recreation and open space strategy - shire of glenelg · 2007-06-15 · glenelg shire council...

GL

EN

EL

G S

HIR

E C

OU

NC

IL

R E C R E A T I O N A N D O P E N S P A C E S T R A T E G Y

V O L U M E 2 : R E S E A R C H A N D R E F E R E N C E M A T E R I A L F I N A L R E P O R T A P R I L 2 0 0 7

T: (03) 9521 6033

F: (03) 9521 6533

www.stratcorp.com.au

Suite 3/81 Beach Road

Sandringham Vic 3191

P R E P A R E D B Y S T R A T C O R P C O N S U L T I N G

Recreation and Open Space Strategy Glenelg Shire Council

Final Report Vol2 © Stratcorp Consulting 2007 Page ii

DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY

This report is a confidential document that has been prepared by Stratcorp Consulting and Glenelg Shire Council. Stratcorp has undertaken this analysis in its capacity as advisor in accordance with the scope and subject to the terms associated with Stratcorp’s letter of offer. Readers should note that this report may include implicit projections about the future which by their nature are uncertain and cannot be relied upon, as they are dependent on potential events which have not yet occurred. For these reasons and others, facility development is inherently risky and frequently things do not turn out as planned. In preparing this report, Stratcorp has relied upon information supplied by third parties, Glenelg Shire Council and their advisers, along with publicly available information. Stratcorp has not attempted to verify the accuracy or completeness of the information provided. Neither Stratcorp nor its officers and employees undertakes any responsibility arising in any way whatsoever to any person or organization, except Glenelg Shire Council, in respect of information set out in this report, including any errors or omissions therein through negligence or otherwise however caused.


Final Report Vol2 © Stratcorp Consulting 2007 Page iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background.................................................................................................................................1 1.2. Study Aims and Objectives..........................................................................................................1 1.3. The Planning Process ..................................................................................................................2 1.4. Structure of the Report ................................................................................................................2 1.5. Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................................3

2. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF GLENELG SHIRE COUNCIL............................... 4 2.1. Recreation and Open Space Planning Implications from the Demographic Data .........................4

3. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND REPORTS......................................................... 8

4. SUMMARY OF RELEVENT INDUSTRY TRENDS...............................................13 4.1. General Recreation Participation Trends....................................................................................13 4.2. Sports Participation Trends - Children........................................................................................14 4.3. Participation Trends Based on Exercise, Recreation and Sport Survey ........................................15

4.3.1. Adult Participation .............................................................................................................15 4.3.2. Organised and Non-Organised Participation ......................................................................18

4.4. Sports Trends/Participation Characteristics.................................................................................18 4.5. Organised Sport and Recreation Participation in Glenelg ..........................................................21 4.6. Recreation Facility Design Trends .............................................................................................24 4.7. Trends in Indoor Sports Facility Management ............................................................................24 4.8. Open Space Trends ...................................................................................................................25

4.8.1. Residential Development ...................................................................................................25 4.8.2. Acquisition ........................................................................................................................25 4.8.3. Reserve Development ........................................................................................................25

5. EXISTING PROVISION OF FACILITIES AND SERVICES...................................27 5.1. Sport and Recreation Facilities ..................................................................................................27 5.2. Education Department Facilities ................................................................................................28 5.3. Other key Public and Private Facilities ......................................................................................28 5.4. Facilities Available in Surrounding Areas...................................................................................29 5.5. Overall Summary of Available Recreation Facilities...................................................................29 5.6. Recreation Programs and Services .............................................................................................34

5.6.1. Recreation Programs Provided by Hall Committees............................................................34 5.6.2. Glenelg Shire Services .......................................................................................................37 5.6.3. Services Available Through Other Providers ......................................................................38

5.7. Assessment of Recreational Programs and Services....................................................................42 5.8. Open Space ..............................................................................................................................43

6. OPEN SPACE PROVISION GUIDELINES..........................................................47 6.1. Proposed Minimum Levels of Provision of Open Space.............................................................47


Final Report Vol2 © Stratcorp Consulting 2007 Page iv

6.2. Proposed Open Space System ...................................................................................................47 6.3. Objectives.................................................................................................................................48 6.4. Guiding Principles ....................................................................................................................48

6.4.1. General Principles for Open Space Provision .....................................................................48 6.4.2. Principles for the Development of Sports Grounds/Sports Reserves ....................................50 6.4.3. Principles for the Development of Regional and District Parks ...........................................50 6.4.4. Principles for the Development of Local Parks ...................................................................52 6.4.5. Principles for the Development of Natural Areas................................................................53

7. SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION OUTCOMES ................................................................................................................55

7.1. Methodology.............................................................................................................................55 7.2. Household Telephone Survey ...................................................................................................56 7.3. Infield Surveys...........................................................................................................................58 7.4. Community Workshops.............................................................................................................59 7.5. Sports Club Survey ....................................................................................................................60

7.5.1. Facility/Venue Needs and Issues ........................................................................................61 7.5.2. Facility/Venue Ownership and Management......................................................................61 7.5.3. User Agreements................................................................................................................62 7.5.4. Maintenance Responsibilities .............................................................................................62 7.5.5. Rating Council Performance...............................................................................................62 7.5.6. Role of Council..................................................................................................................63 7.5.7. Other Comments ...............................................................................................................64

7.6. Leisure/Community Group Survey.............................................................................................64 7.6.1. Facility/Venue Needs and Issues ........................................................................................65 7.6.2. Hire of Facilities.................................................................................................................65 7.6.3. Future Projects ...................................................................................................................65 7.6.4. Role of Council..................................................................................................................65 7.6.5. Council Support.................................................................................................................65 7.6.6. Other Comments ...............................................................................................................66

7.7. Council Staff Workshop ............................................................................................................66 7.8. Councillors and Senior Management Workshop........................................................................68 7.9. Key Target Groups ....................................................................................................................69

7.9.1. Older Adults ......................................................................................................................70 7.9.2. Youth/young adults ............................................................................................................70 7.9.3. People with a Disability .....................................................................................................71

7.10. Primary Care Partnership (PCP) .................................................................................................72 7.11. Primary and Secondary Schools ................................................................................................72 7.12. Neighbouring LGA’s and other Management Agencies..............................................................73

7.12.1. Department of Victorian Communities (DVC) – Sport and Recreation Victoria (SRV)..........73 7.12.2. Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) .........................................................74


Final Report Vol2 © Stratcorp Consulting 2007 Page v

7.12.3. Parks Victoria (PV) .............................................................................................................75 7.12.4. South West Sports Assembly (SWSA) .................................................................................76 7.12.5. CASA Leisure .....................................................................................................................77 7.12.6. Southern Grampians Shire .................................................................................................78 7.12.7. Warrnambool City Council ................................................................................................78 7.12.8. Moyne Shire ......................................................................................................................79 7.12.9. Mt Gambier Shire ..............................................................................................................79

7.13. Public Submissions ...................................................................................................................80

8. SHIRE-WIDE ISSUES AND ANALYSIS ..............................................................81

9. SUMMARY OF TOWNSHIP SPECIFIC ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES .........104 9.1. Portland ..................................................................................................................................104 9.2. Bridgewater.............................................................................................................................112 9.3. Narrawong ..............................................................................................................................113 9.4. Tyrendarra...............................................................................................................................114 9.5. Bolwarra .................................................................................................................................114 9.6. Heywood ................................................................................................................................115 9.7. Nelson ....................................................................................................................................116 9.8. Dartmoor ................................................................................................................................117 9.9. Casterton.................................................................................................................................118 9.10. Sandford .................................................................................................................................121 9.11. Merino ....................................................................................................................................122 9.12. Digby......................................................................................................................................123 9.13. Heathmere ..............................................................................................................................123

10. CONCLUSIONS..............................................................................................125

APPENDICES Appendix 1 – Glenelg Demographic Profile Appendix 2 – Background Research Review Appendix 3 – Household Telephone Survey Results Appendix 4 – Club/Group Membership Trends Appendix 5 – School Facilities Audit Appendix 6 – Planning Scheme Guidelines for Open Space Provision Appendix 7 – Community Workshops Write Up Appendix 8 – Sports Club Issues Table Appendix 9 – Leisure Group Issues Table Appendix 10 – Key Agency Roles Matrix Appendix 11 – Draft Recreation Facility Development Funding Framework Appendix 12 – In Field Survey Results Appendix 13 – Sport and Open Space Facilities Audit


Final Report Vol2 © Stratcorp Consulting 2007 Page 1

1. INTRODUCTION

The Glenelg Shire Council is located in the South West corner of Victoria. The western municipal border also forms the State border with South Australia. Glenelg Shire enjoys the benefits offered by abundant natural features including beaches, foreshore areas, rivers, waterways, bushland (National and State Parks) and rural areas. Portland is the Shire’s main population, commercial, service, industrial and residential centre. Portland has developed around Portland Bay and Portland Harbour, one of the most significant deep water ports in Australia. The Shire also comprises a number of smaller rural towns including Heywood, Casterton, Narrawong, Digby, Merino, Sandford, Dartmoor and Nelson.

1.1. Background

The current population of the Shire is estimated at approximately 20,000 people, however (based on current DSE forecasts) this is expected to decline by between 6-10% over the next 20-30 years. In addition, consistent with the Australian population as a whole, the Shire’s overall population is ageing. As a percentage of the total population, the proportion of people in older age categories (50+ years) is expected to grow significantly within the Shire despite the predicted decline in the total population.

The Shire previously completed a Recreation Strategy in 1998 that provided valuable guidance for Council in terms of recreation facility and service development following Council amalgamations. However, in light of the anticipated demographic changes and changing nature of the community, it has become timely for Council to develop a new Recreation and Open Space Strategy that identifies key community needs and provides a strategic basis for short and long-term resource allocation and management. The resulting plan will be used to integrate with Council’s other existing or proposed strategic planning documents including township specific urban design frameworks, settlement plans and Asset Management Strategy.

1.2. Study Aims and Objectives

Participation in sport, leisure and recreation activities has been demonstrated to provide a range of health, social and economic benefits for individuals and entire communities. The Glenelg Shire recognises the importance of recreation participation and the contribution that it makes to individual health, community life and the character of individual townships, therefore Council is committed to the provision of a range of facilities, services and venues to support these activities. Hence, in order to effectively and efficiently address the needs of the community the following two aims underpin this planning project:

1. To identify the sporting and recreational needs within the communities of Glenelg Shire Council and develop an achievable and sustainable implementation plan.

(See the Implementation Plan provided in the Executive Summary, Section 1.13).

2. To determine Glenelg Shire Council’s long term needs for recreation facilities, open space, recreation programs and service requirements

(See identified issues, Section 8 and 9).



The aims are supported by the following key project objectives:

• Identify gaps in the provision of public open space, recreation programs, recreation infrastructure and Council policy procedures

(See Section 5),

• Develop a strategic framework and achievable action plan which addresses gaps and is fully integrated into other relevant Council planning processes

(See the Implementation Plan provided in the Executive Summary, Section 1.13),

• To identify the most appropriate use of community recreation facilities and public open space, having regard to changes in the socio demographic nature of the Shire and recreation participation trends.

(Issues and opportunities identified in Section 8 and 9),

• Consider regional initiatives as well as existing services and facilities in neighbouring Shires when planning for the needs of the community.

(Sections 5 and 7)

• To develop a Recreation and Open Space Strategy that is integrated with other key Council plans.

(See review of background material provided in Section 3).

1.3. The Planning Process

The planning process used to prepare the Glenelg Shire Recreation and Open Space Strategy included the following tasks or phases:

• A high level audit and review of existing recreation facilities, services and open space across the municipality.

• An analysis of current and likely future demographic profile of the Shire.

• A review of previous research and literature.

• Review of National, State, and local recreation and physical activity participation trends.

• Community and stakeholder consultation.

• Gap analysis and strategy development.

• Client review and finalisation of the Plan.

1.4. Structure of the Report

The Main Report (this document) is supported by a stand-alone Executive Summary which includes an overview of the key issues, opportunities and detailed



recommendations (“Implementation Plan”) for the Glenelg Shire Recreation and Open Space Strategy.

The following diagram provides a ‘plain English’ overview of the structure of this document. The statements or questions in the bubbles broadly refer to the information that will be covered in each respective chapter/s.

1. Background and setting the scene (Chapters 1-4).

2. Where are we now?

(Chapters 5)What should be

considered in providing open space?(Chapter 6)

3. What can the community

tell us in terms of their sport, recreation and open space participation habits,

aspirations and needs? (Chapters 7).

4. What are the key issues and how can we address

them? (Chapters 8&9).

5. What are the

recommendations and priorities?

Who should take the lead and what will it cost? (Ex.

Sum 1.13).

6. What are the

conclusions? (Chapter 10).

Glenelg Shire Recreation

and Open Space Strategy

1.5. Acknowledgements

Stratcorp Consulting would like to acknowledge the contributions of all those who participated in the development of the Glenelg Shire Recreation and Open Space Strategy, including Shire staff, in particular Dayle King, Recreation Services Officer (Project Manager) and residents, sporting/recreation club representatives, community groups and other stakeholders who responded to the various opportunities for input and/or who provided advice and information where required.



2. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF GLENELG SHIRE COUNCIL

The section below highlights the key demographic statistics, issues and characteristics and identifies the possible implications that need to be considered in the context of this study. A copy of the full demographic profile of the Shire is included as Appendix 1.

Data has been obtained from the following sources:

• Basic Community Profile, 2001 ABS Census (Source: www.abs.gov.au).

• Regional Victoria in Fact, Department of Sustainability & Environment (2001).

• Demographics Profile (prepared by Paul Moss, Glenelg Shire Council).

It is often difficult to obtain consistency in population statistics and projections. Various government departments quote differing figures based on different data collection and analysis techniques. For example, for the year 2001 the ABS Census quotes the total population of the Glenelg Shire as 19,288 people, the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) 20,392 people and the Department of Infrastructure (DOI) 20,759 people. Where possible ABS Census data has been used for actual figures and DSE population projections used for future forecasts.

2.1. Recreation and Open Space Planning Implications from the Demographic Data

The key issues and implications from the demographic profile in relation to recreation needs, planning and development are highlighted below:

Issue/Characteristic Implications

• Declining population. Estimated at between 6% and 10% over the next 20-30 years caused predominantly by declining birth rates and a loss of people in their 20s and early 30s

• The sustainability of sporting clubs may be challenged, particularly in small rural areas.

• Demand for traditional competitive sports (e.g. football, cricket etc) are likely to decline.

• Demand for recreation programs and activities by pre-school aged children are likely to decline.

• Recreation programs and facilities, including open space, must be capable of adapting to changing community needs (e.g. reduced focus on structured/competitive/combative recreation).

• There is likely to be limited overall demand for the development of new recreation facilities or open space. Therefore Council may need to concentrate on improving the condition and flexibility of existing facilities.

• Ageing population. By 2011, 27% of the Shire’s population will be aged over 60 and 14% over 70,

• Demand for unstructured (informal) leisure facilities, activities and open space (parks) is likely to increase, including activities such as




compared to 20% and 11% in 2001. walking, golf and low impact physical activity related social activities.

• Facilities will need to be accessible for older adults (mobility and transport access).

• Demand for low impact leisure activities and recreation programs are likely to increase, including walking trails and non-sporting recreation pursuits. Demand for formal sporting facilities such as sports ovals and playing fields is likely to decline.

• Perceptions of public safety can also be a major concern for older adults, therefore the need for safe/accessible (sealed and well lit) paths and facilities will be important.

• Proportional reduction in the total number of young people (less than 55 years) and increase in people aged over 55 years.

• As above.


• The Shire has a similar profile compared to the average for Regional Victoria in relation to;

o Age profile,

o Household type (the majority (56.8%) of households without children, 42.4% with children).

o Employment (the majority of people are employed full time (57.8%), with an unemployment rate of 7.9% (National average was 7.4% at the same time),

o Dwelling structure (predominantly single dwellings (94.2%), and

o Methods of travel to work (57.3% by car as the driver).

• Trends and issues being experienced in Regional Victoria are likely to be reflected in Glenelg (see implications identified above).

• Programs and facilities need to cater for ‘whole of life’ activities, that is, children, families and individual adults of all ages. There is likely to be demand for recreation opportunities for participation as a family unit.

• Industry figures indicate that there are lower physical activity participation rates for unemployed people. Glenelg has a slightly higher unemployment rate than the National average which could influence participation rates. However the Shire also has a relatively high rate of full time employment. High employment rates contribute to high levels of disposable income, which may assist people’s ability to make leisure choices. Finally, there is likely to be a high demand for physical activity participation opportunities at varying times throughout the day coinciding with people’s limited available leisure time and changing working hours. (Particularly shift workers in Portland).

• The vast majority of residents have access to their own private open space via backyards, hence the reliance on public open space may be reduced (marginally). However open space provision is still important in providing opportunities that can not generally be




catered for in individual properties, e.g. sporting activities.

• Whilst the majority of households have at least one vehicle, geographic distances across the Shire are large, therefore access to public/community transport options will remain important, particularly for young people and those in smaller townships.

• The Shire has a different profile compared to the average for Regional Victoria in relation to;

o Occupation (Glenelg Shire has a higher proportion of “Manager and administrators” and “Intermediate production and transport” workers and a lessor proportion of “Professionals”, and

o Weekly household income (Glenelg Shire has a lower proportion of families earning over $1,500 per week and a greater proportion of families earning less than $299 per week).

• Recreation facilities and programs will need to cater equally to ‘white’ and ‘blue’ collar workers. Industry research indicated that ‘less skilled’ workers tend to have higher participation rates in local, community based, team sports.1

• The capacity of residents to pay for recreation services and activities is likely to be relatively low associated with low average weekly household incomes.

• The number of children under 10 years old in Portland and Casterton declined significantly between 1996-2001 (9% and 12% respectively).

• Demand for children’s services, facilities and activities are likely to decline, including playground provision.

• The age profile of individual townships varies (e.g. in 2001 27% of the population of Casterton were aged over 65, compared to 20% in Heywood, 14% in Portland and Dartmoor and 11% in Merino).

• Recommendations will need to reflect the needs of individual communities, having due regard to township specific characteristics. For example, demand for services for older adults is likely to be higher in Casterton than other towns in the Shire.

• In 2001, 7% of the population of Heywood identified as being of Indigenous origin, the highest representation in the State.

• Programs, services and facilities need to be culturally sensitive and appropriate.

• Slight increase in the number and proportion of residents either born overseas or from non-English speaking backgrounds (6.8% in 2001, only 1.1% of the population indicated that they were not fluent

• Residents from non-English speaking backgrounds generally have lower levels of involvement in traditional mainstream recreation activities.

• There may be an increasing demand for a 1 Australian Sports Commission, Exercise, Recreation and Sport Survey (ERASS) 2004.




in English). broader diversity in recreation programs, facilities and opportunities.

• The number and proportion of people living in units has increased from 1996-2001, particularly in Portland.

• The figures infer that there may be more people living alone or as single parents, particularly in Portland. Therefore demand for team sports/activities that offer social interaction may increase. Demand for informal access to open space may also increase in central Portland.

• The proportion of elderly people (aged over 75) whose incomes are below the Shire average has increased from 1996-2001 (e.g. Portland 67%-78%, Heywood 56%-67%).

• Recreation services, programs and activities may need to include concession rates for older adults.

• The number of children aged 0-9 years is set to decline to around 2000 children in 2021 (from 3,000 in 2001).

• Demand for children’s services, programs and facilities are likely to decline. There may be less demand for participation in junior sports.

• Declining birth rates will reduce the total number and proportion of children aged 0-4 years.

• Demand for playgrounds and pre-school program’s and services are likely to decline.

• The number of young people (aged 15-24 years) will increase slightly to 2011 before declining to below current levels by 2016.

• Younger age groups are most active in organised sports participation2, demand for access to formal sporting clubs and associated facilities is expected to peak by 2011 before declining. Therefore programs, services and facilities need to be capable of adapting to changing uses and community needs.

2 According to the 2004 ERASS results 66.1% of 15-24 year olds in Australia were involved in organised sport and physical activity however this declines to 46.2% for 25-34 year olds and 33.7% for 45-54 year olds.



3. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND REPORTS

It is important that the Recreation and Open Space Strategy has a context which is consistent with other planning directions and initiatives supported by Council, therefore a review of relevant strategic planning documents and previous research was completed to identify key issues and recommendations that may impact on this study. The table below summarises the key information ascertained from the review of previous research. A more detailed summary of key documents is included as Appendix 2.

Key Finding and Key Issues Document or Source Implication for this project • There is a high level of community satisfaction

with recreational facilities and the appearance of public areas. Although the level of satisfaction of the appearance of public areas has declined slightly from 2005 to 2006.

• Glenelg Shire Council, Community Well-Being Report, 2004 & 2006 (Draft).

• Glenelg Shire Council, Community Satisfaction Survey, 2004 and 2006.

• This strategy will need to identify initiatives and projects that will contribute to reinforcing the high level of community satisfaction.

• The Shire’s population is declining (3% change between 1996-2001 Census) and ageing. The proportion of older adults (65+ years) will increase from around 16% of the population to over 28% by 2010.

• Glenelg Shire Council, Community Well-Being Report, 2004 & 2006 (Draft).

• Demand for new and existing facilities will need to consider the impact of the changing demographic profile of the community and declining population.

• Demand for facilities that support informal, non-competitive (non-combative) recreational activities is likely to increase associated with the ageing population.

• There is high level of satisfaction with the Shire’s health and community services.

• Glenelg Shire Council, Community Well-Being Report, 2004 and 2006 (Draft).

• Consider opportunities to improve links and integration between existing health and community services and the recreation sector.

• Unemployment in the Shire is historically on average 3% points higher than the State and regional averages.

• Glenelg Shire Council, Community Well-Being Report, 2004 and 2006 (Draft).

• Participation statistics reveal that unemployed people tend not to participate in recreational activities as much as employed people.

• Participation opportunities must be affordable for all. • The Shire’s existing aquatic facilities are highly

valued by the community and well-utilised. • Glenelg Shire Council,

Community Well-Being Report, 2004 and 2006 (Draft).

• Glenelg Shire Council –

• Continue to support, maintain and develop existing aquatic facilities.



Key Finding and Key Issues Document or Source Implication for this project Aquatics Centres Audit/Strategy Report, 2001

• There is a need to review signage along major trails.

• Glenelg Shire Strategic Tourism Plan, 2005-2008.

• Consider opportunities to improve signage and connections to existing major trails throughout the municipality.

• Council should protect areas of high environmental significance.

• Glenelg Shire Strategic Tourism Plan, 2005-2008.

• Review opportunities for open space to provide a buffer to areas of high environmental significance.

• Review management/use of existing environmentally significant areas to ensure adequate protection measures are in place.

• Existing fees and charges are expected to rise by 3% per annum. Rate increases are set at 5% for 2006/07 and 3% thereafter.

• Council Strategic Resource Plan, 2004-2008.

• Fee and rate increases may impact on the capacity of some sections of the community to participate in recreation activities.

• Consider the impact of rate increases on reserve committees. • Council’s capital allocation to Parks and Gardens

accounts for around 1.2% of the total Shire allocation.

• Council Strategic Resource Plan, 2004-2008.

• Historical allocations for capital projects within the Parks and Gardens area of Council appear proportionally low and may need to be reviewed in order to meet identified needs.

• The Portland foreshore will be the focus of major redevelopment and capital investment for commercial and community projects.

• Glenelg Shire Council, Portland Foreshore Masterplan Re-evaluation, June 1998.

• Continue to support further recreational development of the foreshore. Consider additional opportunities to compliment the existing Masterplan and meet community needs.

• Council is committed to complying with the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act.

• Glenelg Shire Council, Including All – Disability Action Plan

• Ensure all new and renovated facilities comply with the DDA.

• The percentage of the community that rated recreational facilities as ‘excellent or good’ has increased from 49% to 57% from 1998-2004. However has declined from 47% in 2005 to 46% in 2006.


• This strategy will need to identify initiatives and projects that will contribute to reinforcing and improving the high level of community satisfaction.

• 26% of respondents suggested recreational facilities needed improvement in 2005, this has grown to 31% in 2006.


• This strategy will need to identify initiatives and projects that will contribute to improving the level of community satisfaction.

• There is a need for Council’s Recreation Unit to improve business processes, continuous

• Glenelg Shire Council, Recreation Best Value

• Identify opportunities to improve business processes and/or management of existing facilities and recreational



Key Finding and Key Issues Document or Source Implication for this project improvement, communications and introduce balanced scorecard reporting.

Review, May 2002. opportunities. (The next Best Value review for Recreation Services is scheduled for 2007).

• 52% of all sport and recreational buildings warranted a ‘fair to poor’ rating. This evaluation has critical implications as 37% of all buildings are sport and recreational (73 in total).

• Glenelg Shire Council, Building Inspection and Financial Implications Report, 2005.

• Substantial investment in existing sport and recreational facilities will be needed. This may limit the capacity of Council to fund new or additional projects.

• Significant works were required to address existing defects in sports, recreational and community infrastructure facilities. Only a very minor proportion of required works related to areas of Club/User group responsibility.

• Glenelg Shire Council, Building Inspection and Financial Implications Report, 2005.

• VRA Report, March 2006.

• Substantial investment in existing sport and recreational facilities will be needed. This may limit the capacity of Council to fund new or additional projects.

• Council should recognise the effective contributions of existing user groups in maintaining facilities. Council may need to improve maintenance of facilities in line with expectations it places on user groups.

• A range of program and facility initiatives are needed to address the needs of young people across the municipality.

• Southern Grampian & Glenelg Primary Care Partnership – Youth Issues Report, Sept. 2004

• Note the recommendations of the report and identify initiatives to support options for young people.

• Approximately $1,722,100 will be required to be spent on Council’s existing aquatic facilities from 2001-2011.

• Glenelg Shire Council – Aquatics Centres Audit/Strategy Report, 2001

• Substantial investment in existing aquatic facilities will be needed. This may limit the capacity of Council to fund new or additional recreational projects.

• According to Council’s Asset Management Plan, the Shire has approximately 35,000 individual assets with a total replacement value of $268.7 million, ‘Parks and Garden’ assets account for $29.6 million

• Budgeted renewal/capital works over the next three years for Parks and Gardens assets are to the value of $76,000 (2005/06), $105,000 (2006/07) and $63,000 (2007/08).

• Glenelg Shire Council – Asset Management Strategy, 2005

• Council may need to review the level of budget allocations provided to recreation assets and infrastructure to be more in line with the proportion of total asset value and high importance of these facilities.

• Upgrade and improvement works are required at Merino recreation reserve.

• Glenelg Shire Council – Merino Urban Design Framework, Dec 2004

• Note the recommendations of the report and identify further initiatives where appropriate.

• Upgrade and improvement works are required at • Glenelg Shire Council – • Note the recommendations of the report and identify further



Key Finding and Key Issues Document or Source Implication for this project Dartmoor recreation reserve.

• A range of other recreation related recommendations are identified. For Dartmoor and Nelson.

Dartmoor and Nelson Urban Design Framework, Sept. 2003.

initiatives where appropriate.

• The 1998 Recreation Strategy contained key directions related to ‘establishing partnerships’, ‘the importance of small communities’, ‘the natural environment’, ‘communication and information’, ‘management and pricing’ and the ‘development of foreshores areas’. It is likely that these key themes will remain important and appropriate for this latest recreation strategy.

• Glenelg Shire – Recreation Strategy, Volume 1 & 2, March 1998

• Consider the themes established in the 1998 Recreation Strategy when developing this report.

• There is greater socio economic prosperity around the reaches of major townships and lower prosperity in rural areas.

• Glenelg Strategic Futures Plan, Draft Regional Context Report, 2006.

• The capacity of residents in rural areas to pay for access to recreation facilities and opportunities may not be as high as residents from major townships.

• There is likely to be demand for additional housing construction, despite overall population decline.


• Additional residential subdivision can be expected. Opportunities for acquisition of public open space and/or cash contributions need to be considered.

• Accessibility of facilities and services, walkability of townships and creating a sense of place (or town character) is critical to overall liveability.


• Consider opportunities to improve accessibility of facilities, services and infrastructure, particularly foot paths and walking tracks.

Table 1: Review of Background Reports

In addition to the previous reports that have been reviewed, there are a number of concurrent and/or planned strategic planning projects that are being undertaken as part of the overarching ‘Glenelg Strategic Futures Plan’ that may influence future directions for sport, recreation and open space provision. These planning projects should consider the recommendations contained in this plan and highlight any potential changes or modifications to the recommendations should they be needed as a result of the additional planning work. Glenelg Strategic Futures Plan concurrent studies/projects include:

• Waste Water Management Strategy (being prepared by the Environmental Health Officer),

• Sewerage and Water Supply project for Dutton Way (Wannon Water/DSE),



• Wildfire Management Overlays (being prepared by CFA),

• Coastal Spaces Study (being prepared by DSE),

• Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority Flooding Study,

• Port of Portland - Port Strategy Plan, and

• Stage 2 of the Heritage Study (being prepared by Timothy Hubbard & Associates).



4. SUMMARY OF RELEVENT INDUSTRY TRENDS

For the purpose of informing this study, Stratcorp Consulting undertook an assessment of relevant National, State and Local recreation and sport participation trends. The following section outlines the results of this assessment and highlights issues considered during the strategy development process.

The section commences with an overview of general trends in recreation participation, and selected sports-specific participation trends, followed by National/State physical activity participation trends as identified through the annual Exercise, Recreation and Sport Survey, (ERASS) commissioned by the Australian Sports Commission3.

The section concludes with Glenelg specific membership trends for sports clubs and leisure/community group as identified via the respective written surveys.

4.1. General Recreation Participation Trends

Factors regarded as the catalysts for change in recreation participation include the following:

• Change in the size and structure of a population.

• Increased recognition of the strong links between involvement in recreational activities and good health, and the development of appropriate activities and services which cater for this.

• Demand by people for a greater diversity of recreational activities.

• Increased expectation of people/groups for higher standards in facility provision, and of quality programming, servicing and management.

• Greater reliance on locally accessed and lower cost opportunities by those without the resources to travel or pay for more expensive pursuits.

• Greater emphasis on non-competitive, unstructured recreation opportunities at the expense of participation and involvement in organised sport.

• Improved promotion, provision, and management of introductory sports programs by most State Sporting Associations aimed at junior development and recruitment.

• More flexible opening hours of facilities and for programming, including weekday, evening and weekend time-slots.

• An increasing demand for indoor facilities to provide protection from poor weather, exposure to the sun and to facilitate diverse activity programming.

Other significant trends include a gradual decline in sports participation by young people (14 – 20 year olds), possibly because of increased importance placed on academic achievement, and a greater involvement by young people in the workforce (as

3 The methodology for the ERASS is that every 12 months four surveys are conducted throughout Australia (quarterly) with the sample size each quarter being 3,410 of people aged 15 years and over. The total annual sample is 13,640. AC Neilson undertakes the fieldwork survey by telephone on behalf of the ASC. The first ERASS was carried out in 2001.



casuals). Another possible reason identified through recent National research4 is the prevalence of children’s use of electronic games, computers, TVs and videos. The research found that within the total population of children aged 5-14 years (2,647,500), more children now play electronic or computer games (71%) than play organised sport (66%). This decline in sports participation has resulted in decreasing involvement by young people in ‘structured’ sporting activities.

Notwithstanding the previously described trend, overall participation rates in organised sport and physical activities remains highest amongst young people and declines steadily with age. In 2004, 66.1% of all 15-24 year olds in Australia were involved in organised sport and physical activities (70.9% in Victoria). However, among 25-34 years olds, the participation rate had dropped to 46.2%, for 45-54 year olds to 33.7%, and down to 30.7% for people over 65 years5.

A particularly significant trend concerns increasing participation rates amongst older people. Government programs (such as Active Australia and Go for your life), the continued high media exposure of the Masters Games and athlete role models6, and pro-active sporting organisations are collectively having the result of increasingly encouraging older people to participate in sport and regular physical exercise. In 2001, 27.9% of all 55-64 years olds in Australia were participating in organised activities, which rose to 33.2% in 2004. For people aged over 65 years, the participation level in organised activities rose from 27.2% to 30.7% for the same period. Demand for facilities and suitable activities to support the growing interest in participation by older adults represents a key challenge for Council.

4.2. Sports Participation Trends - Children

A recent survey of children’s participation in sport7 found that:

• Of children aged 5-14 years, 62% participated in sport outside of school hours, which had been organised by a school, club or association (up from 59% in 2000).

• Across all age groups, boys had a higher participation rate (69%) in organised sport than girls (54%). Both rates of participation in 2003 were up from 2000 levels (boys at 66% and girls at 52%).

• Participation for boys increased between 2000 and 2003 in the following sports and activities:

− Soccer: 19.6% to 22.2%. − Swimming: 13.1% to 15.7%. − Australian Rules Football: 12.6% to 13.6%. − Tennis: 9.2% to 9.5%. − Martial Arts: 5.4% to 6.2%. − Gymnastics (trampolining): 0.9% to 1.7%. − Hockey: 2.3% to 2.5%. − Watching TV or videos: 96.9% to 98.6%. − Playing electronic or computer games: 79.1% to 81.8%. − Arts and craft activities: 34.4% to 39.0%.

4 Children’s Participation in Cultural and Leisure Activities April 2003, ABS. 5 ERASS. 2004. 6 Former champion players/athletes who are still actively involved in training/competition for fitness and social outcomes. 7 Children’s Participation in Cultural and Leisure Activities April 2003, ABS.



• ….. but decreased for:

− Cricket: 9.9% to 9.1%. − Basketball: 8.8% to 8.6%.

− Athletics: 3.9% to 3.8%.

− Rugby League: 6.8% to 5.6%.

− Skateboarding: 35.6% to 28.5%.

− Bike Riding: 71.1% to 70.5%.

• Participation for girls increased between 2000 and 2003 in the following sports:

− Swimming: 15.8% to 17.5%. − Soccer: 2.9% to 4.2%. − Tennis: 7.7% to 7.8%. − Basketball: 6.3% to 6.9%. − Australian Rules Football: 0.3% to 0.7%. − Cricket: 0.6% to 0.7%. − Martial Arts: 2.5% to 3.6%. − Gymnastics (trampolining): 4.3% to 5.4%. − Hockey: 2.5% to 2.6%. − Watching TV or Videos: 96.9% to 97.9%. − Playing electronic cor computer games: 58.1% to 58.9%. − Arts and Craft activities: 54.7% to 60.6%.

• ….. but decreased for:

− Netball: 18.2% to 18.1%.

− Athletics: 4.0% to 3.8%.

− Skateboarding: 26.1% to 16.9%.

− Bike riding: 56.2% to 53.3%.

4.3. Participation Trends Based on Exercise, Recreation and Sport Survey

The Australian Sports Commission (ASC) conducted its fourth annual Exercise, Recreation and Sport Survey (ERASS) in 2004 to measure Australians’ participation in physical activity for exercise, recreation and sport (15 years old and over). The results from the fourth survey have been recently released and are reported in the following sections.

4.3.1. Adult Participation

The ERASS identified a National participation rate in exercise, recreation and sport for adults of 82.8% in 2004 (an increase of 5.0% since 2001). The following table identifies the most popular activities undertaken by all Australians, which were walking, aerobic/fitness/weights and swimming, and shows comparisons between 2001 and 2004.



Table 2: Activity Participation 2001 to 2004 (National)

In Victoria, 85.1% of the population participated in exercise, recreation and sport (an increase of 7.7% since 2001) with the breakdown of males and females being 85.3% and 84.9%, respectively. According to the Household Telephone Survey results, the overall participation rate in Glenelg is 70% (males 71% and females 70%).

The following table shows the direct comparison of participation rates between Victoria, Nationally and locally (Glenelg Shire). The results show a direct correlation between the first four most popular activities for Victoria and Nationally. However, there is higher participation in Victoria compared to Nationally in walking, aerobics/fitness/weights, cycling, tennis, running, golf, Australian football, basketball and netball, but a lesser participation in walking (bush) and soccer.

When compared to participation rates in Glenelg Shire (based on the Household Telephone Survey results) there are a number of significant differences, including;

• Glenelg residents have a lower participation rate in all the sports/activities identified except for netball, basketball and Australian football.

• Bush walking was not identified as an activity regularly participated in by Glenelg residents, although it is noted that the telephone survey did not target tourists and visitors for whom this may be a popular attraction within the region.

• Soccer was not identified as an activity regularly participated in by Glenelg residents, although anecdotally there is growing interest in the sport, particularly from juniors.

• Cycling is not as popular in Glenelg (ranked 8th) as it is in Victoria (ranked 4th).

• Running/jogging is more popular Nationally (ranked 6th) and in Victoria (ranked 5th) compared to Glenelg (ranked 13th).

Rank Activity % Participation (2004)

% Participation Change from

2001 1 Walking (other) 39.0% 10.2%

2 Aerobics/Fitness/Weights 19.8% 3.9%

3 Swimming 16.5% 0.5%

4 Cycling 10.5% 1.0%

5 Tennis 8.4% -0.8%

6 Running 8.3% 1.1%

7 Golf 7.9% - 0.3%

8 Walking (bush) 5.2% -0.1%

9 Soccer (outdoor) 4.2% 0.5%

10 Netball 3.6% - 0.5%



• Netball and Australian football are more popular in Glenelg than the Victorian or National ranking.

• Although it is not identified in this table, lawn bowls is more popular in Glenelg (ranked 4th) than the Victorian ranking (equal 18th).

Rank Activity National

Participation (2004)

Victoria Participation

(2004)

Rank (Vic)

Glenelg Participation8

Glenelg Rank

1 Walking (other) 39.0% 39.9% 1 31% 1

2 Aerobics/Fitness/Weights 19.8% 23.5% 2 11% 3

3 Swimming 16.5% 16.5% 3 14% 2

4 Cycling 10.5% 11.6% 4 6% 8

5 Tennis 8.4% 9.2% 6 6% 7

6 Running 8.3% 9.3% 5 3% 13

7 Golf 7.9% 8.6% 7 7% 5

8 Walking (bush) 5.2% 4.7% 9 Not recorded

9 Soccer (outdoor) 4.2% 2.6% Eq.14 Not recorded

10 Netball 3.6% 4.0% 11 7% 6

11 Basketball 3.2% 4.3% 10 5% 9

14 Australian football 2.9% 5.2% 8 5% 10

Table 3: Comparison of Activity Participation Between National and Victoria (2004)

The following table shows the comparison between male and female participation in exercise, sport and recreation in Victoria.

Female participation in walking, aerobics/fitness/weights, swimming and netball is significantly greater than males, but similar for tennis and basketball.

Rank Activity Male


Activity Female


1 Walking (other) 27.7% Walking (other) 51.9%

2 Aerobics/Fitness/Weights 19.1% Aerobics/Fitness 27.8%

3 Cycling 15.6% Swimming 19.0%

4 Swimming 14.0% Tennis 9.2%

5 Golf 13.5% Cycling 7.6%

6 Running 11.3% Running 7.4%

7 Australian Football 9.6% Netball 6.9%

8 Tennis 9.2% Yoga 6.5%

9 Cricket (outdoor) 6.7% Walking (bush) 4.5%

10 Basketball 6.0% Golf 3.8%

Table 4: Comparison of Activity Participation Between Males and Females (2004)

8 Glenelg participation rates have been taken from the Household Telephone survey results, see Appendix 3.



4.3.2. Organised and Non-Organised Participation

The ERASS defined participation as being "organised" if the survey respondent reported that his or her participation was "organised in full or in part by a club, association or other type of organisation".

In Victoria, an estimated 1.842 million people aged 15 years and over participated in at least one organised activity, which represents a participation rate of 46.4% (compared to 40.4% for 2001). It also represents over half (54.5%) of the 3.378 million people who participated in sport or physical activity in Victoria in 2004. Those people who participated in organised sport or physical activity undertook an average of 3.4 sessions of organised activity per week9.

In relation to participation in organised sport by age, the table below shows that participation in organised sport declines rapidly with age.

Age Groups Organised Participation (Victoria)

Organised Participation (National)

15-24 years 70.9% 66.1%

25-34 years 50.4% 46.2%

35-44 years 41.7% 41.5%

45-54 years 35.4% 33.7%

55-64 years 37.4% 33.2%

65+ years 37.7% 30.7%

Average 46.4% 42.7%

Table 5: Comparison of Organised Participation Between Victoria and National (2004)

Organised participation rates in Victoria were highest in the 15-24 years age group (70.9%), and declined to 37.7% for persons aged over 65 years. There was a higher rate of participation in Victoria compared to Nationally for all age groups.

4.4. Sports Trends/Participation Characteristics

High-level participation trends/participant characteristics for the six organised sports identified in the top-ten activities for Glenelg Shire residents (see Household Telephone Survey results, Appendix 3) are presented below. The six sports are lawn bowls, golf, netball, tennis, basketball and Australian football. Key trends/characteristics for cricket have also been included, although it ranks at 14th position in Glenelg. The data has been sourced from the Australian Sports Commission publication, The Numbers Game, March 2000, unless otherwise stated. The source data relates to people aged 18 years and over.

Lawn Bowls

• 9% of Glenelg residents participate in lawn bowls, this is significantly higher than the National average of 2.3%.

9 National average, as frequency data was not provided to State level.



• The National (adult) participation rate has increased from 2002 (1.9%) to 2004 (2.3%).

• On average (within Australia) lawn bowls participants are male, aged 65 years or over. They are likely to be Australian born, not be in the work force and play only lawn bowls.

• On a National basis, of those that participate in other activities, the most popular are golf and carpet bowls.

• In Victoria (in 2003) there were 165 bowls greens with a synthetic surface (17% of all greens in Victoria). 72% of all Victorian clubs have only natural turf greens, 23% have a combination of grass and synthetic surfaces.

Golf

• On average, golfers will be male, aged over 45 years. Male golfers account for approximately 77.9% of all participants.

• The majority of female participants are aged between 55-64 years.

• Unlike other sports/activities, participation rates do not decline progressively with age, in fact participation rates increase for each age group, peaking at 55-64 years.

• The proportion of married people who play golf (80.6%) is significantly higher than the proportion for any other organised activity and higher than the proportion of married individuals in the community.

• More golfers work as trades persons and related workers than any other occupation, although golfers work across the whole spectrum of industries/professions.

• Approximately two thirds of all golfers only participate in golf. Of those that participate in other activities the most popular are tennis, lawn bowls, cricket and aerobics/fitness.

Netball

• Victoria has a higher number of registered netballers than any other state.

• The age profile of netballers is generally younger than other sports and activities – 80.4% of netballers are less than 35 years of age.

• Netball participants are likely to be Australian born (91.8%).

• There was a steady decline in the total number of registered netballers in Victoria between 1991 and 2001, however this decline levelled out in 2002. The decline in membership during the nineties was due largely to a decline in seniors10. Anecdotally, this decline was off-set by the increased number of mid-week and evening social netball competitions being offered at indoor community recreation centres (public and private) where players do not have to be registered with Netball Victoria.

10 Source: Interview and membership information from Netball Victoria.



• There has been sustained growth in registered junior participation since 1994, coinciding with the introduction of junior promotional programs (e.g. Netta).

Tennis

• Tennis is the 2nd most popular organised sport and physical activity undertaken by adult Australians, behind aerobics/fitness.

• Victoria has a higher rate of participation in tennis (9.2% of all people), compared to the National average (8.4%). The participation rate in Glenelg is approximately 6%.

• More women (57.1%) participate in tennis than men, with the gap widening as age increases. The gap peaks at 45 years and over, where there is almost 50% more women playing tennis than men.

• Tennis participants are likely to be Australian born (82.2%).

• Over half (54.7%) of tennis players participate only in tennis. Of those who undertake additional sports or physical activities, golf and aerobic/fitness are the most popular.

Basketball

• Victoria has a higher rate of participation in basketball than other state or territory.

• Basketball tends to be dominated by younger people, with 74.6% of participants under 35 years. However, participation declines markedly after the age of 24 years.

• Basketball participants are likely to be Australian born (86.7%).

• Over 33% of basketballers participate in one additional sport or physical activity, of which netball is the most popular.

Australian Football

• Victoria ranks 4th in relation to Australian football participation rates, behind South Australia, Tasmania and the Northern Territory.

• Participation in Australian football is dominated by young males (98.3% of all participants are male, with 91.2% aged 18 - 34 years).

• Australian football participants are likely to be Australian born (96.4%).

• Over half (58%) of Australian footballers participate in an additional sport or physical activity, of which outdoor cricket, basketball and golf are the most popular.

Cricket

• Tasmania has the highest rate of participation in cricket compared to than any other state or territory, followed by Victoria and NSW.



• 40.1% of all cricketers are aged 25 - 34 years, however, there is a higher rate of participation in cricket by all 18 – 24 year olds (3.1%), compared to 25 – 34 year olds (2.4%).

• Cricketers are likely to be Australian born (90.1%).

• 40% of cricketers participate only in cricket, whilst the 60% who participate in additional sports or physical activities have a preference for Australian football, golf and indoor cricket.

4.5. Organised Sport and Recreation Participation in Glenelg

The table in Appendix 4 shows membership trends for the past three years (2003 – 2005 seasons) for Glenelg based sport, recreation and community groups. The data has been collated from the club survey administered as part of this study.

In most instances, membership numbers reflect “active” members only, not “social/associate” members. In some cases membership data may not have been available for each year, in these instances the latest membership data has been applied to all years in order to enable a comparative analysis to be made over the past 3 years.

The analysis below excludes the estimated 2005 attendance figures provided for The Place (Portland Aquatic Centre, 110,000 people) in order to avoiding skewing the results.

The key trends and information from a review of local club membership data are:

• In 2005, approximately 23,548 people were involved in Glenelg sport, recreation and community groups as either participants, members or attendees at events and functions (up from approximately 21,771 or 8% since 2003).

• Males accounted for approximately 66% of the total club membership, whilst females comprised 34%. This difference in participation is significantly greater than the average “organised” physical activity participation rates for all Victorian males (49.1%) and females (43.7%)11.

• Juniors (U/18 years) made up approximately 38% of the total club membership, whilst Adults comprised 62%.

• The majority of sporting clubs anticipate that their membership growth will either stabilise or increase in the next 5 years, only a few clubs expect membership to decline. Specifically these were the Casterton & District Cricket Association, Portland Swimming Club, Sandford Mechanics Institute and the Casterton Garden Club.

The graphs on the following pages highlight the key membership trends for each of the Glenelg sport and recreation categories12 that responded to the survey. Key trends that can be identified from the graphs include:

11 Source: Participation in Exercise Recreation and Sport Survey (ERASS), Australian Sports Commission, 2004. 12 Categories refer to the total figures for all clubs/groups within a particular sport/activity.



