remote sensing, rocks and soils

61
Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Upload: dalmar

Post on 16-Jan-2016

35 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils. Prospecting and Exploration. What we’re looking for is subtle Most rocks, even the most favorable, do not have extractable resources 1% of mineral occurrences are worth detailed study 1% of those are worth drilling 1% of those are worth mining. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Page 2: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Prospecting and Exploration• What we’re looking for is subtle• Most rocks, even the most favorable, do

not have extractable resources• 1% of mineral occurrences are worth

detailed study• 1% of those are worth drilling• 1% of those are worth mining

Page 3: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Geologic Map of

Wisconsin

Page 4: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Gravity Map of

Wisconsin

Page 5: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Gravity• Mean value about 9.8 m/sec2 = 1 g• About 0.5% smaller at equator than poles• Map unit = gal (for Galileo) = 1 cm/sec2

• Mean gravity = 980 gal• Maps contour in mgal = 10-6 g• Modern gravimeters can detect .001 mgal

variations (= 1 ppb)• A gravimeter is essentially a spring balance.

Page 6: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Gravimeter

Page 7: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Gravity Maps• Gravity varies by latitude due to earth’s

equatorial bulge and centrifugal force• Need altitude correction = 0.3 mgal/m = 3 x 10-7

g/m• Altitude only correction = Free-Air Anomaly Map• Correct for mass between you and sea level =

Bouguer Anomaly Map• Correct for variations in thickness of crust =

Isostatic Anomaly Map

Page 8: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Colorado Bouguer Map

Page 9: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Colorado Isostatic Map

Page 10: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Chicxulub Impact Basin Gravity Map

Page 11: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils
Page 12: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Gravity Mapping

• Simple corrections for latitude and altitude

• Density = Lithology• Can sense deep into

crust

• Gravimeters are basically sensitive spring balances

• Fragile• Prone to drift• Discrete data points• Labor intensive, low

detail

Page 13: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Magnetic Map of

Wisconsin

Page 14: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Geomagnetism • Magnetic field of Earth = 40 microtesla =

40,000 nt• Varies from 25 to 70 mt• Non-axial• Not centered on the earth• Varies over a human lifetime

Page 15: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Overall Magnetic Field of Earth

Page 16: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

MAGSAT Map of Earth

Page 17: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Magnetic Mapping

• Corrections are complex and time variable

• No simple correlation with lithology

• Can’t sense deep into crust because heat destroys magnetism

• Magnetism is electromagnetic phenomenon

• Instruments can be purely electronic

• Can record continuously

• Can be extremely detailed

Page 18: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Gravity and Magnetic Mapping

• Greater sensing depth • Complex corrections• Greater detail possible

Page 19: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Gravity and Magnetic MappingGravity maps Magnetic Maps

Mechanical Instrument Instruments are purely electronic

Discrete readings Continuous readings

Less detail Great detail

Can sense to great depths Can sense only a few kilometers deep

Simple corrections for latitude and elevation

Complex corrections in time and space

Density correlates with rock type No simple correlation with rock type

Page 20: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

SatelliteImage of Wisconsin

Page 21: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils
Page 22: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Grand Canyon

Page 23: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Lake Vostok,

Antarctica

Page 24: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Copper Mines, Iran

Page 25: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Saline Valley, California

Page 26: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

The Moon

Page 27: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Mercury

Page 28: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Mars False Color View

Page 29: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Remote and Not

So Remote Sensing

Page 30: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils
Page 31: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Telling Minerals Apart

Page 32: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Martian Minerals?

Page 33: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Absorption Bands

Page 34: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Radar Interferometry: L’Aquila, Italy,

2009

Page 35: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Haiti, 2010

Page 36: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Haiti, 2010

Page 37: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Damage, Port au prince

Page 38: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Chile, 2010

Page 39: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Chile 2010

Page 40: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Chile, 2010, GPS

Page 41: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Ice Flow, Antarctica

Page 42: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Kilauea, Hawaii

Page 43: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Venus

Page 44: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Topography of Venus

Page 45: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Radar Map of Venus

Page 46: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Radar Map of Venus

Page 47: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Venus Gravity Maps

Page 48: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Gravity Map of Mars

Page 49: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Titan

Page 50: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Radar Image, Titan

Page 51: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Lakes on Titan

Page 52: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Sun Glint

Page 53: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Laser Rangefinder

Page 54: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Laser Reflector

Page 55: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

LAGEOS

Page 56: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Herstmonceaux Castle (London)

• Latitude increasing (moving N)

• Longitude increasing (Moving E)

Page 57: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Lamont Earth Observatory

(Near New York)• Latitude increasing

(moving N)• Longitude decreasing

(Moving W)

Page 58: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Trans-Atlantic Plate Motion

• New York moving west at 15.4 mm/yr• London moving east at 16.6 mm/yr• Relative motion = 32 mm/yr

Page 59: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Churchill, Manitoba

• Latitude decreasing (moving S)

• Longitude decreasing (Moving W)

• Rising rapidly

Page 60: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Real-Time Plate Motions

Page 61: Remote Sensing, Rocks and Soils

Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin