor

(0.7

5)

x M

ate

rial x V

isib

ilit

y x

Jo

b E

ffic

ien

cy (

0.8

3)

x (

Slo

t/S

ide-b

y-S

ide)

Re

gra

din

g

Vo

lum

e

Do

zin

g

Dis

tan

ce

(s

ee

ab

ov

e)

Un

co

rre

cte

d

Do

ze

r

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Gra

de

Co

rre

cti

on

De

ns

ity

Co

rre

cti

on

Do

zin

g

Ma

teri

al

Sid

e-b

y-S

ide

or

Slo

t D

ozin

g

To

tal

Ho

url

y

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

To

tal

Do

ze

r

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Re

gra

din

g

Co

st

cy

ftcy/h

rcy/h

rh

r$

$$

1T

SF

Su

rface, 1

350,0

00

400

317

1.0

00.9

61.2

01

227

1541.9

$89,2

91

$270,8

96

$360,1

87

2T

SF

Dam

Lif

t, 2

100,0

00

400

317

1.0

00.9

61.2

01

227

440.5

$25,5

09

$77,3

91

$102,9

00

3T

SF

II

350,0

00

400

317

1.0

00.9

61.2

01

227

1541.9

$89,2

91

$270,8

96

$360,1

87

800,0

00

3524.3

$204,0

91

$619,1

83

$823,2

74

Ta

ilin

gs

- C

ov

er

an

d G

row

th M

ed

ia C

os

ts

Co

ver

Pla

cem

en

tG

row

th M

ed

ia P

lacem

en

t

Co

ve

r V

olu

me

Co

ve

r

Pla

ce

me

nt

Fle

et

Co

ve

r

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Co

ve

r

Pla

ce

me

nt

Co

st

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Vo

lum

e

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Pla

ce

me

nt

Fle

et

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

To

ps

oil

Pla

ce

me

nt

Co

st

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

1T

SF

Su

rface, 1

730,8

40

Sm

all

Tru

ck

420

21740.1

$362,2

19

$902,2

07

$1,2

64,4

26

487,2

27

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

853.3

$721,2

94

$1,8

43,5

89

$2,5

64,8

83

2T

SF

Dam

Lif

t, 2

110,2

44

Sm

all

Tru

ck

420

2262.5

$54,6

42

$136,1

01

$190,7

43

6,6

15

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

11.6

$9,8

05

$25,0

62

$34,8

67

3T

SF

II

730,8

40

Sm

all

Tru

ck

420

21740.1

$362,2

19

$902,2

07

$1,2

64,4

26

487,2

27

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

853.3

$721,2

94

$1,8

43,5

89

$2,5

64,8

83

1,5

71,9

24

3742.7

$779,0

80

$1,9

40,5

15

$2,7

19,5

95

981,0

68

1718.2

$1,4

52,3

93

$3,7

12,2

40

$5,1

64,6

33

Ta

ilin

gs

- S

ca

rify

ing

/Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

sts

Em

ba

nk

me

nt

Slo

pe

Are

a

Ta

ilin

gs

Su

rfa

ce

Are

a

To

tal

Su

rfa

ce

Are

a

Fin

al

Slo

pe

Le

ng

th

Slo

pe

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g H

ou

rs

Fla

t A

rea

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g H

ou

rs

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

La

bo

r

Co

st

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Co

st

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

La

bo

r

Co

st

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Re

vg

eta

tio

n

Ma

teri

al

Co

st

To

tal

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

st

acre

sa

cre

sa

cre

sft

hrs

hrs

$$

$$

$$

$

1T

SF

Su

rface, 1

0.1

151

151.1

00

105.1

$11,3

00

$11,3

00

$22,6

00

$11,7

78

$10,1

17

$83,7

30

$105,6

25

2T

SF

Dam

Lif

t, 2

0.1

4.1

4.2

00

2.8

$301

$301

$602

$320

$275

$2,2

73

$2,8

68

3T

SF

II

0.1

151

151.1

00

105.1

$11,3

00

$11,3

00

$22,6

00

$11,7

78

$10,1

17

$83,7

30

$105,6

25

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

an

gle

slo

pe

lco

s(O

ve

ral

he

igh

tE

mb

an

km

en

t

Fig

ure

2 -

Fin

al S

lop

e A

rea a

nd

Fo

otp

rin

t A

rea C

alc

ula

tio

n

Fig

ure

1 -

Reg

rad

ing

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

n

!

21

c32

"c

Fig

ure

2 -

Do

zin

g D

ista

nce C

alc

ula

tio

n

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 2

of

3T

aili

ngs

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nT

ailin

gs

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls 0

.3306.1

306.4

213.0

$22,9

01

$22,9

01

$45,8

02

$23,8

76

$20,5

09

$169,7

33

$214,1

18

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 3

of

3T

aili

ngs

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nF

ou

nd

ati

on

s &

Bu

ild

ing

sP

roje

ct

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Bu

ild

ing

s &

Fo

un

da

tio

n D

em

oli

tio

n C

os

t S

um

ma

ry

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Bu

ild

ing

Dem

oliti

on

Co

st

$508,8

41

$508,8

41

N/A

$1,0

17,6

82

Wall D

em

oliti

on

Co

st

$309,6

98

$49,6

77

N/A

$359,3

75

Sla

b D

em

oliti

on

$54,4

34

$151,6

23

N/A

$206,0

57

Su

bto

tal D

em

oliti

on

$872,9

73

$710,1

41

$0

$1,5

83,1

14

Co

ver

Pla

cem

en

t C

ost

$18,3

58

$45,7

23

N/A

$64,0

81

Gro

wth

Med

ia P

lacem

en

t C

ost

$61,4

51

$157,0

79

N/A

$218,5

30

Rip

pin

g C

ost

$5,6

10

$1,8

49

N/A

$7,4

59

Su

bto

tal E

art

hw

ork

s$85,4

19

$204,6

51

$0

$290,0

70

Reveg

eta

tio

n C

ost

$2,8

70

$2,4

66

$13,0

32

$18,3

68

TO

TA

LS

$961,2

62

$917,2

58

$13,0

32

$1,8

91,5

52

Co

lor

Co

de K

ey

User

Input -

Direct In

put

Dir

ect

Inp

ut

Min

imu

m t

hic

kn

ess o

f co

ver

over

un

bro

ken

sla

b:

5.0

ft<

In

Nevad

a u

se 5

ft p

er

NV

BL

M

User

Input -

Pull

Dow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

onsta

nt (c

an o

verr

ide)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rogra

m C

alc

ula

ted V

alu

eL

ocked

Cell -

Fo

rmu

la o

r R

efe

ren

ce

Bu

ild

ing

s &

Fo

un

da

tio

n -

Us

er

Inp

ut

Yo

u m

ust

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

bu

ild

ing

or

facilit

y

Ph

ysic

al C

hara

cte

risti

cs

Fo

un

dati

on

Co

ver

(1)

Gro

wth

Med

ia (1

)(e

ntire

footp

rint)

ID C

od

eL

en

gth

Wid

th

Eve

Heig

ht

Sla

b

Th

ickn

ess

Wall

Th

ickn

ess

Fo

un

dati

on

Wall

Heig

ht

Avera

ge F

lat

Are

a L

on

g

Dim

en

sio

n

(rip

pin

g

dis

tan

ce)

Bu

ild

ing

Are

a

Fo

otp

rin

t

(in

clu

din

g

su

rro

un

din

g

facilit

ies)

Fo

un

dati

on

Co

ver

Th

ickn

ess

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Fo

un

dati

on

Co

ver

Bo

rro

w A

rea

Slo

pe f

rom

Facilit

y t

o

Bo

rro

w A

rea

Gro

wth

Med

ia

Th

ickn

ess

Dis

tan

ce f

rom

Gro

wth

Med

ia

Sto

ckp

ile

Slo

pe f

rom

Facilit

y t

o

Sto

ckp

ile

-1ft

ftft

inin

ftft

acre

sin

ft%

gra

de

inft

% g

rade

1A

dm

inis

trati

on

, 2

65.6

32.8

15

68

266

0.1

024

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

2E

ng

ineeri

ng

, 2

39.4

32.8

15

68

270

0.0

624

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

3T

rain

ing

, 2

85.3

32.6

15

68

270

0.1

324

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

4C

han

ge H

ou

se, 2

13.1

49.2

15

68

270

0.0

324

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

5E

nclo

sed

Ware

ho

use, 3

65.6

65.6

20

12

62

66

0.2

024

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

6O

pen

-sid

ed

Ware

ho

use, 3

75.5

65.6

15

12

62

76

0.2

324

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

7E

qu

ipm

en

t W

ork

sh

op

Meta

l, 3

118.1

98.4

35

20

66

118

0.5

324

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

8W

eld

ing

Sh

op

, 3

98.4

65.6

25

12

64

98

0.3

024

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

9W

ash

ing

Bay, 3

98.4

39.4

20

98

0.1

824

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

10

Lab

ora

tory

, 4

76.9

76.9

15

68

277

0.2

724

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

11

Pro

cessin

g P

lan

t, 4

118.1

72.2

20

20

62

118

0.3

924

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

12

Ho

usin

g &

Oth

er

Bu

ild

ing

s, 5

250

250

84

10

2250

2.8

724

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

13

Pri

mary

Cru

sh

er,

585

70

100

24

24

685

0.2

724

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

14

Cru

sh

ed

Ore

Su

rge, 5

200

200

12

200

1.8

424

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

15

Su

bsta

tio

n, 5

200

200

24

200

1.8

424

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

16

Gri

nd

ing

Pad

, 5

230

70

24

230

0.7

424

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

17

Lix

ivia

tio

n P

ad

, 5

445

215

24

445

4.3

924

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

18

Sep

ara

tio

n P

ad

, 5

400

200

24

400

3.6

724

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

19

Co

ncre

te P

lan

t, 5

100

70

24

100

0.3

224

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

20

Tan

k P

ad

, 5

130

130

24

130

0.7

824

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

21

Wate

r T

reatm

en

t P

lan

t, 6

160

70

24

160

0.5

124

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

22

Co

neyo

rs, 5

820

10

512

10

2820

0.3

824

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

23

Exp

losiv

es S

tora

ge

35

35

20

12

10

235

0.0

624

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-6

24

Incin

tera

tor,

530

30

15

12

62

30

0.0

424

2,5

00

012

30,0

00

-625

Po

rtal B

en

ch

Facilit

ies, 5

300

230

20

12

62

300

3.1

724

2,5

00

01

230,0

00

-6

Note

s:

1. F

oundation c

over

only

calc

ula

ted to c

over

sla

b. G

row

th m

edia

estim

ate

d o

ver

entire

footp

rint are

a

2. M

EG

2003, p

.3-1

15. C

om

isio

n 2

010

3. M

EG

2003, p

. 3-1

26. M

AR

N 2

007

4. M

EG

2003, p

. 3-1

3, p

. 7-1

Bu

ild

ing

s &

Fo

un

da

tio

n -

Us

er

Inp

ut

(co

nt.

)Y

ou

mu

st

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

bu

ild

ing

or

facilit

y

Co

nstr

ucti

on

Mate

rials

Sla

b D

em

oliti

on

Fo

un

dati

on

Co

ver

Gro

wth

Med

iaR

eveg

eta

tio

n

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 1

of

5F

oundations &

Build

ings

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nF

ou

nd

ati

on

s &

Bu

ild

ing

sP

roje

ct

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Bu

ild

ing

Typ

e

Fo

un

dati

on

Wall

Typ

e

Sla

b D

em

o

Meth

od

Sla

b

Bre

akin

g

Eq

uip

men

t

Fle

et

Co

ver

Mate

rial T

yp

e

Co

ver

Pla

cem

en

t

Eq

uip

men

t

Fle

et

Gro

wth

Med

ia

Mate

rial T

yp

e

Gro

wth

Med

ia

Pla

cem

en

t

Eq

uip

men

t

Fle

et

Seed

Mix

Mu

lch

Fert

iliz

er

Scari

fy/ R

ip?

Rip

pin

g F

leet

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

1A

dm

inis

trati

on

, 2

Sm

. ste

el

nc 8

in

(20 c

m)

thB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

2E

ng

ineeri

ng

, 2

Sm

. ste

el

nc 8

in

(20 c

m)

thB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

3T

rain

ing

, 2

Sm

. ste

el

nc 8

in

(20 c

m)

thB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

4C

han

ge H

ou

se, 2

Sm

. ste

el

nc 8

in

(20 c

m)

thB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

5E

nclo

sed

Ware

ho

use, 3

Lg

. ste

el

nc 8

in

(20 c

m)

thB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

6O

pen

-sid

ed

Ware

ho

use, 3

Sm

. ste

el

nc 8

in

(20 c

m)

thB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

7E

qu

ipm

en

t W

ork

sh

op

Meta

l, 3

Lg

. ste

el

nc 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

8W

eld

ing

Sh

op

, 3

Lg

. ste

el

nc 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

9W

ash

ing

Bay, 3

Lg

. co

ncre

ten

c 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

10

Lab

ora

tory

, 4

Sm

. ste

el

nc 8

in

(20 c

m)

thB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

11

Pro

cessin

g P

lan

t, 4

Lg

. ste

el

nc 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

12

Ho

usin

g &

Oth

er

Bu

ild

ing

s, 5

Sm

. m

aso

nry

nc 1

0 in

(25 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

13

Pri

mary

Cru

sh

er,

5L

g. m

aso

nry

nc 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

14

Cru

sh

ed

Ore

Su

rge, 5

Lg

. co

ncre

ten

c 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

15

Su

bsta

tio

n, 5

Lg

. co

ncre

ten

c 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

16

Gri

nd

ing

Pad

, 5

Lg

. co

ncre

ten

c 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

17

Lix

ivia

tio

n P

ad

, 5

Lg

. co

ncre

ten

c 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

18

Sep

ara

tio

n P

ad

, 5

Lg

. co

ncre

ten

c 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

19

Co

ncre

te P

lan

t, 5

Lg

. co

ncre

ten

c 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

20

Tan

k P

ad

, 5

Lg

. co

ncre

ten

c 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

21

Wate

r T

reatm

en

t P

lan

t, 6

Lg

. co

ncre

ten

c 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

22

Co

neyo

rs, 5

Lg

. ste

el

nc 1

2 in

(30 c

m)

tB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

23

Exp

losiv

es S

tora

ge

Sm

. ste

el

nc 8

in

(20 c

m)

thB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

24

Incin

tera

tor,

5S

m. ste

el

nc 8

in

(20 c

m)

thB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

25

Po

rtal B

en

ch

Facilit

ies, 5

Sm

. ste

el

nc 8

in

(20 c

m)

thB

reak &

bu

ryM

ed

Excavato

rA

llu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

ze

r

Bu

ild

ing

s &

Fo

un

da

tio

n -

Ca

lcu

lati

on

s

Bu

ild

ing

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Usin

g M

ean

s H

eavy C

on

str

ucti

on

Co

st

Data

(2004)

calc

ula

tes c

ub

ic f

eet

fro

m b

uild

ing

dim

en

sio

ns

Estim

age s

lab thic

kness a

nd w

all

thic

kness if not know

nA

ssum

es that all

concre

te s

labs a

re r

ein

forc

ed

Pro

ductivity for

cre

w fro

m M

eans H

eavy C

onstr

uction C

ost D

ata

(2004)

adju

ste

d for

superv

isio

n

(addre

ssed in M

isc. C

osts

) and D

avis

-Bacon W

age R

ate

s

Sla

b D

em

oliti

on

Calc

ula

tio

ns

Min

imum

1 h

r excavato

r tim

e for

sla

b d

em

olit

ion

Co

ver

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

n

Fo

un

dati

on

are

a x

co

ver

thic

kn

ess

If "

Bury

in P

lace"

is s

ele

cte

d a

s s

lab d

em

olit

ion m

eth

od, cover

thic

kness is a

dju

ste

d s

uch that

tota

l cover

(cover

+ g

row

th m

edia

) equals

5 ft (p

er

NV

BLM

Guid

ance)

Rip

pin

g/S

cari

fyin

g C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Fla

t are

a w

idth

= F

inal flat are

a ÷

Avera

ge long d

imensio

ns

Num

ber

of passes =

Fla

t are

a w

idth

÷ G

rader

wid

thT

ravel dis

tance =

Num

ber

of passes x

A

vera

ge long d

imensio

ns

Tota

l hours

= (

Tra

vel dis

tance ÷

Gra

der

pro

ductivity)

+ (

Num

ber

of passes x

Gra

der

maneuver

tim

e)

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 2

of

5F

oundations &

Build

ings

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nF

ou

nd

ati

on

s &

Bu

ild

ing

sP

roje

ct

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Min

imum

1 a

cre

revegeta

tion c

rew

tim

e p

er

are

a

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 3

of

5F

oundations &

Build

ings

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nF

ou

nd

ati

on

s &

Bu

ild

ing

sP

roje

ct

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Bu

ild

ing

& F

ou

nd

ati

on

De

mo

liti

on

Co

sts

Uses R

S M

ean

s H

eavy C

on

str

ucti

on

Co

st

Data

fo

r b

uild

ing

an

d w

all d

em

oliti

on

co

st

calc

ula

tio

ns. U

ses C

AT

Han

db

oo

k f

or

sla

b b

reakin

g p

rod

ucti

on

.

Bu

ild

ing

Fo

otp

rin

t

(sla

b a

rea)

