record of site condition # 213348 record of site condition under

Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # 213348

Record of Site Condition

Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has

access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings

with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental

condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from

the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been

submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment.

Record of Site Condition Number 213348Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2014/05/20Certification Date 2013/10/21Current Property Use ResidentialIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,

with Potable Ground Water, Coarse TexturedSoil, for Residential property use

Property Municipal Address 144 FOUNTAIN STREET NORTH,CAMBRIDGE, ON, N3H 1H6, 102-110FOUNTAIN STREET SOUTH, CAMBRIDGE,ON, N3H 1H9, 134 FOUNTAIN STREETNORTH, CAMBRIDGE, ON, N3H 1H6

1 of 18Filed Record of Site Condition # 213348 on 2014/05/20

PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC

Owner Name HAASTOWN HOLDINGS (PRESTON) INC.

Authorized Person PAUL DE HAAS

Mailing Address 170 WEST BEAVER CREEK ROAD, RICHMOND HILLONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code L4B 1L6

Phone (905) 889-5011

Fax (905) 889-3182

Email Address [email protected]


RSC Property Location Information

Municipal Address(es) 102-110 FOUNTAIN STREET SOUTH, CAMBRIDGE, ON N3H 1H9

134 FOUNTAIN STREET NORTH, CAMBRIDGE, ON N3H 1H6

144 FOUNTAIN STREET NORTH, CAMBRIDGE, ON N3H 1H6

Municipality Cambridge

Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter

Assessment Roll Number(s)

110025077000000

110025077500000

3006110025078000000

3006110025079000000

Property Identifier Number(s)

03769-0215 (LT)

03769-0214 (LT)

03769-0213 (LT)

RSC Property Geographical References

Coordinate System UTM

Datum NAD 83

Zone 17

Easting 551,001.00

Northing 4,805,444.00

RSC Property Use Information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current Property Use Residential

Intended Property Use Residential

Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA

No


Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank


PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information

Name MICHAEL LEFEBVRE

Type of Membership Under the Professional Geoscientists Act

Practising Member

Membership Number 1073

QP Employer Name CHUNG & VANDER DOELEN ENGINEERING LTD.

Mailing Address 311 VICTORIA STREET NORTH, KITCHENERONTARIO, N2H 5E1 CANADA

Phone (519) 742-8979

Fax (519) 742-7739

Email Address [email protected]

Municipal Information

Local or Single-Tier Municipality

Cambridge

Upper-Tier Municipality Waterloo

Ministry of the Environment District Office

District Office Guelph District Office

District Office Address 1 Stone Road W., Guelph ON N1G 4Y2


Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2013/09/09

Type of Report

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)

Author of Report

Name of ConsultingCompany

P1 ESA Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 102-110 Fountain Street South, Cambridge, Ontario

2013/03/05 Michael Lefebvre, Jared Barclay, Eric Chung

CHUNG & VANDER DOELEN ENGINEERING LTD.

P1 ESA Update

Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, 102-110 Fountain Street South, 134 and 144 Fountain Street North, Cambridge, Ontario



Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment


Author of Report


N/A


Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2013/10/21

Type of Report


Author of Report


P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, 102-110 Fountain Street South, 134 & 144 Fountain Street North, Cambridge, Ontario



Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).

Author of Report


N/A


Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? No

Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2013/10/21

Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 1.15000

Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property

Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property

Soil Texture Coarse

Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?

Yes

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?

