reconciling the armm and ipra laws*...indigenous people's rights act (ipra) makes no mention of...

17
Jurisdiction over Ancestral Domains: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws* jennifer joy Ong** ii. INTRODUCTION ......... : .......................... . 590 . BRIEF HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ......................... 591 IIL\EXTENT OF LOCAL AUTONOMY OF THE ARMM REGION ........ 594 IV. EFFECTS OF THE ARt\1M LAWS ON THE IPRA .............. -598 A; Character of an Organic Law B. \ Com!itutional Provisions V. OF POWERS TO THE ARMl\1 .................... 602 VI. OSCC-ARMM AND THE 0FFICF. OF THE DEPUTY GOVERNOR FOR INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS ............................. . 60S VII.RECOMMENDATIONS ................................. 610 A. Proposed Regional Legislation B. Proposed Regional Executive Order V!II. ON ANCESTRAL wATERS ............................. 621 IX. CONCLUSION ...................................... 622 I. INTRODUCTION The struggle for self-detennination has been the foremost reason for unrest the peoples and Muslim Filipinos. The passage of new legtslatlOn )'lelds nothing to solve this problem. In fact, to prevent stepping • . This article was presented during the first day of the Colloquium. It is an abndged verswn of the ILO-UNDP commissioned paper of the Katutubo unit of the. Human .Rights _Center _under the tutelage of Atty. Sedfrey M. Candelana, and a modified verswn of the juris doctor thesis of Ms. Jennifer Joy Ong. . In making this research, the author conducted researches on House and Senate bills ofthe_ARM!'-1 and IPRA, relevant jurisprudence, laws, conventions, newspaper and magazme arttcles, books and internet materials, research in the ARMM Liaison O_ffice for Committee Hearings and Working Groups discussions, personal interview With Atty. Evelyn S. National Cornrnissior. on Indigenous and telephone mterviews With Deputy Governor Timuay Gumbalia T. Gu?si, Deputy Governor for Indigenous Peoples, ARi\1M Region, Ariel de Asis, Assistant to the Deputy_ Governor for Indigenous People, ARMM Region, Santos M. Unsad,_DocumentatJon Head, OSCC-ARMM, Technical Working Group, and Joel B. Beling, Member, Documentation Committee. •• Research Assistant, KATUTUBO unit, Ateneo Human Rights Center; Editor, Ateneo Law journal. _.., ... . Cite as 47 ATENEO L.J. 590 (2002). I I I I i I r 2002] RECONCILING ARMMAND lPRA 591 on the others' toes, the authors of each of the new laws had treaded carefully, making sure that each sector's political sensibilities will not be affected. The Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides no procedure for survey, delineation and titling of ancestral lands and domains of indigenous peoples within the t>.RMM. Such cautious approach led to the creation of several gray areas, one of which is the issue on the jurisdiction over ancestral lands and domains: There are two issues that must be considered. First is whether the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) may validly devolve the powers, functions and duties granted to it by the IPRA to the Autonomous Regional Go·•ernment's (ARG) autonomy as vested by the Constitution. The subsequent issue would be the reconciliation of two ARMM offices, each of which daims to exercise jurisdiction over the indigenous peoples within the region - the OSCC-1\RMM and the Office of the Deputy Governor for Indigenous Peoples. The resplution of these issues is of importance in order to prevent an im:ninent conilict betweeri the indigenous cultural communities and the Muslim Filipinos. This paper aims first, to present laws, including Congressional committee deliberations relating to jurisdiction over ancestral lands and domains; second, to determine which agency should have the power to award titles to the indigenous peoples within the ARMM; and, lastly, in. case agencies will have overlapping jurisdictions, to properly delineate the functions of each affected agency. II. BRIEF HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Prior to the ratification of the 1987 Constitution, then President Corazon Aquino issued Executive Order Nos. (EO) 122-A, t22-B 122-C, which created the Office of the Northern Cultural Communities, Southern Cultural Communities and Muslim Affairs, respectively. Under Section of· each of these laws, powers and functions granted to each office included the provision of legal and technical services for the survey, adjudication, titli11g and development of Muslim/ tribal ancestral lands as well as settlements proclaimed by the government for the Muslim Filipinos/northern cultural communities/southern cultural communities. It must be noted that the power to award titles or claims over the lands was withheld from these· offices. The 1987 Constitution mandated the creation of autonomous regions in the Cordillera and the Muslim Mindanao Regions. 1 Further, the r. PHIL. CaNST. art. X, § 15 provides: "There shall be created autonomous regions in Muslim Mindanao and in the Cordilleras consisting of provinces, cities, municipalities, and geographical areas sharing common and distinctive historical

Upload: others

Post on 15-Nov-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides

Jurisdiction over Ancestral Domains:

Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws* jennifer joy Ong**

ii. INTRODUCTION ......... : .......................... . 590 . BRIEF HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ......................... 591

