report on the professional development training … · 2019. 7. 30. · followed by two interactive...

24
1 REPORT on the PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TRAINING PROGRAMME FOR FACULTY & ADMINISTRATORS OF PROJECT INSTITUTIONS TECHNICAL EDUCATION QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME – III (TEQIP – III) (Under the aegis of the National Project Implementation Unit, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India) INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT VISAKHAPATNAM 15 – 19 JULY 2019

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jan-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    REPORT

    on the

    PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TRAINING PROGRAMME FOR FACULTY & ADMINISTRATORS

    OF PROJECT INSTITUTIONS

    TECHNICAL EDUCATION QUALITY

    IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMME – III (TEQIP – III)

    (Under the aegis of the National Project Implementation Unit, Ministry of Human Resource Development,

    Government of India)

    INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT VISAKHAPATNAM

    15 – 19 JULY 2019

  • 2

    INDEX

    Topic Page No. Programme Summary 3 Programme Schedule 4 Brief Report on the Programme 5 Feedback from the Participants 7 Training Assessment with Recommendations 10 Glimpses from the Programme (Photos) 12 Appendices 17-24 List of Participants 17 Attendance Sheets 20

  • 3

    Programme Summary Programme Title: Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme – III (TEQIP – III) Professional Development Training Programme for Faculty & Administrators of Project Institutions Sponsor: National Project Implementation Unit, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India Organiser: Indian Institute of Management Visakhapatnam Venue: IIM Visakhapatnam campus, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam Dates: 15 – 19 July 2019 Duration: 5 days Number of Participants: 37 Number of Resource Persons: 10 Programme Director: Prof. Bishakha Majumdar Programme Co-Director: Prof. Anupama Sharma

  • 4

    Programme Schedule

    Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme – III (TEQIP – III) Professional Development Training Programme for Faculty & Administrators of Project Institutions

    (Under the aegis of the National Project Implementation Unit, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India)

    Venue: Class-Room: LT-1, IIM Visakhapatnam Days Session-1 Session-2 Session-3 Session(s): 4-5

    0830-0930 Hrs. 0930-1030 Hrs. 1100-1200 Hrs. 1400-1500 Hrs. 1500-1630 Hrs. 1635-1650 Hrs.

    July 15 (Mon)

    Inauguration

    Aligning Teaching to

    Learning Outcomes: Teachers in Leadership

    Roles

    Industry-Academia Connect: Curricula

    Development, Talent-supply &

    Capacity-building

    Accreditation in Academic

    Institutions

    Briefing on Administrative Arrangements

    Faculty

    Chief Guest: Shri Prasad Dahapute

    Member (BoG), IIMV

    Prof. Subir Verma

    Prof. Subir Verma

    Prof. Subir Verma

    Mr. Kaleem V Khan, Sr. Admin

    Officer & Mr. Kamal Keerthi,

    Asst. Manager (IT)

    July 16 (Tue)

    Developing Teaching Styles

    Case-based Teaching

    Experiential Exercises

    Time Management: Best Practices

    from the Academia

    Faculty Prof. Vinay Ramani Prof. Anupama

    Sharma Prof. Anupama

    Sharma Prof. Bishakha

    Majumdar

    July 17 (Wed)

    Project Management

    Decision-Making using Spreadsheets

    Making Students Employment-

    Ready

    Stress Management:

    Managing Physical &

    Psychological Stress for Work-

    Life Balance

    Faculty Prof. B Srirangacharyulu Prof. B

    Srirangacharyulu Prof. Bishakha

    Majumdar Prof. Bishakha

    Majumdar

    July 18 (Thu)

    Strategizing for World-class Campuses

    Trends in Technical Education

    Networking and Mentoring in

    Academic Institutions

    Financial Management in Academic Institutions

    Leadership for Realising

    Institutional Vision & Mission

    Faculty Prof. Amit B Chakrabarti Prof. G

    Srinivasan Prof. G.

    Srinivasan

    Prof. Deepika R

    Gupta

    Prof. M. Chandrasekhar

    July 19 (Fri)

    Research in Academia:

    Sponsorship and

    Management

    Consultancy in Academia: Skills and

    Techniques

    1100-1230 Hrs. ICT-enabled

    Pedagogy

    1400-1430 Hrs.

