Reports of CGIAR System Units

Jonathan WadsworthSamy Gaiji

The Fund Office

Content

1. CGIAR Fund Status2. The Strategy & Results Framework 3. The CRP extensions

Content

1. CGIAR Fund Status2. The Strategy & Results Framework 3. The CRP extensions

Fund Inflows and Outflowsin $ million

as of August 31 , 2014

Window 1 Window 2 Window 3 Provisional Total

Received Confirmed Expected Received Confirmed Expected Received Confirmed Expected Received Confirmed Received Confirmed Expected Total

Carryover balance 124.0 2.0 - 32.29 38.2 - 36.7 92.8 - 8.1 8.5 201.1 141.5 342.5

Receipts:

(a) 2013 Contributions 1.5 (1.5) 38.2 (38.2) 74.6 (74.6) 8.5 (8.5) 122.7 (122.7) - -

(b) 2014 Contributions 94.0 33.9 50.0 33.1 39.8 31.1 94.3 55.9 99.2 - - 221.4 129.6 180.3 531.3

(c) Transfers 15.6 (15.6) - -

Total Inflows 219.5 34.5 50.0 103.5 39.8 31.1 221.2 74.1 99.2 1.0 0.0 545.2 148.4 180.3 873.9

Disbursements

2014. 1 (132.3) (74.4) (207.6) - (414.3) - - (414.3)

Collection of CSP 5.1 (1.4) (3.7) - - - -

Fund Balance 92.4 34.5 50.0 27.7 39.8 31.1 9.8 74.1 99.2 1.0 0.0 130.9 148.4 180.3 459.5

1 commitments for system costs of $0.6m

CGIAR Fund Status

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug -

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 2 1863 72

123 130219

155 154190

151 155

195245

184

402 427

516 514 514 517 554 559

Received Confirmed Projected 2013

US$

mill

ion

Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug -

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

11 23 3380 85 120 153

221 237 237 228 200 230

213 180 130

514 527 505 520 519 527 531 531

Received Confirmed Projected 2014

US$

mill

ion

Inflows to the CGIAR Fund

2014 2013

Balance in the CGIAR Fund

CY 2014 as of Aug

Car-ry-

over bal-ance

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept (proj)

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

201

98

205

63 7148

6076

131

60

Inflows Disbursements Balance

CY 2013 as of Sept

Carryove

r balance

January

February

March AprilMay

JuneJuly

August

September0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

181

136

8899

121104

121

9377

130

Inflows Disbursements Balance

(in US$ million)

Window 1 & 2 Disbursement rate to CRPs

(from inception to March 31, 2014)

AASMaiz

eFT

APIM

Whea

tRTB

Livest

ock an

d Fish

A4NHW

LEGRiSP

CCAFS

Humid Tropics

Grain Le

gumes

Drylan

d Cereals

Geneb

anks

Drylan

d Syste

ms0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

W1&2 Disbursement rate to CRPfrom inception to March 31, 2014

% of W1&2 approved budget disbursed % elapsed time

Content

1. CGIAR Fund Status2. The Strategy & Results Framework 3. The CRP extensions

SRF SRF Structure

Theory of Change+

Intervention areas

Implementation

Results Framework

Strategy

Donors

Doers

Theory of Change

Working GroupsVision+MissionPriorities SLO1 SLO2 SLO3Crosscutting

‘Crosscutting’ = SLO enabling Programme

SRF Planning Workshop proposalsGenderCapacity DevelopmentNRM Climate Change

Others?Big Data/Bioinformatics?Biodiversity?

SLO

Setting prioritiesTo what extent can donors set priorities?

Target beneficiariesRelative importance of different geographic fociRelative importance of different System Level OutcomesThe importance of partnershipsRecognizing the dynamism of the 21st century

Donor expectations of research proposalsRelevance and effective contribution to SLOs & IDOs

= Coherent Theory of ChangeAccountability with clear targets Science quality/Significance of the expected research outputsCoherent strategy for ‘crosscutting’ themesGovernance, M&E, IPRs, Open Access etc.

Theory of Change

Example of Research Theme/Thrust

CLIMATE SMART AGRICULTURE

Content

1. CGIAR Fund Status2. The Strategy & Results Framework 3. The CRP extensions

Planning121110090807060504

FCCB

ISPC

CO

ISPC

CO

CRP CRP

Final message: The importance of the ISPC recommendations for the FC

High appreciation of the ISPC reviews by the FC The independent reviews of the ISPC are

essential in the decision-making process (e.g. CRPs, SRF, Open Access etc.)

The ISPC participation and commitment in various processes/meetings(e.g. SRF Planning Workshop)

etc.