ribble valley industrial ltd

Proposed Commercial Development

Barrow Brook Business Park Extension | Barrow | Clitheroe

RIBBLE VALLEY INDUSTRIAL LTD

Transport Assessment

July 2021

Page a

Proposed Commercial Development | Barrow Brook Business Park | Barrow | Clitheroe

Transport Assessment | July 2021

REPORT

Document: Transport Assessment

Project: Proposed Commercial Development, Barrow Brook Business Park Extension, Barrow

Client: Ribble Valley Industrial Ltd

Job Number: 3465

File Origin: Z:\projects\3465 Barrow Brook Business Park\Docs\Reports\3465TA.2.docx

Document Checking:

Primary Author MR Initialled:

Contributor GM Initialled:

Review By PJW Initialled:

Issue Date Status Checked for Issue

1 23-07-21 Final

2

3

4

Page i



Contents

1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Scope of Report ..................................................................................................... 1

1.3 Structure of Report ................................................................................................ 2

2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 3

2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 3

2.2 Existing Site .......................................................................................................... 3

2.3 Public Rights of Way (PRoW) .................................................................................. 4

2.4 Local Highway Network ......................................................................................... 4

3 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS .......................................................................................... 6

3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 6

3.2 Proposed Development .......................................................................................... 6

3.3 Vehicular Access .................................................................................................... 6

3.4 Servicing................................................................................................................ 7

3.5 Construction Access ............................................................................................... 7

4 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 9

4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 9

4.2 Assessment Criteria ................................................................................................ 9

4.3 Traffic Survey Data ................................................................................................. 9

4.4 Growthed Traffic Flows ........................................................................................ 10

4.5 Trip Distribution ................................................................................................... 10

4.6 Proposed Development ........................................................................................ 11

4.7 With Development Flows ...................................................................................... 12

4.8 Traffic Impact Summary ....................................................................................... 12

5 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 14

Page ii



6 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................. 16

Page iii



Contents FIGURES 1 to 5

PLANS

Plan 1 Site Location

Plan 2 Proposed Site Layout

Plan 3 Vectio Consulting Access Detail (Drawing Ref no VCO134-005)

Plan 4 Swept Path Analysis

APPENDICES

Appendix 1 Vectio Consulting Limited Report

Appendix 2 TRICS Output for Commercial Use

Appendix 3 Personal Injury Accident Data



1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction

1.1.1 Croft have been instructed by Ribble Valley Industrial Ltd to advise on the traffic and

transportation issues relating to proposals to develop a site on land off the A59 in

Barrow for commercial purposes.

1.1.2 The report provides information on the traffic and transport planning aspects of the

development proposals to assist the local planning authority in the positive

determination of the forthcoming planning application.

1.1.3 The Local Highway Authority (LHA) responsible for the Barrow area is Lancashire

County Council (LCC), while the Local Planning Authority (LPA) is Ribble Valley

Borough Council (RVBC).

1.2 Scope of Report

1.2.1 This Transport Assessment (TA) has been prepared to consider the development in

transport and highways terms in order to provide the local highway authority with the

necessary reassurance that the proposals can be accommodated by the local transport

network.

1.2.2 Reference has been made to the Highways Technical Note prepared by Vectio

Consulting Limited, which considered the potential site access options and is contained

within Appendix 1.

1.2.3 The scope of this Transport Assessment conforms to the guidance provided in the

Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) Planning Practice

Guidance ‘Transport Evidence Bases in Plan Making’.



1.2.4 The guidance covers the following issues;

• Reducing the need to travel, especially by car – ensure at the outset that thought is

given to reducing the need to travel; consider the types of uses (or mix of uses) and

the scale of development in order to promote multipurpose or linked trips;

• Sustainable accessibility – promote accessibility by all modes of travel, in particular

public transport, cycling and walking; assess the likely travel behaviour or travel

pattern to and from the proposed site; and develop appropriate measures to

influence travel behaviour;

• Dealing with residual trips – provide accurate quantitative and qualitative analyses

of the predicted impacts of residual trips from the proposed development and

ensure that suitable measures are proposed to manage these impacts; and

• Mitigation measures – ensure as much as possible that the proposed mitigation

measures avoid unnecessary physical improvements to highways and promote

innovative and sustainable transport solutions.

1.3 Structure of Report

1.3.1 Following this introduction, Section 2 will provide a description of the existing site and

local highway network, while Section 3 will detail the development proposals.

1.3.2 Section 4 will consider the trip generation and the traffic impact of the proposals on the

local highway network.

1.3.3 A review of road safety and personal injury accidents in the vicinity of the site over the

last 3 years will be detailed in Section 5.

1.3.4 Section 6 will draw together the Report’s findings and conclusions.



2 EXISTING CONDITIONS

2.1 Introduction

2.1.1 This section will detail the existing site and surroundings and provide details about the

existing highway network.

2.2 Existing Site

2.2.1 The development site is located on the western side of the A59 Clitheroe Bypass,

approximately 3.5 kilometres to the south of Clitheroe and around 15 kilometres to the

north of Blackburn.

2.2.2 The location of the site in relation to the surrounding local area is shown in Plan 1.

2.2.3 The application site is broadly rectangular in shape and comprises a parcel of land

which extends to approximately 3 hectares (7.4 acres).

