rice production in ghana: past, present and future. driving forces and required actions
DESCRIPTION
RICE PRODUCTION IN GHANA: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE. DRIVING FORCES AND REQUIRED ACTIONS. BOANSI DAVID. RICE, FOOD FOR THE PEOPLE RICE, SOURCE OF LIVELIHOOD THROUGH PRODUCTION & MARKETING RICE AS A POLITICAL CROP IN GHANA AND MOST WEST AFRICAN COUNTRIES. BACKGROUND. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
RICE PRODUCTION IN GHANA: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE.DRIVING FORCES AND REQUIRED ACTIONS
BOANSI DAVID
BACKGROUND
• RICE, FOOD FOR THE PEOPLE
• RICE, SOURCE OF LIVELIHOOD THROUGH PRODUCTION & MARKETING
• RICE AS A POLITICAL CROP IN GHANA AND MOST WEST AFRICAN COUNTRIES
MOTIVATION/PROBLEM STATEMENT
CHANGING CONSUMER PREFERENCES: INCREASING CONSUMPTION
PRODUCTION LESS THAN 40% OF DEMAND AND NATIONAL SUPPLY (Olaf and Emmanuel, 2009; Lançon and Hélène, 2007)
INFLUX OF IMPORTED RICE, HIGH PRICES OF IMPORTED AGRICULTURAL INPUTS ⇒ NEGATIVE RETURNS ⇒ 66% OF RICE PRODUCERS (FAO, 2006)
DRIFT FROM RICE PRODUCTION; LIMITED REPLACEMENT FOR AGING FARMERS ⇒ EXPOSURE OF GHANA TO SHOCKS ON WORLD MARKET
IRREGULAR SUPPLY OF LOCAL RICE LOW QUALITY
OBJECTIVE
TO IDENTIFY AND MEASURE THE MAGNITUDE OF EFFECT OF THE KEY ECONOMIC DETERMINANTS OF LOCAL RICE PRODUCTION IN GHANA
PERFORMANCE IN MEETING SUPPLY AND DEMAND
ASSESS DEVELOPMENTS IN PADDY PRODUCTION, HARVESTED AREA AND YIELD
ESTIMATION OF LONG-RUN RELATIONSHIPS (COINTEGRATING REGRESSION –FMOLS)
ESTIMATION OF SHORT-RUN EFFECTS (ERROR CORRECTION MODEL)
RICE PRODUCTION AND SUPPLY IN GHANA, 1961-2012
RICE SELF-SUFFICIENCY FOR GHANA, 1961-2009
DEVELOPMENTS IN RICE PRODUCTION : TRENDS RICE PLANNING
TRENDS
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
0
100
200
300
400
500
60019
6119
6319
6519
6719
6919
7119
7319
7519
7719
7919
8119
8319
8519
8719
8919
9119
9319
9519
9719
9920
0120
0320
0520
0720
0920
11
Yie
ld,
t/ha
Pad
dy P
rodu
ctio
n an
d A
rea,
000
t
Year
Production (000 t)
Harvested area (000 Ha)
Yield (t/Ha)
RICE PLANNING
Output =AREA * YIELD
RICE MARKET STRUCTURE
DATA AND METHODS ⇒METHODOLOGY
VARIABLES:
DEPENDENT VARIABLE INDEPENDENT VARIABLES
*TOTAL PADDY OUTPUT *HARVESTED RICE AREA
*YIELD
*REAL PRODUCER PRICE OF RICE
*REAL PRODUCER PRICE OF MAIZE
* WORLD PRICE OF UREA FERTILIZER (P)
*IRRIGATED AGRICULTURAL AREA (P)
*AGRICULTURAL LABOUR FORCE (P)
HYPOTHESIS
Log TPOt =β0 + β1 Log HAt-1 + β2 LogYt-1 + β3 Log RPPRt-1+ β4 Log RPPMt-1 + β5 Log
PUFt + β6 LogIRAt + β7 Log ALt + µt
Hypothesis: β1, β2, β3, β6, β7 > 0; β4, β5 <0;
ESTIMATOR : FULLY MODIFIED ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES
* COINTEGRATING REGRESSION: LONG-RUN EFFECTS
* ERROR CORRECTION MODEL: SHORT-RUN EFFECTS AND S.O.A.O.S
