representing body - worcestershire lep€¦ · web view4.wlep growth plan and eu investment...

WORCESTERSHIRE LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIP BOARDThursday 23 May 2013 3.00pm - 5.30pm

Yamazaki Mazak, Badgeworth Drive, Warndon, Worcester, WR4 9NF

AGENDA

1. Welcome and Apologies

2. Minutes from the Board Meetings 24 January 2013 (5mins)

3. Matters Arising (10mins)- Action List- Correspondence & Approvals

4. WLEP Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy - Gary Woodman (30mins)- Kim Rowlands, BIS WM to provide a Government Update

5. Growing Places Sub Group Recommendation – Ed Webb (15mins)

6. Local Transport Body - Gary Woodman (5mins)

7. Chair’s Report – inc. Away Day Report and Actions – Peter Pawsey (10mins)

8. Executive Director’s Report – Gary Woodman (10mins)

9. WLEP Sub Groups’ Feedback – Gary Woodman (10mins)

10. Finance, Audit, Risk and Appointments Committee (5mins)

11. Regulators and Business Partnership Charter Action Plan – Claire Bridges(5mins)

12. Cyber Security Strategy Approval – Gary Woodman (5mins)

12. Any Other Business

LEP Board 2013 Meetings - All 3.00 p.m. – 5.00 p.m.

25 July 2013 Coomber Electronics26 September 2013 Coomber Electronics28 November 2013 Coomber Electronics

1

MINUTES OF WORCESTERSHIRE LOCAL ENTERPRISE PARTNERSHIPBOARD MEETING

Thursday, 24 January 2013 3.00pm – 5.00pmCoomber Electronics, Brindley Road, Warndon Worcestershire WR4 9FB

PRESENT:Peter Pawsey (Chair) (PP) Chairman Robert West and Director Midland HeartAlan White (AW) MD Malvern Hills Science ParkDean Attwell (DA) MD Oakland International Cllr Simon Geraghty (SG) Deputy Leader Worcestershire County CouncilCllr John Campion (JC) Leader, Wyre Forest District Council (rep Northern DCs)Ed Webb (EW) Executive Chairman Webbs of WychboldCarl Arntzen (CA) MD Worcester Bosch Thermotechnology Cllr David Hughes (DH) Leader, Malvern Hills District Council (rep Southern DCs)John Callaghan (JCal) Principal, North East Worcestershire College

IN ATTENDANCE:Gary Woodman (GW) Worcestershire LEPClaire Bridges (CB) Worcestershire LEPCarole Rudolf (CR) Worcestershire LEPAhmed Goga (AG) Worcestershire County CouncilEmma Philpott (EP) Key IQ Limited

1. Welcome and Apologies

Peter Pawsey (Chair) welcomed the Board and Emma Philpott. There were no apologies.

2. Minutes of the Board Meeting – Thursday 22 November 2012 & 9 January 2013

The Minutes of the meeting held on Thursday, 22 November 2012 were agreed as a true record.

The Minutes of the meeting held on Wednesday, 9 January 2013 were agreed subject to an addition.

Item 7 - Any Other BusinessIn relation to the discussion on the Marches LEP, AW suggested that we should contemplate some sort of ‘City Deal’ equivalent. JC backed this up by saying that Government were keen to hear ideas along those lines.

2

3. Matters Arising

Action List – 22 November 2012

1. Brown Signs : PP had met with Peter Blake who was happy in principal that LEP would have input into the process of renewing the county boundary signage.

2. PXP : GW was still awaiting feedback re Bromsgrove Technology Park.

3. Growing Places and the extra allocation to WCCC : SG suggested that LEP project signage was erected to show support for this project. GW to investigate.

4. RGF3- Green Bridge Project : A working group is still to be established. It was agreed that this would be raised at the Chair’s meeting in February. RGF4 has just been announced. The WLEP will consider its options on a number of potential bids.

5. Worcester Technology Park: A briefing paper will be circulated to Board Members in due course.

6. Planning Charter : CB gave brief overview. Planning Charter approved by WLEP and LPAs and discussions being held to convert the Planning Charter principles into delivery and fulfil the strategic objectives in the Business Plan. A Board Report will follow.

7. Regulatory Charter : WLEP and WRS are developing a joint action plan to deliver the Regulatory Charter; business engagement is bring scoped out with the LEP Board champion, Ed Webb. A Board Report will follow.

8. Armed Forces Covenant : CB reported that she had attended meetings with representatives of the Armed Forces and Covenant Working Group. A pilot model of how the Worcestershire business community and Armed Forces can deliver innovative solutions is being developed and will be reported to a future Board. WLEP had submitted a response on the Government Green Paper Reservists 2020.

9. Heseltine Review : GW reported that there had been no feedback from the National LEP Network and hence none required from WLEP.

10.Other Actions : All other actions are covered later in the Minutes.

Action List – 9 January 2013

1. Finance, Audit & Appointments Committee : Private Sector - Francis Christie, is still considering his position and Tony King is willing to be a member. Public Sector – Trish Haines had spoken with Kevin Dicks and would report back after Leaders Board Meeting next week. AG stated that Stuart Laverick had expressed an interest. It was agreed that this needed to be sorted quickly as the Audit

GW

CB

CB

GW

ALL

3

Committee needed to meet as soon as practical, in order to sign off the 2013/14 LEP budget.

2. PR contacts from Board Members: Feed back had been received from DA and EW. The Board were again asked to submit contact details.

3. PP has made initial contact with the current Marches LEP Chair, Geoff Davies, and is now awaiting a response.

4. LEP Cyber Strategy – Presentation by Emma Philpott

Emma Philpott - Key IQ Limited gave a presentation highlighting the importance of Cyber Security in business following her research and commission to write the Worcestershire Cyber Security Strategy. The aim being to establish Worcestershire as the national centre of excellence for cyber security and also to ensure that Worcestershire companies are the most cyber aware and safely operating in the UK. The strategy outlined eight areas for action – Skills, Finance, Growing SMEs, Infrastructure, Innovation & Start-Ups, Securing Worcestershire, Attracting New Companies and Publicity. These areas were prioritised in relation to the feedback received from the Cyber Security businesses that were consulted as part of the process.

The e-Skills element regarding the bid was discussed in some detail. It was agreed that the delivery of this National Training Centre of Excellence was a high priority. CA questioned the costs and timescales of potential delivery. EW and JC also felt that soonest practical delivery of the project was important to the LEP strategy.

AG informed the meeting that he was meeting with e-Skills on Friday 25 January. It was agreed that a full business plan would need to be produced in order to secure the funding to deliver the training centre. AG would circulate a briefing paper to the Board on the outcome of the meeting and actions to be taken. JCal highlighted the potential of a further education establishment close by which could provide the facilities to deliver such a training centre. All options would be considered following AGs briefing.

DH said that Malvern Hills District Council and partners recognised the opportunity for Malvern. JC stated that this was an opportunity for the whole of Worcestershire which needs to be seized. PP thanked Emma for her excellent piece of work. Emma Philpott left the meeting.

AW expressed concerns regarding the strategy paper and its credibility, stating that it was important to follow due diligence and have any documentation ‘peer reviewed’ by technical professionals within the industry before the Board approved the strategy. It was agreed that Steve Borwell-Fox, Business Board member, would conduct a review of the document by the end of January. Electronic comments would be distributed to the Board and a decision to approve a cyber strategy for Worcestershire would be made by e-mail.

AG

Steve Borwell-

Fox

4

The recommendations in the Board Papers would be brought back electronically before the Board once the review had been completed.

5. Manufacturing Study

It was agreed to commission suitably qualified consultants to undertake a study with manufacturers to identify manufacturing businesses in the area, identify any barriers to growth, determine support needs and make recommendations for future actions that should be taken by the LEP.

The Consultancy Brief is to be advertised by the end of the month, tenders to be assessed between 14-18 February.

CA to lead this process with assistance from Marcus Burton and Chris Akers (WLEP Business Board members) following which recommendations to be approved by the Board.

JCal questioned the skill needs of such businesses, with particular reference to the North East Worcestershire pilot project. It was agreed that JCal would also be involved in the development of this work.

The Board agreed that the study was commissioned.

CA

6. WLEP Business Plan – Working Session on Strategic Objective 1 – National Profile and Promotion

A general discussion took place. Prime topics were on how to lift Worcestershire’s profile to a national and international level, to identify USPs and establish what Worcestershire is good at and to increase visibility. SG suggested focussing on a few key issues rather than too many. The Board noted that a number of partnerships and organisations had tried to answer the question ‘what is Worcestershire’s USP’ without success. It was agreed that there are numerous stakeholders and bodies who have a contribution to make in this area. The LEP’s role will be to try and bring about some co-ordination and focus. During the discussion, it was highlighted that Worcestershire’s diversity was its strength, although this made it difficult to promote one or two things that are special to the county. Another suggestion was that the LEP really focussed on the opportunities which were presented through the game changer sites but also highlighting the high quality of life and history and heritage of the county. It was agreed that a high level marketing company be identified. PP asked that in the first instance the Board e-mailed the Secretariat with things they rate as important, the deadline for this being 1 February. All results could then be collated and redistributed to the Board.