Bu

ild

ing

Vo

lum

eW

all L

en

gth

Wall A

rea

Sla

b V

olu

me

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

Bu

ild

ing

Dem

oliti

on

Co

st

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

Wall

Dem

oliti

on

Co

st

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal S

lab

Bre

akin

g C

ost

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Dem

oliti

on

Co

sts

sqft

cu ft

ftsq ft

cy

$$

$$

$$

$$

$$

$$

1A

dm

inis

trati

on

, 2

2,1

52

32,2

75

197

394

40

$4,8

41

$4,8

41

$9,6

82

$5,5

79

$894

$6,4

73

$117

$326

$443

$10,5

37

$6,0

61

$16,5

98

2E

ng

ineeri

ng

, 2

1,2

92

19,3

85

144

288

24

$2,9

08

$2,9

08

$5,8

16

$4,0

78

$654

$4,7

32

$117

$326

$443

$7,1

03

$3,8

88

$10,9

91

3T

rain

ing

, 2

2,7

81

41,7

12

236

472

52

$6,2

57

$6,2

57

$12,5

14

$6,6

84

$1,0

71

$7,7

55

$117

$326

$443

$13,0

58

$7,6

54

$20,7

12

4C

han

ge H

ou

se, 2

645

9,6

68

125

250

12

$1,4

50

$1,4

50

$2,9

00

$3,5

40

$568

$4,1

08

$117

$326

$443

$5,1

07

$2,3

44

$7,4

51

5E

nclo

sed

Ware

ho

use, 3

4,3

03

86,0

67

262

524

159

$10,3

28

$10,3

28

$20,6

56

$7,4

20

$1,1

89

$8,6

09

$316

$881

$1,1

97

$18,0

64

$12,3

98

$30,4

62

6O

pen

-sid

ed

Ware

ho

use, 3

4,9

53

74,2

92

282

564

183

$11,1

44

$11,1

44

$22,2

88

$7,9

86

$1,2

80

$9,2

66

$363

$1,0

11

$1,3

74

$19,4

93

$13,4

35

$32,9

28

7E

qu

ipm

en

t W

ork

sh

op

Meta

l, 3

11,6

21

406,7

36

433

2,5

98

717

$48,8

08

$48,8

08

$97,6

16

$51,4

92

$8,2

62

$59,7

54

$1,4

06

$3,9

15

$5,3

21

$101,7

06

$60,9

85

$162,6

91

8W

eld

ing

Sh

op

, 3

6,4

55

161,3

76

328

1,3

12

239

$19,3

65

$19,3

65

$38,7

30

$26,0

04

$4,1

72

$30,1

76

$469

$1,3

05

$1,7

74

$45,8

38

$24,8

42

$70,6

80

9W

ash

ing

Bay, 3

3,8

77

0276

0239

$469

$1,3

05

$1,7

74

$469

$1,3

05

$1,7

74

10

Lab

ora

tory

, 4

5,9

14

88,7

04

308

616

110

$13,3

06

$13,3

06

$26,6

12

$8,7

23

$1,3

98

$10,1

21

$211

$587

$798

$22,2

40

$15,2

91

$37,5

31

11

Pro

cessin

g P

lan

t, 4

8,5

27

170,5

36

381

762

526

$20,4

64

$20,4

64

$40,9

28

$15,1

03

$2,4

23

$17,5

26

$1,0

31

$2,8

71

$3,9

02

$36,5

98

$25,7

58

$62,3

56

12

Ho

usin

g &

Oth

er

Bu

ild

ing

s, 5

62,5

00

500,0

00

1,0

00

2,0

00

772

$75,0

00

$75,0

00

$150,0

00

$33,0

40

$5,3

00

$38,3

40

$1,5

11

$4,2

09

$5,7

20

$109,5

51

$84,5

09

$194,0

60

13

Pri

mary

Cru

sh

er,

55,9

50

595,0

00

310

1,8

60

441

$77,3

50

$77,3

50

$154,7

00

$36,8

65

$5,9

15

$42,7

80

$867

$2,4

15

$3,2

82

$115,0

82

$85,6

80

$200,7

62

14

Cru

sh

ed

Ore

Su

rge, 5

40,0

00

0800

01,4

81

$2,8

93

$8,0

59

$10,9

52

$2,8

93

$8,0

59

$10,9

52

15

Su

bsta

tio

n, 5

40,0

00

0800

02,9

63

$5,7

87

$16,1

19

$21,9

06

$5,7

87

$16,1

19

$21,9

06

16

Gri

nd

ing

Pad

, 5

16,1

00

0600

01,1

93

$2,3

31

$6,4

93

$8,8

24

$2,3

31

$6,4

93

$8,8

24

17

Lix

ivia

tio

n P

ad

, 5

95,6

75

01,3

20

07,0

87

$13,8

34

$38,5

35

$52,3

69

$13,8

34

$38,5

35

$52,3

69

18

Sep

ara

tio

n P

ad

, 5

80,0

00

01,2

00

05,9

26

$11,5

73

$32,2

37

$43,8

10

$11,5

73

$32,2

37

$43,8

10

19

Co

ncre

te P

lan

t, 5

7,0

00

0340

0519

$1,0

19

$2,8

39

$3,8

58

$1,0

19

$2,8

39

$3,8

58

20

Tan

k P

ad

, 5

16,9

00

0520

01,2

52

$2,4

48

$6,8

19

$9,2

67

$2,4

48

$6,8

19

$9,2

67

21

Wate

r T

reatm

en

t P

lan

t, 6

11,2

00

0460

0830

$1,6

17

$4,5

03

$6,1

20

$1,6

17

$4,5

03

$6,1

20

22

Co

neyo

rs, 5

8,2

00

41,0

00

1,6

60

3,3

20

304

$4,9

20

$4,9

20

$9,8

40

$65,8

02

$10,5

58

$76,3

60

$597

$1,6

64

$2,2

61

$71,3

19

$17,1

42

$88,4

61

23

Exp

losiv

es S

tora

ge

1,2

25

24,5

00

140

280

45

$3,6

75

$3,6

75

$7,3

50

$3,9

65

$636

$4,6

01

$117

$326

$443

$7,7

57

$4,6

37

$12,3

94

24

Incin

tera

tor,

5900

13,5

00

120

240

33

$2,0

25

$2,0

25

$4,0

50

$3,3

98

$545

$3,9

43

$117

$326

$443

$5,5

40

$2,8

96

$8,4

36

25

Po

rtal B

en

ch

Facilit

ies,

569,0

00

1,3

80,0

00

1,0

60

2,1

20

2,5

56

$207,0

00

$207,0

00

$414,0

00

$30,0

19

$4,8

12

$34,8

31

$4,9

90

$13,9

00

$18,8

90

$242,0

09

$225,7

12

$467,7

21

3,6

44,7

51

$508,8

41

$508,8

41

$1,0

17,6

82

$309,6

98

$49,6

77

$359,3

75

$54,4

34

$151,6

23

$206,0

57

$872,9

73

$710,1

41

$1,5

83,1

14

Bu

ild

ing

& F

ou

nd

ati

on

- F

ou

nd

ati

on

Co

ve

r a

nd

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Co

sts

Fo

un

dati

on

Co

ver

Gro

wth

Med

ia

Co

ver

Vo

lum

e

Co

ver

Rep

acem

en

t

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

cks/ S

cra

pers

To

tal F

leet

Ho

urs

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal C

over

Co

st

To

pso

il

Vo

lum

e

To

pso

il

Rep

acem

en

t

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

cks/

Scra

pers

To

tal F

leet

Ho

urs

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

To

pso

ilin

g

Co

st

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

1A

dm

inis

trati

on

, 2

159

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$208

$518

$726

161

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

2E

ng

ineeri

ng

, 2

96

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$208

$518

$726

97

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

3T

rain

ing

, 2

206

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$208

$518

$726

210

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

4C

han

ge H

ou

se, 2

48

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$208

$518

$726

48

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

5E

nclo

sed

Ware

ho

use, 3

319

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$208

$518

$726

323

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

6O

pen

-sid

ed

Ware

ho

use, 3

367

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$208

$518

$726

371

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

7E

qu

ipm

en

t W

ork

sh

op

Meta

l, 3

861

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

22.0

$396

$985

$1,3

81

855

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.5

$1,2

68

$3,2

41

$4,5

09

8W

eld

ing

Sh

op

, 3

478

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$229

$570

$799

484

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

9W

ash

ing

Bay, 3

287

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$208

$518

$726

290

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

10

Lab

ora

tory

, 4

438

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$208

$518

$726

436

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

11

Pro

cessin

g P

lan

t, 4

632

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$291

$726

$1,0

17

629

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.1

$930

$2,3

77

$3,3

07

12

Ho

usin

g &

Oth

er

Bu

ild

ing

s, 5

4,6

30

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

210.0

$2,1

23

$5,2

88

$7,4

11

4,6

30

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

8.1

$6,8

47

$17,5

00

$24,3

47

13

Pri

mary

Cru

sh

er,

5441

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$208

$518

$726

436

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

14

Cru

sh

ed

Ore

Su

rge, 5

2,9

63

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

27.0

$1,3

53

$3,3

70

$4,7

23

2,9

69

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

5.2

$4,3

96

$11,2

35

$15,6

31

15

Su

bsta

tio

n, 5

2,9

63

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

27.0

$1,3

53

$3,3

70

$4,7

23

2,9

69

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

5.2

$4,3

96

$11,2

35

$15,6

31

16

Gri

nd

ing

Pad

, 5

1,1

93

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

23.0

$541

$1,3

48

$1,8

89

1,1

94

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

2.1

$1,7

75

$4,5

37

$6,3

12

17

Lix

ivia

tio

n P

ad

, 5

7,0

87

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

216.0

$3,2

47

$8,0

88

$11,3

35

7,0

83

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

12.4

$10,4

82

$26,7

91

$37,2

73

18

Sep

ara

tio

n P

ad

, 5

5,9

26

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

213.0

$2,7

27

$6,7

92

$9,5

19

5,9

21

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

10.4

$8,7

91

$22,4

70

$31,2

61

19

Co

ncre

te P

lan

t, 5

519

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$229

$570

$799

516

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

20

Tan

k P

ad

, 5

1,2

52

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

23.0

$583

$1,4

52

$2,0

35

1,2

58

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

2.2

$1,8

60

$4,7

53

$6,6

13

21

Wate

r T

reatm

en

t P

lan

t, 6

830

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

22.0

$375

$933

$1,3

08

823

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.4

$1,1

83

$3,0

25

$4,2

08

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Sla

b D

em

oliti

on

To

tal C

osts

Bu

ild

ing

Dem

oliti

on

Wall D

em

oliti

on

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 4

of

5F

oundations &

Build

ings

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nF

ou

nd

ati

on

s &

Bu

ild

ing

sP

roje

ct

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

22

Co

neyo

rs, 5

607

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$271

$674

$945

613

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.1

$930

$2,3

77

$3,3

07

23

Exp

losiv

es S

tora

ge

91

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$208

$518

$726

97

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

24

Incin

tera

tor,

567

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.0

$208

$518

$726

65

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

1.0

$845

$2,1

61

$3,0

06

25

Po

rtal B

en

ch

Facilit

ies, 5

5,1

11

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

211.0

$2,3

52

$5,8

59

$8,2

11

5,1

14

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

9.0

$7,6

08

$19,4

45

$27,0

53

37,5

71

89.0

$18,3

58

$45,7

23

$64,0

81

37,5

91

72.7

$61,4

51

$157,0

79

$218,5

30

Bu

ild

ing

& F

ou

nd

ati

on

- S

ca

rify

ing

/Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

sts

Fla

t A

rea

Are

a L

on

g

Dim

en

sio

n

Scari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Ho

urs

Scari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Lab

or

Co

sts

Scari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Scari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Co

sts

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Lab

or

Co

st

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

Revg

eta

tio

n

Mate

rial

Co

st

To

tal

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Co

st

acre

sft

hrs

$$

$$

$$

$

1A

dm

inis

trati

on

, 2

0.1

066

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$55

$200

2E

ng

ineeri

ng

, 2

0.1

070

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$55

$200

3T

rain

ing

, 2

0.1

070

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$55

$200

4C

han

ge H

ou

se, 2

0.1

070

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$55

$200

5E

nclo

sed

Ware

ho

use, 3

0.2

066

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$111

$256

6O

pen

-sid

ed

Ware

ho

use, 3

0.2

076

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$111

$256

7E

qu

ipm

en

t W

ork

sh

op

Meta

l, 3

0.5

0118

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$277

$422

8W

eld

ing

Sh

op

, 3

0.3

098

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$167

$312

9W

ash

ing

Bay, 3

0.2

098

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$111

$256

10

Lab

ora

tory

, 4

0.3

077

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$167

$312

11

Pro

cessin

g P

lan

t, 4

0.4

0118

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$222

$367

12

Ho

usin

g &

Oth

er

Bu

ild

ing

s, 5

2.9

0250

2.3

$133

$404

$537

$226

$194

$1,6

08

$2,0

28

13

Pri

mary

Cru

sh

er,

50.3

085

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$167

$312

14

Cru

sh

ed

Ore

Su

rge, 5

1.8

0200

1.4

$81

$246

$327

$140

$121

$999

$1,2

60

15

Su

bsta

tio

n, 5

1.8

0200

1.4

$81

$246

$327

$140

$121

$999

$1,2

60

16

Gri

nd

ing

Pad

, 5

0.7

0230

0.6

$35

$105

$140

$78

$67

$388

$533

17

Lix

ivia

tio

n P

ad

, 5

4.4

0445

3.3

$191

$580

$771

$343

$295

$2,4

40

$3,0

78

18

Sep

ara

tio

n P

ad

, 5

3.7

0400

2.8

$162

$492

$654

$289

$248

$2,0

51

$2,5

88

19

Co

ncre

te P

lan

t, 5

0.3

0100

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$167

$312

20

Tan

k P

ad

, 5

0.8

0130

0.7

$41

$123

$164

$78

$67

$444

$589

21

Wate

r T

reatm

en

t P

lan

t, 6

0.5

0160

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$277

$422

22

Co

neyo

rs, 5

0.4

0820

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$222

$367

23

Exp

losiv

es S

tora

ge

0.1

035

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$55

$200

24

Incin

tera

tor,

50.1

030

1.0

$58

$176

$234

$78

$67

$55

$200

25

Po

rtal B

en

ch

Facilit

ies, 5

3.2

0300

2.4

$139

$422

$561

$250

$214

$1,7

74

$2,2

38

23.5

031.9

$1,8

49

$5,6

10

$7,4

59

$2,8

70

$2,4

66

$13,0

32

$18,3

68

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 5

of

5F

oundations &

Build

ings

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Oth

er

De

mo

& E

qu

ip R

em

ov

al

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Oth

er

Dem

olt

ion

an

d E

qu

ipm

en

t R

em

oval -

Co

st

Su

mm

ary

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Oth

er

De

mo

liti

on

$4

,50

0$

4,5

00

$0

$9

,00

0E

qu

ipm

en

t R

em

ov

al

$1

24

,47

6$

41

4,9

20

$0

$5

39

,39

6

TO

TA

LS

$1

28

,97

6$

41

9,4

20

$0

$5

48

,39

6

Co

lor

Co

de

Ke

y

Use

r In

pu

t -

Dire

ct

Inp

ut

Dir

ec

t In

pu

t

Use

r In

pu

t -

Pu

ll D

ow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

on

sta

nt

(ca

n o

ve

rrid

e)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rog

ram

Ca

lcu

late

d V

alu

eL

oc

ke

d C

ell

- F

orm

ula

or

Re

fere

nc

e

Oth

er

De

mo

liti

on

-1L

OC

AT

ION

ID C

od

eQ

ua

nti

tyU

nit

s

La

bo

r

Un

it C

os

t

($)

Eq

uip

me

nt

Un

it C

os

t

($)

Ma

teri

al

Un

it C

os

t

($)

To

tal

Co

st

($)

1 D

ies

el

Ta

nk

, 1

80

,00

0 g

al,

11

ea

10

00

$1

,00

0.0

0$

2,0

00

2G

as

oli

ne

Ta

nk

, 1

20

00

ga

l, 1

1e

a2

50

$2

50

.00

$5

00

3L

ub

e &

Hy

dra

uli

c O

il1

ea

25

0$

25

0.0

0$

50

04

Wa

ter

Ta

nk

3e

a1

00

0$

1,0

00

.00

$6

,00

0

$4

,50

0$

4,5

00

$0

$9

,00

0

No

tes:

Eq

uip

me

nt

& M

ate

ria

l R

em

ov

al

-1L

OC

AT

ION

ID C

od

eQ

ua

nti

tyU

nit

s

La

bo

r

Un

it C

os

t

($)

Eq

uip

me

nt

Un

it C

os

t

($)

Ma

teri

al

Un

it C

os

t

($)

To

tal

Co

st

($)

1M

inin

g E

qu

ipm

en

t E

art

hm

ov

ing

, 1

43

ea

10

80

36

00

$2

01

,24

0

2O

pe

n P

it L

igh

t V

eh

icle

s,

12

ea

30

01

00

0$

2,6

00

1.

ME

G 2

00

3,

p.

3-1

2

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 1

of

2O

ther

De

mo

& E

qu

ip R

em

ova

l

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Oth

er

De

mo

& E

qu

ip R

em

ov

al

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

3U

nd

erg

rou

nd

La

rge

Eq

uip

me

nt,

32

8e

a1

08

03

60

0$

13

1,0

40

4U

nd

erg

rou

nd

Sm

all

Eq

uip

me

nt,

35

ea

30

01

00

0$

6,5

00

5P

roc

es

sin

g E

qu

ipm

en

t, 2

1,9

04

ton

s2

48

0$

19

8,0

16

6

$1

24

,47

6$

41

4,9

20

$0

$5

39

,39

6

No

tes:

1.

ME

G 2

00

3,

p.

3-1

9

2.

ME

G 2

00

3,

p.

3-3

5

3.

ME

G 2

00

3,

Ta

ble

3.4

-3

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 2

of

2O

ther

De

mo

& E

qu

ip R

em

ova

l

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nY

ard

s, E

tc.

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Ya

rds

, E

tc.

- C

os

t S

um

ma

ry

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Reg

rad

ing

Co

st

$97,9

26

$181,8

17

N/A

$279,7

43

Co

ver

Pla

cem

en

t C

ost

$76,0

82

$189,5

04

N/A

$265,5

86

Gro

wth

Med

ia P

lacem

en

t C

ost

$122,5

69

$313,2

79

N/A

$435,8

48

Rip

pin

g C

ost

$4,3

78

$13,2

83

N/A

$17,6

61

Su

bto

tal E

art

hw

ork

s$300,9

55

$697,8

83

$998,8

38

Reveg

eta

tio

n C

ost

$8,0

03

$6,8

74

$56,8

92

$71,7

69

TO

TA

LS

$308,9

58

$704,7

57

$56,8

92

$1,0

70,6

07

Co

lor

Co

de K

ey

User

Input -

Direct In

put

Dir

ect

Inp

ut

User

Input -

Pull

Dow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

onsta

nt (c

an o

verr

ide)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rogra

m C

alc

ula

ted V

alu

eL

ocked

Cell -

Fo

rmu

la o

r R

efe

ren

ce

Ya

rds

, E

tc.

- U

se

r In

pu

tY

ou

mu

st

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

bu

ild

ing

or

facilit

y

Ph

ysic

al

Co

ver

(lo

wer

layer)

Gro

wth

Med

ia (

up

per

layer)

ID C

od

eA

rea

Av

era

ge

Fla

t

Are

a L

on

g

Dim

en

sio

n

(rip

pin

g

dis

tan

ce

)

Re

gra

de

Vo

lum

e

(ca

lcu

late

d

els

ew

he

re)

Co

ve

r

Th

ick

ne

ss

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Co

ve

r

Bo

rro

w A

rea

Slo

pe

fro

m

Fa

cil

ity

to

Bo

rro

w A

rea

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Th

ick

ne

ss

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Sto

ck

pil

e

Slo

pe

fro

m

Fa

cil

ity

to

Sto

ck

pil

e

-1a

cre

sft

cy

inft

% g

rad

ein

ft%

gra

de

1A

rea 5

B, 1

14

1,0

00

77,0

00

12

2,5

00

06

30,0

00

-6

2O

ffic

e A

rea, 1

7.4

650

39,0

00

12

2,5

00

06

30,0

00

-6

3L

ixiv

iati

on

, 1

9.9

650

51,0

00

12

2,5

00

06

30,0

00

-6

4T

reatm

en

t P

lan

t, 1

3.7

500

15,0

00

12

2,5

00

06

30,0

00

-6

5P

ort

al B

en

ch

, 1

62

820

22,0

00

12

2,5

00

06

30,0

00

-6

6C

am

p, 1

5.6

500

9,0

00

12

2,5

00

06

30,0

00

-6

Note

s:

1. C

om

isio

n 2

010

Ya

rds

, E

tc.

- U

se

r In

pu

t (c

on

t.)

Yo

u m

ust

fill in

AL

L g

reen

cells a

nd

rele

van

t b

lue c

ells in

th

is s

ecti

on

fo

r each

bu

ild

ing

or

facilit

y

Gra

din

gC

over

Gro

wth

Med

iaR

eveg

eta

tio

n

Do

zin

g M

ate

ria

l

Do

zin

g

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Gra

din

g

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Co

ve

r

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Co

ve

r

Pla

ce

me

nt

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Ma

teri

al

Ty

pe

Gro

wth

Me

dia

Pla

ce

me

nt

Eq

uip

me

nt

Fle

et

Se

ed

Mix

Mu

lch

Fe

rtil

ize

rS

ca

rify

/ R

ip?

Rip

pin

g F

lee

t

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

(se

lect)

1A

rea 5

B, 1

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

2O

ffic

e A

rea, 1

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

3L

ixiv

iati

on

, 1

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

4T

reatm

en

t P

lan

t, 1

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

5P

ort

al B

en

ch

, 1

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

6C

am

p, 1

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Med

Do

zer

Ya

rds

, E

tc.

- C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Gra

din

g C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Avera

ge p

ush d

ista

nce a

ssum

ed to b

e 2

/3 o

f th

e 6

00 feet m

axim

um

fro

m C

ate

pill

ar

Handbook o

r 400 feet

Mate

rial assum

ed to b

e loose s

tockile

(1.2

pro

ductivity facto

r)

Slo

pe a

ssum

ed to b

e 0

to 5

% (

1.0

pro

ductivity facto

r)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 1

of

2Y

ard

s, E

tc.

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nY

ard

s, E

tc.

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Co

ver

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

n

Yard

are

a x

co

ver

thic

kn

ess

Rip

pin

g/S

cari

fyin

g C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Fla

t are

a w

idth

= F

inal flat are

a ÷

Avera

ge long d

imensio

ns

Num

ber

of passes =

Fla

t are

a w

idth

÷ G

rader

wid

th

Tra

vel dis

tance =

Num

ber

of passes x

A

vera

ge long d

imensio

ns

Tota

l hours

= (

Tra

vel dis

tance ÷

Gra

der

pro

ductivity)

+ (

Num

ber

of passes x

Gra

der

maneuver

tim

e)

Min

imum

1 h

r rippin

g/s

carify

ing p

er

are

a

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Min

imum

1 a

cre

revegeta

tion c

rew

tim

e p

er

are

a

Ya

rds

, E

tc.

- R

eg

rad

ing

Co

sts

Pro

du

cti

vit

y =

Do

zer

Pro

du

cti

vit

y x

Gra

de C

orr

ecti

on

x D

en

sit

y C

orr

ecti

on

x O

pera

tor

(0.7

5)

x M

ate

rial x V

isib

ilit

y x

Jo

b E

ffic

ien

cy (

0.8

3)

x (

Slo

t/S

ide-b

y-S

ide)

Re

gra

din

g

Vo

lum

e

Do

zin

g

Dis

tan

ce

(s

ee

ab

ov

e)

Un

co

rre

cte

d

Do

ze

r

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Gra

de

Co

rre

cti

on

Do

zin

g M

ate

ria

l

De

ns

ity

Co

rre

cti

on

To

tal

Ho

url

y

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

To

tal

Do

ze

r

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Re

gra

din

g C

os

t

cy

ftcy/h

rcy/h

rh

r$

$$

1A

rea 5

B, 1

77,0

00

400

213

1.0

01.2

00.7

9126

611.0

$35,3

83

$65,6

95

$101,0

78

2O

ffic

e A

rea, 1

39,0

00

400

213

1.0

01.2

00.7

9126

310.0

$17,9

52

$33,3

31

$51,2

83

3L

ixiv

iati

on

, 1

51,0

00

400

213

1.0

01.2

00.7

9126

405.0

$23,4

54

$43,5

46

$67,0

00

4T

reatm

en

t P

lan

t, 1

15,0

00

400

213

1.0

01.2

00.7

9126

119.0

$6,8

91

$12,7

95

$19,6

86

5P

ort

al B

en

ch

, 1

22,0

00

400

213

1.0

01.2

00.7

9126

175.0

$10,1

34

$18,8

16

$28,9

50

6C

am

p, 1

9,0

00

400

213

1.0

01.2

00.7

9126

71.0

$4,1

12

$7,6

34

$11,7

46

213,0

00

1691.0

$97,9

26

$181,8

17

$279,7

43

Ya

rds

, E

tc.

- C

ov

er

an

d G

row

th M

ed

ia C

os

ts

Co

ver

Gro

wth

Med

ia

Co

ve

r

Vo

lum

e

To

ps

oil

Re

pa

ce

me

nt

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Co

ve

r

Co

st

To

ps

oil

Vo

lum

e

To

ps

oil

Re

pa

ce

me

nt

Fle

et

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

s/

Sc

rap

ers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

To

tal

La

bo

r

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

To

ps

oil

ing

Co

st

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

1A

rea 5

B, 1

22,5

87

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

250.0

$10,3

87

$25,8

72

$36,2

59

11,2

93

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

19.8

$16,7

37

$42,7

79

$59,5

16

2O

ffic

e A

rea, 1

11,9

39

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

226.0

$5,4

95

$13,6

88

$19,1

83

5,9

69

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

10.5

$8,8

76

$22,6

86

$31,5

62

3L

ixiv

iati

on

, 1

15,9

72

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

235.0

$7,3

48

$18,3

02

$25,6

50

7,9

86

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

14.0

$11,8

34

$30,2

48

$42,0

82

4T

reatm

en

t P

lan

t, 1

5,9

69

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

213.0

$2,7

48

$6,8

44

$9,5

92

2,9

85

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

5.2

$4,3

96

$11,2

35

$15,6

31

5P

ort

al B

en

ch

, 1

100,0

27

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

2221.0

$45,9

62

$114,4

80

$160,4

42

50,0

13

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

87.6

$74,0

48

$189,2

63

$263,3

11

6C

am

p, 1

9,0

35

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

220.0

$4,1

42

$10,3

18

$14,4

60

4,5

17

Sm

all

Tru

ck

571

16

7.9

$6,6

78

$17,0

68

$23,7

46

165,5

29

365.0

$76,0

82

$189,5

04

$265,5

86

82,7

63

145.0

$122,5

69

$313,2

79

$435,8

48

Ya

rds

, E

tc.

- S

ca

rify

ing

/Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

sts

Fla

t A

rea

Are

a L

on

g

Dim

en

sio

n

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Ho

urs

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

La

bo

r

Co

sts

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tal

Sc

ari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Co

sts

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

La

bo

r

Co

st

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

Re

vg

eta

tio

n

Ma

teri

al

Co

st

To

tal

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

st

acre

sft

hrs

$$

$$

$$

$

1A

rea 5

B, 1

14.0

1,0

00

10.3

$596

$1,8

10

$2,4

06

$1,0

92

$938

$7,7

63

$9,7

93

2O

ffic

e A

rea, 1

7.4

650

5.5

$319

$966

$1,2

85

$577

$496

$4,1

04

$5,1

77

3L

ixiv

iati

on

, 1

9.9

650

7.3

$423

$1,2

83

$1,7

06

$772

$663

$5,4

90

$6,9

25

4T

reatm

en

t P

lan

t, 1

3.7

500

2.8

$162

$492

$654

$289

$248

$2,0

51

$2,5

88

5P

ort

al B

en

ch

, 1

62.0

820

45.5

$2,6

35

$7,9

94

$10,6

29

$4,8

36

$4,1

54

$34,3

79

$43,3

69

6C

am

p, 1

5.6

500

4.2

$243

$738

$981

$437

$375

$3,1

05

$3,9

17

102.6

75.6

$4,3

78

$13,2

83

$17,6

61

$8,0

03

$6,8

74

$56,8

92

$71,7

69

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

De

sc

rip

tio

n

(re

qu

ire

d)

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 2

of

2Y

ard

s, E

tc.

