recycling of carbon fibres from epoxy composites · recycling of carbon fibres from epoxy...
TRANSCRIPT
Recycling of Carbon Fibres From Epoxy Composites
João Pedro dos Santos Carvalho
Thesis to obtain the Master of Science Degree in
Chemical Engineering
Supervisors
Supervisor: Professora Doutora Ana Paula Vieira Soares Pereira Dias
External Co-Advisor: Doutor Ricardo José Nunes dos Reis
Examination Committee
Chairperson: Professor Doutor Sebastião Manuel Tavares da Silva Alves
Supervisor: Professora Doutora Ana Paula Vieira Soares Pereira Dias
Members of the Committee: Professor Doutor Luís Filipe da Silva dos Santos
May 2016
ii
Acknowledgements
Firstly I would like to thank my supervisor, Prof. Ana Paula Dias, for the opportunity to work in this
project. Her advice, help, trust and support were essential to the conclusion of this thesis.
To Eng. Ricardo Reis I would like to thank for all the help he gave and for the availability to give me
the tour of the factory.
A special thanks to Cristina Marques for all the support, help, interest and patience throughout all the
development of this thesis.
I would also like to thank Tiago Ribeiro for all the help he gave me in the DRX and Raman
spectroscopy.
I would also like to thank all my friends and family for all the help, support and friendship they gave me
throughout the work.
And a special thanks for my parents for never stopping believing in me and giving all the support they
could throughout this project.
iii
Resumo
Este trabalho teve como objectivo a recuperação de fibras de carbono a partir de um compósito
proveniente de peças de aviação. Foi utilizado o método de solvólise ácida com ácido nítrico. Foram
testadas várias concentrações de ácido nítrico com várias razões de massa de compósito/volume de
solução. As amostras foram também expostas a tratamentos de ultra-violeta de modo a simular as
condições atmosféricas.
Após a recuperação das fibras, estas foram submetidas a vários testes de caracterização de modo a
perceber qual a melhor combinação de tratamentos a utilizar de modo a obter fibras de carbono
comparáveis com fibras de carbono virgens. As fibras foram submetidas a espectroscopia de Raman,
termogravimetria, difracção de raios-X, espectroscopia de infra-vermelho, testes mecânicos e
microscopia electrónica de varrimento.
Submeteu-se a alguns destes testes uma amostra de fibras virgens e os resultados obtidos foram
comparados com os resultados das fibras recuperadas.
Observou-se que o ultra-violeta degrada a resina do compósito e danifica ligeiramente a fibra.
Observou-se também que as fibras com melhores resultados foram as que foram submetidas a uma
solução de ácido nítrico de concentração 4M e com uma razão de massa de compósito/volume de
solução igual a 4.
Palavras-chave: Fibras de carbono, solvólise ácida, ácido nítrico, compósito, UVB
iv
Abstract
The aim of this work was the recuperation of carbon fibres from an aviation composite. The solvolysis
with nitric acid was the method chosen. Various concentrations of nitric acid were utilised to various
composite weight/volume of solution ratio of composite. The samples were also exposed to ultraviolet
treatments to simulate atmospheric conditions.
After recuperating the carbon fibres, these were submitted to various characterization tests in order to
conclude which method is better to obtain carbon fibres similar to virgin carbon fibres. The carbon
fibres were submitted to Raman spectroscopy, thermogravimetry, X-ray diffraction, infrared
spectroscopy, mechanical tests and scanning electronic microscopy.
Virgin fibre samples were submitted to some of the characterization tests and the results were
compared to the recuperated carbon fibres.
It was observed that ultraviolet rays degrade the resin in the composite and slightly damage the
carbon fibre. It was also observed that the fibres submitted to the combination nitric acid at 4M and a
ratio of composite weight/volume of solution equal to 4 obtained better results in the characterization
tests.
Keywords: Carbon fibres, acid solvolysis, nitric acid, composite, UVB
v
Index
Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................. ii
Resumo ................................................................................................................................................... iii
Abstract.................................................................................................................................................... iv
Table Index .............................................................................................................................................. vi
Figure Index ............................................................................................................................................ vii
Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................... ix
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Introduction to Embraer ................................................................................................................ 1
1.2. Carbon Fibre ................................................................................................................................. 2
1.2.1. Synthesis ............................................................................................................................... 2
1.2.3. Properties .............................................................................................................................. 3
1.3. Carbon Fibre composites ............................................................................................................. 4
1.3.1. Properties ............................................................................................................................. 4
1.3.2. Problematic ........................................................................................................................... 5
2. Bibliographic research ......................................................................................................................... 6
3. Experimental method ......................................................................................................................... 11
4. Results and Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 13
4.1. Results ........................................................................................................................................ 13
4.1.1. X-Ray Diffraction ................................................................................................................. 13
4.1.2. Scanning Electronic Microscopy ......................................................................................... 16
4.1.3. Mechanical Tests ................................................................................................................. 19
4.1.4. Raman Spectroscopy .......................................................................................................... 22
4.1.5. Thermogravimetry ............................................................................................................... 26
4.1.6. Infrared Spectroscopy ......................................................................................................... 30
4.2. Discussion of the results ............................................................................................................ 34
5. Conclusions and Future Work ........................................................................................................... 36
5.1. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 36
5.2. Future Work ................................................................................................................................ 37
Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................... 38
Appendix A – SEM Images.................................................................................................................... 40
vi
Table Index
Table 1 – Mechanical properties of commercial available carbon fibres ................................................ 3
Table 2 – Conditions of each experiment .............................................................................................. 12
Table 3 – XRD results of CFs treated under different reaction conditions ............................................ 15
Table 4 – Mechanical properties of the 4M 2α sample ......................................................................... 20
Table 5 – Mechanical properties of the 4M 4α sample ......................................................................... 20
Table 6 – Mechanical properties of the 6M 2α sample ......................................................................... 21
Table 7 – Raman results of CFs treated under different reaction conditions ........................................ 22
Table 8 – Degradation temperatures of the carbon fibres ..................................................................... 26
Table 9 – Residual mass after TGA analysis ........................................................................................ 26
vii
Figure Index
Fig. 1 – Plausible reaction mechanism for solubilisation of epoxy resin using PEG-200/NaOH
proposed by Yang et al (2012) ................................................................................................................ 6
Fig. 2 – Solubilisation product obtained by PEG-200/NaOH reaction proposed by Yang et al (2012) ... 7
Fig. 3 – Glass vessel with a solution of nitric acid and samples of CFRP ............................................ 11
Fig. 4 – XRD of carbon fibres with different treatments ........................................................................ 14