    Feedback

    1430-1600 Hrs. Summarizing &

    Valedictory; Presentation of

    Certificates

    Faculty Prof. Ganesh Prabhu Prof. Ganesh

    Prabhu Prof. Ganesh

    Prabhu Participants

    Chief Guest: Dr. OR Nandagopan, Director, NSTL,

    DRDO

    Notes: • Coffee/Tea Break: • Lunch (Mon-Wed: 15/7 -

    17/7/2019): • Lunch (Thurs: 18/7/2019): • Lunch (Fri: 19/7/2019):

    1030-1100 Hrs. & 1630-1645 Hrs. 1215-1445 Hrs. (in the Hotel) 1215-1345 Hrs. (in the Hotel) 1230-1400 Hrs. (on Campus)

    • Photos during Inauguration: • Group Photo (15/7/2019): • Photos during Valedictory

    (19/7/2019):

    0830-0930 Hrs. 0930-0940 Hrs. 1430-1600 Hrs.

    • Exposure Visits / Sight-seeing:

    1630 Hrs. onwards (daily) • Farewell Dinner (18/7/2019) in the Hotel:

    1930-2130 Hrs.

    o0o

  • 5

    Brief Report on the Programme TEQIP III

    The Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme (TEQIP) was implemented by the Government of India in 2002 as a World Bank assisted Project to improve the quality of technical education system in the country. Currently in its third phase, the TEQIP is run by the National Project Implementation Unit (NPIU), Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, with an aim to make engineering education holistic and responsive to changes in the environment.

    TEQIP Phase III was launched to improve the competence in teaching, learning, and research in the government and government-aided AICTE approved engineering institutions and engineering departments of centrally funded Universities and Deemed to be Universities of India. The goal of the TEQIP III encompasses having multi-pronged improvement in faculty productivity and motivation and student learning and employability. The Present Programme

    The objective of the five-day Professional Development Training Programme at Indian Institute of Management (IIM) Visakhapatnam was to create the needed capacities under TEQIP-III in technical education policy planners and administrators towards gaining greater appreciation for governance, institutional and policy reforms, as well as the management principles, precepts and practices, so that they are able to fulfil the role-responsibilities envisaged of them as mentors, facilitators and champions of change, with competence and confidence. The training aimed to facilitate networking and knowledge-sharing among the participants and the resource persons, provide insights into effective academic practices, and afford exposure to the latest developments in the academic, professional, and socio-economic contexts, in order to empower the participants to transfer the benefits in turn to their key stakeholders – the students, the community, and to the nation. Participant Profile

    The 5 Day Programme at IIM Visakhapatnam saw participation from 37 professionals from premier engineering institutions across India, such as NIT Trichy, NIT Uttarakhand, IIIT Guwahati, and Delhi Technical University, among others (List of Participants in Appendix 1). The list of attendees included profiles such as Deans, Professors, Associate Professors, and Assistant Professors from various streams such as Chemical Engineering, CSE, Chemistry, and Humanities and Social Sciences. Together, the participants represented 13 states of India, namely Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Maharashtra, Odisha, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh. Brief Account of the Training Activities

    On Day 1, the Inaugural Address was delivered by Mr. Prasad Dahapute, Managing Director, Varhad Capital Private Limited, and Hon. Member, Board of Governors, IIM Visakhapatnam, who emphasized on the changing nature of the industries and the need for academicians to stay updated with the latest trends in the field. This was followed by three engaging sessions by Prof. Subir Verma, on aligning teaching to the learner’s requirements, on

  • 6

    enhancing an academic institute’s connection with the corporate world beyond placements, into areas such as curriculum designing, live projects, and knowledge sharing, and on the Accreditation process and how to holistically prepare an institute for an accreditation.

    Day 2 was dedicated to three sessions on teaching practices, where Prof Vinay Ramani focused on Teaching Styles, teaching objectives, and developing effective course outlines, followed by two interactive sessions by Prof. Anupama Sharma on Experiential Exercises and Case-Based Teaching. The afternoon session by Prof. Bishakha Majumdar focused on personal development through best practices in Time Management for Academicians.

    Day 3 focused on Project Management and Operational Decision Making, with two knowledge-intensive sessions by Prof. B. Srirangacharyulu. This was followed by two activity-driven sessions by Prof. Majumdar, on enhancing Employability of Students, and Managing Stress and gaining Work-Life Balance.