ALL

7. LEP Funding & Accounts

GW explained the context of the various funding announcements that had been made by Central Government since September 2012. This specifically highlighted the immediate support of £125,000 where underspend can be carried forward, the core funding for financial years

5

2013/14 and 2014/15 of £250,000 on a matched basis and the Autumn Statement announcement of £500,000 over two years to develop a growth plan.

GW wished to bring the Board’s attention to the scope of the match funding in 2.4 of the report. The Local Government contribution of £150,000 from 1 September 2012 can be allocated as match funding. The Board previously had acknowledged that the LEP funding should be based on one third from Central Government, one third from Local Government and one third from business. It was noted that an altruistic cash donation of £100,000 from local businesses would be extremely challenging within the current economic climate. Over the coming month the Executive were working on a number of contingency plans to ensure Worcestershire LEP maximised this funding.

The Board noted the 1 April 2012/13 position as at 31 December 2012. It was acknowledged that the position statement did not account for the Local Government contribution starting on 1 September 2012, and not 1 April 2012 as indicated in this statement.

GW explained to the Board the first draft of the 1 April 2013/14 budget, recognising the following points:

1. Core funding 2012/13 – the carry over figure will be reduced depending on spend between now and the financial year.

2. The EU Funding Support Officer is a small financial contribution to a post which is shared between The Marches LEP, Stoke & Staffs LEP and Worcestershire LEP. External support relates to consultancy expertise that may or may not need to be brought in.

3. The communications budget figures are a significant increase on 2012/13 and this may be better shown as an allocation to strategic objective 1 – National Profile and Promotion, under project funding.

4. Until the guidance on growth plans is issued, the £250,000 shown as income is a direct charge in expenditure.

The Board, recognising this was a first draft, agreed that further work would be carried out before the Finance Audit Committee met to approve the budget, and then signed off by the Executive of the Board.

GW

8. Chair’s Report

PP had a positive meeting with QinetiQ, who were very keen to get involved with WLEP particularly with regards to defence and security.

Westminster – The National Infrastructure Conference held at the Institution of Civil Engineers: PP presented a paper on Worcestershire forward planning of all infrastructure supported by Worcestershire County Council’s planning team.

EW noted that there were a number of meetings on Worcester 6

Technology Park. This appeared to be the highest priority on the LEP in order to ensure delivery of results and outcomes. It was agreed that a future item for the Board would be brought forward in a briefing session.

GW

9. Executive Director’s Report

1. Autumn Statement – This is outlined as key bullet points in the report in relation to LEPs and the Heseltine Review. The points were acknowledged by the Board members. Two significant announcements will be made Spring 2013, they are Government’s formal response to the Heseltine Review and the Guidance To Growth plans. Once we have more information we will bring to the Board for consideration.

2. Away Day – Following feedback on availability it was agreed that the most suitable date for the Away Day was Wednesday, 10 April 2013. It was also suggested to possibly extend the attendees to include members of sub groups. A formal structure of the day will be put forward for approval in due course. GW requested approval for a budget of £4,000 for the day, which was agreed.

3. Board Members’ Declaration – GW informed the Board that a Declaration of Interests Form had been prepared, a copy of which would be sent to each member of the WLEP Board and WLEP Business Board for completion and return to Executive.

GW

GW

10.

National LEPs’ Business Plan Status

A summary of LEPs’ Business Plan Status was distributed with the Board Papers. GW suggested an Intern to research more fully, to ensure that WLEP is consolidating and developing its position favourably against all other 38 LEPs.

CB stated that in meeting other LEPs across the region and England, Worcestershire is progressing well and in a good position with its Business Plan. With regard to the Growth Plan and government criteria, we are still awaiting guidance.

Next LEP Board Meeting

23 May 2013 - 3.00pm to 5.00pm LEP Offices, Brindley Court, Gresley Road, Warndon, Worcester, WR4 9FD

7

Item 3: Action List, Correspondence & Approvals

Action List from the Minutes dated 24 January 2013

1. Growing Places – Extra allocation to WCCC: GW to investigate signage promoting LEP support.

2. Planning Charter – CB to prepare report for Board

3. Regulatory Charter – CB to prepare report for Board

4. Finance & Audit Committee – members to be appointed as soon as possible – GW

5. Board Members to provide details of their PR contacts

6. E-Skills - AG to circulate briefing paper to the Board

7. Review of Cyber Strategy document – Steve Borwell-Fox

8. Manufacturing Study – CA to lead process

9. WLEP Business Plan – National Profile & Promotion – All to e-mail Secretariat with suggestions for USPs

10. A proposed budget for the LEP to be developed for 2013/4 in consultation with the Finance, Audit, Risk and Appointment Committee.

11. Worcester Technology Park – Briefing session for the Board – GW

12. It was agreed that there would be value in meeting for an LEP Away Day to aid communication, review progress and prepare the partnership for the next financial year. – GW

13. Board declaration of interest forms were to be sent for completion by Board and Business Board members.

8

Item 4: WLEP Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy

WLEP BOARD RECOMMENDATION

The LEP Board is recommended to:a) note the Government requirements and timescale for the WLEP Growth Plan

and EU Investment Strategyb) agree the proposed WLEP timeline as set out in Appendix A c) confirm the Task and Finish Group and its Terms of Reference in Appendix B

which will oversee the process

1.0 Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy

1.1 In April, the Government announced that each LEP is required to prepare a new Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy (and ultimately Single Pot bids) through one integrated approach and have both documents in place by Spring 2014. This signals a step change in the Government’s recognition of the LEPs’ status and establishes an expanded remit. This shift purposefully introduces one single, joined-up programme and responds to the Heseltine Review’s criticism of the Government’s existing “top-down and one LEP size fits all” model and starts to recognise diversity amongst LEPs.

1.2 A fundamental feature will be the strengthening of the direct Government - LEP relationship to establish a mature mechanism for mutual continuous conversations and negotiations which resolve LEP ambitions with funding opportunities available across various national Government policy programmes and EU funding sources. This will provide opportunities to jointly explore other potential levers and resource alignment from wide-ranging funding sources as well as act as an “early warning system” for each LEP to raise issues and concerns.

1.3 Government guidance specifically signals a clear expectation that the Growth Plan ambition needs to identify its challenges, innovations, opportunities and proposals in detail first and then the LEP should look at the blend of Government, European and other funding sources needed to ensure delivery will happen. This is a significant change to previous funding requirements where project identification followed once each funding programme allocation had been secured in separate silos. In aligning the Government and EU funding streams, LEPs’ Growth Plans are expected to comprise robust, imaginative and holistic solutions.

1.4 The Growth Plan needs to be in position by Spring 2014 with cross-reference and connections made to the emerging parallel EU Investment Strategy. While both parallel timescales are slightly different, the Government expects that by October 2013, the LEPs should be in a position to substantially confirm the Growth Plan and determine actual funding requirements. This will enable Government to calculate resources needed to underpin delivery from 2015 onwards, whether from Government Departments or EU Structural funds.

9

1.5 The Government has endorsed one of the Heseltine Review recommendations for a “Single Pot” for LEPs to bid against competitively. The Government will reveal the nature and extent of the fund when it publishes Single Pot Guidance on 26 June 2013 alongside a simultaneous announcement on the Comprehensive Spending Review. The WLEP Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy need to set out a strong long term strategy with clear priorities for the LEP to access this fund successfully. Funding for skills, housing and transport are already indentified as commitments. Ministers liken the Single Pot bids to the City Deal process which is viewed as an exemplar template. Government will allocate a basic sum for each LEP but Ministers want a strong competitive edge featured in the negotiations as it is felt that incentivised competition between LEPs will drive up the quality of the Growth Plans and, as a consequence, enhance the funding deal given for individual LEP bids.

1.6 Recent Government letters confirming the WLEP budget (250k per annum over next two years) intend that the additional funding augments each LEP capacity to create and develop the strategic Growth Plan, EU Investment Strategy and Single Pot bids. Government representatives will provide co-ordinated support to the WLEP in considering WLEP Growth Plan challenges, opportunities and priorities and, on WLEP’s behalf, securing Government support across the national policy and delivery landscape. In practical terms, there will be one Government-WLEP Channel through Kim Rowlands/Ian Smith, BIS WM with Emma Ward, BIS Central who will collectively co-ordinate contributions and support from BIS, DCLG, DEFRA, DWP, DfT etc. WLEP held its first bilateral with BIS WM in April and, apart from planned monthly meetings, contact is being made on a regular daily/weekly basis according to the WLEP needs and pace.

