road casualty review 2006 - bristol city council

8/14/2019 Road Casualty Review 2006 - Bristol City Council

1/62

The Road CasualtyReview 2006


2/62

The Road Casualty Review 2006


3/62

i


Contents

Section 1 - Service Assessment Page

1.0 Forward 1

2.0 Acknowledgement 2

3.0 Introduction 3

4.0 Background 4

5.0 Targets 5

6.0 Progress Towards Targets 6

7.0 Interpretation of Results 9

8.0 Partnerships 12

9.0 Priority Areas for Action 14

Section 2 - The Casualty Report 15

10.0 Summary of 2005 Casualty Figures 15

11.0 Casualties by Severity 15

12.0 Casualties by Route 16

13.0 Casualties by Area Deprivation 18

14.0 Casualties by Other Factors 19

15.0 Casualties by Age and User Group 21

16.0 Specific Road User Group Analysis 24

Section 3 - Directory 44

17.0 Road Safety Economics 44

18.0 Glossary of Terms 45

19.0 Charges for Providing Road Accident Information 46

20.0 Road Safety Organisations Contact Details 47

List of Injury Accident Cluster Sites for 2004 - 2006 49


4/62

ii



5/62

1


1.0 Foreword

1.1 Bristol City Council is committed to making ourroads safer for everyone and to encouragingchoice in travelling round the city. Improvingsafety and reducing the number of accidents onBristols roads is a high priority within ourintegrated transport strategy and also withinthe Joint Local Transport Plan.

1.2 In the year 2006, over 1,800 people were injuredon Bristols roads and we recognise that all of

these accidents cause human suffering. Wesupport the Governments casualty reductiontargets set out in their road safety strategyTomorrows Roads: Safer for Everyone byworking to reduce road deaths and injuries,especially concentrating on improving thesafety of children.

1.3 This document reports on the progress we have

made towards targets set out in the CityCouncils Road Safety Strategy. Workingtogether, and with the support of government,the police, schools, voluntary groups andindividual road users (pedestrians, cyclists,motorcyclists and drivers) we can all play ourpart in making Bristol a safer city for everyone.

SECTION 1 - SERVICE ASSESSMENT


6/62

2.1 Bristol City Council is grateful to officers andstaff of the Avon & Somerset Constabularywho attended the road accidents and collectthe data which is presented here. Since thedata is collected by Avon & SomersetConstabulary, its accuracy cannot beguaranteed by the City Council.

2.2 The City Council is also grateful to AtkinsHighways and Transportation staff who

process the data for the Department forTransport (DfT) on behalf of the highwayauthority and provide records for the BristolCity Council road casualty database.

2


2.0 Acknowledgment
http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/


7/62

3.1 Road Safety is an issue that concerns everyperson in Bristol. Every resident and visitoruses the Citys transport infrastructure tosome extent, whether as a pedestrian, rider,passenger or driver. Safety on the transportsystem is paramount for all users. Thiscommitment is documented within the RoadSafety Strategy contained within the JointLocal Transport Plan which was published inMarch 2006.

3.2 The provision of a road safety service is astatutory duty of local highway authorities inGreat Britain. Bristol City Council has theduty of promoting road safety in Bristol onall roads. The City Council also hasresponsibility for traffic management andmaintenance on all roads except trunk roadsand motorways (M32, M49, M5 and part ofthe A4) which are the responsibility of theHighways Agency.

3.3 The purpose of this report is to set outBristols casualty statistics and to report onprogress towards the current casualtyreduction targets.

3.3.1 In Section 1 Service Assessment, the reportoutlines steps towards the targets set in2000 to be reached by 2010 and discussesthe further targets indicated within the JointLocal Transport Plan and the progressrequired to reach these.

Note: The Road Safety Strategy section within theJoint Local Transport Plan should be referredto for information on how it is proposed tomeet these targets.

3.3.2 It then looks at how the results have beenaffected over time by changes in reportingmethodology.

3.3.3 Consideration is then given to other issueswhich help to inform the road safety workprogramme partnerships and priority areasfor action.

3.3.4 In Section 2 The Casualty Report, a briefsummary of 2006 is included before the datais analysed in terms of casualties by severity,route, area and other factors.

3.3.5 Consideration is then given to casualties byage and user group in more detail.

3.3.6 Finally in this section a comprehensive list ofInjury Accident Cluster Sites is provided.

3.3.7 In Section 3 Directory, the costs of roadtraffic accidents in Bristol are summarised.

3.3.8 A glossary of terms is included along withcosts for providing road safety informationand road safety contacts in the Bristol area.

3


3.0 Introduction
http://www.westofengland.org/site/JointLocalTransportPlan_2867.asphttp://www.westofengland.org/site/JointLocalTransportPlan_2867.asp


8/62

4.1 The statutory duty of the City Councilincludes and stresses the importance of roadsafety. The following are extracts from the1988 Road Traffic Act, Section 39 (asamended by the Road Traffic Act 1991):

39 (1) Each local authority must prepare and carryout a programme of measures designed topromote road safety and may makecontributions towards the cost of measuresfor promoting road safety taken by otherauthorities or bodies.

Measures include education and training,road safety audits and road safetyengineering.

(2) Each local authority:

a) must carry out studies into accidents arisingout of the use of vehicles on roads or parts ofroads other than trunk roads, within theirarea;

b) must, in the light of those studies, take suchmeasures as appear to the authority to beappropriate to prevent accidents, includingthe dissemination of information and advicerelating to the use of roads, the giving ofpractical training to road users or any class ordescription of road users, the construction,improvement, maintenance or repair ofroads for which they are the highwayauthority and other measures taken in the

exercise of their powers for controlling,protecting or assessing the movement oftraffic on roads, and;

c) in constructing new roads, must take suchmeasures as appear to the authority to beappropriate to reduce the possibilities ofsuch accidents when the roads come intouse.

Bristols Road Safety Team combines RoadSafety Engineering and Road SafetyEducation, Training and Publicity (ETP).

4.2 Road safety engineers manage and analysethe injury accident data presented in thisdocument. The road accident database isroutinely interrogated to identify problemsites and areas of concern such as injuryaccident cluster sites, and a list of localsafety schemes is proposed for treatablesites that could be expected to produce asignificant reduction in accidents. (SeePriority Areas for Action Section 9.0).

4.3 Road safety officers work with all sections ofthe community from school children to theelderly to try to reduce road casualties in thelong term. The Road Safety Team is based inthe Traffic Management team within theDepartment of Planning, Transport andSustainable Development. More details ofthe above activities can be found on the CityCouncils Road Safety pages Road Safetyand elsewhere on the City Councils website.

4.4 It should be noted that only personal injuryaccidents, which were reported to the policeand have been forwarded to the Council, arerepresented by accident data. An accidentmust involve one or more vehicles, occur onthe public highway and involve injury to oneor more persons. Damage only accidentsand near misses are not recorded. Researchindicates that for every injury accident thereare estimated to be over 17 damage-onlyaccidents on built-up roads.

4


4.0 Background
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/transport-and-streets/road-safety/http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/transport-and-streets/road-safety/


9/62

5.1 In the year 2000, Central Governmentproduced the road safety strategyTomorrows Roads: Safer for Everyone.This set targets to be achieved by 2010,compared with the average of 1994-98 asfollows:

5.1.1 Target 1 a 40% reduction in the number ofpeople killed or seriously injured (KSI) in roadaccidents;

5.1.2 Target 2 - a 50% reduction in the number of

child KSIs;

5.1.3 Target 3 - a 10% reduction in the slightcasualty rate, expressed as the number ofpeople slightly injured per 100 million vehiclekilometres.

5.2 Bristol City Council adopted these targets andadopted additional targets, which areincluded within the Joint Local TransportPlan. These targets are set jointly for the four

participating Authorities (Bath and NorthEast Somerset Council, Bristol City Council,North Somerset Council and SouthGloucestershire Council) and have beenapproved by the Government under theoverarching Government targets for 2010(targets 1,2 & 3 as above).

5.2.1 20% reduction on the 2001-2004 averagenumber of KSIs (all ages) by 2010.

5.2.2 25% reduction on the 2001-2004 average

number of child KSIs by 2010.

5.2.3 No increase in the number of slightcasualties on the 2001-2004 average by2010.

5


5.0 Targets
http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roadsafety/strategytargetsperformance/tomorrowsroadssaferforeveryo4865http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roadsafety/strategytargetsperformance/tomorrowsroadssaferforeveryo4865


10/62

6.1 Statistical Representation

6


6.0 Progress Towards Targets

Figure 1 Casualty Targets and Progress

Note: 2010 targets are based on 1994 to 1998 average figures.