    On Day 4, Prof. Amit B. Chakrabarti introduced the participants to the role of campus architecture and infrastructure in an institution’s development. Prof. Srinivasan G. subsequently briefed the participants on the best practices of Networking and Mentoring in Academic Institutions and the latest Trends in Technical Education. The afternoon sessions consisted of Prof. Deepika Gupta providing an overview of Financial Management in Academic Institutions, followed by Prof. M. Chandrasekhar driving an animated discussion on the importance and the process of realizing the mission and vision of one’s Institution.

    Day 5, the final day, saw three knowledge-intensive sessions by Prof. Ganesh Prabhu, who discussed the best practices for driving research and consultancy in Academia, the use of technology in classrooms and online education. The valedictory address was delivered by Dr. O R Nandagopan, Outstanding Scientist and Director, Naval Science and Technological Laboratory (NSTL), DRDO, Government of India, who focused on the value of engineering institutions to be industry-ready, and to contribute to the larger cause of nation-building.

    In addition to the training sessions, participants were taken out in the evenings to various tourist attractions of Visakhapatnam, such as museums, beaches, and natural spots. The Networking Dinner was organized on 18 July evening, where the participants met and shared views with the faculty fraternity of IIM Visakhapatnam.

    Feedback from the Participants Session-wise feedback was collected from the participants at the end of each session, where participants were asked to anonymously rate the resource person on a scale of 1-5 (with 5 indicating the highest level of agreement/satisfaction), on five parameters. The overall feedback for the training was collected in a similar fashion on the last day, before the valedictory. The feedback from the participants is summarized on pages 7-9.

  • 7

    Resource Person

    Session

    Was

    the

    sess

    ion

    info

    rmat

    ive,

    pro

    vidi

    ng

    valu

    able

    info

    rmat

    ion

    on th

    e to

    pic?

    Was

    the

    sess

    ion

    enga

    ging

    , stim

    ulat

    ing

    disc

    ussi

    on a

    nd e

    xcha

    nge

    of th

    ough

    ts

    amon

    g pa

    rtic

    ipan

    ts?

    Has

    the

    sess

    ion

    prov

    ided

    you

    act

    iona

    ble

    inpu

    ts to

    be

    appl

    ied

    at y

    our w

    orkp

    lace

    ?

    Was

    the

    facu

    lty a

    ble

    to a

    nsw

    er q

    ueri

    es a

    nd

    clar

    ify d

    oubt

    s of p

    artic

    ipan

    ts?

    Did

    the

    facu

    lty c

    ome

    acro

    ss a

    s hav

    ing

    sign

    ifica

    nt c

    omm

    and

    over

    the

    subj

    ect

    mat

    ter,

    or b

    eing

    a d

    omai

    n ex

    pert

    ? O

    vera

    ll le

    vel o

    f sat

    isfa

    ctio

    n w

    ith th

    e se

    ssio

    n

    Comments

    DAY 1 Subir Verma Professor, OB & HR, FORE School of Management, New Delhi

    1)Aligning Teaching to Learning Outcomes: Teachers in Leadership Roles 2)Industry-Academia Connect: Curricula Development Talent-supply & Capacity-building 3)Accreditation in Academic Institutions

    4.53 4.83 4.36 4.67 4.61 4.67

    Very informative and inspiring lecture A session that introduced the current topics in academics and will certainly help in improving teaching Excellent, Interactive

    DAY 2 Vinay Ramani Associate Professor, Economics, IIM Visakhapatnam

    Developing Teaching Styles 4.26 4.48 4.24 4.65 4.61 4.45

    Faculty was professional in approach; composed and friendly in equal measure; Planned and prepared Good topic for teaching faculty to use in their premises

    Anupama Sharma Assistant Professor, OB & HRM, IIM Visakhapatnam

    Case-based Teaching 3.88 4.33 3.70 4.27 4.27 4.06

    An engaging session Edge of case study approach over traditional methods was very nicely explained

    Experiential Exercises 4.11 4.41 3.50 4.28 4.17 4.22

    While the exercises do serve their purpose, one needs more assurance on how they may be viably applied to different learning environments

    Bishakha Majumdar Assistant Professor, OB & HRM, IIM Visakhapatnam

    Time Management: Best Practices from the Academia

    4.75 4.75 4.78 4.78 4.83 4.74

    Outstanding. Very good real time examples Constructive suggestions to implement in daily life.