1.7 Leadership is needed to engage businesses, particularly SMEs, and a strong entrepreneurial flavour needs to be evident in the LEP plans and bids. Innovation is being encouraged and the Government is open to further delegated powers, freedoms and flexibilities if innovations can demonstrate that added value is being achieved. In essence, additionality and consolidated resources are intended to overcome genuine local weaknesses and demonstrate a bigger impact with growth as an important ingredient. Local Authorities are simultaneously challenged to consider alternative and innovative models of delivery which establish concrete resources in support of their LEP and align resources into the Growth Plan.

1.8 As a priority the LEP is expected to lead the development of the EU Investment Strategy to demonstrate objectives, priorities, proposals and allocation of supporting resources to enable delivery. The purpose of restructuring the separate EU funds into one single EU Growth Programme with a menu of opportunities is to encourage “growth in the round”. There are 10 thematic objectives/priorities and a strong focus on innovation, research and development, skills, housing, environment, infrastructure etc. The “new” features include low carbon economy, climate change (energy efficiency), protecting environment/resource efficiency/biodiversity, community-led local engagement/development and higher skills

1.9 EU Funds require domestic UK match funding which reinforces why there is now a need to combine with the Growth Plan and other national funding sources. The current Government guidance will be supplemented with more detailed guidance in June 2013. Government will aggregate the funding needs of the 39 LEPs into one English programme to present and justify to the EU Commission. This provides Government with the opportunity to assess LEP proposals, cumulatively and individually, and trigger opportunities for collaborative solutions or advise well in advance if LEP proposals need further amendment.

10

1.10 LEPs need to submit their EU Investment Strategy in September 2013 and LEPs will receive initial Government feedback in November 2013. A final EU Investment Strategy is required in January 2014 with implementation commencing in March 2014.

2.0 WLEP Approach

2.1 The WLEP Business Plan “The Outlook is Bright in Worcestershire” provides a sound starting point as the basis to work up the WLEP Growth Plan. This framework is supplemented by priority activities since November 2012 converting the Business Plan into delivery through the forming of WLEP Sub Groups and other initiatives. By their very nature, the Sub Groups are already incorporating wider stakeholder interests and expertise while firming up innovations and proposals for delivery.

2.2 Given the tight timescale, the Chair and WLEP Executive began discussions with LEP partners as soon as the Government Guidance was issued in April to scope out an initial WLEP timeline (attached in Appendix A). This outline will be worked up in more detail by the Task and Finish Group as it gets underway immediately following the WLEP Board.

2.3 A Growth Plan Task and Finish Group (GPTFG), chaired by Peter Pawsey WLEP Chair, is proposed as the mechanism to oversee the WLEP process in producing its Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy. The GPTFG will bring in additional partners’ and stakeholders’ expertise and knowledge as needed as well as commission services as development work evolves.

2.4 The GPTFG Terms of Reference are recommended in Appendix B. The GPTFG will report to the WLEP Board, which ultimately retains decision-making responsibilities, as well as liaise with WLEP Sub Groups and wider stakeholder engagement as outlined in Section 4.0 below suggested membership of the GPTFG is currently being drawn up and will be presented verbally at the meeting for approval and/or comment.

3.0 Delivery

3.1 The GPTFG will be responsible for developing the WLEP Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy based on the existing WLEP business plan and ensuring that it is suitable for delivery from April 2014 onwards. The Growth Plan will frame future performance management, preparation of pipeline projects via EU Investment, national programmes and other funding regimes and establish a simple integrated appraisal and evaluation process.

3.2 The first priority is to commission expertise and capacity from a specialised investment/economic expertise to support and work with the GPTFG and WLEP Executive in producing the Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy. A Tender Panel, comprising representatives of the GPTFG and core expertise from WLEP partners, will oversee the procurement process. A WLEP Tender Brief is being prepared and will be issued through the established WLEP procurement process and aims to have a WLEP consultancy appointed during June 2013. The successful consultancy will be expected to commence immediately and participate in the stakeholder consultation series currently being devised.

11

4.0 Partners and Engagement

4.1 A core Government requirement is that the WLEP incorporates wide stakeholder engagement to help shape its Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy. The WLEP is in a good position, having established stakeholder engagement at the heart of its activities over the last year in producing its business plan. Since November 2012, the WLEP has been broadening its engagement to include wider perspectives and interests as Sub Groups lead delivery plans and develop specific projects.

4.2 The EU Investment Strategy themes require the LEPs to engage wider stakeholder interests such as third sector, civic society, rural areas and environment interests. LEPs are expected to design and manage the engagement plan carefully and avoid being swamped by individual approaches. The WLEP will build on its own consolidating engagement, particularly with businesses, while working with key partners, organisations and networks which extend across Worcestershire and embrace the environment networks, rural communities and other key interests. Using effective communication channels (website, social media, local media) as well as involving local MPs will be inherent in the stakeholder engagement activities.

4.3 WLEP has established strong collaborative working with other LEPs around common themes and beneficial alliances, whether across the West Midlands, adjoining LEPs or others with shared priorities across the National LEP network. These alliances will facilitate the joint exploration of potential shared Growth Plan proposals and bids. There will also be opportunities to work unique local-national solutions with national programme providers such as MAS, Growth Accelerator and UKTI

12

Appendix AWLEP Growth Plan & Investment Strategy Timeline 2013/14

Timeline ActionsApril 2013 Government GP & IS Guidance and requirements announced

BIS/CLG, National LEP Network briefings; liaison with BIS and WM LEP Chairs/Executive

Preliminary discussions WLEP Board, WLEP Business Board, WCC/DCs

WLEP and BIS Relationship Channel - Kick-Off meeting

Form WLEP GP & IS Task and Finish Group to lead: scope out and deliver WLEP stakeholder engagement process with partner

leads develop GP & IS approach from WLEP Business Plan prepare contract brief for investment expertise and liaise with successful

consultancyMay 2013 WLEP and BIS Liaison (WLEP to co-ordinate WLEP partners knowledge,

expertise; BIS to co-ordinate DCLG, DEFRA, DWP, DfT etc)

WLEP GP & IS Task and Finish Group meeting

Tender/Appoint investment consultancy

Develop ambitions/principles of Growth Plan

Begin developing evidence base/robust business case for Growth Plan, incorporating EU Investment Strategy funding streams and aligned government national funding programmes in holistic support

Continuous liaison across LEPs (West Midlands LEPs, surrounding LEPs and nationally for synergies and alliances)

Confirm/organise WLEP stakeholder consultation process

16 May Leaders’ Panel Update from WLEP

23 May – WLEP Board (approval of WLEP approach, timetable and Task & Finish Group)

Explain Outline WLEP Growth Plan to BIS (pending stakeholder outcomes and planned GP and IS detailed development)

June 2013 WLEP and BIS Liaison (WLEP to co-ordinate WLEP partners knowledge, expertise; BIS to co-ordinate DCLG, DEFRA, DWP, DfT etc)


5 June WLEP Business Board and WLEP Sub Group consultations to contribute to GP/IS as part of normal agendas

GP/IS Stakeholder Consultations: Individual WLEP Liaison meetings – UKTI, MAS, Growth Accelerator etc

w/c 3 June WLEP ESB – Skills Stakeholder Workshop (ESB Chair to confirm and include education providers)

5 June WLEP & Worcestershire Environment Partnership Stakeholder Workshop (confirmed)

13

June 2013w/c 10 or 17 June WLEP & LTB Joint Transport/Infrastructure Workshop (to be confirmed with Peter Blake and WLEP PDI SG Chair)

19 June WCC European Funding Workshop for Stakeholders (WCC and DCs to confirm invitees but assumed inclusion of “Voices” - community, voluntary and LEDE/Social, housing and local authority representatives)

26 June Special WLEP Business Board – business community consultation

26 June Government Guidance on Single Pot criteria for LEPs and CSR announced

Consolidate/Detail Growth Plan ambitions and underpinning evidence, business case and aligning EU Investment Strategy, Single Pot and national programme funding streams in principle

July 2013 3 July Special WLEP Board – (review outcomes of stakeholder consultations, approve co-ordinated emerging Growth Plan, EU Investment Strategy, Single Pot and other programme ambitions)

4 July – Joint West Midlands LEP Event

WLEP and BIS Liaison – submit outline ambitions (as approved by WLEP) for informal Government feedback (WLEP to co-ordinate WLEP partners knowledge, expertise; BIS to co-ordinate DCLG, DEFRA, DWP, DfT etc)


Continue refining Growth Plan ambitions and underpinning evidence, business case, EU Investment Strategy, Single Pot and national programme funding streams

25 July WLEP Board – GP/IS Progress ReviewAugust 2013 WLEP and BIS Liaison (WLEP to co-ordinate WLEP partners knowledge,



Continue refining Growth Plan ambitions and underpinning evidence, business case, EU Investment Strategy, Single Pot and national programme funding streams

