results of the evaluation questionnaire · results of the evaluation questionnaire llp grundtvig...

34
RESULTS OF THE RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th, 2011

Upload: others

Post on 06-Jul-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

RESULTS OF THERESULTS OF THE EVALUATION EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONNAIRE

LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th, 2011

Page 2: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Our way from Kuressaare…Our way from Kuressaare…

Page 3: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

to Florence…to Florence…

Page 4: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

The keys for the scales in English/and in Latvian and in Latvian

� 1 point � I disagree� 1 point (balle)

� 2 points (balles)

� I disagree

� Rather to disagree� 2 points (balles)

� 3 points (balles)

� Rather to disagree

� Partially agree

� 4 points (balles) � I agree

� I fully agree� 5 points (balles) � I fully agree

Page 5: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

1 I know the objectives of the project well RRESULTS OF THEESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE: EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE:

1. I know the objectives of the project well enough

4

4,5

5

3

3,5

4

1,5

2

2,5

4

5 5 5

4

5 5

4

5

4

5

0

0,5

1 3

4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

0

12

Page 6: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

I know and understand the timetable of project activities well enough /timetable of project activities well enough /

12 5

9

10

11

3

5

4

6

7

8

5

4

3

3

4

5

6

5

5

5

1

2

3

04

5

5

5

01

23

45

4

5

Page 7: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

I understand my I understand my responsibilities in the project

54

5 5 5 5 5 5 5

3

44 4

4 44

0

1

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

0

12

Page 8: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

The tasks between partners are equally distributed in the project/are equally distributed in the project/

0,00%0,00%

41,67%5 balles

58,33%4 balles3 balles

Page 9: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

I know what is expected on behalf of my organization well enoughbehalf of my organization well enough

33%17%

33%5balles4balles 3balles

50%

3balles

Page 10: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

I am satisfied with the documentation provided for the project task implementationprovided for the project task implementation6

5 5 5 5 55

4

3

4 4

3

4 44

3 3

2

3 S�rijas1

Espo. (S�rijas1)

1

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 120

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Page 11: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

I am satisfied with the supportprovided by project managerprovided by project manager

12 5

9

10

11

55

45

6

7

8

55

45

3

4

5

54

55

1

2

01

4 55

01

23

45

Page 12: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

The communication with project manager is efficientwith project manager is efficient

6

/ bal

les

5 54

5 5 5 54

5 5 5 54

5

/ bal

les

2

3

......

agr

ee

The communication with project manager is efficient

0

1

2

disa

gree

......

Lineare (The communication with project manager is efficient)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

participants

disa

gree

disa

gree

Page 13: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

9.The communication between all project coordinators is efficientefficient10. I feel support from the management of my organization� 9. � 10.

10

11

12

444

55 5 5 5 5 5 5

7

8

9

10

52

34

3

4

5

43

45 5 5

34

5 5

4

5

6

7

54

55

0

1

2

1

2

3

4

344

50

1

0 1 2 3 4 5

3

answer

Page 14: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

11.I feel support from my project team in my organization12. Structure, contents and handling of the event12. Structure, contents and handling of the event

� 11. � 12.5

55 1

212

45 6

55311

1234

4

5

4 4

5

4

5 5

4 4 44

5

44 410 01

4 4 4 4

3

4 4 4

3

4

5559

1

2

55

56

7

8

-5 0 5 10 150

1

-5 0 5 10 15

Page 15: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

15. Organization: Evidence of clear planning16. Contents: Variety of the activities16. Contents: Variety of the activities

� 15. � 16.

15

1

2

311

12

2345

42%

410 012

58%

42%

595 balles 4 balles

6

7

84 balles

Page 16: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Management: Any personal commentsManagement: Any personal comments

� Management and follow-up

� I think that there was a lot to cover in this first meeting in a short period of up this first meeting in a short period of time. It may have been better to plan an extra day or half day onto the schedule to make sure we could get

425 balles

4 balles schedule to make sure we could get everything in.

� I liked that everything started and finished on time. meetings were well

42%

4 balles

finished on time. meetings were well planned.