  • 8

    Resource Person

    Session

    Was

    the

    sess

    ion

    info

    rmat

    ive,

    pro

    vidi

    ng

    valu

    able

    info

    rmat

    ion

    on th

    e to

    pic?

    Was

    the

    sess

    ion

    enga

    ging

    , stim

    ulat

    ing

    disc

    ussi

    on a

    nd e

    xcha

    nge

    of th

    ough

    ts

    amon

    g pa

    rtic

    ipan

    ts?

    Has

    the

    sess

    ion

    prov

    ided

    you

    act

    iona

    ble

    inpu

    ts to

    be

    appl

    ied

    at y

    our w

    orkp

    lace

    ?

    Was

    the

    facu

    lty a

    ble

    to a

    nsw

    er q

    ueri

    es

    and

    clar

    ify d

    oubt

    s of p

    artic

    ipan

    ts?

    Did

    the

    facu

    lty c

    ome

    acro

    ss a

    s hav

    ing

    sign

    ifica

    nt c

    omm

    and

    over

    the

    subj

    ect

    mat

    ter,

    or b

    eing

    a d

    omai

    n ex

    pert

    ? O

    vera

    ll le

    vel o

    f sat

    isfa

    ctio

    n w

    ith th

    e se

    ssio

    n

    Comments

    DAY 3 B. Srirangacharyulu Associate Professor, Production and Operations Management, IIM Visakhapatnam

    Project Management 4.28 4.22 4.09 4.25 4.50 4.42

    Very useful Very good. More practical cases could be discussed

    Decision-Making using Spreadsheets

    4.59 4.52 4.41 4.59 4.66 4.61

    A very experience faculty who knows his job Outstanding. Such a course may be repeated

    Bishakha Majumdar Assistant Professor, OB & HRM, IIM Visakhapatnam

    Making Students Employment-Ready

    4.74 4.71 4.77 4.69 4.71 4.67

    Quite engaging as it had a few open-ended problems Excellent presentation with interactive discussion

    Stress Management: Managing Physical & Psychological Stress for Work-Life Balance

    4.91 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.97 4.88 Complete soothing of mind Ultimate experience. If possible, include one more session

    DAY 4 Amit B. Chakrabarti Assistant Professor, Corporate Strategy and Policy, IIM Visakhapatnam

    Strategizing for World-class Campuses

    4.56 4.53 4.47 4.65 4.62 4.64

    Well-prepared, methodical approach, efficient delivery Did full justice to the subject Nicely explained the features of world class universities/institutions

    Srinivasan G. Professor, Department of Management Studies, IIT Madras

    Trends in Technical Education

    4.42 4.34 4.22 4.58 4.61 4.30

    Life-long learning really influenced us High on experience and knowledge, grounded in the basics, Fine communication, Propagates values

    Networking and Mentoring in

    Academic Institutions

    4.64 4.46 4.50 4.64 4.79 4.58

    Wonderful presentation with day-to-day experiences Experiential learning and teaching emphasized

    Deepika Gupta Assistant Professor, Corporate Strategy and Policy, IIM Visakhapatnam

    Financial Management in

    Academic Institutions

    4.53 4.56 4.32 4.65 4.68 4.53

    Quite informed faculty and engaging in the class Explanation with relevant examples was very good

  • 9

    Resource Person

    Session

    Was

    the

    sess

    ion

    info

    rmat

    ive,

    pro

    vidi

    ng

    valu

    able

    info

    rmat

    ion

    on th

    e to

    pic?

    Was

    the

    sess

    ion

    enga

    ging

    , stim

    ulat

    ing

    disc

    ussi

    on a

    nd e

    xcha

    nge

    of th

    ough

    ts

    amon

    g pa

    rtic

    ipan

    ts?

    Has

    the

    sess

    ion

    prov

    ided

    you

    act

    iona

    ble

    inpu

    ts to

    be

    appl

    ied

    at y

    our w

    orkp

    lace

    ?

    Was

    the

    facu

    lty a

    ble

    to a

    nsw

    er q

    ueri

    es

    and

    clar

    ify d

    oubt

    s of p

    artic

    ipan

    ts?