29 August Leaders’ Panel Update from WLEPSeptember 2013

4 September LEP Business Board – consider emerging Draft Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy

WLEP and BIS Liaison (WLEP to co-ordinate WLEP partners knowledge, expertise; BIS to co-ordinate DCLG, DEFRA, DWP, DfT etc)


26 September WLEP Board (approve final draft of Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy)

Submit Draft Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy to GovernmentOctober 2013 WLEP and BIS Liaison (WLEP to co-ordinate WLEP partners knowledge,



14

October 2013 Continue refining/amending Growth Plan ambitions and underpinning evidence, business case, EU Investment Strategy, Single Pot and national programme funding streams

November 2013

Government feedback to WLEP on Draft EU Investment Strategy



Continue refining/amending Growth Plan ambitions and underpinning evidence, business case, EU Investment Strategy, Single Pot and national programme funding streams

21 November Leaders’ Panel Update from WLEP

Government feedback to WLEP on Draft Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy

28 WLEP Board – GP/IS Progress ReviewDecember 2013

4 December WLEP Business Board – GP/IS Progress Review



Refine/Amend Draft EU Investment StrategyJanuary 2014 WLEP and BIS Liaison (WLEP to co-ordinate WLEP partners knowledge,



WLEP Board - to approve Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy

Submit Final Growth Plan to Government; convert into Delivery from April 2014 onwards

Submit Final EU Investment Strategy to GovernmentFebruary 2014 WLEP and BIS Liaison (WLEP to co-ordinate WLEP partners knowledge,



Prepare Growth Plan Delivery from April 2014 onwardsMarch 2014 WLEP Board



Prepare Growth Plan Delivery from April 2014 onwards

15

Appendix B

WLEP Growth Plan & Investment StrategyTask and Finish Group - Terms of Reference

The Worcestershire LEP Board identifies its strategic ambitions in its business plan “The Outlook is Bright in Worcestershire” and provides the framework for delivery. The Growth Plan Task and Finish Group (GPTFG) is tasked to oversee the development of the business plan into a WLEP Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy on behalf of WLEP and in partnership with the wider business community, public and third sector interests to fulfil Government requirements and deadlines in 2013/14 to raise Worcestershire’s national profile. The GPTFG has been established to:

oversee the preparation and development of the WLEP Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy in accordance with Government guidance, requirements and timescales

advise, monitor and submit recommendations regularly on the evolving WLEP Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy, risk management and delivery implications to the WLEP Board for decisions and approvals

enhance the WLEP’s ability to draw on a wider range of people, organisations and expertise

design, plan and manage the WLEP stakeholder engagement as an integral part of the Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy process

procure and manage the commission of specialist investment/economic expertise and any other expertise which is needed to support the WLEP in producing its Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy

maintain a watching brief on local to national level issues which will inform WLEP lobbying of government, the development of the Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy and support alliances with other LEPs

monitor and comment on the delivery and associated risks of the WLEP Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy

16

Item 5 Growing Places Fund – Panel Recommendation


The LEP Board is recommended to:a) Approve the projects with conditions outlined.b) To ask the executive to consider options for the remaining funds.

1.0 Context1.1 Worcestershire Local Enterprise Partnership (WLEP) has been allocated £5.5m through

central Government's Growing Places Fund (GPF). The amount of funding was based on a formula of population and employed earnings. The funding is intended to boost economic activity by unlocking development.

1.2 Approximately £3.5m is available in round two. WLEP – with Worcestershire County Council as the accountable body – will allocate funds through loan and equity financing.

1.3 The Growing Places Fund is therefore important to unlock growth and jobs in Worcestershire through a programme of projects which will support the creation of an environment to encourage the public and private sector to invest in our local projects.

Eligible activities

Projects must: Support WLEP priorities Be located (fully or partly) in Worcestershire Begin within 12 months of funding being allocated Deliver change and growth to Worcestershire within a short timescale Safeguard and create jobs in Worcestershire (direct and indirect) Be economically viable Be completed in a timescale to ensure loan repayment within 5 years

3.0 Allocations in Round One.

3.1 Cricket Club – documents all agreed our end pending approval to the deed of variation by the Clubs bank and sport England. Contracts will be signed the end of the month and then signage from the LEP will be able to be displayed.

3.2 Hoo Brook / Kidderminster Enterprise Park – Both LEPs have now an agreement with St. Francis group in place regarding security of the loan. This will mean a reduced figure of £900,000 from each LEP being drawn down for the completion of the Phase 1 of the Hoo Brook link Road.

4.0 Round Two Panel Recommendations4.1 Johnson Vellen – A detailed paper was circulated in relation to this project. The Board

agreed that it would joint fund with Wychavon District Council (£94,000each) the project subject to due diligence, A review of the board governance structure, A full defined

17

business plan and a legal agreement with South Worcestershire College. Wychavon have agreed their part of the loan and the process of due diligence has started with Worcestershire County Council.

4.2 Malvern Hills Science Park.

The Science Park is one of the LEP Priority employment sites. There has recently been a successful planning application for Phase 4 of the Science Park. This is a facility which is dependant on the spin out of Goodrich and them signing for a Phase 4. Worcestershire County Council as shareholder has £4m to develop Phase 4, which safeguard and create up to 85 jobs. The panel is recommending making a £1m available to Worcestershire County Council. If agreed further detail would come before the Board within a 12 month period. It should be recognised that further phases of the Science Park are planned for development and any award should not preclude further proposals being brought forward at a future date in relation to those future phases.

Recommendation: Approval of £1m loan facility to the WCC for a 12 month period, with further details to come before the Board and any future phases of development for the site can be brought forward if required.

4.3 Redditch Eastern Gateway

Savills and the Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) outlined a proposal for funding the delivery of Redditch Eastern Gateway, a regionally significant economic development opportunity and another of the four priority game changing sites identified.

The potential development comprises a total gross developable area of c. 24 ha (59 acres), suitable for up to 95,000 sq m of B1, B2 and/or B8 uses, made up of three parcels of land: The Winyates site is owned by the HCA whilst the Gorcott sites are owned by Adams’ Trustees; the parties are working jointly towards the promotion of the sites as employment land.

There are clear economic benefits of the development including the generation of circa 60 FTE positions during the construction period, approximately 1800 post construction jobs and producing circa £90M GVA per annum.

Recommendation: Approval of £80,000 for the Environmental Studies to be completed. This would include the Flood Risk, Noise and Air Quality, Ground Investigation Phase II and Utilities, Transport Assessment, Topographical, Landscape, Trees and Archaeology; with a condition that a planning application is brought forward. Also any further funds that are requested from the LEP are aggregated between the project which has 3 LEPs, 2 County Councils and 3 District Councils involved.

4.4 Marina Point

The project is looking to develop units which were part developed but halted because of the banking crisis. They have stood half built on the Marina Point Industrial Estate in Stourport for four years. It is the intention of the developer and project team is to create a business incubator centre to support entrepreneurs who are looking at starting a business and

18

provide managed workspace to continue, grow and develop their existing businesses whether large or small. This would be supported by Forum training.

The costs of the scheme is £1.2m, this covers utilities, constructions costs related to bring the half built buildings in to use. The construction period is 26 weeks. The estimated number of jobs created is 50.

Recommendation: The panel considers that the managed workspace option would be competing with a number of local centres. Further information is requested on the demand within the market place. The funding request is for 100% of the project costs and the GBS LEP should be approached for a 50% contribution of any LEP contribution. Finally, clarity on the payback and return of the project needs to be determined. Further work to be done before any allocation considered.

4.5 Worcester 6th Form College

The project involves the construction of the first phase of a new Science Centre at the College. A significant proportion of the funding for this is already in place, however, there is a gap in funding without which the project could not proceed. The College therefore seeks to meet this need through the Growing Places Fund.

The College is an extremely successful provider of Level 3 (predominantly A Level) courses in STEM subjects. Last academic year we had over 1500 enrolments on Science, Technology and Maths subjects (a growth of over 15% since 2008). Through this, we make a major contribution to meeting skills needs in this sector locally and in terms of enabling progression to Higher Education courses in these subjects.

The total project costs £2.5m, £2m of which is in place and therefore they are asking for £500,000, the project would create 2 direct jobs and have a five year payback period.

Recommendation: The panel could see the merit for the 6th Form to invest in such a project. Also there was a high degree of security and payback within the financial modelling of the project. Concerns were expressed about the 6th Forms connectivity to local employers and the project benefiting local employment. Board need to consider if any funding is allocated.

4.6 Evesham Country ParkThe site comprises some 41 hectares of existing Country Park located to the north ofthe urban boundary of Evesham. The access is off the roundabout on the A46 site and the site goes down to the River Avon.

The site is an existing tourist attraction featuring garden centre, a range of craft andretail shops, and Evesham Vale Light Railway. The project is to provide a sub-regional leisure destination by expanding the leisure Retail, cafes offer and proving educational facilities together with 60 holiday lodgesset in the parkland with lake views.