• Only two sports/activities have current membership rates that are lower than what they had in 2003. The sports/activities are athletics (down 16%) and equestrian/riding (down 10%).

• The majority of sports/activities have experienced membership growth over the last three years. In percentage terms, the following sports/activities recorded the highest membership growth over the last three years:

1. Croquet (increase 68%),

2. Swimming (increase 29%),

3. Football/Netball Clubs (increase 24%),

4. Golf (increase 19%),

5. Miscellaneous Sports/Activities (increase 16%),

6. Hockey (increase 15%),

7. Tennis (increase 13%)

Athletics Total

020406080

100120

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Athletics Total

Aust Football & Football/Netball Total

0200400600800

1000120014001600

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Aust Football &Football/NetballTotal

Bow ls

165170175180185190195

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Bow ls

Cricket Total

760770780790800810

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Cricket Total

Equestrian/Riding Total

404244464850

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Equestrian/RidingTotal

Gymnastics Total

145150155160165

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Gymnastics Total



Motorsport Total

98

100

102

104

106

108

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Motorsport Total

Basketball Total

940960980

100010201040

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Basketball Total

Croquet Total

010203040

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Croquet Total

Golf Total

320340360380400420440

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Golf Total

Hockey Total

9095

100105110115120

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Hockey Total

Netball Total

420440460480500520

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Netball Total

Sw imming Total

050

100150200250300

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Sw imming Total

Miscellaneous Total

500520540560580600620640660680

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

MiscellaneousTotal

Tennis Total

600650700750800

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

Tennis Total

TOTAL

20500

21000

21500

2200022500

23000

23500

24000

2003 2004 2005

Year

Mem

bers

hip

#

TOTAL



4.6. Recreation Facility Design Trends

Relevant industry trends on a National basis in sports facility design that have been observed by the consulting team, include:

• The design and development of facilities that can be configured to meet a variety of different needs and uses.

• Inclusion of facilities to accommodate mixed gender use of facilities, for example cubicle showers (similar to caravan park shower/change cubicles) and removal of urinals in preference for additional toilet pans.

• Inclusion of under cover external viewing areas attached to sports pavilions.

• The design of “meeting and social places” within sports and leisure facilities.

• A growing community preference for indoor facility provision, as the expense of participation in outdoor sports.

• Design of major regional sports/leisure facilities that offer a wide variety of activities/sports and ancillary services.

• Consideration of energy efficiency and environmentally friendly features within the design of sports and leisure facilities.

• Co-locating leisure and sports facilities close to other community assets such as retail precincts, arts precincts, libraries and other facilities is an emerging trend designed to maximise the visibility, traffic and throughput to these facilities.

• The design of joint-use facilities (educational and community use) at school and other educational facility locations allowing educational use during off-peak daytime periods (weekdays) and community use during the peak evening and weekend periods.

• There is an emerging trend of public-private partnerships between developers, government and sports clubs to develop sports facilities.

4.7. Trends in Indoor Sports Facility Management

A number of common indoor facility management trends have been observed in recent times, including:

• A general shift (back) to in-house Council management,

• A lack of professional non-government indoor facility management service providers,

• Incorporation of commercial facility components into the overall service mix, e.g. retail outlets, health services and café facilities.

• Recent moves toward the establishment of community Boards of Management/Committees to oversee the operation of indoor facilities, particularly



when in partnership with joint (community) use of education department facilities, and

• Pursuit of non-sporting uses for indoor facilities, for example, events, displays, functions etc.

4.8. Open Space Trends

A number of trends in open space development and acquisition have been noted by the consulting team that are likely to be relevant to this project. A snap-shot of these are included below.

4.8.1. Residential Development

• Growing recognition of the importance of open space and direct relationship/correlation to individual property prices.

• Emergence of high-quality, highly-developed landscaped areas in substantial residential subdivisions, including infrastructure provision such as community playgrounds, park furniture, lighting and even sports pavilions.

• Inclusion of highly developed landscaped open space as key entry features in new land releases (often provided for visual impact as opposed to community usability).

• Increasing use of water and water features in public open space.

• The use of glossy promotional/sales brochures and concept plans for residential developments that depict significant open space development, which may or may not ultimately be provided.

4.8.2. Acquisition

• Associated with the above trends, acquisition of open space that may not be usable for active recreation or informal use (i.e. entry features).

• At times inadequate consideration of connectivity to existing residential areas, key activity nodes and/or likely desired destinations.

• Use of encumbered land, or land with limited usability, to satisfy required developer contributions.

• Industry trend towards acquisition of more than the maximum 5% developer contribution (by negotiation) for future open space purposes.

4.8.3. Reserve Development

• Development of open space by developers to an initial standard that promotes land sales however can not sustainably be maintained by Council.



• Increasing community expectations regarding the standard of facilities and maintenance.

• Inclusion of areas for informal activity and casual community use within larger active sports reserves.

• Increasing recognition of risk management and minimisation initiatives.

• Increasing use of interpretive signage and interactive information tools.

It should be noted that the State Government are in the process of developing an Active City Strategy in response to the Melbourne 2030 Strategic Plan.

The Environment and Sustainable Development Cabinet Committee (ESDCC) has endorsed the development of an Active City Strategy to progress initiatives 5.6.3 and 5.6.4 of Melbourne 2030. These initiatives aim to establish a new policy framework and guidelines that improve the quality, distribution and use of public open space. An inter-government working group chaired by SRV and including DSE, DOI, DET, DHS, DPC, DTF and Parks Victoria has been established to progress the development of the strategy. It is anticipated that the strategy may make recommendations for increasing the mandatory Developer Contributions from a maximum of 5% to 10% of the total developable land for open space purposes.

Council should monitor the progress of the Active City Strategy and consider the implications from the resulting recommendations as appropriate for Glenelg Shire.



5. EXISTING PROVISION OF FACILITIES AND SERVICES

The following section provides an overview of the existing provision of recreation and open space facilities and services available in the Glenelg Shire.

5.1. Sport and Recreation Facilities

According to Council’s Land Asset Register, there are 98 Council owned or managed reserves, totalling approximately 243 hectares, in Glenelg Shire. These include reserves used for active recreation, drainage, open space, playgrounds and other specific community recreation purposes. The majority (78) are within Portland, 8 in Casterton and the remaining 12 spread throughout the Shire. (Section 6.7 provides a list of all Council owned and managed reserves/land used for recreation purposes).

Council’s Land Asset Register estimates the Capital Improved Value of the Council owned or managed reserves at approximately $5,385,300.

In addition to the Council owned/managed recreation reserves there are a number of reserves owned or managed for the community by others. The majority of these are Crown Land, under the control of DSE, managed by local community Committees of Management. The table below identifies the key recreation facilities available at either Council controlled or DSE controlled reserves.

Facility Council DSE Total Football Ovals* 9 5 14 Soccer pitches 2 0 2 Cricket Ovals* 10 4 14 Cricket Nets 13 4 17 Netball Courts 19 10 29 Tennis Courts 25 20 45 Lawn Bowls 2 3 5 Softball/Baseball 1 0 1 Athletics track (grass) 0 1 1 Hockey (grass) 3 2 5 Squash 5 0 5 Basketball (indoor) 2 0 2 Croquet 2 0 2 Swimming Pools 4 0 4 Playgrounds 22 4 26 Gymnastics 1 0 1 Go-Karting 1 0 1 BMX 1 1 2 Skate Park 2 0 2 Equine Parks 3 2 5 Gymnasium 1 0 1 Community Halls 6 23 29

Table 6: Current Facility Provision

NB: These playing fields are shared use (summer and winter sports).



5.2. Education Department Facilities

Telephone interviews were conducted with each of the 14 primary and 4 secondary schools located throughout the Shire. A summary of key findings are included in the table at Appendix 5. The consultation results revealed that all secondary school facilities are reportedly available for community use outside of school hours, similarly all except for four primary schools make their facilities available for use by the community. (Another school allows community use to only some of its facilities, that is, Casterton Primary School does not allow community use of their indoor multi-purpose court but does allow access to all other facilities). Collectively the schools in Glenelg provide the following facilities available for community use:

• School ovals = 11.

• ½ size ovals = 3.

• Outdoor multi-purpose courts = 24.

• Indoor multi-purpose courts = 6.

• Tennis courts = 7.

• Indoor squash courts = 4.

In addition to the above facilities, three schools have plans for new or upgraded facilities, specifically:

• Covering-in an outdoor court to permit all-weather use (Merino PS and North Portland PS), and

• Potential oval upgrade to include development of a grass athletics track (Portland SC).

5.3. Other key Public and Private Facilities

In addition to the facilities identified above, the following key recreation facilities are provided (although not all these are necessarily accessible by all members of the community, many facilities are restricted to members or employees only):

• Portland Leisure and Aquatic Centre Gymnasium,

• Great South West Walk (GSWW)13,

• Recreational and commercial fishing infrastructure,

• 5 Golf Clubs,

• Casterton Racing Club,

• South Coast Drag Racing Club,

13 The GSWW is a unique250km recreational trail, starting and finishing in Portland, the walk traverses magnificent coastal, environmental and bushland areas. The GSWW is highly valued by the community, more information about the walk can be obtained from www.greatsouthwestwalk.com



• Southern 500 Speedway,

• Portland Surf Life Saving Club,

• Rifle/Gun/Pistol Clubs, and

• Portland YMCA Gymnasium (provided within a school).

5.4. Facilities Available in Surrounding Areas

In addition to the facilities available within Glenelg Shire, a number of residents travel outside the Shire to access regional standard facilities available in surrounding areas. The following existing and/or proposed facilities are likely to attract use by Glenelg residents:

• Hamilton Indoor Leisure and Aquatic Centre,

• Brauer College (Warrnambool) Synthetic Athletics Track (currently under development),

• Warrnambool Synthetic Hockey facility,

• 10-Pin Bowling in Warrnambool and Mt Gambier,

• Mt Gambier Indoor Recreation Centre (proposed), and

• Regional Gymnastics Facility (Warrnambool, currently under investigation).

5.5. Overall Summary of Available Recreation Facilities

Stratcorp Consulting undertook a high level assessment of the adequacy of the current number of sports facilities available in the Shire for each of the five (predominantly) team sports identified in the top-ten most popular sport or recreation activities undertaken by Glenelg residents (according to the household telephone survey results) and compared the current level of provision to ‘benchmark’14 levels of provision per head of population. Cricket falls outside the top-ten, ranked 14th however has also been included in the assessment below.

As indicated in the footnote, these figures are to be viewed as a guide only and provide us with a basis for a high level assessment of the total number of sport facilities, however there are a number of influencing considerations that need to be considered when determining the final level of facility provision, including population changes, quality and condition of existing facilities, standard of competition, accessibility and a range of social considerations. Hence the needs of specific townships based on the research results and consultation outcomes are discussed in Section 10.

Therefore, the table below identifies Shire-wide total level of facility provision per head of population and compares this to an industry ‘benchmark’. Please note that the existing facility provision numbers do not include school facilities.

14 There are no known benchmarks for provision of sports facilities per head of population that have been universally adopted by the industry. There are too many variables that can influence the recommended level of provision for a single standard to be universally applied. The ‘benchmark’ levels of provision identified in this report are based on Stratcorp’s extensive experience with projects of a similar nature, however it is acknowledged that these should be viewed as a guide only, and all other influencing factors need to be considered in ultimately determining levels of facility provision.



It is important to note that the number of playing fields identified in this table can not all be provided at the same time, that is, the majority of playing fields in the Shire are multi-purpose and are used by different sports in both summer and winter seasons, they are generally not single purpose facilities.

Sport/Activity Existing

# of Facilities

Benchmark # per

person

Actual ratio of

provision

Benchmark # required

(2006)

Difference (2006)

Lawn Bowls 6 1:10,000 1:3,356 2 +4 Netball (outdoor) 29 1:3,000 1:694 7 +22

Tennis 58 1:2,000 1:347 10 +48 Basketball (indoor multi purpose)

2 1:10,000 1:10,068 2 Nil

Australian Football 15 1:4,000 1:1,342 5 +10

Cricket 20 1:4,000 1:1,006 5 +15

Notes:

Council and DSE,

not schools.

Based on industry

experience.

Based on estimated

2006 population of 20,13715

Based on estimated

2006 population of

20,137.

Based on estimated

2006 population of

20,137.

Table 7: Assessment of Current Facility Provision Compared to Total Population

At a Shire-wide level, the results indicate that there is a significant over supply of facilities for lawn bowls, netball, tennis, football and cricket based on the estimated current population. (Current DSE population projections suggest a slight overall decline in the total Glenelg population, however these are not of sufficient magnitude to change the figures as provided for 2006. Conversely, there is some suggestion that the total population may in fact increase associated with major economic and industry development in the Shire. However given the current level of facility supply for the activities identified above, there is sufficient scope to cater for significant population growth should this occur). However as indicated, these are raw figures only and do not include consideration of influences such as the quality of facilities, age of the population, participation trends, structure of competitions or the social needs of rural communities. Therefore the benchmark figures and ratios are not to be applied in a mechanical (black and white) way.

Of particular importance is the valuable role that sports and recreation facilities play in rural communities in facilitating social capital and community interaction. These benefits should not be underestimated. Application of the raw ratio figures on a Shire-wide basis suggests that there may be an oversupply of certain facilities, however the community consultation results consistently highlight the ongoing importance of these facilities and venues to local communities. Therefore it is not recommended that any of the above facility types be considered for removal/rationalisation without in-depth engagement, consultation and detailed planning with local communities.

As a basis for further comparison, Stratcorp Consulting undertook a comparative analysis with other rural Victorian municipal areas in relation to the supply of facilities for selected (or popular) sports.

15 DSE :Know Your Area’ at www.doi.vic.gov.au



The table below compares the average provision of sporting facilities in the Shires of Macedon Ranges, Southern Grampians, the City of Latrobe and Echuca-Moama, with the current provision in the Glenelg Shire. The comparison is based on the provision of facilities per 1,000 people.

The results of this comparison reveals that the level of provision for football, cricket, netball, tennis, swimming pools and skate/BMX facilities is higher in Glenelg Shire compared to the ‘rural average’. Conversely the level of provision of indoor multi-purpose courts, outdoor soccer and to a lesser extent, lawn bowls is lower than the average of selected Shires.

Comparative Analysis of Provision of Selected Sporting Facilities

FacilityM

aced

on

Latro

be

Echu

ca-

Moa

ma

Sout

hern

G

ram

pian

s

Ave

rage

*

Gle

nelg

Population Year 2004 2004 2001 2001 2006

Football Oval 2,500 2,593 2,107 874 2,019 1,342

Cricket Oval 2,500 1,795 1,639 722 1,664 1,006

Indoor Multipurpose court 6,667 3,889 2,458 2,768 3,946 10,068

Bowling Green 5,000 4,118 1,229 1,510 2,964 3,356

Netball Court 2,500 1,429 983 554 1,367 694

Outdoor Soccer Field 6,667 3,182 3,687 0 3,384 10,068

Tennis Court 519 667 399 221 452 347

Pools (indoor and outdoor) 10,000 11,666 7,374 2,372 7,853 5,034

Skate/BMX Facility 8,000 5,833 7,374 8,303 7,378 5,034

* Average is calculated using Macedon, Latrobe, Echuca-Moama and Glenelg only.

Table 8: Assessment of Current Facility Provision Compared to ‘Rural Average’

However, as previously indicated, the application of ‘industry benchmarks’ and/or comparisons to other rural municipalities needs to be viewed with caution, as no two municipalities are the same, each has a unique demographic profile, character and geographic distribution of population. Application of raw figures also fails to acknowledge the condition or useability of each asset. Therefore, the level of facility provision needs to be assessed on a case by case basis. Having said this, the comparisons reveal that residents of Glenelg Shire appear to be well serviced for ‘traditional’ sports and activities (i.e. football, cricket, netball, tennis, pools etc) and under-provided for public indoor multi-purpose facilities and soccer grounds.

A further comparison can be made if we were to consider the needs of Glenelg Shire from a ‘greenfield’ perspective, that is, if we were planning for the needs of a new population of around 20,000 people in rural Victoria, it is reasonable to expect that there should be access to the following facilities across the Shire:

• An “Access for All Abilities” playground.

• Regional sports ground facilities (cricket/football).



• A regional soccer complex.

• A regional athletics centre (synthetic).

• A regional indoor sports centre.

• A regional (dedicated) gymnastics centre.

• A regional hockey field (synthetic).

• A regional tennis centre.

• Regional and district netball facilities.

• Golf courses,

• Sports specific facilities (based on identified need, e.g. Baseball/Softball etc) and

• A regional indoor aquatic leisure centre.

Within each theoretical settlement, access to the following facilities could be expected:

Note: In the Categories below, the following applies:

• Towns (approx. 10,000 people) will typically comprise both District and Neighbourhood areas.

• Towns (500 - 5,000 people) will typically comprise at least 2 Neighbourhood areas.

Category Indicative Facility Provision

Large Townships

(approx. 10,000 people, e.g. Portland).

1 Regional playground

1 Regional sports ground facility (cricket/football)

1 District sports ground facility (cricket/football

2 District soccer facilities (depending on demand)

1 District athletics track (grass)

1 District baseball field

1 multipurpose indoor sports/recreation centre

1 bocce court

1 golf course

1 (non-dedicated) gymnastics facility (multipurpose space)

1 lawn bowling facility

1 District netball centre (outdoor)

1 District tennis centre (minimum 8 courts)

1 indoor aquatic centre

Medium Townships

(approx. 500 - 5,000 people, e.g. Casterton and Heywood).

1 District playground

1 District sports ground facility (cricket/football)

1 District soccer facility (pending local demand)

1 multipurpose indoor sports/recreation court (may be



Category Indicative Facility Provision school).

1 lawn bowling green

1 netball court (could be co-located with school/football ground)

1 District tennis facility (4 courts)

District (2-3 Neighbourhood Cells).

1 District playground

1 District sports ground facility (cricket/football)

1 Neighbourhood soccer field

1 lawn bowling green

1 netball court (could be co-located with school/football ground)

Neighbourhood (includes Townships with less than 200 people).

2 Neighbourhood playgrounds

1 Neighbourhood sports field (cricket/football/soccer, not necessarily used for competition).

Comparing the current level of facility provision against this theoretical model (above) highlights the following potential implications:

• Within the Shire there may be a need to:

o Review the need for a synthetic athletics track.

o Consider the need for a dedicated gymnastics facility.

o Consider the need for a synthetic hockey facility.

o Consider the needs of specific sports with high demand or known facility gaps, e.g. Motor cross.

• Within Portland there may be a need to:

o Designate and upgrade a playground (preferably on the foreshore) to Regional status, ensure Access for All Abilities.

o Monitor the level of demand for soccer facilities.

o Install a bocce facility.

• Within medium sized townships, there may be a need to:

o Monitor the level of demand for soccer facilities.

• Within neighbourhood areas/smaller townships, there may be a need to:

o Review the level of community demand for local playgrounds.



5.6. Recreation Programs and Services

The following section provides an overview of the key recreation programs and activities offered by public hall committees in Glenelg and identifies the range of support programs or services that are available within the Shire to facilitate the ‘capacity building’ of individual clubs, groups, associations or Committees.

5.6.1. Recreation Programs Provided by Hall Committees

There are approximately 33 public hall/reserve committees in Glenelg Shire. Many of these play a direct role in physical activity program and service delivery. Telephone interviews were attempted with each of the 33 committees using the Council supplied contact details for each respective group. Each group was asked what activities they offered, how often they were conducted, who they were run/provided by, average attendance and whether attendance was increasing or decreasing (on average). The committees were then asked if there were any other activities that they would like to run, why they were not being offered and asked to outline any assistance that they may require from Council (NB: the telephone interviews were conducted in addition to the written survey that had previously been distributed to all clubs, group and committees in the Shire).

The table on the following two pages summarises the key responses from the 16 committees that were able to be contacted.

A review of the information reveals that there is quite an extensive range of programs and activities that are offered/managed by the hall/reserve committees, including activities such as bowls, meditation, dance, art groups, theatre, play groups and gentle exercise classes (e.g. Tai Chi) as well as facilitating participation in traditional sports (i.e. football, cricket, tennis and netball). The halls are also used by the community for a variety of meetings, gatherings and social interactions. The importance of these activities/functions in rural communities can not be over stated.

The results reveal that many of the activities are undertaken under the direct auspice or management of the respective committees, whilst others are provided by external hirers and/or agencies. The results indicate that some committees (e.g. Bolwarra) have been active and successful in establishing partnerships with other agencies to deliver service to local communities utilising ‘their’ facilities. The majority of halls/reserves are used on a weekly or at least monthly basis for community activities.

The respective committees indicated varying levels of use/attendance, with the majority suggesting attendance is relatively stable or static. Few of the committees indicated that they would like to run other/additional activities, however this may reflect limited knowledge of alternative options that may be available and/or limited capacity to pro-actively program these spaces.

Many of the committees contacted highlighted the need for additional Council support in terms of facility maintenance and development, however the majority of these are DSE controlled assets and therefore additional facility support from DSE appears needed. There may also be opportunities for Council to regularly engage with local committees to establish relationships and identify opportunities for possible program development and support. This could largely entail Council playing a facilitator role, linking committees to available resources and options such as those listed later in this section.



Name of Committee/Hall Activities Offered Frequency Who run by? Average AttendanceParticipation Increasing or Decreasing

Future activities would like to run?

Why can’t they be run? Assistance required from Council

Bowls 1/week

Social gatherings On occasion

Meditation 1/ month Neighbourhood House 10 people/ session

Dance 1/ fortnight Students at Henfield

Art Group 1/ week Neighbourhood House 10 people/ session

Tennis Seasonal Students at local school

Dances 2 times/ year 60

Funerals On occasion Varies

Exercise classes 3 times/ wk

Afternoon tea 1/ weekTheatre 1/ year Drama club in HamiltonFunerals/weddings On occasion

Programs provided by Hall/Reserve Committees

-- --Occasional private and public functions

On occasionFire brigade, private Christmas celebrations

Homerton Hall & Rec Reserve Varies Increasing --

-- --Community meetings

General functions

On occasion

On occasion

VariousGorae West Public Hall and Rec Reserve

Varies --

6-10 a year

Local resident (Jim McKenzie)

40-50 players

New paint job

Drumborg Public Hall Committee Static -- -- --

Varies

Tennis

Various functions

1/ fortnight

Digby Rec Public Hall & Mechanics Institute

Static -- --

New sewerage New paintNew sanding of floorToilets maintenanceNew rain water tank

On occasionParties

New fridgeNew water tankNew bowls matNew bowls balls

-- --

Bolwarra Rec Reserve & Public Hall

All increasing Many Hall facilities in disrepair

Bahgallah Memorial Hall Hall & Social Club Bowls – 18 people/ wk Static

Cashmore Rec & Public Hall Reserve

CricketSeasonal (until March)

Portland Cricket Association

Two cricket teams Static -- -- New cricket mats

Condah Mechanics Institute & Rec Reserve

Community meetings On occasion

Various

Varies

Static ManyDifficult to recruit enough people to the Management Committee

Assistance with grants for general maintenance

Dunrobin Public Hall Committee Bowls 1/ week Hall Committee 10 - 20 people Decreasing Craft activitiesNeed to hire some people to run it (for about 10 weeks)

Help with the craft activities

Lower Cape Bridgewater Public Hall

Bridgewater Fair 1/ year Hall Committee 2000 people Increasing -- -- --



Name of Committee/Hall Activities Offered Frequency Who run by? Average AttendanceParticipation Increasing or Decreasing

Future activities would like to run?

Why can’t they be run? Assistance required from Council

Gun Club Jan - JuneParties On occasionMeetings On occasion

Quilting 1/ month Local Resident (June Lazell) 20 people/ session

Craft 1/ month Local Resident (June Lazell) 20 people/ session

Play group 1/ week

Tai Chi just finished

Tennis 1/ week Casterton 4 or 5 teams CabaretNeed someone to run it/ help with marketing

Bowls Need extra support

Badminton Need extra support

Movie nights Costs too much for projector

Football each week Tyrendarra F/Netball Club Varies

Netball each week Tyrendarra F/Netball Club Varies

Tennis each week Tyrendarra Tennis Club Varies

Cricket each week Tyrendarra Cricket Club Varies

Update hall Put in fans and A/CDecent chairs and tablesKeep grants coming!

Wando Vale Public Rec & Hall Reserve

Static -- -- --

Narrawong Mechanic Institute Inc IncreasingWant more people using facilities

--

Strathdownie Memorial Hall & Rec Reserve Meetings/ Training On occasion

Various - e.g. fire brigade, Red Cross

VariousStatic

If we had more money and more assistance to run programs, a lot more would happen!

Myamyn Public Hall & Rec Reserve

Don't know

N/A N/A

-- --Don't know Static

People tend to go to nearby town instead

N/A

Tyrendarra Public Hall & Rec Reserve

Static 10 - 12 rubbish bins

N/A N/A N/A N/ATrewalla Rec Reserve

None. We are mostly concentrating on making this a refuge for wildlife species

Cricket each week Wando Vale Cricket Club Two cricket teams



5.6.2. Glenelg Shire Services

Despite the previous Recreation Strategy (1998) and recent Recreation Services Best Value Review (May 2002), the Shire does not have a clearly defined policy that articulates its fundamental role in providing or facilitating recreation participation opportunities for the community. Having said this, Council does have policies that provide guidance in order to support groups and activities that “contribute to the achievement of the Shire’s vision”, e.g. Community Grants Program, Conditions of Use of Glenelg Shire Recreational Reserves and Facilities. Such policies appear to have been developed on a case by case basis without an overarching statement that articulates Council’s fundamental role, i.e. facility provider, service provider, program/activity provider, facilitator etc. As a result Council may be all or none of these things at any given time. This may be appropriate, however it also leads to inconsistencies and dilution of resource efficiency. Council has a limited capacity to be ‘all things to all people’ and therefore it is recommended that Council clearly articulate and define its primary role in recreation and open space provision in order to focus effective effort.

It appears that Council’s role may have already evolved, as evidenced by the support programs offered by Council, to primarily that of a facility/asset provider, landlord and funding body. The Council also plays a key role in facility/asset maintenance, however has little involvement in direct service or program provision. Key recreation services offered by Council include:

• Minor Recreation Grants - $30,000 available per annum, spread equally over two rounds (Summer and Winter). Funding is offered on a dollar for dollar basis with a maximum $5,000 Council contribution.

• Public Halls Grants - $30,000 available per annum, dollar for dollar basis, maximum $5,000 Council contribution.

• Glenelg Junior Sports trust - $2,200 available annually for students to participate at regional, state, national and international competitions. Maximum grants of $150 each are usually provided.

• Officer assistance for clubs/groups etc in seeking external funding and grants.

• Occasional workshops – for example information sessions on grant seeking and club development (NB: Council does not have a formalised annual program of events or training e.g. an annual calendar of support events, activities or opportunities).

• School Holiday Programs – funded by Council and currently delivered by the YMCA.

• Landlord – asset maintenance and renewal (primarily limited to Council owned/controlled recreation facilities and assets, and not those provided on DSE controlled land).



5.6.3. Services Available Through Other Providers

South West Sports Assembly (SWSA)

Aside from Council, the South West Sports Assembly (SWSA) is the main provider of services to support the capacity building of recreation/community clubs and groups in the region. SWSA does not receive any ongoing direct financial assistance from Council. Each LGA in the region provides SWSA with an operational grant (usually around $10-$15k) every four years to stage/host the South-West Games.

The following information has been sourced from www.southwestsport.com.au and provides an overview of the SWSA.

Mission Statement

The South West Sports Assembly supports the planning and development of sport and recreation to foster a more active, inclusive and healthier South West Community.

Who Is The SWSA

The South West Sports Assembly (formerly Glenelg Sports Assembly) was founded in 1985 and is a not-for-profit incorporated association, with a membership primarily consisting of sporting and recreational organisations.

The South West Sports Assembly is governed by a Committee of Management made up of representatives nominated by member organisations from all 5 sub-regions of the South West of Victoria.

The Committee of Management employs an Executive Officer, who oversees all other paid staff including Program Managers and Project Officers.

The Region

The region that the SWSA services is the South West of Victoria, which incorporates the Corangamite Shire, Glenelg Shire, Moyne Shire, Warrnambool City and Shire of Southern Grampians. The South West Sports Assembly has offices located in Warrnambool and Hamilton.

SWSA Activities

• Assistance with Club Development

• Training Opportunities

• Resource Promotion

• Referral and Advice

• Regional Planning

• Health Promotion through Physical Activity

• Partnership Linkages

• Inclusive Development



• Advocacy

• Club Promotional Opportunities

What Are The Assembly's Key Areas Of Work?

1. The Regional Sports Assembly (RSA) Program is a program, funded by Sport and Recreation Victoria, that aims to assist local communities to provide quality and inclusive opportunities for involvement through sport and recreation.

2. Access for All Abilities (AAA) Program is a program, funded by Sport and Recreation Victoria, that aims to develop and support sport and recreation environments that are inclusive of and accessible to people with a disability.

3. The Participation In Community Sport and Recreation (PICSAR) Program is a program, funded by the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (VicHealth), that aims to develop linkages between a range of sporting and community agencies that will result in increased opportunities for people to become physically active in community sport.

4. Event Management Program is a program that aims to promote economic activity whilst providing participation and recognition opportunities to industry participants.

5. Industry Linkages Program is a program that aims to promote collaborative planning, development and delivery of quality inclusive sport and recreation opportunities to the community.

6. Sport Education Program is a program that aims to improve sporting organisations and their personnel throughout the South West by the provision of quality education and training.

The following list provides an indication of the programs, activities and services that have been delivered by the SWSA in the Glenelg Shire.

Club Development Workshops (RSA Program):

• Sports Safety

• Risk Management

• Project Planning

• Funding/Sponsorship

• Financial Management

• Inclusive Development

• Disability Education Program (clubs and leisure centres)

• Support for inclusive programming (sports clubs) - i.e. Portland RSL Bowls Club (inclusive program) and Kyeema (Disability Agency) Strength Training Program

• Health Promotion Activities (VicHealth PICSAR Program)



• Development of community based strength training (in partnership with PCP)

• Development of 10 township walking maps (in partnership with PCP with Portland & District Health - lead agency)

• Assisted with support of a successful VicHealth grant for Winda Mara Aboriginal Co-op - to develop a gym program and training of fitness instructors

Industry Development:

The South West region was successful in received a CRISP grant (Southern Grampians Shire - auspice) to train aquatic staff. The co-ordination of training was outsourced to SWSA. SWSA co-ordinated providers to deliver:

• Austswim

• Life Guard

• First Aid

• Gas Handling

• Disability Education

• Various Certificate iv Courses (TAFE)

Regional Games:

The regional games rotate annually between Warrnambool, Corangamite, Southern Grampians and Glenelg. Glenelg Shire is due to stage the games in November 2007. The regional games involve approximately;

• 6000 participants.

• 60 sports.

• 10 days of events.

• 6 monthly club development workshops in the lead up to the event.

There may be opportunities for Council and SWSA to develop a more formal relationship in order for SWSA to deliver specific club development and participation initiatives in the Shire (on a fee for service basis).

Ourcommunity

In addition to the SWSA, support services are also offered through the web based Ourcommunity organisation (www.ourcommunity.com.au). Ourcommunity offers a range of information and support services for community groups and organisations, including access to “Australia's most useful website and publishing house, encompassing the nation's largest and most diverse membership base and 15 knowledge and service hubs - accelerating the impact of Australia's 700,000 community organisations”. Services primarily support local club capacity building through access to education, training and funding programs.



There is also a range of other web based education, training and support opportunities provided by other organisations, including the Geelong based Sports House. However despite the two main service providers identified above, it is not clear the extent to which local clubs are accessing the services available

Portland YMCA

The Portland YMCA offer a range of programs and services to residents across the Shire. These include operation of a Health and Fitness Gymnasium at the former All Saints School in Portland as well as active After School Care programs. The YMCA has a focus on wellness programs and targets people that may not traditionally access commercial gymnasium facilities. The YMCA provide a range of activities such as yoga, belly dancing, painting, personal training etc. The YMCA has been active in engaging local sporting clubs to run programs and clinics as part of their active after school care program.

Consultation with the YMCA revealed that there can be difficulties in accessing appropriate program spaces in central Portland and other towns to conduct activities. The YMCA suggested that a single multi-purpose indoor recreation facility may be needed in Portland that could be used by a variety of sporting clubs, community groups and the YMCA to run programs and activities on a ‘user pays’ basis. The concept of establishing a single multi-purpose sport and recreation ‘hub’ within each township (particularly Portland) was encouraged by the YMCA.

The YMCA recognise the financial constraints on Council and therefore support a ‘user pays’ basis for accessing programs and facilities. However it was suggested that greater priority and support needed to be provided at a senior level within Council for sport and recreation resource allocation.

South West Sports Academy

The South West Sports Academy (Warrnambool based) is one of four regional academies established by the Victorian Institute of Sport (VIS) with funding assistance from Sport and Recreation Victoria. The other regional academies are based in Bendigo, Ballarat and Gippsland. The Academy has a focus on providing a pathway for athlete development and talent identification.

The Academy operates with funding support from each of the five LGA’s that make up the South West Region as well as corporate sponsorship and assistance from State Sporting Associations (SSA’s). The Glenelg Shire provides $6,000 annually (based on approximately $0.30 per head of population) to support the Academy programs. The Academy was established in February 2005, government funding (via the VIS) has been committed to June 2007.

The Academy has an initial focus on the four sports of tennis, golf, swimming and lawn bowls. It is anticipated that the range of sports will be increased over time. The Academy works with SSA’s to identify possible service and opportunity gaps in the region and then targets initiatives to address the identified gaps, therefore the focus for each of the four sports may vary. Initiatives and priorities for each of the four sports are guided by a committee. The Academy also offers generic athlete training and education programs that are open to athletes from other sports to attend.

The Academy has been effective in facilitating local clubs and associations coming together within the region to share resources and training opportunities. A number of



training, education and talent identification programs have been offered within the Glenelg Shire, these are expected to continue on a periodic basis as needed.

5.7. Assessment of Recreational Programs and Services

The research indicates that there is a range of leisure, recreation and sports program options available for residents throughout the Shire, and a range of funding options and support mechanisms available.

However, Council appears to have limited direct involvement in the delivery of programs or activities. Typically Council adopts the role of “facility provider”, “funder” (through subsidies, grants and partnerships), “advocate” and “promoter”. These roles and levels of involvement by Council are appropriate, however could be expanded to increase the overall participation by targeted sectors of the community.

Therefore, there are opportunities for Council to increase targeted leisure programs, particularly in the small townships, through improved relationship building (establishing a knowledge base) and linking committees to existing support services that may be available to assist program delivery (e.g. SWSA, SSA’s, Health agencies).

A lack of facilities to support leisure participation does not appear to be a major issue, however the physical condition of some building requires improvement and Council could play a greater role in advocating for their enhancement through DSE where appropriate.

Furthermore, Council could play a greater role in facilitating direct service delivery through training and development initiatives that could be provided by SWSA, the YMCA or other similar organisations, on a fee for service basis. Council may also wish to consider establishing ‘seeding’ grants for local committees to offset the initial cost of starting programs (staff, training and resources/equipment) in the hope that they become financially self-sustaining.

Finally, it is clear that Council does not have the capacity to directly deliver leisure activities or programs and therefore Council’s role should be focussed on facilitating the capacity of individual committees through providing access to training, funding and other service providers. These roles will be greatly enhanced through effective relationship building with local committees to ensure decisions and resources are applied from a basis of shared knowledge and understanding of local priorities.



5.8. Open Space

The following section provides a high level overview of the Council owned or controlled public open space available throughout the entire Shire16. The needs, issues and opportunities available within each township are discussed in Section 10.

The table below identifies all the public open space that is owned or controlled by the Shire within Portland. In total Portland has approximately 183 hectares of public open space, valued at approximately $4.73 million (site value, not Capital Improved Value).

Portland Public Open SpaceLand Description Size (ha) Capital Improved Value

Active Open Space (Sports) - PortlandAlexandra Park 15.74 $188,800Flinders Park 5.56 $278,000Cavalier Park 3.64 $127,400Hanlon Park 3.08 $169,500Nelson Park - Cape Nelson Rd 3.62 $90,400Henty Park 8.83 $327,600Friendly Society Reserve 2.02 $70,700Yarraman Park 26.30 $157,800Basketball Stadium 0.67 $40,000The Place - Portland Aquatic 1.46 $90,100Skate Park Unknown UnknownSub Total 70.92 $1,540,300Drainage Reserve Land - Portland30a Kerrs Rd (Rear) 0.74 $36,8005 Macneil St 0.06 $6,3006 Macneil St 0.06 $9005a Dusting Ct (Rear) 1.71 $30,7006a Dusting Ct (Rear) 1.84 $33,100Laguna Ct - Portland 0.72 UnknownKerrs Rd-Wattle Hill Creek Res 1.32 $10,600Oakpark Rd - Wattle Hill Creek 0.42 $0Kerrs Rd 1 - Wattle Hill Creek 0.70 UnknownKerrs Rd 2 - Wattle Hill Creek 0.25 UnknownPritchard Rd 0.17 Unknown31 Dalwood Ln 0.78 UnknownSub Total 8.77 $118,400Open Space Developer Contribution Land - Portland10 Bolwarra Ct 0.60 $15,00020 Karinya Cres 0.07 $16,5003 Curragh Ct 0.38 $76,20044 Camira St 0.27 $40,7004-5 Gilga Ct 0.12 $7,00045-53 Theresa St 0.49 $39,4005 Correa Ct 0.09 $8,0005-6 Shevill Ct 0.10 $25,000Bellara Ct 0.19 $29,000Champion Ct 0.28 $8,500Pile Ct 0.03 $15,0006 Isabel Ct 0.14 Unknown3 Tukki Ct 0.17 Unknown20a Donegal Ct 0.07 UnknownVidic Dr 0.43 UnknownNeptune Av 0.29 UnknownAquarius Ct 0.28 UnknownSub Total 4.03 $280,300

16 Source: Glenelg Shire Land Asset Register, 2006. NB: The scope of the project did not involve a review of all open space sites in Glenelg, including those that may be management by local Hall Committees.



Playground Reserve Land - Portland27 Tamora Cres 0.33 $66,70029 Tamora Cres 0.21 $41,8003-4 Mulga Ct 0.13 $19,10064 Short St 0.07 $10,6008 Rossdell St 0.11 $32,00045 Oswald St 0.62 $31,000Sub Total 1.48 $201,200Public Open Space - PortlandBotanical Gardens - Cliff St 3.12 $115,800Almond Tree Reserve - Cliff St 0.16 $79,000Recreation Reserve Market Square - 1 Market Ct 0.31 $370,800Ploughed Field Reserve - 168 Bentinck St 2.16 $183,700Lawn Area On Foreshore - 102 Bentinck St 1.76 $131,800Lawn Near Angling Club - Bentinck St Lawns 1.66 $124,700Nuns Beach/Park - Nuns Beach 3.90 $370,200Lions Fauna Park - Wyatt St 2.27 $45,000Battery Point - Victoria Pde 0.56 $140,000Magazine Hill Rec Reserve - 1 View St 4.33 $30,000Apex Park Playground - 1b Wade St 0.41 $81,000Dutton Bluff Rec Reserve - 1 Wade St 1.37 $82,300Fawthrop Lagoon - 31 Glenelg St 6.34 $19,000Sub Total 75.36 $1,869,600Other Recreational Reserve Land - PortlandRecreational Reserve - 17 Bentinck St (Rear) 0.05 $7,400Recreational Reserve - Finn St - Reserve 0.40 $40,500Recreational Reserve 1 - Dutton Way 4.48 $44,800Recreational Reserve 2 - Dutton Way 2.02 $16,200Recreational Reserve - Murphys Rd 1.20 $21,600Recreational Reserve - Olearia Rd 4.65 $37,200Recreational Reserve - Robin Av 4.94 UnknownRecreational Reserve - McIntyres Rd 3.14 UnknownLagoon - Fawthrop Lagoon - Henty Hwy 19.50 UnknownWalook Swamp Reserve - Cashmore Rd 27.52 $96,300Recreational Reserve - Echidna Rd 0.38 UnknownSub Total 68.29 $264,000Other Utilised Council Land - PortlandFawthrop Community Centre - 3 Bentinck St 0.41 $143,900Band Hall Soccer Clubrooms - 19 Glenelg St 0.11 $40,000South Portland Hall - 106-114 Wellington Rd 0.57 $60,000Civic Hall - 30 Bentinck St 0.36 $250,000Town Hall Reserve - Charles St 0.20 $60,000Sub Total 1.66 $553,900

Portland Total Open Space 183.49 $4,731,400

Table 9: Council Owned or Controlled Public Open Space In Portland

Outside of Portland, the amount of Council owned or controlled public open space is limited. The following tables identify that Casterton has approximately 22 hectares of Council owned/controlled public open space with a site value estimated at slightly over $115,000. The remainder of the municipality has a further 12 hectares with an estimated site value of just over $60,000.



Casterton Public Open SpaceLand Description Size (ha) Capital Improved Value

Active Open Space (Sports) - CastertonIsland Park 17.64 UnknownCasterton Gun Club 0.10 UnknownSub Total 17.74 UnknownPublic Open Space - CastertonRecreational Reserve - 42-44 Henty St 0.20 $20,000Reserve - 18-40 Kirby St 2.00 $16,000Goodman Park - Mt Gambier Rd 2.00 $20,000Recreational Reserve - 9 Murray St 0.20 UnknownSub Total 4.40 $56,000Open Space Developer Contribution Land - CastertonRecreation Reserve - Queen Street 0.30 UnknownOther Utilised Council Land - CastertonCasterton Town Hall - 67-71 Henty St 0.20 $50,000Casterton Town Hall Car Park - 6 Jackson St 0.08 $9,400Sub Total 0.28 $59,400

Casterton Total Open Space 22.72 $115,400

Table 10: Council Owned or Controlled Public Open Space In Casterton

Other Council Owned/Managed Open SpaceLand Description Size (ha) Capital Improved Value

MerinoMerino Park (Active) 6.31 UnknownRecreational Reserve - High St 0.20 UnknownWando ValeRecreational Reserve - Davidson Reserve 2.00 UnknownNelsonRecreational Reserve - Portland Nelson Rd 0.33 UnknownNarrawongRecreational Reserve - East St 2.39 UnknownBridgewaterForeshore Reserve - 1661 Bridgewater Rd 0.20 UnknownHeywoodHeywood Swimming Pool (Active) 0.51 $35,400Heywood Hall - 18-20 Edgar St 0.20 $25,000

Other Total Open Space 12.14 $60,400

Table 11: Council Owned or Controlled Public Open Space Excluding Portland and Casterton.

The public open space identified above supports a range of recreation facilities as identified in Section 6, however of equal importance is the range of DSE owned/controlled Crown Land that also supports community and recreational use. In addition to Council facilities, Section 6 also identifies the scope of facilities provided by ‘others’, these are predominantly available on Crown Land under DSE control (either directly or via local Committees of Management), however these areas are not included in the tables above as they are not considered part of Council’s Land Asset Register. In addition, there are substantial parcels of Crown Land that are zoned as Public Conservation and Resource Zone (PCRZ) according to the Glenelg Planning



Scheme (predominantly used for plantation purposes) however these are also not included in the list above.

The adequacy of open space in a local government area has historically been assessed using a standard or benchmark, e.g. 2.83 hectares per 1,000 people in NSW, 4.00 hectares in the ACT, and 5.00 hectares in Victoria (or 4.00 hectares for rural areas). One deficiency with this approach is that standards do not necessarily reflect the different needs of different communities, or the diversity in the quality and accessibility of the open space available. It does, however, provide one indicator towards the adequacy of open space in any given area, albeit in a simplistic form, and is also one means by which a comparative analysis can be made between different areas within the same local government area.

The benchmark of 4.00 hectares per 1,000 people has been used in this study as a means of undertaking a preliminary assessment of the adequacy of the current provision of open space in the Shire. The intent of the analysis is to assess the adequacy of “useable” open space which provides both passive and active recreation opportunities, such as playgrounds, picnic areas, bike paths, sporting and recreation reserves. Therefore, ‘drainage’ open space and ‘utilised’ open space categories from the preceding tables above have been excluded from the analysis below.

Main Township Total Council

Owned/Controlled Open Space

Estimated Population

(2001 Census)

Existing Provision Ratio

Comparison to standard

(4ha/1,000 people)

Portland 194.43 ha 9,588 20.27 ha / 1,000 people

Considerably higher.

Casterton 22.14 ha 1,670 13.25 ha/ 1,000 people


Heywood 0.71 ha 1,223 0.57 ha/1,000 people

Considerably lower.

Dartmoor 0.53 ha 246 2.15 ha/1,000 people Lower.

Merino 6.51 ha 215 30.27 ha/1,000 people


Narrawong 2.39 ha 175 13.65 ha/1,000 people


Table 12: Open Space Provision Ratios for Major Townships

At a high level, the analysis suggests that Portland, Casterton, Merino and Narrawong have a higher level of Council owned/controlled open space provision than the benchmark of four hectares per 1,000 people. Conversely Heywood and Dartmoor appear to have a lower quantity of provision. As indicated, this information needs to be viewed as a high level indicator only. This information will be considered in light of the overall research and consultation findings. Therefore township specific issues and opportunities in relation to public open space and recreation provision are discussed in Section 10.



6. OPEN SPACE PROVISION GUIDELINES

This section provides guidelines for the provision and development of open space in the Shire.

6.1. Proposed Minimum Levels of Provision of Open Space

A standard for the provision of open space in Glenelg is recommended at 4.0Ha/1,000 people, which is consistent with the current planning ratios being applied by other rural local government authorities for new urban subdivisions17. In order to provide for minimum levels of recreation and sporting areas, this 4.0Ha/1,000 people ratio should be divided into 2.5Ha for outdoor recreation areas and 1.5Ha for sporting facilities.

Note: These figures include provision to cater for average community and visitor requirements, and do not allow for the provision of regional open space areas or facilities, nor the provision of land for environmental or conservation related purposes.

For local outdoor recreation area development, a minimum size of 1.0Ha is recommended, whilst for outdoor sports facility development, a minimum area of 2.0Ha is recommended (which allows for 1 sports ground and associated areas), however, where possible both areas should be combined to create a large multipurpose recreation node, featuring a number of design and functional experiences.

6.2. Proposed Open Space System

The Open Space System for Glenelg is proposed to incorporate the following layers and categories (NB: Appendix 13 Sports Facility Audit applies these categories to each of the major reserves in the Shire):

1. Sports Grounds/Sports Reserves

− Premier − Township. − Local.

