reducing climate change

18
www.winrock.org Reducing Climate Change and Water Quality Impacts from Grain Production on Maryland's Eastern Shore Jon Winsten, Tom Fisher, Rebecca Fox, Anne Gustafson, Jim Lewis, Neville Millar

Upload: soil-and-water-conservation-society

Post on 20-Jun-2015

31 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Reducing Climate Change and Water Quality Impacts from Grain Production on Maryland's Eastern Shore

Jon Winsten, Tom Fisher, Rebecca Fox, Anne Gustafson, Jim Lewis, Neville Millar

Page 2: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Background• Crucial issues: Climate change and water quality • Nitrous oxide (N2O) has 310 times the radiative

forcing of carbon dioxide (CO2) • N2O is 7% of U.S. GHG emissions

– 73% is from agriculture • Agriculture is the leading source NPS pollution

to ground and surface waters in the U.S.

Page 3: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Background• Feeding 9 billion people by 2050.• Regulations decrease productivity and increase

costs.• Environmental markets provide prices for

“externalities” and can result in efficient outcomes.

Page 4: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Choptank River Watershed

Page 5: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Research Site

Page 6: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Research Treatments• Winter cover crops• Reduced N rate (80% of UMD recommendations)• Conservation rotation

– 80% N rate on corn – 80% N rate on winter wheat– Soybeans– Barley cover crop

Page 7: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Nitrous Oxide Sampling

Page 8: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Nitrous Oxide Sampling

Page 9: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Water Quality Sampling

Page 10: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Water Quality Sampling

Page 11: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Nitrous Oxide Sampling ScheduleTreatment: 80% N on Corn

date purpose20130129 winter fluxes

20130225 winter fluxes

20130408 spring fluxes prior to biosolids

20130513 3 days after biosolids

20130517 7 days after biosolids

20130530 7 days after planting corn, starter

20130614 10 days prior to side-dress

20130627 3 days after side-dress

20130702 8 days after side-dress

20130709 15 days after side-dress

20130828 2 weeks prior to harvest

20131007 3 weeks following harvest

20131106 7 weeks following harvest

Page 12: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Nitrous Oxide Sampling

Page 13: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Results: Winter Cover Cropping

22 3.7lbs N acre-1 (Nov-Mar)

36 32lbs N acre-1 (Dec-Mar)

Page 14: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Results: Reduced N Rate

45 29lbs N acre-1 (Nov-Mar)

32 30lbs N acre-1 (Dec-Mar)

Page 15: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Costs and Revenues

• Cover Crops– Potential Revenues

• Conservation payment: $70/ac• Carbon credits: 1MT CO2e/ac @ $10/MT = $10/ac• WQ credits: 10 lbs N/ac @ $5/lb = $50/ac

– Costs• Seed: $40/ac• Planting: $8/ac• Herbicide: $14/ac

– Profit = $130 - $62 = $68

Page 16: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Costs and Revenues

• 80% N Rate– Potential Revenues

• Carbon credits: 0.2MT CO2e/ac @ $10/MT = $2/ac• WQ credits: 8 lbs N/ac @ $5/lb = $40/ac

– Costs• Fertilizer: saved 40lbs N/ac @ $0.52/lb N = -$20.80• Yield loss: 30 bushels/ac @ $3.75/bu = $112.50

– Profit = $42 - $91.70 = $-49.70

Page 17: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Initial Conclusions

– Dry Year:• Cover crops reduced fall N2O fluxes winter/spring

tile drain NO3

• Reduced N rate reduced N2O and NO3 and did not affect yields

– Wet Year:• Cover crops did not reduce N2O, but did reduce

NO3• Reduced N rate lowered yields and had minimal

effect on N2O and NO3

Page 18: Reducing climate change

www.winrock.org

Future Work

– Use measurement data to cal/val simulation models

– Use models to estimate impacts for farmers in Eastern Shore region

– Facilitate farmers’ transactions in environmental markets