revised annex 6 cost engineering: tsp march 2020 6_cost engineerin… · revised annex 6 cost...

Port of New Orleans Deepening Feasibility Study

Appendix A: Engineering

Revised Annex 6

Cost Engineering: TSP

March 2020

M-CACES

Print Date Thu 20 February 2020 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Time 07:37:01Eff. Date 1/29/2020 Project PONO: PORT OF NEW ORLEANS DEEPENING NAVIGATIONAL FEASIBILITY STUDY - TSP- 50-FT DEPTH

TSP-Port of New Orleans Deepening - FEB 2020 Title Page

Labor ID: NOL2017 EQ ID: EP18R03 Currency in US dollars TRACES MII Version 4.4

This report is not copyrighted, but the information contained herein is For Official Use Only.

Estimated Construction Time 100 DaysEffective Date of Pricing 1/29/2020

Preparation Date 1/29/2020

Prepared by Benjamin Salamone

Estimated by Benjamin SalamoneDesigned by US Army Corps of Engineers

PORT OF NEW ORLEANS DEEPENING NAVIGATIONAL FEASIBILITY STUDY - TSP- 50-FT DEPTH5.0 Study Scope

The scope of the feasibility study includes evaluation of alternatives, including the no-action alternative, to provide deep draft access along the PONO at incremental depths between 40 feet and 50 feet for the next phase of construction. Per authority, the evaluation of alternatives was limited to a depth of the existing MRSC (which is currently justified to 50 feet).

Implementation is driven by the need to safely dock New Panamax deep draft ships (ships with a draft deeper than 49 feet). The feasibility study will identify the depth that creates the greatest net benefits, up to a depth of 50 feet. At initiation, the study recognized there was a need to evaluate phasing/sequencing of the PONO deepening because of existing conditions

and constraints.

The feasibility study will investigate an array of alternatives that deepen the PONO from 35 feet to 50 feet from RM 98.3 to 100.6. The focused array of alternatives are as follows:� No Action (35 ft)

� Alternative 2: Dredge the entire study area to 40 ft.� Alternative 3: Dredge the entire study area to 45 ft.

� Alternative 4: Dredge the entire study area to 50 ft. - TSP

FCCM Adjustment: The equipment FCCM adjustment percentage is adjusted using the following: We assume that the dredge assistant equipment shall work 6 hours per day, 7 days per week. Using EP 1110-1-8, Vol 3, paragraph 3.8 an adjustment factor of -4.762% was determined. -4.762% = (40/42)-1*100.

Orleans Parish. LA


TSP-Port of New Orleans Deepening - FEB 2020 ProjectTop Level Cost Summary Page 1

Description ContractCost ProjectCost

ProjectTop Level Cost Summary 8,105,362.30 8,105,362.30

12 NAVIGATION, PORTS & HARBORS 8,105,362.30 8,105,362.30

12 Dredging - Construction and Maintenance 8,105,362.30 8,105,362.30

12 01 04 Alternative 4 - TSP 6,514,982.95 6,514,982.95

12 01 04 01 Port of New Orleans - CONSTRUCTION PHASE I 4,646,267.17 4,646,267.17

12 01 04 01 01 BID ITEM 0001 - Mobilization and Demobilization 768,312.35 768,312.35

12 01 04 16 02 BID ITEM 0002 - DREDGING 3,877,954.82 3,877,954.82

12 01 04 02 Port of New Orleans - MAINTENANCE PHASE I & II 1,868,715.78 1,868,715.78


12 01 04 02 16 02 BID ITEM 0002 - DREDGING 1,104,582.88 1,104,582.88

12 01 00 FEDERAL STANDARD 1,590,379.35 1,590,379.35

12 01 00 02 Port of New Orleans - MAINTENANCE FEDERAL STANDARD 1,590,379.35 1,590,379.35


12 01 00 02 16 02 BID ITEM 0002 - DREDGING 826,246.45 826,246.45



TSP-Port of New Orleans Deepening - FEB 2020 Project Cost Summary Page 2

Description DirectLabor DirectEQ DirectMatl DirectSubBid DirectCost ContractCost CostToPrime

Project Cost Summary 348,742.93 1,400,590.98 0.00 4,607,813.00 6,357,146.91 8,105,362.30 6,357,146.91

12 NAVIGATION, PORTS & HARBORS 348,742.93 1,400,590.98 0.00 4,607,813.00 6,357,146.91 8,105,362.30 6,357,146.91

12 Dredging - Construction and Maintenance 348,742.93 1,400,590.98 0.00 4,607,813.00 6,357,146.91 8,105,362.30 6,357,146.91

12 01 04 Alternative 4 - TSP 283,169.52 1,131,981.03 0.00 3,694,640.00 5,109,790.55 6,514,982.95 5,109,790.55

12 01 00 FEDERAL STANDARD 65,573.41 268,609.95 0.00 913,173.00 1,247,356.35 1,590,379.35 1,247,356.35



TSP-Port of New Orleans Deepening - FEB 2020 Table of Contents

Description Page

ProjectTop Level Cost Summary 112 NAVIGATION, PORTS & HARBORS 112 Dredging - Construction and Maintenance 112 01 04 Alternative 4 - TSP 112 01 04 01 Port of New Orleans - CONSTRUCTION PHASE I 112 01 04 01 01 BID ITEM 0001 - Mobilization and Demobilization 112 01 04 16 02 BID ITEM 0002 - DREDGING 1

