review of wvrs in astronomy
DESCRIPTION
Review of WVRs in Astronomy. (Wiedner). Alan Roy MPIfR. The Troposphere as Seen from Orbit. Method: Synthetic Aperture Radar (Earth Resources Satellite) Frequency: 9 GHz Region: Groningen Interferograms by differencing images from different days. 100 mm. 0 mm. 5 km. -100 mm. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Review of WVRs in Astronomy
Alan Roy MPIfR
(Wiedner)
![Page 2: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Troposphere as Seen from Orbit
Method: Synthetic Aperture Radar (Earth Resources Satellite)Frequency: 9 GHzRegion: GroningenInterferograms by differencing images from different days
5 km
5 km
Internal waves in a homo-genously cloudy troposphere
A frontal zone Convective cells
0 mm
-100 mm
100 mm
Hanssen (1997)
![Page 3: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Coherence Loss due to Troposphere
Pico Veleta – Onsala baselineSource: BL LacFrequency: 86 GHz
Coherence Function
7 min
360°
VLBI phase time series
![Page 4: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Phase Referencing Errors due Troposphere
![Page 5: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
WVR Performance Requirements
Phase Correction
Aim: coherence = 0.9 requires / 20 (0.18 mm rms at = 3.4 mm) after correction
Need: thermal noise 14 mK in 3 s Need: gain stability 3.9 x 10-4 in 300 s
Zenith Delay for Phase Referencing
Aim: transfer phase over 5o with 0.1 rad error at 43 GHz
Need: absolute ZWD with error < 1 mm (?)
![Page 6: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
WVR Performance Requirements
Opacity Measurement
Aim: correct visibility amplitude to 1 % (1 )
Need: thermal noise 2.7 KNeed: absolute calibration 14 % (1 )
![Page 7: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Phase Correction MethodsUse a nearby strong calibrator
a) Interleave source and calibrator observations BUT: must cycle fast -> short integrations -> few calibrators strong enough
b) Dual beam: observe simultaneously calibrator and source (VERA) BUT: need duplicate moveable receiver
c) Dual frequency: observe target source at lower frequency scale up phase to calibrate the higher frequency
BUT: scaling up multiplies the phase noise; need very good low-frequency observation
d) Paired antennas: one observes target, one observes calibrator (Asaki 1997)
Measure the water vapour and infer the phase
a) Total power method
b) Radiometric phase correction (eg at 22 GHz, 183 GHz or 20 um)
![Page 8: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Telescope Technique Freq Path Residual / mm dG/G dT in 1 s
VLA WLM 22 GHz cooled 0.81 0.6x10-4 (100 s) 20 mKPlateau de Bure WLM 22 GHz uncooled 0.031 7.5x10-4 (30 min)
Plateau de Bure TP 230 GHz cooled 0.041 2x10-4
Pico Veleta TP 230 GHz cooled 0.24OVRO WLM 22 GHz uncooled 0.16 10 mKBIMA TP 90 GHz cooled 0.17BIMA WLM 22 GHz uncooled 0.1 5x10-3
CSO-JCMT WLM 183 GHz uncooled 0.06SMA TP 230 GHz cooled 0.09 2x10-4
SMA WLM 183 GHz uncooledATCA WLM 22 GHz cooled 0.3 12 mKEffelsberg WLM 22 GHz uncooled 0.24 5x10-4 (100 s) 12 mKVLBA TP 86 GHz cooled 0.6Chatnantor WLM 183 GHz uncooled 0.08 2x10-3 (100s)
DSN WLM 22 GHz uncooled 0.21 25 mK (8 s)
IRMA WLM 15 THz cooled
WVR Phase Correction Performance Comparison
= represented at this meeting = lowest rms phase demonstrated
![Page 9: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Total Power Phase CorrectionPlateau de BureTotal power at 230 GHzCorrection applied to simultaneous 90.6 GHz
Bremer 1995, 2000
3 mm
30 min
Phase correction
Observed phase: rms = 0.623 mm
Corrected phase: rms = 0.167 mm
![Page 10: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Total Power Phase Correction: VLBI demoPico Veleta - OnsalaTotal power at 230 GHzCorrection applied to simultaneous 86 GHz VLBI
Bremer et al. 2000
4.7 mm
6 min
Observed phase: rms = 0.71 mm