Fig.5 – SEM image of Carbon fibre composite (x1500) ........................................................................ 16
Fig.7 - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with a 4M solution of HNO3 and 2α (x4000) ...................... 17
Fig.8- SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with 120 cycles of UV, a 4M solution of HNO3 and 2α (x3000)
............................................................................................................................................................... 18
Fig.9- SEM image of Carbon fibre with the diameter measured ........................................................... 18
Fig.10- Card specimen holder with a sample of recovered carbon fibre ............................................... 19
Fig.11- Mechanical test result of a specimen of carbon fibre ................................................................ 19
Fig.12 – Raman spectra of the carbon fibres ........................................................................................ 23
Fig.13- Kubelka-Munk Raman Spectra of the carbon fibres ................................................................. 24
Fig.14- Raman Spectra of the composite and of a polymer residue ..................................................... 25
Fig.15- Thermogravimetric analysis spectra of the recuperated carbon fibres ..................................... 27
Fig.16- DTG spectra of the recuperated carbon fibres .......................................................................... 28
Fig.17- Comparison of the degradation temperature of a sample of recuperated carbon fibre with the
virgin carbon fibre .................................................................................................................................. 29
Fig.18- Infrared adsorption spectra of the carbon fibres (virgin and recuperated) ................................ 31
Fig.19- Infrared adsorption spectra of the carbon fibres (virgin and recuperated) between 2250 cm-1
and 2500 cm-1
........................................................................................................................................ 32
Fig.20- Infrared adsorption spectra of the carbon fibres (virgin and recuperated) between 800 cm-1
and
1800 cm-1
............................................................................................................................................... 33
Fig.1A - SEM image of Carbon fibre composite (x4000) ....................................................................... 40
Fig.2A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with a 6M solution of HNO3 and 2α (x1500) .................... 40
Fig.3A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with a 6M solution of HNO3 and 2α (x2000) .................... 41
Fig.4A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with 309 cycles of UV, a 2M solution of HNO3 and 2α
(x1500)................................................................................................................................................... 41
Fig.5A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with 309 cycles of UV, a 2M solution of HNO3 and 2α
(x4000)................................................................................................................................................... 42
viii
Fig.6A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with 249 cycles of UV, a 4M solution of HNO3 and 2α
(x1500)................................................................................................................................................... 42
Fig.7A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with a 8M solution of HNO3 and 6α (x1000) .................... 43
Fig.8A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated a 4M solution of HNO3 and 2α (x2000) ........................... 43
Fig.9A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with 120 cycles of UV and a 4M solution of HNO3 (x2000)
............................................................................................................................................................... 44
ix
Abbreviations
CFRP – Carbon fibre reinforced plastic
XRD – X-ray diffraction
SEM – Scanning electronic microscopy
UV – Ultraviolet radiation
GC-MS – Gas chromatography mass spectrometry
PAN - Polyacrylonitrile
FTIR – Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
HATR – Horizontal attenuated total reflectance
1
1. Introduction
1.1. Introduction to Embraer
Created on August 19, 1969, Embraer - Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica, was a mixed capital
company under government control. With the support of the Brazilian Government, the Company
would transform science and technology into engineering and industrial capability. In addition to
starting the production of the Bandeirante, Embraer was commissioned by the Brazilian Government
to manufacture the EMB 326 Xavante, an advanced trainer and ground attack jet, under license of
Italian company Aermacchi.
By the end of the 70’s, the development of new products, such as the EMB 312 Tucano and the EMB
120 Brasilia, followed by the AMX program in cooperation with the companies Aeritalia (now Alenia)
and Aermacchi, allowed Embraer to reach a new technological and industrial level.
The entry into service of the new EMBRAER 170/190 family of commercial aviation in 2004, the
confirmation of Embraer’s definitive presence in the executive aviation market with the launch of new
products. Embraer is one of Brazil's largest exporters, working through three business units:
Commercial Aviation, Executive Aviation, and Defense & Security.
In 2008, Embraer announced the deployment of two new plants in Portugal, both based in the city of
Évora, east of Lisbon. The construction of the plants started in November 2010 and they were
inaugurated in September 2012. The units occupy 30 thousand cubic meters and are dedicated to
manufacture machined metal structures and composite material assemblies.
In November of 2012 Embraer’s composites factory in Évora completed its first shipset – a mostly
composite empennage for the Legacy 500 midsize twinjet. The Legacy 500 was the first Embraer
aircraft to feature a composite fuselage section.
The carbon fibre empennage was assembled in a semi-automatic line in one of two Embraer plants in
Évora, allowing for higher efficiency in operations such as drilling and joining primary
composite structures.[1]
2
1.2. Carbon Fibre
1.2.1. Synthesis
The synthesis process begins with a precursor. About 90% of the carbon fibres produced are
manufactured from polyacrylonitrile (PAN), the remaining 10% are manufactured from rayon or a
mesophase pitch.
A acrylonitrile plastic powder is mixed with another plastic, like methyl acrylate or methyl methacrylate,
and is reacted with a catalyst in a conventional suspension or solution polymerization process to form
a polyacrylonitrile plastic. The polymer is then spun into fibres. The spinning step is vital because the
internal atomic structure of the fibre is shaped during this process. The fibres are then washed and
stretched to the desired fibre diameter. The stretching helps align the molecules within the fibre and
provide the basis for the formation of the tightly bonded carbon crystals after carbonization.
The fibres are then heated in air to 200o-300
oC for 30-120 minutes. This allows the fibres to pick up
oxygen molecules from the air and rearrange their atomic bonding pattern, and thus becoming more
thermally stable.
Once the fibres are stabilized they need to be carbonized. This is accomplished by heating the fibres
to a temperature of about 1000o-3000
oC for several minutes in a furnace with an inert atmosphere. As
the fibres are heated, they begin to lose their non-carbon atoms, plus a few carbon atoms, in the form
of various gases including water vapour, ammonia, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen,
nitrogen, and others. As the non-carbon atoms are expelled, the remaining carbon atoms form tightly
bonded carbon crystals that are aligned more or less parallel to the long axis of the fibre.
After carbonizing, the fibres’ surface does not bond well with epoxies and other materials used in
composite materials. To give the fibres better bonding properties, the surface is slightly oxidized. The
surface treatment process must be carefully controlled to avoid forming tiny surface defects, such as
pits, which could cause fibre failure.
After the oxidation of the fibre surface, the fibres are coated to protect them from damage during
winding or weaving. This process is called sizing. Coating materials are chosen to be compatible with
the adhesive used to form composite materials. Typical coating materials include epoxy, polyester,
nylon, urethane, and others.[2, 3]
3
1.2.3. Properties
Depending upon the precursor to make the fibre, carbon fibre may be turbostratic or graphitic, or have
a hybrid structure with both graphitic and turbostratic parts present. In turbostratic carbon fibre the
sheets of carbon atoms are crumpled together. Carbon fibres derived from PAN are turbostratic,
whereas carbon fibres derived from mesophase pitch are graphitic after heat treatment at
temperatures exceeding 2200oC. Turbostratic carbon fibres tend to have high tensile strength,
whereas heat-treated mesophase-pitch-derived carbon fibres have high Young's modulus and
high thermal conductivity. In the table below it is shown some mechanical properties of some
commercial available fibre.[2]
Table 1 – Mechanical properties of commercial available carbon fibres
Type Manufacturer Model Tensile
Strength (MPa) Young's
Modulus (GPa)
PAN Hercules Inc.
(U.S.A.) AS-4 4000 235
PAN Torey Indust.
(Japan) T300 3530 230
PAN Amoco Corp.
(U.S.A.) Thornel T600 4160 241
PAN Torey Indust.
(Japan) T1000 7060 294
Rayon Amoco Corp.