Eagle Land on behalf of Eagle One Country Shopping (EOCS) has been progressingdevelopment on the site since 2008. With Planning permission granted with associatedconditions.

Progress has also been made in identifying anchor operators and end users for theretail outlets, but as yet the further development is stalled at this marketing stage,

19

with the risk that interest may evaporate if no clear delivery can be evidenced.

The total project cost is £13.7m with a requested contribution of £2.3m, which is broken down into £1.5m contribution towards the infrastructure for the retail and leisure and £700,000 contribution towards the lodges. This project would create approximately 300 jobs.

Recommendation: Approval of a slightly lower figure suggested £1.5m to compensate that the LEP would be the 100% funder of the infrastructure on the retail and leisure. Other conditions would include, clarity on the planning conditions and pre lets related to the retail development and security of the loan, that is on the parent company and not this site.

20

Item 6: Local Transport Body

WLEP BOARD RECOMMENDATIONThe LEP Board is recommended to:

a) Nominate White Logistics and Pete Cullen to represent the Worcestershire LEP on the Local Transport Body. b) To approve the use of the Department of Transport allocation to jointly fund the independent assessment of the scheme with the Worcestershire County Council. This is a figure of £15,000.

1.0 Context1.1 The Department for Transport has devolved funding for major transport schemes to Local Transport

Bodies which are a voluntary partnership between the Local Highways Authority and the Local Enterprise Partnership.

1.2 Their primary role is to prioritise investments following evaluating the business cases and ensuring the delivery of the chosen schemes over the period 2013/14 to 2018/19.

1.3 The Department for Transport requires each LTB to develop an assurance framework, which sets out governance and working arrangements for LTBs.

1.4 The Department for Transport allocated the Local Enterprise Partnership £131,450 to support the work of the Local Transport Body.

2.0 Membership of Local Transport Body2.1 The Local Transport Body will have the following membership.

Bromsgrove District and Redditch Borough Councils are in the Greater Birmingham and Solihull Transport Body as well as the Worcestershire Local Transport Body.

Composition of the WLTB

2.2 The Assurance Framework, which includes all the governance and standard rules of operation, had to be submitted by February 2013 to the Department of Transport.

21

Representing BodyNumber of Delegates

Voting Member or Observer

Worcestershire County Council Elected Members

4 Voting

Worcestershire Local Enterprise Partnership 2 VotingBirmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership

1 Voting

Worcestershire District Councils elected Members – 1 Rep North 1 Rep South

2 Voting

National Transport Agency - Highways Agency / Network Rail

0 Observer

Worcestershire Transport Operators 0 Observer

2.3 The Worcestershire Local Enterprise Partnership representatives are recommended as Whites Logistics and Pete Cullen.

3.0 Delivery/Actions3.1 The indicative funding allocation provided to Worcestershire over the period is approximately

£11.5m and prioritisation must be developed through a transparent process of business case evaluation.

3.2 A call has gone out to partners and the private sector for schemes which meet the following criteria:

- A scheme threshold of £2.5m- A local contribution requirement of 25%- Submissions based on a business case, inc. strategic, financial, economic and delivery

assessments.

The deadline for submissions is the 31st May 2013.

3.3 Worcestershire County Council has tendered to secure the services of a suitable Transport Consultancy to independently assess the submissions and provide appropriate information and recommendations for WLTB to consider. The deadline for tenders to be received is the 15th May 2013. It is recommended that the LEP use part of its funding to joint fund this independent assessment.

4.0 Partners and Engagement4.1 Regular updates of the LTB will be brought forward to the Board and, if required, Business Board for

information and input to decisions.

4.2 The private sector has been asked to submit schemes. Once the priority schemes have been chosen these will be communicated to the business community through the business networks.

22

Item 7: Chairs Report


The WLEP Board is recommended to note the details of the report and seek clarification where required.

January

25th Malvern Russian delegation from Attended and presented on WLEP Ulyanovsk Region organised by and Worcestershire business Harriet Baldwin MP opportunities. Visit included Morgan

Cars and MHSP with reference CyberSecurity.

28th Malvern Meeting MHDC leader, deputy General review and update meetingand economic portfolio holder on LEP progress and MHDC prioritiesand officers. and issues.

30th Redditch Apprenticeship programme launch Attended and supported the initiative event at the Kingfisher Centre to create and add 50 apprenticeships

in 50 days.

February

5th Malvern Breakfast launch event for Attended and supported event initiativeBusiness Central at the Abbey Hotel.

7th Pershore Meeting Jack Hegarty (CEO) and Regular review meeting to report onPhil Merrick (Dir. Econ. Devt) LEP progress and to understand

WDC priorities and issues.

11th Worcester Meeting with John Dodds To discuss and understand St Modwens’Regional Director and Julie priorities and potential developmentRossiter St Modwens. programme for Worcestershire sites in

their control.

13th Worcester Meeting with Mrs Yamaguchi To explore the potential forand colleague from Japanese Japanese businesses to invest in Business Desk in London. Worcestershire and the process of

potentially hosting the Japanese team at the 2015 Rugby World Cup.

15th County Hall Shenstone Group meeting. Regular meeting to progress 2040 vision document.

20th County Hall EU funding group Meeting to understand EU Fundingand opportunities for the LEP and maximising funding into Worcestershire.

21st Birmingham West Midlands Chairs Meeting Quarterly meeting.

23

21st Bromsgrove Meeting with Leader & Chief To discuss prospects for bringing Officers, Bromsgrove DC proposed Food Park at Oakland along-

side A435 to planning reality.

22nd LEP Office Mgt. Paul Brown, Black Country To discuss areas of common interestLEP and further opportunities for

collaboration

25th County Hall Meeting of the Executive Board To discuss key messages before meeting BIS.

March20th Malvern, Visit of Emma Ward, BIS Presentations at MHSP inc Cyber

Worcester Champion at Worcester Bosch for lunch regardingWorcester Tech Park and finally a visit to Fladbury

27th County Hall Meeting with John Hobbs and Review meeting re transport issuesPeter Blake.

27th LEP Office Meeting with Rural Hub and reps. To understand Rural Hub and prioritiesrelated to the rural sector.

April

5th Pershore Mtg. M3 advertising agency Prelim discussion on the profile and promotion and the big picture campaign of Worcestershire.

9th Malvern Mtg. Charles Morgan and Steve To discuss Morgan ambitions for new Morris larger production base and consequent

development.

10th Stanbrook Abbey LEP Away Day Annual away day for LEP Board, Business Board members and selectedpartners.

11th LEP Office Meeting with Barrett/Wilson Exploratory meeting with developer Bowden group on the key sites in Worcestershire.

11th Worcester postcodeanywhere.com new office Attended launch event of exciting young opening. business.

26th Pershore Russian delegation from Bryansk Attended & presented to delegation on Birlingham Region organised by Harriett WLEP and Worcestershire business

Baldwin MP opportunities particularly the horticultureand agri-food sector. Visit included Pershore College and Red Star growers at Birlingham.

May 2nd County Hall EU Investment Strategy meeting Chairing a meeting with DCLG, BIS,

DEFRA representatives as part of the preparation of Growth Plan and EU Investment Plan.

24

15th LEP Office UKTI Inward Investment service To understand better the available help and processes necessary for maximisinginward investment opportunities forWorcestershire

15th Worcester University Summer Reception Attended event which was good Worcester Arena networking with partners and

stakeholders of the LEP.

17th County Hall Worcester Technology Park board To finalise bid for RGFmeeting

Peter Pawsey17th May 2013

25

Item 8: Executive Directors Report


a) Agree the programme for delivery of annual conference in October 2013. b) Note the contents of the report.

LEP Annual ConferenceIn order to prepare for the Annual LEP Conference, we propose that a tender is issued to appoint a conference organiser in the next month. We are looking for an innovative way to present our successes and gather key messages to the wider audience. It is proposed due to other events planned that we bring this forward into October. Proposed dates of the 10 th / 11th October are suggested. We are looking to develop the programme before the summer and will bring a report to the next Board meeting.

StaffingSince the approval of new staffing structure at 9 January 2013 we have now recruited Jan Bailey, to the role of PR and Communications Executive for the WLEP. Jan began her role on Monday 13 May and we welcome her to the team.

We have also recruited on a self employed basis for a three month contract, Victoria Cronin who will be building the access to finance network culminating in a launch event to professionals to secure the commitment and buy in to the LEP and the access to finance proposition.

We have interviews with a number of graduates to appoint a graduate researcher for the LEP.

LEP FundsEnd of Year Accounts will be presented at the next Board meeting. Preparation of the accounts is taking place by Worcestershire County Council Finance team.