94-98 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TargetAverage for 2010

Child KSI'sTarget 30 29 27 26 25 24 22 21 20 19 17 16 15

Child KSI's 30 26 30 27 34 23 24 25 17 15

Table 2 - Presents the 2010 child KSI casualty reduction target progress.

94-98 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Average

KSI Target 177 171 164 158 151 145 138 132 125 119 112 106

Actual KSIs 177 177 180 243 197 228 178 171

Table 1 Presents progress towards 2010 killed and seriously Injured (KSI) targets.

Child KSI Totals KSI Totals Slight Rate Target KSI Target Child KSI Target Slight Rate

Ro

ad

Casualties

Year

94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

0

50

100

150

200

250

2009 2010

Bristol City Council - Casualty Targets and Progress


11/62

6.2 Target 1 & 4a - reduction in the number of

people killed or seriously injured (KSI) in roadcollisions.

6.2.1 The number of total KSIs in 2006 continuedto fall with a 4% reduction from the previous

year.

6.2.2 A 38% reduction in KSI casualties will need tobe achieved over the next 4 years in order toreach the 2010 target. Progress suggest thatthis target is likely to prove challenging.

6.3 Target 2 - 50% reduction in the number ofchildren killed and seriously injured.

6.3.1 The number of children killed or seriouslyinjured decreased dramatically to 17 in 2006,from 25 in 2005. The interim target for 2006was met and the 2010 target was almostachieved. However, whilst these statistics arevery encouraging the figures involved arerelatively small and as such can be subject tosignificant yearly fluctuations and should

not be read in isolation.6.4 Target 3 - 10% reduction in the slight

casualty rate, expressed as the number ofpeople slightly injured per 100 millionvehicle kilometres.

6.4.1 The number of total casualties fell by justunder 1% again in 2006, although slightcasualties only fell by less than 0.5%.

6.4.2 The slight casualty rate remains at around 74

slight casualties per million vehiclekilometres.

6.4.3 Whilst progress continues to be made on

total casualty numbers, slight casualtynumbers remain above the target required tobring the rate down sufficiently to meet the2010 target of 66 slight casualties permillion vehicle kilometres.

6.4.4 Accidents involving speed related factorsaccounted for an estimated 26% of the total1,465 accidents in Bristol in 2006.

6.4.5 Speed related accidents are those whichhave been reported by the police to have the

contributory factors of in a hurry,excessive speed, aggressive drivingand/or to have been coded as a loss ofcontrolaccident. The Police do not attend allroad traffic accidents and it is thereforebelieved that this figure is underestimatedand that many more accidents are speedrelated. Research indicates that one-third ofall accidents are caused as a direct result ofexcess or inappropriate speed.

7


94-98 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 TargetAverage for 2010

Slight CasualtyTarget Rate 73 72 72 71 71 70 69 69 68 68 67 66 66

Slight CasualtyRate 73 88 82 83 81 75 72 74 74

Table 3 - Presents the 2010 slight casualty rate reduction target progress


12/62

6.5 Best Value Performance Indicator

6.5.1 Table 4 presents the Best Value PerformanceIndicator (BVPI99), which has been set underthe Local Government Act 1999.

6.5.2 Calendar year figures are reported 15months in arrears.

8


1994-1998 2003 2004 2005 2006

average Reported 2004/05 Reported 2005/06 Reported 2006/07 Reported 2007/08Actual

number% changeover prev

year

% changeover 94-98

average

Actualnumber

% changeover prev

year

% changeover 94-98

average

Actualnumber

% changeover prev

year

% changeover 94-98

average

Actualnumber

% changeover prev

year

% changeover 94-98

averageTotal number

of people killedor seriously

injured177 197 -19% 9% 228 14% 22% 178 -22% 0% 171 -4% -3%

Number ofchildren killedor seriously

injured30 23 -32% -23% 24 4% -20% 25 4% -17% 17 -32% -43%

Total number

of peopleslightly injured 1524 1640 -4% 7% 1601 -2% 5% 1,640 2% 7% 1,635 0% 7%

Table 4 - Best Value Performance Indicator


13/62

7.1 Fluctuations from year to year highlight the

need for the careful monitoring of accidentsand it is therefore not advisable to considerindividual years in isolation. Trends overthree to five years should be regarded as aminimum.

7.2 Bristols Killed & Seriously Injured (KSI)History.

7.2.1 In 1998 Bristol experienced a 25% rise intotal casualties, from 1609 in 1997 to 2010

in 1998. This rise represented a steppedincrease as the average number of casualtiesfor the three years from 1998 to 2000 was23% higher than the three years prior to1998. This change in casualty totals wasconsidered to be the result of reorganisationand improvement in the collection ofaccident data collection by the Avon andSomerset Constabulary. Similar increasesexperienced by the other Local Authoritiesacross the Avon and Somerset region helped

to confirm this.

7.2.2 As the Central Government casualtyreduction targets are based on the averagetotals from 1994 to 1998, the base totals areweighted more heavily to the time prior tothe stepped increase in Bristols casualtytotals. This means the resulting casualtyreduction targets to be achieved by 2010 areconsidered artificially low and are thereforemore difficult to achieve.

7.2.3 Improved accident severity reporting hascontributed to the large fluctuations in KSIcasualties since 2001. In 2002, withagreement from Bristol City Council, theaccident recording form used by the Avonand Somerset police was altered to include adescription of serious injuries for the firsttime.

7.2.4 As a result of this change, the number of

killed and seriously injured (KSI) casualties inBristol rose by 34% from 2001 to 2002, yetthe total number of casualties rose by lessthan 1%. This represented a significantchange in the proportion of KSI casualties tototal casualties, known as the severity ratio.Over the next two years the Bristol KSIcasualty total and severity ratio continued tofluctuate as Bristol continued to improve theaccuracy of its data. (Table 5)

9


7.0 Interpretation of Results


14/62

7.2.5 On 1 January 2005, a new national form wasintroduced to all police authorities includingAvon and Somerset. This form does notinclude a description of serious injuries aspart of the severity classification section.Results from 2005 and 2006 data (in table 5)indicate that the severity ratio has revertedback to pre-2002 levels.

7.2.6 The City Council Road Safety team is veryconcerned about it's findings and is keen toestablish confidence in it's KSI totals,particularly because of the emphasis placedon KSI casualties by the National targets.The Department for Transport has beennotified of these concerns and has beensupplied with copies of the investigationwork that was carried out.

7.2.7 As a result of the various changes to thecollection of casualty data from 2001 to2006 (Table 5) and the ensuing variations inKSI casualty totals and severity ratios, itfollows that the KSI totals from 2002 to 2004are not directly comparable with the KSItotals from years prior to 2002. This includesthe 1994 to 1998 totals on whichGovernment targets are based. It is therefore

considered useful to present recalculated KSItotals for 2002 to 2004 (Table 6) forcomparison.

10


Year Total Casualties Total KSI % KSI1999 2074 182 9%

2000 1897 177 9%

2001 1949 181 9%

2002 1961 243 12%

2003 1837 197 11%

2004 1829 228 13%

2005 1817 178 10%

2006 1806 171 10%

Accident Form Details1999 to 2001 Avon and Somerset Form -No severity guidance on form.

New police form introduced. Severity guidanceintroduced on form for first time.

Form as per 2002.

Form as per 2002 & 2003 but police requested toinclude details of casualty injuries on form inorder to check severity classification.

New National Accident Form introduced. Noseverity guidance on form. Police no longerentering details of casualty injuries on form.

No change to form.

Table 5 - Bristols KSI History


15/62

7.2.8 These recalculated totals offer a bettercomparison with pre-2002 data and willmore accurately reflect Bristols performanceagainst targets during this period. It is alsoexpected that these recalculated totals willalso provide a smoother transition throughto KSI totals resulting from the use of thenew national accident form in 2005onwards. (Figure 2).

7.3 The Road Safety Strategy contained withinthe Joint Local Transport Plan identifies keyobjectives in addressing ongoing roadcasualty problems, including a section onSpeed Management.Joint Local Transport Plan

11


1999

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

2000 2001 2002 2003

Year

2004 2005 2006

KSI

Actual KSI* Factored KSI Target KSI

a b c d eYear Total Casualties Actual KSI Total Factored KSI Total* Difference (c d)

2002 1961 243 178 -65

2003 1837 197 167 -30

2004 1829 228 166 -62

Factored KSI Total (d) is Total casualties (b) multiplied by the average severity ratio of 1999 to 2001 (9.1%) from table 4.