(U.S.A.) Thornol 75 2520 517
Rayon Hitco
(U.S.A.) HMG 50 0.7 345
Pitch Osaka Gas
(Japan) Danacarb F140 1800 140
Pitch Kureha (Japan)
Kureca KCF100 900 38
4
1.3. Carbon Fibre composites
1.3.1. Properties
Carbon fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP) is an extremely strong and light fibre-reinforced polymer which
contains carbon fibres.
This composite can be very expensive to manufacture but it is very commonly used whenever a high
strength-to-weight ratio and rigidity is needed, for example, in aerospace, in the automotive industry, in
sports goods and in civil engineering.
Carbon fibre composites are composed by two parts: a matrix and a reinforcement. The matrix is,
usually, a resin (e.g., epoxy) to bind the reinforcements together. Carbon fibres are usually the
reinforcement, which gives the composite its strength and rigidity.
Despite its high strength-to-weight ratio, CFRP lacks a definable fatigue endurance limit, so it is
needed to be designed in considerable strength safety margins to provide suitable component
reliability over its service life.
The properties of a carbon fibre part are dependent on a number of factors. One important
consideration is knowing the direction of the property of interest. Unlike metals, carbon fibre, and
composites in general, are called anisotropic materials. That means the properties of the material
are directionally dependent. The strength of the carbon fibre is dependent on the orientation of the
fibre. On the other hand, metals, plastics, and most common materials have the same properties in
every direction. They are called isotropic materials.
In addition to being directionally dependent (anisotropic), there are many other factors in determining
the properties of carbon fibres composites. Some of the key factors are:
Type of carbon fibre and resin;
Fibre to resin ratio (fibre amount, fibre volume);
Fibre form - unidirectional, fabric, braid, chopped;
Fibre orientation - fibre layup design;
Quality - Uniformity of fibre distribution, voids, etc.
All of the factors above, or design options, are a unique advantage of carbon fibre and advanced
composite materials. A part using carbon fibre can be tailored and designed for a specific
application. The fibre type, fibre amount, fibre orientation, etc. can all be changed to achieve certain
properties, whether for mechanical reasons (strength, stiffness) or for other reasons, such as low CTE
(coefficient of thermal expansion). Metals and other materials do not have this tailor ability. For
example, on a metal part, the only thing that can be changed is the grade or alloy of metal and its
thickness or shape.
Because there are literally thousands of options when it comes to CFRPs, it is impossible to list and
explain all of the potential properties of CFRPs.[4]
5
1.3.2. Problematic
CFRP is lightweight and easier to manipulate into shapes than other materials, including various
metals, and it lasts longer than any other material. That is actually a great problem. Carbon fibre,
which at its most basic form is carbon graphite, will last virtually forever. The material is typically not
biodegradable or photo-degradable. The problem is made worse by the fact that unlike plastics,
aluminium and many other materials, CFRPs will not degrade, and it is extremely difficult to recycle.
There are, however, industries that have methods of recycling CFRPs, but the results are still
unsatisfactory.
When free of vinyl and other halogenated polymers, a pyrolysis can be used to recover the fibres.
Pyrolysis, the thermal decomposition of organic molecules in an inert atmosphere (e.g. N2), is one of
the most widespread recycling processes for CFRP. During this process, the CFRP is heated up
between 450oC to 700
oC in the (nearly) absence of oxygen; the polymeric matrix is volatilized into
lower weight molecules, while the CFs remain inert and are eventually recovered. The main
drawbacks of this method is that there is a possible deposition of char on the fibre surface and the
release of hazardous gases.[5, 6]
Solvolysis is another method for recovering carbon fibres. Using reactive solvents to break down
chemical bonds in thermoset resins, has been regarded as one of the most promising recycling
methods. Nitric acid is capable to decompose epoxy resin; however, quite long reaction time (100-400
h) and high concentration nitric acid (4-8 mol L-1
) makes this process difficult to handle. On the other
hand, monoethanolamine (MEA) titanium(IV) n-butoxide/diethyleneglycol (TBT/DEG) could also
enhance the solvolysis of epoxy resin, but the solubilisation efficiency is still unsatisfactory. Recently, it
is found that the solvolysis of thermosets using subcritical/supercritical fluids such as water, ethanol,
or propanol possesses high decomposition efficiency, but they must be carried out in high temperature
and pressures that require the use of expensive facilities.[6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]
Therefore, developing a new process with high efficiency under mild reaction conditions is of
considerable importance.
6
2. Bibliographic research
This thesis is based on the paper by Liu et al. (2004). Liu et al., through orthogonal experiments,
examined the recycling conditions for carbon fibres while varying the concentration of nitric acid (4M,
6M and 8M), the reaction temperature (70oC, 80
oC and 90
oC) and the weigh to volume of solution ratio
(2g:100mL, 4g:100mL and 6g:100mL). They concluded that the best combination was a
decomposition temperature at 90oC, a nitric acid solution concentration of 8M and a ratio of the
sample weight to the nitric acid solution volume of 4g:100mL. Gas chromatography-mass
spectrometry (GC-MS) and gel permeation chromatography (GPC) showed that the epoxy resin
decomposed to low molecular weight compounds, such as 2,4-dinitrophenol and 2-nitro-4-
carboxylphenol, and mechanical tests showed that the recovered fibres lost about 1.1% of single fibre
tension strength.[8]
Yang et al. (2012) verified that using poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)/NaOH is highly efficient at recycling
epoxy resins. They state that with 40mL of PEG-200, 0.8g of NaOH at 180oC for 50 minutes the epoxy
resin is completely dissolved. They conclude that the main reaction mechanism is a ester hydrolysis
accompanied by a transetherification process and the most plausible mechanism is as follows:
Fig. 1 – Plausible reaction mechanism for solubilisation of epoxy resin using PEG-200/NaOH
proposed by Yang et al (2012)
7
The exact solubilisation products were investigated using ESI-MS (electrospray ionization-mass
spectrometry) that mainly include:
Fig. 2 – Solubilisation product obtained by PEG-200/NaOH reaction proposed by Yang et al (2012)
Yang et al. also stated that the solubilisation rate in this process is better than the solubilisation rate
obtained by Gersifi et al. (2003).[11]
Gersifi et al. (2003) stated that the association of titanium (IV) n-butoxide with diethyleneglycol proved
effective in solubilising epoxy resins. The depolymerisation of the model matrix and the composite
waste are pushed to the monomer stage and are mainly constituted by esterdiols, tetraalcohols and
excess of glycol. It was also studied the solvolysis with monoethanolamine and it was observed that
the reaction is more effective but its products are solid. Characterization of the depolymerisation
products by NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) and MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted laser
desorption/ionization - time of flight mass spectrometer) has confirmed the reaction mechanism of
transesterification, similar to those observed by Yang et al. (2012), and the presence of other
alcoholysis side reactions.[7]
Palmer et al. (2009) and Pickering et al. (2006) used the mechanical recycling approach, which
involves breaking down the composite by shredding, crushing, milling or other similar mechanical
processes and segregating the resulting scrap pieces, by sieving, into powdered products (rich in resin)
and fibrous products (rich in fibres). These recycled composites are usually re-incorporated in new
composites, as filler or reinforcement, and used in construction industry, as fillers for asphalt or as
mineral sources for cement. However, this method reduces significantly the mechanical properties of
the fibres and limits the possibilities for re-manufacturing.[12, 13]
Meyer et al. (2009) used pyrolysis as a recycling method. During pyrolysis, the composite is heated up
to 450oC to 700