2.2.4 The site is bound by the A59 to the east and the Barrow Brook Business Park to the

south. Open land which has outline planning consent of residential development

bounds the site on its western side and further undeveloped land is located to the

north.

2.2.5 Footway provision in the area is limited to Holm Road, which serves the Barrow Brook

Business Park and the existing residential areas. Beyond that to the west, bus stops are

located on Whalley Road, providing a range of services to local destinations. Whalley

train station is located just under 3 kilometres to the south west.

2.2.6 The site is currently undeveloped and so has no formal point of access at present.



2.3 Public Rights of Way (PRoW)

2.3.1 There are numerous Public Rights of Way (PRoW’s) in the area surrounding the site, as

illustrated in Figure 2.1 below.

Figure 2.1 – Public Rights of Way in the Area

2.3.2 As can be seen above, footpath 3-47-FP1 is located to the north of the Barrow Brook

Business Park and passes through the site in a broadly east-west alignment from the

A59 to Whalley Road.

2.4 Local Highway Network

2.4.1 The site is located off the A59 Clitheroe Bypass, which is a two lane dual carriageway.



2.4.2 To the south of the site, the A59 forms a roundabout junction with Holm Road which

connects the site to existing residential areas and provides access to the Barrow Brook

Business Park.

2.4.3 The Barrow Brook Business Park comprises a service area, with a petrol filling station,

Co-op convenience store and various fast food outlets, including McDonald’s, KFC,

Subway, Greggs and Starbucks Coffee.

2.4.4 To the north of the site, the A59 forms a roundabout junction the A571 Whalley Road,

which links the site to Clitheroe, located to the north.

2.4.5 To the south, the A59 forms another roundabout junction with the A671 Whalley

Bypass, (known locally as the 'Bramley Meade' roundabout). The A671 connects to the

A6119, which in turn, provides access to the M65 motorway. To the west, the M65 also

connects the site to the M6 and M61.

2.4.6 It is therefore considered that the site is well connected to the local highway network,

and also to the wider motorway network.



3 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS

3.1 Introduction

3.1.1 The following paragraphs will describe the development proposals and report on

proposed access arrangements and servicing.

3.2 Proposed Development

3.2.1 The applicant is seeking planning permission to develop the site for commercial

purposes, comprising a number of industrial units with a combined gross floor area of

approximately 9.913 square metres, with associated car parking and landscaping.

3.2.2 A plan to show the internal site layout is provided at Plan 2.

3.2.3 Car parking across the site will comply with the Councils’ current car parking standards.

3.2.4 The existing PRoW (footpath 3-47-FP1) which passes through the site, will be diverted

and accommodated within the site to ensure there is no detrimental impact to the

existing footpath network in the area.

3.3 Vehicular Access

3.3.1 Vehicular access to the site is proposed via a new left in/left out access junction directly

off the A59.

3.3.2 The Vectio note presented detailed information in this regard and this approach was

deemed acceptable in principle by LCC. As such, it is considered that a left in/left out

access would be an appropriate vehicular access arrangement.

3.3.3 The Vectio access detail is provided in Plan 3.



3.3.4 The access into the site will be constructed to current adoptable standards to ensure

that the access to the site is suitable and appropriate to serve the proposed

development.

3.3.5 All of the land required for the vehicular access is on land controlled by the applicant or

on currently adopted highway.

3.4 Servicing

3.4.1 The internal access road has been designed to accommodate waste and delivery

vehicles so that they can enter the site, turn around and exit in a forward gear.

3.4.2 This will ensure there is no detrimental impact to the public highway and confirm that

the site can be serviced without giving rise to any road safety issues.

3.4.3 A swept path analysis has been undertaken for a 12 metre rigid vehicle, as shown in

Plan 4.

3.5 Construction Access

3.5.1 It is likely that a Construction Management Plan will be the subject of a formal planning

condition that will be appended to any planning consent at the site. Such a document

could include the following elements:

• Size of HGV to be used in the construction period.

• Timing of deliveries during construction, to avoid peak periods for example.

• Control noise to specified levels and duration.

• Procedures related to dust suppression measures.



• Routing of HGVs to and from the site.

3.5.2 The details will need to be agreed with LCC, but at this stage it is likely that access to

the site during the construction period will be via the A59.



4 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

4.1 Introduction

4.1.1 The following section considers the traffic impact of the development proposals on the


4.2 Assessment Criteria

4.2.1 Given the proposed commercial land use, it is assumed reasonable to consider the AM

and PM weekday peak hours, as being those with the greatest impact on the local

highway network.

4.3 Traffic Survey Data

4.3.1 It has not been possible to conduct traffic surveys which could be regarded as

representative of ‘typical’ traffic conditions due to the effects of Covid-19 on

commuting in particular and general travel.

4.3.2 Notwithstanding the above, the Vectio report (contained within Appendix 1) included

traffic surveys at the following junctions;

• A59/ A571 Whalley Road

• A59/ A671 Whalley Bypass

4.3.3 The surveys were undertaken between 0730 and 0930 hours in the morning and

between 1630 and 1830 hours in the evening.

4.3.4 The peak hours were identified as 0815 to 0915 hours and 1630 to 1730 hours, for the

AM and PM peaks respectively.



4.3.5 The 2021 surveyed flows for the peak hours converted into Passenger Car Units (PCU’s)

are shown in Figure 1.