MODELS
DATA PREPARATION
GROUP TEST FOR NORMALITY
LTPO LHA LY LRPPR LRPPM LPUF LIRA LAL
Mean 4.9205 4.5426 0.3784 5.8121 5.4421 5.0466 3.2487 8.2681
Median 5.0401 4.6001 0.5098 5.8898 5.3820 5.0203 3.4012 8.2234
Max. 6.1985 5.1930 1.0043 6.4088 6.3557 6.2000 3.5264 8.7119
Min. 3.5835 3.6889 -0.5276 4.9972 4.7920 4.1897 2.7081 7.9128
Std.Dev. 0.6678 0.3199 0.4323 0.3527 0.3471 0.4127 0.2261 0.2506
Skewness -0.1271 -0.4594 -0.3763 -0.4175 0.7533 0.4758 -0.6961 0.2684
Kurtosis 1.9710 3.0817 1.7068 2.3663 3.7127 3.3345 2.0538 1.6741
Jarque-B. 1.7788 1.3474 3.5447 1.7396 4.3978 1.6109 4.4866 3.2400
Prob. 0.4109 0.5098 0.1699 0.4190 0.1109 0.4469 0.1061 0.1979
Sum 186.9790 172.6157 14.3799 220.8587 206.8011 191.7690 123.4488 314.1878
Sum.Sq.D 16.5028 3.7856 6.9154 4.6034 4.4580 6.3029 1.8912 2.3238
Obs 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38
UNIT ROOT TEST AT LEVEL
UNIT ROOT TEST AT FIRST DIFFERENCE
MODELS AND RESULTS
MODEL 1 COINTEGRATING REGRESSION
Log TPOt =β0 + β1 Log HAt-1 + β2 LogYt-1 + β3 Log PUFt+ β4 LogIRAt + β5 Log ALt + µt
Hypothesis: β1, β2, β4, β5 > 0 : β3 < 0
RESULTS
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
LHA (-1) 0.101992 0.144533 0.705668 0.4858
LY (-1) 0.451116 0.168657 2.674758 0.0120
LPUF -0.021379 0.089340 -0.239301 0.8125
LIRA 0.249820 0.352111 0.709492 0.4835
LAL 1.461326 0.371715 3.931308 0.0005
C -8.472846 2.232593 -3.795069 0.0007
R-squared 0.839266 Durbin-Watson stat 1.925412Adjusted R-squared 0.812477 Long-run variance 0.036138S.E. of regression 0.290031
TEST FOR COINTEGRATION AND NORMALITY OF RESIDUAL
Cointegrated Test- Phillips-Ouliaris ; H0: Series are not cointegrated
Phillips-Ouliaris tau-statistic -5.690282 Prob* 0.0190Phillips-Ouliaris z-statistic -31.30937 0.0445
Cointegration Test- Park Added Variables (L. trend) ; H0: Series are cointegrated
Chi-square value 1.320867 df(1) Prob. 0.2504
ADF Unit Root Test on Residual ; Residual has a unit root
ADF test statistic -5.081128 Prob. 0.0002
Jarque-Bera 0.923407 Prob. 0.630209
MODEL 2 ERROR CORRECTION MODEL
REFERENCES
Olaf, K. and Emmanuel, D. (2009). Global Food Security Response: Ghana Rice Study. Attachment I to the Global Food Security Response West African Rice Value Chain Analysis. microREPORT#156, USAID
LanÇon, F. and Hélène, D.B. (2007). Rice imports in West Africa: trade regimes and food policy formulation. Poster prepared for presentation at the 106th Seminar of the EAAE. Pro-poor development in low income countries. Food, agriculture, trade and environment. 25-27 October 2007-Montpellier France
FAO (2006). Briefs on Import Surges –Countries. No. 5, Ghana: rice, poultry and tomato paste. November 2006. Commodities and Trade Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/ah628e/ah628e00.pdf