oC in an inert atmosphere. While the fibres are inert and are eventually recovered, the
resin is volatilized into lower weight molecules. These molecules, however, are environmentally
hazardous and there is a possible deposition of char on the fibre surface that can alter the properties
of the fibres.[5, 14]
Pinero-Hernanz et al. (2008) tried various supercritical fluids to dissolve the resin and obtained
interesting results. They recovered carbon fibres with virtually no mechanical degradation, especially
8
when using propanol, and recovered useful chemicals from the matrix. However this method is very
expensive to use in industry, because of the high temperature and the high pressure that is needed to
achieve the supercritical stage of a fluid.[9, 10]
Kumar et al. (2002) observed extensive erosion of the epoxy resin when CFRPs are exposed to
ultraviolet radiation and/or condensation. They concluded that matrix dominated properties are
affected the most, with the transverse tensile strength decreasing by 29% after only 1000 h of cyclic
exposure to UV radiation and condensation. While the longitudinal fibre-dominated properties are not
affected for the exposure durations investigated, it was noted that extensive matrix erosion would
ultimately limit effective load transfer to the reinforcing fibres and lead to the deterioration of
mechanical properties even along the fibre dominated material direction.[15]
Lee et al. (2011) proposed and adapted a circulating flow reactor to a recycling process for carbon
fibre from carbon fibre reinforced epoxy composite. Lee at al. proposed a recycling system that was
composed of hexahedral circulating flow reactor made of quartz, teflon supporter, acid resistance
pump and auxiliaries. They concluded that the circulating flow reactor most effectively recycled carbon
fibre at 12M of concentration of nitric acid aqueous solution, 90ºC of decomposition temperature, 1.8L
of nitric acid aqueous solution per 100g composite and 1.0cm/sec of linear flow rate of circulating
solution. They observed that the liquid phased decomposition product was a mixture of nitrated
compounds and the tensile strength loss of the recycled single carbon fibre was 2.91%.[16]
Feraboli et al. (2011) bathed the composites in boiling sulphuric acid to separate the fibres from the
resin. They observed that the recycled reinforcement consisted of long fibres arranged in a random,
entangled mat. Then, using the same epoxy matrix and infusion materials and process, they reutilized
the recycled fibres to manufacture solid laminates. They characterized the laminates, by means of
pulse-echo ultrasound, visual microscopy, fibre volume content and tested the mechanical properties
of the laminates, and concluded that the recycled panels show trends and traits similar to those of
advanced carbon fibre and that with further development efforts, it is possible to realign the recycled
long fibres and re-establish their original performance.[17]
Shi et al. (2012) recycled glass and carbon fibres using superheated steam. These fibres were then
surface treated for reuse as fibre-reinforced polymer composite. The treated fibres were characterized
by scanning electron microscopy and remanufactured by vacuum-assisted resin transfer moulding.
They observed that most residual resin impurities were removed by the surface treatment and that the
treatment did no adverse effect on bending strength. The mechanical properties of the treated
composites were determined and compared with those of recycled reinforced polymers. The bending
strengths of recycled reinforced polymers were very low, compared to that of virgin glass fibre-
reinforced polymer and that of virgin carbon fibre-reinforced polymer. The bending strength of treated
glass fibre polymer composites was improved to about 90% of that of the virgin glass fibre one, and
the bending strength of the treated carbon fibre polymer composites was improved to about 80% of
that of the virgin carbon fibre one.[18]
9
Akonda et al. (2011) used chopped recycled carbon fibres from Recycled Carbon Fibre Ltd., UK, to
produce yarns of comingled carbon fibre and polypropylene blended with matrix polypropylene staple
fibres using a modified carding and wrap spinning process. They observed with microscopic analysis
that more than 90% of the recycled carbon fibres were aligned along the yarn axis and thermoplastic
composite test specimens fabricated from the wrap-spun yarns had 15–27.7% recycled carbon fibre
volume content. They also observed that similar to the yarn, greater than 90% of the recycled carbon
fibres comprising each composite sample made, showed a parallel alignment with the axis of the test
specimens. The mechanical tests showed that the average values obtained for tensile, and flexural
strengths were 160 MPa and 154 MPa, respectively for composite specimens containing 27.7%
recycled carbon fibres by volume. Akonda et al. concluded that with such mechanical properties,
thermoplastic composites made from recycled carbon fibres could be used as low cost materials for
many non-structural applications.[19]
McNally et al. (2007) used reclaimed carbon fibres obtained from the CARBON-CLEAN® technology,
a thermochemical process that recovers 95% of the CF, to manufacture a composite with polyethylene.
The morphology of the composites and the degree of dispersion of the carbon fibres in the matrix was
examined using scanning electron microscopy, and revealed the carbon fibres to be highly dispersed
at all loadings and strong interfacial adhesion to exist between the carbon fibres and the matrix.
Raman and FTIR spectroscopy were used to characterize the surface chemistry and potential bonding
sites of recycled carbon fibres. They observed that both the Young’s modulus and ultimate tensile
stress increased with increasing carbon fibre loading, but the percentage stress at break was
unchanged up to 5 wt % loading, then decreased with further successive addition of carbon fibres.[20]
McNally et al. (2007) concluded that carbon fibres reclaimed from carbon fibre filled epoxy prepregs
can be readily melt blended with polyethylene, the carbon fibre was highly dispersed in the matrix at
all loadings and that the Young’s modulus and tensile strength of the composites increased by 180
and 27.5%, respectively, with increasing carbon fibre loading, suggesting that some degree of
interfacial adhesion is present between the carbon fibre and polyethylene. They also concluded that
good interfacial adhesion and wetting between polyethylene and the recycled carbon fibres is possible,
in part, due to the presence of polar functional groups, observed in the FTIR spectrum of this carbon
fibre, along the length of the carbon fibre.[20]
Dannenhauer et al. (2003) proposed a process for recycling composite materials that comprise fibres
and a matrix by exposing the composite material to electromagnetic waves in the form of microwaves.
The electromagnetic waves induce an introduction of energy into the composite material, leading to a
separation of the fibres and the matrix. This method is assisted by suitable solvent, and this solvent
has to be polar. The fibres and the solvent are put in a TEFLON® container and put inside a
microwave oven with a frequency used between 300 MHz and 300 GHz. They observed that the resin
was completely removed from the fibres.[21]
Adam et al. (2014) proposed a method of extracting and recycling carbon fibres with furan-2-
carbaldehyde. This method consists in bathing the composite in the solvent and a swelling agent at a
10
temperature between 50oC and 90
oC during about 1 hour to 24 hours. It was observed that the matrix
was removed and that can be reutilized, and that the fibres were reusable as well.[22]
11
3. Experimental method
The method chosen in this work was the solvolysis approach[7]
. In this case, different concentrations of
nitric acid were used in different weight to volume ratios and with different UV light treatments.[15]
The UV light treatment simulates the environmental conditions so that we can study the effect of the
natural degradation that the carbon fibres suffer over time and the effect it has on the nitric acid
treatment. This treatment was performed in a POL-EKO Apartura UVB oven. Each cycle is composed
by three steps:
Heating to 30oC and stabilization at that temperature for 30 minutes;
Heating to 60oC and stabilization at that temperature and at 60% humidity for 2 hours and 30
minutes;
Cooling to 25oC and returning to 0% humidity and stabilizing at that temperature for 30
minutes.