Corrected phase: rms = 0.45 mm
Phase correction
![Page 11: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Owens Valley Radio Observatory (Caltech)
(Array before moving to Cedar Flat)
Frequencies: 86 - 115 GHz 210 – 270 GHzAntenna diam: 10.4 mAltitude: 1220 m
![Page 12: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Owens Valley Radio ObservatoryWoody, Carpenter, Scoville 2000, ASP Conf Ser 217, 317
Uncooled LNA(Tsys = 200 K)
Downconvert to 4 GHz to 12 GHz(cheaper components,better characterized)
Triplexer separates 2 GHzBands on line and off-line18.2 to 20.2, 21.2 to 23.2, 24.2 to 26.2 GHz
Analog sum of wingchannels for continuum
Analog difference of line and continuum channels
Alternate L and C every 1.7 ms
to 16-bit A/D
363 K load
Ambient load
Cold load (optional)
![Page 13: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Owens Valley Radio Observatory
Woody et al. (2000)
Two levels of Dicke switching reduce effects of gain and offset drifts:
1) PIN-diode attenuators adjust the Line-Continuum output to be zerofor blackbody loads; output measures deviation from a flat spectrum.
2) Transfer switch reverses assignment of Line and Continuum to thedetectors every 1.7 ms; demodulation is performed in software-> removes DC offsets and most of the gain drifts in detectors and following electronics
Results:1) Allan Variance -> noise in L - C < 10 mK for 20 s to 20 min while noise in L & C > 30 mK -> analog L – C differencing and transfer switch modulation valuable
2) C1 & C2 channels derived from -10 dB coupler have 10x more noise -> standard radiometer noise is not the dominant noise
3) White noise to 1 s in L or C channels separately White noise to 10 s in L-C channel
![Page 14: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Owens Valley Radio Observatory
Woody et al. (2000)
Calibration
Once per hour hot & ambient load
Solve for gain, Tsys, and drift in offset of L-C channel
Accuracy of gain determination: 1 %Noise in offset determination: 20 mK
![Page 15: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Owens Valley Radio Observatory
26 min
3 m
m
interferometer path at 100 GHz WVR predicted path
RMS before correction = 0.53 mmRMS after correction = 0.16 mm
Woody et al. (2000)
![Page 16: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Owens Valley Radio Observatory
Woody et al. (2000)
Path Length Retrieval
Observe a strong calibrator -> conversion factor
Typically use a fixed 12 mm/Kcf calculated conversion factor of 8 mm/K
Difference is “within the uncertainties of the triplexerbandpass shapes and atmospheric model assumptions”
![Page 17: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Owens Valley Radio Observatory
Woody et al. (2000)
![Page 18: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Owens Valley Radio Observatory
Woody et al. (2000)
Transferring phase between calibrator and source: hard! (due to gradient in sky brightness)must normalize gains among the WVRs using the step due to elevation change
Average L-C from all WVRs / K
L-C from eachWVR / K
![Page 19: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Owens Valley Radio Observatory
Woody et al. (2000)
0309+411 at 100 GHz for 5 hCycle: 6 min source, 6 min calibrator (0.7 degrees away)WVR phase is transferred from calibrator to source
Before WVRcorrection
After WVRcorrection
(weather degraded)(good weather)
28 Jy
40 Jy
36 Jy
42 Jy
13 Jy
34 Jy
![Page 20: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Owens Valley Radio Observatory
Woody et al. (2000)
Conclusion
Can correct tropospheric phase fluctuations down to < 0.2 mm.
Allows 3 mm observations in previously unusable weather.
Not sufficient for improving images during typical conditionsOr for routine use during 1 mm observations.
Developing a cooled version to decrease noise to reach 0.05 mm.