Table 6 - Factored KSI Totals

Figure 2 - Actual KSI and Factored KSI totals against target trend
http://www.westofengland.org/site/JointLocalTransportPlan_2867.asphttp://www.westofengland.org/site/JointLocalTransportPlan_2867.asp


16/62

8.1 West of England Road Safety Partnership

The four Local Council Authorities of Bath &North East Somerset Council, Bristol CityCouncil, North Somerset and SouthGloucestershire Council have agreed to worktogether to improve road safety throughoutthe area.

The Partnership (incorporating the four LocalAuthorities, NHS Primary Care Trusts, Fire &Rescue, HM Court Service, Police, Highways

Agency and West of England Partnership)will enable Partners to work together tooptimise road safety activities and ensurethat the Road Safety Strategy of the JointLocal Transport Plan (JLTP) is fullyimplemented.

8.2 Background

In December 2005 the Governmentannounced that safety camera activities and

partnerships are to be integrated into awider road safety delivery process withfunding for safety cameras being provided tolocal authorities through the Local TransportPlan (LTP) from April 2007. This will give localauthorities more freedom and flexibility topursue the most appropriate mix of roadsafety measures to reduce road casualties intheir area.

The Government is enhancing the overall

level of funding for road safety in accordancewith road safety needs, such as the numberof casualties and the quality of LTPsubmissions.

Safety cameras still have an important roleto play in reducing speeding and collisions atlocations where excess or inappropriatespeed represents a serious road safetyproblem, but as part of an overall road safetystrategy.

The Road Safety Partnership will bringtogether professionals involved in road

safety to implement initiatives as part of awider road safety strategy encompassingeducation & publicity, engineering andenforcement.

It aims to build on the successes of the Avon& Somerset Safety Camera Partnership andmake use of resources presently focused onreducing speed to achieve greater reductionsin road traffic accidents and casualties.

It is anticipated that improved co-operation

and collaboration should maximise theimpact of education, training and publicitycampaigns and expenditure on road safety.

Pooling of knowledge will lead to greaterjustification for enforcement to back up roadsafety schemes and campaigns. Effectiveenforcement and the support of the Police isfundamental to achieving a reduction incasualties.

8.3 What the Partnership will do Implement the Road Safety Strategy

Action Plan in the JLTP.

Implement a road safety educationand publicity programme.

Procure camera enforcement servicesfrom the Avon & Somerset SafetyCamera Partnership.

Provide recommendations forallocating LTP funding to schemes.

Oversee the monitoring, analysis andreview of effectiveness of casualtyreduction schemes.

8.4 Safecam (formerly the Avon and SomersetSafety Camera Partnership)

The original Avon and Somerset SafetyCamera Partnership was launched in 2002 by

the local authorities, health authorities,police, Magistrates Court Service, Crown

12


8.0 Partnerships


17/62

Prosecution Service and Highways Agencywith the aim of reducing deaths and injurieson roads through enforcement of speedlimits and education.

The establishment of the West of EnglandRoad Safety Partnership has taken on muchof this work, although the enforcement ofspeed limits and red traffic signals is nowprovided on behalf of the partnership bySafecam. www.safecam.org.uk

According to the results recently publishedby Safecam there has been a 10% reductionin road accidents at safety camera sites(speed and red light cameras) in the Bristolarea (based on data for the 2004/2005financial year) when compared to the three

years prior to Safety Camera Partnershipcommencing operations.

There are currently 12 roadside safetycameras and 21 Red light camera sites in

Bristol, with mobile speed detection camerasbeing used at another 50 locations. Thesuccess of the project will continue to be

judged directly on how far traffic speeds androad casualties are reduced, particularlywhen speed and red light jumping is asignificant factor in many crashes.

13

http://www.safecam.org.uk/http://www.safecam.org.uk/


18/62

9.1 Each year a number of casualty reduction ledschemes are included in the Road Safetysection of the Traffic Management workprogramme in order to try to help meet ourcasualty reduction targets.

9.2 The City Council will continue to focus itsRoad Safety activities on locations with highaccident levels, high severity ratios, childcasualties and in areas with a high index ofmultiple deprivation. child casualties and inareas with a high index of multipledeprivation

9.3 Additional Factors Considered whenselecting sites are:

Other/future work programmes theTraffic Management annual workprogramme looks to maximise roadsafety benefit by engaging with, andinfluencing, other/multiple workprogrammes where possible.

Future development TrafficManagement annual work programmelooks to gain road safety benefit fromdeveloper contributions whereverpossible.

Maintenance issues if there are twosimilar schemes under considerationfor the work programme, then it maybe that the site that is in the worst

maintenance condition is chosen.

14


9.0 Priority Areas for Action
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]


19/62

Total casualty numbers fell slightly forthe fourth consecutive year.

Total KSI numbers fell by a further 4%.

Child KSI numbers fell by 32%.

Child casualty numbers fell by 8%overall.

Child pedestrian casualties fell by 17%.

Total Cycle casualties rose by 10%

although KSIs fell by 7%. Powered Two Wheeler casualties

increased by 7% but KSI casualties fellby 20%.

Car occupant casualties fell by 3%.

11.1 Table 7 presents a comparison of accidentand casualties numbers for 2005 and 2006.

15

The Road Casualty Review 2006SECTION 2 - THE CASUALTY REPORT

2005 2006 % Change2005 - 2006

Fatal Accidents 9 14 56%Casualties 9 15 67%

Serious Accidents 166 143 -14%Casualties 169 156 -8%

Slight Accidents 1323 1308 -1%Casualties 1640 1635 =

Total Accidents 1497 1465 -2%Casualties 1817 1806 -1%

Table 7 - Comparison of Accident/Casualty data: 2005 with 2006

10.0 Summary of 2006 Casualty Figures

11.0 Casualties by Severity


20/62

12.1 Table 8 presents accident data for 2005 &2006 on principle roads

16


12.0 Casualties by Route

EuroRAP2004 2005 Risk rating

Route Casualties Casualties KSI Rank Rank Casualties Casualties KSI Rank Rankper km (cas/ km) (KSI/ km) per km (cas/ km)(KSI/ km)

A3029 15 2.42 2 18 16 24 3.87 0 15 18=

A369 3 3.00 0 17 21= 2 2.00 1 18 5 Medium

A37 56 9.49 4 3 6 27 4.58 2 13 14

A370 24 5.85 1 11 17 24 5.85 1 8 16

A38 North 117 16.25 16 1 1 117 16.25 9 1 2

A38 South 40 7.27 3 7 9 26 4.73 5 11 7 Medium

A4 Central 26 6.84 4 10 3 27 7.11 3 6 9 Medium

A4 North 18 1.22 6 20 15 21 1.43 2 21 17 Medium

A4 South 51 7.61 1 6 19 71 10.60 7 5 3= Medium

A4017 0 0.00 0 22 21= 0 0.00 0 22 18=

A4018 106 8.03 10 5 5 76 5.76 10 9 10

A403 20 3.03 3 16 12= 12 1.82 2 20 15

A4032 12 5.45 1 12 12= 24 10.91 1 4 13

A4044 26 7.22 4 9 2 17 4.72 3 12 8

A4162 7 2.26 2 19 8 6 1.94 0 19 18=

A4174 58 7.25 4 8 11 51 6.38 5 7 11

A4176 2 0.91 1 21 12= 8 3.64 0 16 18=

A420 53 8.83 4 4 7 81 13.5 8 2 1

A431 7 3.68 1 14 10 10 5.26 2 10 3=

A432 82 13.02 6 2 4 70 11.11 6 3 6

A4320 27 4.22 1 13 18 29 4.53 3 14 12

M32 34 3.47 1 15 20 29 2.96 0 17 18= Low

Table 8 Accident Rates (on principle roads) per Km - 2004/2005

Notes: The casualty rates shown above are based on geographical road lengths, ignoring additional highway lengths at dual

carriageways, roundabouts etc.

Rank order of casualty and KSI rate per km (1 is the highest).

Eurorap rating is taken from work carried out by The AA Motoring trust which assesses Europes roads in terms of safety.

(It should be noted that the road lengths used for Eurorap roads may be different).


