river herring bycatch avoidance in small mesh fisheries

42
River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries Kevin Stokesbury: Principle Investigator Daniel Goergianna: Principle Investigator Dave Bethoney: Study Lead/PhD candidate Sustainable Fisheries Coalition Mike Armstrong: Principle Investigator Bill Hoffman: Port sampling coordinator Brad Schondelmeier: Field Coordinator Peter Moore: Principle Investigator

Upload: ulf

Post on 26-Feb-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries. Sustainable Fisheries Coalition. Kevin Stokesbury: Principle Investigator Daniel Goergianna : Principle Investigator Dave Bethoney: Study Lead/PhD candidate. Peter Moore: Principle Investigator. Mike Armstrong: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh

Fisheries

Kevin Stokesbury: Principle Investigator

Daniel Goergianna: Principle Investigator

Dave Bethoney:Study Lead/PhD candidate

Sustainable Fisheries Coalition

Mike Armstrong: Principle InvestigatorBill Hoffman: Port sampling coordinatorBrad Schondelmeier: Field Coordinator

Peter Moore: Principle Investigator

Page 2: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Population Decline

ASMFC (2009)

Page 3: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Population Decline

Past overfishingSpawning Habitat Loss

Pollution↑Predator Populations

Environmental factorsIncidental catch at sea

Page 4: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Project Objectives1. Expand port sampling program (MA DMF)

• From 15% to 50%

2. Reduce river herring bycatch: • Real-time fleet communication system (MA

DMF/SMAST)

3. Environmental predictors of river herring bycatch/abundance (SMAST)

Page 5: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Port Sampling• Sampling scheme

– Systematic sampling– Whole boat samples

• Mid-water trawl (MA)– 2010 -2012: ~59%

• RI SMBT– 4 boats: ~50%– ~28% 2012 Area 2

Landings

Page 6: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

River Herring Avoidance System

Page 7: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

35 tows (of ≈350) > 2,000kg80% of bycatch by weight

Observed bycatchMid-Water trawls 2000-Sept2010

High: Alosa weight >1.25% of target species weightModerate: Between 1.25% and 0.2%Low: <0.2%

Page 8: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Communication approach

• Coded grids–Cells:≈5x8Nm–Distributed to

vessels

Page 9: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Avoidance Areas

Page 10: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Evaluation Metrics• Industry Support

– Collaboration– Movement

• Separation of target species and river herring–Patterns –Space/time

• Bycatch reduction

Page 11: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

• Participation– 11 of 12 mid-water trawl vessels

• Consistent Communication– Phone calls/Emails/In person

• Captains, crew, or onshore managers– MA DMF trip log completion

• Movement patterns– Re-entry into high bycatch cells

• 1 of 9– Direction of effort

Industry Collaboration

Page 12: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Spatial, Temporal SeparationWinter 2012: RI SMBT

2/9

Page 13: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Spatial, Temporal SeparationWinter 2012: RI SMBT

2/9 to 2/15

Page 14: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Bycatch reduction• Grant objective: 50% reduction

– Acceptable range 44 to 380 mt• Bycatch Rates

• Reduced frequency of high bycatch events

Page 15: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Future Improvements• Integrate tow by tow at-sea-observer data

- Increase frequency decrease lag time, spatial scale

• Proactive program– Fall 2011– Depth > 40 fthm

• ↓ river herring• ≈ Atlantic herring

–Winter, ↑ SST• ↓ herring• ↑ mackerel

Page 16: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

SST (7○C) and Catch: March 2008

Page 17: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Acknowledgements• Mid-water trawl vessels and crew

– F/Vs Western Venture, Osprey, Challenger, Endeavour, Dona Martita, Nordic Explorer, Retriever, Enterprise, Starlight, Sunlight, Jean McCausland, Isabella Taylor

• SFC on-shore members: Peter Moore, several others• RI vessels and crew

– F/Vs Sea Breeze Too, Ocean State, Heather Lynn, Darana R, Tiger Jo

• Port-samplers• Northeast Fisheries Observer Program• AIS Inc.• Fisheries Research• Funding:

– National Fish and Wildlife Foundation– Nature Conservancy

Page 18: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Discussion/Questions

Page 19: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries
Page 20: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries
Page 21: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

1A 2012

• 10/22-24• 7 low• 1 moderate

Massachusetts MarineFisheries

Page 22: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

• Industry Collaboration– ≈150 emails from vessels and onshore managers– 9 of 10 mid-water trawl vessels in fishery

• Other 4: 2 squid fishing, 2 inactive – 5 cells classified as high, 1 reentry-25% of

bycatch• Consistent bycatch patterns

– 3 events accounted for 75%– ≈80%: mid-February to mid-March– Eleven “low” cells reentered

• One changed directly to high • Eight remained low

Winter Information System: Evaluation

B.Hoffman

Page 23: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Nova Scotia separating Gulf of St.Lawrence and Bay of Fundy/Gulf of Maine

Dams from US/Canada Borderto Cape Cod limited reproductivepotential of native Shad populations: “null zone”

Southern range different reproductive strategy: start of semelparity

Page 24: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

American ShadAlosa sapidissima

River Herring

Alewife (A. pseudoharengus)

Blueback (A. aestivalis)

Page 25: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Collective Action• Ostrom 2000• Collective action when members jointly benefit

(foundation of modern democratic thought)• Zero Contribution Thesis (Olson 1965)

– Self-interested people will not contribute to public – Unless: group small

• Face to face communication ↑ cooperation – Discuss strategy, extract promises, tongue-lashes

• Contextual framing matters• Evolution and Cooperation• Staying power of cooperation-not good when forced• Common pool resources better managed internally,

than externally

Page 26: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Reciprocity

• Fehr and Gachter 2000• Response to friendly or hostile actions

– Even if no material gains expected• Friendly actions

– Result in more than expected cooperation than self-interest models

Page 27: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Bycatch Caps• Abbott and Wilen – mixed flatfish and halibut• Under invest in avoidance

– Cost of avoidance: individual, Benefits: fleet wide (11 vessels, 5 pairs)

• ↑ cost of cooperation, ↑ free riders– High cooperation = little behavioral change?