4.4 Growthed Traffic Flows

4.4.1 For the purpose of this Report, assessments have been undertaken for a design horizon

of 2026, representing just over five years after the application registration.

4.4.2 This can be considered to be a robust approach.

4.4.3 To derive the baseline 2026 flows, the 2021 surveyed flows have been growthed to

2026 using National Traffic Model (NTM) factors adjusted by using the Trip End Model

Program (TEMPro) local growth factors.

4.4.4 The resultant growth factors are shown below:

• 2021 to 2026 AM Peak - 1.0319

• 2021 to 2026 PM Peak - 1.0277

4.4.5 The resultant 2026 growthed traffic flows, which form the ‘Without Development’

flows are shown in Figure 2 for the AM and PM peak periods.

4.5 Trip Distribution

4.5.1 The directional distribution of the traffic associated with the proposals has been

assigned to the local highway network based on a simple 50/50 split between traffic

travelling to/from the north and south, which is considered to present a reasonable

approach, as part of this initial report.

4.5.2 The resulting traffic assignment for the AM and PM peaks is shown in Figure 3.



4.6 Proposed Development

4.6.1 The development proposals are likely to consist of approximately 9.913 square metres

of commercial floor space. However, for robustness, this report will consider the

provision of up to 10,000 square metres of commercial floor space.

4.6.2 In order to establish the number of trips which the proposed development is forecast to

generate the TRICS database has been used for the ‘Employment – Industrial Units’

range of sites. The parameters used to ascertain the vehicular trip rates for the

proposed development are as follows:

• Range between 150 and 67,459 square metres

• Monday to Friday surveys

• Sites in Greater London, Eire and Scotland excluded.

4.6.3 A summary of these trip rates and the likely level of trips that would occur as a result of

the proposed development comprising 6,941 square metres is included in Table 4.1,

below, with the TRICS output being provided at Appendix 2.

Period

Trip Rate Trips

Arr Dep Arr Dep

AM Peak Hour 0.379 0.054 38 5

PM Peak Hour 0.073 0.3544 7 35

Table 4.1 Proposed Development Trip Rates and Trips

4.6.4 As can be seen, the proposed commercial development is forecast to generate

approximately 43 two-way trips in the AM and PM peak hours.



4.6.5 The resulting traffic flows based on the distribution shown in Figure 3 are shown in

Figure 4 for the AM peak and PM peak traffic.

4.6.6 It is considered that such increases would not have a material impact on the operation

of the adjoining local highway network.

4.6.7 The likely traffic impact of the development will be discussed in more detail with

highways officers at LCC and capacity assessments at the roundabouts to the north and

south of the site could be undertaken, if deemed necessary.

4.6.8 At this stage, it is considered that once the traffic associated with the development is

dispersed across the network, the impact will be minimal.

4.7 With Development Flows

4.7.1 In order to calculate the 2026 ‘With Development’ flows, the development flows

contained within Figure 4 have been added to the 2026 ‘Without Development’ flows

contained within Figure 2.

4.7.2 The resulting 2026 ‘With Development’ Flows are presented in Figures 5 for the AM

and PM peak hours.

4.8 Traffic Impact Summary

4.8.1 This section of the Report has considered the impact of the proposal in transport terms.

4.8.2 The trip generation assessment has demonstrated that the proposals will not have a

material impact or give rise to any highway capacity issues.



4.8.3 It is therefore considered that the predicted level of traffic can be accommodated onto

the local highway network.

4.8.4 However, further analysis can be undertaken, should this be required by LCC, but on

the basis of the above, it can be assumed that the impact of the proposals on the local

highway network would be minimal and, in any event, could not be considered to be

severe, as is the test set out within paragraph 111 of the NPPF.



5 ACCIDENT ANALYSIS

5.1.1 In order to consider the potential impact of the development on road safety, a brief

review of the Crashmap website (www.crashmap.co.uk) has been undertaken.

5.1.2 The information provided on the website covered the three-year period 2018 to 2020 in

the vicinity of the development site.

5.1.3 According to the data provided there have been a total of 7 recorded accidents within

the study area, which in this instance comprises the A59 for approximately 500 metres

in each direction, as shown in Figure 5.1 below. For completeness, while located

approximately 1 kilometre to the south, the review has included the A59 roundabout

junction with the A671. The accident data is provided at Appendix 3.

Figure 5.1 - CrashMap Accident Plot

http://www.crashmap.co.uk/



5.1.4 Seven of the incidents resulted in slight injuries, while one was recorded as a serious

accident, as detailed below in Table 5.1.

Date Severity Light

Conditions Weather

Road Conditions

Manoeuvre

05/01/2018 Slight Daylight Fine Dry Collision

16/07/2018 Serious Daylight Fine Dry Loss of control

01/03/2019 Slight Darkness Fine Wet/damp Shunt

05/07/2019 Slight Daylight Fine Dry Car struck cyclist

05/02/2020 Slight Darkness Fine Dry Provisional data only

02/03/2017 Slight Darkness Other Wet/Damp Provisional data only

13/11/2019 Slight Darkness Fine Dry Loss of control

Table 5.1 - Accident Summary

5.1.5 The data reviewed has not identified any untypical accidents.

5.1.6 The evidence shows that there are no particular engineering issues or problems with

the road network or junction layouts.

