research paper writing for undergraduate students
TRANSCRIPT
RESEARCH PAPER
WRITING
BY:
Kern Rocke
Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension
Faculty of Food and Agriculture
The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus
Research Paper Writing Process
The purpose of this session is aimed at
identifying and examining the components
essential to planning and executing college-
level research writing assignments.
Research Paper Writing Process
At the end of this session, students should be able to:
1. Identify and conceptualize the essential steps in the research paper writing process;
2. Access valuable campus resources to help at various stages of the writing process;
3. Use time management strategies to plan for the successful and timely completion of a research paper project.
Many students share a common idea about the
task of writing a research paper:
Choose a topic
Do research on the topic
Write an essay based on your research
Yet the comments from the supervisor may be disappointing:
"No research question"
“Too general" or "Not sufficiently narrow”
"Improper use of sources“
"Much of this material appears to be
plagiarized”
"Inadequate references"
“No journal articles"
The Research Writing Process1) Choose a Topic
2) Find Information
3) Develop your Thesis Statement
4) Make a Tentative Outline
5) Organization of Information
6) Develop your First Draft
7) Revise Your Outline & Draft
8) Write the Final Paper
Research Paper Writing Process
1. Project Clarification
2. Time Management
3. Topic Selection
4. Topic Brainstorm
5. Library Visit
6. Locate/Select Sources
7. Survey Sources
8. Topic Focus
9. Read Articles
10.Preliminary Thesis
11.Outline
12.Draft Paper
13.Revise Paper
14.Sources of Help
Time Management
1. Write down all due dates.
2. Break down the research process into steps.
3. Assign a due date for each step.
4. Make weekly and daily priority lists.
Topic Selection
1. Previous knowledge
2. Course content
3. Personal or professional experience/interests
Topic Selection
1. Ask questions: who, what, where, when, why
What is it similar to or different from; what are the causes; what are the consequences; what is the essential function; what are the definitions; what is the history; what is the present status; what case can be made for or against it; how did it happen; why did it happen; what is my personal reaction to it?
2. Identify subtopics
Library Visit1. Browse the Drake Memorial Library website.
2. Tour the library.
3. Meet with a reference librarian.
4. Learn the difference between scholarly journalsand other periodicals.
5. Locate sources.
Survey Sources
1. Read abstracts, headings and subheadings.
2. Make note of charts, statistics, graphs.
3. Read the reference lists.
4. Read introductory and summary paragraphs.
5. Skim body.
Topic Focus
Go back to your original subject and focus it further based upon the information you gleaned during the text survey activities.
Read
Read once-Read write!
Take notes as you read: Develop a system of underlining, marking, and/or paraphrasing in the margins that is meaningful to you.
Thesis Statement Examples“ Although companies often have legitimate concerns that lead them to monitor
employees’ Internet usage—from expensive security breaches to reduced productivity—the benefits of electronic surveillance are outweighed by its costs to employees’ privacy and autonomy” (Hacker, 2007, p. 12).
“Much maligned and the subject of unwarranted fears, most bats are harmless and highly beneficial” (Hacker, 2007, p.10).
“ Understanding the limitations of medical treatments for children highlights the complexity of the childhood obesity problem in the United States and underscores the need for physicians, advocacy groups, and policymakers to search for other solutions” (Hacker, 2007, p. 453).
“Raging in mines from Pennsylvania to China, coal fires threaten towns, poison air and water, and add to global warming” (Hacker, 2007, p. 10).
Source
Hacker, Diana. (2007). A writer’s reference 6th edition. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Draft1. Begin to write in chunks of text defined by the
parameters of each main point.
2. Continuously refer to the thesis in order to stay on track. Use key terms from the thesis to thread each section together.
3. Integrate information from sources as you draft, and include parenthetical citations.
4. Move from point to point rather than from author to author.
Integrating Sources
Research papers demand abundant reference to professional sources. That is, your research paper will be generously populated with the voices of the published experts. Your job is to manage those voices, to synthesize them, to use them to substantiate your claim.
Integrating Sources
Use a variety of lead-ins to introduce concepts or findings from researchers:
1. According to Smith (2001), the presence of a television set in the home even changed eating habits; frozen TV dinners, TV trays, and TV tables altered the physical and social contexts of family meals.
2. By the early 1960’s, “90 percent of all households had at least one television set” (Bishop & Marx, 2006, p. 2).
3. Television programs and commercials reinforced rigid gender roles and promised consumers material wealth if they could fit the roles. One social critic from the era remarked that “television certainly nurtured both consumerism and conformity” (Cole, 1966, p. 24).