Government Ministers approved our application for the maximum award of £250,000 of core matched funding towards the running of the LEP and this will allow the organisation to increase its resources and capacity to engage with a greater number of Worcestershire businesses and to move on faster with our many initiatives.

26

Item 9: WLEP Sub Groups’ Feedback


The WLEP Board is recommended to note the progress of the WLEP Sub Groups.

1.0 Summary of Sub Groups’ Progress

1.1 The WLEP Sub Groups which encompass strategic policy objectives, sector priorities, specific topics and Finance, Audit, Risk and Appointment Committee have been progressing respective responsibilities, development and delivery proposals. All have taken on board the soundings and observations raised during the WLEP Away Day on 10 April 2013 and progress can be summarised as follows:

National Profile and Promotion

Initial brainstorming meeting held Key strengths and USPs identified Updated/strengthened at LEP Away Day Initial discussions with Marketing Agencies Identification of others Draft High Level Strategic Steering Group proposed first full meeting 4th June Draft members list drawn up for comment/approval

Access to Finance

Appointment of Victoria Cronin on a self employed basis to sign up private sector to LEP model.

Completion of the Web portal which provides advice, information and a finance network Launch of the portal to the professionals in July 2013. Work with Finance Worcestershire under the banner of LEP, FinditinWorcestershire to

deliver large funding event on 19 July 2013. Establishment of the Access to Finance sub group with representatives in order to drive

forward this agenda for the LEP. Appointment of Roy Irish to the Business Board and representative on the Regional

Finance Forum.

Employment and Skills

A lead and focus to the Employment and Skills Board and delivery of the strategy. Questionnaire to all 28 High Schools with 19 responses. Establishing a relationship with Worcestershire Association of School Headteachers

(WASH) Building an Employer offer to schools in establishing that offer; this includes, work

placement programme, careers, advice and guidance, curriculum development, teacher development and governing body representation.

Planning, Development and Infrastructure

27

WLEP PDI Sub Group formed comprising multi disciplinary business perspectives Good collaboration with LEPs – West Midlands and alliances with surrounding LEPs Shared learning and practice exchange across National LEP network Collaborative working established between WLEP, LPAs/WPOG and Statutory Consultees

at kick-off event on 10 May 2013 Developing initiatives with strong business cases to feature in WLEP Growth Plan, Single

Pot, EU Investment Strategy 4 game changing sites underway – second wave next priority National Pinch point programme (Junction 4/M5 capacity, J9 M5 and A46 improvements at

Ashchurch) and Southern Link improvements secured Bromsgrove station (consultation) and Worcestershire Parkway bid - New Stations Fund. County Broadband project – moving closer to delivery Planning and Development Charter launched and now converting into Delivery

Manufacturing

We have tendered for the appropriate research expertise to conduct this piece of the work. The interview panel included Karen Drinkwater from JSC Rotational a small manufacturer in Wychavon.

We shortlisted 4 companies and appointed Worcester Research to conduct the study. Following Worcester Research’s appointment they have been pulling data of manufacturing

companies togother from different sources. We have agreed a list of topics for questions with members of the Board and Business

Board. A letter has gone out to all those companies on the database of over 1000 contacts making

them aware of the study. We have also press released that the study is taking place and the telephone survey has

started with Manufacturing companies.

Cyber Security

See Item 11 on this agenda for full progress report

Horticulture and Food Production

A review of the current structures and group that represent this sector is taking place. A meeting with Chris Brookes at Wychavon DC who led a piece of work in 2011 with sector

action plan has taken place and draft list of outputs drawn up. Several Meetings with Julia Page, Head of Pershore College ref sector skills gap &

Pershore’s Future held. A group of businesses has been identified from that meeting. Meetings already held with

soft fruit and ornamental segments of sector. Meetings being set-up with veg, food production & distribution key players

Meeting with Jacqui Bayliss held to ensure Horticulture Planning concerns get fed into planning charter

Regulators and Business28

See Item 10 on this agenda for full progress report

Armed Forces Covenant established strategic alliance between WLEP and Armed Forces West Midlands 143

Brigade (March 2013) WLEP positioned as lead in West Midlands LEPs and as a national pilot forming Sub Group with business perspectives and contributors from inside/outside

business Board (May 2013) first kick-off meeting to scope out Delivery Plan and stakeholder engagement (June 2013) Delivery Plan to identify short term project delivery and communications (May – December

2013) External funding bid to the national Armed Forces Covenant panel (Ministry of Defence) in

partnership with WM Armed Forces for 1 FTE to lead implementation of Delivery Plan and broker short , medium and long term project delivery

29

Item 10: Finance, Audit, Risk and Appointment Committee


The LEP Board is recommended to:1) Clarify the LEP Board’s role and the FAR&A Committee’s role and the process

for compiling and approving the LEP budget. In January, this was delegated to the FAR&A Committee (as an exceptional event). It is the Committee’s recommendation that the LEP Board must own the next budget and the FAR&A Committee can then perform its role of providing financial oversight and audit functions;

2) Require members of all LEP sub-committees to sign and file a Declaration of Interest.

3) Ask our BIS sponsor for examples of ‘best practice’ in the areas of:a) Applying for Funding from Government;b) Assessing Risk; c) Defining jobs and making appointments; andd) Reviewing and resolving complaints.

1.0 Context1.1 Appointments to the Finance, Audit, Risk & Appointments (FAR&A) Committee were

discussed at the January LEP Board Meeting. Francis Christie was appointed as Chairman and two meetings were held in February to get changes made and approve the 2013/14 LEP budget. This also highlighted the need for clarity about the roles and responsibilities of the LEP Board and the FAR&A Committee (see recommendation 1 above).

2.0 Proposal2.1 The FAR&A Committee will coordinate their meetings with the LEP budget cycle.

Therefore, the cycle of meetings for future years would be: June to review the end of year accounts for the previous year; October for a half-yearly budget review; and February to consider the budget for the next year’s business plan.Additional meetings will be arranged to work on particular aspects of the FAR&A Committee’s responsibilities.

3.0 Delivery/Actions3.1 The Committee met in April to review the Terms of Reference of the FAR&A Committee. A

further meeting is planned in June to continue work on clarifying the remit and defining the tasks that are needed.

4.0 Partners and Engagement4.1 Francis Christie will be writing to the members of the Business Board. The LEP Executive

Director has been asked to contact our sponsor in BIS and ask for examples of ‘best practice’ in the areas of:a) Applying for Funding from Government;b) Assessing Risk; c) Defining jobs and making appointments; andd) Reviewing and resolving complaints.

30

Item 11: Regulators and Business Partnership Charter Action Plan


a) note the WLEP Sub Group progress to date and the national recognition of WLEP as a national “Better Business for All” Championb) approve the Regulators and Business Partnership Charter Action Plan as the basis for detailed development, wider stakeholder involvement and deliveryc) approve the development of proposals, individually and collaboratively with other LEPs, to include in the emerging WLEP Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy

1.0 Regulation supporting Business Growth Landscape

1.1 The WLEP has established a strategic commitment to the regulation supporting business agenda and launched its Regulatory and Business Partnership Charter simultaneously with the WLEP Business Plan “The Outlook is Bright in Worcestershire” in November 2012. Following the Charter launch, the WLEP has been working with Worcestershire Regulatory Services, National Regulators and representative businesses and business member organisations to convert the Charter into delivery.

1.2 In November 2012, the WLEP was simultaneously announced as a national “Better Business for All” Champion and is being sponsored by BIS/Better Regulation Delivery Office (BRDO) to roll out the work of the two National Pathfinders (Greater Birmingham and Solihull LEP; Leicester and Leicestershire LEP). As a consequence, the WLEP has access to practical expertise and seed funding (£15,000) to establish essential foundations required by BIS/BRDO before 31 October 2013. WLEP and WRS are jointly matching existing resources and expertise to the BIS/BRDO support to meet the Champion requirements.

1.3 With Champion status, the WLEP is challenged to apply the shared Pathfinder learning, generic tools and products as well as devise its own unique solutions to help the local business community. Worcestershire LEP has therefore been forging strong alliances with both Pathfinder LEPs as well as other nearby Champions, namely, Black Country LEP, Stoke on Trent and Staffordshire LEP and Coventry and Warwickshire LEP, to explore collective solutions. The WLEP has also been asked to act as a lead mentor to The Marches LEP and Gloucester/Gloucester First LEP as both embark on initial steps in tackling this agenda.

1.4 The significance of Champion status is that it places the WLEP in a strong position to achieve early delivery of regulatory initiatives supporting businesses while building a robust business case to secure additional funding for longer term solutions through the WLEP Growth Plan and EU Investment Strategy negotiations process. There is also the potential to identify collaborative cross-LEP proposals through the relationships already forged with other LEPs as mentioned in paragraph 1.3 above as well as devise unique WLEP outcomes.