The method is carried out in a glass vessel with a magnetic agitator, at 95oC for 12 hours with a 250ml
of a nitric acid solution. The nitric acid solutions were made with a Panreac nitric acid at 65% (w/w).
Fig. 3 – Glass vessel with a solution of nitric acid and samples of CFRP
Various experiments were carried out to optimize the method. The variables that were altered during
the optimization process are:
The concentration of nitric acid solution;
The mass of composite to volume of acid ratio;
12
The number of cycles of the UV treatment.
The following table describes the specific conditions of each experiment.
Table 2 – Conditions of each experiment
[HNO3] (M) α (g of composite/100mL of solution) UVB cycles
Experiment 1 4 4 0
Experiment 2 4 2 0
Experiment 3 6 2 0
Experiment 4 4 2 120
Experiment 5 4 2 249
Experiment 6 2 2 309
Experiment 7 8 6 0
During the experiments, some changes were observed. At 10 minutes into the reaction, the liquid
solution started showing a light yellow colour. At 30 minutes into to the reaction, the solution is bright
yellow shows signs that the viscosity rises. At approximately 1h30 min. the first loose fibres are
starting to show in the liquid, and at approximately 4 hours most of the fibres appear loose from the
matrix.
After the 12 hour reaction is over, the mixture is cooled to room temperature and then is filtered. The
fibres are then washed with running water. When the water washing the fibres is no longer coming out
yellow, the fibres are considered clean and then they dried in a stove at 120oC for two days. After this
the fibres were characterized.
13
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Results
After the experiments, the recovered carbon fibres were submitted to various tests so that it was
possible to characterize this fibres and the polymer that was in the liquid residue.
The fibres were submitted to x-ray diffraction (XRD) (Fig. 4), scanning electronic microscopy (SEM)
(Fig. 5-9), mechanical tests (Table 4-6), Raman spectroscopy (Fig. 12-14; Table 7), thermogravimetry
analysis (Fig. 15-17; Table 8 and 9) and infrared spectroscopy (Fig. 18-20).
4.1.1. X-Ray Diffraction
The fibres were analysed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with a Philips PW3020, at room temperature,
using Cu Kα radiation (λ= 1.541874 Å) generated at 40 kV and 30 mA, in the range (2θ) 10 to 35o, with
a step of 3 o/min. with an aluminium support. The results are shown bellow in Fig. 4.
The X-ray diffractogram is used to test the structure of CFs as shown in Fig. 4. The detailed data are
listed in Table 3.
It is seen that a strong peak ((002) plane) exists at approximately 2θ = 25.5o. The interlayer spacing
(d002) and apparent crystallite thickness (Lc) derived from (002) reflection are also used as an
experimental parameter to assess the structural properties of the CF’s Layers of the stacked crystallite
are used to measure the degree of graphitization of CF determined by Lc/d002. [23, 24]
The value of d002 was calculated using Bragg’s law (1), and the crystallite size Lc was calculated using
Scherrer’s formula (2):
λ
θ
λ
θ
Where θ is the scattering angle, λ is the wavelength of the X-rays used (1.541874 Å), and is the full
width at half maximum intensity (FWHM). The form factor K is 0.9.[23, 24]
(1)
(2)
14
Fig. 4 – XRD of carbon fibres with different treatments
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
10 15 20 25 30 35
Inte
nsi
ty
2θ(o)
C epoxi
C.F. 4M 2α
C.F. 4M 2α 249UV
C.F. 6M 2α
C.F. 4M 4α
Virgin Fiber
V. F. Pretreatment
15
Table 3 – XRD results of CFs treated under different reaction conditions
Sample β (o) 2θ(o) Lc (nm) d002 (nm) Lc/d002
Virgin fibres 4.83 26.5 1.7 0.34 5.00
V.F. Pre-treatment 5.41 25.6 1.5 0.35 4.28
C. epoxy 4.13 25.4 2.0 0.35 5.71
C.F. 4M 2α 5.92 25.9 1.5 0.34 4.41
C.F. 4M UV249 2α 5.39 25.7 1.5 0.35 4.28
C.F. 4M 4α 5.04 26.2 1.6 0.34 4.70
C.F. 6M 2α 5.56 25.7 1.5 0.35 4.28
16
4.1.2. Scanning Electronic Microscopy
The surface images of the carbon fibres were obtained with a JEOL 7001F Field Emission Scanning
Electron Microscope (FEG-SEM) in secondary and back-scattered electron modes. A thin layer of
chromium (~ 15 nm) was deposited on the surface of the films in order to minimize charging effects.
Firstly the composite was analyzed and was observed some alignment of the fibres and the matrix is
clearly shown in Fig. 5.
Fig.5 – SEM image of Carbon fibre composite (x1500)
Afterwards the fibres that were recovered from the various experiments were also analyzed.
There is signs of polymer left (white spots in the fibres) and the scales that appear in the fibres show
that the fibres were damaged during the polymeric matrix removal processes.
17
Fig.6 - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with a 4M solution of HNO3 and 2α (x 1500)
Fig.7 - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with a 4M solution of HNO3 and 2α (x4000)
18
Fig.8- SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with 120 cycles of UV, a 4M solution of HNO3 and 2α (x3000)
After all the fibres were analysed, the diameter of the fibres was measured (fig. 9)
Fig.9- SEM image of Carbon fibre with the diameter measured
As shown in the image above, the diameter measured is approximately 5.5 µm and is assumed that
this diameter is the same among all of the recovered fibres.
19
4.1.3. Mechanical Tests
A Instron 5566 with 10N claws was used to do the mechanical tests on the fibres.
Due to limitations of the machine, it was only possible to test fibres which were 5 centimetres long or
more.
Firstly the carbon fibres were glued to a card specimen holder (Fig. 10). Then these specimens were
placed in the equipment and underwent a strain test. The samples were subjected with a 0.08 mm/s
extension, with a 0.1s step, until the sample was broken, at the same time the tension exerted on the
sample was recorded. The results are exemplified in the image below (Fig. 11).
Fig.10- Card specimen holder with a sample of recovered carbon fibre
Fig.11- Mechanical test result of a specimen of carbon fibre
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
0 0,5 1 1,5
Load
(N
)
Extension (mm)
CF 4M 2α test 4
20
After all the specimens were tested, it estimated the number of fibres in all the specimen holders so
that it was possible to calculate the Young’s modulus and the ultimate tensile strength of a single
carbon fibre.
The ultimate tensile strength corresponded with the maximum load value and the Young’s modulus
corresponded with the slope in the Tensile vs Axial Extension chart.
The values of the ultimate tensile strength and the Young’s modulus are displayed below in the tables
4 through 6 . The values that are strickenthrough were not considered for the calculation of the
average.
