resiliency in african american college students
TRANSCRIPT
Michelle Norman
Department of
Psychology
Laura Coyle, Ph.D
McNair Program
Introduction
Background/Variables
Research Questions
Hypothesis
Methodology
Results
Discussion/Implications
Limitations
In the field of Psychology, most research
focuses on what predicts negative outcomes.
(e.g. depression and anxiety)
There is less focus on what factors predict
positive outcomes and how those who are
faced with obstacles function well.
This study focuses on resiliency, which is
thriving in the face of adversity.
It is imperative that more research is done
on resiliency related factors in stigmatized
groups such as African Americans.
Racism-related stress The stress that is related to encounters with racism
and discrimination
Which can lead to:
Poor physical and mental health
Low quality of life
Rejection Sensitivity Sensitivity to rejection based on group membership
(e.g. dominant group settings)
Africultural Coping strategies that African Americans use in order to
overcome their steady contact with racism and
adversity
Examples:
- Attending church/Prayer
- Helping others with their problems
- Celebrating events
- Spending more time with family and friends
Flourishing refers to a person’s “self-perceived” success in
important aspects of life which may include
relationships as well as self-esteem
Subjective Well-being consists of three main factors:
Positive affect-Positive emotions
Negative affect-Negative emotions
Life Satisfaction-focuses on one’s judgment
of their overall quality of life
1. Is racism-related stress associated with
subjective well-being/flourishing?
2. Is rejection sensitivity associated with
subjective well-being/flourishing?
3. Is racism-related stress associated with
rejection sensitivity?
4. Is Africultural coping associated with higher
levels of subjective well-being?
Higher levels of racism-related stressors and rejection sensitivity will be associated with lower levels of subjective well-being/flourishing.
Higher levels of racism-related stressors will be associated with higher levels of rejection sensitivity.
More use of Africultural coping strategies will be associated with higher levels of Subjective well-being.
Participants
Data was collected from 186 college students
87.5% females, 12.5% males, 1.1% unidentified
Ethnic Groups
96.2% identified as African Americans/Blacks, .5%
African American descent not born in U.S., 2.7%
African American Descent born U.S.
The mean GPA of students was 2.99
Students were recruited from undergraduate Psychology classes at FSU.
Data was gathered through an online survey.
Extra credit was offered.
Students signed consent form and there was no penalty for discontinuing participation in the study.
Correlational Design in which patterns of correlations are analyzed
Designed to measure feelings of desirable
and undesirable experience (Well-being, ill-being)
Gives the participant different types of
emotions and asked to rate how often they
experience each emotion (e.g. Happy, Sad)
Designed to assess “social-psychological
prosperity” from the participants point of
view
Respondents are to indicate their agreement
with each item
(e.g “I lead a purposeful and meaningful life”)
Designed to measure a person’s perception of
their quality of life as a whole
Participants are to indicate whether or not
they agree with a statement
(e.g. “I am satisfied with my life”)
Designed to measure racism-related stress
that African Americans come in contact with
due to constant encounters with racism
Respondents also indicate what type of
impact the experience had on them
(e.g. “While shopping at a store, or when
attempting to make a purchase, you were
ignored as if you were not a serious customer or
didn’t have any money, unfairly by whites/non-
blacks due to your race”)
Designed to measure individuals concern or
anxiety of “race-based” rejection
Respondents are to specify their “concern”
or “anxiety” that negative events will occur
based off of their race
(e.g. “How concerned or anxious would you be
that the guard might stop you because of your
race/ethnicity?)
Designed to measure the “culture-specific” coping strategies that African Americans use during daily stressful events
Four subscales
Cognitive/Emotional Debriefing- individual evaluates (cognitive) the level of risk and adversity in an effort to regulate emotional response to the situation
Spiritual Coping-uses prayer and religious practices to provide a sense of confidence.
Collective Coping- relying on family and social networks
Ritual Coping- rites and rituals are used
Respondents indicate how often they used the listed coping strategies
(e.g. “Got a group of family and friends together to help with the problem”)
Correlations, Means, and Standard Deviations (N = 186)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1. Flourishing -2. Satis. w/ life .594** -3. PositiveAffect .643**.549** -4. NegativeAffect-.414* -.311**-.509** -5. AfriculturalCope.239**.219**.164 .028 -6. Cognitive/Emo .096 .129 .091 .102 .851** -7. SpiritualCope .336**.221**.241**-.098 .865**.572** -8. CollectiveCope .250**.230**.133 -.008 .839**.566** .678** -9. RitualCope .007 .109 -.015 .176* .514**.324** .406**.336** -10. RacismRelated.044 -.068 -.001 .177* .085 -.023 .150* .152* -.045 -11. Rejection - .088 .008 -.116 .186* .318* .240** .271**.280** .370**.370** -Sensitivity
M 48.50 24.87 19.78 15.34 73.98 28.04 21.06 20.72 4.15 57.69 9.94SD 6.36 6.33 3.47 4.38 17.03 7.31 6.07 5.31 2.12 19.23 7.27
Cronbach α .880 .866 .885 .840 .921 .853 .847 .807 .830 .916 .924
Is racism-related stress associated with
subjective well-being/flourishing?
