repositories for research information management
DESCRIPTION
Repositories for research information management . Wolfram Horstmann. CERIF-CRIS and Repositories , Brussels , 12/13-oct-2011. The challenge. http://mhpbooks.com/mobylives/?p=33681 . Collaboration of researchers, administration & librarians!. Why CRIS & OA- Repositories ?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Repositories for research information management
Wolfram Horstmann
CERIF-CRIS and Repositories, Brussels, 12/13-oct-2011
![Page 2: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The challenge
Collaboration of researchers, administration & librarians!
http://mhpbooks.com/mobylives/?p=33681
![Page 3: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Why CRIS & OA-Repositories?
“Given their affinity, achieving interoperability between CRIS and OAR is desirable and will benefit
all parties involved, including the researchers. A joint approach will avoid double input and management of redundant data as well as
redundant services and processes and will both enhance the efficiency and quality (mutual enrichment) of the services offered by CRIS and OAR to their users.”
January 2007: Knowledge Exchange DEFF, DFG, JISC, SURF
Exchanging Research Information -- Razum, Simons & Horstmann [>> Text]
![Page 4: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Task• There is still an assumed
competition between CRIS and OARs and many other institutional systems
• CRIS and OARs should join forces to deliver the best possible services
• An account of „Who does what and how?“ should be developed
![Page 5: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Delineation: Characteristics• Current Research Information Systems
CRIS
– administrative, sensitive, comprehensive, integrative, local, analytic | administrators
• Open Access Repositories OAR
– public, file-centric, rights, preservation, globally distributed paradigm | librarians
• Bibliography Management System BMS
– CV oriented, complete, representative | researchers
![Page 6: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Delineation: Commonalities• Bibliographic Information– Title, Source, Subject, Keywords,
Rights, Authorship…• Affiliation– Author Identity, Institute,
Organisational Unit, Research Group, Time Frame…
• Project Information “short-term affiliation“
– Time Frame, Funder, Participants, Budgets…
![Page 7: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Delineation: Differences• CRIS more local, while OARs
distributed• CRIS: Financial information– Budgets of projects, staff
• CRIS: Staff information– Employment details, costs
• OAR: Full-Text Management– Access Rights, Identifiers, Preservation,
Compound Objects / Research Data …
![Page 8: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
System Habitat• CRIS and OAR potentially
– Financial System– Human Resource Management– Facility Management System– Campus Management System– Bibliographic Databases
• WoS, Scopus, ArXiV, PMC, IRs/BASE– Authoritative Data Resources /Disambiguation
• Vocabularies, Ontologies, ORCID/AuthorClaim• Massive common interoperability
requirements
![Page 9: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
‚Species‘• CRIS proper– CERIF-centric: self or METIS, PURE, CONVERIS– Integrating with institutional HRM, project &
financial systems• OAR proper– DCES , MODS etc | DSPACE, E-Prints, Fedora
• BMS intermediates– Proprietary, MODS: DSPACE, E-Prints, Invenio,
LUP, etc.• Aggregative Approaches– Sharing and re-using resources
![Page 12: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Further Trends in OARs• Extension towards BMS / Reporting– Demand for authoritative resources increases–Usage of vocabularies, ontologies, e.g. SPAR–Usage of web services, linked data– Personal displays, CV-Systems
• Extension towards Research Data– Demand for collaboration with researchers
incresases• Repositories as embedded systems– local and global integration
![Page 13: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Research Data & Enhanced Publications
http://www.ukpmc.co.uk
![Page 14: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Semantic Web Approaches
OpenAIRE and KE CRIS-OAR Interoperability Project
![Page 15: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Interim Conclusion• Neither CRIS nor OARs are
autonomous– Rather open, interrelated data mgmt.
systems• Any individual solution will be different– Depending on the local system habitat
• Systems level not the correct approach?– Rather consider human curation
responsibilities
![Page 16: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Curation processes• Persons– e.g. Human resource office, IT department
(IDM)• Finance– e.g. Finance office
• Units– e.g. Facility/Campus Management
• Projects – e.g. Research office, Researchers
• Bibliographic Information– e.g. Library, Researchers
![Page 17: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The curation view on CRIS & OARs
• Treatment of systems as curation tools maintained by specialists– Research project manager, financial officer, staff
manager, bibliography specialist, data librarian, web content manager, identity manager, analyst
• No requirement to build integrated IT-‚columns‘– Rather distributed systems view– Reporting as distributed queries with display– Data model may differ in systems, while entities,
properties and vocabularies are aligned to interoperate on the aggregation/reporting level
![Page 18: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Conclusion• Convergence between CRIS and OAR – both head towards aggregative systems– OARs become ‚sensitive‘ e.g. Bibliometrics,
Research Data
– CRIS become public e.g. CV displays, full-text
• Differences there to stay– Administrators as end-users for CRIS– Open Access as committment for OARs
• Research Information Repository / ‚CRISpository‘ already a reality
![Page 19: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Recommendations• Put the researcher in the centre
– CRIS & OARs have joint responsibility to serve research – Even assessment exercises will only be accepted if the
researchers agree on the approach taken– Researchers are not interested in technicalities
• Regard CRIS and OARs as assemblies of specialized data curation activities – Everybody should keep on doing what he/she can do
best– Systems and formats are slave to curation requirements– Inter-departmental collaboration is the clue (and main
challenge)– Codex: Nobody will take away responsibility of the other
![Page 20: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
And yes…
…CERIF will be the common demoninator
![Page 21: Repositories for research information management](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062410/568162e0550346895dd364c1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Thanks!