21/62

12.2 The EuroRAP (European Road Programme)rates are also included where appropriate.EuroRAP is an international not-for profitassociation formed by motoringorganisations and road authorities in Europeto provide a safety rating for Motorways andmajor roads across Europe. The EuroRAP

12.3 Table 9 presents accident data split by roadclass and severity for 2005 and 2006.

17


Road Class Fatal Serious Slight Total

2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006

Motorway 0 0 5 1 44 36 49 37A 4 10 64 55 523 502 591 567

B 0 0 21 18 210 208 231 226

Unclassified 5 4 76 69 545 562 626 635

Total 9 14 166 143 1322 1308 1497 1465

Table 9 - Number of accidents split by road class and severity
http://www.eurorap.org/http://www.eurorap.org/


22/62

13.1 Evidence shows there to be a strong link

between social deprivation and casualtynumbers. Index of Multiple Deprivation iscalculated using weighted indicators onincome, employment, health, education,housing, crime and environment. Formerlythis was carried out on a ward by ward basis,however, from 2004 deprivation data is nowcalculated using smaller Super Output Areas(SOAs), representing readily identifiablegeographical areas with similar populations.

For further information about SOAs inBristol, click on the following link SOAs

13.2 There are 252 SOAs in Bristol but, for the

purpose of analysis, we concentrate on themost deprived and least deprived 10%,(Index of Multiple Deprivation BristolRankings).

13.3 The casualty numbers in different casualtyclasses were examined and for each casualtyclass in each group an average number ofcasualties per SOA was calculated. Alsocalculated was a percentage figure for eachcasualty class within each group expressed

as a percentage of the total casualties in thatclass.

13.4 The most significant findings are shownbelow.

13.5 The average number of casualties per SOA inall of the casualty classes below tended toincrease with deprivation:

KSIs

Slight casualties

Total casualties

Child casualties

This indicates that there is a link betweendeprivation and road casualties.

18


13.0 Casualties by Area - Deprivation

Most deprived 10% of SOAs Least deprived 10% of SOAs

Experienced an average of 14 accidents per SOA Experienced an average of 4 accidents per SOA19% of all KSIs took place in the most 4% of child casualties were located in the leastdeprived 10% of SOAs deprived 10% of SOAs

25% of slight accidents took place in 8% of slight accidents took place inthe most deprived 10% of SOAs the least deprived 10% of SOAs
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Council-Democracy/Statistics-Census-Information/deprivation.en]


23/62

14.1 Table 10 presents accident data split bymonth and severity for 2005 and 2006.

19


14.0 Casualties by Other Factors

Month Fatal Serious Slight Total

2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006

January 0 3 11 6 118 122 129 131

February 0 1 9 13 120 104 129 118

March 1 0 14 9 99 106 114 115

April 1 0 15 8 112 79 128 87

May 0 1 16 12 119 92 135 105

June 1 1 11 9 113 118 125 128

July 1 1 14 18 110 131 125 150

August 0 2 17 11 111 104 128 117

September 0 0 11 16 100 132 111 148

October 0 2 13 12 90 130 103 144

November 3 1 19 11 122 85 144 97

December 2 2 16 18 108 105 126 125Total 9 14 166 143 1322 1308 1497 1465

Table 10 - Number of accidents per month split by severity

14.2 Table 11 presents accident data split by light condition and severity for 2004 and 2005.

Lighting Fatal Serious Slight TotalCondition

2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006

Daylight 3 8 101 82 941 947 1045 1037

Darkness 6 6 65 61 381 361 452 428

Total 9 14 166 143 1322 1308 1497 1465

Table 11 - Number of accidents in daylight and darkness split by severity


24/62

20


14.3 Table 12 presents accident data split by road surface condition and severity for 2005 and 2006.

RoadSurfaceCondition Fatal Serious Slight Total

2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006

Dry 6 8 117 106 980 964 1103 1078

Wet/Damp 3 6 44 36 327 333 374 375

Snow 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0

Frost/Ice 0 0 3 0 13 9 16 9Flood 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 3

Total 9 14 166 143 1322 1308 1497 1465

Table 12 - Number of accidents by road surface condition split by severity


25/62

21


15.0 Casualties by Age and User Group

15.1 Table 13 presents casualty data split by age group, severity and road user type for 2006.

Casualty Analysis by Age : 2006

CHILDREN Total ADULTS Total Age TotalChildren Adults Unknown

Age Group 0-4 5-6 7-11 12-15 16-16 17-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71+

Pedestrians

Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 6 0 6

Serious 2 1 2 2 7 1 4 6 4 4 4 4 6 33 0 40

Slight 10 8 27 23 68 2 34 51 34 11 16 7 12 167 2 237Sub Total 12 9 29 25 75 3 38 58 39 16 20 12 20 206 2 283

Cyclists

Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2

Serious 0 0 2 1 3 0 1 6 6 4 3 0 0 20 0 23

Slight 0 3 6 18 27 3 16 84 49 24 9 2 2 189 4 220

Sub Total 0 3 8 19 30 3 17 91 55 29 12 2 2 211 4 245

Powered 2-Wheelers & Combinations : Riders

Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Serious 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 9 13 5 2 0 0 41 0 41

Slight 0 0 0 2 2 32 47 40 30 20 9 2 1 181 0 183

Sub Total 0 0 0 2 2 40 52 49 44 25 11 2 1 226 0 226

Powered 2-Wheelers & Combinations : Passengers

Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Serious 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Slight 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 4

Sub Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 5

4-Wheeled Cars & Taxis : Drivers

Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 3

Serious 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 5 5 0 1 2 2 23 0 23

Slight 0 0 0 0 0 1 62 202 113 97 60 24 19 578 1 579

Sub Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 70 208 119 97 62 26 21 604 1 605


26/62

22


CHILDREN Total ADULTS Total Age TotalChildren Adults Unknown

Age Group 0-4 5-6 7-11 12-15 16-16 17-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71 +

4-Wheeled Cars & Taxis : Passengers

Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Serious 0 0 0 6 6 1 3 7 0 0 0 0 1 12 0 18

Slight 10 6 16 17 49 9 65 90 33 23 17 11 13 261 7 317

Sub Total 10 6 16 23 55 10 70 97 33 23 17 11 14 275 7 337

PCV/Minibus/Motor Caravan : Drivers & Passengers

Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Serious 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 3

Slight 4 0 0 2 6 0 4 4 4 16 8 9 3 48 2 56

Sub Total 4 0 0 2 6 0 4 4 5 16 8 11 3 51 2 59

All Goods Vehicles : Drivers / Passengers

Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Serious 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 3

Slight 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 3 3 6 0 2 20 0 21

Sub Total 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 4 3 8 0 2 23 0 24

Other Motor & Non-Motor Vehicles : Drivers / Passengers

Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Serious 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 4

Slight 0 0 0 2 2 0 3 5 5 2 1 0 0 16 0 18

Sub Total 0 0 1 2 3 0 3 6 6 2 2 0 0 19 0 22

TOTALS

Fatal 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 3 2 1 1 2 15 0 15

Serious 2 1 5 9 17 9 22 34 31 13 13 8 9 139 0 156

Slight 24 18 49 64 155 47 232 483 272 196 126 55 52 1463 17 1635

Sub Total 26 19 54 73 172 57 256 520 306 211 140 64 63 1617 17 1806

Table 13 2006 Casualty Data by User Group, Age and Severity


27/62

23


15.2 Figure 3 demonstrates the comparative trend in Casualties by Road User Group over the past eightyears and includes the 94-98 average for comparison.

Year

94 - 96 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

Pedestrians Cyclists Motorcyclists Car Occupants Other

Year

94 - 96 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Pedestrians Cyclists Motorcyclists Car Occupants Other

Figure 3 Casualties by Road User Group

Figure 4 KSI Casualties by Road User Group

Casualties by Road User Group

KSI Casualties by Road User Group


28/62

24

Fatal Serious

KSI Slight

Slight

Casualties

Year

Age Group

94 - 96 avg

0 - 4 5 - 6 7 - 11 12 - 15

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Casualti

es

140

120

100

8060

40

20

0

16.1 Figures 5 to 24 show yearly road user casualty data split by severity since 1999 along with a

breakdown of number of casualties by age group for 2006. Comments regarding general trends areincluded for each road user group.