12 01 04 02 Port of New Orleans - MAINTENANCE PHASE I & II 112 01 04 02 01 BID ITEM 0001 - Mobilization and Demobilization 112 01 04 02 16 02 BID ITEM 0002 - DREDGING 1

12 01 00 FEDERAL STANDARD 112 01 00 02 Port of New Orleans - MAINTENANCE FEDERAL STANDARD 112 01 00 02 01 BID ITEM 0001 - Mobilization and Demobilization 112 01 00 02 16 02 BID ITEM 0002 - DREDGING 1

Project Cost Summary 212 NAVIGATION, PORTS & HARBORS 212 Dredging - Construction and Maintenance 212 01 04 Alternative 4 - TSP 212 01 00 FEDERAL STANDARD 2


TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY

CONSTRUCTION

**** TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY **** Printed:3/20/2020 Page 1 of 2

PROJECT: DISTRICT: New Orleans District PREPARED: 2/7/2020PROJECT NO: P2471889 POC: CHIEF, COST ENGINEERING, John PetitbonLOCATION: New Orleans , Louisiana

This Estimate reflects the scope and schedule in report; WRDA 2016, SECTION1202(d) 13 September 2017

Program Year (Budget EC): 2025Effective Price Level Date: 1 OCT 24

Spent Thru:WBS Civil Works COST CNTG CNTG TOTAL ESC COST CNTG TOTAL 1-Oct-19 INFLATED COST CNTG FULL

NUMBER Feature & Sub-Feature Description ($K) ($K) (%) ($K) (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

12 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $4,649 $1,545 33.24% $6,194 16.0% $5,393 $1,793 $7,186 $302 $7,488 2.3% $5,516 $1,833 $7,651-------

__________ __________ ____________ _________ _________ __________ ____________ _________ _________ ________________CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $4,649 $1,545 $6,194 16.0% $5,393 $1,793 $7,186 $302 $7,488 2.3% $5,516 $1,833 $7,651

01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $0 $0 - $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0

30 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN $350 $52 15.0% $402 20.7% $422 $63 $485 $0 $485 0.9% $426 $64 $490

31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT $225 $56 25.0% $282 20.7% $272 $68 $340 $0 $340 0.9% $275 $69 $344

PROJECT COST TOTALS: $5,224 $1,654 31.7% $6,878 $6,087 $1,924 $8,012 $302 $8,314 2.1% $6,217 $1,966 $8,485

CHIEF, COST ENGINEERING, John PetitbonESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST: $8,485

PROJECT MANAGER, Marti Lucore

CHIEF, REAL ESTATE, Judy Guitierrez

CHIEF, PLANNING, Troy Constance

CHIEF, ENGINEERING, Jean Vossen

CHIEF, OPERATIONS, Micheal Park

CHIEF, CONSTRUCTION, Stuart Waits

CHIEF, CONTRACTING, Deborah Logan

CHIEF, PM-PB, Brad Inman

CHIEF, DPM, Durand Elzey

TSP-Port of New Orleans Deepening-CONSTRUCTION-50-ft

Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST

TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)

TOTAL FIRST COST

PROJECT FIRST COST (Constant Dollar Basis)

Filename: TPCS-PONO-CONST-TSP-29JAN2020.xlsxTPCS


**** CONTRACT COST SUMMARY ****

PROJECT: DISTRICT: New Orleans District PREPARED: 2/7/2020LOCATION: New Orleans , Louisiana POC: CHIEF, COST ENGINEERING, John PetitbonThis Estimate reflects the scope and schedule in report; WRDA 2016, SECTION1202(d) 13 September 2017

29-Jan-19 2025 1-Oct-19 1 OCT 24

RISK BASED WBS Civil Works COST CNTG CNTG TOTAL ESC COST CNTG TOTAL Mid-Point INFLATED COST CNTG FULL

NUMBER Feature & Sub-Feature Description ($K) ($K) (%) ($K) (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) Date (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) A B C D E F G H I J P L M N O

PHASE 1 or CONTRACT 112 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $4,649 $1,545 33.24% $6,194 16.0% $5,393 $1,793 $7,186 2025Q4 2.3% $5,516 $1,833 $7,349

__________ __________ _________ ____________ _________ _________ __________ _________ _________ ________________CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $4,649 $1,545 33.2% $6,194 $5,393 $1,793 $7,186 $5,516 $1,833 $7,349

01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $0 $0 0.0% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0

