revenue&’linked’ supply’scheme’(rlss)’ · 2014-11-03 ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Revenue-‐ Linked Supply Scheme (RLSS)
01 November, 2014 BSPHCL Founda9on Day
Sarur Chaudhary, JPAL SA
Robin Burgess, LSE and IGC Michael Greenstone, UChicago and IGC
Nicholas Ryan, Yale and IGC Anant Sudarshan, UChicago
Reducing distribu9on losses will help to provide more electricity to consumers
14221536
1800
02004006008001,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,0002,2002,400
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%55%60%
Power Sup
ply (M
W)
T&D Losses (%
)
Financial Year
Transmission and Distribution (T&D) Lossesand Power Supply
Source: BERC, BSPHCL
Steady losses
Bihar discoms have done upgrades to allow targe9ng of losses
1. Technical upgrades – Transformer maintenance
(>95% reduc,on in burnt DTs) – Grid metering
2. Data accuracy improvements – Feeder-‐ level consumer mapping – DT-‐ level consumer mapping
Losses come more from certain areas than others
Revenue Rate : A measure of payments received as a percentage of cost of total electricity supply
Areas paying all their bills
Areas not paying their bills
Areas with high payment not being awarded with high supply
Feeder: Basahi PSS: Lahlladpur District: Chapra
Feeder: Mela PSS: Sonpur District: Chapra
“ हम समय पर अपने बिलों का पूरा भुगतान और अपनी तरफ से कोशिश करते हैं की देरी न हो इस आशा में आपूर्ति की स्थिति बेहतर हो जाएगी ”
-‐ Raja Kumar Lakesaripur Gaon, Katya Panchayat, Lahlladpur Block, Chapra`
Why low supply for high payment?
District PSS Name Feeder Name Revenue Rate (%)
Average Supply (hrs)
Chapra Lahlladpur Basahi 95% 12 hrs
Summary of RLSS scheme: You get what you pay for
Group Revenue Rate (%)
Hours / Day
1 0-‐15 12 2 15-‐30 15 3 30-‐45 18 4 45-‐60 21 5 > 60 24
Group Revenue Rate (%)
Hours / Day
1 0-‐10 6 2 10-‐20 8 3 20-‐30 10 4 30-‐40 12 5 > 40 14
Rural Feeder AllocaLon Urban/Mixed Feeder AllocaLon
Benefits of the scheme: I. Reward beYer paying areas with more supply II. Provide an incen9ve to increase payment rates III. Reduce u9lity losses
Scheme Piloted in Chapra and Siwan ObjecLve: To test feasibility of implementa9on on a small scale for a short 9me
• Total Feeders: 85 Feeders with data: 39
• Feeders were randomly assigned to two groups:
Ø Treatment : Supply based on revenue performance Ø Control : Supply is uniform
• Random assignment ensures we can be certain impact is due to the scheme only
Araria
AurangabadBanka
Begusarai
Kaimur
Bhagalpur
AraBuxar
Darbhanga
Gaya
Gopalganj
Jamui
Jehanabad
KatiharKhagaria
Kishanganj
Lakhisarai
Madhepura
Madhubani
Munger
Muzaffarpur
Nalanda
Nawada
Champaran W
Patna
Champaran E
Purnea
Rohtas
SaharsaSamastipur
Saran
Shekhpura
Sheohar
Sitamarhi
SiwanSupaul
Vaishali
PILOT PHASE: JAN 2014 - FEB 2014
-‐ 0.02
+ 1.01
-‐0.40
0.00
0.40
0.80
1.20
Control Treatment
Revenue Rate (Rs/kWh) Change
• Treatment feeders show increase of Rs. 1.01 on base of Rs. 0.95 within just two months
Revenue improves dras9cally in a short period
Maharashtra DCL scheme: Large drop in load-‐shedding within 2 years
LOAD-‐ SHEDDING FREE FEEDERS
Courtesy: MSEDCL
Ø MSEDCL suggests DCL scheme successful in increasing payment and consequently increasing supply
Scale up to 8 Districts star9ng October 20th
1. Chapra 2. Siwan 3. Purnea 4. Ka9har 5. Darbhanga 6. Patna (Rural) 7. Ara (Bhojpur) 8. Buxar
Scheme has many benefits for discom opera9ons seen by early 2015
• Close Monitoring of Electricity Supply – Compliance Report
NOV 2014 Benefits of close scruLny
• Increased Consumer Awareness & Feedback – Bills, Mobile-‐ marke9ng & Consumer helplines
DEC 2014 Benefits of Consumer
InteracLon
• Improvement in Revenue performance MAR 2015
Medium-‐ term revenue growth
• Consequent Increase in electricity supply JUN 2015
Medium-‐ term supply increase
• Measuring benefits of the scheme – Survey of 18,000 respondents
JUL – SEP 2015 Benefit of measuring
impact