5.1.7 It is not considered that the proposals for a commercial development will unduly

change the characteristics or nature of the surrounding highway network and as such

will not have a detrimental impact on overall road safety.

5.1.8 In view of this information, it can be concluded that the local highway network in the

vicinity of the site does not have an unduly poor safety record, and it is highly unlikely

that this situation should be materially worsened as a consequence of the development

proposals.



6 CONCLUSIONS

6.1.1 Croft have been instructed by Ribble Valley Industrial Ltd to advise on the traffic and

transportation issues relating to proposals to develop a site off the A59 in Barrow for

commercial purposes.

6.1.2 The following conclusions have been drawn with regard to the proposed development:

• The site can be accessed in a safe and efficient manner off the A59 via a left

in/left out arrangement.

• The impact of the proposals has been assessed using the TRICS database and the

assessment undertaken has shown that the proposals will not have a material

impact or give rise to any highways related issues.

• It can therefore be concluded that the proposed development would have a

minimal impact and be able to be accommodated onto the local highway

network.

• The proposed development can be adequately serviced in a safe and efficient

manner.

• The proposed development will have a minimal impact on the operation of the


• The existing road network operates safely and the highway network in the

vicinity of the site also has a good road safety record.

• There is no evidence to suggest that the proposals would have an adverse effect

on road safety or the number of accidents in the vicinity.

6.1.3 Based on the above it is the conclusion of this Report that there are no material reasons

why the proposed development should not be granted planning consent on highways

or transportation grounds.

ESS

Lay-by

N

O

R

T

H

R

O

A

D

9

L

O

D

G

E

C

L

O

S

E

P

a

t

h

(

u

m

)

Food Processing Plant

T

r

a

c

k

P

a

th

(u

m

)

1

8

6

m

²

/

2

0

0

0

s

q

f

t

8

3

6

m

²

/9

0

0

0

s

q

f

t

10

11

A59

Retained

Vegetation

SUDS

L

o

r

r

y

L

a

y

b

y

P

R

O

W

P

R

O

W

P

R

O

W

P

R

O

W

P

R

O

W

P

R

O

W

1

8

6

m

²

/

2

0

0

0

s

q

f

t

1

8

6

m

²

/

2

0

0

0

s

q

f

t

1

8

6

m

²

/

2

0

0

0

s

q

f

t

7

1

5

m

²

/7

7

0

0

s

q

f

t

6

9

6

m

²

/

7

5

0

0

s

q

f

t

1

8

6

m

²

/

2

0

0

0

s

q

f

t

11

16

9

20

12

16

9

8

9

22

11

9

10

14

2

0

5

m

²

/2

2

0

0

s

q

f

t

2

0

5

m

²

/2

2

0

0

s

q

f

t

2

0

5

m

²

/2

2

0

0

s

q

f

t

2

0

5

m

²

/2

2

0

0

s

q

f

t

7

1

5

m

²

/7

7

0

0

s

q

f

t

12

12

12

7

4

3

m

²

/

8

0

0

0

s

q

f

t

7

4

3

m

²

/

8

0

0

0

s

q

f

t

7

4

3

m

²

/

8

0

0

0

s

q

f

t

NOTESZ

:\projects\3465 B

arrow

B

rook B

usiness P

ark\C

AD

\C

roft D

raw

ings\3465-S

P01.dw

g

BARROW BROOK BUSINESS PARK,

CLITHEROE

SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS

RIBBLE VALLEY

INDUSTRIAL LTD

1:1000 @ A3

3465-SP01-

Croft Transport Planning & Design

340 Deansgate

Manchester

M3 4LY

Email: [email protected]

Tel: 0161 837 7380

Web: www.eddisons.com/services/transport-planning

DRAWING NUMBER: REVISION:

DRAWN:

LB MR

CHECKED:

JUL 21

DATE:

SCALES:

DRAWING TITLE:

PROJECT:

CLIENT:

REV DETAILS DRAWN CHECKED DATE

-

-

- --

AutoCAD SHX Text

W

AutoCAD SHX Text

E

AutoCAD SHX Text

S

AutoCAD SHX Text

N

AutoCAD SHX Text

Rigid Truck

AutoCAD SHX Text

12

AutoCAD SHX Text

1.298

AutoCAD SHX Text

1.4

AutoCAD SHX Text

4.7

AutoCAD SHX Text

1.4

AutoCAD SHX Text

Rigid Truck

AutoCAD SHX Text

Overall Length

AutoCAD SHX Text

12.000m

AutoCAD SHX Text

Overall Width

AutoCAD SHX Text

2.500m

AutoCAD SHX Text

Overall Body Height

AutoCAD SHX Text

3.928m

AutoCAD SHX Text

Min Body Ground Clearance

AutoCAD SHX Text

0.412m

AutoCAD SHX Text

Track Width

AutoCAD SHX Text

2.471m

AutoCAD SHX Text

Lock to Lock Time

AutoCAD SHX Text

6.00s

AutoCAD SHX Text

Kerb to Kerb Turning Radius

AutoCAD SHX Text

11.900m

AutoCAD SHX Text

Rigid Truck

FIGURES

FIGURE DESCRIPTION SCENARIO CALC

FIGURE 1 2021 SURVEYED FLOWS AM&PM PEAK See TA

FIGURE 2 2026 FACTORED FLOWS AM&PM PEAK FIG1xNTM

FIGURE 3 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AM&PM PEAK See TA

FIGURE 4 DEVELOPMENT FLOWS AM&PM PEAK F3+F7

FIGURE 5 2026 ASSESSMENT FLOWS AM&PM PEAK See TA

142 1047 2

354 197 357 1005 2

171 245

189 976

229 895

0 1218

0 0 0 1250

0 0

0 1169

0 1125

57 1163

52 37 23 1231

378 469

491 1132

543 1073

AM Peak

PM Peak

Flows in PCUs

Figure 1 2021 Surveyed Flows PCU's)