30 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN1.5% Project Management $70 $10 15.0% $80 20.7% $84 $13 $97 2025Q2 0.9% $85 $13 $980.5% Planning & Environmental Compliance $23 $3 15.0% $27 20.7% $28 $4 $32 2025Q2 0.9% $28 $4 $332.3% Engineering & Design $106 $16 15.0% $121 20.7% $127 $19 $147 2025Q2 0.9% $129 $19 $1480.5% Reviews, ATRs, IEPRs, VE $21 $3 15.0% $24 20.7% $25 $4 $29 2025Q2 0.9% $25 $4 $290.5% Life Cycle Updates (cost, schedule, risks) $23 $3 15.0% $27 20.7% $28 $4 $32 2025Q2 0.9% $28 $4 $330.5% Contracting & Reprographics $23 $3 15.0% $27 20.7% $28 $4 $32 2025Q2 0.9% $28 $4 $330.5% Engineering During Construction $23 $3 15.0% $27 20.7% $28 $4 $32 2025Q2 0.9% $28 $4 $330.3% Planning During Construction $14 $2 15.0% $16 20.7% $17 $3 $19 2025Q2 0.9% $17 $3 $200.5% Adaptive Management & Monitoring $23 $3 15.0% $27 20.7% $28 $4 $32 2025Q2 0.9% $28 $4 $330.5% Project Operations $23 $3 15.0% $27 20.7% $28 $4 $32 2025Q2 0.9% $28 $4 $33

31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT2.9% Construction Management $132 $33 25.0% $166 20.7% $160 $40 $200 2025Q2 0.9% $161 $40 $2021.0% Project Operation: $46 $12 25.0% $58 20.7% $56 $14 $70 2025Q2 0.9% $57 $14 $711.0% Project Management $46 $12 25.0% $58 20.7% $56 $14 $70 2025Q2 0.9% $57 $14 $71

CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $5,224 $1,654 $6,878 $6,087 $1,924 $8,012 $6,217 $1,966 $8,183

ESTIMATED COST

TSP-Port of New Orleans Deepening-CONSTRUCTION-50-ft


Estimate Prepared:Effective Price Level:

Program Year (Budget EC):Effective Price Level Date:

Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure PROJECT FIRST COST(Constant Dollar Basis)

Filename: TPCS-PONO-CONST-TSP-29JAN2020.xlsxTPCS

TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY

MAINTENANCE


PROJECT: DISTRICT: New Orleans District PREPARED: 2/7/2020PROJECT NO: P2471889 POC: CHIEF, COST ENGINEERING, John PetitbonLOCATION: New Orleans , Louisiana

This Estimate reflects the scope and schedule in report; WRDA 2016, SECTION1202(d) 13 September 2017

Program Year (Budget EC): 2025Effective Price Level Date: 1 OCT 24

Spent Thru:WBS Civil Works COST CNTG CNTG TOTAL ESC COST CNTG TOTAL 1-Oct-19 INFLATED COST CNTG FULL

NUMBER Feature & Sub-Feature Description ($K) ($K) (%) ($K) (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O

12 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $74,350 $24,536 33.0% $98,886 16.0% $86,251 $28,463 $114,714 $0 $114,714 137.6% $204,975 $67,642 $272,616-------

__________ __________ ____________ _________ _________ __________ ____________ _________ _________ ________________CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $74,350 $24,536 $98,886 16.0% $86,251 $28,463 $114,714 $0 $114,714 137.6% $204,975 $67,642 $272,616

01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $0 $0 - $0 - $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - $0 $0 $0

30 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN $12,491 $4,122 33.0% $16,613 20.7% $15,080 $4,977 $20,057 $0 $20,057 185.6% $43,072 $14,214 $57,285

31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT $11,264 $3,717 33.0% $14,981 20.7% $13,599 $4,488 $18,087 $0 $18,087 205.8% $41,582 $13,722 $55,304

PROJECT COST TOTALS: $98,105 $32,375 33.0% $130,479 $114,931 $37,927 $152,858 $0 $152,858 152.0% $289,628 $95,577 $385,206

CHIEF, COST ENGINEERING, John PetitbonESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST: $385,206

PROJECT MANAGER, Marti Lucore

CHIEF, REAL ESTATE, Judy Guitierrez

CHIEF, PLANNING, Troy Constance

CHIEF, ENGINEERING, Jean Vossen

CHIEF, OPERATIONS, Micheal Park

CHIEF, CONSTRUCTION, Stuart Waits

CHIEF, CONTRACTING, Deborah Logan

CHIEF, PM-PB, Brad Inman

CHIEF, DPM, Durand Elzey


TOTAL FIRST COST

PROJECT FIRST COST (Constant Dollar Basis)

TSP-Port of New Orleans Deepening-MAINTENANCE-50-ft


Filename: TPCS-PONO-MAINT-TSP-29JAN2020.xlsxTPCS




29-Jan-19 2025 1-Oct-19 1 OCT 24

RISK BASED WBS Civil Works COST CNTG CNTG TOTAL ESC COST CNTG TOTAL Mid-Point INFLATED COST CNTG FULL

NUMBER Feature & Sub-Feature Description ($K) ($K) (%) ($K) (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) Date (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) A B C D E F G H I J P L M N O

Maintenance Year 112 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2026Q4 5.3% $1,817 $600 $2,417

__________ __________ _________ ____________ _________ _________ __________ _________ _________ ________________CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 $1,725 $569 $2,294 $1,817 $600 $2,417




CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $1,962 $647 $2,610 $2,299 $759 $3,057 $2,422 $799 $3,221




Program Year (Budget EC):Effective Price Level Date:

Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST(Constant Dollar Basis)