� :) ….. /OK….� We need sometimes more time for � We need sometimes more time for

some activities like workshops, discussions so we have to take it into consideration preparing meetings. But

58%

consideration preparing meetings. But it�€™s just from one side, - maybe we should work quicker and more effectively??!effectively??!

� Nice atmosphere, all partners were active and involved…

Page 17: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Quality of thetransnational elementtransnational element

5 points

3 points17% points

25%17%

4 points58%58%

Page 18: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Links between the aims of the meeting and the aims of the project. Personal comments:and the aims of the project. Personal comments:

� Mutual understanding among partners about the objectives of the project – on average 4,5 pointsobjectives of the project – on average 4,5 points

� Synergy in the program of the meeting with the project– 4,6.– 4,6.

Personal comments:� Not all partners are willing to take on the tasks of the project

and I think that at first there was some confusion about the and I think that at first there was some confusion about the aims and tasks of the project. I think that by the end of the meeting the partners seemed to agree and shared the roles as evenly as possible. evenly as possible.

� I liked that partners from France, ITALY and Finland shared experience how it WORKS IN THEIR COUNTRIES. It is sometimes difficult to get an agreement and effective sometimes difficult to get an agreement and effective communication between partners but in spite of all I think we are following agendas of meetings...and it is quite interesting...

� I think the kick-off meeting was very various and was � I think the kick-off meeting was very various and was concerning all aspects of the project (topics, tasks, best practices and study visits

Page 19: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Quality of partnershipQuality of partnership12 5

9

10

11

444

5

6

7

8

55

34

2

3

4

5

4555

1

2

0 15

44

0 1 23

45

Page 20: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Commitment of every partnerCommitment of every partner

50%8% 5 balles 4 balles 3 balles

50%8%

42%

Page 21: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Transnational partnership:Agreement among the partnersAgreement among the partners

8%8%

42%

8%5 balles

4 balles

3 balles42%

3 balles

2 balles

Page 22: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Effective communication between the partners. Commentsthe partners. Comments

� All of the partners seem committed and All of the partners seem committed and everyone felt comfortable to express their opinions in the meeting and their opinions in the meeting and discuss the various points of view.

� I WISH THAT IN COMING MEETINGS THE COMMON � I WISH THAT IN COMING MEETINGS THE COMMON LANGUAGE USED WILL BE ENGLISH AS AGREED IN THE PROJECT PLAN. IN THE FIRST MEETING THE PROJECT PLAN. IN THE FIRST MEETING SEVERALLANGUAGES WERE USED DURING THE MEETING. THIS CAN CAUSE CONFUSION AND

. …MISUNDERSTANDINGS. …

Page 23: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Practical questions:Practical questions:1. Quality of the reception1. Quality of the reception

33%

0% 0%

67%

33%5 balles 4 balles3 balles67% 3 balles2 balles

Page 24: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

2. Quality and comfort: Attention brought to the practical aspects and cateringbrought to the practical aspects and catering

8% 0%

5 balles 4 balles

59%

33% 3 balles2 balles

59%

Page 25: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

3. Quality and comfort: Quality of accommodation. CommentsQuality of accommodation. Comments� We were the hosting partners, therefore question 7 is not

applicable to us.applicable to us.� Thank you very much for your hospitality, organization of

project meeting in Florence, where we had nice trip to Chianti and seeing special green and ecological life style Chianti and seeing special green and ecological life style in practical…good ideas for us and our region…

� on the second day the communication was easier � on the second day the communication was easier because we were sitting on a circule. there were little bit too much talk of our own languages.

� our apartment in the hotel was excellent. i liked the visit � our apartment in the hotel was excellent. i liked the visit of that man who talked about his nature friendly hotel (sorry, but i forgot his name) and visit to the family pasta factory and vineyard. traditional Italian cousine - very factory and vineyard. traditional Italian cousine - very delicious.

� everything was oki didn't write anything to accommodation because i live in � i didn't write anything to accommodation because i live in Florence. but i think all the rest was ok.

