risk-adjusted performance and informed decision making

14
Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making www.mcubeit.com Dr. Arun Muralidhar

Upload: portia-mccormick

Post on 30-Dec-2015

34 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making. Dr. Arun Muralidhar. www.mcubeit.com. Arun Muralidhar - Bio. Chairman of Mcube Investment Technologies, LLC and Managing Director at FX Concepts, Inc. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

Risk-Adjusted Performance and

Informed Decision Making

www.mcubeit.com Dr. Arun Muralidhar

Page 2: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

2

Arun Muralidhar - BioArun Muralidhar - Bio

Chairman of Mcube Investment Technologies, LLC and Managing Director at FX Concepts, Inc.

Head of Investment Research and Member of Investment Management Committee, World Bank Investment Department, 1995-1999

Derivatives and Liability Management, World Bank Funding Department, 1992-1995

Managing Director and Head of Currency Research, JPMIM, 1999-2001

BA, Wabash College (1988); PhD, MIT Sloan (1992)

Page 3: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

3

Agenda

Background

Why the information ratio is wrong – M2

Risk budgeting – connecting returns to risk – M3

Confidence in skill: History matters - SHARAD

Optimal portfolio construction using these measures

Page 4: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

4

Relative Risk – Tracking ErrorRelative Risk – Tracking Error

Most commonly used measure

Ann. standard deviation of excess returns

Depends on the standard deviation of the benchmark, strategy and correlation

Few test ex-ante forecast with ex-post outcomes

Papers that recommend that managers stay within tracking error ranges are WRONG

Page 5: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

5

Performance MeasuresPerformance Measures Returns – Absolute and Relative

Annualized versus Cumulative

Ratios – Risk-Adjusted

Sharpe, Information Ratio, Sortino Ratio

Risk-Adjusted Returns

M2, M3, SHARAD

Skill Measures

Page 6: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

6

How to Calculate Standard Measures? Unadjusted measures

Excess return = Portfolio return - Benchmark return

Risk-adjusted ratio measures

Sharpe ratio = Excess over risk free rate/standard deviation of portfolio

– higher the ratio, the better the investment opportunity

Information ratio = Excess over benchmark/standard deviation of excess returns

– higher the ratio, better the manager

Page 7: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

7

Some Advanced Risk-Adjusted Measures

Sortino ratio = Excess/Downside risk measure

Risk-adjusted measures (in return terms)

M2 = extended Sharpe ratio (in basis points)

M3 = extended M2 ratio; corrects for correlation

SHARAD = Normalizes for different length of history

Confidence in Skill – Tells how confident one can be that there is skill (as opposed to noise) in a given track record

Page 8: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

8

Riskless asset

ReturnActive portfolio A

Standard deviation of unlevered portfolio

Benchmark

Standard deviationMarket risk

Active portfolio B

Information Ratio is Wrong - M2 Need to normalize for different Std.

deviations

B has a negative Information Ratio!

Page 9: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

9

Riskless asset

Benchmark Return

Benchmark

Standard deviationMarket risk

Portfolio B has a Higher M2 Return

Problem: Need to normalize for different correlations

i.e., have different tracking error

M2 Return for B

M2 Return for A

Page 10: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

10

Correlation-Adjustment: M3 Measure

Fund Return(%)

Standarddeviation

(%) M2

(%)TE(basic)

(%)TE(M2)

(%)M3

(%)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (7) (8) (12)

F 5.50 0.00 0.00

B 17.09 13.27 1.00 17.09

1 33.24 27.57 0.71 18.85 20.45 10.14 18.43

2 25.63 24.93 0.77 16.21 17.02 9.04 17.43

3 25.04 25.02 0.73 15.86 17.74 9.68 17.41

4 24.08 21.33 0.80 17.06 13.34 8.38 17.65

5 21.95 21.75 0.59 15.53 17.52 11.97 17.68

6 21.90 13.84 0.84 21.21 7.76 7.57 19.26

7 21.61 14.37 0.83 20.37 8.13 7.74 18.91

8 20.89 23.06 0.79 14.36 15.07 8.69 16.70

9 20.77 14.00 0.89 19.97 6.53 6.32 18.83

10 20.56 14.79 0.92 19.00 5.74 5.24 18.43

Correcting for tracking error – different rankings

F = Risk-free asset; B = Benchmark (S&P500)

Page 11: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

11

Ranking Portfolios: Different Methods

Ranking UnadjustedSkill usingraw returns

M2 orSharpe

Skill usingM2 M3

Skill usingM3

Informationratio

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

First 1 6 6 6 6 6 1

Second 2 9 7 9 7 7 6

Third 3 7 9 7 9 9 10

Fourth 4 10 10 10 1 1 9

Fifth 5 1 1 1 10 10 7

Sixth 6 4 4 4 5 5 4

Seventh 7 2 2 2 4 4 2

Eighth 8 3 3 3 2 2 3

Ninth 9 5 5 5 3 3 5

Tenth 10 8 8 8 8 8 8

M3 is the only one consistent with Skill

Information ratio, Sharpe or M2 say little about Skill

Skill = Confidence in Skill Measure M3

Page 12: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

12

Which Measure Should you Use?

Manage portfolio yourself – Sharpe, Information Ratio or M2

External manager and with a tracking error budget – M3 (Previous papers ignore possible actions by client)

Worried about skill – M3

M2 provides valuable advice on leverage/ deleverage; M3 provides valuable advice on (a) active versus passive (“beta”) and leverage/deleverage

Important to have a risk budget

Page 13: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

13

How Do You Compare 2 Strategies with Different Data Histories?

In the past – drop non-overlapping data

Lose valuable information on strategy with longer history

SHARAD Measure – Normalizes for different risk and different data history

SHARAD = {M3 return}*{Confidence in skill (of M3

portfolio)}

Confidence in skill acts as a probability measure and explicitly captures the length of data history – more history, greater the confidence in skill

Page 14: Risk-Adjusted Performance and Informed Decision Making

14

Risk Budgeting is only First Step

Cannot force tracking error ranges on managers – client needs to be evaluate how good manager is in dynamically managing risk

Risk-adjusted performance measures are the right way to go, but many are paid on the basis of excess returns

Measures can tell you how good manager is at managing risk

Use creative measures along with risk budgets to achieve optimal portfolio performance