16.2 Child Pedestrians.

16.2.1 Table 14 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 5.

16.0 Specific Road User Group Analysis

Figure 5

Figure 6

Child Pedestrians

Child Pedestrians - 2006



29/62

16.2.2 The number of child pedestrians injured in2006 fell by 17% from the previous year andKSIs dropped to 35% of the 1994-98

average.16.2.3 Whilst the UK has a relatively good road

safety record overall in Europe, childpedestrian casualties nationally still givecause for concern.[See Department for Transport website forfurther information:Department for Transport

Initiatives undertaken by Bristol City Council andlinks to sites with further information:

School Travel Plans

Walking Buses

School Crossing Patrols

Child Safety Audit

25


Child Pedestrians

Year Slight Serious Fatal Casualty Total KSI Total % KSI

1994 -1998Average 103 19 1 123 20 16

1999 113 15 0 128 15 12

2000 96 22 1 119 23 19

2001 98 18 1 117 19 16

2002 106 21 0 127 21 17

2003 77 16 0 93 16 17

2004 61 17 0 78 17 222005 73 17 0 90 17 19

2006 68 7 0 75 7 9

Table 14
http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_control/documents/homepage/dft_home_page.hcsphttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/school-travel-plans.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/walk-to-school.en?page=4http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/school-crossing-patrol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/child-safety-audit.enhttp://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_control/documents/homepage/dft_home_page.hcsphttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/school-travel-plans.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/walk-to-school.en?page=4http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/school-crossing-patrol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/child-safety-audit.en


30/62

26


Casualties

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Casualties

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Fatal Serious

KSI Slight

Slight

Year

Age Group

94 - 98 avg

0 - 4 5 - 6 7 - 11 12 - 15

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

16.3 Child Cyclists


Child Cyclist

Child Cyclist - 2006

Figure 7

Figure 8


31/62

16.3.2 Child cyclist casualties have remainedconsistant since 2001 set against anincrease in general cycle use (all ages) of

34% over the same period.Initiatives undertaken by Bristol City Council andlinks to sites with further information:

Child cycle training

Bike IT

National Cycle Training Standards

School Travel Plans

27


Child Cyclist


1994 -1998Average 41 4 1 46 5 11

1999 61 3 1 65 4 6

2000 35 4 0 39 4 10

2001 26 5 0 31 5 16

2002 26 4 0 30 4 13

2003 30 3 0 33 3 9

2004 28 2 0 30 2 72005 25 2 1 28 3 11

2006 27 3 0 30 3 10

Table 15
http://www.sustrans.org.uk/http://www.ctc.org.uk/cycletraininghttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/school-travel-plans.enhttp://www.sustrans.org.uk/http://www.ctc.org.uk/cycletraininghttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/school-travel-plans.en


32/62

28


Casualties

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Casu

alties

0

5

10

15

20

25

Fatal Serious

KSI Slight

Slight

Year

Age Group

94 - 98 avg

0 - 4 5 - 6 7 - 11 12 - 15

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

16.4 Child Car Passengers


Child Car Passenger

Figure 9

Child Car Passenger - 2006

Figure 10


33/62

16.4.2 The number of child car passenger injuriesin 2006 rose by 18% on the previous year.Of the 6 seriously injured children, 4

occurred as a result of a single accident.


Try before you buy

School Gate Reports

School Gate Reports are an assessment ofbehaviour outside a school at the start and end of

the school day. Road Safety Officers andsometimes students observe and note down thingslike:

Crossing the road safely,

Holding hands of younger children,

Parking on zigzags or pavement,

Wearing Seatbelts.

The report is then compiled and sent out toparents with the school news letter. These reportstake place on an as and when requested basis.

Walking BusesWalk on Wednesday

29


Child Car Passengers


1994 -1998Average 69 2 0 71 2 3

1999 95 2 0 97 2 2

2000 73 3 0 76 3 4

2001 62 2 0 64 2 3

2002 50 1 0 51 1 2

2003 70 2 0 72 2 3

2004 79 2 0 81 2 32005 44 1 0 45 1 2

2006 49 6 0 55 6 11

Table 16
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/child-car-seat-checks.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/walk-to-school.en?page=4http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/child-car-seat-checks.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/walk-to-school.en?page=4


34/62

30


Casualties

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Casua

lties

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fatal Serious Slight

Year

94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

KSI Slight

Age Group

16 17 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+

16.5 Adult Pedestrians


Adult Pedestrians

Figure 11

Adult Pedestrians - 2006

Figure 12


35/62

16.5.2 Adult pedestrian casualty figures fell by 9%

to a new lowest recorded figure, continuingthe general trend since 2001. The numberof KSI casualties, as a percentage of overallcasualty numbers (severity ratio) has alsobeen falling from the 2002 high of 30% to19% in 2006.

16.5.3 The most vulnerable age group is the 17-20age range.

31


Adult Pedestrians


1994 -1998Average 168 42 5 215 47 22

1999 174 49 1 224 50 22

2000 188 41 6 235 47 20

2001 198 40 6 244 46 19

2002 166 63 7 236 70 30

2003 172 47 6 225 53 24

2004 165 42 7 214 49 232005 186 39 2 227 41 18

2006 167 33 6 206 39 19

Table 17


36/62

32


Casualties

0

50

100

150

200

250


Year

94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

16.6 Adult Cyclists


Casualti

es

0

20

40

60

80

100

KSI Slight

Age Group

16 17 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+

Adult Cyclists

Figure 13

Adult Cyclists - 2006

Figure 14


37/62

16.6.2 Although the general casualty trend foradult cyclists had remained fairly constantsince 2001, casualties rose by a further 9%in 2006. Cycle journeys (all ages) have

increase by 34% in the same period.

16.6.3 However, the rate of KSI casualties fell to10% in 2006 from 13% in the previous year.[Please refer to Interpretation of Results section 7.0]

16.6.4 The most vulnerable age group remains the21-30 group.

Initiatives undertaken by Bristol City Council and

links to sites with further information:

The Cycling Strategy

Adult Cycle Training Scheme

Biggest Bike Ride

National Bike week

Car Free Day

Bristol Bike Shed (Cycle Resource Centre)

National Cycle Network (NCN)

Bike Buddies

33


Adult Cyclists


1994 -1998Average 137 15 1 153 16 11

1999 183 16 2 201 18 9

2000 159 17 0 176 17 10

2001 173 20 0 193 20 10

2002 135 18 0 153 18 12

2003 161 23 0 184 23 13

2004 149 32 1 182 33 182005 168 24 0 192 24 13

2006 189 20 2 211 22 10

Table 18
http://www.westofengland.org/site/JointLocalTransportPlan_2867.asphttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.ctc.org.uk/cycletraininghttp://www.234car.com/bikebuddies/bikebuddies.htmlhttp://www.westofengland.org/site/JointLocalTransportPlan_2867.asphttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Walking-Cycling/cycling-in-bristol/cycling-in-bristol.enhttp://www.ctc.org.uk/cycletraininghttp://www.234car.com/bikebuddies/bikebuddies.html


38/62

34


Casualties

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800


Year94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

16.7 Adult Car Drivers


Casualties

0

50

100

150

200

250

KSI Slight

Age Group

16 17 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+

Adult Car Drivers

Figure 15

Adult Car Drivers - 2006

Figure 16


39/62

16.7.2 The numbers of adult car driver casualtieshave been generally rising since the 94-98average. However, numbers dropped back alittle in 2005 and have dropped further in

2006 to a level 7% higher than the 94-98average. The most vulnerable age groupremains the 21-30 age range.

16.7.3 The number of KSI casualties is 4% of totalcasualties in 2006 (from 6% as the 1994-1998 average).


Educational campaigns

Annual Drink Drive Campaign

The Safety Camera Partnership

Enforcement

35


Adult Cyclists


1994 -1998Average 529 30 4 563 34 6

1999 667 33 1 701 34 5

2000 587 23 2 612 25 4

2001 595 28 3 626 31 5

2002 668 42 3 713 45 6

2003 584 26 3 613 29 5

2004 618 34 2 654 36 62005 610 20 3 633 23 4

2006 578 23 3 604 26 4

Table 19
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/national-road-safety-information.enhttp://www.safecam.org.uk/http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Road-Safety/national-road-safety-information.enhttp://www.safecam.org.uk/http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/


40/62

36


Casualties

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450


Year

94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

16.8 Adult Car Passengers


Adult Car Passengers

Figure 17

Casualties

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

KSI Slight

Age Group

16 17 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+

Adult Car Passengers - 2006

Figure 18


41/62

16.8.2 Despite a 14% increase over 2005 figures,adult car passengers casualty figuresremained less than 4% higher than the1994-1998 average in 2006. (The 2005

figures should perhaps be regarded as anexceptional dip in an underlying reductionin casualties since 2002).

