renogram processing-the manchester method - nucleusnucleus.iaea.org › hhw › nuclearmedicine ›...
TRANSCRIPT
Richard LawsonCentral Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Renogram ProcessingThe Manchester Method
Radionuclides in Nephrourology, Mikulov 2010
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
The Manchester Method• Renogram processing
• Optimised background subtractionRutland method is preferred
• Renogram display• Curves normalised to administered activity
To get an idea of absolute function• Using consistent display parameters
To aid serial comparison of studies• ‘ManRen’
• Manchester Renogram processing programIncorporates these features
Optimum Background Subtraction
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Renogram Curves
• Raw kidney ROI curve has three components• Tissue background, blood background & kidney activity,
• Two background components to be subtracted• Difficult to achieve with single ROI
• After correct subtraction curve should rise from origin• Because kidney activity must start from zero
Kidney ROI curve
+ Kidney
+ BloodTissue
cps
Time
Background subtracted
Kidney
cps
Time
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
The Rutland Method *• Two background ROIs
• Tissue backgroundSubtracted in proportion to size of ROI
• Vascular backgroundSubtraction factor calculated individually for each kidney
Using the Rutland Plot• Advantages
• Deals well with kidneys with different vascularity• Robust and reliable
• Recommended by ISCORN Consensus Report• Prigent et.al. Sem.Nucl.Med. 1999, 24:146-159
* Rutland MD Nuc.Med.Comm 1985, 6: 11-20
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Background below kidney
Relative functionLeft kidney: 76%Right kidney: 24%
Right kidney under-subtracted(still some vascular background present)Relative function over-estimated
L R
Left Kidney
Right Kidney
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Background above kidney
Relative functionLeft kidney: 84%Right kidney: 16%
Right kidney over-subtracted(too much vascular background subtracted)Relative function under-estimated
Left Kidney
Right Kidney
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Peri-renal background
Relative functionLeft kidney: 85%Right kidney: 15%
Right kidney over-subtracted(too much vascular background subtracted)Relative function under-estimated
L R
Left Kidney
Right Kidney
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Rutland Method
Relative functionLeft kidney: 81%Right kidney: 19%
Both kidneys correct subtractionRelative function correct
L R
Left Kidney
Right Kidney
The Importance of Good Renogram Display
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Serial Renograms
Question 1 Has kidney function changed since previous renogram?1=No change, 2=Got worse, 3=Got better, 4=Can’t tell
Answer: Can’t tellHalf cps could be change from 100 MBq to 50 MBq doseor change from LEHS to LEGP collimator
Left kidney
Right kidney
0
CPS
15 20minutes0 5 10
250
200
150
100
50Left kidney
Right kidney
0
CPS
15 20minutes0 5 10
500
400
300
200
100
Previous renogram Current renogram
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Scale Uptake to Percent Dose
Left kidney
Right kidney4
3
2
1
0
% uptake
15 20minutes
0 5 10
5
Percent uptake normalises kidney counts to administered activityAllows for:� Different administered activities � Different collimators� Different gamma camera
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
More Serial Renograms
Answer: No change – still 3% at 3 minutesConfused by change of vertical scaleComputer has scaled each display to maximum in both curves
Left kidney
Right kidney4
3
2
1
0
% uptake
15 20minutes0 5 10
5
Previous renogramwith furosemide
Current renogramwithout furosemide
Question 2: Has function of left kidney changed since previous?1=No change, 2=Got worse, 3=Got better, 4=Can’t tell
Left kidney
Right kidney
3
2
1
0
% uptake
15 20minutes0 5 10
Furosemide
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Standardise Vertical Scale
• Fixed maximum for vertical scale makes comparison of two studies easier• We use 15% of dose because normal MAG3 fits easily within this
• Can see at a glance that these kidneys have poor uptake compared with normal
Left kidney
Right kidney
10
5
0
% uptake
15 20minutes
0 5 10
15
‘Normal’ Renogram
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Another Patient
Answer: No change – still peaks at 2½ minutesChange of horizontal scale has changed shape of peakComputer has scaled each display to duration of study
Previous renogram Current renogram
Question 3: Has emptying of left kidney changed?1=No change, 2=Got worse, 3=Got better, 4=Can’t tell
Left kidney
Right kidney10
5
0
% uptake
30 40minutes0 10 20
15
Left kidney
Right kidney10
5
0
% uptake
15 20minutes0 5 10
15
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Standardise Horizontal Scale
• Use standard scales for all renograms40 min is longest of any of our renograms
• Makes serial comparison easy• Makes comparison with ‘normal’ pattern easy
10
5
0
% uptake
30 40minutes0 10 20
15
5 15 25 35
Right kidney
Left kidney
‘Normal’Renogram
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
ISCORN Recommendations *• ISCORN Consensus Report recommends
• Curves displayed as cps• Y axis should be scaled to highest peak count
• But changing Y axis each time is confusing• And cps give no idea of absolute function
• Because cps depends on dose and collimator• Conversion from cps to percent uptake gives a measure of absolute function• Percent uptake will correlate with renal clearance
eg GFR or ERPF• So how do we calculate percent uptake . . . . * Prigent et.al. Sem.Nucl.Med. 1999, 24:146-159
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Calculating Percent Uptake
• Administered activity• Measure each patient dose in isotope calibrator• Decay factor• Calculated from time between dose measurement
and patient injection• System sensitivity
• Measured once for each camera & collimator used
% Uptake =Kidney cpsDose cps X 100 %
From renogram
X Decay factorX Sensitivity (cps/MBq)
Dose cps = Administered activity (MBq)
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Sensitivity Measurement• Known activity in saline bag
• approx 2 MBq• In bowl of water
• 7.5 cm below surface• Acquire 1 min image
• with gamma camera• Draw ROI round bag
• as for kidney• Draw background ROI
• as for kidney background• Calculate net counts
• after background subtraction• Calculate sensitivity
• cps/MBq at 7.5cm depth
Gamma Camera
Plastic bowl 7.5 cm
Saline bag Water
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Allowing for Kidney Depth• This standard sensitivity measurement assumes both kidneys lie at 7.5cm depth• This is adequate for most adults
• For children kidneys are not so deep• Estimate kidney depth based on child’s weight *• Increase sensitivity by 12% per cm less depth
• Can easily use any other formula for kidney depth• Or enter measured depths for each kidney
* Gordon et.al. Nuc. Med. Comm. 1987, 8: 661-670.
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
‘ManRen’ Program Display
Percent dose not cps
Fixed vertical scale
Functional results
Summed 5min images
Processing parameters
Regions & curves in
same colour
Rutland background method
Fixed time scale
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Conclusion• In Manchester we believe that all these features are an aid to correct interpretation of the renogram• We have been using them for over 20 years• ISCORN recommendations recognise the advantage of the Rutland method for background subtraction• But contradicts the Manchester display method• We believe that display using percent uptake rather than cps gives an indication of absolute function
• Using fixed axes makes serial comparison easier• ‘ManRen’ is an in-house Aladdin program that runs on GE Xeleris computers• It incorporates all these features• Used by several hospitals in the UK