Yes

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment

ALS GROUP

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Potable

Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 2


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Benzene < 0.02 0.21 µg/g

2 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 1.1 µg/g

3 Toluene < 0.2 2.3 µg/g

4 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 3.1 µg/g

5 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 5 55 µg/g

6 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 10 98 µg/g

7 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 50 300 µg/g

8 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 101 2800 µg/g

9 Acetone < 0.5 16 µg/g

10 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 1.5 µg/g

11 Bromoform < 0.05 0.27 µg/g

12 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

13 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

14 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 2.4 µg/g

15 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 2.3 µg/g

16 Chloroform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

17 Ethylene dibromide < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

18 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 1.2 µg/g



21 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 16 µg/g

22 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.05 0.47 µg/g

23 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

24 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.05 1.9 µg/g

25 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.084 µg/g

26 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.042 0.05 µg/g

27 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.1 µg/g

28 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

29 Hexane (n) < 0.05 2.8 µg/g

30 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 16 µg/g

31 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 1.7 µg/g

32 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.75 µg/g

33 Styrene < 0.05 0.7 µg/g

34 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.05 0.058 µg/g

35 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

36 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.28 µg/g

37 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 0.38 µg/g

38 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

39 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.061 µg/g


39 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.061 µg/g

40 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 4 µg/g

41 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g

42 Antimony < 1 7.5 µg/g

43 Arsenic 2 18 µg/g

44 Barium 36.8 390 µg/g

45 Beryllium < 0.5 4 µg/g

46 Boron (total) 8.3 120 µg/g

47 Cadmium < 0.5 1.2 µg/g

48 Chromium Total 12.4 160 µg/g

49 Cobalt 5 22 µg/g

50 Copper 13.2 140 µg/g

51 Lead 29.7 120 µg/g

52 Molybdenum < 1 6.9 µg/g

53 Nickel 10.4 100 µg/g

54 Selenium < 1 2.4 µg/g

55 Silver < 0.2 20 µg/g

56 Thallium < 0.5 1 µg/g

57 Uranium < 1 23 µg/g

58 Vanadium 22.3 86 µg/g

59 Zinc 63.2 340 µg/g

60 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Antimony < 0.5 6 µg/L

2 Arsenic < 1 25 µg/L

3 Barium 51.1 1000 µg/L

4 Beryllium < 0.5 4 µg/L

5 Boron (total) 25 5000 µg/L

6 Cadmium < 0.1 2.7 µg/L

7 Chromium Total < 0.5 50 µg/L

8 Cobalt < 0.5 3.8 µg/L

9 Copper 1.9 87 µg/L

10 Lead < 1 10 µg/L

11 Molybdenum 2.09 70 µg/L

12 Nickel 1 100 µg/L

13 Selenium < 5 10 µg/L

14 Silver < 0.1 1.5 µg/L

15 Thallium < 0.3 2 µg/L

16 Vanadium < 0.5 6.2 µg/L

17 Zinc 9.7 1100 µg/L

18 Acetone < 30 2700 µg/L

19 Benzene < 0.5 5 µg/L

20 Bromodichloromethane < 2 16 µg/L

21 Bromoform < 5 25 µg/L

22 Bromomethane < 0.5 0.89 µg/L

23 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L

24 Chlorobenzene < 0.5 30 µg/L

25 Chloroform < 1 2.4 µg/L

26 Ethylene dibromide < 0.2 0.2 µg/L

27 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.5 3 µg/L



30 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 2 590 µg/L

31 Dibromochloromethane < 2 25 µg/L

32 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.5 5 µg/L

33 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

34 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

35 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

36 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

37 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.3 0.5 µg/L

38 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.5 5 µg/L

39 Ethylbenzene < 0.5 2.4 µg/L


39 Ethylbenzene < 0.5 2.4 µg/L

40 Hexane (n) < 0.5 51 µg/L

41 Methylene Chloride < 5 50 µg/L

42 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 20 1800 µg/L

43 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 20 640 µg/L

44 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 2 15 µg/L

45 Styrene < 0.5 5.4 µg/L

46 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.5 1.1 µg/L

47 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.5 1 µg/L

48 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

49 Toluene < 0.5 24 µg/L

50 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.5 200 µg/L

51 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.5 4.7 µg/L

52 Trichloroethylene < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

53 Trichlorofluoromethane < 5 150 µg/L

54 Vinyl Chloride < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

55 Xylene Mixture < 0.5 300 µg/L

56 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 750 µg/L

57 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L



60 Uranium < 2 20 µg/L


Remedial Action and Mitigation

Remediated Soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

None

Description of Remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.

None

Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³)

Soil Brought to the Property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)


Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.

None

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.

None

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres)


Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

None

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

None

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

None

Ground Water Management Measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

None

Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?

No


Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.

As of 2013/10/21, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.

Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

As of 2013/10/21, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 36 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.

As of 2013/10/21, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.

The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.

I do not hold and have not held and my employer CHUNG & VANDER DOELEN ENGINEERING LTD.does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based

To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2013/10/21.

By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, MICHAEL LEFEBVRE, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2014/04/28:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I Agree


Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment as part of the record of site condition

Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired

A Current plan of Survey

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

Owner or agent certification statements

v 4.1.1


Request ID: 016335540 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2014/04/08 Demande n° : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le : Transaction ID: 53905689 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 15:31:28 Transaction n° : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à : Category ID: CT Catégorie :

CERTIFICATE OF STATUS ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE

This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère des records of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons Services que la société

H A A S T O W N H O L D I N G S ( P R E S T O N ) I N C .

Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario) 0 0 2 3 5 6 5 3 5 is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou née amalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la the laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario.

The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le J A N U A R Y 0 8 J A N V I E R , 2 0 1 3 and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.

Dated Fait le A P R I L 0 8 A V R I L , 2 0 1 4

Director Directeur

The issuance of this certificate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.

To view Order Summary for this transaction,

check the check box for this request and click the 'Order Summary' button.

Please note that this is a summary usage for this particular request and is not an Invoice.

Invoices will be provided as a combined total of all transactions on a monthly basis.

The Monthly Invoice can be viewed from the Statement of Account in the Accounting area.

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Line

Owner

Text Box

Phase One, Phase Two & RSC Property Boundary

Owner

Line

TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

Area of

Potential Environmental

Concern

Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on

Phase One Property

Potentially

Contaminating Activity

Location of

PCA (on-Site or off-Site)

Contaminants of

Potential Concern

Media Potentially Impacted (ground water, soil and/or

sediment)

APEC-1 Southeast corner of former hotel/nursing home

PCA No. 28 – Gasoline and associated products

stored in fixed tanks

On-Site: Former storage of furnace oil in

AST

Benzene, toluene,

ethyl benzene, xylenes (BTEX),

PHCs F1-F4

Soil & Ground Water

APEC-2 East side of Site

PCA no. 28 – Gasoline and associated products

storage in fixed tanks

Off-Site: Former

gasoline service station at 250 King Street

West

BTEX, PHCs F1-F4, volatile organic

compounds (VOCs), metals

Soil & Ground Water

TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY

102-110 FOUNTAIN STREET SOUTH, CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIO

Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use Property Use

Other observations from aerial photographs, Fire Insurance Plans (FIP), etc.

1853 Frederick Guggisberg &

Dora Guggisberg

Vacant Undeveloped Agricultural or other N/A

1878 Dora Guggisberg to Henry Walder

General Store Commercial N/A

1889 Henry Walder to Robert Walder

General Store Commercial N/A

1915 Robert Walder to Samuel Garfunkel

Hotel Commercial N/A

1915 Samson Garfunkel to Jacob Garfunkel


1916 Samson & Jacob Garfunkel to Phillip Goodman


1921 Phillip Goodman to Preston Springs Sanatorium Ltd.


1964 Preston Springs Sanatorium Ltd. to Roy H. Schafer

Retirement Home Residential An aerial photograph from 1963 shows the current buildings

1964 Roy H. Schaefer to Preston Springs Gardens Ltd.


1976 Preston Springs Gardens Ltd. to Milburn Holdings Ltd.


1981 Milburn Holdings Ltd. to Deem Management

Services Ltd.


1984 Deem Management Services Ltd. to Milburn

Holdings Ltd.


1987 Milburn Holdings Ltd. to Preston Springs Gardens Retirement Homes Inc.

Retirement Home Residential N/A

1990 Preston Springs Garden Retirement Home Inc. to

Milburn Holdings Ltd.


1990 Milburn Holdings to 467964 Ontario Ltd.


1998 Cosbild Investment Corporation to Benchmark

Equity Corporation

Vacant Residential An aerial photograph from 1995 shows the current buildings

1999 Benchmark Equity Holdings to Preston Springs Gardens

Inc.