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nS

ed

imen

t &

Dra

inag

e C

on

tro

lP

roje

ct

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Dra

ina

ge

Co

ntr

ol

- C

os

t S

um

ma

ry

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Ru

no

n D

ivers

ion

Dit

ch

es

$20,6

71

$33,0

54

N/A

$53,7

25

Sed

Po

nd

Co

nstr

uct/

Reg

rad

e$6,5

57

$7,6

68

N/A

$14,2

25

Lin

er

Insta

llati

on

$30,2

74

$18,7

31

$15,2

46

$64,2

51

Sed

Po

nd

Co

ve

r$5,2

89

$13,1

69

N/A

$18,4

58

Scari

fy/R

ip$464

$862

N/A

$1,3

26

Su

bto

tal E

art

hw

ork

s$63,2

55

$73,4

84

$15,2

46

$151,9

85

Div

ers

ion

Dit

ch

Reveg

eta

tio

n$2,0

82

$1,7

90

$14,6

40

$18,5

12

Sed

imen

t P

on

d R

eveg

eta

tio

n$780

$671

$5,2

14

$6,6

65

Su

bto

tal R

eveg

eta

tio

n$2,8

62

$2,4

61

$19,8

54

$25,1

77

TO

TA

LS

$66,1

17

$75,9

45

$35,1

00

$177,1

62

Co

lor

Co

de K

ey

User

Input -

Direct In

put

Dir

ect

Inp

ut

User

Input -

Pull

Dow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

onsta

nt (c

an o

verr

ide)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rogra

m C

alc

ula

ted V

alu

eL

ocked

Cell -

Fo

rmu

la o

r R

efe

ren

ce

Div

ers

ion

Dit

ch

es

- U

se

r In

pu

t

Reveg

eta

tio

n

ID C

od

eD

ivers

ion

Len

gth

Div

ers

ion

Dep

th

Dit

ch

Bo

tto

m

Wid

th

Dit

ch

Sid

eslo

pe

An

gle

Excavati

ng

Mate

rial

Excavati

ng

Eq

uip

men

t

Fle

et

Seed

Mix

Mu

lch

Fert

iliz

er

-1ft

ftft

_H

:1V

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

1T

SF

Peri

mete

r (M

EG

2003, p

. 3-1

4)

17000

33

2.5

1M

ed

ium

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

2W

aste

Ro

ck D

um

p P

eri

mete

r (C

om

isio

n 2

010)

11000

33

2.5

1M

ed

ium

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

3M

arl

in P

it (

Co

mis

ion

2010)

6000

33

2.5

1M

ed

ium

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

4C

och

ise P

it (

Co

mis

ion

2010)

1600

33

2.5

1M

ed

ium

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

5M

arl

in P

it D

ew

ate

r (C

om

isio

n 2

010)

500

35

50.1

0.6

Med

ium

No

ne

No

ne

No

ne

6T

SF

II P

eri

mete

r17000

33

2.5

1M

ed

ium

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

7W

aste

Ro

ck D

um

p C

on

tou

r (C

om

isio

n 2

010)

16400

23

1.0

0.6

Sm

all

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Se

dim

en

t/E

va

po

rati

on

Po

nd

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/Re

mo

va

l -

Us

er

Inp

ut

ID C

od

eP

on

d W

idth

Po

nd

/Berm

Len

gth

Berm

Heig

ht

Cre

st

Wid

th

Sid

eslo

pe

An

gle

Fin

al A

rea

(if

calc

ula

ted

els

ew

here

)

Reg

rad

e

Vo

lum

e

(if

calc

ula

ted

els

ew

here

)

Co

ver

Vo

lum

e

(if

calc

ula

ted

els

ew

here

)

Co

ver

Th

ickn

ess

Dis

tan

ce

fro

m

Co

ver

Bo

rro

w

Slo

pe f

rom

Po

nd

to

Co

ver

Bo

rro

w

-1ft

ftft

ft_

H:1

Vacre

scy

cy

inft

% g

rade

1M

arl

in P

it W

est

100

225

10

32.5

12

2,5

00

-6

2M

arl

in P

it E

ast

100

225

10

32.5

12

2,5

00

-6

3C

och

ise P

it100

225

10

32.5

12

2,5

00

-6

4T

SF

Peri

mete

r, 2

each

200

600

10

32.5

12

2,5

00

-65

TS

F II P

eri

mete

r, 2

each

200

600

10

32.5

12

2,5

00

-6

Se

dim

en

t/E

va

po

rati

on

Po

nd

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/Re

mo

va

l -

Us

er

Inp

ut

(co

nt.

)

Excavati

ng

Mate

rial

Mate

rial T

yp

e

Excavati

ng

Eq

uip

men

t

Fle

et

Lin

er

Typ

e

Co

ver

Mate

rial T

yp

e

Co

ver

Pla

cem

en

t

Eq

uip

men

t

Fle

et

Seed

Mix

Mu

lch

Fert

iliz

er

Fla

t A

rea

Scari

fy/ R

ip?

Scari

fy/ R

ipp

ing

Fle

et

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

1M

arl

in P

it W

est

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall

No

ne

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Sm

all D

ozer

2M

arl

in P

it E

ast

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall

60 m

il H

DP

E

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Sm

all D

ozer

3C

och

ise P

it1

Allu

viu

mS

mall

No

ne

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Sm

all D

ozer

4T

SF

Peri

mete

r, 2

each

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall

No

ne

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Sm

all D

ozer

5T

SF

II P

eri

mete

r, 2

each

1A

llu

viu

mS

mall

No

ne

Allu

viu

mS

mall T

ruck

Mix

1S

traw

Mu

lch

Ch

em

ical

Yes

Sm

all D

oze

r

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Descri

pti

on

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Co

ver

Sed

imen

t P

on

ds

Rip

pin

g/S

cari

fyin

g

Div

ers

ion

s D

itch

es

Sed

imen

t P

on

ds

Reveg

eta

tio

n

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 1

of

3S

edim

ent &

Dra

inage C

ontr

ol

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nS

ed

imen

t &

Dra

inag

e C

on

tro

lP

roje

ct

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Dra

ina

ge

Co

ntr

ol

- C

alc

ula

tio

ns

Div

ers

ion

Dit

ch

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

nS

ed

imen

t/E

vap

ora

tio

n P

on

d C

on

str

ucti

on

Calc

ula

tio

n

1)

Assum

e b

ala

nced c

ut-

to-f

ill for

berm

constr

uction

2)

Inclu

de c

ost fo

r lin

er,

if re

quired.

3)

Inclu

de lin

e ite

ms for

rem

oval, if necessary

.4)

Assum

e 2

0%

sw

ell

for

excavations

1)

Assum

e 2

0%

sw

ell

for

excavations

5)

Min

imum

1 h

r rippin

g/s

carify

ing p

er

are

a2)

Assum

es h

eavy d

uty

tre

nchin

g b

ucket is

used

6)

Min

imum

1 a

cre

revegeta

tion c

rew

tim

e p

er

are

a

Div

ers

ion

Dit

ch

es

- E

xc

av

ati

on

Co

sts

Div

ers

ion

Dit

ch

Vo

lum

e

Co

rrecte

d

Excavato

r

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

To

tal

Ho

urs

Div

ers

ion

Dit

ch

Lab

or

Co

st

Div

ers

ion

Dit

ch

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Div

ers

ion

Dit

ch

Co

st

LC

YLC

Y/h

r$

$$

0 1T

SF

Peri

mete

r (M

EG

2003, p

. 3-1

4)

23,8

00

139

171.0

$10,1

28

$16,7

12

$26,8

40

2W

aste

Ro

ck D

um

p P

eri

mete

r (C

om

is15,4

00

360

43.0

$2,5

47

$4,2

02

$6,7

49

3M

arl

in P

it (

Co

mis

ion

2010)

8,4

00

360

23.0

$1,3

62

$2,2

48

$3,6

10

4C

och

ise P

it (

Co

mis

ion

2010)

2,2

40

360

6.0

$355

$586

$941

5M

arl

in P

it D

ew

ate

r (C

om

isio

n 2

010)

944

360

3.0

$178

$293

$471

6T

SF

II P

eri

mete

r23,8

00

360

66.0

$3,9

09

$6,4

50

$10,3

59

7W

aste

Ro

ck D

um

p C

on

tou

r (C

om

isio

10,9

33

299

37.0

$2,1

92

$2,5

63

$4,7

55

85,5

17

349.0

$20,6

71

$33,0

54

$53,7

25

Div

ers

ion

Dit

ch

es

- R

ev

eg

eta

tio

n C

os

ts

Su

rface A

rea

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Lab

or

Co

st

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

Revg

eta

tio

n

Mate

rial

Co

st

To

tal

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Co

st

acre

s$

$$

$

1T

SF

Peri

mete

r (M

EG

2003, p

. 3-1

4)

7.5

0$585

$503

$4,1

59

$5,2

47

2W

aste

Ro

ck D

um

p P

eri

mete

r (C

om

is4.8

0$374

$322

$2,6

62

$3,3

58

#R

EF

!

3M

arl

in P

it (

Co

mis

ion

2010)

2.6

0$203

$174

$1,4

42

$1,8

19

0

4C

och

ise P

it (

Co

mis

ion

2010)

0.7

0$78

$67

$388

$533

0

5M

arl

in P

it D

ew

ate

r (C

om

isio

n 2

010)

0.9

02.5

6T

SF

II P

eri

mete

r7.5

0$585

$503

$4,1

59

$5,2

47

07

Waste

Ro

ck D

um

p C

on

tou

r (C

om

isi o

3.3

0$257

$221

$1,8

30

$2,3

08

0

27.3

0$2,0

82

$1,7

90

$14,6

40

$18,5

12

Se

dim

en

t/E

va

po

rati

on

Po

nd

s -

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

/Re

gra

din

g C

os

ts

Descri

pti

on

Descri

pti

on

!

db

a"

# 2

Fig

ure

1 -

Div

ers

ion

Dit

ch

Are

a &

Vo

lum

e C

alc

ula

tio

n

Fig

ure

2 -

Se

dim

en

t P

on

ds

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 2

of

3S

edim

ent &

Dra

inage C

ontr

ol

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nS

ed

imen

t &

Dra

inag

e C

on

tro

lP

roje

ct

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Pro

du

cti

vit

y =

Do

zer

Pro

du

cti

vit

y x

Gra

de C

orr

ecti

on

x D

en

sit

y C

orr

ecti

on

x O

pera

tor

(0.7

5)

x M

ate

rial x V

isib

ilit

y x

Jo

b E

ffic

ien

cy (

0.8

3)

Eart

hw

ork

Lin

er

Reg

rad

ing

Vo

lum

e

Do

zin

g

Dis

tan

ce

(see a

bo

ve)

Un

co

rrecte

d

Do

zer

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Gra

de

Co

rrecti

on

Den

sit

y

Co

rrecti

on

Excavati

ng

Mate

rial

Co

rrecte

d

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

To

tal D

ozer

Ho

urs

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal C

on

str

/

Reg

rad

ing

Co

st

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Mate

rial

Co

st

To

tal L

iner

Co

st

LC

Yft

LC

Y/h

rLC

Y/h

rhr

$$

$$

$$

$

1M

arl

in P

it W

est

2,8

00

100

627

1.0

00.7

91.0

0308

9.1

$539

$630

$1,1

69

2M

arl

in P

it E

ast

2,8

00

100

627

1.0

00.7

91.0

0308

9.1

$539

$630

$1,1

69

$30,2

74

$18,7

31

$15,2

46

$64,2

51

3C

och

ise P

it2,8

00

100

627

1.0

00.7

91.0

0308

9.1

$539

$630

$1,1

69

4T

SF

Peri

mete

r, 2

each

7,4

67

200

365

1.0

00.7

91.0

0179

41.7

$2,4

70

$2,8

89

$5,3

59

5T

SF

II P

eri

mete

r, 2

each

7,4

67

200

365

1.0

00.7

91.0

0179

41.7

$2,4

70

$2,8

89

$5,3

59

23,3

34

110.7

$6,5

57

$7,6

68

$14,2

25

$30,2

74

$18,7

31

$15,2

46

$64,2

51

Se

dim

en

t/E

va

po

rati

on

Po

nd

s -

Co

ve

r C

os

ts

Co

ver

Vo

lum

e

Co

ver

Pla

cem

en

t

Fle

et

Co

ver

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

cks/

Scra

pers

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Co

ver

Pla

cem

en

t

Co

st

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

1M

arl

in P

it W

est

807

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.8

$375

$933

$1,3

08

2M

arl

in P

it E

ast

807

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.8

$375

$933

$1,3

08

3C

och

ise P

it807

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

21.8

$375

$933

$1,3

08

4T

SF

Peri

mete

r, 2

each

4,5

17

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

210.0

$2,0

82

$5,1

85

$7,2

67

5T

SF

II P

eri

mete

r, 2

each

4,5

17

Sm

all

Tru

ck

453

210.0

$2,0

82

$5,1

85

$7,2

67

11,4

55

25.4

$5,2

89

$13,1

69

$18,4

58

Se

dim

en

t/E

va

po

rati

on

Po

nd

s -

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Co

sts

Su

rface

Are

a

Lo

ng

Rip

pin

g D

ista

nce

Are

a

Wid

th

Scari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Ho

urs

Scari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

Scari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Lab

or

Co

sts

To

tal

Scari

fyin

g/

Rip

pin

g

Co

sts

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Lab

or

Co

st

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

Revg

eta

tio

n

Mate

rial

Co

st

To

tal

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Co

st

acre

sft

fthrs

$$

$$

$$

$

1M

arl

in P

it W

est

0.8

0218

100

0.5

$108

$58

$166

$78

$67

$444

$589

2M

arl

in P

it E

ast

0.8

0218

100

0.5

$108

$58

$166

$78

$67

$444

$589

3C

och

ise P

it0.8

0218

100

0.5

$108

$58

$166

$78

$67

$444

$589

4T

SF

Peri

mete

r, 2

each

3.5

0610

200

2.5

$269

$145

$414

$273

$235

$1,9

41

$2,4

49

5T

SF

II P

eri

mete

r, 2

each

3.5

0610

200

2.5

$269

$145

$414

$273

$235

$1,9

41

$2,4

49

9.4

01,8

73

6.5

$862

$464

$1,3

26

$780

$671

$5,2

14

$6,6

65

Descri

pti

on

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Co

ver

Pla

cem

en

t

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 3

of

3S

edim

ent &

Dra

inage C

ontr

ol

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nW

aste

Dis

po

sal

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Wa

ste

Dis

po

sa

l -

Co

st

Su

mm

ary

La

bo

rE

qu

ipm

en

tF

ee

sT

ota

lsS

olid

Waste

- O

n S

ite

$0

$0

N/A

$0

So

lid

Waste

- O

ff S

ite

$0

Hazard

ou

s M

ate

rials

$0

$0

Hyd

rocarb

on

Co

nta

min

ate

d S

oils

$9,1

96

$0

$91,2

45

$100,4

41

TO

TA

LS

$9,1

96

$0

$91,2

45

$100,4

41

Co

lor

Co

de K

ey

User

Input -

Direct In

put

Dir

ect

Inp

ut

User

Input -

Pull

Dow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

onsta

nt (c

an o

verr

ide)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rogra

m C

alc

ula

ted V

alu

eL

ocked

Cell -

Fo

rmu

la o

r R

efe

ren

ce

Wa

ste

Dis

po

sa

l -

Us

er

Inp

ut

- S

oli

d W

as

teO

ff-S

ite

ID C

od

eW

aste

Typ

e

Dis

po

sal

Meth

od

Qu

an

tity

Dis

tan

ce

to O

n-S

ite

Dis

po

sal

Slo

pe t

o

Dis

po

sal

(on

-sit

e)

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

cks

Mo

nth

s

Du

mp

ste

r

Ren

tal

-1(s

ele

ct)

(sele

ct)

cy

ft%

gra

de

(user

overr

ide)

month

s

Note

s:

1. U

se L

andfills

Sheet fo

r la

ndfill

recla

mation

Wa

ste

Dis

po

sa

l -

Us

er

Inp

ut

- H

aza

rdo

us

Ma

teri

als

ID C

od

e

Waste

Typ

e

Co

nta

iner

Typ

e

Vacu

um

Tru

ck

Siz

e

Liq

uid

Qu

an

tity

So

ild

Qu

an

tity

On

e W

ay

Tra

vel

Dis

tan

ce t

o

Dis

po

sal S

ite

On

e W

ay

Tra

vel T

ime t

o

Dis

po

sal S

ite

-1(s

ele

ct)

(sele

ct)

(sele

ct)

gallo

ns

cy

mi

hr

1

Note

s:

1. U

se O

ther

Dem

o &

Equip

Rem

oval S

heet fo

r ta

nk r

em

oval

On

-Sit

e

Descri

pti

on

Descri

pti

on

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4 -

20

08

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e .

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pag

e 1

of

3W

aste

Dis

posal

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nW

aste

Dis

po

sal

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Wa

ste

Dis

po

sa

l -

Us

er

Inp

ut

- H

yd

roc

arb

on

Co

nta

min

ate

d S

oil

s

ID C

od

eW

aste

Typ

e

Dis

po

sal

Meth

od

Qu

an

tity

Tra

vel

Dis

tan

ce t

o

Off

sit

e

Dis

po

sal

-1(s

ele

ct)

(sele

ct)

cy

mi

1A

irstr

ip P

avem

en

tO

ther

On

sit

e7,0

00

2,5

00

Note

s:

1. U

se Y

ard

s o

r Landfills

Sheets

for

bio

rem

edia

tion facili

ty r

ecla

mation

Wa

ste

Dis

po

sa

l -

As

su

mp

tio

ns

& C

alc

ula

tio

ns

So

lid

Waste

Dis

po

sal

Off s

ite d

isposal assum

es u

se o

f avera

ge r

ollo

ff d

um

pste

r [3

0 c

y (

m3),

10 ton (

tonne)]

On s

ite d

isposal assum

es u

se o

f sm

all

loader/

truck fle

et fo

r haula

ge

Avera

ge d

ensity for

on s

ite d

isposal =

2,6

00 lb/c

y (

1,5

40 k

g/m

3)

For

on s

ite d

isposal only

1 tru

ck is r

equired u

nle

ss tota

l tr

uck h

ours

> 8

, only

2 tru

cks u

nle

ss tota

l tr

uck h

ours

are

> 1

6

Hazard

ou

s M

ate

rials

Dis

po

sal

Assum

es a

ll hazard

ous m

ate

rials

are

know

n

Ente

r E

ITH

ER

solid

or

liquid

quantity

each lin

e.

If c

onta

iner

type =

55 g

allo

n d

rum

then s

olid

waste

haulin

g c

osts

apply

Avera

ge d

ensity for

solid

s a

ssum

ed to b

e 2

,600 lb/c

y (

1,5

40 k

g/m

3)

Avera

ge d

ensity for

liquid

s a

ssum

ed to b

e w

eig

ht of w

ate

r 2,6

00 lb/c

y (

1,5

40 k

g/m

3)

Vacuum

tru

ck s

izes: sm

all

= 2

,200 g

al (~

8,3

00 litre

s),

larg

e =

5,0

00 g

al (~

19,0

00 litre

s)

Vacuum

tru

ck o

n s

ite for

4 h

ours

for

each load

Hyd

rocarb

on

Co

nta

min

ate

d S

oils D

isp

osal

Assum

es a

ll hazard

ous m

ate

rials

are

know

n

On s

ite d

isposal assum

es b

iopad tre

atm

ent

Exavation p

roductivity =

45 C

.Y./hr

(Means H

eavy C

onstr

uction, 2006: 02315-4

24-0

360)

Wa

ste

Dis

po

sa

l -

So

lid

Wa

ste

Dis

po

sa

l

Descri

pti

on

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4 -

20

08

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e .

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pag

e 2

of

3W

aste

Dis

posal

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nW

aste

Dis

po

sal

Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Waste

Vo

lum

e

Nu

mb

er

of

Off

Sit

e

Du

mp

ste

r

Lo

ad

s

On

sit

e

Fle

et

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

cks

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

To

tal

Off

sit

e

Co

sts

(in

cl fe

es)

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Waste

Dis

po

sal

Co

st

cy

LC

Y/h

r$

$$

$

$0

$0

$0

$0

Wa

ste

Dis

po

sa

l -

Ha

za

rdo

us

Ma

teri

als

Dis

po

sa

l

Liq

uid

Waste

Vo

lum

e

So

lid

Waste

Vo

lum

e

Nu

mb

er

of

Tru

ck

Lo

ad

s

To

ns

of

Waste

Pic

k-u

p

Fees

Tra

nsp

ort

Fees

Dis

po

sal

Fees

To

tal

Hazard

ou

s

Mate

rial

Co

st

gallo

ns

cy

Tons

$$

$$

1

$0

$0

$0

$0

Wa

ste

Dis

po

sa

l -

Hy

dro

ca

rbo

n C

on

tam

ina

ted

So

ils

Qu

an

tity

To

tal

Fle

et

Ho

urs

Tre

atm

en

t

Co

st

Tra

nsp

ort

Fees

Dis

po

sal

Fees

To

tal

Lab

or

Co

st

To

tal

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Waste

Dis

po

sal

Co

st

cy

$$

$$

$$

1A

irstr

ip P

avem

en

t7,0

00

$91,2

45

$9,1

96

$100,4

41

7,0

00

$91,2

45

$0

$0

$9,1

96

$0

$100,4

41

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Descri

pti

on

Descri

pti

on

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4 -

20

08

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e .

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pag

e 3

of

3W

aste

Dis

posal

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Mis

c.