PlagiarismPlagiarism is using another writer’s words or
unique ideas as if they were your own. The
professor believes those are your own words or
ideas, because you have not shown that they
came from someone else.
This means that plagiarism is fraud –
pretending that the words or ideas in your
research paper are yours, when they actually
came from someone else.
Pointers
Should you Use the Words of
Others or Your Own Words?
Some students get confused about what a
supervisor wants. You are to do research, but if
you simply copy information the books and
articles, you are committing plagiarism.
If you use only your own ideas, then you are not
doing research that uses other people’s writing.
PointersYour supervisor wants you to read the books
and articles of other people. The research
project makes use of that research to present
your own analysis and arguments.
But how can a student use the work of others
if he/she is not allowed to quote their work?
Pointers
The quotations should be short (usually 5 lines or
less). My suggestion is to have no more than one
short quotation per page of your project.
Quotations must have quotation marks (" ")
around them to make it clear that they are
quotations.
All quotations must also be in your reference list.
Pointers
Most of your work is to be in your own words. This means:
That you show you have understood what you are reading by interpreting it in your own words.
That you are not just paraphrasing. Paraphrasing involves rewriting each sentence of something you have read, changing the wording a little bit. This is not enough to make the material "your own words.“
That you show that you can interpret what the writer is saying without needing to use many of the writer’s words.
Pointers
To avoid plagiarism, do not try to rewrite an
author’s sentences in your own words. You will
almost always use too many of that author’s
words.
Instead, read the author’s words and interpret
what they mean. Then write down your
interpretation.
Pointers
Supervisors are mainly interested in seeing how
well YOU have understood the material. They do
not want you simply to repeat what you’ve read
but to interpret what you’ve read, expressing
your own understanding in your own words.
But what if other writers have already expressed
their thoughts in better ways than you could ever
use? Why not just copy their words?
Because that would be plagiarism.
Pointers
How would a supervisor find out that I
plagiarized material?
Supervisors and examiners usually first see that
some of the writing in a paper is in a different
style from the student’s other writing, which is
usually a sign that the student is using words
from another author.
Pointers
How would a supervisor find out that I
plagiarized material?
With the number of electronic searching tools
we have today, supervisors can quite easily
identify work taken from web sites, articles and
even some books by using Turnitin!
Pointers
What, then, is the best way to use research from
other authors?
Quote only when something an author has said
really explains well what you are trying to say.
Quotations should be short, and there should be
few of them.
Introduction
The main purpose of the INTRODUCTION is
to give a description of the problem that will be
addressed. In this section the researcher might
discuss the nature of the research, the
purpose of the research, the significance of
the research problem, and the research
question(s) to be addressed.
Introduction
Every introduction contains three essential
components:
Rationale
Purpose
Research Question
IntroductionRationale: This focuses on informing the reader of
the rationale of your research study. It is a brief explanation of why your research topic is worthy of study and its significant impact of its contribution to existing body of research
Purpose: The statement of purpose is not simply a statement of why the research is being done. (That is what the rationale section is for.) Rather, "purpose" refers to the goal or objective of your research. The purpose statement should answer questions. . .
"What are the objectives of my research?" and
"What do I expect to discover or learn from this research?"
Introduction
RESEARCH QUESTION: The introduction
usually ends with a research question or
questions. This question should be. . .
Related to your research purpose
Focused
Clear
Structure of Introduction
1) Background
2) Rationale
3) Purpose
4) Problem Statement
5) Research Question
6) Aims and Objectives
7) Hypotheses
Writing the IntroductionIn the introduction you will need to do the
following things:
present relevant background or contextual
material
define terms or concepts when necessary
explain the focus of the paper and your
specific purpose
reveal your plan of organization
Writing the Introduction
Background
Like in any good Hollywood movie, the first task of the introduction is to set the scene, giving your paper a context and seeing how it fits in with previous research in the field.
Whilst not the only way, this section, comprising the first paragraphs of your introduction, can be based around a historical narrative, from the very first research in the field to the current day.
Stick to relevant information.
Writing the IntroductionImportance
This leads into the rationale behind the research,
revealing whether it is building upon previous
research, looking at something that everybody else
has overlooked, or improving upon a previous
research project that delivered unclear results.
This section can then flow into how you are going
to fill the gap. You are trying to predict what impact
your research will have if everything works as it
should.
Writing the Introduction- Tips
Begin your introduction by providing a concise
background accounting for the research problem
being studied.
Establish the significance of your project: Why
is there need to conduct your study?