31

2.0 Regulation supporting Business Growth Delivery

2.1 The WLEP is working closely with its lead partner, Worcestershire Regulatory Services (WRS) to widen and deepen business and regulator engagement around key delivery priorities. Achievements so far include:

first Joint Business & Regulators workshop contributed to WLEP Business Plan (May 2012) launched Regulatory and Business Partnership Charter (November 2012) selected as BIS/BRDO “Better Business for All” LEP Champion on national Regulation

supporting Business Growth agenda (December 2012) established Worcestershire Regulators Forum comprising WLEP; WRS (Trading Standards,

Licensing, Environmental Health, Food Standards, Animal Health); National Regulators - Environment Agency, HMRC, ACAS, HSE, Fire & Rescue Service (November 2012)

Ed Webb confirmed as WLEP Board Champion and Chair of Business and Regulation Sub Group (November 2012)

WLEP positioned to share practical learning and explore collaborative solutions with nearby LEPs as well as across the National LEP Network (December 2012 onwards)

Business and Regulators Workshop held to shape first joint Charter Action Plan (March 2013)

BIS/BRDO National Pathfinders and Champion LEPs Shared Learning Event (May 2013) formation of the WLEP Business and Regulators Sub Group to lead the Charter delivery

(May 2013)

2.2 The main outcome of the joint March 2013 workshop is the first Charter Action Plan which identifies actions and next steps to take the Regulations supporting Business Growth agenda forwards in Worcestershire (see attached as Appendix A). This outlines the key themes and work streams that the newly formed Sub Group (explained further in Section 3.0) will focus on during the next year in partnership with other interests. The Action Plan aims to develop and deliver short term projects which establish a momentum for change. It will also provide a platform to find longer term solutions as well as promote positive messages which aid wider business engagement. The Charter Action Plan initiatives and innovations will also feature as integral commitments in the WLEP Growth Plan ambitions and consolidate aligned funding streams to aid delivery.

2.3 The primary focus of the Charter Action Plan in this early stage is on a “Made in Worcestershire” Horticulture and Food Production Sector Pilot. There is significant shared interest and ambition from a range of businesses which feature in the “field/farm to fork” supply chain, from local food provenance through production processes and innovative technologies to retailers and distributors. It is pertinent to focus on streamlining regulatory experiences and exploring constructive ways which support new and expanding businesses in this significant market sector as identified in the Business Plan while testing out new ideas which will generate more generic solutions to help other business sectors. This work will augment Worcestershire’s unique food/horticulture sector offers while raising the WLEP national profile.

32

3.0 Regulation supporting Business Growth Engagement

3.1 A culture of business-regulators joint endeavour which brings all perspectives together and ensures shared development and delivery of beneficial local solutions will be established. The WLEP Sub Group (businesses) will link up with the Worcestershire Regulators Forum which combines local regulators (WRS) and various National Regulators.

3.2 The WLEP Business - Regulator Sub Group membership is currently being confirmed under Ed Webb’s leadership and will comprise representatives of the WLEP Business Board, business member organisations and individual businesses (corporate and particularly SMEs), all of whom participated in the WLEP March 2013 workshop and are keen to get involved. This does not preclude other contributions, expertise and interests which emerge across the business community as the Sub Group becomes more established.

3.3 The Charter Action Plan incorporates important core priorities around developing a communications plan (website, social media, press releases channels etc) to raise the Worcestershire profile and a strong commitment to deliver structured and sustainable engagement with the business community. The Sub Group will develop and confirm a prioritised approach which focuses on aligning communication channels and interactive engagement with established business fora, networks and member organisations, particularly those which support SMEs. This stakeholder approach will be essential to align and match resources, expertise and knowledge in order to lever other match funding sources from national and EU programme funds through the WLEP Growth Plan.

33

WLEP & WRS Regulatory and Business PartnershipConverting Charter into Action Plan

Initiative Purpose Actions Lead Target Date

First Joint Business and Regulators Workshop

Explore business’ and regulators’ initial interest, issues and ideas

Scoped out stakeholder processInclusion of Regulation supporting Growth in WLEP Business Plan

WLEP & WRS May 2012

Regulators Working Group

Established to co-ordinate and deliver information, guidance and support more effectively to help businesses - WLEP, WRS, Environment Agency, HMRC, HSE, Fire & Rescue Service, ACAS

Terms of Reference agreedBi-monthly meetingsOutcomes of Pathfinder Shared Learning Event considered/appliedPriority Actions identified

WLEP & WRS & National Regulators

Nov 2012

Regulatory and Business Partnership Charter

Charter to establish a strategic framework of principles for regulation supporting business growth. Charter publicizes a firm statement of intent locally, nationally and globally. Charter cross reference to WLEP Business Plan

Charter launched at WLEP Conference “The Outlook is Bright in Worcestershire” (300+ businesses)

WLEP & WRS, businesses, national regulators

Nov 2012

WLEP Board Champion

Ed Webb, Webbs of Wychbold confirmed as WLEP Board Champion and Chair of WLEP Business and Regulation Sub Group

To champion business needs; steer joint working with local/national regulators; oversee Charter converted to Action Plan

WLEP Nov 2012

Business and Regulators Workshop

Worcestershire business community, National Regulators, WLEP and WRS (35 representatives) to shape actions and priorities

Scope out first joint Charter Action Plan, priorities and targets

WLEP & WRS March 2013

WLEP Business and Regulation Sub Group

Sub Group formed to: lead, co-ordinate, facilitate,

monitor and review delivery of Charter and annual Action Plans

encourage an open, honest exchange and constructive challenge

Business-Led GroupLEP Board Champion (Chair)Delivery FocusBi-monthly meetings

WLEP & WRS April 2013

34

WLEP Business and Regulation Sub Group

between regulators and businesses

facilitate feedback on experiences between businesses and regulators

provide a consultative mechanism to help regulators shape innovative service delivery to meet local business needs and promote business success

build a positive relationship between businesses and regulators that improves compliance and supports business growth

Report initial Action Plan outcomes to Annual WLEP Conference and BRDO

October 2013

Wider Business Engagement – stakeholder meetings

Charter and Action Plan promotion through generic stakeholders meetings/events as follows:

WLEP Board & WLEP Business Board meetings

WLEP Business members/networks

Business membership organisations/networks/events – Chamber of Commerce, FSB, IoD, Mid West Rural Enterprises network

Key Trade Associations events/networks relating to priority business sectors

Seminars/workshops delivered/ attended by WRS/National Regulators prioritising the food chain

“How we can help your bottom line” - common scripts, texts, messages to adapt/deliver to various audiences. Co-ordinate and share regulator events.Target main audiences/priority networks

WLEPBusiness & Regulator Sub GroupWRSRegulators Working GroupBusiness Member Organisations

April 2013 onwards

Communications

Target Charter and Action Plan promotion through generic communications channels:

WLEP website WRS website and

Worcestershire authorities’ “Business Central”

WLEP Linked in and Twitter Groups

Links to National Regulators’ respective websites and social media channels

WLEP and WRS Press Releases

Show “How we can help your bottom line” - common scripts, texts, messages to adapt/deliver to various audiences. Co-ordinate and share regulator events.Target main audiences/priority networks


April 2013 onwards

35

Co-ordinated relationship management across WRS/National Regulators

Business and Regulators Summit

Promote initial Charter principles and strive to attain Action Plan outcomes. Constructive critical challenge of progress and set ambitions for next year

“Sense Check” Charter principles and progress with Action Plan with wider business audience and regulatory interests.Reaffirm/amend Action Plan and priorities


October 2013

WLEP Annual Conference

Promote achievements since Charter launch and ambitions for forthcoming year

Engage and sustain wider WLEP business involvement.Use Conference promotional channels to spread messages.“Sense Check” with wider WLEP audience to reaffirm/amend Action Plan and priorities


October 2013

Business Needs Survey

Undertake sample survey/analysis of Worcestershire businesses to identify business needs (alongside stakeholder engagement) and shape regulatory support, tools and products

Establish a benchmark for current business experiences of regulation.Establish baseline from which to measure future pace/effectiveness of planned actions and improvements

WRS Feb – March 2013

Create a Business Friendly Environment

Establish new, innovative Regulatory Delivery Model:

accessible advice – Smart Phone, “Talk to Reg” Phone app, links to ERWIN website, social media channels

website signposting – WRS/Business Central, WLEP, National Regulators, Business Member Organisations

website/publishable material in practical, simple language and

Determining detailed actions, tools and products which are responsive to business needs (survey and stakeholder discussions)


April 2013 – October 2013

36

pragmatic steps to aid self compliance

publish simple compliance code for business

“Single point of contact” - co-ordinate streamlined, constructive, synchronized risk-based regulatory support (WRS & National regulators) as an effective, tailored relationship management approach for any one business with web-based support

Business Lifecycle Development

Develop business support mapped against the Pathfinder Business Lifecycle Stages – micros/start-ups, expanding existing SME businesses and large/corporates

Preliminary scoping of each business lifecycle stage to formulate consistent streamlined combined offer by all regulators

Business & Regulators Sub GroupLocal/National Regulators Group

September 2013

Support for Micro/Start Up Businesses

Pilot “First Steps” Model as scoped out under “Business Lifecycle Development” above

WLEP, WRS, National Regulators to test co-ordinated programme of consistent practical advice, information and support


October 2013 – Feb 2014

Support for existing business, particularly SMEs

Pilot “Expanding Business” Model as scoped out under “Business Lifecycle Development” above

WLEP, WRS, National Regulators to test co-ordinated programme of consistent practical advice, information and support


October 2013 – Feb 2014

Primary Authority

Promotion of advantages of Primary Authority scheme to meet needs of large/corporate businesses in Worcestershire

Host targeted and collective workshop for corporate businesses; Follow up 121s with companies

WRS April – Sept 2013

Business Support and Mentor Model

Establishing an individual relationship between a lead regulator contact and business will build trust, confidence, transparency and consistency in providing tailored advice and support to help any business start, thrive and grow.