29-Jan-19 2025 1-Oct-19 1 OCT 24

WBS Civil Works COST CNTG CNTG TOTAL ESC COST CNTG TOTAL Mid-Point INFLATED COST CNTG FULLNUMBER Feature & Sub-Feature Description ($K) ($K) (%) ($K) (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) Date (%) ($K) ($K) ($K)

A B C D E F G H I J P L M N OMaintenance Year 2

12 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2027Q4 8.5% $1,872 $618 $2,489

__________ __________ _________ ____________ _________ _________ __________ _________ _________ ________________

CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 $1,725 $569 $2,294 $1,872 $618 $2,489





Estimate Prepared: Program Year (Budget EC):Effective Price Level: Effective Price Level Date:


ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST(Constant Dollar Basis) TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure





29-Jan-19 2025 1-Oct-19 1 OCT 24




__________ __________ _________ ____________ _________ _________ __________ _________ _________ ________________






Effective Price Level: Effective Price Level Date:

TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST(Constant Dollar Basis)

Estimate Prepared: Program Year (Budget EC):


Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure




PROJECT: TSP-Port of New Orleans Deepening-MAINTENANCE-50-ft DISTRICT: New Orleans District PREPARED: 2/7/2020LOCATION: New Orleans , Louisiana POC: CHIEF, COST ENGINEERING, John PetitbonThis Estimate reflects the scope and schedule in report; WRDA 2016, SECTION1202(d) 13 September 2017

29-Jan-19 Program Year (Budget EC): 2025 1-Oct-19 Effective Price Level Date: 1 OCT 24 FULLY FUNDED PROJECT ESTIMATE




__________ __________ _________ ____________ _________ _________ __________ _________ _________ ________________






Effective Price Level:

Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST(Constant Dollar Basis) TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)

Estimate Prepared:









__________ __________ _________ ____________ _________ _________ __________ _________ _________ ________________







PROJECT FIRST COST(Constant Dollar Basis)Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)









__________ __________ _________ ____________ _________ _________ __________ _________ _________ ________________






Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST(Constant Dollar Basis)



Estimate Prepared:









__________ __________ _________ ____________ _________ _________ __________ _________ _________ ________________






Effective Price Level:Estimate Prepared:

Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST(Constant Dollar Basis) TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)









__________ __________ _________ ____________ _________ _________ __________ _________ _________ ________________

CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $1,487 $491 33.0% 1,978 $1,725 $569 $2,294 $2,235 $738 $2,972

01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $0 $0 0.0% -$ 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0


31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT9.2% Construction Management $136 $45 33.0% 181 20.7% $164 $54 $218 2033Q4 40.2% $230 $76 $3063.0% Project Operation: $45 $15 33.0% 59 20.7% $54 $18 $72 2033Q4 40.2% $75 $25 $1003.0% Project Management $45 $15 33.0% 59 20.7% $54 $18 $72 2033Q4 40.2% $75 $25 $100

CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $1,962 $647 2,610 $2,299 $759 $3,057 $3,028 $999 $4,027

PROJECT FIRST COST(Constant Dollar Basis) TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)

Estimate Prepared:











__________ __________ _________ ____________ _________ _________ __________ _________ _________ ________________





CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $1,962 $647 $2,610 $2,299 $759 $3,057 $3,127 $1,032 $4,159

PROJECT FIRST COST(Constant Dollar Basis) TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST








A B C D E F G H I J P L M N OMaintenance Year 10 to 50

12 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2035Q4 37.4% $2,371 $782 $3,15312 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2036Q4 41.6% $2,442 $806 $3,24812 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2037Q4 45.8% $2,515 $830 $3,34612 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2038Q4 50.2% $2,591 $855 $3,44612 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2039Q4 54.7% $2,669 $881 $3,54912 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2040Q4 59.3% $2,749 $907 $3,65612 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2041Q4 64.1% $2,831 $934 $3,76512 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2042Q4 69.0% $2,916 $962 $3,87812 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2043Q4 74.1% $3,004 $991 $3,99512 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2044Q4 79.3% $3,094 $1,021 $4,11512 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2045Q4 84.7% $3,186 $1,052 $4,23812 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2046Q4 90.3% $3,282 $1,083 $4,36512 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2047Q4 96.0% $3,381 $1,116 $4,49612 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2048Q4 101.8% $3,482 $1,149 $4,63112 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2049Q4 107.9% $3,586 $1,184 $4,77012 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2050Q4 114.1% $3,694 $1,219 $4,91312 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2051Q4 120.6% $3,805 $1,256 $5,06012 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2052Q4 127.2% $3,919 $1,293 $5,21212 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2053Q4 134.0% $4,037 $1,332 $5,36912 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2054Q4 141.0% $4,158 $1,372 $5,53012 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2055Q4 148.2% $4,282 $1,413 $5,69612 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2056Q4 155.7% $4,411 $1,456 $5,86612 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2057Q4 163.4% $4,543 $1,499 $6,04212 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2058Q4 171.3% $4,679 $1,544 $6,22412 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2059Q4 179.4% $4,820 $1,591 $6,41012 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2060Q4 187.8% $4,964 $1,638 $6,60312 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2061Q4 196.4% $5,113 $1,687 $6,80112 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2062Q4 205.3% $5,267 $1,738 $7,00512 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2063Q4 214.5% $5,425 $1,790 $7,21512 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2064Q4 223.9% $5,588 $1,844 $7,43112 NAVIGATION PORTS & HARBORS $1,487 $491 33.0% $1,978 16.0% $1,725 $569 $2,294 2065Q4 233.6% $5,755 $1,899 $7,654

CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $46,097 $15,212 $61,309 $53,476 $17,647 $71,123 $118,558 $39,124 $157,682



PROJECT FIRST COST(Constant Dollar Basis) TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)


ABBREVIATED RISK ANALYSIS

CONSTRUCTION

Project (less than $40M):Project Development Stage/Alternative:

Risk Category: Meeting Date: 1/31/2020

Total Estimated Construction Contract Cost = 4,649,000$

CWWBS Feature of Work Estimated Cost % Contingency $ Contingency Total

01 LANDS AND DAMAGES Real Estate -$ 0% -$ -$

1 12 01 PORTS Mob/Demob 769,000$ 23% 179,823$ 948,823$

2 12 01 PORTS Dredging 3,880,000$ 35% 1,365,510$ 5,245,510$

3 -$ 0% -$ -$

4 -$ 0% -$ -$

5 -$ 0% -$ -$

6 -$ 0% -$ -$

7 -$ 0% -$ -$

8 -$ 0% -$ -$

9 -$ 0% -$ -$

10 -$ 0% -$ -$

11 -$ 0% -$ -$

12 All Other Remaining Construction Items -$ 0.0% 0% -$ -$

13 30 PLANNING, ENGINEERING, AND DESIGN Planning, Engineering, & Design 350,000$ 15% 52,500$ 402,500$

14 31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Construction Management 225,000$ 25% 56,132$ 281,132$

XX FIXED DOLLAR RISK ADD (EQUALLY DISPERSED TO ALL, MUST INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION SEE BELOW) -$ KEEPKEEP TotalsKEEP Real Estate -$ 0% -$ -$ KEEP Total Construction Estimate 4,649,000$ 33% 1,545,333$ 6,194,333$ KEEP Total Planning, Engineering & Design 350,000$ 15% 52,500$ 402,500$ KEEP Total Construction Management 225,000$ 25% 56,132$ 281,132$ KEEPKEEP Total Excluding Real Estate 5,224,000$ 32% 1,653,965$ 6,877,965$ RANGE Base 50% 80%RANGE Confidence Level Range Estimate ($000's) $5,224k $6,216k $6,878kKEEP * 50% based on base is at 5% CL.

Fixed Dollar Risk Add: (Allows for additional risk to be added to the risk analsyis. Must include

justification. Does not allocate to Real Estate.

Abbreviated Risk AnalysisPort of New Orleans Deepening Study 50-ft DepthAlternative FormulationModerate Risk: Typical Project Construction Type

TSP-50-ft-ConstructionAlternative:

Port of New Orleans Deepening Study 50-ft Depth TSP-50-ft-ConstructionAlternative Formulation Risk RegisterAbbreviated Risk Analysis

Meeting Date: 31‐Jan‐20

Risk Element Feature of Work ConcernsPDT Discussions & Conclusions(Include logic & justification for choice of Likelihood & Impact)

Impact Likelihood Risk Level

ProjectManagement&ScopeGrowth Maximum Project Growth 75%

PS-1 Mob/Demob

• Potential for scope growth, added features? • Project accomplishes intent? • Funding Difficulties? • Sufficent Staffing/Support?

The quantity for mobilizations is set. The Contractor would mobilize one time to deliver all equipment and resources required to complete work. Project is normally occurring work for MVN. There is no project without funding, no risk.

Negligible Unlikely 0

PS-2 Dredging


Dredging scope is agreed upon by the PDT and the nonfederal sponsor. The dredging scope is maximum with this alternative since the navigaiton channel is authorized to 50-ft. Funding stream shall be addressed in External Project Risk. Staffing is not an issue. Project is normally occurring work for MVN.

Marginal Unlikely 0

PS-3 0 Negligible Unlikely 0









PS-12 Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

PS-13 Planning, Engineering, & Design


No concerns. Project is normally occurring work for MVN Negligible Unlikely 0

PS-14 Construction Management


If a scope change occurrs is would be minor time increase to the project. Project is normally occurring work for MVN. Since this depth is the maximum attainable no further change could occur.

Negligible Possible 0

AcquisitionStrategy Maximum Project Growth 30%

AS-1 Mob/Demob

• Contracting plan firmly established?• 8a or small business likely?• Requirement for subcontracting?• Accelerated schedule or harsh weather schedule?• High-risk acquisition limits competition, design/build?• Limited bid competition anticipated?• Bid schedule developed to reduce quantity risks?

Large business competitive solicitation. There is a very small chance of this being small business but is not likely to happen.

Marginal Possible 1

AS-2 Dredging


Contracting plan will be to lowest bidder open competition. There is an oppurtunity for a small business to bid and construct the project as a open competition project. The scarcity of equipment dictates that this contract be advertised as open cometition.