A59

A671

Site

Holm Road

A59

145 1075 2

364 203 368 1037 2

176 252

195 1007

235 920

0 1251

0 0 0 1289

0 0

0 1206

0 1156

59 1195

53 38 24 1270

388 484

507 1168

558 1103

AM Peak

PM Peak

Flows in PCUs

Figure 2 2026 Forecast Flows PCU's)

A59

A671

Site

Holm Road

A59

0.25

0.25

0.25 0.25

0.25 0.25

0.25 0.25

0.50

0.50 0.50 0.50

0.50 0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

AM Peak

PM Peak

Flows in PCUs

Figure 3 Trip Distribution

A59

A671

Site

Holm Road

A59

AM PM

IN 38 5

OUT 7 35

1

10

1 10

2 2

9 9

3

18 4 19

18 4

19

3

0 4

0 0 0 18

19

3

AM Peak

PM Peak

Figure 4 Development Trips

A59

A671

Site

Holm Road

A59

145 1085 2

365 213 368 1037 2

176 252

204 1016

235 920

3 1251

18 4 19 1289

18 4

19 1206

3 1156

59 1213

53 38 24 1270

388 484

507 1171

558 1103

AM Peak

PM Peak

Flows in PCUs

Figure 5 2026 Assessment Flows PCU's)

A59

A671

Site

Holm Road

A59

APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1

Vectio Consulting Limited Report

APPENDIX 2

TRICS Output for Industrial Use

TRICS 7.8.2 210621 B20.20 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Monday 12/07/21

Employment - Industrial Unit Page 1

Croft Transport Solutions 9 Jordan Street Manchester Licence No: 851401

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 02 - EMPLOYMENT

Category : C - INDUSTRIAL UNIT

TOTAL VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas:

02 SOUTH EAST

BD BEDFORDSHIRE 1 days

HC HAMPSHIRE 2 days

WS WEST SUSSEX 2 days

03 SOUTH WEST

BR BRISTOL CITY 1 days

DV DEVON 1 days

04 EAST ANGLIA

NF NORFOLK 2 days

SF SUFFOLK 1 days

05 EAST MIDLANDS

DS DERBYSHIRE 1 days

NR NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 1 days

06 WEST MIDLANDS

HE HEREFORDSHIRE 1 days

WM WEST MIDLANDS 1 days

07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE

WY WEST YORKSHIRE 2 days

08 NORTH WEST

CH CHESHIRE 2 days

LC LANCASHIRE 2 days

09 NORTH

CB CUMBRIA 1 days

TV TEES VALLEY 1 days

10 WALES

CF CARDIFF 1 days

11 SCOTLAND

SR STIRLING 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Primary Filtering selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range

are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area

Actual Range: 150 to 67459 (units: sqm)

Range Selected by User: 150 to 67459 (units: sqm)

Parking Spaces Range: All Surveys Included

Public Transport Provision:

Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/13 to 22/10/20

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are

included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days:

Monday 3 days

Tuesday 6 days

Wednesday 3 days

Thursday 10 days

Friday 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types:

Manual count 24 days

Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding

up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys

are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations:

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 9

Edge of Town 11

Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) 3

Free Standing (PPS6 Out of Town) 1

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories

consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and

Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories:

Industrial Zone 18

Commercial Zone 1

Development Zone 1

Village 3

Out of Town 1




This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories

consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village,

Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category.

Secondary Filtering selection:

Use Class:

Not Known 24 days

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005

has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®.

Filter by Site Operations Breakdown:

All Surveys Included

Population within 500m Range:

All Surveys Included

Population within 1 mile:

1,000 or Less 2 days

1,001 to 5,000 3 days

5,001 to 10,000 4 days

10,001 to 15,000 4 days

15,001 to 20,000 1 days

20,001 to 25,000 4 days

25,001 to 50,000 6 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles:

5,001 to 25,000 1 days

25,001 to 50,000 1 days

50,001 to 75,000 4 days

75,001 to 100,000 3 days

100,001 to 125,000 2 days

125,001 to 250,000 8 days

250,001 to 500,000 4 days

500,001 or More 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles:

0.6 to 1.0 8 days

1.1 to 1.5 14 days

1.6 to 2.0 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling,

within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan:

Yes 2 days

No 22 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place,

and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans.

PTAL Rating:

No PTAL Present 24 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys with PTAL Ratings.