Co

sts

Pro

jec

t N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

- R

ec

lam

ati

on

Pla

n

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Mis

ce

lla

ne

ou

s C

os

t S

um

ma

ry

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Fen

ce R

em

oval

$20,8

50

$8,4

50

N/A

$29,3

00

Fen

ce In

sta

llati

on

$90,2

00

$22,4

00

$760,0

00

$872,6

00

Pip

e &

Cu

lvert

Rem

oval

$260,1

00

$105,3

00

N/A

$365,4

00

Po

werl

ines

$635,0

00

N/A

N/A

$635,0

00

Su

bsta

tio

ns/T

ran

form

ers

$58,5

00

N/A

N/A

$58,5

00

Rip

-rap

, ro

ck lin

ing

, g

ab

ion

s$5,0

14,7

81

$2,3

25,7

98

$73,6

22

$7,4

14,2

01

Oth

er

Co

sts

$177,3

75

$64,2

34

$520,5

81

$762,1

90

TO

TA

LS

$6,2

56,8

06

$2,5

26,1

82

$1,3

54,2

03

$10,1

37,1

91

Co

lor

Co

de K

ey

User

Input -

Direct In

put

Dir

ect

Inp

ut

User

Input -

Pull

Dow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Pro

gra

m C

onsta

nt (c

an o

verr

ide)

Alt

ern

ate

In

pu

tP

rogra

m C

alc

ula

ted V

alu

eL

ocked

Cell -

Fo

rmu

la o

r R

efe

ren

ce

Fe

nc

e R

em

ov

al

Yo

u m

ust

fill in

AL

L g

reen

an

d b

lue c

ells

Inp

ut

Co

sts

Len

gth

Typ

e

Lab

or

Co

st

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Co

st

-1ft

(sele

ct ty

pe)

$$

$

1P

eri

mte

r F

en

ce, 1

9,1

85

Ch

ain

lin

k 8

-10 f

t (2

.5-3

m$20,8

50

$8,4

50

$29,3

00

2

$20,8

50

$8,4

50

$29,3

00

Note

s:

Fe

nc

e I

ns

tall

ati

on

Yo

u m

ust

fill in

AL

L g

reen

an

d b

lue c

ells

Inp

ut

Co

sts

Len

gth

Typ

e

Lab

or

Co

st

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

Mate

rial

Co

st

To

tal

Co

st

-1ft

(sele

ct ty

pe)

$$

($)

$

1T

ailin

gs P

on

d,1

19,0

00

Ch

ain

lin

k 8

-10ft

(2.5

-3m

$85,6

90

$21,2

80

$722,0

00

$828,9

70

2M

arl

in E

ast

Sed

imen

t P

on

d, 2

1,0

00

Ch

ain

lin

k 8

-10ft

(2.5

-3m

$4,5

10

$1,1

20

$38,0

00

$43,6

30

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

1.M

EG

2003, p

. 3-1

3

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 1

of

3M

isc. C

osts

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Mis

c.

Co

sts

Pro

jec

t N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

- R

ec

lam

ati

on

Pla

n

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

$90,2

00

$22,4

00

$760,0

00

$872,6

00

Note

s:

Pip

e a

nd

Cu

lve

rt R

em

ov

al

Yo

u m

ust

fill in

AL

L g

reen

an

d b

lue c

ells

Inp

ut

Co

sts

Len

gth

Typ

e

Lab

or

Co

st

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

To

tal

Co

st

-1ft

(sele

ct ty

pe)

$$

$

1P

ipe, 1

45,0

00

12 in

(30 c

m )

Dia

mete

r$260,1

00

$105,3

00

$365,4

00

$260,1

00

$105,3

00

$365,4

00

Note

s:

Po

we

rlin

e a

nd

Su

bs

tati

on

Re

mo

va

lY

ou

mu

st

fill in

AL

L g

reen

an

d b

lue c

ells

Inp

ut

Co

sts

Po

werl

ine

Len

gth

Po

werl

ine

Typ

e

Nu

mb

er

of

Su

bsta

tio

ns

Po

werl

ine

Rem

oval

Su

bsta

tio

n

Rem

oval

To

tal C

ost

-1m

iles

(sele

ct)

#$

$$

1P

ow

er

Lin

e, 1

15.0

0D

ou

ble

Po

le2

$600,0

00

$39,0

00

$639,0

00

2W

ate

r S

up

ply

Well P

SA

-1, 2

1.0

0S

ing

le P

ole

1$35,0

00

$19,5

00

$54,5

00

$635,0

00

$58,5

00

$693,5

00

Note

s:

Rip

-Ra

p &

Ro

ck

Lin

ing

Yo

u m

ust

fill in

AL

L g

reen

an

d b

lue c

ells

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

1. C

om

isio

n 2

010

If s

ubsta

tion o

wned b

y o

pera

tor,

use O

ther

Dem

o &

Equip

ment R

em

oval sheet

User

may n

eed to a

dd lin

e ite

ms in F

oundations &

Build

ings for

substa

tion s

lab d

em

olit

ion a

nd fence r

em

oval

1. M

EG

2003, p

. 3-1

8

2. C

om

isio

n 2

010

1. C

om

isio

n 2

010

2. S

ed

imen

t &

Dra

inag

e C

on

tro

l S

pre

ad

sh

eet

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 2

of

3M

isc. C

osts

Bo

nd

Ca

lcu

lati

on

Mis

c.

Co

sts

Pro

jec

t N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

- R

ec

lam

ati

on

Pla

n

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Inp

ut

Co

sts

Are

aT

yp

e

Lab

or

Co

st

Eq

uip

men

t

Co

st

Mate

rial

Co

st

To

tal

Co

st

-1S

.Y.

(sele

ct ty

pe)

$$

$$

1T

SF

Peri

mete

r D

itch

, 1

9,0

00

Rip

-Rap

18 in

min

th

ick,

$341,7

30

$158,4

90

$0

$500,2

20

2W

RF

Dit

ch

, 1

23,0

00

Rip

-Rap

18 in

min

th

ick,

873310

405030

$0

$1,2

78,3

40

3M

arl

in P

it D

itch

, 1

14,0

00

Rip

-Rap

18 in

min

th

ick,

531580

246540

$0

$778,1

20

4C

och

ise P

it D

itch

, 1

3,6

00

Rip

-Rap

18 in

min

th

ick,

136692

63396

$0

$200,0

88

5M

arl

in P

it W

est

Sed

imen

t P

on

d, 1

80

Rip

-Rap

3/8

to

1/4

C.Y

. p

2013

934

$1,1

24

$4,0

71

6M

arl

in P

it E

ast

Sed

imen

t P

on

d, 1

80

Rip

-Rap

3/8

to

1/4

C.Y

. p

2013

934

$1,1

24

$4,0

71

7C

och

ise P

it S

ed

imen

t P

on

d. 1

80

Rip

-Rap

3/8

to

1/4

C.Y

. p

2013

934

$1,1

24

$4,0

71

8T

SF

Dam

Face, 1

70,0

00

Rip

-Rap

18 in

min

th

ick,

2657900

1232700

$0

$3,8

90,6

00

9T

SF

Dam

Sp

illw

ay, 1

5,0

00

Rip

-Rap

3/8

to

1/4

C.Y

. p

125800

58350

$70,2

50

$254,4

00

10

TS

F II P

eri

mete

r D

itch

9,0

00

Rip

-Rap

18 in

min

th

ick,

341730

158490

$0

$500,2

20

$5,0

14,7

81

$2,3

25,7

98

$73,6

22

$7,4

14,2

01

Note

s:

Oth

er

Co

sts

Qu

an

tity

Un

its

Lab

or

Un

it C

ost

Eq

uip

men

t

Un

it C

ost

Mate

rial

Un

it C

ost

To

tal C

ost

-1($

)($

)($

)$

1O

pen

Pit

Lim

e T

reatm

en

t650

ton

s1.5

05.0

0143

$96,8

50

2M

arl

in P

it D

ew

ate

r T

ren

ch

Cu

lvert

, 1

600

feet

7.5

025

$19,5

00

3U

nd

erg

rou

nd

Lim

e T

reatm

en

t500

ton

s3.0

010.0

0143

$78,0

00

4U

nd

erg

rou

nd

Dew

ate

r P

um

p &

Pip

e1

each

27,0

00.0

025,0

00.0

065,0

00

$117,0

00

5W

aste

Ro

ck D

um

p C

on

tou

r D

itch

C98,4

00

sq

uare

feet

1.0

00.0

12

$255,8

40

6M

arl

in P

it D

ew

ate

r P

um

p &

Pip

e1

each

45,0

00.0

030,0

00.0

0120,0

00

$195,0

00

$177,3

75

$64,2

34

$520,5

81

$762,1

90

Note

s:

1. C

om

isio

n 2

010

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

Descri

pti

on

(req

uir

ed

)

1. C

om

isio

n 2

010

1/1

7/2

011

Copyri

ght

© 2

004 -

2008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e . A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. P

ag

e 3

of

3M

isc. C

osts

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nM

on

ito

rin

gP

roje

ct

Na

me

: M

arl

in -

Re

cla

ma

tio

n P

lan

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Re

cla

ma

tio

n M

on

ito

rin

g &

Ma

inte

na

nc

e -

Co

st

Su

mm

ary

La

bo

rE

qu

ipm

en

t

Ma

teri

als

/

La

bo

rato

ryT

ota

lsR

eveg

eta

tio

n M

ain

ten

an

ce

$44,4

42

$38,1

75

$172,3

55

$254,9

72

Recla

mati

on

Mo

nit

ori

ng

$549,7

92

$12,0

43

$561,8

35

Su

bto

tal R

ecla

mati

on

Mo

nit

ori

ng

$594,2

34

$50,2

18

$172,3

55

$816,8

07

Wate

r Q

uality

Mo

nit

ori

ng

$267,2

86

$68,7

26

$366,6

00

$702,6

12

TO

TA

L M

ON

ITO

RIN

G$861,5

20

$118,9

44

$538,9

55

$1,5

19,4

19

Re

cla

ma

tio

n M

ain

ten

an

ce

Descri

pti

on

To

tal

Reveg

eta

tio

n

Su

rface A

rea (1

)

% A

rea

Req

uir

ing

Reseed

ing

Seed

Mix

Are

a

Req

uir

ing

Reseed

ing

Seed

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tT

ota

ls

acre

s(s

ele

ct)

acre

s$/a

cre

s$/a

cre

s$/a

cre

s$

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Ma

inte

na

nc

e569.7

7100%

Mix

1569.7

7$302.5

0$78.0

0$67.0

0

Labor

$44,4

42

Equip

ment

$38,1

75

Mate

rials

$172,3

55

Cost/A

cre

$447.5

0

Su

bto

tal

$254,9

72

Note

s:

1)

Surf

ace a

rea is N

OT

the s

am

e a

s footp

rint dis

turb

ance a

rea typic

ally

used for

perm

itting p

urp

oses.

Re

cla

ma

tio

n M

on

ito

rin

g

Descri

pti

on

Hrs

/Day

Days/Y

ear

Nu

mb

er

of

Years

Rate

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4 -

20

08

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e .

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pa

ge

1 o

f 4

Monitoring

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nM

on

ito

rin

gP

roje

ct

Na

me

: M

arl

in -

Re

cla

ma

tio

n P

lan

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

$/h

r

Fie

ld W

ork

Fie

ld G

eolo

gis

t/E

ngin

eer

820

15

$95

$229,0

80

Range S

cie

ntist

820

15

$95

$229,0

80

Re

po

rtin

g

Fie

ld G

eolo

gis

t/E

ngin

eer

84

15

$95

$45,8

16

Range S

cie

ntist

84

15

$95

$45,8

16

Su

bto

tal

$549,7

92

Tra

ve

l

Hrs

/Tri

pT

rip

s/Y

ear

Years

Tru

ck C

ost

hr

$/h

r

Tra

vel

84

15

$25.0

9$12,0

43

Su

bto

tal

$12,0

43

To

tal R

ecla

mati

on

Mo

nit

ori

ng

$561,8

35

Note

s:

Gro

un

d &

Su

rfa

ce

Wa

ter

Mo

nit

ori

ng

Fie

ld w

ork

Descri

pti

on

No

. o

f sta

ffH

rs/D

ay

Days/e

ven

tE

ven

ts/Y

ear

No

. Y

ears

Man

-ho

urs

/

year

Rate

Co

st

$/h

r$

Fie

ld T

ech/S

am

ple

r2

84

41

5256

$63.6

4$244,3

78

Pic

kup T

ruck

115

256

$17.3

4$66,5

86

Pum

p (

purc

hased)

1$2,1

40

$2,1

40

Su

bto

tal F

ield

Wo

rk

$313,1

04

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4 -

20

08

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e .

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pa

ge

2 o

f 4

Monitoring

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nM

on

ito

rin

gP

roje

ct

Na

me

: M

arl

in -

Re

cla

ma

tio

n P

lan

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

Wa

ter

an

d R

oc

k S

am

ple

An

aly

sis

Descri

pti

on

Sam

ple

sE

ven

ts/Y

ea

rN

o. Y

ears

An

aly

sis

Co

st

Su

pp

lies

Lab

Co

st

Mate

rial C

ost

Co

st

#$/s

am

ple

$/s

am

ple

$$

$

Wate

r A

naly

sis

(P

rofile

I)

(1)

15

41

5$325.0

0$5.0

0$292,5

00.0

0$4,5

00.0

0$297,0

00

AB

A +

S s

pecia

tion

44

15

$125.0

0$5.0

0$30,0

00.0

0$1,2

00.0

0$31,2

00

WA

D C

yanid

e in w

ate

r2

12

15

$35.0

0$5.0

0$12,6

00.0

0$1,8

00.0

0$14,4

00

Leach T

est (M

WM

P)

w/ analy

sis

22

15

$395.0

0$5.0

0$23,7

00.0

0$300.0

0$24,0

00

Su

bo

tal S

am

ple

An

aly

sis

$366,6

00

Re

po

rtin

g Descri

pti

on

Hrs

/Even

tR

ate

Even

ts/Y

ear

Man

-ho

urs

/

yea

rN

o. Y

ears

Co

st

$/h

r$

Fie

ld G

eolo

gis

t/E

ngin

ee

r4

$95.4

54

16

15

$22,9

08

Su

bto

tal R

ep

ort

ing

$22,9

08

To

tal W

ate

r Q

uality

Mo

nit

ori

ng

$702,6

12

Note

s:

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4 -

20

08

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e .

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pa

ge

3 o

f 4

Monitoring

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nM

on

ito

rin

gP

roje

ct

Na

me

: M

arl

in -

Re

cla

ma

tio

n P

lan

Da

te o

f S

ub

mit

tal:

1

Ju

ly 2

01

0

Fil

e N

am

e:

Ma

rlin

Re

c C

st

20

10

12

01

.xls

Mo

de

l V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

da

ted

03

Fe

bru

ary

, 2

00

8)

Co

st

Da

ta:

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Co

st

Da

ta F

ile

: c

os

t_d

ata

-std

-nv

20

09

-1.x

ls

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4 -

20

08

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e .

All

Rig

hts

Res

erv

ed.

Pa

ge

4 o

f 4

Monitoring

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nC

on

str

. M

gm

tP

roje

ct

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Co

nstr

ucti

on

Man

ag

em

en

t &

Ro

ad

Main

ten

an

ce -

Co

st

Su

mm

ary

Lab

or

Eq

uip

men

tM

ate

rials

To

tals

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Ma

nag

em

en

t$

1,7

75

,23

2$

49

9,3

92

N/A

$

2,2

74

,62

4

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Su

pp

ort

$3

56

,60

9$

35

6,6

09

Ro

ad

Ma

inte

na

nc

e$

22

4,1

00

$4

23

,72

7$

7,5

00

$6

55

,32

7

TO

TA

L C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT

$1

,99

9,3

32

$1

,27

9,7

28

$7

,50

0$

3,2

86

,56

0

Co

nstr

ucti

on

Man

ag

em

en

tC

on

str

ucti

on

Man

ag

em

en

t S

taff

De

sc

rip

tio

nD

ura

tio

n

Ho

urs

/

Mo

nth

Nu

mb

er

of

Su

pe

rvis

ors

Su

pe

rvis

or

Ra

te

La

bo

r

Co

st

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st(1

)T

ota

ls

mo

.h

r.$

/hr

$$

$

Active

Re

cla

ma

tio

n1

2.0

01

20

5$

62

$4

43

,80

8$

12

4,8

48

$5

68

,65

6M

on

ito

rin

g &

Ma

inte

na

nce

18

0.0

01

20

1$

62

$1

,33

1,4

24

$3

74

,54

4$

1,7

05

,96

8

To

tal

Sta

ff$

1,7

75

,23

2$

49

9,3

92

$2

,27

4,6

24

Co

nstr

ucti

on

Man

ag

em

en

t S

up

po

rt

De

sc

rip

tio

nD

ura

tio

n

Nu

mb

er

of

Un

its

Re

nta

l

Ra

te

Ge

ne

rato

r

Co

st

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st(1

)T

ota

ls

mo

.$

/mo

$/m

o$

$

Te

mp

ora

ry O

ffic

e R

en

tal

18

0.0

01

$1

49

$1

,65

6$

32

4,9

29

$3

24

,92

9T

em

po

rary

To

ilets

18

0.0

01

$1

76

$3

1,6

80

$3

1,6

80

To

tal

Su

pp

ort

$3

56

,60

9$

35

6,6

09

No

tes:

Off

ice

re

nta

l a

ssu

me

s o

nly

1 g

en

era

tor

req

uire

d f

or

eve

ry 4

tra

ilers

To

tal

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

$2

,63

1,2

33

1/1

7/2

01

1C

op

yri

gh

t ©

20

04

- 2

00

8 -

SR

CE

So

ftw

are

. A

ll R

igh

ts R

eser

ved

. P

ag

e 1

of

2C

on

str

. M

gm

t

Bo

nd

Calc

ula

tio

nC

on

str

. M

gm

tP

roje

ct

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Ro

ad

Main

ten

an

ce

De

sc

rip

tio

nF

lee

t S

ize

Nu

mb

er

Du

rati

on

Ho

urs

/

Mo

nth

La

bo

r

Co

st

Eq

uip

me

nt

Co

st

To

tals

(se

lect)

mo

.h

r.$

$$

Acti

ve R

ecla

mati

on

Wa

ter

Tru

ck

Sm

all

1.0

01

2.0

60

$3

2,2

56

$6

0,9

48

$9

3,2

04

Gra

de

rS

ma

ll1

.00

12

.06

0$

42

,44

4$

80

,29

4$

12

2,7

38

Mo

nit

ori

ng

& M

ain

ten

an

ce

Wa

ter

Tru

ck

Sm

all

1.0

01

80

.08

$6

4,5

12

$1

21

,89

6$

18

6,4

08

Gra

de

rS

ma

ll1

.00

18

0.0

8$

84

,88

8$

16

0,5

89

$2

45

,47

7

De

sc

rip

tio

n

Ga

llo

ns

/

Da

yD

ay

s/

Mo

nth

Du

rati

on

Co

st/

Ga

llo

nT

ota

ls

(se

lect)

mo

.$

$

Wate

r F

ees

Wa

ter

Fe

es

50

00

25

6.0

$0

.01

0$

7,5

00

To

tal

Pro

jec

t M

ain

ten

an

ce

$2

24

,10

0$

42

3,7

27

$6

55

,32

7

No

tes:

1)

Su

pe

rvis

or

eq

uip

me

nt

= p

icku

p t

ruck

1/1

7/2

01

1C

op

yri

gh

t ©

20

04

- 2

00

8 -

SR

CE

So

ftw

are

. A

ll R

igh

ts R

eser

ved

. P

ag

e 2

of

2C

on

str

. M

gm

t

Project Name: Marlin - Reclamation Plan



Model Version: Version 1.1.2 (updated 03 February, 2008)

Cost Data: Standardized Data


Color Code Key

User Input - Direct Input Direct Input

User Input - Pull Down List Pull Down Selection

Standardized Data (imported from data file)Program Calculated Value Locked Cell - Formula or Reference

ZONE ADJUSTMENTS

Cost Basis/Project Region Northern Nevada

Power Equipment Operators 151 to 300 miles $3.00

Truck Drivers 151 to 300 miles $3.00Laborers < 50 miles $0.00

INDIRECT COSTSFICA/Medicare (%) 7.65%

Unemployment (%) 3.00%Workman's Compensation (%) 9.77%

HOURLY LABOR RATE TABLEDavis-Bacon

Group Base Rate Fringe

Zone

Adjustment

Hourly

Wage

FICA/

Medicare

Unemploym

ent

Workman's

Comp Total($/hr) ($/hr) ($/hr) ($/hr) ($/hr) ($/hr) ($/hr) ($/hr)

EQUIPMENT OPERATORS ($/hr) (2)

BulldozersD6R Group 8 $29.55 $15.54 $3.00 $48.09 $3.68 $1.44 $4.70 $57.91

D7R Group 8 $29.55 $15.54 $3.00 $48.09 $3.68 $1.44 $4.70 $57.91

D8R Group 8 $29.55 $15.54 $3.00 $48.09 $3.68 $1.44 $4.70 $57.91

D9R Group 8 $29.55 $15.54 $3.00 $48.09 $3.68 $1.44 $4.70 $57.91

D10R Group 8 $29.55 $15.54 $3.00 $48.09 $3.68 $1.44 $4.70 $57.91D11R Group 8 $29.55 $15.54 $3.00 $48.09 $3.68 $1.44 $4.70 $57.91

Motor Graders14G/H Group 10A $30.41 $15.54 $3.00 $48.95 $3.74 $1.47 $4.78 $58.9516G/H Group 10A $30.41 $15.54 $3.00 $48.95 $3.74 $1.47 $4.78 $58.95

Track Excavators

320C Group 11 $30.65 $15.54 $3.00 $49.19 $3.76 $1.48 $4.81 $59.23

325C Group 11 $30.65 $15.54 $3.00 $49.19 $3.76 $1.48 $4.81 $59.23

345B Group 11 $30.65 $15.54 $3.00 $49.19 $3.76 $1.48 $4.81 $59.23385BL Group 11 $30.65 $15.54 $3.00 $49.19 $3.76 $1.48 $4.81 $59.23

Scrapers631G Group 10 $30.22 $15.54 $3.00 $48.76 $3.73 $1.46 $4.76 $58.72637G PP Group 11 $30.65 $15.54 $3.00 $49.19 $3.76 $1.48 $4.81 $59.23

Wheeled Loaders928G Group 10 $30.22 $15.54 $3.00 $48.76 $3.73 $1.46 $4.76 $58.72

966G Group 11 $30.65 $15.54 $3.00 $49.19 $3.76 $1.48 $4.81 $59.23

972G Group 11 $30.65 $15.54 $3.00 $49.19 $3.76 $1.48 $4.81 $59.23

988G Group 11 $30.65 $15.54 $3.00 $49.19 $3.76 $1.48 $4.81 $59.23992G Group 11A $32.29 $15.54 $3.00 $50.83 $3.89 $1.52 $4.97 $61.21

Hydrauilc Hammers

H-120 (fits 325)

H-160 (fits 345)H-180 (fits 365/385)

Other Equipment

420D 4WD Backhoe Group 10A $30.41 $15.54 $3.00 $48.95 $3.74 $1.47 $4.78 $58.95

CS563E Vibratory Roller Group 6 $28.71 $15.54 $3.00 $47.25 $3.61 $1.42 $4.62 $56.90

Light Truck - 1.5 Ton

Supervisor's Truck

Air Compressor + tools Group 3 $27.50 $15.54 $3.00 $46.04 $3.52 $1.38 $4.50 $55.44

Welding Equipment Group 9 $29.87 $15.54 $3.00 $48.41 $3.70 $1.45 $4.73 $58.30

Heavy Duty Drill Rig Group 10 $30.22 $15.54 $3.00 $48.76 $3.73 $1.46 $4.76 $58.72

Pump (plugging) Drill Rig Group 10 $30.22 $15.54 $3.00 $48.76 $3.73 $1.46 $4.76 $58.72

EQUIPMENT TYPE (1)