16.8.3 KSI casualties remain low at 5% of totalcasualty figures in this class.

16.8.4 The most vulnerable group is now the17-20 age range.


Educational campaigns

The Safety Camera Partnership

37


Adult Car Passengers


1994 -1998Average 248 16 1 265 17 6

1999 313 18 1 332 19 6

2000 267 16 2 285 18 6

2001 291 16 1 308 17 6

2002 356 29 0 385 29 8

2003 265 21 0 286 21 7

2004 259 24 1 284 25 92005 227 7 1 235 8 3

2006 261 12 2 275 14 5

Table 20
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/transport-and-streets/road-safety/http://www.safecam.org.uk/http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/transport-and-streets/road-safety/http://www.safecam.org.uk/


42/62

38


Casua

lties

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Cas

ualties

0

10

20

30

40

50

60


Year

94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

KSI Slight

Age Group

16 17 - 2012-157 - 1 15 - 60 - 4 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+

16.9 Powered Two Wheeler Users


Powered Two Wheeler Users

Figure 19

Powered Two Wheeler Users - 2006

Figure 20


43/62

16.9.2 The general casualty trend for powered twowheeler (PTWs) users has been increasingsince the 94-98 average. However, 2006saw a 9% fall in casualties along with a

reduction in the KSI rate from 21% to 19%.

16.9.4 The casualty figures for 2006 are now 28%above the 1994-1998 average.


Bristol City Council web page

Motorcycle Strategy

Campaigns

Motorcycle awareness courses

Enforcement

Motorcycle Industry Association

Motorcycle Action Group

39


Powered Two Wheeler Users


1994 -1998Average 133 29 3 165 32 19

1999 173 29 2 204 31 15

2000 197 35 0 232 35 15

2001 198 31 4 233 35 15

2002 178 47 4 229 51 22

2003 165 41 0 206 41 20

2004 162 52 6 220 58 262005 204 52 2 258 54 21

2006 187 42 2 231 44 19

Table 21
http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Roads-highways-and-pavements/motorcycles/motorcycles.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Roads-highways-and-pavements/motorcycles/motorcycles.en?page=4#internalSection4http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/http://www.mcia.co.uk/http://bristol.mag-uk.org/http://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Roads-highways-and-pavements/motorcycles/motorcycles.enhttp://www.bristol.gov.uk/ccm/content/Transport-Streets/Roads-highways-and-pavements/motorcycles/motorcycles.en?page=4#internalSection4http://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/http://www.mcia.co.uk/http://bristol.mag-uk.org/


44/62

40


Casu

alties

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Casualties

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18


Year

94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

KSI Slight

Age Group

16 17 - 2012-157 - 1 15 - 60 - 4 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+

16.10 Bus Occupants

16.10.1Table 22 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 21.

Bus Occupants

Figure 21

Bus Occupants - 2006

Figure 22


45/62

16.10.2 Injuries to bus occupants fell by 38% in2006. Casualty figures for bus occupantshave tended to fluctuate from year to year.The 2006 figure is 35% lower than the

1994-1998 average

41


Bus Occupants


1994 -1998Average 76 2 0 79 2 3

1999 71 7 0 78 7 9

2000 79 1 0 80 1 1

2001 99 4 0 103 4 4

2002 47 2 0 49 2 4

2003 72 6 0 78 6 8

2004 54 5 0 59 5 92005 79 4 0 83 4 5

2006 54 3 0 57 3 5

Table 22


46/62

42


Casua

lties

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

45


Year

94 - 98 avg 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

16.11 Goods Vehicle Occupants

16.11.1Table 23 presents the absolute numbers graphed in Figure 23.

Goods Vehicle Occupants

Figure 23

Casualties

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

KSI Slight

Age Group

16 17 - 2012-157 - 1 15 - 60 - 4 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 71+

Goods Vehicle Occupants - 2006

Figure 24


47/62

16.11.2 Casualty numbers for Goods Vehicleoccupants can vary considerably from yearto year. In 2006 there was an increase of43% although figures remain relatively

low and no clear trend is evident.

43


Goods Vehicle Occupants


1994 -1998Average 14 0.8 0.2 15 1 7

1999 22 2 0 24 2 8

2000 19 2 0 21 2 10

2001 15 1 0 16 1 6

2002 29 2 0 31 2 7

2003 33 1 1 35 2 6

2004 25 0 0 25 0 02005 11 2 0 13 2 15

2006 21 3 0 24 3 13

Table 23


48/62

17.0 Road Safety Economics

17.1 Table 24 is an extract from the Departmentfor Transport Highways Economic Note No. 1(January 2007) showing the average value ofprevention per accident by severity and classof road.

Using the average cost per accident on urbanroads suggests a cost to the community inBristol of over one hundred and forty millionpounds (140m) in 2006.

17.2 The costs shown in Table 24 are used to

calculate economic rates of return forschemes intended to reduce road casualties.This allows the City Council to demonstrateits genuine effort in terms of the allocationof Local Transport Plan funding andenhanced road safety on the streets ofBristol.

44

The Road Casualty Review 2006 SECTION 3 - DIRECTORY

Road Class

Accident Severity Urban 1 Rural 2 Motorway All

Fatal 1,558,290 1,669,140 1,751,150 1,644,790

Serious 179,210 206,700 213,540 188,920

Slight 18,130 21,620 25,570 19,250

All Injury 49,580 105,900 78,930 64,440

Damage Only 1,590 2,360 2,270 1,710

Average cost per injury 77,820 124,280 96,160 89,820accident including anallowance for damageon accidents 3

Notes:

1 Urban roads are those roads other than motorways with speed limits of 40mph or less

2 Rural roads are those roads other than motorways with speed limits greater than 40mph

3 Cost per injury accident including an allowance for damage only accidents

Table 24 - Average value in s of the prevention of a single accident split by severity and class of road: all hours.

Table 24


49/62

45


Accident A collision involving one or more vehicles, resulting in personal injury, which

occurred on the public highway and was reported to the police within 30 daysof occurrence.

Accident severity The severity of the most seriously injured casualty:

KSI Killed or seriously injured.

Serious Injury Injury resulting in detention in hospital as an in-patient, or fractures,concussion, internal injuries, crushing, severe cuts and lacerations, severegeneral shock, injuries causing death 30 or more days after a road accident.

Slight Injury Injury of a minor character such as a sprain, bruise or cut judged not to be

severe or slight shock.

BVPI Best Value Performance Indicator

Casualty A person killed or injured in an accident.

Casualty Class A distinction between drivers/ riders, passengers and pedestrians etc.

Child/Adult For the purposes of analysing casualties by age, persons aged 15 years andbelow are classed as children and persons aged 16 years and above are classedas adults.

ETP Education, Training & Publicity

EuroRAP European Road Programme

Fatal Injury Death occurring within 30 days of, and as a result of a road accident.

Goods Vehicle:

LGV Goods vehicle under 3.5 tonnes laden weight.

HGV Goods vehicle over 3.5 tonnes laden weight.

Hours of Darkness The period coinciding with lighting up time, i.e. half an hour after sunset to

half an hour before sunrise.JLTP Joint Local Transport Plan

Pedestrians Includes persons riding toy cycles on the footway, persons pushing bicycles,persons pushing or pulling other vehicles, occupants of prams or wheelchairsand people who alight safely from vehicles and are subsequently injured.

PSA Target Public Service Agreement Target

PSV/PCV Public Service Vehicles, including buses and coaches, whether on stagecarriage service or not.

18.0 Glossary of Terms


50/62

46


Roadside Object An object situated adjacent to the carriageway. Includes items of street

furniture and natural features such as trees, ditches and hedges. Excludespedestrians.

Severity Index A measure of the severity of a group of accidents defined as the ratio of fataland serious combined to all injury accidents within that group.

TWMV/PTW Two Wheeled Motor Vehicle/Powered Two Wheeler. Powered two wheelersincluding mopeds, scooters, motor cycles and motor cycle combinations.

19.0 Charges for Providing Road Accident Information

19.1 No charge is made for accident information made available in the interests of road safety promotion.Bristol City Council does, however, reserve the right to offset costs of providing data for commercialuse. The charging structure is as follows:

(i) 70.00 for up to 10 accidents + 5.00 for additional 10 accidents + VAT for accident plot anddetails

(ii) a charge relating to staff time, computer costs and administrative overheads for complexenquiries not properly covered by (i)

Requests may be made in writing, fax or e-mail. Contact details below.