Businesses which have already achieved compliance as well as

Establish a business support team to coordinate regulatory advice and link with web-based signposts via ‘Business Central’, WLEP, WRS and individual National Regulators

Facilitate a Business Mentoring

Local/National Regulators Group

Business & Regulators

July 2013

37

business member organisations can facilitate a business-to-business mentoring role to help other businesses comply.

Scheme where businesses help other businesses with self-compliance

Sub Group

“Made in Worcestershire” Horticulture and Food Production Sector Pilot

One of four priority business sectors for Worcestershire in WLEP Business Plan (significant financial output contributing to Worcestershire economy, exports across UK, increased focus on local provenance and food miles, investment in innovative technologies etc)

Rural economy and “field/farm to fork” supply chain to be focus of Regulation supporting Growth initiatives (farmers, horticulturalists, food producers/manufacturers/distributors, retailers, caterers, consumers) and innovative solutions (connect to Regulation as a Market Opportunity below)

Identify Sector Working Group of key businesses (local producers/distributors, retailers, caterers) Trade associations (CoC, FSB, MWRECIC, NFU etc) and Regulators (Defra, EA, Animal Health, HSE, HMRC etc)

Facilitate Business-led Networking Forum to look at the feasibility of an accreditation scheme

Draft scope of project

WLEP,WRS,National Regulators,Local Businesses,Trade Associations,Business Member Organisations

July 2013

Regulations as a Market Opportunity

Explore opportunities to create new streamlined Regulatory Frameworks allied to new/emerging business markets. Focus on WLEP priority sectors i.e. Cyber Security, Food & Horticulture Sector (link to Pilot above)

Identify sector focus and key partners to work in collaboration. Draft scope of project


July 2013

Regulatory Culture

Ensure regulators are competent, professional and consistent in working with businesses. Regulators intend to fulfill the Charter principles and work with businesses to deliver the Action Plan and individual initiatives. Reinforce consistency, access, knowledge, and awareness across the regulatory system (local and national) while strengthening cross-regulator working and co-ordination

Shared Practice Event for all WRS/National Regulators to update knowledge and experience across all regulatory fields.

Pilot a Worcestershire Trading Places Scheme where businesses and regulators swap places for a day to enhance mutual understanding of barriers and

Local/National Regulators Group

July 2013

38

opportunities

Individual and team/organisational accountability through performance review and continuing professional development

Regulatory Charter and Planning Charter Connect

The Regulatory and Business Charter and parallel Planning and Development Charter both provide strategic frameworks and principles to steer culture change and initiatives which support business growth. While both focus on their priority actions, connections need to be made to help businesses receive clear, consistent advice on any development enquiry.

Explore and pilot co-ordinated approach around significant priority development sites as a means to pilot culture change for regulators and planners

WLEPWRSBusiness & Regulators Sub GroupPlanning Development Infrastructure Sub Group

April 2013 onwards

Regulation supporting Growth Shared Learning with West Midlands LEPs, BRDO Pathfinders and other Champions

West Midlands LEPs are sharing practical experiences and highlighting strategic issues and solutions about which they can collectively lobby Ministers and Government Departments. Regulation supporting Business Growth is one identified common theme which connects WLEP with one of the National Pathfinders (GBS LEP), BIS/BRDO and other LEP/Regulator Champions

Regular progress to be reported to WM LEP Executive Directors and Chairs

WLEPBusiness & Regulators Sub Group

April 2013 onwards

39

Item 12: Cyber Security Strategy


a) To approval the final draft of the Cyber Security Strategy. b) This is launched in Westminster as part of the profile of the LEP and this priority sector

1.0 Context1.1 Within the WLEP Business Plan we identified key sectors, this included Cyber Security & Defence.

Worcestershire is the home to QinetiQ in Malvern and the Malvern Hills Science Park which hasgiven birth to a number of spin out companies. This vital and emerging Cyber Security sector, has growth potential to embed itself across the county.

1.2 This sector has the ability to harness growth across boundaries into neighbouring LEPs, especially The Marches, with its military history and its current focus on the Hereford Enterprise Zone, and also Gloucestershire with GCHQ.

1.3 At the last Board meeting it was agreed that the work be peer reviewed by Cyber businesses. This has now taken place and a re draft is now presented back to the Board.

2.0 The Worcestershire Cluster2.1 Worcestershire has a cluster of small, innovative cyber security companies that have

developed in the area through a combination of locally available skills and proximity to customers. This cluster, known as the Malvern Cyber Security Cluster, is widely seen as the most developed, organised and active cyber security cluster in the country and has already started to make a name for the region in the area of cyber security.

2.2 The combination of a cluster of cyber security suppliers, growth in the market and a concerted central Government agenda to grow this area represents a unique opportunity for Worcestershire.

In order for a successful cluster of companies to thrive, WLEP recognises a number of factors that need to be considered. These are:

Skills development Suitable physical and communications infrastructure Customer awareness and commercial engagement

In parallel to the investment in cyber security activities, WLEP recognises the importance of promoting the work and success of the cluster both nationally and internationally; this will be important to attracting further business investment and resources into Worcestershire. As such, this strategy will be a key component of WLEP's National Reputation and Profiling strategy to promote position and showcase Worcestershire's economic and business strengths to investors, Government and international markets.

40

3.0 Summary of the aim, recommendations and actions3.1 Aim: To establish Worcestershire as the national centre of excellence for cyber security

ensuring that Worcestershire companies are the most cyber aware and safely operating in the UK supply chain

Recommendation 1: The WLEP should invest in ‘Worcestershire’s advantage’ - the latent growth potential that exists within the county’s cyber security suppliers

Recommendation 2: The WLEP should help promote Worcestershire to be recognised as the national hub for cyber security training, skills, products and services

Action 1: The WLEP to commission market research at the earliest opportunity to confirm the needs, role and focus for a Cyber Security Centre of Excellence in Worcestershire, with the facility being accessible to SMEs from Autumn 2013.

Action 2: The WLEP will collate, co-ordinate and promote all cyber security related courses referenced in this strategy which are available from existing Worcestershire Training Providers & Cyber Security suppliers under a single brand.

Action 3: The WLEP to actively work with e-skills to successfully deliver the national cyber security skills pilot and ensure that Worcestershire is recognised as a lead location for high quality skills development and talent generation in the sector.

Action 4: The WLEP should support, promote and encourage investment in the existing cyber security cluster in Worcestershire and facilitate connections with national and international networks whilst encouraging other clusters to setup (where opportunities exist) based on the successful model used.

Action 5: The WLEP will develop proposals to support Worcestershire businesses to attain full IASME accreditation and part or full accreditation to ISO 27001 standards.

Action 6: The WLEP should plan, develop and establish with partners and the cyber security sector a programme of regular events and seminars to raise the awareness of cyber security for local businesses in Worcestershire and highlight the capacity of the supply chain within the county.

Action 7: The WLEP will work with the Cyber Security Cluster, UKTI and stakeholders to develop and execute a wide-ranging and innovative marketing plan to promote and position Worcestershire as the investment location for cyber security businesses.

Action 8: The WLEP should work with the Cyber Security Cluster, the private sector and stakeholders to maximise the take up of support services via Worcestershire Business Central to ensure companies access business consulting & coaching, financial support and business to business opportunities to help them develop and grow.

Action 9: WLEP to work with BIS, UKTI and local partners to provide assistance for Worcestershire based cyber security companies to identify, understand and apply for Regional, Government and EU investment grants.

41

Action 10: The WLEP should work with the private sector, financial institutions and local stakeholders to develop a dedicated package of support measures to encourage and incentivise local employees, young people and potential entrepreneurs to establish cyber security start up companies in Worcestershire.

42

representing body - worcestershire lep€¦ · web view4.wlep growth plan and eu investment...

Documents