IIL\EXTENT OF LOCAL AUTONOMY OF THE ARMM REGION ........ 594 IV. EFFECTS OF THE ARt\1M LAWS ON THE IPRA .............. -598

A; Character of an Organic Law B. \ Com!itutional Provisions

V. 1R~SFER OF POWERS TO THE ARMl\1 .................... 602 VI. OSCC-ARMM AND THE 0FFICF. OF THE DEPUTY GOVERNOR

FOR INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS ............................. . 60S VII.RECOMMENDATIONS ................................. 610

A. Proposed Regional Legislation B. Proposed Regional Executive Order

V!II. ON ANCESTRAL wATERS ............................. 621 IX. CONCLUSION ...................................... 622

I. INTRODUCTION

The struggle for self-detennination has been the foremost reason for unrest :Vi~hin_ the ~ndigenous peoples and Muslim Filipinos. The passage of new legtslatlOn )'lelds nothing to solve this problem. In fact, to prevent stepping

• . This article was presented during the first day of the Colloquium. It is an abndged verswn of the ILO-UNDP commissioned paper of the Katutubo unit of the. Ate~eo Human . Rights _Center _under the tutelage of Atty. Sedfrey M. Candelana, and a modified verswn of the juris doctor thesis of Ms. Jennifer Joy Ong.

. In making this research, the author conducted researches on House and Senate bills ofthe_ARM!'-1 and IPRA, relevant jurisprudence, laws, conventions, newspaper and magazme arttcles, books and internet materials, research in the ARMM Liaison O_ffice for Committee Hearings and Working Groups discussions, personal interview With Atty. Evelyn S. D~nuan,_ Chai~erson, National Cornrnissior. on Indigenous Peop~es, and telephone mterviews With Deputy Governor Timuay Gumbalia T. Gu?si, Deputy Governor for Indigenous Peoples, ARi\1M Region, Ariel de Asis, Assistant to the Deputy_ Governor for Indigenous People, ARMM Region, Santos M. Unsad,_DocumentatJon Head, OSCC-ARMM, Technical Working Group, and Joel B. Beling, Member, Documentation Committee.

•• Research Assistant, KATUTUBO unit, Ateneo Human Rights Center; Editor, Ateneo Law journal. <~· _.., ... w-·.~;,;,.< .

Cite as 47 ATENEO L.J. 590 (2002).

I

I I I i

I r

2002] RECONCILING ARMMAND lPRA 591

on the others' toes, the authors of each of the new laws had treaded carefully, making sure that each sector's political sensibilities will not be affected. The Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides no procedure for survey, delineation and titling of ancestral lands and domains of indigenous peoples within the t>.RMM. Such cautious approach led to the creation of several gray areas, one of which is the issue on the jurisdiction over ancestral lands and domains:

There are two issues that must be considered. First is whether the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) may validly devolve the powers, functions and duties granted to it by the IPRA to the Autonomous Regional Go·•ernment's (ARG) autonomy as vested by the Constitution. The subsequent issue would be the reconciliation of two ARMM offices, each of which daims to exercise jurisdiction over the indigenous peoples within the region - the OSCC-1\RMM and the Office of the Deputy Governor for Indigenous Peoples.

The resplution of these issues is of foremos~ importance in order to prevent an im:ninent conilict betweeri the indigenous cultural communities and the Muslim Filipinos. This paper aims first, to present laws, including Congressional committee deliberations relating to jurisdiction over ancestral lands and domains; second, to determine which agency should have the power to award titles to the indigenous peoples within the ARMM; and, lastly, in. case agencies will have overlapping jurisdictions, to properly delineate the functions of each affected agency.

II. BRIEF HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

Prior to the ratification of the 1987 Constitution, then President Corazon Aquino issued Executive Order Nos. (EO) 122-A, t22-B ~nd 122-C, which created the Office of the Northern Cultural Communities, Southern Cultural Communities and Muslim Affairs, respectively. Under Section ~ of· each of these laws, powers and functions granted to each office included the provision of legal and technical services for the survey, adjudication, titli11g and development of Muslim/ tribal ancestral lands as well as settlements proclaimed by the government for the Muslim Filipinos/northern cultural communities/southern cultural communities. It must be noted that the power to award titles or claims over the lands was withheld from these· offices.

The 1987 Constitution mandated the creation of autonomous regions in the Cordillera and the Muslim Mindanao Regions. 1 Further, the

r. PHIL. CaNST. art. X, § 15 provides: "There shall be created autonomous regions in Muslim Mindanao and in the Cordilleras consisting of provinces, cities, municipalities, and geographical areas sharing common and distinctive historical

Page 2: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 3: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 4: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 5: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 6: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 7: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 8: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 9: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 10: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 11: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 12: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 13: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 14: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 15: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 16: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides
Page 17: Reconciling the ARMM and IPRA Laws*...Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA) makes no mention of Muslim Filipinos, whereas the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) · Law provides