    Did

    the

    facu

    lty c

    ome

    acro

    ss a

    s hav

    ing

    sign

    ifica

    nt c

    omm

    and

    over

    the

    subj

    ect

    mat

    ter,

    or b

    eing

    a d

    omai

    n ex

    pert

    ? O

    vera

    ll le

    vel o

    f sat

    isfa

    ctio

    n w

    ith th

    e se

    ssio

    n

    Comments

    M. Chandrasekhar Director, IIM Visakhapatnam

    Leadership for Realising

    Institutional Vision & Mission

    4.82 4.91 4.79 4.88 4.88 4.79 Highly beneficial Excellent interactive session

    DAY 5

    Ganesh N. Prabhu Professor, Strategy, IIM Bangalore

    Research in Academia: Sponsorship

    and Management

    4.06 3.94 3.74 4.26 4.16 4.03

    Good presentation with case studies Include who, why and when regarding industry/business for offering consultancy for the benefit of young/middle age faculty

    Consultancy in Academia: Skills and

    Techniques 4.31 4.38 4.04 4.23 4.38 4.38

    These innovative ideas should be implemented to all colleges of India Very useful

    ICT-enabled Pedagogy

    4.50 4.54 4.42 4.46 4.50 4.72

    Identification of subject specific interactive class (ICT-enabled) for UG/PG students Excellent

    OVERALL TRAINING FEEDBACK

    Wer

    e th

    e se

    ssio

    ns in

    gen

    eral

    in

    form

    ativ

    e, p

    rovi

    ding

    val

    uabl

    e in

    form

    atio

    n on

    the

    topi

    c?

    Wer

    e th

    e se

    ssio

    ns in

    gen

    eral

    en

    gagi

    ng, s

    timul

    atin

    g di

    scus

    sion

    an

    d ex

    chan

    ge o

    f tho

    ught

    s am

    ong

    part

    icip

    ants

    ?

    Have

    the

    sess

    ions

    in g

    ener

    al

    prov

    ided

    you

    act

    iona

    ble

    inpu

    ts to

    be

    app

    lied

    at y

    our w

    orkp

    lace

    ?

    Have

    the

    reso

    urce

    per

    sons

    in

    gene

    ral b

    een

    able

    to a

    nsw

    er

    quer

    ies a

    nd c

    larif

    y do

    ubts

    of

    part

    icip

    ants

    ?

    Did

    the

    reso

    urce

    per

    sons

    in

    gene

    ral c

    ome

    acro

    ss a

    s hav

    ing

    sign

    ifica

    nt c

    omm

    and

    over

    the

    subj

    ect m

    atte

    r, or

    bei

    ng a

    dom

    ain

    expe

    rt?

    Ove

    rall

    leve

    l of s

    atis

    fact

    ion

    with

    th

    e ac

    adem

    ic se

    ssio

    ns

    4.61 4.65 4.42 4.68 4.71 4.71

  • 10

    Training Assessment with Recommendations The five-day TEQIP-III Professional Development Training Programme saw the

    presence of 37 academicians from different corners of the country in IIM Visakhapatnam. The core themes that ran through the sessions were:

    1. Exposure to and identification of the best practices from academia across the world that can make teaching, research, administration. and consultancy efficient and effective for the present gathering,

    2. Customization of the tools and techniques discussed to the recipient’s context, i.e., engineering education, to the extent possible

    3. Peer-to-peer knowledge sharing so that the participants benefitted from knowing what other engineering institutions are doing well, and

    4. Facilitation in the participants a sense of urgency to change, an attitude of openness and interest towards the latest innovative methods, and a willingness for continuous self-improvement that in turn translates into holistic development of the prime stakeholders of educational institutions – the students and the society.

    The training programme saw enthusiastic participation from the audience from the beginning, as Resource Persons established the urgency to change. Sessions had a blend of knowledge and experience-sharing, experiential activities, and animated discussions on issues of importance. Resource persons also effectively demonstrated engaging and easy to use teaching methods such as Chalk and Talk, Power point presentations, games, online polls, and group activities, in their respective sessions.

    To facilitate retention of key takeaways, the participants were divided in teams, and each team made a presentation at the start of the training day, summarizing the key takeaways from the previous days’ sessions. In addition, the participants engaged in formal and informal interaction with the faculty and the students at IIM Visakhapatnam, during the networking dinner and between the training sessions.