Vacant Residential N/A

2002 Guelph Financial Corporation


2013 Haastown Holdings (Preston) Inc.



134 FOUNTAIN STREET NORTH, CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIO



1806 Henry Greif Vacant Undeveloped Agricultural or

other N/A

1879 Isaac Kay Vacant Undeveloped Agricultural or other N/A

1893 William Kay Vacant Undeveloped Agricultural or other

N/A

1903 John Limpert Vacant Undeveloped Agricultural or other

N/A

1911 Frederick Pfeiffer Single Family Residence Residential N/A 1936 Katherine Weiberg Single Family Residence Residential N/A 1939 Eliza Schultz Single Family Residence Residential N/A 1948 Ignatius McDermott Single Family Residence Residential An aerial photograph from 1945 shows the

current dwelling. 1990 Marion McDermott, Marlene

Bowman, Mary Kummer Single Family Residence Residential Aerial photographs from 1955 to 1978 show the

current dwelling 1992 Jose Nicolau Dos Santos Single Family Residence Residential N/A. 2000 Allan Hodge Single Family Residence Residential An aerial photograph from 1995 and 2003 shows

the current dwelling. 2013 Haastown Holdings

(Preston) Inc. Single Family Residence Residential An aerial photograph from 2010 shows the

current dwelling.


144 FOUNTAIN STREET NORTH, CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIO



1806 Henry Greif Vacant Undeveloped Agricultural or

other N/A

1879 Isaac Kay Vacant Undeveloped Agricultural or other N/A

1893 William Kay Vacant Undeveloped Agricultural or other

N/A

1903 John Limpert Vacant Undeveloped Agricultural or other

N/A

1912 John Johnstone Single Family Residence Residential An aerial photograph from 1945 shows the current dwelling.

1964 Frances Roden Single Family Residence Residential An aerial photograph from 1955 shows the current dwelling.

1978 Gilles Parise, Catherin Ladouceur

Single Family Residence Residential An aerial photograph from 1978 shows the current dwelling.

1989 John Hills Single Family Residence Residential N/A 1991 Robert & Jean Clark Single Family Residence Residential N/A 1994 John Paul Haines Single Family Residence Residential An aerial photograph from 1995 shows the

current dwelling. 1998 Larry Kirby

(lost by power of sale to Scotia Mortgage)


2013 Haastown Holdings (Preston) Inc.


Phase Two Conceptual Site Model 102-110 Fountain Street South, Cambridge, Ontario (Site) 134 Fountain Street North, Cambridge, Ontario (Site) 144 Fountain Street North, Cambridge, Ontario (Site) 1.0 Introduction A Phase Two Conceptual Site Model (CSM) has been prepared in accordance with Schedule E, Part V, Table 1, S6(x) of Regulation 153/04 (as amended). The CSM is complete with several figures to assist with organizing, presenting and understanding the potential and/or actual environmental concerns related to the soil and ground water at the Site. Refer to Figures 1-7. Figure 1- Key Plan Figure 2- Conceptual Site Model Phase One, Phase Two and RSC Study Area Figure 3- Site Plan Figure 4- Cross Section Plan Figure 5 & 6- Cross Sections Figure 7- Shallow Ground Water Directional Flow Plan 2.0 Site Location and Description The Site is an irregular shaped property, 1.15 hectares in area located on the west side of Fountain Street South and Fountain Street North at the intersection with King Street West in Cambridge. The Site is improved with a five-storey former hotel/nursing home historically known as the Preston Springs Hotel and two (2) vacant residential houses. All services have been disconnected to all buildings on the Site. 3.0 Physical Setting A description of the physical setting of the Site is as follows. The following details were identified during the Phase One ESA and Phase Two ESA completed at the Site:

Based on the subsurface conditions encountered during the Phase Two Environmental

Site Assessment conducted on the Site, the soil profile generally consists of a layer of silty sand and gravel to a maximum depth of 2.44 metres below ground surface (mbgs). Alternating layers of native silty sand and clayey silt till over fractured limestone bedrock were then encountered to a maximum borehole termination depth of 12.20 mbgs. No imported fill material was identified on, in or under the Phase Two Property.

Haastown Holdings (Preston) Inc. File No.: 13-09-E02 Conceptual Site Model Page 2 102-110 Fountain Street South & 134 and 144 Fountain Street North, Cambridge, Ontario


The Site is not an environmentally sensitive area as defined in Ontario Regulation 153/04 s. 41.

The Site does not include an area of natural significance and is not located within, adjacent to or within 30 m of an area of natural significance.