Found that racism-related stress was not
associated with flourishing, satisfaction with
life, or positive affect.
R(FS)=.044, R(SWLS)=-.068, R(PA)=-.001 p<.01
Some evidence indicated that racism-related
stress was associated with higher negative
affect.
R(NA)=.186* p<.01
Is rejection sensitivity associated with
subjective well-being/flourishing?
Found that rejection sensitivity was not
associated with flourishing, satisfaction with
life, or positive affect.
R(FS)=-.088, R(SWLS)=.008, R(PA)=-.116 p<.01
Is racism-related stress associated with
rejection sensitivity?
There was a significant positive relationship
between each variable. Higher-levels of
racism-related stress were associated with
higher levels of rejection sensitivity.
R(RSQR)= .370** p<.01
Is africultural coping associated with higher levels of subjective well-being?
Significantly positively related to flourishing, satisfaction with life, and positive affect
R(FS)=.239**, R(SWLS)=.219**, R(PA)=.164* p<.01
Spiritual coping was significantly positively associated with flourishing, satisfaction with life, and positive affect.
R(FS)=.336**, R(SWLS)=.221**, R(PA)=.241** p<.01
Collective coping was significantly positively associated with flourishing and satisfaction with life.
R(FS)=.250**, R(SWLS)=.230**
Ritual coping was significantly positively associated with negative affect.
R(NA)=.176* p<.01
Best coping skills appear to be spiritual and
collective coping
A lot of counselors teach cognitive/emotional
strategies for dealing with mental health
Perhaps counselors need to expand on what
they teach or accept as mentally healthy
when working with African Americans.
Correlational/cross-sectional design cannot
establish cause and effect
May not apply to African American non-
college students
Self report among respondents may not be
accurate for the following reasons:
Temporary mood influences
Desire to “look good”
Pavot. , William, , & Diener, E. D. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with the life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164-172
Andrews, F.M., & Withey, S.B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America’s perception of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.
Diener, E. (1990). Issues in defining and measuring subjective well-being. Manuscripsubmitted for publication.
Diener, E., & Emmons, R.A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105-1117.
Shin, D.C., & Johnson, D.M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475-492.
Utsey, S. O. U., & Constantine, M. G. C. (2008). Mediating and moderating effects of racism-related stress on the relation between poverty-related risk factors and subjective ell-being in a community sample of african americans. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 13, 186-204.
Kessler, R.C. (1979). Stress, social status, and psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20, 259-272.
Kessler, R.C., Price, R.H., & Wortman, C.B. (1985). Social factors in psychopathology: Stress, social support, and coping processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 36, 531-572.
Semmes, C.E. (1997). Racism, health, and post-inductrialism: A theory of African American health. Westport, CT: Praeger.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1999). Mental health: Culture, race, ethnicity supplement. Washington, DC: Author.
Williams, D.R. & Chung, A.M. (2000). Racism and health. In R. Gibson and J.S. Jackson (Eds.), Health in Black America (pp. 75-92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Diener, E. D., Wirtz, D. W., Tov, W. T., Kim-Prieto, C. K. P., Choi, D. W. C., Oishi, S. O., & Biswas-Diener, R. B. D. (2010). New well-being measuresl short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 97, 143-156.
Lent, R. W. L. (2004). Toward a unifying theoretical and practical perspective on well-being and psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(4), 482-509.
Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 353-373). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Diener, E., Lucas, R.E. & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In. C.R. Synder & S.J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positivr psychology (pp. 63-73). New York: Oxford University Press.
Harlow, R.E., & Cantor, N. (1996). Still participating after all these years: A study of life task participation in later life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1235-1249.
Lucas, R.E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal or Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 616-628.
Diener, E. D., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E. L., & Smith, H. L. S. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress . Psychological Bullentin, 125(2), 276-302.
Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 36, 917-927.
DeNEve, K.M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A metanalysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bullentin, 124, 197-229.
Diener, E., & Lucas, R. (In press). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-Being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell-Sage.
Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731-739.
Magnus, K., & Diener, E. (1991). A longitudinal analysis of personality, life events, and subjective well-being. Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
Myers, D.G., Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10-19.
Mentor: Dr. Laura Coyle
Director of McNair Program:
Dr. McNeill-Blue
Program Coordinator of McNair Program:
Ms.Shatasha Hamilton
Program Assistant of McNair Program:
Ms. Latoya Amaya
Dr. Okunbor
Fellow McNair Scholars, Faculty & Staff