reproductive ecology and conservation of the rare dictamnus · reproductive ecology and...

16
Reproductive ecology and conservation of the rare Dictamnus V Congreso de Biologia de la Conservacion de Plantas 28 sept. – 1 oct. 2011 - Es Mercadal (Menorca) Alessandro Fisogni, Martina Rossi, Giovanni Cristofolini & Marta Galloni Department of Experimental Evolutionary Biology, University of Bologna - Italy

Upload: others

Post on 22-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Reproductive ecology and conservation of the rare Dictamnus

    V Congreso de Biologia de la Conservacion de Plantas 28 sept. – 1 oct. 2011 - Es Mercadal (Menorca)

    Alessandro Fisogni, Martina Rossi, Giovanni Cristofolini & Marta Galloni

    Department of Experimental Evolutionary Biology, University of Bologna - Italy

  • Dictamnus albus L.

    - Long-lived perennial herb (up to 30 years)

    - Flowering: April-May

    - Fruits: star-shaped capsules

    - Dissemination: autochory

    - Habitat: edges and clearings of warm mediterranean Oak woods (100-800 m a.s.l.)

    - Chorotype: eurasiatic

  • Rare and threatened both in Europe and Asia

    Italy: distribution limit

    Locally protected (I; EU)

    Study site

    Land-use change

    Suitable habitats fragmented and

    surrounded by agricultural landscapes; canopy closure

    SCI-SPA IT4050001 Natura 2000 Network

  • Phenology

    Phase ♂: 3.20 ± 0.20 gg Phase ♀: 2.70 ± 0.75 gg

    3 steps

    1 step

  • - Dichogamy ?Peroxidase test

    In vivo pollen tubes germination

    - Peroxidase activity only on upward bending stigmas

    - Lack of germinated pollen grains on downward bending stigmas

    Heterodichogamy

    Yes: protandry

    - Herchogamy

    Phenology

    Asynchronous maturation of flowers on the raceme - from bottom to top

  • In vivo germination

    All pollen tubes were longer than ¾ of - or as much as - the style

    0

    25

    50

    75

    100

    self control

    % g

    erm

    inat

    ion

    treatment

    n=15 n=13

    Physiologicalself-incompatibility?

    No

  • Open pollinated controls (C)

    Breeding system

    Agamospermy Stigma excision

    Autogamy Spontaneous (SS)

    Hand-pollinated (HS)

  • Reproductive success

    Significant diff.: SS - HS (p=0.02); SS - C (p

  • ♂♀

    Nectar analysis

    : open racemes: bagged racemes

    - Nectar analysis along the raceme

    - Comparison between bagged and unbagged racemes

    - Higher uptake in older phases

    - GBNP (♀ phase)

    Fisogni et al. 2011

  • Visitors vs.

    pollinators

    - Floral reward

    - Flowers visited per plant

    - Contact with receptive stigma

    : pollinators: visitors: no obs.

    Fisogni et al. 2011

  • Insect nRelative

    abundancePollen fidelity PI

    Apis mellifera

    8 0.13 0.94 0.12

    Bombus spp. 11 0.19 0.68 0.13

    Megachile sp.

    7 0.11 0.72 0.08

    Pollinator importance

    PI = relative abundance x fidelity

    Direct correlation between PI Max and fruit production

    Fisogni et al. 2011Galloni et al. 2008

  • Pollinator directionality

    1

    3

    5

    2

    4b ≥1 upward

    b ≈ 0 random

    b < 0 downward

    DirectionLine slope

    Flowers in different sexual phases at the same time on the raceme

    Hp: Possible geitonogamy (b ≤ 0)

  • Insect n b Modified Student's t

    p-value

    Apis mellifera 36 1.41 ± 0.35

    1.64 0.05

    Bombus spp. 10 1.87 ± 0.53

    2.35 0.02

    Megachile sp. 19 0.24 ± 0.48

    - 2.22 0.02

    Pollinator directionality

    Modified Student’s t = (b - 1) / SEb

    - Bombus and Apis: upward visits

    - Megachile: random visits

    b = 1: threshold beyond which geitonogamy has minor effect

    No geitonogamy

    Geitonogamy (weak effect)Fisogni et al. 2011

  • Pollinator limitation

    Hand pollen supplementation

    : C

    : S

    2007 (t-test) - Fr:fl: t = 2.15, p = 0.04 S:O: t = 2.35, p = 0.032008 (t-test) - n.s. diff.

    0,2

    0,4

    0,6

    0,8

    1,0

    2007 2008

    Fr:fl

    Year

    0,100

    0,325

    0,550

    0,775

    1,000

    2007 2008

    S:O

    Year

    * *

    43129 60127

    In 2008 more flowering plants

  • Demographic study

    Permanent quadrats (3x3 m) – years: 2008-2010

    2 ecological situations

    Wood edge

    Mature wood

    Class ages

    Seedlings (P)

    Juveniles (P2)

    Young – 3 leaflets (GT)

    Adults – non flowered (A)

    Adults – fruited (F)

  • Demographic study

    0

    12,5

    25,0

    37,5

    50,0

    P P2 GT A F

    Margine 2008

    Abb

    onda

    nza

    rela

    tiva

    Classi di età

    0,4

    15,3

    30,2

    45,1

    60,0

    P P2 GT A F

    Margine 2009

    Abb

    onda

    nza

    rela

    tiva

    Classi di età

    Wood edge2008

    2009

    0

    15

    30

    45

    60

    P P2 GT A F

    Margine 2010

    Abb

    onda

    nza

    rela

    tiva

    Classi di età

    2010

    0

    15

    30

    45

    60

    P P2 GT A F

    Bosco maturo 2008

    Abb

    onda

    nza

    rela

    tiva

    Classi di età

    0

    12,5

    25,0

    37,5

    50,0

    P P2 GT A F

    Bosco maturo 2009

    Abb

    onda

    nza

    rela

    tiva

    Classi di età

    0

    12,5

    25,0

    37,5

    50,0

    P P2 GT A F

    Bosco maturo 2010

    Abb

    onda

    nza

    rela

    tiva

    Classi di età

    2008

    2009

    2010

    Mature wood

    n=27

    n=25

    n=25

    n=215

    n=208

    n=239

    rela

    tive

    abun

    danc

    ere

    lativ

    e ab

    unda

    nce

    rela

    tive

    abun

    danc

    e

    class ages class ages