OR

JOB DESCRIPTION

Churchill, Douglas, Elko, Eureka, Humboldt, Lander, Lyon, Mineral, Pershing, Storey, Washoe, and White Pine

Counties

Standardized Data

1/17/2011Copyright © 2004-2008 - SRCE Software. All Rights Reserved. 1 of 3 Labor Rates







Color Code Key




ZONE ADJUSTMENTS







Counties

Standardized Data

Concrete Pump

Gas Engine Vibrator Group 6 $28.71 $15.54 $3.00 $47.25 $3.61 $1.42 $4.62 $56.90

Generator 5KW

HDEP Welder (pipe or liner)

5 Ton Crane Truck Group 10A $30.41 $15.54 $3.00 $48.95 $3.74 $1.47 $4.78 $58.9525 Ton Crane Group 11 $30.65 $15.54 $3.00 $49.19 $3.76 $1.48 $4.81 $59.23

NOTES:(1) Equipment Type: Catepillar model or equivalent

(2) Equipment Operator Source:

(3) Zone Basis:

TRUCK DRIVERS ($/hr)(4)

769D Truck Driver > 25 yds < $22.85 $11.94 $3.00 $37.79 $2.89 $1.13 $3.69 $45.51

777D Truck Driver > 60 yds < $24.29 $11.94 $3.00 $39.23 $3.00 $1.18 $3.83 $47.24

613E (5,000 gal) Water Wagon ter Truck > 2,500 gall $22.26 $11.94 $3.00 $37.20 $2.85 $1.12 $3.63 $44.80621E (8,000 gal) Water Wagon ter Truck > 2,500 gall $22.26 $11.94 $3.00 $37.20 $2.85 $1.12 $3.63 $44.80Dump Truck (10-12 yd

3 ) Truck Driver > 8 yds < $22.26 $11.94 $3.00 $37.20 $2.85 $1.12 $3.63 $44.80

NOTES:(4) Truck Driver Source:

(5) Zone Basis:

LABORERS ($/hr) (6,7)

General Laborer Group 1 $21.25 $6.87 $0.00 $28.12 $2.15 $0.84 $2.75 $33.86

Skilled Laborer Group 4 $21.75 $6.87 $0.00 $28.62 $2.19 $0.86 $2.80 $34.46

Driller's Helper Group 3 $21.50 $6.87 $0.00 $28.37 $2.17 $0.85 $2.77 $34.16

Rodmen (reinforcing concrete) Group 2 $21.35 $6.87 $0.00 $28.22 $2.16 $0.85 $2.76 $33.98

Cement finisher Group 3 $21.50 $6.87 $0.00 $28.37 $2.17 $0.85 $2.77 $34.16Carpenter $27.54 $6.87 $0.00 $34.41 $2.63 $1.03 $3.36 $41.44

NOTES:(6) Laborer Source:

(7) Carpenter Source:

(8) Zone Basis:

PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL LABOR ($/hr)(9)

Project Manager $51.19 $51.19 $3.92 $1.54 $5.00 $61.64

Foreman $47.25 $47.25 $3.61 $1.42 $4.62 $56.90

Field Geologist/Engineer $95.45 $95.45

Field Tech/Sampler $63.64 $63.64

Range Scientist $95.45 $95.45

D-B ENGI0003-35 07/01/2008

From Washoe Co. Courthouse


D-B LABO0169-021 10/01/2006

D-B CARP0971-010 07/01/2009


D-B TEAM0533-002 12/01/2007








Color Code Key




ZONE ADJUSTMENTS







Counties

Standardized Data

NOTES:(9) Project Manager:

(9) Foreman Source:

(9) Techical Labor Source: SRK Consulting (Total Incl. O&P-10%)

R.S.Means 2009 (01300-700-0260 Total Incl

R.S.Means 2009 (01300-700-0200 Total Incl








Monthly Rental Basis: 176 hrs month

EQUIPMENT RENTAL RATE TABLE

EQUIPMENT TYPE(1) Monthly Rental

Rate

Equipment

Hourly Rate

Fuel/Lube/

WearTotal Rate

BulldozersD6R $9,895 $56.22 $22.64 $78.86

D7R $13,855 $78.72 $28.80 $107.52

D8R $17,820 $101.25 $36.31 $137.56

D9R $21,725 $123.44 $52.25 $175.69

D10R $28,050 $159.38 $67.54 $226.92

D11R $54,000 $306.82 $97.58 $404.40

Motor Graders

14G/H $12,430 $70.63 $40.90 $111.52

16G/H $18,425 $104.69 $49.93 $154.62

Track Excavators

320C $7,240 $41.14 $19.45 $60.59

325C $7,885 $44.80 $24.47 $69.27

345B $10,800 $61.36 $36.37 $97.73

385BL $22,140 $125.80 $58.77 $184.57

Scrapers

631G $23,460 $133.30 $62.18 $195.47

637G PP $32,140 $182.61 $87.40 $270.01

Wheeled Loaders928G $5,495 $31.22 $19.87 $51.09

966G $10,890 $61.88 $35.56 $97.43

972G $11,990 $68.13 $37.33 $105.45

988G $20,350 $115.63 $60.76 $176.38

992G $42,300 $240.34 $121.50 $361.85

Hydrauilc Hammers

H-120 (fits 325) $4,840 $27.50 $3.11 $30.61

H-160 (fits 345) $8,100 $46.02 $6.85 $52.87

H-180 (fits 365/385) $10,100 $57.39 $8.11 $65.50

Other Equipment

420D 4WD Backhoe $3,045 $17.30 $13.90 $31.21

CS563E Vibratory Roller $9,618 $54.65 $8.26 $62.91

Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $4,000 $22.73 $2.36 $25.09

Supervisor's Truck $2,636 $14.98 $2.36 $17.34

Air Compressor + tools $3,935 $22.36 $0.00 $22.36

Welding Equipment $2,761 $15.69 $0.00 $15.69

Heavy Duty Drill Rig $57,090 $324.38 $0.00 $324.38

Pump (plugging) Drill Rig $57,090 $324.38 $0.00 $324.38

Concrete Pump $15,224 $86.50 $4.72 $91.22

Gas Engine Vibrator $534 $3.04 $4.72 $7.76

Generator 5KW $825 $4.69 $4.72 $9.41

HDEP Welder (pipe or liner) $4,110 $23.35 $0.00 $23.35

5 Ton Crane Truck $3,986 $22.65 $7.08 $29.73

25 Ton Crane $16,236 $92.25 $7.08 $99.33

Trucks

769D $14,000 $79.55 $37.74 $117.29

777D $28,000 $159.09 $70.38 $229.47

613E (5,000 gal) Water Wagon $9,235 $52.47 $32.17 $84.65

621E (8,000 gal) Water Wagon $14,575 $82.81 $32.53 $115.34

Dump Truck (10-12 yd3 ) $10,978 $62.38 $37.74 $100.12

NOTES:

(1) Power Equipment Source: Cashman Equipment Company (July 2009) unless noted

1/17/2011Copyright © 2004-2008 - SRCE Software. All Rights Reserved. 1 of 6 Equipment Costs







(2) Power Equipment Type: Catepillar model or equivalent

(3) Drilliing Equipment Source: Means Heavy Construction (2009)

(4) Other Equipment Source: Means Heavy Construction (2009)

(5) Drill rig includes support (pipe) truck








FUEL, LUBE AND WEAR CALCULATIONSCost@

$2.36/galBulldozers

D6R $4.98 $4.09 5.75 $13.57 $22.64

D7R $5.03 $6.07 7.50 $17.70 $28.80

D8R $5.48 $7.82 9.75 $23.01 $36.31

D9R $6.46 $12.16 14.25 $33.63 $52.25

D10R $8.08 $16.98 18.00 $42.48 $67.54

D11R $9.80 $25.24 26.50 $62.54 $97.58

Motor Graders

14G/H $5.24 $8.74 $12.17 6.25 $14.75 $40.90

16G/H $5.09 $10.51 $16.63 7.50 $17.70 $49.93

Track Excavators

320C $4.18 $3.71 4.90 $11.56 $19.45

325C $4.22 $4.67 6.60 $15.58 $24.47

345B $5.44 $5.91 10.60 $25.02 $36.37

385 BL $6.70 $10.77 17.50 $41.30 $58.77

Scrapers

631G $6.24 $13.83 $6.71 15.00 $35.40 $62.18

637G PP $9.10 $13.83 $8.42 23.75 $56.05 $87.40

Wheeled Loaders

928G $3.92 $4.05 $3.64 3.50 $8.26 $19.87

966G $4.95 $8.54 $8.50 5.75 $13.57 $35.56

972G $4.71 $8.54 $9.33 6.25 $14.75 $37.33

988G $7.65 $14.47 $11.50 11.50 $27.14 $60.76

992G $11.09 $28.90 $27.23 23.00 $54.28 $121.50

Hydrauilc Hammers

H-120 (fits 325 N/A $3.11 $0.00 $3.11

H-160 (fits 345) N/A $6.85 $0.00 $6.85

H-180 (fits 365/385) N/A $8.11 $0.00 $8.11

Other Equipment

420D 4WD Backhoe $2.88 $1.08 $2.86 3.00 $7.08 $13.90

CS563E Vibratory Roller N/A 3.50 $8.26 $8.26

Light Truck - 1.5 Ton N/A N/A 1.00 $2.36 $2.36

Supervisor's Truck N/A N/A 1.00 $2.36 $2.36

Air Compressor + tools N/A N/A $0.00 $0.00

Welding Equipment N/A $0.00 N/A $0.00 $0.00

Heavy Duty Drill Rig N/A N/A $0.00 $0.00

Pump (plugging) Drill Rig N/A N/A $0.00 $0.00

Concrete Pump N/A N/A 2.00 $4.72 $4.72

Gas Engine Vibrator N/A N/A 2.00 $4.72 $4.72

Generator 5KW N/A $0.00 N/A 2.00 $4.72 $4.72

HDEP Welder (pipe or liner) N/A $0.00 N/A $0.00 $0.00

5 Ton Crane Truck N/A 3.00 $7.08 $7.08

25 Ton Crane N/A 3.00 $7.08 $7.08

Trucks

769D $6.79 $6.45 $2.67 9.25 $21.83 $37.74

777D $10.42 $16.28 $3.56 17.00 $40.12 $70.38

613E (5,000 gal) Water Wagon $4.16 $2.64 N/A 10.75 $25.37 $32.17

621E (8,000 gal) Water Wagon $5.47 $5.23 N/A 9.25 $21.83 $32.53

Dump Truck (10-12 yd3 ) $6.79 $6.45 $2.67 9.25 $21.83 $37.74

Notes:

(1) PM Source: July 2009 Cashman Equipment Rental Rate, Elko, NV (except as noted)

(2) Undercarriage Source: Purcell Tire. 07/16/2009

(3) G.E.T. Source: CAT Historical Data

(4) Fuel Use Source: Caterpillar Handbook, Edition 35, Ch. 20; or estimated average for smaller vehicles

EQUIPMENT TYPEPM Cost

Per Hour(1)

Total Hourly

Equipment

Under carriage

or Tires (2)

G.E.T

Consumption

Fuel Use

Rate gal/hr








Equipment Tire Size # of Tires Per Cost Tire Cost Life Tire Cost per

Bulldozers

D6R N/A

D7R N/A

D8R N/A

D9R N/A

D10R N/A

D11R N/A

Motor Graders

14G/H 20.5R25 6 $5,095.71 $30,574.29 3,500 $8.74

16G/H 23.5R25 6 $6,131.43 $36,788.57 3,500 $10.51

Track Excavators

320C N/A

325C N/A

345B N/A

385 BL N/A

Scrapers

631G 37.25R35 4 $13,825.71 $55,302.86 4,000 $13.83

637G PP 37.25R35 4 $13,825.71 $55,302.86 4,000 $13.83

Wheeled Loaders

928G 17.5R25 4 $4,554.29 $18,217.16 4,500 $4.05

966G 26.5R25 4 $9,607.14 $38,428.56 4,500 $8.54

972G 26.5R25 4 $9,607.14 $38,428.56 4,500 $8.54

988G 35/65-33 4 $16,275.71 $65,102.84 4,500 $14.47

992G 45/65R45 4 $32,517.14 $130,068.56 4,500 $28.90

Hydrauilc Hammers

H-120 (fits 325 N/A

H-160 (fits 345) N/A

H-180 (fits 365/385) N/A

Other Equipment

420D 4WD Backhoe 340/80R18-195LR24 2 + 2 $1,627.14 $3,254.28 3,000 $1.08

CS563E Vibratory Roller N/A

Light Truck - 1.5 Ton N/A

Supervisor's Truck N/A

Air Compressor + tools N/A

Welding Equipment

Heavy Duty Drill Rig N/A

Pump (plugging) Drill Rig N/A

Concrete Pump N/A

Gas Engine Vibrator N/A

Generator 5KW N/A

HDEP Welder (pipe or liner) N/A

5 Ton Crane Truck N/A

25 Ton Crane N/A

Trucks

769D 18.00R33 6 $6,452.86 $38,717.16 6,000 $6.45

777D 27.00R49 6 $13,565.71 $81,394.26 5,000 $16.28

613E (5,000 gal) Water Wagon 23.5R25 4 $3,967.14 $15,868.56 6,000 $2.64

621E (8,000 gal) Water Wagon 33.25R29 4 $10,452.86 $41,811.44 8,000 $5.23

Dump Truck (10-12 yd3 ) 6 $6,452.86 $38,717.16 6,000 $6.45

Notes:

(1) Unit Cost Basis: Cost per set

(2) Cost Basis: Total cost for all required tires.

(3) Tire Cost Source: Purcell Tire. 07/16/2009

TIRE COST TABLES








(4) Tire Wear Source: Caterpillar Handbook, Edition 35; Ch. 20








Revegetation MaterialsSeed Mixes

Seed Mix Description Cost/Acre

None

Mix 1 Basins $302.50

Mix 2 Low Hills $332.75

Mix 3 Uplands $363.00Mix 4 Riparian or Custom $393.25

User Mix 1 Lowlands $217.00

User Mix 2 Low Hills

User Mix 3 UplandsUser Mix 4 Riparian

Cost/lb lbs/Acre Cost/Acre

User Mix 5 (from Seed Mix sheet) #DIV/0! 0 $0.00Notes:

MulchItem Cost/lb lbs/Acre Cost/Acre

NoneStraw Mulch $0.11 2000 $220.00

Hydro Mulch $0.27 50 $13.50

550

Notes: Straw Specialties $8.00 per bale, certified (July 2009)

Granite Seed $13.00 per 50# bag Wood (Hydro) Mulch (June 2009)

AmendmentsItem Cost/lb lbs/Acre Cost/Acre

None

Organic Matter $0.70 2000 $1,400.00

Treated Sludge 3000

1/17/2011Copyright © 2004-2008 - SRCE Software. All Rights Reserved. 1 of 3 Material Costs







Chemical $0.32 100 $32.00

1000

Notes: Granite Seed $35.00 per 50 # bag Biosol Mix (June 2009)

Western Nevada Supply $16.00 per 50 # bag 16/20/0 (June 2009)

Well Abandonment MaterialsDescription Units Cost/unit

Cement cy $292.09

Grout (Low Grade Bentonite) cy $65.60

Inert Material/Cuttings cy $0.00

Monitoring CostsDescription Units Cost/unit

Monitor Well Pump ea. $2,140.00

Sampling Supplies ea. $5.00

Water Analysis (Profile I) (1) ea. $325.00

Leach Test (MWMP) w/ analysis ea. $395.00

ABA + S speciation ea. $125.00

WAD Cyanide in water ea. $35.00

Water Analysis (Profile II) (1) ea. $375.00

(1) Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. quote (June 2009) Type I,II Cement at $11.90

(2) Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. (June 2009) Abandonite grout at $12.70 per


Pro

ject

Nam

e:

Marl

in -

Recla

mati

on

Pla

n

Date

of

Su

bm

itta

l: 1 J

uly

2010

File N

am

e:

Marl

in R

ec C

st

2010 1

2 0

1.x

ls

Mo

del V

ers

ion

: V

ers

ion

1.1

.2 (

up

date

d 0

3 F

eb

ruary

, 2008)

Co

st

Data

: S

tan

dard

ized

Data

Co

st

Data

File:

co

st_

data

-std

-nv2009-1

.xls

Co

lor

Co

de

Ke

y

Use

r In

pu

t -

Dire

ct

Inp

ut

Dir

ec

t In

pu

t

Use

r In

pu

t -

Pu

ll D

ow

n L

ist

Pu

ll D

ow

n S

ele

cti

on

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

(im

po

rte

d f

rom

da

ta f

ile)

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d D

ata

Pro

gra

m C

alc

ula

ted

Va

lue

Lo

ck

ed

Ce

ll -

Fo

rmu

la o

r R

efe

ren

ce

Re

ve

ge

tati

on

Da

ily

Me

an

s N

um

be

rU

nit

Cre

wO

utp

ut

Ma

teri

als

La

bo

rE

qu

ipm

en

tT

ota

l

N

ote

s

Se

ed

ing

- B

roa

dca

st

Me

ch

an

ica

l (1

)a

cre

s$

78

.00

$6

7.0

0$

14

5.0

0

Se

ed

ing

- D

rill

(1)

acre

s3

65

$0

.00

Se

ed

ing

- H

yd

rose

ed

ing

(1

)3

65

$0

.00

Sh

rub

Pla

ntin

g -

ba

re r

oo

t 6

-10

in

(1

5-

25

cm

) (2

)0

29

10

-40

0-0

56

1e

a.

1 C

lab

36

5$

0.7

4$

0.0

0$

0.7

4

Tre

e P

lan

tin

g -

ba

re r

oo

t 1

1-1

6 in

(2

7-

40

cm

) (3

)0

29

10

-40

0-0

56

2e

a.

1 C

lab

26

0$

1.0

4$

0.0

0$

1.0

4C

actu

s P

lan

tin

g (

4)

ea

.1

Cla

b$

0.0

0

NO

TE

S:

(1)

Se

ed

ing

So

urc

e:

Sla

terS

ee

din

g (

Ju

ly 2

00

7)

ad

juste

d t

o 2

00

9

(2)

Sh

rub

So

urc

e:

(3)

Tre

e S

ou

rce

: (4

) C

actu

s S

ou

rce

:

Bu

ild

ing

an

d W

all

De

mo

liti

on

H

ou

rly p

rod

uctivity r

ate

s a

nd

cre

w c

om

po

sitio

n f

rom

Me

an

s H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

n 2

00

5 E

ditio

n b

y p

erm

issio

n o

f R

.S.M

ea

ns/R

ee

d C

on

str

uctio

n D

ata

.

A

ll e

qu

ipm

en

t, la

bo

r a

nd

ma

teria

l u

nit c

osts

are

fro

m L

ab

or

Co

sts

, E

qu

ipm

en

t C

osts

an

d M

ate

ria

l C

osts

sp

rea

dsh

ee

ts

Da

ily

Me

an

s N

um

be

rU

nit

Cre

wO

utp

ut

La

bo

rE

qu

ipm

en

tP

rem

ium

To

tal

No

tes

Bu

ild

ing

Dem

oliti

on

Lg

. ste

el

02

22

0-1

10

-00

12

C.F

.B

-82

15

00

$0

.12

$0

.12

$0

.24

Lg

. co

ncre

te0

22

20

-11

0-0

05

0C

.F.

B-8

15

30

0$

0.1

7$

0.1

7$

0.3

4

Lg

. m

aso

nry

02

22

0-1

10

-00

80

C.F

.B

-82

01

00

$0

.13

$0

.13

$0

.26

Lg

. m

ixe

d0

22

20

-11

0-0

10

0C

.F.

B-8

20

10

0$

0.1

3$

0.1

3$

0.2

6S

m.

ste

el

02

22

0-1

10

-05

00

C.F

.B

-31

48

00

$0

.15

$0

.15

$0

.30

Sm

. co

ncre

te0

22

20

-11

0-0

60

0C

.F.

B-3

11

30

0$

0.1

9$

0.1

9$

0.3

8

Sm

. m

aso

nry

02

22

0-1

10

-06

50

C.F

.B

-31

48

00

$0

.15

$0

.15

$0

.30

Sm

. w

oo

d0

22

20

-11

0-0

70

0C

.F.

B-3

14

80

0$

0.1

5$

0.1

5$

0.3

0

Wall D

em

oliti

on

Blo

ck 4

in

(1

0 c

m)

thic

k0

22

20

-13

0-2

00

0S

.F.

1 C

lab

18

0$

1.5

0$

0.0

02

0%

$1

.80

assu

me

s v

ert

ica

l re

info

rcin

g r

od

s in

clu

de

d (

20

% p

rem

ium

)

Blo

ck 6

in

(1

5 c

m)

thic

k0

22

20

-13

0-2

04

0S

.F.

1 C

lab

17

0$

1.5

9$

0.0

02

0%

$1

.91

assu

me

s v

ert

ica

l re

info

rcin

g r

od

s in

clu

de

d (

20

% p

rem

ium

)

Blo

ck 8

in

(2

0 c

m)

thic

k0

22

20

-13

0-2

08

0S

.F.

1 C

lab

15

0$

1.8

1$

0.0

02

0%

$2

.17

assu

me

s v

ert

ica

l re

info

rcin

g r

od

s in

clu

de

d (

20

% p

rem

ium

)

Blo

ck 1

2 in

(3

0 c

m)

thic

k0

22

20

-13

0-2

10

0S

.F.

1 C

lab

15

0$

1.8

1$

0.0

02

0%

$2

.17

assu

me

s v

ert

ica

l re

info

rcin

g r

od

s in

clu

de

d (

20

% p

rem

ium

)

Co

nc 6

in

(1

5 c

m)

thic

k0

22

20

-13

0-2

40

0S

.F.

B-9

16

0$

12

.39

$1

.99

10

%$

15

.82

assu

me

s a

ve

rag

e r

ein

forc

ing

(1

0%

pre

miu

m)

Co

nc 8

in

(2

0 c

m)

thic

k0

22

20

-13

0-2

42

0S

.F.

B-9

14

0$

14

.16

$2

.27

10

%$

18

.07

assu

me

s a

ve

rag

e r

ein

forc

ing

(1

0%

pre

miu

m)

Co

nc 1

0 in

(2

5 c

m)

thic

k0

22

20

-13

0-2

44

0S

.F.

B-9

12

0$

16

.52

$2

.65

10

%$

21

.09

assu

me

s a

ve

rag

e r

ein

forc

ing

(1

0%

pre

miu

m)

Co

nc 1

2 in

(3

0 c

m)

thic

k0

22

20

-13

0-2

50

0S

.F.

B-9

10

0$

19

.82

$3

.18

10

%$

25

.30

assu

me

s a

ve

rag

e r

ein

forc

ing

(1

0%

pre

miu

m)

Wa

ste

Dis

po

sa

l

Un

it r

ate

s f

rom

Me

an

s H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

n 2

00

6 E

ditio

n b

y p

erm

issio

n o

f R

.S.M

ea

ns/R

ee

d C

on

str

uctio

n D

ata

.