Covid-19 Restrictions Yes At least one survey within the selected data set

was undertaken at a time of Covid-19 restrictions




LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 BD-02-C-01 PUMPS, MOTORS & FANS BEDFORDSHIRE

POSTLEY ROAD

BEDFORD

KEMPSTON

Edge of Town

Industrial Zone

Total Gross floor area: 1 0 4 5 sqm

Survey date: THURSDAY 15/10/20 Survey Type: MANUAL

2 BR-02-C-02 STAINLESS FITTINGS BRISTOL CITY

SOUTH LIBERTY LANE

BRISTOL

Edge of Town

Industrial Zone


Survey date: TUESDAY 22/09/15 Survey Type: MANUAL

3 CB-02-C-01 DOMINO'S PIZZA CUMBRIA

COWPER ROAD

PENRITH

GILWILLY IND. ESTATE

Edge of Town

Industrial Zone



4 CF-02-C-02 BAKERY CARDIFF

MAES-Y-COED ROAD

CARDIFF

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre)

Industrial Zone

Total Gross floor area: 1 4 1 2 5 sqm


5 CH-02-C-02 INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS CHESHIRE

JUPITER DRIVE

CHESTER

CHESTER W. EMP. PARK

Edge of Town

Industrial Zone


Survey date: WEDNESDAY 19/11/14 Survey Type: MANUAL

6 CH-02-C-03 OFFICE FURNITURE CHESHIRE

BRUNEL ROAD

MACCLESFIELD

LYME GREEN BUS. PARK

Edge of Town

Development Zone


Survey date: MONDAY 19/09/16 Survey Type: MANUAL

7 DS-02-C-02 ENGINEERED PRODUCTS DERBYSHIRE

PONTEFRACT STREET

DERBY


Industrial Zone



8 DV-02-C-02 ENERGY RECOVERY FACILITY DEVON

GRACE ROAD SOUTH

EXETER

MARSH BARTON TRAD. EST.


Industrial Zone



9 HC-02-C-01 ENGINEERING COMPANY HAMPSHIRE

JAYS CLOSE

BASINGSTOKE

Edge of Town

Industrial Zone






LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

10 HC-02-C-02 GIN DISTILLERY HAMPSHIRE

LONDON ROAD

LAVERSTOKE

Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre)

Village



11 HE-02-C-02 THERMAL PROCESSING HEREFORDSHIRE

COLLEGE ROAD

HEREFORD

BURCOTT

Edge of Town

Commercial Zone



12 LC-02-C-03 TIMBER SUPPLIES LANCASHIRE

GOLDEN HILL LANE

LEYLAND


Industrial Zone

Total Gross floor area: 1 5 0 sqm


13 LC-02-C-04 POWDER COATINGS LANCASHIRE

CHORLEY ROAD

BLACKPOOL

LITTLE CARLETON

Edge of Town

Industrial Zone



14 NF-02-C-03 SHEET METAL CONTRACTOR NORFOLK

ELVIN WAY

NORWICH

HELLESDON

Edge of Town

Industrial Zone



15 NF-02-C-04 EXHIBITION DESIGN & MANUF. NORFOLK

FLETCHER WAY

NORWICH

UPPER HELLESDON


Industrial Zone



16 NR-02-C-02 RENEWABLE ENGINEERING NORTHAMPTONSHIRE

TREVITHICK ROAD

CORBY


Industrial Zone



17 SF-02-C-01 JOINERY SUFFOLK

ANSON ROAD

IPSWICH

MARTLESHAM HEATH

Edge of Town

Industrial Zone


Survey date: FRIDAY 12/07/13 Survey Type: MANUAL

18 SR-02-C-01 SPECIALIST MODEL MAKING STIRLING

BORROWMEADOW ROAD

STIRLING

Edge of Town

Industrial Zone






LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

19 TV-02-C-02 FLUID ENGINEERING TEES VALLEY

PARKVIEW ROAD WEST

HARTLEPOOL


Industrial Zone


Survey date: FRIDAY 04/09/20 Survey Type: MANUAL

20 WM-02-C-04 FOUNDRY WEST MIDLANDS

STOURVALE ROAD

STOURBRIDGE

LYE


Industrial Zone



21 WS-02-C-02 AVIATION COMPANY WEST SUSSEX

MAYDWELL AVENUE

NEAR HORSHAM

SLINFOLD

Free Standing (PPS6 Out of Town)

Out of Town



22 WS-02-C-03 ROLLS ROYCE HQ & PLANT WEST SUSSEX

STANE STREET

NEAR CHICHESTER

WESTHAMPNETT


Village



23 WY-02-C-02 FLUID SYSTEMS WEST YORKSHIRE

BROWN LANE WEST

LEEDS

HOLBECK


Industrial Zone



24 WY-02-C-03 COMPUTER MANUFACTURER WEST YORKSHIRE

INMOOR ROAD

NEAR BRADFORD

BIRKENSHAW


Village



This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a

unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the

week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count.




TRIP RATE for Land Use 02 - EMPLOYMENT/C - INDUSTRIAL UNIT

TOTAL VEHICLES

Calculation factor: 100 sqm

BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS

No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip

Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate

00:00 - 00:30

00:30 - 01:00

01:00 - 01:30

01:30 - 02:00

02:00 - 02:30

02:30 - 03:00

03:00 - 03:30

03:30 - 04:00

04:00 - 04:30

04:30 - 05:00

4 17796 0.204 4 17796 0.001 4 17796 0.20505:00 - 05:30

4 17796 0.305 4 17796 0.004 4 17796 0.30905:30 - 06:00

6 15985 0.085 6 15985 0.040 6 15985 0.12506:00 - 06:30

7 14037 0.245 7 14037 0.023 7 14037 0.26806:30 - 07:00

23 6791 0.170 23 6791 0.017 23 6791 0.18707:00 - 07:30

23 6791 0.158 23 6791 0.028 23 6791 0.18607:30 - 08:00

24 6587 0.235 24 6587 0.023 24 6587 0.25808:00 - 08:30

24 6587 0.144 24 6587 0.031 24 6587 0.17508:30 - 09:00

24 6587 0.085 24 6587 0.034 24 6587 0.11909:00 - 09:30

24 6587 0.086 24 6587 0.061 24 6587 0.14709:30 - 10:00

24 6587 0.071 24 6587 0.044 24 6587 0.11510:00 - 10:30

24 6587 0.073 24 6587 0.053 24 6587 0.12610:30 - 11:00

24 6587 0.044 24 6587 0.051 24 6587 0.09511:00 - 11:30

24 6587 0.041 24 6587 0.040 24 6587 0.08111:30 - 12:00

24 6587 0.061 24 6587 0.061 24 6587 0.12212:00 - 12:30

24 6587 0.068 24 6587 0.075 24 6587 0.14312:30 - 13:00

24 6587 0.083 24 6587 0.078 24 6587 0.16113:00 - 13:30

24 6587 0.112 24 6587 0.062 24 6587 0.17413:30 - 14:00

24 6587 0.124 24 6587 0.062 24 6587 0.18614:00 - 14:30

24 6587 0.146 24 6587 0.238 24 6587 0.38414:30 - 15:00

24 6587 0.041 24 6587 0.103 24 6587 0.14415:00 - 15:30

24 6587 0.037 24 6587 0.149 24 6587 0.18615:30 - 16:00

24 6587 0.038 24 6587 0.174 24 6587 0.21216:00 - 16:30

24 6587 0.030 24 6587 0.138 24 6587 0.16816:30 - 17:00

24 6587 0.031 24 6587 0.167 24 6587 0.19817:00 - 17:30

24 6587 0.042 24 6587 0.187 24 6587 0.22917:30 - 18:00

24 6587 0.025 24 6587 0.130 24 6587 0.15518:00 - 18:30

23 6771 0.015 23 6771 0.051 23 6771 0.06618:30 - 19:00

5 4620 0.043 5 4620 0.035 5 4620 0.07819:00 - 19:30

5 4620 0.017 5 4620 0.069 5 4620 0.08619:30 - 20:00

4 2931 0.017 4 2931 0.111 4 2931 0.12820:00 - 20:30

4 2931 0.017 4 2931 0.043 4 2931 0.06020:30 - 21:00

1 8000 0.000 1 8000 0.000 1 8000 0.00021:00 - 21:30

1 8000 0.000 1 8000 0.000 1 8000 0.00021:30 - 22:00

22:00 - 22:30

22:30 - 23:00

23:00 - 23:30

23:30 - 24:00

Total Rates: 2.893 2.383 5.276

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just

above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals

plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days

where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per

time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the

foot of the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days

that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals

(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated

time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated

calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip

rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.




The survey data, graphs and all associated supporting information, contained within the TRICS Database are published

by TRICS Consortium Limited ("the Company") and the Company claims copyright and database rights in this published

work. The Company authorises those who possess a current TRICS licence to access the TRICS Database and copy the

data contained within the TRICS Database for the licence holders' use only. Any resulting copy must retain all copyrights

and other proprietary notices, and any disclaimer contained thereon.

The Company accepts no responsibility for loss which may arise from reliance on data contained in the TRICS Database.

[No warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the data contained in the TRICS Database.]

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 150 - 67459 (units: sqm)

Survey date date range: 01/01/13 - 22/10/20

Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 24

Number of Saturdays: 0

Number of Sundays: 0

Surveys automatically removed from selection: 1

Surveys manually removed from selection: 0

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate

calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum

survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of

surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of

the standard filtering procedure are displayed.

APPENDIX 3

Personal Injury Accident Data

Crash Date:

Highest Injury Severity:

Highway Authority:

Local Authority:

Weather Description:

Road Surface Description:

Speed Limit:

Light Conditions:

Carriageway Hazards:

Junction Detail:

Junction Pedestrian Crossing:

Road Type:

Junction Control: Give way or uncontrolled

Dual carriageway

No physical crossing facility within 50 metres

Roundabout

None

Daylight: regardless of presence of streetlights

60

Dry

Fine without high winds

Ribble Valley Borough

Lancashire

Slight

Friday, January 05, 2018 Time of Crash:

Road Number: A59

12:11:00 PM Crash Reference:

Number of Casualties:

Number of Vehicles:

OS Grid Reference: 374140 438260

2

2

201804EG18005

Page 1 of 2 09/07/2021 04:11 PM

For more information about the data please visit: www.crashmap.co.uk/home/FaqTo subscribe to unlimited reports using CrashMap Pro visit www.crashmap.co.uk/Home/Premium_Services

Validated Data

CasualtiesVehicle Ref Casualty Ref Injury Severity Casualty Class Gender Age Band Pedestrian Location Pedestrian Movement