2. Parks

− Regional Park. − District Park. − Local Park. − Ornamental/Utility Park-Reserve. − Undeveloped.

3. Culturally Significant Areas

4. Natural Areas (including waterways)

17 Source: Planning Guide for Urban Open Space, Ministry for Planning & Environment (Vic), and is based on the open space needs for an average Residential 1 zone type development with a population density of approximately 25 people per hectare.



6.3. Objectives

The proposed key objectives for the provision of open space are:

1. To ensure sufficient land is reserved to meet the open space needs of current and future residents.

2. To ensure adequate provision is made to accommodate expansion of open space areas to cater for predicted population growth.

3. To enhance the environmental quality of Glenelg Shire.

4. To ensure residents have a range of opportunities in which to participate in outdoor recreation and sporting activities.

5. To ensure there is a diversity of open space which provides a range of different experiences and opportunities for both active and passive recreation.

6. To preserve and identify significant landscape features so as to enhance their character for the benefit of residents.

7. To encourage and facilitate access to rivers, foreshore areas and waterways for aquatic recreational activities and scenic benefit.

8. To provide opportunities for the development of private-sector recreation facilities.

6.4. Guiding Principles

The following principles are recommended to guide the detailed design and provision of public open space for recreational purposes.

6.4.1. General Principles for Open Space Provision

General Principles applicable to all settings are identified below.

Principle Description

Balance with Diversity

• To achieve a balanced and diverse provision of quality open space with capacity to accommodate leisure opportunities responsive to community needs and within the financial resources of Council.

Choice • To ensure that residents and visitors can

participate in a variety of open space activities and choices.

Distribution

• To provide open space areas which are relatively evenly distributed throughout and adjacent to residential areas to ensure all residents have reasonable access to an appropriate range of areas.

Access

• To provide safe and convenient access between residences and open space areas, and ensure that all areas are accessible to people with mobility constraints.

Equity • To ensure that the open space needs of all



Principle Description sectors of the community are treated fairly and equitably.

• To recognise and give special consideration to those sectors of the community who have special needs (e.g. older adults, people who have visual, mobility or intellectual impairments, and people from culturally diverse backgrounds).

Safety and Liability • To give consideration to public safety in the

design and location of all open space areas and facilities.

Innovation

• To encourage planners to explore innovative ways to address open space related issues and opportunities in the most cost effective manner.

Quality

• To ensure land acquired as open space through compulsory developer contributions is usable open space (i.e. excludes waterways, drainage easements, degraded land and steep escarpments, etc).

• To ensure that all Council funded open space areas and facilities are attractively designed and located, and comply with Australian design standards.

Integration

• To ensure that the provision of open space opportunities is in accordance with an appropriate planning framework and is integrated with other local and regional open space plans.

Sustainable Use • To ensure that the type and level of activity

proposed for the site is compatible with the sustained use and management of the area.

Private Sector Involvement

• To encourage private sector involvement in the funding, provision and management of open space areas and facilities, services and programs where it is in Council’s best interest to do so.

Conservation and Heritage Protection

• To encourage the use of public open space (accompanied by appropriate management) to preserve and protect areas of environmental and heritage significance.



6.4.2. Principles for the Development of Sports Grounds/Sports Reserves

The landscape and amenity development of Sports Grounds/Sports Reserves should be guided by the following principles:

SG1 An integrated perimeter tree planting strategy should be implemented in Sports Grounds to provide an overall landscape framework.

SG2 Planting should be provided in car parks within Sports Grounds to provide shade and shelter for vehicles, and to contribute to an improved landscape character and setting. Trees should be planted to avoid loss of parking spaces and be protected from vehicle impacts by fencing or other appropriate ‘bumpers’.

SG3 Trees should be planted along shared paths within Sports Grounds to provide shade for path users and improved definition of circulation around the reserve. Park seating should be provided along path routes. Planting should consist of canopy trees to maintain views along and across the paths and to enhance a sense of personal security for park users.

SG4 Tree planting should be provided to the perimeter of playing fields and outdoor hard court areas, to provide additional shade for spectators and to further improve the visual character of the reserve. Care should be taken in the selection of the species and placement of these trees to ensure they do not adversely affect the condition of the playing surface or overhang to a level where disruption ‘to the game’ may occur.

SG5 Where possible, circulation within the reserve should connect directly with broader neighbourhood and regional trails/paths.

SG6 Facilities including playgrounds, tables, seats, BBQs, drinking fountains, rubbish bins, and bicycle parking facilities should be provided at points of public focus. The precise siting of each of these facilities will be determined on a site by site basis, but are to meet the following criteria:

Grouping of facilities. Use of existing access and pavements. Association with existing buildings, to reduce visual prominence. No removal of established indigenous vegetation. Association with existing parking where possible. Sited to take advantage of the shade and shelter provided by existing

vegetation.

6.4.3. Principles for the Development of Regional and District Parks

The development of Regional and District Parks should be guided by the following principles:

RDP1 An integrated tree planting strategy should be implemented throughout Regional and District Parks to:

Provide an overall landscape framework. Increase amenity though shade and wind protection.



Form landscape spaces. Improve habitat values.

Trees should be located to integrate with facilities, such as picnic shelters, seats and tables.

RDP2 Planting should be provided in car parks within Regional and District Parks to provide shade and shelter for vehicles, and to contribute to an improved landscape character and setting. Trees should be planted to avoid loss of parking spaces and should be protected from vehicle impacts by fencing or other appropriate ‘bumpers’.

RDP3 Trees should be planted along shared paths within Regional and District Parks to provide shade for path users, improved definition of circulation around the park, and locations for seating. Planting should consist of canopy trees, to maintain views along and across the paths, and to also enhance a sense of personal security for park users.

RDP4 Areas of low level indigenous planting should be added at appropriate locations throughout Regional and District Parks, to create a variety of informal park spaces and a varied landscaper character. However, care should be taken in the selection of species and siting to avoid the creation of personal security issues through reduced sight lines.

RDP5 Some planting should to be provided along park edges adjoining perimeter roads, to create an attractive public interface, and in some cases, as a buffer between the road and the park. This planting should be canopy trees to maintain views into the parkland and to enhance a sense of personal security for park users.

RDP6 Where possible, circulation within the park should connect directly with broader neighbourhood and regional trails/paths.

RDP7 Pedestrian access from residential streets should be provided through the construction of paths linking with the end of streets, as well as directional signage at appropriate locations.

RDP8 Clear and direct links should be made between spaces within the park to encourage use of the entire reserve, rather than just localised areas. This could be achieved through manipulation of views, landform and planting, as well as formal paths.

RDP9 As with Sports Grounds, general park facilities, including tables, seats, BBQs, drinking fountains, rubbish bins, and bicycle parking facilities should be provided at points of public focus. The precise siting of each of these facilities will be determined on a site by site basis, but are to meet the following criteria:

Grouping of facilities. Use of existing access and pavements. Association with existing buildings, to reduce visual prominence. No removal of established indigenous vegetation. Association with existing parking where possible.



Taking advantage of the shade and shelter provided by existing vegetation.

RDP10 Tables and seats should be located to take advantage of key views, particularly to activity areas, playgrounds etc. Tables and seats should be of robust construction and of a standard detail, to allow for easy and inexpensive replacement.

RDP11 The location of buildings and structures within Regional and District Parks should be planned to maximise integrated vehicle and pedestrian pavements and planting.

6.4.4. Principles for the Development of Local Parks

In relation to future provision, the development of new subdivisions should avoid the reservation of inappropriate parcels of land (such as steep escarpments or low lying flood-prone land) as part of any Developer Contributions. The design of subdivisions should consider the provision of Local Parks as integral components of new neighbourhoods.

Key principles should include:

LP1 Local Parks should be connected to surrounding path and cycle networks.

LP2 Local Parks should have an adequate size and shape in order to provide for a variety of uses.

LP3 Local Parks should generally not cater for a single use, but rather should be flexible and multi-functional.

LP4 Local Parks should have high visibility, and be open on at least two major/significant sides, to provide for improved personal security through passive surveillance. Local Parks should be designed with residential blocks facing onto them, rather than backing onto them.

LP5 Where there are sites of heritage or environmental significance, these should be incorporated into the open space system without being detrimental to the provision of usable local open space (‘fit for purpose’).

LP6 As a key principle, all residential blocks should be within approximately 400m – 600m of a Local Park.

LP7 Where local commercial facilities are provided within a new subdivision, opportunities for collocation of a Local Park should be considered.

LP8 Where a subdivision provides more than one Local Park, the setting and function of these parks should be different, but complementary. The provision of Local Parks should be seen in the context of the overall open space system, and in the provision of a diverse range of recreation opportunities and landscape settings.



6.4.5. Principles for the Development of Natural Areas

The physical development of waterways and other nature reserves should be guided by the following principles:

NA1 Existing areas of remnant and established indigenous vegetation should be protected from degrading processes such as weed invasion and foot traffic. Existing vegetation creates useful habitat, provides banks stability and contributes to the natural character of the reserve.

NA2 Bio-diversity and wildlife habitat should be increased through planting of additional indigenous vegetation. Gaps in indigenous vegetation cover should be revegetated using indigenous species in order to extend and connect the habitat provided by existing indigenous vegetation. All revegetation should aim to recreate the structure and species mix of the vegetation community relevant to the site.

NA3 Environmental weed species should be managed to control their spread, reduce competition, and be gradually replaced by appropriate indigenous species. Environmental weed management priorities should be based on working from better quality areas towards lower quality areas.

NA4 Lawn areas should be minimised, unless the reserve is of appropriate size and topography to provide an open relatively flat lawn area of at least 400m², sufficient to function as a useable space in its own right.

NA5 Shared paths along sections of waterways should (where possible) be provided along both sides to create a circuit, rather than a single lineal system.

NA6 Path construction should be appropriate to the “parent” landscape. In remote or less utilised areas, paths may be unsealed or constructed of a consolidated gravel.

NA7 New subdivision design should allow for adequate space along waterway reserves for the provision of a 2.5m wide shared path.

NA8 Seating/rest stops should be provided along shared paths (not more than 1km apart) and be located to take advantage of shade and desirable views where possible. For high-use paths, consider the installation of exercise /fitness stations.

NA9 Facilities including seats, shelters, BBQs and picnic areas should be provided at key viewing points and points of public focus.

NA10 Interpretative signage is recommended at seating / lookout points. Interpretive signage should provide education about such points of interest, for example:

Geomorphologic processes and features; The waterways habitat corridor and its component flora, fauna, and

habitat elements; Occupation / use of the creeks by indigenous communities; and



Historical aspects related to the settlement of the Shire.

NA11 Directional signage is recommended along shared paths to provide direction and distance to attractions and facilities, such as toilets, playgrounds, picnic areas and other community facilities.

NA12 New Natural Areas which may be acquired/created through subdivision activity should, where possible, be located around areas of existing native vegetation, be linked to existing natural and open space areas, and be as wide as possible to provide core habitat and minimise edge effects.

Appendix 6 provides additional guidelines for public open space provision that should be considered in any review of the Glenelg Shire Planning Scheme.



7. SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION OUTCOMES

The section below provides a summary of key consultation results and outcomes. Where appropriate an extended write up of the results for each consultation method is provided in the appendices.

7.1. Methodology

A comprehensive consultation processes was established with Glenelg residents, sporting clubs, community groups, relevant Council staff and other key stakeholders.

Consultation was designed to ensure that a wide cross section of people and interested parties were given an opportunity to provide input into the planning process. The table below outlines the range of consultation techniques employed, each of these is discussed in more detail in the following section.

Target Group Consultative Technique Date Responses/ Attendees

Residents/Community Telephone Survey

Community Workshops (11)

Park User Surveys

Community Submissions

April 2006

March 2006

April & May 2006

April/May 2006

350

40

72

3

Sports Clubs Written Survey (138 sent) March 2006 36

Leisure/Community Groups Written Survey (214 sent) March 2006 50

Primary and Secondary Schools

Telephone Interviews March/April 2006

18

Key Stakeholder Interviews Older Adults

Youth Services

People with a Disability/Careers

Private Facility & Program Operators

Government Agencies

April/May 2006

April/May 2006

April/May 2006

April/May 2006

April/May 2006

1

1

1

1

1

3

Neighbouring Councils Telephone Interviews April 2006 4

Council Personnel Workshop – Council Staff

Workshop – Councillors and Senior Management

Recreation Department

March 2006

March 2006

Ongoing

6

7

Ongoing

Table 13: Overview of Consultation Processes



7.2. Household Telephone Survey

A full copy of the Household Telephone survey results are provided as Appendix 3. A summary of key issues and observations are included below.

• 41% of all households surveyed across the Shire included children.

• 70% of all respondents indicated that they were regular participants in physical activities (this compares to a Victorian State average of 85.1%). The Glenelg participation rates are the similar for males or females (71% and 70% respectively).

• Participation rates decline with age, although young adults – with or without children – are more likely to participate.

• Broadly speaking, those in the north eastern portion of the municipality (e.g. Heywood, Digby, Casterton and Sandford) have lower average participation rates than the total Shire average.

• Walking (31%), swimming (14%), aerobics/fitness/gym/weights (11%), lawn bowls (9%) and golf (7%) were the five most popular activities.

• Eight out of ten of Victoria’s top 10 activities are also in Glenelg’s top 10.

• Walking is identified within the three most popular activities for regular participation for sport, recreation or fitness by all age groups except 14-17 year olds.

• The majority of respondents (44%) participate in activities that are “not organised” by a club, group or association. Only 31% participate in activities that are “all organised”. Younger age groups (14-17 year olds) and older adults (50+ years) are more likely to participate in organised activities. Males are more likely to participate in organised activities than females.

• Opportunities for organised participation in smaller townships may be limited.

• Fun, fitness, enjoyment and social interaction are primary reasons for regular participation in physical activities.

• The most frequently cited reason for non-participation in physical activities is “age” (main reason cited by 39% of non-participants). Of these, 70% were over 60 years old.

• Respondents were asked to nominate a preferred activity for future participation. A variety of responses were provided without a specific dominance by a particular activity. The largest proportion of respondents indicated that they would like to do aerobics/fitness/gym/weights (5%), swim (5%), play golf (4%), or play tennis (4%) in the future.

• A lack of facilities was nominated by 11% of respondents as a reason for non-participation (respondents who provided this response were likely to come from Nelson or Narrawong and wished to participate in swimming or tennis). A further 5% of all respondents indicated a lack of clubs available in their town as a reason



for non-participation. The majority of these respondents wished to participate in tennis.

• A total of 60% of respondents rated the location and distribution of Glenelg indoor and outdoor sporting facilities as either “very good” or “good.” Only 7% of rated the location and distribution of indoor and outdoor sporting facilities as either “poor” or “very poor.” Significantly almost one quarter of respondents either did not answer, or did not know, potentially indicating a lack of information/awareness/promotion of existing opportunities.

• Dancing and fishing were nominated as the most popular “other” leisure activities.

• Respondents indicated that the majority of activities or recreation participation opportunities were “mostly provided by community groups” (34%) or “private sector groups” (28%) with only a minor portion (13%) provided by Council.

• The largest proportion of respondents rated the overall quality of Glenelg’s parks and reserves as “Good” (52%). Furthermore, 60% rated the overall distribution of parks and reserves as “Good”. Very few respondents (less than 5%) rated either the quality or distribution of parks and reserves as “poor” or “very poor.”

• The largest proportion of respondents rated the overall quality of Glenelg’s sports grounds as “Good” (53%). Furthermore 54% rated the overall distribution of sports grounds as “Good”. Very few respondents (less than 5%) rated either the quality or distribution of sports grounds as “poor” or “very poor.”

• The majority of respondents (45% and 46% respectively) could not rate the quality or distribution of playgrounds, potentially suggesting a lack of community awareness regarding the facilities available.

• Half of all respondents rated Glenelg parks and reserves as either 7 or 8 out of 10 when it came to meeting their outdoor recreation needs. In total over three quarters (76%) of all respondents provided a rating of 6 or better on the 1-10 scale. Only 14% suggested parks and reserves were not meeting their needs (that is, a rating of 5 or below). This is a significant result for Council as it indicates a high level of satisfaction with existing parks and reserves.

• Respondents were asked to indicate their priorities for sporting, recreation or public reserve projects they would fund over the next ten years. Requests for “upgrading/maintaining existing bike paths and walking trails” and “parks maintenance” were the most frequent. Overall the focus of the results strongly favoured improving and maintaining existing facilities as opposed to the provision of new facilities. This is further supported by the Shire wide high levels of satisfaction with existing parks and reserves in terms of quality, distribution and meeting community needs (note satisfaction results vary for individual townships).

• Local newspapers (48%) and word or mouth (31%) remain the most popular methods for obtaining information about Council recreation services and/or activities. Only a very small percentage accessed Council’s website (5%) and even fewer used the Community Directory (1%) or Community Notice Board (1%). It is therefore imperative that Council target appropriate newspapers and appropriate editions (Mondays and Fridays) for each respective township (these may be Hamilton or Mt Gambier based publications).



• (Note: Anecdotal evidence suggests that Scuba Diving, Recreational Fishing and Bush Walking are very popular activities in the Shire. Unfortunately it is difficult to quantify the level of participation and demand for these sports/activities. The Portland Visitor information Centre does not keep records of requests for information in relation to specific activities, therefore we are unable to assess the level of interest in these activities from visitors to the region. Similarly the Department of Primary Industries keep records of the total number of recreational fishing licenses allocated across the State, however a breakdown for specific regions is not available. Therefore a more detailed assessment of the infrastructure needs of these sports/activities, particularly Scuba and Recreational Fishing, may need to be considered in the development of a new Master Plan for the Portland Foreshore).

7.3. Infield Surveys

A full copy of the Infield Survey results is provided as Appendix 12. A summary of key issues and observations are included below.

• A total of 72 surveys were completed. The majority (40% or 29 surveys) were completed in Casterton (sample sizes from each town are influenced by the availability and willingness of people to participate in the survey process).

• Almost half (49%) of all respondents use or visit one of Glenelg’s parks, reserves or foreshore areas at least once per week.

• Younger people aged 14-17 years were the most likely to use Glenelg’s parks, reserves or foreshore areas at least once per week (72%), followed by those aged 35-49 years (68%).

• The majority of users (57%), typically spend over an hour using Glenelg’s parks, reserves or foreshore areas.

• There was a diversity of reasons provided by people for using the parks. The most popular activities (or reasons for using the parks) were BBQ/Picnic (29%), Walking/Jogging for exercise (29%), playing organised sport (28%), family outing (25%), meeting friends (24%) and watching sport (24%). Clearly therefore, parks play a valuable role in servicing the formal and informal sport and recreation needs of the community.

• Providing a ‘meeting place for people’ (36%) and being ‘close to home’ (32%) were important consideration for park, followed closely by providing ‘large open spaces/places to run around’ (31%) and ‘playgrounds’ (28%).

• The most frequently provided response for “least liked elements” of parks were public toilets (47%) and litter (29%). A lack of facilities, poor maintenance and poor lighting were also mentioned by a relatively high proportion of respondents (approximately 15%).

• Public toilets were nominated as the least liked element of parks by all age groups from 18-69 years old.

• Almost half (47%) of those surveyed indicated that there was nothing preventing them from using parks, reserves and recreation facilities.



• Those who live in Nelson, Dartmoor and Merino were most likely to state “lack of facilities available in town” as a preventative factor to using parks, reserves and recreation facilities.

• 67% of those who stated “distance – too far to travel” as a preventative factor to using parks, reserves and recreation facilities, were from Heywood.

• Public toilets (40%), paths and walking trails (19%) and park furniture (17%) were the items that received the highest ‘poor’ rating by survey respondents.

• 64% of respondents were either “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the quality of parks and reserves in Glenelg, 18% were ‘unsatisfied’ or ‘very unsatisfied’.

• 59% of respondents were either “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the quality of sport and recreation facilities in Glenelg, 21% were ‘unsatisfied’ or ‘very unsatisfied’.

• Aside from requests to upgrade Casterton Swimming Pool (17%) (which has been influenced by the large proportion of the survey sample residing in Casterton), the majority of respondents (14%) requested improvements to existing public toilets.

• The most requested new facility suggested by survey respondents was a new Skate Park in Casterton (22%), however this has also been influenced by the large proportion of the survey sample residing in Casterton.

7.4. Community Workshops

Workshops were scheduled in each of the eleven major townships across the Shire between 27th to 30th March 2006. A total of 40 people attended the various workshops. The section below provides a high level summary of the general issues and key themes raised from each of these (a copy of the write up from each workshop is contained as Appendix 7). Township specific issues or comments are reflected in Section 10.

• There appears to be demand from across the Shire for access to a designated motor cross facility.

• There is evidence of low level demand for access to bush horse riding trails.

• Asset maintenance, renewal and improvement are major issues.

• The majority of public reserves are located on DSE land. Council involvement and support (maintenance, funding, development etc) is reportedly very limited.

• Public liability insurance remains a major issue restricting clubs and community groups (particularly associated with use of DSE facilities, Council insurance does not cover use of non-Council assets and there appears to be limited awareness of the opportunities for insurance cover via DSE Committees of Management for casual users. (DSE acknowledge that the process for acquiring cover may be cumbersome and overly onerous for potential casual hirers).

• Footpath and walking trail provision and maintenance is limited throughout the Shire.



• There are limited community services and programs offered in smaller townships.

• There is concern regarding declining rural populations and likely impacts on recreational infrastructure (e.g. capacity to maintain, availability of volunteers and participants etc).

• Council grants and funding programs are difficult to access, the process is considered too complicated. Additional officer support is needed.

• Greater Council assistance with the management and development of facilities on DSE land is needed. Similarly, DSE need to accept greater responsibility and provide support for Committees, assets and facilities on their land.

• Council is not ‘hands on’ enough (i.e. lack a consistent physical presence) in rural communities.

• There may be opportunities for the use and development of disused rail corridors as Rail Trails for walking, cycling and horse riding.

• Existing swimming pools are highly valued by rural communities.

• Walking is growing in popularity.

• Playgrounds are needed to cater for a range of ages.

• Options for young people are needed.

• Community Halls are often the only recognisable community asset in smaller communities, these need to be retained and maintained.

• Council needs to make better use of local Community Newsletters to distribute information to the community (as opposed to a reliance on Portland based newspapers). Improved relationships (one on one) with key community members would also assist this.

7.5. Sports Club Survey

The following section provides an overview of the key findings from the sports club survey. A total of 138 surveys were distributed to sports clubs throughout the Shire based on contact details provided by Council. Thirty-six completed surveys were returned, this represents a response rate of 26%. In addition, a separate written survey was distributed to all ‘Leisure/Community Groups’ across the Shire, an overview of the results from this survey are included in Section 8.6. However, 14 of the completed ‘Leisure/Community Group’ surveys were actually from sporting clubs and therefore, where possible, the results from these surveys have been included in the analysis below.

Following the initial distribution of the Sports Club survey, Council agreed to re-circulate the survey to all groups in an attempt to improve the overall response rate. As a result an additional six completed surveys were returned, however three of these were from clubs that had already responded to the initial survey. Inclusion of the additional three new surveys improves the overall response rate to approximately 28%.

Key results from the completed surveys are discussed below.



7.5.1. Facility/Venue Needs and Issues Sports clubs were asked to identify any current issues they may be facing in relation to playing areas/surfaces, pavilion/clubrooms facilities, club management, development, programming and any other issues. The table provided in Appendix 8 presents the key issues raised. In summary, common themes/issues raised were: Playing Areas: • Limited capacity of clubs to maintain playing surfaces, in particular

mowing and watering. • Inadequate Council mowing and general maintenance (including fencing

and tree control). • Need to upgrade/replace ageing infrastructure. Pavilions/Clubrooms: • Inadequate size of existing pavilions, many are considered too small. • Need to upgrade/replace ageing infrastructure. • Inadequate general maintenance. • Limited capacity of clubs to maintain facilities. • Desire for new/upgraded facilities. Club Management, Development and Programming: • Lack of new committee members and volunteers. • Lack of strategic planning for club and facility development. • Lack of information and assistance with grant and funding opportunities. • Limited opportunities for coach training and education. • Lack of administrative support, including facilities and equipment. Other: • Poor road and vegetation maintenance (by Council). • Many facilities and reserves are visually unappealing and poorly

maintained. • There is relatively high demand for improved and/or new fencing around

reserves and playing fields. • There is a need to improve/upgrade general park infrastructure (e.g. park

furniture, public toilets, roads, car parking, lighting etc).

7.5.2. Facility/Venue Ownership and Management Club were asked to identify the ownership and management model for their main facility or venue of use. The table below identifies the responses received.

Ownership & Management Frequency % of total responses.

Owned and managed by Council 16 36%

Owned by Council, managed by Reserve Committee 9 20%

Owned by DSE, managed by DSE Nil 0%

Owned by DSE, managed by Reserve Committee 9 21%

Other 9 21%

Don’t know 1 2%

Total 44 100%

Table 14: Ownership and Management of Facilities



7.5.3. User Agreements 81% of clubs indicated that they have a formal written user agreement with Council. 14% (or five clubs) indicated that they did not have an agreement. The five clubs were; • Casterton Croquet Club • Dartmoor Football and Netball Club • Bolwarra Tennis Club • Wando Vale Cricket Club • Southern 500 Speedway Club. 55% of clubs with a formal agreement had a lease, 35% a seasonal agreement (10% did not know). Of those that have a formal agreement, the average seasonal rental/charge was $639, however varied from a low of $220 (Bolwarra Tennis Club) to a high of $2,250 (Portland Colts Cricket Club) per season. For those clubs with an annual agreement, the average rental/charge was $1,395, however varied from a low of $104 (Portland Swimming Club and Portland Lawn Tennis Club) to a high of $6-$7,00018 (Portland Football and Netball Club) per annum. Council is responsible for setting the rate of annual fees and charges based on partial cost-recovery for direct services provided. However, there appeared to be little consistency in the annual or seasonal fees and charges levied for sporting clubs, which may reflect inconsistencies in the standard and frequency of services provided at each reserve. Therefore, there may be opportunities to improve the consistency in the standard and frequency of maintenance to ‘like’ facilities and hence improve the consistency in fees and charges applied to similar sporting clubs and groups.

7.5.4. Maintenance Responsibilities The majority of clubs that responded to the survey (75%), indicated that their agreement with Council included specific facility maintenance responsibilities for the club. When asked what the key challenges or issues facing clubs were in carrying out their maintenance responsibilities, the following list provides the five most common responses or themes; 1. Lack of volunteers (22%), 2. Costs (22%), 3. Lack of funding assistance (12%), 4. Time (10%), and 5. Limited capacity to maintain playing fields/grass/lawn areas (10%).

7.5.5. Rating Council Performance Clubs were asked to rate the performance of Council in relation to a number of fundamental service areas. A rating scale of “1” equals “Poor” and “5” equals “Excellent” was used (Table 15 follows).

18 Higher fees are attributed to the commercial nature of the enterprises being conducted by the Portland Football and Netball Club.



Poor Average ExcellentService Area 1 2 3 4 5 Don't know Total

Responsiveness to user group enquiries/requests 14% 19% 42% 11% 3% 11% 100%Sports field/court maintenance 17% 25% 19% 11% 0% 28% 100%Pavilion and building maintenance 28% 19% 25% 0% 3% 25% 100%Coordination and allocation of sports grounds/ courts/ pavilions 11% 8% 22% 8% 3% 47% 100%Seeking external funding grants for capital improvements 19% 11% 19% 14% 3% 33% 100%Developing new facilities or improving areas around the reserve 31% 19% 22% 6% 0% 22% 100%Keeping user groups up-to-date with information 19% 6% 42% 19% 3% 11% 100%Seeking input/ suggestions from user groups about the development of the reserve 3% 14% 47% 14% 6% 17% 100%Managing risks associated with use of sporting facilities 8% 3% 53% 11% 3% 22% 100%Providing club development and management support 8% 19% 33% 14% 0% 25% 100%Providing recreation programs and encouraging participation 8% 25% 31% 3% 0% 33% 100%

Table 15: Club Rating of Council Performance

An analysis of the table reveals a less than flattering picture for Council that may reflect a lack of available resources for the management and servicing of sport and recreation groups and facilities. Key results include: • Three quarters (75%) of respondents believe the responsiveness of Council

to enquires and requests is ‘average’ to ‘poor’. • The majority (61%) of respondents rate Council’s maintenance of sports

fields and playing surfaces as ‘average’ to ‘poor’. • 72% of all respondents rate Council’s maintenance of pavilions and reserve

buildings as ‘average’ to ‘poor’. • Almost half (41%) of all respondents rated Council’s coordination and

allocation of sports grounds/courts/pavilions as ‘average’ to ‘poor’, the majority (47%) did not know.

• Almost half (49%) of all respondents rated Council’s support in seeking external funding grants for capital improvements as ‘average’ to ‘poor’.

• Almost three quarters (72%) of all respondents rated Council’s performance in developing new facilities or improving areas around reserves as ‘average’ to ‘poor’.

• 67% of all respondents rated Council’s performance in keeping user groups up-to-date with information as ‘average’ to ‘poor’. However, almost one quarter (22%) rated Council above average.

• 64% rated Council’s performance in seeking user group input and suggestions as ‘average’ to ‘poor’. Only one fifth (20%) rated Council’s performance better than average.

• 64% rated Council’s performance in managing risks associated with the use of the reserves as ‘average’ to ‘poor’.

• 60% rated Council’s performance in providing club development and management support as ‘average’ to ‘poor’.

• 64% rated Council’s performance in providing recreation programs and encouraging participation as ‘average’ to ‘poor’.

7.5.6. Role of Council Clubs were asked to nominate the three main roles that Council should play in the management and development of sporting reserves, recreation facilities and club development/support. A range of responses were provided, however the five most common suggestions were; 1. Maintain and develop facilities (25%); 2. Provide equitable financial assistance (12%); 3. Assist club development, management and promotion (11%), 4. Regular consultation with club and listening to their needs (11%), 5. Facility provision and management (7%).



Items 1 and 5 both relate to facility provision and management, therefore accounting for approximately one third (32%) of all suggestions provided by respondent clubs.

7.5.7. Other Comments A range of ‘other’ comments were provided by respondent clubs. The two most common themes related to a need for Council to develop facilities and improve playing field maintenance. A sample of other comments provided includes; • ‘Council should provide speedier assistance to club requests for assistance’, • ‘Council has minimal contact with clubs’, • ‘There needs to be greater equity in fees (potentially) based on clubs

membership figures’, • ‘Council should provide a vision/plan for specific facilities to guide future

development’, • ‘Need better support and assistance from DSE’, • ‘Improve consultation with clubs’, • ‘Increase financial assistance to clubs’, • ‘Council needs to assist club promotion’, and • ‘The Shire needs a dedicated motor cross facility’. • The main reasons suggested by respondents for a predicted decline or static

membership were attributed to overall population decline and population ageing.

• The main reasons nominated for predicted membership growth were club initiated junior development programs, positive promotion of the sport/club, club recruiting efforts and upgraded or new facilities.

7.6. Leisure/Community Group Survey

The following section provides an overview of the key findings from the leisure/community group survey. A total of 214 surveys were distributed to leisure and community groups throughout the Shire based on contact details provided by Council. Fifty completed surveys were returned, this represents a response rate of 23%. In addition, a separate written survey was distributed to all ‘Sports Clubs’ across the Shire, an over view of the results from this survey are discussed in Section 8.5. However, 14 of the completed ‘Leisure/Community Group’ surveys were actually from sporting clubs and therefore, where possible, the results from these surveys have been included in the sports club survey analysis (Section 8.5 and Appendix 8).

Note, following the initial distribution of the Sports Club survey, Council agreed to re-circulate the survey to all sports groups in an attempt to improve the overall response rate, however it would appear that the Sports Club survey was also circulated to leisure/community groups. As a result, an additional six completed surveys were returned, however one of these was from a club/group that had already responded to the initial survey. Therefore, inclusion of the additional five new surveys improves the overall response rate to approximately 26%.

Key results from the completed surveys are discussed below.



7.6.1. Facility/Venue Needs and Issues Leisure groups/clubs were asked to highlight any issues that they may be facing in relation to the facilities that they use. Appendix 9, provides a summary of the issues raised by respective clubs (note, not all clubs provided a response to this question), key themes or common issues to emerge included: • Poor condition of ageing infrastructure and associated maintenance

difficulties. • Limited size of a number of facilities. • Lack of (appropriate) public toilets. • Lack of storage. • Difficulties associated with fundraising and limited available funding

support for improvements/development. • Lack of volunteers to assist with facility maintenance and development.

7.6.2. Hire of Facilities The majority of responses (51%) indicated that Leisure/Community Groups are able to rent or hire indoor or outdoor facilities at times and locations when required. Only 5% suggested that they could not access facilities when needed, however a significant portion of respondents (35%) either did not respond to the question, did not know the answer or the question was not appropriate for their group (that is, hire facilities are not required).

7.6.3. Future Projects Groups were asked to nominate (in their opinion) the three most important sport, recreation or club development projects to be funded by Council over the next ten years. A range of responses were provided (approximately 48 individual suggestions), however the three most common were; 1. Implementing a Shire-wide prioritised capital works and maintenance

program (19%), 2. Facility development and upgrading (17%), and 3. Enhanced club support (10%). Items 1 and 2 are essentially the same thing, therefore collectively accounting for over one third (36%) of all responses.

7.6.4. Role of Council Groups were asked to nominate the three main roles that Council should play in the management and development of sporting reserves, recreation facilities and club development/support. A range of responses were provided, however the three most common suggestions were; 1. Maintain and develop facilities (24%); 2. Provide equitable financial assistance (22%); and 3. Assist clubs/groups with funding applications (12%).

7.6.5. Council Support Clubs/groups were asked weather they were satisfied with the level of support and assistance they receive from Council. Nineteen per cent (19%) chose not to answer the question, the remaining results were ‘Yes’(31%), ‘Most of the Time’(31%), and ‘No’(19%). Of those that indicated that they were not satisfied (19%), the main areas they would like improved were ‘facility



maintenance and development’ (25%), ‘increased support’ (10%), ‘increased funding’ (10%) and ‘assistance with insurance cover’ (10%).

7.6.6. Other Comments A range of ‘other’ comments were provided by respondents. The main theme (indicated by approximately 20% of comments) related to demand for increased funding, support and liaison, particularly for clubs/groups based outside of Portland. A sample of other comments provided includes; • ‘Implement Council’s Asset Management Plan’, • ‘Increase Council involvement in community arts’, • ‘Retain areas of public open space’, • ‘Improve maintenance support’, and • ‘Improve communication with clubs/groups, not just Portland based

media)’. • The main reasons suggested by respondents for a predicted decline or static

membership were attributed to overall population decline, population ageing and a general lack of interest.

• The main reason nominated for predicted membership growth was an increasing population near the groups activities (not surprisingly groups providing this response were most likely to be Portland based).

7.7. Council Staff Workshop

Staff from across the organisation were invited to attend a workshop on March 30th, 2006. The table below identifies the six staff that attended.

Attendees Council Department

Jonathon Merrett Engineering/Asset Management

David Hol CEO Department

Lyn Meyrick Development Services

Lynda Cooper Media Liaison/CEO Department

Janie Jacobson Finance Manager/Asset Management

Dayle King Recreation Services

Table 16: Council Staff Workshop Attendance

The following section provides a summary of the key issues, comments and/or suggestions identified during the workshop.

• Limited available resources (money) to maintain assets and facilities. Usually restricted to basic essential items only to an acceptable risk management standard.

• Limited staffing and equipment resources to support asset maintenance, development or recreation programming or direct service delivery.

• Community expectations of Council are high, and maybe unrealistic.

• Conflict between various users groups is common – competing for priorities.



• There is a need to improve/review current maintenance standards and practices. Basic maintenance is undertaken however ‘little extras’ rarely are, for example tree pruning, path edging etc.

• Timing of reserve mowing can be contentious, most clubs want their ground mown immediately prior to the weekend or specific competitions.

• The asset maintenance budget is not divided by Township, rather it is based on a prioritised list/assessment of required works.

• The Asset Management Plan for parks and recreation buildings has identified that there is an under funded liability of approximately $2.4 million worth of projects in the first year. This represent a rate rise of around 18-20% to fulfil.

• Council practice adheres to the following prioritisation of projects;

1. Maintain existing assets,

2. Renew existing assets,

3. Develop new assets.

• Council fees and charges for sporting clubs aim for approximately 20% of cost recovery.

• Aside from one recreation reserve (Cavalier Park), all others are Crown Land under the control of DSE.

• DSE act as a landlord only and offer very limited support or assistance to user groups.

• A major issue is insurance cover for users of DSE reserves/assets. Council insurance does not cover users of non-Council assets. DSE does not offer direct insurance cover for users.

• Key strengths of the current provision across the municipality include playing surface quality, range/variety, location (spread) across the Shire, number of sporting ovals, quality playgrounds and existing building assets.

• Key weaknesses (or challenges) include maintenance, resource allocation and implementing existing (and this) strategic plan.

• Council offers ‘minor recreation grants’ each summer and winter (total $15,000 each) for sports equipment and minor facility upgrades on a dollar for dollar basis. Council also offer ‘community hall’ grants to the value of $30,000 per annum. Limited funding may also be available for groups to cover operational costs e.g. printing and first aid.

• The Glenelg Junior Sports Trust also offer up to $2,000 grants to support individuals.

• Council relies heavily on groups such as the South West Sports Assembly (SWSA) and the YMCA to run holiday programs, participation programs and club support. Council provides limited funding support for these activities.



• Key priorities include;

Maintaining assets to an appropriate standard,

Improving the process and guidelines for assessment of subdivision applications to guide open space acquisitions.

• A ‘suitability assessment’ of Council reserves is currently being undertaken.

• Development of a Parks and Gardens Asset Management Plan is scheduled for 2006/07.

7.8. Councillors and Senior Management Workshop

Councillors and Senior Management were invited to attend a workshop in Portland on March 30th, 2006. The table below identifies the seven staff that attended.

Attendees Riding/Council Department

Cr Tom Munro Mitchell

Cr Bill McIntyre Narrawong, Dutton Riding

Cr Gilbert Wilson Portland, Henty Riding

Cr Frank Zeigler Portland, Fawthrop

Trevor Hornby Corporate Services Manager

Jennifer Tod CEO

Dayle King Recreation Service – Project Manager

Apologies

Cr Joy Benbow Mt Clay

Cr Karen Stephens Gilmore

Table 17: Councillor and Senior Management Workshop

The following section provides a summary of the key issues, comments and/or suggestions identified during the workshop.

• Key issues include ensuring asset safety, improving/managing asset condition, insurance, improving linkages between existing open space and residential areas, and providing adequate access to natural areas (beaches (poor condition of roads), cliffs, national and state parks etc).

• The planning scheme needs to identify and protect a long term vision for open space provision and connections. There may be an opportunity to utilise disused rail reserves as future rail trails.

• Other key issues include club sustainability and affordability. Clubs are concerned with asset maintenance, renewal and liability insurance.

• The relationship (roles, responsibilities and level of support offered) between Council and DSE owned assets needs to be reviewed. Better cooperation and resourcing is required.

• Growth sports include junior soccer and junior hockey.



• Population changes and rural decline present challenges.

• Overall strengths include the community volunteer base, range and diversity of opportunities and harbour/foreshore areas generally. Weaknesses or challenges include aging volunteers/aging communities, public liability insurance, maintenance burden of existing assets and a reluctance (possible inability) of the community to pay for recreational activities, programs and facilities.

• Specific project and/or activity needs suggested in the workshop include;

access to a motor cross facility,

access to bush equestrian trails,

demand for an additional boat ramp (Portland),

disabled fishing access/facilities,

demand for infrastructure to support scuba diving,

demand for a designated swimming area in the harbour,

activities for young people,

support for ‘active aging’,

infrastructure for recreational fishing,

new skate park in Casterton,

an additional indoor multi purpose court in Portland,

access and community use of school facilities,

provision of multi purpose club office/administration areas,

update/expand the Portland skate park,

improve the capacity to cater for ‘self-catered’ camping i.e. motor homes, caravans etc in State and National parks in the area,

improved community transport options, and

additional funding support to assist participation by individuals and teams within and outside the Shire.

7.9. Key Target Groups

The following section provides a summary of key issues or comments raised in consultation with specific target groups.



7.9.1. Older Adults

An interview was conducted with Myra Bourke (Co-ordinator of Community Services - Aged Services) from Glenelg Shire on 3rd May 2006, and she provided the following information:

• Currently older adults utilise a range of sporting and recreation facilities within the shire. Typically these are community centres, bowling clubs and neighborhood houses.

• Portland Senior Citizens have recently brought up the issue that as they are getting older it is becoming increasingly more difficult to lift the heavy mats in and out of the cupboards at their indoor bowls venue. They almost require resources to set up for activities (e.g. Younger, stronger volunteers).

• The BBQ facilities in Portland have no shade or shelter. Both the Senior Citizens Group and Planned Activity Group use this venue, however they are limited in the amount they can use it due to the lack of shade or shelter.

• Walking tracks are not always even. Many older adults use the walking trails around the shire, however to increase the use, the pathways need improving. More lighting is also required.

• Older adults have issues with the lack of lighting surrounding buildings. A lot of planned activities are held in the evening and the older adults are deterred from using these venues due to both the lack of lighting and in some cases the lack of shelter from the car park to the building itself. Perhaps more “drop-off zones” are required.

• There is also a concern amongst older adults about the lack of public transport to access recreation facilities.

• There are plenty of facilities available to use in the area, however consideration needs to be given to making them more older-adult friendly. (e.g. The Casterton Senior Citizens building does not have good toilet facilities – no disabled hand rails etc).

7.9.2. Youth/young adults

An interview was conducted with Shelly Nevins (Youth Development Officer) from Glenelg Shire on 5th May 2006, and she provided the following information:

• Currently the groups within Council representing youth are in negotiations to “obtain” the Drill Hall in Portland as a youth venue. This is proposed to be a staged implementation.

• Youth in the area have been surveyed about the kinds of recreation/leisure facilities they would like to see in the area and the top 5 were:

• Bowling Alley

• Outside arena



• Multi-purpose place for films/concerts etc

• Drive in/outdoor movies

• Longer pier

• Skate Parks are very popular amongst youth. There is currently 1 in Heywood and Portland. It has been suggested that some type of clubroom be built with lighting. Parents have expressed concern with after hours use of the skate parks. They are concerned with the safety as a result of no lighting and no shade for during the day. Youth would like to see an extension of the number of installation equipment. Casterton are currently fundraising for a skate park in there township by running film nights.

• Youth in the Nelson area (there are about 30 young people there) are more into arts and multimedia rather than sport.

• There are plenty of sporting clubs in the area, so now there is a need for ‘alternative recreation activities’ (e.g. Surfing, 3 on 3 basketball competitions, hip hop dancing, music/arts driven).

• At present the “user pays” system limits youth’s ability to participate in all the activities they wish to.

• CFA has also grown in popularity amongst youth in recent years.

• The main problem with running programs and services for youth is the lack of resources available. The council offer a lot of one-off pilot programs but don’t have the human or financial resources to keep them going.

• There needs to be more collaboration between arts and youth.

• There have been some suggestions by youth to offer free bike use to tourists – similar to overseas.

7.9.3. People with a Disability

The comments below are based on a summary of key issues raised by Lynne Millard, Rural Access Worker, Southern Grampians and Glenelg Shire Council’s. Many of the issues identified relate to physical access, although it is acknowledged that promoting inclusiveness (i.e. welcoming environments) is equally important in providing for people with special needs.

• General accessibility throughout the urban environment and public open space is a major barrier for people with a disability. This includes pathways, pedestrian crossings, Tactile Ground Indicators, seating, park furniture, signage, parking and toilets.

• Playgrounds are generally not accessible to people with a disability (either for direct use by children and/or accessible for parents/carers). This includes play equipment, accessible pathways, seating, toilets etc.

• Key areas for improvement or opportunity include;



Accessible fishing platforms,

Access to Bridgewater beach,

Accessible playgrounds (throughout the shire),

Portland foreshore access,

Portland cliff top access, and

• Accessible walking tracks, paths and trails.

7.10. Primary Care Partnership (PCP)

A telephone interview was conducted with Rosie Rowe from the Glenelg and Grampians Shire Primary Care Partnership (PCP). The PCP receives State Government funding to be a health and disability service advocate/facilitator in the community. Key comments or issues raised included:

• The role of the PCP is primarily to support existing agencies to deliver services and opportunities for the community. The PCP therefore concentrates on ‘capacity building’ and partnering between agencies. The PCP also facilitates coordination of services between agencies to improve overall service delivery across the region.

• The PCP is a policy advocate and planning facilitator.

• The PCP has identified physical activity participation and mental health as two key priority areas for attention.

• The PCP has gathered extensive evidence supporting the link between physically activity participation and mental (and physical) health benefits.

• Inclusiveness for people with disabilities and/or socially or economically disadvantaged groups into existing recreation opportunities is a key issue that should be improved/addressed in the region.

• Public open space should be appropriately developed (and promoted) to facilitate opportunities for community engagement and social interaction, therefore footpaths and infrastructure become important (not just trees and landscaping). Inclusion of public art should be encouraged as it is known to promote community engagement and community pride.

7.11. Primary and Secondary Schools

Telephone interviews were conducted with each of the 14 primary and 4 secondary schools located throughout the Shire. A summary of key findings are included in the table at Appendix 5. Furthermore, Section 6.2 provides an overview of the facilities available for community use. In addition, the following comments are based on an assessment of the consultation results.

• The majority of schools utilise external facilities to support current activities.

• The two main activities undertaken by schools externally are swimming and athletics.



• Many schools, particularly secondary schools, utilise external facilities on a weekly basis.

• Key facility needs identified/suggested by schools include:

A skate park in Casterton,

Installation of shade/shelter facilities at Nelson Park (Portland) for school and community use,

Additional indoor courts in Portland,

Retention (and improvement) to existing rural pools,

Extension of the outdoor pool season in Portland, and

Gymnasium facilities in Casterton.

7.12. Neighbouring LGA’s and other Management Agencies

The following section provides a summary of the key consultation outcomes, issues or comments with neighbouring LGA’s and other management agencies.

7.12.1. Department of Victorian Communities (DVC) – Sport and Recreation Victoria (SRV)

SRV provided written comments in response to a number of initial questions that were discussed with the Project Steering Committee. A summary of key issues presented by SRV are identified below.

Open space – key issues:

• Ensuring there is adequate open space that meets the needs of the community.

• Linkages and pathways – walking/cycling, importance of footpaths and walking infrastructure, options for active transport, connections to key activity nodes and facilities.