51/62


52/62

BRAKE

PO Box 548HuddersfieldHD1 2XZ

tel: 01484 559909

e-mail: [email protected]

web: www.brake.org.uk/

South Gloucestershire Council

Planning, Transportation and StrategicEnvironmentChris StutleyHighways SectionBroad LaneYateSouth GloucestershireBS37 7FY

Tel: (01454) 863640

e-mail: [email protected]

web: www.southglos.gov.uk

Bath & Northeast Somerset

GuildhallHigh Street,Bath BA1 5AW

tel: (01225) 477000

web: www.bathnes.gov.uk/bathnes

North Somerset Council

Town HallWalliscote Grove RoadWeston-super-MareSomersetBS23 1UJ

tel: (01934) 888 888

web: www.n-somerset.gov.uk/

or

Liz BuxtonRoad Safety

(01275) 882021

West of England Road Safety Partnership

Adrian Clarke : Transport Policy Manager, Bath& North East Somerset Council

Colin Knight ; Head of Transport Operations,Bristol City Council

Frank Cox ; New Works Manager, NorthSomerset Council

Derek Bailie ; Head of Highways, SouthGloucestershire Council

Useful Websites:

Department for Transport

Sustrans

European Road Assessment Programme

48

http://www.brake.org.uk/http://www.southglos.gov.uk/http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/bathneshttp://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_control/documents/homepage/dft_home_page.hcsphttp://www.sustrans.org.uk/http://www.eurorap.org/http://www.brake.org.uk/http://www.southglos.gov.uk/http://www.bathnes.gov.uk/bathneshttp://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_control/documents/homepage/dft_home_page.hcsphttp://www.sustrans.org.uk/http://www.eurorap.org/


53/62

49

The Road Casualty Review 2006Injury Accident Cluster Sites for 2004 - 2006

BristolC

ityCouncil

INJURYACCIDENTCLUSTER

SITES

-2004to2006

Notes:1

Thistablecontainsdatabyroute,conce

rningreportedinjuryaccidents(Accs),together

withseparatecolumnsforaccidentsinvolvingp

edestrians(Peds)andaccidents

involvingbicycles(Bike).Thetotalnumberofcasualtiesresultingfromthereportedinjuryaccidentsateachsiteisrecorded(Cas),toge

therwiththenumberofcasualties

under16yearsofage(Child).Thetotal

numberofcasualtiesthatwereeitherkilledors

eriouslyinjuredisrecorded(KSI)includingthos

ecasualtiesunder16yearsold

thatwerekilledorseriouslyinjured(ChildKSI).Datarelatestoaccidentsoccurringinthethreeyearperiodfrom1stJanuary2004to3

1stDecember2006.

2

Allsiteslistedhad5ormorereportedin

juryaccidentsoccurringwithinaradiusof40metres.

3

Accidentinjurysitesgenerallyoccuratroadfeaturesorcombinationsofroadfeaturess

uchasjunctions,roundaboutsandpedestrianc

rossingfacilities.Thesetypes(Type)

offeaturearespecifiedinthetableassetoutbelow:

Z=ZebraCrossing

P=Pelican/PuffinCrossing

C=SignalControlledCrossing

J=PriorityCon

trolledJunction

S=SignalControlledJunction

R=Roundabout

M=Mini-roundabout

L=LengthofR

oad

4

Sitesmaybeaddressedbymorethano

neprogramme(Prog)asindicatedbythefollow

ingcodes:

R=RouteReview

T=AreaTrafficCalming

B=BusQualityPartnership/Showcase

M=MaintenanceImprovements

P=CityCentrePromenadeProject

L=LocalSafetyScheme

C=Cyclingincl.NationalCycle

Network

A=Access/MobilityImprovements

J=JunctionImprovementforVulnerableRdUsers

D=DevelopmentProp

osals

U=UrbanTrafficManagement

&Control

S=SaferRoute

stoSchool

5

Sitestatus(Stat)isindicatedasfollows:

E=Existingsite(5ormoreinjuryaccidents2003to2005)

N=Newsite(lessthan5injuryaccidentsin2003to2005)

6

Abbreviationsareasfollows:

LSS=LocalSafetyScheme

UTC=UrbanTrafficControl

AS

L=Advancedstopline

VAS=VehicleActivatedSign

SCOOT=SplitCycleOffsetO

ptimisationTechnique

SR

tS=SaferRoutestoSchool

MOVA=MicroprocessorOptimisedVehicleActuation

Ref

Route

Location

Type

3

Prog

4

Accs

1

Peds1

Bike

1

Cas1

KSI1

Child1

ChildKSI1St

at5DescriptionofActionTaken/Proposed6

Date

A3029

1

BrunelWay/nrAshtonGateUnderpass

L

L

5

0

0

6

0

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

2

WinterstokeRoad/AshtonDrive

R

DR

5

0

0

8

1

1

0

E

Monitor

06/07

3

WinterstokeRd/SouthLibertyLane/LuckwellRd

J

L

5

0

0

9

0

1

0

E

Monitor

06/07

Route

Totals

3sites

15

0

0

23

1

2

0

Accident

s

Casualties

InjuryAccidentClusterSites

for2004-2006


54/62

50


Ref

Route

Location

Type

3

Prog

4

Accs

1

Peds

1

Bike

1

Cas

1

KSI1

Child1

ChildKSI1Stat5DescriptionofActionTaken/Proposed6

Date

A37

4

WellsRd/BathRoad(ThreeLampsjunction)

S

6

1

0

7

0

2

0

E

Monitor

07/08

5

WellsRd/BrecknockRd

J

6

2

1

6

1

2

0

E

Monitor

07/08

6

WellsRd/MarstonRoad/OakmeadPk

JM

M

11

1

0

11

2

0

0

E

Monitor

07/08

7

WellsRd/RedcatchRd/GreenmooreR

d

JP

BM

6

2

0

6

2

0

0

E

Monitor

07/08

8

WellsRd/BroadWalk

SC

LMJ

14

2

1

20

1

0

0

E

HighFrictionsurfacing

05/06

9

WellsRd/HengroveLane/WestTown

Lane

SC

MD

10

0

1

20

2

2

0

E

Digitalredlightsafetycamera&signalup

graded

10

WellsRoad/PethertonRoad

J

BL

5

0

1

5

1

0

0

E

Monitor

07/08

11

WellsRd/NewFossewayRd

J

BLJ

7

1

0

11

0

3

0

E

Monitor

07/08

RouteTotals

8sites

65

9

4

86

9

9

0

A370

12

YorkRd/St.Luke'sRd

SC

ML

9

3

1

14

1

3

0

E

Monitor

07/08

13

ClarenceRoad/ChattertonStreet

7

0

0

8

0

0

0

N

Investigate

07/08

RouteTotals

2sites

16

3

1

22

1

3

0

A38

14

BedminsterDownRd/BishopsworthR

d/BridgwaterRd

S

ML

6

2

0

8

0

1

0

E

ModerniseSignals

06/07

15

WestStreet(ChesselStreettoBartlett'sRoad)

LZ

6

1

2

7

2

0

0

E

Monitor

07/08

16

EastStreet/ChurchRoad

J

L

5

1

1

5

0

1

0

N

Investigate

07/08

17

BedminsterParade/EastStreet

P

L

6

3

2

6

1

1

0

N

Investigate

07/08

18

RedcliffHill/CommercialRd/Bedminst

erBridge

SC

BPM

6

0

1

7

1

0

0

E

Monitor

07/08

19

RedcliffeWay/RedcliffStRdbt

R

M

7

0

3

7

0

0

0

E

Monitor

20

St.Augustine'sParadeoppositeHippo

drome

LP

P

16

9

1

17

3

0

0

E

CityCentresafetystudycompleted

04/05

21

ColstonAve/BaldwinSt/BroadQuay

SC

PL

15

1

3

0

16

0

0

0

E

Realignmentofpedestriancrossing

03/04

22

ColstonAve/BroadQuay

SC

P

6

2

0

6

0

0

0

E


04/05

23

ColstonAvenearStStephensAve

SC

8

1

1

13

0

1

0

E

Monitor

06/07

24

ColstonAve/RupertSt/QuaySt

SLC

P

10

4

0

11

2

0

0

E


04/05

25

RupertStreet/o/sCourts

CL

P

7

2

0

7

0

0

0

N

Investigate

07/08

26

RupertSt/LewinsMead

SCJ

M

6

4

0

7

2

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

27

TheHaymarket/StJamesBartonRdb

t

R

11

2

0

12

0

1

0

E

Monitor

06/07

28

St.James'BartonRdbt/NorthSt

SR

7

2

2

8

0

1

0

E

Monitor

06/07

29

StJamesBarton/BondSt

SR

8

2

3

8

0

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

30

StokesCroft

L

8

2

2

8

1

1

0

E

Monitor

06/07

31

StokesCroft/CityRoad/UpperYork

St

SC

BSL

13

1

6

13

2

0

0

E

BannedTurnSchemeproposed

07/08

32

StokesCroft/JamaicaSt

SC

B

10

5

4

10

1

0

0

E

BannedTurnSchemeproposed

07/08

33

CheltenhamRoad(South)