    Training assessment was done through training evaluation by participants in terms of perceived effectiveness of delivery and perceived relevance of the content. The overall rating received by the programme was 4.71 out of 5. The participants’ comments gathered through the anonymous training feedback are listed:

  • 11

    Excellent planning and delivery All sessions were very interactive, informative and useful This is my first PDT. This programme well-designed and showed effective time management Thanks, IIMV team for the excellent hospitality at every point of our PDT. I look forward to seeing this place again in future Very good lectures and topics were arranged for the participants I hope, we will have this type of programmes again and gather more information

    In addition to the above, some valuable insights were received for the way forward:

    Some more lectures on management regarding the administration and research methodology is needed More space may be provided for participants to share their experiences For some topics, there should be more focus on how it could be implemented on ground reality or practical ground More sessions on stress management, project management In future may please include a session or two on entrepreneurship

    Based on the above, the following recommendations are made:

    1. To facilitate adult learning, future TEQIP sessions should continue to be engaging, relevant to realistic issues faced at the workplace, and have a balance between knowledge-sharing and experiential activities.

    2. Future programmes may include sessions on Entrepreneurship incubation, designed to empower faculty members to guide engineering students interested in entrepreneurial journey, lead the institute incubation centres, and give courses an entrepreneurial flavour.

    3. Future programmes should have additional sessions specifically focussed on building Administrative Skills – such as financial management, campus management, project management, or library management – empowering faculty members to be effective in their Faculty Coordinator roles in their respective institutions

    4. Since self-care is crucial to energize academicians in their professional roles, future programmes should have additional sessions – if necessary, in the afterhours – on Yoga and Relaxation Practices, Stress Management, Self-Enhancement, and Life Skills.

  • 12

    5. There should be at least 1 session dedicated to Experience Sharing by Participants, where they may discuss Best Practices in their respective institutions, or the way they have found innovative solutions to professional problems.

    6. While efforts have been made in the present training to contextualize the content to the engineering context, future trainings need further cognizance in this area so that the cases, activities, and research methods used may be easily adopted to the technical disciplines

    7. Future programmes may have an evaluative component – where teams of participants are asked to use one of the teaching methods introduced to them in the training, to teach a topic to the rest of the class. Alternatively, they may be asked to redesign their session plans or course outlines to make them more interactive or industry-driven.

    Glimpses from the Programme

    Shri Prasad Dahapute delivering the inaugural

    address Prof. Subir Verma in his session

    Prof. Vinay Ramani in the session on Teaching

    Styles Prof. Anupama Sharma speaking on case-based teaching

  • 13

    Prof. Srirangacharyulu teaching Project Management Group Activity

    Group Discussion during the Session

  • 14

    Prof. Chakrabarti speaking on world-class

    institutions Prof. Deepika Gupta explaining financial management

    Prof. Ganesh Prabhu on ICT Prof. Srinivasan leading a discussion on networking

    Stress Management Exercises

  • 15

    Prof. Bishakha Majumdar speaking on Work-Life

    Balance Team Presentation on key takeaways

    Prof. Chandrasekhar, Director, IIM

    Visakhapatnam, addressing the participants Experience sharing by participants

  • 16

    Dr. O. R. Nandagopan, Director, NSTL, DRDO, at

    the Valedictory Awarding certificates

    Programme participants and the IIM Visakhapatnam faculty at the Networking Dinner

  • 17

    Appendices

    1. List of Participants (in alphabetical order)

    Sr.

    Sl. Name Designation Department & Institution

    E-mail ID

    1 Mr. Alok Kumar H.O.D Nalanda College of Engineering, Chandi, Nalanda

    [email protected]

    2 Ms. Amrita A. Manjrekar

    Assistant Professor

    Department of Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur

    [email protected]

    3 Dr. Anamika Chauhan

    Assistant Professor

    Delhi Technological University, NCT Delhi

    [email protected]

    4 Mr. Anish Kumar

    Assistant Professor & Dean Academics

    Rajkiya Engineering College Azamgarh

    [email protected]

    5 Dr. Ashok Kumar

    Assistant Professor (ECE) & Nodal Officer (Procurement), TEQIP Cell

    Govt. Mahila Engg College, Ajmer

    [email protected]