• Diversity and accessibility of playground provision.

• Diversity and accessibility of open space settings.

• Need for clear policies on the provision of open space for new residential developments.

Recreation and Sport Provision – key issues:

• Need to clarify Council’s role in the management of facilities – DSE vs. Council owned, a clear policy position is needed.

• Need to provide a strategic direction for facility developments across the Shire.



• Consider opportunities to improve programming and use of aquatic facilities across the Shire.

• Consider the role of the Portland YMCA now that it is not managing the Indoor Aquatic Centre?

• How does Council respond to facility development proposals? What support is provided?

• What impact will the recent Asset Management Planning have on Council’s budget for recreation? Facility maintenance/renewal role only?

• Internal Council funding programs – relevance/do they meet community needs?

• Identify levels of demand for new facilities and a strategic vision that provides prioritised recommendations.

• What support can Council offer in leading new developments and access external funding?

• Club development – how can Council ensure clubs are equipped to meet the demands of the management of their sport/recreation.

• Establish a clear basis for Council recreation policy development, e.g. policy on resource provision for facilities – maintenance, subsidies, grants etc.

7.12.2. Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE)

A telephone interviews were conducted with Stewart Beaton (Property Officer), Brian Simpson (Contract Services Coordinator) and Greg Leece (Property Manager Resources and Regional Services), a summary of key comments from these discussions are recorded below.

• DSE are ultimately responsible for the management, development and assets on the Crown Land recreation reserves, even if where the day-to-day management is vested in a Committee of Management (Council or Community).

• DSE attempt to provide ‘as much support as possible’ to these committees. DSE produce a ‘Handbook/Guide’ for Committees of Management and provide limited funding support.

• It was acknowledged that funding support is limited, heavily competitive and can be ad hoc depending on State budgetary allocations on an annual basis. (Because annual State allocations can vary from year to year, regional funding programs can also vary, this causes an issue with a lack of consistency. This can be further complicated by limited communication of possible funding opportunities to local committees. Local committees can be confused because amounts available and funding criteria can change from year to year).



• Government has recently announced (as part of the ‘Moving Forward Strategy’) $2million over the next 4 years, therefore $500,000 per year for Committee of Management. This is to be spread across approximately 2,000 committees and 70 LGA’s, therefore allocations are likely to be highly competitive and relatively small amounts. Funding will be inadequate to address the range of issues facing committees in relation to ageing infrastructure.

• DSE does not have any clear guidelines, defined policy or role statement that identifies expectations of Council in relation to DSE recreation reserves or community infrastructure.

• DSE offers insurance cover for official DSE appointed committees however this does not extend directly to other users of assets on DSE land. DSE does however have a process by which local Committee of Management can facilitate/assist applications for insurance cover by potential casual hirers. However it is acknowledged that there may be little awareness of the support available and the process itself may be cumbersome for some Committees.

• DSE acknowledges that it is facing a major issue in relation to ageing infrastructure, asset maintenance and asset renewal.

• Providing support to local committees is identified as a ‘keystone priority’ for DSE.

• DSE have researched the benefits that reserve committees provide the State (Titled “Committees of Management for Crown Land Reserves” completed in March 2004), however the report has not been publicly released. It is believed that this report, whilst not a facility condition audit, highlighted a number of key challenges facing local committees, including a lack of funding and assistance with capital facility improvements.

• DSE have experienced increasing difficulties in attracting people to participate on local committees in rural areas (which may be attributed to declining populations and dissatisfaction with the level of support provided).

7.12.3. Parks Victoria (PV)

A telephone interview was conducted with Don Tumney, Range in Charge Glenelg Area, on 11th May 2006. Key issues or comments relevant to this project are summarised below.

• The Friends of the Great South West Walk (GSWW) have been instrumental in instigating discussions between management agencies to explore opportunities to establish a dedicated space for motorbike activity (in an effort to prevent inappropriate use of the GSWW by motorbikes).

• Despite and extensive analysis, PV and DSE have been unable to identify suitable public land for a dedicated motorbike facility. Therefore, Council and/or private land options now need to be fully explored.



• The Friends of the GSWW are currently reviewing the previous Management Strategy (now 8 years old) to guide future management and development of the walk. Comments/input from Council will be sought in the near future for this planning review.

• In addition to demand for a dedicated motorbike facility, illegal use of tracks and trails by motorbikes throughout the PV estate is an ongoing issue.

• Similar to above, there is also demand (although limited) for use of tracks and trails by horse riders.

• PV only provide two areas where dogs are permitted (Bridgewater foreshore and Nelson – head of Glenelg River). There may be demand for additional dog exercise areas, particularly beaches. Furthermore, dogs must be on-leash in PV areas, whereas they may be allowed off-leash in Council areas, this can lead to confusion for the public.

7.12.4. South West Sports Assembly (SWSA)

A telephone interview was conducted with Michael Neoh, Executive Officer SWSA, on 30th March 2006. Key issues or comments raised in this discussion are summarised below.

• Policy – there is limited formal policy development in the region. Those policies that are development rarely involve consultation with the SWSA, for example the SWSA could provide valuable input into policy and planning of facilities to service people with a disability e.g. playgrounds.

• Programs – the YMCA is a key activity service provider in Portland and Glenelg Shire, however their capacity to delivery programs has declined since loosing the contract for swimming pool management.

• Skill – there is a lack of appropriately qualified recreation staff in the region to deliver programs and activities (including swimming pool staff and lifeguards). Hence potential opportunities in retraining health professional staff (bridging courses) to deliver programs and activities. SWSA can offer training support however a critical mass of potential instructors is needed to make courses viable. Council involvement and local facilitation and coordination is needed.

• Regional Facilities – there is an issue with improving linkages between local clubs to regional club/facilities e.g. Warrnambool Synthetic Athletics and Hockey facilities.

• Insurance – LGA’s need to broker a better deal for users of non-Council assets i.e. DSE facilities.

• Grant Schemes – Council should consider the inclusion of criteria linking facility and operational funding to club sustainability and capacity building objectives.

• Relationships – Glenelg Shire tends to focus primarily on facility provision and facility related issues and offers limited direct support to clubs. There



may be an opportunity for SWSA to deliver certain services on behalf of Glenelg Shire on an agreed basis. Improved personal relationships with clubs and community groups are needed.

• Roles – a review of the key roles of existing agencies in the region, e.g. Council, SWSA, health sector, sport and recreation groups, may highlight opportunities for cooperation and improved service outcomes. Council should be more than just a facility provider.

• Isolation – personal isolation is an issue in rural communities. Council need to identify clubs that SWSA can work with to assist in addressing this issue.

• Disability Sector – there is a trend towards individuals working one on one to develop personal recreation plans. This may increase the need for integration of individuals into existing sporting clubs. SWSA can offer a facilitator to work with clubs and individuals to assist integration.

7.12.5. CASA Leisure

A telephone interview was conducted with Donna Pedler, Customer Service Teamleader (Portland Aquatic Centre), key issues or comments relevant to this project are summarised below.

• Overall the facilities are very good and appear to meet community needs.

• Seasonal closure of the Portland outdoor pool can cause complaints as some patrons would like it open all year round.

• Spinning (cycling) classes have recently been introduced 6 nights per week and are proving very popular.

• There is demand to regularly replace/upgrade gym equipment.

• The pools have poor disabled accessibility, including the spa.

• There is some (limited) demand for a hydrotherapy pool.

• There is demand for Pilates and yoga classes however we are unable to secure a qualified instructor.

• A number of staff are in the process of completing further training/qualifications to allow them to offer personal training.

• Centre management are not aware of demand for any additional classes, programs, activities or facilities.

• CASA also operate the smaller outdoor pool across the Shire. Many of these are in poor repair and need substantial capital investment, including addressing OH&S issues. They are important community assets and are generally well patronised (depending on summer season conditions).



7.12.6. Southern Grampians Shire

A telephone interview was conducted with Phil Currie, key issues or comments relevant to this project are summarised below.

• The Hamilton Indoor Leisure and Aquatic Centre has recently opened and fulfils a regional role.

• The Shire does not have any current plans for any other major recreation or open space facility developments that may impact on Glenelg Shire.

• There are pockets of residential subdivision, particularly in Hamilton that need to incorporate adequate local open space.

• There may be opportunities for regional walking trails and tracks that could cross municipal borders.

• Casterton, Merino and Digby residents tend to relate to Hamilton more than Portland as their regional centre.

• The Southern Grampian Shire view their role more as a landlord than direct involvement in running recreation programs or activities.

• The majority of recreation reserves are controlled by DSE. The Shire is considering a review of existing committee structure, potentially moving towards a ‘township public lands’ model (e.g. Dunkeld) for a single committee to oversee the management of all public lands within individual townships.

• The Shire offers some operational funding for Reserve Committee and Hall Committees. The Shire has a defined policy that outlines opportunities and the level of support available.

• Ensuring clarity of roles and responsibilities between Council, DSE and Committees is critical. DSE tend to offer limited and ad-hoc support.

• Football, hockey, netball and drag racing are activities that are participated in across municipal borders.

7.12.7. Warrnambool City Council

A telephone interview was conducted with Russell Lineham, key issues or comments relevant to this project are summarised below.

• Brauer College are in the process of developing a synthetic athletics track that will be capable of servicing regional events and activities. The track is expected to be completed in 2007.

• Council has undertaken a preliminary investigation into the feasibility of establishing a regional gymnastics facility. Further investigations are being undertaken.

• A synthetic hockey facility has recently been developed and will open in the next few months, it will be capable of hosting regional events.



• Issues common across municipalities include pressure on club volunteers, demand for skate facilities, emergence of walking as a key recreation activity and relationship and support from DSE in the management of recreation reserves and facilities.

• Council are considering opportunities for the establishment of a Rail Trail from Warrnambool to Port Fairy.

• Further promotion and development, including connections to/from, the South West Walk are important.

7.12.8. Moyne Shire

A telephone interview was conducted with Dean Robertson, key issues or comments relevant to this project are summarised below.

• A new single court indoor stadium is being developed in Koroit, this will service a local catchment only.

• There are no facility developments planned that are likely to impact on Glenelg Shire.

• Issues associated with maintenance and development of existing reserves and aging infrastructure are common across the region. Water availability and cost are also significant issues.

• The majority of reserves are DSE controlled.

• The Shire has policy that outlines the level of support offered to DSE appointed committees. In addition, the Shire offers an annual funding program ($110,000 total) which is usually allocated in $5,000 amounts to reserve committees for minor capital/maintenance works.

• DSE offer limited support or assistance to local committees. The Shire is forced into taking a lead advocacy role in relating issues to DSE.

• The administrative burden on volunteers is increasing.

7.12.9. Mt Gambier Shire

A telephone interview was conducted with Darryl Sexton (Director of Operations), key issues or comments relevant to this project are summarised below.

• Demand for a major indoor regional recreation centre has previously been identified. Therefore the Shire recently appointed Philip Gray and Associates to undertake a detailed feasibility study into the possible development of a major Indoor Recreation Centre in Mt Gambier. Facilities are likely to include indoor aquatic, ball sports, gymnasium etc.

• Mt Gambier has an extensive range of sport and recreation facilities for residents and visitors. Many people from Nelson and border towns utilise Mt Gambier facilities.



• Aside from the proposed new Indoor Recreation facility (which may attract minimal usage from border residents), there are no developments planned that are likely to impact on Glenelg Shire.

• There may be opportunities to further promote and develop an extended coastal trail across the border.

7.13. Public Submissions

Three submissions were received from the public, two were from members of the Portland Gymnastics Club and one from the Narrawong Playgroup. The submissions from the gymnastics club provided an outline of the history of the club, the status of existing facilities (inadequate) and request consideration of opportunities to establish a permanent gymnastics facility in Portland. Options that were suggested include an addition to the Portland Netball Club facilities at Flinders Park or in association with possible school developments, in particular Bundarra Primary School.

It is acknowledged that the existing facilities in Yarraman Park are less than ideal in terms of access, location, standard and maintenance of facilities. Therefore a long term solution to the needs of the Gymnastics Club will need to be considered in the context of this study.

The third submission related to a request for installation of a playground in Narrawong to support the Narrawong Playgroup. According to the submission, the playgroup currently has 18 children attending fortnightly and it is noted that there are approximately 50 children attending the local primary school.



8. SHIRE-WIDE ISSUES AND ANALYSIS

The following section draws on the research and consultation results outlined in preceding chapters to identify the key issues that are relevant to the entire Shire. This section is followed by an analysis of the key issues for each of the major townships in the Shire. The information below provides a summary of the main issues, outlines the evidence or source supporting the issue, provides a brief discussion of the issue and presents a ‘possibly way forward’. Following consideration of the possible way forward, the preferred direction will be refined to become a strategy recommendation (see Section 11).

Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward

Open Space

There are no significant gaps in the provision of regional open space.

• According to household survey results, there is a high level of satisfaction with the current quality and distribution of open space across the Shire (less than 5% rated either the quality or distribution as ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’).

• Over three quarters (76%) of household survey respondents indicated that the existing parks and reserves were meeting their needs.

• The research or consultation has not revealed demand sufficient to warrant further investigation of the provision of regional open space.

• However two possible exceptions exist, specifically demand for the establishment of a Motor cross facility and opportunities for regional rail trails. (The Motor cross issue is discussed further under Potential Facility Gaps, below).

1. Focus any public open space acquisition (via subdivisions) on the needs of local communities and townships rather than regional facilities.

Rail Trails – see below.

There may be opportunities for re-use of rail corridors for cycle, walking and horse trails.

• There are a number of disused (or minimally used) rail corridors throughout the Shire.

• There may be an opportunity to establish Rail Trails throughout the Shire, providing connections to/from towns that could also be linked to sites of cultural and historical significance.

2. Investigate the feasibility, benefits and requirements for establishing a network of Rail Trails throughout the Shire that provide connections to individual townships and sites of cultural and historical significant. Investigations should include consideration of providing camping destinations along the trails. For example Sandford to Casterton, note certain routes may need to include on-road sections to facilitate connections to townships.




Lack of policy or guidelines for open space provision.

• Consultation with Council officers has confirmed a lack of policy and guidelines for the provision and acquisition of open space in the Shire.

• Section 7 and Appendix 6 provide guidelines for the future provision and acquisition of open space in the Shire.

3. Adopt the guidelines provided in this report (Section 7 and Appendix 6) and incorporate into the Glenelg Shire Planning Scheme and Council Policy.

There is a lack of diversity and accessibility in playground provision across the Shire as well as a lack of knowledge about existing facilities.

• Almost half of all household survey respondents could not provide a rating of the quality or distribution of playgrounds across the Shire.

• Furthermore, the site visits and consultation revealed a lack of accessibility (mobility) and lack of diversity in playground experiences.

• The level of demand for playgrounds is expected to decline associated with an aging population, declining birth rates and decline in the number of people under 10 years old in the Shire. However, industry benchmarks suggest that all residents should be able to access a playground within a reasonable proximity to their homes (usually 400-600 meters in urban settings).

• It is acknowledged that Council has recently invested significantly in playground maintenance and improvements over the last few years, however the research results suggest a lack of diversity in opportunities being provided.

• Aside from Digby and new/emerging growth areas of Portland (see Section 10 for Township Specific directions), there is no evidence of demand for new or additional playgrounds, therefore the focus should be on continuing to improve the existing suite of facilities.

4. Upgrade and designate one of the existing foreshore playgrounds in Portland as a regional playground, complete with Access for All Abilities.

5. In order to efficiently guide future resource allocation, Council should develop a clear Playground provision Policy and Strategy that articulates Council’s objectives for playgrounds provision, standards, accessibility requirements and design objectives for various target age groups, including diversity of equipment provision and inclusion of public art. The Playground Strategy should include an audit of all existing playgrounds provided in the Shire and identify actions required to ensure compliance with Australian Standards and/or identify opportunities for rationalisation. The Strategy should include a prioritised and costed plan of maintenance and capital works.




Lack of connectivity between subdivisions and existing open space and/or key destinations (e.g. beaches etc).

• Consultation results and site visits. • The open space acquisition guidelines provided in this report should help ensure connectivity is considered in all new subdivisions.

6. Incorporate the open space provision guidelines included in this report as Council policy/practice when considering new subdivisions.

Protection of open space corridors along natural waterways.

• The existing Planning Scheme appears to provide good protection (via public purpose zoning) for natural waterways within existing residential areas, however there appear to be limited public acquisition overlays to protect areas that may fall within future residential areas or areas of potential conservation significance.

• Natural waterways provide valuable opportunities for habitat protection and linear reserve corridors that can incorporate paths and trails where appropriate.

7. Review the Glenelg Shire Planning Scheme to ensure adequate protection (via zoning as PPRZ, PPCZ or public acquisition overlays) of land adjacent to natural waterways within existing and future residential zoned land or areas of known environmental or heritage significance.

Water costs and availability. • Consultation results revealed that many clubs (and Council) are concerned about the rising cost and sustainability of water use at sports reserves.

• There is growing community awareness (State-wide) regarding the sustainable use of water for irrigating playing fields and open space.

• It is acknowledged that the cost of water use is likely to continue to rise.

• A lack of water for sportsground irrigation is an issues being faced at the majority of reserve and is likely to get worse. Tahara Recreation Reserve is a prime example.

8. Consider opportunities to incorporate water harvesting infrastructure (e.g. water tanks, playing field drainage and storage) at all sports pavilions and reserves as part of any major refurbishment or development for possible re-use for ground watering and/or internal pavilion services (e.g. toilets and showers).

9. Engage Wannon Water in discussions to explore options for possible use of recycled waste water for irrigation of recreational land (consider possible options for Tahara Recreation Reserve as a high priority).

Recreation Programs & Activities

Consider the needs of emerging sports and activities.

• There is evidence of growing demand (Nationally) by both boys and girls aged 5-14 years for

• Whilst there are National and State trends indicating increasing participation in soccer the consultants are not aware of

10. There are no immediate needs for the development of new soccer facilities, however the level of demand could change



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward participation in soccer.

• Demand for informal ‘adventure’ sports such as kite-surfing and sand-boarding are likely to increase, supported by the geographic features in the region.

specific evidence to support this in Glenelg.

• Council has recently received a request for support (financial and promotional) for an inaugural sand-boarding event in the Shire. Should this be successful it is likely that the popularity of the sport/.activity will grow associated with the unique geographic features (sand dunes) in the region.

and should be monitored.

11. Council should support the growth of emerging sports and activities such as sand boarding to capitalise on the geographic features of the region. Council support could include assistance with funding applications, marketing, promotion, strategic planning (club development), sponsorship of events and activities or other assistance as required or possible within existing Council resources.

Demand for ongoing support for traditional sports is expected to remain a priority.

• According to the Household survey results, participation in traditional organised sports such as football, basketball, netball, golf and tennis rate in the top ten most popular activities in the Shire.

• Despite anticipated changes in the overall population profile which may (over time) reduce the level of participation in traditional competitive sports, these activities still remain the most popular forms of organised activity in the Shire.

• Some of these activities, in particular golf and lawn bowls, are provided via private clubs that traditionally attract little involvement from Council. Facilities that support participation in these activities will remain important to the community, particularly as the population ages.

12. Continue to support traditional sports through facility provision, maintenance and club development support (including ‘private’ clubs such as golf and lawn bowls as appropriate, support for these groups should concentrate on club development support, strategic planning and assistance with external funding applications as required).

13. Actively monitor the level of demand for indoor sports (i.e. Basketball) in order to track local participation trends and patterns of use. It is not anticipated that new or additional public indoor courts will be required in the foreseeable future, however tracking existing levels of demand over time will help Council be prepared for any dramatic changes in possible demand. Should demand for additional courts become evident, opportunities for community use of school facilities should be explored in the first instance.

Ensure balanced support for • According to Club membership • The percentage of female club 14. Review the level of support (and funding)



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward male and female sports and activities.

data, 66% of all club members are male, compared to 34% female.

members/participants is significantly below the Victorian average (43.7%).

offered to traditional female sports in order to identify possible opportunities for improvement.

15. Encourage female participation and membership in clubs via a targeted Shire-wide promotional campaign (ensure data is collected on any membership changes as a result of the campaign). Involve State Sporting Associations and the SWSA as appropriate to assist with promotional initiatives.

16. Consider the introduction of criteria linked to club funding or facility development that promotes catering for female participation.

Support for growing and declining Clubs.

• According to club membership information provided via the written survey, total club membership has declined for athletics and equestrian/riding clubs. Whereas membership has grown for croquet, swimming, football/netball, golf, hockey and tennis.

• Council support for clubs or community groups should be responsive to the individual needs and circumstances being experienced. This present a challenge for Council in terms of being able to offer adequate individualised support for clubs.

17. Establish a funding agreement and service contract, including defined performance reporting, with SWSA to provide individualised capacity building support to selected clubs/activities on behalf of Council. It is recommended the funding program be offered over a three year period with annual priorities reviewed and agreed based on identified needs.

Glenelg has a lower physical activity participation rate than the Victorian average.

• According to the Household survey results 70% of Glenelg residents are regular participants in physical activities, compared to 85.1% for Victoria as a whole.

• Not only is Glenelg starting from a relatively low participation base, participation rates traditionally decline with age and the proportion of older people in the community 55+ years is expected to grow.

• There may be opportunities for increased promotion and delivery of recreation services and programs

18. Consider opportunities to establish a Shire-wide Physical Activity Promotional Strategy that links with the Municipal Health Plan and existing service providers (e.g. YMCA, SWSA, PCP etc) that considers:

a. Opportunities to establish annual Shire-wide physical activity promotional campaigns in association with local clubs, e.g. annual come ‘n’ try days for



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward from Community Neighbourhood Houses and/or Community Centres. Opportunities to involve these facilities in implementing the recommendations should be explored where appropriate.

• According to the ABS Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA 2001), the Glenelg Shire Glenelg is an area of disadvantage in terms of overall income levels, poor health and limited education. This fact could be used to support applications for funding from State Government sources.

selected sports/activities, walking promotion campaigns, tabloid sports days in individual townships, specialist coaching and special events etc. Support from State and Regional Sports Associations and external funding sources should be pursued (e.g. Vic Health, DVC etc).

b. Regularly promotes the benefits of physical activity participation to residents via Council information.

c. Engage with the local health sector to explore opportunities to promote physical activity participation, e.g. ‘green prescriptions’, community forums etc.

Ensure there is balanced support for opportunities for organised and non-organised participation (informal) in recreation activities.

• The majority (44%) of residents participate in physical activities that are not organised by a club or group. Only 31% participate only in organised activities.

• Younger age groups (14-17 years) are more likely to participate in organised activities.

• Despite the fact that the majority of participants undertake non-organised activities, the role of community based clubs and groups should not be underestimated in terms of their contribution to social capital, community character, identity and sense of belonging.

19. Review Council’s capital and operational resource allocation to organised sports/activities and non-organised sports/activities. Ensure there is an appropriate balance in overall resource allocation. (NB: An appropriate balance may not necessarily be an equal split in resources, it is reasonable to expect that the majority of resource allocation will be directed to formal sports as these require higher levels of maintenance and servicing. Improving the balance of allocation to informal activities may need to be phased in over time. A goal to achieve a 70:30 or 60:40 split may be appropriate over time).

There is a lack of appropriately qualified recreation staff capable of running programs.

• Consultation with the SWSA revealed that it is often difficult to get enough people interested in

• SWSA have begun to concentrate on bridging courses, targeting existing allied health professionals

20. Consult with existing recreation service providers (i.e. YMCA, CASA) and committees of management to identify key



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward skills training/professional development for classes to be viable.

to consider opportunities for recreation programming and service delivery. However, SWSA indicated that securing suitable instructors, training venues and promotion of opportunities is difficult.

areas of skill shortage. Once identified, work with SWSA (or other appropriate agencies e.g. State Sports Associations) to provide the necessary training. (Council may wish to target a specific Committee of Management/Community to identify skill shortage needs, provide opportunities for training and monitor the impact on local participation as a ‘model’ for roll-out in other areas. Evidence of changes in participation rates should be recorded pre and post training delivery as an evidence base to support future funding applications for training delivery and facility development).

21. Support and actively promote training opportunities provided by SWSA.

Recreation Infrastructure

Sustainability of existing recreation infrastructure.

• The Shire is currently serviced by an extensive range of recreation facilities and assets. The ongoing maintenance of existing scope of facilities/venues places a considerable financial burden on Council. Council’s Asset Management Plan highlighted requirements to maintain the existing suite of community assets is currently under funded and would require a substantial rate increase if all requirements were to be addressed.

• Council and DSE have a limited capacity to maintain and develop the existing suite of community recreation assets and venues. Therefore opportunities for rationalisation of facilities may need to be pursued. The Township specific recommendations provided in Section 10 identify a number of opportunities for removal of disused and/or underutilised community assets. However it is likely that there are additional opportunities for the potential removal of other underperforming assets and/or opportunities to

22. Encourage shared use of existing facilities and venues in preference to the development (or retention) of single purpose facilities or venues. Do not develop any new single purpose recreation facilities, assets or venues unless it can be clearly demonstrated that there are no opportunities for shared use of existing facilities (Council or non-Council owned). Where possible the development of multi-use reserves and facilities, such as Island Park, should be pursued.

23. Critically review Council’s Asset Management Strategy (Parks and Garden Assets) in consultation with specific user groups to identify possible opportunities for



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward promote increased shared use of facilities/venues that would help reduce the maintenance and development burden on Council.

rationalisation and removal of underutilised and/or underperforming facilities. (Consideration should be given to negotiating a higher level of service for retained shared use facilities if agreement can be reached to remove certain assets).

Maintenance of aging infrastructure and general lawn/grass maintenance are major issues.

• Council’s Asset Management Plan highlights that there are significant resource challenges for Council.

• Consultation results regularly highlighted community issues associated with poor lawn/grass maintenance (in terms of time, frequency or level of support offered local communities and committees) and issues associated with ageing infrastructure.

• Adequate asset maintenance is critical to ensure the safety of users, attractiveness of facilities and as a means of supporting community based recreation participation.

• Many local communities feel that there is inadequate support and/or recognition from Council for community members who voluntarily maintain (mow) public reserves, nature strips and other public areas. Quality maintenance of these areas not only supports physical activity participation it also contributes to community pride and enhances the overall appearance of public spaces.

24. Establish formal agreements with community groups and/or individuals that accept responsibility to maintain defined public areas to levels beyond Council’s base level of service. The agreements should be supported by quarterly funding program that offers reimbursement of fuel costs for such groups.

25. Consider opportunities to establish a program that offers community access to basic Council maintenance equipment (e.g. a ‘community trailer’ stocked with lawn mowing maintenance equipment that is made available on a rotational basis to groups across the Shire. Note, a training/familiarisation program may also need to instigated to ensure appropriate user safety).

26. Council should review its current lawn mowing and vegetation maintenance program and schedules in order to explore opportunities for service improvements (where possible benchmark current levels and standard of service against other ‘like’ Council’s as a basis for comparison)..

27. Provide adequate resources (as outlined in the respective plans) are allocated for the staged implementation of the Asset



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward Management Plan and (2006) VRA report.

28. Ensure requests for maintenance are responded to within a defined period in accordance with Council’s Customer Service Charter (e.g. 48 hours, earlier if an emergency).

29. Host an annual community meeting in each township to discuss and clarify key maintenance and development priorities for urban landscapes and community infrastructure.

30. Continue to promote existing annual volunteer recognition programs (consider integration with SWSA’s e.g. Sports Star Awards) and/or Certificate of Recognition from the mayor for volunteers demonstrate outstanding performance and commitment to improving local areas.

Increasing preference for walking as sport/recreation/fitness activity of choice.

• Walking is one of the three most popular sport, recreation or fitness activities for all age groups 20+ years old in the Shire.

• Consistent with State and National trends, walking is the most popular physical activity in the Shire. Therefore there may need to be a paradigm shift in recognising street footpaths as valuable recreation assets as well as designated walking paths/trails.

• Where appropriate, particularly paths leading to key destination points and/or adjacent to busy roads, footpaths should be designed to accommodate shared use between cyclists and pedestrians.

31. Ensure all new subdivisions include the provision of footpaths on at least one side of all streets.

32. Ensure footpaths in new subdivisions connect with the existing networks or paths and trails.

33. Establish an Asset Management Plan and Strategy for footpaths that identifies and prioritises maintenance requirements and opportunities to address key gaps in the network.

34. Review paths in public reserve to ensure they are adequately maintained and free from trip hazards. Installation of lighting on high use walking paths is encouraged.




35. Explore opportunities to establish walking routes within each individual township (consider recent initiatives undertaken by the Primary Care Partnership in identifying possible path options).

Lack of funding for asset management and improvement of facilities, particularly facilities on DSE land.

• Consultation results.

• Limited, irregular and ad-hoc DSE funding programs.

• Poor condition of many facilities and aging infrastructure.

• Inadequate funding to implement key recommendations of Council’s Asset Management Plan.

• There appears to be a history of inadequate resourcing to facilitate effective asset maintenance and renewal. As a result many community building and infrastructure are in a state of disrepair and require substantial improvement to ensure they remain attractive, safe and viable options for community use/activity.

• Furthermore, there is a heavy reliance on clubs to raise money to fund facility developments and improvements, which comes on top of existing heavy workloads for club volunteers.

36. Strongly advocate and make regular representation to high level bureaucrats and relevant government Ministers in DSE for improved funding and resourcing of local committees of management.

37. Glenelg Shire to work through the South West Municipalities Group and Municipal Association of Victoria to strongly advocate that DSE establish an Asset Management Strategy for all DSE owned/controlled facilities and assets in Glenelg (to ensure the safety of users and preservation of community assets). Ensure the development of the Asset Management Strategy is available for public input.

38. Explore opportunities to improve Council funding (and external grants/funding) for asset maintenance and renewal in accordance with the Asset Management Plan requirements.

39. Explore opportunities through Council’s annual budget process to increase the overall amount of funding available through the Minor Recreation Grants and Community Hall Grants and alter the funding ratio provided from a dollar for dollar basis to $2 Council for every $1 provided by Clubs/Groups. (NB: Review eligibility criteria to link capital funding to



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward requirements for clubs/groups to engage in proactive sustainability and development planning).

40. Investigate Policy options for Council to offer a Sporting Club/Community Group Loan Guarantee system that allows clubs/groups to access funding sources with Council acting as a loan guarantor. Link any such system (i.e. eligibility criteria/funding agreement) to strict fiscal controls, reporting requirements and requirements for Clubs/Groups to proactively engage in sustainability and club development planning prior to applying to Council to act as a guarantor. (NB: Discuss Loan Guarantee policy options with Warrnambool City Council as they currently offer a similar service to club/groups in their community).

Sports clubs have expressed a limited (and declining) capacity to maintain playing surfaces (turf and grassed areas in particular).

• Lack of volunteers, costs (in particular water and fuel) and time are all common impediments.

• Council already has a well defined policy that sets out maintenance responsibilities for users groups of Glenelg Shire Reserves and Facilities. However this does not apply to users of non-Council (DSE) reserves. Therefore there may be inequities in the level of responsibilities and expectations placed on users groups depending on whether they use Council or DSE facilities.

41. Review Council and DSE user agreements (“Conditions of Use”) to determine if there are inequities in the requirements for sporting clubs/tenants. If so, consider opportunities to improve the consistency in requirements regardless of the land ownership.

Common facility issues identified by sports clubs and community committees relate

• These issues were identified in the sports club and leisure group surveys as well as witnessed in the

• The fact that these issues were commonly raised presents Council with an opportunity to focus

42. Implement Council Asset Management Strategy.

43. Advocate for the development of an Asset



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward to ageing infrastructure, limited size of facilities, lack of appropriate public toilets and lack of storage facilities.

site visits. resource allocation on these matters in order to address the needs/concerns of a large proportion of clubs/groups.

Management Strategy for community infrastructure on DSE owned/controlled land.

44. Assist clubs/groups with funding applications for facility improvements.

There is a large volume of reserve and oval fencing that requires upgrading and/or replacement.

• Sports club survey results, site visits, Council’s Asset Management Plan and VRA report.

• Fencing needs to be repaired and maintained to ensure the public safety of users and capacity of clubs to collect gate revenue from matches.

45. Upgrade reserve and oval fencing in accordance with the priorities identified in the Asset Management Plan.

There is limited demand for new recreation facilities.

• Only 11% of respondents to the Household survey indicated that a lack of facilities was a factor in their reason for non-participation in physical activities.

• 60% of household survey respondents rated the location and distribution of indoor and outdoor sporting facilities as either ‘good’ or ‘very good’. Only 7% rated these as ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’.

• Over three quarters (76%) of household survey respondents indicated that the existing parks and reserves were meeting their needs.

• The consultation results provided a clear community preference for the maintenance and upgrading of existing facilities as opposed to the development of new facilities.

• Declining population.

• Of those that indicated a lack of facilities as a reason for non-participation, respondents were likely to come from Nelson or Narrawong and wished to participate in swimming or tennis.

• Overall there is little evidence of demand for the development of new recreation facilities.

46. On balance, Council priorities should be to maintain and renew existing facilities ahead of establishing new facilities.




Hard surface areas (i.e. courts) within reserves.

• Site visits revealed that many reserves have deteriorating court surfaces (e.g. tennis and netball courts).

• Court surfaces need to be repaired and maintained in order to facilitate ongoing use and participant safety.

47. Audit all existing tennis and netball courts to identify and prioritise resurfacing requirements. Use the results of the audit to establish an annual budget allocation for resurfacing.

Aging aquatic facilities. • There is evidence that the existing facilities are well utilised and highly valued by the community.

• Approximately $1.7 million is required to be spent on Council’s existing aquatic facilities between 2001-2011 (Aquatic Centres Audit, 2001).

• The role of swimming pools in supporting learn to swim programs, activities for young people and facilitating opportunities for community interaction should not be underestimated. However it is also likely that the level of use of existing facilities will decline associated with the declining (and aging) population and aging infrastructure which may reduce the appeal of existing facilities.

• Furthermore, the recent development of the Hamilton Regional Aquatic facility is likely to attract users from the north eastern part of the Shire (i.e. Casterton, Sandford, Merino, Digby). The Portland Aquatic facility adequately caters for residents of Portland and surrounding areas. Finally, development of the proposed major Indoor Sport and Aquatic Facility in Mt Gambier will attract users from the western portion of Glenelg. Therefore, overall the appeal and level of use of local rural pools is likely to decline.

48. The Portland Aquatic Centre is the premier regional facility in the Shire and should be maintained and upgraded accordingly.

49. Heywood and Casterton Pools should be supported and maintained to ensure the facilities remain attractive and appealing for local users.

50. The Merino pool should be maintained to basic level only, ensuring it remains fit for seasonal use.

51. The level of demand for all pools should be reviewed in 2011 to determine if they remain relevant, required and sustainable.




Potential Facility Gaps

Motor Cross

• There is a history of demand for access to a dedicated Motor Cross facility.

• The Portland Junior Motorcycle Club is the main (formal) motor cross club in the region. According to club membership data the club currently has 77 active members, which has increased from 72 members in 2003.

• The sport/activity is traditionally very popular in rural communities and there may be a large number of participants/enthusiasts who are not currently a member of the club.

• Despite previous attempts by Council, Parks Victoria and DSE a suitable site to establish a designated motor cross facility has not been identified.

52. Continue to work with DSE, PV and the Great South West Walk (GSWW) Committee to identify a suitable site for the establishment of a designated motor cross facility. Investigations should concentrate on the large holdings of Crown Land zoned PCRZ between Portland and Heywood.

Synthetic Athletics Track • According to the theoretical model (Section 6.5) a region with a population of around 20,000 may experience demand for a synthetic athletics track.

• There is no evidence of significant demand for a synthetic athletics track sufficient to warrant further investigation into the provision of such a facility. The existing grass track facilities appear to be adequately servicing local demand. In addition, the soon to be completed synthetic athletics track at Brauer College, Warrnambool, will be capable of adequately catering for wider regional demand.

• Furthermore, participation trends (Nationally, State and Local)

53. Development of a synthetic athletics track is not recommended.



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward suggest a decline in participation in athletics. This is supported by the fact that the Portland Little Athletics club membership has declined from 107 members in 2003 to 90 members in 2005.

Synthetic Hockey Pitch • According to the theoretical model (Section 6.5) a region with a population of around 20,000 may experience demand for a synthetic hockey pitch.

• Whilst there is evidence of limited local demand for a synthetic hockey facility, primarily from the Portland Hockey Club, there is no evidence of wide-scale demand sufficient to warrant further investigation into the provision of such a facility.

• The existing grass facilities and synthetic training facility (in Portland) are appropriate to service local demand.

• In addition, Warrnambool City Council has recently developed a synthetic hockey pitch which is capable of adequately catering for wider regional demand.

• Having said this, membership of the Portland Hockey Club has grown steadily from 100 members in 2003 to approximately 115 members in 2005. Therefore this issue will need to be monitored and reviewed on a periodic basis.

54. Development of a synthetic hockey pitch is not recommended in the short-medium term (next 8 years). However, the level of demand for such a facility will need to be monitored and periodically reviewed.

Dedicated Gymnastics Facility

• According to the theoretical model (Section 6.5) a region with a population of around 20,000 may

• The Portland Gymnastics Club currently operate out of facilities in Yarraman Park which they share

55. Council should undertake a detailed investigation into the needs of gymnastics, including:



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward experience demand for a dedicated gymnastics facility.

with a number of other users. This requires the club to dismantle and pack up all equipment several times per year. In addition, the club have expressed concerns regarding the inadequate nature (quality and condition) of the existing facility and have a desire to establish a single purpose gymnastics facility in Portland. Possible locations that have been suggested include Flinders Park or in association with Bundarra Primary School.

• In 2005 the club had approximately 160 members (up from 150 in 2003). Due to the nature of the equipment used and spatial requirements of the sport, it is highly desirable for a permanent facility to be established from a participant, coach, club management and safety perspective.

• Warrnambool City Council has recently undertaken preliminary investigations into the establishment of a regional gymnastics facility.

a. Review existing use arrangement for the current facility at Yarraman Park, clarify the frequency and scope of disruption to the Gymnastics Club, and scope/cost the facility improvements required in order to satisfactorily continue to accommodate the Club at this location.

b. Investigate the feasibility and options for possible relocation of the club to another existing Council and/or private facility.

c. Investigate the feasibility and options available for establishing a new dedicated gymnastics facility in Portland.

Policy & Procedures

Clarify, articulate and communicate agency roles and responsibilities.

• The consultation results revealed significant confusion in the community (by sporting clubs, committees of management and

• The matrix in Appendix 10 outlines the preferred roles of key agencies involved in recreation in the Shire. The

56. Consider using the Matrix provided in Appendix 10 to develop a Council Policy that further defines Council’s role in recreation and open space provision,



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward even within Government departments) regarding the roles and responsibilities of respective groups and agencies involved in recreation in the Shire.

• The sports club and leisure group survey results suggested that the three main roles of Council should be;

1. Providing and maintaining facilities (capital developments and maintenance),

2. Providing equitable financial assistance to clubs, and

3. Enhanced club support.

matrix highlights areas for possible service improvements for the respective agencies.

management and maintenance.

Increase Council capital allocations to Parks, Gardens and Recreation Services.

• Capital allocations to Parks and Gardens account for only around 1.2% of the total Shire allocation.

• 52% of all sport and recreation buildings were rated as ‘fair to poor’ in the Shire’s Building Inspection Report (2005).

• Significant rectification works and safety issues have been identified in the recent VRA Assessment Report.

• Parks and recreation facilities are integral elements of the community that promote and facilitate a range of health benefits and social capital.

• It would appear that the current level of funding for parks and recreation is insufficient to adequately maintain the existing suite of assets and service club needs.

57. Review Council’s historical (last 5 years) annual capital and operational funding allocations to parks, gardens and recreation services (benchmark the results against other similar Council’s where possible, and/or data from MAV) and explore opportunities to increase the proportional allocation of Council’s annual budget to these areas.

There is a need to improve business processes for Council’s Recreation Unit.

• Council’s Recreation Services Best Value Review and the sports club survey results (see Section 8.5) completed at part of this study have highlighted a number of priority areas for improvement to Council’s

Key areas identified for improvement include;

• Communication and consultation

• Responsiveness

• Maintenance (grounds and

58. Establish an annual meeting and/or incorporate into existing community meetings in each individual township with all sports/community clubs to identify key priorities and issues to be addressed in the following 12 months. Record all agreed



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward Recreation service. facilities)

• Assistance (particularly with seeking external funding)

• Funding

• Improving facilities

• Clarifying roles

• Managing risks

• Supporting club development and

• Encouraging participation.

priorities and agreed actions to be taken. Use the subsequent year’s meeting to report back on the implementation of the agreed actions. Over time this will improve the credibility and accountability of Council services.

59. Establish one on one relationships and regular communication with key members in each community as a means of information dissemination via word of mouth.

60. Use appropriate local newspapers and other appropriate media (not necessarily Portland based) for promoting information about Council services.

61. Establish appropriate performance criteria for responding to requests for Council assistance in accordance with Council’s Customer Service Charter (e.g. all requests assessed within 48 hours and an initial response provided) and regularly monitor and report performance against the criteria.

62. Establish an annual schedule of training events and outline of assistance available for community groups who may be seeking external funding. Incorporated in the program should be opportunities for one-on-one assistance for individual clubs/groups (this could be provided by Council officers or by agreement (fee for service) with the SWSA).

63. Develop a Council policy that links existing Council funding programs to criteria for



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward club sustainability and capacity building requirements (i.e. requirements for club training and development linked to successful facility funding).

There is inadequate (non-facility based) support for community based sports clubs, groups and committees.

• The sports club survey revealed that many clubs are facing issues in relation to a lack of new committee members and volunteers, lack of strategic planning, lack of assistance with funding applications and grant opportunities, limited opportunities for coach training and education and lack of administrative support.

• Council has a limited capacity (in terms of available staff and expertise) to deliver the range of support services required by clubs/committees. Therefore opportunities to work in collaboration with local Association, State Associations and existing service providers should be explored. Council should concentrate resources on facilitation and funding support.

• Council should work with local sports Associations and Committees of Management in an ongoing capacity to promote inclusiveness and initiatives to create welcoming environments for potential new participants and those with special needs.

64. Council should meet with Shire based sports Associations to identify the non-facility development and support needs of individual clubs and collectively establish a plan to address the identified needs. This may involve the development of an annual ‘training calendar’, delivery of which could be facilitated by Council and/or other agencies i.e. SWSA, South West Sports Academy (including support funding where appropriate).

65. Council should facilitate an annual workshop with Committees of Management to identify the non-facility development and support needs of individual groups and collectively establish a plan to address the identified needs. . This may involve the development of an annual ‘training calendar’, delivery of which could be facilitated by Council (including support funding where appropriate).

66. Glenelg Shire should establish a formal agreement with SWSA to deliver defined support services to local clubs and committees on its behalf, including initiatives to support inclusiveness. The agreement should be supported by an appropriate three-year performance based funding program with annual priorities and



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward activities determined in consultation with Council.

There are inconsistencies in the fees that individual sporting clubs pay for use of facilities and inconsistencies in the standards of service provided by Council for the various reserves.

• The club survey results indicated that there are disparities in the amounts individual clubs are required to pay for use of reserves/facilities (for example, one tennis club may be required to pay more for use of facilities than another tennis club in a different location).

• Council currently negotiates with reserve user groups and/or Committee of Management for 20% cost recovery of the total cost required to maintain each individual (entire) reserve. The user groups/Committee of Management then determine an appropriate breakdown of the 20% fee amongst the respective clubs using the reserve, on a percentage basis. If individual clubs are unable to pay their required percentage proportion, Council offers funding assistance and/or fee relief.

• As a policy basis and process for determining fees this is considered an appropriate model (20% cost recovery is a common benchmark figure used by a number of metropolitan and rural LGA’s). However it is acknowledged that this process may lead to differences in the amounts that individual clubs pay compared to other clubs using different locations. For example, Island Park in Casterton currently services approximately 14 user groups, which allows a greater distribution of costs compared to a reserve that has fewer user groups.

67. In consultation with Council’s Works Department, determine (define) an appropriate level of service to be offered at each category of reserve (i.e. Premier, Township and Local Sports Reserves) and apply these categories to each of Council’s existing sports reserves (as an example, Appendix 13 Sports Facilities Audit applies these categories to each reserve for the purposes of the Draft Report). Facilities/reserves should then be maintained in accordance with the defined levels of service and fees charged accordingly (20% cost recovery). Where clubs/users groups desire a higher level of service this should be considered a club/user group responsibility.

68. Continue to offer fee relief/subsidies for those clubs/groups that can not afford to pay their portion of the overall reserve fee. (Note, work with any clubs/groups that apply for fee relief to identify strategies to improve their ongoing financial position and overall sustainability).

69. Continue to apply appropriate commercially based fees and charges to those clubs/groups that operate commercial enterprises on Council owned or managed land.



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward However, in such cases Council’s ability to offer fee relief can be accessed.

• Therefore, a greater issue appears to be the potential disparities in the level of service provided by Council at varying reserves, which is then inturn used to determine the basis of the 20% cost recovery.

Lack of insurance cover for community groups utilising DSE facilities.

• Consistent issue raised in various consultation forums.

• DSE currently offer insurance assistance for Committee of Management utilising DSE facilities however cover does not extend to casual hirers or other community groups who may wish to utilise facilities. This can severely limit the capacity of local community groups and clubs (formal or informal) to access facilities.

70. Advocate with DSE to provide blanket cover for community groups utilising DSE facilities (similar to the cover Council offers users of its facilities) and/or to simplify the process by which Committees and of Management can facilitate cover for casual hirers.

71. Regularly promote the availability of public liability cover for community groups and casual hirers through Council and DSE processes (Council cover is limited to use of Council owned facilities only).

Aquatic Facilities Management may not be achieving the full scope of possible recreation outcomes for the community.

• There is a limited range of recreation programs and activities provided at existing facilities, in particular the outdoor seasonal pools.

• Asset management appears adequate and there are management plans and condition reports to assist ongoing maintenance.

• Operational management of the facilities is not aligned with

• The facilities are currently managed (asset management and operations) by Council’s Engineering Services Department.

• Alignment with Council’s Recreation Services may provide opportunities for enhanced leisure programming and opportunities for the local communities.

• The existing contract for operational management of the facilities should be reviewed (in

72. Review Council’s corporate structure to transfer aquatic centre operational management (i.e. contract management) responsibilities to the Community Service Department/Recreation Services Unit (ensure existing internal resources are also transferred).