1 1 Slight Driver or rider Female Over 75 Unknown or other Unknown or other

2 2 Slight Driver or rider Male 56 - 65 Unknown or other Unknown or other

Vehicles involvedVehicle Ref

Vehicle Type Vehicle Age

Driver Gender

Driver Age Band

Vehicle Maneouvre First Point of Impact

Journey Purpose

Hit Object - On Carriageway

Hit Object - Off Carriageway

1 Car (excluding private hire)

12 Female Over 75 Vehicle proceeding normally along the carriageway, not on a bend

Offside Other None Nearside or offside crash barrier


4 Male 56 - 65 Vehicle is in the act of turning right Front Other None None

Page 2 of 2 09/07/2021 04:11 PM


Validated Data

Crash Date:


Highway Authority:

Local Authority:



Speed Limit:

Light Conditions:


Junction Detail:


Road Type:

Junction Control: Not Applicable

Dual carriageway


Not at or within 20 metres of junction

None

Darkness: street lights present and lit

60

Wet or Damp



Lancashire

Serious

Monday, July 16, 2018 Time of Crash:

Road Number: A59



Number of Vehicles:


3

1

201804EG18165

Page 1 of 2 09/07/2021 04:13 PM


Validated Data


1 1 Serious Driver or rider Male 26 - 35 Unknown or other Unknown or other



Driver Gender

Driver Age Band


Journey Purpose



1 Motorcycle over 500cc 18 Male 26 - 35 Vehicle proceeding normally along the carriageway, not on a bend

Did not impact Other None None


2 Male 36 - 45 Vehicle proceeding normally along the carriageway, not on a bend



4 Male 26 - 35 Vehicle proceeding normally along the carriageway, not on a bend


Page 2 of 2 09/07/2021 04:13 PM


Validated Data

Crash Date:


Highway Authority:

Local Authority:



Speed Limit:

Light Conditions:


Junction Detail:


Road Type:

Junction Control: Not Applicable

Dual carriageway



None


60

Dry



Lancashire

Slight

Friday, March 01, 2019 Time of Crash:

Road Number: A59



Number of Vehicles:


2

1

2019040838174

Page 1 of 2 09/07/2021 04:03 PM


Validated Data





Driver Gender

Driver Age Band


Journey Purpose




1 Female 26 - 35 Vehicle is slowing down or stopping Front Other None None

2 Van or goods vehicle 3.5 tonnes mgw and under

12 Male 56 - 65 Vehicle is slowing down or stopping Back Journey as part of work

None None

Page 2 of 2 09/07/2021 04:03 PM


Validated Data

Crash Date:


Highway Authority:

Local Authority:



Speed Limit:

Light Conditions:


Junction Detail:


Road Type:


Roundabout


Roundabout

None


50

Dry



Lancashire

Slight

Friday, July 05, 2019 Time of Crash:

Road Number: U0



Number of Vehicles:


2

1

2019040874456

Page 1 of 2 09/07/2021 04:12 PM


Validated Data





Driver Gender

Driver Age Band


Journey Purpose




14 Female 36 - 45 Vehicle proceeding normally along the carriageway, not on a bend

Offside Other None None

2 Pedal cycle -1 Male 46 - 55 Vehicle proceeding normally along the carriageway, not on a bend

Offside Other None None

Page 2 of 2 09/07/2021 04:12 PM


Validated Data

Crash Date:


Highway Authority:

Local Authority:



Speed Limit:

Light Conditions:


Junction Detail:


Road Type:


Dual carriageway


Roundabout

None

Darkness: street lights present and lit

60

Dry



Lancashire

Slight

Friday, September 13, 2019 Time of Crash:

Road Number: A59

1:49:00 AM Crash Reference:


Number of Vehicles:


1

1

2019040890791

Page 1 of 2 09/07/2021 04:14 PM


Validated Data


1 1 Slight Vehicle or pillion passenger

Female 26 - 35 Unknown or other Unknown or other



Driver Gender

Driver Age Band


Journey Purpose




-1 Male 26 - 35 Vehicle proceeding normally along the carriageway, not on a bend

Front Other Central island of roundabout

None

Page 2 of 2 09/07/2021 04:14 PM


Validated Data

Crash Date:


Highway Authority:

Local Authority:



Speed Limit:

Light Conditions:


Junction Detail:


Road Type:

Junction Control: Unknown

Single carriageway



None

Darkness: no street lighting

60

Dry



Lancashire

Slight

Wednesday, February 05, 2020 Time of Crash:

Road Number: U0



Number of Vehicles:


2

2

2020040927257

Page 1 of 2 09/07/2021 04:07 PM


Provisional Data does not include vehicle and casualty records

of 2 09/07/2021 04:07 PM



Crash Date:


Highway Authority:

Local Authority:



Speed Limit:

Light Conditions:


Junction Detail:


Road Type:

Junction Control: Unknown

Dual carriageway



Dislodged vehicle load in carriageway

Darkness: no street lighting

60

Wet or Damp

Other


Lancashire

Slight

Monday, March 02, 2020 Time of Crash:

Road Number: A59



Number of Vehicles:


2

1

2020040959510

Page 1 of 2 09/07/2021 04:04 PM



of 2 09/07/2021 04:04 PM



Croft Transport Planning & Design

340 Deansgate

Manchester

M3 4LY

0161 837 7380

croftts.co.uk

ribble valley industrial ltd

Documents