Introduce the reader to the pertinent literature.
Do not give a full historical view point of your
topic. Only reference previous work which had
a direct impact on the research problem.
Writing the Introduction- Tips
Provide a concise discussion the results and
findings of other studies.
Move from general to specific: from the
problem in the real world to the literature to
your research study.
Identify gaps in the present body of literature
State the objective and hypotheses of your
study.
Write in the present tense and be concise.
Purpose of a Literature Review
The literature review is a critical look at the
existing research that is significant to the work
that you are carrying out.
To provide background information
To establish importance
To demonstrate familiarity
To “carve out a space” for further research
Characteristics of
Effective Literature Reviews
Outlining important research trends
Assessing the strengths and weaknesses
of existing research
Identifying potential gaps in knowledge
Establishing a need for current and/or
future research projects
Finding your academic voice involves:
healthy skepticism … but not cynicism;
confidence … but not ‘cockiness’ or arrogance;
judgement which is critical … but not dismissive;
opinions … without being opinionated;
careful evaluation of published work … not serial shooting at
random targets;
being ‘fair’: assessing fairly the strengths and weaknesses of other
people’s ideas and writing … without prejudice;
making judgements on the basis of considerable thought and all the
available evidence … as opposed to assertions without reason.”
Wellington J., Bathmaker A., Hunt C., McCulloch G. and Sikes P.
(2005). Succeeding with your doctorate. London: Sage.
How to get started: ask yourself
these questions
What is the specific thesis, problem, or research
question that my literature review helps to define?
What type of literature review am I conducting?
Am I looking at issues of theory? methodology? policy?
quantitative research? qualitative research?
What is the scope of my literature review? What types
of publications am I using (e.g., journals, books,
government documents, popular media)?
What time period am I interested in? What geographical
area? What social setting? What materials?
Sources for literature review
Identify key primary sources (e.g. govt. documents, newspaper articles) and secondary sources (e.g. books, journal articles) relevant to your topic early on
Use relevant search terms on library databases (e.g. Lexis Nexis) to identify your sources (see Library tutorials for more on this)
Use resources that are not in the library e.g. Inter-library loans, BFI Archive, blogs.
Remember, there is no target for the number of references you include, but you need to show the marker you have covered the literature that is relevant to your project.
47
Finding relevant literature:
Check references of references. it can be a good idea to check
through their reference lists to see the range of sources that they
referred to.
Hand searching of journals will reveal ideas about focus,
research questions, methods, techniques, or interpretations that
had not occurred to you
If in doubt, consult your Librarian!
Writing up your literature review:
Write up your review part way through your reading in
order to identify gaps/weaknesses
Keep the focus on your study and not the literature
Make sure the structure leads the reader through the key
issues e.g. signposting
Make sure that the literature review is framed by your
research questions
Where possible, use original sources rather than other
people’s review of literature(s)
PlanningFocus
What is the specific thesis, problem, or research question that my literature review helps to define?
Identifying a focus that allows you to:
Sort and categorize information
Eliminate irrelevant information
Type
What type of literature review am I conducting?
Theory; Methodology; Policy; Quantitative; Qualitative
PlanningScope
What is the scope of my literature review?
What types of sources am I using?
Academic Discipline
What field(s) am I working in?
Reflection
Take a moment to answer each of the questions
in the “Planning” section of your packet about a
literature review you are currently working on
or plan to work on.
How many of the questions could you answer?
What questions did this short exercise raise for
you?
Reading and Researching
Collect and read material.
Summarize sources. Who is the author?
What is the author's main purpose?
What is the author’s theoretical perspective? Research methodology?
Who is the intended audience?
What is the principal point, conclusion, thesis, contention, or question?
How is the author’s position supported?
How does this study relate to other studies of the problem or topic?
What does this study add to your project?
Select only relevant books and articles.
Analyzing Sources
A literature review is never just a list of studies-
it always offers an argument about a body of
research
Analysis occurs on two levels:
Individual sources
Body of research
Four Analysis Tasks of the
Literature Review
TASKS OF LITERATURE
REVIEW
SUMMARIZE SYNTHESIZE CRITIQUE COMPARE
Summary and Synthesis
In your own words, summarize and/or
synthesize the key findings relevant to your
study.
What do we know about the immediate area?
What are the key arguments, key characteristics,
key concepts or key figures?
What are the existing debates/theories?
What common methodologies are used?
Comparison and Critique
Evaluates the strength and weaknesses of the work:
How do the different studies relate? What is new, different, or controversial?
What views need further testing?