The soil pH at the Site is within the acceptable ranges. As a part of the

subsurface investigations completed at the property, soil samples have been submitted for laboratory analysis to determine soil pH. The pH results indicate that surface soil (0.0 – 1.5 mbgs) and subsurface soil (> 1.5 mbgs) chemistry on the Site is within the acceptable pH ranges of 5.0 to 9.0 for surface soils and 5.0 to 11.0 for subsurface soils.

The Site is not considered a shallow soil property as defined in Ontario

Regulation 153/04 s. 43.1. Soil across the entire Site is greater than two (2) metres in depth.

The Site is not located within 30 m of a water body.

The City of Cambridge relies on ground water as a source of potable water. In accordance with Ontario Regulation 153/04 s. 43.1, the analytical soil and ground water results were compared to the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Table 2, Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition. The proposed use of the property is residential and therefore, the soil and ground water results were compared to the residential / parkland / institutional property use for a coarse textured soil (herein referred to as the “applicable regulatory standard”).

Topography in the vicinity of the Site slopes towards the Speed River located 85 m southeast of the Site. Based on ground water data collected as part of the Site assessment work, the inferred shallow ground water flow direction is generally in a southeasterly direction, as shown in Figure 7.

A comprehensive ground water elevation survey was completed. Ground water was

measured in the monitoring wells between 2.55 and 4.36 mbgs, corresponding to ground surface elevations 98.35 and 99.66 m respectively.

The horizontal hydraulic gradient in a southeasterly direction is calculated to be 0.191 m/m, based on a 21.02 m fall of the water table over a 110 m horizontal distance. The ground water level is below the depth of local utilities and therefore flow is not expected to be influenced by these features. The hydraulic conductivity in the saturated sand layer where groundwater was primarily found is estimated to be 1 x 10-4 cm/s, based on observations of soil conditions at the Site and supported by information from other sites with similar stratigraphy in the proximate area.



Subsurface structures and utilities on, in or under the Phase Two property that may affect contaminant distribution and transport include underground natural gas, municipal water, and sanitary sewer service to all three (3) buildings on the Site. An underground storm sewer line is located at the south side of the property. Hydro electric, Bell telephone and Rogers cable service is provided by overhead lines. The locations of the underground services are shown on Figure 3. Locations of future development have not yet been determined.

Native limestone bedrock was encountered in all boreholes between depths of 3.96 to

12.20 mbgs. In accordance with the Ministry of Environment amended Ontario Regulation 153/04 (regulation) Part IX section 43.1, the property is not considered a shallow soil property. A shallow soil property is defined in the regulation as a property of which 1/3 or more of the area consists of soil equal to or less than two (2) metres in depth beneath the soil surface, excluding any non-soil surface treatment such as asphalt, concrete or aggregate. pH samples were obtained at several locations across the subject site. pH levels ranged from 7.88 to 7.91 and are within normal range.

4.0 Phase One ESA Summary The Phase One ESA evaluated the environmental conditions of the Site and adjacent properties to identify actual or potential sources of contamination associated with the Site and surrounding properties. Based on the result of this investigation, potentially contaminating activities (PCAs) associated with the Site and surrounding properties were identified. The PCAs are illustrated in Figure 2. The identified PCAs are summarized as follows:

Furnace oil was historically stored in aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) in the former hotel/nursing home.

A former gasoline service station was located opposite Fountain Street South at 250

King Street West.

As per the above PCAs, areas of potential environmental concern (APECs) were identified on the Site. Therefore, conducting a subsurface investigation (Phase Two ESA) was recommended to assess the environmental quality of the soil and ground water on the Site in the APECs.



The following table provides the areas of potential environmental concern related to the Site:

TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

Area of Potential

Environmental Concern (APEC)

Location of Area of

Potential Environmental

Concern on Phase One Property

Potentially Contaminating

Activity

Location of PCA (on-Site or off-Site)

Contaminants of Potential

Environmental Concern

Media Potentially Impacted (ground

water, soil and/or

sediment

APEC-1

Southeast corner of former

hotel/nursing home

PCA No. 28 – Gasoline and associated

products stored in fixed tanks

On-Site: Former

storage of furnace oil in

ASTs.

Benzene, toluene, ethyl

benzene, xylenes (BTEX),

petroleum hydrocarbons

(F1-F4).