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. 1

of

4M

isc.

Un

it C

osts

Da

ily

Me

an

s N

um

be

rU

nit

Cre

wO

utp

ut

Ma

teri

als

La

bo

rE

qu

ipm

en

tP

rem

ium

To

tal

No

tes

Ru

bb

ish

Han

dlin

gD

um

pste

r d

eliv

ery

(a

ve

rag

e f

or

all

siz

es)

02

22

0-3

50

-09

10

ea

.$

43

.50

$4

3.5

0

Ha

ul (a

ve

rag

e f

or

all

siz

es)

02

22

0-3

50

-09

20

ea

.$

12

8.0

0$

12

8.0

0

Re

nt

pe

r m

on

th (

ave

rag

e f

or

all

siz

es)

02

22

0-3

50

-09

40

ea

.$

43

.50

$4

3.5

0

Dis

po

sa

l fe

e p

er

ton

(to

nn

e)

(ave

rag

e f

or

all

siz

es)

02

22

0-3

50

-09

50

ton

$4

3.5

0$

43

.50

NO

TE

S:

Du

mp

ste

r C

ost

So

urc

e2

00

9 M

ea

ns H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

nD

um

pste

r D

isp

osa

l F

ee

So

urc

e:

20

09

Me

an

s H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

n

Hazard

ou

s M

ate

rial H

an

dlin

g -

So

lid

sP

icku

p f

ee

s 5

5 g

al. d

rum

s0

21

10

-30

0-1

10

0e

a.

$2

05

.00

$2

05

.00

Bu

lk m

ate

ria

l (a

ve

rag

e)

02

11

0-3

00

-12

20

/12

30

ton

$3

32

.00

$3

32

.00

Tra

nsp

ort

- t

ruck lo

ad

(8

0 d

rum

s,

25

cy (

m3

), 1

8 t

on

s)

02

11

0-3

00

-12

60

/12

70

mile

$4

.39

$4

.39

Du

mp

site

so

lid d

isp

osa

l fe

e0

21

10

-30

0-6

00

0/6

02

0to

n$

26

1.0

0$

26

1.0

0

NO

TE

S:

So

lid H

an

dlin

g C

ost

So

urc

e2

00

9 M

ea

ns H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

nS

olid

Dis

po

sa

l F

ee

So

urc

e:

20

09

Me

an

s H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

n

Hazard

ou

s M

ate

rial H

an

dlin

g -

Liq

uid

sV

acu

um

Tru

ck P

icku

p (

22

00

ga

l)0

21

10

-30

0-3

11

0h

r.$

11

2.0

0$

11

2.0

0

Va

cu

um

Tru

ck P

icku

p (

50

00

ga

l)0

21

10

-30

0-3

12

0h

r.$

15

2.0

0$

15

2.0

0D

um

p s

ite

liq

uid

dis

po

sa

l fe

e0

21

10

-30

0-6

00

0/6

02

0to

n$

26

1.0

0$

26

1.0

0

NO

TE

S:

Liq

uid

Ha

nd

ling

Co

st

So

urc

e2

00

9 M

ea

ns H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

nL

iqu

id D

isp

osa

l F

ee

So

urc

e:

20

09

Me

an

s H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

n

Hyd

rocarb

on

Co

nta

min

ate

d S

oils (

HC

S)

Insitu

Bio

tre

atm

en

t0

21

15

-20

0-2

02

0/2

02

1C

.Y.

$1

3.0

4$

13

.04

HC

S d

isp

osa

l fe

e0

21

15

-20

0-2

05

0/2

05

5C

.Y.

$1

02

.00

$1

02

.00

NO

TE

S:

Insitu

Tre

ate

me

nt

Co

st

So

urc

e2

00

9 M

ea

ns H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

nH

CS

Dis

po

sa

l F

ee

So

urc

e:

20

09

Me

an

s H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

n

Co

nc

rete

Str

uc

ture

In

sta

lla

tio

n

We

ekly

du

mp

ste

r re

nta

l ra

tes f

rom

Me

an

s H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

n 2

00

5 E

ditio

n w

ith

pe

rmis

sio

n b

y R

.S.M

ea

ns/R

ee

d C

on

str

uctio

n D

ata

.

We

ekly

du

mp

ste

r re

nta

l ra

tes in

clu

de

ha

ul to

off

-site

dis

po

sa

l site

an

d d

isp

osa

l fe

es

Da

ily

Me

an

s N

um

be

rU

nit

Cre

wO

utp

ut

Ma

teri

als

La

bo

rE

qu

ipm

en

tP

rem

ium

To

tal

No

tes

Rein

forc

ed

Co

ncre

te B

ulk

head

s a

nd

Sh

aft

Co

vers

Gra

de

wa

lls -

15

in

(4

0 c

m)

thic

k,

8 f

t (

2.5

m)

hig

h0

33

10

-24

0-4

30

0C

.Y.

C-1

4D

80

.02

$1

75

.00

$1

02

.93

$1

1.6

3$

28

9.5

6in

clu

de

s r

ein

forc

ing

Gra

de

wa

lls -

15

in

( 4

0 c

m)

thic

k,

12

ft

(3.7

m)

hig

h0

33

10

-24

0-4

35

0C

.Y.

C-1

4D

26

.2$

17

5.0

0$

31

4.3

7$

35

.52

$5

24

.89

inclu

de

s r

ein

forc

ing

Ele

va

ted

co

nc,

1-w

ay b

ea

m &

sla

b -

15

ft (

4.6

m)

sp

an

03

31

0-2

40

-27

00

C.Y

.C

-14

B2

0.5

9$

32

0.0

0$

40

7.5

0$

45

.19

$7

72

.69

inclu

de

s r

ein

forc

ing

Ele

va

ted

co

nc,

1-w

ay b

ea

m &

sla

b -

25

ft (

7.5

m)

sp

an

03

31

0-2

40

-27

50

C.Y

.C

-14

B2

8.3

6$

31

5.0

0$

29

5.8

5$

32

.81

$6

43

.66

inclu

de

s r

ein

forc

ing

Bat

Gate

/Fo

am

Plu

g In

sta

llati

on

$/e

a.

$/e

a.

Ba

t G

ate

(5

)e

a.

0.5

$2

,51

8.3

1$

2,5

20

.40

$8

15

.60

ma

teria

ls $

/ea

. In

sta

lled

Cu

lve

rt G

ate

(5

)e

a.

1$

5,0

36

.62

$1

,84

9.7

0$

71

9.9

0m

ate

ria

ls $

/ea

. In

sta

lled

Ad

it F

oa

m P

lug

(6

)e

a./

C.Y

.0

.5$

25

1.8

3$

2,5

33

.40

$1

,12

6.0

0m

ate

ria

ls $

/cy p

lace

dP

rod

uctio

n O

pe

nin

g F

oa

m P

lug

(6

)e

a./

C.Y

.0

.5$

25

1.8

3$

2,5

33

.40

$1

,12

6.0

0m

ate

ria

ls $

/cy p

lace

d

NO

TE

S:

(5)

Ba

t G

ate

So

urc

e:

NV

BL

M,

2/2

00

6:

8 h

r +

1h

r m

ob

/de

mo

b +

1h

r se

tup

pe

r g

ate

(a

dju

ste

d t

o 2

00

9)

(6)

Fo

am

Plu

g S

ou

rce

: N

V B

LM

, 2

/20

06

: 8

hr

+ 1

hr

mo

b/d

em

ob

+ 1

hr

se

tup

pe

r a

dit;

16

hrs

pe

r p

rod

uctio

n o

pe

nin

g (

ad

juste

d t

o 2

00

9)

Mis

c.

Lin

ea

r P

roje

cts

H

ou

rly p

rod

uctivity r

ate

s a

nd

cre

w c

om

po

sitio

n f

rom

Me

an

s H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

n 2

00

5 E

ditio

n b

y p

erm

issio

n o

f R

.S.M

ea

ns/R

ee

d C

on

str

uctio

n D

ata

.

All

eq

uip

me

nt,

la

bo

r a

nd

ma

teria

l u

nit c

osts

are

fro

m L

ab

or

Co

sts

, E

qu

ipm

en

t C

osts

an

d M

ate

ria

l C

osts

sp

rea

dsh

ee

tsD

ail

y

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. 2

of

4M

isc.

Un

it C

osts

Me

an

s N

um

be

rU

nit

Cre

wO

utp

ut

Ma

teri

als

La

bo

rE

qu

ipm

en

tP

rem

ium

To

tal

No

tes

Fen

cin

g In

sta

llati

on

Ba

rbe

d 3

-str

an

d0

28

20

-17

0-1

65

0L

.F.

B-8

0A

76

0$

0.4

5$

1.0

7$

0.2

6$

1.7

8

Ba

rbe

d 4

-str

an

de

xtr

ap

ola

ted

L.F

.B

-80

A5

70

$0

.60

$1

.43

$0

.35

$2

.38

Ba

rbe

d 5

-str

an

d0

28

20

-13

0-0

92

0L

.F.

B-8

0A

45

6$

0.7

5$

1.7

8$

0.4

4$

2.9

7

Ch

ain

lin

k 8

-10

ft (

2.5

-3m

) In

sta

ll0

28

20

-13

0-0

92

0L

.F.

B-8

0C

18

0$

38

.00

$4

.51

$1

.12

$4

3.6

3

Wo

od

sto

cka

de

fe

nce

6 f

t (2

m)

hig

h -

In

sta

ll0

28

20

-51

0-1

24

0L

.F.

B-8

0C

15

0$

11

.15

$5

.42

$1

.34

$1

7.9

1

use

rL

.F.

B-8

0A

$0

.00

use

rL

.F.

$0

.00

use

rL

.F.

$0

.00

use

rL

.F.

$0

.00

Fen

cin

g R

em

oval

Ba

rbe

d 3

-str

an

d R

em

ova

l0

22

20

-22

0-1

60

0L

.F.

2 C

lab

43

0$

1.2

6$

0.4

7$

1.7

3

Ba

rbe

d 4

-str

an

d R

em

ova

le

xtr

ap

ola

ted

L.F

.2

Cla

b3

55

$1

.53

$0

.57

$2

.10

Ba

rbe

d 5

-str

an

d R

em

ova

l0

22

20

-22

0-1

65

0L

.F.

2 C

lab

28

0$

1.9

3$

0.7

2$

2.6

5

Ch

ain

lin

k 8

-10

ft

(2.5

-3 m

) R

em

ova

l0

22

20

-22

0-1

70

0L

.F.

B-6

44

5$

2.2

7$

0.9

2$

3.1

9

Wo

od

, a

ll ty

pe

s 4

-6 f

t ("

1.5

-2 m

) h

igh

- R

em

ova

l0

22

20

-22

0-1

77

5L

.F.

2 C

lab

43

0$

1.2

6$

0.4

7$

1.7

3

use

rL

.F.

use

rL

.F.

$0

.00

use

rL

.F.

$0

.00

use

rL

.F.

$0

.00

Pip

elin

e a

nd

Cu

lvert

Rem

oval

12

in

(3

0 c

m )

Dia

me

ter

02

22

0-2

20

-29

00

L.F

.B

-61

75

$5

.78

$2

.34

$8

.12

18

in

(4

5 c

m)

Dia

me

ter

02

22

0-2

20

-29

30

L.F

.B

-61

50

$6

.74

$2

.72

$9

.46

24

in

(6

0 c

m)

Dia

me

ter

02

22

0-2

20

-29

60

L.F

.B

-61

20

$8

.43

$3

.41

$1

1.8

4

36

in

(1

m)

Dia

me

ter

02

22

0-2

20

-30

00

L.F

.B

-69

0$

11

.24

$4

.54

$1

5.7

8

Pip

e a

nd

Dra

inp

ipe In

sta

llati

on

Wa

ter

4in

(1

0cm

) 4

0ft

(1

2m

) le

ng

th,

we

lde

d H

DP

E0

25

10

-76

0-0

10

0L

.F.

B-2

2A

40

0$

3.1

2$

4.3

6$

2.1

0$

9.5

8

Wa

ter

6in

(1

5cm

) 4

0ft

(1

2m

) le

ng

th,

we

lde

d H

DP

E0

25

10

-76

0-0

20

0L

.F.

B-2

2A

38

0$

9.1

5$

4.5

9$

2.2

1$

15

.95

Dra

in 4

in (

10

cm

) p

erf

ora

ted

PV

C0

26

20

-63

0-2

10

0L

.F.

B-1

43

15

$0

.94

$6

.38

$1

.43

$8

.75

Dra

in 6

in (

15

cm

) p

erf

ora

ted

PV

C0

26

20

-63

0-2

11

0L

.F.

B-1

43

00

$1

.75

$6

.70

$1

.50

$9

.95

Dra

in 4

in (

10

cm

) co

rru

ga

ted

, p

erf

or

pla

in0

22

20

-22

0-2

96

0L

.F.

2 C

lab

12

00

$0

.48

$0

.45

$0

.17

$1

.10

Dra

in 6

in (

15

cm

) co

rru

ga

ted

., p

erf

or

pla

in0

22

20

-22

0-3

00

0L

.F.

2 C

lab

90

0$

1.5

6$

0.6

0$

0.2

2$

2.3

8

Mis

c.

Ba

ckh

oe

wo

rk0

22

10

-70

0-0

12

0C

.Y.

B-1

1M

28

$1

6.8

4$

8.9

2$

25

.76

Po

werl

ine a

nd

Tra

nsfo

rmer

Rem

oval

Sin

gle

Po

lem

ile$

35

,00

0.0

0

Do

ub

le P

ole

mile

$4

0,0

00

.00

Tra

nsfo

rme

r (9

)e

a.

$1

9,5

00

.00

NO

TE

S:

(7)

Sin

gle

Po

le S

ou

rce

: N

VE

ne

rgy e

stim

ate

(2

00

9)

(8)

Do

ub

le P

ole

So

urc

e:

NV

En

erg

y e

stim

ate

(2

00

9)

(9)

Tra

nsfo

rme

r S

ou

rce

: S

ierr

a P

acific

Po

we

r C

om

pa

ny e

stim

ate

(2

00

4)

ad

juste

d t

o 2

00

9

Ero

sio

n a

nd

Se

dim

en

tati

on

Co

ntr

ol

H

ou

rly p

rod

uctivity r

ate

s a

nd

cre

w c

om

po

sitio

n f

rom

Me

an

s H

ea

vy C

on

str

uctio

n 2

00

5 E

ditio

n b

y p

erm

issio

n o

f R

.S.M

ea

ns/R

ee

d C

on

str

uctio

n D

ata

.

All

eq

uip

me

nt,

la

bo

r a

nd

ma

teria

l u

nit c

osts

are

fro

m L

ab

or

Co

sts

, E

qu

ipm

en

t C

osts

an

d M

ate

ria

l C

osts

sp

rea

dsh

ee

ts

Da

ily

Me

an

s N

um

be

rU

nit

Cre

wO

utp

ut

Ma

teri

als

La

bo

rE

qu

ipm

en

tP

rem

ium

To

tal

No

tes

Rip

-Rap

& R

ock L

inin

gR

ip-R

ap

3/8

to

1/4

C.Y

. p

iece

s,

gro

ute

d0

23

70

-45

0-0

11

0S

.Y.

B-1

38

0$

14

.05

$2

5.1

6$

11

.67

$5

0.8

8a

ssu

me

s o

n-s

ite

so

urc

e o

f rip

-ra

p

Rip

-Ra

p 1

8 in

min

th

ick,

no

gro

ut

02

37

0-4

50

-02

00

S.Y

.B

-13

53

$3

7.9

7$

17

.61

$5

5.5

8a

ssu

me

s o

n-s

ite

so

urc

e o

f rip

-ra

p

Ga

bio

ns,

6 in

(1

5 c

m)

de

ep

02

37

0-4

50

-04

00

S.Y

.B

-13

20

0$

4.9

2$

10

.06

$4

.67

$1

9.6

5a

ssu

me

s o

n-s

ite

so

urc

e r

ock f

ill f

or

ga

bio

ns

Ga

bio

ns,

12

in

(3

0 c

m)

de

ep

02

37

0-4

50

-02

00

S.Y

.B

-13

15

3$

7.7

3$

13

.15

$6

.10

$2

6.9

8a

ssu

me

s o

n-s

ite

so

urc

e r

ock f

ill f

or

ga

bio

ns

Ga

bio

ns,

18

in

(4

5 c

m)

de

ep

02

37

0-4

50

-02

00

S.Y

.B

-13

10

2$

10

.70

$1

9.7

3$

9.1

5$

39

.58

assu

me

s o

n-s

ite

so

urc

e r

ock f

ill f

or

ga

bio

ns

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. 3

of

4M

isc.

Un

it C

osts

Ga

bio

ns,

36

in

(1

m)

de

ep

02

37

0-4

50

-02

00

S.Y

.B

-13

60

$1

2.3

0$

33

.54

$1

5.5

6$

61

.40

assu

me

s o

n-s

ite

so

urc

e r

ock f

ill f

or

ga

bio

ns

HD

EP

Lin

er

Ins

tall

ati

on Fin

ish

gra

din

g la

rge

are

a2

31

0-1

00

-01

00

S.F

.B

-11

L2

,00

0$

0.3

7$

0.4

5$

0.8

2C

om

pa

ctio

n -

rid

ing

, vib

ratin

g r

olle

r -

12

" lif

ts2

31

5-3

10

-50

80

S.F

.B

-10

Y3

,50

0$

0.2

1$

0.1

4$

0.3

56

0 m

il H

DP

E

26

60

-61

0-1

20

0S

.F.

3 S

kw

k1

,60

0$

0.7

0$

0.8

1$

0.2

7$

1.7

8

TO

TA

L$

0.7

0$

1.3

9$

0.8

6$

2.9

5

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

Su

pp

ort

Off

ice

Tra

iler,

Fu

rnis

he

d,

no

ho

ok-u

ps

01

50

-50

0-0

25

0m

o$

14

9.0

0$

14

9.0

0

To

ilet

Po

rta

ble

, ch

em

ica

l1

59

0-4

00

-64

10

mo

.$

17

6.0

0$

17

6.0

0

TO

TA

L$

32

5.0

0$

0.0

0$

0.0

0$

32

5.0

0

Pu

mp

an

d C

as

ing

Re

mo

va

l

Pu

mp

Ty

pe

Me

as

ure

me

nt

Un

itL

ab

or

Eq

uip

me

nt

To

tal

No

tes

Pu

mp

Rem

ova

lS

ub

me

rsib

left

to

pu

mp

L.F

.$

2.3

0$

5.0

1$

7.3

1

Lin

e S

ha

ftft

to

pu

mp

L.F

.$

5.3

7$

11

.69

$1

7.0

6

NO

TE

S:

(10

) P

um

p R

em

ova

l S

ou

rce

: W

DC

Exp

lora

tio

n 1

2/2

00

5 (

ad

juste

d t

o 2

00

9)

1/1

7/2

01

1C

opyri

ght

© 2

004-2

008 -

SR

CE

Soft

war

e. A

ll R

ights

Res

erved

. 4

of

4M

isc.

Un

it C

osts







EQUIPMENT FLEETS

RIPPINGRip road

Waste rock dumps, heaps, tails - rip flat surfaces

Surface preparation

Scarify

Small Dozer w/ multi-shankD7R $107.52 $57.91 $165.43

Totals $107.52 $57.91 $165.43

Medium Dozer w/ multi-shankD9R $175.69 $57.91 $233.60

Totals $175.69 $57.91 $233.60

Large Dozer w/ multi-shankD10R $226.92 $57.91 $284.83

Totals $226.92 $57.91 $284.83

Grader w/ multi-shank16G/H $154.62 $58.95 $213.57

Totals $154.62 $58.95 $213.57

GRADINGGrading storage and structure areas

Grading waste rock dumps and heaps

Grading landfills

Constructing pit safety berms

Small Dozer FleetD7R $107.52 $57.91 $165.43

Totals $107.52 $57.91 $165.43

Medium Dozer FleetD9R $175.69 $57.91 $233.60

Totals $175.69 $57.91 $233.60

Large Dozer FleetD10R $226.92 $57.91 $284.83

Totals $226.92 $57.91 $284.83

EXPLORATION GRADINGBackfilling and grading exploration trenches

Grading flat exploration roads

1/17/2011Copyright © 2004-2008 - SRCE Software. All Rights Reserved. 1 of 11 Fleets (Crews)







EQUIPMENT FLEETS

Small Dozer FleetD6R $78.86 $57.91 $136.77

Totals $78.86 $57.91 $136.77

Medium Dozer FleetD7R $107.52 $57.91 $165.43

Totals $107.52 $57.91 $165.43

Large Dozer FleetD8R $137.56 $57.91 $195.47

Totals $137.56 $57.91 $195.47

EXCAVATINGEarthen Berms

Diversion ditch backfill

Underground openings backfill - excavate and place

Large Excavator385BL $184.57 $59.23 $243.80

Totals $184.57 $59.23 $243.80

Medium Excavator345B $97.73 $59.23 $156.96

Totals $97.73 $59.23 $156.96

Small Excavator325C $69.27 $59.23 $128.50

Totals $69.27 $59.23 $128.50

EXCAVATE AND RECONTOURRecontour large roads (haul roads, access roads, etc.)Ponds - Excavate and pull liner and bury

Excavation and grading for diversion and drainage control

Large Excavator + Dozer385BL $184.57 $59.23 $243.80

D10R $226.92 $57.91 $284.83

Totals $411.49 $117.14 $528.63

Medium Excavator + Dozer345B $97.73 $59.23 $156.96

D9R $175.69 $57.91 $233.60








EQUIPMENT FLEETS

Totals $273.42 $117.14 $390.56

Small Excavator + Dozer325C $69.27 $59.23 $128.50

D7R $107.52 $57.91 $165.43

Total Equipment $176.79 $117.14 $293.93

EXPLORATION ROAD/PAD RECONTOURRecontour small roads (exploration roads, service roads, etc.)