What evidence is lacking, inconclusive, contradicting, or too limited?
What research designs or methods seem unsatisfactory?
Analyzing: Putting It All Together
Once you have summarized, synthesized, compared,
and critiqued your chosen material, you may
consider whether these studies
Demonstrate the topic’s chronological development.
Show different approaches to the problem.
Show an ongoing debate.
Center on a “seminal” study or studies.
Demonstrate a “paradigm shift.”
Analyzing: Putting It All Together
What do researchers KNOW about this field?
What do researchers NOT KNOW?
Why should we (further) study this topic?
What will my study contribute?
Drafting: An Overview
To help you approach your draft in a
manageable fashion, this section addresses
the following topics:
Exigency
Thesis Statement
Organization
Introduction and conclusion
Citations
Thesis Statements
The thesis statement offers an argument
about the literature. It may do any of or a
combination of the following:
Offer an argument and critical assessment of the
literature (i.e. topic + claim).
Provide an overview of current scholarly conversations.
Point out gaps or weaknesses in the literature.
Relate the literature to the larger aim of the study.
Chronological: Characteristics
Lists studies in terms of chronological
development
Useful when the field displays clear
development over a period of time
Linear progression
Paradigm shift
Introductions
Indicate scope of the literature review.
Provide some background to the topic.
Demonstrate the importance or need for
research.
Make a claim.
Offer an overview/map of the ensuing
discussion.
Conclusions
Summarize the main findings of your
review.
Provide closure.
Explain “so what?”
Implications for future research.
OR
Connections to the current study.
Citing Sources
If it’s not your own idea (and not common
knowledge)—DOCUMENT IT!
Paraphrase key ideas.
Use quotations sparingly.
Introduce quotations effectively.
Use proper in-text citation to document the source of ideas.
Maintain accurate bibliographic records.
Some Tips on RevisingTitle: Is my title consistent with the content of my
paper?
Introduction: Do I appropriately introduce my review?
Thesis: Does my review have a clear claim?
Body: Is the organization clear? Have I provided
headings?
Topic sentences: Have I clearly indicated the major
idea(s) of each paragraph?
Transitions: Does my writing flow?
Conclusion: Do I provide sufficient closure? (see p. 10)
Spelling and Grammar: Are there any major spelling or
grammatical mistakes?
Referencing
Provide full details of all sources cited in the dissertation
Should include published books or articles, book chapters,
technical reports, web sources, etc.
List alphabetically by author name (name of first author in the
case of works with co-authors)
Make sure you understand the university regulations on
plagiarism
Consult your department guidelines for more on referencing
style
Structure of the Literature
Review:There is not one ‘ideal’ structure for your
literature review so talk to your supervisor
about this
Consider whether you wish to organise your
literature review chronologically, thematically,
by development of ideas (or a combination of
these)
Make sure that you always explain your
structure for your reader and have a clear
narrative
Writing a Literature Review:
In Summary
As you read, try to see the “big picture”—your literature
review should provide an overview of the state of research.
Include only those source materials that help you shape
your argument. Resist the temptation to include everything
you’ve read!
Balance summary and analysis as you write.
Keep in mind your purpose for writing:
How will this review benefit readers?
How does this review contribute to your study?
Be meticulous about citations.
Methods- Components
Research Design
Study Sample/ Participants
Research Instrument
Procedure
Statistical/Data Analysis
Methods- Research Design
This is the actual structure or framework of
your study which indicates (a) the time frame(s)
in which data will be collected, (b) when the
intervention will be implemented (or not), and
how many groups will be involved.
Include study design type and sample size
calculation where appropriate.
Methods- Study Participants
Target population and the study sample that is
being used for your research study should be
described.
Include details of the demographic information
of the target population if available.
Methods- Research Instrument
This section should give a full description of the
instruments used to collect data on variables
which have been identified in your research
question. Include:
The source or developers of the instrument
Validity and reliability information (If
available)
Descriptions of the instrument (e.g.
questions/scales used in a questionnaire)
Methods- Procedures
Give descriptive and concise details on the
methods used to collect data.
How will data be collected?
The information presented should be in a
chronological order.
Should be stately clearly thereby allowing
another researcher to replicate the study by your
procedure section without asking any questions.
Methods-
Statistical/Data Analysis
This section details the methods of data analysis
which will be conducted to answer your study’s
research questions and objectives.
Should include a summary of descriptive and
inferential statistical tests for quantitative
studies.
Should include the procedures to be followed
for the analyses for qualitative studies.
Any statistical or data management programs
should be mentioned in this section.