Staguhn et al. 2001, ASP Conf: First light on prototypeCooled 22 GHz WVRDouble sideband heterodyne0.5 GHz to 4 GHz IF16 channel analogue lag correlator (APHID)
(see Alberto Bolatto’s talk)
![Page 21: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
JCMT – CSO Interferometer
Frequencies: 210 – 270 GHz 318 – 360 GHz Higher than OVRO 460 – 500 GHzAntenna diam: 10.4 m & 15 mAltitude: 4092 m Higher than OVROLocation: Hawaii
James Clark Maxwell Telescope (JCMT)
Caltech SubmillimeterObservatory (CSO)
![Page 22: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
JCMT – CSO: 183 GHz WVRs
Line pivot points: least sensitive to altitude of water vapour
Wiedner 1998 PhD thesisWiedner, Hills, Carlstrom, Lay 2001, ApJ, 553, 1036
![Page 23: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
JCMT – CSO: 183 GHz WVRsWiedner 1998 PhD thesisWiedner, Hills, Carlstrom, Lay 2001, ApJ, 553, 1036
The three double-sideband frequency channels of the WLM
![Page 24: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
JCMT – CSO: 183 GHz WVRsWiedner 1998 PhD thesisWiedner, Hills, Carlstrom, Lay 2001, ApJ, 553, 1036
Advantages of 183 GHz over 22 GHz:
- line is 10 x stronger than 22 GHz. -> can build uncooled systems - optics are small -> easier to install in existing telescopes
Disadvantages of 183 GHz:
- line saturates easily -> suitable only for dry sites - retrieval coefficient depends on amount of water vapour and conditions
![Page 25: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
JCMT – CSO: 183 GHz WVRsWiedner 1998 PhD thesisWiedner, Hills, Carlstrom, Lay 2001, ApJ, 553, 1036
![Page 26: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
JCMT – CSO: 183 GHz WVRsWiedner 1998 PhD thesisWiedner, Hills, Carlstrom, Lay 2001, ApJ, 553, 1036
Calibration- Loads at 30 C and 100 C- Load stability: 10 mK- Flip mirror cycles every 1 s between sky and loads
10 mK
5 min
Load temperature vs time
Sectioned drawing of load
![Page 27: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
JCMT – CSO: 183 GHz WVRsWiedner 1998 PhD thesisWiedner, Hills, Carlstrom, Lay 2001, ApJ, 553, 1036
Hot load Warm load
Mirror 2
Mirror 1
Corrugated horn (facing away)
![Page 28: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
JCMT – CSO: 183 GHz WVRsWiedner 1998 PhD thesisWiedner, Hills, Carlstrom, Lay 2001, ApJ, 553, 1036
Uncooled mixer(Tsys = 2500 K)
Coupler Mixer Filter Detector V/F Powersplitter
1.2 GHz 4.2 GHz 7.8 GHz Oscillators
Gunn oscillator91.655 GHz
183.31 GHz+/- 8 GHz
Double-sideband mixing makesmeasurement insensitive to filter shape
Used coupler + power splitter since no suitable triplexer exists
![Page 29: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
JCMT – CSO: 183 GHz WVRsWiedner 1998 PhD thesisWiedner, Hills, Carlstrom, Lay 2001, ApJ, 553, 1036
A small shift in the centre frequency of a filter makes a big change in the measured brightness temperature since the line is steep.Thus, need filter shape within 5 MHz of spec. No triplexer matched this.
![Page 30: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
JCMT – CSO: 183 GHz WVRsWiedner 1998 PhD thesisWiedner, Hills, Carlstrom, Lay 2001, ApJ, 553, 1036
DSB mixing to baseband folds water line at oscillator frequencyResult is flat water line spectrumWater line spectrum is then same as the calibration load spectrumCalibration factor is then independent of the filter shape
![Page 31: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
JCMT – CSO: 183 GHz WVRsWiedner 1998 PhD thesisWiedner, Hills, Carlstrom, Lay 2001, ApJ, 553, 1036
Gain fluctuations of WVR measured against loads each second9 min
2x10-4 10x10-4
WVR at JCMT
WVR at CSO (outside, so less stable environment)
![Page 32: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
JCMT – CSO: 183 GHz WVRsWiedner 1998 PhD thesisWiedner, Hills, Carlstrom, Lay 2001, ApJ, 553, 1036
12 min
1.4 mm
Maser source MWC 349at 356 GHz
After correctionRMS = 48d = 0.11 mm
Before correctionRMS = 127d = 0.30 mm
WVR correction
Atmospheric model: transition strengths from Waters (1976), Ben-Reuven line profile, exponential atmosphere, radiative transfer calculation
![Page 33: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Sub-Millimeter Array