73. Council Engineering Services Department to continue to manage the asset.

74. In consultation with the current contractor (CASA Leisure) review existing operational management requirements in order to



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward Council’s Recreation Services. consultation with the current

provider) to identify possible opportunities for enhanced leisure programming.

identify possible opportunities for enhanced leisure programming at all facilities.

Opportunity to establish closer links with other agencies and service providers in the region.

• Consultation outcomes revealed that there is not a thorough understanding of agency roles, initiatives and priorities. This may lead to duplication of effort and lost opportunities for collaborations or partnerships.

• There is a need to establish improved relationships with DSE, Parks Victoria, Wannon Water, Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority, South West Sports Assembly, South West Sports Academy, Portland YMCA and health service providers.

75. Establish officer-level (e.g. Community Services Manager and/or Recreation Services Officer) bi-annual meetings with relevant officers from each respective agency in order to foster relationships and explore opportunities for partnerships and collaborations to deliver recreation and health (through physical activity) outcomes for the community. (For example, SWSA may be able to provide a range of club development, training and support initiatives on a fee for service basis on behalf of Council. Another example may be exploring opportunities for reuse of treated waste water for sportsground irrigation with Wannon Water).

Other

Changing size and nature of the community.

• Anticipated population decline.

• Population ageing.

• Declining birth rates.

• Loss of young people aged below 30 years.

• Reduction in young people under 10 years old.


• Demand for traditional competitive sports (e.g. football, cricket etc) are likely to decline.

• Demand for recreation programs and activities for pre-school aged children are likely to decline.

76. Recreation programs and facilities, including open space, must be capable of adapting to changing community needs (e.g. reduced focus on structured/competitive/combative recreation).

77. Any new facility developments, including upgrades to existing facilities, should consider opportunities for multi-use and (where appropriate) incorporate areas for informal community activities.

78. Maintain current levels of service and



Issue Characteristics/Evidence Discussion Possible Way Forward opportunities for pre-school aged children in the short-term. In the longer term there may be opportunities to shift resource allocation to services and facilities for school aged children.

(All recommendations contained in this section have taken these likely changes into consideration).

Increasing proportion of people aged over 75 years whose incomes are below the Shire average.

• Community demographic results and projections.

• The capacity of older residents to pay for recreation services and activities is likely to be limited.

79. Consider Council owned/managed recreation services and facilities offer discounted (concession) rates for older adults.

Use of National and State Parks for camping.

• The Shire remains a popular destination for tourists and visitors.

• There is anecdotal evidence of growth in demand for self-catered camping within the natural areas throughout the Shire. (Self catered camping ranges from facilities/locations for tents through to caravans and motor-homes).

80. Engage in discussions with Parks Victoria and DSE to identify possible options to improve (and promote) the availability of facilities and infrastructure to support a range of self-catered camping at key destinations throughout the Shire.



9. SUMMARY OF TOWNSHIP SPECIFIC ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES

In addition to the shire-wide issues and recommendations (Section 9), the following section provides an overview of the key issues identified for specific sites within each individual township. For each of these sites it is assumed that the recommendations contained in Council’s Asset Management Plan and VRA Suitability Report will be implemented.

9.1. Portland

Site Strengths Weaknesses Discussion and Possible Way Forward

Hanlon Park

• The premier football competition venue in Portland.

• High quality playing surface.

• Extensive scope of existing infrastructure.

• Central location.

• High visibility.

• Quality netball courts.

• Meets minimum acceptable standard according to the VRA report, rating ‘A’.

• Overall size of the reserve is small and cramped in certain parts.

• Limited opportunities for expansion of facilities or improvements to circulation.

• Unsealed perimeter road and car parking, particularly around the pavilion.

• Aging infrastructure.

• Maintenance is required to the netball change rooms.

• General improvements are needed to cater for female participants and family use of the reserve.

• The club have a desire to extend the main pavilion.

• Additional equipment storage is reportedly needed.

• Hanlon Park is not zoned as Public Park Recreation Zone (PPRZ).

• There is inadequate storage facilities to service club needs.

1. Continue to develop and maintain Hanlon Park as the ‘premier’ sporting reserve in Portland.

2. Engage in discussion with user groups to explore opportunities to improve existing assets, including facilities to accommodate netballers and female participation, storage and general improvements to make more family friendly.

3. In exploring facility upgrade options, consider opportunities to improve the overall space utilisation within the reserve, for example, consider options to relocate the existing cricket practice nets to a more appropriate location within the reserve.

4. Rezone the reserve to PPRZ in the Glenelg Shire Planning Scheme to more appropriately reflect its use.

5. Consider the development of a Master Plan for the site to guide its long-term upgrade and development (addressing 1, 2 and 3 above).




Yarraman Park

• Overall size, including large areas of undeveloped land.

• Modern Go-Karting facility.

• Existing scope of infrastructure.

• Aging infrastructure, including fencing.

• Large size makes it difficult to maintain.

• Visually unappealing (poorly maintained facilities).

• Lack of landscaping.

• Facilities appear disused and/or in poor repair.

• Site appears to be underutilised in general.

• The reserve is isolated from residential areas and lacks a sense of vibrancy.

• Lack of facilities or infrastructure to encourage informal use (not helped by the hire wire fence that surrounds the site).

• Potential for use conflict between existing tenants.

• Evidence of vandalism.

• VRA rating ‘BBB’, below acceptable minimum standard.

6. Develop a Master Plan for the site to guide its future use and development. The Master Plan should clarify the level of use and opportunities for demolition of existing disused or under used facilities/structure in preference for a new multi-purpose, shared use facility (including consideration of the needs of gymnastics for a permanently established area).

7. Improve vegetation management, litter control and landscape maintenance. A thorough clean up of the reserve is needed.

8. Improve access roads and pathways throughout the reserve.

9. Monitor the level of use of the trotting track and upgrade surface if required.

Cavalier Park

• Located within an existing and emerging residential growth area.

• Good quality timber pole fence around the oval.

• Overall site is relatively small for formal sporting use, there is restricted space available around the oval.

• The playing surface quality is poor and requires top dressing and irrigation.

• Limited opportunities for casual

10. Demolish the existing temporary building and public toilets, establish a new sports pavilion that incorporates these functions.

11. Upgrade the playing surface through installation of irrigation and top dressing.

12. Improve overall landscaping, including trimming/pruning surrounding vegetation to allow improved views into the reserve.



Site Strengths Weaknesses Discussion and Possible Way Forward surveillance of the reserve – landscaping along road way prevents views into the reserve.

• No formal footpaths or defined pedestrian circulation.

• No training lights.

• There may be issues with cricket balls landing in near-by residential back-yards.

• The gravel road around the oval requires maintenance.

• A temporary building is being used as a sports pavilion.

• The cricket nets require repair.

• Existing public toilets are poor.

• VRA rating ‘BBB’, below acceptable minimum standard.

13. Formalise pedestrian circulation paths throughout the reserve.

14. Maintain/repair the internal road and cricket nets.

15. Investigate the need for training lights.

16. Investigate options to improve facilities for informal community use.

17. .Monitor incidences of cricket balls entering residential properties, install netting and/or other appropriate barriers as required.

Henty Park


• Adjacent to other community infrastructure e.g. Portland Aquatic Centre, Botanic Gardens and opposite the Arts Centre.

• Quality grass tennis courts.

• Large pavilion facilities.

• Turf cricket.

• Close proximity to foreshore.

• Lighting is provided to some tennis courts (hardcourts only).

• Oval fencing needs painting/repair.

• Existing playground is very small.

• Playing surfaces appear uneven.

• Public toilets (southern) are very poor and should be demolished.

• The works depot on the southern side of the reserve is unsightly.

• Evidence of extensive (birds and rabbits) damage to the grass tennis courts.

• Sports lighting and security lighting may need improvement.

• Tennis court fencing requires

18. Improve visual and pedestrian connectivity to the foreshore through defined paths, landscaping and directional signage.

19. Audit sports lighting and security lighting, upgrade as required.

20. Demolish the public toilets at the eastern end of the reserve.

21. Improve screening of the works depot.

22. Improve maintenance/repair reserve fencing, internal roads and vegetation management.

23. Seek advice from DSE on possible ways to prevent rabbit and bird damage to the grass tennis courts.



Site Strengths Weaknesses Discussion and Possible Way Forward upgrading.

• Pavilion buildings may require upgrading.

• Internal road maintenance is required.

• Landscape maintenance (vegetation) could improve.

• VRA rating ‘BB-‘, considerably below minimum accepted standard.

24. Top dress and level the oval playing surfaces where required.

Nelson Park

• Located adjacent to an existing and emerging residential area.

• Good quality playing surfaces.

• Existing brick pavilion.

• VRA rating ‘A-‘, acceptable minimum standard.

• Reserve fencing may prevent/limit opportunities for informal community use.

• Poor connection to surrounding residential areas (lack footpaths).

• Ageing infrastructure.

• Litter and poor vegetation management in the areas surrounding the main playing field.

25. Establish walking tracks/paths within and external to the reserve.

26. Review opportunities to reduce the amount of perimeter fencing, or add openings at key locations, to encourage informal use.

27. Consider installation of a playground to encourage informal community use.

28. Improve vegetation management and litter control.

Graham Husson Fauna Reserve

• Quality (recent) playground and picnic area.

• Overall size is appropriate for a local park.

• Located adjacent to a residential area.

• Involvement of the Lions Club.

• Appearance is overgrown and poorly maintained.

• Entrance is unclear, poorly defined.

• Poorly developed pedestrian circulation.

• The reserve is unappealing/unattractive to informal use.

• Reserve fencing is unsightly and restricts access.

29. The future of the reserve needs to be determined in consultation with DSE and the Lions Club. Ongoing maintenance needs to be addressed.




Flinders Park

• Overall size.


• Evidence of multi-use and quality facilities for netball, softball/baseball, hockey and CFA.

• Large netball pavilion and separate football pavilion.


• Unsealed roads and car park.

• Lack of a quality playground and BBQ area (fencing/cage around existing playground).

• Poor cricket nets.

• VRA rating ‘BBB’ below acceptable standard.

• Poor siting of some facilities, too close to road edges.

• Lack of access to pavilion facilities for hockey players.

• Lack of training lights (hockey).

• Lack of undercover shelter and viewing areas.

• Poor drainage on some netball courts.

• Poor vegetation management preventing views into the reserve from surrounding areas.

30. Improve vegetation management, including ‘uplifting’ (pruning) trees around the reserve perimeter and trimming of trees around the netball courts.

31. Install undercover shelter and viewing facilities at key locations e.g. near hockey facility, around the main oval and on the far side of the netball courts.

32. Remove the existing fencing/cage around the playground and relocate to a more appropriate location within the reserve that encourages use by all reserve and community users.

33. Discuss the need to either remove or replace the cricket nets with Flinders Cricket Club and the Portland and District Cricket Association.

34. Seal (asphalt) the main car parks and access roads.

35. Improve drainage around netball courts.

36. Facilitate access to one of the existing pavilion/shower facilities for hockey players.

Fitzgerald Street Stadium

• Indoor basketball (2) and squash facilities (5).

• Centrally located.

• Sealed car parking.

• VRA rating ‘AAA-‘, above acceptable minimum standard.


• Cracks in squash court walls.

• Lighting and seating in the basketball stadium may require upgrade.

• Poor disabled accessibility to basketball stadium entrance.

37. Audit car park and security lighting, upgrade as required.

38. Improve disabled accessibility to the stadium.

39. Improve lighting and seating in the basketball stadium.

40. Implement a program of general facility maintenance and renewal.




Friendly Societies Reserve

• Quality pavilion.

• Quality playing surfaces.

• Walking paths and connection to Fawthrop Lagoon.

• VRA rating ‘A’, acceptable minium standard.

• Limited scope for expansion at this site.

• Poor grass and vegetation maintenance around the Lagoon.

• Pedestrian paths around the lagoon could be upgraded/improved.

41. Upgrade walking paths around Fawthrop Lagoon, including consideration of alterative routes.

42. Improve vegetation maintenance and management (particularly adjacent to walking paths).

Portland Foreshore Reserve

• Visual beauty.

• Scope of existing infrastructure and facilities for community recreation and commercial activities.

• Sweeping lawns.

• Nuns beach.

• Visitor Information Centre/Museum.

• Angling club and yacht club pavilions.

• Skate park.

• Playgrounds.

• Pier, boating and fishing facilities.

• BBQ and picnic facilities.

• Unsealed roads and car parking (especially around the Visitor Information Centre/Museum).

• Lack of access to water edge and to park features for people with mobility restrictions.

• Inadequate supply of rubbish bins.

• Ageing infrastructure, in particular the playground.

43. Review the existing Masterplan to guide the future use and development of the foreshore. Amongst other things, the Masterplan should consider:

• Upgrading car parks and vehicle circulation,

• Disability access,

• Upgrading the playground to regional status, including access for all abilities,

• Inclusion of additional fishing platforms for recreational use, including platforms that cater for those with restricted mobility,

• Upgrading the skate park and BBQ/picnic facilities throughout,

• Additional boat launching facilities and support infrastructure (commercial and recreational),

• Consideration of infrastructure needs to cater for recreational and commercial scuba diving,

• Additional fish cleaning stations, and

• Potential inclusion of a designated swimming enclosure (50m sea baths).




Alexandra Park

• Size and location.

• Oval surface (fair) and netball courts.

• BMX track.

• Pavilion.

• Native vegetation/trees.

• Limited run off between the oval boundary and fencing.

• Overall maintenance is poor (roads need grading, vegetation maintenance, rubbish collection etc).

• Disjointed outbuildings, not all appear to be used.

• Training lights may require upgrading.

• VRA rating ‘BBB’ below acceptable minimum standard.

• Pavilion may require upgrading.

44. Improve road surfaces.

45. Improve vegetation maintenance and general clean up.

46. Formalise/establish path connections between key infrastructure.

47. Re-line the oval boundary to allow sufficient run off before the oval fencing.

48. Review the level of use of existing buildings, demolish any facilities that are not used and in poor repair.

Other Issues Discussion Possible Way Forward

Ad-hoc walking trail along the foreshore escarpment.

• The walking trail along the foreshore cliff top is disjointed and at times unclear.

49. Formalise the walking trail along the Portland foreshore escarpment, including strategically located seating and viewing areas.

50. Investigate options for a shared path connection along the entire foreshore length through to Narrawong, via Dutton Way and emerging residential areas (some sections may need to be provided on-road).

Demand for soccer.

• Whilst there is no evidence of significant demand for additional soccer pitches at this point in time, general trends (State and National) indicate increasing popularity and participation in the sport. Council has a number of potential options to cater for additional soccer demand should it arise, including shared use of facilities at Yarraman Park, Cavalier Park, Nelson Park, Alexandra Park or Henty Park (and/or use of school ovals).

51. Council should monitor trends in local soccer participation and respond to demand for additional facilities as required.




Poor condition of many public roads to beaches (in particular in the Point Danger area).

• Many gravel roads that provide access to surfing beaches and the garnet rookery around the Portland Smelter are in deplorable condition, requiring 4wd access only. These areas provide valuable access to legitimate informal recreation activities and should be upgraded and maintained.

52. Council to encourage DSE to upgrade and maintain public roads leading to beaches around the Portland Smelter/Point Danger.

Portland Rifle Club

• The Portland Rifle Club is reportedly one of the oldest sporting club in the State (121 years old). They currently utilise facilities within the Garnet Reserve land under the control of the DSE appointed Point Danger Management Committee. Existing facilities are grossly inadequate, including no power. The club reportedly has around 90 members and offers a range of participation programs for the community.

53. Council should facilitate a meeting between the Rifle Club and DSE (on site) to clarify facility development aspirations and key needs. Council should then consider working with the club, DSE and Management Committee to explore opportunities to improve facilities at this location (or alternatively identify a suitable site for possible relocation of the club to more appropriate facilities).

Portland Botanic Gardens

• The gardens are highly valued and the site has Victorian Heritage listing, including built facilities within the reserve (e.g. Croquet Club building).

• There is an active Friends Group that has been instrumental in developing and implementing a Conservation Management Plan for the reserve.

• Additional funds are required in order to ensure ongoing implementation of the Conservation Management Plan, including facility improvements.

54. Work in cooperation with the Friends Group, Croquet Club and other relevant users to develop a combined application to Heritage Victoria for building upgrades, general improvements and implementation of the Conservation Management Plan.



9.2. Bridgewater


Bridgewater Foreshore • Natural features.

• Surf Club.

• Kiosk.

• Existing infrastructure, including car parks.

• Modern public toilets and showers.

• See ‘Discussion and Possible Way Forward’.

1. Adopt a ‘principles’ based approach to management of the foreshore, that is:

a. Protect the existing character of the foreshore,

b. Protect existing vegetation,

c. Manage visitor impacts e.g. litter, erosion, car parking etc.

d. Prevent residential encroachment (establish designated set backs from the northern side of Bridgewater Road),

e. Prevent further commercial development.

Within this context, the following recommendations should be pursued;

2. Prevent vehicle access to the western end of the foreshore (grassed picnic area adjacent to the Surf Club).

3. Install a ‘beach’ shower at the eastern end of the beach (near the unsealed car park).

4. Install additional park furniture (picnic tables and bench seats) along the foreshore.

5. Consider installation of playground swings on either the eastern or western grassed foreshore areas.

6. Consider opportunities to improve beach access for horse training, including consideration of removing the vehicle access ramp from the eastern end of the



Site Strengths Weaknesses Discussion and Possible Way Forward beach (east of the kiosk) whilst retaining and improving vehicle access in front of the surf club.

7. Investigate opportunities to improve pedestrian access to the beach from existing car parks and tracks through formalising/upgrading ramps, steps and tracks to avoid unnecessary erosion and improve access.

9.3. Narrawong


Maintenance

• The standard of maintenance (specifically mowing) of some public areas could improve. A number of community members already maintain large areas of public land with little or no support from Council, including the Esplanade and River reserves. The standard of maintenance provided by the community is generally higher than the standard provided by Council, this results in an obvious visual difference. The high standard provided by the community adds to the overall level of community pride, satisfaction and sense of belonging that residents have.

See recommendations 23-29 in Section 9 Shire-Wide recommendations.

Rest Stop Playground and Public Toilets • Participants at the community meeting expressed a desire to

establish a public rest stop in Narrawong complete with public toilets, picnic tables and a small playground.

1. Investigate opportunities and possible funding sources to establish a public rest stop in Narrawong.

River Reserve

• Council/DSE maintenance of the river reserve banks and open space areas needs improvement. Large sections of the reserve where overgrown.

2. DSE (CoM) to review the effectiveness of existing maintenance schedules and consider opportunities to improve the level of service (i.e. more regular mowing).

Beach Tracks

• A number of the walking tracks and board walks leading to the beach, over the dunes, required maintenance/repair.

3. DSE (CoM) to inspect all walking tracks to the beach and repair where necessary. Ensure tracks are inspected annually (prior to summer).




Public Transport

• Residents where concerned that the loss of mobile services (e.g. Library) and lack of public transport prevented a number of residents from accessing Council services and recreational opportunities in Portland.

4. Council to ensure the Glenelg Strategic Future Plan (currently being prepared) gives adequate consideration to resolution of public transport options throughout the Shire

9.4. Tyrendarra


Tyrendarra Recreation Reserve

• Size.

• Location.

• Scope of existing infrastructure.

• Playing surfaces (oval and courts).

• Community Hall.

• VRA rating ‘A’ which is the acceptable minimum standard.

• Cricket nets may require repair.

• Cyprus trees have been damaged by fire and may present a safety concern.

• The small bench seats around the ground could be improved/upgraded.

1. Commission a detailed arborist’s report into the health and safety of the existing trees and document a recommended management and maintenance regime, including consideration of complete removal (subsequently completed).

2. Inspect the cricket nets and repair as required.

3. Commence a program for staged upgrade of the bench seating around the reserve.

9.5. Bolwarra


Recreation Reserve/Tennis Club

• Adjacent to the primary school.

• Overall size.

• Club rooms (although not the toilets).

• Two new picnic tables.

• Poor condition of the toilets.

• Courts require resurfacing/reconstruction.

• Court fencing requires upgrade/replacement.

• Two old picnic tables.

1. Support the Committee in seeking funding (including a Council contribution) to upgrade the existing courts and fencing (in preference to establishing new facilities).

2. Upgrade the public toilets.

3. Assist the club with a funding applications for shade structures to be installed adjacent to the courts

4. Remove the existing old picnic tables.



9.6. Heywood


Heywood Recreation Reserve • Size.

• Location.

• Existing infrastructure (including pavilions, gate keepers box, under cover areas and storage facilities).

• Quality netball courts, with lighting.

• Multi use.

• Lack of subsurface drainage and irrigation to main playing field (?)

• Limited room/space behind the northern goals (although netting helps alleviate issues with errant balls).

• Open swale drain at the southern end of the reserve (becomes a ’bog’ in winter).

• Oval needs top dressing and levelling (in parts).

• Mowing throughout the reserve (i.e. other than the oval).

• Overuse of the playing field.

• VRA rating ‘BBB-‘, considerable below acceptable standard.

1. The large undeveloped open space area behind the main pavilions could be improved (e.g. junior/training oval) to accommodate training (thereby preserving the playing surface on the main oval), this space could also potentially be used for emerging sports (e.g. soccer) and/or activities/events/festivals in the future should the need arise.

2. Improve landscaping and pedestrian circulation throughout the reserve, including a pedestrian connection and crossing over the Fitzroy River to compliment the DSE/Heywood Gardens CoM bridge project.

3. Renovate the oval including installation of sub-surface drainage and irrigation, levelling and reseeding.


Fitzroy River Open Space Corridor • The Fitzroy River open space corridor provides an attractive linear park and potential for greater community use.

4. Establish pedestrian crossings at either end of the open space corridor and establish a sealed path connection on both sides of the river, including a connection to the Heywood Recreation Reserve.



5. Associated with the above recommendation, upgrade landscaping and revegetation on both sides of the river, provide park furniture (e.g. tables and seats) at key points along the trail.

Planning scheme amendments. • Certain areas of open space do not appear to be zoned PPRZ (or other appropriate zoning) in the Planning Scheme. Specifically,

The swimming pool and skate park are zoned R1Z,

The area adjacent to the Heywood Recreation Reserve (eastern side) is zoned FZ (need to confirm if this has a PAO?)

The Barclay (road) reserve is zoned R1Z, this is appropriate however it may not accurately reflect its current function, that is, informal park, therefore PPRZ may be a better fit.

6. Investigate and rectify possible planning scheme anomalies.

9.7. Nelson


Development of a Concept Plan for the River Foreshore Reserve.

• Stratcorp was advised that DSE and the Reserve Committee were in the process of developing/updating a Concept Plan to guide the future management and development of the reserve.

1. Council continue to work with the community in an advocacy role to identify opportunities and strategically plan for future development.

2. Ensure the plan considers;

a. Installation of shade structures over the picnic tables near the boat ramp,

b. Improved access to the fishing platform for people with mobility impairments,

c. Improved accessibility (mobility) to the picnic shelter, public toilets and



Other Issues Discussion Possible Way Forward playground, and

d. Supports installation of a ½ court basketball court in Bridge Park.

Demand for a community hall. • The existing Visitor Information Centre has a multi-purpose room that is used by the community as a public meeting place and activity centre. Demand for a larger, purpose built community hall has been expressed by some members of the community.

3. Investigate the feasibility (i.e. level of demand and facility options) of establishing a new community hall in Nelson. Investigations should ensure consultation with key government agencies (e.g. DSE, CFA, DVC, Parks Vic) and other public service providers (e.g. health and community services) to explore opportunities for the development of a single integrated public facility that services corporate and community needs.

9.8. Dartmoor


Dartmoor Recreation Reserve

• Size.

• Multi-use.



• Poor condition of roads and lack of pedestrian paths/connections.

• A number of buildings and structures may be disused.

• Reserve lacks perimeter fencing or gate keepers box, which limits the clubs capacity to raise revenue from attendance.

• Surface of the netball court will require resurfacing in the short-medium term. One netball court needs to be extended.

• VRA rating ‘BBB-‘, which is slightly below the acceptable minimum

1. Consult with reserve users to identify if any of the existing buildings and structures are disused and can be removed.

2. Reseal the netball courts (medium term), ensuring all meet minimum size requirements.

3. Consider options to facilitate improved capacity of the club to collect attendance revenue and safety of users adjacent to the road (if fencing is required around the entire reserve, ensure it is designed to minimise visual impact e.g. black mesh not galvanised. It would be reasonable to expect the club to contribute substantially to the cost of any solution, repayment/contribution options would need



Site Strengths Weaknesses Discussion and Possible Way Forward standard. to be negotiated with Council).

4. Reseal/grade all internal roads and establish pedestrian paths (gravel) between key destination points.


Dartmoor Bowling Club • Located behind the Anzac Hall. The existing public toilets are in poor repair.

5. Demolish the existing public toilets and replace only if needed (it is assumed that the Anzac Hall internal toilets could be used by the Bowling Club).

Informal park opposite the hotel (known as the “Village Green”).

• Poor pedestrian access. 6. DSE to improve pedestrian access through installation of appropriate path connections.

Fort O’Hare Picnic Area • Vehicles, including heavy vehicles, are known to inadvertently cause damage to the picnic area as a turn-around site after failing to realise it is a no-through-road.

7. Vic Roads and/or Council to review road signage to ensure adequate notice of the no-through road in order to prevent vehicle damage to the Fort O’Hare picnic area.

9.9. Casterton


Island Park Recreation Reserve

• Central hub/precinct for active recreation.

• Natural setting and established trees.

• Size.

• Extensive size may make the site difficult to maintain.

• Poor condition of some ageing infrastructure.

• General building maintenance

1. Establish a network of formal walking paths and trails throughout the park, including along the river, consistent with the Kelpie Trail concept.

2. Consider opportunities to introduce training lights to the second oval to help alleviate




• Location.

• Existing infrastructure (scope).

• Multi-use (e.g. range of sporting activities, including cricket, football, croquet, tennis, netball etc and variety of user groups (14).

• Quality playing fields.

• Good lighting to main oval and courts (netball and tennis).

• Backs onto the Glenelg River.

• VRA rating ‘AA+’, considerably above minimum acceptable standard.

could improve.

• Lack of formal paths/pedestrian connections throughout the site, including along the river.

• Centre cricket wicket area on the main oval has become raised over time.

over-use of the main oval.

3. Council to discuss with the Lions Club the need to repair the pedestrian bridge connection to the adjacent Lions Club Memorial Park.

4. Improve regular and preventative maintenance of buildings within the reserve, including public toilets and the shelter/BBQ area behind the goals at the main oval.

5. Resurface tennis and netball courts as funds become available.

6. Review vegetation management, ensure trees are appropriately trimmed from around playing areas, car parking and buildings.

7. Install additional park seating at key locations e.g. tennis and netball courts and along the river.

8. Ensure ground levels surrounding tennis and netball courts are not higher than the court surfaces.

9. Reshape centre wicket area on the main oval to provide a more even (level) surface.

10. Supply electricity to the pavilion on the second oval, install an undercover verandah area and hard surface base.

11. Review maintenance practices to ensure grass cutting is timed appropriately for sporting use, particularly cricket.

12. Consider installation of sub-surface irrigation to both ovals.




13. Ensure both ovals are top dressed and reseeded periodically.


Skate Park

• Council has resolved to install a Skate Park in Possum Park, including a ½ court basketball facility. There has been evidence, via the consultation results, of strong community support for this development.

14. Install a skate park and ½ court basketball facilities in Possum Park as funds become available.

Bryan Park

• The small informal park is strategically located opposite the hospital and includes a small playground. The park lacks quality grass cover due to a lack of irrigation. The park would be more appealing if the grass surface was improved.

15. Install automated irrigation to improve grass cover and quality.

16. Undertake a risk assessment of the reserve fencing to ensure adequate public safety.

Goodman Park • The park provides excellent views over the town and across to

Island Park and the Glenelg River. The park contains quality native vegetation.

17. Protect the native vegetation and manage the park for its conservation and landscape values.

Polocross Reserve

• The reserve may be underutilised and is generally in poor condition. The VRA rating is ‘B-‘, considerably below acceptable minimum standard.

18. In addition to implementing the VRA recommendations, meet with the Polo Cross club to determine levels and frequency of use and key improvement or development priorities, including an agreed ongoing maintenance program.

Small Bore Rifle Club

• Facilities appear underutilised and in very poor condition. 19. Meet with the Rifle Club to determine levels and frequency of use.

20. DSE and Club to undertake a public safety audit of the building to determine if it is still appropriate for public use. Depending on the outcomes of the audit, and levels of community use and community interest, upgrade/improve the building or demolish it.

Cussen Street Park • Small informal park, including an older style playground. 21. Remove existing playground.



Other Issues Discussion Possible Way Forward Additional playground facilities exist near-by in Bryan Park

Rotary Rest Point Park (Tyers St).

• The existing playground may not comply with Australian Standard. The open wood fire BBQ appears to receive little use and could be a potential fire hazard.

In consultation with the Rotary Club of Casterton;

22. Inspect the playground to ensure appropriate compliance, upgrade facilities if required.

23. Consider removing the existing open wood fire BBQ.

Casterton Kelpie Walking Trail / Round the town Walking Trail

• There may be an opportunity to establish a walking trail around the town utilising key areas of public open space, natural features and small sections of on-street/footpaths. A possible route could be as follows. Starting at Goodman Park – McEvoy Street – Casterton-Naracoorte Road – Ess Lagoon – Island Park (along the river) – follow Glenelg River through to Old Mt Gambier Road – up Old Mt Gambier Road – right into Russell Street – Bryan Park/Wall Memorial – Goodman Park.

24. Investigate the options and feasibility of establishing a continuous walking loop around the town (as described).

Casterton Railway Precinct

• Public Transport land, leased by Council, used by a number of local volunteer community groups who have been active in upgrading, beautifying and maintaining the area for community open space benefit.

25. Council to maintain an active interest in the area (i.e. re-lease) for community public open space benefit pending resolution of potential public safety issues with the PTC.

Ess Lagoon

• Attractive river-side public open space reserve. 26. Council to continue an active role in the future management of Ess Lagoon, in consultation with other agencies, for broad community benefit.

9.10. Sandford


Sandford Recreation Reserve • Size.

• Multi-use (i.e. variety of sports and


• Surface of the netball and tennis courts will require resurfacing in

1. DSE CoM to reseal the netball and tennis courts (medium term).

2. DSE CoM to repair or replace the existing



activities).


the short-medium term.

• The existing tennis shelter requires repair and the main pavilion may require upgrading.

• VRA rating ‘BBB+‘, which is slightly below the acceptable minimum standard.

tennis shelter.

As per all other facilities, implement the recommendations contained in Council’s Asset Management Plan and VRA Suitability report.

(NB: Review planning scheme zoning for the reserve, currently PUZ7, should be PPRZ?)

9.11. Merino


Merino Recreation Reserve

• Size.

• Adjacent to the public swimming pool.


• Ageing infrastructure, generally in very poor condition.

• The majority of facilities appear unused and/or in various states of decline/disrepair.

• Location is a considerable distance from the town centre.

• The netball and tennis courts are unused.

• Playground does not meet Australian Standards.

• Disused horse jumps.

• Poor pedestrian connection to the swimming pool.

• VRA rating ‘BB+’ which is below an acceptable minimum standard.

1. Meet with the community to further clarify the current levels of use, activities and core facility requirements for the reserve. Once the core facility requirements have been identified, maintain these facilities to a base acceptable standard. Demolish and remove all other structures, including the tennis and netball courts, playground and disused buildings.

2. Consider improving pedestrian connections to the pool and to/from the town centre.


Lions Club Park • The existing playground may not comply with Australian Standards.

3. Inspect the existing playground to ensure compliance, upgrade if required.



9.12. Digby


Digby Springs Reserve • DSE controlled reserve which is overgrown and undeveloped.

There may be an opportunity to upgrade the park for informal community use.

1. Approach DSE to clean up and maintain the reserve, including consideration of a walking track and park seating.

Digby Memorial Park/Community Hall

• Aside from the general store, the Memorial Park/Community Hall function as the central community hub for the town. The Hall is in good condition and well maintained. The two tennis courts adjacent to the Hall are not used for formal sporting competitions however provide a valuable social function. Court surfaces need to be resealed. The Hall Committee would like to install a BBQ and playground on the site.

• The Mechanics Hall adjacent to the Community Hall may have historical significance and requires repair. In the long term this facility could operate as a ‘Tea House’ or similar. The Hall Committee would like to upgrade the precinct so that it becomes attractive for passing traffic to use as a rest stop and/or point of interest.

2. Support the Hall Committees efforts to attract funding for the installation of a playground and resealing of the tennis courts.

3. Support community efforts to renovate the Mechanics Hall adjacent to the Community Hall.

9.13. Heathmere


Heathmere Recreation Reserve

• Size.

• Adjacent to Southern 500 Speedway.


• Good quality roads and facilities.

• The existing playground appears non-compliant.

1. DSE CoM to inspect the existing playground and upgrade/replace if non-compliant.

2. DSE CoM should consider resealing the old netball court so that it can be used as a warm up area.



• VRA rating, ‘A’ which is the accepted minimum standard.



10. CONCLUSIONS

(NB: The Glenelg Shire Recreation and Open Space Strategy recommendations and Implementation Plan are provided in the stand-alone Executive Summary report that accompanies this document).

This report has been developed to research and clarify the recreation and open space needs of the community and to articulate suitable recommendations to address the identified needs. The planning process has involved an extensive review of background material, industry trends, demographic data, population projections and community engagement. The project has benefited from a range of consultation techniques including telephone surveys, face to face surveys, community meetings, workshops and key stakeholder surveys.

The research and consultation results led to the identification of a number of key issues and opportunities for the Shire as a whole and for specific townships and individual sites. These have been presented in Sections 8 and 9. The outcomes present a number of key challenges for Council, not least of which involves responding to the changing demographic and population profile of the community. Other key challenges include managing the existing stock of ageing sport and recreation infrastructure so that it remains relevant and useable by the community, as well as supporting the overall sustainability of ‘non-built’ (i.e. community infrastructure) that supports sport and recreation across the region.

Hence the sustainability of communities as a whole becomes an important issue for Glenelg Shire. The importance of sport, recreation and open space should not be underestimated within this context. Sport and recreation clubs and facilities provide opportunities for community interaction - preventing social isolation - and contribute to the economic and social prosperity of individual townships. Therefore sport, recreation and open space, along with the community committees that are involved in their management and development, play an integral role in contributing to community life, community identify and the character of individual townships.

Implementation of the recommendation presents a significant resource challenge for Council. The estimated cost for each action does not provide an allowance for additional Council staff resources that are likely to be needed to implement the recommendations. A large proportion of the recommendations relate to service improvements or initiatives that Council can implement or absorb within existing budgets though a review of current work priorities and practices. That is, the recommendations outlined in this report can form the basis of an annual works plans for Council’s Recreation Officer and other Council staff.

However it is recognised that Council currently only has one full time staff person responsible for sport, recreation and open space, therefore it is strongly recommended that a review of the priorities and work practices of this position be undertaken with a view to identifying opportunities for service improvement (in line with the recommendations contained in this report) and a realistic assessment of the capacity of this one role to fulfil these recommendations be undertaken.

It is anticipated that additional staff resources will be required to implement the recommendations and to achieve the desired level of overall service improvement demanded by the community as evidenced through the research and consultation results. Therefore opportunities to create a Recreation Liaison Officer or Recreation



Development Officer role (or similar) should be explored, including consideration of traineeships or other Government subsidised employment options (full or part time). If additional human resources are not made available the capacity of Council to implement the recommendations will be significantly constrained.

It is recommended that this report be reviewed annually by Council officers and a progress report/update presented to Council. The strategy should undergo a comprehensive review, including community consultation, after five years to determine if the outstanding recommendations and priorities remain appropriate.


Final Report Vol2 © Stratcorp Consulting 2007 Appendices

APPENDIX 1 – GLENELG DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF GLENELG SHIRE

The following section presents demographic data obtained from the following sources:

• Basic Community Profile, 2001 ABS Census (Source: www.abs.gov.au).

• Regional Victoria in Fact, Department of Sustainability & Environment (2001).

• Demographics Profile (prepared by Paul Moss, Glenelg Shire Council).

It is often difficult to obtain consistency in population statistics and projections. Various government departments quote differing figures based on different data collection and analysis techniques. For example for the year 2001 the ABS Census quotes the total population of the Glenelg Shire as 19,288 people, the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) 20,392 people and the Department of Infrastructure 20,759 people. Where possible ABS Census data has been used and DSE population projections used for future forecasts.

1. Population Profile All population sources predict a decline and aging of the total population of the Glenelg Shire. According to DSE figures, the estimated resident population is expected to decline by approximately 6% between 2001 to 2031. The total number of people in each age group under 54 years old is expected to experience a decline, however the total number of people aged over 55 years will increase during the same period.

The table below provides a breakdown of the Shire population for each major settlement.

Area 2001 Population % of total population

Portland 9,588 50%

Casterton 1,670 9%

Heywood 1,223 6%

Dartmoor 246 1%

Merino 215 1%

Narrawong 175 1%

Rural Balance 6,171 32%

Total 19,288 100%

2. Age Structure The following figure demonstrates the age structure of the Glenelg Shire compared to that of Regional Victoria as a whole.

6.96.7

20.720.3

6.1

7.9

12.2 12.2

23.3

22.1

11.912

8.48.3 8.8 8.8

1.7 1.7

0

5

10

15

20

25

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

0-4 years 5-17 years 18-24years

25-34years

35-49years

50-59years

60-69years

70-84years

85 +years

Glenelg Regional Victoria

Age structure of Glenelg vs Regional Victoria

Overall, the age distribution profile of the Glenelg Shire is very similar to the age distribution profile for Regional Victoria. The two major age cohorts are 35-49 years (23.3%) and 5-17 years (20.7%).

It is estimated that by 2011, 27% of the Shire’s population will be aged over 60 and 14% over 70, compared to figures of almost 20% and 11% in 2001. Whilst the overall population size is in decline, the numbers of people in the older age groups will continue to rise.

3. Household Type The figure below indicates the various household types with the Glenelg Shire.

32.932.7

27 27.6

9.510.5

0.8 0.92.1

2.9

27.7

25.4

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

Couple withchildren

Couple withoutchildren

One parentfamily

Other family Grouphousehold

Lone person


Glenelg Shire household types

The largest proportions of Glenelg Shire households comprise of either “couple with children” (32.9%), “lone person” (27.7%) or “couple without children” (27%) households. However, in comparison to Regional Victoria as a whole, the Glenelg Shire has:

• A greater proportion of “lone person” households (27.7% compared to 25.4%)

• A lesser proportion of “one parent families” (9.5% compared to 10.5%).

• A lesser proportion of “group households” (2.1% compared to 2.9%).

4. Employment The figure below shows the employment profile of the Glenelg Shire for the Census year of 2001.

57.8 58.2

30.8 31.4

3.5 3

7.9 7.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

Employed full time Employed part time Employed - not stated Unemployed


Employment in Glenelg Shire

In 2001, Glenelg Shire had a very similar employment profile to that of Regional Victoria. A total of 57.8% of residents are employed on a full time basis compared to Regional Victoria’s 58.2%. 30.8% of residents are employed part time in Glenelg compared to Regional Victoria’s 31.4%. The percentage of those unemployed in Glenelg in 2001 (7.9%) was only slightly higher than the Regional Victorian average (7.4%), and the Australian average of 7.4%.

5. Occupation The figure below indicates the various occupations of residents within the Shire of Glenelg.

15.3

12.9

11.9

14.9

9.6

11.1

12.9

13.5

2.42.9

12

13.913.3

8.58.1

9.4

12.1

10.8

2.42.1

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

Managers andadministrators

Professionals AssociateProfessionals

Tradespersonsand related

Advancedclerical and

services

Intermediateclerical and

services

Intermediateproduction and

transport

Elementaryclerical, salesand service

Labourers andrelated

Inadequatelydescribed or not

stated


Glenelg Shire occupations

“Managers and administrators” (15.3%) and “Intermediate production and transport” (13.3%) are the most common occupations of residents surveyed from the Shire of Glenelg. In comparison to Regional Victoria as a whole, the Shire of Glenelg has:

• A higher proportion of “Manager and administrators” (15.3% compared to 12.9%).

• A lesser proportion of “Professionals” (11.9% compared to 14.9%).

• A greater proportion of “Intermediate production and transport” (13.3% compared to 8.5%).

6. Country of Birth The largest proportion of Glenelg residents were born in Australia (87.9%). This figure is higher than the average for Regional Victoria, where 85% of residents are Australian-born.

Of those born overseas the top 4 countries of birth of Glenelg Shire residents are:

• United Kingdom (3%)

• New Zealand (1%)

• Netherlands (0.6%)

• Philippines (0.3%)

7. Weekly Household Income The following figure shows the breakdown of weekly household income for residents of the Glenelg Shire as compared to Regional Victoria.

0.6 0.6

5.44.8

9.89.3

19.9 19.9

13.2 13.2

14.414.8

15.4

14.7

6.8 7

3.94.2

10.6

11.5

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

Negative and nil $1 to $199 $200 to $299 $300 to $499 $500 to $699 $700 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 to $1,999 $2,000 or more Not stated


Weekly household income Glenelg vs Regional Victoria

The largest proportion of Glenelg households (19.9%) earn a weekly household income of “$300 - $499”. There are also a significant proportion of Glenelg households earning between $1,000 and $1,499 (15.4%). Generally, Glenelg Shire residents earn less than Regional Victoria as a whole. The main differences between Glenelg residents and Regional Victoria residents are:

• A greater proportion of families earning less than $299 (15.8% compared to 14.7%).

• A lesser proportion of families earning over $1,500 (10.7% compared to 11.2%).

8. Dwelling Structure

The following figure shows the various dwelling structures of Glenelg residents compared to those of Regional Victoria overall.

94.292.3

0.8 2.13 3.6

1.2 1.4 0.8 0.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

Separate house Semi-detached, rowor terrace house,

townhouse

Flat, unit orapartment

Other dwelling Not stated


Dwelling types – Glenelg vs Regional Victoria

The vast majority of dwellings in the Glenelg Shire are “separate houses” (94.2%), followed by “flat, unit or apartment” (3%), “other” dwelling (1.2%) and “semi-detached, row or terrace house, townhouse” (0.8%). The main difference between the dwelling structures of Glenelg residents and Regional Victoria residents is the lack of “semi-detached, row or terrace house, townhouses” in the Glenelg Shire.:

7. Travel to work The figure below shows the various methods that Glenelg residents use to get to work.

0 0.4 0.2 0.5 0 0

57.3

60.2

65.7 5 5.1

1.3 1.1

4.1 31 1.3

10.68.8

12.4 11.9

2.1 2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70Pe

rcen

tage

(%)

Train Bus Tram Car, asdriver

Car, aspassenger

Walk Bicycle Othermode

Multiplemode

Worked athome

Did not goto work

Not stated


Travel to work – Glenelg vs Regional Victoria

A total of 57.3% of Glenelg residents travel to work by “car, as the driver.” This is by far the most popular method of travel to work followed by “car, as passenger” (6%). A significant proportion of residents either “worked at home” (10.6%) or “did not go to work” (12.4%).

8. Motor Vehicle Ownership The figure below indicates the distribution of “number of vehicles per household” for residents of Glenelg Shire.

Not stated5.2%

3 or more motor vehicles15.6%

1 motor vehicle36.1%

No motor vehicles7.3%

2 motor vehicles35.8%

Motor vehicle ownership

The largest proportion of households in Glenelg own “1 motor vehicle” (36.1%), followed by “2 motor vehicles” (35.8%), “3 or more motor vehicles” (15.6%) and “no motor vehicles” (7.3%).



APPENDIX 2 – BACKGROUND RESEARCH REVIEW

1. SUMMARY OF RELEVANT REPORTS

The following section provides a high level summary of previous major reports or plans that have been reviewed to provide context and inform the development of this project. They are listed in no set priority order.

1.1. Glenelg Shire Council, Community Information Plan 2004-06. The plan was adopted by Council on 23 November 2004. The plan outlines the Shire’s commitment to the provision and facilitation of information services throughout the Shire. The overall mission is stated as “Glenelg Shire Council will enable lifelong learning through” a range of library services, facilities, access to services and information technology. There are no direct implications from this report in relation to the future active recreation and open space needs of the community.

1.2. Glenelg Shire Council, Community Well-Being Report, 2004 and 2006 (Draft). The 2004 report was adopted by Council on 27th July 2004, the 2006 report is currently being considered by Council.

The Shire have adopted a well-being framework that includes assessing the positives and negatives associated with each of the following components, community growth, environment, health and recreation, safety, business and innovation, employment, economic development, housing, governance, culture and arts, education and training, equal opportunity and population. Key points or issues raised in the report relevant to this project include;

• Community satisfaction with the Shire’s overall performance continues to increase (slightly), although satisfaction declined in reference to “recreational facilities” and the “appearance of public areas” between 2002 to 2003 (although both remain relatively high, e.g. approximately 68% community satisfaction with the Shire’s recreational facilities in 2003).

• The Shire’s population is declining and ageing, with significant increases in the proportion of retirement age and beyond. The total population of 20,759 (2001) is expected to decline to 20,082 by 2010, around 3% decline, the proportion of those aged over 55 years is expected to be around 30% of the total population.

• Census data suggests birth rates in the Shire are declining, however hospital data indicates child birth is on the increase.

• There is high level of satisfaction with the Shire’s health and community services.

• Life expectancy in the Shire is below regional and state averages.

• Unemployment in the Shire is trending slightly upward, contrary to state and regional trends. Unemployment rates in the Shire are on average 3% points higher than state and regional trends.

• Visitation numbers to Portland are below what they were in 2001/02.

• Usage of the Portland pool is at the upper end of the expected range and Merino pool is well above the norm for rural towns. Attendances at the Casterton and Heywood pools increased in 2002-03.

1.3. Glenelg Shire, Strategic Tourism Plan 2005-2008. The Plan has been developed as a whole of industry plan, to be implemented by all major stakeholders in the Glenelg region tourism industry. Key issues and recommendations contained in the report relevant to this project include;

• Support the development of potential tourism icons for the Shire – Portland waterfront, Budj Bim National Heritage Landscape, Glenelg River, Cape Bridgewater and Princess Margaret Rose Caves.

• Support the event management committees of the Shire’s 4 major events (Australian Kelpie Muster, Portland Bay Festival, Heywood Wood, Wine and Roses Festival and the Glenelg River Fishing Competition.

• Review signage along major tails, including the Mary McKillop Trail, Shipwreck Trail and Major Mitchell Trail.

• Protect sites of environmental significance.