Table 4 – Mechanical properties of the 4M 2α sample
Sample Tensile strength
(Mpa) Young's Modulus
(Gpa)
1 3297 76
2 3173 156
3 3213 138
4 3190 154
5 3166 151
6 3138 149
7 3157 146
8 3180 135
9 3167 168
10 3200 151
Average 3176 150
Table 5 – Mechanical properties of the 4M 4α sample
Sample Tensile strength
(Mpa) Young's Modulus
(Gpa)
1 4188 189
2 4293 129
3 5051 111
4 5472 70
5 4642 142
6 4183 190
7 4546 235
8 4420 195
9 4798 135
10 4098 212
Average 4569 161
21
Table 6 – Mechanical properties of the 6M 2α sample
Sample Tensile strength
(Mpa) Young's Modulus
(Gpa)
1 4510 196
2 4525 313
3 4299 249
4 4198 219
5 4156 170
6 4191 200
7 4162 187
8 4339 212
9 4359 233
10 4341 226
Average 4308 221
22
4.1.4. Raman Spectroscopy
The Raman spectra were recorded with a Labram HR 800 Evolution micro-Raman spectrometer
(Horiba Jobin– Yvon), using a 532 nm diode laser for excitation and a 600 grove/mm grating. The
laser power on the samples was 10 mW and the data were collected in the range of 100 - 3500 cm-1
at
a resolution of 4 cm-1
.
Raman spectrogram combines a prominent surface selectivity with an exceptional sensitivity to the
degree of structural disorder. Carbon mainly shows two peaks in the first order (1000–2000cm-1
). One
near 1580cm-1
is corresponding to an ideal graphitic lattice called G band while the other near
1360cm-1
is the characteristic peak of sp3 state of C called D band which is due to the existence of
structural disorder.[23, 24, 25, 26]
Table 7 – Raman results of CFs treated under different reaction conditions
Sample Raman
Shift (cm-1)
Area (x10-5) ID/IG
CF 2M 2α 1347 6.8
2.08 1582 3.3
CF 4M 2α 1350 5.1
1.33 1580 3.8
CF 4M 120UV 2α 1348 6.4
1.30 1576 4.9
CF 4M 4α 1359 5.8
1.18 1583 4.9
CF 6M 2α 1347 9.0
1.35 1571 6.6
CF 8M 6α 1358 7.3
1.32 1576 5.5
Virgin Fibre 1345 5.5
1.32 1569 4.1
V. F. Pre-Treatment
1342 7.1 1.20
1574 5.9
After the Raman spectra were obtained, it was used the Kubelka-Munk function to aid in the analysis
of the spectra, and the results are shown in Fig. 13 and Fig. 14.
The D to G band integrated intensity ratio (ID/IG) is a parameter to quantify the degree of disorder.
Usually, the smaller value of ID/IG indicates the higher degree of graphitization of the CF’s.[23, 24, 25, 26]
23
Fig.12 – Raman spectra of the carbon fibres
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Inte
nsi
ty [
a.u
.]
Wavenumbers [1/cm]
CF 2M
CF 4M UV 120
CF 4M
CF 4M 4alfa
CF 6M
CF 8M
Virgin CF
V. F. Pre-treatment
2α
2α
2α
4α
2α
6α
24
Fig.13- Kubelka-Munk Raman Spectra of the carbon fibres
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Inte
nsi
ty (
a.u
.)
Wavenumbers [1/cm]
CF 2M 2α 309UV
CF 4M 2α 120UV
CF 4M 2α
CF 4M 4α
CF 6M 2α
CF 8M 6α
25
Fig.14- Raman Spectra of the composite and of a polymer residue
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Inte
nsi
ty (
a.u
.)
Wavenumbers [1/cm]
Composite
CF 8M poly
26
4.1.5. Thermogravimetry
The carbon fiber samples were characterized by thermogravimetry (Netzsch STA 409 PC equipment),
under air, to evaluate the thermal stability after the recuperation process .The fibres were heated from
30oC to 1100
oC at 30
oC/min using alumina crucibles. The DTG profiles, the weight losses and the
degradation temperatures of the carbon fibres were computed using the equipment software (Table 8
and 9; Fig. 15, 16 and 17).
Some samples were analyzed twice, one test with the fibres showing less polymer (A) and one test in
which the polymer was not totally removed from the fibre (B).
Table 8 – Degradation temperatures of the carbon fibres
Sample Degradation Temperature (oC)
Virgin CF 767
CF 4M 4α 650
CF 4M 120UV 2α A 704
CF 4M 120UV 2α B 754
CF 8M 6α A 638
CF 8M 6α B 654
The degradation temperature of the composite was also calculated. The composite starts
decomposing at 399,7oC.
Table 9 – Residual mass after TGA analysis
Sample Residual mass (%)
Virgin CF 86.5
CF 4M 4α 74.3
CF 4M 120UV 2α A 68.0
CF 4M 120UV 2α B 68.0
CF 8M 6α A 78.1
CF 8M 6α B 79.7
Composite 55.9
27
Fig.15- Thermogravimetric analysis spectra of the recuperated carbon fibres
50
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Weig
ht (%
)
Temperature (oC)
CF 4M 4α
Composite
CF 4M 2α 120UV A
CF 4M 2α 120UV B
CF 8M 6α A
CF 8M 6α B
Virgin CF
28
Fig.16- DTG spectra of the recuperated carbon fibres
-6,00E+00
-5,00E+00
-4,00E+00
-3,00E+00
-2,00E+00
-1,00E+00
0,00E+00
1,00E+00
-2,00E+00
-1,50E+00
-1,00E+00
-5,00E-01
0,00E+00
5,00E-01
1,00E+00
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
CF 4M 4α
CF 4M 2α 120UV A
CF 8M 6α A
CF 8M 6α B
Virgin CF
Composite
29
Fig.17- Comparison of the degradation temperature of a sample of recuperated carbon fibre with the virgin carbon fibre
Virgin CF
CF 4M 4α
30
4.1.6. Infrared Spectroscopy
The recycled carbon fibers were characterized by HATR-FTIR spectroscopy. The spectra in mid
infrared wave numbers range (4000-600 cm-1
) were collected with a resolution of 16 cm− 1,
using a FT-
MIR equipment from BOMEN (FTLA2000-100, ABB) with a DTGS detector. A horizontal total
attenuated reflection accessory (HATR), from PIKE Technologies, with a ZnSe crystal was used.
Sixty-four scans were accumulated for each spectrum to obtain an acceptable signal-to-noise ratio.
Furthermore, the spectra were recorded in duplicate for each sample and the average of the two
measurements was used.
The FTIR spectre of a virgin carbon fibre doesn’t show any bands, so any bands showing in a
recovered carbon fibre FTIR spectre is proof of organic residue of the epoxy resin left over from the
recovery process. The FTIR spectra are shown in the Fig. 18-20.