Moderate Possible 2

AS-3 0 Negligible Unlikely 0




AS-7 0Negligible Unlikely 0





AS-12 Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

AS-13 Planning, Engineering, & Design


No concerns Negligible Unlikely 0

AS-14 Construction Management



ConstructionElements Maximum Project Growth 25%

CON-1 Mob/Demob

• Accelerated schedule or harsh weather schedule? • High risk or complex construction elements, site access, in-water? • Water care and diversion plan? • Unique construction methods?• Special mobilization?• Special equipment or subcontractors needed?• Potential for construction modification and claims? Work is common to the MVN area.


CE-2 Dredging

• Accelerated schedule or harsh weather schedule? • High risk or complex construction elements, site access, in-water? • Water care and diversion plan? • Unique construction methods?• Special mobilization?• Special equipment or subcontractors needed?• Potential for construction modification and claims?

There is always a potentential for claims The work is within the Mississippi River New Orleans Port area. Rental equipment is used for surveying, crew boats, and towing vessels. All construction methods are common to MVN. The Port of New Orleans opinion is that there is a marginal chance of encountering an obstruction.

Marginal Possible 1

CE-3 0 Negligible Unlikely 0




CE-7 0Negligible Unlikely 0





CE-12 Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

CE-13 Planning, Engineering, & Design



CE-14 Construction Management


No concerns. Project is normally occurring work for MVN Marginal Possible 1

SpecialtyConstructionorFabrication Maximum Project Growth 65%

SC-1 Mob/Demob

• Atypical construction elements, unusual material or equipment manufactured or installed? • Confidence in constructibility or methodology? • One of a kind and confidence in fabrication and installation? • Ability to reasonably transport?• Risk of specialty equipment functioning first time? Testing?

Entire project is marine accesed and highway accessed for some of the disposal areas and BUDMAT. Nomrally occuring work for MVN.


SC-2

Dredging


Typical dredge work and disposal methods for the MVN area. Negligible Unlikely 0

SC-30 Negligible Unlikely 0




SC-7 0Negligible Unlikely 0





SC-12Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

SC-13

Planning, Engineering, & Design



SC-14

Construction Management



TechnicalDesign&Quantities Maximum Project Growth 30%

T-1 Mob/Demob

• Level of confidence based on design and assumptions? • Possibility for increased quantities due to loss, waste, or subsidence?• Appropriate methods applied to calculate quantities?• Sufficient investigations to develop quantities?• Quality control check applied? Mobilization will occur once. No risk for additional mobilizations.


T-2

Dredging

• Level of confidence based on design and assumptions? • Possibility for increased quantities due to loss, waste, or subsidence?• Appropriate methods applied to calculate quantities?• Sufficient investigations to develop quantities?• Quality control check applied?

Quantities were develooped from surveys of August 2019. No quantity is included above elevation -37.4 NAVD88 which is the maximum depth of maintenance dredging. Maintenance dredging is assumed to occur first. Due to the dynamics of the Mississippi River and dredging depths the current project could change the dredge quantities.

Moderate Possible 2

T-30 Negligible Unlikely 0




T-7 0Negligible Unlikely 0





T-12Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

T-13




T-14



If there is a quantity fluctuation then a revision to duration is possible. Project is normally occurring work for MVN Moderate Possible 2

CostEstimateAssumptions Maximum Project Growth 35%

EST-1 Mob/Demob

• Reliability and number of key quotes? • Assumptions related to prime and subcontractor markups/assignments?• Assumptions regarding crew, productivity, overtime?• Site accessibility, transport delays, congestion?• Overuse of Cost Book, lump sum, allowances?• Lack confidence on critical cost items?

Job site is in New Orleans area. Contact tugs are used in the MII estimate to facilitate hauling of equipment. Overtime is based upond avergaes for dredge companies. Typical work for MVN. The CEDEP for mobilization has been revised to reflect all crew and dredge plant movement in a more realistic fashion.

Moderate Unlikely 1

EST-2

Dredging


A robust crew is described in the cost estimate working at conservative rates for this dredge area. This is based on historical data. Dredge running time is conservative but the risk for this will be addressed in EX-2 EXTERNAL RISK. Dredging is done as the prime contractor in this estimate. Mobilization tugs, crew boats and survey boats are rental equipment. The CEDEP developed by New Orleans Districts features 3 separate size tenders, anchor barges, skidder barges and fuel water barges in addition to previous inputs. The New Orleans District CEDEP also has insurance as a separate input and features full field office overhead. If dredge material is stiffer than anticipated a lower production rate may be needed. A stiff clay is currently assumed however somthing stiffer is possible but not likely. Borings have not been obtained however with our experience dredging in south louisiana a drastic change is not anticipated. Due to the depth greater than 40-ft and the lack of ladder pump some ineffecieny in production adds risk.

Moderate Possible 2

EST-30 Negligible Unlikely 0




EST-7 0Negligible Unlikely 0





EST-12Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

EST-13



No concerns with design. Negligible Unlikely 0

EST-14



Time could be increased some due to stiffer materials or differing dredge sizes to accomplish the work Moderate Possible 2

ExternalProjectRisks Maximum Project Growth 40%

EX-1 Mob/Demob

• Potential for severe adverse weather? • Political influences, lack of support, obstacles?• Unanticipated inflations in fuel, key materials?• Potential for market volatility impacting competition, pricing?• Funding Constraints

To the PDT's knowledge there are no environmental windows affecting the project. Fuel is a volatile commodity and swings in prices occur annually. The river must be in a dropping mode before construction/maintenance can begin. It is logical to wait for the river to drop to accomplish minimal maintenance dredging first before construction.