1.4. Glenelg Shire Council, Strategic Resource Plan 2004-2008. The Plan has been developed to guide Council’s future resource allocation in line with commitments expressed in the Council (Management) Plan 2004-2008. Key issues and recommendations contained in the report relevant to this project include;

• Existing fees and charges are expected to increase by approximately 3% per annum.

• Rate increases to be 5% per annum from 2004-05 and 2006/07, reducing to 3% per annum from 2007/08 onwards.

• Council aims to reduce the ‘total debt as a percentage of rate revenue’ from currently around 40% to approximately 19% by 2008, indicating a reluctance to fund new developments via borrowings.

• The Shire’s average allocation to ‘Capital and Projects’ is expected to be approximately $5,711,750 per annum to 2007/08. Approximately $69,000 is forecast to be allocated each year (05/06, 06/07 and 07/08) for Parks, Gardens and Reserve capital works. With a further $20,333 per annum toward swimming pools.

1.5. Glenelg Shire Council, Portland Foreshore Masterplan Re-evaluation, June 1998. The document provides a review of the updated 1994 Foreshore Masterplan and outlines recommended changes or alterations, overall the vision contained in the 1994 Masterplan is still considered relevant and logical. Key issues and recommendations contained in the report relevant to this project include;

• The study area stretches from the water tower in the north to the fishing port in the south.

• A total landscape upgrade is recommended as a priority for the area between Julia and Henty Streets (Harbour Village), along with the commencement of a new yacht/game fishing structure, boat launching facilities, museum, tourist and community (possibly convention centre) facilities should be developed.

• Reinforce Hanlon Parade as the scenic/tourist route.

• Landscape improvements are required at the Water Tower, the lighthouse, Ploughed Field, Nuns Beach and Henty Beach areas.

• The Go-Kart Grand Prix should be encouraged to remain on the foreshore.

1.6. Glenelg Shire Council, Including All – Disability Action Plan. The Plan was adopted by Council on 28th March 2006. The Plan reflects the vision of Glenelg Shire to meet the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA, 1992). The Shire is committed to Inclusiveness – equitable access for all, Action – working towards improving access to Council facilities, and Quality Service – provision of high quality services to people with a disability. A summary of key actions particularly relevant to this project include;

• Developing plans for accessible playgrounds,

• Identifying a preferred location for the Beach Wheel Chair,

• Confirm location and funding for an accessible fishing platform,

• Support existing programs and services,

• Upgrade equipment in swimming pools to promote access, and

• Explore the feasibility of establishing a hydrotherapy pool (CASA).

1.7. Glenelg Shire Council, Community Satisfaction Survey, 2004 and 2006. The reports provide an outline of the results from the annual community satisfaction surveys. Key issues or results contained in the report relevant to this project include;

• The Shire achieved an overall community satisfaction rating of 57% in 2006, although the satisfaction rating fro Recreation Facilities was 62%. In relation to the results for recreational facilities, this is lower than the rating for each of the previous 6 years (ranging from a low of 68% to high of 72% during this period).

• In 2006 the 2 highest results were for “Health and Human Services” (70%) and “Appearance of Public Areas” (67%). In relation to public areas, the result is lower than the recent past (e.g. 74% in 2003, 75% in 2002).

• Recreation facilities and the appearance of public areas fall within the “sustain high performance” quadrant for Council management, both are considered ‘non essential’ however important to maintain.

• The percentage of respondents that indicated ‘excellent or good’ for their rating of recreational facilities has declined from 57% in 2004, 47% in 2005 to 46% in 2006. Conversely, for appearance of public areas, the results have increased from 60% in 1998, 65% in 2004 to 67% in 2006.

• 26% of respondents suggested recreational facilities needed improvement in 2005, whereas 31% suggested they needed improvements in 2006.

• Of those that indicated a need for improvement to recreational facilities the top three suggestions were;

28% suggested more/better sporting complexes (including pools),

27% suggested better maintenance of sporting fields/grounds and/or buildings,

17% suggested more support/funding for local recreation facilities.

• Of those that indicated a need for improvement to the appearance of public areas the top three suggestions were;

37% better maintenance of parks and gardens,

36% more frequent/better street cleaning,

19% suggested more frequent pruning of street trees.

1.8. Glenelg Shire Council, Recreation Best Value Review, May 2002. The Best Value review highlighted a number of areas where improvements may be needed within the Recreation Unit and identified a number of possible actions to achieve these. Key issues or recommendations contained in the review report relevant to this project include;

• A need to improve business processes.

• A need to implement a continuous improvement program.

• A need to develop a Communications Strategy for the Unit targeting the community and key stakeholders to inform them of Council initiatives, available support and opportunities.

• A need to improve information dissemination and self-help resources on the Council web page (to free up officer time from routine requests for information).

• A need to develop a new Recreation Plan (this project).

• A need to continue to provide high level of community and internal (Council staff) consultation.

• A need to introduce balanced scorecard reporting on the Unit’s performance.

1.9. Glenelg Shire Council, Building Inspection and Financial Implications Report, 2005. The report document the findings and outcomes from building inspections conducted on July 12th and August 9th, 2004. All Council registered buildings were inspected (199 in total), a total of 863 defects were identified. Below is a summary of key findings or issues relevant to this project;

• 41% of buildings require paintwork of some kind.

• 49% of buildings are rated in the ‘severe to extreme’ category and in urgent need of repair related to leaking roofs, walls, spouting and down pipes.

• 30% of all building recorded defects relating to structural issues. The Hanlon Park spectator shelter provides a good example of structural damage caused by exposure to the coastal elements (extensive corrosion is evident).

• 40% of buildings require exterior maintenance - considerable work is needed across the Shire.

• 20% of buildings require some form of floor replacement.

• 45% of all buildings received a ‘fair to poor’ rating.

• “A most significant findings was that 52% of all sport and recreational buildings warranted a ‘fair to poor’ rating. This evaluation has critical implications as 37% of all buildings are sport and recreational (73 in total).

• The following sport and recreational buildings were noted of ‘major concern’;

Hanlon Park – extensive defects noted in the main sports pavilion and grandstand, spectator shelter and main scoreboard. The defects take on greater significance as the venue is noted as being the ‘prime football and cricket facility for the Shire…’

Alexander Park – extensive defects to the pavilion.

Henty Park – extensive defects to the tennis club pavilion.

Portland Botanical Gardens – defects to garages and depot structures.

Portland Croquet Clubrooms – a new roof is required.

Public Toilets – defects to doors, locks and blockages noted.

Other – defects noted with park buildings i.e. Trewavis Lookout, Casterton Saleyards Rotunda, Flinders Park and Cavalier Park.

Other – the following buildings are considered in extreme condition and recommended for removal or replacement, the Merion Tennis Pavilion, Yarraman Park North Toilet Block, Alexandra Park Greyhound Shed and Henty Park North Toilet Block.

• Repairs to Sport and Recreational buildings was estimated to cost $709,210 accounting for the largest proportion of required Council spending. Sport and Recreational Buildings rated as ‘poor’ require remedial works to the value of $169,040, those rated as ‘fair’ require remedial works to the value of $406,335.

• Only works to the value of $3,820 related to maintenance and renewal works which User Groups of Council buildings were responsible for under current licences and agreements.

• Public Toilets only account for 3% of the estimated costs yet represent 17.6% of the Asset Stock. The report suggests that this indicates that public toilets are being well maintained.

• The total cost to address all identified defects was estimated to be $1,877,591.

1.10. Southern Grampian & Glenelg Primary Care Partnership – Youth Issues Report, Sept. 2004. The report documents the findings and outcomes from consultation with ‘at risk’ young people in the Southern Grampian and Glenelg Shires. Below is a summary of key findings or issues relevant to this project;

• The three main disadvantaged groups identified were young people with disabilities, disadvantaged young mums and Koori youth.

• The three key issues identified from the consultations were bullying, sexual health and alcohol.

• A key factor contributing to better health outcomes for young people is ‘experiences of achievement and belonging to a positive peer group’. Consequently a key recommendation relates to ‘supporting recreational opportunities and youth outreach services in local towns across the municipalities’.

• According to 2001 Census data, Glenelg Shire has 2,936 young people aged between 12-24 years (1,768 people are aged between 12-17 years), representing 15.2% of the total population, a decline of 2.4% from the 1996 Census.

• There were an estimated 79 indigenous young people aged 12-25 years.

• Youth population decline was highest in the Glenelg North Statistical Local Area.

• In relation to specific target groups the following key issues were identified;

Effort was needed to up-skill community sports and recreational groups to incorporate youth with disabilities in a meaningful way.

Koori youth - no specific sport or recreational issues identified, however the report suggested that the success of some existing Koori community programs (e.g. Community Dreaming) may reflect the high degree of flexibility in addressing the needs of young people.

Disadvantaged Young Mums – Glenelg has consistently had the highest birth rate for young women under 20 years per head of population (within the 5 LGA’s that comprise the South West) for the last 6 years. 7.3% of all births in the Glenelg Shire were by young mothers aged under 24 years, this is over double the State average of 3.1%. Recommendations related to health and support services, there were no specific recommendation in relation to sport or recreational activities.

• Recommendations related to the Local Government/Recreation sector include;

Glenelg Shire Youth Services to assist the Merion community in developing more youth options in their town.

South West Sports Assembly (SWSA);

• Encourage clubs to take a more proactive role in educating members about alcohol.

• Assist Special Disabilities Services to utilise AAA to increase pathways into mainstream sports and leisure activities.

• Lobby for a specialist AAA sailing boat to be stored in Portland (youth programs/activities).

1.11. Glenelg Shire Council – Aquatics Centres Audit/Strategy Report, 2001. The report documents the findings and outcomes from as assessment of Council aquatic facilities in Portland, Casterton, Heywood and Merino. A summary of key findings or issues relevant to this project is included below;

• The existing aquatic facilities provide a range of important social, economical and cultural benefits to the communities they serve.

• The following tables summarises key financial implications from the report (a total of $1,722,100 over ten years);

Issue Portland Casterton Heywood Merino Back-log maintenance works. $86,850 $14,300 $5,100 $7,500 10-year standard maintenance costs $175,000 $115,150 $95,650 $108,000 10-years building, plant and equipments replacements costs. $45,000 $27,900 $15,800 $32,850

New facilities required. $662,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 Total $968,850 $267,350 $227,550 $258,350

1.12. Glenelg Shire Council – Asset Management Strategy, 2005. The Asset Management Strategy was adopted by Council on 28th June 2005. A summary of key findings or issues relevant to this project is included below;

• The Shire has approximately 35,000 individual assets with a total value of $268.7 million, ‘Parks and Garden’ assets account for $29.6 million.

• An inspection routine is needed for Parks and Gardens assets, the condition of assets are generally believed to be ‘good to fair’, although some are unknown.

• Budgeted renewal/capital works over the next three years for Parks and Gardens assets are to the value of $76,000 (2005/06), $105,000 (2006/07) and $63,000 (2007/08).

1.13. Glenelg Shire Council – Merino Urban Design Framework, Dec 2004. The Urban Design Framework contains a number of key directions and recommendations for the future use, development and management of land in Merino. A summary of key findings or issues relevant to this project is included below;

• Sport is important to the town, Council should support and encourage team sport initiatives in the town.

• Usage of the Merino swimming pool increased between 2002/03 to 2003/04. Council should continue to support (maintain) and manage the swimming pool for community access.

• The recreation reserve is highly valued by the community. The tennis and netball courts require complete upgrade. The reserve is no longer used for football matches. Opportunities to establish matches at the reserve should be explored.

• There are limited facilities/activities for young people.

• Revegetate Merino creek to enhance it as a natural feature.

• Investigate opportunities to create a rail trail along the existing rail reserve, including links to the town, especially the pool.

• Create a picnic area near the general store.

1.14. Glenelg Shire Council – Dartmoor and Nelson Urban Design Framework, Sept. 2003. The Urban Design Framework contains a number of key directions and recommendations for the future use, development and management of land in

Dartmoor and Nelson. A summary of key findings or issues relevant to this project is included below;

• Sport is important to the towns, Council should support and encourage team sport initiatives in the town.

• Improve recreational access to the Glenelg River.

• Provide a public toilet facility in Dartmoor.

• Lack of sporting facilities for young people in Dartmoor, the report recommended investigating demand for minor skate facilities and an outdoor ½ court basketball court.

• Improve the presentation of the Dartmoor Recreation Reserve.

• The open space corridor along the rail line in Dartmoor is a maintenance burden to the community.

• Improve support infrastructure facilities at the Fort O’Hare swimming hole.

• Improve access facilities and infrastructure along the river in Nelson, including timber ramps and jetty.

• Construct a new Community Hall in Nelson on the former cricket ground site (Stuart Street) to accommodate larger community gatherings, activities and events.

• Purchase the former cricket ground land.

• Extend public ladder access to waters edge.

• Name and sign all parks in Nelson.

• Investigate options to construct a timber boardwalk along sections of the Glenelg River.

• Construct a boardwalk from Beach Road to Livingstone Island.

• Improve directional signage associated with the Great South West Walk (GSWW).

1.15. Glenelg Shire – Recreation Strategy, Volume 1 & 2, March 1998. The Shire’s previous recreation strategy was completed in 1998. The report contains 72 individual recommendations, many of which may now be out-of-date and/or already fully implemented. Other may no longer be relevant. This project will consider the key findings from the 1998 study in light of current research, consultation results and recreation trends. Key directions contained in the 1998 report related to ‘establishing partnerships’, ‘the importance of small communities’, ‘the natural environment’, ‘communication and information’, ‘management and pricing’ and the ‘development of foreshores areas’. It is likely that these key themes will remain important and appropriate for this latest recreation strategy.

1.16. Glenelg Shire – Glenelg Strategic Futures Plan, Draft Regional Context Report (MacroPlan). The report provides an overview of the strategic context for the Glenelg Shire. Key issues or opportunities identified in the Draft report that may be relevant to

this project include (Note: population and demographic implications are discussed in Section 3 of the main report);

• Areas of socio economic advantage are concentrated around the reaches of key townships, in particular Portland and coastal towns, whilst areas of low socio economics are more evident around rural areas.

• Despite anticipated overall population decline across the Shire, it is expected that Glenelg will require an additional 994 households between 2001-2031. This implies that household structures are changing, that is, fewer people in each dwelling.

• Liveability (“creating quality places, enhancing ‘physical capital’ and our satisfaction with the living environment” (p7)) is a key consideration and driver of future prosperity. Accessibility of facilities and services, walkability of townships and creating a sense of place (or town character) is critical to overall liveability.

• A review of the MSS (Feb 2005) highlighted increasing rural and coastal subdivision, changing rural sector – including investment in timber production – and increasing demand for large scale industrial and commercial development as key issues/challenges.

• Tourism is an important contributor to economic sustainability. Visitation numbers to Portland have declined whilst visitation to Nelson and Casterton have increased.

• Emerging issues include the need to protect coastal areas from inappropriate development (protecting the natural landscape) and the importance of communities having access to sporting and recreation facilities/opportunities as integral ingredients in creating liveable communities.

1.17. Other Documents Reviewed. Below is a list of other Council provided documents that have been reviewed as part of the background research associated with this project.

• Glenelg Shire Council Plan 2005-2009.

• Glenelg Shire Council – Municipal Strategic Statement Three Year Review Report, Feb 2005.

• Glenelg Shire Council – Local Planning and Policy Framework.

• Glenelg Shire Council – Municipal Health Plan, 2003.

• Glenelg Shire Council – Community Grants Program (Policy).

• Southern Grampian and Glenelg Primary Carer Partnership, Community Health Plan 2003-2004.

• Healthy Communities Project, June 2002. Three individual reports reviewed, ‘Integrated Planning Project’, ‘Integrated Services Plan’ and the ‘Municipal Public Health Plan’.

• Portland-Horsham Forests – Proposed Forest Management Plan, DSE, Dec. 2005.

• Proposed Portland Fishing Precinct, DSE, May 2004.

• Portland Bicycle Study, Report to Portland Town Council, (1981).

• VRA Report, March 2006.



APPENDIX 3 – HOUSEHOLD TELEPHONE SURVEY RESULTS

Recreation and Open Space Plan Glenelg Shire Council

Household Telephone Survey writeup © Stratcorp Consulting 2006 Page 1

1. CONSULTATION - HOUSEHOLD TELEPHONE SURVEY

1.1. Data Collection The results from this survey were obtained from a stratified random telephone survey of 350 residents who reside within the Glenelg Shire. The interviews took place between 1st – 4th April 2006.

• The survey was conducted on weekends between 10.00am and 6.00pm and weeknights between 4.00pm and 8.00pm.

• Only persons aged 14 years or above were interviewed.

1.2. Profile of Respondents The key demographic characteristics of the survey sample are described below including a comparison to the demographic profile of the entire Glenelg Shire population. This table shows a higher proportion of older people were surveyed relative to the amount actually living in Glenelg Shire (i.e 35% of survey respondents were aged over 60, compared to only 18.9% of all Glenelg residents being aged over 60 years.) The highest proportion of respondents were aged 35 - 49 years (27%), followed by those aged 50 - 59 years (24%) and 60 - 74 years (19%). The majority of respondents were female (62%).

Age Category Frequency Percent Age Structure of Glenelg

14-17 years 15 4% 27.6% (0-17years)

18-24 years 10 3% 6.1%25-34 years 20 6% 12.2%35-49 years 96 27% 23.3%50-59 years 85 24% 11.9%60-74 years 67 19%75+ years 55 16%

No response 2 1% 0%Total 350 100% 53.5%

18.9% (60+years)

Age structure of sample compared to demographic profile of Glenelg



• Consistent with the distribution of the overall population, the largest proportion of survey respondents were from the three major townships of Portland (58%), Casterton (10%) and Heywood (9%). The table below provides a comparison between the distribution of survey respondents and the broader population distribution as a whole.

Town of Residence Survey Frequency Survey Percent Shire PercentPortland 203 58% 50%Casterton 36 10% 9%Heywood 30 9% 6%Sandford 11 3% 1% or lessMerino 11 3% 1% or lessNarrawong 10 3% 1% or lessDigby 10 3% 1% or lessDartmoor 10 3% 1% or lessCape Bridgewater 9 3% 1% or lessBolwarra 9 3% 1% or lessNelson 8 2% 1% or lessEdgley 1 0% 1% or lessDunrobin 1 0% 1% or lessCape Nelson 1 0% 1% or lessRural 'other' 0 0% 14%Total 350 100% 100%

Town of residence

• The figure below shows the distribution of household types of those surveyed. Significantly 41% of all households in the Glenelg Shire include children.

18

32

22

4

19

0

4

1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

Lone personhousehold

Older couplewithoutchildren

Couple/singlewith

child(ren) 16years and

under

Group ofadults

Couple/singlewith

child(ren)over 16 years

Otherhousehold

Young couplewithoutchildren

No response

Household types of respondents



1.3. Current Physical Activity Participation Respondents were asked whether they participated in any physical activities for exercise, recreation or sport in the past 12 months. A total of 70% of respondents indicated that they were regular participants in activities. The participation rate is lower than the Victorian participation rate of 85.1%1, (although ERASS does not specify "regular" participation.)

The figure below indicates participation levels by age category. It shows that those most likely to participate in physical activities are aged 14-17 years (93%). Not surprisingly, the participation rate by age category generally declines with age.

54

61

72

7975

9093

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

14-17 years 18-24 years 25-34 years 35-49 years 50-59 years 60-74 years 75+ years

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

Participation by age category

Cross tabulations revealed:

• The participation rate for males (71%) and females (70%) is basically the same. These participation rates are lower than for Victoria as a whole which records 85.3% participation for males and 84.9% participation for females.

• Households described as “group of adults” (87%), “couple/single with child(ren) 16 years and under” (85%) and “young couple without children” (77%) were the most likely to participate in physical activities for exercise, recreation or sport. That is, young adults – with or without children – are more likely to participate.

• The lowest rate of participation came from “lone person household” (45%).

• Although sample sizes are quite small, the results indicate that residents from Dartmoor and Nelson were the most likely to participate in physical activities for exercise, recreation or sport with 100% of these residents participating. This is followed by Narrawong (90%), Merino (82%), Cape Bridgewater (78%), Portland (71%), Bolwarra (67%), Heywood (63%), Digby (60%), Casterton (58%) and Sandford (54%).

1 Exercise Recreation and Sport Survey (ERASS), 2004.



Therefore, broadly speaking, those in the north eastern portion of the municipality have lower average participation rates than the total Shire average.

1.3.1. Popular Physical Activities The following table shows the most popular physical activities nominated for regular participation by survey respondents.

Rank Activity Frequency% of total surveyed

Overall rank in VIC*

1 Walking 108 31% 12 Swimming 50 14% 33 Aerobics/fitness/gym/weights 37 11% 24 Lawn Bowls 32 9% 18eq5 Golf 24 7% 76 Netball 23 7% 117 Tennis 22 6% 68 Cycling 20 6% 49 Basketball 18 5% 1010 Australian Football 17 5% 811 Surf Sports 13 4% 18eq12 Fishing 12 3% 2113 Running/Jogging 10 3% 514 Cricket (outdoor) 8 2% 1315 Horse Riding/equestrian 7 2% 26eq

Other 69 20%Total 470

* ERASS 2004 Most popular physical activities

(N.B. Multiple responses were allowed for the above question.)

Eight out of ten of Victoria’s top 10 activities are also in Glenelg’s top 10. The main differences include:

• Lawn Bowls is more popular in Glenelg (ranked 4th) than in Victoria (ranked equal 18th).

• Netball is more popular in Glenelg (ranked 6th) than in Victoria (ranked 11th).

• Cycling is not as popular in Glenelg (ranked 8th) as it is in Victoria (ranked 4th).

• Running/jogging is not as popular in Glenelg (ranked 13th) as it is in Victoria (ranked 5th).

The most popular activities for each age group are summarised below:

Age Category Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 314-17 years Australian Football Netball Swimming/Basketball18-24 years Netball Surf Sports Swimming/Walking25-34 years Aerobics/fitness/gym Walking Swimming35-49 years Walking Swimming Aerobics/fitness/gym50-59 years Walking Swimming Tennis60-74 years Walking Lawn Bowls Golf75+ years Walking Lawn Bowls Golf

Top 3 activities by age category



Therefore, walking is identified within the three most popular activities for regular participation for sport, recreation or fitness by all age groups except 14-17 year olds.

1.3.2. Type of Participation Of respondents who participate in physical activities, the largest proportion participate in activities that are “not organised” by a club, association or other group. The following figure shows the different types of participation.

Some organised25.0%

All organised31.0%

Not organised44.0%

Type of participation


• The age group most likely to participate in “all organised” physical activities is the 14-17 years age group (63% of active participants). The remaining 36% of this age group participated in “some organised” physical activities.

• 50-59 year olds are least likely to participate in any type of organised physical activity (whether it be “all organised” or “some organised”).

• Males (63%) are more likely to participate in organised physical activity (whether it be “all organised” or “some organised”) than females (49%).

• Residents from the townships of Narrawong (77%), Merino (66%), Nelson (62%) and Cape Bridgewater (57%), were the most likely to participate in physical activities “not organised by a club, association or other group.” This potentially suggests a lack of organised (or programmed) recreation participation opportunities in these towns.



1.3.3. Reason for Participation Respondents who indicated that they regularly participated in physical activities were asked what the THREE MAIN reasons why they participated. The following table shows the results.

Rank Reason for Participation Frequency % of "active" respondents

1 Fitness 186 76% 2 Fun/enjoyment 111 45% 3 Social - meet new people 78 32% 4 Relaxation/stress relief 43 17% 5 Time with friends/family 19 8% 6 Thrill of competition 14 6% 7 Lose/maintain my weight 8 3% 8 Have always played sport 5 2% 9 For a charity 2 1%

Total 466

Reasons for participation

Results indicate:

• Not surprisingly, the majority of responses related to fitness (76%) and fun/enjoyment (45%). Furthermore, an additional 32% of responses identified the importance of social outcomes. Therefore, fun, enjoyment and social outcomes are important considerations in activity planning and facility provision.


• The most frequently provided reason for participation in physical activities was “fitness” for all respondents irrespective of age.

• The 18-34 years age group were also highly likely to participate in physical activities for social reasons (i.e to meet people).

• There was little difference between males and females in regards to the reasons for participation, however males were more likely to participate for the “thrill of competition” than females.



1.4. Reasons for Non-participation The 104 respondents who did not participate in physical activities were asked to state the main reasons why not. The table below shows that the most frequently cited reason for non-participation in physical activities is “age” (main reason for 41 people).

Rank Reason for Non-participation Frequency% of "non-

active"1 Age - too young/old 41 39%2 Lack of time (family/work/study commitments) 30 29%3 Physical constraints (injury/illness/disability) 25 24%4 Nothing, not interested 12 12%5 Lack of motivation 6 6%6 Exercise enough with work 2 2%7 Distance - too far to travel 1 1%7 Too expensive 1 1%7 Feel insecure/unsafe/unwelcome 1 1%

Total 119 Reasons for non-participation physical activities


• 70% of those who stated “age” as a main reason they did not participate in physical activities were over 60 years of age.

• Those who stated “lack of time” as a reason they did not participate in physical activities were most likely to be aged between 35 and 59 years of age (63%).

• The largest proportion of those who stated “physical constraints, injury or illness” as a main reason for non-participation in physical activities were over 75 years of age.

1.5. Future Participation in Physical Activities Respondents were asked if there are any sporting, recreation and fitness activities that they do not currently participate in, but would like to participate in on a regular basis in the future. The largest proportion of respondents indicated that they would like to do aerobics/fitness/gym/weights (5%), swim (5%), play golf (4%), or play tennis (4%) in the future. The figure below shows the main responses.

Rank Activity Frequency% of total surveyed

1 Aerobics/fitness/gym/weights 19 5%2 Swimming 18 5%3 Golf 13 4%3 Tennis 13 4%5 Walking 12 3%6 Cricket (outdoor) 6 2%7 Cycling 5 1%8 Basketball 4 1%8 Dance 4 1%8 Lawn Bowls 4 1%8 Yoga 4 1%


Nominated future activities




• The most popular choice for future activities by age were:

Age Category Rank 1 Rank 214-17 years Aerobics/fitness/gym Tennis18-24 years Yoga/pilates Walking25-34 years Aerobics/fitness/gym Swimming35-49 years Tennis Swimming50-59 years Swimming Aerobics/fitness/gym60-74 years Golf Walking75+ years Walking Lawn Bowls

Nominated future activities by age cohort

• 69% of those of those who nominated “Aerobics/fitness/gym/weights” as a future activity were female.

1.5.1. Factors Preventing Participation Respondents were asked whether there were any particular factors preventing them from participating in their future nominated activities. The following table indicates the most frequently nominated factors.

Rank Reason for inability to participate Frequency% of total

reasons given1 Lack of time (family/work/study commitments) 54 25%2 No, nothing 46 21%3 Age - too young/old 29 13%4 Lack of facilities available in town 23 11%5 Physical constraints (injury/illness/disability) 16 7%6 Lack of motivation 11 5%6 Lack of clubs or organised groups available in town 11 5%8 Distance - too far to travel 9 4%9 Too expensive 7 3%10 Don't know what is available 5 2%11 Lack of public transport 2 1%11 Feel insecure/unsafe/unwelcome 2 1%

Total 215 100% Reasons for inability to participate in physical activities in the future


• Those who stated their inability to participate was due to “lack of facilities available in town” were most likely to come from the townships of Nelson or Narrawong.

• Those who stated their inability to participate was due to “lack of facilities available in town” were most likely want to participate in “swimming” or “tennis.”

• Those who stated their inability to participate was due to “lack of clubs available in town” were most likely want to participate in “tennis.”

• “Lack of time” was most likely to prevent respondents from participating in swimming.



1.6. Rating Sporting Facilities Throughout the Shire Respondents were asked to think generally about indoor and outdoor sporting facilities throughout the Shire and rate their overall location and distribution. The following figure shows the results.

12

48

9

5

2

24

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50Pe

rcen

tage

(%)

Very Good Good Neutral Poor Very Poor Don't know/noresponse

Rating location and distribution of sporting facilities

Results indicate:

• A total of 60% of respondents rated the location and distribution of Glenelg indoor and outdoor sporting facilities as either “very good” or “good.”

• Only 7% of respondents rated the location and distribution of Glenelg indoor and outdoor sporting facilities as either “poor” or “very poor.”

• Significantly almost one quarter of respondents either did not answer, or did not know, potentially indicating a lack of information/awareness/promotion of existing opportunities.

Cross Tabulations revealed:

• Residents from the township of Nelson were the most likely to rate the overall location and distribution of indoor and outdoor sporting facilities within the Shire as “very poor.”

• Residents from the townships of Bolwarra (77%), Sandford (72%), Merino (72%) or Portland (64%) were the most likely to rate the overall location and distribution of indoor and outdoor sporting facilities within the Shire as “good” or “very good”, thereby suggesting quite high levels of satisfaction with the location and distribution of sporting facilities in these towns.



1.7. Other Leisure Activities In addition to activities that people regularly participated in, respondents were asked to list any leisure activities they had participated in or services they had used for fun, exercise or social outcomes. A total of 28% had done so. The following table shows the most popular activities or services utilised and where they were undertaken.

Rank Activity Frequency% of those

who participate

1 Dancing 12 12%2 Fishing 10 10%3 Bingo 9 9%4 Walking 7 7%5 Cards 6 6%5 Music 6 6%7 Senior Citizens Club 4 4%7 Arts productions 4 4%7 Voluntary work 4 4%10 Martial arts 3 3%10 Gardening 3 3%10 Darts 3 3%


Other leisure activities undertaken

Cross Tabulations Revealed:

• Dancing and fishing were the most popular “other” leisure activity undertaken in Portland by Glenelg residents. Dancing was also quite popular in Heywood.

• Bingo was very popular in Casterton and typically undertaken in the various clubs around town (i.e football, RSL or bowling clubs).

1.7.1. Provision of Activity Respondents were asked whether these activities were provided directly by Council, or by some other community group or private sector. The figure below identifies the largest proportion of activities were “mostly provided by community groups” (34%) or “private sector groups” (28%) with only a minor portion (13%) provided by Council.



Don't know/no response25.0%

Mostly privided by private sector groups

28.0%Mostly provided by

council13.0%

Mostly provided by community groups

34.0%

Who provided the activity?

1.7.2. Future “Other Leisure” Activities Respondents were asked whether there were any other leisure activities that they don’t currently participate in, but would like to undertake in the future. The total number of responses was quite low (36 in total), therefore the top five responses are provided below.

Activity Frequency% of total surveyed

Dancing 4 1%Martial arts 4 1%Bingo 3 1%Senior citizens 3 1%Golf 2 1%Hydrotheraphy exercises 2 1%Ten pin bowling 2 1%

Future nominated leisure activities



1.8. Glenelg Parks and Reserves – Frequency of Use Respondents were asked how often they would typically visit Glenelg Shire parks and reserves. The following graph shows the results.

14

6

11

21

6

14

24

4

0

5

10

15

20

25

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

Don't useparks

Daily 3-4 times perweek

Once ortwice per

week

Two or threetimes amonth

Monthly A few timesper year

Don'tknow/noresponse

Frequency of use of Glenelg parks and reserves

Results indicate:

• The largest proportion of respondents use Glenelg parks and reserves “a few times per year” (24%).

• A total of 38% of respondents use Glenelg parks and reserves at least once per week.

Cross Tabulations Revealed:

• 35% of those who “don’t use parks” are aged 75+ years.

• Males (10%) were less likely to use parks than females (16%).

• Residents of Digby were the least likely to use Glenelg parks and reserves.



1.9. Glenelg Parks and Reserves – Rating Quality and Distribution Respondents were asked to rate the overall quality and distribution of parks and reserves located within the Glenelg area. The results can be viewed below.

23

15

52

60

8 64

1 1 1

12

17

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

Very Good Good Indifferent Poor Very Poor Don't know/ noresponse

Quality Distribution

Rating the quality and distribution of Glenelg parks and reserves

Results indicate:

• The largest proportion of respondents rate the overall quality of Glenelg’s parks and reserves as “Good” (52%).

• The largest proportion of respondents rate the overall distribution of Glenelg’s parks and reserves as “Good” (60%).

• Very few respondents rated either the quality or distribution as “poor” or “very poor.”


• Those respondents who rated the overall quality of parks and reserves in the Glenelg area as “very poor” all came from Portland.

• Notwithstanding the smaller sample size in smaller townships, on average residents from the townships of Cape Bridgewater (89%), Bolwarra (89%) and Casterton (83%) were the most likely to rate the quality of parks and reserves in the Glenelg area as “good” or “very good.”

• Residents from the township of Nelson (25%) were most likely to rate the distribution of parks and reserves in the Glenelg area as “poor” or “very poor.”



1.10. Glenelg Sports Grounds – Rating Quality and Distribution Respondents were asked to rate the overall quality and distribution of sports grounds located within the Glenelg area. The results can be viewed below.

108

53 54

56

42

1 1

2729

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Perc

enta

ge (%

)



Rating the quality and distribution of Glenelg sports grounds

Results indicate:

• The largest proportion of respondents rate the overall quality of Glenelg’s sports grounds as “Good” (53%).

• The largest proportion of respondents rate the overall distribution of Glenelg’s sports grounds as “Good” (54%).

• Very few respondents rated either the quality or distribution as “poor” or “very poor.”


• Those respondents who rated the overall quality of sports grounds in the Glenelg area as “very poor” all came from Portland and Sandford.

• On average residents from the townships of Casterton (92%), Digby (80%) and Dartmoor (70%) were the most likely to rate the quality of sports grounds in the Glenelg area as “good” or “very good.”

• Residents from the township of Sandford (18%) were most likely to rate the distribution of sports grounds in the Glenelg area as “poor” or “very poor.”



1.11. Glenelg Playgrounds – Rating Quality and Distribution Respondents were asked to rate the overall quality and distribution of playgrounds located within the Glenelg area. The results can be viewed below.

10

7

33 33

6 65

6

1 1

45 46

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Perc

enta

ge (%

)



Rating the quality and distribution of Glenelg playgrounds

Results indicate:

• The largest proportion of respondents could not/did not rate the overall quality or distribution of Glenelg’s playgrounds.

• Of those who did rate the overall quality and distribution of Glenelg’s playgrounds, the largest proportion rated them as “good” (33%).


• On average residents from the townships of Casterton (61%) and Heywood (57%) were the most likely to rate the quality of playgrounds in the Glenelg area as “good” or “very good.”

• Residents from the townships of Casterton (61%) and Heywood (55%) were also the most likely to rate the distribution of playgrounds in the Glenelg area as “good” or “very good.”

• Those aged either 14-17 years or over 75 years were least likely to rate the quality or distribution of Glenelg’s playgrounds. This is not uncommon as these age groups do not tend to utilised these facilities.



1.12. How Well Do Glenelg’s Parks and Reserves Meet Your Needs? Respondents were asked how well Glenelg’s parks and reserves meet their outdoor recreation needs on a scale of 1 to 10, where “1” meant “very poorly” and “10” meant “very well.” The following graph shows the results.

1 1 1

2

9 9

25 25

89

10

0

5

10

15

20

25

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Don'tknow/

noresponse

How well do Glenelg parks and reserves meet your outdoor recreation needs?

Results indicate:

• Half of all respondents rated Glenelg parks and reserves as either 7 or 8 out of 10 when it came to meeting their outdoor recreation needs. In total over three quarters (76%) of all respondents provided a rating of 6 or better on the 1-10 scale. Only 14% suggested parks and reserves were not meeting their needs (that is, a rating of 5 or below). This is a significant result for Council as it indicates a high level of satisfaction with existing parks and reserves.



1.13. Future Sporting, Recreation or Public Reserve Projects Survey respondents were asked to indicate their priorities for the top three sporting, recreation or public reserve projects they would fund over the next ten years if they were in charge of Glenelg Council. Requests for “upgrading/maintaining existing bike paths and walking trails” and “parks maintenance” were the most frequent.

Rank Project Frequency% of

respondents1 Upgrade/maintain existing bike paths and walking trails 46 18%2 Parks maintenance 45 17%3 Improved quality of sports grounds 39 15%4 Places/activities for young people 35 13%5 Improve pavilions and change facilities 28 11%5 Skate Parks 28 11%7 More bike paths/walking tracks 23 9%7 Improve the foreshore area 23 9%9 New indoor sports centre 18 7%10 Upgraded playgrounds 17 7%11 Improved provision of recreation facilities in parks 16 6%12 Plant shade trees 11 4%13 Upgrade community halls 10 4%14 More sports grounds 9 3%14 Improve indoor stadium 9 3%14 Bowling ally 9 3%17 Upgrade existing pools 8 3%17 More playgrounds 8 3%


Most suggested future sporting, recreation or public reserve projects

Overall the focus of the results favours improving and maintaining existing facilities as opposed to the provision of new facilities. When combined with the results of item 1.12 this provides a clear direction for Council in terms of focussing future efforts and resource allocation.



1.14. Current Way of Seeking Information about Recreation Services Available Respondents were asked how they have gone about seeking information regarding recreation services, facilities or events that are available in Glenelg Shire. The following table shows the methods used to obtain information.

Method Frequency% of respondents

who had contacted Council

Read the Local Newspaper 132 48%Word of mouth/family/friends 85 31%Called council 41 15%Read Council's Resident Newsletter 41 15%Visited a Council facility and asked staff 23 8%Don't know/no response 16 6%Access Council's website (the internet) 13 5%Radio/television 7 3%Through school 7 3%Read Council's Community Directory 4 1%Annual calendar of events 4 1%Local knowledge 4 1%Community Notice board 4 1%Through clubs 3 1%Total 384

Methods used to seek information on recreation services

Clearly local newspapers and word or mouth remain the most popular methods for obtaining information. Only a very small percentage accessed Council’s website (5%) and even fewer used the Community Directory (1%) or Community Notice Board (1%). It is therefore imperative that Council target appropriate newspapers and appropriate editions for each respective township (these may be Hamilton or Mt Gambier based publications).


• Most 14-24 year olds (66%) were likely find out about recreation services available through “word of mouth/family/friends.”

• The age group most likely to “read the local newspaper” to find out about recreation services available are the 25-34 years and 50-59 years age groups.

• The age group most likely to call the council to enquire about what recreation services are available are those aged 75+ years.



1.15. Future Way of Seeking Information about Recreation Services Available Residents were asked their preferred method for accessing information in the future. The results indicate (see table below) that reading local newspapers (50%) is likely to be used as the primary source of information for the majority of residents, followed by calling Council, resident newsletter, Council website and visiting a Council facility. All other potential methods/information sources accounted for less than 10% of all responses.

Method Frequency% of respondents

who answered question

Reading the Local Newspaper 147 50%Calling Council 50 17%Reading Council's Resident Newsletter 45 15%Accessing Council's website (the internet) 33 11%Visiting a Council facility and asking staff 29 10%Word of mouth 20 7%Reading Council's Community Directory 8 3%Radio/television 7 2%Brochures 5 2%Community Notice Board 4 1%Annual calender of events 1 0%Council newsletter 1 0%Mailing lists 1 0%School newsletter 1 0%Tourist centre 1 0%Total 353

Preferred future method of seeking information


• In the future the 50-59 year old age group are more likely to “call council” to find out about recreation services available than any other age group.

• The 60-74 years age group are the most likely to “read the local newspaper” to find out about recreation services available than any other age group.



APPENDIX 4 – CLUB/GROUP MEMBERSHIP TRENDS

Club Membership Trends - Glenelg Shire(Active Club Members only)Activity / Club 2003 2004 2005 Senior Junior Male Female Jnr Snr Jnr Snr

Athletics

Portland Little Athletics 107 65 90 53 37 90 0

Athletics Total 107 65 90 53 37 0 0 90 0

Australian Football & Football/Netball

Tyrendarra Football/ Netball Club 450 470 520 300 220 120 400

Casterton Football/Netball Club Inc. 148 161 181 170 11 126 55

Central Junior Football Club 42 52 55 55 0 55 0

South Portland Junior Football Club N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S

Portland Football/Netball/Cricket Club 450 455 455 305 150 305 150

Dartmoor Football Netball Club N/S N/S 150 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Heywood Junior Football Club 64 65 66 66 0 0 66

Aust Football & Football/Netball Total 1154 1203 1427 896 381 0 0 606 671

Bowls

Dartmoor Bowling Club 29 26 26 16 10 1 25

Casterton Bowling Club Inc. 107 107 107 75 35

Nelson Senior Citizens Indoor Bowling 15 13 18 8 10 0 18

Portland Bowling Club 132 140 148 93 55 0 148

Bowls 283 286 299 192 110 0 0 1 191

Basketball

Portland Basketball Association 974 1003 1026 566 460 512 514

Basketball Total 974 1003 1026 566 460 0 0 512 514

Cricket

Dartmoor Cricket Club 33 36 77 57 20 37 40

Casterton Cricket Club Inc. 29 30 35 33 2 20 15

United Cricket Club 15 14 12 12 0 0 12

South Portland Cricket Club 42 47 52 52 0 12 40

Drumborg Heywood Cricket Club 74 77 65 62 3 45 20

Casterton & District Cricket Assoc. 189 194 178 172 6 78 100

Portland Colts Cricket Club 60 60 60 60 0 30 30

Portland & District Cricket Association 260 260 260 N/S N/S 123 137

Wando Vale Cricket Club 25 24 26 26 0 11 15

Tahara Cricket Club 50 45 40 30 10 15 25

Cricket Total 777 787 805 448 31 0 0 371 434

Croquet

Casterton Croquet Club 18 15 17 2 15 0 17

Portland Croquet Club 19 25 32 N/S N/S 0 32

Croquet Total 37 40 49 2 15 0 0 0 49

Equestrian/Riding

Branxholme and District Pony Club Inc 9 9 13 0 13 10 3

Portland & District Pony Club 40 38 31 0 31 31 0

Portland Riding for the Disabled Assoc. N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S

Equestrian/Riding Total 49 47 44 0 0 0 44 0 0 41 3

2005 seasonTrend next 5yrs

(Active Club Members only)Activity / Club 2003 2004 2005 Senior Junior Male Female Jnr Snr Jnr Snr

Golf

Portland Golf Club 313 319 383 310 73 24 359

Dartmoor Golf Club 50 50 50 30 20 0 50

Golf Total 363 369 433 340 93 0 0 24 409

Gymnastics

Portland Gymnastics Club 150 160 160 N/S N/S 160 0

Gymnastics Total 150 160 160 0 0 0 0 160 0

Hockey

Portland Hockey Club 100 110 115 25 25 68 50

Hockey Total 100 110 115 25 25 0 0 68 50

Motorsport

Portland & District Motoring Enthusiasts 20 20 20 20 0 0 20

Dual Sport Motorcycle Riders Assoc. 10 10 10 10 0 0 10

Portland Junior Motorcycle Club 72 72 77 76 1 36 41

Motorsport Total 102 102 107 106 1 0 0 36 71

Netball

Portland Netball Association 450 500 450 N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S

Cats Netball Club 62 62 65 0 65 30 35

Netball Total 450 500 450 0 0 0 0 0 0

Swimming

Portland Swimming Club 82 86 97 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Bridgewater Lakes Aquatic Club Inc 107 123 147 78 69 70 77

CASA Leisure (Glenelg Pools & PLAC)* N/S N/S 110000 55000 55000 50000 60000

Swimming Total 189 209 244 78 69 0 0 70 77

Tennis

Drumborg Tennis Club 18 18 18 9 9 6 12

Casterton Junior Tennis Association 90 95 100 55 45 100 0

Bolwarra Tennis Club 36 27 45 21 24 17 28

Portland Lawn Tennis Club 400 427 430 N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S

Heywood Tennis Club 54 70 72 36 36 40 32

Casterton Coleraine District Tennis Ass 80 85 100 N/S N/S N/S 100

Tennis Total 678 722 765 121 114 0 0 163 172

Horse Racing

Casterton Racing Club Inc N/S 80 91 74 17 0 91Sandford Racecourse and Recreation Reserve

180 180 180 90 90 80 100

Casterton Racing Club 115 133 125 88 37 0 125Horse Racing Total 295 393 396 252 144 0 0 80 316


Miscellaneous

Portland Badminton Association 26 22 18 12 6 4 14

Portland Shotokan Karate-Do Australia 30 33 61 43 18 41 20

Portland Dance & Social Club 37 48 46 N/S N/S 0 46

Portland Surf Life-saving Club Inc 170 180 200 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Casterton Motor Enthusiasts Club Inc. 30 30 32 18 12 0 32

Casterton Railway Precinct 12 12 12 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Heywood Combined Probus Club Inc 60 60 60 20 40 0 60

Portland Racing Pigeon Club Inc. 14 11 12 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Portland Sport and Game Fishing Club 57 60 67 85 9 11 56

Fourthrop Lagoon Walking Group 15 10 55 N/S 15 40 0 55Casterton Angling Society Club 121 92 102 N/S N/S 22 80Miscellaneous Total 572 558 665 193 125 0 0 78 363

Trend next 5 yrs 2005 season



Community Groups

Bahgallah Memorial Hall Inc 140 80 140 58 72 0 140

Casterton Apex Club 15 15 12 12 0 0 12

Portland Club Incorporated 57 58 69 63 6 3 66

Portland YMCA N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S

Sandford Mechanics Institute Inc 14 14 12 N/S N/S 0 12

Digby Hall Mechanics Institute & Rec Res N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S

Condah Mechanics Institute & Rec Res. N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S

Heathmere Rec Reserve and Hall Comm. 1000 1050 1100 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Portland Family History Group Inc. 50 N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S

Old Courthouse Community Centre N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S N/S

Hotspur Recreation Reserve N/A N/A N/A N/S N/S N/S N/S

Tyrendarra Public Hall & Rec Reserve 10000 10000 10000 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Promoting Heywood & District 20 20 20 10 10 0 20

Casterton Garden Club Inc 40 56 45 6 39 0 45

Friends of the Portland Botanic Gardens 55 34 54 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Dartmoor Recreation Reserve Committee 6 6 6 6 0 0 6

C.E.M.A Book Discussion Group 10 12 11 1 10 0 11

Bolwarra Recreation Reserve 4000 4400 4750 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Casterton & District Historical Society Inc 15 15 20 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Nelson Progress Association 10 10 12 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Portland and Heywood Poultry Club 24 26 25 19 6 0 25

Poetry Reading Group 18 15 17 5 12 0 17

Casterton Playgroup 30 42 25 1 24 N/S N/S

Heywood Floral Art Club 14 13 11 0 11 0 11

Casterton Pipes and Drums Club Inc 15 17 18 N/S N/S 4 14

Portland Dahlia Festival 250 300 400 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Casterton Railway Precinct Advisory Committee

N/A N/A N/A N/S N/S N/S N/S

Casterton RSL Sub-Branch N/A N/A N/A N/S N/S N/S N/S

Casterton Pastoral & Agricultural Society N/A N/A N/A N/S N/S N/S N/S

Casterton and District Elderly Citizens Cen N/A N/A N/A N/S N/S N/S N/S

Casterton Probus Club N/A N/A 49 N/S N/S N/S N/S

Glenelg Branch of CWA 13 30 30 0 30 18 12

Community Groups Total 15796 16213 16826 181 220 0 0 25 391

TOTAL 22076 22767 23901 3453 1869 0 0 2325 3711

N/S = Not Stated, N/A = Not Applicable* CASA Leisure (The Place) figures not included in the totals.