Page 26: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

What were your expectations of this course/meeting ?/Iexpectations of this course/meeting ?/I

� To get a clear picture of the project, main goal/s, activities, responsibilities.activities, responsibilities.

� My expectations of the meeting were to get to know each other and clearly understand the project and it's aims along with making some decisions for the each other and clearly understand the project and it's aims along with making some decisions for the results to be accomplished.

� I wanted to know more about sustainable tourism in � I wanted to know more about sustainable tourism in Italy, because it is not so common in Latvia. I found out!

� We expected to meet our partners personally and agree the way we are going to work next year on this project.project.

� the first project meeting and all partners in nice Borgo Santa Crose... together. Next plans for the next time more detailedBorgo Santa Crose... together. Next plans for the next time more detailed

Page 27: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

What were your expectationsof this course/meeting ? IIof this course/meeting ? II

� to present the project's aims and objectives, distribute the tasks and decide next steps. also distribute the tasks and decide next steps. also to meet all partners.I EXPECTED TO UNDERSTAND THE AIMS OF � I EXPECTED TO UNDERSTAND THE AIMS OF THE PROJECT AND CONFIRMED SCHEDULE/TIMETABLESCHEDULE/TIMETABLE

� TO CLARIFY THE OBJECTIVES, AGREE THE TIMETABLE, TO GET KNOW NEW PARTNERS.

� the kickoff meeting met our expectation to define � the kickoff meeting met our expectation to define project contents and objectives and to know the partners

Page 28: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

To what extent have these expectations been met? Ithese expectations been met? I� quite well. the first meeting is often a little bit

confusing but i trust that the project will be confusing but i trust that the project will be successful.I feel that my expectations were fully met. I think that � I feel that my expectations were fully met. I think that as a group we were able to get to know one another and we discussed thoroughly the project and what and we discussed thoroughly the project and what each partner needs to do.

� EVERYTHING WAS OK!� EVERYTHING WAS OK!� we were really pleased to meet all the partners and

we achieved all the objectives we plannedwe achieved all the objectives we planned� the meeting was successful, it covered all the

aspects of point 9.aspects of point 9.

Page 29: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

To what extent have these expectations been met? IIexpectations been met? II� TWO NEXT MEETINGS WERE CONFIRMED WITH

THE DATES, BUT THE GOALS AND THE THE DATES, BUT THE GOALS AND THE CONTENTS ARE STILL A BIT UNCLEAR.HIGH� HIGH

� the kickoff meeting met our expectation to define project contents and objectives and to know the partners

� quite well. the first meeting is often a little bit confusing but i trust that the project will be confusing but i trust that the project will be successful.

Page 30: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Please add any additional comments herePlease add any additional comments here� All in all I believe that the first meeting was

successful and that our project group is very successful and that our project group is very dynamic and that this was a good start to a new partnership and project.partnership and project.

� It was nice to meet new partners and previous partners, too. I like to work with Qualitas team. Theypartners, too. I like to work with Qualitas team. Theyare real professional in their field. ..these days in Florencefirst class team in hostorganisation and fantastic � first class team in hostorganisation and fantastic entrepreneurs who we met there.

� NO COMMENTS� NO COMMENTS� the EXCURSION ON FRIDAY AFTERNOON WAS

VERY WELL PLANNED AND CARRIED OUT VERY WELL PLANNED AND CARRIED OUT (PASTA FACTORY, LUNCH AND WINE ESTATE).

Page 31: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Kopsavilkums /Summary: Structure, contents and handling of the Structure, contents and handling of the event

Page 32: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Summary: Quality of the transnational elementtransnational element

Page 33: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

Summary: Quality of partnershipSummary: Quality of partnership

Page 34: RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE · RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE LLP Grundtvig project “Host with most “meeting in Firenze, Italia, October 13th.-October 14th,

������������ ������������������ ������

Thank you for your attention!Thank you for your attention!Merci de l'attention !

Merci de votre attention!?

Anita Juška & Co /Barkava VSS / Madona / Latvia