L

JMBL

6

3

1

7

2

0

0

N

Investigate

07/08

34

CheltenhamRd/ArleyHill/BathBuildin

gs

SC

BSJL

14

1

5

18

1

0

0

E

Improvementstosignaljunctioncomplete

07/08

35

CheltenhamRd/CothamBrow

MJ

BM

7

0

1

9

0

0

0

E

Monitor


55/62

51

Ref

R

oute

Location

Type

3

Prog

4

Accs1Peds1

Bike

1

Cas1

KSI1

Child1

ChildKSI1S

tat5DescriptionofActionTaken/Proposed6

Date

36

GloucesterRd/EltonRd/ZetlandRd

SC

BM

9

1

3

14

2

1

0

E

Monitor

37

GloucesterRd/OvertonRd/ClaremontRd

JLP

BM

7

3

2

7

2

1

0

E

Monitor

38

GloucesterRd/BerkeleyRd/Somerville

Rd

SC

9

1

3

9

1

1

0

N

Investigate

07/08

39

GloucesterRd/BrynlandAve

J

BM

8

1

5

8

2

1

0

E

Monitor

06/07

40

GloucesterRd/LongmeadAve/NevilRd

JZ

BM

7

3

2

8

0

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

41

GloucesterRd/DongolaAvenue

J

6

2

1

6

1

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

42

GloucesterRoad/AshleyDownRoad

S

6

0

3

6

1

0

0

N

Investigate

07/08

43

GloucesterRd/QuarringtonRd

J

M

6

1

2

6

0

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

44

GloucesterRoad/DorianRd

JZ

6

0

1

8

1

0

0

E

SafetyCamerainstalled

05/06

Newsignaljunction

05/06

45

FiltonRd/Monk'sParkAve/TorontoRd

SC

MBJ

8

3

1

9

0

2

0

E

Redlightsafetycamera

06/07

Route

Totals

31sites

260

75

58

291

28

13

0

A

4

46

Portway/PortwayRoundabout

RS

5

1

0

6

0

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

47

Portway/ParkRoad

RS

5

0

1

5

0

0

0

N

Investigate

07/08

48

Portway/BridgeValleyRoad

S

5

0

1

11

1

1

0

N

Investigate

07/08

49

JacobsWellsRd/HotwellRdRAB

R

DJ

12

2

3

14

3

0

0

E

Highwayimprovementsaspartofdevelopment

07/08

50

AnchorRd/Canon'sWay

S

6

1

0

10

2

0

0

E


06/07

51

TempleGate/StationApproachRd

S

M

9

3

1

10

1

1

0

E

Highfrictionsurfacing

05/06

52

BathBridgeRdbt/ClarenceRoad

S

RU

6

0

0

7

1

1

0

E

Junction/Signalsimprovements

07/09

53

YorkRd/BathRd

S

RU

7

0

3

8

0

1

0

E

Junction/Signalsimprovements

07/09

54

BathRd/SandyParkRd

SC

12

2

2

12

1

1

0

E


04/05

55

BathRd/WaterLane

JP

BMJ

7

0

1

18

0

2

0

E

LSScompleted

06/07

56

BristolHill/ChurchHill

JP

MBL

8

1

4

8

1

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

57

BrislingtonHill

L

MBL

7

2

2

7

2

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

58

BathRd/WestTownLane

SC

DM

18

1

2

31

1

3

0

E


07/08

59

BathRd/BonvilleRd/BrislingtonRetail

Park

J

5

0

0

5

1

0

0

N

Investigate

07/08

60

BathRd/StockwoodRd/EmeryRd

SC

DML

6

1

1

9

1

0

0

E

Digitalredlightsafetycameras

05/06

Route

Totals

15sites

118

14

21

161

15

10

0



56/62

52


Ref

Route

Location

Type3

Prog4

Accs1

Peds1

Bike1

Cas1

KSI1

Child1

ChildKSI1

Stat5DescriptionofActionTaken/Proposed6

Date

A4018

61

PassageLane/Crowlanerdbt

JR

M

6

0

1

7

0

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

62

FalcondaleRd/HenburyRd

S

LM

5

1

1

8

1

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

63

FalcondaleRoad(CanfordLanetoLampeterRoad)

SJL

LM

7

0

0

12

1

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

64

WestburyRd/Parry'sLane(WhiteTreeRdbt)

RZ

M

9

3

2

9

0

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

65

WestburyRd/RedlandHill

JZ

6

2

1

6

1

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

66

BlackboyHill/YorkStreet

L

ML

8

3

2

9

0

2

0

E

Monitor

06/07

67

WhiteladiesRd/WorrallRoad

J

ML

5

1

2

5

1

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

68

WhiteladiesRd/LwrRedlandRdtoA

psleyRd

J

ML

8

3

4

8

1

0

0

N

Investigate

07/08

69

WhiteladiesRd/Cothamhill

JZP

8

2

3

10

1

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

70

WhiteladiesRd/AlmaRd

JZ

R

5

2

0

6

1

0

0

E


04/05

71

WhiteladiesRd(MelrosePlacetoAbe

rdeenRd)

JL

M

6

3

1

6

1

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

72

WhiteladiesRd(WestParktoBelgraveRd)

JZL

7

1

1

8

0

0

0

E


05/06

73

WhiteladiesRd/Tyndall'sParkRd/St.P

aul'sRd

S

M

12

3

4

13

1

1

0

E

Monitor

06/07

74

WhiteladiesRd/Queen'sRd

JZ

8

2

1

9

0

0

0

E


05/06

75

TriangleWest/TriangleSouth/BerkeleyPlace

J

12

3

8

12

2

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

76

QueensRoad/Triangle/BerkeleySqua

re

SPLC

LMD

6

4

0

6

0

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

77

ParkSt/QueenCharlotteStreet

LJ

ML

7

3

3

7

1

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

78

ParkSt/GreatGeorgeSt

LJ

M

9

4

3

10

0

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

79

ParkSt/StGeorgesRoad

LJ

M

14

3

7

15

4

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

80

ParkSt/UnitySt

JPL

M

11

5

6

12

1

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

81

CollegeGreen/Canon'sRd/St.Augustine'sPde

SC

P

27

2

0

2

28

6

2

0

E

Monitor

RouteTotals

21sites

186

6

8

52

206

23

5

0

A403

82

StAndrew'sRoad/King'sWestonLane

J

ML

6

0

1

6

2

0

0

E

M

06/07

RouteT

otals

1Site

6

0

1

6

2

0

0


57/62

53


Ref

Route

Location

Type

3

Prog

4

Accs

1

Ped

s1

Bike

1

Cas

1

KSI1

Child1

ChildKSI1

Stat5DescriptionofActionTaken/Proposed6

Date

A4032

83

NewfoundlandSt/BondSt

SC

LMD

12

3

1

13

0

0

0

E

BroadmeadDevt

06/07

84

NewfoundlandSt/HoultonSt

S

MD

12

2

1

17

2

0

0

E

BroadmeadDevt

06/07

Rou

teTotals

2sites

24

5

2

30

2

0

0

A4044

85

BondSt(inboundoppositeMcDonalds)

LJ

D

8

1

0

10

0

1

0

E

Monitor

06/07

86

TempleCircusRoundabout

SR

8

0

1

9

0

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

Rou

teTotals

2sites

16

1

1

19

0

1

0

A4174

87

ParsonStreet/BedminsterRoad

JS

BM

6

1

0

10

1

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

88

ParsonSt/HartcliffeWay

JP

BM

6

1

0

8

0

0

0

E

Monitor

06/07

89

HartcliffeWay/ValeLane

JP

M

5

0

1

5

0

0

0

E


04/05

90

HartcliffeWay/Nover'sLane

S

7

1

2

9

1

3

0

E

Digitalredlightsafetycamera

05/06

91

HartcliffeWay/HartcliffeRoundabou

t

R

DM

11

0

0

15

0

1

0

E


05/06

92

HartcliffeRoundabout/WhitchurchLa

ne

R

DM

road casualty review 2006 - bristol city council

Documents