= Increasing Membership= Decreasing Membership

NB: Membership figures are based on the survey results as provided by clubs/groups that responded to the consultation study.


= Stable Membership



APPENDIX 5 – SCHOOL FACILITIES AUDIT

School Facilities AuditGlenelg Council

School Sports FacilitiesAvailable for

Community UseY / N

Current User Groups

Proposed New / Improved Facilities

Sports played externally

Facility used Frequency Comments

Primary Schools

1/2 size school oval YES NIL

Netball Court YES NIL

School Oval YES AUSKICK

Outdoor MP court (1) YES NIL

Indoor MP court (1) NO NIL


Tennis court YES NIL


Sacred Heart Primary School

Ph: 5581 1131Outdoor MP court (1) YES

Local Saturday Tennis Competition

NIL

Cross CountryAthletics

Various SportsSwimming LTS

Merino Primary SchoolIsland ParkColeraineIsland Park

1 time per year1 time per yearOn occasion

2 week intensive

School has both a tennis court and oval over the road that they use very regularly.

School Oval YES NIL


School Oval NO NIL

Outdoor MP courts (5) NO NIL

PE ProgramSwimming LTS

AthleticsCross Country

Athletics

Dartmoor HallPortland Leisure Centre

Dartmoor Recreation ReserveDartmoor Golf Course

Nelson Park

Swimming LTS Portland Outdoor Pool

Weekly2 week intensive1 time per year1 time per year2 time per year

Narrawong State SchoolPh: 5529 5375

NILSwimming LTS

AthleticsTennis

Portland Leisure CentreNelson ParkNarrawong

2 week intensive2 times per year

On occasion

School also has a "shed" used for indoor games and PE classes.

Dartmoor Primary School

Ph: 5528 1382

Upgrading Netball Court to become

Multi-purpose Court

Casterton Primary SchoolPh: 5581 1522

NIL

SwimmingFootballNetball

Athletics

Casterton PoolIsland ParkIsland ParkIsland Park

Merino Primary SchoolPh: 5579 1305

Covering in the outdoor court to make

it all-weatherSwimming LTS Merino Pool

3 week intensive1 time per year1 time per year2 times per year

School believes the town is in need of a skate park.

5 week intensiveCricket club used to use oval. Schools facilities are used very

heavily by the students and other schools.

2 week intensive School is quite self sufficient and mainly use their own facilities.Portland Primary School

Ph: 5523 1911NIL



Community UseY / N

Current User Groups




Portland Nth Primary School

Ph: 5523 1482


Outdoor MP courts (5) YES NIL

Indoor MP court (1)Gymnastics and Dance groups

NIL

School Oval NO NIL


Bundarra Primary SchoolPh: 5523 4122

School Oval NO NIL


School Ovals (2) YES NIL


Swimming LTSSwimming Carnival

The Place, PortlandThe Place, Portland

South Portland Primary School

Ph: 5523 2708NIL

Swimming LTSCross Country

AthleticsBasketballFootball

The Place, PortlandYarraman ParkNelson Park

Portland B.ball StadiumNorth Ground

2 week intensive1 time per year1 time per year1 time per year1 time per year

Bolwarra Primary SchoolPh: 5529 2374

NIL

Swimming LTSAthletics

Cross CountryTennis

The Place, PortlandNelson ParkNarrawong

Adjacent to school

All Saints Parish SchoolPh: 5523 3654

NILSwimming LTS

AthleticsThe Place, Portland

Nelson Park

2 week intensive2 times per year1 time per yearOn occasion

School believes there is a strong need for indoor MP courts in the area.

2 week intensive2 times per year

2 week intensive1 time per year

School is quite self sufficient and mainly use their own facilities.St Johns Lutheran Primary SchoolPh: 5523 3833

NIL



Community UseY / N

Current User Groups




Indoor MP court (1) YESPortland Badminton

AssociationLocal Netball clubs

School Ovals (2) YESAUSKICK

Local Football clubs

Cricket pitch YES NIL

Outdoor MP courts (2) YES Junior Netball teams

Branxholme/ WallacedaleCommunity School

Ph: 5578 6253School oval NO NIL NIL


Athletics

Hamilton Outdoor PoolHamilton Outdoor Pool

Hamilton

2 week intensive1 time per year1 time per year

Heywood Consolidated School

Ph: 5527 1200NIL


Heywood PoolHeywood Pool

1 time per year6-8 times per year

The Heywood Pool is crucial to the school. Transport costs are too high to travel elsewhere. The school stadium has made the

school very self sufficient.



Community UseY / N

Current User Groups




Secondary Schools

Indoor MP court (1) YES Local Bball teams

Indoor Squash courts (2) YESRacquetball &

Badminton teams

School Ovals (2) YES NIL


Tennis courts (5) YES NIL

Indoor MP court (1) YESWestern Border Netball

Assoc

Indoor Squash courts (2) YES Local squash teams


School oval YES NIL

Indoor MP court (1) YESPortland Bball Assoc

(2nd or 3rd court)

School oval YES Local football teams

Outdoor MP courts (2) YES Junior Netball teams

Tennis court YES NIL

Cricket nets YES Cashmore Cricket Club

Indoor MP court (1) YESUmpires group

Local netball club

School oval YES NIL


2 times per year50 times per year2 times per year1 time per year

20 times per year2-3 times per year2-3 times per year2-3 times per year

15-20 times per year15-20 times per year

School would like to see the Portland Outdoor Pool open for an extented period.

Bayview CollegePh: 5523 1042

NIL

Swimming CarnivalSwimming PE classes

AthleticsCross Country

SquashBasketball

Football/NetballNetballTennis

Surfing/snorkelling


Nelson ParkAround Lagoon

Squash/Racqetball CentrePortland Basketball Stadium

Henlan ParkFlinders Park

Portland Lawn Tennis ClubPortland Marina

3 times per year3 times per year1 time per year

2-3 times per year20-30 times per year

4 times per year4 times per year4 times per year

Town is lacking a community gym. Residents of Casterton travel 2 or 3 times per week to Hamilton, Mt Gambier or Portland to

access gyms.

Portland Secondary College

Ph: 5523 1344

Swimming CarnivalSwimming PE classes

AthleticsCross CountrySkate-boarding

Surf Skills/rescueWalking

HorseridingBasketball

Squash/racquetballOpen water swimming

GolfGymnasticsSnorkelling


Nelson ParkAround Lagoon

Skate ParkPortland Surf Club

Great South West WalksRundle Riding School

Portland Basketball StadiumSquash/Raquetball Centre

Portland MarinaPortland Golf Club

Portland Gymnastics ClubNunns Beach

1 time per yearOver 100 times per yr

4 times per year1 time per year

Over 50 times per yrOver 50 times per yrOver 50 times per yrOver 50 times per yrOver 50 times per yrOver 50 times per yr

1 time per year30 times per year10 times per year5-6 times per year

Nelson Park needs more shelter. Interschool sports were cancelled due to a lack of shelter.

Looking into upgrading oval to

include an Athletics track

Casterton Secondary College

Ph: 5581 1588NIL

FootballNetball

Swimming CarnivalAthletics

Swimming PE classesLawn Bowls

CroquetGolf

Island ParkIsland Park

The Place, PortlandIsland Park

The Place, PortlandCasterton Bowls Club

Casterton Croquet ClubCasterton Golf Club

Heywood & District Secondary College

Ph: 5527 1303

School also has an indoor hall/theatre that is used by the community for aerobics/group exercise classes.

School strongly suggests more shelter at Nelson Park. Interschool sports were cancelled due to lack of shelter for students.

Heywood Pool's solar heating needs improvement.

NIL


AthleticsGolf

Lawn Bowls

Heywood PoolHeywood Pool

Nelson ParkHeywood Golf Club

Heywood Bowls Club

30 times per year1 time per year1 time per year

10 times per year10 times per year



APPENDIX 6 – PLANNING SCHEME GUIDELINES FOR OPEN SPACE PROVISION


1. PLANNING SCHEME GUIDELINES FOR OPEN SPACE PROVISION

Glenelg Shire is currently reviewing and updating its Planning Scheme. The following information is to inform the preparation of relevant sections within the Planning Scheme that deal with the provision and development of open space and linear corridors in new residential subdivisions.

The information has been developed using the following reference sources:

• www.dse.vic.gov.au.

• www.crimeprevention.vic.gov.au.

• Safer Design Guidelines for Victoria, DSE, 2005.

1.1. Overarching Objectives Open space provision in residential areas shall have the following overarching objectives:

1. To facilitate healthy lifestyles, community connectedness and social cohesion.

2. To provide for improved community safety.

3. To preserve and enhance, where practical, the rural qualities and characteristics of Glenelg Shire.

4. To respect and preserve native flora, fauna and wildlife corridors.

1.2. Planning Context The Shire-wide context for the provision of open space shall be guided by the following principles:

− All open space across the Shire shall have an identified function and defined catchment.

− Open space provision in either a rural setting or a township (urban) setting should contribute to the collective diversity of open space opportunities and experiences across the Shire.

− The provision of open space within any proposed new subdivision shall take into account the availability and function of existing open space in neighbouring areas, and any physical features or community facilities that may also exist (current or planned).

1.3. Type of Activities In addition to those areas set aside for sport, Council should provide opportunities in open space areas for the following “core” non-sporting activities1:

Walking. Bike riding. Use of play equipment (playgrounds). Picnicking.

1 Based on national and local trends in participation.


The “core” experiences being provided for are:

Relaxing. Exercising. Things for children to do or play on. Socialising with family / friends.

1.4. Location Considerations Guidelines to inform the location of open space in residential areas include:

− Requirements as outlined in Council adopted Structure Plan, Urban Design Frameworks or other relevant strategic planning documents, including Public Acquisition Overlays.

− Open space areas and facilities should be provided in locations that maximise accessibility for all users, including people with poor mobility, such as older adults and people with a physical disability, and parents with prams and strollers.

− Local open spaces should not be located on major roads, however, there should be good sightlines into an open space area from neighbouring streets, houses, schools or other buildings.

− Local parks and playgrounds should have active frontages on at least two dominant sides to provide surveillance, and where possible should avoid bordering rear yards.

− Local Parks shall comprise a minimum area of 0.75 – 1.0 hectare.

− Aside from open space whose primary function is to create linear links, long narrow areas should be avoided as open space contributions.

• Isolated pockets of land within a park (i.e. “dead” spaces) or those areas which cannot be overlooked, should be avoided.

− In relation to subdivision planning:

The provision of public open space should not be considered separate from the design of a subdivision. Rather, open space should be a primary consideration in the design of new subdivisions, so as houses appear to “sit” in open space rather than open space being simply provided after the housing and roadway layers have been prepared.

Council’s priority for provision of open space should be a Local park with family recreation facilities2 within 400 – 600m of every household (without residents having to cross major physical barriers, such as waterways, highways and railways in an unsafe manner).

2 Family recreation facilities = playground, picnic area and seats.


1.5. Design Considerations

Guidelines to inform the design and provision of open space in residential areas include:

− The elements and features available in all Local parks (except those set aside for conservation) shall include as a minimum:

large shade trees or planting for future provision of shade trees. a high standard of maintenance. seats.

− Additional elements and features available in at least one park within each rural township, or within a District in an urban township, should include:

play equipment. paths suitable for walking and cycling. BBQ/ picnic area. open “kick-about” space. a shelter for protection from the weather. public toilets. areas for dog off leash exercise.

− No linear open space area provided to carry a path should be less than 10m wide, and where practical locate paths along routes where clear sightlines are possible to assist navigation, to enhance security, and to provide visibility of potential hazards (i.e. people and cars).

− Avoid dense shrubbery along linear paths and set plantings well back from the path edge.

− The minimum width of shared paths should be 2.0m (2.5m preferred) and for pedestrian paths the minimum width should be 1.2m.

− Linear paths should primarily be provided to add to and/or link to a Shire-wide trail/path system, and should be located to connect residential areas with community facilities, shopping/commercial areas, other residential areas, or other key destinations/attractions.

− Where possible, circuits of varying lengths (15mins to 4 hours walking/riding) should be provided to maximise the opportunity for people to utilise linear paths for exercise.

− Family recreation facilities and spaces, sporting facilities and off-road trails shall be completed in each stage of a subdivision prior to a maximum of 50% of the dwellings being occupied.


1.6. Encumbered Land The following shall apply to encumbered land:

− Encumbered land shall not be taken as open space for use as sports areas, play areas or family recreation areas.

− Encumbered land, however, may add area to land taken for these purposes as long as it is over and above the recommended standard of provision.

− It is desirable for open space to abut encumbered land retained for floodway purposes, easements or buffers, as a means to extend opportunities available on the designated open space.

1.7. Developer Contributions The following principles shall be considered by Council when assessing open space provision in new subdivisions. It terms of Council processes, it is considered critical that the Recreation Services Unit be consulted as early as possible in the subdivision application process in order to provide direction on possible open space acquisitions.

− An open space contribution will be taken from the net developable land, not land required to be reserved for drainage purposes, transport corridors, or the protection of significant flora and fauna, or sites of significant cultural heritage.

− The maximum contribution allowed via the Subdivision Act (and as amended from time to time) should be pursued (currently 5%). Where possible (via negotiation with the developer) higher contribution percentages should be pursued, particularly where a direct nexus between the proposed development and community demand can be demonstrated and/or where it can be demonstrated that a higher contribution will improve the overall urban design outcomes for specific developments.

− Land should be taken in preference to a cash contribution in instances where:

there is demand for open space in that location. there is no family recreation area or trail to serve that rural

township or District within an urban township. an existing corridor could be enhanced to provide for recreation

activities. there is a strategically important link required with adjoining open

space or other land uses, for wildlife movement, for a path or a trail.

there are mature trees, or features of regional (or greater) environmental or cultural significance (those of environmental significance should be able to be protected outside the open space provision requirement).

the land is of sufficient size, and in an appropriate location for the provision of the type of park, recreation or sporting facility required in the local area, township or Shire

the nature and condition of the land is compatible with the preferred end use/purpose, and its development for that purpose can be cost effective.


− Developers shall be required to either fund or undertake basic development

works in parks and open space areas (in order to render the site usable by the community and fit for its intended purpose) as part of their contribution, over and above the contribution of the land.

− Where Developers undertake the works to develop open space areas provided as part of their contribution, a concept plan showing the park plan should firstly be approved by Council as part of the approvals process.

− The landscape design and standard of development of new open space areas provided by Developers shall be at a level able to be sustained by Council after the responsibility for maintaining the site is passed onto Council.

− Cash should be accepted from a Developer in lieu of land where:

the size of the subdivision does not allow sufficient land to be taken as open space to meet the demand for identified functions and setting types within the boundaries of the subdivision.

An adequate range of functions and setting types are already available within the locality.

resources are needed to develop a regional recreational resource. it is possible that the cash taken in lieu of open space shall be

returned to open space in the vicinity of where it was taken.

− In instances where a cash contribution is accepted by Council in lieu of land acquisition, the amount will be equal to the maximum allowable in accordance with relevant legislation (currently equivalent to 5% of the total subdivision land value).



APPENDIX 7 – COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS WRITE UP

Consultation - Community Workshop

Workshops were scheduled in each of the major townships across the Shire between 27th to 30th March 2006. The following section provides a high level summary of the key issues or comments raised at each of these.

Portland – 27th March, 7pm.

Four people attended the meeting, the following general issues were raised;

• There is demand for access to open space for motor cross and equestrian activities.

• Each reserve can not be expected to cater for all activities/uses. It is appropriated that some areas are specialised and provide restricted access to non-core users.

• Generally there is a lack of rubbish bins in reserves.

• Poor condition of public toilets.

• Poor path maintenance and provision.

• Poor path provision and vegetation maintenance in Fawthrop Lagoon (concern regarding snakes), limited shade and shelter facilities.

• The Portland Fauna Park is overgrown and underutilised.

• Concern that Reserve Management Committees can (over time) become dominated by particular user groups.

• Insurance cover for sporting club activities is an issue.

• YMCA programs and activities can be too expensive. The average wage/affordability of the population is low.

• A multi purpose meeting room with kitchen facilities may be needed in Portland that could be shared by a number of clubs/sports.

• Non smelter workers can not access the company recreation facilities or services (e.g. gym etc).

• Council needs to take more interest (i.e. recognition and promotion) in lower profile sports.

• A member for the Portland Rifle Club raised the following issues;

The Club having been trying (unsuccessfully) to lease land from the Smelter for club use.

Access to their existing site (Gannett Colony Road) is extremely difficult due to the poor road condition.

The Rifle Club is the oldest continuous sporting club in Victoria (121 years old) and has approximately 90 members.

The condition of existing facilities is grossly inadequate e.g. no power.

• Two members of the (Portland) Motor Cycle Club raised the following issues;

The club currently operate on private land by agreement with the owner however the Club have actively been looking for access to Council or other Public land for some time without success. The

rear of Yarraman Park was investigated, however the club were advised that the site remains required for land fill/garbage.

The club require access to approximately 30-40 acres and assistance to establish appropriate infrastructure.

Current membership is around 50 people, which used to be approximately 100 three to four years ago. Events usually cater for around 300 riders, it was suggested that Council does not recognise or value the economic benefit of the club to the town.

There is limited local media coverage for ‘fringe’ sports/activities.

• A member for the Portland Darts Club raised the following issues;

The Club currently use the South Portland Hall (for the past seven years) as they wanted to get away from Pub environments. The Club operates under an annual user agreement with Council. This offers limited security.

The condition of the facility is basic but OK, although external maintenance (by Council) could improve.

The cost of using ‘Council’ trades people for club improvement works is prohibitive.

Cape Bridgewater – 27th March, 3.30pm.

This workshop did not proceed as no one turned up.

Narrawong – 28th March, 10am.

Eleven people attended the meeting, the following key issues or comments were raised;

• The community would like a playground and BBQ facilities in the town.

• Playgrounds need to be able to cater for a variety of age groups.

• There is adequate open space in Narrawong however it is not maintained by Council. The community maintain The Esplanade open space without support from Council (eastern end, Council should maintain the western end to the same standard). Council should supply a ride on mower for community use if they are to continue to maintain public open space areas.

• Existing walking and cycle paths/tracks are overgrown and in poor condition.

• There are no formal sporting clubs in Narrawong.

• The existing cricket oval needs upgrading (top dressing and surface levelling) and the pitch upgraded. This may promote greater community use.

• The existing recreation and open space facilities are meeting the community needs however the level of maintenance is poor.

• There is demand for a motocross facility within the Shire.

• Council (and other agency) community service need to visit/service Narrawong.

• There is limited Council support for older people in the town e.g. lawn mowing services (private), meals on wheels, library etc.

• A lack of public transport is an issue, a summer community bus is needed to provide greater access to services and opportunities in Portland.

• There is no longer a mobile library service in the town and no transport offered to access the Portland library service.

• Peak period beach life guard services should be offered in Narrawong, this would require Council support e.g. facilities, insurance cover and training facilitation.

• Residents of Narrawong pay similar rates to those in Portland and yet do not receive the same levels of services.

• There is concern about adequate open space acquisition (or use of cash contributions) from residential subdivisions.

• Not all people buy the newspaper therefore use of the Community Newsletter is an appropriate means of information dissemination, however more copies need to be provided by Council at the general store. Public advertisements should be placed in Friday’s Observer Newspaper only.

• Planning for future reserves does not appear to be occurring in recent subdivisions.

• There is undeveloped public open space on Dutton Way that was previously donated to Council.

• Wally’s Boat Ramp is too small and needs additional support facilities (toilets and fish cleaning).

• Increasing subdivision in the town is a concern.

• There may be a need for public toilets/rest stop on the Highway in Narrawong.

• Council’s existing funding grants are difficult to apply for and time consuming. Council should provide a facilitator to assist applicants and promote funding opportunities more broadly.

• Portland foreshore needs improving, including fencing in certain areas to prevent toddler access to water and/or cliffs.

Bolwarra – 28th March, 1pm.

Two people attended the meeting, the following key issues or comments were raised;

• There is demand for a motocross facility in the Shire, a review of the planning scheme should be undertaken to secure an appropriate space in the long term (protected from residential encroachment or other conflicts).

• The Bolwarra Hall Committee has raised funds for repainting and toilet upgrade. The Committee wish to upgrade (or replace) the existing two tennis courts and install a water tank. (If new courts are to be developed the two existing courts should be removed and the area landscaped). The Committee currently have an application with SRV for possible support funding. The total project cost is estimated at approximately $80,000. Additional shade ands picnic tables are also needed around the tennis courts.

• The Hal sewage needs replacing. This should be a DSE responsibility however it is difficult to get assistance.

• Access to foreshore areas is limited and is being further constrained by recent residential developments (particularly between Narrawong and Portland).

• Fencing between the Narrawong Tennis Courts and River Foreshore (Caravan Park) should be removed immediately as it presents a safety and access barrier.

• Infrastructure to support camping at the Fitzroy River Bridge (Tyrendarra) may be needed.

• Management of public land is confusing and cumbersome for residents i.e. relationships and varied support offered by Council, DSE, Parks Vic and the CMA.

• There may be demand for a youth activity centre in Portland.

Heywood – 28th March, 6pm.

Two people attended the meeting, the following key issues or comments were raised;

• The local Football/Netball club recently (2005) took out a loan of $80,000 to upgrade the Netball courts.

• Ground rental is charged at 30% of total maintenance cost to clubs across the Shire, however this is inequitable because the standard of facilities differs so greatly across the Shire (therefore certain facilities cost more to maintain).

• Council grants are ad-hoc. Feedback is not provided on unsuccessful applications.

• Council is not ‘hands on’ enough in the community. There is a general negativity associated with the Council by the community. Council should work more closely with clubs to establish a long term master plan for the site and assist in achieving the agreed objectives.

• The open drain at the eastern end of the recreation reserve need urgent repair/rectification (becomes a ‘bog’ in winter).

• A regular maintenance plan for Council assets is needed.

• The level and standard of infrastructure should be improved consistent with other comparable reserve in Portland.

• The relationship and level of cooperation between Council and DSE needs to improve.

• There is a community desire to improve the connection (pedestrian bridge) between the recreation reserve and river foreshore/town.

• A Concept Plan has been developed to link Apex Park on both sides of the Fitzroy River and other open space in the town. Walking paths should be established.

• Recent tree planting using ‘work for the dole’ labour at the rear of the recreation reserve has been very good. More use of this resource is encouraged.

• A walking trail linking the school with the recreation reserve is needed.

• The community are not clear about who to deal with in Council on specific issues. There is limited community support offered by Council.

• Officers do not give clear advice/guidance on specific projects.

• The swimming pool may be under used, however it is highly valued by the community.

• The skate park is very good, there could be improved links/connections from the skate park and swimming pool.

• The school includes a ‘Sports Complex’ available for community use comprising two squash courts, basketball stadium, kiosk, meeting room, theatrette, showers change rooms etc. The school oval is in poor condition and not used by community sporting clubs. Improving the school oval may help manage overuse of the main recreation reserve oval.

• Walking is a very popular activity in the town.

• There are limited community services or programs offered in the town. Private operators provide some activities however the cost of hiring the hall (and insurance) can be prohibitive.

• Council needs to provide blanket insurance cover for community groups (e.g. model train group) and ensure hire fees for public assets are affordable.

• Activities and programs are needed for young people.

• Need for Council to be more pro-actively involved in the town and supporting community groups.

• A playground is needed on the western side of the bridge over the Fitzroy River.

• Declining population is an issue.

Nelson – 29th March, 11am.

Seven people attended the meeting, the following key issues or comments were raised;

• Recreation facilities in the town are limited (1 asphalt tennis court, two playgrounds, community hall). There are no active sports reserves.

• There is only one reserve that is Council owned/managed (Centenary Park - opposite the road house), all others are DSE controlled.

• Permission was given by DSE (4 years ago) to install a half court basketball court (near the car park/picnic area at the northern end of Leake Street). Council have subsequently leased the land from DSE and indicated that they would contribute to the cost of implementation, however this is yet to occur and is considered a key priority for the town.

• There is a lack of land availability for other recreation facilities.

• There is a disused cricket pitch (Ann Kerr Reserve) that could be maintained to host 2-3 matches per year. Council could hire public toilets for these events.

• Consideration should be given to acquiring a suitable space for a future recreation oval.

• Residents tend to access recreation facilities in Mt Gambier (37kms away).

• The Visitor Information Centre and public toilets require upgrading.

• A Concept Plan for the river foreshore area is being developed.

• A skate park on the foreshore may be appropriate for residents and visitors ( the nearest other facility is approximately 30 kms away).

• Improved pedestrian crossing options for the Princes Highway may be needed (including installation of slower speed limit during school hours).

• The Reserve Committee has little to do with Council, the relationship is directly with DSE.

• Walking paths need improving (e.g. North Nelson Road).

• Overall level of maintenance in the town is poor.

• The Reserve Committee constantly look for funding support for projects on DSE land, Council are reluctant to get involved.

• In the long term a new community hall is desirable.

• Aside from the foreshore areas, there is a lack of open space for community events, festivals or large activities.

• Centenary Park has been suggested as a possible location for a future community hall.

• There is a need for a walking track to the beach along Beach Road and improved maintenance of road side vegetation to allow walking along the edge of the road.

• The existing community hall is used for indoor bowls and exercise classes, however the space is limited.

• There may be an opportunity to plan for a new community facility that could meet the needs of all key agencies in the town e.g. Parks Vic, DSE, Library Services, Council, Health Services etc.

• Communication with Council is poor. Council should use the Nelson Progress Association Monthly Newsletter.

Dartmoor – 29th March, 2pm.


Casterton – 29th March, 6pm.

Three people attended the meeting, the following key issues or comments were raised;

• The major reserve in the town (Island Park) is Council managed.

• Turf cricket is played on both ovals.

• The small bore shooting club is still active (despite the poor condition of exiting facilities). Substantial refurbishment is needed. Club membership is predominantly male.

• There is no single major issue or need for Island Park, rather issues associated with aging infrastructure and maintenance. Shared use of facilities and infrastructure is generally working well. The three tennis courts adjacent to the second oval need resurfacing. The ‘community kitchen’/shelter facility needs to be repaired and maintained.

• Community Halls and tennis courts in surrounding smaller settlements are often in poor repair, e.g. Strathdownie.

• The Island Park model of having all major recreation facilities in one central reserve works well and could be duplicated in other areas within the Shire.

• Sports participant number for teams in the town are quite strong, however there is limited interest in office bearer positions. Council assistance with succession planning, training and club sustainability may be needed.

• There is demand and community support for a skate park and half court basketball in Possum Park.

• There are opportunities to improve pedestrian connections between Possum Park and Island park reserves.

• Casterton is a service hub for the surrounding district.

• A shade sail is needed over the playground in the Rail Precinct park. The disused rail line could be further developed for walking and cycling.

• Additional walking paths and trails are planned as part of the existing ‘Kelpie Trail’. Council support will be needed to assist implementation.

• There is a desire to establish a walking trail from the Stock Bridge to the Sanford Bridge in Balgallah.

• ESS Lagoon could provide a possible site for a Commonwealth Games fish/sculpture.

Sanford – 30th March, 9am.


Merino – 30th March, 10.30am.


Digby – 30th March, 12noon.

Eleven people attended the meeting, the following key issues or comments were raised;

• Digby is geographically isolated.

• There are no facilities aside from the community hall and adjacent tennis courts (requires resurfacing). (Both are on DSE land).

• The Hall Committee would like to install a playground and have applied to Council for funding assistance.

• Council has limited involvement in the maintenance of the Hall or tennis court.

• The tennis courts are used for social tennis only.

• There used to be a recreation reserve, however this is now leased for grazing purposes. There is no obvious demand to reinstate the recreation reserve.

The income from grazing lease is used by the Hall Committee for ongoing maintenance and operational costs.

• Population decline is an issue, although there are a number of families with young children in the town.

• The Hall is well used for a variety of activities, classes and community events/functions. The committee would like to install ceiling fans, internal painting, floor resurfacing, electrical audit, install shelving in the storage room and improve general maintenance.

• The small Mechanics Hall adjacent to the community Hall is gradually being restored and could potentially be used as a museum/coffee shop.

• The Merino pool should have solar blankets to improve the temperature. The pool is well used by people from the district and should be retained.

• More cooperation from Council for general town maintenance is needed.

• The strong community spirit and existing efforts are largely unrecognised and unsupported by Council.

• Council information should be promoted through the local community newsletter.

• Residents relate more to Hamilton than Portland.

• Residents would like the mobile library service reinstated.

• The Southern Grampian Shire and Primary Care Partnership have provided funding for exercise equipment for classes in the Hall. Additional funding for equipment is needed.

• Council treats Merino and Digby as one town, where as they are completely separate identities.

• There may be an opportunity to establish a heritage walking trail around the town. Council funding support and assistance with planning for the project are needed.



APPENDIX 8 – SPORTS CLUB ISSUES TABLE

Playing Area Pavilion / Clubhouse Other Club Management, Development and Programming

ATHLETICSGrass needs to be cut shorter. Mice problem.

Shared facility - different priorities.Watering left on all night.

FOOTBALL

Poor ground surface. Poor lighting. Road maintenance required.Rabbits. Too small. Overgrown shrubs.

Lack of water. Poorly maintained. Lack of security/lighting.FOOTBALL/NETBALL

C.F.N.C Clubroom requires attention.BBQ area needs maintenance.

Change rooms (GR Gill Pavilion) require maintenance.

Netball change rooms need maintenance. Require fencing around oval.New scoreboard is needed.Storage facility is needed.

NETBALL

Require drainage around courts.Need to replace one court.

Trees to be kept trimmed back.TENNIS

Courts need re-sheeting within approx 4-5 years. Development - need to keep encouraging local kids.

Assistance in maintaining fences and tree control. Maintenance of pavilion. Lack of new committee membership.Control of court bird damage. Poor hall kitchen facilities. Defining club coaching criteria.

Future greenkeeping costs. Poor overall condition of pavilion. Time constraints of committee members.

Pavilion required.Clubroom required.

Trees trimmed around building. Additional seating required.Surface deteriorating. Kitchen area needs upgrade. More information regarding funding and grants.

CRICKET

Dartmoor Cricket ClubDartmoor Recreation

ReserveNIL NIL Require fencing around perimeter NIL

Maintain/improve ground condition. Maintenace regime. Upgrade training nets. Training/accreditation - jnr coaches.Improved and safer viewing area. Improve social room. Address issues with co-tennants. Future committee representation.

Extension of playing surface. Storage. Reserve clean-up/maintenance. Provision of senior cricketers for jnr development.No 1 oval -better prep of surface. Lower cutting of grass. Weatherproof patio area at front of pavilion (No. 2 oval). Improve Council communication with clubsNo 2 oval -better prep of surface. Lower cutting of grass. Cement patio area at front of pavilion (No. 2 oval). Improve facility accessibility

No 1 oval -shaving off raised area surrounding cricket pitch. Supply electricity to pavilion (No. 2 oval). Imrpove facility presentation/standardMaintenance - mowing Cleaning

Poor surface. Virtually no support or encouragement to improve.Build up of grass at runners western end.

Fence needs maintenance.Nets could do with some work.

Toilet block needs to be absorbed by new clubrooms.Ground needs to be top-dressed and re-seeded. Increased grassed spectating areas would be good.

Length of Grass. Toilets require maintenance. Gateway access to back of pavilion is lacking.Lack of watering in all areas of ground.

Run ups (ground and nets) could use maintenance.Maintaining playing surface.

Cricket wicket.Cost.

Island park 1 needs resurfacing.

Information on how committees could improve running of junior sport.

NIL

Shed for roller.

Overall reserve maintenance

NIL

NIL

Costs rising.

Playing courts and an additional court to get more teams playing.

NIL

NIL

NIL

We desperately need a high fence right around reserve. 50 meters from Princes Highway very dangerous for children, and people access ground without paying. The SWDFL will not give us a major final for this reason.

Poor playing surface.

Casterton Coleraine District Tennis Association

Island Park

Other users not compatable.

NIL NILPlaying surface requires regular watering.

Portland Little Athletics Nelson Park NIL

Summary of Key Issues Identified by Sports Clubs

Club / User GroupCurrent Issues

Facility

South Portland Junior Football Club

Cavalier Park

Casterton Football Netball Club Island Park

Change room are inadequate. Too small and old.

NIL NIL

Lacking succession planning.NIL

Gorae-Portland Cricket Club Alexandra Park

Casterton Cricket Club

Henty Park

Portland Netball Association Flinders Park

Drumborg Tennis ClubDrumborg Recreation

Reserve/Drumborg HallPavilion very small, but currently adequate.

If council or someone could help with mowing it would be appreciated. Currently club does it.

Central Junior Football Club

NIL

The club is currently relocating the hard wicket away from the turf for safety reasons. One more turf wicket may be put

Portland Colts Cricket Club Henty Park

Surrounding fence need maintenance Need new rainwater supply

NILNo electricity. Overhanging branches (parking risk).

Island Park Sporting Complex

NIL

Cavalier Park An office with a computer, fax, phone etc would be nice.

NILDoors and locks not working. Grassed arenas on and around the reserve would be good.

New pavilion and change rooms needed. This is the highest priority the club has. Facilities are old, makeshift and

dilapildated.

Drumborg Heywood Cricket Club

Heywood Reserve

United Cricket Club Island Park (2)

South Portland Cricket Club

NIL NIL

Bolwarra Tennis ClubBolwarra and Heathmere

Tennis CourtsNIL

Would like time keepers box attached to main building.

Portland Football Netball Cricket Club

Hanlon Park

NIL

NIL

Casterton Junior Tennis Association

Island Park Court surrounds - higher than court surface.Not enough courts. Toilet facilities upgrade.

Heywood Junior Football ClubHeywood Recreation

Reserve

New tennis courts and fencing. NIL

Portland Lawn Tennis Club Henty Park Reserve NIL

Dartmoor Football Netball ClubDartmoor Recreation

Reserve1 new netball court condemed because of lack of funds to

finish edging for umpires to run on.

NIL

NIL

NIL

NILAll ovals - need grass to be cut.

Island Park Need for upgrading court surface. NIL

Upgrade of toilets required.

NILExtension to clubrooms is required.

NIL

Tahara Cricket Club

NIL

Fences need tacking to ground in some places.Have just "incorporated" ourselves and now operate under a

sub-committee for insurance reasons.

Tahara Recreation Reserve

Cats Netball Club

Casterton & District Cricket Association

Island Park

Playing Area Pavilion / Clubhouse Other Club Management, Development and ProgrammingClub / User Group

Current IssuesFacility

BADMINTON

Increasing insurance costs.SWIMMING

Shade areas are required.Pool surrounds require maintenance.

Pool maintenance is required.CROQUET

Space for at least 1 "A" court.More lighting in area to deter vandals.

More effort in eradicating rabbits and corellas. To incorporate toilet facilities.

EQUESTRIAN/RACINGUpkeep of the ground. Suitable kitchen would be good.

Suitable clubroom would be good.Suitable toilets facilities are required.

Costs Costs Costs Lack volunteer supportMaintenance Staff/Workers Childrens Playground Costs

Public risk insurance HealthMOTOR SPORTS

Larger display areas - indoor and outdoor.Larger storage and workshops.To share Powerhouse Museum.

Lap score box requires maintenance.Pit canteen could be upgraded.

Pit marshall box needs maintenance.BOWLING CLUBS

Reduce extent of grassed areas to maintain New toilets needed Parking facilities, including lighting Lack volunteer supportSeparate bar room Lack of Council supportImproved kitchen Costs

HOCKEYLack of artificial turf (all-weather). Surrounds of Nelson Park (under trees) not kept clean.Improved lighting at Flinders Park.

Lack of shower facilities at Flinders Park.BASKETBALL

Another court is required. Entrance to accommodate wheelchair access. Secure front doors.More lights required. Security system.Seating is required. General maintenance.

MISCELLANEOUSMore width. Disabled toilets. Removal of derelict buildings adjacent to clubroom. Appropriate building for gymnastics.More height. Sole occupancy. Office and meeting area with phone line.

Dust and vermin proof. Central position in town - to share with like-minded groups. Training new coaches.

Not big enough.Water in room.

Small club. Over-charged for use of facilities.

Casterton Bowling Club Island ParkPaving circulation areas around the greens

Nil Nil Costs

Sandford Racecourse & Recreation Reserve

Sandford Recreation Reserve

NIL

Portland Basketball AssociationPortand Basketball

Stadium

Portland & District Pony Club Yarraman Park

NILAgreement and commitment from Glenelg Shire Council to

long term plans for suitable home and facility.No shelter at Flinders Park for Primary School Camp.Portland Hockey Club

Nelson Park (Games)Flinders Park (Train)

Portland Racing Pigeon ClubPortland Racing Pigeon

ClubNIL

Portland & District Motoring Enthusiasts Club

NIL

Portland Gymnastics ClubMulti-purpose shed @

Yarraman Park

Portland and Heywood Poultry Club

Yarraman Park

NIL

Portland Leisure and Aquatic Centre

NIL NIL NIL

Portland Croquet Club Courts

Need a transport vehicle to take birds away. Club rooms aren’t big enough for this.

NILNIL

Drainage of roadway to prevent deterioration.

NIL

Casterton Racing Club Casterton Racecourse Upgrade horse accommodation areas (OH&S issues).

NILThe road to the ground needs maintenance.

To extend clubroom south from growing membership and storage.

Club going from year to year with no-one doing anything.NILPortland Badminton Association

Heywood Community Complex

NIL

Strategic Marketing Plan.NIL NIL

NIL

NIL NIL

NIL

Nil

Storage space is required.

Cost of insurance. NIL

Development of club is needed.Outer Fence requires fixing. Clubroom needs maintenance.

NIL

Southern 500 Speedway Club Inc.

Southern 500 Speedway

Tram Depot

Portland Swimming Club

Portland Croquet Club

Casterton Croquet Club Island Park



APPENDIX 9 – LEISURE GROUP ISSUES TABLE

Leisure Group Facility Name Facility Address Current Issues

PORTLAND

Name not stated Fawthrop CentreBentinick Street/Hood

Street, Portland

Group requires a storage space to enable them to keep cues and balls on site. This has been denied by Centre

representation after requested.

Bridgewater Lakes Aquatic Centre

BLAC ClubroomsBridgewater Lakes -

Discovery Bay National Park

Club must maintain membership numbers to enable us to cover costs of running clubhouse and club. Club is

very restricted by guidelines of Parks Vic. Any removal of reeds, trees, additional infrastructure of repairs must be approved by them. Size of lake limits number of

boats that can safely use lake at one time. Removal of one tree would give us more beach space but Parks Vic

refuses requests.

Portland Club Incorporated Portland Club 35 Percy Street, Portland

Club has freehold over these 'classified' premises. The toilet facilities and adjoining rooms need immediate attention. Hard to raise the money needed ($20K).

Will apply for federal grant in near future.

CASA LeisurePortland Leisure and

Aquatic Centre22 Bentindi Street,

PortlandCosts involved in getting more gym equipment.

Walking GroupForthrop Lagoon and Community Centre

Hood Street, Portland.Lagoon Walking Trail. Some older more disabled

clients have trouble walking up hill. Alternative path would be very helpful for aging population.

CASTERTON

Bahgallah Memorial Hall Inc.Bahgallah Memorial Hall

Inc.Bahgallah Road, Casterton. Farms are selling out to Blue Gums.

Casterton & District Historical Society Inc

Casterton Railway Station Jackson Street, Casterton

Facility limited in size. Heritage listed - so we are limited to the changes we can make to the building.

Not big enough to hold meetings.Lawn and building maintenance could improve

(including the Railway platform).

Casterton & District Elderly Citizens Centre

Casterton & District Elderly Citizens Centre

Clarke St, Casterton

Facilities are occassionaly too small, would ideally like space for a reading room and snooker table.

Grass debris after Council mowing can be an issue (trip hazard).

Casterton Railway Precinct Advisory Committee

Railway Precinct Railway Precinct Ground and building maintenance could improve

HEYWOOD

Promoting Heywood & DistrictOld school building and

Town GreenEdgar Street, Heywood.

Lack of toilet facilities. Public toilets are totally inadequate and are often not working.

NELSON

Nelson Senior Citizens Indoor Bowling Club

Nelson Hall Leake Street, Nelson Not enough room to have more than one mat.

Nelson Progress Association Nelson Hall Leake Street, Nelson

Facility often too small. Lack of storage of local historical materials. Lack of space limits development of community services (eg. Library/televillage, SWARH

health proposal). Public liability issues between management and users.

SANDFORD

Sandford Mechanics Institute Inc

Sandford Mechanics Institute

Burice Street, SandfordFundraising - due to a lack of local or government

funding.

TYRENDARRA

Tyrendarra Public Hall and Recreation Reserve C.O.M

Manages Tyrendarra Recreation Reserve

Manages Tyrendarra Recreation Reserve

Unsafe Cypress trees in reserves.

DIGBY

Digby Hall Mechanics Institute and Recreation Reserve

Digby Hall DigbyMaintenance of hall. Tennis court upgrade. MechanicsInstitute - window replacement, upgrade from proposed

history centre.BOLWARRA

Bolwarra Recreation ReserveBolwarra Recreation

ReserveRobertsons Road, Bolwarra

The tennis courts are in very poor condition. May have to play tennis competition elsewhere. The toilets and sewerage system all need to be replaced, which could

attract more user groups to use the hall.

Summary of Key Issues Identified by Leisure Groups



APPENDIX 10 – KEY AGENCY ROLES MATRIX


Key Agency Roles in Supporting Sport and Recreation in Glenelg Shire The following table provides an overview of the preferred responsibilities of key agencies in supporting sport and recreation in the Glenelg Shire. The boxes highlighted in yellow indicate roles that are not currently being adequately fulfilled and/or require substantial improvement. The table is not intended to be a comprehensive indicator of all roles and responsibilities of each agency, rather it identifies if each respective agency should have a ‘Primary’(1st), ‘Secondary’(2nd), ‘Tertiary’ (3rd) or ‘No Role’ for each of the common functions or issues facing sport in the region. The table could be used as a valuable communication tool with stakeholders in order to clarify and direct potential levels of support.

Key Function or Issue

Glenelg Shire Council

South West Sports

Assembly

South West Sports

Academy DVC - SRV DSE Primary Care

Partnership

Local Clubs and

Associations

State Sporting Associations

Facility Risk Management Primary No Role No Role No Role

Primary (DSE Facilities

Only) No Role Secondary Tertiary

Facility Provision Primary No Role No Role

Primary (Funding)

Secondary (Management

of existing) No Role Secondary Tertiary

Facility Maintenance and Development

Primary No Role No Role No Role Primary

(DSE Facilities Only)

No Role Secondary

No Role (Maintenance)

Tertiary (Development)

Capital Facility Funding Primary No Role No Role Primary No Role No Role Secondary

Tertiary (Some SSA’s

provide facility funding grants)

Club/Committee Management and Development

Secondary Primary No Role Primary

(Funding)

Primary (DSE

Committees) No Role Primary Primary


Key Function or Issue

Glenelg Shire Council

South West Sports

Assembly

South West Sports

Academy DVC - SRV DSE Primary Care

Partnership

Local Clubs and

Associations

State Sporting Associations

Sports Promotion Secondary Primary Secondary

Secondary (Benefits

Promotion) No Role No Role Primary Secondary

Junior Sports Development Secondary Primary Secondary

Secondary (Funding)

No Role No Role Primary Primary

Elite Athlete Development No Role No Role Primary

Secondary (Funding)

No Role No Role Primary Primary

Volunteer Recruitment, Management and Training

Secondary Primary No Role Secondary (Funding)

Primary (DSE

Committees) No Role Primary Secondary

Physical Activity Promotion Secondary Primary No Role

Secondary (Funding)

No Role Primary Secondary Secondary

Delivery of Physical Activity Participation Programs and Activities

No Role Secondary No Role Secondary (Funding)

No Role No Role Primary Secondary

Volunteer Recognition Primary Secondary No Role

Secondary (Funding)

Secondary (DSE

Committees) No Role Primary Secondary

Club/Committee Operational Funding

Secondary (e.g. Fee relief as required)

No Role No Role No Role

Secondary (DSE

Committee Potential funding)

No Role Primary Secondary (Support as required)



APPENDIX 11 – DRAFT RECREATION FACILITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDING FRAMEWORK



Draft Recreation Facility Development Funding Framework

POLICY CONTEXT

1. Introduction / Purpose

The Recreation Facility Development Funding Framework has been established to provide a strategic and transparent approach for the assessment and prioritisation of recreation-based Capital Works projects either generated internally or submitted to Council for consideration by a club or community group.

Requests for Capital Works will be reviewed, evaluated, prioritised and implemented using effective processes and sound financial management practices giving due consideration to Council’s long-term strategic goals and Vision, and its ongoing operational requirements.

2. Definitions

For this Policy, Capital Works will be defined as:

• Purchase or construction of new assets.

• Capital renewal of existing assets which will result in an increase in the service potential of an asset or extends the life of an asset.

• Capital expansion which extends the standard of an existing asset to provide a higher level of service.

3. Scope

This funding framework will apply to all requests for Council funds required to partially or wholly fund Capital Works projects (as defined above) to create, establish or improve recreation facilities or spaces, including open space areas, recreational or sporting buildings, sports playing areas, and associated related infrastructure.

4. Requests for Capital Works Projects

Requests for projects to be considered for inclusion in the Council’s Capital Works Program, are typically generated by one of the following ways:

• By resolution of Council.

• From a Councillor.

• Internally from Council staff.

• From the community.



5. Process of Review and Evaluation of Capital Works Projects

Preliminary Review

All submissions received will be initially reviewed to establish whether a project proposal:

− Is a Council responsibility. − Is consistent with the definition of a Capital Works project.

Formal Review of Eligible Submissions

Eligible projects will be reviewed and prioritised by the Recreation Service Unit in consultation with other appropriate Council staff (e.g. Parks Maintenance, Community Services) using the following evaluation criteria and weightings.