183 GHz WVRs being installed.
(Talks by Ross Williamson & Richard Hills)
CSO JCMT SMA
![Page 34: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Very Large Array
22 GHz WVRs being prototyped.
(Talk by Walter Brisken)
Image courtesy NRAO/AUI
Dave Finley
![Page 35: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Plateau de Bure
22 GHz WVRs in routine operation.
(Talks by Michael Bremer & Aris Karastergiou)
![Page 36: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Effelsberg
22 GHz sweeping WVR operating.
(Talk by Alan Roy)
![Page 37: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland Array
22 GHz sweeping WVRs prototyped.
Array relocated to Cedar Flat with OVRO antennas Now called CARMA.
(Talk by Alberto Bolatto)
![Page 38: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
VLBI Phase Correction Demo
Demonstration by Tahmoush & Rogers (2000) 3C 273Hat Creek – Kitt Peak86 GHz VLBI
400 s
4 mm
path
● RMS phase noise reduced from 0.88 mm to 0.34 mm after correction.● Coherent SNR rose by 68 %.
VLBI phase
WVR phase
![Page 39: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
CARMA
(Talk by Alberto Bolatto)
Jim Stimson Photography
![Page 40: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Chajnantor Site Testing
Delgado et al. 2001, ALMA Memo 361
Two 183 GHz WVRs 300 m apartDuplicates of JCMT-CSO WVRs (Hills/Wiedner)Co-located with two 11.2 GHz seeing interferometers observing a geostationary satellite
![Page 41: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Chajnantor Site Testing
Delgado et al. 2001, ALMA Memo 361
Correlation coefficient between WVR and interferometers varied.
Cause: when turbulence is lower than 300 m it lies in near-field of interferometer antennas causing large beam differences between the instruments (?)
![Page 42: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Chajnantor Site Testing
Delgado et al. 2001, ALMA Memo 361
![Page 43: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Chajnantor Site Testing
Delgado et al. 2001, ALMA Memo 361
![Page 44: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Australia Telescope Compact Array
Frequencies: 1.2 - 106 GHz Antenna diam: 22 mAltitude: 300 m
![Page 45: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
ATCA 22 GHz WVR
![Page 46: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
ATCA WVR Frequencies
![Page 47: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
ATCA Phase Correction Demo
![Page 48: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
NASA Deep Space Network
22 GHz to 32 GHz WVR (Tanner et al.)For Cassini gravity wave experiment
Naudet et al. (2000)
![Page 49: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
NASA Deep Space Network
Need: 10 mK radiometric stability from 100 s to 10000 s
Focus: improve precision and stability of noise diode and Dicke switch
Methods: 1) Regulate temperature in radiometer box to 1 mK. 2) bought commercial noise diodes. 3) follow instructions to bias with regulated 28 V.
-> poor stability: 20 x 10-4 in 10 s - 100 s 4) try current-regulating bias circuit -> immediate improvement to 1 x 10-4 in 100 s, 5 x 10-4 in 1 day
5) replace magic T power combiner with directional couplers due to extreme sensitivity to mismatch (-40 dB reflection caused 4 % change of noise diode power) -> 1 x 10-4 in 1 day 6) regulate the relative humidity -> 0.3 x 10-4 in 1 day
7) Dicke switch using absorber inserted in slotted waveguide by loudspeaker voicecoil
Tanner et al. (1998)
![Page 50: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
NASA Deep Space Network
RMS before correction = 0.43 mmRMS after correction = 0.1 mm
Naudet et al. (2000)
4 h
2 mm
![Page 51: Review of WVRs in Astronomy](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062423/5681472b550346895db4648c/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Conclusion
Reviewed 5 of 16 WVRs for astronomy (7 radiometers tomorrow)
Many clever techniques are available for use
Lowest residual path 0.031 mm