• Mid-water fleet- share information, don’t think they catch at lot of alosines

• ↑ benefits of cooperation, ↑ free riders– Marginal gains

Page 28: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Ad 5 draft (472)

Page 29: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries
Page 30: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Why Participate w/o a cap?• Threat of regulation (Cap, Closed Areas)

– Can address problem w/o regulation– Participation, no regulation

• Public Opinion– Initiative to fish responsibly– Dispel false perceptions with improved data

• Ethics– Charters → SFC Code of Conduct– Wasting fish

• Economics/Fishing Efficiency– Plants

• Cleaner catch → faster offloads → lower initial costs – MWT

• Areas with ↑ RH, harder to find Atlantic herring• Ipswich Bay

– SMBT• Waste of time• Limited hold space• Formalizing what they already do

Page 31: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries
Page 32: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries
Page 33: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries
Page 34: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Slide by B.Hoffman

Page 35: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Slide by B.Hoffman

Page 36: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Reduce Predation• Confusion: Sensory overload• Morphological differences increase predation

risk

– Size

– Color

– Shape

Atlantic herring, Juvenile Shad, River herring: <30cm

35-46cm

50-70cm

Page 37: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Conserve Energy• Swimming efficiency

– Hydrodynamic studies– Optimal speeds

• Long distance migrations• Canoe Paddle vs. Torpedo

Page 38: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

ReferenecesBarbaro A, Einarsson B, Birnir B, Sigurosson S, Valdimarsson H, Palsson OK, Sveinbjornsson S, Sigurosson P. 2009. Modeling and

simulations of the migration of pelagic fish. ICES J Mar Sci 66(5):826-38.Castillo J, Barbieri MA, Gonzalez A. 1996. Relationships between sea surface temperature, salinity, and pelagic fish distribution off

northern Chile. ICES J Mar Sci 53:139-46.Dadswell MJ, Melvin GD, Williams PJ, Themelis DE. 1987. Influences of origin, life history, and chance on the Atlantic coast migration

of American shad. Am Fish Soc Symp 1:313-30.Dodson JJ, Laroche J, Lecomte F. 2009. Contrasting evolutionary pathways of anadromy in euteleostean fishes. Am Fish Soc Symp

69:63-77.Manderson J, Palamara L, Kohut J, Oliver MJ. 2011. Ocean observatory data is useful for regional habitat modeling of species with

different vertical habitat preferences. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 438:1-17.NEFMC (New England Fisheries Management Council). 2010a. Proposed Atlantic herring specifications for the 2010-2012 fishing

years (January 1, 2010- December 31, 2012).Neves RJ. 1981. Offshore distribution of alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus, and Blueback herring, Alosa aestivalis, along the Atlantic

coast. Fish Bull 79(3):473-85.Okunishi T, Yamanaka Y, Ito S. 2009. A simulation for Japanese sardine (Sardinops melanosticus) migrations in the western north

Pacific. Eco Model 220:462-79Panigada S, Zanardelli M, MacKenzie M, Donovan C, Melin F, Hammond PS. 2008. Modeling habitat preferences for fin whales and

striped dolphins in the Pelagos sanctuary (western Mediterranean sea) with physiographic and remote sensing variables. Remote Sens Environ 112:3400-12.

Sagarminaga Y and Arrizabalaga H. 2010. Spatio-temporal distribution of albacore (Thunnus alalunga) catches in the northeastern Atlantic: Relationship with the thermal environment. Fish Oceanogr 19(2):121-34.

Sette OE. 1943. Biology of the Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) of north America part II: Migrations and habits. Fish Bull 38:251-70.

Sindermann CJ. 1979. Status of the northwest Atlantic herring stocks of concern to the united states. Northeast Fish Center, Sandy Hook Lab: U.S. Natl. Mar. Fish. Serv. Report nr 23. 449 p.

Stokesbury KDE, Kirsch J, Brown ED, Thomas GL, Norcross BL. 2000. Spatial distributions of pacific herring, Clupea pallasi, and walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma, in Prince William sound, Alaska. Fish Bull 98:400-9.

Wang J, Pierce GJ, Boyle PR, Denis V, Robin J, Bellido JM. 2003. Spatial and temporal patterns of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) abundance and environmental influences - a case study using trawl fishery data in French Atlantic coastal, English channel, and adjacent waters. ICES J Mar Sci 60:1149-58.

Page 39: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Spatial, Temporal SeparationWinter 2011

Page 40: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Spatial, Temporal SeparationWinter 2011

Page 41: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Spatial, Temporal SeparationWinter 2011

Page 42: River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries

Information System Results Winter 2011

4/1

75% of effort75% of target catch97% of alosine catch

25% of effort25% of target catch3% of alosine catch