Moderate Possible 2

EX-2 Dredging


Conservative running times are used for the dredging cost. Minimal impact. There is an opportunity for inflations in fuel or a disaster somewhere else impacting availability. Adverse weather is a possibility however the work location is in safe harbor. Funding constraints affect when the project occurs however not a major driver with cost risk. Funding stream is not a constraint, uncertainty or unpredictability of appropriation. This affects the schedule. The river must be in a dropping mode before construction/maintenance can begin. It is logical to wait for the river to drop to accomplish minimal maintenance dredging first before construction. Since the New Orleans Harbor is a vital resource to the nation funding is usually forethcoming. The dollar amount for the construction is small therefore assisting the projects approval.

Moderate Possible 2

EX-3 0 Negligible Unlikely 0




EX-7 0Negligible Unlikely 0





EX-12 Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

EX-13 Planning, Engineering, & Design


No conerns. Negligible Unlikely 0

EX-14 Construction Management


No concers. Negligible Unlikely 0

ABBREVIATED RISK ANALYSIS

MAINTENANCE

Project (less than $40M):Project Development Stage/Alternative:

Risk Category: Meeting Date: 1/31/2020

Total Estimated Construction Contract Cost = 1,487,196$

CWWBS Feature of Work Estimated Cost % Contingency $ Contingency Total

01 LANDS AND DAMAGES Real Estate -$ 0% -$ -$

1 12 01 PORTS Mob/Demob 382,500$ 23% 89,444$ 471,944$

2 12 01 PORTS Dredging 1,104,696$ 41% 449,486$ 1,554,182$

3 -$ 0% -$ -$

4 -$ 0% -$ -$

5 -$ 0% -$ -$

6 -$ 0% -$ -$

7 -$ 0% -$ -$

8 -$ 0% -$ -$

9 -$ 0% -$ -$

10 -$ 0% -$ -$

11 -$ 0% -$ -$

12 All Other Remaining Construction Items -$ 0.0% 0% -$ -$

13 30 PLANNING, ENGINEERING, AND DESIGN Planning, Engineering, & Design 250,000$ 15% 37,500$ 287,500$

14 31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Construction Management 225,000$ 27% 61,515$ 286,515$

XX FIXED DOLLAR RISK ADD (EQUALLY DISPERSED TO ALL, MUST INCLUDE JUSTIFICATION SEE BELOW) -$ KEEPKEEP TotalsKEEP Real Estate -$ 0% -$ -$ KEEP Total Construction Estimate 1,487,196$ 36% 538,930$ 2,026,126$ KEEP Total Planning, Engineering & Design 250,000$ 15% 37,500$ 287,500$ KEEP Total Construction Management 225,000$ 27% 61,515$ 286,515$ KEEPKEEP Total Excluding Real Estate 1,962,196$ 33% 637,944$ 2,600,140$ RANGE Base 50% 80%RANGE Confidence Level Range Estimate ($000's) $1,962k $2,345k $2,600kKEEP * 50% based on base is at 5% CL.

Fixed Dollar Risk Add: (Allows for additional risk to be added to the risk analsyis. Must include

justification. Does not allocate to Real Estate.

Abbreviated Risk AnalysisPort of New Orleans Deepening Study 50-ft DepthAlternative FormulationModerate Risk: Typical Project Construction Type

TSP-50-FT-MaintenanceAlternative:

Port of New Orleans Deepening Study 50-ft Depth TSP-50-FT-MaintenanceAlternative Formulation Risk RegisterAbbreviated Risk Analysis

Meeting Date: 31‐Jan‐20

Risk Element Feature of Work ConcernsPDT Discussions & Conclusions(Include logic & justification for choice of Likelihood & Impact)

Impact Likelihood Risk Level

ProjectManagement&ScopeGrowth Maximum Project Growth 75%

PS-1 Mob/Demob


The quantity for mobilizations is set. The Contractor would mobilize one time to deliver all equipment and resources required to complete work. Project is normally occurring work for MVN. There is no project without funding, no risk. The cost for this mobilization shall be shared with outher dredging areas in the harbor, therefore mobilization cost is cut in half, this is a conservative approach.


PS-2 Dredging


Dredging scope is agreed upon by the PDT and the nonfederal sponsor. The dredging scope is maximum with this alternative since the navigaiton channel is authorized to 50-ft. Funding stream shall be addressed in External Project Risk. Staffing is not an issue. Project is normally occurring work for MVN.

Marginal Unlikely 0










PS-12 Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

PS-13 Planning, Engineering, & Design



PS-14 Construction Management


If a scope change occurrs is would be minor time increase to the project. Project is normally occurring work for MVN. Since this depth is the maximum attainable no further change could occur.

Negligible Possible 0

AcquisitionStrategy Maximum Project Growth 30%

AS-1 Mob/Demob


Large business competitive solicitation. There is a very small chance of this being small business but is not likely to happen.