31
Fig.18- Infrared adsorption spectra of the carbon fibres (virgin and recuperated)
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
800 1300 1800 2300 2800
Ab
sorb
ance
Wavenumbers [1/cm]
CF 4M 4α
CF 6M 2α
CF 8M 6α
CF 8M 6α Poly
CF 2M 2α 309UV
CF 4M 2α
CF 4M 2α 120UV
Virgin CF
32
Fig.19- Infrared adsorption spectra of the carbon fibres (virgin and recuperated) between 2250 cm-1
and 2500 cm-1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500
Ab
sorb
ance
Wavenumbers [1/cm]
CF 4M 4α
CF 6M 2α
CF 8M 6α
CF 8M 6α Poly
CF 2M 2α 309UV
CF 4M 2α
CF 4M 2α 120UV
Virgin CF
33
Fig.20- Infrared adsorption spectra of the carbon fibres (virgin and recuperated) between 800 cm-1
and 1800 cm-1
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
Ab
sorb
ance
Wavenumbers [1/cm]
CF 4M 4α
CF 6M 2α
CF 8M 6α
CF 8M 6α Poly
CF 2M 2α 309UV
CF 4M 2α
CF 4M 2α 120UV
Virgin CF
34
4.2. Discussion of the results
The FTIR spectra shows the organic residue in the fibres, as well as evidence of CO2 adsorbed in the
fibres. Generally, the recovered carbon fibres show adsorption bands around 2900 cm-1
and 1700 cm-1
which are derived from carboxylic acid and carbonyl functionality respectively. These groups are
formed due to the degradation of the epoxy resin during the recovery process[20]
.
The adsorption band present in all the recuperated fibres at around 2350 cm-1
corresponds to the CO2
adsorbed. Generally, the longer the UV treatment, the value of the CO2 adsorbed in the fibres is higher.
This adsorption band can also correspond to the C-N triple bond resulting from the nitric acid attack on
the epoxy resin[9]
.
Some fibres show an adsorption band at around 850 cm-1
, which represents evidence of epoxy
groups[9]
.
The TGA analysis shows that the fibres treated with UV lose more mass than the fibres which are not
treated with UV, however, they show more thermal stability than the other recuperated fibres. This
may be because, during the UV treatment, the graphite crystallises thus increasing the resistance to
the oxidation process.
Comparing the weight loss of the recovered fibres and the virgin fibres, it is shown that all the
recovered fibres have a higher weight loss, this is because all of the recovered fibres have a lower
thermal stability in comparison with the virgin fibres.
All the samples analyzed in the Raman show a D to G band integrated intensity ratio similar to the
virgin carbon fibres, except the samples recovered with the two treatments of 2M concentration of
nitric acid and with 309 cycles of UV treatment, which shows a higher ratio, indicating a lower degree
of graphitization. The sample recovered with the treatment of 4M concentration of nitric acid and an
alpha of 4 shows the lowest integrated ratio, which indicates a higher degree of graphitization. The
Raman results of this fibre show that it has less damage and less residue to the surface[27]
.
Comparing the Raman of the virgin fibres and the virgin fibres with a thermal pre-treatment, it is shown
that the fibres with the treatment show a higher degree of graphitization, thus the treatment is shown
to increase the strength of the carbon fibre. The recovered fibre which was treated with a 4M solution
of nitric acid and an alpha of 4 has a similar integrated intensity ratio in comparison to the virgin fibre
with the thermal pre-treatment, this tells us that the degree of graphitization is similar to the virgin fibre
with the thermal pre-treatment.
XRD spectra were also used to test the structure of CFs. The detailed data are listed in Table 3. It is
seen that a strong peak ((002) plane) exists at a 2θ = 25.5o. It is found that the layers of the stacked
crystallite of the recovered CFs are comparable with the virgin ones. It reveals that the recovered CFs
retains high degree of graphitization of the virgin CFs. These results indicate that the structure of CFs
is damaged slightly during the recycling process. Combining the SEM, Raman and XRD results, it is
35
believed that the structure of CFs is not damaged dramatically, and this can be testified by the tensile
strength[27]
.
The mechanical tests show that all the samples are in the gamma of the tabulated values for virgin
fibres and the fibres treated with 4M of nitric acid and an alpha of 4 have a higher ultimate tensile
strength. This result backs up the conclusions of the XRD and the Raman, however the sample
treated with the 6M of nitric acid shows a higher Young’s modulus.
In the SEM images the results back up the previous conclusions; the more UV cycles used, the more
resin is removed. But the SEM images also show that the more cycles used, the more damage the
fibres suffer. It also shows that, the more concentrated the solution, more resin is removed and more
damage appears on the fibres.
Without the UV treatment, the fibres treated with the 4M solution show less damage on the surface
than those treated with the 6M and 8M solutions, and the loss of resin is almost the same.
With the UV treatment, the fibres treated with 309 cycles of UV light, even though they were treated
with a 2M solution, show a lot more damage than those with less cycles and a 4M solution.
36
5. Conclusions and Future Work
5.1. Conclusions
An experimental investigation was conducted to recover carbon fibres from a epoxy resin. Specimens
of carbon fibre reinforced plastic were subjected to four different concentrations of nitric acid, three
different treatments of UV cycles and three different initial weights of composite. The recovered fibres
were then physically, chemically and mechanically characterized.
From the SEM images, it was concluded that the UV treatments help in the removal of the epoxy resin,
but it also damages the carbon fibres. Also, it was shown that higher concentrations of nitric acid
damages the carbon fibres and the effectiveness of the removal of the epoxy resin does not justify the
usage of such high concentrations.
From the FTIR results, it was observed that all the recovered carbon fibres contain residues of the
epoxy resin, but the treatment with a concentration of 4M of nitric acid and 4α and the treatment with a
concentration of 6M of nitric acid and 2α were the more effective treatments in the removal of the
epoxy resin.
From the Raman and the XRD results it was concluded that the recuperated carbon fibres do not lose
much of their graphitization degree, which means that there was practically no significant damage to
the surface of the carbon fibres. The treatments with the best results were the fibres treated with a
concentration of 4M of nitric acid and 4α.
From the mechanical tests it was concluded that the recuperated carbon fibres maintain their tensile
strength, comparing it with tabulated values. The recuperated carbon fibre with the highest tensile
strength was treated with a concentration of 4M of nitric acid and 4α.
From the TGA analysis it was shown that the recuperated carbon fibres lose some of their thermal
stability and that the carbon fibres treated with the UV lights have a higher thermal stability due to the
crystallization of the graphite.
In conclusion, it is possible to recuperate carbon fibres from an epoxy resin with nitric acid and that the
best concentrations of nitric acid are between 4M and 6M, the best α is between 2 and 4 and that the
UVB light treatment is helpful in removing the epoxy resin, but too much exposure can damage the
carbon fibres.
37
5.2. Future Work
Despite the advances made in this thesis, the continuation of this project is necessary. There are still
many ways to develop and improve, such as those shown hereinafter.
Obtain the tensile strength of all recuperated carbon fibres, so that it is possible to ascertain which is
the better treatment option.
The comparison of the mechanical tests with virgin fibres is invaluable, so that we can see if there is a
significantly loss of strength in the recovery methods.
Analyzing the liquid residue is important, so that we can see if it is possible to reuse the polymer.
Optimize the number of UV cycles. It was shown that the UV treatment helps in the removal of the
resin, but it also damages the fibres. With the optimization it will be possible to minimize the damage
of the fibres and obtain good results in the removal of the resin.