1. Fit with Endorsed Corporate Planning Strategies and Reports 25%

a. Does the project help the Council meet it’s Vision? b. Is the project identified in an endorsed Strategy Plan, Master Plan, Asset

Management Plan etc., and what is its priority? c. Is the project consistent with Council policy and priorities? d. Does the project enhance operational efficiency? e. Does the project provide for a base level of facility? f. Is the project a core responsibility of Council?

2. Identified Need 25%

a. Has need been identified using effective means? b. Are there other community or private facilities nearby that could satisfy the

need? c. How effective will the project be in meeting the identified needs? d. Are there better options to meet the need? e. Will the project value-add in some capacity as well meeting the identified

need?

3. Participation / Involvement 15%

a. Will the project increase the opportunity for residents to increase their participation in physical activity or passive recreation pursuits (for fitness and/or health & wellbeing benefits)?

b. Will the project increase the attractiveness of a facility for spectators and other non-player/participants (for social and community development benefits)/

4. Urgency 20%

a. Is the project urgent due to contractual, safety or legislative obligations (e.g. Disability and Discrimination Act, OH & S, Local Government Act)?

b. Will the project satisfy a government initiative or attract seed funding? c. Is there an existing Council commitment to the project? d. Does the project respond to environmental considerations or a natural disaster?



5. Financial Issues 15%

a. Is the project consistent with the definition of Capital Works? b. Is external funding committed, or is the likelihood of attracting future external

funding high (government sources, community, private/sponsorship)? c. What is the cost/benefit of the project having regard to recurrent income,

expenditure and external subsidy? d. Does an economic analysis of the project confirm viability (where applicable)? e. What impact will the project have on the life of an asset? f. Have the project risks been satisfactorily managed? g. What is the funding mix for the project? Does it maximise the use of Council

funds?

The weightings for each criterion may change from time to time according to the overall priorities of Council, however, any changes to the weightings should be subject to formal approval by Council.

Where a project does not fulfil a majority of the criteria and is not recommended for funding, this will be formally communicated to the applicant group, however, the project will still remain on the Capital Works list for information and possible later consideration.

At the conclusion of the formal review process, a priority listing of all submissions will be available and will be referred to Council’s annual budget process for consideration for inclusion on Council’s Capital Works Program.

Following adoption of the Council’s Annual Budget, the Recreation Service Unit will formally advise all applicants that submitted a request(s), the outcome of the Capital Works evaluation and approvals process.



APPENDIX 12 - INFIELD SURVEY RESULTS

Glenelg Recreation and Open Space Plan Glenelg Shire Council

Infield Survey writeup © Stratcorp Consulting 2006 Page 1

1. CONSULTATION - INFIELD SURVEY

1.1. Data Collection The results from this survey were obtained from infield surveys conducted at various parks, reserves and foreshore areas within the Glenelg Shire. The interviews took in April and May 2006.

• The survey was conducted on weekends between 9.00am and 5.00pm and weekdays between 8.00am and 12noon.

• Only persons aged 14 years or above were interviewed.

1.2. Profile of Respondents The key demographic characteristics of the survey sample are described below.

Where appropriate, these characteristics have been used as the basis for cross tabulations in the data analysis.

• The majority of respondents were female (58%).

• The highest proportion of respondents were aged 35 - 49 years (24%), followed by those 25 - 34 years (22%) and 14 - 17 years (15%).

Age Category Frequency PercentAge Structure

of Glenelg14-17 years 11 15% 20.7% (5-17 yrs)

18-24 years 8 11% 6.1%25-34 years 16 22% 12.2%35-49 years 17 24% 23.3%50-59 years 9 13% 11.9%60-69 years 6 8% 8.4%70+ years 4 6% 10.5%

No response 1 1% 0%Total 72 100%

Age structure of sample compared to demographic profile of Glenelg

• The largest proportion of respondents were from the township of Casterton (40%), followed by Portland (19%), Heywood (15%) and Nelson (13%). The following table shows where the largest proportions of respondents reside.

Township Frequency PercentPortland 14 19%

Heywood 11 15%Casterton 29 40%Nelson 9 13%

Dartmoor 2 3%Merino 5 7%

Narrawong 2 3%Total 72 100% Respondents suburb of residence



1.3. Frequency of Use of Parks, Reserves and Foreshore Areas Respondents were asked how often they typically visit Glenelg’s parks, reserves or foreshore areas. The following figure shows the results.

2524

15

4

19

8

1

4

0

5

10

15

20

25

Perc

enta

ge (%

)

3 or moretimes per

week

Once ortwice per

week

2 or 3times per

month

Monthly Few timesper year

Hardly ever First time Don'tknow/noresponse

How often do you use or visit one of Glenelg’s parks, reserves or foreshore areas?

Results indicate:

• Almost half (49%) of all respondents use or visit one of Glenelg’s parks, reserves or foreshore areas at least once per week.

• Only 1% of those surveyed were first-time users.


• Females (52%) were more likely to use Glenelg’s parks, reserves or foreshore areas at least once per week than males (41%).

• Younger people aged 14-17 years were the most likely to use Glenelg’s parks, reserves or foreshore areas at least once per week (72%), followed by those aged 35-49 years (68%).



1.4. Length of Use of Parks, Reserves and Foreshore Areas Respondents were asked how long they typically spend in Glenelg’s parks, reserves or foreshore areas when they visit. The following figure shows the results.

4 4

6

19

32

25

10

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35Pe

rcen

tage

(%)

Walk/ridethrough it

< 15 mins 16-30 mins 31-60 mins 1-2 hours 2 hours + Don't know

How long do you usually stay?

Results indicate:

• A total of 57% of users, typically spend over an hour using Glenelg’s parks, reserves or foreshore areas.

• Less than 10% of users are only “passing through” or spending less than 15 minutes at the park, reserve or foreshore area.



1.5. Reason for Use Respondents were asked what activities they were doing (or usually do) when at parks, reserves or foreshore areas. The following table shows the results.

Activity Frequency% of those surveyed

BBQ/Picnic 21 29%Walking/jogging for exercise 21 29%Playing organised sport 20 28%Family outing (with children) 18 25%Meeting friends 17 24%Watching sport 17 24%Enjoying the view 16 22%Walking the dog 15 21%Visiting the beach 15 21%Using or supervising children on the playground 11 15%Playing informal sport 10 14%Enjoy the flora and fauna 10 14%Travelling through it 9 13%Bike riding 8 11%Playing informal activities 5 7%Place to sit and relax 5 7%Lunchbreak 4 6%Swimming 3 4%School Sports 2 3%Fishing 1 1%Working 1 1%Total 229

Reason for use or parks, reserves or foreshore areas

Results indicate:

• The largest proportion of park visitors were there for a BBQ/Picnic (29% of those surveyed), or walking/jogging for exercise (29%).

• Playing organised sport was also a very popular activity undertaken at parks, reserves or foreshore areas (28%).


The following table indicates the most common reasons for visiting parks by age cohort.

Age Category Activity 1 Activity 214-17 years Playing organised sport Meeting friends18-24 years Walking the dog BBQ/picnic25-34 years Walking/jogging for exercise Playing organised sport35-49 years Family outing Watching sport50-59 years Enjoying the view Walking/jogging for exercise60-69 years Enjoying the flora and fauna Walking/jogging for exercise70+ years BBQ/picnic Walking/jogging for exercise

Most popular reasons for use by age cohort



1.6. Most Liked Features of Glenelg’s Parks and Reserves Respondents were asked to state the things they like most about Glenelg’s parks and reserves. The following table shows the results.

Most liked elements Frequency% of those surveyed

Meeting place for people 26 36%Close to home 23 32%Large open spaces/places to run around 22 31%Playground 21 29%Beach and foreshore areas 20 28%Well maintained 19 26%BBQ/Picnic areas 18 25%Sporting facilities 18 25%Variety of facilities/activities 13 18%Feel safe 12 17%Close to work 6 8%Gardens/lakes 5 7%Don't know/no response 8 11%Total 203

Most liked features of Glenelg’s Parks and Reserves

Results indicate:

• A “meeting place for people” was an important feature of Glenelg’s Parks and Reserves according to 36% of users.

• The location of the park or reserve being “close to home” was important for 32% of those surveyed.


The following table indicates the most liked features of parks and reserves for each age cohort.

Age Category Most Liked Feature

14-17 years Don't know/no response 18-24 years Beach and Foreshore areas 25-34 years Large open spaces to run around 35-49 years Large open spaces to run around 50-59 years Beach and Foreshore areas 60-69 years Close to home 70+ years Meeting place for people

Most liked features of Glenelg’s Parks and Reserves by age cohort



1.7. Least Liked Features of Glenelg’s Parks and Reserves Respondents were asked to state the things they like least about Glenelg’s parks and reserves. The following table shows the results.

Least liked elements Frequency% of those surveyed

Public toilets 34 47%Litter 21 29%Don't know/no response 16 22%Lack of facilities 11 15%Poorly maintained 10 14%Poor lighting 10 14%BBQ/Picnic areas 6 8%Sporting facilities 3 4%Traffic 1 1%Playground 1 1%Sports grounds 1 1%Lack of open space areas/places to run around 1 1%All round improvement required 1 1%Lack of environmental management 1 1%Not enough provision for post playground ages 1 1%Poor signage 1 1%Stray dogs 1 1%Walking tracks not maintained 1 1%Total 121

Least liked features of Glenelg’s Parks and Reserves

Results indicate:

• The most frequently provided response for “least liked elements” of parks were the public toilets (47%) and litter (29%).

• A lack of facilities, poor maintenance and poor lighting were mentioned by a relatively high proportion of respondents.

• Approximately 1 in 5 people (22%) could not provide an answer when asked what features they least liked about parks and reserves in Glenelg.


The following table indicates the least liked features of parks and reserves for each age cohort.

Age Category Least Liked Feature

14-17 years Litter 18-24 years Public Toilets 25-34 years Public Toilets 35-49 years Public Toilets 50-59 years Public Toilets 60-69 years Public Toilets 70+ years Litter

Least liked features of Glenelg’s Parks and Reserves by age cohort.



1.8. Factors Preventing Use of Glenelg’s Parks, Reserves and Recreation Facilities Respondents were asked if there was anything that prevents them from using Glenelg’s parks, reserves and recreation facilities. The following table shows the results.

Factors that prevent use Frequency% of those surveyed

No, nothing 34 47%Lack of time 20 28%Lack of motivation 9 13%Lack of facilities available in town 9 13%Distance - too far to travel 6 8%Lack of public transport 4 6%Don't know what is available 3 4%Physical constraints 3 4%Age 2 3%Lack of clubs or organised groups available in town 2 3%Need child care/babysitter 1 1%Dogs loose on the beach 1 1%Total 94

Factors preventing use of parks, reserves and recreation facilities

Results indicate:

• Almost half (47%) of those surveyed indicated that there was nothing preventing them from using parks, reserves and recreation facilities.

• “Lack of time” was a preventative factor for 28% of respondents.

• “Lack of motivation” or “lack of facilities available in town” prevented 13% of respondents from using parks, reserves and recreation facilities.


• Those who live in Nelson, Dartmoor and Merino were most likely to state “lack of facilities available in town” as a preventative factor to using parks, reserves and recreation facilities.

• 67% of those who stated “distance – too far to travel” as a preventative factor to using parks, reserves and recreation facilities, were from Heywood.



1.9. Quality of Facilities in Glenelg Parks Respondents were given a list of facilities/features of Glenelg parks and asked to rate their quality on a scale of “good”, “average” or “poor.” The following table shows the results.

Facility/element Good Avg Poor DK TotalCleanliness 26% 58% 8% 7% 100%Maintenance of lawns, paths, gardens 49% 42% 3% 7% 100%Public toilets 13% 43% 40% 4% 100%Park furniture 22% 56% 17% 6% 100%BBQ and picnic area 44% 43% 8% 4% 100%Playground 35% 50% 7% 8% 100%Signage 29% 51% 10% 10% 100%Feeling of personal safety 49% 40% 3% 8% 100%Car parking 49% 39% 6% 7% 100%Playing fields 38% 40% 8% 14% 100%Tennis courts 29% 47% 7% 17% 100%Paths and walking trails 26% 46% 19% 8% 100%Sports grounds 42% 36% 8% 14% 100%Other recreation facilities 32% 26% 18% 24% 100%

Rating the quality of facilities in Glenelg parks

Results indicate:

• In regards to quality, the highest rating facilities/elements of Glenelg parks were; “maintenance of lawns, paths, gardens”, “feeling of personal safety” and “car parking.” These facilities/elements all received almost 50% of ratings as “good.”

• A total of 40% of respondents rated public toilets as having “poor” quality. In regards to quality, this made this feature the lowest rating facility/element of Glenelg parks.

• “Other recreation facilities” (24%) and “tennis courts” were facilities that received the highest “don’t know” response when asked to rate their quality.



1.10. Quality of Parks and Reserves and Sport and Recreation Facilities Respondents were asked how satisfied they were with the quality of parks and reserves, and sport and recreation facilities in Glenelg Shire. The following figure shows the results.

4 4

14

17

11

7

53

46

1113

7

13

0

10

20

30

40

50

60Pe

rcen

tage

(%)

Very Unsatisfied Unsatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied Don't know

Quality of Parks and Reserves Quality of Sport and Recreation Facilities

Level of satisfaction with the quality of parks and reserves and sport and recreation facilities

Results indicate:

• A total of 64% of respondents were either “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the quality of parks and reserves in the Glenelg area.

• A total of 59% of respondents were either “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the quality of sport and recreation facilities in the Glenelg area.

• Slighting more respondents were either “unsatisfied” or “very unsatisfied” with the quality of sport and recreation facilities (21%) than parks and reserves (18%).



1.11. Improving Current Facilities Respondents were asked in their view, whether there any existing sport, recreation or park facilities that need improving in the Glenelg Shire. The following table shows the suggestions provided for facilities in need of improvement.

Facility or Service Frequency% of those surveyed

Upgrade Casterton Swimming Pool 12 17%Improve Public toilets 10 14%Absailing, canoeing in Portland 1 1%Clearing of old cricket pitch area 1 1%Closer access to coastal areas for elderly 1 1%Crossing in Main St 1 1%Choice of playground equipment for older children 1 1%Upgrade Merino Swimming Pool 1 1%More tennis courts 1 1%Nelson area, everything needs improvement 1 1%Playground at skate park needs maintenance 1 1%Portland foreshore- maintenance of play equipment 1 1%Cleaning of coast wattle at Nelson Rec Reserve 1 1%Tennis courts need cleaning up 1 1%Total 34

Current facilities in need of improvement

Results indicate:

• Upgrading Casterton Swimming Pool was suggested as an improvement required by 17% of those surveyed (Note that the majority of those surveyed (40%) were from Casterton which has no doubt influenced this response).

• Improving public toilets was the second most frequently suggested improvement required.



1.12. New Facilities Required Respondents were asked whether there were any new sport, recreation or park facilities or services needed in the Glenelg Shire. The following table shows the responses provided.

Facility or Service Frequency% of those surveyed

Skate Park in Casterton 16 22%Multipurpose venue in Nelson 4 6%Wave Pool 3 4%1/2 court basketball court in Nelson 2 3%Bike path on foreshore in Portland 2 3%Skate park in Merino 2 3%Ten pin bowling 2 3%Basic utilities needed 1 1%Hockey field in Casterton 1 1%Mini golf in Portland or Heywood 1 1%More childrens playgrounds in Heywood 1 1%More facilities for kids 1 1%Shed for surf lifesaving equipment in Portland 1 1%Skate park in Dartmoor 1 1%Bike tracks up river and around town 1 1%Soccer fields 1 1%Surfing lessons in Portland 1 1%Tennis courts in Nelson 1 1%Walking tracks up river in Casterton/Merino 1 1%Total 43

New facilities suggested

Results indicate:

• The most popular suggestion by respondents for new facilities was the installation of a skate park in Casterton. A total of 22% of all respondents suggested this facility.


• All of those respondents who suggested the skate park in Casterton as a required facility were from the town of Casterton.



APPENDIX 13 – SPORT & OPEN SPACE FACILITY AUDIT

Glenelg Shire

Reserve User Groups Comments

No

of S

occe

r Fi

elds

S =

Sen

ior,

J =

Juni

orL

= F

lood

light

ing

No

of A

FL O

vals

J = Ju

nior

, L =

Flo

odlig

htin

g

No

of C

rick

et O

vals

T =

Tur

f, S

= S

ynth

etic

C =

Con

cret

e, N

= N

o cr

icke

t wic

ket

J = Ju

nior

Cri

cket

Net

sS

= S

ynth

etic

, T =

Tur

f, C

= C

oncr

ete

Net

ball

Cou

rts

A =

Asp

halt,

C =

Con

cret

eP

= P

lexi

pave

L=

Flo

odlig

htin

g

Law

n Bo

wlin

gS

= S

ynth

etic

, T =

Tur

f, L

= F

lood

light

ing

Tenn

is C

ourt

sH

= H

ardc

ourt

, P =

Por

ous,

S

= S

and-

fille

d G

rass

, G =

Gra

ss,

A =

Asp

halt,

L =

Flo

odlig

htin

g

Oth

er R

ecre

atio

nal a

nd/o

rSp

ort F

acili

ties

Path

Net

wor

k

Play

grou

nd a

nd/o

r BB

QP

= P

layg

roun

d

B =

BB

Q/P

icni

c A

rea

Publ

ic T

oile

ts

Car

Par

king

S =

Sea

led,

U =

Uns

eale

d

Pavi

lions

C =

Cha

nge

Pavi

lions

, S =

Soc

ial R

oom

s

Comments

Hanlon ParkPortland Football, Netball and Cricket Club, Portland Touch Football Club

x 1L 1T 2S 2AL x xGrandstand, seating and scoreboard. Timekeepers and Umpires building.

Equipment storage shed. x

x2

U

C&S

Crown Land Council managed.See main report (Section 10).VRA rating 'A', meets minimum acceptable standards. Implement recommendations of VRA report.Change rooms may require upgrading/extension, particularly to cater for female netballers. Proposed Open Space System Category: Premier Sports Reserve

Yarraman Park

Portland Racing Pigeon ClubPortland & District Karting ClubPortland Light Harness ClubPortland and Heywood Poultry ClubPortland Polocrosse ClubPortland & District Adult Riding ClubPortland Gymnastics Club, Portland Pony Club, Portland Judo Club

x x x x x x x

Gallops training track. Trotting track. Horse holding yards. Stables. Indoor

Riding Arena. Karting Track and facilities. Polocrosse fields (3). Pony Club oval. 3

Sheds. Poultry pavilion. Park Admin building.

x

U

Crown Land Council managed.The reserve contains numerous building and structures, some appear to be in disrepair. There is also considerable litter/building rubbish/vegetation throughout the park that needs to be cleared away. A master plan for the site may be needed that includes consideration of demolishing existing structures in preference for a single shared use facility that also incorporates specialist elements e.g. Gymnastics. Access roads and pathways throughout the reserve require improvement. VRA rating 'BBB', below acceptable minimum standard, implement VRA recommendations.Proposed Open Space System Category: Township Sports Reserve

Alexandra ParkWesterns Football Netball Club, West Portland Junior Football Club, Gorae Portland Cricket Club

x 1L 1T 2S 2A x xBMX track and support buildings.

Greyhound training track and shedLimited x

U

C&S

Crown Land Council managed.Many parts of the reserve are overgrown and appear poorly maintained. The playing surface may need to be improved along with updated pavilion and general park infrastructure.VRA rating 'BBB', below acceptable minimum standard, implement VRA recommendations.

Cavalier ParkSouth Portland Cricket ClubSouth Portland Junior Football Club

x 1J 1T 2S x x xA storage shed/garage is provided near

the cricket nets.x x

U

C&S

Council owned and managed.There may be issues with cricket balls landing in near-by residential back yards. The road around the oval is unsealed and may require upgrading. Pavilion facilities are very basic (temporary building) and require replacement (considered a priority by the club). Playing surfaces require top dressing and may require irrigation. Cricket nets require repair, existing public toilets could be demolished and/or incorporated into a new pavilion.VRA rating 'BBB-', significantly below acceptable minimum standards, implement VRA recommendations.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Flinders Park

Portland Hockey ClubPortland Baseball ClubPortland Netball Association, North Portland Junior Football Club, Portland Hockey Club, Portland Urban Fire Brigade, Flinders Cricket Club

x 1L 1S 2S 8P x x1 Baseball Diamond.

Synthetic Hockey training facility.Fire Track and support building.

x P

U

x2

C&S

Crown Land Council managed.The disused/fenced off playground near the netball courts should be replaced by a new playground (fencing to be removed, consider site options). Hockey players do not have access to shower facilities. Training lights may require upgrading. Undercover spectator shelters are needed. Netball court drainage may need to be improved. Tree and vegetation maintenance requires improvement.VRA rating 'BBB', below acceptable minimum standard, implement VRA recommendations.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Friendly Societies Reserve/Melaleuca St Reserve

Portland Soccer Club 1SL, 1J x x x x x x Training lights (basic) to one field only. x x

S

C&S

Crown Land Council managed.Very good pavilion, playing surfaces appear well maintained, walking paths and general mowing/maintenance around the lagoon needs to improve (including considering disabled/mobility impaired access).VRA rating 'A', acceptable minimum standard, implement VRA recommendations.

Henty Park & Portland Botanical Gardens

Central Junior Football ClubPortland Lawn Tennis ClubPortland Colts Cricket Club, Portland Croquet Club, Portland Cable Trams Inc, Portland Motoring Enthusiasts, Hamilton Pastoral Museum, Portland Surf Life Saving Club, Christian Outreach Centre

x 2 (1J) 1T, 1S 3 (1T, 2C) x x 3HL, 18G

Lighting is provided to plexipave courts only.

The park is adjacent to the Portland Aquatics Centre (home of the Portland Swimming Club) and Botanic Gardens. Storage facility for tennis club. Storage

facility for Portland Surf Life Saving Club. Portland Cable Trams Inc Depot and

workshop.

P

S&U

C&S

Crown Land Council managed.The playground is very small and could be improved. Playing surfaces require top dressing and levelling (also need to prevent bird damage to grass tennis courts, possibly though netting)Sports lighting and security lighting may need to improve. Tennis court fencing requires upgrade/maintenance. Pavilions require upgrading.VRA rating 'BB-', considerably below minimum accepted standard, implement VRA recommendations.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Nelson Park

Portland Athletics Centre/Portland Little AthleticsPortland Hockey ClubPortland Dog Obedience Club

x x x x x x xGrass athletics track and grass hockey

fields (3) Storage facilities for athletics andfor dog obedience clubs

x x

U

C&S

Crown Land, Council managed.Toilets in the pavilion may require upgrading.VRA rating "A-', acceptable minimum standard, implement VRA recommendations.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Portland Foreshore ReservePortland Angling ClubPortland Yacht Club

x x x x x x xAngling club and yacht club

buildings/pavilions. Skate park, boat ramps, fishing platform/pier.

P&B

S&U

C&S

Crown land Council managed.See main report (Section 10).Proposed Open Space System Category: Regional Park

Fitzgerald Street Stadium

Portland Squash ClubLighthouse Seaside Coasters Basketball ClubPortland Basketball Association

x x x x x x x5 squash courts

2 basketball courtsx x x

S

C&S

Council owned and managed (operational contract with Portland Basketball Association).Limited casual use of facilities, however strong club utilisation (e.g. 150-160 squash members, 3 pennants per year). Cracks in squash court walls require repairing. Lighting and seating in the basketball stadium could improve, additional storage may be needed and improve disabled accessibility at the front entrance. VRA rating 'AAA-', significantly above minimum required standard. Proposed Open Space System Category: Township Sports Reserve

Cnr Tyers St and Percy St"Market Square"

Informal park. x x x x x x x Street x x x xCrown Land, Council managed.Small informal park, includes park furniture/seating, no obvious works required.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Flinders Park (Dutton Bluff) Portland Bowling Club 1S 1T U SCrown Land, Council managedProposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Graham Husson Fauna Park Lions Club x x x x x x x

P&B

U xVicRoads Road Reserve managed by Council. The playground area is quite good however the rest of the reserve appears largely overgrown, underutilised and poorly maintained. The future of this reserve needs to be considered in consultation with DSE and the Lions Club.Proposed Open Space System Category: District Park (pending resolution of future development).

Portland Swimming Centre - "The Place".

Portland Swimming Club

Key Indoor facilities include:25m (geothermally) heated poolToddlers PoolGym/Aerobics roomCrecheSaunaKioskOffice/administrationChange roomsKey Outdoor facilities include (all pools geothermally heated):50m PoolToddlers Pool25m pool with slideSpaBBQ area

Council owned, managed under contract with CASA Leisure.The Shire's premier aquatic facility. The Place fulfils a vital role in meeting the Portland community's recreation needs. An extensive range of facilities are available for a community of this size.A good range of programs are offered, for example gymnasium, cardio, group fitness, water aerobics, lean to swim, personal training, swim squads, kids parties however additional water features or programs could be offered, for example 'Dive-in Movies', inflatable water toys etc. These could be mobile facilities provided on a rotational basis across the Shire's aquatic facilities.etc.Refer to Council's "Aquatic Centres Audit/Strategy Report (Oct 2001) for detailed condition auditing and recommended maintenance and capital works.

Amenities

Portland

Sport and Open Space Facilities Audit

Glenelg Shire


No

of S

occe

r Fi

elds

S =

Sen

ior,

J =

Juni

orL

= F

lood

light

ing

No

of A

FL O

vals

J = Ju

nior

, L =

Flo

odlig

htin

g

No

of C

rick

et O

vals

T =

Tur

f, S

= S

ynth

etic

C =

Con

cret

e, N

= N

o cr

icke

t wic

ket

J = Ju

nior

Cri

cket

Net

sS

= S

ynth

etic

, T =

Tur

f, C

= C

oncr

ete

Net

ball

Cou

rts

A =

Asp

halt,

C =

Con

cret

eP

= P

lexi

pave

L=

Flo

odlig

htin

g

Law

n Bo

wlin

gS

= S

ynth

etic

, T =

Tur

f, L

= F

lood

light

ing

Tenn

is C

ourt

sH

= H

ardc

ourt

, P =

Por

ous,

S

= S

and-

fille

d G

rass

, G =

Gra

ss,

A =

Asp

halt,

L =

Flo

odlig

htin

g

Oth

er R

ecre

atio

nal a

nd/o

rSp

ort F

acili

ties

Path

Net

wor

k

Play

grou

nd a

nd/o

r BB

QP

= P

layg

roun

d

B =

BB

Q/P

icni

c A

rea

Publ

ic T

oile

ts

Car

Par

king

S =

Sea

led,

U =

Uns

eale

d

Pavi

lions

C =

Cha

nge

Pavi

lions

, S =

Soc

ial R

oom

s

Comments

Amenities


Casterton

Island Park Recreation Reserve

Cats Netball ClubCasterton tennis ClubCasterton Junior Tennis AssociationCasterton Cricket ClubUnited Cricket ClubCasterton & District Cricket AssociationCasterton Football and Netball ClubCasterton Croquet ClubCasterton Little AthleticsCasterton P & A SocietyCasterton Bowling Club, Casterton Junior Football Assn, Casterton Netball Assn, Casterton Kelpie Assn, Casterton Band, Casterton Swimming Club

x 2L 2T 2S 4AL 1S 9AL

Croquet green.Band stand/stage.

Caravan park.Adjacent to public swimming pool.

P&A building/pavilion. Football grandstand. Cattle pavilion. Poultry

pavilion.

P2 & B

x3

U

x3 C&S

Crown Land Council managed.See main report (Section 10).General asset maintenance and improvement required due to ageing infrastructure.VRA rating 'AA+', considerably above minimum standard required, implement VRA recommendations.Proposed Open Space System Category: Premier Sports Reserve

Possum Park Informal park. x x x x x x x x x x xCouncil owned and managed.Provides a vital linear link from the main road/commercial strip to Island Park. Proposed site for new Skate Park facility, including 1/2 court basketball. Additional park furniture (seating), top dress gravel path and consider inclusion of public art (possible murals on walls). Proposed site for new skatepark

Casterton Racecourse Racing Club x x x x x x xRacing and jumps track, various support

buildings, pavilion and grand stand. x

U

Crown Land - managed by DSE CoM. Considerable infrastructure to support horse racing. No obvious works are required. There could be potential to utilise the course in-field for a variety of other sporting uses (e.g. playing fields).

Apex Park Part of Island park x x x x x x x

B

U xCrown Land, Council managed.Community developed informal park. No obvious works required. Part of Island ParkProposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Bryan Park War Memorial & Playground x x x x x x x x

P x On street xCrown Land, Council managed.Small informal park, opposite the hospital. Grass and landscape would benefit from irrigation. Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Goodman Park Informal park. x x x x x x x x x x x xCouncil owned and managed.Informal park incorporating steep escarpment, overlooking the town. Currently good native vegetation, continue to manage for its conservation and landscape values.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Polocrosse Reserve Polocrosse Club x x x x x x xPolocrosse ground and associated

facilities. x x

U

S

Crown Land Council managed. Overall facilities (and reserve) appears largely underutilised and in poor repair.VRA rating 'B-', considerably below the accepted minimum standard, implement VRA recommendations.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Big Bore Rifle Range Casterton Rifle Club x x x x x x x Shooting mounds and targets x x Road Reserve, Council managed.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Small Bore Pistol Range Small Bore Pistol Club x x x x x x x x x x

S

Crown Land Council managed.Facilities appear underutilised and in very poor repair. An audit of the building should be undertaken, if the club is still viable facilities should be upgraded, otherwise demolish the site and incorporate as open space connected to Ess Lagoon.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Cussen Street Park Informal park. x x x x x x x x

P x x xManaged by Casterton Hospital. Upgrade or remove existing playground equipment.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Ess Lagoon Informal park. x x x x x x x Fishing platform, public sculpture. x

B x

U xCrown Land Council managed.Small informal park that takes advantage of the adjacent lagoon, no obvious works required.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

CFA Training Track CFA x x x x x x x Tower and pavilion. x x x

S

S

Crown Land, DSE managed.No works required.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Rotary Rest Point Park Informal park. x x x x x x x x

P&B x

U x

Crown Land Council managed. Existing playground needs to be inspected for Australian Standard compliance and maintained. The wood BBQ appears to receive little use and may be best removed (potential fire hazard).Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Rail Precinct

Casterton Rail Precinct Advisory Committee- Casterton Garden Club, Casterton Historical Society, Casterton Apex Club, Casterton Rotary Club, Casterton Field Nats

x x x x x x x Playground and Rotunda x x

Land leased by Council from Public Transport Corporation. Passenger Station (Museum) and Goods Sheds are the interest of the Historical Society, Field Nats mainly interested in the native veg at Minnie Hole (water supply in days of steam) Garden Club - general surrounds plantings. Service Clubs - general support.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Casterton Swimming Centre Casterton Swimming Club

Key (outdoor) facilities include:50m Pool (solar heated)Toddlers PoolKioskChange roomsOffice/administration

Council owned, managed under contract with CASA Leisure for seasonal use.The pool plays a key role in meeting the Casterton community's aquatic recreation needs, especially given the distance from the coast. A limited range of programs are offered, for example lean to swim, Vic Swim, School use, lap swimming and recreational swimming.Refer to Council's "Aquatic Centres Audit/Strategy Report (Oct 2001) for detailed condition auditing and recommended maintenance and capital works.The facility may attract greater utilisation with additional programming and addition of leisure water attractions or features (e.g. water cannons, inflatable toys/features). These could be mobile facilities provided on a rotational basis across the Shire's aquatic facilities.

Glenelg Shire


No

of S

occe

r Fi

elds

S =

Sen

ior,

J =

Juni

orL

= F

lood

light

ing

No

of A

FL O

vals

J = Ju

nior

, L =

Flo

odlig

htin

g

No

of C

rick

et O

vals

T =

Tur

f, S

= S

ynth

etic

C =

Con

cret

e, N

= N

o cr

icke

t wic

ket

J = Ju

nior

Cri

cket

Net

sS

= S

ynth

etic

, T =

Tur

f, C

= C

oncr

ete

Net

ball

Cou

rts

A =

Asp

halt,

C =

Con

cret

eP

= P

lexi

pave

L=

Flo

odlig

htin

g

Law

n Bo

wlin

gS

= S

ynth

etic

, T =

Tur

f, L

= F

lood

light

ing

Tenn

is C

ourt

sH

= H

ardc

ourt

, P =

Por

ous,

S

= S

and-

fille

d G

rass

, G =

Gra

ss,

A =

Asp

halt,

L =

Flo

odlig

htin

g

Oth

er R

ecre

atio

nal a

nd/o

rSp

ort F

acili

ties

Path

Net

wor

k

Play

grou

nd a

nd/o

r BB

QP

= P

layg

roun

d

B =

BB

Q/P

icni

c A

rea

Publ

ic T

oile

ts

Car

Par

king

S =

Sea

led,

U =

Uns

eale

d

Pavi

lions

C =

Cha

nge

Pavi

lions

, S =

Soc

ial R

oom

s

Comments

Amenities


Heywood

Heywood Recreation Reserve

Heywood Junior Football ClubDrumborg Heywood Cricket ClubHeywood Football and Netball ClubHeywood Lions ClubHeywood Tennis Club

x 1L 1C 2S 4AL x 4ASupport buildings including food and

beverage outlets, grand stand/under coverviewing area, gate keepers etc.

x x

S

x2 C&S

Crown land, Council managed.See main report (Section 9).The playing surface may require top dressing and levelling. Grass maintenance/mowing within the reserve requires improvement. The open drain along the rear of the reserve (behind the goals) requires rectification/improvement.VRA rating 'BBB-', considerably below the minimum standard required, implement VRA recommendations. Proposed Open Space System Category: Township Sports Reserve

Heywood Bowling Club Heywood Bowling Club x x x x x1S1T

x x x x x xPrivate owned.No obvious works required.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Barclay Street road Reserve Lions Club x x x x x x x x x x x xCentral road reserve/informal park, Council managed.No obvious works required. Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Heywood Skate Park Skate Park x x x x x x x BMX & Skate Park & half basketball Court x

P x x xCrown land, Council managed.Recently constructed skate park (2002). May be opportunities to improve integration of the skate park/reserve with the adjacent swimming pool.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Fitzroy River Open Space Informal park. x x x x x x x

P&B x

U xCrown land, DSE CoM (East) and Council managed (West).There are opportunities to improve path connections and establish a walking trail along both sides of the river (connected by foot bridges).Proposed Open Space System Category: District Park

Heywood Swimming Centre Heywood Swimming Club

Key (outdoor) facilities include:50m Pool (solar heated)Toddlers Pool25m pool with slideSpaKioskChange roomsOffice/administration

Council owned, managed under contract with CASA Leisure for seasonal use.The pool plays a key role in meeting the Heywood and surrounding area aquatic recreation needs. A limited range of programs are offered, for example lean to swim, Vic Swim, School use, lap swimming and recreational swimming.Refer to Council's "Aquatic Centres Audit/Strategy Report (Oct 2001) for detailed condition auditing and recommended maintenance and capital works.The facility may attract greater utilisation with additional programming and addition of leisure water attractions or features (e.g. water cannons, inflatable toys/features). These could be mobile facilities provided on a rotational basis across the Shire's aquatic facilities.

Glenelg Shire


No

of S

occe

r Fi

elds

S =

Sen

ior,

J =

Juni

orL

= F

lood

light

ing

No

of A

FL O

vals

J = Ju

nior

, L =

Flo

odlig

htin

g

No

of C

rick

et O

vals

T =

Tur

f, S

= S

ynth

etic

C =

Con

cret

e, N

= N

o cr

icke

t wic

ket

J = Ju

nior

Cri

cket

Net

sS

= S

ynth

etic

, T =

Tur

f, C

= C

oncr

ete

Net

ball

Cou

rts

A =

Asp

halt,

C =

Con

cret

eP

= P

lexi

pave

L=

Flo

odlig

htin

g

Law

n Bo

wlin

gS

= S

ynth

etic

, T =

Tur

f, L

= F

lood

light

ing

Tenn

is C

ourt

sH

= H

ardc

ourt

, P =

Por

ous,

S

= S

and-

fille

d G

rass

, G =

Gra

ss,

A =

Asp

halt,

L =

Flo

odlig

htin

g

Oth

er R

ecre

atio

nal a

nd/o

rSp

ort F

acili

ties

Path

Net

wor

k

Play

grou

nd a

nd/o

r BB

QP

= P

layg

roun

d

B =

BB

Q/P

icni

c A

rea

Publ

ic T

oile

ts

Car

Par

king

S =

Sea

led,

U =

Uns

eale

d

Pavi

lions

C =

Cha

nge

Pavi

lions

, S =

Soc

ial R

oom

s

Comments

Amenities


Cape Bridgewater

Bridgewater Foreshore Reserve Surf Club x x x x x x xSurf Club

Commercial Kiosk, Boat Ramp

S&U

C&S

Crown Land Council managed.See main report (Section 10).Recently developed surf club and public toilet facilities. Kiosk has also recently been upgraded.Proposed Open Space System Category: District Park

Narrawong

The Esplanade Reserve Informal park/road reserve. x x x x x x x x x x

U x

Crown land, DSE CoM managed.Largely undeveloped road side reserve, large portions are maintained by the community with little or no Council support. Areas maintained by Council are generally not to the same (high) standard as the community. Council may need to explore opportunities to provide greater assistance to the community to maintain the reserve.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Recreation Reserve x 1 1C x x x 4A Adjacent to the caravan park. x

B

U x

Crown Land managed by DSE Committee of Management. Not currently used for formal sporting use/competitions. The reserve is adjacent to the beach, river and caravan park, therefore receive significant use in the summer. Playing surface would need to be upgraded (levelled, top dressed) in order to cater for formal sport. Current level of development is appropriate for its informal use.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

River Reserve x x x x x x x Opposite the caravan park.

B

U x

Crown land, DSE CoM managed.Informal picnic/park area with good access to the river and beaches. Many paths are overgrown and need to be widened/formalised along the river. Some of the 'boardwalks' leading to the beach (over the dunes) require repair.Proposed Open Space System Category: District Park

Bolwarra

Recreation ReserveBolwarra & Heathmere Tennis ClubReserve Committee

x x x x x x 2A Adjacent to the primary school. x x

U

S

Crown land, DSE CoM managed.Very basic standard facilities. The tennis courts are barely usable (poor surface and poor fencing conditions). The pavilion main social room and kitchen are OK, however the toilets require upgrading. The club are in the process of pursuing external funding to upgrade and/or replace the existing two tennis courts.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Nelson

River Foreshore ReserveParks VictoriaVisitor Information CentreReserve Committee

x x x x x x x Public hall.

P&B

U xCrown land, DSE CoM managed.The Reserve Committee are currently in the process of reviewing/developing a Concept Plan to guide the future management and development of the reserve. Proposed Open Space System Category: District Park

River Boat Ramp Area Informal park. x x x x x x xBoat Ramp

Fishing PlatformPicnic Tables

x

P

S&U xCrown land, DSE CoM managed.Install shade structure over picnic tables and improve disabled access to the fishing platform. Proposed Open Space System Category: District Park

Punt Hill Lookout Informal park. x x x x x x x

B x

U xCrown land, DSE CoM managed.No obvious works required.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Cameron Park Informal park. x x x x x x x

P x

U xCrown land, DSE CoM managed.Improve disabled access to the picnic shelter and public toilets, upgrade the path.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Centenary Reserve Informal park. x x x x x x x x x x

S&U x

Crown land, Council managed.Civic reserve, opposite the main roadhouse in Sturt Street. The reserve has previously been suggested as a possible location for a new community hall if one were to be developed. Three 'events' flagpoles installed as part of the Commonwealth Games funding.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Bridge Park Informal park. x x x x x x x x

P&B

U x

Crown land, DSE CoM managed.Located on the river, near the visitor information centre. The reserve provides a good picnic area/informal park and has been identified at the preferred location for the development of a 1/2 court basketball court - currently under construction. The playground area is leased to Council.Proposed Open Space System Category: District Park

Rural Townships

Glenelg Shire


No

of S

occe

r Fi

elds

S =

Sen

ior,

J =

Juni

orL

= F

lood

light

ing

No

of A

FL O

vals

J = Ju

nior

, L =

Flo

odlig

htin

g

No

of C

rick

et O

vals

T =

Tur

f, S

= S

ynth

etic

C =

Con

cret

e, N

= N

o cr

icke

t wic

ket

J = Ju

nior

Cri

cket

Net

sS

= S

ynth

etic

, T =

Tur

f, C

= C

oncr

ete

Net

ball

Cou

rts

A =

Asp

halt,

C =

Con

cret

eP

= P

lexi

pave

L=

Flo

odlig

htin

g

Law

n Bo

wlin

gS

= S

ynth

etic

, T =

Tur

f, L

= F

lood

light

ing

Tenn

is C

ourt

sH

= H

ardc

ourt

, P =

Por

ous,

S

= S

and-

fille

d G

rass

, G =

Gra

ss,

A =

Asp

halt,

L =

Flo

odlig

htin

g

Oth

er R

ecre

atio

nal a

nd/o

rSp

ort F

acili

ties

Path

Net

wor

k

Play

grou

nd a

nd/o

r BB

QP

= P

layg

roun

d

B =

BB

Q/P

icni

c A

rea

Publ

ic T

oile

ts

Car

Par

king

S =

Sea

led,

U =

Uns

eale

d

Pavi

lions

C =

Cha

nge

Pavi

lions

, S =

Soc

ial R

oom

s

Comments

Amenities


Dartmoor

Dartmoor Recreation ReserveDartmoor Football and Netball ClubDartmoor Cricket Club

x 1L 1C x 2A x 4ATraining lights on oval and netball courts.

One netball court appears unused.x x

U

C&S

Crown Land DSE COM.There appears to be a number of disused building and structures in the reserve that could be removed. Road surfaces need upgrade/repair. The tenant clubs have requested fencing around the reserve, a time keepers box and improvement to netball courts (run off areas).VRA rating 'BBB+', slightly below acceptable minimum standards, implement VRA recommendations.Proposed Open Space System Category: Township Sports Reserve

Dartmoor Bowling Club Dartmoor Bowling Club x x x x x 1T x x x x xCrown land, DSE CoM managed.Located behind the Anzac Hall. Very basic facilities, public toilets should be demolished and replaced (if needed). Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Informal Park - Village Green Opposite Pub x x x x x x x x

P&B x x xPublic Transport owned, leased to Council.Small informal park including a modern playground, need to improve pedestrian access.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Sandford

Recreation ReserveSanford Football and Netball Club, Sandford Tennis Club

x 1L x x 1AL x 2A CFA Fire Track

P&B

U

C&S

Crown land, DSE CoM managed.Basic level facilities only, netball and tennis courts require resealing. Tennis shelter requires repair, pavilion may need upgrading.VRA Rating 'BBB+', slightly below acceptable minimum standard, implement VRA recommendations.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Merino

Merino Recreation Reserve & Showgrounds

Merino P&A Society, Merino Cricket Club, Merino-Digby Lions Club, Glenelg Pony Club

x x 1C x 1A x 2AVarious outbuildings and animal yards

(holding pens).2 external power outlets for camping.

x

P

x2

U

C&S

Crown Land Council managed.The netball and tennis courts are in a state of disrepair and unused (unusable). The centre wicket cricket pitch is surrounded by netting for use as a training facilities, it appears to no longer be used for competition.All disused buildings should be demolished and removed, including the playground which does not meet appropriate standards.Remove disused horse jumps (if no longer in use).Upgrade the path connection to the adjacent swimming pool.VRA rating 'BB+', below an acceptable minimum standard, implement VRA recommendations.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Lions Club Park Public rest stop. x x x x x x x x

P& B xCrown land, managed by Lions Club and Council.The playground may not be compliant, therefore upgrade/replace. Equipment upgrades planned in June.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Merino Swimming Centre Merino Swimming Club

Key (outdoor) facilities include:25m Pool (solar heated)Toddlers PoolKioskChange roomsOffice/administration

Council owned, managed under contract with CASA Leisure for seasonal use.The pool plays a key role in meeting the aquatic recreation needs of the surrounding area, however a limited range of programs are offered, for example lean to swim, Vic Swim, School use, lap swimming and recreational swimming only.Refer to Council's "Aquatic Centres Audit/Strategy Report (Oct 2001) for detailed condition auditing and recommended maintenance and capital works.The facility may attract greater utilisation with additional programming and addition of leisure water attractions or features (e.g. water cannons, inflatable toys/features). These could be mobile facilities provided on a rotational basis across the Shire's aquatic facilities.

Digby

Digby Springs Reserve x x x x x x x x x x x x

Crown land, DSE managed.DSE controlled reserve which is very overgrown and undeveloped. May be an opportunity to clean up and establish a linear path. Encourage DSE to assume maintenance and control of the reserve.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Digby Memorial Park Informal Park x x x x x x 2AAdjacent to the Mechanics Institute and

Community Hall.

B x x x

Crown land, DSE CoM managed.War memorial, BBQ and rotunda. Tennis courts will require resealing (Medium term). Recent improvements have been made to the Community Hall, e.g. painting and maintenance. Support community efforts to upgrade facilities and install a playground on the site.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Park

Tyrendarra

Tyrendarra Recreation ReserveTyrendarra Football and Netball ClubTyrendarra Cricket Club, Tyrendarra Tennis Club

x 1L 1S 2C 3P x 4PlexiGate keepers box and scoreboard.

Adjacent to Community Hall/Memorial Hall.

x

P& B

C&S

Crown land, DSE CoM managed.Cricket nets are in poor repair, appear not to be used. The small bench seating around the oval could be improved/upgraded.Cyprus trees need to be inspected by an arborist and removed if required (high priority).VRA rating 'A', acceptable minimum standard, implement VRA recommendations.Proposed Open Space System Category: Township Sports Reserve

Others

Heathmere Recreation Reserve

CFAHeathmere Football and Netball Club, Heathmere Junior Football Club, Heathmere Cricket Club,Community Hall

x 1L x x 2A x 2AAdjacent to Speedway.

CFA and Community Hall facilities also inthe reserve.

x

P

U

C&S

Crown land, DSE CoM managed.The playground appears non compliant and requires upgrade/replacement. Remove old/disused netball court or reseal as a warm up area.Plantation land adjacent to the reserve could potentially be a good location for future motocross facility. VRA rating 'A', acceptable minimum standard, implement all VRA recommendations.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve

Drumborg Hall and Recreation Reserve Drumborg COM, Drumborg Tennis Club x 1 C x x x 2 U

Crown land, DSE CoM managed.Proposed Open Space System Category: Local Sports Reserve