    6 Dr. Asini Kumar Baliarsingh

    Associate Professor

    Government College of Engineering, Kalahandi, Odisha

    [email protected]

    7 Mr Brajendra Shukla

    HOD, Assistant Professor, Biotechnology, TEQIP-III Coordinator

    Institute of Engineering & Technology, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi

    [email protected]

    8 Mr. Chaitanya Nidhi

    Assistant Professor & TEQIP-III Coordinator

    Rajkiya Engineering College Azamgarh

    [email protected]

    9 Er. Chandan Kumar

    Assistant Professor

    IET Ayodhya (Dr.RML Avadh University)

    [email protected]

    10 Dr. Deba Prasad Dash

    Associate Professor

    Government College of Engineering, Kalahandi, Odisha

    [email protected]

    11 Dr. Dharmendra Tripathi

    Associate Professor

    National Institute of Technology Uttarakhand

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • 18

    12 Dr. Dhiren Kumar Behera

    Assistant Professor (Selection Grade)

    Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Sarang

    [email protected]

    13 Dr. G K Agrawal

    Professor Government Engineering College, Bilaspur

    [email protected]

    14 Dr. Hariharan Muthusamy

    Associate Professor

    National Institute of Technology Uttarakhand

    [email protected]

    15 Dr. Harpuneet Singh

    Assistant Professor & Deputy Controller

    GNDEC Ludhiana [email protected]

    16 Mr. Jibesh Datta Assistant Professor

    Tripura Institute of Technology, Narsingarh, Tripura

    [email protected]

    17 Dr. Kanupriya Sachdev

    Professor MNIT Jaipur [email protected]

    18 Ms.

    Kumari Priyanka Sinha

    HOD CSE Nalanda College of Engineering, Chandi, Nalanda

    [email protected]

    19 Dr. M V V Chandana Lakshmi

    Professor, Dept Of Chemical Engineering

    A U College of Engg, Visakhapatnam

    [email protected]

    20 Dr. Munish Rattan

    Assistant Professor

    GNDEC Ludhiana [email protected]

    21 Dr. N Prema Kumar

    Professor A U College of Engg, Visakhapatnam

    [email protected]

    22 Mrs.

    N.J. Kotmire Assistant Professor

    Department of Technology , Shivaji University Kolhapur

    [email protected]

    23 Prof.

    P V Ramana Assistant Professor

    MNIT Jaipur [email protected]

    24 Prof.

    R.K. Mahajan

    Assistant Professor

    Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh

    [email protected]

    25 Mr. Rahul Ranjan

    Assistant Professor (CSE) & Nodal Officer(Procurement), TEQIP Cell

    University College of Engineering and Technology (UCET), Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribag, Jharkhand

    [email protected]

    26 Dr. Rakesh Biswas

    Assistant Professor

    IIIT Guwahati [email protected]

    27 Mr. Ravi Prakash Pandey

    Assistant Professor

    IET Ayodhya (Dr.RML Avadh University)

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • 19

    28 Dr. S. K. Patil Dean, Students Welfare

    Govt College of Engineering, Karad

    [email protected]

    29 Dr. S.K. Jarial Professor Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram University of Science& Technology, Murthal, Haryana

    [email protected]

    30 Dr. Sangeeta Vishwakarma

    HOD Chemistry University College of Engineering and Technology (UCET), Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribag, Jharkhand

    [email protected]

    31 Dr. Shovan Barma

    Assistant Professor

    IIIT Guwahati [email protected]

    32 Mr. Siddhartha Das

    Assistant Professor, Training & Placement Officer

    Tripura Institute of Technology, Narsingarh, Tripura

    [email protected]

    33 Dr. Suryakant H. Pawar

    Associate Professor

    Govt College of Engineering, Karad

    [email protected]

    34 Prof.

    T. Ramashri Professor SVU College of Engineering, Tirupati

    [email protected]

    35 Dr. V M Murthy Professor, TEQIP Coordinator

    Faculty of Science, Kurukshetra University

    [email protected]

    36 Dr. V. Usha Reddy

    Assistant Professor

    SVU College of Engineering, Tirupati

    [email protected]

    37 Dr. Vinod Balakrishnan V

    Professor in Humanities and Social Sciences

    NIT Trichy [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • 20

    Attendance Sheets

  • 21

  • 22

  • 23

  • 24