A alternative to nitric acid was encountered during this thesis. The use of polyethylene glycol with
sodium hydroxide shows some promise and a comparison of methods could prove interesting if this
method is capable of recovering the carbon fibres.
The energy costs are important to the industry, so it is needed to see if these methods are too energy
consuming and it is needed to choose the best method with the lowest energy cost.
The scale up of the best method to a pilot scale is the most important improvement that is needed to
approach, since is the last step before introducing it to the industry and there is still variables that were
not approached in this thesis, such as pumps, heat exchangers and the materials to use in all the
pipes and reactor at full scale.
38
Bibliography
[1] Web page of Ebraer: www.embraer.com consulted in June 2014.
[2] Donnet, J. B., Carbon Fibers, CRC-Press, 1998.
[3] Huang, X., Fabrication and Properties of Carbon Fibers, Materials (2009); 2: 2369-2403.
[4] Corum, J. M., Battiste, R. L., Liu, K. C., Ruggles, M. B., Basic properties of reference crossply
carbon-fiber composite N. p., (2001). Web. doi:10.2172/777662.
[5] Meyer, L.O., Schulte, K., Grove-Nielsen, E., Optimisation of a pyrolysis process for recycling of
CFRP's, in: ICCM-16, Japan Society for Composite Materials (2007), Kyoto, Japan.
[6] Pimenta S, Pinho ST., Recycling carbon fibre reinforced polymers for structural applications:
technology review and market outlook. Waste Management (2011); 31: 378-392.
[7] Gersifi, K. E., Destais-Orvoën N., Durand G., Tersac G., Glycolysis of epoxide-amine hardened
networks. I. Diglycidylether/aliphatic amines model networks, Polymer (2003); 44: 3795–3801.
[8] Liu, Y.Y., Meng, L.H., Huang, Y.D., Du, J.J., Recycling of carbon/epoxy composites. J. Appl. Polym.
Sci.(2004); 94: 1912-1916.
[9] Pinero-Hernanz, R., Garcia-Serna, J., Dodds, C., Hyde, J., Poliakoff, M., Cocero, M.J., Kingman, S.,
Pickering, S., Lester, E.,. Chemical recycling of carbon fibre composites using alcohols under
subcritical and supercritical conditions. Journal Supercritical Fluids (2008); 46: 83-92.
[10] Pinero-Hernanz, R., Dodds, C., Hyde, J., Garcia-Serna, J., Poliakoff, M., Lester, E., Cocero, M.J.,
Kingman, S., Pickering, S., Wong, K.H., Chemical recycling of carbon fibre reinforced composites in
nearcritical and supercritical water. Composites: Part A (2008); 39: 454-461.
[11] Yang, P., Zhou, Q., Yuan, X., Kasteren, J.M.N., Wang, Y., Highly efficient solvolysis of epoxy
resin using poly(ethylene glycol)/NaOH systems. Polymer Degradation Stabilisation (2012); 97: 1101-
1106.
[12] Palmer, J., Ghita, O.R., Savage, L., Evans, K.E., Successful closed-loop recycling of thermoset
composites. Composites: Part A (2009); 40: 490-498.
[13] Pickering, S.J., Recycling technologies for thermoset composite materials - current status.
Composites: Part A (2006); 37: 1206-1215.
[14] Meyer, L.O., Schulte, K., Grove-Nielsen, E., CFRP-Recycling Following a Pyrolysis Route:
Process Optimization and Potential, Journal of Composite Materials (2009); 43: 1121-1132.
[15] Kumar B. G., Singh R. P., Nakamura T., Degradation of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites
by ultraviolet radiation and condensation, Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 36, No. 24/2002.
39
[16] Lee S. H., Choi H. O., Kim J. S., Lee C. K., Kim Y. K., Ju C. S., Circulating flow reactor for
recycling of carbon fiber from carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composite, Korean J. Chem. Eng. (2011);
28(1): 449-454.
[17] Feraboli, P., Kawakami, H., Wade, B., Gasco, F., DeOto, L., Masini, A., Recyclability and
reutilization of carbon fiber fabric/epoxy composites. Journal of Composite Materials (2011).
[18] Shi, J., Bao, L., Kobayashi, R., Kato, J., Kemmochi, K., Reusing recycled fibers in high-value
fiber-reinforced polymer composites: Improving bending strength by surface cleaning, Composites
Science and Technology (2012); 72(11):1298-1303.
[19] Akonda, M.H., Lawrence, C.A., Weager, B.M., Recycled carbon fibre-reinforced polypropylene
thermoplastic composites, Composites: Part A (2012); 43: 79-86.
[20] McNally, T., Boyd, P., McClory, C. , Bien, D., Moore, I., Millar, B., Davidson, J., Carroll T.,
Recycled carbon fiber filled polyethylene composites, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, (2007); 107:
2015-2021.
[21] Dannenhauer, F., Grundig, P., Sailer, M.T., Process for recycling fiber composite materials,
Patent Nº.: US 6537341 B2 (2003).
[22] Adam, G. A., Recycling carbon fibers from epoxy using solvent cracking, Patent Nº.: US
2014/0023581 A1 (2014).
[23] Zhang, S., Cui, Y., Wu, B., Song, R., Zhou, H. S. J., Chen, X., Liua, J., Cao, L., Control of
graphitization degree and defects of carbon blacks through ball-milling, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 505.
[24] Li, D., Wang, H., Wang, X., Effect of microstructure on the modulus of PAN-based carbon fibers
during high temperature treatment and hot stretching graphitization, J Mater Sci (2007) 42:4642–4649.
[25] Lobo, A. O., Martin, A. A., Antunes, E. F., Trava-Airoldi, V. J., Corat, E. J., Caracterização de
materiais carbonosos por espectroscopia raman, INPE ePrint: sid.inpe.br/yolanda/2004/12.08.13.44
v1 2004-12-09.
[26] Chaudhuri, S. N., Chaudhuri, R. A., Benner, R. E., Penugonda, M. S., Raman spectroscopy for
characterization of interfacial debonds between carbon fibers and polymer matrices, Composite
Structures 76 (2006) 375–387.
[27] Xu, P., Li, J., Ding, J., Chemical recycling of carbon fibre/epoxy composites in a mixed solution of
peroxide hydrogen and N,N-dimethylformamide, Composites Science and Technology 82 (2013) 54–
59.
40
Appendix A – SEM Images
Fig.1A - SEM image of Carbon fibre composite (x4000)
Fig.2A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with a 6M solution of HNO3 and 2α (x1500)
41
Fig.3A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with a 6M solution of HNO3 and 2α (x2000)
Fig.4A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with 309 cycles of UV, a 2M solution of HNO3 and 2α
(x1500)
42
Fig.5A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with 309 cycles of UV, a 2M solution of HNO3 and 2α
(x4000)
Fig.6A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with 249 cycles of UV, a 4M solution of HNO3 and 2α
(x1500)
43
Fig.7A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with a 8M solution of HNO3 and 6α (x1000)
Fig.8A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated a 4M solution of HNO3 and 2α (x2000)
44
Fig.9A - SEM image of Carbon fibre treated with 120 cycles of UV and a 4M solution of HNO3 (x2000)