Marginal Possible 1

AS-2 Dredging


Contracting plan will be to lowest bidder open competition. There is an oppurtunity for a small business to bid and construct the project as a open competition project. A small buisiness adds 10% to the large buisness bidders. The New Orleans Harbor is fairly difficult for a small buisness to maintain however not impossible. The scarcity of equipment dictates that this contract be advertised as open cometition.

Marginal Possible 1










AS-12 Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

AS-13 Planning, Engineering, & Design



AS-14 Construction Management



ConstructionElements Maximum Project Growth 25%

CON-1 Mob/Demob

• Accelerated schedule or harsh weather schedule? • High risk or complex construction elements, site access, in-water? • Water care and diversion plan? • Unique construction methods?• Special mobilization?• Special equipment or subcontractors needed?• Potential for construction modification and claims? Work is common to the MVN area.


CE-2 Dredging


There is always a potentential for claims The work is within the Mississippi River New Orleans Port area. Rental equipment is used for surveying, crew boats, and towing vessels. All construction methods are common to MVN. Modifications are very non existant in the harbor because of the contract base and option hours structure.

Marginal Unlikely 0










CE-12 Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

CE-13 Planning, Engineering, & Design



CE-14 Construction Management


No concerns. Project is normally occurring work for MVN Marginal Unlikely 0

SpecialtyConstructionorFabrication Maximum Project Growth 65%

SC-1 Mob/Demob


Entire project is marine accesed and highway accessed for some of the disposal areas and BUDMAT. Nomrally occuring work for MVN.


SC-2

Dredging


Typical dredge work and disposal methods for the MVN area. Negligible Unlikely 0










SC-12Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

SC-13




SC-14




TechnicalDesign&Quantities Maximum Project Growth 30%

T-1 Mob/Demob

• Level of confidence based on design and assumptions? • Possibility for increased quantities due to loss, waste, or subsidence?• Appropriate methods applied to calculate quantities?• Sufficient investigations to develop quantities?• Quality control check applied? Mobilization will occur once. No risk for additional mobilizations.


T-2

Dredging


Due to the dynamics of the Mississippi River depths deeper than the current project could change the maintenace dredge quantities slightly more than what is currently assumed. The dredge quantity for maintenance dredging in the harbor can vary 60%.

Significant Likely 4










T-12Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

T-13




T-14



If there is a quantity fluctuation then a revision to duration is possible. Project is normally occurring work for MVN but is not a large impact to schedule.

Moderate Possible 2

CostEstimateAssumptions Maximum Project Growth 35%

EST-1 Mob/Demob


Job site is in New Orleans area. Contact tugs are used in the MII estimate to facilitate hauling of equipment. Overtime is based upond avergaes for dredge companies. Typical work for MVN. The CEDEP for mobilization has been revised to reflect all crew and dredge plant movement in a more realistic fashion.

Moderate Unlikely 1

EST-2

Dredging


A robust crew is described in the cost estimate working at conservative rates for this dredge area. This is based on historical data. Dredge running time is conservative but the risk for this will be addressed in EX-2 EXTERNAL RISK. Dredging is done as the prime contractor in this estimate. Mobilization tugs, crew boats and survey boats are rental equipment. The CEDEP developed by New Orleans Districts features 3 separate size tenders, anchor barges, skidder barges and fuel water barges in addition to previous inputs. The New Orleans District CEDEP also has insurance as a separate input and features full field office overhead. Because of the deeper depth fine tuning the pay efficiency may occur increasing cost initially.

Moderate Possible 2










EST-12Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

EST-13



No concerns with design. Negligible Unlikely 0

EST-14



Verying dredge sizes with different capabilities can accomplish this maintenance dredging. A fluctuation in schedule will occur Moderate Likely 3

ExternalProjectRisks Maximum Project Growth 40%

EX-1 Mob/Demob


To the PDT's knowledge there are no environmental windows affecting the project. Fuel is a volatile commodity and swings in prices occur annually. The river must be in a dropping mode before maintenance can begin. It is logical to wait for the river to drop to accomplish minimal maintenance dredging first before construction.

Moderate Possible 2

EX-2 Dredging


Conservative running times are used for the dredging cost. Minimal impact. There is an opportunity for inflations in fuel or a disaster somewhere else impacting availability. Adverse weather is a possibility however the work location is in safe harbor. Funding constraints affect when the project occurs however not a major driver with cost risk. Funding stream is not a constraint, uncertainty or unpredictability of appropriation. This affects the schedule. The river must be in a dropping mode before construction/maintenance can begin. It is logical to wait for the river to drop to accomplish minimal maintenance dredging first before construction. Since the New Orleans Harbor is a vital resource to the nation funding is usually forethcoming. The dollar amount for the construction is small therefore assisting the projects approval.

Moderate Possible 2










EX-12 Remaining Construction Items Negligible Unlikely 0

EX-13 Planning, Engineering, & Design


No conerns. Negligible Unlikely 0

EX-14 Construction Management


No concers. Negligible Unlikely 0

revised annex 6 cost engineering: tsp march 2020 6_cost engineerin… · revised annex 6 cost...

Documents