Soil & Ground Water

APEC-2 East side of Site

PCA no. 28 – Gasoline and associated products

storage in fixed tanks

Off-Site: Former gasoline

service station at 250 King Street West

BTEX, petroleum hydrocarbons

(F1-F4), volatile organic

compounds (VOCs), metals

Soil & Ground Water

5.0 Phase Two ESA Summary A total of three (3) boreholes (BH1 to BH3) were advanced on the Site to characterize the underlying soil and ground water conditions. All three (3) of the boreholes were installed with monitoring wells. Soil and ground water samples were submitted to ALS Laboratory Group (CAEAL accredited laboratory) in Waterloo, Ontario, for chemical analyses which included pH, metals, VOCs, BTEX, petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) in the F1-F4 fraction. Contaminant present at the Site:

No soil chemicals are considered to be chemicals of concern (COCs) at the Site, as all soil samples submitted for laboratory analysis reported all analyzed parameters were either not detected or were below the applicable Table 2 regulatory standard.

No ground water chemicals are considered to be COCs at the Site, as all ground water

samples submitted for laboratory analysis reported all analyzed parameters were either not detected or were below the applicable Table 2 regulatory standard.



Climatic and meteorological conditions, such as seasonal fluctuations in ground water elevations are not a concern at the Phase Two property. Soil vapour intrusion is also not a concern at the Phase Two property. No release mechanisms, contaminant transport pathways, human or ecological receptors, receptor exposure points or routes or exposure exist on the Site. Tables illustrating potential source(s), contaminant transport pathways and human or ecological receptors on the Site are included below:

HUMAN HEALTH

Source

Contaminant of Concern

(COC)

Potential Pathway

Potential Risks

Fill

None

Ingestion No Source No Risk Inhalation

Skin Contact

Native Soils

None Ingestion

No Source No Risk Inhalation Skin Contact

Bedrock

None


Skin Contact Ground Water None Ingestion No Source No Risk

Potential current human receptors at the Site include regular workers and construction/remediation workers. Future potential human receptors at the Site include residents (adult and children).

TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT

Source

Contaminant of Concern

(COC)

Potential Pathway

Potential Risks

Fill

None Ingestion

No Source No Risk Inhalation Skin Contact Root Intake

Native Soils

None


Prey/Food Uptake

Bedrock

None


Skin Contact Ground Water None Ingestion No Source No Risk

Potential current and future ecological receptors include terrestrial plants (root uptake), soil invertebrates, small mammals and birds.



AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT

Source Contaminant of Concern

(COC)

Potential Pathway

Potential Risks

Ground Water

None Gill Uptake No Source / No

Aquatic Ecosystem No Risk

No Source / No Aquatic Ecosystem No Risk

No potential current or future aquatic environment ecological receptors exist as no aquatic ecosystem is present on the Site. 8.0 Risk Assessment A risk assessment has not been completed and is not required. 9.0 Limitations The statements made in this CSM are subject to the same limitations included in the appendices of the above-referenced reports.

SIT

E

CHUNG & VANDER DOELEN

ENGINEERING LTD.

311 Victoria Street NorthKitchener, Ontario, N2H 5E1Phone: (519) 742-8979 Fax: (519) 742-7739E-mail: [email protected]

KEY PLAN

102-110 FOUNTAIN STREET SOUTH,134 FOUNTAIN STREET NORTH &

144 FOUNTAIN STREET NORTH

CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIO

Date: Nov., 2013

Scale: 1:15,000

File No.: 13-09-E02

Figure: 1

Phase One, Phase Twoand RSC Site Boundary -

250 m Radius Study Area -

Potentially ContaminatingActivity -

Legend

Residential

Fou

nta

inS

t. S

ou

th

Speed River

Residential

Residential

Industrial

Commercial

Former GasolineService Station

GasolineServiceStation

P&H MillingFlour Mill

FormerDrycleaner

King Street West

Fou

nta

inS

t. North

Shantz Hill Rd.

Ab

rah

am

St.

Cyru

sS

t.

Hillcrest Rd.

Kitchener Rd.

Jacob St.

FormerFurnace Oil

AST


ENGINEERING LTD.


CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL,PHASE ONE, PHASE TWO & RSC

STUDY AREA



CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIOFigure: 2

Date: Nov., 2013

Scale: 1:2,800

File No.: 13-09-E02


Commercial

FormerRailway

Yard

Abra

ham

St.