Cut and Fill reclamation on slopes

Drill pad recountour

Drill sump backfill

Small DozerD6R $78.86 $57.91 $136.77

Totals $78.86 $57.91 $136.77

Large DozerD8R $137.56 $57.91 $195.47

Totals $137.56 $57.91 $195.47

Grader14G/H $111.52 $58.95 $170.47

Totals $111.52 $58.95 $170.47

Small Excavator320C $60.59 $59.23 $119.82

Totals $60.59 $59.23 $119.82

Medium Excavator325C $69.27 $59.23 $128.50

Totals $69.27 $59.23 $128.50

LOAD, HAUL AND PLACE MATERIALRock placement

Haul overburden for backfill

Haul borrow for backfill

Haul cover or growth media

Large Truck/Loader Fleet777D $229.47 $47.24 $276.71

992G $361.85 $61.21 $423.06

D7R $107.52 $57.91 $165.43

Totals $698.84 $166.36 $865.20








EQUIPMENT FLEETS

Small Truck/Loader Fleet769D $117.29 $45.51 $162.80

988G $176.38 $59.23 $235.61

D7R $107.52 $57.91 $165.43

Totals $401.19 $162.65 $563.84

Scraper/Dozer Fleet631G $195.47 $58.72 $254.19

D10R $226.92 $57.91 $284.83

D7R $107.52 $57.91 $165.43

Totals $529.91 $174.54 $704.45

Tandem Scraper Fleet637G PP $270.01 $59.23 $329.24

D7R $107.52 $57.91 $165.43

Totals $377.53 $117.14 $494.67

MISC. LOAD AND HAUL AND EARTHWORKSSludge removal

Drainage controls

Misc. - Cat 325B Excavator / 10-12 yd3 Truck325C $69.27 $59.23 $128.50

Dump Truck (10-12 yd3 ) $100.12 $44.80 $144.92

Totals $169.39 $104.03 $273.42

Misc. - Cat D9R Dozer/ Loader (5 yd3) / 10-12 yd

3 Truck

D9R $175.69 $57.91 $233.60

966G $97.43 $59.23 $156.66

Dump Truck (10-12 yd3 ) $100.12 $44.80 $144.92

Totals $373.24 $161.94 $535.18

Misc. - Cat D6 Dozer / Cat 966 Loader / 10-12 yd3 TruckD6R $78.86 $57.91 $136.77

966G $97.43 $59.23 $156.66

Dump Truck (10-12 yd3 ) $100.12 $44.80 $144.92

Totals $276.41 $161.94 $438.35

CONCRETE BREAKINGSlab demolition

Footing demolition

Wall demolition








EQUIPMENT FLEETS

Small - Cat 325B Excavator w/ H140D s Hammer325C $69.27 $59.23 $128.50

H-120 (fits 325) $30.61 $0.00 $30.61

D9R $175.69 $57.91 $233.60

Totals $275.57 $117.14 $392.71

Medium - Cat 345B Excavator w/ H180D s Hammer345B $97.73 $59.23 $156.96

H-160 (fits 345) $52.87 $0.00 $52.87

D9R $175.69 $57.91 $233.60

Totals $326.29 $117.14 $443.43

Large - Cat 385B Excavator w/ H180D s Hammer385BL $184.57 $59.23 $243.80

H-180 (fits 365/385) $65.50 $0.00 $65.50

D9R $175.69 $57.91 $233.60

Totals $425.76 $117.14 $542.90

DRILL HOLE ABANDONMENT

Drill Hole - Grout or CementPump (plugging) Drill Rig $324.38 $58.72 $383.10

Driller's Helper $0.00 $34.16 $34.16

Driller's Helper $0.00 $34.16 $34.16

Totals $324.38 $127.04 $451.42

Drill Hole - Inert Media (Means Crew B-11M+ 1 Laborer)420D 4WD Backhoe $31.21 $58.95 $90.16

General Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86

Totals $31.21 $92.81 $124.02

Drill Hole - Casing Perforation or RemovalHeavy Duty Drill Rig $324.38 $58.72 $383.10

Driller's Helper $0.00 $34.16 $34.16

Driller's Helper $0.00 $34.16 $34.16

Totals $324.38 $127.04 $451.42

MAINTENANCE FLEETRoad Grading, Dust Suppression, Clean Up

Maintenance - Small Water Truck and Cat 14G Grader613E (5,000 gal) Water Wagon $84.65 $44.80 $129.45

14G/H $111.52 $58.95 $170.47

Totals $196.17 $103.75 $299.92








EQUIPMENT FLEETS

Maintenance - Large Water Truck and Cat 16G Grader621E (8,000 gal) Water Wagon $115.34 $44.80 $160.14

16G/H $154.62 $58.95 $213.57

Totals $269.96 $103.75 $373.71

PROJECT SUPERVISIONSupervisor's Truck $17.34 $0.00 $17.34

Totals $17.34 $0.00 $17.34

MEANS CREW DEFINITIONSCrew composition from Means Heavy Construction 2005 Edition by permission of R.S.Means/Reed Construction Data .

For use with misc. unit costs where Means is the source for productivity

1 Clab - Seedling Planting/Block Wall DemolitionGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86

Totals $0.00 $33.86 $33.86

2 Clab - Barbed Wire/Wood Fence Removal, Corrugated Drainpipe InstallationGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86


Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $25.09 $0.00 $25.09

Totals $25.09 $67.72 $92.81

2 Clab + Excavator - Pond Liner Cut and FoldGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86


325C $69.27 $59.23 $128.50

Totals $69.27 $126.95 $196.22

2 Clab + Welder - Bat GatesGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86


Welding Equipment $15.69 $58.30 $73.99

Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $25.09 $0.00 $25.09

Totals $40.78 $126.02 $166.80

3 Clab - Foam Adit PlugsGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86


420D 4WD Backhoe $31.21 $58.95 $90.16

Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $25.09 $0.00 $25.09

Totals $56.30 $126.67 $182.97

3 Clab + Welder - Culvert Bat Gate








EQUIPMENT FLEETS



Welding Equipment $15.69 $58.30 $73.99

420D 4WD Backhoe $31.21 $58.95 $90.16

Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $25.09 $0.00 $25.09

Totals $71.99 $184.97 $256.96

3 Clab D - 3 Laborers + ForemanGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86



Foreman $17.34 $56.90 $74.24

Supervisor's Truck $17.34 $0.00 $17.34

Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $25.09 $0.00 $25.09

Totals $59.77 $158.48 $218.25

3 SKWK - Liner InstallationSkilled Laborer $0.00 $34.46 $34.46

Skilled Laborer $0.00 $34.46 $34.46


HDEP Welder (pipe or liner) $23.35 $0.00 $23.35

420D 4WD Backhoe $31.21 $58.95 $90.16

Totals $54.56 $162.33 $216.89

B-3 - Small Building DemoltionGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86


Foreman $17.34 $56.90 $74.24

928G $51.09 $58.72 $109.81

Dump Truck (10-12 yd3 ) $100.12 $44.80 $144.92

Dump Truck (10-12 yd3 ) $100.12 $44.80 $144.92

Totals $268.67 $272.94 $541.61

B-6 - Chain Link Fence/Pipeline/Culvert RemovalGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86


928G $51.09 $58.72 $109.81

Totals $51.09 $126.44 $177.53

B-8 - Large Building DemolitionGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86


Foreman $17.34 $56.90 $74.24

928G $36.97 $58.72 $95.69

25 Ton Crane $78.03 $59.23 $137.26








EQUIPMENT FLEETS

Dump Truck (10-12 yd3 ) $100.12 $44.80 $144.92

Dump Truck (10-12 yd3 ) $100.12 $44.80 $144.92

Totals $332.58 $332.17 $664.75

B-9 - Concrete Wall DemolitionGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86




Foreman $17.34 $56.90 $74.24

Air Compressor + tools $22.36 $55.44 $77.80

Totals $39.70 $247.78 $287.48

B-10Y - General CompactionGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86

CS563E Vibratory Roller $62.91 $56.90 $119.81

Totals $62.91 $90.76 $153.67

B-11L - Fine Grading for Evaporation Pond Liner BaseGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86

14G/H $111.52 $58.95 $170.47

Totals $111.52 $92.81 $204.33

B-11M - Backhoe Work420D 4WD Backhoe $31.21 $58.95 $90.16

Totals $31.21 $58.95 $90.16

B-12G - Rip-Rap Machine Placed (Modified)966G $97.43 $59.23 $156.66

325C $69.27 $59.23 $128.50

Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $25.09 $0.00 $25.09

Totals $191.79 $118.46 $310.25

B-13 - Grouted Rip-Rap & Gabion BasketsGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86




Foreman $17.34 $56.90 $74.24

25 Ton Crane $99.33 $59.23 $158.56

Totals $116.67 $251.57 $368.24









EQUIPMENT FLEETS

325C $69.27 $59.23 $128.50

Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $25.09 $0.00 $25.09

Totals $191.79 $118.46 $310.25


325C $69.27 $59.23 $128.50

Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $25.09 $0.00 $25.09

Totals $191.79 $118.46 $310.25

B-14 PVC Drain Pipe InstallationForeman $0.00 $56.90 $56.90





420D 4WD Backhoe $31.21 $58.95 $90.16

Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $25.09 $0.00 $25.09

Totals $56.30 $251.29 $307.59

B-22A - HDEP Installation - Pipe or LinerForeman $17.34 $56.90 $74.24




Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $25.09 $0.00 $25.09

5 Ton Crane Truck $29.73 $58.95 $88.68

Generator 5KW $9.41 $0.00 $9.41

HDEP Welder (pipe or liner) $23.35 $0.00 $23.35

Totals $104.92 $218.03 $322.95

B-80A - Install Barbed Wire FenceGeneral Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86



Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $25.09 $0.00 $25.09

Totals $25.09 $101.58 $126.67

B-80C - Install Chain Link Fence (Flatbed truck has small crane)General Laborer $0.00 $33.86 $33.86



Light Truck - 1.5 Ton $25.09 $0.00 $25.09

Totals $25.09 $101.58 $126.67








EQUIPMENT FLEETS

C-14B - Elevated Concrete Slabs (Reinforced Concrete Shaft Covers)Foreman $17.34 $56.90 $74.24

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44



Rodmen (reinforcing concrete) $0.00 $33.98 $33.98




Cement finisher $0.00 $34.16 $34.16


Gas Engine Vibrator $7.76 $56.90 $64.66

Concrete Pump $91.22 $0.00 $91.22

Totals $116.32 $1,048.80 $1,165.12

C-14D - Concrete Walls Formed in Place (Reinforced Concrete Adit Bulkheads)Foreman $17.34 $56.90 $74.24

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44








EQUIPMENT FLEETS

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44

Carpenter $0.00 $41.44 $41.44






Gas Engine Vibrator $7.76 $56.90 $64.66

Concrete Pump $91.22 $0.00 $91.22

Totals $116.32 $1,029.56 $1,145.88


Pro

du

cti

vit

y -

Bu

lld

oze

rs

Descri

pti

on

D11R

D10R

D9R

D8R

D7R

D6R

Bla

de W

idth

(S

U)

18.3

3 ft

15.9

2 ft

14.1

7 ft

12.9

2 ft

12.0

8 ft

10.6

7 ft

Shank G

uage (

3 s

hanks)

9.8

3 ft

8.6

7 ft

7.6

7 ft

7.0

8 ft

6.5

0 ft

6.5

0 ft

Pocket S

pacin

g4.7

5 ft

4.3

3 ft

3.8

7 ft

3.5

8 ft

3.2

5 ft

3.2

5 ft

Rip

pin

g W

idth

(R

ipper

+ 1

Pocket)

14.5

8 ft

13.0

0 ft

11.5

4 ft

10.6

6 ft

9.7

5 ft

9.7

5 ft

Rip

pin

g S

peed

1.0

mph

1.0

mph

1.0

mph

1.0

mph

1.0

mph

1.0

mph

Rip

pin

g M

aneuver

(turn

) T

ime

0.2

5 m

in0.2

5 m

in0.2

5 m

in0.2

5 m

in0.2

5 m

in0.2

5 m

in

Rip

pin

g H

ourly P

roduction (

exclu

din

g

maneuvering tim

e)

5280 ft

5280 ft

5280 ft

5280 ft

5280 ft

5280 ft

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

Avera

ge

Do

zin

g

Dis

tan

ce

(feet)

D11R

D10R

D9R

D8R

D7R

D6R

50

4800

2800

2000

1400

1000

100

2800

1700

1250

850

700

520

200

1500

950

700

475

375

210

300

1000

625

450

275

250

150

400

750

500

300

175

500

600

410

250

125

600

500

350

200

100

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

dozer

pro

ductivity =

k x

Dozin

g D

ista

nce

p

(see g

raph)

k =

185082

81639

89889

115087

22719

101029

p =

-0.9

19

-0.8

502

-0.9

425

-1.0

809

-0.7

796

-1.1

506

Pro

du

cti

vit

y -

Bu

lld

oze

rs (

co

nt.

)

% G

rad

e

-30

-20

-10 0 10

20

30

% G

rade D

ozin

g F

acto

r =

-0

.02

14

x +

0.9

78

6

(see g

raph)

OP

ER

AT

OR

Avera

ge

0.7

5

MA

TE

RIA

L(1

)

1.4

0.3

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

Pro

du

cti

on

(L

CY

/hr)

% G

rad

e v

s. D

ozin

g F

acto

r

Do

zer

Pro

du

cti

vit

y v

s. G

rad

ing

Dis

tan

ce

Do

zer

Sp

ecif

icati

on

s

1.6

Do

zin

g F

acto

r

0.5

5

1.2 1 0.8

Jo

b C

on

dit

ion

Co

rrecti

on

Facto

rs -

Bu

lld

ozers

Do

zer

Pro

du

cti

vit

y (

Sem

i-U

Bla

de)

y =

18

50

82x

-0.9

19

y =

81

639

x-0

.85

02

y =

89

88

9x

-0.9

425

y =

11

508

7x

-1.0

80

9

y =

227

19x

-0.7

796

y =

10

102

9x

-1.1

506

0

50

0

10

00

15

00

20

00

25

00

30

00

01

00

200

300

400

500

600

70

0

Do

zin

g D

ista

nc

e (

fee

t)

LCY/hr

D11

R

D10

R

D9R

D8R

D7R

D6R

% G

rad

e v

s.

Do

zin

g F

ac

tor

y =

-0

.02

14

x +

0.9

78

6

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.81

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

-30

-20

-10

01

02

03

0

% G

rad

e (

- D

ow

nh

ill,

+ U

ph

ill)

Dozing Factor

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

dtio

n 3

5

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e. A

ll R

igh

ts R

eser

ved

. 1 o

f 8

Pro

ductivity

Loose s

tockpile

1.2

0

Norm

al

1.0

0

Hard

to c

ut; fro

zen —

with tilt

cylin

der

0.8

0

Hard

to d

rift; “d

ead”

(dry

,non-c

ohesiv

e

mate

rial) o

r very

sticky m

ate

rial

0.8

0

Rock, ripped o

r bla

ste

d0.6

0

1.2

0

VIS

IBIL

ITY

Good c

onditio

ns

1.0

0

JO

B E

FF

ICIE

NC

Y

50 m

in/h

r0.8

3

(1)

Se

lecte

d in

fa

cili

ty w

ork

sh

ee

ts.

Oth

er

facto

rs in

clu

de

d a

s s

tan

da

rd f

acto

rs.

Mate

rial D

en

sit

ies

(1)

Mate

rial

lb/c

ykg

/m3

Allu

viu

m2,9

00

1,7

20

Note

: uses S

and &

Gra

vel -

Dry

fro

m C

ate

rpill

ar

Handbook

Basalt

3,3

00

1,9

60

Cla

y -

Dry

2,5

00

1,4

80

Gra

nite -

bro

ken

2,8

00

1,6

60

Gra

vel

2,5

50

1,5

10

LS

- b

roken

2,6

00

1,5

40

LS

- c

rushed

2,6

00

1,5

40

Sandsto

ne

2,5

50

1,5

10

Shale

2,1

00

1,2

50

Sto

ne -

cru

shed

2,7

00

1,6

00

Taili

ngs -

Coars

e (

dry

, lo

ose s

and)

2,4

00

1,4

20

Taili

ngs -

Slim

es (

loose s

and &

cla

y)

2,7

00

1,6

00

Topsoil

1,6

00

950

(1)

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok

Ed

itio

n 3

5

Pro

du

cti

vit

y -

Sc

rap

ers

Scra

per

Sp

ecif

icati

on

sD

escri

pti

on

631G

637G

PP

Em

pty

Weig

ht

100,6

00 lb

112,7

60 lb

Paylo

ad C

apacity

Str

uck

24 c

y24 c

y

Heaped

34 c

y34 c

y

Avera

ge

29 c

y29 c

y

Loaded b

yO

ne D

10R

Self*

Load T

ime

0.5

min

0.5

min

Maneuver

and S

pre

ad

0.7

min

0.6

min

Job E

ffic

iency

0.8

30.8

3

Rolli

ng R

esis

tance**

2.5

%2.5

%

* R

equires p

air

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

Weig

ht

of

Mate

rials

Mate

rial

lb/c

y

Scra

per

Lo

ad

lb

Lo

ad

ed

Weig

ht

(lb

s)

22.0

%16.0

%10.0

%5.0

%1.0

%

Lo

ad

ed

Weig

ht

(lb

s)

25.0

%20.0

%15.0

%10.0

%5.0

%1.0

%

Allu

viu

m2,9

00

84,1

00

184,7

00

7.5

10

13

33

33

196,8

60

710

10

18.5

34

34

Basalt

3,3

00

95,7

00

196,3

00

7.5

10

13

24.5

33

208,4

60

710

10

18.5

25

34

637G

PP

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

**A

firm

, sm

ooth

, ro

lling r

oadw

ay w

ith d

irt or

light surf

acin

g, flexin

g s

lightly u

nder

load o

r undula

ting, m

ain

tain

ed fairly

regula

rly, w

ate

red

Do

wn

hill S

cra

per

Sp

eed

- G

rad

e R

eta

rdin

g v

s. E

ffecti

ve G

rad

e (

Gra

de -

Ro

llin

g R

esis

tan

ce)

SL

OT

DO

ZIN

G O

R S

IDE

BY

SID

E

DO

ZIN

G(1

)

631G

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e. A

ll R

igh

ts R

eser

ved

. 2 o

f 8

Pro

ductivity

Cla

y -

Dry

2,5

00

72,5

00

173,1

00

7.5

10

13

33

33

185,2

60

710

10

18.5

34

34

Gra

nite -

bro

ken

2,8

00

81,2

00

181,8

00

7.5

10

13

33

33

193,9

60

710

10

18.5

34

34

Gra

vel

2,5

50

73,9

50

174,5

50

7.5

10

13

33

33

186,7

10

710

10

18.5

34

34

LS

- b

roken

2,6

00

75,4

00

176,0

00

7.5

10

13

33

33

188,1

60

710

10

18.5

34

34

LS

- c

rushed

2,6

00

75,4

00

176,0

00

7.5

10

13

33

33

188,1

60

710

10

18.5

34

34

Sandsto

ne

2,5

50

73,9

50

174,5

50

7.5

10

13

33

33

186,7

10

710

10

18.5

34

34

Shale

2,1

00

60,9

00

161,5

00

7.5

10

18

33

33

173,6

60

10

10

13.5

18.5

34

34

Sto

ne -

cru

shed

2,7

00

78,3

00

178,9

00

7.5

10

13

33

33

191,0

60

710

10

18.5

34

34

Taili

ngs -

Coars

e (

dry

, lo

ose s

and)

2,4

00

69,6

00

170,2

00

7.5

10

13

33

33

182,3

60

710

10

18.5

34

34

Taili

ngs -

Slim

es (

loose s

and &

cla

y)

2,7

00

78,3

00

178,9

00

7.5

10

13

33

33

191,0

60

710

10

18.5

34

34

Topsoil

1,6

00

46,4

00

147,0

00

7.5

10

18

33

33

159,1

60

10

10

13.5

18.5

34

34

Em

pty

10

18

24.5

33

33

Em

pty

10

10

13.5

18.5

34

34

Sourc

e: C

ate

rpill

ar

Perf

orm

ance H

andbook E

ditio

n 3

4

Pro

du

cti

vit

y -

Sc

rap

ers

(c

on

t.)

0 0 0 0 0

0.5

12

34

5k

p0

0.0

%825

2250

5300

2142.7

1.3

418

0

2.0

%750

1800

4600

1838.1

1.3

083

4.0

%550

1400

3000

4800

6700

1310.7

1.1

893

6.0

%490

1000

2200

3300

4500

5600

1022.1

1.0

66

0

8.0

%375

750

1600

2500

3300

4200

769.0

11.0

558

10.0

%300

700

1300

2000

2750

3450

645.8

41.0

424

12.0

%250

550

1100

1700

2250

2800

531.0

41.0

453

14.0

%225

450

900

1400

1850

2250

452.0

71.0

089

Tra

vel T

ime (

min

) =

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

0.5

12

34

5k

p

0.0

%1100

2550

5550

2496.9

1.1

675

2.0

%950

2400

5300

2294.8

1.2

4

4.0

%800

2100

4750

1998.3

1.2

849

6.0

%700

1600

3550

5550

1557.5

1.1

566

8.0

%600

1300

2750

4300

5750

1287.8

1.0

891

10.0

%500

1100

2250

3450

4550

5750

1068.1

1.0

552

12.0

%450

900

1950

2950

3950

4950

923.5

61.0

492

14.0

%375

800

1600

2500

3300

4200

783.3

71.0

444

Tra

vel T

ime (

min

) =

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

631G

Scra

per

Tra

vel T

ime -

Up

hill E

mp

ty

To

tal R

esis

tan

ce (

%)

(ro

llin

g +

gra

de

)T

ime (

min

)

631G

Scra

per

Tra

vel T

ime -

Up

hill L

oad

ed

Tim

e (

min

)T

ota

l R

esis

tan

ce (

%)

(ro

llin

g +

gra

de)

p

k

dis

tance

p

k

dis

tance

631G

Tra

vel Tim

e - L

oaded

y =

2142.7

x1.3

418

y =

1838.1

x1.3

083

y =

1310.7

x1.1

893

y =

1022.1

x1.0

66

y =

769.0

1x

1.0

558

y =

645.8

4x

1.0

424

y =

531.0

4x

1.0

453

y =

452.0

7x

1.0

089

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

01

23

45

Tim

e (m

in)

Distance (fee

0.0

%

2.0

%

4.0

%

6.0

%

8.0

%

10.0

%

12.0

%

14.0

%

Sourc

e: Cate

rpillar Perf

orm

ance H

andbook

Edition 3

4

631G

Tra

vel Tim

e - U

phill Em

pty

y =

2496.9

x1.1

675

y =

2294.8

x1.2

4

y =

1998.3

x1.2

849

y =

1577.5

x1.1

566

y =

1287.8

x1.0

891

y =

1068.1

x1.0

552

y =

923.5

6x

1.0

492

y =

783.3

7x

1.0

444

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

01

23

45

Tim

e (m

in)

Distance (fee

0.0

%

2.0

%

4.0

%

6.0

%

8.0

%

10.0

%

12.0

%

14.0

%

SC

illP

fH

db

kEdii

34

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e. A

ll R

igh

ts R

eser

ved

. 3 o

f 8

Pro

ductivity

Pro

du

cti

vit

y -

Sc

rap

ers

(c

on

t.)