Former BoilerRoom

Founta

in S

t. N

ort

h

King St. West

Knotty PinesRestaurant

BH 3

BH 1

Founta

inSt.

South


BH 2

Site Boundary -Legend

Borehole Locations -Natural Gas Service

Water Service

Sanitary Sewer Service

Storm Sewer Service

----


ENGINEERING LTD.


SITE PLAN



CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIO

Date: Nov., 2013

Scale: 1:1,000

File No.: 13-09-E02

Figure: 3

Abra

ham

St.

Former BoilerRoom

Founta

in S

t. N

ort

h

King St. West


BH 3

BH 1

Founta

inSt.

South


BH 2

Site Boundary -Legend

Borehole Locations -Natural Gas Service

Water Service

Sanitary Sewer Service

Storm Sewer Service

----

A1

A1

A

B

-Cross-Section Limits

B1

B1


ENGINEERING LTD.


CROSS-SECTION PLAN VIEW



CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIO

Date: Nov., 2013

Scale: 1:1,000

File No.: 13-09-E02

Figure: 4

LEGEND:

SURFACE PROFILE

SLOTTED WELL SCREEN

ASPHALT

SAND & SILT FILL trace GRAVEL

SILTY SAND

CLAYEY SILT TILL

DATE

FILE NO.

FIGURE NO.

Nov., 2013

13-09-E02

5

A A1

WEST EAST

311 Victoria Street NorthKitchener, OntarioN2H 5E1

Phone: (519) 742-8979Fax: (519) 742-7739E-mail: [email protected]

CROSS SECTION A-A



CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIO

1

BOREHOLE

MEASURED GROUNDWATERLEVEL

ESTIMATED GROUNDWATERLEVEL

BH 1

HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (m)

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 100 120 130

300.00

295.00

290.00

285.00

280.00

265.00

275.00

270.00

Sand & Silt Fill trace Gravel

Pro

pert

y L

ine

Pro

pert

y L

ine

BH 2

FRACTURED LIMESTONEBEDROCK

70 80 90 110

300.00

295.00

290.00

285.00

280.00

265.00

275.00

270.00

Silty Sand

Clayey Silt Till

Fractured Limestone Bedrock

Limestone Bedrock

LIMESTONE BEDROCK

BH 3

B B1

SOUTH NORTH

HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (m)

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m)

0 20 40 60 120 160

285.00

280.00

275.00

260.00

270.00

265.00

Sand & Silt Fill tra

ce Gravel

Pro

pert

y L

ine

BH 2

80 100 140

Clayey Silt Till

Fractured Limestone Bedrock

Limestone Bedrock

BH 3

ELE

VA

TIO

N (

m) 275.00

270.00

285.00

280.00

260.00

265.00

275.00

270.00

Pro

pert

y L

ine

Basement

Basement

Basement

Sand & Gravel

LEGEND:

SURFACE PROFILE

SLOTTED WELL SCREEN

ASPHALT

SAND & SILT FILL trace GRAVEL

SAND & GRAVEL

CLAYEY SILT TILL

DATE

FILE NO.

FIGURE NO.

Nov., 2013

13-09-E02

6

311 Victoria Street NorthKitchener, OntarioN2H 5E1

Phone: (519) 742-8979Fax: (519) 742-7739E-mail: [email protected]

CROSS SECTION B-B



CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIO

1

BOREHOLE

MEASURED GROUNDWATERLEVEL

ESTIMATED GROUNDWATERLEVEL

BH 1 FRACTURED LIMESTONEBEDROCK

LIMESTONE BEDROCK

Founta

in S

t. N

ort

h

King St. West



BH 2

271.51

280.00 270.00290.00

Former BoilerRoom

BH 3

292.53

BH 1

276.54

LegendSite Boundary -

Monitoring Wells -Interpreted Direction ofGround Water Flow

-

Ground Water Elevations - 290.00

Abra

ham

St.

Founta

inSt.

South


ENGINEERING LTD.


SHALLOW GROUND WATERDIRECTIONAL FLOW PLAN



CAMBRIDGE, ONTARIO

Date: Nov., 2013

Scale: 1:1,000

File No.: 13-09-E02

Figure: 7