0.5

12

34

5k

p

0.0

%1000

2500

5550

2402.9

1.2

362

2.0

%850

2200

5150

2127.6

1.2

995

4.0

%700

1700

3900

6250

1659.4

1.2

212

6.0

%600

1300

2750

4300

5750

1287.8

1.0

891

8.0

%500

1100

2200

3300

4500

5600

1059.1

1.0

421

10.0

%400

850

1750

2700

3600

4475

839.8

91.0

503

12.0

%375

750

1500

2300

3000

3800

751.5

81.0

055

14.0

%275

600

1300

2000

2650

3250

595.2

81.0

794

Tra

vel T

ime (

min

) =

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

0.5

12

34

5k

p

0.0

%1250

2750

5700

2695.9

1.0

945

2.0

%1200

2600

5550

2587.1

1.1

047

4.0

%990

2450

5250

2335.2

1.0

234

6.0

%800

2000

4450

7216

1914.4

1.2

211

8.0

%700

1600

3500

5400

7216

1563.8

1.1

24

10.0

%625

1350

2800

4300

5750

7216

1327.4

1.0

611

12.0

%550

1200

2450

3750

5000

6250

1168.8

1.0

524

14.0

%495

1010

2100

3200

4250

5300

1015.8

1.0

337

Tra

vel T

ime (

min

) =

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

Pro

du

cti

vit

y -

Ha

ul

Tru

ck

s

Hau

l T

ruck S

pecif

icati

on

sD

escri

pti

on

769D

777D

Chassis

Weig

ht

53,5

06 lb

111,5

75 lb

Body W

eig

ht

17,2

00 lb

36,7

88 lb

Sta

ndard

Lin

er

Weig

ht

Tota

l T

ruck W

eig

ht

70,7

06 lb

148,3

63 lb

To

tal R

esis

tan

ce (

%)

(ro

llin

g +

gra

de

)T

ime (

min

)

637G

Pu

sh

-Pu

ll S

cra

per

Tra

vel T

ime -

Up

hill E

mp

ty

To

tal R

esis

tan

ce (

%)

(ro

llin

g +

gra

de

)T

ime (

min

)

637G

Pu

sh

-Pu

ll S

cra

per

Tra

vel T

ime -

Up

hill L

oad

ed

p

k

dis

tance

p

k

dis

tance

Tim

e (m

in)

Sourc

e: Cate

rpillar Perf

orm

ance H

andbook

Edition 3

4

637G

PP T

ravel Tim

e - L

oaded

y =

2402.9

x1.2

362

y =

2127.6

x1.2

995

y =

1659.4

x1.2

212

y =

1287.8

x1.0

891

y =

1059.1

x1.0

421

y =

839.8

9x

1.0

503

y =

751.5

8x

1.0

055

y =

595.2

8x

1.0

794

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

01

23

45

Tim

e (m

in)

Distance (fee

0.0

%

2.0

%

4.0

%

6.0

%

8.0

%

10.0

%

12.0

%

14.0

%

Sourc

e: Cate

rpillar Perf

orm

ance H

andbook

Edition 3

4

637G

PP

Tra

ve

l T

ime -

Lo

ad

ed

y =

26

95

.9x1

.0945

y =

25

87

.1x1

.1047

y =

23

35

.2x1

.2034

y =

19

14

.4x1

.2211

y =

15

63

.8x1

.124

y =

132

7.4

x1.0

611

y =

11

68.8

x1.0

524

y =

10

15

.8x1

.0337

0

10

00

20

00

30

00

40

00

50

00

60

00

70

00

80

00

00

.51

1.5

22.5

33

.54

4.5

5

Tim

e (

min

)

Distance (feet)

0.0

%

2.0

%

4.0

%

6.0

%

8.0

%

10

.0%

12

.0%

14

.0%

So

urc

e:

Cate

rpill

ar

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

4

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e. A

ll R

igh

ts R

eser

ved

. 4 o

f 8

Pro

ductivity

Paylo

ad C

apacity

Str

uck

21.6

cy

55 c

y

Heaped

31.7

cy

78.6

cy

Avera

ge

26.6

5 c

y66.8

cy

Maneuver

to L

oad T

ime

0.7

min

0.7

min

Maneuver

and D

um

p T

ime

1.1

min

1.1

min

Job E

ffic

iency

0.8

30.8

3

Rolli

ng R

esis

tance**

2.5

%2.5

%

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

Do

wn

hill H

au

l T

ruck S

peed

- G

rad

e R

eta

rdin

g v

s. E

ffecti

ve G

rad

e (

Gra

de -

Ro

llin

g R

esis

tan

ce)

Mate

rial

lb/c

y

Tru

ck

(769D

) L

oad

lb

Tru

ck

(777D

) L

oad

lb

Lo

ad

ed

Weig

ht

(lb

s)

20.0

%15.0

%10.0

%5.0

%

Lo

ad

ed

Weig

ht

(lb

s)

20.0

%15.0

%10.0

%5.0

%

Allu

viu

m2,9

00

77,2

85

193,7

20

147,9

91

11

11

15

26

342,0

83

79

12

29

Basalt

3,3

00

87,9

45

220,4

40

158,6

51

11

11

11

20

368,8

03

77

12

21

Cla

y -

Dry

2,5

00

66,6

25

167,0

00

137,3

31

11

11

15

26

315,3

63

79

16

29

Gra

nite -

bro

ken

2,8

00

74,6

20

187,0

40

145,3

26

11

11

15

26

335,4

03

79

12

29

Gra

vel

2,5

50

67,9

58

170,3

40

138,6

64

11

11

15

26

318,7

03

79

16

29

LS

- b

roken

2,6

00

69,2

90

173,6

80

139,9

96

11

11

15

26

322,0

43

79

12

29

LS

- c

rushed

2,6

00

69,2

90

173,6

80

139,9

96

11

11

15

26

322,0

43

79

12

29

Sandsto

ne

2,5

50

67,9

58

170,3

40

138,6

64

11

11

15

26

318,7

03

79

16

29

Shale

2,1

00

55,9

65

140,2

80

126,6

71

11

11

15

26

288,6

43

79

16

29

Sto

ne -

cru

shed

2,7

00

71,9

55

180,3

60

142,6

61

11

11

15

26

328,7

23

79

12

29

Taili

ngs -

Coars

e (

dry

, lo

ose s

and)

2,4

00

69,6

00

170,2

00

Taili

ngs -

Slim

es (

loose s

and &

cla

y)

2,7

00

78,3

00

178,9

00

Topsoil

1,6

00

42,6

40

106,8

80

113,3

46

11

11

15

26

255,2

43

912

16

29

Em

pty

15

15

26

36

Em

pty

16

16

29

39

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

0.4

12

34

5k

p

0.0

%1148

3428

7183

3316.3

1.1

422

2.0

%951

2821

5904

2733

1.1

372

4.0

%689

1984

4198

6330

1928.3

1.1

033

6.0

%508

1427

2952

4510

6002

1386.4

1.0

725

8.0

%394

1082

2263

3411

4592

5740

1061.8

1.0

6

10.0

%328

869

1771

2690

3608

4510

857.8

21.0

373

15.0

%213

574

1181

1804

2394

3018

565

1.0

482

Tra

vel T

ime (

min

) =

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

Pro

du

cti

vit

y -

Ha

ul

Tru

ck

s (

co

nt.

)

0.4

12

34

5k

p

0.0

%1427

3870

3870

1.0

888

Tim

e (

min

)T

ota

l R

esis

tan

ce (

%)

(ro

llin

g +

gra

de

)

769D

769D

Hau

l T

ruck T

ravel T

ime -

Up

hill E

mp

ty

To

tal R

esis

tan

ce (

%)

(ro

llin

g +

gra

de

)T

ime (

min

)

769D

Hau

l T

ruck T

ravel T

ime -

Up

hill L

oad

ed

777D

Weig

ht

of

Mate

rials

**A

firm

, sm

ooth

, ro

lling r

oadw

ay w

ith d

irt or

light surf

acin

g, flexin

g s

lightly u

nder

p

k

dis

tance

769D T

ravel Tim

e - L

oaded

y =

3316.3

x1.1

422

y =

2733x

1.1

372

y =

1928.3

x1.1

033

y =

1386.4

x1.0

725

y =

1061.8

x1.0

6

y =

857.8

2x

1.0

373

y =

565x

1.0

482

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

01

23

45

Tim

e (m

in)

Distance (fee

0.0

%

2.0

%

4.0

%

6.0

%

8.0

%

10.0

%

15.0

%

Sourc

e: Cate

rpillar Perf

orm

ance H

andbook

Edition 3

4

769D T

ravel Tim

e - E

mpty

y =

3870x

1.0

888

y =

3400.1

x1.0

895

6000

7000

8000

0.0

%

4.0

%

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e. A

ll R

igh

ts R

eser

ved

. 5 o

f 8

Pro

ductivity

4.0

%1246

3444

7183

3400.1

1.0

895

6.0

%1017

2755

5740

2734.5

1.0

759

8.0

%820

2230

4592

6954

2191.3

1.0

614

10.0

%722

1870

3870

5838

1872

1.0

391

15.0

%459

1246

2558

3903

5248

6560

1222.9

1.0

523

Tra

vel T

ime (

min

) =

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

0.4

12

34

5k

p

0.0

%656

2558

6068

2403.1

1.3

876

4.0

%459

1509

3313

5215

7085

1412

1.1

863

6.0

%394

1148

2460

3706

5018

6298

1111

1.0

949

8.0

%918

1886

2837

3772

4756

922.5

71.0

197

10.0

%722

1443

2165

2919

3608

721.4

41.0

027

15.0

%525

1017

1558

2034

2591

520.5

60.9

905

Tra

vel T

ime (

min

) =

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

Pro

du

cti

vit

y -

Ha

ul

Tru

ck

s (

co

nt.

)

0.4

12

34

5k

p

0.0

%968

3034

6560

2929.3

1.1

92

4.0

%754

2657

6068

2532.8

1.2

999

6.0

%656

2247

5182

2167.3

1.2

873

8.0

%607

1935

4248

6560

1846.2

1.1

831

10.0

%525

1607

3378

5215

7282

1528.4

1.1

332

15.0

%410

1197

2460

3706

4986

6232

1139.7

1.0

72

Tra

vel T

ime (

min

) =

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

777D

Hau

l T

ruck T

ravel T

ime -

Up

hill E

mp

ty

To

tal R

esis

tan

ce (

%)

(ro

llin

g +

gra

de

)T

ime (

min

)

777D

Hau

l T

ruck T

ravel T

ime -

Up

hill L

oad

ed

To

tal R

esis

tan

ce (

%)

(ro

llin

g +

gra

de

)T

ime (

min

)

p

k

dis

tance

p

k

dis

tance

p

k

dis

tance

y=

3400.1

x

y =

2734.5

x1.0

759

y =

2191.3

x1.0

614

y =

1872x

1.0

391

y =

1222.9

x1.0

523

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

01

23

45

Tim

e (m

in)

Distance (fee

6.0

%

8.0

%

10.0

%

15.0

%

Sourc

e: Cate

rpillar Perf

orm

ance H

andbook

Edition 3

4

777D T

ravel Tim

e - U

phill Loaded

y =

2403.1

x1.3

876

y =

1421x

1.1

863

y =

1111x

1.0

949

y =

922.5

7x

1.0

197

y =

721.4

4x

1.0

027

y =

520.5

6x

0.9

905

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

01

23

45

Tim

e (m

in)

Distance (fee

0.0

%

4.0

%

6.0

%

8.0

%

10.0

%

15.0

%

Sourc

e: Cate

rpillar Perf

orm

ance H

andbook

Edition 3

4

777D T

ravel Tim

e - U

phill Em

pty

y =

2929.3

x1.1

92

y =

2532.8

x1.2

999

y =

2167.3

x1.2

873

y =

1846.2

x1.1

831

y =

1528.4

x1.1

332

y =

1139.7

x1.0

72

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

01

23

45

Distance (fee

0.0

%

4.0

%

6.0

%

8.0

%

10.0

%

15.0

%

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e. A

ll R

igh

ts R

eser

ved

. 6 o

f 8

Pro

ductivity

Pro

du

cti

vit

y -

Wh

ee

l L

oa

de

rs

Wh

eel L

oad

er

Sp

ecif

icati

on

sD

escri

pti

on

928G

966G

972G

988G

992G

Wheele

d L

oaders

Genera

l P

urp

ose

Spade N

ose-R

ock

Paylo

ad C

apacity

928G

3.2

5 c

ubic

yard

not availa

ble

Str

uck

2.5

cy

4.4

6 c

y4.7

1 c

y6.9

cy

13.2

cy

966G

5.0

cubic

yard

not availa

ble

Heaped

3.2

5 c

y5 c

y5.5

cy

8.3

3 c

y16 c

y972G

5.5

cubic

yard

not availa

ble

Avera

ge

2.8

8 c

y4.7

3 c

y5.1

1 c

y7.6

2 c

y14.6

0 c

y988G

not availa

ble

8.3

cubic

yard

Matc

hed T

ruck

N/A

N/A

N/A

769D

777D

992G

not availa

ble

16.0

cubic

yard

Avera

ge C

ycle

Tim

e0.4

5 m

in0.5

0 m

in0.5

0 m

in0.5

5 m

in0.6

0 m

in

Passes to F

ill T

ruck

N/A

N/A

N/A

45

note

: c

apacitie

s a

re 2

:1 h

eaped, S

AE

sta

ndard

s

Tim

e to F

ill T

ruck

N/A

N/A

N/A

2.2

93.2

3N

OT

ES

: B

uckets

for

both

Tra

ck E

xcavato

rs a

nd W

heel Loaders

are

offere

d b

y C

EC

o &

Rolli

ng R

esis

tance**

2.5

%2.5

%2.5

%2.5

%2.5

%availa

ble

for

the r

enta

l ra

tes q

uote

d. B

ucket siz

es a

nd c

apacitie

s o

bta

ined fro

m C

AT

ER

PIL

LA

R

PE

RF

OR

MA

NC

E H

AN

DB

OO

K, E

D 3

4; S

ection 1

2, W

heel Loader

and S

ection 4

, E

xcavato

rs

Bucket capacity a

nd w

idth

dic

tate

d b

y m

ate

rial w

eig

ht and c

onfigura

tion, ie

., s

hot, loose,

**A

firm

, sm

ooth

, ro

lling r

oadw

ay w

ith

tight bank, sto

ckpile

, ro

ck, etc

. T

ypic

al N

evada a

pplic

ations w

ere

used to d

ete

rmin

e a

bove

bucket capacitie

s a

s r

ela

ted to m

ate

rials

& d

ensitie

s. J

ob s

ite s

pecific

s m

ay a

lter

specific

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5bucket re

quirem

ents

. (C

ashm

an E

quip

ment, E

lko, N

evada -

Febru

ary

21, 2005)

Pro

du

cti

vit

y -

Mo

tor

Gra

de

rs

Mo

tor

Gra

der

Sp

ecif

icati

on

sD

escri

pti

on

14G

/H16G

/H

Gra

der

Wid

th9.2

5 ft

10.0

8 ft

Bla

de W

idth

14.0

0 ft

16.0

0 ft

Rip

per

Wid

th (

7 s

hanks)

8.5

0 ft

9.7

5 ft

Road M

ain

tence S

peed

Min

imum

3.0

mph

3.0

mph

Maxim

um

9.5

mph

9.5

mph

Avera

ge

6.3

mph

6.3

mph

Hourly P

roduction

33000 ft

33000 ft

Rip

pin

g S

peed

1.0

mph

1.0

mph

Min

imum

0.0

mph

0.0

mph

Maxim

um

3.0

mph

3.0

mph

Avera

ge

1.5

mph

1.5

mph

Hourly P

roduction (

exclu

din

g m

anuever

tim

e)

7920 ft

7920 ft

Maneuver

tim

e p

er

pass

0.5

min

0.5

min

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

Pro

du

cti

vit

y -

Ex

ca

va

tors

Tra

ck E

xcavato

r S

pecif

icati

on

sT

rack E

xcavato

rsH

vy D

uty

Rock

Hvy D

uty

Tre

nch

Descri

pti

on

320C

325C

345B

385B

L

Bucket C

apacity

1.5

7 c

y2.2

2 c

y3 c

y7.3

cy

320C

30"

.78 c

ubic

yd

55.1

", 1

.57 c

ubic

yard

23.6

", .54 y

ard

Fill

Facto

r0.9

00.9

00.9

00.9

0325C

36",

1.2

5 c

ubic

yd

60",

2.2

2 c

ubic

yard

30",

.88 c

ubic

yard

Avera

ge B

ucket Load

1.4

13 c

y1.9

98 c

y2.7

cy

6.5

7 c

y345B

43.2

", 1

.69 c

ubic

yd

65",

3.0

cubic

yd

48",

2.0

9 c

ubic

yd

Soil

Type

hard

cla

yhard

cla

yhard

cla

yhard

cla

y385B

L85",

6.3

0 c

ubic

yd.

96.0

, 7.3

0 c

ubic

yd

57",

2.7

5 c

uic

yd

Job C

onditio

nm

ed-h

ard

med-h

ard

med-h

ard

med-h

ard

Cycle

Tim

es (

min

ute

s)

- based o

n h

ard

cla

y

Load B

ucket

0.0

90.0

90.1

30.1

9

Sw

ing L

oaded

0.0

60.0

60.0

70.0

6

Dum

p B

ucket

0.0

30.0

40.0

20.0

3

Sw

ing E

mpty

0.0

50.0

60.0

60.0

7N

ote

: c

apacitie

s a

re 2

:1 h

eaped, S

AE

sta

ndard

s

Tota

l C

ycle

Tim

e0.2

30.2

50.2

80.3

5N

OT

ES

: B

uckets

for

both

Tra

ck E

xcavato

rs a

nd W

heel Loaders

are

offere

d b

y C

EC

o &

Job E

ffic

iency

0.8

30.8

30.8

30.8

3availa

ble

for

the r

enta

l ra

tes q

uote

d. B

ucket siz

es a

nd c

apacitie

s o

bta

ined fro

m C

AT

ER

PIL

LA

R

Opera

tor

Effic

iency

0.7

50.7

50.7

50.7

5P

ER

FO

RM

AN

CE

HA

ND

BO

OK

, E

D 3

4; S

ection 1

2, W

heel Loader

and S

ection 4

, E

xcavato

rs

Corr

ecte

d P

roductivity (

LC

Y/h

r)229 c

y299 c

y360 c

y701 c

yB

ucket capacity a

nd w

idth

dic

tate

d b

y m

ate

rial w

eig

ht and c

onfigura

tion,

ie., s

hot, loose,

Explo

ration R

oad C

ycle

Tim

e (1

)0.3

80.4

0N

/AN

/Atight bank, sto

ckpile

, ro

ck, etc

. T

ypic

al N

evada a

pplic

ations w

ere

used to d

ete

rmin

e a

bove

Explo

ration R

oad C

orr

Pro

d (

LC

Y/h

r)139 c

y187 c

yN

/AN

/Abucket capacitie

s a

s r

ela

ted to m

ate

rials

& d

ensitie

s. J

ob s

ite s

pecific

s m

ay a

lter

specific

Tra

ck W

idth

9.1

7 ft

9.8

3 ft

11.4

2 ft

11.5

0 ft

bucket re

quirem

ents

( C

ashm

an E

quip

ment, E

lko, N

evada -

Febru

ary

21, 2005)

Ditch/T

rench E

xcavation

Bucket C

apcity

0.4

5 c

y0.8

8 c

y2.0

9 c

y2.7

5 c

y

Extr

em

e S

erv

ice E

xc

(e.g

. haulroad r

econto

ur)

01

23

45

Tim

e (m

in)

Sourc

e: Cate

rpillar Perf

orm

ance H

andbook

Edition 3

4

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e. A

ll R

igh

ts R

eser

ved

. 7 o

f 8

Pro

ductivity

Fill

Facto

r0.5

00.5

00.5

00.5

0

Corr

ecte

d P

roductivity (

LC

Y/h

r)37 c

y66 c

y139 c

y147 c

y

(1)

Explo

ration c

ycle

tim

e a

ssum

es feath

ering/s

mooth

ing p

erf

orm

ed b

y e

xcavato

rS

ou

rce

: C

ate

rpill

ar

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

Co

nc

rete

Bre

ak

ing

Pro

du

cti

on

Tra

ck E

xcavato

r w

/Ham

mer

Sp

ecif

icati

on

sD

escri

pti

on

325C

345B

385B

Hydra

ulic

Ham

mer

H120D

sH

160D

sH

180D

s

Mate

rial

Min

Shift P

roduction (

8hr)

160 c

y300 c

y350 c

y

Max S

hift P

roduction (

8hr)

300 c

y850 c

y1550 c

y

Avg S

hift P

roduction (

8hr)

230 c

y575 c

y950 c

y

Job E

ffic

iency

0.8

30.8

30.8

3

So

urc

e:

Ca

terp

illa

r P

erf

orm

an

ce

Ha

nd

bo

ok E

ditio

n 3

5

Dri

ll H

ole

Plu

gg

ing

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Dri

ll H

ole

Plu

gg

ing

Pro

du

cti

vit

y

Descri

pti

on

Dri

ll R

igP

um

p R

ig

Move-t

o-h

ole

, set-

up, te

ar-

dow

n1.5

hr

1.5

hr

Pulli

ng c

asin

g (

thre

aded, not cem

ente

d)

80 ft/hr

Sin

gle

-pass p

erf

ora

ting (

wate

r w

ells

)

4-inch

240 ft/hr

6-inch

240 ft/hr

8-inch

200 ft/hr

12-inch

150 ft/hr

18-inch

40 ft/hr

Perf

ora

tion s

etu

p,trip in/o

ut,te

ar-

dow

n ti m

1.0

hr

Perf

ora

tion tool cost (w

ear

cost)

$1.2

5 ft

Inert

Mate

rial P

lacem

ent (b

ackfill)

Gro

uting/C

em

ent

5.3

3 c

y/h

r

Cuttin

gs (

see b

elo

w)

3.5

0 c

y/h

r

So

urn

ce

: W

DC

Exp

lora

tio

n,

De

c 2

00

5

Cu

ttin

gs P

lacem

en

t P

rod

ucti

vit

y

Shift pro

ductivity (

Means 0

2210-7

00-

0120; C

rew

B11M

)28

cy / s

hift

Shift le

ngth

8hours

Estim

ate

d H

ourly P

roductivity

3.5

cy / h

our

rein

forc

ed c

oncre

te

1/1

7/2

011

Co

py

rig

ht

© 2

00

4-2

00

8

- S

RC

E S

oft

war

e. A

ll R

igh

ts R

eser

ved

. 8 o

f 8

Pro

ductivity

Bond Calculation Seed Mixture







Seed Mixture

Common Name Scientific NameSpecies Number of

Seeds / lb

Species % in

MixPLS/acre Cost/Lb Cost/Acre

Grasses$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Total 0 $0.00

Source:

Notes:

1/17/2011Copyright © 2004 - Jeffrey V. Parshley. All Rights Reserved.

1 of 1 Seed Mixture






Cost Data File: cost_data-std-nv2009-1.xlsYears of Annual Total Cost Equipment

Operation Cost Replacement

Waste Water Treatment 17 3024000 51408000 9000000

Quantity Units

Labor

Unit Cost

Equipment

Unit Cost

Material

Unit Cost Total Cost

($) ($) ($) $

Hazmat Incinerator, 400 lbs/h 10 day 3325 0 25000 283250

reclamation issues and estimated cost of ......reclamation at modern mines. others also have...

Documents